US20090219210A1 - Wireless Tracking System And Method With Multipath Error Mitigation - Google Patents
Wireless Tracking System And Method With Multipath Error Mitigation Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20090219210A1 US20090219210A1 US12/463,411 US46341109A US2009219210A1 US 20090219210 A1 US20090219210 A1 US 20090219210A1 US 46341109 A US46341109 A US 46341109A US 2009219210 A1 US2009219210 A1 US 2009219210A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- location
- stationary
- tag
- sensors
- indoor facility
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S5/00—Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more direction or position line determinations; Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more distance determinations
- G01S5/02—Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more direction or position line determinations; Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more distance determinations using radio waves
- G01S5/0205—Details
- G01S5/021—Calibration, monitoring or correction
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W64/00—Locating users or terminals or network equipment for network management purposes, e.g. mobility management
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02D—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES [ICT], I.E. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES AIMING AT THE REDUCTION OF THEIR OWN ENERGY USE
- Y02D30/00—Reducing energy consumption in communication networks
- Y02D30/70—Reducing energy consumption in communication networks in wireless communication networks
Definitions
- the present invention is related to wireless tracking systems and methods. More specifically, the present invention relates to a system and method for mitigating multipath errors associated with the wireless tracking of objects.
- a typical radio frequency identification system includes at least multiple tagged objects, each of which transmits a signal, multiple receivers for receiving the transmissions from the tagged objects, and a processing means for analyzing the transmissions to determine the locations of the tagged objects within a predetermined environment.
- One exemplary method triangulates the strongest received signals to determine the location of a tagged object. This method is based on the assumption that the receivers with the strongest received signals are the ones located closest to the tagged object. However, such an assumption is sometimes erroneous due to common environmental obstacles. Multipath effects can result in a further located receiver having a stronger signal from a tagged object than a more proximate receiver to the tagged object, which result in a mistaken location determination.
- the prior art has yet to resolve mistaken location calculations based on multipath effects.
- One aspect of the present invention is a method for determining a real-time location of an object within an indoor facility.
- the method begins with obtaining a plurality of sensor readings from a transponder attached to the object.
- a reading set is generated from the plurality of sensor readings.
- the reading set is then sorted by a plurality of physical regions.
- a first physical region is selected from the plurality of physical regions.
- the first physical region is composed of a first plurality of sensor readings that have the highest average signal strength.
- the first plurality of sensor readings is sorted into a second plurality of sensor readings. Each of the second plurality of sensor readings corresponds to sensor located in a zone within the first physical region. A selected zone having the highest average reading is then selected.
- a real-time location of the object is calculated using only the second plurality of sensor readings that correspond to the selected zone.
- Each sensor reading preferably comprises a signal strength, link quality, time and identification of the transponder.
- the method may further comprise displaying the real-time location of the object on a graphical user interface.
- the method may also include comparing the calculated real-time location of the object to a previously calculated location for the object.
- the method may include monitoring the motion state of the object to confirm movement of the object from the previously calculated location to the real-time location.
- the indoor facility is a hospital, with each of the plurality of physical regions being a floor of the hospital, and the selected zone being a room on a floor of the hospital.
- the plurality of sensor readings of the reading set preferably comprises from eight to thirty sensor readings for the transponder, and each sensor reading originates from a single stationary sensor positioned within the indoor facility.
- Each sensor reading is preferably a radio frequency transmission from the transponder.
- the step of obtaining a plurality of sensor readings from the transponder attached to the object preferably comprises, transmitting a radio frequency transmission from the transponder, the radio frequency transmission comprising a signal strength, link quality, time of transmission and identification of the transponder, receiving the radio frequency transmission at a plurality of stationary sensors positioned within the indoor facility, and transmitting the signal strength, the link quality, the time of transmission and the identification of the transponder from each of the plurality of stationary sensors to a server for processing.
- Another object of the present invention is a system for providing real-time location information for a plurality of non-stationary objects within an indoor facility.
- the system includes a plurality of sensors, a plurality of transponders and a processing means.
- Each of the stationary sensors is positioned within the indoor facility.
- Each of the transponders is attached to one of the non-stationary objects.
- Each of the transponders has means for wirelessly transmitting to each of the stationary sensors transponder-specific data.
- the processing means processes the transponder-specific data to obtain a real-time reading set for the transponder.
- the processing means also processes the real-time reading set to determine a first plurality of sensor readings.
- the first plurality of sensor readings corresponds to a physical region within the indoor facility having the highest average reading.
- the processor means then processes the first plurality of sensor readings, which are associated with the selected physical region, to select a zone within the physical region having the highest average reading.
- the processing means then calculates the position of the non-stationary object using the sensor readings from the stationary sensors positioned within the selected zone of the selected physical region.
- the transponder-specific data preferably comprises a signal strength, link quality, time and identification of the transponder.
- the indoor facility is a hospital with the physical region preferably a floor of the hospital, and the selected zone is a room on a floor of the hospital.
- the processing means is preferably a server in communication with the plurality of stationary sensors through a network.
- Each transponder preferably transmits a radio frequency transmission of approximately 2.48 gigahertz, and each stationary sensor preferably communicates utilizing a 802.15.4 protocol.
- the system may further comprise means for eliminating those sensor readings not associated with (i.e., located within) the selected zone.
- Another aspect of the present invention is a method for determining a location of an object within a predetermined environment.
- the method begins with transmitting a plurality of radio frequency signals for a wireless tracking device to a positioning engine.
- the wireless tracking device is attached to the object and each of the radio frequency signals corresponds to a fixed signal transmitter within the environment.
- Each radio frequency signal is processed to determine the location of the respective fixed signal transmitter.
- a probable region of the object is determined based on the location of a majority of the fixed signal transmitters for the plurality of radio frequency signals.
- the radio frequency signals that correspond to fixed signal transmitters located outside of the probable region of the object are eliminated from the location determination.
- the position of the object within the predetermined environment is calculated using only the radio frequency signals that correspond to fixed signal transmitters located within the probable region of the object.
- the predetermined environment is preferably a hospital, and the probable region of the object is preferably a room in the hospital.
- the step of transmitting a plurality of radio frequency signals for a wireless tracking device to a positioning engine preferably comprises transmitting radio frequency signals from the wireless tracking device, each radio frequency signal comprising a signal strength, link quality, time of transmission and identification of the transponder, receiving the radio frequency signals at a plurality of stationary sensors positioned within the predetermined environment, and transmitting the signal strength, the link quality, the time of transmission and the identification of the wireless tracking device from each of the plurality of stationary sensors to a server for processing.
- Yet another aspect of the present invention is a system for providing real-time location information for a plurality of non-stationary objects within an indoor facility.
- the system includes a mapped space and a processor.
- the mapped space is of a physical environment of the indoor facility.
- the processor includes means for updating the mapped space in response to received measurements of the physical environment from one or more stationary sensors located within the indoor facility, means for generating a plurality of location hypotheses for a non-stationary object within the physical environment, at least one of the location hypotheses computed in response to measurement received from the non-stationary object and the mapped space, and means for generating a location estimate based on one or more of the plurality of location hypotheses, wherein one or more of the plurality of location hypotheses are selected based on a probability associated respectively therewith.
- the probability is computed in association with known barriers in the physical space.
- FIG. 1 is schematic view of a system of the present invention.
- FIG. 2 is a multi-floor view of a facility employing the system of the present invention.
- FIG. 3 is a floor plan view of a single floor in a facility employing the system of the present invention.
- FIG. 5 is a flow chart of a general method of the present invention.
- FIG. 6 is a flow chart of a specific method of the present invention.
- the system 50 is preferably employed within an indoor facility 70 such as a business office, factory, home, hospital and/or government agency building.
- the system 50 is utilized to track and locate various objects positioned throughout the facility 70 .
- the tags 60 continuously transmit signals on a predetermined time cycle, and these signals are received by sensors 55 positioned throughout the facility 70 .
- the sensors 55 transmit the data to a bridge 56 for transmission to a server 65 . If a sensor 55 is unable to transmit to a bridge 56 , the sensor may transmit to another sensor 55 in a mesh network-like system for eventual transmission to a bridge 56 .
- a transmission may be sent from a transmission distance of six sensors 55 from a bridge 56 .
- the facility 70 is depicted as a hospital.
- the facility 70 has a multitude of floors 75 a - c .
- An elevator 80 provides access between the various floors 75 a , 75 b and 75 c .
- Each floor 75 a , 75 b and 75 c has a multitude of rooms 90 a - i , with each room 90 accessible through a door 85 .
- Positioned throughout the facility 70 are sensors 55 a - o for obtaining readings from tags 60 a - d attached to or integrated into non-stationary objects 100 a , 100 b (see FIGS. 2 and 4 ).
- a bridge 56 is also shown for receiving transmissions from the sensors 55 for processing by the server 65 .
- the tag 60 a is attached to movable bed 100 a positioned on an upper floor 75 c .
- the tag 60 a transmits a signal which is received by sensors 55 a , 55 b and 55 c . If the signal to sensor 55 c is the strongest, then an analysis of the readings from the sensors 55 a - c may place the tag 60 a , and thus the movable bed 100 a , at position 60 ′ on the lower floor 75 b . This type of faulty reading would likely occur with triangulation. To prevent such a faulty positioning reading, the present invention processes the readings preferably according to one of the methods illustrated in FIGS. 5-7 , which would eliminate the reading from sensor 55 c from the location calculation for movable bed 100 a.
- a more specific method 300 of the present invention is set forth in FIG. 6 .
- the sensors 55 of the system 50 generate readings from the tags 60 .
- the single sensor reading inputs 600 are illustrated in FIG. 8 .
- a reading set is generated for readings from a single tag 60 .
- the generation of the reading set is typically in response to an inquiry from a user of the system 50 in search of an object 100 bearing tag 60 .
- the server 65 determines if there is sufficient data to proceed with the location analysis. If there is insufficient data, the method is restarted at block 302 . If there is sufficient data, then the method proceeds to block 308 .
- the reading sets are separated by floor 75 of the facility 70 .
- the floor 75 with the highest average reading set is selected for further processing.
- the readings for the selected floor are sorted by zones. Each zone may represent any physical boundary on the selected floor 75 of the facility 70 . Preferably, the zones represent a room 90 , station 95 or other easily determined physical location.
- the zone with the highest average reading is selected.
- the location of the object 100 is calculated based on the readings from the selected zone.
- the location is inputted to the location database for dissemination to users of the system to locate the object 100 .
- FIG. 7 An even more specific method 400 of the present invention is set forth in FIG. 7 .
- the sensors 55 of the system 50 generate readings from the tags 60 .
- the single sensor reading inputs 600 are illustrated in FIG. 8 .
- a reading set is generated for readings from a single tag 60 .
- the generation of the reading set is typically in response to an inquiry from a user of the system 50 in search of an object 100 bearing tag 60 .
- the server 65 determines if there is sufficient data to proceed with the location analysis. If there is insufficient data, the method is restarted at block 402 . If there is sufficient data, then the method proceeds to block 408 .
- the reading sets are separated by floor 75 of the facility 70 .
- the floor 75 with the highest average reading set is selected for further processing.
- the readings for the selected floor are sorted by zones. Each zone may represent any physical boundary on the selected floor 75 of the facility 70 . Preferably, the zones represent a room 90 , station 95 or other easily determined physical location.
- the zone with the highest average reading is selected.
- the location of the object 100 is calculated based on the readings from the selected zone.
- the server 65 inquires if the new calculated location is consistent with available data for the object 100 .
- the available data includes the motion sensor state of the object 100 which is tracked at block 424 . If the motion sensor has not detected a motion threshold of the object 100 , then that is one indication that the new calculated location is in error. However, if the motion sensor has detected movement (a motion threshold) of the object 100 , then that is one indication that the new calculated location is correct.
- Additional data for the decision block 418 includes recently calculated locations for the object 100 which are available from database 426 .
- Yet further data available for decision block 418 is data from the possible hypotheses database 428 .
- the possible hypotheses database includes data such as the timing between the last calculated location and the new calculated location.
- the new calculated location may be in error. If the response to decision block 418 is yes, then at block 420 the location is inputted to the location database for dissemination to users of the system to locate the object 100 . If the response to decision block 418 is no, then the new calculated location is held as an unproven hypothesis at block 422 .
- the signal strength from each tag 60 is provided dBm with a full strength value of zero, which is a ratio of power relative to 1 milli-Watt.
- the Link Quality value is provided as a similar value as the signal strength.
- the time is a date stamp of the time and date that the signal is received by the sensor 55 .
- the sensor location is preferably a floor and region on the floor. In a preferred embodiment, the regions on the floors overlap each other. The regions are preferably determined based on the facility 70 .
- Table One ten readings from sensors 55 positioned on various floors of the facility 70 . Each of the readings is transmitted from a single tag 60 to the sensors 60 .
- the sensors 60 transmit the data from the tag 60 to the server 65 via bridges 56 .
- the server 65 uses the data to calculate the location of the object 100 as discussed.
- the sensor location may also be provided in terms of a X-Y position which is based on a floor plan image of each floor of the facility 70 .
- the X-Y position may be based on the pixel location on the image of the floor plan.
- the average reading from all of the sensors 55 on each floor is provided in Table Two. More specifically, if the fifth floor has ten sensors 55 that each received a signal from a specific tag 60 , then the readings from those ten sensors 55 are averaged to obtain the average reading per floor value provided in Table Two. The readings from the floor with the highest value are then further processed to determine the location of the object 100 . The readings from the sensors 55 on the other floors are eliminated from the calculation for the location of the object 100 .
- the average reading from all of the sensors 55 in each region on the selected floor is provided in Table Three. As mentioned above, the regions preferably overlap so that a single sensor 55 may be in two or more regions, and used in the average reading for both regions.
- the peak reading for each region is also set forth in Table Three. In an alternative embodiment, if the peak reading exceeds a threshold, then that region is selected even if the average readings for that region are less than another region. In calculating the location of the object 100 , the highest readings within a selected region are used for the calculation.
- the number of readings used preferably ranges from 2 to 10, and is most preferably 3 to 5. The more readings used in the calculation, the longer the processing time for the calculation.
- a radial basis function is utilized in calculating the location of the object 100 .
- the location of the object 100 is preferably conveyed as an XY coordinate on an floor plan image of the facility 70 .
Abstract
Description
- The Present Application is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/672,047, filed on Feb. 7, 2007, which is a Continuation-In-Part Application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/968,814, filed on Oct. 18, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,312,752, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/572,690, filed on May 19, 2004, now abandoned, U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/528,052, filed on Dec. 9, 2003, now abandoned, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/513,784, filed on Oct. 22, 2003, now abandoned.
- Not Applicable
- 1. Field of the Invention
- The present invention is related to wireless tracking systems and methods. More specifically, the present invention relates to a system and method for mitigating multipath errors associated with the wireless tracking of objects.
- 2. Description of Related Art
- The ability to quickly determine the location of objects located within a facility is becoming a necessity of life. To the uninformed observer, the placement of transponders, also known as tags, on numerous non-stationary objects whether in an office or home would appear to be an unnecessary use of resources. However, the uninformed observer fails to appreciate the complexity of modern life and the desire for efficiency, whether at the office or home.
- For example, in a typical hospital there are numerous shifts of employees utilizing the same equipment. When a new shift arrives the ability to quickly locate medical equipment not only results in a more efficient use of resources, but also can result in averting a medical emergency. Thus, the tracking of medical equipment in a hospital is becoming a standard practice.
- The tracking of objects in other facilities is rapidly becoming a means of achieving greater efficiency. A typical radio frequency identification system includes at least multiple tagged objects, each of which transmits a signal, multiple receivers for receiving the transmissions from the tagged objects, and a processing means for analyzing the transmissions to determine the locations of the tagged objects within a predetermined environment. One exemplary method triangulates the strongest received signals to determine the location of a tagged object. This method is based on the assumption that the receivers with the strongest received signals are the ones located closest to the tagged object. However, such an assumption is sometimes erroneous due to common environmental obstacles. Multipath effects can result in a further located receiver having a stronger signal from a tagged object than a more proximate receiver to the tagged object, which result in a mistaken location determination.
- Tekinay, U.S. Pat. No. 6,259,894 for a Method For Improved Line-Of-Sight Signal Detection Using RF Model Parameters, discloses a method for reducing time-shift due to multipathing for a RF signal in an RF environment.
- Close, U.S. Pat. No. 3,869,673 for a Method And Apparatus For Measuring Multipath Distortion, discloses a method for indicating multipath distortion in a received signal.
- Lennen, U.S. Pat. No. 5,402,450 for a Signal Timing Synchronizer, discloses a method and apparatus for reducing the effects of multipath induced distortions on the accuracy of detecting the time of arrival of a received signal.
- Fortune et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,450,615 for a Prediction Of Indoor Electromagnetic Wave Propagation For Wireless Indoor Systems, discloses techniques for predicting RF propagation within a structure.
- The prior art has yet to resolve mistaken location calculations based on multipath effects.
- One aspect of the present invention is a method for determining a real-time location of an object within an indoor facility. The method begins with obtaining a plurality of sensor readings from a transponder attached to the object. Next, a reading set is generated from the plurality of sensor readings. The reading set is then sorted by a plurality of physical regions. Then, a first physical region is selected from the plurality of physical regions. The first physical region is composed of a first plurality of sensor readings that have the highest average signal strength. Next, the first plurality of sensor readings is sorted into a second plurality of sensor readings. Each of the second plurality of sensor readings corresponds to sensor located in a zone within the first physical region. A selected zone having the highest average reading is then selected. Next, a real-time location of the object is calculated using only the second plurality of sensor readings that correspond to the selected zone.
- Each sensor reading preferably comprises a signal strength, link quality, time and identification of the transponder. The method may further comprise displaying the real-time location of the object on a graphical user interface. The method may also include comparing the calculated real-time location of the object to a previously calculated location for the object. The method may include monitoring the motion state of the object to confirm movement of the object from the previously calculated location to the real-time location. In a preferred embodiment, the indoor facility is a hospital, with each of the plurality of physical regions being a floor of the hospital, and the selected zone being a room on a floor of the hospital. The plurality of sensor readings of the reading set preferably comprises from eight to thirty sensor readings for the transponder, and each sensor reading originates from a single stationary sensor positioned within the indoor facility. Each sensor reading is preferably a radio frequency transmission from the transponder. The step of obtaining a plurality of sensor readings from the transponder attached to the object preferably comprises, transmitting a radio frequency transmission from the transponder, the radio frequency transmission comprising a signal strength, link quality, time of transmission and identification of the transponder, receiving the radio frequency transmission at a plurality of stationary sensors positioned within the indoor facility, and transmitting the signal strength, the link quality, the time of transmission and the identification of the transponder from each of the plurality of stationary sensors to a server for processing.
- Another object of the present invention is a system for providing real-time location information for a plurality of non-stationary objects within an indoor facility. The system includes a plurality of sensors, a plurality of transponders and a processing means. Each of the stationary sensors is positioned within the indoor facility. Each of the transponders is attached to one of the non-stationary objects. Each of the transponders has means for wirelessly transmitting to each of the stationary sensors transponder-specific data. The processing means processes the transponder-specific data to obtain a real-time reading set for the transponder. The processing means also processes the real-time reading set to determine a first plurality of sensor readings. The first plurality of sensor readings corresponds to a physical region within the indoor facility having the highest average reading. The processor means then processes the first plurality of sensor readings, which are associated with the selected physical region, to select a zone within the physical region having the highest average reading. The processing means then calculates the position of the non-stationary object using the sensor readings from the stationary sensors positioned within the selected zone of the selected physical region.
- The transponder-specific data preferably comprises a signal strength, link quality, time and identification of the transponder. In a preferred embodiment, the indoor facility is a hospital with the physical region preferably a floor of the hospital, and the selected zone is a room on a floor of the hospital. The processing means is preferably a server in communication with the plurality of stationary sensors through a network. Each transponder preferably transmits a radio frequency transmission of approximately 2.48 gigahertz, and each stationary sensor preferably communicates utilizing a 802.15.4 protocol. The system may further comprise means for eliminating those sensor readings not associated with (i.e., located within) the selected zone.
- Another aspect of the present invention is a method for determining a location of an object within a predetermined environment. The method begins with transmitting a plurality of radio frequency signals for a wireless tracking device to a positioning engine. The wireless tracking device is attached to the object and each of the radio frequency signals corresponds to a fixed signal transmitter within the environment. Each radio frequency signal is processed to determine the location of the respective fixed signal transmitter. A probable region of the object is determined based on the location of a majority of the fixed signal transmitters for the plurality of radio frequency signals. The radio frequency signals that correspond to fixed signal transmitters located outside of the probable region of the object are eliminated from the location determination. The position of the object within the predetermined environment is calculated using only the radio frequency signals that correspond to fixed signal transmitters located within the probable region of the object.
- The predetermined environment is preferably a hospital, and the probable region of the object is preferably a room in the hospital. The step of transmitting a plurality of radio frequency signals for a wireless tracking device to a positioning engine preferably comprises transmitting radio frequency signals from the wireless tracking device, each radio frequency signal comprising a signal strength, link quality, time of transmission and identification of the transponder, receiving the radio frequency signals at a plurality of stationary sensors positioned within the predetermined environment, and transmitting the signal strength, the link quality, the time of transmission and the identification of the wireless tracking device from each of the plurality of stationary sensors to a server for processing.
- Yet another aspect of the present invention is a system for providing real-time location information for a plurality of non-stationary objects within an indoor facility. The system includes a mapped space and a processor. The mapped space is of a physical environment of the indoor facility. The processor includes means for updating the mapped space in response to received measurements of the physical environment from one or more stationary sensors located within the indoor facility, means for generating a plurality of location hypotheses for a non-stationary object within the physical environment, at least one of the location hypotheses computed in response to measurement received from the non-stationary object and the mapped space, and means for generating a location estimate based on one or more of the plurality of location hypotheses, wherein one or more of the plurality of location hypotheses are selected based on a probability associated respectively therewith. The probability is computed in association with known barriers in the physical space.
- Having briefly described the present invention, the above and further objects, features and advantages thereof will be recognized by those skilled in the pertinent art from the following detailed description of the invention when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
-
FIG. 1 is schematic view of a system of the present invention. -
FIG. 2 is a multi-floor view of a facility employing the system of the present invention. -
FIG. 3 is a floor plan view of a single floor in a facility employing the system of the present invention. -
FIG. 4 is a two-floor view of a facility including a tagged object and sensors of the system of the present invention. -
FIG. 5 is a flow chart of a general method of the present invention. -
FIG. 6 is a flow chart of a specific method of the present invention. -
FIG. 7 is a flow chart of a specific method of the present invention. -
FIG. 8 is a flow chart of a single sensor reading input. - As shown in
FIGS. 1-4 , a system is generally designated 50. Thesystem 50 is capable of determining real-time location of an object 100 within anindoor facility 70. Thesystem 50 preferably includes a plurality of sensors 55, a plurality ofbridges 56, a plurality of tags 60 and at least oneserver 65. One example of the components of thesystem 50 is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,312,752 for a Wireless Position Location And Tracking System, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. A more specific example of the sensors 55 is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,324,824 for a Plug-In Network Appliance, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Another example of asystem 50 is set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 6,751,455 for a Power-And Bandwidth-Adaptive In-Home Wireless Communications System With Power-Grid-Powered Agents And Battery-Powered Clients, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. - The
system 50 is preferably employed within anindoor facility 70 such as a business office, factory, home, hospital and/or government agency building. Thesystem 50 is utilized to track and locate various objects positioned throughout thefacility 70. The tags 60 continuously transmit signals on a predetermined time cycle, and these signals are received by sensors 55 positioned throughout thefacility 70. The sensors 55 transmit the data to abridge 56 for transmission to aserver 65. If a sensor 55 is unable to transmit to abridge 56, the sensor may transmit to another sensor 55 in a mesh network-like system for eventual transmission to abridge 56. In a preferred embodiment, a transmission may be sent from a transmission distance of six sensors 55 from abridge 56. Theserver 65 preferably continuously receives transmissions from the sensors 55 via thebridges 56 concerning the movement of objects 100 bearing a tag 60 within thefacility 70. Theserver 65 processes the transmissions from the sensors 55 and calculates a real-time position for each of the objects 100 bearing a tag 60 within thefacility 70. The real-time location information for each of the objects 100 bearing a tag 60 is preferably displayed on an image of a floor plan of theindoor facility 70, or if thefacility 70 has multiple floors, then on the floor plan images of the floors of thefacility 70. The floor plan image may be used with a graphical user interface so that an individual of thefacility 70 is able to quickly locate objects 100 within thefacility 70. - As shown in
FIG. 1 , thesystem 50 utilizes sensors 55 to monitor and identify the real-time position of non-stationary objects bearing or integrated with tags 60. The sensors 55 a-f preferably wirelessly communicate with each other (shown as double arrow lines) and with aserver 65 through awired connection 66 via at least onebridge 56, such as disclosed in the above-mentioned U.S. Pat. No. 7,324,824 for a Plug-In Network Appliance. The tags 60 a-c transmit signals (shown as dashed lines) which are received by the sensors 55 a-e, which then transmit signals tobridges 56 for eventual transmission to aserver 65. Theserver 65 is preferably located on-site at thefacility 70. However, thesystem 50 may also include an off-site server 65, not shown. - Each tag 60 preferably transmits a radio frequency signal of approximately 2.48 GigaHertz (“GHz”). The communication format is preferably IEEE Standard 802.15.4. Those skilled in the pertinent art will recognize that the tags 60 may operate at various frequencies without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention.
- As shown in
FIGS. 2-4 , thefacility 70 is depicted as a hospital. Thefacility 70 has a multitude of floors 75 a-c. Anelevator 80 provides access between thevarious floors floor facility 70 are sensors 55 a-o for obtaining readings from tags 60 a-d attached to or integrated intonon-stationary objects FIGS. 2 and 4 ). Abridge 56 is also shown for receiving transmissions from the sensors 55 for processing by theserver 65. - As shown in
FIG. 4 , thetag 60 a is attached tomovable bed 100 a positioned on anupper floor 75 c. Thetag 60 a transmits a signal which is received bysensors sensor 55 c is the strongest, then an analysis of the readings from the sensors 55 a-c may place thetag 60 a, and thus themovable bed 100 a, at position 60′ on thelower floor 75 b. This type of faulty reading would likely occur with triangulation. To prevent such a faulty positioning reading, the present invention processes the readings preferably according to one of the methods illustrated inFIGS. 5-7 , which would eliminate the reading fromsensor 55 c from the location calculation formovable bed 100 a. - A
general method 200 of the present invention is illustrated inFIG. 5 . Atblock 202, the sensors 55 of thesystem 50 generate readings from the tags 60. These singlesensor reading inputs 600 are illustrated inFIG. 8 . As shown inFIG. 8 , the inputs preferably include thetag identification 604, thesignal strength 606, thelink quality 608 and the time of the reading 610, which are inputted as asingle sensor reading 602. Atblock 204, a plurality of readings sets are generated from the sensor readings. In a preferred embodiment, each of the plurality of readings sets represents an area of afacility 70. Atblock 206, the readings are further sorted by a particular zone of thefacility 70 thereby eliminating readings that may lead to an incorrect location. In a preferred embodiment, a zone is a subset of an area. Atblock 208, the zone with the highest average reading is selected for calculation of the position of the object 100, again eliminating readings that may lead to an incorrect reading. Atblock 210, the location of the object 100 is calculated based on the readings from the selected zone. - A more
specific method 300 of the present invention is set forth inFIG. 6 . Atblock 302, the sensors 55 of thesystem 50 generate readings from the tags 60. As discussed above, the singlesensor reading inputs 600 are illustrated inFIG. 8 . Atblock 304, a reading set is generated for readings from a single tag 60. The generation of the reading set is typically in response to an inquiry from a user of thesystem 50 in search of an object 100 bearing tag 60. Atdecision block 306, theserver 65 determines if there is sufficient data to proceed with the location analysis. If there is insufficient data, the method is restarted atblock 302. If there is sufficient data, then the method proceeds to block 308. Atblock 308, the reading sets are separated by floor 75 of thefacility 70. Atblock 310, the floor 75 with the highest average reading set is selected for further processing. Atblock 312, the readings for the selected floor are sorted by zones. Each zone may represent any physical boundary on the selected floor 75 of thefacility 70. Preferably, the zones represent a room 90, station 95 or other easily determined physical location. Atblock 314, the zone with the highest average reading is selected. Atblock 316, the location of the object 100 is calculated based on the readings from the selected zone. Atblock 318, the location is inputted to the location database for dissemination to users of the system to locate the object 100. - An even more
specific method 400 of the present invention is set forth inFIG. 7 . Atblock 402, the sensors 55 of thesystem 50 generate readings from the tags 60. As discussed above, the singlesensor reading inputs 600 are illustrated inFIG. 8 . Atblock 404, a reading set is generated for readings from a single tag 60. The generation of the reading set is typically in response to an inquiry from a user of thesystem 50 in search of an object 100 bearing tag 60. Atdecision block 406, theserver 65 determines if there is sufficient data to proceed with the location analysis. If there is insufficient data, the method is restarted atblock 402. If there is sufficient data, then the method proceeds to block 408. Atblock 408, the reading sets are separated by floor 75 of thefacility 70. Atblock 410, the floor 75 with the highest average reading set is selected for further processing. Atblock 412, the readings for the selected floor are sorted by zones. Each zone may represent any physical boundary on the selected floor 75 of thefacility 70. Preferably, the zones represent a room 90, station 95 or other easily determined physical location. Atblock 414, the zone with the highest average reading is selected. Atblock 416, the location of the object 100 is calculated based on the readings from the selected zone. - At
decision block 418, theserver 65 inquires if the new calculated location is consistent with available data for the object 100. The available data includes the motion sensor state of the object 100 which is tracked atblock 424. If the motion sensor has not detected a motion threshold of the object 100, then that is one indication that the new calculated location is in error. However, if the motion sensor has detected movement (a motion threshold) of the object 100, then that is one indication that the new calculated location is correct. Additional data for thedecision block 418 includes recently calculated locations for the object 100 which are available fromdatabase 426. Yet further data available fordecision block 418 is data from thepossible hypotheses database 428. The possible hypotheses database includes data such as the timing between the last calculated location and the new calculated location. If the object 100 has moved one end of thefacility 70 to another end of thefacility 70 within seconds, then the new calculated location may be in error. If the response to decision block 418 is yes, then atblock 420 the location is inputted to the location database for dissemination to users of the system to locate the object 100. If the response to decision block 418 is no, then the new calculated location is held as an unproven hypothesis atblock 422. - The following example illustrates the information that is utilized and eliminated in practicing the present invention.
-
TABLE ONE Sensor Signal Strength Link Sensor Location # dB Quality Time (floor/region) 1 −95 −95 Sep. 14, 2006 5/B 11:22:35 2 −10 −10 Sep. 14, 2006 4/C 11:22:35 3 −20 −20 Sep. 14, 2006 4/C 11:22:36 4 −25 −25 Sep. 14, 2006 4/C 11:22:35 5 −40 −40 Sep. 14, 2006 4/C 11:22:36 6 −50 −50 Sep. 14, 2006 4/C 11:22:36 7 −70 −70 Sep. 14, 2006 4/D 11:22:36 8 −80 −80 Sep. 14, 2006 4/D 11:22:36 9 −90 −90 Sep. 14, 2006 4/E 11:22:37 10 −95 −95 Sep. 14, 2006 4/E 11:22:37 -
TABLE TWO Floor Average Reading per Floor 2 N/ A 3 −120 4 −30 5 −85 -
TABLE THREE Region Peaks Average Reading per Region C −20 −20 D −10 −70 E −70 −95 - As shown in Table One, the signal strength from each tag 60 is provided dBm with a full strength value of zero, which is a ratio of power relative to 1 milli-Watt. The Link Quality value is provided as a similar value as the signal strength. The time is a date stamp of the time and date that the signal is received by the sensor 55. The sensor location is preferably a floor and region on the floor. In a preferred embodiment, the regions on the floors overlap each other. The regions are preferably determined based on the
facility 70. - In Table One, ten readings from sensors 55 positioned on various floors of the
facility 70. Each of the readings is transmitted from a single tag 60 to the sensors 60. The sensors 60 transmit the data from the tag 60 to theserver 65 viabridges 56. Theserver 65 uses the data to calculate the location of the object 100 as discussed. The sensor location may also be provided in terms of a X-Y position which is based on a floor plan image of each floor of thefacility 70. The X-Y position may be based on the pixel location on the image of the floor plan. - The average reading from all of the sensors 55 on each floor is provided in Table Two. More specifically, if the fifth floor has ten sensors 55 that each received a signal from a specific tag 60, then the readings from those ten sensors 55 are averaged to obtain the average reading per floor value provided in Table Two. The readings from the floor with the highest value are then further processed to determine the location of the object 100. The readings from the sensors 55 on the other floors are eliminated from the calculation for the location of the object 100.
- The average reading from all of the sensors 55 in each region on the selected floor is provided in Table Three. As mentioned above, the regions preferably overlap so that a single sensor 55 may be in two or more regions, and used in the average reading for both regions. The peak reading for each region is also set forth in Table Three. In an alternative embodiment, if the peak reading exceeds a threshold, then that region is selected even if the average readings for that region are less than another region. In calculating the location of the object 100, the highest readings within a selected region are used for the calculation. The number of readings used preferably ranges from 2 to 10, and is most preferably 3 to 5. The more readings used in the calculation, the longer the processing time for the calculation. Thus, using 10 readings may provide a more accurate location, however, the processing time will be longer than using 3 readings. In a preferred embodiment, a radial basis function is utilized in calculating the location of the object 100. The location of the object 100 is preferably conveyed as an XY coordinate on an floor plan image of the
facility 70. - From the foregoing it is believed that those skilled in the pertinent art will recognize the meritorious advancement of this invention and will readily understand that while the present invention has been described in association with a preferred embodiment thereof, and other embodiments illustrated in the accompanying drawings, numerous changes modification and substitutions of equivalents may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention which is intended to be unlimited by the foregoing except as may appear in the following appended claim. Therefore, the embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property or privilege is claimed are defined in the following appended claims.
Claims (20)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/463,411 US20090219210A1 (en) | 2003-10-22 | 2009-05-10 | Wireless Tracking System And Method With Multipath Error Mitigation |
Applications Claiming Priority (6)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US51378403P | 2003-10-22 | 2003-10-22 | |
US52805203P | 2003-12-09 | 2003-12-09 | |
US57269004P | 2004-05-19 | 2004-05-19 | |
US10/968,814 US7312752B2 (en) | 2003-10-22 | 2004-10-18 | Wireless position location and tracking system |
US11/672,047 US7545326B2 (en) | 2003-10-22 | 2007-02-07 | Wireless tracking system and method with multipath error mitigation |
US12/463,411 US20090219210A1 (en) | 2003-10-22 | 2009-05-10 | Wireless Tracking System And Method With Multipath Error Mitigation |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/672,047 Division US7545326B2 (en) | 2003-10-22 | 2007-02-07 | Wireless tracking system and method with multipath error mitigation |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20090219210A1 true US20090219210A1 (en) | 2009-09-03 |
Family
ID=39708336
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/672,047 Active 2025-03-26 US7545326B2 (en) | 2003-10-22 | 2007-02-07 | Wireless tracking system and method with multipath error mitigation |
US12/463,411 Abandoned US20090219210A1 (en) | 2003-10-22 | 2009-05-10 | Wireless Tracking System And Method With Multipath Error Mitigation |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/672,047 Active 2025-03-26 US7545326B2 (en) | 2003-10-22 | 2007-02-07 | Wireless tracking system and method with multipath error mitigation |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US7545326B2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2008097410A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8837558B1 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-16 | Motorola Solutions, Inc. | Systems, methods, and devices for improving signal detection in communication systems |
Families Citing this family (60)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2005086802A2 (en) | 2004-03-08 | 2005-09-22 | Proxense, Llc | Linked account system using personal digital key (pdk-las) |
US7528716B2 (en) * | 2004-09-15 | 2009-05-05 | Radarfind Corporation | Methods, location circuits and computer program products for automated location and monitoring of mobile devices |
US7525432B2 (en) * | 2004-09-15 | 2009-04-28 | Radarfind Corporation | Methods, identification tags and computer program products for automated location and monitoring of mobile devices |
US20060063522A1 (en) * | 2004-09-21 | 2006-03-23 | Mcfarland Norman R | Self-powering automated building control components |
AU2005319019A1 (en) | 2004-12-20 | 2006-06-29 | Proxense, Llc | Biometric personal data key (PDK) authentication |
US20070132576A1 (en) * | 2005-12-08 | 2007-06-14 | Honeywell International Inc. | Method and apparatus for tracking persons |
US9113464B2 (en) | 2006-01-06 | 2015-08-18 | Proxense, Llc | Dynamic cell size variation via wireless link parameter adjustment |
US11206664B2 (en) | 2006-01-06 | 2021-12-21 | Proxense, Llc | Wireless network synchronization of cells and client devices on a network |
US7904718B2 (en) | 2006-05-05 | 2011-03-08 | Proxense, Llc | Personal digital key differentiation for secure transactions |
US20080068267A1 (en) * | 2006-09-14 | 2008-03-20 | Huseth Steve D | Cost effective communication infrastructure for location sensing |
US9269221B2 (en) | 2006-11-13 | 2016-02-23 | John J. Gobbi | Configuration of interfaces for a location detection system and application |
US7884712B2 (en) * | 2007-05-08 | 2011-02-08 | Awarepoint Corporation | Wireless tracking system and method utilizing tags with variable power level transmissions |
US8319635B2 (en) * | 2007-05-08 | 2012-11-27 | Awarepoint Corporation | Wireless tracking system and method utilizing variable location algorithms |
US20090058653A1 (en) * | 2007-09-05 | 2009-03-05 | Geissler Randolph K | Hospital inventory management including radio tag(s) and additional tranceiver(s) |
US8659427B2 (en) | 2007-11-09 | 2014-02-25 | Proxense, Llc | Proximity-sensor supporting multiple application services |
US8171528B1 (en) | 2007-12-06 | 2012-05-01 | Proxense, Llc | Hybrid device having a personal digital key and receiver-decoder circuit and methods of use |
US9251332B2 (en) | 2007-12-19 | 2016-02-02 | Proxense, Llc | Security system and method for controlling access to computing resources |
WO2009102979A2 (en) | 2008-02-14 | 2009-08-20 | Proxense, Llc | Proximity-based healthcare management system with automatic access to private information |
WO2009126732A2 (en) | 2008-04-08 | 2009-10-15 | Proxense, Llc | Automated service-based order processing |
JP5474953B2 (en) * | 2008-06-18 | 2014-04-16 | ヴァイアップ リミテッド | Tag product information |
US8410935B2 (en) | 2008-07-10 | 2013-04-02 | Radarfind Corporation | Rotatable tags for automated location and monitoring of moveable objects and related systems |
US8033462B2 (en) * | 2009-04-01 | 2011-10-11 | Awarepoint Corporation | Wireless tracking system and method for sterilizable object |
US8285564B2 (en) * | 2009-04-05 | 2012-10-09 | Awarepoint Corporation | Wireless tracking system and method for analyzing an interaction between objects |
US20110025464A1 (en) * | 2009-07-30 | 2011-02-03 | Awarepoint Corporation | Antenna Diversity For Wireless Tracking System And Method |
US8867993B1 (en) * | 2009-09-20 | 2014-10-21 | Awarepoint Corporation | Wireless tracking system and method utilizing near-field communication devices |
GB2488942B (en) * | 2009-09-20 | 2014-06-04 | Awarepoint Corp | Wireless tracking system and methods utilizing near-field communication devices |
US8903416B1 (en) | 2009-09-20 | 2014-12-02 | Awarepoint Corporation | Wireless tracking system and method utilizing near-field communication devices |
US20110068892A1 (en) * | 2009-09-20 | 2011-03-24 | Awarepoint Corporation | Wireless Tracking System And Method Utilizing Near-Field Communication Devices |
US8089354B2 (en) * | 2009-10-08 | 2012-01-03 | Awarepoint Corporation | Wireless tracking system and method for backhaul of information |
US9418205B2 (en) | 2010-03-15 | 2016-08-16 | Proxense, Llc | Proximity-based system for automatic application or data access and item tracking |
US9322974B1 (en) | 2010-07-15 | 2016-04-26 | Proxense, Llc. | Proximity-based system for object tracking |
US8457656B2 (en) | 2010-09-27 | 2013-06-04 | Awarepoint Corporation | Wireless tracking system and method utilizing multiple location algorithms |
NL2005784C2 (en) * | 2010-11-30 | 2012-05-31 | Stichting Van Hall Larenstein | Locating and tracking system. |
US8600374B1 (en) * | 2011-02-11 | 2013-12-03 | Awarepoint Corporation | Sterilizable wireless tracking and communication device and method for manufacturing |
US8857716B1 (en) * | 2011-02-21 | 2014-10-14 | Proxense, Llc | Implementation of a proximity-based system for object tracking and automatic application initialization |
EP2745135B1 (en) | 2011-08-17 | 2020-05-27 | Zebra Technologies Corporation | Method and apparatus for modeling timing relationships between clocks |
AT511881B1 (en) * | 2011-09-08 | 2015-02-15 | Indoo Rs Gmbh | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR LOCATING A COMMUNICATION DEVICE |
US9086469B2 (en) | 2012-05-08 | 2015-07-21 | Awarepoint Corporation | Low frequency magnetic induction positioning system and method |
US9395189B2 (en) | 2012-06-21 | 2016-07-19 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Indoor structure inference using points of interest |
WO2014083494A2 (en) * | 2012-11-27 | 2014-06-05 | Koninklijke Philips N.V. | A system for locating a radio unit |
US9405898B2 (en) | 2013-05-10 | 2016-08-02 | Proxense, Llc | Secure element as a digital pocket |
US10078811B2 (en) | 2013-11-29 | 2018-09-18 | Fedex Corporate Services, Inc. | Determining node location based on context data in a wireless node network |
US20150288604A1 (en) | 2014-04-02 | 2015-10-08 | Tyco Fire & Security Gmbh | Sensor Network Gateway |
US9443363B2 (en) | 2014-03-03 | 2016-09-13 | Consortium P, Inc. | Real-time location detection using exclusion zones |
US10453023B2 (en) | 2014-05-28 | 2019-10-22 | Fedex Corporate Services, Inc. | Methods and node apparatus for adaptive node communication within a wireless node network |
JP6405468B2 (en) * | 2014-12-17 | 2018-10-17 | フィリップス ライティング ホールディング ビー ヴィ | Method and system for sophisticated positioning via hyperzone intersections |
US11238397B2 (en) | 2015-02-09 | 2022-02-01 | Fedex Corporate Services, Inc. | Methods, apparatus, and systems for generating a corrective pickup notification for a shipped item using a mobile master node |
US9734682B2 (en) | 2015-03-02 | 2017-08-15 | Enovate Medical, Llc | Asset management using an asset tag device |
US20160275767A1 (en) * | 2015-03-16 | 2016-09-22 | Menonthemoon Pty Ltd. | Intelligent beacon and system including same |
US9985839B2 (en) | 2015-07-08 | 2018-05-29 | Fedex Corporate Services, Inc. | Systems, apparatus, and methods of event monitoring for an event candidate within a wireless node network based upon sighting events, sporadic events, and benchmark checkpoint events |
WO2017165011A1 (en) | 2016-03-23 | 2017-09-28 | Fedex Corporate Services, Inc. | Systems, apparatus, and methods for self-adjusting a broadcast setting of a node in a wireless node network |
US10231078B1 (en) * | 2016-05-31 | 2019-03-12 | Infinite Leap, Inc. | Bluetooth low energy (BLE) real-time location system (RTLS) having simple transmitting tags, beacons and bridges, that use a combination of motion detection and RSSI measurements to determine room-location of the tags |
US10117959B2 (en) | 2016-06-07 | 2018-11-06 | General Electric Company | Smart sterilization tracker tag |
EP3513390B1 (en) * | 2016-09-14 | 2024-03-06 | Invisalert Solutions, LLC | Tamper resistant clasp and wristband apparatus and associated patient monitoring system and method of use |
US10346649B2 (en) | 2017-01-11 | 2019-07-09 | Abl Ip Holding Llc | Asset tracking using active wireless tags that report via a local network of connected beacons |
US10210353B1 (en) | 2018-03-09 | 2019-02-19 | Abl Ip Holding Llc | Asset tag tracking system and network architecture |
US10502811B2 (en) | 2018-03-09 | 2019-12-10 | Abl Ip Holding Llc | Network architecture, radio frequency based asset tracking and/or location estimation methods and systems |
US10422848B1 (en) | 2018-03-09 | 2019-09-24 | Abl Ip Holding Llc | More accurate asset tag locating of radio frequency devices |
USD906359S1 (en) | 2018-07-05 | 2020-12-29 | Invisalert Solutions, Inc. | Display screen with graphical user interface |
GB2605760A (en) * | 2021-03-19 | 2022-10-19 | Detego Ltd | Determining location of RFID tag |
Citations (33)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3805265A (en) * | 1971-10-06 | 1974-04-16 | Rcds Enterprises Inc | Radiant wave locating system |
US3869673A (en) * | 1973-05-21 | 1975-03-04 | Magnavox Co | Method and apparatus for measuring multipath distortion |
US5119104A (en) * | 1990-05-04 | 1992-06-02 | Heller Alan C | Location system adapted for use in multipath environments |
US5402450A (en) * | 1992-01-22 | 1995-03-28 | Trimble Navigation | Signal timing synchronizer |
US5450615A (en) * | 1993-12-22 | 1995-09-12 | At&T Corp. | Prediction of indoor electromagnetic wave propagation for wireless indoor systems |
US5534876A (en) * | 1994-03-10 | 1996-07-09 | Motorola, Inc. | Multipath tolerant location system and method therefor |
US5883598A (en) * | 1995-12-15 | 1999-03-16 | Signatron Technology Corporation | Position location system and method |
US5977913A (en) * | 1997-02-07 | 1999-11-02 | Dominion Wireless | Method and apparatus for tracking and locating personnel |
US6259406B1 (en) * | 1996-03-22 | 2001-07-10 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Wireless communication system and method and system for detection of position of radio mobile station |
US6259894B1 (en) * | 1997-12-04 | 2001-07-10 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method for improved line-of-sight signal detection using RF model parameters |
US6342854B1 (en) * | 1995-09-19 | 2002-01-29 | Cambridge Positioning Systems Ltd. | Position determining system |
US6380894B1 (en) * | 1999-08-30 | 2002-04-30 | Wherenet Corporation | Multi-lateration system with automatic calibration and error removal |
US6529164B1 (en) * | 2000-03-31 | 2003-03-04 | Ge Medical Systems Information Technologies, Inc. | Object location monitoring within buildings |
US6720922B2 (en) * | 2002-03-29 | 2004-04-13 | Microsoft Corporation | Radio-frequency badge for location measurement |
US20040136384A1 (en) * | 2003-01-10 | 2004-07-15 | Double Win Enterprise Co., Ltd. | Ethernet communication apparatus, bridge thereof and connection device |
US20040147232A1 (en) * | 2002-04-11 | 2004-07-29 | Richard Zodnik | Wall mounted wireless transceiver that tracks a location of a wireless communication device |
US20040157551A1 (en) * | 2002-06-21 | 2004-08-12 | Tantivy Communications, Inc | Repeater for extending range of time division duplex communication system |
US6799047B1 (en) * | 1999-02-25 | 2004-09-28 | Microsoft Corporation | Locating and tracking a user in a wireless network through environmentally profiled data |
US20040212500A1 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2004-10-28 | Stilp Louis A. | RFID based security network |
US20040235468A1 (en) * | 2003-05-19 | 2004-11-25 | Luebke Charles J. | Wireless network clustering communication system, wireless communication network, and access port for same |
US6839560B1 (en) * | 1999-02-25 | 2005-01-04 | Microsoft Corporation | Using a derived table of signal strength data to locate and track a user in a wireless network |
US6839027B2 (en) * | 2002-11-15 | 2005-01-04 | Microsoft Corporation | Location measurement process for radio-frequency badges employing path constraints |
US20050075118A1 (en) * | 2003-10-06 | 2005-04-07 | Lewis Thomas P. | Method and system for improved wlan location |
US6889032B2 (en) * | 1996-01-22 | 2005-05-03 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Mobile base station for disseminating information |
US6915135B1 (en) * | 2001-05-15 | 2005-07-05 | Praxis Technology Group, Inc. | Method and system for detecting object presence and its duration in a given area |
US6990428B1 (en) * | 2003-07-28 | 2006-01-24 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Radiolocation using path loss data |
US7050819B2 (en) * | 2002-07-16 | 2006-05-23 | Qwest Communications International Inc. | Mesh network mobile unit with positioning system |
US7084740B2 (en) * | 2000-06-07 | 2006-08-01 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | Wireless locating and tracking systems |
US7138920B2 (en) * | 2001-03-20 | 2006-11-21 | Jan Bengtsson | Method for monitoring the movements of individuals in and around buildings, rooms and the like |
US7196662B2 (en) * | 2002-05-31 | 2007-03-27 | Ekahau Oy | Probabilistic model for a positioning technique |
US7202816B2 (en) * | 2003-07-22 | 2007-04-10 | Microsoft Corporation | Utilization of the approximate location of a device determined from ambient signals |
US7339523B2 (en) * | 2005-12-05 | 2008-03-04 | Honeywell International Inc. | Navigation system using radio frequency tags |
US7423516B2 (en) * | 2006-05-04 | 2008-09-09 | Goliath Solutions, Llc | Systems and methods for approximating the location of an RFID tag |
Family Cites Families (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6212392B1 (en) * | 1999-02-26 | 2001-04-03 | Signal Soft Corp. | Method for determining if the location of a wireless communication device is within a specified area |
GB2353910A (en) | 1999-09-03 | 2001-03-07 | Ibm | Asset tracking using local beacons |
US6839650B2 (en) * | 2001-11-19 | 2005-01-04 | Agilent Technologies, Inc. | Electronic test system and method |
US6952574B2 (en) | 2003-02-28 | 2005-10-04 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and apparatus for automatically tracking location of a wireless communication device |
US6838992B2 (en) * | 2003-03-21 | 2005-01-04 | Versus Technology, Inc. | Methods and systems for locating subjects and providing event notification within a tracking environment and badge for use therein |
US20040207523A1 (en) * | 2003-04-18 | 2004-10-21 | Sa Corporation, A Texas Corporation | Integrated campus monitoring and response system |
KR100752947B1 (en) | 2003-06-06 | 2007-08-30 | 메시네트웍스, 인코포레이티드 | MAC protocol for accurately computing the position of wireless devices inside buildings |
US7250907B2 (en) | 2003-06-30 | 2007-07-31 | Microsoft Corporation | System and methods for determining the location dynamics of a portable computing device |
US7433696B2 (en) * | 2004-05-18 | 2008-10-07 | Cisco Systems, Inc. | Wireless node location mechanism featuring definition of search region to optimize location computation |
US20060063523A1 (en) | 2004-09-21 | 2006-03-23 | Mcfarland Norman R | Portable wireless sensor for building control |
-
2007
- 2007-02-07 US US11/672,047 patent/US7545326B2/en active Active
- 2007-12-31 WO PCT/US2007/089194 patent/WO2008097410A1/en active Application Filing
-
2009
- 2009-05-10 US US12/463,411 patent/US20090219210A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (33)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3805265A (en) * | 1971-10-06 | 1974-04-16 | Rcds Enterprises Inc | Radiant wave locating system |
US3869673A (en) * | 1973-05-21 | 1975-03-04 | Magnavox Co | Method and apparatus for measuring multipath distortion |
US5119104A (en) * | 1990-05-04 | 1992-06-02 | Heller Alan C | Location system adapted for use in multipath environments |
US5402450A (en) * | 1992-01-22 | 1995-03-28 | Trimble Navigation | Signal timing synchronizer |
US5450615A (en) * | 1993-12-22 | 1995-09-12 | At&T Corp. | Prediction of indoor electromagnetic wave propagation for wireless indoor systems |
US5534876A (en) * | 1994-03-10 | 1996-07-09 | Motorola, Inc. | Multipath tolerant location system and method therefor |
US6342854B1 (en) * | 1995-09-19 | 2002-01-29 | Cambridge Positioning Systems Ltd. | Position determining system |
US5883598A (en) * | 1995-12-15 | 1999-03-16 | Signatron Technology Corporation | Position location system and method |
US6889032B2 (en) * | 1996-01-22 | 2005-05-03 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Mobile base station for disseminating information |
US6259406B1 (en) * | 1996-03-22 | 2001-07-10 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Wireless communication system and method and system for detection of position of radio mobile station |
US5977913A (en) * | 1997-02-07 | 1999-11-02 | Dominion Wireless | Method and apparatus for tracking and locating personnel |
US6259894B1 (en) * | 1997-12-04 | 2001-07-10 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method for improved line-of-sight signal detection using RF model parameters |
US6839560B1 (en) * | 1999-02-25 | 2005-01-04 | Microsoft Corporation | Using a derived table of signal strength data to locate and track a user in a wireless network |
US6799047B1 (en) * | 1999-02-25 | 2004-09-28 | Microsoft Corporation | Locating and tracking a user in a wireless network through environmentally profiled data |
US6380894B1 (en) * | 1999-08-30 | 2002-04-30 | Wherenet Corporation | Multi-lateration system with automatic calibration and error removal |
US6529164B1 (en) * | 2000-03-31 | 2003-03-04 | Ge Medical Systems Information Technologies, Inc. | Object location monitoring within buildings |
US7084740B2 (en) * | 2000-06-07 | 2006-08-01 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | Wireless locating and tracking systems |
US7138920B2 (en) * | 2001-03-20 | 2006-11-21 | Jan Bengtsson | Method for monitoring the movements of individuals in and around buildings, rooms and the like |
US6915135B1 (en) * | 2001-05-15 | 2005-07-05 | Praxis Technology Group, Inc. | Method and system for detecting object presence and its duration in a given area |
US6720922B2 (en) * | 2002-03-29 | 2004-04-13 | Microsoft Corporation | Radio-frequency badge for location measurement |
US20040147232A1 (en) * | 2002-04-11 | 2004-07-29 | Richard Zodnik | Wall mounted wireless transceiver that tracks a location of a wireless communication device |
US7196662B2 (en) * | 2002-05-31 | 2007-03-27 | Ekahau Oy | Probabilistic model for a positioning technique |
US20040157551A1 (en) * | 2002-06-21 | 2004-08-12 | Tantivy Communications, Inc | Repeater for extending range of time division duplex communication system |
US7050819B2 (en) * | 2002-07-16 | 2006-05-23 | Qwest Communications International Inc. | Mesh network mobile unit with positioning system |
US6839027B2 (en) * | 2002-11-15 | 2005-01-04 | Microsoft Corporation | Location measurement process for radio-frequency badges employing path constraints |
US20040136384A1 (en) * | 2003-01-10 | 2004-07-15 | Double Win Enterprise Co., Ltd. | Ethernet communication apparatus, bridge thereof and connection device |
US20040212500A1 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2004-10-28 | Stilp Louis A. | RFID based security network |
US20040235468A1 (en) * | 2003-05-19 | 2004-11-25 | Luebke Charles J. | Wireless network clustering communication system, wireless communication network, and access port for same |
US7202816B2 (en) * | 2003-07-22 | 2007-04-10 | Microsoft Corporation | Utilization of the approximate location of a device determined from ambient signals |
US6990428B1 (en) * | 2003-07-28 | 2006-01-24 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Radiolocation using path loss data |
US20050075118A1 (en) * | 2003-10-06 | 2005-04-07 | Lewis Thomas P. | Method and system for improved wlan location |
US7339523B2 (en) * | 2005-12-05 | 2008-03-04 | Honeywell International Inc. | Navigation system using radio frequency tags |
US7423516B2 (en) * | 2006-05-04 | 2008-09-09 | Goliath Solutions, Llc | Systems and methods for approximating the location of an RFID tag |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8837558B1 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-16 | Motorola Solutions, Inc. | Systems, methods, and devices for improving signal detection in communication systems |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7545326B2 (en) | 2009-06-09 |
US20080012767A1 (en) | 2008-01-17 |
WO2008097410A1 (en) | 2008-08-14 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7545326B2 (en) | Wireless tracking system and method with multipath error mitigation | |
US7884712B2 (en) | Wireless tracking system and method utilizing tags with variable power level transmissions | |
US8457656B2 (en) | Wireless tracking system and method utilizing multiple location algorithms | |
US10390182B2 (en) | Real-time location system (RTLS) having tags, beacons and bridges, that uses a combination of motion detection and RSSI measurements to determine room-location of the tags | |
US8319635B2 (en) | Wireless tracking system and method utilizing variable location algorithms | |
US10231078B1 (en) | Bluetooth low energy (BLE) real-time location system (RTLS) having simple transmitting tags, beacons and bridges, that use a combination of motion detection and RSSI measurements to determine room-location of the tags | |
US20070132577A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for estimating the location of a signal transmitter | |
US7362656B2 (en) | Ultrasonic locating system | |
US7212830B2 (en) | Position detection method, position detection system, and position detection server equipment | |
US8350758B1 (en) | Systems and methods for indoor geolocation based on yield of RF signals | |
US20110025464A1 (en) | Antenna Diversity For Wireless Tracking System And Method | |
Diaz et al. | Bluepass: An indoor bluetooth-based localization system for mobile applications | |
US20130162481A1 (en) | Systems and methods for calibration of indoor geolocation | |
US20100026569A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for location detection using gps and wifi/wimax | |
US9086469B2 (en) | Low frequency magnetic induction positioning system and method | |
WO2015028474A1 (en) | Location detection system and method | |
JP2007515851A (en) | Mobile unit position tracking method | |
Mazan et al. | A Study of Devising Neural Network Based Indoor Localization Using Beacons: First Results. | |
US10251020B1 (en) | Bluetooth low energy (BLE) real-time location system (RTLS) having tags, beacons and bridges, that use a combination of motion detection and RSSI measurements to determine room-location of the tags | |
US20110102267A1 (en) | Method and system for determining location information | |
KR101955023B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for tracking location of object based on network | |
Akram et al. | Design and implementation of asset tracking system based on internet of things | |
JP4498882B2 (en) | POSITIONING DEVICE AND POSITIONING METHOD | |
CN110823221B (en) | Indoor positioning system, method and device | |
WO2023281506A2 (en) | System and method for determining object location |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: AWAREPOINT CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:CALIRI, DYAMI;SMITH, DEREK;REEL/FRAME:022661/0573 Effective date: 20070202 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: PATIENT CARE TECHOLOGY SYSTEMS, LLC, NORTH CAROLIN Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:AWAREPOINT CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:026159/0597 Effective date: 20110415 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: WMX, LLC, NORTH CAROLINA Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:PATIENT CARE TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, LLC;REEL/FRAME:026254/0186 Effective date: 20110420 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: AWAREPOINT CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WMX, LLC;REEL/FRAME:030440/0546 Effective date: 20130426 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: CLINICAL PATENTS, LLC, PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:AWAREPOINT CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:046521/0391 Effective date: 20180620 |