Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20090143862 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 12/363,061
Publication date4 Jun 2009
Filing date30 Jan 2009
Priority date10 Dec 2002
Also published asUS6974479, US20040111161, US20050261774, WO2004052247A1
Publication number12363061, 363061, US 2009/0143862 A1, US 2009/143862 A1, US 20090143862 A1, US 20090143862A1, US 2009143862 A1, US 2009143862A1, US-A1-20090143862, US-A1-2009143862, US2009/0143862A1, US2009/143862A1, US20090143862 A1, US20090143862A1, US2009143862 A1, US2009143862A1
InventorsHai H. Trieu
Original AssigneeWarsaw Orthopedic, Inc.
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
System and method for blocking and/or retaining a prosthetic spinal implant
US 20090143862 A1
Abstract
Devices for anchoring and/or blocking spinal implants in an intervertebral disc space are disclosed. In one aspect of the invention the device includes a rigid blocking member having one end unconnected and free to block a spinal implant, and another end attached to a securing member to secure the blocking member to the spine. Methods for using the inventive anchoring/blocking implants are also provided.
Images(12)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(20)
1. A device for maintaining separation between naturally adjacent vertebrae in a human while cushioning the intervertebral space, the device comprising:
a first L-shaped blocking member having an anchoring arm and a blocking arm, the L-shaped blocking member being sized and adapted to be coupled to a human vertebra;
a securing member for coupling the anchoring arm to a human vertebra; and
an intervertebral disc implant sized and adapted to be positioned between two, naturally adjacent vertebrae in a human;
wherein the blocking arm of the L-shaped blocking member is sized and adapted to block the intervertebral disc implant from being expelled from an intervertebral disc space while remaining free and unconnected to the intervertebral disc implant.
2. The device of claim 1 wherein the intervertebral disc implant is formed from an elastic material.
3. The device of claim 1 wherein the intervertebral disc implant member comprises a prosthetic disc nucleus.
4. The device of claim 1 wherein the intervertebral disc implant member comprises an annular plug.
5. The device of claim 1 wherein the intervertebral disc implant comprises a polymeric material.
6. The device of claim 5 wherein the polymeric material comprises a material selected from the group consisting of polyurethane, silicones, polyaryletherketones, polyarylacrylates, polyacrylamidesacrylates, polyolefins, polyvinyl alcohols, polyacrylonitriles, polyesters.
7. The device of claim 1 wherein the intervertebral disc implant comprises a natural, collagen-source material.
8. The device of claim 7 wherein the natural, collagen-source material comprises a material selected from the group consisting of disc annulus material, fascia lata material, planar fascia material, anterior or posterior cruciate ligament material, patella tendons, hamstring tendons, quadriceps tendons, Achilles tendons, skins, and connective tissues.
9. The device of claim 1 wherein the intervertebral disc implant comprises a synthetic, collagen-type material.
10. A device for maintaining separation between naturally adjacent human vertebrae, the device comprising an L-shaped blocking member having an anchoring arm and a blocking arm; and
a spinal implant sized and adapted to be positioned between two, naturally adjacent human vertebrae in a disc nucleus space;
wherein the anchoring arm is sized and adapted to be anchored to a human vertebra; and
wherein the blocking arm is sized and adapted to extend into an opening in a disc annulus without extending into the disc nucleus space, and is thereby to be positioned to block the spinal implant in the disc nucleus space while remaining unconnected to the spinal implant.
11. The device of claim 10, further comprising a securing member for coupling the anchoring arm to a human vertebra.
12. The device of claim 10 wherein the spinal implant is formed from an elastic material.
13. The device of claim 10 wherein the spinal implant comprises a polymeric material.
14. The device of claim 13 wherein the polymeric material comprises a material selected from the group consisting of polyurethane, silicones, polyaryletherketones, polyarylacrylates, polyacrylamidesacrylates, polyolefins, polyvinyl alcohols, polyacrylonitriles, polyesters.
15. A device for maintaining separation between naturally adjacent human vertebrae, the device comprising a pair of L-shaped blocking members, wherein each blocking member has an anchoring arm and a blocking arm; and
a spinal implant sized and adapted to be positioned between naturally adjacent human vertebrae in a disc nucleus space;
wherein each of the anchoring arms is sized and adapted to be anchored to a respective one of the naturally adjacent human vertebra; and
wherein each of the blocking arms is sized and adapted to extend into an opening in a disc annulus without extending into the disc nucleus space, and are thereby to be positioned to block the spinal implant in the disc nucleus space while remaining unconnected to the spinal implant.
16. The device of claim 15, further comprising a first securing member for coupling a first of the pair of anchoring arms to a first of the to a human vertebrae.
17. The device of claim 16, further comprising a second securing member for coupling a second of the pair of anchoring arms to a second of the human vertebrae.
18. The device of claim 15 wherein the spinal implant is formed from an elastic material.
19. The device of claim 15 wherein the spinal implant comprises a polymeric material.
20. The device of claim 19 wherein the polymeric material comprises a material selected from the group consisting of polyurethane, silicones, polyaryletherketones, polyarylacrylates, polyacrylamidesacrylates, polyolefins, polyvinyl alcohols, polyacrylonitriles, polyesters.
Description
    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • [0001]
    This application is a continuation application of pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/173,451, filed Jul. 1, 2005, which is a divisional of U.S. Pat. No. 6,974,479, filed Apr. 21, 2003, which is based on Provisional Application 60/432,368, filed Dec. 10, 2002.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • [0002]
    The present invention relates generally to spinal implants, and more particularly to devices for blocking and/or retaining implants in an intervertebral disc space.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0003]
    The intervertebral disc functions to stabilize the spine and to distribute forces between vertebral bodies. A normal disc includes a gelatinous nucleus pulposus, an annulus fibrosis and two vertebral end plates. The nucleus pulposus is surrounded and confined by the annulus fibrosis.
  • [0004]
    Intervertebral discs may be displaced or damaged due to trauma or disease. Disruption of the annulus fibrosis allows the nucleus pulposus to protrude into the spinal canal, a condition commonly referred to as a herniated or ruptured disc. The extruded nucleus pulposus may press on the spinal nerve, which may result in nerve damage, pain, numbness, muscle weakness and paralysis. Intervertebral discs may also deteriorate due to the normal aging process. As a disc dehydrates and hardens, the disc space height will be reduced, leading to instability of the spine, decreased mobility and pain.
  • [0005]
    One way to relieve the symptoms of these conditions is by surgical removal of a portion or all of the intervertebral disc. The removal of the damaged or unhealthy disc may allow the disc space to collapse, which could lead to instability of the spine, abnormal joint mechanics, nerve damage, as well as severe pain. Therefore, after removal of the disc, adjacent vertebrae are typically fused to preserve the disc space.
  • [0006]
    Several devices exist to fill an intervertebral space following removal of all or part of the intervertebral disc in order to prevent disc space collapse and to promote fusion of adjacent vertebrae surrounding the disc space. Even though a certain degree of success with these devices has been achieved, full motion is typically never regained after such intervertebral fusions.
  • [0007]
    Attempts to overcome these problems have led to the development of disc replacements. Many of these devices are complicated, bulky and made of a combination of metallic and elastomeric components and thus never fully return the full range of motion desired. More recently, efforts have been directed to replacing the nucleus pulposus of the disc with a similar gelatinous material, such as a hydrogel. However, once positioned in the disc space, many hydrogel implants may migrate in the disc space and/or may be expelled from the disc space through an annular defect. Closure of the annular defect, or other opening, using surgical sutures or staples following implantation is typically difficult and, in some cases, ineffective.
  • [0008]
    A need therefore exists for a nucleus pulposus or other spinal implant that resists migration from the disc space, as well as for devices and methods that block or retain the implants so that the implants are more resistant to migration and/or expulsion through an opening in the annulus fibrosis. The present invention addresses these needs.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0009]
    Devices and methods for blocking and/or retaining a prosthetic spinal implant member in an intervertebral disc space are provided. In a first aspect of the invention the device comprises a first blocking member having an anchoring end and a blocking end. The anchoring end is anchored to a vertebra, and the blocking end is free and unconnected to a prosthetic spinal implant, and is positioned to block a prosthetic spinal implant from being expelled from an intervertebral disc space.
  • [0010]
    In a second embodiment the device further includes a second blocking member having an anchoring end and a blocking end. The anchoring end of the second blocking member is anchored to a vertebra, and the blocking end of the second blocking member is free and unconnected to a prosthetic spinal implant, and is positioned to block a prosthetic spinal implant from being expelled from an intervertebral disc space.
  • [0011]
    Methods for anchoring a spinal implant are also provided. In one aspect of the invention the method comprises: (a) implanting a prosthetic spinal implant member in an intervertebral disc space; (b) providing a first blocking member having an anchoring end and a blocking end, wherein said blocking end is free and unconnected to a prosthetic spinal implant; (c) positioning the blocking end of said first blocking member in a position effective to block said prosthetic spinal implant from being expelled from the intervertebral disc space; and (d) securing the anchoring end of said first blocking member to a vertebra in a manner in which the blocking end of said first blocking member is maintained in a position effective to block said prosthetic spinal implant from being expelled from the intervertebral disc space.
  • [0012]
    In another embodiment the method additionally includes the steps of: (e) providing a second blocking member having an anchoring end and a blocking end, wherein said blocking end is free and unconnected to a prosthetic spinal implant; and (f) positioning the blocking end of said second blocking member in a position effective to block said prosthetic spinal implant from being expelled from the intervertebral disc space; and (g) securing the anchoring end of said second blocking member to a vertebra in a manner in which the blocking end of said second blocking member is maintained in a position effective to block said prosthetic spinal implant from being expelled from the intervertebral disc space.
  • [0013]
    In a third embodiment the method comprises: (a) implanting a prosthetic spinal implant in an intervertebral disc space; (b) providing a flexible blocking member having a first anchoring end, a second anchoring end, and a blocking portion, wherein said flexible blocking member is unconnected to said prosthetic spinal implant; and (c) securing said first anchoring end to a vertebra; and (d) securing said second anchoring end to a vertebra; wherein said securing steps are accomplished in a manner effective to position said blocking portion in a position effective to block said prosthetic spinal implant from being expelled from the intervertebral disc space.
  • [0014]
    One object of the present invention is to provide devices for anchoring spinal implants so they will be resistant to excessive migration in, and/or expulsion from, the intervertebral disc space. Further objects and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the following description.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
  • [0015]
    FIGS. 1 a and 1 b show one embodiment of the present invention, wherein the device includes an L-shaped plate attached to the implant, and further wherein the implant fills the annular opening.
  • [0016]
    FIGS. 2 a and 2 b show another embodiment of the present invention, wherein the device includes an L-shaped plate attached to an annular plug, and further wherein the annular plug fills the annular opening.
  • [0017]
    FIGS. 3 a and 3 b show another embodiment of the present invention, wherein the device includes an L-shaped plate attached to the implant, and further wherein there is nothing in the annulus.
  • [0018]
    FIGS. 4 a-4 c show another embodiment of the present invention, wherein the device includes a flat plate blocks implant, and further wherein the implant fills the annulus.
  • [0019]
    FIGS. 5 a-5 c show another embodiment of the present invention, wherein the device includes a flat plate blocks plug, and further wherein the plug fills the annulus.
  • [0020]
    FIGS. 6 a-6 c show another embodiment of the present invention, wherein the device includes an L-shaped plate not attached to the implant, and further wherein there is nothing in the annulus opening.
  • [0021]
    FIGS. 7 a-7 c show another embodiment of the present invention, wherein the device includes a double plate with a flexible band between, and further wherein the implant fills the annulus.
  • [0022]
    FIGS. 8 a-8 c show another embodiment of the present invention, wherein the device includes a double plate with a flexible band between, and further wherein there is a separate annulus plug.
  • [0023]
    FIGS. 9 a-9 c show another embodiment of the present invention, wherein the device includes a double plate with a flexible band between, and further wherein there is nothing in the annulus opening.
  • [0024]
    FIGS. 10 a and 10 b show another embodiment of the present invention, wherein the device includes double L-shaped plates attached to the implant, and further wherein the implant fills the annulus.
  • [0025]
    FIGS. 11 a and 11 b show another embodiment of the present invention, wherein the device includes double L-shaped plates attached to the annular plug, and further wherein the plug fills the annulus.
  • [0026]
    FIGS. 12 a and 12 b show another embodiment of the present invention, wherein the device includes double L-shaped plates attached to the implant, and further wherein there is nothing in the annulus opening.
  • [0027]
    FIGS. 13 a-13 c show another embodiment of the present invention, wherein the device includes a double flat plates block implant, and further wherein the implant fills the annulus.
  • [0028]
    FIGS. 14 a-14 c show another embodiment of the present invention, wherein the device includes a double flat plates block plug, and further wherein the plug fills the annulus.
  • [0029]
    FIGS. 15 a-15 c show another embodiment of the present invention, wherein the device includes a double flat plates not attached to the implant, and further wherein there is nothing in the annulus opening.
  • [0030]
    FIGS. 16 a and 16 b show another embodiment of the present invention, wherein the device includes an L-shaped plate attached to the implant, and further wherein the implant fills the annulus.
  • [0031]
    FIGS. 17 a and 17 b show another embodiment of the present invention, wherein the device includes an L-shaped plate attached to the annular plug, and further wherein the plug fills the annulus.
  • [0032]
    FIGS. 18 a and 18 b show another embodiment of the present invention, wherein the device includes an L-shaped plate attached to the implant, and further wherein there is nothing in the annulus opening.
  • [0033]
    FIGS. 19 a-19 c show another embodiment of the present invention, wherein the device includes a flat plate blocks implant, and further wherein the implant fills the annulus.
  • [0034]
    FIGS. 20 a-20 c show another embodiment of the present invention, wherein the device includes a flat plate blocks plug, and further wherein the plug fills the annulus.
  • [0035]
    FIGS. 21 a-21 c show another embodiment of the present invention, wherein the device includes an L-shaped plate not attached to the implant, and further wherein there is nothing in the annulus opening.
  • [0036]
    FIGS. 22 a-22 c show another embodiment of the present invention, wherein the device includes a double plate with a flexible band between, and further wherein the implant fills the annulus.
  • [0037]
    FIGS. 23 a-23 c show another embodiment of the present invention, wherein the device includes a double plate with a flexible band between, and further wherein there is a separate annulus plug.
  • [0038]
    FIGS. 24 a-24 c show another embodiment of the present invention, wherein the device includes a double plate with a flexible band between, and further wherein there is nothing in the annulus opening.
  • [0039]
    FIGS. 25 a and 25 b show another embodiment of the present invention, wherein the device includes double L-shaped plates attached to the implant, and further wherein the implant fills the annulus.
  • [0040]
    FIGS. 26 a and 26 b show another embodiment of the present invention, wherein the device includes double L-shaped plates attached to the annular plug, and further wherein the plug fills the annulus.
  • [0041]
    FIGS. 27 a and 27 b show another embodiment of the present invention, wherein the device includes double L-shaped plates attached to the implant, and further wherein there is nothing in the annulus opening.
  • [0042]
    FIGS. 28 a-28 c show another embodiment of the present invention, wherein the device includes a double flat plates block implant, and further wherein the implant fills the annulus.
  • [0043]
    FIGS. 29 a-29 c show another embodiment of the present invention, wherein the device includes a double flat plates block plug, and further wherein the plug fills the annulus.
  • [0044]
    FIGS. 30 a-30 c show another embodiment of the present invention, wherein the device includes a double flat plates not attached to the implant, and further wherein there is nothing in the annulus opening.
  • [0045]
    FIGS. 31 through 33 show steps in a preferred procedure for using the inventive implants.
  • [0046]
    FIG. 34 shows an embodiment of the present invention where the securing member (in this case, a screw) is attached to the vertebral end plate.
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • [0047]
    For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the invention, reference will now be made to certain preferred embodiments and specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended. All embodiments of the present invention, including those explicitly disclosed, those inherently disclosed, and those that would normally occur to persons skilled in the art, are desired to be protected.
  • [0048]
    The present invention relates to prosthetic spinal implants that are blocked and/or anchored to prevent excessive migration in and/or expulsion from the disc space. Methods of using such implants are also disclosed. The spinal implants described herein include those that may be useful as nucleus pulposus replacements, partial or complete disc replacements, and those that may be useful in other disc reconstruction or augmentation procedures.
  • [0049]
    Referring now to the drawings, FIGS. 1 a and 1 b show one preferred embodiment of the present invention. Device 10 may include a first, rigid anchoring member 11, having a first end 12 and a second end 13. A prosthetic implant member 14 is attached to, and completely covers, first end 12 of anchoring member 11. At least one securing member 15 is attached to the second end 13 of anchoring member 11. Securing member 15 is securable to a vertebra 16.
  • [0050]
    As shown in FIGS. 1 a and 1 b, in some embodiments of the invention implant member 14 extends into, and substantially fills, both the vacated nucleus space and opening 18 in annulus 17. The vacated nucleus space and opening 18 are both formed during the discectomy procedure that removes the degenerated disc that is replaced by implant member 14 in the illustrated embodiment.
  • [0051]
    Anchoring member 11 may be “L” shaped as shown in FIG. 1 a, or it may be another shape effective to position the prosthetic implant member 14 in a desired location when one end of the anchoring member is secured to a vertebra. Anchoring member 11 is preferably made of a rigid, biocompatible material, such as metals, ceramics, composites, etc. For example, carbon fiber reinforced composites such as carbon fiber/epoxy composites or carbon fiber/polyaryletherketone composites may be used, as may a wide variety of metallic materials, such as, for example, shape memory materials, stainless steel, titanium, titanium alloys, cobalt chrome alloys, and combinations thereof.
  • [0052]
    As shown in FIGS. 2 a and 2 b, in other embodiments of the present invention implant member 24 may extend into, and/or substantially fill, only opening 28 of annulus 27. In this embodiment the nucleus space is filled with a separate prosthetic disc nucleus 29.
  • [0053]
    As shown in FIGS. 3 a and 3 b, in other embodiments implant member 34 may extend into, and/or substantially fill, only the vacated nucleus space, leaving opening 38 of annulus 37 unplugged.
  • [0054]
    As shown in FIGS. 4 a-4 c, alternative embodiments of the present invention comprise a rigid anchoring member that blocks, but is not attached to, a prosthetic spinal implant member. As with the prior embodiments, rigid anchoring member 41 may have a first end 42 and a second end 43. At least one securing member 45 may be attached to the second end 43 of anchoring member 41, but the first end 42 is left free and unconnected to prosthetic spinal implant 44. Securing member 45 may be secured to a vertebra 46.
  • [0055]
    FIGS. 5 a-5 c show another embodiment where a rigid anchoring member blocks, but is not attached to, a prosthetic spinal implant member. In this embodiment rigid anchoring member 51 has a first end 52 and a second end 53, with at least one securing member 55 being attached to second end 53. Here too, first end 52 is left free and unconnected to prosthetic spinal implant 54, and securing member 55 may be secured to a vertebra 56.
  • [0056]
    In the embodiment shown in FIGS. 5 a-5 c, rigid anchoring member 51 blocks an implant 54 which is separate and distinct from prosthetic nucleus 59. This is in contrast to the embodiment shown in FIGS. 4 a-4 c, where rigid anchoring member 41 blocks a single prosthetic nucleus implant 44. As with the embodiment shown in FIGS. 1 a-1 b, the single prosthetic implant 44 of FIGS. 4 a-4 c extends into, and substantially fills, both the vacated nucleus space and opening 48 in annulus 47.
  • [0057]
    FIGS. 6 a-6 c show a further embodiment of the present invention, corresponding to the embodiment shown in FIGS. 3 a-3 b but with a rigid anchoring member that blocks, but is not attached to, a prosthetic spinal implant member. In this embodiment rigid anchoring member 61 has a first end 62 and a second end 63, with at least one securing member 65 being attached to second end 63. As with the embodiments shown in FIGS. 4 and 5, first end 62 is left free and unconnected to prosthetic spinal implant 64, and securing member 65 may be secured to a vertebra.
  • [0058]
    The anchoring member of the device may also, in other forms of the invention, include a flexible implant-blocking material. For example, FIGS. 7 a-7 c show one embodiment wherein anchoring member 70 comprises a flexible band 71 anchored at each end by one or more securing members 75. In the embodiment shown in FIGS. 7 a-7 c, anchoring member 70 retains implant 74 to keep the implant from being expelled from the intervertebral disc space. Implant 74 extends into, and substantially fills, both the vacated nucleus space and opening 78 in annulus 77.
  • [0059]
    FIGS. 8 a-8 c show a related embodiment where flexible band 81 blocks both an annular plug 84, and a prosthetic nucleus 89. Flexible band 81 is anchored at each end by one or more securing members 85, in a manner similar to that used in the preceding embodiment.
  • [0060]
    FIGS. 9 a-9 c show an embodiment where flexible band 91 blocks a prosthetic nucleus 99, leaving the annular opening 98 substantially implant-free. Flexible band 91 is anchored at each end by one or more securing members 95, which are secured to vertebra 96 as previously described.
  • [0061]
    FIGS. 10 a-10 b through 15 a-15 c show embodiments similar to those shown in FIGS. 1 a-1 b through 6 a-6 c, but with a second anchoring member being used and attached to the corresponding vertebra. Accordingly, FIGS. 10 a-10 b show a device 100 that includes a two, rigid anchoring members 101 a and 101 b, each of said anchoring members having a first end 102 a and 102 b respectively, that completely covers second ends 103 a and 103 b. A prosthetic implant member 104 is attached to, and completely covers, first ends 102 a and 102 b of anchoring members 101 a and 101 b. At least one securing member (e.g., 105 a and 105 b) is attached to the second end (e.g., 103 a and 103 b) of each anchoring member. The securing members are securable to a vertebra.
  • [0062]
    Implant member 104 extends into, and substantially fills, both the vacated nucleus space and opening 108 in annulus 107. In the embodiment shown in FIGS. 11 a-11 b, the implant member 114 fills only the annular opening, and a second, separate prosthetic nucleus 119 is used.
  • [0063]
    As shown in FIGS. 12 a and 12 b, in other embodiments implant members 124 a and 124 b may extend into, and/or substantially fill, only the vacated nucleus space, leaving opening 128 of annulus 127 unplugged.
  • [0064]
    As shown in FIGS. 13 a-13 c, alternative embodiments of the present invention comprise a rigid anchoring member that blocks, but is not attached to, a prosthetic spinal implant member. As with the prior embodiments, each rigid anchoring member 131 a and 131 b may have a first end 132 a and 132 b and a second end 133 a and 133 b. At least one securing member 135 may be attached to the second end 133 of each anchoring member 131, but the first end 132 is left free and unconnected to prosthetic spinal implant 134. Securing member 135 may be secured to a vertebra 136.
  • [0065]
    FIGS. 14 a-14 c show another embodiment where a rigid anchoring member blocks, but is not attached to, a prosthetic spinal implant member. In this embodiment each rigid anchoring member 141 a and 141 b has a first end 142 and a second end 143, with at least one securing member 145 being attached to second end 143. Here too, first end 142 is left free and unconnected to prosthetic spinal implant 144, and securing member 145 may be secured to a vertebra 146.
  • [0066]
    In the embodiment shown in FIGS. 14 a-14 c, rigid anchoring member 141 blocks an implant 144 which is separate and distinct from prosthetic nucleus 149. This is in contrast to the embodiment shown in FIGS. 13 a-13 c, where rigid anchoring member 131 blocks a single prosthetic nucleus implant 134. As with the embodiment shown in FIGS. 1 a-1 b and FIGS. 10 a-10 b, the single prosthetic implant 134 of FIGS. 13 a-13 c extends into, and substantially fills, both the vacated nucleus space and opening 138 in annulus 137.
  • [0067]
    FIGS. 15 a-15 c show a further embodiment of the present invention, corresponding to the embodiment shown in FIGS. 12 a-12 b but with a rigid anchoring member that blocks, but is not attached to, a prosthetic spinal implant member. In this embodiment rigid anchoring member 151 has a first end 152 and a second end 153, with at least one securing member 155 being attached to second end 153. As with the embodiments shown in FIGS. 4 and 5 and FIGS. 11 a-11 b, first end 152 is left free and unconnected to prosthetic spinal implant 154, and securing member 155 may be secured to a vertebra.
  • [0068]
    Blocking and/or retaining members such as those shown in FIGS. 1-15 may be secured to a vertebra as shown, or they may be “flush fit” as shown in FIGS. 16 a-16 b through 30 a-30 c. In the flush fit embodiments, bone is cut away from the vertebra so that the anchoring/blocking member may be attached in a manner in which the outside surface of the anchoring/blocking member is substantially flush with the outer surface of the vertebra.
  • [0069]
    When an “L-shaped” anchoring/blocking member is used, the anchoring/blocking member is preferably mounted to contact the vertebral end plate, as shown in FIGS. 16 a-16 b through 18 a-18 b, FIGS. 21 a-21 c, FIGS. 25 a-25 b through 27 a-27 b, and in FIGS. 30 a-30 c. It is preferred that the lower portion of the anchoring/blocking member extend into the intervertebral space to effectively block the natural or prosthetic disc. When a prosthetic disc or annular plug is being blocked or retained, an adhesive may be used to secure the prosthetic disc or plug to the anchoring/blocking member. In such cases the need for extension into the intervertebral space is reduced or eliminated.
  • [0070]
    It is also to be appreciated that in “flush fit” embodiments using an “L-shaped” anchoring member, the end connected to the implant need not be covered completely by the implant. Accordingly, the embodiment shown in FIGS. 16 a-16 b differs from the embodiment shown in FIGS. 1 a-1 b in that the first end 162 of anchoring member 161 is not completely covered by implant 164.
  • [0071]
    Similarly, in FIGS. 17 a-17 b, first end 172 of anchoring member 171 is not completely covered by implant 174 as was the case in the embodiment shown in FIGS. 2 a-2 b. In the same manner, first end 182 of anchoring member 181 is not completely covered by implant 184 as was the case in the embodiment shown in FIGS. 3 a-3 b.
  • [0072]
    In the “double anchor” embodiments of FIGS. 25 a-25 b through 27 a-27 b the distal ends of the implants need not be completely covered by the corresponding implant. Accordingly, none of anchoring member ends 252, 262, and 272 are completely covered by implants 254, 264, and 274, respectively, as were anchoring member ends 102, 112, and 122.
  • [0073]
    As to methods of using the disclosed anchored implants, the procedure typically begins with a discectomy to remove the degenerated natural disc. An opening is provided in the annulus, and the degenerated disc material is removed. A prosthetic nucleus in delivered into the disc space, and the anchoring and/or blocking member(s) are installed and attached.
  • [0074]
    As to the materials that may be used to make the various components of the preferred embodiments, anchoring/blocking members may be formed from rigid, semi-rigid, or flexible biocompatible materials including metals, polymers, ceramics, composites, natural or synthetic bone materials, etc. For example, carbon fiber reinforced composites such as carbon fiber/epoxy composites or carbon fiber/polyaryletherketone composites may be used, as may a wide variety of metallic materials, such as, for example, stainless steel, titanium, titanium alloys, cobalt chrome alloys, tantalum, shape memory alloys, etc.
  • [0075]
    Examples of appropriate polymeric materials include, but are not limited to, synthetic polymers such as polyurethanes, silicones, polyolefins, polyvinylalcohols, polyesters, polyacrylonitriles, polyetherketones, polycarbonates, polymethacrylates, polyamides, etc. In other embodiments natural polymers, such as cellulose, may be used.
  • [0076]
    Specific preferred polymers include polytetrafluoroethylene, polymethylmethacrylate, polymethyletherketone, polyacrylamide, polyparaphenylene terephthalamide, polyethylene, polystyrene, polypropylene, and combinations of these materials. In some embodiments the polymeric materials are braided in the form of a cord, cable, or may have some other appropriate configuration, and combinations thereof.
  • [0077]
    Examples of ceramic materials that may be used for the various components of the present invention include alumina, zirconia, alumina-zirconia composites, pyrolytic carbon, and polycrystalline diamond compact materials.
  • [0078]
    A wide variety of spinal implants for serving differing functions may be anchored or blocked with the anchoring/blocking devices described herein, including implants sized and configured for nucleus pulposus replacements, implants sized and configured for partial or full disc replacements, or other implants designed for other disc reconstruction or augmentation purposes, such as a fusion cage. Elastic, or otherwise resilient, implants are most preferred. For example, implants may be formed from hydrophilic materials, such as hydrogels, or may be formed from biocompatible elastomeric materials known in the art, including silicone, polyurethane, polyolefins such as polyisobutylene and polyisoprene, copolymers of silicone and polyurethane, neoprene, nitrile, vulcanized rubber and combinations thereof. In a preferred embodiment, the vulcanized rubber is produced by a vulcanization process utilizing a copolymer produced, for example, as in U.S. Pat. No. 5,245,098 to Summers et al., from 1-hexene and 5-methyl-1,4-hexadiene. Preferred hydrophilic materials are hydrogels. Suitable hydrogels include natural hydrogels, and those formed from polyvinyl alcohol, acrylamides such as polyacrylic acid and poly (acrylonitrile-acrylic acid), polyurethanes, polyethylene glycol, poly(N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone), acrylates such as poly(2-hydroxy ethyl methacrylate) and copolymers of acrylates with N-vinyl pyrolidone, N-vinyl lactams, acrylamide, polyurethanes and polyacrylonitrile or may be formed from other similar materials that form a hydrogel. The hydrogel materials may further be cross-linked to provide further strength to the implant. Examples of different types of polyurethanes include thermoplastic or thermoset polyurethanes, aliphatic or aromatic polyurethanes, polyetherurethane, polycarbonate-urethane and silicone polyether-urethane. Other suitable hydrophilic polymers include naturally-occurring materials such as glucomannan gel, hyaluronic acid, polysaccharides, such as cross-linked carboxyl-containing polysaccharides, and combinations thereof. The nature of the materials employed to form the elastic body should be selected so the formed implants have sufficient load bearing capacity. In preferred embodiments, a compressive strength of at least about 0.1 MPa is desired, although compressive strengths in the range of about 1 MPa to about 20 MPa are more preferred.
  • [0079]
    It is to be appreciated that natural materials may be used to make the prosthetic implants disclosed in the present invention. For example, natural collagen material such as allogenic or xenogenic disc nucleus material may be used. Alternatively, collagen-based material derived from natural, collagen-rich tissue, such as intervertebral disc, fascia, ligament, tendon, demineralized bone matrix, etc., may be used. The material may be autogenic, allogenic, or xenogenic, or it may be of human-recombinant origin. In alternative embodiments the collagen-based material may be a synthetic, collagen-based material. Examples of preferred collagen-rich tissues include disc annulus, fascia lata, planar fascia, anterior or posterior cruciate ligaments, patella tendon, hamstring tendons, quadriceps tendons, Achilles tendons, skins, and other connective tissues.
  • [0080]
    In some embodiments the implant material is an inelastic, semi-rigid material. Such materials stretch very little, if at all, but allow some compression. The compression typically occurs when air in the implant is pushed out, such as when a small roll of fabric is compressed.
  • [0081]
    The implants can be shaped as desired. For example, the nucleus pulposus implants may take the form of a cylinder, a rectangle, or other polygonal shape or may be substantially oval.
  • [0082]
    The securing and/or blocking members may be made of any appropriate biocompatible material, such metals, ceramics, polymers and combinations thereof. Non-resorbable metallic materials include biocompatible stainless steel, titanium, titanium alloys, titanium-vanadium-aluminum alloy, cobalt alloys such as cobalt-chromium alloy, cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy, and cobalt-nickel-chromium-molybdenum alloy, tantalum, niobium, hafnium, tungsten, shape memory materials as described above, especially those exhibiting superelastic behavior and including metals, and alloys thereof. Resorbable materials include polylactide, polyglycolide, tyrosine-derived polycarbonate, polyanhydride, polyorthoester, polyphosphazene, bioactive glass, calcium phosphate, such as hydroxyapatite, and combinations thereof.
  • [0083]
    The anchoring devices may also be anchored with other soft tissue anchors known in the art, including suture anchors commonly used in arthroscopy or sports medicine surgeries, for example. In the case of a soft tissue or suture anchor, the end of the elongated body of the anchoring device is attached to the end of the anchor, which is embedded and anchored in an adjacent vertebral body.
  • [0084]
    While the invention has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, the same is to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive in character, it being understood that only the preferred embodiment has been shown and described and that all changes and modifications that come within the spirit of the invention are desired to be protected.
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3867728 *5 Apr 197325 Feb 1975Cutter LabProsthesis for spinal repair
US3875595 *15 Apr 19748 Apr 1975Froning Edward CIntervertebral disc prosthesis and instruments for locating same
US4309777 *13 Nov 198012 Jan 1982Patil Arun AArtificial intervertebral disc
US4349921 *16 Jun 198021 Sep 1982Kuntz J DavidIntervertebral disc prosthesis
US4759766 *9 Sep 198726 Jul 1988Humboldt-Universitaet Zu BerlinIntervertebral disc endoprosthesis
US4759769 *22 Jun 198726 Jul 1988Health & Research Services Inc.Artificial spinal disc
US4772287 *20 Aug 198720 Sep 1988Cedar Surgical, Inc.Prosthetic disc and method of implanting
US4863477 *12 May 19875 Sep 1989Monson Gary LSynthetic intervertebral disc prosthesis
US4874389 *7 Dec 198717 Oct 1989Downey Ernest LReplacement disc
US4904260 *25 Jul 198827 Feb 1990Cedar Surgical, Inc.Prosthetic disc containing therapeutic material
US4911718 *10 Jun 198827 Mar 1990University Of Medicine & Dentistry Of N.J.Functional and biocompatible intervertebral disc spacer
US4917704 *8 Jun 198817 Apr 1990Sulzer Brothers LimitedIntervertebral prosthesis
US4932969 *17 Dec 198712 Jun 1990Sulzer Brothers LimitedJoint endoprosthesis
US4946378 *22 Nov 19887 Aug 1990Asahi Kogaku Kogyo Kabushiki KaishaArtificial intervertebral disc
US4955908 *8 Jun 198811 Sep 1990Sulzer Brothers LimitedMetallic intervertebral prosthesis
US4997432 *14 Mar 19895 Mar 1991Waldemar Link Gmbh & Co.Surgical instrument set
US5002576 *6 Jun 198926 Mar 1991Mecron Medizinische Produkte GmbhIntervertebral disk endoprosthesis
US5035716 *10 May 199030 Jul 1991Downey Ernest LReplacement disc
US5047055 *21 Dec 199010 Sep 1991Pfizer Hospital Products Group, Inc.Hydrogel intervertebral disc nucleus
US5071437 *21 Nov 199010 Dec 1991Acromed CorporationArtificial disc
US5108438 *7 May 199028 Apr 1992Regen CorporationProsthetic intervertebral disc
US5171280 *21 Mar 199115 Dec 1992Sulzer Brothers LimitedIntervertebral prosthesis
US5192326 *9 Sep 19919 Mar 1993Pfizer Hospital Products Group, Inc.Hydrogel bead intervertebral disc nucleus
US5306308 *23 Oct 199026 Apr 1994Ulrich GrossIntervertebral implant
US5370697 *19 Feb 19936 Dec 1994Sulzer Medizinaltechnik AgArtificial intervertebral disk member
US5401269 *10 Mar 199328 Mar 1995Waldemar Link Gmbh & Co.Intervertebral disc endoprosthesis
US5423816 *29 Jul 199313 Jun 1995Lin; Chih I.Intervertebral locking device
US5425773 *5 Apr 199420 Jun 1995Danek Medical, Inc.Intervertebral disk arthroplasty device
US5458642 *18 Jan 199417 Oct 1995Beer; John C.Synthetic intervertebral disc
US5507816 *1 Dec 199216 Apr 1996Customflex LimitedSpinal vertebrae implants
US5534028 *20 Apr 19939 Jul 1996Howmedica, Inc.Hydrogel intervertebral disc nucleus with diminished lateral bulging
US5534030 *25 Apr 19949 Jul 1996Acromed CorporationSpine disc
US5545229 *28 Jul 199313 Aug 1996University Of Medicine And Dentistry Of NjFunctional and biocompatible intervertebral disc spacer containing elastomeric material of varying hardness
US5549679 *1 Mar 199527 Aug 1996Kuslich; Stephen D.Expandable fabric implant for stabilizing the spinal motion segment
US5556431 *9 Aug 199417 Sep 1996B+E,Uml U+Ee Ttner-Janz; KarinIntervertebral disc endoprosthesis
US5562738 *12 Jan 19958 Oct 1996Danek Medical, Inc.Intervertebral disk arthroplasty device
US5571189 *20 May 19945 Nov 1996Kuslich; Stephen D.Expandable fabric implant for stabilizing the spinal motion segment
US5645597 *29 Dec 19958 Jul 1997Krapiva; Pavel I.Disc replacement method and apparatus
US5674294 *14 Sep 19947 Oct 1997Commissariat A L'energie AtomiqueIntervertebral disk prosthesis
US5674295 *26 Apr 19967 Oct 1997Raymedica, Inc.Prosthetic spinal disc nucleus
US5674296 *22 Jul 19967 Oct 1997Spinal Dynamics CorporationHuman spinal disc prosthesis
US5683464 *7 Jun 19954 Nov 1997Sulzer Calcitek Inc.Spinal disk implantation kit
US5683465 *18 Mar 19964 Nov 1997Shinn; Gary LeeArtificial intervertebral disk prosthesis
US5693100 *15 Mar 19962 Dec 1997Pisharodi; MadhavanMiddle expandable intervertebral disk implant
US5702450 *27 Jun 199430 Dec 1997Bisserie; MichelIntervertebral disk prosthesis
US5716416 *10 Sep 199610 Feb 1998Lin; Chih-IArtificial intervertebral disk and method for implanting the same
US5755796 *6 Jun 199626 May 1998Ibo; IvoProsthesis of the cervical intervertebralis disk
US5755797 *2 Oct 199626 May 1998Sulzer Medizinaltechnik AgIntervertebral prosthesis and a process for implanting such a prosthesis
US5824093 *6 Jun 199720 Oct 1998Raymedica, Inc.Prosthetic spinal disc nucleus
US5824094 *17 Oct 199720 Oct 1998Acromed CorporationSpinal disc
US5827328 *22 Nov 199627 Oct 1998Buttermann; Glenn R.Intervertebral prosthetic device
US5888226 *12 Nov 199730 Mar 1999Rogozinski; ChaimIntervertebral prosthetic disc
US5893889 *20 Jun 199713 Apr 1999Harrington; MichaelArtificial disc
US5895428 *1 Nov 199620 Apr 1999Berry; DonLoad bearing spinal joint implant
US5976186 *25 Jun 19962 Nov 1999Stryker Technologies CorporationHydrogel intervertebral disc nucleus
US6001130 *6 Oct 199714 Dec 1999Bryan; VincentHuman spinal disc prosthesis with hinges
US6093205 *25 Jun 199825 Jul 2000Bridport-Gundry Plc C/O Pearsalls ImplantsSurgical implant
US6120503 *5 Sep 199719 Sep 2000Michelson; Gary KarlinApparatus instrumentation, and method for spinal fixation
US20030120274 *22 Oct 200126 Jun 2003Morris John W.Implant retaining device
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US770877820 May 20054 May 2010Flexuspine, Inc.Expandable articulating intervertebral implant with cam
US77539583 Feb 200513 Jul 2010Gordon Charles RExpandable intervertebral implant
US77853518 Mar 200631 Aug 2010Flexuspine, Inc.Artificial functional spinal implant unit system and method for use
US77944808 Mar 200614 Sep 2010Flexuspine, Inc.Artificial functional spinal unit system and method for use
US77990828 Mar 200621 Sep 2010Flexuspine, Inc.Artificial functional spinal unit system and method for use
US7867278 *14 Mar 200811 Jan 2011Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Intervertebral disc anulus implant
US78790973 May 20061 Feb 2011Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Method of performing a procedure within a disc
US790986912 Feb 200422 Mar 2011Flexuspine, Inc.Artificial spinal unit assemblies
US795967719 Jan 200714 Jun 2011Flexuspine, Inc.Artificial functional spinal unit system and method for use
US795967916 Jan 200714 Jun 2011Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Intervertebral anulus and nucleus augmentation
US797233719 Dec 20065 Jul 2011Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Devices and methods for bone anchoring
US799821317 Nov 200616 Aug 2011Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Intervertebral disc herniation repair
US800283620 Sep 200423 Aug 2011Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Method for the treatment of the intervertebral disc anulus
US802142521 Jul 200920 Sep 2011Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Versatile method of repairing an intervertebral disc
US802569827 Apr 200927 Sep 2011Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Method of rehabilitating an anulus fibrosus
US80527238 Mar 20068 Nov 2011Flexuspine Inc.Dynamic posterior stabilization systems and methods of use
US810538429 Jun 200931 Jan 2012Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Weakened anulus repair
US811408220 Aug 200914 Feb 2012Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Anchoring system for disc repair
US81188698 Mar 200621 Feb 2012Flexuspine, Inc.Dynamic interbody device
US811887020 May 200521 Feb 2012Flexuspine, Inc.Expandable articulating intervertebral implant with spacer
US811887120 May 200521 Feb 2012Flexuspine, Inc.Expandable articulating intervertebral implant
US812381020 May 200528 Feb 2012Gordon Charles RExpandable intervertebral implant with wedged expansion member
US814755020 May 20053 Apr 2012Flexuspine, Inc.Expandable articulating intervertebral implant with limited articulation
US815784422 Oct 200717 Apr 2012Flexuspine, Inc.Dampener system for a posterior stabilization system with a variable length elongated member
US816299422 Oct 200724 Apr 2012Flexuspine, Inc.Posterior stabilization system with isolated, dual dampener systems
US817290320 May 20058 May 2012Gordon Charles RExpandable intervertebral implant with spacer
US818251422 Oct 200722 May 2012Flexuspine, Inc.Dampener system for a posterior stabilization system with a fixed length elongated member
US818733022 Oct 200729 May 2012Flexuspine, Inc.Dampener system for a posterior stabilization system with a variable length elongated member
US82316783 May 200631 Jul 2012Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Method of treating a herniated disc
US825743710 Jan 20114 Sep 2012Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Methods of intervertebral disc augmentation
US825744020 May 20054 Sep 2012Gordon Charles RMethod of insertion of an expandable intervertebral implant
US826796522 Oct 200718 Sep 2012Flexuspine, Inc.Spinal stabilization systems with dynamic interbody devices
US832334112 Nov 20094 Dec 2012Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Impaction grafting for vertebral fusion
US836115519 Jan 201029 Jan 2013Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Soft tissue impaction methods
US837709819 Jan 200719 Feb 2013Flexuspine, Inc.Artificial functional spinal unit system and method for use
US83941461 Jul 201112 Mar 2013Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Vertebral anchoring methods
US840928410 Jan 20112 Apr 2013Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Methods of repairing herniated segments in the disc
US845461220 Aug 20094 Jun 2013Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Method for vertebral endplate reconstruction
US84546943 Mar 20114 Jun 2013Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Interbody device and plate for spinal stabilization and instruments for positioning same
US848074711 Aug 20109 Jul 2013Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Interbody spinal implants with extravertebral support plates
US852391222 Oct 20073 Sep 2013Flexuspine, Inc.Posterior stabilization systems with shared, dual dampener systems
US859735819 Jan 20073 Dec 2013Flexuspine, Inc.Dynamic interbody devices
US8603168 *8 Mar 200610 Dec 2013Flexuspine, Inc.Artificial functional spinal unit system and method for use
US864738622 Jul 201011 Feb 2014Charles R. GordonExpandable intervertebral implant system and method
US86909488 Apr 20138 Apr 2014Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Interbody device and plate for spinal stabilization and instruments for positioning same
US875339820 May 200517 Jun 2014Charles R. GordonMethod of inserting an expandable intervertebral implant without overdistraction
US884573730 May 201330 Sep 2014Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Interbody spinal implants with extravertebral support plates
US894002219 Jan 200727 Jan 2015Flexuspine, Inc.Artificial functional spinal unit system and method for use
US89400514 Mar 201327 Jan 2015Flexuspine, Inc.Interbody device insertion systems and methods
US90397417 Mar 201326 May 2015Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Bone anchor systems
US906681119 Jan 200730 Jun 2015Flexuspine, Inc.Artificial functional spinal unit system and method for use
US91800197 Feb 201410 Nov 2015Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Interbody device and plate for spinal stabilization and instruments for positioning same
US922683228 Jan 20135 Jan 2016Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Interbody fusion material retention methods
US933308722 Dec 201410 May 2016Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Herniated disc repair
US949228820 Feb 201415 Nov 2016Flexuspine, Inc.Expandable fusion device for positioning between adjacent vertebral bodies
US951714424 Apr 201413 Dec 2016Exactech, Inc.Limited profile intervertebral implant with incorporated fastening mechanism
US952653215 Sep 201527 Dec 2016Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Interbody device and plate for spinal stabilization and instruments for positioning same
US952662715 Nov 201227 Dec 2016Exactech, Inc.Expandable interbody device system and method
US95791242 Apr 201228 Feb 2017Flexuspine, Inc.Expandable articulating intervertebral implant with limited articulation
US961010620 May 20154 Apr 2017Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Bone anchor systems
US961594016 May 201611 Apr 2017Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Interbody device and plate for spinal stabilization and instruments for positioning same
US970694731 Jan 201118 Jul 2017Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Method of performing an anchor implantation procedure within a disc
US20050283248 *20 May 200522 Dec 2005Gordon Charles RExpandable intervertebral implant with spacer
US20070260249 *19 Dec 20068 Nov 2007Thomas BoyajianDevices and methods for bone anchoring
US20070270972 *8 Mar 200622 Nov 2007Southwest Research InstituteArtificial functional spinal unit system and method for use