US20110069745A1 - Using equalization coefficients of end devices in a cable television network to determine and diagnose impairments in upstream channels - Google Patents

Using equalization coefficients of end devices in a cable television network to determine and diagnose impairments in upstream channels Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20110069745A1
US20110069745A1 US12/565,185 US56518509A US2011069745A1 US 20110069745 A1 US20110069745 A1 US 20110069745A1 US 56518509 A US56518509 A US 56518509A US 2011069745 A1 US2011069745 A1 US 2011069745A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
impairment
end devices
contribution
equalization coefficients
components
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US12/565,185
Other versions
US8526485B2 (en
Inventor
Robert J. Thompson
Michael J. Cooper
Charles S. Moore
John L. Moran
Marc L. Morrissette
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Arris Enterprises LLC
Original Assignee
General Instrument Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by General Instrument Corp filed Critical General Instrument Corp
Priority to US12/565,185 priority Critical patent/US8526485B2/en
Assigned to GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION reassignment GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: MORAN, JOHN L., MORRISSETTE, MARC L., MOORE, CHARLES S., THOMPSON, ROBERT J., COOPER, MICHAEL J.
Publication of US20110069745A1 publication Critical patent/US20110069745A1/en
Assigned to BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT reassignment BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: 4HOME, INC., ACADIA AIC, INC., AEROCAST, INC., ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC., ARRIS GROUP, INC., ARRIS HOLDINGS CORP. OF ILLINOIS, ARRIS KOREA, INC., ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC., BIGBAND NETWORKS, INC., BROADBUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., CCE SOFTWARE LLC, GENERAL INSTRUMENT AUTHORIZATION SERVICES, INC., GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION, GENERAL INSTRUMENT INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, INC., GIC INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL LLC, GIC INTERNATIONAL HOLDCO LLC, IMEDIA CORPORATION, JERROLD DC RADIO, INC., LEAPSTONE SYSTEMS, INC., MODULUS VIDEO, INC., MOTOROLA WIRELINE NETWORKS, INC., NETOPIA, INC., NEXTLEVEL SYSTEMS (PUERTO RICO), INC., POWER GUARD, INC., QUANTUM BRIDGE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., SETJAM, INC., SUNUP DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC., TEXSCAN CORPORATION, THE GI REALTY TRUST 1996, UCENTRIC SYSTEMS, INC.
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US8526485B2 publication Critical patent/US8526485B2/en
Assigned to ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC. reassignment ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC. MERGER AND CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION
Assigned to ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC. reassignment ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC
Assigned to ARRIS GROUP, INC., MOTOROLA WIRELINE NETWORKS, INC., UCENTRIC SYSTEMS, INC., JERROLD DC RADIO, INC., SETJAM, INC., QUANTUM BRIDGE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., GIC INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL LLC, SUNUP DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC., GENERAL INSTRUMENT AUTHORIZATION SERVICES, INC., POWER GUARD, INC., GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION, IMEDIA CORPORATION, ARRIS KOREA, INC., LEAPSTONE SYSTEMS, INC., ARRIS HOLDINGS CORP. OF ILLINOIS, INC., AEROCAST, INC., GENERAL INSTRUMENT INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, INC., BROADBUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., GIC INTERNATIONAL HOLDCO LLC, CCE SOFTWARE LLC, ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC., 4HOME, INC., NETOPIA, INC., TEXSCAN CORPORATION, THE GI REALTY TRUST 1996, ACADIA AIC, INC., ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC., MODULUS VIDEO, INC., BIG BAND NETWORKS, INC., NEXTLEVEL SYSTEMS (PUERTO RICO), INC. reassignment ARRIS GROUP, INC. TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Assignors: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Assigned to ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC reassignment ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC.
Assigned to WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT reassignment WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC
Assigned to JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. reassignment JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ABL SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC, ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC., ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC., COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC, COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA, RUCKUS WIRELESS, INC.
Assigned to JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. reassignment JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. TERM LOAN SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC, ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC., ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC., COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC, COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA, RUCKUS WIRELESS, INC.
Assigned to WILMINGTON TRUST reassignment WILMINGTON TRUST SECURITY INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC, ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC., COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC, COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA, RUCKUS WIRELESS, INC.
Assigned to ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC. reassignment ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B10/00Transmission systems employing electromagnetic waves other than radio-waves, e.g. infrared, visible or ultraviolet light, or employing corpuscular radiation, e.g. quantum communication
    • H04B10/25Arrangements specific to fibre transmission
    • H04B10/2575Radio-over-fibre, e.g. radio frequency signal modulated onto an optical carrier
    • H04B10/25751Optical arrangements for CATV or video distribution

Definitions

  • a typical cable network generally contains a headend which is usually connected to several nodes which provide bi-directional content to a cable modem termination system (CMTS).
  • CMTS cable modem termination system
  • the CMTS contains several receivers, and each receiver connects to several modems of many subscribers. For instance, a single receiver may be connected to hundreds of modems at customer premises. Data may be transmitted downstream to the modems on different frequency bands.
  • the modems communicate to the CMTS via upstream communications on a dedicated frequency band, referred to as a return band.
  • Cable networks are also increasingly carrying signals, which require a high quality and reliability of service, such as Voice over IP (VoIP) communications. Any disruption of voice or data traffic is a great inconvenience and often unacceptable to a customer.
  • VoIP Voice over IP
  • Various factors may affect the quality of service, including the quality of the upstream channels.
  • One factor that affects the quality of upstream communications is the presence of up-stream channel impairments, such as micro-reflections (MRs) of communication signals, group delay variation (GDV), and amplitude distortion (AD).
  • MRs micro-reflections
  • GDV group delay variation
  • AD amplitude distortion
  • AD is an undesirable variation in the channel's amplitude response.
  • Common forms of AD include tilt, ripple, and roll-off.
  • a common cause of AD is upper return band-edge carriers, aggravated by long reaches of a cable network plant.
  • the long reaches accumulate diplex filters from devices including amplifiers and in-line equalizers. While individually contributing small attenuation versus frequency, the accumulated diplex filters can create appreciable response variation.
  • the amplitude roll-off causes the symbols to spread in a pattern similar in appearance to Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) and causes received symbols to cross decision boundaries, resulting in errors.
  • AWGN Additive White Gaussian Noise
  • GDV is an undesirable variation in the communication channel's phase response, resulting in distortion of the digital signal phase, or a variation in the propagation of frequency components of the signal across the channel.
  • AD one major cause of GDV in the plant is upper-band-edge operation, combined with long reaches of cable network plant.
  • the reasoning is the same as in the AD case.
  • filtering functions typically induce nonlinear phase responses as the band edges are approached, so the combination of AD and GDV in the same band region is perfectly expected, with the understanding that diplex filtering is the cause.
  • Different filter functions induce different GDV responses, in a similar manner that different filter functions induce different stop-band characteristics.
  • GDV causes the symbols to spread in a pattern similar to AWGN and AD and causes received symbols to cross decision boundaries, resulting in errors.
  • 16-QAM is less sensitive to GDV than 64-QAM because of reduced decision boundary size of 64-QAM.
  • a MR is a copy of the transmitted signal, arriving late and with reduced amplitude.
  • the result of the additional copy is the typically seen by end users as image ghosting in analog video reception, whereas for digital communications the result is inter-symbol interference (ISI).
  • MR sources are composed of pairs of hybrid fiber-coaxial (HFC) components separated by a distance of cable.
  • the HFC components also referred to as cable network components, facilitate the propagation of signal copies in a variety of ways including return loss, isolation, mixing, and combining.
  • the MR may arise if a length of cable separates two devices with poor return loss, acting as signal reflectors. The reflector return loss and the loss between the reflectors determine the amplitude of the MR.
  • Any HFC component for instance a cable modem (CM)
  • CM cable modem
  • the CM typically has as a design limit of 6 dB return loss, meaning it may reflect up to 25% of its incident power.
  • components other then the CM typically reflect a lower percentage of incident power because the design limits are typically significantly better.
  • PCBs printed circuit boards
  • an equalizer During equalization, an equalizer generates coefficient information that is used to create an equalizing filter, with an inverse channel response, canceling distortion in the channel caused by the upstream channel impairments.
  • the equalization coefficients in Data Over Cable Service Interface Specification (DOCSIS) 2.0 and DOCSIS 3.0 are 24 symbol-spaced coefficients (also referred to as taps). Equalization is part of virtually all modern telecommunications platforms, and is instrumental in proper return operation for all DOCSIS systems.
  • upstream channels are one of the most challenging digital communication channels to manage and fully exploit. Operators prefer to ensure that capacity associated with the upstream channel, or as much of the capacity as possible, is realized for services and revenue. To do so requires a thorough understanding of a diverse set of HFC and digital communications variables. More importantly, variables that did not matter very much for 16-QAM operation now become not just relevant, but critical to understand for successful deployment of 64-QAM, and to a lesser extent, 32-QAM. Accurately diagnosing upstream issues typically requires technicians or engineers to be at multiple locations within a HFC plant and simultaneously inject test signals at the suspected device locations. This diagnostic process requires extensive manual effort, often requiring rolling trucks to remote locations within a plant or specialized test equipment. The diagnostic process is also time consuming and costly.
  • a system estimates impairment contributions for upstream communications in a cable television system.
  • the system receives equalization coefficients used by end devices in the cable television system.
  • the equalization coefficients are used by equalizers to mitigate distortion in upstream channels for the end devices.
  • the system analyzes the coefficients based on impairment thresholds to determine whether impairment problems exist in the upstream channels and to identify the types of impairment problems that exist.
  • Other embodiments include computer-implemented methods estimating impairment contributions for upstream communications based on received equalization coefficients and impairment thresholds.
  • Embodiments interpret equalization coefficients for end devices and identify potential impairments of upstream channels for the end devices based on an analysis of the equalization coefficients. Also, a particular type of impairment problem can be identified based on the analysis of equalization coefficients. Determination of the type of impairment can be coupled with additional information, such as location of the end device or tap, to determine suspect cable network components that may be causing the impairment. Thus, identification of an impairment problem and potential solutions can be determined before a customer problem is experienced and without dispatching technicians to diagnose the problem.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram of a cable network, according to an embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a CMTS architecture, according to an embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a device for estimating impairment contributions and isolating defective network components, according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a device for estimating impairment contributions and isolating defective network components, according to an embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 5 illustrates a method for estimating impairment contributions and isolating defective network components using a plurality of end devices, according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 6 shows a block diagram of a computer system that may be used for estimating impairment contributions and isolating defective network components, according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • decibels relative to a carrier refers to a measure of the power ratio of a signal to a carrier signal, and is expressed in decibels. Note “dB” refers to a decibel, “ns” refers to a nanosecond, and “MHz” refers to a megahertz.
  • equalization coefficient refers to complex tap values used to create an equalizing filter with an inverse channel response.
  • the term “impairment contribution” refers to causes of impairment in an upstream hybrid fiber coaxial (HFC) plant.
  • micro-reflection refers to an impairment contribution wherein a copy of a communication signal is reflected back onto itself, with a time delay. Significant MRs can degrade upstream HFC plant performance.
  • group delay variation refers to an impairment contribution wherein different frequency components of a signal propagate through a network component with different time delays.
  • the term “cable network plant components” refers to any component that may cause impairment in an upstream channel in the cable network.
  • the components may be components of an HFC network, and may be active or passive components.
  • the upstream channel may be a channel between a modem and a CMTS or another upstream channel in the cable network.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a network 100 , such as an HFC network, including end devices 102 .
  • the end device 102 may be DOCSIS Terminal devices, such as cable modems (CMs), modem terminal adapters, MTAs, and embedded cable modems of DOCSIS set-top gateways (eCMs of DSGs), or any other like devices.
  • the end devices 102 are connected to a headend 104 of the network 100 via nodes 106 and an RF cascade 103 comprised of multiple amplifiers and passive devices including cabling, taps, splitters, and in-line equalizers.
  • a network tap is a hardware device providing access to data within the network 100 .
  • the network tap provides the ability to monitor data between two points, for instance components, in the network 100 .
  • An impairment contribution estimator 200 may be connected to the network 100 through any network access point including a tap.
  • the headend 104 connects to an IP (Internet Protocol) and/or PSTN (Public Switched Telephone Network) network 108 .
  • IP Internet Protocol
  • PSTN Public Switched Telephone Network
  • Data such as TV programs, audio, video and other data, which may be from the network 108 , is sent from the headend 104 to the end devices 102 .
  • the end devices 102 may send data upstream towards the headend 104 .
  • each of the nodes 106 may be connected to multiple end devices.
  • the headend 104 includes a CMTS 110 and optical transceivers 112 which provide optical communications to and from the CMTS 110 through optical fiber to the nodes 106 .
  • the nodes 106 connect to the headend 104 , and the headend 104 contains a plurality of CMTS units 110 .
  • Each CMTS 110 contains a plurality of transceivers, which communicate with the plurality of end devices 102 .
  • each CMTS 110 may have eight or more receivers (e.g., for DOCSIS 2.0), and each receiver may communicate with hundreds of end devices 102 .
  • the CMTS may have more than eight receivers (e.g., DOCSIS 3.0 may use 48 receivers).
  • FIG. 2 illustrates an architecture of the CMTS 110 , according to an embodiment.
  • the CMTS 110 includes a processing unit 114 having a microprocessor 116 that receives information, such as instructions and data, from a RAM 118 and a ROM 120 .
  • the processing unit 114 controls the operation of the CMTS 110 and RF communication signals to be sent by the end devices 102 to the CMTS 110 .
  • the processing unit 114 is connected to a display 122 , which may display status information such as whether station maintenance (SM) is being performed, or a receiver is in need of load balancing.
  • An input keypad 124 may also be connected to the processing unit 114 to permit an operator to provide instructions and process requests.
  • SM station maintenance
  • the CMTS 110 also includes an RF transceiver (transmitter/receiver) unit 126 having transmitters 128 and receivers 130 providing bi-directional communication capability with the end devices 102 through optical transceivers 112 , nodes 106 and an RF cascade 103 comprised of multiple amplifiers and passive devices including cabling, taps, splitters, and in-line equalizers.
  • the CMTS 110 may contain a plurality of RF receivers 130 , such as eight RF receivers and a spare RF receiver. Each of the RF receivers 130 may provide support for a hundred or more end devices 102 .
  • the receivers 130 can be BROADCOM 3140 receivers that each includes a demodulator unit 132 and an equalizer 134 to which received RF signals are provided, for instance, for purposes of acquiring equalizer values and burst modulation error ratio (MER) measurements, packet error rate (PER) and bit error rate (BER).
  • the equalizer 134 can be a multiple tap linear equalizer (e.g. a twenty-four tap linear equalizer), which also is known as a feed forward equalizer (FFE).
  • the equalizer 134 can be integrally contained in the RF receiver, or alternatively, may be provided as a separate device.
  • the communication characteristics of each receiver 130 may be stored on ROM 120 or RAM 118 , or may be provided from an external source. Note that the equalizer 134 is in the upstream path, for example, from the end devices 102 towards the network 108 .
  • the RF transceiver unit 126 also includes a modulator 136 , which provides the modulated signals to RF transmitters 128 .
  • the modulator 136 and demodulator 132 are capable of modulation schemes of various levels of complexity. For example, some upstream DOCSIS 2.0 modulation schemes that may be used in order of level of complexity include, but are not limited to 16 QAM, 32 QAM, 64 QAM and 128 QAM.
  • the microprocessor 116 may provide instructions to the end devices 102 as to which modulation scheme is to be used during communication.
  • the CMTS 110 also provides instructions for the end devices 102 using a transmit pre-equalization (PRE-EQ) feature in order to compensate for upstream channel impairments.
  • the CMTS 110 receives an incoming signal from each of the end devices 102 and compares the incoming signal with an expected signal, which is an ideal response. If the incoming signal received by the CMTS 110 differs from the expected signal, the microprocessor 116 or other processing device performing a PRE-EQ function then determines a set of equalization coefficients (alternately referred to as transmit pre-equalization coefficients) for each of the end devices 102 and instructs the end devices 102 to set their transmit equalization coefficients to the transmit pre-equalization coefficients determined by the PRE-EQ function. The end devices 102 apply the pre-equalization coefficients and then continue to transmit. The CMTS 110 thereafter continues to monitor and compare the incoming signal against the expected signal.
  • PRE-EQ transmit pre-equalization
  • FIG. 3 illustrates an architecture of an impairment contribution estimator 200 .
  • the impairment contribution estimator 200 may be connected to the network 100 through any network access point, for instance through a network access terminal.
  • the impairment contribution estimator 200 is configured for estimating impairment contributions and isolating defective network components in the system 100 according to the method 300 below.
  • the impairment contribution estimator 200 includes a data storage device 201 , and a testing module 202 .
  • the testing module 202 includes an equalization coefficient receiving (ECRC) module 203 , an equalization coefficient resolution (ECRS) module 204 , an impairment level determination (ILD) module 205 , and a cable network plant components isolation (CPCI) module 206 .
  • the testing module 201 may also include a modulation configuration (MC) module (not shown).
  • MC modulation configuration
  • the data storage device 201 is configured to store an impairment threshold for at least one impairment contribution.
  • the ECRC module 203 is configured to receive equalization coefficients from the end devices 102 . The equalization coefficients are thereafter stored in the data storage device 201 .
  • the ECRS module 204 is configured to resolve the equalization coefficients into the at least one impairment contribution.
  • the ILD module 205 is configured to determine whether each of the end devices 102 exceeds the impairment threshold and to group each of the end devices 102 into sets that exceed impairment thresholds as impaired sets or sets that do not exceed impairment thresholds as unimpaired sets.
  • the CPCI module 206 is configured to identify cable network plant components associated with each of the ILD sorted sets wherein the cable network plant components are designated as suspect components. cable network plant components are correlated with each set of end devices, for example, based on whether they are used in an upstream or downstream path for an end device.
  • the components 202 - 206 are configured to perform the method 300 described with respect to FIG. 5 .
  • the components 202 - 206 may comprise software modules, hardware modules, and a combination of software and hardware modules.
  • one or more of the modules 202 - 206 comprise circuit components.
  • one or more of the modules 202 - 206 comprise software code stored on a computer readable storage medium, which is executable by a processor.
  • the impairment contribution estimator 200 depicted in FIG. 3 may include additional components and that some of the components described herein may be removed and/or modified without departing from a scope of the impairment contribution estimator 200 .
  • the impairment contribution estimator 200 comprises a part of a network device such as a RF-Sentry application. According to another embodiment, the impairment contribution estimator 200 comprises a part an edge router, such as a part of the advanced spectrum management function of the BSR64000 edge router.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates an embodiment of one of the end devices 102 (shown as 102 a ), such as a cable modem.
  • the end device 102 a contains a processor 181 which communicates with a RAM 182 and ROM 183 and which controls the general operation of the end device 102 , including applying the pre-equalization coefficients and controlling preamble lengths of communications sent by the end device 102 a in accordance with instructions from the CMTS 110 .
  • the end device 102 a also contains a transceiver 186 which provides bidirectional RF communication with the CMTS 110 .
  • a demodulator 185 demodulates signals received by the transceiver 186 , and an equalizer 187 biases communications transmitted to the CMTS 110 .
  • the equalizer 187 is connected in the upstream path between a transmitter in the transceiver 186 and the CMTS 110 .
  • the microprocessor 181 configures the equalizer 187 using the coefficients received from the CMTS 110 to compensate for upstream impairments.
  • the end device 102 a also contains a modulator 188 , which modulates signals to be transmitted upstream to the CMTS 110 according to a modulation scheme, which the end device 102 a has been instructed to use by the CMTS 110 .
  • the end device 102 a has an attenuator 189 controlled by microprocessor 181 to attenuate signals to be transmitted by the RF transmitter to be within a desired power level.
  • the end device 102 a may be a DOCSIS network element, such as a cable modem, to generate a variety of test signals.
  • the test signals may be implemented using one of the available upstream DOCSIS bandwidths, e.g. 200 kHz, 400 kHz, 800 kHz, 1600 kHz, 3200 kHz or 6400 kHz.
  • Accurate knowledge of the available and/or optimum modulation schemes of the network 100 enables the operator to utilize available resources of their network more efficiently, such as by adding additional end devices to improve portions of the network with the least complex modulation schemes so that those portions may be able to use more complex modulation schemes.
  • system 100 may include additional elements not shown and that some of the elements described herein may be removed, substituted and/or modified without departing from the scope of the system 100 . It should also be apparent that one or more of the elements described in the embodiment of FIG. 1 may be optional.
  • Some or all of the operations set forth in the method 300 may be contained as one or more computer programs stored in any desired computer readable medium and executed by a processor on a computer system.
  • Exemplary computer readable media that may be used to store software operable to implement the present invention include but are not limited to conventional computer system RAM, ROM, EPROM, EEPROM, hard disks, or other data storage devices.
  • the impairment contribution estimator 200 retrieves at least one impairment threshold corresponding to an impairment contribution from the data storage 201 .
  • the impairment contribution may be selected from the group including GDV, AD, MR and any impairment contribution that may be isolated by analysis of the coefficients as described in detail at step 303 below.
  • At least one impairment threshold corresponding to the impairment contribution may be selected from the group comprising an industry standard specification, a customer preferred limit, a PRE-EQ failure limit, a PRE-EQ failure limit less acceptable system margin and, where applicable, a function of signaling characteristics.
  • Signaling characteristics include, for instance, RF frequency, QAM modulation level, bandwidth, symbol rate, forward error correction (FEC) settings, and other properties related to signaling.
  • the impairment threshold may be selected from the group comprising the industry standard specification (for GDV), the customer preferred limit, the PRE-EQ failure limit, the PRE-EQ failure limit less acceptable system margin and a function of a radio frequency (RF) cascade.
  • the function of the RF cascade may comprise a to-be-determined (TBD) value in ns/MHz per RF Amplifier. For instance, a DOCSIS assumption for GDV is 200 ns/MHz.
  • the impairment threshold may be any of the industry standard specification. For instance any of a DOCSIS assumption for amplitude ripple of ⁇ 0.5 dB per MHz, the customer preferred limit, the PRE-EQ failure limit, the PRE-EQ failure limit less acceptable system margin and a function of RF frequency and RF amplifier cascade length.
  • the impairment contribution may comprise any impairment contribution that may be isolated by analysis of the coefficients, for instance as described at step 303 below.
  • the at least one impairment threshold corresponding to the impairment contribution may be thereafter selected in a similar manner as described above with regard to the impairment threshold for AD, MR, and GDV.
  • the impairment contribution estimator 200 determines the equalization coefficients currently being used by the end devices 102 for upstream communication.
  • the equalization coefficients may be received from the end devices 102 or the CMTS 110 .
  • the end devices 102 may comprise at least one of the group comprising DOCSIS terminal devices, including cable modems (CMs), modem terminal adapters, (MTAs), and embedded cable modems of DOCSIS set-top gateways, (eCMs of DSGs).
  • CMs cable modems
  • MTAs modem terminal adapters
  • eCMs of DSGs embedded cable modems of DOCSIS set-top gateways
  • the ECRC module 203 may be configured to query the end devices 102 (preferably a DOCSIS 2.0 CM population) using a simple network management protocol (SNMP) query tool such as a modem PRE-EQ response tool.
  • the modem PRE-EQ response tool developed by MOTOROLA, is operable to query multiple DOCSIS terminal devices based on an Internet protocol (IP) address list.
  • IP Internet protocol
  • the modem PRE-EQ response tool is operable to conduct periodic polls of coefficient values and other relevant physical layer (PHY) metrics and to subsequently display the results of the periodic polls and/or to store the results of the periodic polls into a log file for post processing.
  • the modem PRE-EQ response tool also provides users with a graphical view of the impulse response or alternately the amplitude response for each CM poll.
  • the modem PRE-EQ response tool is operable to establish a baseline of performance, and may be used to identify defective network components based on CM IP addresses of the plurality of end devices.
  • the impairment contribution estimator 200 determines whether an impairment problem exists for upstream communications from the end devices 102 .
  • the determination is based on an analysis of the coefficients determined from step 302 and may be based on the impairment thresholds determined from step 301 .
  • the coefficients are analyzed to determine whether any of the impairment thresholds are exceeded. For example, based on experience, certain coefficient values are associated with certain impairment problems and exceeded impairment thresholds.
  • a table may be stored that includes sets of coefficient values (e.g., impairment coefficient signatures) and the type of impairment problem associated with each set of values. This tables of signatures is compared against each of the coefficients determined at step 302 .
  • an impairment coefficient signature is found in coefficients determined at step 302 , then the end device using those coefficients is determined to have the particular type of impairment associated with the signature as indicated in the table. Thus, at least two determinations may be made. One determination is whether an impairment problem exists, such as unsatisfactory GDV, AR, MR, etc. Then, if an impairment problem exists, at step 304 , a second determination is made which identifies the type of impairment.
  • the ECRS module 204 performs a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) function on the equalization coefficients for the end devices 102 (e.g. a set of 24 complex coefficients in DOCSIS 2.0), and determines frequency domain information, including a frequency response. For instance, the ECRS module 204 may use a 1024-point FFT to arrange the equalization coefficients for the PRE-EQ baseline and determine the optimal translation of the equalization coefficients.
  • the frequency domain information may be interpreted in multiple ways including in terms of magnitude versus frequency, phase versus frequency, and group delay versus frequency. Based on these magnitudes, a determination is made as to the type of impairment problem that exists, if any exists.
  • negligible amplitude correction but increased correction for phase and group delay is indicative of a GDV impairment.
  • other types of impairments can be determined.
  • the end devices 102 are sorted into sets, on increasing levels that sum the DOCSIS PRE-EQ regions for each of the end devices 102 , according to the impairment that the ECRS module 204 is configured to determine.
  • the ECRS module 204 may determine which of the end devices 102 experiences the greatest amount of MR impairment contribution by sorting on the levels which result from summing the taps located in the post-tap region of each tap of the 24-tap equalizer of DOCSIS 2.0.
  • the ILD module 205 determines the type of impairment for each end device, for example, if the impairment threshold is exceeded for the end device.
  • the ILD module 205 groups each of the end devices 102 into impairment level determined (ILD) sets.
  • the ILD sets include impaired sets comprising end devices that exceed impairment thresholds and unimpaired sets comprised of end devices that do not exceed impairment thresholds as unimpaired sets.
  • the impairment sets may include sets by type of impairment and may indicate the level of impairment for each end device.
  • the ILD module 205 determines the relation of the measured impairment contribution to the impairment threshold for each of the impairment contributions. If the impairment contribution exceeds the impairment threshold, the upstream impairments may be at a level at which a customer problem is experienced.
  • the ILD module 205 is configured to provide information so that an end user may perform preventive maintenance.
  • the ILD module 205 may also be configured to determine a dominant impairment contribution. For instance, the ILD module 205 may analyze the translation of the equalization coefficients of the end devices 102 , and an expected translation of the equalization coefficients for each of the impairment contributions in order to determine the dominant impairment contribution.
  • the expected translation of the equalization coefficients for each of the impairment contributions comprises a translation of equalization coefficients for a channel with a single impairment, for instance AD.
  • the operation of the ILD module 205 may be enhanced by application of an increased understanding of the different impairment contributions and how they originate in HFC plant. For example, although an MR source has been discussed in the preceding section regarding MRs, combining an understanding of other probable permutations of MR sources with the location of the ILD sets increases the probability of successful isolation of the MR sources. The understanding of probable sources may be used to eliminate possible sources of the impairment contribution and to therefore isolate the source of the impairment contribution. The results may be used to define what impairment levels will likely result in service calls, and thereafter impairment thresholds as defined at step 301 may be determined. Further, the ILD module 205 may be configured to prioritize the impaired sets or prioritize end devices in each set according to level of impairment.
  • suspect cable network components are identified that are probable causes for the type of impairment being experienced by an end device. Identification of the suspect components may be based on experience or historical analysis of past impairments and their fixes. For example, the CPCI module 206 identifies cable network plant components associated with each of the impaired sets. This process of identification may be enhanced by consulting data regarding the end devices 102 and network components between each of the plurality of end devices and the CMTS 110 . The CPCI module 206 identifies the cable network components associated with impaired sets as suspect components. The CPCI module 206 then leverages the end devices 102 to isolate those experiencing an impairment problem related to a specific impairment contribution.
  • a query of the end devices 102 may reveal that all of the end devices 102 located off a particular node are reporting a MR impairment contribution above the impairment threshold for MR, while the other end devices 102 , unimpaired sets are not reporting a problem.
  • the impairment contribution estimator 200 may provide guidance helping cable operators decide the significance of the information that they are analyzing.
  • the impairment contribution estimator 200 may contain a checklist of possible sources of the impairment contribution, preferably sorted in order of probability. For instance, inspection of the suspect components may show that the MR impairment contribution source is a combination of tap-to-output port isolation loss and an improperly terminated cable splice at the end of a feed amplifier. By properly terminating the splice, the operator may reduce the MR to negligible amplitudes.
  • the impairment contribution estimator 200 may sort the impaired sets into a less impaired set of devices and a more impaired set of devices according to a level of impairment and route traffic to another channel that the impairment contribution estimator 200 indicates is less impaired.
  • the steps of the method 300 may be repeated periodically and for each of the end devices 102 or groups of end devices to detect future impairment problems and to ensure that detected impairment problems are eliminated and the improvements are sustainable. If the operator is preparing to upgrade the network 100 to a higher modulation scheme, for instance upgrading from 16-QAM to 64-QAM, the operator may perform the method 300 in order to determine potential problem components. In order to test the network 100 , the operator may configure the network at the higher modulation scheme. Thereafter, the operator may perform the testing process of the method 300 , designating the suspect components as potential upgrade components.
  • Embodiments of the present invention interpret equalization coefficients for end devices and identify potential impairments of upstream channels for the end devices based on an analysis of the equalization coefficients. Also, a particular type of impairment problem can be identified based on the analysis of equalization coefficients. Determination of the type of impairment can be coupled with additional information, such as location of the end device or tap, to determine suspect cable network components that may be causing the impairment. Thus, identification of an impairment problem and potential solutions can be determined before a customer problem is experienced and without dispatching technicians to diagnose the problem.

Abstract

A system estimates impairment contributions for upstream communications in a cable television system. The system receives equalization coefficients used by end devices in the cable television system. The equalization coefficients are used by equalizers to mitigate distortion in upstream channels for the end devices. The system analyzes the coefficients based on impairment thresholds to determine whether impairment problems exist and to identify the types of impairment problems that exist.

Description

    BACKGROUND
  • Cable television networks, including community antenna television (CATV), hybrid fiber-coaxial (HFC), and fiber networks, have been in widespread use for many years and are extensive. The extensive and complex cable networks are often difficult for a cable operator to manage and monitor. A typical cable network generally contains a headend which is usually connected to several nodes which provide bi-directional content to a cable modem termination system (CMTS). In many instances, several nodes may serve a particular area of a town or city. The CMTS contains several receivers, and each receiver connects to several modems of many subscribers. For instance, a single receiver may be connected to hundreds of modems at customer premises. Data may be transmitted downstream to the modems on different frequency bands. The modems communicate to the CMTS via upstream communications on a dedicated frequency band, referred to as a return band.
  • Cable networks are also increasingly carrying signals, which require a high quality and reliability of service, such as Voice over IP (VoIP) communications. Any disruption of voice or data traffic is a great inconvenience and often unacceptable to a customer. Various factors may affect the quality of service, including the quality of the upstream channels. One factor that affects the quality of upstream communications is the presence of up-stream channel impairments, such as micro-reflections (MRs) of communication signals, group delay variation (GDV), and amplitude distortion (AD).
  • AD is an undesirable variation in the channel's amplitude response. Common forms of AD include tilt, ripple, and roll-off. A common cause of AD is upper return band-edge carriers, aggravated by long reaches of a cable network plant. The long reaches accumulate diplex filters from devices including amplifiers and in-line equalizers. While individually contributing small attenuation versus frequency, the accumulated diplex filters can create appreciable response variation. In a QAM constellation, the amplitude roll-off causes the symbols to spread in a pattern similar in appearance to Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) and causes received symbols to cross decision boundaries, resulting in errors.
  • GDV is an undesirable variation in the communication channel's phase response, resulting in distortion of the digital signal phase, or a variation in the propagation of frequency components of the signal across the channel. As is the case for AD, one major cause of GDV in the plant is upper-band-edge operation, combined with long reaches of cable network plant. The reasoning is the same as in the AD case. Note that filtering functions typically induce nonlinear phase responses as the band edges are approached, so the combination of AD and GDV in the same band region is perfectly expected, with the understanding that diplex filtering is the cause. Different filter functions induce different GDV responses, in a similar manner that different filter functions induce different stop-band characteristics. It is typical that the sharper the roll-off, such as would be the case for long cascades, the worse the GDV will be. In a QAM constellation, GDV causes the symbols to spread in a pattern similar to AWGN and AD and causes received symbols to cross decision boundaries, resulting in errors. 16-QAM is less sensitive to GDV than 64-QAM because of reduced decision boundary size of 64-QAM.
  • As seen by a receiver, a MR is a copy of the transmitted signal, arriving late and with reduced amplitude. The result of the additional copy is the typically seen by end users as image ghosting in analog video reception, whereas for digital communications the result is inter-symbol interference (ISI). MR sources are composed of pairs of hybrid fiber-coaxial (HFC) components separated by a distance of cable. The HFC components, also referred to as cable network components, facilitate the propagation of signal copies in a variety of ways including return loss, isolation, mixing, and combining. For instance, the MR may arise if a length of cable separates two devices with poor return loss, acting as signal reflectors. The reflector return loss and the loss between the reflectors determine the amplitude of the MR. Any HFC component, for instance a cable modem (CM), has the potential to act as a signal reflector. Note that the CM typically has as a design limit of 6 dB return loss, meaning it may reflect up to 25% of its incident power. In the cable network plant, components other then the CM typically reflect a lower percentage of incident power because the design limits are typically significantly better. However, as the cable network plant ages and elements that contribute to good RF matching degrade, for instance connectors, cable, splitters, and interfaces on printed circuit boards (PCBs), the reflected percentage of incident power increases.
  • These upstream channel impairments are known to be mitigated by the fundamental digital communications receiver function of equalization. During equalization, an equalizer generates coefficient information that is used to create an equalizing filter, with an inverse channel response, canceling distortion in the channel caused by the upstream channel impairments. The equalization coefficients in Data Over Cable Service Interface Specification (DOCSIS) 2.0 and DOCSIS 3.0 are 24 symbol-spaced coefficients (also referred to as taps). Equalization is part of virtually all modern telecommunications platforms, and is instrumental in proper return operation for all DOCSIS systems.
  • In order to offer higher data rates to subscribers in the competitive world of high-speed data and Internet access, operators must take advantage of the throughput benefits gained from leveraging more complex digital modulation schemes, such as 32-QAM and 64-QAM. Use of 32-QAM allows, for example, a 20 Mbps 16-QAM upstream to become a 25 Mbps upstream. On the other hand, for 64-QAM, it allows a 16-QAM, 20 Mbps upstream channel to become a 30 Mbps channel. This represents a 25-50% throughput improvement. Unfortunately, channels using these digital modulation schemes are also considerably more sensitive to digital communication channel impairments, including the upstream impairments described above, than the 16-QAM channels they are often replacing in the return band.
  • Given the potential problems that can be caused by the upstream impairments, upstream channels are one of the most challenging digital communication channels to manage and fully exploit. Operators prefer to ensure that capacity associated with the upstream channel, or as much of the capacity as possible, is realized for services and revenue. To do so requires a thorough understanding of a diverse set of HFC and digital communications variables. More importantly, variables that did not matter very much for 16-QAM operation now become not just relevant, but critical to understand for successful deployment of 64-QAM, and to a lesser extent, 32-QAM. Accurately diagnosing upstream issues typically requires technicians or engineers to be at multiple locations within a HFC plant and simultaneously inject test signals at the suspected device locations. This diagnostic process requires extensive manual effort, often requiring rolling trucks to remote locations within a plant or specialized test equipment. The diagnostic process is also time consuming and costly.
  • SUMMARY
  • According to an embodiment, a system estimates impairment contributions for upstream communications in a cable television system. The system receives equalization coefficients used by end devices in the cable television system. The equalization coefficients are used by equalizers to mitigate distortion in upstream channels for the end devices. The system analyzes the coefficients based on impairment thresholds to determine whether impairment problems exist in the upstream channels and to identify the types of impairment problems that exist. Other embodiments include computer-implemented methods estimating impairment contributions for upstream communications based on received equalization coefficients and impairment thresholds.
  • Embodiments interpret equalization coefficients for end devices and identify potential impairments of upstream channels for the end devices based on an analysis of the equalization coefficients. Also, a particular type of impairment problem can be identified based on the analysis of equalization coefficients. Determination of the type of impairment can be coupled with additional information, such as location of the end device or tap, to determine suspect cable network components that may be causing the impairment. Thus, identification of an impairment problem and potential solutions can be determined before a customer problem is experienced and without dispatching technicians to diagnose the problem.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • Features of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following description with reference to the figures, in which:
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram of a cable network, according to an embodiment of the invention;
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a CMTS architecture, according to an embodiment of the invention;
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a device for estimating impairment contributions and isolating defective network components, according to an embodiment of the invention; and
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a device for estimating impairment contributions and isolating defective network components, according to an embodiment of the invention;
  • FIG. 5 illustrates a method for estimating impairment contributions and isolating defective network components using a plurality of end devices, according to an embodiment of the invention; and
  • FIG. 6 shows a block diagram of a computer system that may be used for estimating impairment contributions and isolating defective network components, according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • For simplicity and illustrative purposes, the present invention is described by referring mainly to exemplary embodiments thereof. In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that the present invention may be practiced without limitation to these specific details. In other instances, well known methods and structures have not been described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the present invention.
  • The abbreviation “decibels relative to a carrier (dBc)” refers to a measure of the power ratio of a signal to a carrier signal, and is expressed in decibels. Note “dB” refers to a decibel, “ns” refers to a nanosecond, and “MHz” refers to a megahertz.
  • The term “equalization coefficient” refers to complex tap values used to create an equalizing filter with an inverse channel response.
  • The term “impairment contribution” refers to causes of impairment in an upstream hybrid fiber coaxial (HFC) plant.
  • The term “micro-reflection (MR)” refers to an impairment contribution wherein a copy of a communication signal is reflected back onto itself, with a time delay. Significant MRs can degrade upstream HFC plant performance.
  • The term “group delay variation (GDV)” refers to an impairment contribution wherein different frequency components of a signal propagate through a network component with different time delays.
  • The term “cable network plant components” refers to any component that may cause impairment in an upstream channel in the cable network. The components may be components of an HFC network, and may be active or passive components. The upstream channel may be a channel between a modem and a CMTS or another upstream channel in the cable network.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a network 100, such as an HFC network, including end devices 102. The end device 102 may be DOCSIS Terminal devices, such as cable modems (CMs), modem terminal adapters, MTAs, and embedded cable modems of DOCSIS set-top gateways (eCMs of DSGs), or any other like devices. The end devices 102 are connected to a headend 104 of the network 100 via nodes 106 and an RF cascade 103 comprised of multiple amplifiers and passive devices including cabling, taps, splitters, and in-line equalizers. A network tap is a hardware device providing access to data within the network 100. The network tap provides the ability to monitor data between two points, for instance components, in the network 100. An impairment contribution estimator 200, shown in FIG. 3, may be connected to the network 100 through any network access point including a tap. The headend 104 connects to an IP (Internet Protocol) and/or PSTN (Public Switched Telephone Network) network 108. Data, such as TV programs, audio, video and other data, which may be from the network 108, is sent from the headend 104 to the end devices 102. In addition, the end devices 102 may send data upstream towards the headend 104. Although not shown, each of the nodes 106 may be connected to multiple end devices.
  • As illustrated in FIG. 1, the headend 104 includes a CMTS 110 and optical transceivers 112 which provide optical communications to and from the CMTS 110 through optical fiber to the nodes 106. Typically, the nodes 106 connect to the headend 104, and the headend 104 contains a plurality of CMTS units 110. Each CMTS 110 contains a plurality of transceivers, which communicate with the plurality of end devices 102. For example, each CMTS 110 may have eight or more receivers (e.g., for DOCSIS 2.0), and each receiver may communicate with hundreds of end devices 102. The CMTS may have more than eight receivers (e.g., DOCSIS 3.0 may use 48 receivers).
  • FIG. 2 illustrates an architecture of the CMTS 110, according to an embodiment. As illustrated, the CMTS 110 includes a processing unit 114 having a microprocessor 116 that receives information, such as instructions and data, from a RAM 118 and a ROM 120. The processing unit 114 controls the operation of the CMTS 110 and RF communication signals to be sent by the end devices 102 to the CMTS 110. The processing unit 114 is connected to a display 122, which may display status information such as whether station maintenance (SM) is being performed, or a receiver is in need of load balancing. An input keypad 124 may also be connected to the processing unit 114 to permit an operator to provide instructions and process requests.
  • The CMTS 110 also includes an RF transceiver (transmitter/receiver) unit 126 having transmitters 128 and receivers 130 providing bi-directional communication capability with the end devices 102 through optical transceivers 112, nodes 106 and an RF cascade 103 comprised of multiple amplifiers and passive devices including cabling, taps, splitters, and in-line equalizers. The CMTS 110 may contain a plurality of RF receivers 130, such as eight RF receivers and a spare RF receiver. Each of the RF receivers 130 may provide support for a hundred or more end devices 102.
  • By way of example, the receivers 130 can be BROADCOM 3140 receivers that each includes a demodulator unit 132 and an equalizer 134 to which received RF signals are provided, for instance, for purposes of acquiring equalizer values and burst modulation error ratio (MER) measurements, packet error rate (PER) and bit error rate (BER). The equalizer 134 can be a multiple tap linear equalizer (e.g. a twenty-four tap linear equalizer), which also is known as a feed forward equalizer (FFE). The equalizer 134 can be integrally contained in the RF receiver, or alternatively, may be provided as a separate device. The communication characteristics of each receiver 130 may be stored on ROM 120 or RAM 118, or may be provided from an external source. Note that the equalizer 134 is in the upstream path, for example, from the end devices 102 towards the network 108.
  • The RF transceiver unit 126 also includes a modulator 136, which provides the modulated signals to RF transmitters 128. The modulator 136 and demodulator 132 are capable of modulation schemes of various levels of complexity. For example, some upstream DOCSIS 2.0 modulation schemes that may be used in order of level of complexity include, but are not limited to 16 QAM, 32 QAM, 64 QAM and 128 QAM. The microprocessor 116 may provide instructions to the end devices 102 as to which modulation scheme is to be used during communication.
  • The CMTS 110 also provides instructions for the end devices 102 using a transmit pre-equalization (PRE-EQ) feature in order to compensate for upstream channel impairments. The CMTS 110 receives an incoming signal from each of the end devices 102 and compares the incoming signal with an expected signal, which is an ideal response. If the incoming signal received by the CMTS 110 differs from the expected signal, the microprocessor 116 or other processing device performing a PRE-EQ function then determines a set of equalization coefficients (alternately referred to as transmit pre-equalization coefficients) for each of the end devices 102 and instructs the end devices 102 to set their transmit equalization coefficients to the transmit pre-equalization coefficients determined by the PRE-EQ function. The end devices 102 apply the pre-equalization coefficients and then continue to transmit. The CMTS 110 thereafter continues to monitor and compare the incoming signal against the expected signal.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates an architecture of an impairment contribution estimator 200. The impairment contribution estimator 200 may be connected to the network 100 through any network access point, for instance through a network access terminal. The impairment contribution estimator 200 is configured for estimating impairment contributions and isolating defective network components in the system 100 according to the method 300 below. As such, the impairment contribution estimator 200 includes a data storage device 201, and a testing module 202. The testing module 202 includes an equalization coefficient receiving (ECRC) module 203, an equalization coefficient resolution (ECRS) module 204, an impairment level determination (ILD) module 205, and a cable network plant components isolation (CPCI) module 206. The testing module 201 may also include a modulation configuration (MC) module (not shown).
  • The data storage device 201 is configured to store an impairment threshold for at least one impairment contribution. The ECRC module 203 is configured to receive equalization coefficients from the end devices 102. The equalization coefficients are thereafter stored in the data storage device 201. The ECRS module 204 is configured to resolve the equalization coefficients into the at least one impairment contribution. The ILD module 205 is configured to determine whether each of the end devices 102 exceeds the impairment threshold and to group each of the end devices 102 into sets that exceed impairment thresholds as impaired sets or sets that do not exceed impairment thresholds as unimpaired sets. The CPCI module 206 is configured to identify cable network plant components associated with each of the ILD sorted sets wherein the cable network plant components are designated as suspect components. cable network plant components are correlated with each set of end devices, for example, based on whether they are used in an upstream or downstream path for an end device.
  • The components 202-206 are configured to perform the method 300 described with respect to FIG. 5. The components 202-206 may comprise software modules, hardware modules, and a combination of software and hardware modules. Thus, in one embodiment, one or more of the modules 202-206 comprise circuit components. In another embodiment, one or more of the modules 202-206 comprise software code stored on a computer readable storage medium, which is executable by a processor. It should be understood that the impairment contribution estimator 200 depicted in FIG. 3 may include additional components and that some of the components described herein may be removed and/or modified without departing from a scope of the impairment contribution estimator 200. According to an embodiment, the impairment contribution estimator 200 comprises a part of a network device such as a RF-Sentry application. According to another embodiment, the impairment contribution estimator 200 comprises a part an edge router, such as a part of the advanced spectrum management function of the BSR64000 edge router.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates an embodiment of one of the end devices 102 (shown as 102 a), such as a cable modem. The end device 102 a contains a processor 181 which communicates with a RAM 182 and ROM 183 and which controls the general operation of the end device 102, including applying the pre-equalization coefficients and controlling preamble lengths of communications sent by the end device 102 a in accordance with instructions from the CMTS 110. The end device 102 a also contains a transceiver 186 which provides bidirectional RF communication with the CMTS 110. A demodulator 185 demodulates signals received by the transceiver 186, and an equalizer 187 biases communications transmitted to the CMTS 110. For example, the equalizer 187 is connected in the upstream path between a transmitter in the transceiver 186 and the CMTS 110. The microprocessor 181 configures the equalizer 187 using the coefficients received from the CMTS 110 to compensate for upstream impairments. The end device 102 a also contains a modulator 188, which modulates signals to be transmitted upstream to the CMTS 110 according to a modulation scheme, which the end device 102 a has been instructed to use by the CMTS 110. In addition, the end device 102 a has an attenuator 189 controlled by microprocessor 181 to attenuate signals to be transmitted by the RF transmitter to be within a desired power level. Those of skill in the art will appreciate that the components of end device 102 a have been illustrated separately only for discussion purposes and that various components may be combined in practice.
  • By way of example, the end device 102 a may be a DOCSIS network element, such as a cable modem, to generate a variety of test signals. Accordingly, the test signals may be implemented using one of the available upstream DOCSIS bandwidths, e.g. 200 kHz, 400 kHz, 800 kHz, 1600 kHz, 3200 kHz or 6400 kHz.
  • Accurate knowledge of the available and/or optimum modulation schemes of the network 100 enables the operator to utilize available resources of their network more efficiently, such as by adding additional end devices to improve portions of the network with the least complex modulation schemes so that those portions may be able to use more complex modulation schemes.
  • It will be apparent that the system 100 may include additional elements not shown and that some of the elements described herein may be removed, substituted and/or modified without departing from the scope of the system 100. It should also be apparent that one or more of the elements described in the embodiment of FIG. 1 may be optional.
  • An example of a method in which the system 100 and the impairment contribution estimator 200 may be employed for estimating impairment contributions and isolating defective network components using the end devices 102 will now be described with respect to the following flow diagram of the method 300 depicted in FIG. 5. It should be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that the method 300 represents a generalized illustration and that other steps may be added or existing steps may be removed, modified or rearranged without departing from the scopes of the method 300. In addition, the method 300 is described with respect to the system 100 by way of example and not limitation, and the method 300 may be used in other systems.
  • Some or all of the operations set forth in the method 300 may be contained as one or more computer programs stored in any desired computer readable medium and executed by a processor on a computer system. Exemplary computer readable media that may be used to store software operable to implement the present invention include but are not limited to conventional computer system RAM, ROM, EPROM, EEPROM, hard disks, or other data storage devices.
  • At step 301, as shown in FIG. 5, the impairment contribution estimator 200 retrieves at least one impairment threshold corresponding to an impairment contribution from the data storage 201. The impairment contribution may be selected from the group including GDV, AD, MR and any impairment contribution that may be isolated by analysis of the coefficients as described in detail at step 303 below. At least one impairment threshold corresponding to the impairment contribution may be selected from the group comprising an industry standard specification, a customer preferred limit, a PRE-EQ failure limit, a PRE-EQ failure limit less acceptable system margin and, where applicable, a function of signaling characteristics. Signaling characteristics include, for instance, RF frequency, QAM modulation level, bandwidth, symbol rate, forward error correction (FEC) settings, and other properties related to signaling.
  • To illustrate, where the impairment contribution is GDV, the impairment threshold may be selected from the group comprising the industry standard specification (for GDV), the customer preferred limit, the PRE-EQ failure limit, the PRE-EQ failure limit less acceptable system margin and a function of a radio frequency (RF) cascade. The function of the RF cascade may comprise a to-be-determined (TBD) value in ns/MHz per RF Amplifier. For instance, a DOCSIS assumption for GDV is 200 ns/MHz.
  • Next, where the impairment contribution is AD, the impairment threshold may be any of the industry standard specification. For instance any of a DOCSIS assumption for amplitude ripple of ≦0.5 dB per MHz, the customer preferred limit, the PRE-EQ failure limit, the PRE-EQ failure limit less acceptable system margin and a function of RF frequency and RF amplifier cascade length.
  • Similarly, where the impairment contribution is MR, the impairment threshold may be any of the industry standard specification. For instance a DOCSIS assumption of −10 dBc@<=0.5 μsec (alternately −20 dBc@<=1.0 μsec, or −30 dBc@>1.0 μsec) for a single dominant MR, the customer preferred limit, the PRE-EQ failure limit, the PRE-EQ failure limit less acceptable system margin, and a function of RF frequency. Simulation and tests may be performed to determine the highest MR impairment level that is correctable using DOCSIS 2.0/3.0 PRE-EQ. The results of these simulations may be used to define the PRE-EQ failure limit.
  • Further, the impairment contribution may comprise any impairment contribution that may be isolated by analysis of the coefficients, for instance as described at step 303 below. After the impairment contribution has been isolated, the at least one impairment threshold corresponding to the impairment contribution may be thereafter selected in a similar manner as described above with regard to the impairment threshold for AD, MR, and GDV.
  • At step 302, the impairment contribution estimator 200 determines the equalization coefficients currently being used by the end devices 102 for upstream communication. The equalization coefficients may be received from the end devices 102 or the CMTS 110. The end devices 102 may comprise at least one of the group comprising DOCSIS terminal devices, including cable modems (CMs), modem terminal adapters, (MTAs), and embedded cable modems of DOCSIS set-top gateways, (eCMs of DSGs). The resolution of the 24-tap equalizer of DOCSIS 2.0 more effectively identifies impairments, compared to the 8-tap equalizer of DOCSIS 1.1. In a current HFC plant, in order to more effectively identify impairments, the majority of the end devices 102 are required to support at least DOCSIS 2.0 with the pre-equalization feature enabled.
  • The ECRC module 203 may be configured to query the end devices 102 (preferably a DOCSIS 2.0 CM population) using a simple network management protocol (SNMP) query tool such as a modem PRE-EQ response tool. The modem PRE-EQ response tool, developed by MOTOROLA, is operable to query multiple DOCSIS terminal devices based on an Internet protocol (IP) address list. The modem PRE-EQ response tool is operable to conduct periodic polls of coefficient values and other relevant physical layer (PHY) metrics and to subsequently display the results of the periodic polls and/or to store the results of the periodic polls into a log file for post processing. The modem PRE-EQ response tool also provides users with a graphical view of the impulse response or alternately the amplitude response for each CM poll. The modem PRE-EQ response tool is operable to establish a baseline of performance, and may be used to identify defective network components based on CM IP addresses of the plurality of end devices.
  • At step 303, the impairment contribution estimator 200 determines whether an impairment problem exists for upstream communications from the end devices 102. The determination is based on an analysis of the coefficients determined from step 302 and may be based on the impairment thresholds determined from step 301. There may be multiple techniques for determining whether an impairment problem exists. In one embodiment, the coefficients are analyzed to determine whether any of the impairment thresholds are exceeded. For example, based on experience, certain coefficient values are associated with certain impairment problems and exceeded impairment thresholds. A table may be stored that includes sets of coefficient values (e.g., impairment coefficient signatures) and the type of impairment problem associated with each set of values. This tables of signatures is compared against each of the coefficients determined at step 302. If an impairment coefficient signature is found in coefficients determined at step 302, then the end device using those coefficients is determined to have the particular type of impairment associated with the signature as indicated in the table. Thus, at least two determinations may be made. One determination is whether an impairment problem exists, such as unsatisfactory GDV, AR, MR, etc. Then, if an impairment problem exists, at step 304, a second determination is made which identifies the type of impairment.
  • According to an embodiment, at step 303, to determine if an impairment problem exists, the ECRS module 204 performs a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) function on the equalization coefficients for the end devices 102 (e.g. a set of 24 complex coefficients in DOCSIS 2.0), and determines frequency domain information, including a frequency response. For instance, the ECRS module 204 may use a 1024-point FFT to arrange the equalization coefficients for the PRE-EQ baseline and determine the optimal translation of the equalization coefficients. The frequency domain information may be interpreted in multiple ways including in terms of magnitude versus frequency, phase versus frequency, and group delay versus frequency. Based on these magnitudes, a determination is made as to the type of impairment problem that exists, if any exists. For example, negligible amplitude correction but increased correction for phase and group delay is indicative of a GDV impairment. Similarly, other types of impairments can be determined. For example, the end devices 102 are sorted into sets, on increasing levels that sum the DOCSIS PRE-EQ regions for each of the end devices 102, according to the impairment that the ECRS module 204 is configured to determine. For example, the ECRS module 204 may determine which of the end devices 102 experiences the greatest amount of MR impairment contribution by sorting on the levels which result from summing the taps located in the post-tap region of each tap of the 24-tap equalizer of DOCSIS 2.0.
  • At step 304, the ILD module 205 determines the type of impairment for each end device, for example, if the impairment threshold is exceeded for the end device. In one embodiment, the ILD module 205 groups each of the end devices 102 into impairment level determined (ILD) sets. The ILD sets include impaired sets comprising end devices that exceed impairment thresholds and unimpaired sets comprised of end devices that do not exceed impairment thresholds as unimpaired sets. Furthermore, the impairment sets may include sets by type of impairment and may indicate the level of impairment for each end device. In one embodiment, the ILD module 205 determines the relation of the measured impairment contribution to the impairment threshold for each of the impairment contributions. If the impairment contribution exceeds the impairment threshold, the upstream impairments may be at a level at which a customer problem is experienced. Alternately, if the impairment threshold has an acceptable system margin, the ILD module 205 is configured to provide information so that an end user may perform preventive maintenance. The ILD module 205 may also be configured to determine a dominant impairment contribution. For instance, the ILD module 205 may analyze the translation of the equalization coefficients of the end devices 102, and an expected translation of the equalization coefficients for each of the impairment contributions in order to determine the dominant impairment contribution. The expected translation of the equalization coefficients for each of the impairment contributions comprises a translation of equalization coefficients for a channel with a single impairment, for instance AD.
  • The operation of the ILD module 205 may be enhanced by application of an increased understanding of the different impairment contributions and how they originate in HFC plant. For example, although an MR source has been discussed in the preceding section regarding MRs, combining an understanding of other probable permutations of MR sources with the location of the ILD sets increases the probability of successful isolation of the MR sources. The understanding of probable sources may be used to eliminate possible sources of the impairment contribution and to therefore isolate the source of the impairment contribution. The results may be used to define what impairment levels will likely result in service calls, and thereafter impairment thresholds as defined at step 301 may be determined. Further, the ILD module 205 may be configured to prioritize the impaired sets or prioritize end devices in each set according to level of impairment.
  • At step 305, suspect cable network components are identified that are probable causes for the type of impairment being experienced by an end device. Identification of the suspect components may be based on experience or historical analysis of past impairments and their fixes. For example, the CPCI module 206 identifies cable network plant components associated with each of the impaired sets. This process of identification may be enhanced by consulting data regarding the end devices 102 and network components between each of the plurality of end devices and the CMTS 110. The CPCI module 206 identifies the cable network components associated with impaired sets as suspect components. The CPCI module 206 then leverages the end devices 102 to isolate those experiencing an impairment problem related to a specific impairment contribution. For example, a query of the end devices 102 may reveal that all of the end devices 102 located off a particular node are reporting a MR impairment contribution above the impairment threshold for MR, while the other end devices 102, unimpaired sets are not reporting a problem.
  • At step 306, corrective action is taken. For example, the operator physically inspects all suspect components isolated at step 305 and repairs and replaces as necessary the defective components. The impairment contribution estimator 200 may provide guidance helping cable operators decide the significance of the information that they are analyzing. The impairment contribution estimator 200 may contain a checklist of possible sources of the impairment contribution, preferably sorted in order of probability. For instance, inspection of the suspect components may show that the MR impairment contribution source is a combination of tap-to-output port isolation loss and an improperly terminated cable splice at the end of a feed amplifier. By properly terminating the splice, the operator may reduce the MR to negligible amplitudes. Alternately, the impairment contribution estimator 200 may sort the impaired sets into a less impaired set of devices and a more impaired set of devices according to a level of impairment and route traffic to another channel that the impairment contribution estimator 200 indicates is less impaired.
  • The steps of the method 300 may be repeated periodically and for each of the end devices 102 or groups of end devices to detect future impairment problems and to ensure that detected impairment problems are eliminated and the improvements are sustainable. If the operator is preparing to upgrade the network 100 to a higher modulation scheme, for instance upgrading from 16-QAM to 64-QAM, the operator may perform the method 300 in order to determine potential problem components. In order to test the network 100, the operator may configure the network at the higher modulation scheme. Thereafter, the operator may perform the testing process of the method 300, designating the suspect components as potential upgrade components.
  • Although described specifically throughout the entirety of the instant disclosure, representative embodiments of the present invention have utility over a wide range of applications, and the above discussion is not intended and should not be construed to be limiting, but is offered as an illustrative discussion of aspects of the invention.
  • Embodiments of the present invention interpret equalization coefficients for end devices and identify potential impairments of upstream channels for the end devices based on an analysis of the equalization coefficients. Also, a particular type of impairment problem can be identified based on the analysis of equalization coefficients. Determination of the type of impairment can be coupled with additional information, such as location of the end device or tap, to determine suspect cable network components that may be causing the impairment. Thus, identification of an impairment problem and potential solutions can be determined before a customer problem is experienced and without dispatching technicians to diagnose the problem.
  • What has been described and illustrated herein are embodiments of the invention along with some of their variations. The terms, descriptions and figures used herein are set forth by way of illustration only and are not meant as limitations. Those skilled in the art will recognize that many variations are possible within the spirit and scope of the invention, wherein the invention is intended to be defined by the following claims—and their equivalents—in which all terms are meant in their broadest reasonable sense unless otherwise indicated.

Claims (20)

1. A system for identifying suspect cable network plant components causing an upstream impairment, the system comprising:
a data storage device configured to store an impairment threshold for at least one impairment contribution; and
a testing module configured to perform a testing process, the testing module including
an equalization coefficient receiving module (ECRC) configured to receive equalization coefficients from a plurality of end devices; and
an impairment level determination (ILD) module configured to determine whether an impairment exists for each of the end devices and to determine a type of impairment using the received equalization coefficients and the impairment threshold.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one impairment contribution comprises at least one of group delay variation (GDV), amplitude distortion (AD), micro-reflection (MR), and an impairment contribution isolated by analysis of the equalization coefficients.
3. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one impairment contribution includes a plurality of impairment contributions and the ILD module is further configured to compare the plurality of impairment contributions to determine a dominant impairment contribution.
4. The system of claim 1, further comprising:
an ECRC module configured to receive a set of equalization coefficients after corrective action for the suspect components is performed and to inform the operator whether the corrective action was effective.
5. The system of claim 1, wherein the equalization coefficients are translated into frequency domain information to determine whether an impairment exists.
6. The system of claim 1, further comprising:
an impairment contribution estimator configured to provide a checklist of possible sources of the impairment contribution.
7. The system of claim 1, further comprising:
a modulation configuration (MC) module operable to configure the system to a more advanced modulation scheme; and
wherein the testing module is further configured to perform a test on the system at the more advanced modulation scheme and to designate the suspect components as potential upgrade components.
8. A method for estimating impairments for a plurality of end devices, the method comprising:
retrieving an impairment threshold for at least one impairment contribution from a data storage device;
receiving equalization coefficients for the plurality of end devices;
determining whether an impairment exists for each of the plurality of end devices using the equalization coefficients and a determination of whether the impairment threshold for the at least one impairment contribution is exceeded; and
if an impairment exists for one or more of the plurality of end devices, then determining the type of impairment for each existing impairment.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein the type of impairment is determined from the impairment contribution for the exceeded threshold.
10. The method of claim 8, further comprising:
identifying suspect cable network components causing each impairment at least from the determine type of impairment.
11. The method of claim 10, further comprising:
inspecting the suspect components to identify defective components;
performing a corrective action on the defective components;
receiving a corrected set of equalization coefficients; and
determining whether the corrective action was not effective.
12. The method of claim 8, wherein the impairment contributions are taken from the group comprising GDV, AD, MR and other impairment contributions that may be isolated by analysis of the equalization coefficients.
13. The method of claim 8, wherein the impairment threshold for the at least one impairment contribution comprises one of an industry standard specification, a customer preferred limit, a PRE-EQ failure limit, a PRE-EQ failure limit less acceptable margin, and a function of signaling characteristics.
14. The method of claim 8, wherein the plurality of end devices comprises at least one of the group comprising DOCSIS terminal devices, including cable modems (CMs), modem terminal adapters, (MTAs), and embedded cable modems of DOCSIS set-top gateways (eCMs of DSGs).
15. The method of claim 8, further comprising:
sorting the plurality of end devices into sets that exceed the impairment contribution threshold, wherein end devices are grouped by similar communication channel characteristics and shared common path through a cable network plant components to a CMTS.
16. The method of claim 15, further comprising:
prioritizing the suspect components according to level of impairment.
17. The method of claim 15, further comprising:
sorting impaired sets into a less impaired set of end devices and a more impaired set of end devices according to a level of impairment; and
routing a modulation scheme through the more impaired set of end devices and a more advanced modulation scheme through the less impaired set of end devices.
18. A computer readable storage device storing at least one computer program that when executed by a computer system performs a method comprising:
retrieving an impairment threshold for at least one impairment contribution from a data storage device;
receiving equalization coefficients for the plurality of end devices;
determining whether an impairment exists for each of the plurality of end devices using the equalization coefficients and a determination of whether the impairment threshold for the at least one impairment contribution is exceeded; and
if an impairment exists for one or more of the plurality of end devices, then determining the type of impairment for each existing impairment.
19. The computer readable storage device of claim 18, wherein the type of impairment is determined from the impairment contribution for the exceeded threshold.
20. The computer readable storage device of claim 18, wherein the method comprises:
identifying suspect cable network components causing each impairment at least from the determine type of impairment.
US12/565,185 2009-09-23 2009-09-23 Using equalization coefficients of end devices in a cable television network to determine and diagnose impairments in upstream channels Active 2031-05-23 US8526485B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/565,185 US8526485B2 (en) 2009-09-23 2009-09-23 Using equalization coefficients of end devices in a cable television network to determine and diagnose impairments in upstream channels

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/565,185 US8526485B2 (en) 2009-09-23 2009-09-23 Using equalization coefficients of end devices in a cable television network to determine and diagnose impairments in upstream channels

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20110069745A1 true US20110069745A1 (en) 2011-03-24
US8526485B2 US8526485B2 (en) 2013-09-03

Family

ID=43756591

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/565,185 Active 2031-05-23 US8526485B2 (en) 2009-09-23 2009-09-23 Using equalization coefficients of end devices in a cable television network to determine and diagnose impairments in upstream channels

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US8526485B2 (en)

Cited By (37)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120287796A1 (en) * 2011-05-09 2012-11-15 Cox Communications, Inc. Systems and methods for assigning customers to groups for the transmission of broadband data signals
US20120288067A1 (en) * 2011-05-09 2012-11-15 Cox Communications, Inc. Systems and methods for assigning a customer device to a group of customer devices for the transmission of broadband data signals
US20130070584A1 (en) * 2011-09-15 2013-03-21 Michael D. Hutchison Network impairment unit for concurrent delay and packet queue impairments
CN103152648A (en) * 2013-02-27 2013-06-12 深圳创维-Rgb电子有限公司 Method, device and system for processing non-standard signal
US8516532B2 (en) 2009-07-28 2013-08-20 Motorola Mobility Llc IP video delivery using flexible channel bonding
US8526485B2 (en) 2009-09-23 2013-09-03 General Instrument Corporation Using equalization coefficients of end devices in a cable television network to determine and diagnose impairments in upstream channels
US8537972B2 (en) 2006-12-07 2013-09-17 General Instrument Corporation Method and apparatus for determining micro-reflections in a network
US20130290783A1 (en) * 2012-04-27 2013-10-31 General Instrument Corporation Estimating a Severity Level of a Network Fault
US8576705B2 (en) 2011-11-18 2013-11-05 General Instrument Corporation Upstream channel bonding partial service using spectrum management
US8594118B2 (en) 2006-03-24 2013-11-26 General Instrument Corporation Method and apparatus for configuring logical channels in a network
US8654640B2 (en) 2010-12-08 2014-02-18 General Instrument Corporation System and method for IP video delivery using distributed flexible channel bonding
US20140173095A1 (en) * 2012-12-19 2014-06-19 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Triggering a high availability feature in response to detecting impairment of client experience
US8837302B2 (en) 2012-04-27 2014-09-16 Motorola Mobility Llc Mapping a network fault
US8867371B2 (en) 2012-04-27 2014-10-21 Motorola Mobility Llc Estimating physical locations of network faults
US8937992B2 (en) 2011-08-30 2015-01-20 General Instrument Corporation Method and apparatus for updating equalization coefficients of adaptive pre-equalizers
US9003460B2 (en) * 2012-04-27 2015-04-07 Google Technology Holdings LLC Network monitoring with estimation of network path to network element location
US9025469B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2015-05-05 Arris Technology, Inc. Method for estimating cable plant topology
US9042236B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2015-05-26 Arris Technology, Inc. Method using equalization data to determine defects in a cable plant
US20150148089A1 (en) * 2012-04-25 2015-05-28 Intel Mobile Communications GmbH Communication devices and methods for operating a communication device
US9065731B2 (en) 2012-05-01 2015-06-23 Arris Technology, Inc. Ensure upstream channel quality measurement stability in an upstream channel bonding system using T4 timeout multiplier
US9088355B2 (en) 2006-03-24 2015-07-21 Arris Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for determining the dynamic range of an optical link in an HFC network
US9113181B2 (en) 2011-12-13 2015-08-18 Arris Technology, Inc. Dynamic channel bonding partial service triggering
US9137164B2 (en) 2012-11-15 2015-09-15 Arris Technology, Inc. Upstream receiver integrity assessment for modem registration
US9136943B2 (en) 2012-07-30 2015-09-15 Arris Technology, Inc. Method of characterizing impairments detected by equalization on a channel of a network
US9197886B2 (en) 2013-03-13 2015-11-24 Arris Enterprises, Inc. Detecting plant degradation using peer-comparison
US9203639B2 (en) 2012-12-27 2015-12-01 Arris Technology, Inc. Dynamic load balancing under partial service conditions
US20160037366A1 (en) * 2014-08-01 2016-02-04 Cox Communications, Inc. Detection and reporting of network impairments
US20160380871A1 (en) * 2011-06-30 2016-12-29 Viavi Solutions Inc. Testing an upstream path of a cable network
US20180097716A1 (en) * 2014-07-11 2018-04-05 Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. Edge analytics
RU2653289C1 (en) * 2016-12-07 2018-05-07 Владимир Леонидович Карякин Method for increasing quality of data transmission channel in iptv system by ber rate in tv broadcasting mode and device for its implementation
EP3334092A1 (en) * 2016-12-07 2018-06-13 Cisco Technology, Inc. Radio frequency signal fault signature isolation in cable network environments
CN108173703A (en) * 2016-04-25 2018-06-15 思科技术公司 Radiofrequency signal fault signature isolation in cable system environment
US10348554B2 (en) * 2016-04-25 2019-07-09 Cisco Technology, Inc. Hybrid fibre coaxial fault locationing in cable network environments
US10477199B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2019-11-12 Arris Enterprises Llc Method for identifying and prioritizing fault location in a cable plant
US10721539B1 (en) * 2013-03-14 2020-07-21 CSC Holdings, LLC Detection of impairments in a network system
US11164551B2 (en) 2019-02-28 2021-11-02 Clifford W. Chase Amplifier matching in a digital amplifier modeling system
US11502932B2 (en) 2019-05-17 2022-11-15 Keysight Technologies, Inc. Indirect testing using impairment rules

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8249540B1 (en) 2008-08-07 2012-08-21 Hypres, Inc. Two stage radio frequency interference cancellation system and method
US9735867B2 (en) 2014-04-25 2017-08-15 Arris Enterprises Llc Microreflection delay estimation in a CATV network
US9237040B1 (en) 2015-03-10 2016-01-12 Cisco Technologies, Inc. Pre-equalization enhancement for telecommunication networks
US10367699B2 (en) 2016-04-25 2019-07-30 Cisco Technology, Inc. Network architecture for predictive services management in cable network environments

Citations (95)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3838221A (en) * 1971-08-11 1974-09-24 Communications Satellite Corp Tdma satellite communications system having special reference bursts
US4245342A (en) * 1979-01-10 1981-01-13 Intech Laboratories, Inc. One-for-n modem control apparatus
US4385392A (en) * 1981-07-31 1983-05-24 Angell Gary W Modem fault detector and corrector system
US4811360A (en) * 1988-01-14 1989-03-07 General Datacomm, Inc. Apparatus and method for adaptively optimizing equalization delay of data communication equipment
US4999787A (en) * 1988-07-15 1991-03-12 Bull Hn Information Systems Inc. Hot extraction and insertion of logic boards in an on-line communication system
US5228060A (en) * 1990-07-31 1993-07-13 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Control unit for controlling modem used in receiver
US5251324A (en) * 1990-03-20 1993-10-05 Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. Method and apparatus for generating and collecting viewing statistics for remote terminals in a cable television system
US5271060A (en) * 1990-01-12 1993-12-14 Codex Corporation Circuitry for interfacing telecommunications equipment to a communication channel
US5278977A (en) * 1991-03-19 1994-01-11 Bull Hn Information Systems Inc. Intelligent node resident failure test and response in a multi-node system
US5347539A (en) * 1991-04-15 1994-09-13 Codex Corporation High speed two wire modem
US5390339A (en) * 1991-10-23 1995-02-14 Motorola Inc. Method and apparatus for selecting a serving transceiver
US5463661A (en) * 1995-02-23 1995-10-31 Motorola, Inc. TX preemphasis filter and TX power control based high speed two wire modem
US5532865A (en) * 1992-10-09 1996-07-02 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Fiber optic communication terminal, fiber optic communication system, and its wavelength setting method
US5557603A (en) * 1991-12-23 1996-09-17 Motorola, Inc. Radio communications apparatus with diversity
US5606725A (en) * 1994-11-29 1997-02-25 Xel Communications, Inc. Broadband network having an upstream power transmission level that is dynamically adjusted as a function of the bit error rate
US5631846A (en) * 1995-02-28 1997-05-20 Lucent Technologies Inc. Upstream communications for interactive networks
US5692010A (en) * 1996-01-17 1997-11-25 Zenith Electronics Corporation Adaptive equalizer with impulse noise protection
US5694437A (en) * 1995-10-10 1997-12-02 Motorola, Inc. Device and method for data signal detection in the presence of distortion and interference in communication systems
US5732104A (en) * 1994-12-14 1998-03-24 Motorola, Inc. Signalling techniques and device for high speed data transmission over voiceband channels
US5790523A (en) * 1993-09-17 1998-08-04 Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. Testing facility for a broadband communications system
US5867539A (en) * 1995-07-21 1999-02-02 Hitachi America, Ltd. Methods and apparatus for reducing the effect of impulse noise on receivers
US5870429A (en) * 1996-06-17 1999-02-09 Motorola, Inc. Apparatus method, and software modem for utilizing envelope delay distortion characteristics to determine a symbol rate and a carrier frequency for data transfer
US5886749A (en) * 1996-12-13 1999-03-23 Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. Demodulation using a time domain guard interval with an overlapped transform
US5939887A (en) * 1997-09-05 1999-08-17 Tektronix, Inc. Method for measuring spectral energy interference in a cable transmission system
US5943604A (en) * 1997-10-31 1999-08-24 Cisco Technology, Inc. Echo device method for locating upstream ingress noise gaps at cable television head ends
US6061393A (en) * 1995-04-27 2000-05-09 Wavetek Wandel And Goltermann Non-invasive digital cable test system
US6108351A (en) * 1995-11-09 2000-08-22 Thomson Broadcast Systems Non-linearity estimation method and device
US6154503A (en) * 1996-06-07 2000-11-28 Sharp Kk Corporation Automatic gain control system that responds to baseband signal distortion
US6229792B1 (en) * 1993-11-01 2001-05-08 Xircom, Inc. Spread spectrum communication system
US6230326B1 (en) * 1998-07-30 2001-05-08 Nortel Networks Limited Method and apparatus for initialization of a cable modem
US6233274B1 (en) * 1995-04-27 2001-05-15 Wavetek Wandel Goltermann Non-invasive digital cable test system
US6240553B1 (en) * 1999-03-31 2001-05-29 Diva Systems Corporation Method for providing scalable in-band and out-of-band access within a video-on-demand environment
US6272150B1 (en) * 1997-01-17 2001-08-07 Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. Cable modem map display for network management of a cable data delivery system
US6308286B1 (en) * 1994-06-30 2001-10-23 Hughes Electronics Corporation Complexity reduction system and method for integrated redundancy switchover systems
US6310909B1 (en) * 1998-12-23 2001-10-30 Broadcom Corporation DSL rate adaptation
US6321384B1 (en) * 1994-11-30 2001-11-20 General Instrument Corporation Noise reduction in cable return paths
US6330221B1 (en) * 1998-06-18 2001-12-11 Cisco Technology, Inc. Failure tolerant high density dial router
US6334219B1 (en) * 1994-09-26 2001-12-25 Adc Telecommunications Inc. Channel selection for a hybrid fiber coax network
US20010055319A1 (en) * 1998-10-30 2001-12-27 Broadcom Corporation Robust techniques for optimal upstream communication between cable modem subscribers and a headend
US20020038461A1 (en) * 2000-04-19 2002-03-28 Gerard White Radio-frequency communications redundancy
US20020044531A1 (en) * 1998-03-31 2002-04-18 Cooper Michael J. Method for measuring channel characteristics with the internet control message protocol
US6377552B1 (en) * 1997-08-29 2002-04-23 Motorola, Inc. System, device, and method for evaluating dynamic range in a communication system
US6385773B1 (en) * 1999-01-07 2002-05-07 Cisco Techology, Inc. Method and apparatus for upstream frequency channel transition
US6389068B1 (en) * 2000-05-15 2002-05-14 Motorola, Inc. Sliced bandwidth distortion prediction
US20020091970A1 (en) * 2001-01-11 2002-07-11 Naoki Furudate Communication control system
US20020116493A1 (en) * 1995-11-16 2002-08-22 David Schenkel Method of determining the topology of a network of objects
US6445734B1 (en) * 1999-06-30 2002-09-03 Conexant Systems, Inc. System and method of validating equalizer training
US6456597B1 (en) * 1998-05-04 2002-09-24 Hewlett Packard Co. Discovery of unknown MAC addresses using load balancing switch protocols
US6459703B1 (en) * 1999-06-21 2002-10-01 Terayon Communication Systems, Inc. Mixed DOCSIS 1.0 TDMA bursts with SCDMA transmissions on the same frequency channel
US20020154620A1 (en) * 2001-02-23 2002-10-24 Yehuda Azenkot Head end receiver for digital data delivery systems using mixed mode SCDMA and TDMA multiplexing
US6477197B1 (en) * 1998-06-30 2002-11-05 Arris International, Inc. Method and apparatus for a cable modem upstream RF switching system
US6480469B1 (en) * 1998-12-16 2002-11-12 Worldcom, Inc. Dial-up access response testing method and system therefor
US20020168131A1 (en) * 2001-05-14 2002-11-14 Tony Walter Wavelength power equalization by attenuation in an optical switch
US6483033B1 (en) * 2000-10-11 2002-11-19 Motorola, Inc. Cable management apparatus and method
US20020181395A1 (en) * 2001-04-27 2002-12-05 Foster Michael S. Communicating data through a network so as to ensure quality of service
US6498663B1 (en) * 1999-09-24 2002-12-24 Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. Methods and systems for detecting optical link performance of an optical link in a hybrid fiber coaxial path
US6512616B1 (en) * 1998-11-30 2003-01-28 Nec Corporation Optical packet switch
US20030028898A1 (en) * 2001-05-04 2003-02-06 General Instrument Corporation Enhanced return path performance using modulation-based alignment criteria
US6526260B1 (en) * 1999-06-24 2003-02-25 Mitel Semiconductor Limited Cross-channel interference
US20030043732A1 (en) * 2001-05-17 2003-03-06 Walton Jay R. Method and apparatus for processing data for transmission in a multi-channel communication system using selective channel transmission
US6546557B1 (en) * 1998-10-13 2003-04-08 General Instrument Corporation Method and system for enhancing digital video transmission to a set-top box
US20030067883A1 (en) * 2001-10-09 2003-04-10 Yehuda Azenkot Method and apparatus to improve SCDMA headroom
US6556660B1 (en) * 2001-04-25 2003-04-29 At&T Corp. Apparatus for providing redundant services path to customer premises equipment
US6556239B1 (en) * 2000-04-10 2003-04-29 Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. Distortion monitoring system for CATV transmission networks
US6556562B1 (en) * 1999-09-29 2003-04-29 At&T Corp. System to provide lifeline IP telephony service on cable access networks
US6559756B2 (en) * 2001-06-13 2003-05-06 Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. Ingress monitoring device in a broadband communications system
US6563868B1 (en) * 1998-07-17 2003-05-13 General Instruments Corporation Method and apparatus for adaptive equalization in the presence of large multipath echoes
US6570394B1 (en) * 1999-01-22 2003-05-27 Thomas H. Williams Tests for non-linear distortion using digital signal processing
US6570913B1 (en) * 1999-04-05 2003-05-27 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for selecting optimum frequency for upstream data transmission in a network system utilizing cable modems
US20030101463A1 (en) * 2001-11-26 2003-05-29 Adc Telecommunications, Inc. Passive CMTS redundancy
US6574797B1 (en) * 1999-01-08 2003-06-03 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for locating a cleaner bandwidth in a frequency channel for data transmission
US20030108052A1 (en) * 2001-12-06 2003-06-12 Rumiko Inoue Server load sharing system
US20030120819A1 (en) * 2001-12-20 2003-06-26 Abramson Howard D. Active-active redundancy in a cable modem termination system
US6588016B1 (en) * 1998-06-30 2003-07-01 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for locating a faulty component in a cable television system having cable modems
US20030138250A1 (en) * 2000-04-06 2003-07-24 Glynn Gerard James Wavelength division multiplex (wdm) signal monitor
US20030149991A1 (en) * 2002-02-07 2003-08-07 Reidhead Lance R. Radio frequency characterization of cable plant and corresponding calibration of communication equipment communicating via the cable plant
US20030158940A1 (en) * 2002-02-20 2003-08-21 Leigh Kevin B. Method for integrated load balancing among peer servers
US6611795B2 (en) * 2000-12-06 2003-08-26 Motorola, Inc. Apparatus and method for providing adaptive forward error correction utilizing the error vector magnitude metric
US20030182664A1 (en) * 2002-02-28 2003-09-25 Itay Lusky Parameter selection in a communication system
US20030181185A1 (en) * 2002-02-28 2003-09-25 Itay Lusky Noise identification in a communication system
US20030179768A1 (en) * 2002-02-28 2003-09-25 Itay Lusky Constellation selection in a communication system
US20030179821A1 (en) * 2002-02-28 2003-09-25 Itay Lusky Channel monitoring for improved parameter selection in a communication system
US20030179770A1 (en) * 2002-02-28 2003-09-25 Zvi Reznic Channel allocation and reallocation in a communication system
US20030188254A1 (en) * 2002-02-28 2003-10-02 Itay Lusky Error correction code parameter selection in a communication system
US20030185176A1 (en) * 2002-02-28 2003-10-02 Itay Lusky Noise analysis in a communication system
US20030200317A1 (en) * 2002-04-19 2003-10-23 Native Networks Technologies Ltd Method and system for dynamically allocating bandwidth to a plurality of network elements
US6646677B2 (en) * 1996-10-25 2003-11-11 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image sensing control method and apparatus, image transmission control method, apparatus, and system, and storage means storing program that implements the method
US20030212999A1 (en) * 2002-05-08 2003-11-13 Simin Cai System and method for providing video telephony over a cable access network infrastructure
US6662135B1 (en) * 1998-12-09 2003-12-09 3Com Corporation Method and apparatus for reflective mixer testing of a cable modem
US6662368B1 (en) * 2000-09-11 2003-12-09 Arris International, Inc. Variable spare circuit group size and quantity having multiple active circuits
US6671334B1 (en) * 1998-11-03 2003-12-30 Tektronix, Inc. Measurement receiver demodulator
US20040015765A1 (en) * 2000-12-06 2004-01-22 Motorola, Inc. Apparatus and method for providing optimal adaptive forward error correction in data communications
US6687632B1 (en) * 1998-01-23 2004-02-03 Trilithic, Inc. Testing of CATV systems
US6690655B1 (en) * 2000-10-19 2004-02-10 Motorola, Inc. Low-powered communication system and method of operation
US7778314B2 (en) * 2006-05-04 2010-08-17 Texas Instruments Incorporated Apparatus for and method of far-end crosstalk (FEXT) detection and estimation

Family Cites Families (145)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6175575B1 (en) 1997-09-26 2001-01-16 Lucent Technologies Inc. Internet service via ISDN
US6775840B1 (en) 1997-12-19 2004-08-10 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for using a spectrum analyzer for locating ingress noise gaps
US6700875B1 (en) 1998-03-31 2004-03-02 Motorola, Inc. System, device, and method for selecting a channel in a multichannel communication network
US6961314B1 (en) 1998-10-30 2005-11-01 Broadcom Corporation Burst receiver for cable modem system
US7164694B1 (en) 1998-11-17 2007-01-16 Cisco Technology, Inc. Virtual loop carrier system with gateway protocol mediation
JP3781911B2 (en) 1999-01-07 2006-06-07 株式会社日立製作所 Information reproducing method and apparatus
US6700927B1 (en) 1999-03-10 2004-03-02 Next Level Communications, Inc. Method for establishing and adapting communication link parameters in XDSL transmission systems
US6985437B1 (en) 1999-05-25 2006-01-10 3Com Corporation Method for dynamic performance optimization in a data-over-cable system
US6895043B1 (en) 1999-06-03 2005-05-17 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for measuring quality of upstream signal transmission of a cable modem
US6772437B1 (en) 1999-07-28 2004-08-03 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson Cable modems and systems and methods for identification of a noise signal source on a cable network
US7856049B2 (en) 1999-08-31 2010-12-21 Broadcom Corporation Ranging and registering cable modems under attenuated transmission conditions
US7065779B1 (en) 1999-10-13 2006-06-20 Cisco Technology, Inc. Technique for synchronizing multiple access controllers at the head end of an access network
US6711134B1 (en) 1999-11-30 2004-03-23 Agilent Technologies, Inc. Monitoring system and method implementing an automatic test plan
US6853932B1 (en) 1999-11-30 2005-02-08 Agilent Technologies, Inc. Monitoring system and method implementing a channel plan and test plan
US6741947B1 (en) 1999-11-30 2004-05-25 Agilent Technologies, Inc. Monitoring system and method implementing a total node power test
US6877166B1 (en) 2000-01-18 2005-04-05 Cisco Technology, Inc. Intelligent power level adjustment for cable modems in presence of noise
US7058007B1 (en) 2000-01-18 2006-06-06 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method for a cable modem to rapidly switch to a backup CMTS
US6839829B1 (en) 2000-01-18 2005-01-04 Cisco Technology, Inc. Routing protocol based redundancy design for shared-access networks
US7246368B1 (en) 2000-01-28 2007-07-17 Cisco Technology, Inc. Cable plant certification procedure using cable modems
US7039939B1 (en) 2000-05-09 2006-05-02 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for creating virtual upstream channels for enhanced lookahead channel parameter testing
US6757253B1 (en) 2000-05-30 2004-06-29 Motorola, Inc. Spectrum management method for a cable data system
US6944881B1 (en) 2000-06-19 2005-09-13 3Com Corporation Method for using an initial maintenance opportunity for non-contention ranging
US20050198688A1 (en) 2000-09-19 2005-09-08 Fong Thomas K.T. System and method for digitally monitoring a cable plant
DE60041875D1 (en) 2000-09-20 2009-05-07 Lucent Technologies Inc Communication system and method with variable training means
US6895594B1 (en) 2000-10-18 2005-05-17 Michael J. Simoes Switch matrix packaging for high availability
US7142609B2 (en) 2000-11-29 2006-11-28 Sunrise Telecom Incorporated Method and apparatus for detecting and quantifying impairments in QAM signals
US7072365B1 (en) 2000-12-29 2006-07-04 Arris Interactive, Llc System and method for multiplexing broadband signals
US7222255B1 (en) 2001-02-28 2007-05-22 3Com Corporation System and method for network performance testing
US6961370B2 (en) 2001-03-29 2005-11-01 Acterna Sweep method using digital signals
US7295518B1 (en) 2001-08-30 2007-11-13 Entropic Communications Inc. Broadband network for coaxial cable using multi-carrier modulation
US7099412B2 (en) 2001-05-14 2006-08-29 Texas Instruments Incorporated Sequential decoding with backtracking and adaptive equalization to combat narrowband interference
WO2002101922A1 (en) 2001-06-08 2002-12-19 Broadcom Corporation System and method for performing ranging in a cable modem system
US7010002B2 (en) 2001-06-14 2006-03-07 At&T Corp. Broadband network with enterprise wireless communication method for residential and business environment
US7177324B1 (en) 2001-07-12 2007-02-13 At&T Corp. Network having bandwidth sharing
US7263123B2 (en) 2001-09-18 2007-08-28 Broadcom Corporation Fast computation of coefficients for a variable delay decision feedback equalizer
US6973141B1 (en) 2001-10-04 2005-12-06 Wideband Semiconductors, Inc. Flexible multimode QAM modulator
US7054554B1 (en) 2001-11-02 2006-05-30 Ciena Corporation Method and system for detecting network elements in an optical communications network
US7099580B1 (en) 2001-11-02 2006-08-29 Ciena Corporation Method and system for communicating network topology in an optical communications network
US20030125040A1 (en) 2001-11-06 2003-07-03 Walton Jay R. Multiple-access multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) communication system
US7227863B1 (en) 2001-11-09 2007-06-05 Cisco Technology, Inc. Methods and apparatus for implementing home agent redundancy
US20030200548A1 (en) 2001-12-27 2003-10-23 Paul Baran Method and apparatus for viewer control of digital TV program start time
US7242862B2 (en) 2002-01-21 2007-07-10 Altera Corporation Network diagnostic tool for an optical transport network
EP1341335B1 (en) 2002-02-28 2015-09-23 Intel Corporation Channel monitoring for improved parameter selection in a communication system
US20040047284A1 (en) 2002-03-13 2004-03-11 Eidson Donald Brian Transmit diversity framing structure for multipath channels
US7209656B2 (en) 2002-04-12 2007-04-24 Fujitsu Limited Management of optical links using power level information
KR20040102096A (en) 2002-04-17 2004-12-03 톰슨 라이센싱 소시에떼 아노님 Equalizer status monitor
US7158542B1 (en) 2002-05-03 2007-01-02 Atheros Communications, Inc. Dynamic preamble detection
JP4256207B2 (en) 2002-06-28 2009-04-22 パナソニック株式会社 Transmitting apparatus and communication mode selection table updating method
US6961373B2 (en) 2002-07-01 2005-11-01 Solarflare Communications, Inc. Method and apparatus for channel equalization
US7490345B2 (en) 2002-07-08 2009-02-10 Terayon Communications Systems, Inc. Upstream only linecard with front end multiplexer for CMTS
KR100553544B1 (en) 2002-08-31 2006-02-20 삼성탈레스 주식회사 Method of frequency offset estimation and channel equalization in burst OFDM transmission system
US7739359B1 (en) 2002-09-12 2010-06-15 Cisco Technology, Inc. Methods and apparatus for secure cable modem provisioning
US7248798B2 (en) 2002-09-30 2007-07-24 Tropic Networks Inc. Method and system for identification of channels in an optical network
US7451472B2 (en) 2002-09-30 2008-11-11 Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. System and method to test network performance with impairments
US8116253B2 (en) 2002-10-08 2012-02-14 Qualcomm Incorporated Controlling forward and reverse link traffic channel power
JP4124710B2 (en) 2002-10-17 2008-07-23 松下電器産業株式会社 Wireless communication system
US7684315B1 (en) 2002-11-08 2010-03-23 Juniper Networks, Inc. Ordered switchover of cable modems
US7548558B2 (en) 2002-11-15 2009-06-16 Terayon Communications Systems, Inc. Cable modem termination system with flexible addition of single upstreams or downstreams
JP2004172783A (en) 2002-11-19 2004-06-17 Fujitsu Ltd System for verifying transmission propriety of route in wavelength division multiplex optical transmission network system
US6987922B2 (en) 2002-12-05 2006-01-17 Tropic Networks Inc. Method and apparatus for controlling a variable optical attenuator in an optical network
WO2004056047A1 (en) 2002-12-13 2004-07-01 Internap Network Services Corporation Topology aware route control
AU2003243376A1 (en) 2002-12-17 2004-07-29 Bae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc Bandwidth efficient cable network modem
US20050034159A1 (en) 2002-12-20 2005-02-10 Texas Instruments Incorporated Implementing a hybrid wireless and coaxial cable network
US20040139473A1 (en) 2003-01-10 2004-07-15 Adc Broadband Access Systems, Inc. Increasing capacity in a cable modem termination system (CMTS) with passive redundancy
US7782898B2 (en) 2003-02-04 2010-08-24 Cisco Technology, Inc. Wideband cable system
US7421276B2 (en) 2003-04-09 2008-09-02 Nortel Networks Limited Method, apparatus and system of configuring a wireless device based on location
US20040181811A1 (en) 2003-03-13 2004-09-16 Rakib Selim Shlomo Thin DOCSIS in-band management for interactive HFC service delivery
US6906526B2 (en) 2003-03-14 2005-06-14 General Instrument Corporation Non-intrusive cable connection monitoring for use in HFC networks
US8040915B2 (en) 2003-05-19 2011-10-18 Broadcom Corporation System, method, and computer program product for facilitating communication between devices implementing proprietary features in a DOCSIS-compliant broadband communication system
US7703018B2 (en) 2003-05-22 2010-04-20 International Business Machines Corporation Apparatus and method for automating the diagramming of virtual local area networks
US20040261119A1 (en) 2003-06-17 2004-12-23 Williams Christopher Pierce Addressable fiber node
US7716712B2 (en) 2003-06-18 2010-05-11 General Instrument Corporation Narrowband interference and identification and digital processing for cable television return path performance enhancement
US7315967B2 (en) 2003-07-31 2008-01-01 Terayon Communication Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for automatic rate adaptation in a DOCSIS upstream
US7471928B2 (en) 2003-09-08 2008-12-30 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Modulation scheme management
CA2535643C (en) 2003-09-11 2013-03-19 General Instrument Corporation Spectrum management systems and methods for cable networks
JP2005142923A (en) 2003-11-07 2005-06-02 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Radio communication equipment and mcs determination method
US7751338B2 (en) 2003-12-06 2010-07-06 Terayon Communication Systems, Inc. Establishment of multiple upstream DOCSIS logical channels based upon performance
WO2005064830A1 (en) 2003-12-26 2005-07-14 Zte Corporation Uplink burst equalizing method in broad wide access system
JP2005217548A (en) 2004-01-27 2005-08-11 Nec Corp Method and system for radio communication and radio terminal
US7895632B2 (en) 2004-02-12 2011-02-22 Sony Corporation Cable diagnostic and monitoring system
US20050226161A1 (en) 2004-04-06 2005-10-13 Jaworski Richard C System for monitoring the upstream and downstream cable modem channel
US8089972B2 (en) 2004-05-03 2012-01-03 Level 3 Communications, Llc Registration redirect server
US20050281200A1 (en) 2004-06-16 2005-12-22 Gerard Terreault QAM signal analysis in a network
US7970010B2 (en) 2004-12-10 2011-06-28 Broadcom Corporation Upstream channel bonding in a cable communications system
US7760624B1 (en) 2005-03-08 2010-07-20 Adtran, Inc. Network access device and method for protecting subscriber line communications
US7489641B2 (en) 2005-04-25 2009-02-10 Acterna Data connection quality analysis apparatus and methods
US8345557B2 (en) 2005-06-30 2013-01-01 General Instrument Corporation Automated monitoring of a network
US7742771B2 (en) 2005-09-01 2010-06-22 General Instrument Corporation Automated load balancing of receivers in a network
US20070076790A1 (en) 2005-09-30 2007-04-05 Thibeault Brian K Method and apparatus for testing a network using a spare receiver
US8116360B2 (en) 2005-09-30 2012-02-14 General Instrument Corporation Method and apparatus for preventing loss of service from hardware failure in a network
US20070076592A1 (en) 2005-09-30 2007-04-05 Thibeault Brian K Non-invasive frequency rollback apparatus and method
CN101288302A (en) 2005-10-12 2008-10-15 汤姆逊许可公司 Band switchable taps and amplifier for use in a cable system
US7539125B2 (en) 2005-10-14 2009-05-26 Via Technologies, Inc. Method and circuit for frequency offset estimation in frequency domain in the orthogonal frequency division multiplexing baseband receiver for IEEE 802.11A/G wireless LAN standard
US20070094691A1 (en) 2005-10-24 2007-04-26 Gazdzinski Robert F Method and apparatus for on-demand content transmission and control over networks
US7983295B2 (en) 2005-10-28 2011-07-19 Broadcom Corporation Optimizing packet queues for channel bonding over a plurality of downstream channels of a communications management system
WO2007062108A2 (en) 2005-11-23 2007-05-31 Pak Siripunkaw Method of upgrading a platform in a subscriber gateway device
US7944964B2 (en) 2005-12-09 2011-05-17 Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute Apparatus and method for stable DEF using selective FBF
US7831887B2 (en) 2005-12-15 2010-11-09 General Instrument Corporation Method and apparatus for using long forward error correcting codes in a content distribution system
US7567820B2 (en) 2006-02-09 2009-07-28 Altair Semiconductor Ltd. Scanning for network connnections with variable scan rate
US7778546B2 (en) 2006-02-13 2010-08-17 Aurora Networks, Inc. Point-to-multipoint high data rate delivery systems from optical node in HFC systems over existing and advanced coaxial network
JP4732193B2 (en) 2006-03-01 2011-07-27 住友電工ネットワークス株式会社 COMMUNICATION DEVICE, COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, AND COMMUNICATION METHOD
US7573884B2 (en) 2006-03-06 2009-08-11 Texas Instruments Incorporated Cable modem downstream channel bonding re-sequencing mechanism
US7672310B2 (en) 2006-03-13 2010-03-02 General Instrument Corporation Method and apparatus for dynamically changing the preamble length of a burst communication
US9088355B2 (en) 2006-03-24 2015-07-21 Arris Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for determining the dynamic range of an optical link in an HFC network
US20070245177A1 (en) 2006-03-24 2007-10-18 General Instrument Corporation Method and apparatus for determining the total power margin available for an hfc network
US7742697B2 (en) 2006-09-05 2010-06-22 General Instrument Corporation Efficient use of trusted third parties for additional content-sharing security
US7953144B2 (en) 2006-09-25 2011-05-31 Arris Group, Inc. Method and system for detecting impulse noise in a broadband communication system
US20080125984A1 (en) 2006-09-25 2008-05-29 Veselin Skendzic Spatially Assisted Fault Reporting Method, System and Apparatus
US7792183B2 (en) 2006-10-12 2010-09-07 Acterna Llc Digital quality index for QAM digital signals
KR101136538B1 (en) 2006-10-16 2012-04-17 포항공과대학교 산학협력단 Apparatus for equalizing clipping noise signals of receiver systems and method thereof
US7876697B2 (en) 2006-10-26 2011-01-25 General Instrument Corporation Method and apparatus for characterizing modulation schemes in an HFC network
US7693090B1 (en) 2006-10-31 2010-04-06 Adtran, Inc. Systems and methods for discovering PME bonding groups
US8537972B2 (en) 2006-12-07 2013-09-17 General Instrument Corporation Method and apparatus for determining micro-reflections in a network
WO2008094987A1 (en) 2007-01-30 2008-08-07 General Instrument Corporation Method and apparatus for determining modulation levels that are supported on a channel
EP1956782A1 (en) 2007-02-08 2008-08-13 Abb Research Ltd. Method and apparatus for adaptive blind equalization
US20080193137A1 (en) 2007-02-08 2008-08-14 General Instrument Corporation Method and apparatus for extending broadband communication services over a wireless link while protecting the network from performance degradations caused by the wireless link
US8037541B2 (en) 2007-04-06 2011-10-11 General Instrument Corporation System, device and method for interoperability between different digital rights management systems
US8279764B2 (en) 2007-05-22 2012-10-02 General Instrument Corporation Method and apparatus for selecting a network element for testing a network
US10482081B2 (en) 2007-06-04 2019-11-19 Bce Inc. Methods and systems for validating online transactions using location information
US7802286B2 (en) 2007-07-24 2010-09-21 Time Warner Cable Inc. Methods and apparatus for format selection for network optimization
US8180001B2 (en) 2007-10-17 2012-05-15 Broadcom Corporation Adaptive equalization and interference cancellation with time-varying noise and/or interference
KR101127597B1 (en) 2007-10-19 2012-03-23 한국전자통신연구원 Method and Apparatus of allocating upstream channel resource in HFC Network
US8468572B2 (en) 2008-03-26 2013-06-18 Cisco Technology, Inc. Distributing digital video content to multiple end-user devices
US7978756B2 (en) 2008-04-07 2011-07-12 Ikanos Communications, Inc. Systems and methods for monitoring impulse noise
ES2792349T3 (en) 2008-05-30 2020-11-11 Arris Group Inc Fast initialization of multimode devices
US8040807B2 (en) 2008-09-05 2011-10-18 Cisco Technology, Inc. QoS on bonded channels of a shared access cable network
US9210220B2 (en) 2008-09-29 2015-12-08 Andrew Steckley System and method for intelligent automated remote management of electromechanical devices
US9112910B2 (en) 2008-10-14 2015-08-18 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for authentication
US8201207B2 (en) 2008-12-15 2012-06-12 Cisco Technology, Inc. Apparatus and methods for moving cable modems between upstream channels
US8081674B2 (en) 2008-12-23 2011-12-20 General Information Corporation Methods and system for determining a dominant impairment of an impaired communication channel
US8000254B2 (en) 2008-12-23 2011-08-16 General Instruments Corporation Methods and system for determining a dominant impairment of an impaired communication channel
TWI386020B (en) 2009-01-21 2013-02-11 Htc Corp Method, apparatus and computer program product for selecting location
US8830843B2 (en) 2009-02-27 2014-09-09 Cisco Technology, Inc. Wideband fault correlation system
US8179814B2 (en) 2009-03-30 2012-05-15 John Mezzalingua Associates, Inc. Automatic return path switching for a signal conditioning device
US8516532B2 (en) 2009-07-28 2013-08-20 Motorola Mobility Llc IP video delivery using flexible channel bonding
US8325790B2 (en) 2009-08-03 2012-12-04 Analog Devices, Inc. Equalization for OFDM communication
US8825820B2 (en) 2009-09-18 2014-09-02 At&T Intellectual Property I, Lp Network aware application management
US8526485B2 (en) 2009-09-23 2013-09-03 General Instrument Corporation Using equalization coefficients of end devices in a cable television network to determine and diagnose impairments in upstream channels
US8284828B2 (en) 2009-11-11 2012-10-09 General Instrument Corporation Monitoring instability and resetting an equalizer
US20110153683A1 (en) 2009-12-22 2011-06-23 Hoskinson R Andrew Method and system for generating visual representations of data
US8416697B2 (en) 2010-02-05 2013-04-09 Comcast Cable Communications, Llc Identification of a fault
US8971394B2 (en) 2010-02-05 2015-03-03 Comcast Cable Communications, Llc Inducing response signatures in a communication network
US8392533B2 (en) 2010-08-24 2013-03-05 Comcast Cable Communications, Llc Dynamic bandwidth load balancing in a data distribution network
US9306807B2 (en) 2010-09-30 2016-04-05 Google Technology Holdings LLC Adaptive protocol/initialization technique selection
US8654640B2 (en) 2010-12-08 2014-02-18 General Instrument Corporation System and method for IP video delivery using distributed flexible channel bonding

Patent Citations (99)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3838221A (en) * 1971-08-11 1974-09-24 Communications Satellite Corp Tdma satellite communications system having special reference bursts
US4245342A (en) * 1979-01-10 1981-01-13 Intech Laboratories, Inc. One-for-n modem control apparatus
US4385392A (en) * 1981-07-31 1983-05-24 Angell Gary W Modem fault detector and corrector system
US4811360A (en) * 1988-01-14 1989-03-07 General Datacomm, Inc. Apparatus and method for adaptively optimizing equalization delay of data communication equipment
US4999787A (en) * 1988-07-15 1991-03-12 Bull Hn Information Systems Inc. Hot extraction and insertion of logic boards in an on-line communication system
US5271060A (en) * 1990-01-12 1993-12-14 Codex Corporation Circuitry for interfacing telecommunications equipment to a communication channel
US5251324A (en) * 1990-03-20 1993-10-05 Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. Method and apparatus for generating and collecting viewing statistics for remote terminals in a cable television system
US5228060A (en) * 1990-07-31 1993-07-13 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Control unit for controlling modem used in receiver
US5278977A (en) * 1991-03-19 1994-01-11 Bull Hn Information Systems Inc. Intelligent node resident failure test and response in a multi-node system
US5347539A (en) * 1991-04-15 1994-09-13 Codex Corporation High speed two wire modem
US5390339A (en) * 1991-10-23 1995-02-14 Motorola Inc. Method and apparatus for selecting a serving transceiver
US5557603A (en) * 1991-12-23 1996-09-17 Motorola, Inc. Radio communications apparatus with diversity
US5532865A (en) * 1992-10-09 1996-07-02 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Fiber optic communication terminal, fiber optic communication system, and its wavelength setting method
US5790523A (en) * 1993-09-17 1998-08-04 Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. Testing facility for a broadband communications system
US6229792B1 (en) * 1993-11-01 2001-05-08 Xircom, Inc. Spread spectrum communication system
US6308286B1 (en) * 1994-06-30 2001-10-23 Hughes Electronics Corporation Complexity reduction system and method for integrated redundancy switchover systems
US6334219B1 (en) * 1994-09-26 2001-12-25 Adc Telecommunications Inc. Channel selection for a hybrid fiber coax network
US5606725A (en) * 1994-11-29 1997-02-25 Xel Communications, Inc. Broadband network having an upstream power transmission level that is dynamically adjusted as a function of the bit error rate
US6321384B1 (en) * 1994-11-30 2001-11-20 General Instrument Corporation Noise reduction in cable return paths
US5732104A (en) * 1994-12-14 1998-03-24 Motorola, Inc. Signalling techniques and device for high speed data transmission over voiceband channels
US6606351B1 (en) * 1995-02-06 2003-08-12 Adc Telecommunications, Inc. Ingress protection in a communication system with orthogonal carriers
US5463661A (en) * 1995-02-23 1995-10-31 Motorola, Inc. TX preemphasis filter and TX power control based high speed two wire modem
US5631846A (en) * 1995-02-28 1997-05-20 Lucent Technologies Inc. Upstream communications for interactive networks
US6278730B1 (en) * 1995-04-27 2001-08-21 Wavetek Wandell Goltermann Non-invasive digital cable test system
US6061393A (en) * 1995-04-27 2000-05-09 Wavetek Wandel And Goltermann Non-invasive digital cable test system
US6233274B1 (en) * 1995-04-27 2001-05-15 Wavetek Wandel Goltermann Non-invasive digital cable test system
US5867539A (en) * 1995-07-21 1999-02-02 Hitachi America, Ltd. Methods and apparatus for reducing the effect of impulse noise on receivers
US5694437A (en) * 1995-10-10 1997-12-02 Motorola, Inc. Device and method for data signal detection in the presence of distortion and interference in communication systems
US6108351A (en) * 1995-11-09 2000-08-22 Thomson Broadcast Systems Non-linearity estimation method and device
US20020116493A1 (en) * 1995-11-16 2002-08-22 David Schenkel Method of determining the topology of a network of objects
US5692010A (en) * 1996-01-17 1997-11-25 Zenith Electronics Corporation Adaptive equalizer with impulse noise protection
US6434583B1 (en) * 1996-05-20 2002-08-13 Adc Telecommunications, Inc. Fast fourier transform apparatus and method
US6154503A (en) * 1996-06-07 2000-11-28 Sharp Kk Corporation Automatic gain control system that responds to baseband signal distortion
US5870429A (en) * 1996-06-17 1999-02-09 Motorola, Inc. Apparatus method, and software modem for utilizing envelope delay distortion characteristics to determine a symbol rate and a carrier frequency for data transfer
US6646677B2 (en) * 1996-10-25 2003-11-11 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image sensing control method and apparatus, image transmission control method, apparatus, and system, and storage means storing program that implements the method
US5886749A (en) * 1996-12-13 1999-03-23 Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. Demodulation using a time domain guard interval with an overlapped transform
US6272150B1 (en) * 1997-01-17 2001-08-07 Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. Cable modem map display for network management of a cable data delivery system
US6377552B1 (en) * 1997-08-29 2002-04-23 Motorola, Inc. System, device, and method for evaluating dynamic range in a communication system
US5939887A (en) * 1997-09-05 1999-08-17 Tektronix, Inc. Method for measuring spectral energy interference in a cable transmission system
US5943604A (en) * 1997-10-31 1999-08-24 Cisco Technology, Inc. Echo device method for locating upstream ingress noise gaps at cable television head ends
US6032019A (en) * 1997-10-31 2000-02-29 Cisco Technologies, Inc. Echo device method for locating upstream ingress noise gaps at cable television head ends
US6687632B1 (en) * 1998-01-23 2004-02-03 Trilithic, Inc. Testing of CATV systems
US20020044531A1 (en) * 1998-03-31 2002-04-18 Cooper Michael J. Method for measuring channel characteristics with the internet control message protocol
US6456597B1 (en) * 1998-05-04 2002-09-24 Hewlett Packard Co. Discovery of unknown MAC addresses using load balancing switch protocols
US6330221B1 (en) * 1998-06-18 2001-12-11 Cisco Technology, Inc. Failure tolerant high density dial router
US6588016B1 (en) * 1998-06-30 2003-07-01 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for locating a faulty component in a cable television system having cable modems
US6477197B1 (en) * 1998-06-30 2002-11-05 Arris International, Inc. Method and apparatus for a cable modem upstream RF switching system
US6563868B1 (en) * 1998-07-17 2003-05-13 General Instruments Corporation Method and apparatus for adaptive equalization in the presence of large multipath echoes
US6230326B1 (en) * 1998-07-30 2001-05-08 Nortel Networks Limited Method and apparatus for initialization of a cable modem
US6546557B1 (en) * 1998-10-13 2003-04-08 General Instrument Corporation Method and system for enhancing digital video transmission to a set-top box
US20010055319A1 (en) * 1998-10-30 2001-12-27 Broadcom Corporation Robust techniques for optimal upstream communication between cable modem subscribers and a headend
US6671334B1 (en) * 1998-11-03 2003-12-30 Tektronix, Inc. Measurement receiver demodulator
US6512616B1 (en) * 1998-11-30 2003-01-28 Nec Corporation Optical packet switch
US6662135B1 (en) * 1998-12-09 2003-12-09 3Com Corporation Method and apparatus for reflective mixer testing of a cable modem
US6480469B1 (en) * 1998-12-16 2002-11-12 Worldcom, Inc. Dial-up access response testing method and system therefor
US6310909B1 (en) * 1998-12-23 2001-10-30 Broadcom Corporation DSL rate adaptation
US6385773B1 (en) * 1999-01-07 2002-05-07 Cisco Techology, Inc. Method and apparatus for upstream frequency channel transition
US6574797B1 (en) * 1999-01-08 2003-06-03 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for locating a cleaner bandwidth in a frequency channel for data transmission
US6570394B1 (en) * 1999-01-22 2003-05-27 Thomas H. Williams Tests for non-linear distortion using digital signal processing
US6240553B1 (en) * 1999-03-31 2001-05-29 Diva Systems Corporation Method for providing scalable in-band and out-of-band access within a video-on-demand environment
US6570913B1 (en) * 1999-04-05 2003-05-27 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for selecting optimum frequency for upstream data transmission in a network system utilizing cable modems
US6459703B1 (en) * 1999-06-21 2002-10-01 Terayon Communication Systems, Inc. Mixed DOCSIS 1.0 TDMA bursts with SCDMA transmissions on the same frequency channel
US6526260B1 (en) * 1999-06-24 2003-02-25 Mitel Semiconductor Limited Cross-channel interference
US6445734B1 (en) * 1999-06-30 2002-09-03 Conexant Systems, Inc. System and method of validating equalizer training
US6498663B1 (en) * 1999-09-24 2002-12-24 Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. Methods and systems for detecting optical link performance of an optical link in a hybrid fiber coaxial path
US6556562B1 (en) * 1999-09-29 2003-04-29 At&T Corp. System to provide lifeline IP telephony service on cable access networks
US20030138250A1 (en) * 2000-04-06 2003-07-24 Glynn Gerard James Wavelength division multiplex (wdm) signal monitor
US6556239B1 (en) * 2000-04-10 2003-04-29 Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. Distortion monitoring system for CATV transmission networks
US20020038461A1 (en) * 2000-04-19 2002-03-28 Gerard White Radio-frequency communications redundancy
US6389068B1 (en) * 2000-05-15 2002-05-14 Motorola, Inc. Sliced bandwidth distortion prediction
US6662368B1 (en) * 2000-09-11 2003-12-09 Arris International, Inc. Variable spare circuit group size and quantity having multiple active circuits
US6483033B1 (en) * 2000-10-11 2002-11-19 Motorola, Inc. Cable management apparatus and method
US6690655B1 (en) * 2000-10-19 2004-02-10 Motorola, Inc. Low-powered communication system and method of operation
US6611795B2 (en) * 2000-12-06 2003-08-26 Motorola, Inc. Apparatus and method for providing adaptive forward error correction utilizing the error vector magnitude metric
US20040015765A1 (en) * 2000-12-06 2004-01-22 Motorola, Inc. Apparatus and method for providing optimal adaptive forward error correction in data communications
US20020091970A1 (en) * 2001-01-11 2002-07-11 Naoki Furudate Communication control system
US20020154620A1 (en) * 2001-02-23 2002-10-24 Yehuda Azenkot Head end receiver for digital data delivery systems using mixed mode SCDMA and TDMA multiplexing
US6556660B1 (en) * 2001-04-25 2003-04-29 At&T Corp. Apparatus for providing redundant services path to customer premises equipment
US20020181395A1 (en) * 2001-04-27 2002-12-05 Foster Michael S. Communicating data through a network so as to ensure quality of service
US20030028898A1 (en) * 2001-05-04 2003-02-06 General Instrument Corporation Enhanced return path performance using modulation-based alignment criteria
US20020168131A1 (en) * 2001-05-14 2002-11-14 Tony Walter Wavelength power equalization by attenuation in an optical switch
US20030043732A1 (en) * 2001-05-17 2003-03-06 Walton Jay R. Method and apparatus for processing data for transmission in a multi-channel communication system using selective channel transmission
US6559756B2 (en) * 2001-06-13 2003-05-06 Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. Ingress monitoring device in a broadband communications system
US20030067883A1 (en) * 2001-10-09 2003-04-10 Yehuda Azenkot Method and apparatus to improve SCDMA headroom
US20030101463A1 (en) * 2001-11-26 2003-05-29 Adc Telecommunications, Inc. Passive CMTS redundancy
US20030108052A1 (en) * 2001-12-06 2003-06-12 Rumiko Inoue Server load sharing system
US20030120819A1 (en) * 2001-12-20 2003-06-26 Abramson Howard D. Active-active redundancy in a cable modem termination system
US20030149991A1 (en) * 2002-02-07 2003-08-07 Reidhead Lance R. Radio frequency characterization of cable plant and corresponding calibration of communication equipment communicating via the cable plant
US20030158940A1 (en) * 2002-02-20 2003-08-21 Leigh Kevin B. Method for integrated load balancing among peer servers
US20030179768A1 (en) * 2002-02-28 2003-09-25 Itay Lusky Constellation selection in a communication system
US20030179821A1 (en) * 2002-02-28 2003-09-25 Itay Lusky Channel monitoring for improved parameter selection in a communication system
US20030179770A1 (en) * 2002-02-28 2003-09-25 Zvi Reznic Channel allocation and reallocation in a communication system
US20030181185A1 (en) * 2002-02-28 2003-09-25 Itay Lusky Noise identification in a communication system
US20030182664A1 (en) * 2002-02-28 2003-09-25 Itay Lusky Parameter selection in a communication system
US20030185176A1 (en) * 2002-02-28 2003-10-02 Itay Lusky Noise analysis in a communication system
US20030188254A1 (en) * 2002-02-28 2003-10-02 Itay Lusky Error correction code parameter selection in a communication system
US20030200317A1 (en) * 2002-04-19 2003-10-23 Native Networks Technologies Ltd Method and system for dynamically allocating bandwidth to a plurality of network elements
US20030212999A1 (en) * 2002-05-08 2003-11-13 Simin Cai System and method for providing video telephony over a cable access network infrastructure
US7778314B2 (en) * 2006-05-04 2010-08-17 Texas Instruments Incorporated Apparatus for and method of far-end crosstalk (FEXT) detection and estimation

Cited By (47)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9088355B2 (en) 2006-03-24 2015-07-21 Arris Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for determining the dynamic range of an optical link in an HFC network
US8594118B2 (en) 2006-03-24 2013-11-26 General Instrument Corporation Method and apparatus for configuring logical channels in a network
US8537972B2 (en) 2006-12-07 2013-09-17 General Instrument Corporation Method and apparatus for determining micro-reflections in a network
US8516532B2 (en) 2009-07-28 2013-08-20 Motorola Mobility Llc IP video delivery using flexible channel bonding
US8526485B2 (en) 2009-09-23 2013-09-03 General Instrument Corporation Using equalization coefficients of end devices in a cable television network to determine and diagnose impairments in upstream channels
US8654640B2 (en) 2010-12-08 2014-02-18 General Instrument Corporation System and method for IP video delivery using distributed flexible channel bonding
US8730934B2 (en) * 2011-05-09 2014-05-20 Cox Communications, Inc. Systems and methods for assigning a customer device to a group of customer devices for the transmission of broadband data signals
US20120287796A1 (en) * 2011-05-09 2012-11-15 Cox Communications, Inc. Systems and methods for assigning customers to groups for the transmission of broadband data signals
US8553669B2 (en) * 2011-05-09 2013-10-08 Cox Communications, Inc. Systems and methods for assigning customers to groups for the transmission of broadband data signals
US20120288067A1 (en) * 2011-05-09 2012-11-15 Cox Communications, Inc. Systems and methods for assigning a customer device to a group of customer devices for the transmission of broadband data signals
US20160380871A1 (en) * 2011-06-30 2016-12-29 Viavi Solutions Inc. Testing an upstream path of a cable network
US10873522B2 (en) 2011-06-30 2020-12-22 Viavi Solutions Inc. Testing an upstream path of a cable network
US10063454B2 (en) * 2011-06-30 2018-08-28 Viavi Solutions Inc. Testing an upstream path of a cable network
US8937992B2 (en) 2011-08-30 2015-01-20 General Instrument Corporation Method and apparatus for updating equalization coefficients of adaptive pre-equalizers
US20130070584A1 (en) * 2011-09-15 2013-03-21 Michael D. Hutchison Network impairment unit for concurrent delay and packet queue impairments
US9088520B2 (en) * 2011-09-15 2015-07-21 Ixia Network impairment unit for concurrent delay and packet queue impairments
US8576705B2 (en) 2011-11-18 2013-11-05 General Instrument Corporation Upstream channel bonding partial service using spectrum management
US9113181B2 (en) 2011-12-13 2015-08-18 Arris Technology, Inc. Dynamic channel bonding partial service triggering
US20150148089A1 (en) * 2012-04-25 2015-05-28 Intel Mobile Communications GmbH Communication devices and methods for operating a communication device
US8868736B2 (en) * 2012-04-27 2014-10-21 Motorola Mobility Llc Estimating a severity level of a network fault
US8867371B2 (en) 2012-04-27 2014-10-21 Motorola Mobility Llc Estimating physical locations of network faults
US8837302B2 (en) 2012-04-27 2014-09-16 Motorola Mobility Llc Mapping a network fault
US9003460B2 (en) * 2012-04-27 2015-04-07 Google Technology Holdings LLC Network monitoring with estimation of network path to network element location
US20130290783A1 (en) * 2012-04-27 2013-10-31 General Instrument Corporation Estimating a Severity Level of a Network Fault
US9065731B2 (en) 2012-05-01 2015-06-23 Arris Technology, Inc. Ensure upstream channel quality measurement stability in an upstream channel bonding system using T4 timeout multiplier
US9136943B2 (en) 2012-07-30 2015-09-15 Arris Technology, Inc. Method of characterizing impairments detected by equalization on a channel of a network
US9137164B2 (en) 2012-11-15 2015-09-15 Arris Technology, Inc. Upstream receiver integrity assessment for modem registration
US10938917B2 (en) * 2012-12-19 2021-03-02 Micro Focus Llc Triggering a high availability feature in response to detecting impairment of client experience
US20140173095A1 (en) * 2012-12-19 2014-06-19 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Triggering a high availability feature in response to detecting impairment of client experience
US9203639B2 (en) 2012-12-27 2015-12-01 Arris Technology, Inc. Dynamic load balancing under partial service conditions
US10027588B2 (en) 2012-12-27 2018-07-17 Arris Enterprises Llc Dynamic load balancing under partial service conditions
CN103152648A (en) * 2013-02-27 2013-06-12 深圳创维-Rgb电子有限公司 Method, device and system for processing non-standard signal
US9197886B2 (en) 2013-03-13 2015-11-24 Arris Enterprises, Inc. Detecting plant degradation using peer-comparison
US10721539B1 (en) * 2013-03-14 2020-07-21 CSC Holdings, LLC Detection of impairments in a network system
US9350618B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2016-05-24 Arris Enterprises, Inc. Estimation of network path and elements using geodata
US9025469B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2015-05-05 Arris Technology, Inc. Method for estimating cable plant topology
US10477199B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2019-11-12 Arris Enterprises Llc Method for identifying and prioritizing fault location in a cable plant
US9042236B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2015-05-26 Arris Technology, Inc. Method using equalization data to determine defects in a cable plant
US11159414B2 (en) * 2014-07-11 2021-10-26 Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. Edge analytics
US20180097716A1 (en) * 2014-07-11 2018-04-05 Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. Edge analytics
US20160037366A1 (en) * 2014-08-01 2016-02-04 Cox Communications, Inc. Detection and reporting of network impairments
US10348554B2 (en) * 2016-04-25 2019-07-09 Cisco Technology, Inc. Hybrid fibre coaxial fault locationing in cable network environments
CN108173703A (en) * 2016-04-25 2018-06-15 思科技术公司 Radiofrequency signal fault signature isolation in cable system environment
EP3334092A1 (en) * 2016-12-07 2018-06-13 Cisco Technology, Inc. Radio frequency signal fault signature isolation in cable network environments
RU2653289C1 (en) * 2016-12-07 2018-05-07 Владимир Леонидович Карякин Method for increasing quality of data transmission channel in iptv system by ber rate in tv broadcasting mode and device for its implementation
US11164551B2 (en) 2019-02-28 2021-11-02 Clifford W. Chase Amplifier matching in a digital amplifier modeling system
US11502932B2 (en) 2019-05-17 2022-11-15 Keysight Technologies, Inc. Indirect testing using impairment rules

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US8526485B2 (en) 2013-09-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8526485B2 (en) Using equalization coefficients of end devices in a cable television network to determine and diagnose impairments in upstream channels
KR101615867B1 (en) Method of characterizing impairments detected by equalization on a channel of a network
CA2777484C (en) Monitoring instability and resetting an equalizer
US8000254B2 (en) Methods and system for determining a dominant impairment of an impaired communication channel
US8081674B2 (en) Methods and system for determining a dominant impairment of an impaired communication channel
CA2605514C (en) Method and apparatus for determining micro-reflections in a network
US7616654B2 (en) Spectrum management systems and methods for cable networks
US8279764B2 (en) Method and apparatus for selecting a network element for testing a network
US6757253B1 (en) Spectrum management method for a cable data system
US7876697B2 (en) Method and apparatus for characterizing modulation schemes in an HFC network
US9088355B2 (en) Method and apparatus for determining the dynamic range of an optical link in an HFC network
US20110007788A1 (en) Method for Robust Crosstalk Precoder Training in Channels with Impulse Noise
US20140029654A1 (en) Method and apparatus for characterizing impulse noiseand optimizing data link efficiency
US11456899B2 (en) Methods and systems for performing analysis and correlation of DOCSIS 3.1 pre-equalization coefficients
US9774419B2 (en) Inband spurious detection and processing within communication systems

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION, PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:THOMPSON, ROBERT J.;COOPER, MICHAEL J.;MOORE, CHARLES S.;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20090924 TO 20091102;REEL/FRAME:023479/0506

AS Assignment

Owner name: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT, IL

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:ARRIS GROUP, INC.;ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC.;ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:030498/0023

Effective date: 20130417

Owner name: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT, ILLINOIS

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:ARRIS GROUP, INC.;ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC.;ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:030498/0023

Effective date: 20130417

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

AS Assignment

Owner name: ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC., GEORGIA

Free format text: MERGER AND CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:035176/0620

Effective date: 20150101

Owner name: ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC., GEORGIA

Free format text: MERGER AND CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNORS:GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION;GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:035176/0620

Effective date: 20150101

AS Assignment

Owner name: ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC., GEORGIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC;REEL/FRAME:037328/0341

Effective date: 20151214

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

AS Assignment

Owner name: SETJAM, INC., PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294

Effective date: 20190404

Owner name: CCE SOFTWARE LLC, PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294

Effective date: 20190404

Owner name: SUNUP DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC., PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294

Effective date: 20190404

Owner name: GIC INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL LLC, PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294

Effective date: 20190404

Owner name: TEXSCAN CORPORATION, PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294

Effective date: 20190404

Owner name: ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC., PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294

Effective date: 20190404

Owner name: IMEDIA CORPORATION, PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294

Effective date: 20190404

Owner name: GENERAL INSTRUMENT AUTHORIZATION SERVICES, INC., P

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294

Effective date: 20190404

Owner name: UCENTRIC SYSTEMS, INC., PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294

Effective date: 20190404

Owner name: ARRIS KOREA, INC., PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294

Effective date: 20190404

Owner name: BIG BAND NETWORKS, INC., PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294

Effective date: 20190404

Owner name: ACADIA AIC, INC., PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294

Effective date: 20190404

Owner name: 4HOME, INC., PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294

Effective date: 20190404

Owner name: JERROLD DC RADIO, INC., PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294

Effective date: 20190404

Owner name: THE GI REALTY TRUST 1996, PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294

Effective date: 20190404

Owner name: MODULUS VIDEO, INC., PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294

Effective date: 20190404

Owner name: NEXTLEVEL SYSTEMS (PUERTO RICO), INC., PENNSYLVANI

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294

Effective date: 20190404

Owner name: LEAPSTONE SYSTEMS, INC., PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294

Effective date: 20190404

Owner name: GENERAL INSTRUMENT INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, INC., P

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294

Effective date: 20190404

Owner name: ARRIS HOLDINGS CORP. OF ILLINOIS, INC., PENNSYLVAN

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294

Effective date: 20190404

Owner name: AEROCAST, INC., PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294

Effective date: 20190404

Owner name: BROADBUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294

Effective date: 20190404

Owner name: ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC., PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294

Effective date: 20190404

Owner name: GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION, PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294

Effective date: 20190404

Owner name: GIC INTERNATIONAL HOLDCO LLC, PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294

Effective date: 20190404

Owner name: ARRIS GROUP, INC., PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294

Effective date: 20190404

Owner name: POWER GUARD, INC., PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294

Effective date: 20190404

Owner name: MOTOROLA WIRELINE NETWORKS, INC., PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294

Effective date: 20190404

Owner name: QUANTUM BRIDGE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294

Effective date: 20190404

Owner name: NETOPIA, INC., PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294

Effective date: 20190404

Owner name: GENERAL INSTRUMENT AUTHORIZATION SERVICES, INC., PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294

Effective date: 20190404

Owner name: ARRIS HOLDINGS CORP. OF ILLINOIS, INC., PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294

Effective date: 20190404

Owner name: GENERAL INSTRUMENT INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, INC., PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294

Effective date: 20190404

Owner name: NEXTLEVEL SYSTEMS (PUERTO RICO), INC., PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294

Effective date: 20190404

AS Assignment

Owner name: ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC, GEORGIA

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:049649/0062

Effective date: 20151231

AS Assignment

Owner name: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATE

Free format text: PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC;REEL/FRAME:049820/0495

Effective date: 20190404

Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., NEW YORK

Free format text: ABL SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA;COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC;ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:049892/0396

Effective date: 20190404

Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., NEW YORK

Free format text: TERM LOAN SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA;COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC;ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:049905/0504

Effective date: 20190404

Owner name: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT, CONNECTICUT

Free format text: PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC;REEL/FRAME:049820/0495

Effective date: 20190404

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 8

AS Assignment

Owner name: WILMINGTON TRUST, DELAWARE

Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.;ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC;COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:060752/0001

Effective date: 20211115

AS Assignment

Owner name: ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC., GEORGIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC.;REEL/FRAME:060791/0583

Effective date: 20151214