US20100300674A1 - Permeability flow balancing within integral screen joints - Google Patents
Permeability flow balancing within integral screen joints Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20100300674A1 US20100300674A1 US12/476,856 US47685609A US2010300674A1 US 20100300674 A1 US20100300674 A1 US 20100300674A1 US 47685609 A US47685609 A US 47685609A US 2010300674 A1 US2010300674 A1 US 2010300674A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- borehole
- tubular
- baffles
- formation
- sagd
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 230000035699 permeability Effects 0.000 title description 20
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 26
- 238000010796 Steam-assisted gravity drainage Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 claims description 26
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000007769 metal material Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 238000005755 formation reaction Methods 0.000 description 21
- 229930195733 hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 description 12
- 150000002430 hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 description 12
- 239000004215 Carbon black (E152) Substances 0.000 description 9
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010793 Steam injection (oil industry) Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004873 anchoring Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011065 in-situ storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000638 stimulation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000013077 target material Substances 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/16—Enhanced recovery methods for obtaining hydrocarbons
- E21B43/24—Enhanced recovery methods for obtaining hydrocarbons using heat, e.g. steam injection
- E21B43/2406—Steam assisted gravity drainage [SAGD]
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/02—Subsoil filtering
- E21B43/08—Screens or liners
Definitions
- Viscous hydrocarbon recovery is a segment of the overall hydrocarbon recovery industry that is increasingly important from the standpoint of global hydrocarbon reserves and associated product cost.
- SAGD Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage
- Other wellbore systems however where there is a significant horizontal or near horizontal length of the wellbore system present profile challenges both for heat distribution and for production. In some cases, similar issues arise even in vertical systems.
- inflow and outflow profiles are desired to be as uniform as possible relative to the particular borehole. This should enhance efficiency as well as avoid early water breakthrough. Breakthrough is clearly inefficient as hydrocarbon material is likely to be left in situ rather than being produced. Profiles are important in all well types but it will be understood that the more viscous the target material the greater the difficulty in maintaining a uniform profile.
- a SAGD system including at least one borehole having a tubular therein; and at least one baffle disposed on the tubular, the baffle extending radially outwardly of the tubular into proximity with a formation.
- a downhole configuration for a SAGD system including a tubular; and one or more baffles on the tubular, the one or more baffles configured to be extendible in a radial direction from the tubular to reduce annular flow along the tubular when installed in a borehole.
- a borehole system including a borehole; and one or more metal-to-formation baffles extending radially to proximity with a formation interface.
- a borehole system including a tubular configured to be disposed within an open hole borehole, the tubular being intended to be exposed to a heated fluid; and one or more tubular-to-formation baffles spaced along the tubular and extending into proximity with the formation.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a wellbore system in a viscous hydrocarbon reservoir
- FIG. 2 is a chart illustrating a change in fluid profile over a length of the borehole with and without permeability control.
- borehole 12 is the steam injection borehole and borehole 14 is the hydrocarbon recovery borehole but the disclosure should not be understood as limiting the possibilities to such.
- the discussion herein however will address the boreholes as illustrated.
- Steam injected in borehole 12 heats the surrounding formation 16 thereby reducing the viscosity of the stored hydrocarbons and facilitating gravity drainage of those hydrocarbons.
- Horizontal or other highly deviated well structures like those depicted tend to have greater fluid movement into and to of the formation at a heel 18 of the borehole than at a toe 20 of the borehole due simply to fluid dynamics.
- one or more of the boreholes is configured with one or more permeability control devices 32 that are each configured differently with respect to permeability or pressure drop in flow direction in or out of the tubular.
- the devices 32 nearest the heel 18 or 28 will have the least permeability while permeability will increase in each device 32 sequentially toward the toe 20 and 30 .
- the permeability of the device 32 closest to toe 20 or 30 will be the greatest. This will tend to balance outflow of injected fluid and inflow of production fluid over the length of the borehole 12 and 14 because the natural pressure drop of the system is opposite that created by the configuration of permeability devices as described.
- Permeability and/or pressure drop devices 32 useable in this configuration include inflow control devices such as product family number H48688 commercially available from Baker Oil Tools, Houston Tex., beaded matrix flow control configurations such as those disclosed in U.S. Ser. Nos. 61/052,919, 11/875,584 and 12/144,730, 12/144,406 and 12/171,707 the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference, or other similar devices. Adjustment of pressure drop across individual permeability devices is possible in accordance with the teaching hereof such that the desired permeability over the length of the borehole 12 or 14 as described herein is achievable. Referring to FIG. 2 , a chart of the flow of fluid over the length of borehole 12 is shown without permeability control and with permeability control. The representation is stark with regard to the profile improvement with permeability control.
- Formation pressure can be determined/measured in a number of known ways. Pressure at the heel of the borehole and pressure at the toe should also be determined/measured. This can be determined in known ways.
- a flow profile whether into or out of the completion is dictated by the ⁇ P at each location and the pressure inside the completion is dictated by the head of pressure associated with the column of fluid extending to the surface. The longer the column, the higher the pressure. It follows, then, that greater resistance to inflow will occur at the toe of the borehole than at the heel of the completion.
- permeability control is distributed such that pressure drop at a toe of the borehole is in the range of about 25% to less than 1% whereas pressure drop at the heel of the borehole is about 30% or more. In one embodiment the pressure drop at the heel is less than 45% and at the toe less than about 25%.
- Permeability control devices distributed between the heel and the toe will in some embodiments have individual pressure drop values between the percentage pressure drop at the toe and the percentage pressure drop at the heel. Moreover, in some embodiments the distribution of pressure drops among the permeability devices is linear while in other embodiments the distribution may follow a curve or may be discontinuous to promote inflow of fluid from areas of the formation having larger volumes of desirable liberatable fluid and reduced inflow of fluid from areas of the formation having smaller volumes of desirable liberatable fluid.
- Open hole anchors 42 such as Baker Oil Tools WBAnchorTM may be employed in the borehole to anchor the tubing 40 . This is helpful in that the tubing 40 experiences a significant change in thermal load and hence a significant amount of thermal expansion during well operations. Unchecked, the thermal expansion can cause damage to other downhole structures or to the tubing string 40 itself thereby affecting efficiency and production of the well system.
- one or more open hole anchors 42 are used to ensure that the tubing string 40 is restrained from excessive movement. Because the total length of mobile tubing string is reduced by the interposition of open hole anchor(s) 42 , excess extension cannot occur.
- three open hole anchors 42 are employed and are spaced by about 90 to 120 ft from one another but could in some particular applications be positioned more closely and even every 30 feet (at each pipe joint).
- the spacing interval is also applicable to longer runs with each open hole anchor being spaced about 90-120 ft from the next.
- the exact spacing amount between anchors is not limited to that noted in this illustrated embodiment but rather can be any distance that will have the desired effect of reducing thermal expansion related wellbore damage. In addition the spacing can be even or uneven as desired.
- the determination of distance between anchors must take into account.
- the anchor length, pattern, or the number of anchor points per foot in order to adjust the anchoring effect to optimize performance based on formation type and formation strength tubular dimensions and material.
- the tubing string 40 , 50 or both is configured with one or more baffles 60 .
- Baffles 60 are effective in both deterring loss of steam to formation cracks such as that illustrated in FIG. 1 as numeral 62 and in causing produced fluid to migrate through the intended permeability device 32 .
- the injector borehole, such as 12 is provided with one or more baffles 60 .
- the baffles may be of any material having the ability to withstand the temperature at which the particular steam is injected into the formation.
- a metal deformable seal such as one commercially known as a z-seal and available from Baker Oil Tools, Houston Tex., may be employed.
- metal deformable seals are normally intended to create a high pressure high temperature seal against a metal casing within which the seal is deployed, for the purposes taught in this disclosure, it is not necessary for the metal deformable seal to create an actual seal. That stated however, there is also no prohibition to the creation of a seal but rather then focus is upon the ability of the configuration to direct steam flow with relatively minimal leakage. In the event that an actual seal is created with the open hole formation, the intent to minimize leakage will of course be met. In the event that a seal is not created but substantially all of the steam applied to a particular region of the wellbore is delivered to that portion of the formation then the baffle will have done its job and achieved this portion of the intent of this disclosure.
- the baffles are also of use in that the drawdown of individual portions of the well can be balanced better with the baffles so that fluids from a particular area are delivered to the borehole in that area and fluids from other areas do not migrate in the annulus to the same section of the borehole but rather will enter at their respective locations. This ensures that profile control is maintained and also that where breakthrough does occur, a particular section of the borehole can be bridged and the rest will still produce target fluid as opposed to breakthrough fluid since annular flow will be inhibited by the baffles.
- baffles are placed about 100 ft or 3 liner joints apart but as noted with respect to the open hole anchors, this distance is not fixed but may be varied to fit the particular needs of the well at issue.
- baffles may be even or may be uneven and in some cases the baffles will be distributed as dictated by formation condition such that for example cracks in the formation will be taken into account so that a baffle will be positioned on each side of the crack when considered along the length of the tubular.
Abstract
A SAGD system including at least one borehole having a tubular therein; and at least one baffle disposed on the tubular, the baffle extending radially outwardly of the tubular into proximity with a formation.
Description
- Viscous hydrocarbon recovery is a segment of the overall hydrocarbon recovery industry that is increasingly important from the standpoint of global hydrocarbon reserves and associated product cost. In view hereof, there is increasing pressure to develop new technologies capable of producing viscous reserves economically and efficiently. Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) is one technology that is being used and explored with good results in some wellbore systems. Other wellbore systems however where there is a significant horizontal or near horizontal length of the wellbore system present profile challenges both for heat distribution and for production. In some cases, similar issues arise even in vertical systems.
- Both inflow and outflow profiles (e.g. production and stimulation) are desired to be as uniform as possible relative to the particular borehole. This should enhance efficiency as well as avoid early water breakthrough. Breakthrough is clearly inefficient as hydrocarbon material is likely to be left in situ rather than being produced. Profiles are important in all well types but it will be understood that the more viscous the target material the greater the difficulty in maintaining a uniform profile.
- Another issue in conjunction with SAGD systems is that the heat of steam injected to facilitate hydrocarbon recovery is sufficient to damage downhole components due to thermal expansion of the components. This can increase expenses to operators and reduce recovery of target fluids. Since viscous hydrocarbon reserves are likely to become only more important as other resources become depleted, configurations and methods that improve recovery of viscous hydrocarbons from earth formations will continue to be well received by the art.
- A SAGD system including at least one borehole having a tubular therein; and at least one baffle disposed on the tubular, the baffle extending radially outwardly of the tubular into proximity with a formation.
- A downhole configuration for a SAGD system including a tubular; and one or more baffles on the tubular, the one or more baffles configured to be extendible in a radial direction from the tubular to reduce annular flow along the tubular when installed in a borehole.
- A borehole system including a borehole; and one or more metal-to-formation baffles extending radially to proximity with a formation interface.
- A borehole system including a tubular configured to be disposed within an open hole borehole, the tubular being intended to be exposed to a heated fluid; and one or more tubular-to-formation baffles spaced along the tubular and extending into proximity with the formation.
- Referring now to the drawings wherein like elements are numbered alike in the several figures:
-
FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a wellbore system in a viscous hydrocarbon reservoir; -
FIG. 2 is a chart illustrating a change in fluid profile over a length of the borehole with and without permeability control. - Referring to
FIG. 1 , the reader will recognize a schematic illustration of a portion of aSAGD wellbore system 10 configured with a pair ofboreholes borehole 12 is the steam injection borehole andborehole 14 is the hydrocarbon recovery borehole but the disclosure should not be understood as limiting the possibilities to such. The discussion herein however will address the boreholes as illustrated. Steam injected inborehole 12 heats the surroundingformation 16 thereby reducing the viscosity of the stored hydrocarbons and facilitating gravity drainage of those hydrocarbons. Horizontal or other highly deviated well structures like those depicted tend to have greater fluid movement into and to of the formation at a heel 18 of the borehole than at atoe 20 of the borehole due simply to fluid dynamics. An issue associated with this property is that thetoe 20 will suffer reduced steam application from that desired while heel 18 will experience more steam application than that desired, for example. The change in the rate of fluid movement is relatively linear (declining flow) when querying the system at intervals with increasing distance from the heel 18 toward thetoe 20. The same is true for production fluid movement whereby theheel 28 of theproduction borehole 14 will pass more of the target hydrocarbon fluid than thetoe 30 of theproduction borehole 14. This is due primarily to permeability versus pressure drop along the length of theborehole system 10 as illustrated alleviates this issue as well as others noted above. - According to the teaching herein, one or more of the boreholes (represented by just two
boreholes permeability control devices 32 that are each configured differently with respect to permeability or pressure drop in flow direction in or out of the tubular. Thedevices 32 nearest theheel 18 or 28 will have the least permeability while permeability will increase in eachdevice 32 sequentially toward thetoe device 32 closest totoe borehole pressure drop devices 32 useable in this configuration include inflow control devices such as product family number H48688 commercially available from Baker Oil Tools, Houston Tex., beaded matrix flow control configurations such as those disclosed in U.S. Ser. Nos. 61/052,919, 11/875,584 and 12/144,730, 12/144,406 and 12/171,707 the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference, or other similar devices. Adjustment of pressure drop across individual permeability devices is possible in accordance with the teaching hereof such that the desired permeability over the length of theborehole FIG. 2 , a chart of the flow of fluid over the length ofborehole 12 is shown without permeability control and with permeability control. The representation is stark with regard to the profile improvement with permeability control. - In order to determine the appropriate amount of permeability for particular sections of the
borehole - A flow profile whether into or out of the completion is dictated by the ΔP at each location and the pressure inside the completion is dictated by the head of pressure associated with the column of fluid extending to the surface. The longer the column, the higher the pressure. It follows, then, that greater resistance to inflow will occur at the toe of the borehole than at the heel of the completion. In accordance with the teaching hereof permeability control is distributed such that pressure drop at a toe of the borehole is in the range of about 25% to less than 1% whereas pressure drop at the heel of the borehole is about 30% or more. In one embodiment the pressure drop at the heel is less than 45% and at the toe less than about 25%. Permeability control devices distributed between the heel and the toe will in some embodiments have individual pressure drop values between the percentage pressure drop at the toe and the percentage pressure drop at the heel. Moreover, in some embodiments the distribution of pressure drops among the permeability devices is linear while in other embodiments the distribution may follow a curve or may be discontinuous to promote inflow of fluid from areas of the formation having larger volumes of desirable liberatable fluid and reduced inflow of fluid from areas of the formation having smaller volumes of desirable liberatable fluid.
- Referring back to
FIG. 1 , atubing string boreholes Open hole anchors 42, such as Baker Oil Tools WBAnchor™ may be employed in the borehole to anchor thetubing 40. This is helpful in that thetubing 40 experiences a significant change in thermal load and hence a significant amount of thermal expansion during well operations. Unchecked, the thermal expansion can cause damage to other downhole structures or to thetubing string 40 itself thereby affecting efficiency and production of the well system. In order to overcome this problem, one or moreopen hole anchors 42 are used to ensure that thetubing string 40 is restrained from excessive movement. Because the total length of mobile tubing string is reduced by the interposition of open hole anchor(s) 42, excess extension cannot occur. In one embodiment, threeopen hole anchors 42, as illustrated, are employed and are spaced by about 90 to 120 ft from one another but could in some particular applications be positioned more closely and even every 30 feet (at each pipe joint). The spacing interval is also applicable to longer runs with each open hole anchor being spaced about 90-120 ft from the next. Moreover, the exact spacing amount between anchors is not limited to that noted in this illustrated embodiment but rather can be any distance that will have the desired effect of reducing thermal expansion related wellbore damage. In addition the spacing can be even or uneven as desired. The determination of distance between anchors must take into account. The anchor length, pattern, or the number of anchor points per foot in order to adjust the anchoring effect to optimize performance based on formation type and formation strength tubular dimensions and material. - Finally in one embodiment, the
tubing string FIG. 1 asnumeral 62 and in causing produced fluid to migrate through the intendedpermeability device 32. More specifically, and taking the functions one at a time, the injector borehole, such as 12, is provided with one or more baffles 60. The baffles may be of any material having the ability to withstand the temperature at which the particular steam is injected into the formation. In one embodiment, a metal deformable seal such as one commercially known as a z-seal and available from Baker Oil Tools, Houston Tex., may be employed. And while metal deformable seals are normally intended to create a high pressure high temperature seal against a metal casing within which the seal is deployed, for the purposes taught in this disclosure, it is not necessary for the metal deformable seal to create an actual seal. That stated however, there is also no prohibition to the creation of a seal but rather then focus is upon the ability of the configuration to direct steam flow with relatively minimal leakage. In the event that an actual seal is created with the open hole formation, the intent to minimize leakage will of course be met. In the event that a seal is not created but substantially all of the steam applied to a particular region of the wellbore is delivered to that portion of the formation then the baffle will have done its job and achieved this portion of the intent of this disclosure. With respect to production, the baffles are also of use in that the drawdown of individual portions of the well can be balanced better with the baffles so that fluids from a particular area are delivered to the borehole in that area and fluids from other areas do not migrate in the annulus to the same section of the borehole but rather will enter at their respective locations. This ensures that profile control is maintained and also that where breakthrough does occur, a particular section of the borehole can be bridged and the rest will still produce target fluid as opposed to breakthrough fluid since annular flow will be inhibited by the baffles. In one embodiment baffles are placed about 100 ft or 3 liner joints apart but as noted with respect to the open hole anchors, this distance is not fixed but may be varied to fit the particular needs of the well at issue. The distance between baffles may be even or may be uneven and in some cases the baffles will be distributed as dictated by formation condition such that for example cracks in the formation will be taken into account so that a baffle will be positioned on each side of the crack when considered along the length of the tubular. - While preferred embodiments have been shown and described, various modifications and substitutions may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the present invention has been described by way of illustration and not limitation.
Claims (20)
1. A SAGD system comprising:
at least one borehole having a tubular therein; and
at least one baffle disposed on the tubular, the baffle extending radially outwardly of the tubular into proximity with a formation.
2. A SAGD system as claimed in claim 1 wherein the at least one baffle is configured to withstand a heated fluid.
3. A SAGD system as claimed in claim 2 wherein the heated fluid is steam.
4. A SAGD system as claimed in claim 1 wherein the system further includes a plurality of open hole anchors.
5. A SAGD system as claimed in claim 4 wherein the anchors are spaced along a length of the tubular.
6. A downhole configuration for a SAGD system comprising:
a tubular; and
one or more baffles on the tubular, the one or more baffles configured to be extendible in a radial direction from the tubular to reduce annular flow along the tubular when installed in a borehole.
7. A downhole configuration for a SAGD system as claimed in claim 6 wherein the radial direction is radially outwardly from the tubular.
8. A downhole configuration for a SAGD system as claimed in claim 6 wherein the one or more baffles are configured to extend radially into proximity with a borehole within which the tubular is intended to be installed.
9. A downhole configuration for a SAGD system as claimed in claim 6 wherein the one or more baffles are constructed of a heat tolerant material.
10. A downhole configuration for a SAGD system as claimed in claim 9 wherein the heat tolerant material is metal.
11. A downhole configuration for a SAGD system as claimed in claim 6 wherein the one or more baffles are metal deformable seals.
12. A downhole configuration for a SAGD system as claimed in claim 6 wherein the one or more baffles come into contact with a formation defining the borehole.
13. A downhole configuration for a SAGD system as claimed in claim 6 wherein the one or more baffles form a seal with a formation defining the borehole.
14. A borehole system comprising:
a borehole; and
one or more metal-to-formation baffles extending radially to proximity with a formation interface.
15. A borehole system as claimed in claim 14 wherein the one or more metal-to-formation baffles are positioned relative to the borehole to contain a fluid to a target area.
16. A borehole system as claimed in claim 15 wherein the fluid is heated.
17. A borehole system as claimed in claim 14 wherein the one or more metal to formation baffles are configured and positioned to tailor a production profile of the wellbore system.
18. A borehole system comprising:
a tubular configured to be disposed within an open hole borehole, the tubular being intended to be exposed to a heated fluid; and
one or more tubular-to-formation baffles spaced along the tubular and extending into proximity with the formation.
19. A borehole system as claimed in claim 18 wherein one or more of the one more tubular-to-formation baffles comprise metal material.
20. A borehole system as claimed in claim 18 wherein one or more of the one more tubular-to-formation baffles comprise polymeric material.
Priority Applications (6)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/476,856 US20100300674A1 (en) | 2009-06-02 | 2009-06-02 | Permeability flow balancing within integral screen joints |
CA2763723A CA2763723A1 (en) | 2009-06-02 | 2010-05-13 | Permeability flow balancing within integral screen joints |
GB1119862.9A GB2482812B (en) | 2009-06-02 | 2010-05-13 | Permeability flow balancing within integral screen joints |
BRPI1011076A BRPI1011076A2 (en) | 2009-06-02 | 2010-05-13 | permeability flow equilibrium within integral screen joints |
PCT/US2010/034750 WO2010141196A2 (en) | 2009-06-02 | 2010-05-13 | Permeability flow balancing within integral screen joints |
NO20111681A NO20111681A1 (en) | 2009-06-02 | 2011-12-06 | Permeability current that balances within screen shots |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/476,856 US20100300674A1 (en) | 2009-06-02 | 2009-06-02 | Permeability flow balancing within integral screen joints |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20100300674A1 true US20100300674A1 (en) | 2010-12-02 |
Family
ID=43218899
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/476,856 Abandoned US20100300674A1 (en) | 2009-06-02 | 2009-06-02 | Permeability flow balancing within integral screen joints |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20100300674A1 (en) |
BR (1) | BRPI1011076A2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2763723A1 (en) |
GB (1) | GB2482812B (en) |
NO (1) | NO20111681A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2010141196A2 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102644442A (en) * | 2012-04-25 | 2012-08-22 | 山东立鑫石油机械制造有限公司 | Ultra-viscous crude oil injection-production integrated technique tubular pile |
US20150152720A1 (en) * | 2012-06-06 | 2015-06-04 | Maersk Olie Og Gas A/S | Method of producing viscous hydrocarbons by steam-assisted gravity drainage |
Citations (96)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1649524A (en) * | 1927-11-15 | Oil ahd water sepakatos for oil wells | ||
US2089477A (en) * | 1934-03-19 | 1937-08-10 | Southwestern Flow Valve Corp | Well flowing device |
US2119563A (en) * | 1937-03-02 | 1938-06-07 | George M Wells | Method of and means for flowing oil wells |
US2214064A (en) * | 1939-09-08 | 1940-09-10 | Stanolind Oil & Gas Co | Oil production |
US2257523A (en) * | 1941-01-14 | 1941-09-30 | B L Sherrod | Well control device |
US2762437A (en) * | 1955-01-18 | 1956-09-11 | Egan | Apparatus for separating fluids having different specific gravities |
US2804926A (en) * | 1953-08-28 | 1957-09-03 | John A Zublin | Perforated drain hole liner |
US2810352A (en) * | 1956-01-16 | 1957-10-22 | Eugene D Tumlison | Oil and gas separator for wells |
US3240274A (en) * | 1965-02-17 | 1966-03-15 | B & W Inc | Flexible turbulence device for well pipe |
US3273641A (en) * | 1966-09-20 | Method and apparatus for completing wells | ||
US3322199A (en) * | 1965-02-03 | 1967-05-30 | Servco Co | Apparatus for production of fluids from wells |
US3326291A (en) * | 1964-11-12 | 1967-06-20 | Zandmer Solis Myron | Duct-forming devices |
US3385367A (en) * | 1966-12-07 | 1968-05-28 | Kollsman Paul | Sealing device for perforated well casing |
US3451477A (en) * | 1967-06-30 | 1969-06-24 | Kork Kelley | Method and apparatus for effecting gas control in oil wells |
US3675714A (en) * | 1970-10-13 | 1972-07-11 | George L Thompson | Retrievable density control valve |
US3739845A (en) * | 1971-03-26 | 1973-06-19 | Sun Oil Co | Wellbore safety valve |
US3791444A (en) * | 1973-01-29 | 1974-02-12 | W Hickey | Liquid gas separator |
US3951338A (en) * | 1974-07-15 | 1976-04-20 | Standard Oil Company (Indiana) | Heat-sensitive subsurface safety valve |
US4173255A (en) * | 1978-10-05 | 1979-11-06 | Kramer Richard W | Low well yield control system and method |
US4245701A (en) * | 1979-06-12 | 1981-01-20 | Occidental Oil Shale, Inc. | Apparatus and method for igniting an in situ oil shale retort |
US4287952A (en) * | 1980-05-20 | 1981-09-08 | Exxon Production Research Company | Method of selective diversion in deviated wellbores using ball sealers |
US4410216A (en) * | 1979-12-31 | 1983-10-18 | Heavy Oil Process, Inc. | Method for recovering high viscosity oils |
US4491186A (en) * | 1982-11-16 | 1985-01-01 | Smith International, Inc. | Automatic drilling process and apparatus |
US4497714A (en) * | 1981-03-06 | 1985-02-05 | Stant Inc. | Fuel-water separator |
US4512403A (en) * | 1980-08-01 | 1985-04-23 | Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. | In situ coal gasification |
US4572295A (en) * | 1984-08-13 | 1986-02-25 | Exotek, Inc. | Method of selective reduction of the water permeability of subterranean formations |
US4577691A (en) * | 1984-09-10 | 1986-03-25 | Texaco Inc. | Method and apparatus for producing viscous hydrocarbons from a subterranean formation |
US4649996A (en) * | 1981-08-04 | 1987-03-17 | Kojicic Bozidar | Double walled screen-filter with perforated joints |
US4998585A (en) * | 1989-11-14 | 1991-03-12 | Qed Environmental Systems, Inc. | Floating layer recovery apparatus |
US5040283A (en) * | 1988-08-31 | 1991-08-20 | Shell Oil Company | Method for placing a body of shape memory metal within a tube |
US5060737A (en) * | 1986-07-01 | 1991-10-29 | Framo Developments (Uk) Limited | Drilling system |
US5107927A (en) * | 1991-04-29 | 1992-04-28 | Otis Engineering Corporation | Orienting tool for slant/horizontal completions |
US5333684A (en) * | 1990-02-16 | 1994-08-02 | James C. Walter | Downhole gas separator |
US5337821A (en) * | 1991-01-17 | 1994-08-16 | Aqrit Industries Ltd. | Method and apparatus for the determination of formation fluid flow rates and reservoir deliverability |
US5355956A (en) * | 1992-09-28 | 1994-10-18 | Halliburton Company | Plugged base pipe for sand control |
US5384046A (en) * | 1991-07-02 | 1995-01-24 | Heinrich Fiedler Gmbh & Co Kg | Screen element |
US5435393A (en) * | 1992-09-18 | 1995-07-25 | Norsk Hydro A.S. | Procedure and production pipe for production of oil or gas from an oil or gas reservoir |
US5435395A (en) * | 1994-03-22 | 1995-07-25 | Halliburton Company | Method for running downhole tools and devices with coiled tubing |
US5597042A (en) * | 1995-02-09 | 1997-01-28 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method for controlling production wells having permanent downhole formation evaluation sensors |
US5609204A (en) * | 1995-01-05 | 1997-03-11 | Osca, Inc. | Isolation system and gravel pack assembly |
US5673751A (en) * | 1991-12-31 | 1997-10-07 | Stirling Design International Limited | System for controlling the flow of fluid in an oil well |
US5803179A (en) * | 1996-12-31 | 1998-09-08 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Screened well drainage pipe structure with sealed, variable length labyrinth inlet flow control apparatus |
US5873410A (en) * | 1996-07-08 | 1999-02-23 | Elf Exploration Production | Method and installation for pumping an oil-well effluent |
US5881809A (en) * | 1997-09-05 | 1999-03-16 | United States Filter Corporation | Well casing assembly with erosion protection for inner screen |
US5944446A (en) * | 1992-08-31 | 1999-08-31 | Golder Sierra Llc | Injection of mixtures into subterranean formations |
US6068015A (en) * | 1996-08-15 | 2000-05-30 | Camco International Inc. | Sidepocket mandrel with orienting feature |
US6112817A (en) * | 1997-05-06 | 2000-09-05 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Flow control apparatus and methods |
US6112815A (en) * | 1995-10-30 | 2000-09-05 | Altinex As | Inflow regulation device for a production pipe for production of oil or gas from an oil and/or gas reservoir |
US6253861B1 (en) * | 1998-02-25 | 2001-07-03 | Specialised Petroleum Services Limited | Circulation tool |
US6273194B1 (en) * | 1999-03-05 | 2001-08-14 | Schlumberger Technology Corp. | Method and device for downhole flow rate control |
US6305470B1 (en) * | 1997-04-23 | 2001-10-23 | Shore-Tec As | Method and apparatus for production testing involving first and second permeable formations |
US6367547B1 (en) * | 1999-04-16 | 2002-04-09 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Downhole separator for use in a subterranean well and method |
US6371210B1 (en) * | 2000-10-10 | 2002-04-16 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Flow control apparatus for use in a wellbore |
US20020125009A1 (en) * | 2000-08-03 | 2002-09-12 | Wetzel Rodney J. | Intelligent well system and method |
US6505682B2 (en) * | 1999-01-29 | 2003-01-14 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Controlling production |
US6516888B1 (en) * | 1998-06-05 | 2003-02-11 | Triangle Equipment As | Device and method for regulating fluid flow in a well |
US6530431B1 (en) * | 2000-06-22 | 2003-03-11 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Screen jacket assembly connection and methods of using same |
US6622794B2 (en) * | 2001-01-26 | 2003-09-23 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Sand screen with active flow control and associated method of use |
US6635732B2 (en) * | 1999-04-12 | 2003-10-21 | Surgidev Corporation | Water plasticized high refractive index polymer for ophthalmic applications |
US6679324B2 (en) * | 1999-04-29 | 2004-01-20 | Shell Oil Company | Downhole device for controlling fluid flow in a well |
US6692766B1 (en) * | 1994-06-15 | 2004-02-17 | Yissum Research Development Company Of The Hebrew University Of Jerusalem | Controlled release oral drug delivery system |
US6699611B2 (en) * | 2001-05-29 | 2004-03-02 | Motorola, Inc. | Fuel cell having a thermo-responsive polymer incorporated therein |
US6699503B1 (en) * | 1992-09-18 | 2004-03-02 | Yamanuchi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. | Hydrogel-forming sustained-release preparation |
US20040052689A1 (en) * | 1999-08-17 | 2004-03-18 | Porex Technologies Corporation | Self-sealing materials and devices comprising same |
US6722437B2 (en) * | 2001-10-22 | 2004-04-20 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Technique for fracturing subterranean formations |
US20040144544A1 (en) * | 2001-05-08 | 2004-07-29 | Rune Freyer | Arrangement for and method of restricting the inflow of formation water to a well |
US20040159447A1 (en) * | 2003-02-19 | 2004-08-19 | Bissonnette H. Steven | By-pass valve mechanism and method of use hereof |
US6786285B2 (en) * | 2001-06-12 | 2004-09-07 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Flow control regulation method and apparatus |
US20050016732A1 (en) * | 2003-06-20 | 2005-01-27 | Brannon Harold Dean | Method of hydraulic fracturing to reduce unwanted water production |
US6896049B2 (en) * | 2000-07-07 | 2005-05-24 | Zeroth Technology Ltd. | Deformable member |
US20050126776A1 (en) * | 2003-12-10 | 2005-06-16 | Russell Thane G. | Wellbore screen |
US20050189119A1 (en) * | 2004-02-27 | 2005-09-01 | Ashmin Lc | Inflatable sealing assembly and method for sealing off an inside of a flow carrier |
US20060048942A1 (en) * | 2002-08-26 | 2006-03-09 | Terje Moen | Flow control device for an injection pipe string |
US20060076150A1 (en) * | 2004-07-30 | 2006-04-13 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Inflow control device with passive shut-off feature |
US7032675B2 (en) * | 2003-10-06 | 2006-04-25 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Thermally-controlled valves and methods of using the same in a wellbore |
US20060108114A1 (en) * | 2001-12-18 | 2006-05-25 | Johnson Michael H | Drilling method for maintaining productivity while eliminating perforating and gravel packing |
US20060118296A1 (en) * | 2001-03-20 | 2006-06-08 | Arthur Dybevik | Well device for throttle regulation of inflowing fluids |
US20070039741A1 (en) * | 2005-08-22 | 2007-02-22 | Hailey Travis T Jr | Sand control screen assembly enhanced with disappearing sleeve and burst disc |
US20070045266A1 (en) * | 2005-04-22 | 2007-03-01 | Sandberg Chester L | In situ conversion process utilizing a closed loop heating system |
US20070056729A1 (en) * | 2005-01-11 | 2007-03-15 | Pankratz Ronald E | Apparatus for treating fluid streams |
US7207385B2 (en) * | 2004-06-14 | 2007-04-24 | Marathon Oil Company | Method and system for producing gas and liquid in a subterranean well |
US7252162B2 (en) * | 2001-12-03 | 2007-08-07 | Shell Oil Company | Method and device for injecting a fluid into a formation |
US20070181299A1 (en) * | 2005-01-26 | 2007-08-09 | Nexen Inc. | Methods of Improving Heavy Oil Production |
US20070209799A1 (en) * | 2001-10-24 | 2007-09-13 | Shell Oil Company | In situ recovery from a hydrocarbon containing formation |
US7360593B2 (en) * | 2000-07-27 | 2008-04-22 | Vernon George Constien | Product for coating wellbore screens |
US20080135249A1 (en) * | 2006-12-07 | 2008-06-12 | Fripp Michael L | Well system having galvanic time release plug |
US7398822B2 (en) * | 2005-05-21 | 2008-07-15 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Downhole connection system |
US20080169099A1 (en) * | 2007-01-15 | 2008-07-17 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method for Controlling the Flow of Fluid Between a Downhole Formation and a Base Pipe |
US20090057014A1 (en) * | 2007-08-28 | 2009-03-05 | Richard Bennett M | Method of using a Drill In Sand Control Liner |
US20090071646A1 (en) * | 2005-01-11 | 2009-03-19 | Amp-Lift Group Llc | Apparatus for treating fluid streams |
US20090101342A1 (en) * | 2007-10-19 | 2009-04-23 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Permeable Medium Flow Control Devices for Use in Hydrocarbon Production |
US20090139717A1 (en) * | 2007-12-03 | 2009-06-04 | Richard Bennett M | Multi-Position Valves for Fracturing and Sand Control and Associated Completion Methods |
US7647966B2 (en) * | 2007-08-01 | 2010-01-19 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Method for drainage of heavy oil reservoir via horizontal wellbore |
US7673678B2 (en) * | 2004-12-21 | 2010-03-09 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Flow control device with a permeable membrane |
US20100126720A1 (en) * | 2007-01-29 | 2010-05-27 | Noetic Technologies Inc. | Method for providing a preferential specific injection distribution from a horizontal injection well |
US7757757B1 (en) * | 2007-04-02 | 2010-07-20 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Interior | In-well baffle apparatus and method |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EG22932A (en) * | 2000-05-31 | 2002-01-13 | Shell Int Research | Method and system for reducing longitudinal fluid flow around a permeable well tubular |
MY134072A (en) * | 2001-02-19 | 2007-11-30 | Shell Int Research | Method for controlling fluid into an oil and/or gas production well |
US7147057B2 (en) * | 2003-10-06 | 2006-12-12 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Loop systems and methods of using the same for conveying and distributing thermal energy into a wellbore |
US20080251255A1 (en) * | 2007-04-11 | 2008-10-16 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Steam injection apparatus for steam assisted gravity drainage techniques |
-
2009
- 2009-06-02 US US12/476,856 patent/US20100300674A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2010
- 2010-05-13 WO PCT/US2010/034750 patent/WO2010141196A2/en active Application Filing
- 2010-05-13 GB GB1119862.9A patent/GB2482812B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2010-05-13 BR BRPI1011076A patent/BRPI1011076A2/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2010-05-13 CA CA2763723A patent/CA2763723A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2011
- 2011-12-06 NO NO20111681A patent/NO20111681A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
Patent Citations (99)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1649524A (en) * | 1927-11-15 | Oil ahd water sepakatos for oil wells | ||
US3273641A (en) * | 1966-09-20 | Method and apparatus for completing wells | ||
US2089477A (en) * | 1934-03-19 | 1937-08-10 | Southwestern Flow Valve Corp | Well flowing device |
US2119563A (en) * | 1937-03-02 | 1938-06-07 | George M Wells | Method of and means for flowing oil wells |
US2214064A (en) * | 1939-09-08 | 1940-09-10 | Stanolind Oil & Gas Co | Oil production |
US2257523A (en) * | 1941-01-14 | 1941-09-30 | B L Sherrod | Well control device |
US2804926A (en) * | 1953-08-28 | 1957-09-03 | John A Zublin | Perforated drain hole liner |
US2762437A (en) * | 1955-01-18 | 1956-09-11 | Egan | Apparatus for separating fluids having different specific gravities |
US2810352A (en) * | 1956-01-16 | 1957-10-22 | Eugene D Tumlison | Oil and gas separator for wells |
US3326291A (en) * | 1964-11-12 | 1967-06-20 | Zandmer Solis Myron | Duct-forming devices |
US3322199A (en) * | 1965-02-03 | 1967-05-30 | Servco Co | Apparatus for production of fluids from wells |
US3240274A (en) * | 1965-02-17 | 1966-03-15 | B & W Inc | Flexible turbulence device for well pipe |
US3385367A (en) * | 1966-12-07 | 1968-05-28 | Kollsman Paul | Sealing device for perforated well casing |
US3451477A (en) * | 1967-06-30 | 1969-06-24 | Kork Kelley | Method and apparatus for effecting gas control in oil wells |
US3675714A (en) * | 1970-10-13 | 1972-07-11 | George L Thompson | Retrievable density control valve |
US3739845A (en) * | 1971-03-26 | 1973-06-19 | Sun Oil Co | Wellbore safety valve |
US3791444A (en) * | 1973-01-29 | 1974-02-12 | W Hickey | Liquid gas separator |
US3951338A (en) * | 1974-07-15 | 1976-04-20 | Standard Oil Company (Indiana) | Heat-sensitive subsurface safety valve |
US4173255A (en) * | 1978-10-05 | 1979-11-06 | Kramer Richard W | Low well yield control system and method |
US4245701A (en) * | 1979-06-12 | 1981-01-20 | Occidental Oil Shale, Inc. | Apparatus and method for igniting an in situ oil shale retort |
US4410216A (en) * | 1979-12-31 | 1983-10-18 | Heavy Oil Process, Inc. | Method for recovering high viscosity oils |
US4287952A (en) * | 1980-05-20 | 1981-09-08 | Exxon Production Research Company | Method of selective diversion in deviated wellbores using ball sealers |
US4512403A (en) * | 1980-08-01 | 1985-04-23 | Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. | In situ coal gasification |
US4497714A (en) * | 1981-03-06 | 1985-02-05 | Stant Inc. | Fuel-water separator |
US4649996A (en) * | 1981-08-04 | 1987-03-17 | Kojicic Bozidar | Double walled screen-filter with perforated joints |
US4491186A (en) * | 1982-11-16 | 1985-01-01 | Smith International, Inc. | Automatic drilling process and apparatus |
US4572295A (en) * | 1984-08-13 | 1986-02-25 | Exotek, Inc. | Method of selective reduction of the water permeability of subterranean formations |
US4577691A (en) * | 1984-09-10 | 1986-03-25 | Texaco Inc. | Method and apparatus for producing viscous hydrocarbons from a subterranean formation |
US5060737A (en) * | 1986-07-01 | 1991-10-29 | Framo Developments (Uk) Limited | Drilling system |
US5040283A (en) * | 1988-08-31 | 1991-08-20 | Shell Oil Company | Method for placing a body of shape memory metal within a tube |
US4998585A (en) * | 1989-11-14 | 1991-03-12 | Qed Environmental Systems, Inc. | Floating layer recovery apparatus |
US5333684A (en) * | 1990-02-16 | 1994-08-02 | James C. Walter | Downhole gas separator |
US5337821A (en) * | 1991-01-17 | 1994-08-16 | Aqrit Industries Ltd. | Method and apparatus for the determination of formation fluid flow rates and reservoir deliverability |
US5107927A (en) * | 1991-04-29 | 1992-04-28 | Otis Engineering Corporation | Orienting tool for slant/horizontal completions |
US5384046A (en) * | 1991-07-02 | 1995-01-24 | Heinrich Fiedler Gmbh & Co Kg | Screen element |
US5673751A (en) * | 1991-12-31 | 1997-10-07 | Stirling Design International Limited | System for controlling the flow of fluid in an oil well |
US5944446A (en) * | 1992-08-31 | 1999-08-31 | Golder Sierra Llc | Injection of mixtures into subterranean formations |
US5435393A (en) * | 1992-09-18 | 1995-07-25 | Norsk Hydro A.S. | Procedure and production pipe for production of oil or gas from an oil or gas reservoir |
US6699503B1 (en) * | 1992-09-18 | 2004-03-02 | Yamanuchi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. | Hydrogel-forming sustained-release preparation |
US5355956A (en) * | 1992-09-28 | 1994-10-18 | Halliburton Company | Plugged base pipe for sand control |
US5435395A (en) * | 1994-03-22 | 1995-07-25 | Halliburton Company | Method for running downhole tools and devices with coiled tubing |
US6692766B1 (en) * | 1994-06-15 | 2004-02-17 | Yissum Research Development Company Of The Hebrew University Of Jerusalem | Controlled release oral drug delivery system |
US5609204A (en) * | 1995-01-05 | 1997-03-11 | Osca, Inc. | Isolation system and gravel pack assembly |
US5597042A (en) * | 1995-02-09 | 1997-01-28 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method for controlling production wells having permanent downhole formation evaluation sensors |
US6112815A (en) * | 1995-10-30 | 2000-09-05 | Altinex As | Inflow regulation device for a production pipe for production of oil or gas from an oil and/or gas reservoir |
US5873410A (en) * | 1996-07-08 | 1999-02-23 | Elf Exploration Production | Method and installation for pumping an oil-well effluent |
US6068015A (en) * | 1996-08-15 | 2000-05-30 | Camco International Inc. | Sidepocket mandrel with orienting feature |
US5803179A (en) * | 1996-12-31 | 1998-09-08 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Screened well drainage pipe structure with sealed, variable length labyrinth inlet flow control apparatus |
US6305470B1 (en) * | 1997-04-23 | 2001-10-23 | Shore-Tec As | Method and apparatus for production testing involving first and second permeable formations |
US6112817A (en) * | 1997-05-06 | 2000-09-05 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Flow control apparatus and methods |
US5881809A (en) * | 1997-09-05 | 1999-03-16 | United States Filter Corporation | Well casing assembly with erosion protection for inner screen |
US6253861B1 (en) * | 1998-02-25 | 2001-07-03 | Specialised Petroleum Services Limited | Circulation tool |
US6516888B1 (en) * | 1998-06-05 | 2003-02-11 | Triangle Equipment As | Device and method for regulating fluid flow in a well |
US6505682B2 (en) * | 1999-01-29 | 2003-01-14 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Controlling production |
US6273194B1 (en) * | 1999-03-05 | 2001-08-14 | Schlumberger Technology Corp. | Method and device for downhole flow rate control |
US6635732B2 (en) * | 1999-04-12 | 2003-10-21 | Surgidev Corporation | Water plasticized high refractive index polymer for ophthalmic applications |
US6367547B1 (en) * | 1999-04-16 | 2002-04-09 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Downhole separator for use in a subterranean well and method |
US6679324B2 (en) * | 1999-04-29 | 2004-01-20 | Shell Oil Company | Downhole device for controlling fluid flow in a well |
US20040052689A1 (en) * | 1999-08-17 | 2004-03-18 | Porex Technologies Corporation | Self-sealing materials and devices comprising same |
US6530431B1 (en) * | 2000-06-22 | 2003-03-11 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Screen jacket assembly connection and methods of using same |
US6896049B2 (en) * | 2000-07-07 | 2005-05-24 | Zeroth Technology Ltd. | Deformable member |
US7360593B2 (en) * | 2000-07-27 | 2008-04-22 | Vernon George Constien | Product for coating wellbore screens |
US20020125009A1 (en) * | 2000-08-03 | 2002-09-12 | Wetzel Rodney J. | Intelligent well system and method |
US6371210B1 (en) * | 2000-10-10 | 2002-04-16 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Flow control apparatus for use in a wellbore |
US6622794B2 (en) * | 2001-01-26 | 2003-09-23 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Sand screen with active flow control and associated method of use |
US20060118296A1 (en) * | 2001-03-20 | 2006-06-08 | Arthur Dybevik | Well device for throttle regulation of inflowing fluids |
US20040144544A1 (en) * | 2001-05-08 | 2004-07-29 | Rune Freyer | Arrangement for and method of restricting the inflow of formation water to a well |
US7185706B2 (en) * | 2001-05-08 | 2007-03-06 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Arrangement for and method of restricting the inflow of formation water to a well |
US6699611B2 (en) * | 2001-05-29 | 2004-03-02 | Motorola, Inc. | Fuel cell having a thermo-responsive polymer incorporated therein |
US6786285B2 (en) * | 2001-06-12 | 2004-09-07 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Flow control regulation method and apparatus |
US6722437B2 (en) * | 2001-10-22 | 2004-04-20 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Technique for fracturing subterranean formations |
US20070209799A1 (en) * | 2001-10-24 | 2007-09-13 | Shell Oil Company | In situ recovery from a hydrocarbon containing formation |
US7252162B2 (en) * | 2001-12-03 | 2007-08-07 | Shell Oil Company | Method and device for injecting a fluid into a formation |
US20060108114A1 (en) * | 2001-12-18 | 2006-05-25 | Johnson Michael H | Drilling method for maintaining productivity while eliminating perforating and gravel packing |
US20060048942A1 (en) * | 2002-08-26 | 2006-03-09 | Terje Moen | Flow control device for an injection pipe string |
US20040159447A1 (en) * | 2003-02-19 | 2004-08-19 | Bissonnette H. Steven | By-pass valve mechanism and method of use hereof |
US20050016732A1 (en) * | 2003-06-20 | 2005-01-27 | Brannon Harold Dean | Method of hydraulic fracturing to reduce unwanted water production |
US7032675B2 (en) * | 2003-10-06 | 2006-04-25 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Thermally-controlled valves and methods of using the same in a wellbore |
US7258166B2 (en) * | 2003-12-10 | 2007-08-21 | Absolute Energy Ltd. | Wellbore screen |
US20050126776A1 (en) * | 2003-12-10 | 2005-06-16 | Russell Thane G. | Wellbore screen |
US20050189119A1 (en) * | 2004-02-27 | 2005-09-01 | Ashmin Lc | Inflatable sealing assembly and method for sealing off an inside of a flow carrier |
US7207385B2 (en) * | 2004-06-14 | 2007-04-24 | Marathon Oil Company | Method and system for producing gas and liquid in a subterranean well |
US20060076150A1 (en) * | 2004-07-30 | 2006-04-13 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Inflow control device with passive shut-off feature |
US7673678B2 (en) * | 2004-12-21 | 2010-03-09 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Flow control device with a permeable membrane |
US20070056729A1 (en) * | 2005-01-11 | 2007-03-15 | Pankratz Ronald E | Apparatus for treating fluid streams |
US20090071646A1 (en) * | 2005-01-11 | 2009-03-19 | Amp-Lift Group Llc | Apparatus for treating fluid streams |
US7581593B2 (en) * | 2005-01-11 | 2009-09-01 | Amp Lift Group, Llc | Apparatus for treating fluid streams |
US20070181299A1 (en) * | 2005-01-26 | 2007-08-09 | Nexen Inc. | Methods of Improving Heavy Oil Production |
US20070045266A1 (en) * | 2005-04-22 | 2007-03-01 | Sandberg Chester L | In situ conversion process utilizing a closed loop heating system |
US7398822B2 (en) * | 2005-05-21 | 2008-07-15 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Downhole connection system |
US20070039741A1 (en) * | 2005-08-22 | 2007-02-22 | Hailey Travis T Jr | Sand control screen assembly enhanced with disappearing sleeve and burst disc |
US20080135249A1 (en) * | 2006-12-07 | 2008-06-12 | Fripp Michael L | Well system having galvanic time release plug |
US20080169099A1 (en) * | 2007-01-15 | 2008-07-17 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method for Controlling the Flow of Fluid Between a Downhole Formation and a Base Pipe |
US20100126720A1 (en) * | 2007-01-29 | 2010-05-27 | Noetic Technologies Inc. | Method for providing a preferential specific injection distribution from a horizontal injection well |
US7757757B1 (en) * | 2007-04-02 | 2010-07-20 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Interior | In-well baffle apparatus and method |
US7647966B2 (en) * | 2007-08-01 | 2010-01-19 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Method for drainage of heavy oil reservoir via horizontal wellbore |
US20090057014A1 (en) * | 2007-08-28 | 2009-03-05 | Richard Bennett M | Method of using a Drill In Sand Control Liner |
US20090101342A1 (en) * | 2007-10-19 | 2009-04-23 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Permeable Medium Flow Control Devices for Use in Hydrocarbon Production |
US20090139717A1 (en) * | 2007-12-03 | 2009-06-04 | Richard Bennett M | Multi-Position Valves for Fracturing and Sand Control and Associated Completion Methods |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102644442A (en) * | 2012-04-25 | 2012-08-22 | 山东立鑫石油机械制造有限公司 | Ultra-viscous crude oil injection-production integrated technique tubular pile |
US20150152720A1 (en) * | 2012-06-06 | 2015-06-04 | Maersk Olie Og Gas A/S | Method of producing viscous hydrocarbons by steam-assisted gravity drainage |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
GB2482812B (en) | 2014-03-19 |
GB2482812A (en) | 2012-02-15 |
CA2763723A1 (en) | 2010-12-09 |
BRPI1011076A2 (en) | 2016-04-12 |
WO2010141196A3 (en) | 2011-03-10 |
WO2010141196A4 (en) | 2011-05-05 |
NO20111681A1 (en) | 2011-12-23 |
GB201119862D0 (en) | 2011-12-28 |
WO2010141196A2 (en) | 2010-12-09 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2763735C (en) | Permeability flow balancing within integral screen joints | |
US9803469B2 (en) | Method for controlling fluid interface level in gravity drainage oil recovery processes with crossflow | |
US20100300194A1 (en) | Permeability flow balancing within integral screen joints and method | |
RU2527972C1 (en) | Method (versions) and control system of operating temperatures in wellbore | |
US8132624B2 (en) | Permeability flow balancing within integral screen joints and method | |
RU2481468C1 (en) | Development method of high-viscous oil deposit | |
US20100300675A1 (en) | Permeability flow balancing within integral screen joints | |
US20100300674A1 (en) | Permeability flow balancing within integral screen joints | |
US9279315B2 (en) | Injection well and method for drilling and completion | |
EP2670940B1 (en) | Methods of maintaining sufficient hydrostatic pressure in multiple intervals of a wellbore in a soft formation | |
US11933149B2 (en) | Fluid flow control in a hydrocarbon recovery operation | |
US20140083692A1 (en) | Method for controlling fluid interface level in gravity drainage oil recovery processes with crossflow | |
Wellhoefer et al. | Unique Solution to Repair Casing Failure in a HP/HT Wellbore Allows for Successful Multistage Stimulation Treatment in an Unconventional Reservoir | |
CA2769044A1 (en) | Fluid injection device | |
RU2599118C1 (en) | Method for development of high-viscosity oil deposit |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED, TEXAS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:JOHNSON, MICHAEL H.;KIM, NAMHYO;REEL/FRAME:022845/0254 Effective date: 20090617 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- AFTER EXAMINER'S ANSWER OR BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION |