US20160230789A1 - Actuator predictive system - Google Patents
Actuator predictive system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20160230789A1 US20160230789A1 US14/847,756 US201514847756A US2016230789A1 US 20160230789 A1 US20160230789 A1 US 20160230789A1 US 201514847756 A US201514847756 A US 201514847756A US 2016230789 A1 US2016230789 A1 US 2016230789A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- piston
- pressure
- operable
- actuator
- cylinder
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F15—FLUID-PRESSURE ACTUATORS; HYDRAULICS OR PNEUMATICS IN GENERAL
- F15B—SYSTEMS ACTING BY MEANS OF FLUIDS IN GENERAL; FLUID-PRESSURE ACTUATORS, e.g. SERVOMOTORS; DETAILS OF FLUID-PRESSURE SYSTEMS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- F15B15/00—Fluid-actuated devices for displacing a member from one position to another; Gearing associated therewith
- F15B15/20—Other details, e.g. assembly with regulating devices
- F15B15/28—Means for indicating the position, e.g. end of stroke
- F15B15/2815—Position sensing, i.e. means for continuous measurement of position, e.g. LVDT
- F15B15/2838—Position sensing, i.e. means for continuous measurement of position, e.g. LVDT with out using position sensors, e.g. by volume flow measurement or pump speed
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F15—FLUID-PRESSURE ACTUATORS; HYDRAULICS OR PNEUMATICS IN GENERAL
- F15B—SYSTEMS ACTING BY MEANS OF FLUIDS IN GENERAL; FLUID-PRESSURE ACTUATORS, e.g. SERVOMOTORS; DETAILS OF FLUID-PRESSURE SYSTEMS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- F15B11/00—Servomotor systems without provision for follow-up action; Circuits therefor
- F15B11/08—Servomotor systems without provision for follow-up action; Circuits therefor with only one servomotor
- F15B11/10—Servomotor systems without provision for follow-up action; Circuits therefor with only one servomotor in which the servomotor position is a function of the pressure also pressure regulators as operating means for such systems, the device itself may be a position indicating system
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F15—FLUID-PRESSURE ACTUATORS; HYDRAULICS OR PNEUMATICS IN GENERAL
- F15B—SYSTEMS ACTING BY MEANS OF FLUIDS IN GENERAL; FLUID-PRESSURE ACTUATORS, e.g. SERVOMOTORS; DETAILS OF FLUID-PRESSURE SYSTEMS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- F15B19/00—Testing; Calibrating; Fault detection or monitoring; Simulation or modelling of fluid-pressure systems or apparatus not otherwise provided for
- F15B19/005—Fault detection or monitoring
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01M—TESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G01M3/00—Investigating fluid-tightness of structures
- G01M3/02—Investigating fluid-tightness of structures by using fluid or vacuum
- G01M3/26—Investigating fluid-tightness of structures by using fluid or vacuum by measuring rate of loss or gain of fluid, e.g. by pressure-responsive devices, by flow detectors
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01M—TESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G01M99/00—Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass
- G01M99/008—Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass by doing functionality tests
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F15—FLUID-PRESSURE ACTUATORS; HYDRAULICS OR PNEUMATICS IN GENERAL
- F15B—SYSTEMS ACTING BY MEANS OF FLUIDS IN GENERAL; FLUID-PRESSURE ACTUATORS, e.g. SERVOMOTORS; DETAILS OF FLUID-PRESSURE SYSTEMS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- F15B15/00—Fluid-actuated devices for displacing a member from one position to another; Gearing associated therewith
- F15B15/20—Other details, e.g. assembly with regulating devices
- F15B15/28—Means for indicating the position, e.g. end of stroke
- F15B15/2815—Position sensing, i.e. means for continuous measurement of position, e.g. LVDT
- F15B15/2861—Position sensing, i.e. means for continuous measurement of position, e.g. LVDT using magnetic means
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F15—FLUID-PRESSURE ACTUATORS; HYDRAULICS OR PNEUMATICS IN GENERAL
- F15B—SYSTEMS ACTING BY MEANS OF FLUIDS IN GENERAL; FLUID-PRESSURE ACTUATORS, e.g. SERVOMOTORS; DETAILS OF FLUID-PRESSURE SYSTEMS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- F15B2211/00—Circuits for servomotor systems
- F15B2211/60—Circuit components or control therefor
- F15B2211/63—Electronic controllers
- F15B2211/6303—Electronic controllers using input signals
- F15B2211/6306—Electronic controllers using input signals representing a pressure
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F15—FLUID-PRESSURE ACTUATORS; HYDRAULICS OR PNEUMATICS IN GENERAL
- F15B—SYSTEMS ACTING BY MEANS OF FLUIDS IN GENERAL; FLUID-PRESSURE ACTUATORS, e.g. SERVOMOTORS; DETAILS OF FLUID-PRESSURE SYSTEMS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- F15B2211/00—Circuits for servomotor systems
- F15B2211/60—Circuit components or control therefor
- F15B2211/63—Electronic controllers
- F15B2211/6303—Electronic controllers using input signals
- F15B2211/6306—Electronic controllers using input signals representing a pressure
- F15B2211/6313—Electronic controllers using input signals representing a pressure the pressure being a load pressure
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F15—FLUID-PRESSURE ACTUATORS; HYDRAULICS OR PNEUMATICS IN GENERAL
- F15B—SYSTEMS ACTING BY MEANS OF FLUIDS IN GENERAL; FLUID-PRESSURE ACTUATORS, e.g. SERVOMOTORS; DETAILS OF FLUID-PRESSURE SYSTEMS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- F15B2211/00—Circuits for servomotor systems
- F15B2211/60—Circuit components or control therefor
- F15B2211/63—Electronic controllers
- F15B2211/6303—Electronic controllers using input signals
- F15B2211/6336—Electronic controllers using input signals representing a state of the output member, e.g. position, speed or acceleration
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F15—FLUID-PRESSURE ACTUATORS; HYDRAULICS OR PNEUMATICS IN GENERAL
- F15B—SYSTEMS ACTING BY MEANS OF FLUIDS IN GENERAL; FLUID-PRESSURE ACTUATORS, e.g. SERVOMOTORS; DETAILS OF FLUID-PRESSURE SYSTEMS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- F15B2211/00—Circuits for servomotor systems
- F15B2211/60—Circuit components or control therefor
- F15B2211/63—Electronic controllers
- F15B2211/6303—Electronic controllers using input signals
- F15B2211/6343—Electronic controllers using input signals representing a temperature
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F15—FLUID-PRESSURE ACTUATORS; HYDRAULICS OR PNEUMATICS IN GENERAL
- F15B—SYSTEMS ACTING BY MEANS OF FLUIDS IN GENERAL; FLUID-PRESSURE ACTUATORS, e.g. SERVOMOTORS; DETAILS OF FLUID-PRESSURE SYSTEMS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- F15B2211/00—Circuits for servomotor systems
- F15B2211/60—Circuit components or control therefor
- F15B2211/665—Methods of control using electronic components
- F15B2211/6656—Closed loop control, i.e. control using feedback
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F15—FLUID-PRESSURE ACTUATORS; HYDRAULICS OR PNEUMATICS IN GENERAL
- F15B—SYSTEMS ACTING BY MEANS OF FLUIDS IN GENERAL; FLUID-PRESSURE ACTUATORS, e.g. SERVOMOTORS; DETAILS OF FLUID-PRESSURE SYSTEMS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- F15B2211/00—Circuits for servomotor systems
- F15B2211/70—Output members, e.g. hydraulic motors or cylinders or control therefor
- F15B2211/705—Output members, e.g. hydraulic motors or cylinders or control therefor characterised by the type of output members or actuators
- F15B2211/7051—Linear output members
- F15B2211/7053—Double-acting output members
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F15—FLUID-PRESSURE ACTUATORS; HYDRAULICS OR PNEUMATICS IN GENERAL
- F15B—SYSTEMS ACTING BY MEANS OF FLUIDS IN GENERAL; FLUID-PRESSURE ACTUATORS, e.g. SERVOMOTORS; DETAILS OF FLUID-PRESSURE SYSTEMS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- F15B2211/00—Circuits for servomotor systems
- F15B2211/80—Other types of control related to particular problems or conditions
- F15B2211/857—Monitoring of fluid pressure systems
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F15—FLUID-PRESSURE ACTUATORS; HYDRAULICS OR PNEUMATICS IN GENERAL
- F15B—SYSTEMS ACTING BY MEANS OF FLUIDS IN GENERAL; FLUID-PRESSURE ACTUATORS, e.g. SERVOMOTORS; DETAILS OF FLUID-PRESSURE SYSTEMS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- F15B2211/00—Circuits for servomotor systems
- F15B2211/80—Other types of control related to particular problems or conditions
- F15B2211/86—Control during or prevention of abnormal conditions
- F15B2211/863—Control during or prevention of abnormal conditions the abnormal condition being a hydraulic or pneumatic failure
- F15B2211/864—Failure of an output member, e.g. actuator or motor failure
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F15—FLUID-PRESSURE ACTUATORS; HYDRAULICS OR PNEUMATICS IN GENERAL
- F15B—SYSTEMS ACTING BY MEANS OF FLUIDS IN GENERAL; FLUID-PRESSURE ACTUATORS, e.g. SERVOMOTORS; DETAILS OF FLUID-PRESSURE SYSTEMS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- F15B2211/00—Circuits for servomotor systems
- F15B2211/80—Other types of control related to particular problems or conditions
- F15B2211/865—Prevention of failures
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F15—FLUID-PRESSURE ACTUATORS; HYDRAULICS OR PNEUMATICS IN GENERAL
- F15B—SYSTEMS ACTING BY MEANS OF FLUIDS IN GENERAL; FLUID-PRESSURE ACTUATORS, e.g. SERVOMOTORS; DETAILS OF FLUID-PRESSURE SYSTEMS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- F15B2211/00—Circuits for servomotor systems
- F15B2211/80—Other types of control related to particular problems or conditions
- F15B2211/87—Detection of failures
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01M—TESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G01M3/00—Investigating fluid-tightness of structures
- G01M3/02—Investigating fluid-tightness of structures by using fluid or vacuum
- G01M3/26—Investigating fluid-tightness of structures by using fluid or vacuum by measuring rate of loss or gain of fluid, e.g. by pressure-responsive devices, by flow detectors
- G01M3/28—Investigating fluid-tightness of structures by using fluid or vacuum by measuring rate of loss or gain of fluid, e.g. by pressure-responsive devices, by flow detectors for pipes, cables or tubes; for pipe joints or seals; for valves ; for welds
- G01M3/2853—Investigating fluid-tightness of structures by using fluid or vacuum by measuring rate of loss or gain of fluid, e.g. by pressure-responsive devices, by flow detectors for pipes, cables or tubes; for pipe joints or seals; for valves ; for welds for pipe joints or seals
- G01M3/2869—Investigating fluid-tightness of structures by using fluid or vacuum by measuring rate of loss or gain of fluid, e.g. by pressure-responsive devices, by flow detectors for pipes, cables or tubes; for pipe joints or seals; for valves ; for welds for pipe joints or seals for seals not incorporated in a pipe joint
Definitions
- the present invention relates to system and method for predicting the condition of a cylinder. More specifically, the invention relates to a system and method that uses pressure or another parameter to determine the condition of a pneumatic or hydraulic cylinder.
- Pneumatic and hydraulic cylinders are used throughout industry to operate equipment in manufacturing lines and to provide a motive force for various components. Over time, the operation of these cylinders can degrade. However, often, the degradation in performance is not detected until an ultimate failure of the cylinder occurs. If a user is unprepared for the failure, it can result in substantial down time or costs.
- the invention provides a system that uses one or more pressure sensors to monitor the condition of a cylinder.
- the system includes a microprocessor/controller that compares measured pressure data to a known baseline for a particular cylinder performing a known function to determine if the operation is acceptable.
- the system can be standalone or part of a distributed control system.
- the system can include position sensors that detect the actual position of a piston within the cylinder.
- the invention provides an actuator system that includes a piston-cylinder arrangement including a piston that is movable with respect to a cylinder.
- a first flow path is in fluid communication with the piston-cylinder arrangement and a second flow path is in fluid communication with the piston-cylinder arrangement.
- a control system is operable to fluidly connect the first flow path to a source of high-pressure fluid and to connect the second flow path to a drain to move the piston in a first direction.
- a pressure sensor is fluidly connected to the first flow path and is operable to measure sufficient pressure data during the movement of the piston to generate a pressure versus time curve.
- the control system is operable to compare the generated pressure versus time curve to a known standard pressure versus time curve stored in the control system to determine the condition of the piston-cylinder arrangement.
- the invention provides an actuator system that includes a cylinder defining an internal space and including a first fluid port disposed adjacent a first end of the space and a second fluid port adjacent the second end of the space.
- a piston is disposed within the internal space and is operable to divide the space into a first side and a second side, the first side in fluid communication with the first fluid port and the second side in fluid communication with the second fluid port.
- a working member is coupled to the piston and is operable to perform work in response to movement of the piston and a control system is operable to selectively fluidly connect the first fluid port to one of a pressure source and a drain and to connect the second fluid port to the other of the drain and the pressure source to selectively move the piston away from the first port and toward the first port.
- a pressure sensor is in fluid communication with the first side and is operable to measure pressure data during movement of the piston. The control system is operable to compare the measured pressure data to a known standard to determine the condition of the system.
- the invention provides a method of predicting a failure in an actuator system.
- the method includes porting a high-pressure fluid to a first side of a piston-cylinder arrangement, draining a low-pressure fluid from a second side of the piston-cylinder arrangement to allow the piston to move with respect to the cylinder toward the second side, and taking a plurality of pressure measurements of the fluid adjacent the first side during the movement of the piston.
- the method also includes comparing the plurality of pressure measurements to a known set of pressure values and determining if a failure is likely based on the comparison of the plurality of pressure measurements to the known set of pressure values.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of one possible arrangement of a system embodying the invention
- FIG. 2 is a plot illustrating measured pressure values versus time for a new actuator in the horizontal position with no load and no damping
- FIG. 3 is a plot illustrating measured pressure values versus time for a actuator in the same arrangement as that of FIG. 2 , wherein the actuator is known to be damaged;
- FIG. 4 is a plot illustrating measured pressure values versus time for a new actuator in the horizontal position with no load but with damping
- FIG. 5 is a plot illustrating measured pressure values versus time for a actuator in the same arrangement as that of FIG. 4 , wherein the actuator is known to be damaged;
- FIG. 6 is a plot illustrating measured pressure values versus time for a new actuator that has a larger diameter than the actuator of FIGS. 2-5 arranged in the horizontal position with no load but with damping;
- FIG. 7 is a plot illustrating measured pressure values versus time for a actuator in the same arrangement as that of FIG. 6 , wherein the actuator is known to be damaged;
- FIG. 8 is a plot illustrating measured pressure values versus time for a new actuator in the vertical position with a load and with damping
- FIG. 9 is a plot illustrating measured pressure values versus time for a actuator in the same arrangement as that of FIG. 8 , wherein the actuator is known to be damaged;
- FIG. 10 is a schematic illustration of the arrangement of FIG. 1 and further including a position measurement system
- FIG. 11 is a schematic illustration of a multi-actuator system including a distributed control system
- FIG. 12 is a screen image of a monitoring system for use in monitoring the performance and condition of one or more actuators
- FIG. 13 is another screen image of the monitoring system of FIG. 12 for use in monitoring the performance and condition of one or more actuators;
- FIG. 14 is an image of baseline test results for a known actuator
- FIG. 15 is an image of test results for the known actuator of FIG. 14 with a defective shaft or rod seal
- FIG. 16 is an image of test results for the known actuator of FIG. 14 with a defective rod-side piston seal
- FIG. 17 is an image of test results for the known actuator of FIG. 14 with a defective rear head (opposite the rod) piston seal.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a system 10 that is suitable for use in predicting or evaluating the condition of an actuator 15 (e.g., pneumatic, hydraulic, etc.) or valve.
- the system 10 includes a cylinder 17 , a first pressure sensor 20 , a second pressure sensor 25 , and a microprocessor 30 .
- the illustrated actuator 15 is a typical double acting actuator 15 having a port 35 at either end of a cylinder 17 , a piston 40 disposed between the ports 35 and a rod 45 extending from the piston 40 and out one end of the cylinder 17 .
- the piston 40 divides the cylinder 17 into a first chamber 50 and a second chamber 55 .
- Each of the chambers 50 , 55 provides a variable volume that allows for movement of the piston 40 .
- the system 10 described herein can be applied to different types of actuators (e.g., rodless) and can be used with actuators powered with different working fluids (e.g., hydraulic fluid, oils, water, fuel, air, other gases, other liquids, etc.).
- actuators e.g., rodless
- working fluids e.g., hydraulic fluid, oils, water, fuel, air, other gases, other liquids, etc.
- the illustrated actuator is not biased in any direction, this system could be applied to spring return actuators as well.
- the actual design of the actuator or valve is largely irrelevant as the invention can be adapted to many designs.
- the working fluid is admitted into one port 35 and allowed to drain or escape from the other port 35 to move the piston 40 and rod 45 away from the port 35 in which fluid is being admitted. Because a large pressure differential exists during movement of the piston 40 , a seal 60 is provided between the piston 40 and the cylinder 17 . After some amount of use, this seal 60 can wear or otherwise degrade creating one point where failure may occur.
- a second seal 65 is provided at the end of the cylinder 17 through which the rod 45 extends. This second seal 65 reduces the amount of working fluid that escapes at the rod opening. Through use, this seal 65 can wear or otherwise degrade creating a second point of possible failure.
- valves 70 are used to direct the working fluid to and from the ports 35 as required to produce the desired movement.
- a three-way valve 70 allows the first port 35 to be open to a pressure supply 75 and the second port 35 to be opened to a drain 80 in a first position. In a second position, the ports 35 are reversed so that the first port 35 is open to the drain 80 and the second port 35 is open to the pressure supply 75 . The first position and the second position produce movement of the piston 40 and rod 45 in opposite directions.
- the valve 70 also provides a third operating position in which both ports 35 are closed, thereby trapping the working fluid on both sides of the piston 40 .
- variable flow rate valves or other flow control devices can be employed to control the rate of fluid flow into or out of the ports 35 to control the speed, acceleration, and exact position of the piston 40 and rod 45 as it moves.
- the first pressure sensor 20 is positioned to measure a pressure within the first chamber 50 and the second sensor 25 is positioned to measure a pressure within the second chamber 55 .
- the first sensor 20 is positioned within a first sensor port 85 that is spaced apart from the fluid port 35 already provided in the first chamber 50 of the cylinder 17 .
- the second sensor 25 is positioned within a second sensor port 90 that is spaced apart from the fluid port 35 already provided in the second chamber 55 of the cylinder 17 .
- the pressure sensor 25 might be connected in line with the fluid lines that connect to the cylinder 17 and the valve 70 or may be connected to a tap line that extends from the feed line or the cylinder chambers 50 , 55 as may be desired.
- the pressure sensors 20 , 25 preferably have a range of sensed pressures that exceeds 150 psi with an accuracy of about 0.01 psi with more or less accurate sensors also being possible. Of course, sensors operating at 250 psi or higher are also possible. Additionally, the sensor 20 , 25 is preferably sized to provide a response time that allows for data acquisition at a rate of about 1000 data points per second. Of course other pressure sensors could be employed if desired. For example, in one construction, sound pressure sensors, audio sensors, or other vibration sensors are employed to measure the desired operating characteristics of the actuator 15 .
- the pressure sensors 20 , 25 are removably connected to the actuator 15 so that they may be reused with subsequent actuators 15 .
- the pressure sensors 20 , 25 can be manufactured as part of the actuator 15 and replaced with the actuator 15 .
- the pressure sensors 20 , 25 convert the measured pressures within their respective chambers into a pressure signal that is transmitted to the microprocessor/controller 30 .
- the microprocessor/controller 30 is dedicated to capture data, stream data and/or analyze for faults or control values. Also, a data logger function can be provided to capture the number of operating cycles, minimum and maximum temperatures, maximum pressures, etc.
- Each microprocessor/controller 30 can include a unique ID. In the construction illustrated in FIG. 1 , a wired connection is illustrated. However, wireless connections such as infra-red, radio frequency and the like are also possible.
- the microprocessor/control 30 receives the pressure signals and compares the signals to known signals for actuators 15 to make decisions regarding the performance and condition of the actuator 15 to which it is connected.
- the microprocessor/controller 30 may include indicators such as lights or audio devices that can be actuated when a particular condition is detected. For example, a red light could be provided and illuminated when excessive wear or damage to the actuator 15 is detected.
- the microprocessor/controller 30 may have additional inputs (e.g., ambient temperature, pressure, control signals, etc.) and is provided with multiple output options (e.g., Ethernet, RS-485/422, RS-232, USB, RF, IR, LED blink code, etc.).
- the microprocessor/controller 30 can perform the necessary comparisons and make decisions regarding the operation, maintenance, or condition of the actuator 15 or can transfer the raw data or decision information to a central computer that then displays the information for one or more actuators 15 to a user. Additionally, the microprocessor/controller can perform data logging functions and store data relating to virtually any measured parameter such as but not limited to the number of cycles, maximum and minimum pressures or temperatures, number of faults, etc.
- the present system 10 can be applied to virtually any actuator 15 performing any operation.
- the performance of any given actuator 15 will vary with the load applied, the positioning of the actuator 15 and the load, the size of the actuator 15 , the distance from the pressure source 75 , and any number of other variables.
- the preferred approach is to measure the performance of a known actuator 15 in the particular application and use that measured data as a baseline.
- the baseline represents an acceptable motion profile and is compared to the measured profiles by the microprocessor/controller 30 . This comparison is then used to determine fault condition and reporting.
- FIG. 2 illustrates an example of one such baseline measurement that is exemplary and includes pressure measured and plotted versus time.
- the pressure varied between about 10 psi and 95 psi with other pressure ranges being possible.
- the entire stroke of the piston 40 in a first direction takes about 100 ms with faster or slower strokes being possible.
- the stroke in one direction can be faster than the stroke in the opposite direction due to the reduced piston area caused by the rod 45 .
- each curve 95 , 100 represents data from one of the pressure sensors 20 , 25 .
- the first pressure sensor 20 is measuring a pressure of slightly more than 10 psi and is therefore connected to the drain 80 .
- the second pressure sensor 25 is measuring slightly above 90 psi and is connected to the high pressure source 75 .
- the piston 40 is displaced to an extreme end nearest the first pressure sensor 20 .
- the control valve 70 is moved to the second position such that the first chamber 50 and therefore the first pressure sensor 20 are exposed to the high pressure fluid 75 and the second chamber 55 and therefore the second pressure sensor 25 are opened to the drain 80 .
- the pressure within the second chamber 55 immediately begins to drop, following a substantially exponential curve.
- the pressure within the first chamber 50 rises substantially linearly to a first pressure level.
- the force produced by the high pressure fluid on the piston 40 overcomes the piston's mechanical inertia and any sticking friction and the piston 40 begins to move toward the second pressure sensor 25 .
- the movement of the piston 40 increases the volume in the first chamber 50 , thereby causing a drop in pressure to a level below the first pressure.
- the volume within the second chamber 55 is reduced and the pressure drops toward a lower level at an accelerated rate.
- the pressure within the first chamber 50 increases to a level about equal to the pressure of the high pressure source 75 and the pressure within the second chamber 55 drops to a level about equal to the drain pressure 80 .
- FIG. 3 illustrates the same type of actuator 15 performing the same operation as the actuator 15 of FIG. 2 .
- the actuator 15 of FIG. 3 is known to be defective.
- a comparison of the curves 110 , 115 of FIG. 3 that correspond with the curves 95 , 100 of FIG. 2 illustrates several differences.
- the magnitude 120 of the first pressure required to initiate movement of the piston 40 is noticeably higher in FIG. 3 than it is in FIG. 2 .
- the pressure within the first chamber 50 drops more significantly than it does with the actuator 15 of FIG. 2 .
- the pressure variation within the first chamber 50 during piston motion is larger with the damaged actuator 15 of FIG. 3 when compared to the good actuator 15 of FIG. 2 .
- the curve representing the data measured by the opposite pressure sensor is also different between FIG. 2 and FIG. 3 .
- the high pressure value 125 that is maintained prior to moving the valve 70 is lower in FIG. 3 than it is in FIG. 2 .
- the pressure within the second chamber 55 drops faster in the cylinder of FIG. 3 when compared to the cylinder of FIG. 2 .
- the differences between the two curves 110 , 115 can also be illustrative of possible problems with the cylinder.
- the difference between the maximum pressure within the second chamber 55 prior to switching the valve 70 and the first pressure required to initiate movement 120 of the piston 40 is significantly different between FIG. 2 and FIG. 3 .
- the pressure difference between the two chambers 50 , 55 during motion of the piston 40 and at the end of the piston's stroke is much smaller for the actuator 15 of FIG. 3 when compared to the actuator 15 of FIG. 2 .
- FIGS. 4 and 5 illustrate actuators 15 similar to the actuators 15 of FIGS. 2 and 3 respectively but with the addition of damping to slow the movement of the piston 40 . Again, there are differences in the curves that are identifiable and that could be used to assess the condition of the actuators 15 ; however the curves are very different from those of FIGS. 2 and 3 .
- FIGS. 6 and 7 illustrate the same actuator 15 during horizontal operation with no load and no damping.
- the actuator 15 is a larger diameter than the actuator 15 used to produce FIGS. 2-5 .
- FIG. 6 is data from a new actuator 15 with FIG. 7 illustrating data from an actuator 15 that is known to be damaged
- FIGS. 8 and 9 illustrate a vertically mounted actuator 15 with a load and with damping.
- FIG. 8 is data from a new actuator 15 with FIG. 9 illustrating data from an actuator that is known to be damaged.
- the system 10 is also capable of measuring the total time duration of the stroke and counting the total cycles or strokes of the piston 40 . Both of these values can be used for maintenance cycle purposes or to evaluate the condition of the actuator 15 .
- the microprocessor/controller 30 could actuate a colored light to indicate that a predetermined number of cycles has occurred and routine maintenance should be performed or the actuator 15 should be replaced.
- the system 10 can also measure and monitor the maximum operating pressures and signal an alarm if one or more of the operating pressures are exceeded.
- a temperature sensor could be coupled to the actuator 15 to monitor working fluid temperature, cylinder metal temperature, or any other temperature desired.
- the temperature data could be used to compensate for the effects of temperature on the operating pressure.
- the system 10 can also be used to more directly control the operation of the actuator 15 .
- the microprocessor/controller 30 could provide control signals to the valve 70 or valves controlling the flow of fluid to the actuator 15 to control the speed at which the piston 40 moves or the total force generate by the piston 40 .
- the present system 10 is capable of detecting the end of travel and stopping the piston 40 at that point or prior to that point if desired.
- FIG. 10 Another construction of a system 150 includes a position measurement system 155 that is capable of determining the actual position of the piston 40 within the cylinder 17 .
- the cylinder 17 illustrated schematically in FIG. 10 is identical to that of FIG. 1 but includes the position measurement system 155 .
- the position measurement system 155 includes a plurality of magnetic sensors 160 spaced along the length of the cylinder 17 . Each sensor 160 is capable of accurately measuring the angle 165 between it and another magnet 170 such as a magnet 170 placed within or coupled to the piston 40 .
- a signal indicative of the angle 165 is sent from each sensor 160 to the microprocessor/controller 30 .
- the microprocessor/controller 30 uses the various angles to triangulate and calculate the precise position of the piston 40 .
- This positional data can then be used to control the valves 70 to accurately control the position of the piston 40 at any time. This position information can also be used independently or in addition to other sensors for control and/or monitoring purposes.
- the systems 10 , 150 described herein can be used alone to monitor and control the operation of a single actuator 15 .
- the system can signal when the condition of the actuator 15 changes significantly, can signal when maintenance is required and could signal when a replacement actuator 15 or seal is required.
- the system could be used to control the operation of the individual actuator 15 .
- the various microprocessor/controllers 30 communicate with a central computer 170 as illustrated in FIG. 11 .
- the central computer 170 is part of a distributed control system (DCS) that can monitor and control the individual actuators 15 from one location as may be required.
- DCS distributed control system
- FIGS. 14-17 illustrate actual test results for a known actuators in good condition and the same actuator with three different known defects.
- FIGS. 14-17 illustrate one possible way in which the present system can be employed.
- Other types of actuators may have different failure modes and may therefore require slightly different analysis.
- the absolute pressures, times, and cycles discloses herein are exemplary and could vary depending on many factors including the application or actuator being used.
- FIGS. 14-17 are exemplary of one possible use for the system.
- FIG. 14 illustrates a baseline measurement of a known actuator that is known to be in a good or acceptable condition.
- the actuator includes a shaft or rod seal a rod-side piston seal and a head piston seal positioned on the opposite side of the piston as the rod side seal. Any one of these seals can fail during use of the actuator and the present system is able to detect that failure before the actuator becomes unusable.
- the system generates waveforms (or curves) based on pressure measurements taken from both sides of the piston. As illustrated, three specific data points 301 , 302 , and 303 are identified. These three data points will be discussed with regard to the FIGS. 15-17 as these points move in response to particular failures.
- each side of the cylinder are substantially equal. This is typical of a good cylinder but is a function of any pressure or flow regulator that may be positioned upstream of the fluid ports. Additionally, the low pressure of each wave form is about equal to atmospheric pressure as is typical in a good actuator.
- FIG. 15 illustrates similar waveforms for an identical actuator of that of FIG. 14 but with a known defect.
- the rod seal is known to be damaged.
- the two waveforms no longer intersect at the first data point 301 . Rather, there is now a 2 psi difference between the two points 301 a and 301 b and they have shifted upward from the original 57 psi value.
- the second point 302 has shifted downward from 62 psi to 53 psi and the third point 303 has shifted downward from 55 psi to 48 psi.
- the maximum pressures of the two waveforms are different as a result of the defect. Any or all of these differences can be used to determine, not only that the actuator is operating abnormally but that the cause of the abnormal operation is likely a defective rod seal.
- FIG. 16 illustrates similar waveforms for an identical actuator of that of FIG. 14 but with a known defect.
- the rod side piston seal is known to be damaged.
- the two waveforms now include many differences.
- the first point 301 has shifted upward about 3 psi.
- the second point 302 has shifted downward from 62 psi to 55 psi and the third point 303 has shifted downward from 55 psi to 49 psi.
- the maximum pressure of the two waveforms now has a difference of about 3.5 psi. This is a larger difference than that seen as a result of the damaged rod seal.
- the waveforms of FIG. 16 also show a pressure difference between the minimum pressures. Specifically, a difference of 1.5 psi is clearly visible. This difference was not present as a result of the defective rod seal. Thus, these differences can be used to determine, not only that the actuator is operating abnormally but that the cause of the abnormal operation is likely a defective rod side piston seal.
- FIG. 17 illustrates similar waveforms for an identical actuator of that of FIG. 14 but with a known defect. Specifically, the head side piston seal is known to be damaged.
- the two waveforms now include many differences when compared to the waveforms of FIG. 14 as well as the waveforms of FIGS. 15 and 16 .
- the first point 301 has not shifted when compared to the waveforms of FIG. 14 . This is different than what is seen in FIGS. 15 and 16 .
- the second point 302 and the third point 303 have remained largely unchanged when compared to the waveforms of FIG. 14 .
- the maximum pressure of the two waveforms now has a difference of greater than 3 psi. This difference is similar in magnitude to that of FIG. 16 but the direction is reversed (i.e., the opposite sensor is higher).
- the waveforms of FIG. 17 show a pressure difference between the minimum pressures. Specifically, a difference of about 2 psi is clearly visible. Like the maximum pressure difference, this difference was present in the waveforms of FIG. 16 , but again the direction is reversed (i.e., the opposite sensor is low). Thus, these differences can be used to determine, not only that the actuator is operating abnormally but that the cause of the abnormal operation is likely a defective head side piston seal.
- the actuators used to generate the waveforms of FIGS. 14-17 were unloaded. As such, there was very little variation in the cycle times (the X-axis) as a result of the defects. However, in loaded cylinders, the defects discussed above also cause measurable variations in the cycle times. These variations can be measured and reported and can also be used to assess the status of the actuator. In addition to using time variations to determine if potential problems have occurred, some constructions utilize the area under the curve to assess if problems are occurring. More specifically, the area between the curves can be used in situations where the actuator is operated at varying pressures or at varying rates. In these situations, it has been found that the total area under the curve remains substantially uniform. Thus, an increase in this area is indicative of unwanted leakage or other performance failures. In other applications, variations in the area between the curves may be indicative of a particular failure mode alone or in combination with other measured parameters.
- the start and the end of a cycle can be easily detected and reported for use in both controlling a process as well as accessing the condition of the actuator.
- the pressure can be adjusted to achieve the desired cycle time, thereby enhancing the quality of the process and possibly reducing the amount of air or compressed fluid used by the actuator.
- FIGS. 12 and 13 illustrate images of one possible monitoring system for use with the systems discussed herein.
- FIG. 12 illustrates status page for the monitoring system. While the status page includes the status of one actuator, multiple actuators could be grouped together and illustrated as desired.
- the illustrated image includes three performance indicators with the first indicator providing a red, yellow or green status based on the waveform analysis discussed above.
- the second indicator provides an indication that the end of the stroke has been reached.
- the third indicator counts actuator cycles and provides an indication of actuator life based on the number of cycles. The life could be the actual useful life of the actuator or could be set to mirror recommended maintenance intervals for a particular sensor.
- the second area of the status page provides numerical data for various operating parameters of the actuator. Other parameters could be measured and displayed as desired.
- the third area of the status page provides an efficiency analysis. In this example, the efficiency is based on cycle time.
- the data displayed is a comparison of the actual cycle time versus the desired cycle time with a space provided to provide recommended corrective action based on the result.
- the actuator is moving faster than desired. Thus, the pressure of the fluid could be lowered to slow the actuator and potentially reduce the cost of operation.
- FIG. 13 illustrated one possible configuration page that provides data specific to the actuator being reviewed.
- the bore size, the stroke length, and the total cycle count can be added, stored, and displayed.
- the steps required to generate the baseline waveforms can be initiated from this page.
- alarm set points for any measured parameters can be set with each having a high alarm, a low alarm, and a selector to activate or deactivate the alarm.
- a Firmware update status is provided to alert the user when a firmware update is required.
- the invention is described as being used with an actuator (sometimes referred to as a cylinder, a pneumatic cylinder, or a hydraulic cylinder). However, in other applications, the invention is applied to a valve or any other flow device.
- a flow device would be any device that controls the flow of a fluid or operates in response to a flow of fluid being directed thereto. As such, the invention should not be limited to actuators alone.
- the invention provides a system 10 , 150 for measuring and controlling the operation of an actuator 15 .
- the system 10 , 150 includes pressure sensors 20 , 25 that are capable of collecting data and a microprocessor/controller 30 capable of analyzing the data to determine the condition of the actuator 15 .
Abstract
Description
- This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/838,253, filed Mar. 15, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,128,008 which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/636,431 filed Apr. 20, 2012, the entire contents of each are fully incorporated herein by reference.
- The present invention relates to system and method for predicting the condition of a cylinder. More specifically, the invention relates to a system and method that uses pressure or another parameter to determine the condition of a pneumatic or hydraulic cylinder.
- Pneumatic and hydraulic cylinders are used throughout industry to operate equipment in manufacturing lines and to provide a motive force for various components. Over time, the operation of these cylinders can degrade. However, often, the degradation in performance is not detected until an ultimate failure of the cylinder occurs. If a user is unprepared for the failure, it can result in substantial down time or costs.
- In one embodiment, the invention provides a system that uses one or more pressure sensors to monitor the condition of a cylinder. The system includes a microprocessor/controller that compares measured pressure data to a known baseline for a particular cylinder performing a known function to determine if the operation is acceptable. The system can be standalone or part of a distributed control system. In some constructions, the system can include position sensors that detect the actual position of a piston within the cylinder.
- In another construction, the invention provides an actuator system that includes a piston-cylinder arrangement including a piston that is movable with respect to a cylinder. A first flow path is in fluid communication with the piston-cylinder arrangement and a second flow path is in fluid communication with the piston-cylinder arrangement. A control system is operable to fluidly connect the first flow path to a source of high-pressure fluid and to connect the second flow path to a drain to move the piston in a first direction. A pressure sensor is fluidly connected to the first flow path and is operable to measure sufficient pressure data during the movement of the piston to generate a pressure versus time curve. The control system is operable to compare the generated pressure versus time curve to a known standard pressure versus time curve stored in the control system to determine the condition of the piston-cylinder arrangement.
- In another construction, the invention provides an actuator system that includes a cylinder defining an internal space and including a first fluid port disposed adjacent a first end of the space and a second fluid port adjacent the second end of the space. A piston is disposed within the internal space and is operable to divide the space into a first side and a second side, the first side in fluid communication with the first fluid port and the second side in fluid communication with the second fluid port. A working member is coupled to the piston and is operable to perform work in response to movement of the piston and a control system is operable to selectively fluidly connect the first fluid port to one of a pressure source and a drain and to connect the second fluid port to the other of the drain and the pressure source to selectively move the piston away from the first port and toward the first port. A pressure sensor is in fluid communication with the first side and is operable to measure pressure data during movement of the piston. The control system is operable to compare the measured pressure data to a known standard to determine the condition of the system.
- In yet another construction, the invention provides a method of predicting a failure in an actuator system. The method includes porting a high-pressure fluid to a first side of a piston-cylinder arrangement, draining a low-pressure fluid from a second side of the piston-cylinder arrangement to allow the piston to move with respect to the cylinder toward the second side, and taking a plurality of pressure measurements of the fluid adjacent the first side during the movement of the piston. The method also includes comparing the plurality of pressure measurements to a known set of pressure values and determining if a failure is likely based on the comparison of the plurality of pressure measurements to the known set of pressure values.
- Other aspects of the invention will become apparent by consideration of the detailed description and accompanying drawings.
-
FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of one possible arrangement of a system embodying the invention; -
FIG. 2 is a plot illustrating measured pressure values versus time for a new actuator in the horizontal position with no load and no damping; -
FIG. 3 is a plot illustrating measured pressure values versus time for a actuator in the same arrangement as that ofFIG. 2 , wherein the actuator is known to be damaged; -
FIG. 4 is a plot illustrating measured pressure values versus time for a new actuator in the horizontal position with no load but with damping; -
FIG. 5 is a plot illustrating measured pressure values versus time for a actuator in the same arrangement as that ofFIG. 4 , wherein the actuator is known to be damaged; -
FIG. 6 is a plot illustrating measured pressure values versus time for a new actuator that has a larger diameter than the actuator ofFIGS. 2-5 arranged in the horizontal position with no load but with damping; -
FIG. 7 is a plot illustrating measured pressure values versus time for a actuator in the same arrangement as that ofFIG. 6 , wherein the actuator is known to be damaged; -
FIG. 8 is a plot illustrating measured pressure values versus time for a new actuator in the vertical position with a load and with damping; -
FIG. 9 is a plot illustrating measured pressure values versus time for a actuator in the same arrangement as that ofFIG. 8 , wherein the actuator is known to be damaged; -
FIG. 10 is a schematic illustration of the arrangement ofFIG. 1 and further including a position measurement system; -
FIG. 11 is a schematic illustration of a multi-actuator system including a distributed control system; -
FIG. 12 is a screen image of a monitoring system for use in monitoring the performance and condition of one or more actuators; -
FIG. 13 is another screen image of the monitoring system ofFIG. 12 for use in monitoring the performance and condition of one or more actuators; -
FIG. 14 is an image of baseline test results for a known actuator; -
FIG. 15 is an image of test results for the known actuator ofFIG. 14 with a defective shaft or rod seal; -
FIG. 16 is an image of test results for the known actuator ofFIG. 14 with a defective rod-side piston seal; and -
FIG. 17 is an image of test results for the known actuator ofFIG. 14 with a defective rear head (opposite the rod) piston seal. - Before any embodiments of the invention are explained in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the following drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways.
-
FIG. 1 illustrates asystem 10 that is suitable for use in predicting or evaluating the condition of an actuator 15 (e.g., pneumatic, hydraulic, etc.) or valve. Thesystem 10 includes acylinder 17, afirst pressure sensor 20, asecond pressure sensor 25, and amicroprocessor 30. The illustratedactuator 15 is a typical double actingactuator 15 having aport 35 at either end of acylinder 17, apiston 40 disposed between theports 35 and arod 45 extending from thepiston 40 and out one end of thecylinder 17. Thepiston 40 divides thecylinder 17 into afirst chamber 50 and asecond chamber 55. Each of thechambers piston 40. As one of ordinary skill in the art will realize, thesystem 10 described herein can be applied to different types of actuators (e.g., rodless) and can be used with actuators powered with different working fluids (e.g., hydraulic fluid, oils, water, fuel, air, other gases, other liquids, etc.). In addition, while the illustrated actuator is not biased in any direction, this system could be applied to spring return actuators as well. In fact, the actual design of the actuator or valve is largely irrelevant as the invention can be adapted to many designs. - The working fluid is admitted into one
port 35 and allowed to drain or escape from theother port 35 to move thepiston 40 and rod 45 away from theport 35 in which fluid is being admitted. Because a large pressure differential exists during movement of thepiston 40, aseal 60 is provided between thepiston 40 and thecylinder 17. After some amount of use, thisseal 60 can wear or otherwise degrade creating one point where failure may occur. Asecond seal 65 is provided at the end of thecylinder 17 through which therod 45 extends. Thissecond seal 65 reduces the amount of working fluid that escapes at the rod opening. Through use, thisseal 65 can wear or otherwise degrade creating a second point of possible failure. - Typically, one or
more valves 70 are used to direct the working fluid to and from theports 35 as required to produce the desired movement. In a preferred arrangement, a three-way valve 70 allows thefirst port 35 to be open to apressure supply 75 and thesecond port 35 to be opened to adrain 80 in a first position. In a second position, theports 35 are reversed so that thefirst port 35 is open to thedrain 80 and thesecond port 35 is open to thepressure supply 75. The first position and the second position produce movement of thepiston 40 androd 45 in opposite directions. Thevalve 70 also provides a third operating position in which bothports 35 are closed, thereby trapping the working fluid on both sides of thepiston 40. The third position allows thepiston 40 androd 45 to be positioned and held at some point intermediate of the two extremes. In addition, variable flow rate valves or other flow control devices can be employed to control the rate of fluid flow into or out of theports 35 to control the speed, acceleration, and exact position of thepiston 40 androd 45 as it moves. - With continued reference to
FIG. 1 , thefirst pressure sensor 20 is positioned to measure a pressure within thefirst chamber 50 and thesecond sensor 25 is positioned to measure a pressure within thesecond chamber 55. In the illustrated construction, thefirst sensor 20 is positioned within afirst sensor port 85 that is spaced apart from thefluid port 35 already provided in thefirst chamber 50 of thecylinder 17. Similarly, thesecond sensor 25 is positioned within asecond sensor port 90 that is spaced apart from thefluid port 35 already provided in thesecond chamber 55 of thecylinder 17. In other constructions, thepressure sensor 25 might be connected in line with the fluid lines that connect to thecylinder 17 and thevalve 70 or may be connected to a tap line that extends from the feed line or thecylinder chambers - The
pressure sensors sensor actuator 15. - In preferred constructions, the
pressure sensors actuator 15 so that they may be reused withsubsequent actuators 15. Alternatively, thepressure sensors actuator 15 and replaced with theactuator 15. - The
pressure sensors controller 30. In preferred constructions, the microprocessor/controller 30 is dedicated to capture data, stream data and/or analyze for faults or control values. Also, a data logger function can be provided to capture the number of operating cycles, minimum and maximum temperatures, maximum pressures, etc. Each microprocessor/controller 30 can include a unique ID. In the construction illustrated inFIG. 1 , a wired connection is illustrated. However, wireless connections such as infra-red, radio frequency and the like are also possible. The microprocessor/control 30 receives the pressure signals and compares the signals to known signals foractuators 15 to make decisions regarding the performance and condition of theactuator 15 to which it is connected. The microprocessor/controller 30 may include indicators such as lights or audio devices that can be actuated when a particular condition is detected. For example, a red light could be provided and illuminated when excessive wear or damage to theactuator 15 is detected. The microprocessor/controller 30 may have additional inputs (e.g., ambient temperature, pressure, control signals, etc.) and is provided with multiple output options (e.g., Ethernet, RS-485/422, RS-232, USB, RF, IR, LED blink code, etc.). As noted the microprocessor/controller 30 can perform the necessary comparisons and make decisions regarding the operation, maintenance, or condition of theactuator 15 or can transfer the raw data or decision information to a central computer that then displays the information for one ormore actuators 15 to a user. Additionally, the microprocessor/controller can perform data logging functions and store data relating to virtually any measured parameter such as but not limited to the number of cycles, maximum and minimum pressures or temperatures, number of faults, etc. - In operation, the
present system 10 can be applied to virtually anyactuator 15 performing any operation. However, as one of ordinary skill in the art will realize, the performance of any givenactuator 15 will vary with the load applied, the positioning of theactuator 15 and the load, the size of theactuator 15, the distance from thepressure source 75, and any number of other variables. As such, the preferred approach is to measure the performance of a knownactuator 15 in the particular application and use that measured data as a baseline. The baseline represents an acceptable motion profile and is compared to the measured profiles by the microprocessor/controller 30. This comparison is then used to determine fault condition and reporting. -
FIG. 2 illustrates an example of one such baseline measurement that is exemplary and includes pressure measured and plotted versus time. As can be seen, the pressure varied between about 10 psi and 95 psi with other pressure ranges being possible. In addition, the entire stroke of thepiston 40 in a first direction takes about 100 ms with faster or slower strokes being possible. In addition, the stroke in one direction can be faster than the stroke in the opposite direction due to the reduced piston area caused by therod 45. - With continued reference to
FIG. 2 , there are twocurves curve pressure sensors first pressure sensor 20 is measuring a pressure of slightly more than 10 psi and is therefore connected to thedrain 80. Thesecond pressure sensor 25 is measuring slightly above 90 psi and is connected to thehigh pressure source 75. Thus, thepiston 40 is displaced to an extreme end nearest thefirst pressure sensor 20. At a first time, thecontrol valve 70 is moved to the second position such that thefirst chamber 50 and therefore thefirst pressure sensor 20 are exposed to thehigh pressure fluid 75 and thesecond chamber 55 and therefore thesecond pressure sensor 25 are opened to thedrain 80. The pressure within thesecond chamber 55 immediately begins to drop, following a substantially exponential curve. Simultaneously, the pressure within thefirst chamber 50 rises substantially linearly to a first pressure level. Upon reaching the first pressure level, the force produced by the high pressure fluid on thepiston 40 overcomes the piston's mechanical inertia and any sticking friction and thepiston 40 begins to move toward thesecond pressure sensor 25. The movement of thepiston 40 increases the volume in thefirst chamber 50, thereby causing a drop in pressure to a level below the first pressure. Simultaneously, the volume within thesecond chamber 55 is reduced and the pressure drops toward a lower level at an accelerated rate. Once thepiston 40 reaches its end of travel, the pressure within thefirst chamber 50 increases to a level about equal to the pressure of thehigh pressure source 75 and the pressure within thesecond chamber 55 drops to a level about equal to thedrain pressure 80. - As illustrated in
FIG. 2 , movement in the opposite direction produces similar curves with slightly different pressure values and durations. The variations in the pressures and the durations are mainly due to the non-symmetric configuration of thechambers FIG. 2 because the piston area is slightly larger due to the omission of therod 45 on the second chamber side of thepiston 40. The total force on thepiston 40 is about the same in both directions. Of course, if a load is applied, this relationship and the values will change based at least in part on that load. -
FIG. 3 illustrates the same type ofactuator 15 performing the same operation as theactuator 15 ofFIG. 2 . However, theactuator 15 ofFIG. 3 is known to be defective. A comparison of thecurves FIG. 3 that correspond with thecurves FIG. 2 illustrates several differences. For example, themagnitude 120 of the first pressure required to initiate movement of thepiston 40 is noticeably higher inFIG. 3 than it is inFIG. 2 . In addition, once piston movement begins, the pressure within thefirst chamber 50 drops more significantly than it does with theactuator 15 ofFIG. 2 . Thus, the pressure variation within thefirst chamber 50 during piston motion is larger with the damagedactuator 15 ofFIG. 3 when compared to thegood actuator 15 ofFIG. 2 . - The curve representing the data measured by the opposite pressure sensor is also different between
FIG. 2 andFIG. 3 . For example, thehigh pressure value 125 that is maintained prior to moving thevalve 70 is lower inFIG. 3 than it is inFIG. 2 . In addition, when opened to the drain, the pressure within thesecond chamber 55 drops faster in the cylinder ofFIG. 3 when compared to the cylinder ofFIG. 2 . - The differences between the two
curves second chamber 55 prior to switching thevalve 70 and the first pressure required to initiatemovement 120 of thepiston 40 is significantly different betweenFIG. 2 andFIG. 3 . Additionally, the pressure difference between the twochambers piston 40 and at the end of the piston's stroke is much smaller for theactuator 15 ofFIG. 3 when compared to theactuator 15 ofFIG. 2 . - As noted, the loading and positioning of the
actuator 15, along with many other factors, greatly affect the pressure data collected by thepressure sensors FIGS. 4 and 5 illustrateactuators 15 similar to theactuators 15 ofFIGS. 2 and 3 respectively but with the addition of damping to slow the movement of thepiston 40. Again, there are differences in the curves that are identifiable and that could be used to assess the condition of theactuators 15; however the curves are very different from those ofFIGS. 2 and 3 . -
FIGS. 6 and 7 illustrate thesame actuator 15 during horizontal operation with no load and no damping. Theactuator 15 is a larger diameter than the actuator 15 used to produceFIGS. 2-5 .FIG. 6 is data from anew actuator 15 withFIG. 7 illustrating data from anactuator 15 that is known to be damaged -
FIGS. 8 and 9 illustrate a vertically mountedactuator 15 with a load and with damping.FIG. 8 is data from anew actuator 15 withFIG. 9 illustrating data from an actuator that is known to be damaged. - In addition to measuring the pressure in the
first chamber 50 and thesecond chamber 55, thesystem 10 is also capable of measuring the total time duration of the stroke and counting the total cycles or strokes of thepiston 40. Both of these values can be used for maintenance cycle purposes or to evaluate the condition of theactuator 15. For example, the microprocessor/controller 30 could actuate a colored light to indicate that a predetermined number of cycles has occurred and routine maintenance should be performed or theactuator 15 should be replaced. Thesystem 10 can also measure and monitor the maximum operating pressures and signal an alarm if one or more of the operating pressures are exceeded. - Other parameters could be monitored using the
first sensor 20 and thesecond sensor 25 or additional sensors could be provided to monitor other parameters. For example, a temperature sensor could be coupled to theactuator 15 to monitor working fluid temperature, cylinder metal temperature, or any other temperature desired. The temperature data could be used to compensate for the effects of temperature on the operating pressure. - In addition to the monitoring functions described above, the
system 10 can also be used to more directly control the operation of theactuator 15. For example, the microprocessor/controller 30 could provide control signals to thevalve 70 or valves controlling the flow of fluid to theactuator 15 to control the speed at which thepiston 40 moves or the total force generate by thepiston 40. In addition, thepresent system 10 is capable of detecting the end of travel and stopping thepiston 40 at that point or prior to that point if desired. - Another construction of a
system 150 includes aposition measurement system 155 that is capable of determining the actual position of thepiston 40 within thecylinder 17. Thecylinder 17 illustrated schematically inFIG. 10 is identical to that ofFIG. 1 but includes theposition measurement system 155. Theposition measurement system 155 includes a plurality ofmagnetic sensors 160 spaced along the length of thecylinder 17. Eachsensor 160 is capable of accurately measuring theangle 165 between it and anothermagnet 170 such as amagnet 170 placed within or coupled to thepiston 40. A signal indicative of theangle 165 is sent from eachsensor 160 to the microprocessor/controller 30. The microprocessor/controller 30 uses the various angles to triangulate and calculate the precise position of thepiston 40. This positional data can then be used to control thevalves 70 to accurately control the position of thepiston 40 at any time. This position information can also be used independently or in addition to other sensors for control and/or monitoring purposes. - The
systems single actuator 15. The system can signal when the condition of the actuator 15 changes significantly, can signal when maintenance is required and could signal when areplacement actuator 15 or seal is required. In addition, the system could be used to control the operation of theindividual actuator 15. - In another arrangement, the various microprocessor/
controllers 30 communicate with acentral computer 170 as illustrated inFIG. 11 . Thecentral computer 170 is part of a distributed control system (DCS) that can monitor and control theindividual actuators 15 from one location as may be required. -
FIGS. 14-17 illustrate actual test results for a known actuators in good condition and the same actuator with three different known defects.FIGS. 14-17 illustrate one possible way in which the present system can be employed. Other types of actuators may have different failure modes and may therefore require slightly different analysis. In addition, the absolute pressures, times, and cycles discloses herein are exemplary and could vary depending on many factors including the application or actuator being used. However,FIGS. 14-17 are exemplary of one possible use for the system. -
FIG. 14 illustrates a baseline measurement of a known actuator that is known to be in a good or acceptable condition. The actuator includes a shaft or rod seal a rod-side piston seal and a head piston seal positioned on the opposite side of the piston as the rod side seal. Any one of these seals can fail during use of the actuator and the present system is able to detect that failure before the actuator becomes unusable. As can be seen, the system generates waveforms (or curves) based on pressure measurements taken from both sides of the piston. As illustrated, threespecific data points FIGS. 15-17 as these points move in response to particular failures. In addition, it should be noted that the maximum pressure of each side of the cylinder are substantially equal. This is typical of a good cylinder but is a function of any pressure or flow regulator that may be positioned upstream of the fluid ports. Additionally, the low pressure of each wave form is about equal to atmospheric pressure as is typical in a good actuator. -
FIG. 15 illustrates similar waveforms for an identical actuator of that ofFIG. 14 but with a known defect. Specifically, the rod seal is known to be damaged. As can be seen, the two waveforms no longer intersect at thefirst data point 301. Rather, there is now a 2 psi difference between the two points 301 a and 301 b and they have shifted upward from the original 57 psi value. In addition, thesecond point 302 has shifted downward from 62 psi to 53 psi and thethird point 303 has shifted downward from 55 psi to 48 psi. In addition, the maximum pressures of the two waveforms are different as a result of the defect. Any or all of these differences can be used to determine, not only that the actuator is operating abnormally but that the cause of the abnormal operation is likely a defective rod seal. -
FIG. 16 illustrates similar waveforms for an identical actuator of that ofFIG. 14 but with a known defect. Specifically, the rod side piston seal is known to be damaged. As can be seen, the two waveforms now include many differences. For example, thefirst point 301 has shifted upward about 3 psi. In addition, thesecond point 302 has shifted downward from 62 psi to 55 psi and thethird point 303 has shifted downward from 55 psi to 49 psi. These changes are similar to those discussed with regard to the waveforms ofFIG. 15 . However, the maximum pressure of the two waveforms now has a difference of about 3.5 psi. This is a larger difference than that seen as a result of the damaged rod seal. Furthermore, unlike with the damaged rod seal, the waveforms ofFIG. 16 also show a pressure difference between the minimum pressures. Specifically, a difference of 1.5 psi is clearly visible. This difference was not present as a result of the defective rod seal. Thus, these differences can be used to determine, not only that the actuator is operating abnormally but that the cause of the abnormal operation is likely a defective rod side piston seal. -
FIG. 17 illustrates similar waveforms for an identical actuator of that ofFIG. 14 but with a known defect. Specifically, the head side piston seal is known to be damaged. As can be seen, the two waveforms now include many differences when compared to the waveforms of FIG. 14 as well as the waveforms ofFIGS. 15 and 16 . For example, thefirst point 301 has not shifted when compared to the waveforms ofFIG. 14 . This is different than what is seen inFIGS. 15 and 16 . Similarly, thesecond point 302 and thethird point 303 have remained largely unchanged when compared to the waveforms ofFIG. 14 . Thus, looking only at these three points, one would conclude that the actuator ofFIG. 17 is in a good condition. However, the maximum pressure of the two waveforms now has a difference of greater than 3 psi. This difference is similar in magnitude to that ofFIG. 16 but the direction is reversed (i.e., the opposite sensor is higher). - Furthermore, like the waveforms of
FIG. 16 , the waveforms ofFIG. 17 show a pressure difference between the minimum pressures. Specifically, a difference of about 2 psi is clearly visible. Like the maximum pressure difference, this difference was present in the waveforms ofFIG. 16 , but again the direction is reversed (i.e., the opposite sensor is low). Thus, these differences can be used to determine, not only that the actuator is operating abnormally but that the cause of the abnormal operation is likely a defective head side piston seal. - It should be noted that the actuators used to generate the waveforms of
FIGS. 14-17 were unloaded. As such, there was very little variation in the cycle times (the X-axis) as a result of the defects. However, in loaded cylinders, the defects discussed above also cause measurable variations in the cycle times. These variations can be measured and reported and can also be used to assess the status of the actuator. In addition to using time variations to determine if potential problems have occurred, some constructions utilize the area under the curve to assess if problems are occurring. More specifically, the area between the curves can be used in situations where the actuator is operated at varying pressures or at varying rates. In these situations, it has been found that the total area under the curve remains substantially uniform. Thus, an increase in this area is indicative of unwanted leakage or other performance failures. In other applications, variations in the area between the curves may be indicative of a particular failure mode alone or in combination with other measured parameters. - Furthermore, the start and the end of a cycle can be easily detected and reported for use in both controlling a process as well as accessing the condition of the actuator. In addition, if a cycle time is determined to be faster than necessary, or slower than necessary, the pressure can be adjusted to achieve the desired cycle time, thereby enhancing the quality of the process and possibly reducing the amount of air or compressed fluid used by the actuator.
-
FIGS. 12 and 13 illustrate images of one possible monitoring system for use with the systems discussed herein.FIG. 12 illustrates status page for the monitoring system. While the status page includes the status of one actuator, multiple actuators could be grouped together and illustrated as desired. The illustrated image includes three performance indicators with the first indicator providing a red, yellow or green status based on the waveform analysis discussed above. The second indicator provides an indication that the end of the stroke has been reached. The third indicator counts actuator cycles and provides an indication of actuator life based on the number of cycles. The life could be the actual useful life of the actuator or could be set to mirror recommended maintenance intervals for a particular sensor. - The second area of the status page provides numerical data for various operating parameters of the actuator. Other parameters could be measured and displayed as desired. The third area of the status page provides an efficiency analysis. In this example, the efficiency is based on cycle time. The data displayed is a comparison of the actual cycle time versus the desired cycle time with a space provided to provide recommended corrective action based on the result. In this example, the actuator is moving faster than desired. Thus, the pressure of the fluid could be lowered to slow the actuator and potentially reduce the cost of operation.
-
FIG. 13 illustrated one possible configuration page that provides data specific to the actuator being reviewed. In this example, the bore size, the stroke length, and the total cycle count can be added, stored, and displayed. In addition, the steps required to generate the baseline waveforms (FIG. 14 ) can be initiated from this page. Finally, alarm set points for any measured parameters can be set with each having a high alarm, a low alarm, and a selector to activate or deactivate the alarm. Finally, a Firmware update status is provided to alert the user when a firmware update is required. - It should be noted that the invention is described as being used with an actuator (sometimes referred to as a cylinder, a pneumatic cylinder, or a hydraulic cylinder). However, in other applications, the invention is applied to a valve or any other flow device. A flow device would be any device that controls the flow of a fluid or operates in response to a flow of fluid being directed thereto. As such, the invention should not be limited to actuators alone.
- Thus, the invention provides a
system actuator 15. Thesystem pressure sensors controller 30 capable of analyzing the data to determine the condition of theactuator 15.
Claims (20)
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US14/847,756 US20160230789A1 (en) | 2012-04-20 | 2015-09-08 | Actuator predictive system |
US17/347,768 US11572904B2 (en) | 2012-04-20 | 2021-06-15 | Actuator predictive system |
US18/145,248 US11879484B2 (en) | 2012-04-20 | 2022-12-22 | Actuator predictive system |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US201261636431P | 2012-04-20 | 2012-04-20 | |
US13/838,253 US9128008B2 (en) | 2012-04-20 | 2013-03-15 | Actuator predictive system |
US14/847,756 US20160230789A1 (en) | 2012-04-20 | 2015-09-08 | Actuator predictive system |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/838,253 Continuation US9128008B2 (en) | 2012-04-20 | 2013-03-15 | Actuator predictive system |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US17/347,768 Continuation US11572904B2 (en) | 2012-04-20 | 2021-06-15 | Actuator predictive system |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20160230789A1 true US20160230789A1 (en) | 2016-08-11 |
Family
ID=49378860
Family Applications (4)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/838,253 Active 2034-03-18 US9128008B2 (en) | 2012-04-20 | 2013-03-15 | Actuator predictive system |
US14/847,756 Abandoned US20160230789A1 (en) | 2012-04-20 | 2015-09-08 | Actuator predictive system |
US17/347,768 Active 2033-04-29 US11572904B2 (en) | 2012-04-20 | 2021-06-15 | Actuator predictive system |
US18/145,248 Active US11879484B2 (en) | 2012-04-20 | 2022-12-22 | Actuator predictive system |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/838,253 Active 2034-03-18 US9128008B2 (en) | 2012-04-20 | 2013-03-15 | Actuator predictive system |
Family Applications After (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US17/347,768 Active 2033-04-29 US11572904B2 (en) | 2012-04-20 | 2021-06-15 | Actuator predictive system |
US18/145,248 Active US11879484B2 (en) | 2012-04-20 | 2022-12-22 | Actuator predictive system |
Country Status (15)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (4) | US9128008B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2839169B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP6158914B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR101729822B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN104395615B (en) |
AU (1) | AU2013249065B2 (en) |
BR (1) | BR112014026187B1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2871037C (en) |
DK (1) | DK2839169T3 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2786076T3 (en) |
IN (1) | IN2014KN02380A (en) |
MX (1) | MX355298B (en) |
RU (1) | RU2600200C2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2013159008A1 (en) |
ZA (1) | ZA201407688B (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11402297B2 (en) * | 2017-12-27 | 2022-08-02 | Sintokogio, Ltd. | Wear detection method and wear detection system for linear actuator |
WO2023014473A1 (en) * | 2021-08-06 | 2023-02-09 | Ace Controls Inc. | System to predict failures and duty life cycle in industrial shock absorbers based on pressure and temperature data |
Families Citing this family (44)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9128008B2 (en) | 2012-04-20 | 2015-09-08 | Kent Tabor | Actuator predictive system |
BR102013026645A2 (en) * | 2012-12-07 | 2014-09-16 | Sulzer Pumpen Ag | TEST APPARATUS FOR EXTERNAL PUMP ACCOMMODATION AND METHOD FOR TESTING EXTERNAL PUMP ACCOMMODATION |
WO2015153727A2 (en) * | 2014-04-02 | 2015-10-08 | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | System and method for heatlh monitoring of servo-hydraulic actuators |
US9927322B2 (en) * | 2014-04-16 | 2018-03-27 | Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. | Rotorcraft actuator seal leakage monitor |
US10239610B2 (en) * | 2015-03-10 | 2019-03-26 | Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. | Compact linear hydraulic actuator |
FR3036486B1 (en) * | 2015-05-18 | 2017-05-19 | Sagem Defense Securite | METHOD FOR ESTIMATING AN EXTERNAL FORCE EXERCISING AN ELECTROHYDROSTATIC ACTUATOR |
AT517432B1 (en) * | 2015-06-24 | 2017-09-15 | Engel Austria Gmbh | Pneumatic system and method of operation or commissioning thereof |
GB201514921D0 (en) * | 2015-08-21 | 2015-10-07 | Rolls Royce Plc | Actuator control |
JP6406298B2 (en) * | 2015-10-05 | 2018-10-17 | 株式会社デンソー | Monitoring device and abnormality diagnosis device |
KR101677462B1 (en) | 2016-01-12 | 2016-11-18 | (주) 마이크로프랜드 | Actuator control system for adaptation according environment |
JP6740684B2 (en) * | 2016-04-07 | 2020-08-19 | 株式会社タダノ | crane |
JP6819893B2 (en) * | 2016-04-27 | 2021-01-27 | Smc株式会社 | Cylinder operation status monitoring device |
CA3032386A1 (en) * | 2016-05-31 | 2017-12-07 | Transocean Innovation Labs Ltd | Methods for assessing the reliability of hydraulically-actuated devices and related systems |
JP6859637B2 (en) * | 2016-09-16 | 2021-04-14 | 株式会社タダノ | Pressure booster for aerial work platforms |
JP6944627B2 (en) * | 2016-10-03 | 2021-10-06 | Smc株式会社 | Cylinder operation status monitoring device |
US10408241B2 (en) | 2017-02-09 | 2019-09-10 | Deere & Company | Method of determining cycle time of an actuator and a system for determining a cycle time of a machine having an actuator |
CA3206116A1 (en) | 2017-03-07 | 2018-09-13 | Asco, L.P. | A device and method for anticipating failure in a solenoid valve for a manifold assembly |
MX2019011351A (en) | 2017-09-18 | 2019-11-05 | Asco Lp | A device and method for monitoring response time in a valve manifold assembly. |
JP7223000B2 (en) | 2017-12-21 | 2023-02-15 | スウェージロック カンパニー | Systems and methods for controlling and monitoring actuated valves |
US10837472B2 (en) | 2018-02-22 | 2020-11-17 | Caterpillar Inc. | Hydraulic cylinder health monitoring and remaining life system |
DE102018110064A1 (en) * | 2018-04-26 | 2019-10-31 | Ott-Jakob Spanntechnik Gmbh | Release device for a clamping device |
DE102018214295A1 (en) * | 2018-08-23 | 2020-02-27 | Stabilus Gmbh | Measurement of operating parameters on actuators |
JP7003014B2 (en) * | 2018-08-29 | 2022-01-20 | Ckd株式会社 | Actuator motion detection device |
JP6879284B2 (en) * | 2018-11-20 | 2021-06-02 | オムロン株式会社 | Anomaly detection device, anomaly detection method, and anomaly detection system |
FR3089578B1 (en) * | 2018-12-07 | 2021-01-29 | Safran Aircraft Engines | Control method of a cylinder |
JP6962944B2 (en) * | 2019-01-08 | 2021-11-05 | Ckd株式会社 | Fluid pressure actuator movement amount detection device |
DE102019200165A1 (en) * | 2019-01-09 | 2020-07-09 | Zf Friedrichshafen Ag | Method for determining a state of wear of a concentric release and a concentric release |
US11156262B2 (en) * | 2019-02-01 | 2021-10-26 | Ace Controls Inc. | System to predict failures in shock absorbers |
JP7081535B2 (en) * | 2019-03-11 | 2022-06-07 | トヨタ自動車株式会社 | Failure diagnosis method for air clamp device |
CN110410384B (en) * | 2019-09-01 | 2024-03-08 | 宋彦宏 | Incoming oil measurement indicator of hydraulic pipeline and detection method |
CN110864031B (en) * | 2019-11-11 | 2021-08-03 | 济南华凯葳液压科技有限公司 | Detection system for overcoming hydraulic oil temperature rise in hydraulic detection process |
US11466429B2 (en) | 2020-01-23 | 2022-10-11 | Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. | Prime mover mountable hydraulic tool and related monitoring systems and methods |
CN111520375B (en) * | 2020-04-21 | 2022-10-28 | 广东长盈精密技术有限公司 | System and method for feeding back cylinder to stretch to target position in special environment |
CN114593269B (en) * | 2020-12-03 | 2023-07-25 | 矻颀投资股份有限公司 | Valve with failure self-prediction function |
JP2022108308A (en) * | 2021-01-13 | 2022-07-26 | 住友重機械工業株式会社 | Fluid actuator, control method for fluid actuator, and control program of fluid actuator |
JP2022138918A (en) * | 2021-03-11 | 2022-09-26 | 株式会社東和製作所 | Fluid cylinder and fluid cylinder system |
EP4348064A1 (en) * | 2021-06-04 | 2024-04-10 | Danfoss A/S | Actuator deadhead/stall detection in a load sense hydraulic system |
EP4102083A1 (en) * | 2021-06-09 | 2022-12-14 | Goodrich Actuation Systems Limited | Control strategy for hydraulic system |
IT202100016181A1 (en) * | 2021-06-21 | 2022-12-21 | Fi4 0 S R L | Control device for an actuator of a machine |
IT202100019439A1 (en) * | 2021-07-22 | 2023-01-22 | Roberto Tomassini | Hydraulic controlled actuator for use on vehicles, trailers, semi-trailers, suspended loads and industrial machinery. |
WO2023212799A1 (en) * | 2022-05-04 | 2023-11-09 | Unifiller Systems Inc. | Monitoring use of a pneumatic device |
CN115289100B (en) * | 2022-07-28 | 2023-05-02 | 北京科技大学 | Hydraulic cylinder degradation trend evaluation method |
CN117212299B (en) * | 2023-11-07 | 2024-01-16 | 莱州兴达液压机械科技有限公司 | Hydraulic cylinder pressing testing device |
CN117404370B (en) * | 2023-12-15 | 2024-02-23 | 常州市武进安圩液压件制造有限公司 | Hydraulic cylinder pressure test detecting system based on artificial intelligence |
Citations (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3362215A (en) * | 1966-02-04 | 1968-01-09 | Army Usa | Apparatus for testing seals for propellant actuated devices |
US4719792A (en) * | 1984-02-21 | 1988-01-19 | Ingemar Eriksson | Method and a device for testing the tightness of an engine |
US5471400A (en) * | 1994-05-24 | 1995-11-28 | Gas Research Institute | Method for detecting and specifying compressor cylinder leaks |
US5694808A (en) * | 1993-11-03 | 1997-12-09 | Itt Automotive Europe Gmbh | System for testing the function of a hydraulic device |
US20020193924A1 (en) * | 2000-12-19 | 2002-12-19 | Muller Thomas P. | Hydraulic cylinder life prediction |
US20030146845A1 (en) * | 2002-02-07 | 2003-08-07 | Komatsu Ltd. | Failure diagnostic apparatus for hydraulic equipment |
US6763703B2 (en) * | 2000-12-20 | 2004-07-20 | Abb Patent Gmbh | Method and device for determining leaks at the seal of a valve |
US20040158419A1 (en) * | 2003-02-10 | 2004-08-12 | Flow International Corporation | Apparatus and method for detecting malfunctions in high-pressure fluid pumps |
US7082758B2 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2006-08-01 | Komatsu, Ltd. | Hydraulic machine, system for monitoring health of hydraulic machine, and method thereof |
US7204138B2 (en) * | 2003-07-28 | 2007-04-17 | Caterpillar Inc | Hydraulic system health indicator |
US20080060509A1 (en) * | 2005-04-22 | 2008-03-13 | Bernd Beuth | Drive Device Comprising a Position Controller |
US20130294937A1 (en) * | 2012-04-20 | 2013-11-07 | General Electric Company | System and method for a compressor |
Family Cites Families (44)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS58193914A (en) | 1982-04-09 | 1983-11-11 | Hitachi Constr Mach Co Ltd | Trouble preindicating device for hydraulic system |
SU1267070A1 (en) * | 1984-06-29 | 1986-10-30 | Киргизский Ордена "Знак Почета" Сельскохозяйственный Институт Им.К.И.Скрябина | Method for diagnosis of hydraulic drive technical condition |
US4571994A (en) | 1984-08-06 | 1986-02-25 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Acoustical testing of hydraulic actuators |
JPS6155405A (en) * | 1984-08-28 | 1986-03-19 | Hitachi Constr Mach Co Ltd | Internal leakage detecting system for hydraulic cylinder |
SU1506184A1 (en) * | 1986-04-21 | 1989-09-07 | Киевский Автомобильно-Дорожный Институт Им.60-Летия Великой Октябрьской Социалистической Революции | Method and apparatus for diagnosis of hydraulic circuit |
SU1590708A1 (en) * | 1988-06-21 | 1990-09-07 | Предприятие П/Я А-7179 | Diagnosis method |
JPH02220705A (en) | 1989-02-22 | 1990-09-03 | Kawasaki Steel Corp | Equipment diagnostic method for hydraulic screw down device of rolling mill |
US5424941A (en) | 1991-08-02 | 1995-06-13 | Mosier Industries, Inc. | Apparatus and method for positioning a pneumatic actuator |
DE4218320A1 (en) | 1992-06-03 | 1993-12-09 | Siemens Ag | Method and device for testing a valve driven by a medium |
DE4319022A1 (en) | 1993-06-01 | 1994-12-08 | Mannesmann Ag | Method for operating a pressure medium-operated positioning or gripping or clamping tool |
JP2595450B2 (en) * | 1993-09-08 | 1997-04-02 | 日精樹脂工業株式会社 | Method and apparatus for detecting abnormality of hydraulic system in molding machine |
JP2657352B2 (en) * | 1993-09-08 | 1997-09-24 | 日精樹脂工業株式会社 | Pressure detection method and apparatus for injection molding machine |
US5563351A (en) | 1994-03-31 | 1996-10-08 | Caterpillar Inc. | Method and apparatus for determining pump wear |
US5628229A (en) | 1994-03-31 | 1997-05-13 | Caterpillar Inc. | Method and apparatus for indicating pump efficiency |
US5566091A (en) | 1994-06-30 | 1996-10-15 | Caterpillar Inc. | Method and apparatus for machine health inference by comparing two like loaded components |
DE19628221C2 (en) | 1996-07-15 | 2000-05-31 | Festo Ag & Co | Method and device for determining operating positions of a work device |
JP3638429B2 (en) | 1998-03-20 | 2005-04-13 | イビデン株式会社 | Abnormality detection apparatus for fluid actuator system and abnormality detection method for fluid actuator system |
DE10021744A1 (en) | 2000-05-04 | 2001-11-15 | Festo Ag & Co | Device for adjusting the differential pressure in a fluid cylinder |
JP2002297237A (en) | 2001-03-30 | 2002-10-11 | Toyo Advanced Technologies Co Ltd | Failure diagnosing system and failure diagnosing program |
DE10122297C1 (en) | 2001-05-08 | 2002-06-27 | Festo Ag & Co | Hydraulic circuit and control system for moving piston and locking it in position has proximity switches measuring cylinder position and sending signals to control circuit |
US6866631B2 (en) | 2001-05-31 | 2005-03-15 | Zonare Medical Systems, Inc. | System for phase inversion ultrasonic imaging |
DE10138777A1 (en) | 2001-08-07 | 2003-02-20 | Kunze Silvia | Leak detection method for use with the pressure lines of a hydraulic or pneumatic machine, whereby pressure is measured over time and compared with stored reference pressure values to determine if a threshold is exceeded |
JP2004205022A (en) | 2002-12-24 | 2004-07-22 | Cosmo Tasen Kk | Abnormal carrying alarming and controlling device |
JP4690309B2 (en) | 2003-01-23 | 2011-06-01 | バイキング テクノロジィーズ エル.シー. | Position control system for fluid operated cylinders |
DE10303889B3 (en) | 2003-01-30 | 2004-04-08 | Bar Pneumatische Steuerungssysteme Gmbh | Diagnosis method for pneumatic setting drive using monitoring of static pressure component of working space pressure between 2 operating points of setting drive |
JP4200284B2 (en) | 2003-03-20 | 2008-12-24 | Smc株式会社 | High speed driving method and system for pressure cylinder |
US6708507B1 (en) | 2003-06-17 | 2004-03-23 | Thermo King Corporation | Temperature control apparatus and method of determining malfunction |
US7124057B2 (en) | 2003-08-19 | 2006-10-17 | Festo Corporation | Method and apparatus for diagnosing a cyclic system |
DE10355250B4 (en) | 2003-11-26 | 2005-09-01 | Festo Ag & Co. | Method for determining leaks of a pressure fluid in a pressure actuated machine using a mathematical equation relating pressure and flow volume and comparing actual values to a reference value |
NL1025801C2 (en) | 2004-03-24 | 2005-09-27 | Demolition And Recycling Equip | Method and device for determining the operating conditions under which a tool driven by a hydraulic piston / cylinder combination is operated. |
JP4457299B2 (en) | 2004-08-19 | 2010-04-28 | Smc株式会社 | Pressure control method and apparatus for air cylinder |
WO2006056214A1 (en) * | 2004-11-19 | 2006-06-01 | Festo Ag & Co | Diagnosis device for at least one pneumatic valve actuator arrangement |
WO2006099622A2 (en) | 2005-03-17 | 2006-09-21 | Rogers John T | Reciprocating pump performance prediction |
US7278262B2 (en) | 2005-06-03 | 2007-10-09 | Board Of Control Of Michigan Technological University | Control system for suppression of boom or arm oscillation |
KR100721101B1 (en) | 2005-12-15 | 2007-05-22 | 주식회사 만도 | Method for inspecting efficiency of motor-pump |
EP1860328A1 (en) | 2006-05-27 | 2007-11-28 | Asco Joucomatic GmbH | Control device for a double-acting pneumatic actuator |
DE102006030929A1 (en) | 2006-07-05 | 2008-01-10 | Stabilus Gmbh | Piston / Cylinder Unit with Diagnostic Unit |
CN201034909Y (en) | 2007-01-24 | 2008-03-12 | 贾瑞清 | On-line oil-liquid polluting automatic detection device |
WO2008125132A1 (en) | 2007-04-13 | 2008-10-23 | Norgren Gmbh | Pneumatic actuator system and method |
DE102007058251A1 (en) | 2007-12-04 | 2009-06-10 | Apv Rosista Gmbh | Device for controlling a process valve for use in food technology |
DE102008007651B3 (en) | 2008-02-06 | 2009-09-24 | Samson Aktiengesellschaft | Positioner for double acting pneumatic actuator, double acting pneumatic actuator and method for operating double acting pneumatic actuator |
DE102009030929B4 (en) | 2009-06-25 | 2016-07-28 | Carl Zeiss Ag | Probe for a coordinate measuring machine |
CN102384303B (en) * | 2010-08-31 | 2014-11-26 | 金子产业株式会社 | Cutoff valve control system |
US9128008B2 (en) | 2012-04-20 | 2015-09-08 | Kent Tabor | Actuator predictive system |
-
2013
- 2013-03-15 US US13/838,253 patent/US9128008B2/en active Active
- 2013-04-19 AU AU2013249065A patent/AU2013249065B2/en active Active
- 2013-04-19 EP EP13777637.3A patent/EP2839169B1/en active Active
- 2013-04-19 DK DK13777637.3T patent/DK2839169T3/en active
- 2013-04-19 CN CN201380032344.4A patent/CN104395615B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2013-04-19 BR BR112014026187-3A patent/BR112014026187B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2013-04-19 CA CA2871037A patent/CA2871037C/en active Active
- 2013-04-19 KR KR1020147032533A patent/KR101729822B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2013-04-19 MX MX2014012703A patent/MX355298B/en active IP Right Grant
- 2013-04-19 WO PCT/US2013/037393 patent/WO2013159008A1/en active Application Filing
- 2013-04-19 RU RU2014146622/06A patent/RU2600200C2/en active
- 2013-04-19 JP JP2015507222A patent/JP6158914B2/en active Active
- 2013-04-19 ES ES13777637T patent/ES2786076T3/en active Active
-
2014
- 2014-10-22 ZA ZA2014/07688A patent/ZA201407688B/en unknown
- 2014-10-27 IN IN2380KON2014 patent/IN2014KN02380A/en unknown
-
2015
- 2015-09-08 US US14/847,756 patent/US20160230789A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2021
- 2021-06-15 US US17/347,768 patent/US11572904B2/en active Active
-
2022
- 2022-12-22 US US18/145,248 patent/US11879484B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3362215A (en) * | 1966-02-04 | 1968-01-09 | Army Usa | Apparatus for testing seals for propellant actuated devices |
US4719792A (en) * | 1984-02-21 | 1988-01-19 | Ingemar Eriksson | Method and a device for testing the tightness of an engine |
US5694808A (en) * | 1993-11-03 | 1997-12-09 | Itt Automotive Europe Gmbh | System for testing the function of a hydraulic device |
US5471400A (en) * | 1994-05-24 | 1995-11-28 | Gas Research Institute | Method for detecting and specifying compressor cylinder leaks |
US7120523B2 (en) * | 2000-12-19 | 2006-10-10 | Caterpillar Inc. | Hydraulic cylinder life prediction |
US20020193924A1 (en) * | 2000-12-19 | 2002-12-19 | Muller Thomas P. | Hydraulic cylinder life prediction |
US6763703B2 (en) * | 2000-12-20 | 2004-07-20 | Abb Patent Gmbh | Method and device for determining leaks at the seal of a valve |
US20030146845A1 (en) * | 2002-02-07 | 2003-08-07 | Komatsu Ltd. | Failure diagnostic apparatus for hydraulic equipment |
US20040158419A1 (en) * | 2003-02-10 | 2004-08-12 | Flow International Corporation | Apparatus and method for detecting malfunctions in high-pressure fluid pumps |
US7204138B2 (en) * | 2003-07-28 | 2007-04-17 | Caterpillar Inc | Hydraulic system health indicator |
US7082758B2 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2006-08-01 | Komatsu, Ltd. | Hydraulic machine, system for monitoring health of hydraulic machine, and method thereof |
US20080060509A1 (en) * | 2005-04-22 | 2008-03-13 | Bernd Beuth | Drive Device Comprising a Position Controller |
US20130294937A1 (en) * | 2012-04-20 | 2013-11-07 | General Electric Company | System and method for a compressor |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11402297B2 (en) * | 2017-12-27 | 2022-08-02 | Sintokogio, Ltd. | Wear detection method and wear detection system for linear actuator |
WO2023014473A1 (en) * | 2021-08-06 | 2023-02-09 | Ace Controls Inc. | System to predict failures and duty life cycle in industrial shock absorbers based on pressure and temperature data |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
MX355298B (en) | 2018-04-11 |
CN104395615A (en) | 2015-03-04 |
US20230131734A1 (en) | 2023-04-27 |
RU2600200C2 (en) | 2016-10-20 |
ZA201407688B (en) | 2015-11-25 |
KR101729822B1 (en) | 2017-04-25 |
JP2015514947A (en) | 2015-05-21 |
AU2013249065B2 (en) | 2015-12-17 |
EP2839169A4 (en) | 2016-01-06 |
IN2014KN02380A (en) | 2015-05-01 |
US20210310504A1 (en) | 2021-10-07 |
CN104395615B (en) | 2018-01-09 |
BR112014026187B1 (en) | 2021-08-31 |
DK2839169T3 (en) | 2020-04-27 |
JP6158914B2 (en) | 2017-07-05 |
CA2871037C (en) | 2017-06-27 |
AU2013249065A1 (en) | 2014-11-06 |
WO2013159008A1 (en) | 2013-10-24 |
EP2839169B1 (en) | 2020-04-01 |
MX2014012703A (en) | 2015-06-03 |
KR20150018793A (en) | 2015-02-24 |
CA2871037A1 (en) | 2013-10-24 |
US11572904B2 (en) | 2023-02-07 |
EP2839169A1 (en) | 2015-02-25 |
US9128008B2 (en) | 2015-09-08 |
US11879484B2 (en) | 2024-01-23 |
BR112014026187A2 (en) | 2017-06-27 |
RU2014146622A (en) | 2016-06-10 |
US20130276516A1 (en) | 2013-10-24 |
ES2786076T3 (en) | 2020-10-08 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US11572904B2 (en) | Actuator predictive system | |
US9891135B2 (en) | Fault detection system for actuator | |
US7124057B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for diagnosing a cyclic system | |
CA2848948C (en) | Diagnostic method for detecting control valve component failure | |
CN102449569B (en) | Method for controlling a digital hydraulic controller | |
JP2008520919A (en) | Diagnostic device for at least one pneumatic valve actuator device | |
US10724914B2 (en) | Monitoring apparatus and abnormality diagnosis apparatus | |
US20230008702A1 (en) | Device and method for detecting leakage of a hydraulic cylinder | |
CN101749304A (en) | Method for diagnosing the state of wear of a valve arrangement for controlling the flow of a process medium | |
CN102348585A (en) | Method for operating a hydraulic or pneumatic system | |
JP2019100512A (en) | Operation detection device of fluid pressure actuator | |
KR101377802B1 (en) | Monitoring device for hydraulic system | |
CN110857710B (en) | Measurement of operating parameters of an actuator | |
KR102483414B1 (en) | Monitoring device for cylinder and control method thereof | |
JP2022069978A (en) | Detection method for air cylinder and detection device for air cylinder |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCV | Information on status: appeal procedure |
Free format text: NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED |
|
STCV | Information on status: appeal procedure |
Free format text: APPEAL BRIEF (OR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF) ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: EMBEDTEK, LLC, WISCONSIN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:TABOR, KENT;REEL/FRAME:050405/0069 Effective date: 20190903 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BIMBA MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ILLINOIS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:EMBEDTEK, LLC;REEL/FRAME:050748/0411 Effective date: 20190903 |
|
STCV | Information on status: appeal procedure |
Free format text: NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED |
|
STCV | Information on status: appeal procedure |
Free format text: APPEAL BRIEF (OR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF) ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
STCV | Information on status: appeal procedure |
Free format text: EXAMINER'S ANSWER TO APPEAL BRIEF MAILED |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BIMBA LLC, ILLINOIS Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:BIMBA MANUFACTURING COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:052710/0968 Effective date: 20200401 |
|
STCV | Information on status: appeal procedure |
Free format text: ON APPEAL -- AWAITING DECISION BY THE BOARD OF APPEALS |
|
STCV | Information on status: appeal procedure |
Free format text: BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION RENDERED |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- AFTER EXAMINER'S ANSWER OR BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION |