US20110214879A1 - Tactile pressure sensing devices and methods for using same - Google Patents

Tactile pressure sensing devices and methods for using same Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20110214879A1
US20110214879A1 US13/039,063 US201113039063A US2011214879A1 US 20110214879 A1 US20110214879 A1 US 20110214879A1 US 201113039063 A US201113039063 A US 201113039063A US 2011214879 A1 US2011214879 A1 US 2011214879A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
contact face
sensor
pressure
tool
probe
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/039,063
Inventor
Rocco DiFoggio
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Baker Hughes Holdings LLC
Original Assignee
Baker Hughes Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Baker Hughes Inc filed Critical Baker Hughes Inc
Priority to US13/039,063 priority Critical patent/US20110214879A1/en
Priority to PCT/US2011/027026 priority patent/WO2011109617A2/en
Priority to BR112012022095A priority patent/BR112012022095A2/en
Priority to GB1215432.4A priority patent/GB2490839A/en
Assigned to BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED reassignment BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: DIFOGGIO, ROCCO
Publication of US20110214879A1 publication Critical patent/US20110214879A1/en
Priority to NO20120948A priority patent/NO20120948A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B47/00Survey of boreholes or wells
    • E21B47/06Measuring temperature or pressure
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B47/00Survey of boreholes or wells
    • E21B47/01Devices for supporting measuring instruments on drill bits, pipes, rods or wirelines; Protecting measuring instruments in boreholes against heat, shock, pressure or the like

Definitions

  • This disclosure pertains generally to investigations of underground formations and more particularly to systems and methods for performing one or more tasks in a borehole.
  • Modern drilling systems generally employ a drill string having a bottomhole assembly (BHA) and a drill bit at an end thereof that is rotated by a drill motor (mud motor) and/or the drill string.
  • BHA bottomhole assembly
  • a number of downhole devices placed in close proximity to the drill bit measure certain downhole operating parameters associated with the drill string. Such devices typically include sensors for measuring downhole temperature and pressure, and azimuth and inclination measuring devices.
  • Additional downhole instruments known as measurement-while-drilling (MWD) or logging-while-drilling (LWD) tools, are frequently attached to the drill string to determine formation geology and formation fluid conditions during the drilling operations.
  • completion tools may be deployed into the wellbore to perform a variety of operations. Some of these tools and devices may, during operation, engage a wellbore wall or some other reaction surface in order to execute one or more assigned tasks.
  • the present disclosure addresses the need to obtain information relating to the stability or integrity of such reaction surfaces in order to more effectively perform such tasks.
  • the present disclosure provides a method for conducting a wellbore operation in a borehole formed in an earthen formation.
  • the method may include controlling a tool in the borehole by using at least one pressure estimated at a contact between a reaction surface and a contact face associated with the tool.
  • the present disclosure provides an apparatus for conducting one or more wellbore operations.
  • the apparatus may include a carrier conveyable into a well borehole and a tool coupled to the carrier.
  • the tool may include a contact face and a sensor associated with the contact face.
  • the sensor may be configured to estimate a pressure applied to the contact face.
  • FIG. 1 shows a schematic of a downhole tool deployed in a wellbore along a wireline according to one embodiment of the present disclosure
  • FIG. 2 schematically illustrates in sectional form a portion of a probe having a contact pressure sensor made according to one embodiment according to the present disclosure
  • FIG. 3 schematically illustrates an end view of a probe having a contact pressure sensor made according to one embodiment according to the present disclosure
  • FIG. 4 schematically illustrates in sectional form one embodiment of a contact pressure sensor formed in a layer that is disposed on the probe.
  • FIG. 5 schematically illustrates one embodiment of a probe having members that can selectively move one or more segments of a contact face of the probe.
  • the present disclosure relates to devices and methods for providing enhanced operation of devices that use reaction surfaces.
  • the teachings may be advantageously applied to a variety of systems both in the oil and gas industry and elsewhere. Merely for clarity, certain non-limiting embodiments will be discussed in the context of tools configured for wellbore uses.
  • FIG. 1 schematically illustrates a wellbore system 10 deployed from a rig 12 into a borehole 14 . While a land-based rig 12 is shown, it should be understood that the present disclosure may be applicable to offshore rigs and subsea formations.
  • the wellbore system 10 may include a carrier 16 and a wellbore tool 20 .
  • the wellbore tool 20 is shown as a fluid analysis tool. It should be understood, however, that the present disclosure may be used in any situation wherein contact pressure may be used to control one or more aspects of a device or process.
  • the fluid analysis tool 20 may include a probe 22 that contacts a borehole wall 24 for extracting formation fluid from a formation 26 .
  • Extendable pads or ribs 28 may be used to laterally thrust the probe 22 against the borehole wall 24 .
  • the fluid analysis tool 20 may include a pump 30 that pumps formation fluid from formation 26 via the probe 22 . Formation fluid travels along a flow line to one or more sample containers 32 or to line 34 from which the formation fluid exits to the borehole 14 .
  • a programmable controller may be used to control one or more aspects of the operation of the tool 20 .
  • the wellbore system 10 may include a surface controller 40 and/or a downhole controller 42 .
  • the probe 22 may include a rigid support 52 on which a sealing member 54 is disposed.
  • the sealing member 54 may be formed of a material that is pliable at ambient borehole temperatures, e.g., an elastomer.
  • the probe 22 may also include a sensor 56 having a plurality of sensing elements 58 . The signals generated by the sensor 56 may be transmitted by a suitable line or signal/power carrier 60 to the controllers 40 , 42 ( FIG. 1 ) or to another device. Referring now to FIG.
  • the sensing elements 58 may be distributed at or near the contact face 50 in a manner that enables the sensing of contact pressures at several discrete points or sections around an inlet 62 of the probe 22 .
  • the number of sensing elements 58 and their positioning are selected to identify potential leak paths in the seal formed between the contact face 50 and the wellbore wall 24 . While eight sensing elements 58 are shown, it should be understood that greater or fewer number of sensing elements 58 may be employed and that the sensing elements may be arrayed in any configuration suited to measure contact pressure at multiple locations on the contact face 50 .
  • the sensing elements 58 are distributed in a grid in order to obtain a pressure distribution map of the contact face 50 .
  • the map may, in one aspect, be characterized as including multiple pressure values, with each value being associated with a unique spatial location.
  • the sensor 56 may, therefore, provide in “real-time” pressure values.
  • the output of the distributed sensing elements 58 may provide an indication of the strength, texture or stability of the borehole wall 24 in physical contact with the sealing member 46 around the inlet 62 of the probe 22 .
  • contact pressure may be generated at the contact face 50 as the ribs 28 ( FIG. 1 ) laterally displace the probe 22 . Variations in the magnitude of the contact pressures across the face 50 may be evaluated to determine whether a potential leak path may be present in the seal between the probe 22 and the borehole wall 24 .
  • a segment 69 having a contact pressure lower than adjacent segments may indicate a poor physical contact (e.g., a gap) and, therefore, a potential leak path.
  • a rugose surface which may be ill-suited for forming a seal, may include multiple high spots that generate relatively high pressures. These high pressures may cause discernable non-uniformity in a pressure distribution map.
  • the sensing elements 58 may be embedded in the sealing member 54 as shown in FIG. 2 .
  • the sensing elements 58 may be formed in a layer 64 that is disposed on the sealing member 54 .
  • the layer 64 may be positioned between the support 52 and the sealing member 54 .
  • the sensing elements 58 may be positioned in any location that enables the sensing elements 58 to obtain discrete or segmented contact pressure measurements.
  • the signals generated by the sensing elements 58 may be used to estimate the quality of the seal formed between the contact face 50 of the probe 22 and the wellbore wall 24 .
  • quality it is meant, in one aspect, the amount of a pressure differential that can be generated between the inlet 62 and the wellbore 14 without having fluids or other contaminants enter the inlet 62 from the wellbore 14 .
  • This estimation may be performed by personnel at the surface who monitor or assess the signals of the sensor 56 .
  • the sensor signals may be processed and evaluated by the surface controller 40 and/or the downhole controller 42 . A number of methodologies may be used to estimate the quality of the seal.
  • one non-limiting methodology may involve simply evaluating whether any output(s) are below a predetermined percentage of a measured maximum output (e.g., below eighty percent of a maximum reading). Another non-limiting methodology may involve determining whether adjacent sensing elements 58 generate outputs that vary more than a preset amount. Still another methodology may evaluate whether, over time, the outputs increase in an expected manner as the probe 22 is pressed against the borehole wall 24 . That is, an increasing amount of thrust that does not generate a proportionate increase in contact pressure may indicate instability in the wall. It should be understood that the listed methodologies are only illustrative and that any other evaluation method may be used.
  • the fluid sampling tool 20 is positioned adjacent a formation of interest 26 .
  • the pad 28 may be activated to thrust the probe 22 against the borehole wall 24 .
  • the controller 40 receives signals or output from the sensor 56 .
  • the wall area in contact with the probe 22 has sufficient stability to withstand the thrust applied by the probe 22 .
  • the sensing elements 58 may generate output indicating a uniform contact pressure or uniform increase in contact pressure at most or nearly all segments of the outer surface. While some variance may exist in the contact pressure distribution pattern, the controller 40 may determine that the engagement of the probe 22 to borehole wall 24 is adequately stable in order to proceed with fluid sampling.
  • tool operation in this context is controlled by continuing with the fluid sampling activity using the tool 24 .
  • the fluid sampler will only draw in drilling fluid from the wellbore instead of drawing in the intended target fluid, which is the fluid that is contained within the formation rock, such as formation crude oil or formation brine.
  • the first evidence of a good seal is a temporary drop in fluid pressure as one attempts to withdraw fluid from the formation rock. If there is no initial drop in pressure, then the tool is likely only pulling in drilling fluid from the wellbore at the wellbore fluid pressure but no formation fluid.
  • a good seal is desirable even when one is not collecting fluid samples but only measuring formation fluid pressures.
  • the drawdown process leads to an initial drop in fluid pressure followed by a buildup to a pressure close to the formation fluid pressure, which can be extrapolated to a true formation fluid pressure.
  • Fluid pressures measured by this drawdown technique at different depths are used to determine the fluid pressure gradient from which the formation fluid's density can be calculated, which is important information for the petroleum engineers that is used to determine gas-oil and oil-water contacts as well as crude oil density, which correlates to viscosity.
  • a pressure sensor array integrated into the sealing element would also show whether a portion of the sealing element has been gouged out so that the tool will never make a good seal even on a smooth wellbore in which case the operator would bring the tool back to the surface to have its sealing element replaced instead of wasting any more rig time trying to get a seal.
  • FIGS. 1 and 4 A situation where a seal may be inadequate is described with reference to FIGS. 1 and 4 .
  • the probe 22 is pressed against the borehole wall.
  • a portion of the wall may include a gap 66 , a weakened area, an uneven surface, unconsolidated material, or other seal-inhibiting feature.
  • the sensing element(s) 58 positioned adjacent to a stable surface 68 will generate output(s) indicative of contact pressure at the stable surface 68 .
  • the sensing element(s) 58 positioned adjacent to the gap 66 will read a relatively lower contact pressure because of the lack of a stable reaction surface.
  • Control of tool operation in this context may involve the controller 40 , based on the received outputs, issuing advice or instructions to terminate the fluid sampling activity. Thereafter, the tool 20 may be controlled by moving the tool 20 to another location and the process re-started.
  • the probe 22 may include one or more members 70 that are configured to apply segment-specific pressure.
  • the members 70 which act like individually controllable fingers, may be activated to increase the pressure at any location(s) where the controller 40 estimates that there is inadequate contact pressure between the elastomer and the wall of the wellbore.
  • the segment 70 proximate to the gap 66 has been activated to push a portion of the contact face 50 into engagement with the borehole wall 24 .
  • the members 70 may be driven hydraulically, electrically, pneumatically, or by some other suitable means. While the members 70 are shown as fingers that pivot about an end to apply pressure, the members 70 may also include pistons, bladders, or other devices that can depress or push a section of the probe 22 toward the borehole wall 24 .
  • the pressure distribution may be one of several factors used by personnel to control a device or conduct a given activity. That is, the contact pressure may be used in conjunction with other measured parameter to estimate a quality of a seal between the probe 22 and the wellbore wall 24 .
  • a pressure sensor 72 may be positioned to sense fluid pressure at the inlet 62 .
  • the pressure at the inlet 62 may be monitored.
  • a satisfactory seal may be indicated by a drop in fluid pressure at the inlet 62 as the pump 30 is operated. If the pressure has not dropped by an expected amount, that information, together with the pressure distribution map, may be used to estimate the quality of the probe-to-borehole wall seal.
  • one or more fluid analysis tools may analyze the fluid flowing through the inlet 62 .
  • the fluid analysis tool may be configured to detect wellbore fluids or other wellbore contaminations. Again, that information, together with the pressure distribution map, may be used to evaluate the seal between the probe 22 and the borehole wall 24 .
  • contact pressure may be processed or evaluated with other measured parameters in order to evaluate seal quality and control the fluid sampling tool 20 .
  • the pads 28 may be instrumented with sensor(s) for measuring contact pressure.
  • the pads 28 are merely illustrative of force application members that may be used in steering systems for drilling assemblies, centralizers, or stabilizers, and wellbore anchoring devices. Such information may be used to position the pads 28 , control the thrust generated by the pads 28 , or control some other aspect of the operation of the pads 28 .
  • other devices configured to engage the wellbore wall 24 such as a packer 80 , may include one or more contact pressure sensors.
  • the packers 80 are illustrative of wellbore isolation devices that may be expanded or otherwise actuated to engage a wellbore wall 24 .
  • the packers 80 may also engage surfaces associated with a wellbore tubular, such as a casing or liner (not shown).
  • a reaction surface can include surfaces associated with human-made devices as well as a borehole wall.
  • the wellbore system 10 may be a drilling system that configured to form the borehole 14 using tools such as a drill bit (not shown).
  • the carrier 16 may be a coiled tube, casing, liners, drill pipe, etc.
  • the wellbore system 10 may use a non-rigid carrier.
  • the carrier 16 may be wirelines, wireline sondes, slickline sondes, e-lines, etc.
  • carrier as used herein means any device, device component, combination of devices, media and/or member that may be used to convey, house, support, or otherwise facilitate the use of another device, device component, combination of devices, media and/or member.
  • the controller 40 , 42 may include an information processor that is in data communication with a data storage medium and a processor memory.
  • the data storage medium may be any standard computer data storage device, such as a USB drive, memory stick, hard disk, removable RAM, EPROMs, EAROMs, flash memories and optical disks, or other commonly used memory storage system known to one of ordinary skill in the art including Internet based storage.
  • the data storage medium may store one or more programs that when executed causes information processor to execute the disclosed method(s). Signals indicative of the parameter may be transmitted to a surface controller. These signals may also, or in the alternative, be stored downhole in a data storage device and may also be processed and used downhole for geosteering or for any other suitable downhole purpose. In one example, wired pipe may be used for transmitting information.
  • the present disclosure provides, in part, devices and methods for conducting a wellbore operation in a borehole formed in an earthen formation.
  • the device may include a carrier conveyable into a well borehole and a tool coupled to the carrier.
  • the tool may include a contact face and a sensor associated with the contact face.
  • the sensor may be configured to estimate a pressure applied to the contact face.
  • the method may include controlling a tool in the borehole by using at least one pressure estimated at a contact between a reaction surface and a contact face associated with the tool.
  • the pressure(s) may be estimated the at least one pressure using a sensor positioned at the contact face.
  • the senor estimates a pressure at a plurality of locations on the contact face using a plurality of sensing elements.
  • the controlling may involve adjusting a force applied to the contact face and/or moving the contact face.
  • the reaction surface may be a borehole wall.
  • the pressure data may be used to form a pressure distribution map of the contact face using the estimate pressure.
  • the method may involve drawing a fluid from the formation using a probe associated with the tool, wherein the contact face is formed on the probe.

Abstract

A device and related method for conducting a wellbore operation controls a tool by using at least one pressure estimated at a contact between a reaction surface and a contact face associated with the tool. The device may include a contact face and a sensor associated with the contact face. The sensor may be configured to estimate a pressure applied to the contact face.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/310,107 filed Mar. 3, 2010, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
  • FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE
  • This disclosure pertains generally to investigations of underground formations and more particularly to systems and methods for performing one or more tasks in a borehole.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE DISCLOSURE
  • To obtain hydrocarbons such as oil and gas, well boreholes are drilled by rotating a drill bit attached at a drill string end. Modern drilling systems generally employ a drill string having a bottomhole assembly (BHA) and a drill bit at an end thereof that is rotated by a drill motor (mud motor) and/or the drill string. A number of downhole devices placed in close proximity to the drill bit measure certain downhole operating parameters associated with the drill string. Such devices typically include sensors for measuring downhole temperature and pressure, and azimuth and inclination measuring devices. Additional downhole instruments, known as measurement-while-drilling (MWD) or logging-while-drilling (LWD) tools, are frequently attached to the drill string to determine formation geology and formation fluid conditions during the drilling operations. After the wellbore is formed, completion tools may be deployed into the wellbore to perform a variety of operations. Some of these tools and devices may, during operation, engage a wellbore wall or some other reaction surface in order to execute one or more assigned tasks.
  • In one aspect, the present disclosure addresses the need to obtain information relating to the stability or integrity of such reaction surfaces in order to more effectively perform such tasks.
  • SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE
  • In aspects, the present disclosure provides a method for conducting a wellbore operation in a borehole formed in an earthen formation. The method may include controlling a tool in the borehole by using at least one pressure estimated at a contact between a reaction surface and a contact face associated with the tool.
  • In another aspect, the present disclosure provides an apparatus for conducting one or more wellbore operations. The apparatus may include a carrier conveyable into a well borehole and a tool coupled to the carrier. The tool may include a contact face and a sensor associated with the contact face. The sensor may be configured to estimate a pressure applied to the contact face.
  • Examples of the more important features of the disclosure have been summarized rather broadly in order that the detailed description thereof that follows may be better understood and in order that the contributions they represent to the art may be appreciated.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • For a detailed understanding of the present disclosure, reference should be made to the following detailed description of the embodiments, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like elements have been given like numerals, wherein:
  • FIG. 1 shows a schematic of a downhole tool deployed in a wellbore along a wireline according to one embodiment of the present disclosure;
  • FIG. 2 schematically illustrates in sectional form a portion of a probe having a contact pressure sensor made according to one embodiment according to the present disclosure;
  • FIG. 3 schematically illustrates an end view of a probe having a contact pressure sensor made according to one embodiment according to the present disclosure;
  • FIG. 4 schematically illustrates in sectional form one embodiment of a contact pressure sensor formed in a layer that is disposed on the probe; and
  • FIG. 5 schematically illustrates one embodiment of a probe having members that can selectively move one or more segments of a contact face of the probe.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • In aspects, the present disclosure relates to devices and methods for providing enhanced operation of devices that use reaction surfaces. The teachings may be advantageously applied to a variety of systems both in the oil and gas industry and elsewhere. Merely for clarity, certain non-limiting embodiments will be discussed in the context of tools configured for wellbore uses.
  • FIG. 1 schematically illustrates a wellbore system 10 deployed from a rig 12 into a borehole 14. While a land-based rig 12 is shown, it should be understood that the present disclosure may be applicable to offshore rigs and subsea formations. The wellbore system 10 may include a carrier 16 and a wellbore tool 20. Merely for ease of discussion, the wellbore tool 20 is shown as a fluid analysis tool. It should be understood, however, that the present disclosure may be used in any situation wherein contact pressure may be used to control one or more aspects of a device or process. The fluid analysis tool 20 may include a probe 22 that contacts a borehole wall 24 for extracting formation fluid from a formation 26. Extendable pads or ribs 28 may be used to laterally thrust the probe 22 against the borehole wall 24. The fluid analysis tool 20 may include a pump 30 that pumps formation fluid from formation 26 via the probe 22. Formation fluid travels along a flow line to one or more sample containers 32 or to line 34 from which the formation fluid exits to the borehole 14. A programmable controller may be used to control one or more aspects of the operation of the tool 20. For example, the wellbore system 10 may include a surface controller 40 and/or a downhole controller 42.
  • Referring now to FIG. 2, there is sectionally shown a portion of the probe 22 having a contact face 50 in contact with the borehole wall 24. The probe 22 may include a rigid support 52 on which a sealing member 54 is disposed. The sealing member 54 may be formed of a material that is pliable at ambient borehole temperatures, e.g., an elastomer. The probe 22 may also include a sensor 56 having a plurality of sensing elements 58. The signals generated by the sensor 56 may be transmitted by a suitable line or signal/power carrier 60 to the controllers 40, 42 (FIG. 1) or to another device. Referring now to FIG. 3, the sensing elements 58 may be distributed at or near the contact face 50 in a manner that enables the sensing of contact pressures at several discrete points or sections around an inlet 62 of the probe 22. In some embodiments, the number of sensing elements 58 and their positioning are selected to identify potential leak paths in the seal formed between the contact face 50 and the wellbore wall 24. While eight sensing elements 58 are shown, it should be understood that greater or fewer number of sensing elements 58 may be employed and that the sensing elements may be arrayed in any configuration suited to measure contact pressure at multiple locations on the contact face 50. For instance, in the non-limiting embodiment shown, the sensing elements 58 are distributed in a grid in order to obtain a pressure distribution map of the contact face 50. The map may, in one aspect, be characterized as including multiple pressure values, with each value being associated with a unique spatial location. The sensor 56 may, therefore, provide in “real-time” pressure values.
  • Because the magnitude of the contact pressure is a function of the resistance offered by the borehole wall 24, i.e., the reaction surface, the output of the distributed sensing elements 58 may provide an indication of the strength, texture or stability of the borehole wall 24 in physical contact with the sealing member 46 around the inlet 62 of the probe 22. Referring now to FIGS. 2 and 3, during operation, contact pressure may be generated at the contact face 50 as the ribs 28 (FIG. 1) laterally displace the probe 22. Variations in the magnitude of the contact pressures across the face 50 may be evaluated to determine whether a potential leak path may be present in the seal between the probe 22 and the borehole wall 24. For instance, a segment 69 having a contact pressure lower than adjacent segments may indicate a poor physical contact (e.g., a gap) and, therefore, a potential leak path. In another instance, a rugose surface, which may be ill-suited for forming a seal, may include multiple high spots that generate relatively high pressures. These high pressures may cause discernable non-uniformity in a pressure distribution map.
  • In some non-limiting embodiments, the sensing elements 58 may be embedded in the sealing member 54 as shown in FIG. 2. Referring now to FIG. 4, in other non-limiting embodiments, the sensing elements 58 may be formed in a layer 64 that is disposed on the sealing member 54. In still other embodiments, the layer 64 may be positioned between the support 52 and the sealing member 54. Generally, the sensing elements 58 may be positioned in any location that enables the sensing elements 58 to obtain discrete or segmented contact pressure measurements.
  • As will be discussed in greater detail below, the signals generated by the sensing elements 58 may be used to estimate the quality of the seal formed between the contact face 50 of the probe 22 and the wellbore wall 24. By quality, it is meant, in one aspect, the amount of a pressure differential that can be generated between the inlet 62 and the wellbore 14 without having fluids or other contaminants enter the inlet 62 from the wellbore 14. This estimation may be performed by personnel at the surface who monitor or assess the signals of the sensor 56. Additionally or alternatively, the sensor signals may be processed and evaluated by the surface controller 40 and/or the downhole controller 42. A number of methodologies may be used to estimate the quality of the seal. For example, one non-limiting methodology may involve simply evaluating whether any output(s) are below a predetermined percentage of a measured maximum output (e.g., below eighty percent of a maximum reading). Another non-limiting methodology may involve determining whether adjacent sensing elements 58 generate outputs that vary more than a preset amount. Still another methodology may evaluate whether, over time, the outputs increase in an expected manner as the probe 22 is pressed against the borehole wall 24. That is, an increasing amount of thrust that does not generate a proportionate increase in contact pressure may indicate instability in the wall. It should be understood that the listed methodologies are only illustrative and that any other evaluation method may be used.
  • Illustrative modes of operation will be discussed below with reference to FIGS. 1-3. Merely for convenience, the estimation of seal quality will be described as being performed by the surface controller 40. It should be understood, however, that surface personnel and/or the downhole controller 42 may also autonomously or cooperatively perform such an estimation.
  • Referring now to FIGS. 1 and 2, in one illustrative mode of operation, the fluid sampling tool 20 is positioned adjacent a formation of interest 26. Next, the pad 28 may be activated to thrust the probe 22 against the borehole wall 24. During this time or after the probe 22 has been pressed against the borehole wall 24, the controller 40 receives signals or output from the sensor 56. As shown, the wall area in contact with the probe 22 has sufficient stability to withstand the thrust applied by the probe 22. Thus, the sensing elements 58 may generate output indicating a uniform contact pressure or uniform increase in contact pressure at most or nearly all segments of the outer surface. While some variance may exist in the contact pressure distribution pattern, the controller 40 may determine that the engagement of the probe 22 to borehole wall 24 is adequately stable in order to proceed with fluid sampling. Thus, tool operation in this context is controlled by continuing with the fluid sampling activity using the tool 24.
  • Unless a good seal is made to the wall of the wellbore, the fluid sampler will only draw in drilling fluid from the wellbore instead of drawing in the intended target fluid, which is the fluid that is contained within the formation rock, such as formation crude oil or formation brine. The first evidence of a good seal is a temporary drop in fluid pressure as one attempts to withdraw fluid from the formation rock. If there is no initial drop in pressure, then the tool is likely only pulling in drilling fluid from the wellbore at the wellbore fluid pressure but no formation fluid.
  • A good seal is desirable even when one is not collecting fluid samples but only measuring formation fluid pressures. When there is a good seal, the drawdown process leads to an initial drop in fluid pressure followed by a buildup to a pressure close to the formation fluid pressure, which can be extrapolated to a true formation fluid pressure. Fluid pressures measured by this drawdown technique at different depths are used to determine the fluid pressure gradient from which the formation fluid's density can be calculated, which is important information for the petroleum engineers that is used to determine gas-oil and oil-water contacts as well as crude oil density, which correlates to viscosity.
  • Conventionally, although one can detect that there is not a good seal, one cannot determine why there is not a good seal or what the appropriate remedy should be. One cannot decide whether to try to simply increase the total pressure on the sealing element or whether there is a valley or hill on the surface of the wellbore to which one is trying to seal, which will always prevent a good seal, in which case one should unseat the tool, relocate it to a different spot in the wellbore, and then reseat it at the new location. Also, the inadequate seal may be caused by a defect in the tool; e.g., the sealing element. A pressure sensor array integrated into the sealing element would also show whether a portion of the sealing element has been gouged out so that the tool will never make a good seal even on a smooth wellbore in which case the operator would bring the tool back to the surface to have its sealing element replaced instead of wasting any more rig time trying to get a seal.
  • A situation where a seal may be inadequate is described with reference to FIGS. 1 and 4. As shown, the probe 22 is pressed against the borehole wall. However, a portion of the wall may include a gap 66, a weakened area, an uneven surface, unconsolidated material, or other seal-inhibiting feature. The sensing element(s) 58 positioned adjacent to a stable surface 68 will generate output(s) indicative of contact pressure at the stable surface 68. The sensing element(s) 58 positioned adjacent to the gap 66, however, will read a relatively lower contact pressure because of the lack of a stable reaction surface. Control of tool operation in this context may involve the controller 40, based on the received outputs, issuing advice or instructions to terminate the fluid sampling activity. Thereafter, the tool 20 may be controlled by moving the tool 20 to another location and the process re-started.
  • Referring now to FIG. 5, in one non-limiting variant, the probe 22 may include one or more members 70 that are configured to apply segment-specific pressure. The members 70, which act like individually controllable fingers, may be activated to increase the pressure at any location(s) where the controller 40 estimates that there is inadequate contact pressure between the elastomer and the wall of the wellbore. For example, the segment 70 proximate to the gap 66 has been activated to push a portion of the contact face 50 into engagement with the borehole wall 24. The members 70 may be driven hydraulically, electrically, pneumatically, or by some other suitable means. While the members 70 are shown as fingers that pivot about an end to apply pressure, the members 70 may also include pistons, bladders, or other devices that can depress or push a section of the probe 22 toward the borehole wall 24.
  • It should be understood that the pressure distribution may be one of several factors used by personnel to control a device or conduct a given activity. That is, the contact pressure may be used in conjunction with other measured parameter to estimate a quality of a seal between the probe 22 and the wellbore wall 24. For example, referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, a pressure sensor 72 may be positioned to sense fluid pressure at the inlet 62. During operation of the pump 30, the pressure at the inlet 62 may be monitored. Generally, a satisfactory seal may be indicated by a drop in fluid pressure at the inlet 62 as the pump 30 is operated. If the pressure has not dropped by an expected amount, that information, together with the pressure distribution map, may be used to estimate the quality of the probe-to-borehole wall seal. In still other embodiments, one or more fluid analysis tools may analyze the fluid flowing through the inlet 62. For example, the fluid analysis tool may be configured to detect wellbore fluids or other wellbore contaminations. Again, that information, together with the pressure distribution map, may be used to evaluate the seal between the probe 22 and the borehole wall 24. Thus, in some embodiments, contact pressure may be processed or evaluated with other measured parameters in order to evaluate seal quality and control the fluid sampling tool 20.
  • Referring now to FIG. 1, it should be appreciated that the teachings of the present disclosure may be applied to a variety of devices and systems other than fluid sampling tools. For example, the pads 28 may be instrumented with sensor(s) for measuring contact pressure. The pads 28 are merely illustrative of force application members that may be used in steering systems for drilling assemblies, centralizers, or stabilizers, and wellbore anchoring devices. Such information may be used to position the pads 28, control the thrust generated by the pads 28, or control some other aspect of the operation of the pads 28. In another example, other devices configured to engage the wellbore wall 24, such as a packer 80, may include one or more contact pressure sensors. The packers 80 are illustrative of wellbore isolation devices that may be expanded or otherwise actuated to engage a wellbore wall 24. The packers 80 may also engage surfaces associated with a wellbore tubular, such as a casing or liner (not shown). Thus, a reaction surface can include surfaces associated with human-made devices as well as a borehole wall.
  • In some embodiments, the wellbore system 10 may be a drilling system that configured to form the borehole 14 using tools such as a drill bit (not shown). In such embodiments, the carrier 16 may be a coiled tube, casing, liners, drill pipe, etc. In other embodiments, the wellbore system 10 may use a non-rigid carrier. In such arrangements, the carrier 16 may be wirelines, wireline sondes, slickline sondes, e-lines, etc. The term “carrier” as used herein means any device, device component, combination of devices, media and/or member that may be used to convey, house, support, or otherwise facilitate the use of another device, device component, combination of devices, media and/or member.
  • The controller 40, 42 may include an information processor that is in data communication with a data storage medium and a processor memory. The data storage medium may be any standard computer data storage device, such as a USB drive, memory stick, hard disk, removable RAM, EPROMs, EAROMs, flash memories and optical disks, or other commonly used memory storage system known to one of ordinary skill in the art including Internet based storage. The data storage medium may store one or more programs that when executed causes information processor to execute the disclosed method(s). Signals indicative of the parameter may be transmitted to a surface controller. These signals may also, or in the alternative, be stored downhole in a data storage device and may also be processed and used downhole for geosteering or for any other suitable downhole purpose. In one example, wired pipe may be used for transmitting information.
  • From the above, it should be appreciated that the present disclosure provides, in part, devices and methods for conducting a wellbore operation in a borehole formed in an earthen formation. In embodiments, the device may include a carrier conveyable into a well borehole and a tool coupled to the carrier. The tool may include a contact face and a sensor associated with the contact face. The sensor may be configured to estimate a pressure applied to the contact face. The method may include controlling a tool in the borehole by using at least one pressure estimated at a contact between a reaction surface and a contact face associated with the tool. The pressure(s) may be estimated the at least one pressure using a sensor positioned at the contact face. In some embodiments, the sensor estimates a pressure at a plurality of locations on the contact face using a plurality of sensing elements. The controlling may involve adjusting a force applied to the contact face and/or moving the contact face. The reaction surface may be a borehole wall. The pressure data may be used to form a pressure distribution map of the contact face using the estimate pressure. In some applications, the method may involve drawing a fluid from the formation using a probe associated with the tool, wherein the contact face is formed on the probe.
  • While the foregoing disclosure is directed to the one mode embodiments of the disclosure, various modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art. It is intended that all variations be embraced by the foregoing disclosure.

Claims (15)

1. A method for conducting a wellbore operation in a borehole formed in an earthen formation, comprising:
controlling a tool in the borehole by using at least one pressure estimated at a contact between a reaction surface and a contact face associated with the tool.
2. The method of claim 1 further comprising estimating the at least one pressure using a sensor positioned at the contact face.
3. The method of claim 2 wherein the sensor estimates a pressure at a plurality of locations on the contact face.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the controlling includes at least one of: (i) adjusting a force applied to the contact face, and (ii) moving the contact face.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the reaction surface is a borehole wall.
6. The method of claim 1, further comprising forming a pressure distribution map of the contact face using the estimated pressure, wherein the map includes a plurality of estimated pressures.
7. The method of claim 1, further comprising drawing a fluid from the formation using a probe associated with the tool, wherein the contact face is formed on the probe.
8. An apparatus for conducting a wellbore operation, comprising:
a carrier conveyable into a well borehole;
a tool coupled to the carrier, the tool including a contact face; and
a sensor associated with the contact face, the sensor being configured to estimate a pressure applied at the contact face.
9. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the sensor includes a plurality of sensing elements.
10. The apparatus of claim 9, wherein the tool comprises a probe on which the contact face is formed, the probe including an inlet, wherein the sensing elements are distributed around the inlet.
11. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein the probe includes a sealing element surrounding the inlet, wherein the sensor is in pressure communication with the sealing element, and wherein an outer surface of the sealing element at least partially defines the contact face.
12. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the sensor is positioned on the contact face.
13. The apparatus of claim 8, further comprising a controller coupled to the sensor, the controller being programmed to control the tool in response to at least one signal generated by the sensor.
14. The apparatus of claim 13, further comprising a plurality of independently operable force application elements positioned on the contact face, and wherein the controller adjusts the force application elements in response to the sensor signals.
15. The apparatus of claim 8 wherein the sensor is formed in a layer coupled to the contact face.
US13/039,063 2010-03-03 2011-03-02 Tactile pressure sensing devices and methods for using same Abandoned US20110214879A1 (en)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/039,063 US20110214879A1 (en) 2010-03-03 2011-03-02 Tactile pressure sensing devices and methods for using same
PCT/US2011/027026 WO2011109617A2 (en) 2010-03-03 2011-03-03 Tactile pressure sensing devices and methods for using same
BR112012022095A BR112012022095A2 (en) 2010-03-03 2011-03-03 tactile pressure perception device, and methods for using them.
GB1215432.4A GB2490839A (en) 2010-03-03 2011-03-03 Tactile pressure sensing devices and methods for using same
NO20120948A NO20120948A1 (en) 2010-03-03 2012-08-24 Tactile pressure sensitive devices and methods for using them

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US31010710P 2010-03-03 2010-03-03
US13/039,063 US20110214879A1 (en) 2010-03-03 2011-03-02 Tactile pressure sensing devices and methods for using same

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20110214879A1 true US20110214879A1 (en) 2011-09-08

Family

ID=44530310

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/039,063 Abandoned US20110214879A1 (en) 2010-03-03 2011-03-02 Tactile pressure sensing devices and methods for using same

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US20110214879A1 (en)
BR (1) BR112012022095A2 (en)
GB (1) GB2490839A (en)
NO (1) NO20120948A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2011109617A2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN114564778A (en) * 2022-03-07 2022-05-31 西南石油大学 Method for calculating safe drilling density of fractured stratum

Citations (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5335542A (en) * 1991-09-17 1994-08-09 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Integrated permeability measurement and resistivity imaging tool
US5540101A (en) * 1995-05-09 1996-07-30 Roctest Ltd. Borehole directional dilatometer
US5983725A (en) * 1996-04-27 1999-11-16 Forschungszenlrum Karlsruhe Gmbh Tactile pressure sensor
US6041860A (en) * 1996-07-17 2000-03-28 Baker Hughes Incorporated Apparatus and method for performing imaging and downhole operations at a work site in wellbores
US6301959B1 (en) * 1999-01-26 2001-10-16 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Focused formation fluid sampling probe
US6719049B2 (en) * 2002-05-23 2004-04-13 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Fluid sampling methods and apparatus for use in boreholes
US6871713B2 (en) * 2000-07-21 2005-03-29 Baker Hughes Incorporated Apparatus and methods for sampling and testing a formation fluid
US6964301B2 (en) * 2002-06-28 2005-11-15 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method and apparatus for subsurface fluid sampling
US7114385B2 (en) * 2004-10-07 2006-10-03 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Apparatus and method for drawing fluid into a downhole tool
US7178591B2 (en) * 2004-08-31 2007-02-20 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Apparatus and method for formation evaluation
US7178392B2 (en) * 2003-08-20 2007-02-20 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Determining the pressure of formation fluid in earth formations surrounding a borehole
US7195063B2 (en) * 2003-10-15 2007-03-27 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Downhole sampling apparatus and method for using same
US20070151727A1 (en) * 2005-12-16 2007-07-05 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Downhole Fluid Communication Apparatus and Method
US20080066535A1 (en) * 2006-09-18 2008-03-20 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Adjustable Testing Tool and Method of Use
US20080073078A1 (en) * 2006-09-22 2008-03-27 Schlumberger Technology Corporation System and method for operational management of a guarded probe for formation fluid sampling
US20080125973A1 (en) * 2006-09-22 2008-05-29 Schlumberger Technology Corporation System and method for real-time management of formation fluid sampling with a guarded probe
US20080223125A1 (en) * 2007-03-14 2008-09-18 Baker Hughes Incorporated Method and apparatus for collecting subterranean formation fluid
US20090049904A1 (en) * 2007-08-24 2009-02-26 Baker Hughes Incorporated Automated formation fluid clean-up to sampling switchover
US7581440B2 (en) * 2006-11-21 2009-09-01 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Apparatus and methods to perform downhole measurements associated with subterranean formation evaluation
US7832276B2 (en) * 2007-12-18 2010-11-16 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Pressure measuring device and method
US8016038B2 (en) * 2006-09-18 2011-09-13 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method and apparatus to facilitate formation sampling

Patent Citations (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5335542A (en) * 1991-09-17 1994-08-09 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Integrated permeability measurement and resistivity imaging tool
US5540101A (en) * 1995-05-09 1996-07-30 Roctest Ltd. Borehole directional dilatometer
US5983725A (en) * 1996-04-27 1999-11-16 Forschungszenlrum Karlsruhe Gmbh Tactile pressure sensor
US6041860A (en) * 1996-07-17 2000-03-28 Baker Hughes Incorporated Apparatus and method for performing imaging and downhole operations at a work site in wellbores
US6301959B1 (en) * 1999-01-26 2001-10-16 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Focused formation fluid sampling probe
US6871713B2 (en) * 2000-07-21 2005-03-29 Baker Hughes Incorporated Apparatus and methods for sampling and testing a formation fluid
US6719049B2 (en) * 2002-05-23 2004-04-13 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Fluid sampling methods and apparatus for use in boreholes
US6964301B2 (en) * 2002-06-28 2005-11-15 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method and apparatus for subsurface fluid sampling
US7178392B2 (en) * 2003-08-20 2007-02-20 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Determining the pressure of formation fluid in earth formations surrounding a borehole
US7195063B2 (en) * 2003-10-15 2007-03-27 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Downhole sampling apparatus and method for using same
US7178591B2 (en) * 2004-08-31 2007-02-20 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Apparatus and method for formation evaluation
US7114385B2 (en) * 2004-10-07 2006-10-03 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Apparatus and method for drawing fluid into a downhole tool
US20070151727A1 (en) * 2005-12-16 2007-07-05 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Downhole Fluid Communication Apparatus and Method
US7913557B2 (en) * 2006-09-18 2011-03-29 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Adjustable testing tool and method of use
US20080066535A1 (en) * 2006-09-18 2008-03-20 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Adjustable Testing Tool and Method of Use
US8016038B2 (en) * 2006-09-18 2011-09-13 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method and apparatus to facilitate formation sampling
US20080125973A1 (en) * 2006-09-22 2008-05-29 Schlumberger Technology Corporation System and method for real-time management of formation fluid sampling with a guarded probe
US7857049B2 (en) * 2006-09-22 2010-12-28 Schlumberger Technology Corporation System and method for operational management of a guarded probe for formation fluid sampling
US20080073078A1 (en) * 2006-09-22 2008-03-27 Schlumberger Technology Corporation System and method for operational management of a guarded probe for formation fluid sampling
US7581440B2 (en) * 2006-11-21 2009-09-01 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Apparatus and methods to perform downhole measurements associated with subterranean formation evaluation
US20080223125A1 (en) * 2007-03-14 2008-09-18 Baker Hughes Incorporated Method and apparatus for collecting subterranean formation fluid
US20090049904A1 (en) * 2007-08-24 2009-02-26 Baker Hughes Incorporated Automated formation fluid clean-up to sampling switchover
US7832276B2 (en) * 2007-12-18 2010-11-16 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Pressure measuring device and method

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN114564778A (en) * 2022-03-07 2022-05-31 西南石油大学 Method for calculating safe drilling density of fractured stratum

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB201215432D0 (en) 2012-10-17
BR112012022095A2 (en) 2019-09-24
GB2490839A (en) 2012-11-14
WO2011109617A3 (en) 2011-10-27
WO2011109617A2 (en) 2011-09-09
NO20120948A1 (en) 2012-08-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20090294174A1 (en) Downhole sensor system
EP1623090B1 (en) Formation testing apparatus and method for optimizing draw down
EP1716314B1 (en) Smooth draw-down for formation pressure testing
US10928537B2 (en) Prediction of formation and stratigraphic layers while drilling
US7032661B2 (en) Method and apparatus for combined NMR and formation testing for assessing relative permeability with formation testing and nuclear magnetic resonance testing
EP3055501B1 (en) Life-time management of downhole tools and components
US6923052B2 (en) Methods to detect formation pressure
US7996153B2 (en) Method and apparatus for formation testing
US20060016594A1 (en) Methods to detect formation pressure
US20040111216A1 (en) Method of determining properties relating to an underbalanced well
US8708042B2 (en) Apparatus and method for valve actuation
US20090000785A1 (en) Method and Apparatus to Quantify Fluid Sample Quality
Meister et al. Formation pressure testing during drilling: challenges and benefits
AU1491200A (en) A method for obtaining leak-off test and formation integrity test profile from limited downhole pressure measurements
US7729861B2 (en) Method and apparatus for formation testing
US20230258079A1 (en) Method and system for determining a lithology of a subterranean formation
US20110214879A1 (en) Tactile pressure sensing devices and methods for using same
Burgess et al. Wireline-conveyed through-casing formation tester preserves casing integrity
US20180156035A1 (en) Synthetic chromatogram from physical properties
US11156084B2 (en) Oil-Based Mud contamination estimate from physical properties
US10215741B2 (en) Diffusion chromatography fluid analysis
CA2424112C (en) A method and apparatus for combined nmr and formation testing for assessing relative permeability with formation testing and nuclear magnetic resonance testing
US11661843B2 (en) Method and system for determining a lithology of a subterranean formation
Strobel et al. Comparison of formation pressure and mobility data derived during formation testing while drilling with a mud motor with production data and core analysis
Umeonaku et al. Realtime Aaquisition of Formation Pressure Data For Reservoir Characterization and Safe Drilling

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED, TEXAS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DIFOGGIO, ROCCO;REEL/FRAME:026203/0612

Effective date: 20110427

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION