US20110295887A1 - System and method for providing a searchable database of surgical information - Google Patents
System and method for providing a searchable database of surgical information Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20110295887A1 US20110295887A1 US13/118,215 US201113118215A US2011295887A1 US 20110295887 A1 US20110295887 A1 US 20110295887A1 US 201113118215 A US201113118215 A US 201113118215A US 2011295887 A1 US2011295887 A1 US 2011295887A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- information regarding
- article
- surgical
- implant
- surgical procedure
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16H—HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
- G16H20/00—ICT specially adapted for therapies or health-improving plans, e.g. for handling prescriptions, for steering therapy or for monitoring patient compliance
- G16H20/40—ICT specially adapted for therapies or health-improving plans, e.g. for handling prescriptions, for steering therapy or for monitoring patient compliance relating to mechanical, radiation or invasive therapies, e.g. surgery, laser therapy, dialysis or acupuncture
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16H—HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
- G16H70/00—ICT specially adapted for the handling or processing of medical references
- G16H70/20—ICT specially adapted for the handling or processing of medical references relating to practices or guidelines
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S128/00—Surgery
- Y10S128/92—Computer assisted medical diagnostics
- Y10S128/922—Computer assisted medical diagnostics including image analysis
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S128/00—Surgery
- Y10S128/92—Computer assisted medical diagnostics
- Y10S128/923—Computer assisted medical diagnostics by comparison of patient data to other data
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S715/00—Data processing: presentation processing of document, operator interface processing, and screen saver display processing
- Y10S715/961—Operator interface with visual structure or function dictated by intended use
- Y10S715/965—Operator interface with visual structure or function dictated by intended use for process control and configuration
- Y10S715/966—Computer process, e.g. operation of computer
- Y10S715/968—Computer process, e.g. operation of computer interface for database querying and retrieval
Abstract
Systems and methods of creating, managing, and using a database, comprising surgical data may involve receiving input signals from a plurality of surgical data sources, the input signals being representative of surgical data associated with a plurality of patients, storing the surgical data in the database, and sending one or more output signals to one or more authorized users in response to one or more queries, the output signals being representative of one or more portions of the surgical data. Among other uses, the systems and methods may be used to improve the performance of surgical procedures, rate surgeons, train surgeons, and establish insurance rates for surgeons and patients.
Description
- Not applicable.
- This application relates to information technology in the field of surgery.
- In the field of surgery, various information technology systems are known, and a wide variety of data is collected during the course of a given surgical procedure. However, to date, the data that is collected during surgical procedures is not utilized to its full potential. Indeed, in the field of orthopedic surgery, for example, many compact disks (CDs) containing surgical data are generated and never used at all, except perhaps for archive purposes. Additionally, many types of information pertaining to a given patient's surgical procedure presently are stored only in a surgeon's brain and thus are not available for the benefit of others. Therefore, there is a need in the art for a system and method of collecting surgical data that will allow multiple surgeons, patients, hospitals, medical companies, and other users to realize the value of such information.
- Systems and methods of creating, managing, and using a database comprising, surgical data may involve receiving input signals from a plurality of surgical data sources, the input signals being representative of surgical data associated with a plurality of patients, storing the surgical data in the database, and sending one or more output signals to one or more authorized users in response to one or more queries, the output signals being representative of one or more portions of the surgical data. Among other uses, the systems and methods may be used to improve the performance of surgical procedures, rate surgeons, train surgeons, and establish insurance rates for surgeons and patients.
-
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a system for collecting and managing surgical data. -
FIG. 2 is a flowchart of a registration and download process for a client computer software application. -
FIG. 3 is a flowchart of an installation process for a client computer software application. -
FIG. 4 is a flowchart of an upload process involving extraction of surgical data from a CD and loading the surgical data onto a central computer database. -
FIG. 5 is a flowchart of a user information reading process. -
FIG. 6 is a flowchart of a surgical information parsing process. -
FIG. 7 is a flowchart of an optical character recognition process. -
FIG. 8 is a flowchart of a portion of an optical character recognition process for determining the locations of alphanumeric text in an image. -
FIG. 9 is a flowchart of a portion of an optical character recognition process for establishing bounding areas for each character of alphanumeric text in an image. -
FIG. 10 is a flowchart of a portion of an optical character recognition process for matching patterns for each character of alphanumeric text in an image with known character patterns stored in a database. -
FIG. 11 is a flowchart of a portion of an optical character recognition process for ordering the characters recognized by the process. -
FIG. 12 is a flowchart of an inventory management process. -
FIG. 13 is a flowchart of an electronic mail transmission process. -
FIG. 14 is a schematic diagram of an image of a knee containing surgical data associated with the knee. -
FIG. 15 is another view of the schematic diagram ofFIG. 14 with a portion of interest highlighted. -
FIG. 16 is a schematic diagram of the highlighted portion ofFIG. 15 . -
FIG. 17 is a schematic diagram of the highlighted portion ofFIG. 15 broken down line by line. -
FIG. 18 is a schematic diagram of the highlighted portion ofFIG. 15 with blurred text groups. -
FIG. 19 is a schematic diagram of the highlighted portion ofFIG. 15 showing bounded areas for the blurred text groups. -
FIG. 20 is a schematic diagram of the first line of text ofFIG. 16 . -
FIG. 21 is a schematic diagram of the text ofFIG. 20 showing a bounded area for each character. -
FIG. 22 is a schematic diagram of an X-axis histogram of the first character of the text ofFIG. 21 . -
FIG. 23 is a schematic diagram of a Y-axis histogram of the first character of the text ofFIG. 21 . -
FIG. 24 is a schematic diagram of a combined histogram comprising the X-axis and Y-axis histograms ofFIGS. 22 and 23 . -
FIG. 25 is a schematic diagram of a comparison of the combined histogram ofFIG. 24 to a histogram of a known character. -
FIG. 26 is a schematic diagram of a pattern matching process for the combined histogram ofFIG. 24 . -
FIG. 27 is a schematic diagram of a splitting process for the first and second characters of the text ofFIG. 21 . -
FIG. 28 is an anterior elevational view of a right knee joint in an extension position. -
FIG. 29 is a posterior elevational view of the knee joint ofFIG. 28 . -
FIG. 30 is a medial elevational view of the knee joint ofFIG. 28 in a flexion position. -
FIG. 31 is a schematic diagram showing a knee in an extension position and a flexion position to illustrate a gap differential. -
FIG. 32 is a series of computer generated models of a knee in various degrees of flexion. -
FIG. 33 is an x-ray image of a knee having a deformity. -
FIG. 34 is a series of schematic representations illustrating various motions of a knee joint. -
FIG. 35 is a computer generated image of a knee illustrating various pressure points. -
FIG. 36 is a screen shot of a search screen of a graphical user interface for performing queries of a surgical database. -
FIG. 37 is a screen shot of a search results screen generated by the graphical user interface ofFIG. 36 . -
FIG. 38 is a screen shot of a sample chat window. -
FIG. 39 is a screen shot of a sample search results summary window. -
FIG. 40 is a screen shot of a sample saved search criteria window. -
FIG. 41 is a sample email message that may be sent. -
FIG. 42 is a screen shot of a sample search comparison screen. - As used herein, the following terms should be understood to have the indicated meanings:
- When an item is introduced by “a” or “an” it should be understood to mean one or more of that item.
- “Authorized user” means a person who is permitted to access one or more portions of a database.
- “Communication” means the transmission of one or more signals from one point to another point. Communication between two objects may be direct, or it may be indirect through one or more intermediate objects.
- “Comprises” means includes but is not limited to.
- “Comprising” means including but not limited to.
- “Computer” means any programmable machine capable of executing machine-readable instructions. A computer may include but is not limited to a general purpose computer, microprocessor, computer server, digital signal processor, or a combination thereof. A computer may comprise one or more processors, which may comprise part of a single machine or multiple machines.
- “Computer program” means a list of instructions that may be executed by a computer to cause the computer to operate in a desired manner.
- “Computer readable medium” means an article of manufacture having a capacity for storing one or more computer programs, one or more pieces of data, or a combination thereof. A computer readable medium may include but is not limited to a computer memory, hard disk, memory stick, magnetic tape, floppy disk, optical disk (such as a CD or DVD), zip drive, or combination thereof.
- “Data” means information.
- “Database” means a collection of data embodied in at least one computer readable medium and organized in a suitable way to permit a computer to select one or more desired pieces of such data.
- “Derived data” means information generated or obtained as a result of performing one or more operations using one or more pieces of raw data.
- “Having” means including but not limited to.
- “Optical character recognition” means identification of recorded characters by a machine using light-sensitive detectors.
- “Patient” means a human being or an animal on which a surgical procedure has been performed or is to be performed.
- “Plurality” means two or more.
- “Query” means a request for information from a database.
- “Raw data” means information in its originally acquired form.
- “Signal” means a detectable physical phenomenon that is capable of conveying information. A signal may include but is not limited to an electrical signal, an electromagnetic signal, an optical signal, an acoustic signal, or a combination thereof.
- “Surgical data” means information related to a surgical procedure performed or to be performed on a patient. By way of example, surgical data may include but is not limited to information regarding the patient, such as the patient's name, genus, species, identification number, birth date, age, height, weight, gender, heart rate, temperature, blood pressure, blood oxygen level, medical condition, medical history, diagnosis, genetic history, pre-surgery range of motion, and other characteristics of the patient; information regarding the surgical procedure, such as the type of surgery, date and time of surgery, location of surgery, duration of surgery, type of anesthesia used, time under anesthesia, blood loss, fluids injected, personnel involved, materials and equipment used, body parts operated on, sizes and materials of implants used, location and orientation of implants installed, and other treatment information; information regarding the results of the surgical procedure, such as post-surgery range of motion, pain levels, pain medication used, movement or loosening or degradation of implants, instances of repeated or additional operations, and elapsed time between operations; and any other information that may be collected in connection with the patient and the surgical procedure, whether before, during, or after the surgical procedure. Depending on the particular type of surgical data, it may be fixed or it may vary over time. Surgical data may comprise raw data, derived data, or a combination thereof. Surgical data may have any suitable form or format, such as alphanumeric text, pictorial or graphic images, audio, video, and other types of data.
- “Surgical data source” means a machine, instrument, or other device capable of collecting or generating one or more pieces of surgical data and transmitting one or more “signals representative of such one or more pieces of surgical data. By way of example, a surgical data source may include but is not limited to a computer, thermometer, heart rate sensor, blood pressure sensor, pulse oximeter, weight scale, height scale, timer, bar code scanner, fluid flow meter, x-ray machine, magnetic resonance imaging machine, acoustic imaging machine, or combination thereof. A surgical data source may receive input in any desired manner, such as by manual data entry via a keyboard, mouse, track ball, or other manual input device; by voice recognition; by one or more sensors or transducers, such as piezoelectric sensors, antennas or other electromagnetic wave detectors, acoustic sensors, light sensors, or thermocouples or other temperature sensors; or by any other desired manner.
- “Surgical procedure” means any medical undertaking in which a patient is treated for a disease or condition by one or more operative or manual procedures. A surgical procedure may or may not involve one or more incisions. If an incision is made, it may be made by any suitable means, such as a scalpel, laser beam, or other cutting or puncturing instrument, for example. By way of example, surgical procedures may include but are not limited to the following types of surgery: ear, nose, and throat; general; neurological; obstetrics/gynecology (OB/GYN); ophthalmological; orthopedic; cardiac; cranial; pulmonary; thoracic; dental; plastic; urological; and vascular.
- “Unrelated” means not affiliated with the same medical practice, hospital, laboratory, research institution, or other business entity.
- As shown in
FIG. 1 , a system for populating and managing a surgical database may have acentral computer 100 and acentral database 110. Each ofcentral computer 100 andcentral database 110 may comprise one or more units of hardware, which may or may not be located at the same geographic location.Central database 110, which may be integral to or separate fromcentral computer 100, may serve as a searchable repository for a large volume of surgical data associated with a plurality of patients P1-Pr. Central database 110 may be a relational database or any other suitable type of database. The patients for whom surgical data is collected incentral database 110 and the surgical procedures from which such surgical data is obtained may be located in a plurality of geographic locations. Before, during, and after a given surgical procedure for a given patient, various types of surgical data associated with such surgical procedure and such patient may be collected using various types of data sources D1-Dn, such as shown for patient P1. The surgical data may be transmitted from each data source D1-Dn tocentral computer 100, either directly or through one or more intermediate components, using any suitable type of signal or communication hardware or protocols, whether wired, wireless, or otherwise. For example, data sources D1-Dn may communicate signals representative of the surgical data using serial ports, parallel ports, modems, Ethernet ports, USB ports, Firewire, RS232 ports, or any other suitable types of communication ports. At a given surgical facility, one or more of the data sources D1-Dn may transmit surgical data to alocal computer 10, which in turn transmits the surgical data tocentral computer 100 via anetwork 20.Network 20 may include but is not limited to the Internet. Among other things,central computer 100 may be programmed with one or more computer programs containing instructions for receiving input signals representative of the surgical data, storing the surgical data incentral database 110, and providing access to the surgical data to, a plurality of authorized users U1-Um by sending one or more output signals to the authorized users. U1-Um in response to one or more queries, the output signals being representative of one or more portions of the surgical data.Central computer 100 may be programmed with instructions for performing one or more operations on one or more pieces of raw surgical data in order to generate one or more pieces of derived surgical data, which may be included incentral database 110 and in the output signals. In this manner, a plurality of authorized users U1-Um, which may or may not be located at the same geographic location and may or may not be related in some respect, may realize the value of the surgical data associated with a plurality of patients P1-Pr, some or all of whom may or may not have any relationship with a given authorized user.Central computer 100 may be programmed with instructions to allow or disallow each authorized user to have access to certain portions of the surgical data oncentral database 110 in order to protect the privacy of the patients P1-Pr. For example,central computer 100 may be programmed to be compliant with certain laws and regulations, such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. - One possible source of surgical data to be stored in the
central database 110 may be one or more of the authorized users U1-Um. For example, if an authorized user requests a password to be able to access thecentral database 110,central computer 100 may be programmed with instructions to require certain particular user registration data to be entered, such as doctor name, years'of experience, specialty, medical school, primary position (private practice or hospital doctor), age, address, phone number, email address, and other information concerning the user. Some or all of this user registration data may be storedin'central database 110 and automatically associated with surgical data related to that user; without the need for the user to re-enter the user registration data each time surgical data for a given surgical procedure is uploaded tocentral database 110. For example, whenever an authorized user logs on tocentral computer 100, any surgical data transmitted tocentral computer 100 may be tagged or identified with the authorized user's registration data incentral database 110. In some embodiments, authorized users may be compensated for sending or causing surgical data to be sent tocentral computer 100 for inclusion incentral database 110. For example, orthopedic implant companies or other medical companies could pay legitimate compensation to doctors each time the doctors contribute surgical data tocentral database 110. - Depending on how the
central computer 100 is programmed, authorized users may need to install a client application on their local computers in order to accesscentral database 110.FIGS. 2 and 3 illustrate one embodiment of how that may work. As shown inFIG. 2 , a user may download a client application by going to a specified web site as indicated at 202 and following links to the appropriate downloadable client application as indicated at 204. The software may ask the user whether the user is registered at 206. If yes, the software may present a login screen and the user may enter his or her user ID and password code as indicated at 212. If the user is not registered, the user may be prompted to register as indicated at 208. Once registered, the software may generate a specific user key as indicated at 210, which may initiate a client login as indicated at 212. After login, the software may retrieve the user key specific to that user as indicated in 214. Of course, other ways of establishing user authorization may be used, and a client-side application may or may not be used. - For example, and not by way of limitation, in the context of orthopedic surgery, Table 1 illustrates some types of surgical data that may be collected and
FIG. 36 illustrates asample search screen 542 of a graphical user interface that an authorized user may use in order to perform queries of thecentral database 110 to obtain information regarding knee surgeries that have been performed on a plurality of patients by a plurality of orthopedic surgeons. In this example, a variety of, search criteria may be specified, such as a range of extension gap 556-558, a range of flexion gap 560-562, a range of gap differential 564-566, types of mechanical alignment 568-572,treatment side 574,gender 576, a range, of age 578-580, a range of height 582-584, a range of weight 586-588, ananalysis type 590, types of diseases 592-594, andkeywords 596 invarious fields 598.FIGS. 28-32 illustrate various parts of a knee joint, such as a medial meniscus 502, and how the knee joins afemur 500,fibula 504, andtibia 506, as well as anextension gap 512,flexion gap 514, gap differential 516, and various degrees of flexion of a knee joint. In this example, gap differential 516 is an example of a type of derived data obtained from a calculation performed bycentral computer 100 using values forextension gap 512 andflexion gap 514, as shown inFIG. 31 . An authorized user may specify various date ranges 544-550 or may set aparticular date 552. A search query may be initiated by selecting astart button 604 or by any other desirable indication. An authorized user may save the search criteria using any suitable naming convention by selectingbutton 555. As illustrated inFIG. 40 , the saved search criteria may be populated in a saved search criteria list 630 and may be edited by an authorized user. Editing features may include but are not limited to load, delete, insert, and protocol comparisons. By selecting the compare savedsearches button 565, an authorized user may compare two or more saved searches from a comparison screen such as shown inFIG. 42 . With protocol comparisons, an authorized user may track the differences in results from two or more searches and see the differences in certain data values, for example, in terms of plus or minus differentials, percentages, or other suitable comparative measures. A user;may clear the search screen by selectingclear button 554. A user may specify a manner by which the results of a query may be sorted as indicated at 600-602. A user may open a chat window 610 (seeFIG. 38 ) by selectingbutton 545 in order to communicate with other authorized users about any surgical data of interest. Although pull down boxes, text fields, and buttons are illustrated inFIG. 36 as means for specifying various search criteria, persons of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that any suitable means for specifying search criteria may be used, including but not limited to any suitable type of graphical user interface. -
TABLE 1 1. Surgical case demographic information. a) Case number b) ID c) Surgery location d) Zip code 2. General Information. a) Date of treatment b) Time of treatment c) Operating area d) Treatment side e) Defect f) Surgeon g) Assistant 3. Patient Data a) Patient b) Patient ID 4. Registration a) Name of screen shot 5. Intra-Operative Planning (Implant Selection) a) Implant Product Line b) Implant Toolset c) Implant Component d) Implant System e) Implant Name f) Implant Size 6. Implant Fine-tuning a) Translation Shift [mm] Referenced to Resection (value) (name) Anterior (value) (name) Medial (value) (name) b) Rotation Angle [0] Referenced to Flexion (value) (name) Varus (value) (name) Internal Rotation (value) (name) Epicondyle Line (value) (name) 7. Implant Planning Referenced to a) Posterior Slope Angle [0] (Implant size) b) Varus Angle [0] (Implant size) c) Resection Low Shift [mm] (Implant size) d) Resection High Shift [mm] (Implant size) e) Internal Rotation Angle [0] (Implant size) f) Medial Shift Shift [mm] (Implant size) g) Anterior Shift Shift [mm] (Implant size) 8. Flexion Balancing a) Epi: (value in [0]) WS: (value in [0]) Post: (value in [0]) b) Flexion (value in [0]) c) Ext Space: (value in [mm]) (Med) (Lat) d) Flex Space: (value in [mm]) (Med) (Lat) 9. Final Flexion Alignment a) Extension Gap (value in [mm]) b) Flexion Gap (value in [mm]) 10. Extension Balancing a) Flexion (value in [0]) b) Valgus (value, in [0]) c) Ext Space (value in [mm]) (Med) (Lat) 11. Final Extension Alignment a) Extension Gap (value in [mm]) b) Valgus (value in [0]) Preoperative Information c) Valgus (value in [0]) d) Extension (value in [0]) 12. Distal Resection Data Current Planned Deviation Varus (value in [0]) (value in [0]) (value in [0]) Flexion (value in [0]) (value in [0]) (value in [0]) Resection (value in [mm]) (value in [mm]) (value in [mm]) 13. A/P Resection Data Current Planned Deviation Internal (value in [0]) (value in [0]) (value in [0]) Rotation Anterior (value in [mm]) (value in [mm]) (value in [mm]) Shift 14. Tibia Resection Data Current Planned Deviation Valgus (value in [0]) (value in [0]) (value in [0]) Posterior (value in [0]) (value in [0]) (value in [0]) Slope Resection (value in [mm]) (value in [mm]) (value in [mm]) 15. Averaging of values for shift [mm]. 16. Averaging of values for angles [0] 17. Averaging totals for a section criteria. 18. Comparison totals from (13) 19. Deviation totals with date specific range results 20. Differential values for final alignment totals averaged from case loads - Again by way of example and not by limitation,
FIG. 37 illustrates a sample results screen 606 of a graphical user interface by which an authorized user may view the results of a search query ofcentral database 110. In this example, which again is for orthopedic knee surgeries,screen 606 depicts the results of a search performed ondatabase 110 for all instances of an extension gap in the range of zero to ten millimeters. By viewing such search results, an authorized user may glean valuable information that may be used for the benefit of many individuals and entities, including but not limited to patients, surgeons, orthopedic implant manufacturers, insurance companies, research institutions, and government agencies. For example, from the search results inFIG. 37 , an authorized user may observe various statistics concerning the relevant surgeries, such as the average extension gap, the average flexion gap, the average gap differential, and the mechanical alignment. Such average values may be calculated bycentral computer 100 and displayed for an authorized user based on the personal results of a given physician, the overall results for all physicians in the industry, or any other desirable basis. In addition to averages, any other desirable statistical values may be calculated for each type of surgical data indatabase 110, such as means, medians, standard deviations, and other values. In this example,screen 606 also shows specific values for various parameters of the relevant surgeries, such as final alignment (valgus and varus), final gap differential, final flexion gap, beginning flexion angle, and beginning extension angle. In some embodiments,'a hyperlink may be provided for each relevant surgery so that an authorized user may pull up further information associated with a given surgery. - Persons of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that results of queries of surgical data as described herein may be used as a basis for clinical diagnostic and therapeutic decisions. For example, and not by way of limitation, the surgical data may be used to determine whether a particular surgical procedure should be performed on a given patient, and if so, which materials and equipment should be used and how they should be used. Such clinical diagnostic and therapeutic decisions may be carried out personally by an attending physician, or they may be carried out automatically by
central computer 100 based on statistical data from which best practices are derived. For example, an orthopedic surgeon may utilize certain values of the surgical data to determine placement of a knee implant. Certain values of the surgical data may relate to placement of the knee implant in spatial relation to the anatomy of the particular patient's knee, and after placement, the relative distances and angles between the implant and various portions of the anatomy of the knee. A surgeon may use these values to plan the surgery and to make decisions as to what values to use for each individual knee surgery. Historically, these decisions have been made subjectively by the attending surgeon based on that surgeon's prior experience with a certain implant, or a certain type of patient with a particular medical history, or other relevant considerations known only to the particular surgeon. By contrast, embodiments of the systems and methods described herein are able to collect these values and make them available for statistical analysis to be used not only by the attending surgeon but by other surgeons and other authorized users. - For example, before a given surgical procedure on a particular patient, a surgeon may query the
central database 110 to discover the average or most successful values used by other surgeons on patients having similar characteristics as the particular patient. The surgeon would then be able, to use that data to establish appropriate goal values for various parameters of the surgery at issue, such as extension gap, flexion gap, gap differential, and extension balancing, for example. These goal values would be more useful than the surgeon's subjective decision as to what those values ought to be because the goal values would be a result of an analysis of a large number of patients who were treated by a large number of different physicians, and optimized values could be established based on confirmed successful operations over a long period of time. Among Other benefits, this would allow a less senior surgeon to learn from the experiences of more senior surgeons by allowing access to the senior surgeons' operational results for other patients with similar characteristics. It would also allow a surgeon to determine what values are best for a particular type of implant, as the different sizes and compositions of implants may result in a different goal value to get a good'surgical result. - Other examples of how such surgical data from
database 110 maybe used to improve the practice of surgery are illustrated inFIGS. 33-35 .FIG. 33 illustrates adeformity 518 in a knee joint. By performing searches of other similar surgeries performed on patients with similar deformities and learning from the, successes and failures involved, a surgeon may treat a particular deformity in a given patient in a superior manner. Surgical data fromdatabase 110 may also be used to identify optimum pressure distributions on orthopedic implant surfaces. For example,FIG. 34 illustrates various leg positions for evaluating the pressure gradients on knee implant surfaces throughout the range of motion, andFIG. 35 shows various areas of interest for achieving uniform and minimal distribution of pressure in the polyethylene material of the tibial plateau. The even distribution of a minimal amount of pressure compatible with joint stability may help to minimize wear on the joint. By performing searches ondatabase 110 and viewing the results of other surgeries performed on other patients with the same or similar implants, a surgeon may install an implant in a given patient in an optimal manner so as to achieve a desired distribution of pressure in the joint. -
Central computer 100 may be programmed with instructions comprising a reporting module for reporting results of queries to authorized users in a variety of ways. For example, results of queries may be printed, downloaded, or displayed on a suitable display, which may be fixed or mobile. By way of example and not by limitation, an authorized user may send data resulting from certain search criteria to a designated email account, as illustrated inFIG. 13 . This email account may belong to the authorized user or another designated person. As shown inFIG. 39 , which depicts asummary search screen 620, the email sent may contain a summary of all the data associated with a given search in plain text or any other desired format, such as shown inFIG. 41 , for example. This format may be sent to any desired device, such as a personal computer (PC), mobile PC, blackberry, personal digital assistant (PDA), or cell phone that can receive text messaging or other mobile electronic device, which an authorized user may take to any desired location. Fromsummary search screen 620, a user may also email, save, refine, or define a new search by selectingbuttons FIG. 38 ) for correspondence with other authorized users currently logged into the system by selectingbutton 545. Thechat window 610, which could also be used for audio and video streaming, may be useful for physician training purposes. Thus, for example, a surgeon may view desired surgical data in preparation, for a surgical procedure in advance while away from the surgeon's office or the operating room. Reporting of various search results may be automated based on predefined queries that may be executed periodically. - As mentioned above, one type of information that may be gathered during a surgical procedure is the product information of a medical implant used for a particular procedure. For example, and not by way of limitation, in connection with a knee replacement surgical procedure, all the relevant information about the replacement parts could be captured, such as product name, identification number, manufacturer, size, material, fasteners, installation tools used, and the like. This product information may be captured in any suitable manner, such as scanning with a bar code reader, reading a smart chip, or manually entering such information. The product information may be transmitted to the
central computer 100 to be stored in thecentral database 110. Additionally or alternatively, such product information may be sent to a designated recipient, such as an implant manufacturer or hospital. The product information and other relevant surgical data may be used to generate and send an appropriate invoice to the applicable party or parties, either immediately or at a specified time. This feature enables the appropriate parties, such as physicians, hospitals, and manufacturers, to be paid sooner than is customary under presently available practices. The product information may also be used to implement a real-time or near real-time inventory process to notify the product manufacturer or other designated party that the particular product has been used. In turn, the manufacturer, hospital, or other relevant party may use that information to order or ship more products based on the knowledge of the identities and quantities of the products that have been used. An inventory management process is illustrated inFIG. 12 . - In addition to the clinical diagnostic utility as described above, namely, assisting surgeons in their decisions with respect to surgical procedures, the ability of
central computer 100 to perform statistical analysis on the surgical data incentral database 110 could also be applied to evaluating surgeon performance, evaluating product performance, establishing surgical practitioner liability insurance, establishing patient medical insurance coverage and rates, and other applications. For example, the performance of doctors may be compared based on various statistics produced bycomputer 100 using the surgical data fromdatabase 110, such as the average amount of blood loss during surgery, the incidence of the need for repeat or additional surgery, or the variance of certain measurements from accepted norms, such as final extension gap, flexion gap, or gap differential. Using that information, insurance companies may make business decisions to increase or decrease the premium of a doctor or deny coverage for a doctor, depending on the level of risk indicated. A doctor's employer could make decisions regarding training requirements based on the doctor's performance as indicated by the statistical data. A medical implant manufacturer may use those statistics to determine that a particular doctor is the most successful surgeon with the medical implant manufacturer's products and therefore hire the doctor to train other doctors on a certain implant. A medical insurance provider could utilize the surgical data made available by thedatabase 110 to determine relative coverage of a patient group based on pre-existing conditions and risks. A surgeon could use the same information to make medical decisions on whether a particular patient group is a good candidate for a given procedure, such as knee replacement surgery, or predict likely outcomes of such surgery. Finally, a medical implant manufacturer could make marketing and business decisions by utilizing thedatabase 110 to determine the success of its implants as compared to a competitor's implant and as compared to the average value between allmedical implants 308. Medical implant manufacturers would also have just in time (JIT) inventory figures for faster clearing and accounting of implant devices and accessories that are placed in hospital operating rooms and not yet paid for. This advantage would not only give the manufacturers faster clearing and accounting for faster payment but also the ability to bring new implant designs and improvements to the market faster. - Optical Character Recognition
- In one embodiment, as illustrated in
FIGS. 4-11 and 14-27, an optical character recognition process may be used to collect surgical data from electronic images that have been generated by certain equipment, such as computer assisted surgical systems, and stored on any of a number of types of media, such as CDs or DVDs, for example, as follows: - Step 1: Open Image File. Load image file as a resource into memory. Deliver image resource to image editing and text recognition object.
- Step 2: Crop Image. There are potentially at least two areas of interest on the original images, namely,
graphics area 450 andtext area 452 as shown inFIGS. 14-16 . These areas may be pre-defined and the crop coordinates may be coded into the object. For the purposes of this illustration, we will use thetext area 452 of interest at the right of this example. - Step 3: Run Threshold Filter. The threshold filter ignores color information, essentially treating the image as grayscale, and it takes areas of light grey and makes them white and areas of ark grey and makes them black, bringing the image down to duotone.
- Step 4: Bound Rows. Working along the Y-axis (vertically from the top to the bottom) of the image, each pixel along the X-axis (horizontally) is sampled. White pixels are ignored, but if a black pixel is encountered, the Y value is saved as the top of a new row. When the application encounters an entire row of white, the Y value is saved as the end of that row. This process is repeated along the Y-axis until the bottom of the image is reached and all rows are delineated as shown in
FIG. 17 . - Step 5: Blur Image. Once rows are established, the image is then temporarily blurred horizontally. This is done so all letters and words that are grouped together become fused as shown in
FIG. 18 . - Step 6: Bound Areas. As shown in
FIG. 19 , taking each row in turn, the application works along the X-axis (horizontally from left to right) sampling each pixel along the Y-axis (top to bottom). White pixels are ignored, but if a black pixel is encountered, the X value is saved as the left side of anew area 454; the top of the current row is saved as the top of the current area. When the application encounters an entire vertical column of white, the X value is saved as right side of an area and the bottom of the current row is saved as the bottom of the area. This process is repeated until the application reaches the end of the X-axis, then the application moves to the next row and begins this process again and again until the final row at the bottom of the image is completed. In this example, the resulting text areas are denoted by dotted vertical lines. - Step 7: Analyze Areas. The original pixel data for each area is in turn fed back into the application. Steps 1-6 are repeated for each area. In the event that the area in question has multiple rows, this process is repeated recursively until the area being examined has a single row contained within it as shown in
FIG. 20 . - Step 8: Isolate letters. Once the application has boiled each area down to a single row, the threshold filter (
detailed step 3 above) is run, as is the bound areas function (detail step 6 above). Each letter is now it's own area as shown inFIG. 21 . The following steps are repeated for each letter. - Step 9: Set to a uniform size. Each letter is then set to a uniform size for interpretation (20 pixels wide by 20 pixels high, for example). The appropriate size of the letter may be determined by a mathematical algorithm which takes into, account whether or not the area in question has lowercase letters that pierce the bottom of a line (for example, p's and q's). The original pixel data for the letter is then appropriately, resized—and resampled—and copied onto a 20×20 image. The threshold filter (
Step 3 above) is run on the letter. - Step 10: Create X-Axis Histogram. The application uses statistical analysis to compare images to its database of alphanumeric characters. The
X-axis histogram 468 is created by ignoring Y-axis information for the image. This is done by moving along the X-axis from left to right counting the number of black pixels in each column, as shown inFIG. 22 for the letter B (indicated by reference number 466). This image as shown inFIG. 22 is created solely for the purposes of visualization of the histogram concept; it is not required in practice. - Step 11: Create Y-Axis. Histogram. The Y-
axis histogram 470 is created by ignoring X-axis information for the image. This is done by moving along the Y-axis from top to bottom counting the number of black pixels in each row, as shown inFIG. 23 for the letter B (indicated by reference number 466). Once again, this image as shown inFIG. 23 is created solely for the purposes of visualization of the histogram concept; it is not required in practice. - Step 12: Combine Histograms. The two
histograms 468 and 470 (X-axis and Y-axis) are combined into a 40-dimensional array (based on the 20×20 image size selected) as shown inFIG. 24 . Of course, other dimensions could be used, depending on the desired degree of resolution. Again, this image is created solely for the purposes of visualization. - Step 13: Compare to Database. The application's database (housed in MySQL or another suitable database application, for example) is queried looking for any approved entries that resemble the 40-dimensional array (see more information on approving database entries in Step 16 below). A 4-pixel margin may be added and subtracted to each column of the histogram that contains values and each column may be shifted both right and left by one pixel to accommodate any small shifts in the positioning of the character on the uniform image. Columns with 0-pixels are not assigned any margin, however columns with 0-pixels that are directly to the left of columns that do contain pixels may be ignored entirely. This may be done to ensure that 0-pixel columns factor into the statement, while also allowing for some variance with respect to placement of the character along the X, Y axis. In the image 472 shown in
FIG. 25 , we see the range of pixels that are being searched for in this example. Ignored columns are so indicated inFIG. 25 . If a match is found, go to Step 14. If no match is found and this is not a split-image, go to Step 15. If no match is found and this is not a split-image, go to Step 16. Once again, this image is created solely for the purposes of visualization. - Step 14: Pattern Matching Algorithm. The broad MySQL (or other database application) statement will pull a number of entries from the database, some more accurate than others. At this point, another algorithm is run to see which database entry most closely matches the current character. As illustrated by
images FIG. 26 , one method for matching is to compare the deviation in the number of pixels in each row of the image and the database entry. The application also subtracts the number of black, pixels in the image from the number of coordinates in the database histogram/2. In both the deviation and pixel comparison results, the closer to zero, the better the match. The following distance formula may be used to determine the best match: -
distance=square root((a11 +a12)2+(a21 +a22)2+(a 3 1 +a32)2+ . . . +(a401 +a402)2) - Go to Step 17.
- Step 15: Split image and find matches. In some instances, as shown for example in
FIG. 27 , letters and numbers are close together and thus may be interpreted as a single character by the application when bounding the letters (seeStep 8 above). Working back and forth from the horizontal center of the image, split the image and repeat Steps 9-14 for halves of the image. Repeat this process until either a match is, found for both sides of the split image, or until the right or left side of the image is reached. If there's a match for both sides of the image, go toStep 17. If not, go to Step 16. - Step 16: Add to Training Data Queue. If there is no match for the character in question, add the character's information and histogram into the database and set it to unapproved. Record the character's unique database ID number and embed it into a special character that is to be returned as output. Go to Step 17. The training data queue is comprised of unapproved characters. By being able to add to the training data, the application will always get better at interpreting data and can accommodate future changes, such as changing the font face. A user can go to the training data administration page and input the correct alphanumeric character. Once the character is entered, set the character to approved status in the database. If the special character that was previously returned by this application has been stored in the database, switch out the special character for the one entered by the user. Some embodiments may include an option to email an administrator when a: new character has been entered.
- Step 17: Return output. Once the best match has been determined (Step 14) or a special database identifier established (Step 16), return this text information to the larger application for interpretation, viewing and/or storage in the database.
- Certain embodiments of computer programs directed to the foregoing processes are shown in the attached Appendix, which is incorporated herein by reference. All of the methods disclosed herein may be performed, in whole or in part, by one or more computer programs embodied in one or more computer readable, mediums.
- Although the foregoing specific details describe certain embodiments of this invention, persons reasonably skilled in the art will recognize that various changes may be made in the details of this invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims and considering the doctrine of equivalents. Therefore, it should be understood that this invention is not to be limited to the specific details shown and described herein.
Claims (20)
1-33. (canceled)
34. An article of manufacture comprising a computer program embodied in a computer readable medium comprising computer-executable instructions for:
receiving surgical data via a computer, said surgical data associated with an orthopedic surgical procedure performed on each of a plurality of patients by a plurality of surgeons;
said surgical data comprising, for each of said plurality of patients, information regarding said surgical procedure and information regarding results of said surgical procedure;
said information regarding said surgical procedure comprising, for each of said plurality of patients, information regarding one or more patient characteristics and information regarding an implant used in said surgical procedure;
said information regarding results of said surgical procedure comprising information regarding at least one of range of motion, pain level, pain medication used, movement of implant, loosening of implant, degradation of implant, instances of repeated or additional operations, and elapsed time between operations;
storing said surgical data in a computer-searchable database;
receiving a query from an authorized user via a computer,
said query comprising one or more criteria associated with at least one of patient characteristics, implant information, and surgical results,
said authorized user having no relationship with at least some of said plurality of patients; and
sending a search result to said authorized user via a computer in response to said query,
said search result comprising a portion of said surgical data that meets said one or more criteria or a statistic of said portion,
said search result being configured to protect the privacy of said at least some of said plurality of patients with respect to said authorized user.
35. The article of claim 34 wherein said information regarding said surgical procedure comprises information regarding a location or orientation of said implant with respect to an anatomy of each of said plurality of patients.
36. The article of claim 34 wherein said information regarding said surgical procedure comprises information regarding a resection.
37. The article of claim 34 wherein said information regarding said surgical procedure comprises information regarding a size of said implant.
38. The article of claim 34 wherein said information regarding said surgical procedure comprises information regarding a material of said implant.
39. The article of claim 34 wherein said information regarding said surgical procedure comprises information regarding pressure on a surface of said implant.
40. The article of claim 34 wherein said information regarding said surgical procedure comprises information regarding a pressure distribution on a surface of said implant.
41. The article of claim 40 wherein said instructions further comprise:
computing an optimum pressure distribution on said surface of said implant based on said surgical data.
42. The article of claim 34 wherein said receiving surgical data comprises receiving surgical data from each of a plurality of authorized users, and wherein said instructions further comprise:
associating said surgical data in said database with respective ones of said plurality of authorized users.
43. The article of claim 34 wherein said receiving surgical data comprises receiving surgical data generated by one or more sensors or transducers.
44. The article of claim 43 wherein said one or more sensors or transducers comprises a piezoelectric sensor.
45. The article of claim 34 wherein said query comprises a predefined query that is executed periodically.
46. The article of claim 34 wherein said search result is comparative of two or more searches.
47. The article of claim 34 wherein said one or more patient characteristics are selected from patient's name, genus, species, identification number, birth date, age, height, weight, gender, heart rate, temperature, blood pressure, blood oxygen level, medical condition, medical history, diagnosis, genetic history, and pre-surgery range of motion.
48. The article of claim 34 wherein said search result comprises at least one of said one or more patient characteristics and at least one of said results of said surgical procedure.
49. The article of claim 34 wherein said search result comprises at least one of said information regarding said implant and at least one of said results of said surgical procedure.
50. The article of claim 34 wherein said search result comprises at least one of said results of said surgical procedure associated with a selected one of said plurality of surgeons.
51. The article of claim 34 wherein said search result comprises a statistic of at least one of said results of said surgical procedure associated with a selected one of said plurality of surgeons.
52. The article of claim 34 wherein said search result comprises a statistic of at least one of said results of said surgical procedure associated with said plurality of surgeons.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US13/118,215 US20110295887A1 (en) | 2006-07-17 | 2011-05-27 | System and method for providing a searchable database of surgical information |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/458,069 US7953612B1 (en) | 2006-07-17 | 2006-07-17 | System and method for providing a searchable database of surgical information |
US13/118,215 US20110295887A1 (en) | 2006-07-17 | 2011-05-27 | System and method for providing a searchable database of surgical information |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/458,069 Continuation US7953612B1 (en) | 2006-07-17 | 2006-07-17 | System and method for providing a searchable database of surgical information |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20110295887A1 true US20110295887A1 (en) | 2011-12-01 |
Family
ID=44064144
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/458,069 Expired - Fee Related US7953612B1 (en) | 2006-07-17 | 2006-07-17 | System and method for providing a searchable database of surgical information |
US13/118,215 Abandoned US20110295887A1 (en) | 2006-07-17 | 2011-05-27 | System and method for providing a searchable database of surgical information |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/458,069 Expired - Fee Related US7953612B1 (en) | 2006-07-17 | 2006-07-17 | System and method for providing a searchable database of surgical information |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US7953612B1 (en) |
Cited By (72)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20130001121A1 (en) * | 2011-07-01 | 2013-01-03 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Backup kit for a patient-specific arthroplasty kit assembly |
US8591516B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2013-11-26 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific orthopedic instruments |
US8597365B2 (en) | 2011-08-04 | 2013-12-03 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific pelvic implants for acetabular reconstruction |
US8603180B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2013-12-10 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific acetabular alignment guides |
US8608749B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2013-12-17 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific acetabular guides and associated instruments |
US8632547B2 (en) | 2010-02-26 | 2014-01-21 | Biomet Sports Medicine, Llc | Patient-specific osteotomy devices and methods |
US8668700B2 (en) | 2011-04-29 | 2014-03-11 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific convertible guides |
US8715289B2 (en) | 2011-04-15 | 2014-05-06 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific numerically controlled instrument |
US8764760B2 (en) | 2011-07-01 | 2014-07-01 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific bone-cutting guidance instruments and methods |
US8828087B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2014-09-09 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific high tibia osteotomy |
US8858561B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2014-10-14 | Blomet Manufacturing, LLC | Patient-specific alignment guide |
US8864769B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2014-10-21 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Alignment guides with patient-specific anchoring elements |
US8900244B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2014-12-02 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific acetabular guide and method |
US8903530B2 (en) | 2011-06-06 | 2014-12-02 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Pre-operative planning and manufacturing method for orthopedic procedure |
US8956364B2 (en) | 2011-04-29 | 2015-02-17 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific partial knee guides and other instruments |
US8979936B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2015-03-17 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-modified implant |
US9005297B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2015-04-14 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific elbow guides and associated methods |
US9060788B2 (en) | 2012-12-11 | 2015-06-23 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific acetabular guide for anterior approach |
US9063904B2 (en) | 2011-02-28 | 2015-06-23 | Red Hat, Inc. | De-populating cloud data store |
US9066734B2 (en) | 2011-08-31 | 2015-06-30 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific sacroiliac guides and associated methods |
US9084618B2 (en) | 2011-06-13 | 2015-07-21 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Drill guides for confirming alignment of patient-specific alignment guides |
US9113971B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2015-08-25 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Femoral acetabular impingement guide |
US9173661B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2015-11-03 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient specific alignment guide with cutting surface and laser indicator |
US9204977B2 (en) | 2012-12-11 | 2015-12-08 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific acetabular guide for anterior approach |
US20150379218A1 (en) * | 2013-09-12 | 2015-12-31 | Abbott Medical Optics Inc. | Computer-based operating room support system |
US9237950B2 (en) | 2012-02-02 | 2016-01-19 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Implant with patient-specific porous structure |
US9241745B2 (en) | 2011-03-07 | 2016-01-26 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific femoral version guide |
US9271744B2 (en) | 2010-09-29 | 2016-03-01 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific guide for partial acetabular socket replacement |
US9289253B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2016-03-22 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific shoulder guide |
US9295497B2 (en) | 2011-08-31 | 2016-03-29 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific sacroiliac and pedicle guides |
US9301812B2 (en) | 2011-10-27 | 2016-04-05 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Methods for patient-specific shoulder arthroplasty |
US9339278B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2016-05-17 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific acetabular guides and associated instruments |
US9345548B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2016-05-24 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific pre-operative planning |
US9351743B2 (en) | 2011-10-27 | 2016-05-31 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific glenoid guides |
US9386993B2 (en) | 2011-09-29 | 2016-07-12 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific femoroacetabular impingement instruments and methods |
US9393028B2 (en) | 2009-08-13 | 2016-07-19 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Device for the resection of bones, method for producing such a device, endoprosthesis suited for this purpose and method for producing such an endoprosthesis |
US9408616B2 (en) | 2014-05-12 | 2016-08-09 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Humeral cut guide |
US9445907B2 (en) | 2011-03-07 | 2016-09-20 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific tools and implants |
US9451973B2 (en) | 2011-10-27 | 2016-09-27 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient specific glenoid guide |
US9480490B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2016-11-01 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific guides |
US9498233B2 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2016-11-22 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc. | Universal acetabular guide and associated hardware |
US9517145B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2016-12-13 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Guide alignment system and method |
US9554910B2 (en) | 2011-10-27 | 2017-01-31 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific glenoid guide and implants |
US9561040B2 (en) | 2014-06-03 | 2017-02-07 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific glenoid depth control |
US9572590B2 (en) | 2006-10-03 | 2017-02-21 | Biomet Uk Limited | Surgical instrument |
US9579107B2 (en) | 2013-03-12 | 2017-02-28 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Multi-point fit for patient specific guide |
US9662216B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2017-05-30 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific hip joint devices |
US9795399B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2017-10-24 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific knee alignment guide and associated method |
US9820868B2 (en) | 2015-03-30 | 2017-11-21 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Method and apparatus for a pin apparatus |
US9826981B2 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2017-11-28 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Tangential fit of patient-specific guides |
US9826994B2 (en) | 2014-09-29 | 2017-11-28 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Adjustable glenoid pin insertion guide |
US9833245B2 (en) | 2014-09-29 | 2017-12-05 | Biomet Sports Medicine, Llc | Tibial tubercule osteotomy |
US9839436B2 (en) | 2014-06-03 | 2017-12-12 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific glenoid depth control |
US9839438B2 (en) | 2013-03-11 | 2017-12-12 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific glenoid guide with a reusable guide holder |
US9861387B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2018-01-09 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific knee alignment guide and associated method |
US9907659B2 (en) | 2007-04-17 | 2018-03-06 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Method and apparatus for manufacturing an implant |
US9918740B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2018-03-20 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Backup surgical instrument system and method |
US9968376B2 (en) | 2010-11-29 | 2018-05-15 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific orthopedic instruments |
US10159498B2 (en) | 2008-04-16 | 2018-12-25 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Method and apparatus for manufacturing an implant |
US10226262B2 (en) | 2015-06-25 | 2019-03-12 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific humeral guide designs |
US10278711B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2019-05-07 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific femoral guide |
US10282488B2 (en) | 2014-04-25 | 2019-05-07 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | HTO guide with optional guided ACL/PCL tunnels |
US10568647B2 (en) | 2015-06-25 | 2020-02-25 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific humeral guide designs |
US10603179B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2020-03-31 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific augments |
US10713742B1 (en) | 2014-03-12 | 2020-07-14 | II Alcides O. Pacino | Shared verification of credential records |
US10722310B2 (en) | 2017-03-13 | 2020-07-28 | Zimmer Biomet CMF and Thoracic, LLC | Virtual surgery planning system and method |
US10872684B2 (en) * | 2013-11-27 | 2020-12-22 | The Johns Hopkins University | System and method for medical data analysis and sharing |
US11179165B2 (en) | 2013-10-21 | 2021-11-23 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Ligament guide registration |
US20220238195A1 (en) * | 2021-01-24 | 2022-07-28 | RightDevice Inc. | System and method of processing medical implant device and patient data |
US11419618B2 (en) | 2011-10-27 | 2022-08-23 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific glenoid guides |
US11715560B2 (en) | 2013-09-12 | 2023-08-01 | Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. | Computer-based operating room support system |
US11887718B2 (en) | 2021-03-01 | 2024-01-30 | New York Society For The Relief Of The Ruptured And Crippled, Maintaining The Hospital For Special Surgery | Predicting implant size in arthroplasty using demographic variables |
Families Citing this family (20)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20100249791A1 (en) * | 2009-03-26 | 2010-09-30 | Martin Roche | System and method for orthopedic measurement and alignment |
WO2008151818A2 (en) * | 2007-06-14 | 2008-12-18 | Stichting Imec Nederland | A method of and a system for sensor signal data analysis |
US8983616B2 (en) | 2012-09-05 | 2015-03-17 | Greatbatch Ltd. | Method and system for associating patient records with pulse generators |
US10668276B2 (en) | 2012-08-31 | 2020-06-02 | Cirtec Medical Corp. | Method and system of bracketing stimulation parameters on clinician programmers |
US9180302B2 (en) | 2012-08-31 | 2015-11-10 | Greatbatch Ltd. | Touch screen finger position indicator for a spinal cord stimulation programming device |
US9507912B2 (en) | 2012-08-31 | 2016-11-29 | Nuvectra Corporation | Method and system of simulating a pulse generator on a clinician programmer |
US8868199B2 (en) | 2012-08-31 | 2014-10-21 | Greatbatch Ltd. | System and method of compressing medical maps for pulse generator or database storage |
US9471753B2 (en) | 2012-08-31 | 2016-10-18 | Nuvectra Corporation | Programming and virtual reality representation of stimulation parameter Groups |
US8812125B2 (en) | 2012-08-31 | 2014-08-19 | Greatbatch Ltd. | Systems and methods for the identification and association of medical devices |
US9259577B2 (en) | 2012-08-31 | 2016-02-16 | Greatbatch Ltd. | Method and system of quick neurostimulation electrode configuration and positioning |
US9375582B2 (en) | 2012-08-31 | 2016-06-28 | Nuvectra Corporation | Touch screen safety controls for clinician programmer |
US9594877B2 (en) | 2012-08-31 | 2017-03-14 | Nuvectra Corporation | Virtual reality representation of medical devices |
US8761897B2 (en) | 2012-08-31 | 2014-06-24 | Greatbatch Ltd. | Method and system of graphical representation of lead connector block and implantable pulse generators on a clinician programmer |
US9615788B2 (en) | 2012-08-31 | 2017-04-11 | Nuvectra Corporation | Method and system of producing 2D representations of 3D pain and stimulation maps and implant models on a clinician programmer |
US8903496B2 (en) | 2012-08-31 | 2014-12-02 | Greatbatch Ltd. | Clinician programming system and method |
US8757485B2 (en) | 2012-09-05 | 2014-06-24 | Greatbatch Ltd. | System and method for using clinician programmer and clinician programming data for inventory and manufacturing prediction and control |
US9767255B2 (en) | 2012-09-05 | 2017-09-19 | Nuvectra Corporation | Predefined input for clinician programmer data entry |
US11139080B2 (en) | 2017-12-20 | 2021-10-05 | OrthoScience, Inc. | System for decision management |
CA3087947A1 (en) * | 2018-01-12 | 2019-07-18 | Ieso Digital Health Limited | Methods for improving psychological therapy outcome |
EP3899978A1 (en) | 2018-12-21 | 2021-10-27 | Smith&Nephew, Inc. | Methods and systems for providing an episode of care |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5819229A (en) * | 1995-11-07 | 1998-10-06 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | Surgical assistance and monitoring system |
US20060052782A1 (en) * | 2004-06-07 | 2006-03-09 | Chad Morgan | Orthopaedic implant with sensors |
US20070005462A1 (en) * | 2005-06-06 | 2007-01-04 | Aorn Management Solutions, Inc. | Medical procedure costing system and method |
US7457804B2 (en) * | 2002-05-10 | 2008-11-25 | Medrad, Inc. | System and method for automated benchmarking for the recognition of best medical practices and products and for establishing standards for medical procedures |
US7837621B2 (en) * | 2000-04-07 | 2010-11-23 | Carnegie Mellon University | Computer-aided bone distraction |
Family Cites Families (76)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4058833A (en) | 1974-12-31 | 1977-11-15 | Picker Corporation | Radiation imaging apparatus and method |
US4058832A (en) | 1976-03-05 | 1977-11-15 | Picker Corporation | Display for television imaging system |
US4165520A (en) | 1977-10-17 | 1979-08-21 | Xerox Corporation | Video hard copy controller |
JPS54111215A (en) | 1978-02-21 | 1979-08-31 | Sony Corp | Converter of video signals |
US4196447A (en) | 1978-04-17 | 1980-04-01 | Arvin Industries, Inc. | Facsimile to video converter |
US4491873A (en) | 1980-12-03 | 1985-01-01 | Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd. | Common controlled facsimile system |
JPS57174290A (en) | 1981-04-21 | 1982-10-26 | Canon Inc | Conversation apparatus |
GB2102605B (en) | 1981-05-29 | 1985-12-04 | Sharp Kk | Information retrieval |
JPS58175183A (en) | 1982-04-02 | 1983-10-14 | Toshiba Corp | Picture information file device |
JPS58218004A (en) | 1982-06-10 | 1983-12-19 | Fuji Photo Film Co Ltd | Sound recording system of electronic still camera |
US4724495A (en) | 1982-11-15 | 1988-02-09 | Hedberg David J | Digital formatter, controller, and head assembly for video disk recording system, and method |
JPS5995645A (en) | 1982-11-24 | 1984-06-01 | Toshiba Corp | Information arranging device |
US4598369A (en) | 1983-05-02 | 1986-07-01 | Picker International, Inc. | Tomography apparatus and method |
JPS59229709A (en) | 1983-06-10 | 1984-12-24 | Toshiba Corp | Picture information recorder |
US4571700A (en) | 1983-06-16 | 1986-02-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Page indexing system for accessing sequentially stored data representing a multi-page document |
JPS603056A (en) | 1983-06-21 | 1985-01-09 | Toshiba Corp | Information rearranging device |
JPS6047564A (en) | 1983-08-26 | 1985-03-14 | Toshiba Corp | Storing and retrieving device for image information |
US4658299A (en) | 1983-10-12 | 1987-04-14 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Image processing system |
JPS6084672A (en) | 1983-10-17 | 1985-05-14 | Canon Inc | Image processing system |
US4695895A (en) | 1983-11-02 | 1987-09-22 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Image processing system |
US4563701A (en) | 1983-11-14 | 1986-01-07 | Elscint Ltd. | Digital diagnostic imaging system |
US4910609A (en) | 1984-06-07 | 1990-03-20 | Raytel Systems Corporation | Teleradiology system |
US4674064A (en) | 1984-08-06 | 1987-06-16 | General Electric Company | Selectable bit length serial-to-parallel converter |
US4695975A (en) | 1984-10-23 | 1987-09-22 | Profit Technology, Inc. | Multi-image communications system |
US4817050A (en) | 1985-11-22 | 1989-03-28 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Database system |
JPH0785248B2 (en) | 1986-03-14 | 1995-09-13 | 株式会社東芝 | Data Isle System |
JPS636672A (en) | 1986-06-27 | 1988-01-12 | Fuji Photo Film Co Ltd | Method for storing and reproducing medical picture |
JPS63100562A (en) | 1986-10-17 | 1988-05-02 | Hitachi Ltd | File system control method |
US4764870A (en) | 1987-04-09 | 1988-08-16 | R.A.P.I.D., Inc. | System and method for remote presentation of diagnostic image information |
JPH01195568A (en) | 1988-01-29 | 1989-08-07 | Hitachi Ltd | Electronic document editing control system |
US5036315A (en) | 1988-09-06 | 1991-07-30 | Spectragraphics, Inc. | Simultaneous display of interleaved windowed video information from multiple asynchronous computers on a single video monitor |
US5179651A (en) | 1988-11-08 | 1993-01-12 | Massachusetts General Hospital | Apparatus for retrieval and processing of selected archived images for display at workstation terminals |
US5272625A (en) | 1990-05-17 | 1993-12-21 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Medical image data managing system |
US5291401A (en) | 1991-11-15 | 1994-03-01 | Telescan, Limited | Teleradiology system |
US5321520A (en) | 1992-07-20 | 1994-06-14 | Automated Medical Access Corporation | Automated high definition/resolution image storage, retrieval and transmission system |
US5504677A (en) * | 1992-10-15 | 1996-04-02 | Pollin; Robert E. | Automated payment system |
US5469353A (en) | 1993-11-26 | 1995-11-21 | Access Radiology Corp. | Radiological image interpretation apparatus and method |
JP3632705B2 (en) | 1994-08-31 | 2005-03-23 | ソニー株式会社 | Interactive image providing method, server device, providing method, user terminal, receiving method, image providing system, and image providing method |
US5949491A (en) | 1995-10-24 | 1999-09-07 | Dicomit Imaging Systems Corp. | Ultrasound image management system |
US5851186A (en) | 1996-02-27 | 1998-12-22 | Atl Ultrasound, Inc. | Ultrasonic diagnostic imaging system with universal access to diagnostic information and images |
US5715823A (en) | 1996-02-27 | 1998-02-10 | Atlantis Diagnostics International, L.L.C. | Ultrasonic diagnostic imaging system with universal access to diagnostic information and images |
US6006191A (en) | 1996-05-13 | 1999-12-21 | Dirienzo; Andrew L. | Remote access medical image exchange system and methods of operation therefor |
US5802518A (en) | 1996-06-04 | 1998-09-01 | Multex Systems, Inc. | Information delivery system and method |
US5810747A (en) | 1996-08-21 | 1998-09-22 | Interactive Remote Site Technology, Inc. | Remote site medical intervention system |
JPH1065893A (en) | 1996-08-26 | 1998-03-06 | Brother Ind Ltd | Multifunctional peripheral device and recording medium |
US6748446B2 (en) | 1996-11-29 | 2004-06-08 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Communication method and apparatus with modification of routing path by intermediate relay apparatus |
US5836877A (en) | 1997-02-24 | 1998-11-17 | Lucid Inc | System for facilitating pathological examination of a lesion in tissue |
US6157675A (en) | 1997-04-04 | 2000-12-05 | Sony Corporation | Image transmission device and image transmission method |
JP3774539B2 (en) | 1997-04-10 | 2006-05-17 | キヤノン株式会社 | COMMUNICATION DEVICE SYSTEM AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE SYSTEM CONTROL METHOD |
US5857967A (en) | 1997-07-09 | 1999-01-12 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Universally accessible healthcare devices with on the fly generation of HTML files |
US6021404A (en) | 1997-08-18 | 2000-02-01 | Moukheibir; Nabil W. | Universal computer assisted diagnosis |
US6032120A (en) | 1997-12-16 | 2000-02-29 | Acuson Corporation | Accessing stored ultrasound images and other digital medical images |
US6608930B1 (en) | 1999-08-09 | 2003-08-19 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method and system for analyzing video content using detected text in video frames |
US6937766B1 (en) | 1999-04-15 | 2005-08-30 | MATE—Media Access Technologies Ltd. | Method of indexing and searching images of text in video |
US6785410B2 (en) * | 1999-08-09 | 2004-08-31 | Wake Forest University Health Sciences | Image reporting method and system |
US6827670B1 (en) * | 1999-10-11 | 2004-12-07 | Izex Technologies, Inc. | System for medical protocol management |
US20010032246A1 (en) | 2000-01-05 | 2001-10-18 | Fardella Anthony James | Method and system for creating and sending a video e-mail |
AU2001234835A1 (en) | 2000-02-09 | 2001-08-20 | Ernest W. Kinchen | Method and system for managing patient medical records |
US20020186818A1 (en) | 2000-08-29 | 2002-12-12 | Osteonet, Inc. | System and method for building and manipulating a centralized measurement value database |
US6792401B1 (en) | 2000-10-31 | 2004-09-14 | Diamond Visionics Company | Internet-based modeling kiosk and method for fitting and selling prescription eyeglasses |
WO2002095653A2 (en) | 2001-05-18 | 2002-11-28 | Mayo Foundation For Medical Education And Research | Ultrasound laboratory information management system and method |
US20030187689A1 (en) | 2002-03-28 | 2003-10-02 | Barnes Robert D. | Method and apparatus for a single database engine driven, configurable RIS-PACS functionality |
GB2393625B (en) * | 2002-09-26 | 2004-08-18 | Internet Tech Ltd | Orthopaedic surgery planning |
US20040122705A1 (en) * | 2002-12-18 | 2004-06-24 | Sabol John M. | Multilevel integrated medical knowledge base system and method |
US7542791B2 (en) * | 2003-01-30 | 2009-06-02 | Medtronic Navigation, Inc. | Method and apparatus for preplanning a surgical procedure |
US20040230458A1 (en) | 2003-02-26 | 2004-11-18 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Cyber hospital system for providing doctors' assistances from remote sites |
US6909795B2 (en) * | 2003-06-16 | 2005-06-21 | R2 Technology, Inc. | Communicating computer-aided detection results in a standards-based medical imaging environment |
US7912528B2 (en) | 2003-06-25 | 2011-03-22 | Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. | Systems and methods for automated diagnosis and decision support for heart related diseases and conditions |
US20050192838A1 (en) | 2004-02-27 | 2005-09-01 | Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. | Systems and methods for accessing and distributing medical information |
US20050228270A1 (en) * | 2004-04-02 | 2005-10-13 | Lloyd Charles F | Method and system for geometric distortion free tracking of 3-dimensional objects from 2-dimensional measurements |
US7394946B2 (en) * | 2004-05-18 | 2008-07-01 | Agfa Healthcare | Method for automatically mapping of geometric objects in digital medical images |
DE102004027711B3 (en) | 2004-06-07 | 2006-01-26 | Siemens Ag | Method for automatic scaling control of an image, in particular a patient image |
US8098934B2 (en) | 2006-06-29 | 2012-01-17 | Google Inc. | Using extracted image text |
US8031940B2 (en) | 2006-06-29 | 2011-10-04 | Google Inc. | Recognizing text in images using ranging data |
KR101421704B1 (en) | 2006-06-29 | 2014-07-22 | 구글 인코포레이티드 | Recognizing text in images |
US7953295B2 (en) | 2006-06-29 | 2011-05-31 | Google Inc. | Enhancing text in images |
-
2006
- 2006-07-17 US US11/458,069 patent/US7953612B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2011
- 2011-05-27 US US13/118,215 patent/US20110295887A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5819229A (en) * | 1995-11-07 | 1998-10-06 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | Surgical assistance and monitoring system |
US7837621B2 (en) * | 2000-04-07 | 2010-11-23 | Carnegie Mellon University | Computer-aided bone distraction |
US7457804B2 (en) * | 2002-05-10 | 2008-11-25 | Medrad, Inc. | System and method for automated benchmarking for the recognition of best medical practices and products and for establishing standards for medical procedures |
US20060052782A1 (en) * | 2004-06-07 | 2006-03-09 | Chad Morgan | Orthopaedic implant with sensors |
US20070005462A1 (en) * | 2005-06-06 | 2007-01-04 | Aorn Management Solutions, Inc. | Medical procedure costing system and method |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
Mayo Clinic Joint Replacement Database (available at http://web.archive.org/web/ 20051216035820/http://discoverysedge.mayo.edu/scalpel_to_database/index.cfm) * |
Yew et al. "Analysis of contact mechanics in McKee-Farrar metal-on-metal hip implants." J Eng in Medicine Vol. 217.5 (2003): 333-40 (available at http://pih.sagepub.com/content/217/5/333.abstract), * |
Cited By (130)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US10603179B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2020-03-31 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific augments |
US9918740B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2018-03-20 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Backup surgical instrument system and method |
US9480490B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2016-11-01 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific guides |
US9480580B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2016-11-01 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific acetabular alignment guides |
US8608749B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2013-12-17 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific acetabular guides and associated instruments |
US9662216B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2017-05-30 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific hip joint devices |
US9173661B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2015-11-03 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient specific alignment guide with cutting surface and laser indicator |
US9662127B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2017-05-30 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific acetabular guides and associated instruments |
US11534313B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2022-12-27 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific pre-operative planning |
US8828087B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2014-09-09 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific high tibia osteotomy |
US9700329B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2017-07-11 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific orthopedic instruments |
US8864769B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2014-10-21 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Alignment guides with patient-specific anchoring elements |
US8900244B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2014-12-02 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific acetabular guide and method |
US9913734B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2018-03-13 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific acetabular alignment guides |
US9522010B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2016-12-20 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific orthopedic instruments |
US9345548B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2016-05-24 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific pre-operative planning |
US9005297B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2015-04-14 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific elbow guides and associated methods |
US10507029B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2019-12-17 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific acetabular guides and associated instruments |
US9339278B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2016-05-17 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific acetabular guides and associated instruments |
US10206695B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2019-02-19 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Femoral acetabular impingement guide |
US10743937B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2020-08-18 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Backup surgical instrument system and method |
US9113971B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2015-08-25 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Femoral acetabular impingement guide |
US8603180B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2013-12-10 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific acetabular alignment guides |
US8591516B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2013-11-26 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific orthopedic instruments |
US10278711B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2019-05-07 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific femoral guide |
US10426492B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2019-10-01 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient specific alignment guide with cutting surface and laser indicator |
US10390845B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2019-08-27 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific shoulder guide |
US9289253B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2016-03-22 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific shoulder guide |
US9539013B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2017-01-10 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific elbow guides and associated methods |
US9861387B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2018-01-09 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific knee alignment guide and associated method |
US11576689B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2023-02-14 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific knee alignment guide and associated method |
US8858561B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2014-10-14 | Blomet Manufacturing, LLC | Patient-specific alignment guide |
US9795399B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2017-10-24 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific knee alignment guide and associated method |
US8979936B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2015-03-17 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-modified implant |
US10206697B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2019-02-19 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific knee alignment guide and associated method |
US9993344B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2018-06-12 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-modified implant |
US10893879B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2021-01-19 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific knee alignment guide and associated method |
US9572590B2 (en) | 2006-10-03 | 2017-02-21 | Biomet Uk Limited | Surgical instrument |
US9907659B2 (en) | 2007-04-17 | 2018-03-06 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Method and apparatus for manufacturing an implant |
US11554019B2 (en) | 2007-04-17 | 2023-01-17 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Method and apparatus for manufacturing an implant |
US10159498B2 (en) | 2008-04-16 | 2018-12-25 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Method and apparatus for manufacturing an implant |
US10052110B2 (en) | 2009-08-13 | 2018-08-21 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Device for the resection of bones, method for producing such a device, endoprosthesis suited for this purpose and method for producing such an endoprosthesis |
US9839433B2 (en) | 2009-08-13 | 2017-12-12 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Device for the resection of bones, method for producing such a device, endoprosthesis suited for this purpose and method for producing such an endoprosthesis |
US9393028B2 (en) | 2009-08-13 | 2016-07-19 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Device for the resection of bones, method for producing such a device, endoprosthesis suited for this purpose and method for producing such an endoprosthesis |
US11324522B2 (en) | 2009-10-01 | 2022-05-10 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient specific alignment guide with cutting surface and laser indicator |
US9456833B2 (en) | 2010-02-26 | 2016-10-04 | Biomet Sports Medicine, Llc | Patient-specific osteotomy devices and methods |
US8632547B2 (en) | 2010-02-26 | 2014-01-21 | Biomet Sports Medicine, Llc | Patient-specific osteotomy devices and methods |
US10893876B2 (en) | 2010-03-05 | 2021-01-19 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Method and apparatus for manufacturing an implant |
US10098648B2 (en) | 2010-09-29 | 2018-10-16 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific guide for partial acetabular socket replacement |
US9271744B2 (en) | 2010-09-29 | 2016-03-01 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific guide for partial acetabular socket replacement |
US11234719B2 (en) | 2010-11-03 | 2022-02-01 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific shoulder guide |
US9968376B2 (en) | 2010-11-29 | 2018-05-15 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific orthopedic instruments |
US9063904B2 (en) | 2011-02-28 | 2015-06-23 | Red Hat, Inc. | De-populating cloud data store |
US9445907B2 (en) | 2011-03-07 | 2016-09-20 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific tools and implants |
US9241745B2 (en) | 2011-03-07 | 2016-01-26 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific femoral version guide |
US9743935B2 (en) | 2011-03-07 | 2017-08-29 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific femoral version guide |
US9717510B2 (en) | 2011-04-15 | 2017-08-01 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific numerically controlled instrument |
US8715289B2 (en) | 2011-04-15 | 2014-05-06 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific numerically controlled instrument |
US9743940B2 (en) | 2011-04-29 | 2017-08-29 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific partial knee guides and other instruments |
US8956364B2 (en) | 2011-04-29 | 2015-02-17 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific partial knee guides and other instruments |
US9474539B2 (en) | 2011-04-29 | 2016-10-25 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific convertible guides |
US8668700B2 (en) | 2011-04-29 | 2014-03-11 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific convertible guides |
US8903530B2 (en) | 2011-06-06 | 2014-12-02 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Pre-operative planning and manufacturing method for orthopedic procedure |
US9757238B2 (en) | 2011-06-06 | 2017-09-12 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Pre-operative planning and manufacturing method for orthopedic procedure |
US9084618B2 (en) | 2011-06-13 | 2015-07-21 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Drill guides for confirming alignment of patient-specific alignment guides |
US9687261B2 (en) | 2011-06-13 | 2017-06-27 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Drill guides for confirming alignment of patient-specific alignment guides |
US9173666B2 (en) | 2011-07-01 | 2015-11-03 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific-bone-cutting guidance instruments and methods |
US8764760B2 (en) | 2011-07-01 | 2014-07-01 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific bone-cutting guidance instruments and methods |
US9668747B2 (en) | 2011-07-01 | 2017-06-06 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific-bone-cutting guidance instruments and methods |
US20130001121A1 (en) * | 2011-07-01 | 2013-01-03 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Backup kit for a patient-specific arthroplasty kit assembly |
US11253269B2 (en) * | 2011-07-01 | 2022-02-22 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Backup kit for a patient-specific arthroplasty kit assembly |
US10492798B2 (en) * | 2011-07-01 | 2019-12-03 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Backup kit for a patient-specific arthroplasty kit assembly |
US8597365B2 (en) | 2011-08-04 | 2013-12-03 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific pelvic implants for acetabular reconstruction |
US9427320B2 (en) | 2011-08-04 | 2016-08-30 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific pelvic implants for acetabular reconstruction |
US9066734B2 (en) | 2011-08-31 | 2015-06-30 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific sacroiliac guides and associated methods |
US9295497B2 (en) | 2011-08-31 | 2016-03-29 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific sacroiliac and pedicle guides |
US9439659B2 (en) | 2011-08-31 | 2016-09-13 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific sacroiliac guides and associated methods |
US9603613B2 (en) | 2011-08-31 | 2017-03-28 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific sacroiliac guides and associated methods |
US9386993B2 (en) | 2011-09-29 | 2016-07-12 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific femoroacetabular impingement instruments and methods |
US11406398B2 (en) | 2011-09-29 | 2022-08-09 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific femoroacetabular impingement instruments and methods |
US10456205B2 (en) | 2011-09-29 | 2019-10-29 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific femoroacetabular impingement instruments and methods |
US11602360B2 (en) | 2011-10-27 | 2023-03-14 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient specific glenoid guide |
US9451973B2 (en) | 2011-10-27 | 2016-09-27 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient specific glenoid guide |
US9936962B2 (en) | 2011-10-27 | 2018-04-10 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient specific glenoid guide |
US9554910B2 (en) | 2011-10-27 | 2017-01-31 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific glenoid guide and implants |
US9351743B2 (en) | 2011-10-27 | 2016-05-31 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific glenoid guides |
US9301812B2 (en) | 2011-10-27 | 2016-04-05 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Methods for patient-specific shoulder arthroplasty |
US11298188B2 (en) | 2011-10-27 | 2022-04-12 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Methods for patient-specific shoulder arthroplasty |
US10842510B2 (en) | 2011-10-27 | 2020-11-24 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient specific glenoid guide |
US11419618B2 (en) | 2011-10-27 | 2022-08-23 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific glenoid guides |
US10426493B2 (en) | 2011-10-27 | 2019-10-01 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific glenoid guides |
US10426549B2 (en) | 2011-10-27 | 2019-10-01 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Methods for patient-specific shoulder arthroplasty |
US9237950B2 (en) | 2012-02-02 | 2016-01-19 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Implant with patient-specific porous structure |
US9827106B2 (en) | 2012-02-02 | 2017-11-28 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Implant with patient-specific porous structure |
US9060788B2 (en) | 2012-12-11 | 2015-06-23 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific acetabular guide for anterior approach |
US9597201B2 (en) | 2012-12-11 | 2017-03-21 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific acetabular guide for anterior approach |
US9204977B2 (en) | 2012-12-11 | 2015-12-08 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific acetabular guide for anterior approach |
US11617591B2 (en) | 2013-03-11 | 2023-04-04 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific glenoid guide with a reusable guide holder |
US9839438B2 (en) | 2013-03-11 | 2017-12-12 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific glenoid guide with a reusable guide holder |
US10441298B2 (en) | 2013-03-11 | 2019-10-15 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific glenoid guide with a reusable guide holder |
US9579107B2 (en) | 2013-03-12 | 2017-02-28 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Multi-point fit for patient specific guide |
US9700325B2 (en) | 2013-03-12 | 2017-07-11 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Multi-point fit for patient specific guide |
US9498233B2 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2016-11-22 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc. | Universal acetabular guide and associated hardware |
US10426491B2 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2019-10-01 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Tangential fit of patient-specific guides |
US10376270B2 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2019-08-13 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Universal acetabular guide and associated hardware |
US9826981B2 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2017-11-28 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Tangential fit of patient-specific guides |
US11191549B2 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2021-12-07 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Tangential fit of patient-specific guides |
US9517145B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2016-12-13 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Guide alignment system and method |
US11715560B2 (en) | 2013-09-12 | 2023-08-01 | Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. | Computer-based operating room support system |
US11631496B2 (en) * | 2013-09-12 | 2023-04-18 | Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. | Computer-based operating room support system |
US20150379218A1 (en) * | 2013-09-12 | 2015-12-31 | Abbott Medical Optics Inc. | Computer-based operating room support system |
US11179165B2 (en) | 2013-10-21 | 2021-11-23 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Ligament guide registration |
US10872684B2 (en) * | 2013-11-27 | 2020-12-22 | The Johns Hopkins University | System and method for medical data analysis and sharing |
US10713742B1 (en) | 2014-03-12 | 2020-07-14 | II Alcides O. Pacino | Shared verification of credential records |
US10282488B2 (en) | 2014-04-25 | 2019-05-07 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | HTO guide with optional guided ACL/PCL tunnels |
US9408616B2 (en) | 2014-05-12 | 2016-08-09 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Humeral cut guide |
US9561040B2 (en) | 2014-06-03 | 2017-02-07 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific glenoid depth control |
US9839436B2 (en) | 2014-06-03 | 2017-12-12 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific glenoid depth control |
US9826994B2 (en) | 2014-09-29 | 2017-11-28 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Adjustable glenoid pin insertion guide |
US10335162B2 (en) | 2014-09-29 | 2019-07-02 | Biomet Sports Medicine, Llc | Tibial tubercle osteotomy |
US11026699B2 (en) | 2014-09-29 | 2021-06-08 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Tibial tubercule osteotomy |
US9833245B2 (en) | 2014-09-29 | 2017-12-05 | Biomet Sports Medicine, Llc | Tibial tubercule osteotomy |
US9820868B2 (en) | 2015-03-30 | 2017-11-21 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Method and apparatus for a pin apparatus |
US10925622B2 (en) | 2015-06-25 | 2021-02-23 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific humeral guide designs |
US10226262B2 (en) | 2015-06-25 | 2019-03-12 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific humeral guide designs |
US10568647B2 (en) | 2015-06-25 | 2020-02-25 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific humeral guide designs |
US11801064B2 (en) | 2015-06-25 | 2023-10-31 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific humeral guide designs |
US10722310B2 (en) | 2017-03-13 | 2020-07-28 | Zimmer Biomet CMF and Thoracic, LLC | Virtual surgery planning system and method |
US20220238195A1 (en) * | 2021-01-24 | 2022-07-28 | RightDevice Inc. | System and method of processing medical implant device and patient data |
US11887718B2 (en) | 2021-03-01 | 2024-01-30 | New York Society For The Relief Of The Ruptured And Crippled, Maintaining The Hospital For Special Surgery | Predicting implant size in arthroplasty using demographic variables |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7953612B1 (en) | 2011-05-31 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7953612B1 (en) | System and method for providing a searchable database of surgical information | |
US20200243199A1 (en) | Methods and systems for providing an episode of care | |
JP6433668B2 (en) | Generating patient-specific orthopedic surgery plans from medical image data | |
Culliford et al. | Temporal trends in hip and knee replacement in the United Kingdom: 1991 to 2006 | |
AU2022202026A1 (en) | Graphical representation of a dynamic knee score for a knee surgery | |
Hang et al. | A clinical and roentgenographic study of Little League elbow | |
CN109754886A (en) | Therapeutic scheme intelligent generating system, method and readable storage medium storing program for executing, electronic equipment | |
US7457804B2 (en) | System and method for automated benchmarking for the recognition of best medical practices and products and for establishing standards for medical procedures | |
Inacio et al. | Sex and risk of hip implant failure: assessing total hip arthroplasty outcomes in the United States | |
Bartz et al. | Topographic matching of selected donor and recipient sites for osteochondral autografting of the articular surface of the femoral condyles | |
CN112599225A (en) | Protocol planning client for determining a protocol for use in a medical procedure | |
US20050121505A1 (en) | Patient-centric data acquisition protocol selection and identification tags therefor | |
Dreyer et al. | Lessons on data collection and curation from the NFL injury surveillance program | |
Motion Group | Patient-reported outcomes in orthopaedics | |
Tompkins et al. | Anatomic femoral tunnels in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: inside-out versus outside-in drilling | |
Norman et al. | Cortical bony thickening of the lateral intercondylar wall: the functional attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament | |
CN111128324A (en) | Preoperative visit and anesthesia evaluation information system software | |
Reintgen et al. | What outcome measures are reported in the management of acromioclavicular joint injuries? | |
Delesalle et al. | Comparative morphometry of the temporomandibular joint in brachycephalic and mesocephalic cats using multislice CT and cone beam CT | |
US20220280104A1 (en) | Applying non-real time and non-user attended algorithms to the stored non-imaging data and existing imaging data to obtain a dental diagnosis | |
Mitsutake et al. | The effect of range of motion simulated with a patient-specific three-dimensional simulation analysis on dislocation after total hip arthroplasty | |
Ha et al. | Outcomes of arthroscopic femoroplasty in patients with cam lesions: minimum 2-year follow-up | |
Thom et al. | Females are not proportionally smaller males: relationships between radius anthropometrics and their sex differences | |
Quirk | Stress fractures of the navicular | |
Surowiec et al. | Clinically relevant subregions of articular cartilage of the hip for analysis and reporting quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: a technical note |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ECOMGLOBALMEDICAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, INC., TE Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:PALMESE, NICHOLAS;JENEBY, THOMAS T.;BORNSTEIN, DAVID H.;REEL/FRAME:026380/0661 Effective date: 20070323 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |