US20090077891A1 - Method for producing fuel gas - Google Patents

Method for producing fuel gas Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20090077891A1
US20090077891A1 US11/860,815 US86081507A US2009077891A1 US 20090077891 A1 US20090077891 A1 US 20090077891A1 US 86081507 A US86081507 A US 86081507A US 2009077891 A1 US2009077891 A1 US 2009077891A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
rate
molten metal
reaction chamber
induction furnace
carbon
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/860,815
Inventor
William J. Duca
II Keith R. Bucher
Charles B. Ingram
David C. Thompson
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
GI-GASIFICATION INTERNATIONAL SA
Original Assignee
New York Energy Group
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by New York Energy Group filed Critical New York Energy Group
Priority to US11/860,815 priority Critical patent/US20090077891A1/en
Assigned to NEW YORK ENERGY GROUP, INC. reassignment NEW YORK ENERGY GROUP, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: BUCHER, KEITH R., II, DUCA, WILLIAM J., INGRAM, CHARLES B., THOMPSON, DAVID C.
Priority to BRPI0817439A priority patent/BRPI0817439A2/en
Priority to PCT/US2008/077617 priority patent/WO2009042744A1/en
Priority to BRPI0817441-5A priority patent/BRPI0817441A2/en
Priority to EP20080834577 priority patent/EP2197986A1/en
Priority to PCT/US2008/077616 priority patent/WO2009042743A1/en
Priority to EP20080834661 priority patent/EP2193183A1/en
Assigned to GI-GASIFICATION INTERNATIONAL, SA reassignment GI-GASIFICATION INTERNATIONAL, SA ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: NEW YORK ENERGY GROUP, INC.
Publication of US20090077891A1 publication Critical patent/US20090077891A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10JPRODUCTION OF PRODUCER GAS, WATER-GAS, SYNTHESIS GAS FROM SOLID CARBONACEOUS MATERIAL, OR MIXTURES CONTAINING THESE GASES; CARBURETTING AIR OR OTHER GASES
    • C10J3/00Production of combustible gases containing carbon monoxide from solid carbonaceous fuels
    • C10J3/57Gasification using molten salts or metals
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21BMANUFACTURE OF IRON OR STEEL
    • C21B11/00Making pig-iron other than in blast furnaces
    • C21B11/10Making pig-iron other than in blast furnaces in electric furnaces
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21CPROCESSING OF PIG-IRON, e.g. REFINING, MANUFACTURE OF WROUGHT-IRON OR STEEL; TREATMENT IN MOLTEN STATE OF FERROUS ALLOYS
    • C21C5/00Manufacture of carbon-steel, e.g. plain mild steel, medium carbon steel or cast steel or stainless steel
    • C21C5/52Manufacture of steel in electric furnaces
    • C21C5/5241Manufacture of steel in electric furnaces in an inductively heated furnace
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21CPROCESSING OF PIG-IRON, e.g. REFINING, MANUFACTURE OF WROUGHT-IRON OR STEEL; TREATMENT IN MOLTEN STATE OF FERROUS ALLOYS
    • C21C5/00Manufacture of carbon-steel, e.g. plain mild steel, medium carbon steel or cast steel or stainless steel
    • C21C5/56Manufacture of steel by other methods
    • C21C5/562Manufacture of steel by other methods starting from scrap
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2400/00Products obtained by processes covered by groups C10G9/00 - C10G69/14
    • C10G2400/26Fuel gas
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10JPRODUCTION OF PRODUCER GAS, WATER-GAS, SYNTHESIS GAS FROM SOLID CARBONACEOUS MATERIAL, OR MIXTURES CONTAINING THESE GASES; CARBURETTING AIR OR OTHER GASES
    • C10J2300/00Details of gasification processes
    • C10J2300/09Details of the feed, e.g. feeding of spent catalyst, inert gas or halogens
    • C10J2300/0953Gasifying agents
    • C10J2300/0959Oxygen
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10JPRODUCTION OF PRODUCER GAS, WATER-GAS, SYNTHESIS GAS FROM SOLID CARBONACEOUS MATERIAL, OR MIXTURES CONTAINING THESE GASES; CARBURETTING AIR OR OTHER GASES
    • C10J2300/00Details of gasification processes
    • C10J2300/12Heating the gasifier
    • C10J2300/123Heating the gasifier by electromagnetic waves, e.g. microwaves
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10JPRODUCTION OF PRODUCER GAS, WATER-GAS, SYNTHESIS GAS FROM SOLID CARBONACEOUS MATERIAL, OR MIXTURES CONTAINING THESE GASES; CARBURETTING AIR OR OTHER GASES
    • C10J2300/00Details of gasification processes
    • C10J2300/16Integration of gasification processes with another plant or parts within the plant
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21BMANUFACTURE OF IRON OR STEEL
    • C21B2200/00Recycling of non-gaseous waste material
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21CPROCESSING OF PIG-IRON, e.g. REFINING, MANUFACTURE OF WROUGHT-IRON OR STEEL; TREATMENT IN MOLTEN STATE OF FERROUS ALLOYS
    • C21C2100/00Exhaust gas
    • C21C2100/02Treatment of the exhaust gas
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21CPROCESSING OF PIG-IRON, e.g. REFINING, MANUFACTURE OF WROUGHT-IRON OR STEEL; TREATMENT IN MOLTEN STATE OF FERROUS ALLOYS
    • C21C2200/00Recycling of waste material
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P10/00Technologies related to metal processing
    • Y02P10/10Reduction of greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions
    • Y02P10/122Reduction of greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions by capturing or storing CO2
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P10/00Technologies related to metal processing
    • Y02P10/10Reduction of greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions
    • Y02P10/143Reduction of greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions of methane [CH4]
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P10/00Technologies related to metal processing
    • Y02P10/20Recycling
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P10/00Technologies related to metal processing
    • Y02P10/25Process efficiency

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for producing synthesis gas, and in particular to a method for producing a high quality synthesis gas from a widely varying feedstock of waste and natural fuels using a gasifier having a the reaction chamber mounted on top of and in fluid with communication with an induction furnace.
  • Conventional gasification is a process that converts carbonaceous materials, such as coal, petroleum, petroleum coke or biomass, into carbon monoxide, hydrogen and carbon dioxide.
  • the carbonaceous material undergoes three processes including pyrolysis, combustion and gasification.
  • pyrolysis the carbonaceous material heats up, volatiles are released and char is produced.
  • the process is dependent on the properties of the carbonaceous material and determines the structure and composition of the char, which will then undergo gasification reactions.
  • the combustion process occurs as the volatile products and some of the char reacts with oxygen to form carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide, which provides heat for the subsequent gasification reactions.
  • the gasification process occurs as the char reacts with carbon dioxide and steam to produce carbon monoxide and hydrogen.
  • the resulting gas is called syngas. Syngas is typically combusted in a gas turbine, and the heat is used to produce steam to drive a steam turbine.
  • gasifiers There are four basic types of gasifiers operating today including fixed bed systems, fluidized bed systems, entrained flow systems and molten bed systems.
  • a reactive gas or gases are passed through a fixed bed of feedstock in a co-current or counter current flow.
  • the fixed bed consists of carbonaceous fuel (e.g. coal or biomass) through which a “gasification agent” (steam, oxygen and/or air) flows in a co-current or counter-current configuration.
  • a “gasification agent” steam, oxygen and/or air
  • the ash is either removed dry or as a slag.
  • the nature of a fixed bed gasifier means that the fuel must have high mechanical strength and must be non-caking so that it will form a permeable bed.
  • certain feedstocks such as processed municipal solid waste, biosolids, ground coal and certain types of biomass are not suited for use in fixed bed reactors. This is particularly true when moisture is present.
  • the pressure drop of the gasifying reactants is adjusted so that the feedstock is lifted or suspended by the gaseous phase.
  • the carbonaceous fuel is fluidized in oxygen (or air) and steam.
  • the ash is removed dry or as heavy agglomerates that defluidize.
  • the temperatures are relatively low in dry ash gasifiers, so the fuel must be highly reactive; low-grade coals are particularly suitable.
  • Fluidized bed gasifiers are most useful for fuels that form highly corrosive ash that would damage the walls of slagging gasifiers.
  • Biomass fuels generally contain high levels of corrosive ash.
  • the solid particulate feedstock are carried or “entrained” through the reactor by the reacting gases.
  • a dry pulverized solid, an atomized liquid carbonaceous fuel or a fuel slurry is gasified with oxygen in co-current flow.
  • the gasification reactions take place in a dense cloud of very fine particles.
  • Most coals are suitable for this type of gasifier because of the high operating temperatures and because the coal particles are well separated from one another.
  • the fuel particles must be much smaller than for other types of gasifiers. This means the fuel must be pulverized, which requires somewhat more energy than for the other types of gasifiers. It also means that feedstocks such as processed municipal solid waste, certain biomass, spent tires and several types of industrial wastes are not well suited for this type of gasifier.
  • feedstock primarily coal
  • a reactive gas such as oxygen, steam and/or carbon dioxide is injected into the vessel to control the rate of reaction within the reactor.
  • a shortcoming of current molten bed gasifiers is the inability to process low heat value feedstocks and thus widely varying feedstocks. Often this is because low heat value feedstocks such as municipal solid waste, certain biomass wastes and some household and industrial wastes, when introduced into a molten bath can consume rather than produce heat thus limiting the efficiency of the reactor and possibly endangering the continuity of the process itself.
  • An exemplary molten bed reactor is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,649,867 including a substantially cylindrical vessel which has a substantially oblong section and lateral walls and a bottom wall which are lined with a refractory lining.
  • An orifice for discharging the bath of liquid metal and an orifice for discharging slag supernatant on the bath of liquid metal are provided.
  • a dome is positioned in a sealed manner on the vessel having in its upper part in the vicinity of one of the ends of the vessel a sealed box for introducing an injecting branch.
  • An orifice is provided in the upper part of the vessel for exhausting the gases produced.
  • a roughly central orifice for introducing additional elements is also provided in the upper part.
  • the motivating object of the present invention was the need for a superior waste to energy conversion process allowing for increased fuel flexibility.
  • the goal is to efficiently and economically produce a high quality synthesis gas from low heat value, widely varying feedstock.
  • feedstock can include waste materials contaminated with inorganics as well as low grade natural fuels and industrial by-products.
  • the resulting synthesis gas is of sufficient quality to allow production of electrical power, refining of Fischer-Tropsch liquids, production of methanol or the separation of industrial grade hydrogen.
  • the present invention provides for improved environmental impact and clean and more environmentally friendly energy production while improving upon current industrial conversion efficiencies. Further, the present invention provides a major new source of energy from material that is currently considered useless, hazardous or not worth harvesting.
  • the gasifier of the present invention is capable of handling a broad range of wastes from municipal waste, medical waste, biomass to bio-solids, spent tires, and industrial/agriculture waste. This includes a wide range of natural fuels and waste fuels. Further, the gasifier of the present invention can process solids, liquids and gaseous feed streams simultaneously in a single reactor, as well as low heat value feed (3,800 BTU/lb) as raw material. Additionally, the gasifier can tolerate a large content of in-organics and contaminants in the carbonaceous feedstock.
  • the gasifier exhibits a high thermal conversion efficiency of about 58% to about 65% while operating at ambient pressure, using no air and efficiently using oxygen. It also means that the gasifier can processes large quantities (up to 700 tons per day) of varying feedstock in a single reactor vessel. Further, the gasifier can maintain an exothermic reaction state, thus requiring minimal external heat assist, and generate high quality synthesis gas (250-350 BTU/scf) with a low particulate level.
  • the gasifier produces no char, minimal ash, no tar, no oils, no phenols and no ammonia while producing useable by-products such as siliceous slag and pig iron.
  • the gasifier can also efficiently and safely processes high sulfur and contaminated coal and several types of industrial and household hazardous waste. Further the gasifier can recycle and dissociate polluting exhaust gases and green house gases such as carbon dioxide, dioxins, furans, volatile organic gaseous compounds, nitrous oxides and the like.
  • a molten bed reactor or gasifier including reaction chamber, for the production and collection of a fuel gas, mounted on top of, in fluid communication with and removed from a furnace.
  • the furnace is an induction furnace, and more preferably a coreless induction furnace, although a channel induction furnace can be used.
  • the purpose of the furnace is to provide the reaction chamber with a constant source of molten metal, maintain the molten metal at a desired temperature, especially when synthesis gas production within the reaction chamber becomes endothermic due to the presence of low heat value feed, and impart vertical stirring of the molten metal within the reaction chamber for providing efficient conversion of carbonaceous fuel to carbon monoxide and hydrogen gas.
  • induction furnaces were used primarily for batch processes involving melting and alloying metals.
  • FIG. 1 is a front elevational view of a gasifier in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a side elevational view of the gasifier of FIG. 1 .
  • FIG. 3 is a vertical sectional view of the gasifier of FIG. 1 .
  • FIG. 4 is a vertical sectional view of the gasifier of FIG. 1 showing the chemical reactions that take place within specific locations within the gasifier during gasification.
  • FIG. 5 is a front elevational view of a gasifier in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 6 is a bottom plan view the gasifier of FIG. 5 .
  • FIGS. 1 through 4 illustrate a gasifier 10 in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIGS. 5 and 6 illustrate a gasifier 100 in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • Like portions of gasifier 10 share like numbering with gasifier 100 .
  • the present invention is directed to an integrated, multi-stage gasification system designed to maximize the production of synthesis gas from a widely ranging continuous feed stream of both organic and inorganic material.
  • seven distinct hardware sections are integrated into a continuous, interactive process designed to gasify solid, liquid and gaseous hydrocarbon material simultaneously. This is done in the presence of inorganic material which would otherwise disrupt a normal gasification process.
  • the feed stream material includes, but is not limited to the mixed waste and natural fuels material of Table 1.
  • Each hardware section, or process stage, is designed to accommodate a specific group of feed stream constituents.
  • the arrangement and design of these hardware sections is based upon generating maximum quantities of quality synthesis gas at minimum operational cost.
  • the best section of the gasifier is selected for material feed in accordance with maintaining the balanced combination of hydrocarbons, carbonaceous materials and reaction gases. This allows control of the overall process as an exothermic reaction, resulting in maximum generation of synthesis gas for minimum expenditure of energy.
  • FIGS. 1 and 2 there is shown a front elevation of a gasifier 10 , which consists of a refractory lined lid 11 , an expanded diameter, increased height reaction vessel 12 , an induction furnace 13 mounted below and integral with the reaction vessel 12 and a tilt frame 14 .
  • Tilt frame 14 consists of a base plate 15 , two vertical columns 16 , gussets 17 and two hydraulic cylinders 18 to tilt gasifier 10 for maintenance.
  • refractory lined lid 11 is fitted with an exhaust plenum 21 to remove the synthesis gas 22 , one or more top lances 23 to introduce oxygen, carbon dioxide, steam, other gases or liquids 24 and solid material feed 25 into the gasifier, one or more devices to measure the temperature 26 in the gasifier, one or more devices to measure the gas composition 27 and a burner port 28 to house a burner for preheating the gasifier.
  • Exhaust plenum 21 includes a refractory lining 29 for preventing heat loss therethrough.
  • Reaction vessel 12 is fitted with a refractory lining 31 to contain a molten metal 32 , a slag 33 , a froth 34 and a off-take region 47 .
  • Excess slag 33 is continuously removed from the vessel by means of a siphon stagger 35 .
  • the solid material feed 25 is introduced from above by means of one or more top lances 23 through lid 11 or through exhaust plenum 21 and lid 11 .
  • Solid, liquid or gaseous feed 36 is also introduced by means of one or more side wall injectors 37 . Gaseous and liquid feed can also be introduced into froth 34 or off-take region 47 utilizing injector ports located along the side walls of top injection lances 23 .
  • top lances 23 On the side walls of top lances 23 , one or more side wall ports 48 located in froth 34 and one or more side wall ports 49 located in off-take region 47 can be effectively utilized due to the expanded diameter and increased height (freeboard) of reaction vessel 12 .
  • the bottom of reaction vessel 12 is fitted with a water cooled flange 38 to which furnace 13 is attached.
  • One or more bottom injector lances 50 can also be utilized to enhance the mixing action and gasification process from below, again due to the expanded diameter of reaction vessel 12 . Solids, liquids or gases may also be introduced through bottom injector lances 50 .
  • furnace 13 is a coreless induction furnace.
  • the heart of a coreless induction furnace is the coil, which consists of a hollow section of heavy duty, high conductivity copper tubing which is wound into a helical coil. Coil shape is contained within a steel shell and magnetic shielding is used to prevent heating of the supporting shell. To protect it from overheating, the coil is water-cooled, the water being re-circulated and cooled in a cooling tower or chiller.
  • a channel induction furnace can also be used.
  • Channel furnaces however consist of a refractory lined steel shell which contains the molten metal. Attached to the steel shell and connected by a throat is an induction unit which forms the melting component of the furnace.
  • the induction unit consists of an iron core in the form of a ring around which a primary induction coil is wound. This assembly forms a simple transformer in which the molten metal loops comprise the secondary component. The heat generated within the loop causes the metal to circulate into the main well of the furnace. The circulation of the molten metal effects a useful stirring action in the melt.
  • Channel furnaces however suffer the drawback of requiring an initial molten metal charge from another source for cold start.
  • the feed rate of the carbonaceous material and reaction gases is balanced so that the molten iron retains its high carbon content. This allows operation in the optimum portion of the Fe—C Equilibrium Chart. If this balance should be temporarily lost, and the carbon is depleted from the molten iron, then steel will be made in the bath. This would require a notable increase in temperature to maintain the molten state of the metal while high purity carbon is injected back into the bath to restore the iron. This additional heat requirement would severely strain most channel furnaces. In many cases the channel furnace would have to be shutdown and recharged from a cold start. There is no such problem with a coreless induction furnace which could maintain the required higher temperatures.
  • channel furnaces require additional molten iron depth in order to avoid oxide build up or clogging in the refractory channels. This additional iron is not conducive to the basic gasification reaction efficiency. Therefore, coreless induction furnaces provide a preferred flexibility and adaptability not found in channel furnaces.
  • FIGS. 5 and 6 A second embodiment of this design is shown in FIGS. 5 and 6 .
  • This configuration utilizes three induction furnaces 13 on a larger reaction vessel 12 to facilitate a larger molten bath to enable higher capacity material throughputs. Variations in this approach can accommodate 2 or up to 6 induction furnaces 13 for a single reaction vessel 12 .
  • the use of multiple induction furnaces 13 for larger reaction vessels 12 allows uniform stirring action and heat distribution, thus enhancing the synthesis gas reaction and avoiding cold spots in the larger molten metal volume.
  • induction furnaces are single phase devices, each inductor can be connected to one of the three phases of a standard three phase industrial power supply. Thus, use of a phase balancer can be eliminated. As a result, this approach also saves equipment costs while increasing electrical efficiency.
  • this larger reaction vessel 12 does not utilize a tilt frame for emptying and maintenance, but rather uses a series of tap holes to save on cost and complexity of design. Excess slag during operation is still removed by a siphon slagger
  • induction furnace 13 The purpose of induction furnace 13 is to initially melt the solid pig iron and to subsequently stir molten metal 32 during operation.
  • Induction furnace 13 is fitted with a refractory lining 42 which contains molten metal 32 .
  • a coil 43 Surrounding refractory lining 42 is a coil 43 which is supported by magnetic shunts 44 which are supported by shunt bolts 45 which fasten to a furnace cage 46 .
  • reaction vessel 12 is preheated to about 2200° F. by means of a gas burner inserted through burner port 28 or alternately through a top mounted port for a lance 23 .
  • Electrical power is then applied to induction furnace 13 which melts and superheats molten metal 32 to about 2700° F.
  • the frequencies used for induction melting vary from 50 cycles per second to 10,000 cycles per second. The higher the operating frequency, the greater the maximum amount of power that can be applied to induction furnace 13 and the lower the amount of turbulence induced.
  • the interaction of the magnetic field and the electrical currents flowing in induction coil 43 produce a stirring action within molten metal 32 .
  • This stirring action forces molten metal 32 to rise upwards into reaction vessel 12 .
  • the degree of stirring action is influenced by the power and frequency applied as well as the size and shape of coil 43 and the density and viscosity of molten metal 32 .
  • the stirring action within the molten metal bath is important as it helps with mixing of molten metal 32 as well as homogenizing of temperature throughout induction furnace 13 and reaction vessel 12 .
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a cross section of a gasifier 10 showing the chemical reactions that take place therein.
  • Oxygen is introduced into molten metal 32 by means of one or more oxygen lances 23 .
  • oxygen lances 23 As the oxygen impinges on molten metal 32 , which initially consisted of iron, carbon and silicon, the oxygen initially oxidizes the iron to iron oxide as follows:
  • silicon dioxide The silicon dissolved in molten metal 32 is then oxidized to silicon dioxide as follows:
  • the carbon If the carbon is not replenished, the oxygen will remove virtually all of the carbon in molten metal 32 in about fifteen minutes. Thereafter, froth 34 will collapse and the iron will be completely oxidized to iron oxide. To maintain froth 34 and molten metal 32 , the carbon must be injected at a rate equal to the rate at which the carbon is being removed by oxidation, as follows:
  • the frothing process is most important since it increases the surface area for the following reaction.
  • the amount of oxygen added is closely controlled so that the heat released will provide the heat to dissociate feeds 25 and 36 and provide the heat required to elevate the synthesis gas to a temperature high enough to keep froth 34 , slag 33 and metal 32 molten.
  • the operating temperature will be in the range of 2700-3000° F.
  • the resulting synthesis gas consists of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, hydrogen and water vapor.
  • the ratio of the products in the synthesis gas is controlled by the following equilibrium:
  • Reaction vessel 12 is maintained under either a slightly negative, neutral or slightly positive pressure to remove the hot synthesis gas via exhaust plenum 21 while maintaining the proper reaction and diffusion of gases from molten metal 32 and slag 33 .
  • Exhaust plenum 21 is refractory lined 29 since the synthesis gas exits at temperatures as high as 2700 to 3000° F.
  • feeds 25 and 36 contain some metallic elements, they oxidize and become part of slag 33 or molten metal 32 .
  • silica sand can be added to keep slag 33 fluid.
  • dolomitic limestone can be added to lower the melting point of slag 33 to keep it fluid.
  • slag chemistry in this process is important as it relates to the viscosity of slag 33 and the necessity of controlling the continuity of the synthesis gas production.
  • the chemistry of slag 33 is related to the removal of detrimental impurities.
  • slag chemistry is monitored by periodic sampling and computer control.
  • Siphon type stagger 35 is employed to continuously remove excess slag 33 .
  • Most heavy metals, if present in the feed stream, can also be captured by the molten metal or slag regimes.
  • Induction furnace 13 is integral with but separated from the elevated and expanded diameter reaction vessel 12 and provides the following key features:
  • Reactor vessel 12 is an elevated and extended diameter molten metal reaction section capable of sustaining efficient and stable FeO reaction during the injection of widely varying hydrocarbon material feeds.
  • the extended bed diameter provides enlarged molten metal surface area and thus greater reaction zone potential. With greater surface area, it is also possible to inject multiple feed stream types and multiple process reactants requiring separate injector lance systems 23 . This greatly enhances the flexibility of the system to tolerate the widely varying feed stream characteristics.
  • the bottom portion of elevated and extended diameter reaction vessel 12 is a designed curved member.
  • This curved member is capable of supporting the weight of molten metal 32 , slag 33 , refractory lining 31 , the vertical portion of reaction vessel 12 , lid 11 , exhaust plenum 21 and injection lances 23 while providing superior molten metal flow characteristics.
  • Larger diameter reaction vessels requiring multiple induction furnaces, as shown in FIGS. 5 and 6 can be equipped with square, reinforced bottom sections to allow more uniform metal depth distribution and reduced equipment cost.
  • Reaction vessel 12 can be increased in vertical capacity by adding sections between the reaction vessel 12 and lid 11 interface. This allows an easy, cost-effective increase of iron capacity and froth region 34 volume for changes in feed stream composition and quantity. This design flexibility, coupled with the broad surface area permits extensive control and use of the iron-carbon and oxygen reaction to maintain the exothermic reaction and carbon exchange without depleting the net carbon content of molten metal 32 .
  • Top lance 23 and side injection lances 37 are provided in the integrated design to accomplish this flexibility of operation by simple modifications to reaction vessel 12 design.
  • Refractory and insulation material for lining 31 of reaction vessel 12 is specifically selected to accommodate the volatile FeO reaction, Fe-Carbon exchange and the incumbent splashing and spalling which occurs. This material is also used to assure minimal heat loss.
  • This refractory incorporates basic materials such as magnesia and silica in areas in contact with the metal bath and in proximity of the slag line. Above the slag line, where the refractory may be subject to acid, neutral, or even slightly basic conditions, a neutral refractory such as alumina or chromia-alumina spinel would be more appropriate. In off-take region 47 and duct areas, where temperatures will be more moderate, emphasis is placed on abrasion resistance to counteract the effect of any carry-over particulate combined with high gas stream velocity.
  • the sidewall is brick while the bottom refractory is a monolithic. The refractory is installed by means of a staggered joint configuration.
  • the expanded diameter of the reaction vessel 12 allows:
  • silica slag region is purposely provided in special combinations which:
  • froth region 34 is typically three to fifteen times the depth of the molten metal section, depending upon the type of mixed feed stream material involved. As previously discussed, during the injection of hydrocarbon material and oxygen into molten metal 32 , it is common to experience a frothing or fine material expansion above molten metal 32 and slag section 33 .
  • the purpose of froth region 34 is to provide sufficient surface area and height, with the incumbent expanded injection location capability, to create a controlled secondary gas reaction area which provides the following features:
  • Off-take zone 47 is specifically provided to allow control of the height and intensity of froth region 34 and provide a stable transition of the expanding synthesis gas into lid 11 and exhaust plenum 21 .
  • the height and extent of froth region 34 can grow too rapidly and interfere with the controlled synthesis gas production and transition into lid 11 and plenum 21 sections. Therefore off-take zone 47 is provided to allow injection of pure light gases, oxygen, carbon dioxide, or water vapor to create a hot spot (or cold spot) which will place a controlled cap or limiter to the upper extent of froth region 34 . Care must be taken not to inject too much oxygen or carbon/hydrocarbon material into off-take zone 47 , resulting in excessive depletion of froth zone 34 .
  • off-take zone 47 As a result, injection into off-take zone 47 is often an intermittent process, occurring only long enough to keep froth 34 out of exhaust plenum 21 . This “capping” or stopping of froth region 34 vertical expansion is important to the overall efficiency and control of the gasification process.
  • This area is topped by a flanged connection to lid 11 which allows design expansion of froth region 34 and off-take region 47 due to changes in the feed stream characteristics or quantity, as well as changes in the thermal conversion process. This is accomplished simply by the addition of one or more refractory lined circular sections between off-take region 47 and lid 11 .
  • Off-take region 47 also provides an additional “pure injection” zone for certain gaseous materials available from waste by-products, landfills, Fischer Tropsch by-products and digesters as outlined in Table 1.
  • Lid section 11 is designed to:
  • Lid 11 has a designed curvature which maximizes the stability of high thermal insulating refractory installation while minimizing surface flow tension and erosion characteristics.
  • the specially selected refractory material is designed to minimize heat loss for reduced thickness. This facilitates maximum inside diameter and minimum exterior (outside) hole-size for exhaust plenum 21 .
  • Exhaust plenum 21 is designed to provide:
  • the preferred embodiments of the present invention can process and gasify a large array of mixed wastes and fuels from domestic and industrial applications. These wastes and fuels can be contaminated with a variety of in-organics and hazardous materials.
  • the present invention allows for versatility and adaptability of design to accommodate a variation of organic and in-organic material and still achieve high efficiency in synthesis gas production.
  • this same versatility and adaptability of design implementation can be very useful in other applications and embodiments.

Abstract

A method for producing a synthesis gas from a widely varying feedstock of waste and natural fuels including providing a reaction chamber having a bottom coupled to an induction furnace, introducing a carbonaceous fuel into a molten metal contained within the reaction chamber, continuously or intermittently supplying heat and molten metal to the reaction chamber from the induction furnace and collecting a fuel gas generated within the reaction chamber.

Description

    FIELD OF INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to a method for producing synthesis gas, and in particular to a method for producing a high quality synthesis gas from a widely varying feedstock of waste and natural fuels using a gasifier having a the reaction chamber mounted on top of and in fluid with communication with an induction furnace.
  • BACKGROUND OF INVENTION
  • Conventional gasification is a process that converts carbonaceous materials, such as coal, petroleum, petroleum coke or biomass, into carbon monoxide, hydrogen and carbon dioxide. In a conventional gasifier, the carbonaceous material undergoes three processes including pyrolysis, combustion and gasification. During the pyrolysis process, the carbonaceous material heats up, volatiles are released and char is produced. The process is dependent on the properties of the carbonaceous material and determines the structure and composition of the char, which will then undergo gasification reactions. The combustion process occurs as the volatile products and some of the char reacts with oxygen to form carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide, which provides heat for the subsequent gasification reactions. The gasification process occurs as the char reacts with carbon dioxide and steam to produce carbon monoxide and hydrogen. The resulting gas is called syngas. Syngas is typically combusted in a gas turbine, and the heat is used to produce steam to drive a steam turbine.
  • There are four basic types of gasifiers operating today including fixed bed systems, fluidized bed systems, entrained flow systems and molten bed systems. In a fixed bed reactor, a reactive gas or gases are passed through a fixed bed of feedstock in a co-current or counter current flow. The fixed bed consists of carbonaceous fuel (e.g. coal or biomass) through which a “gasification agent” (steam, oxygen and/or air) flows in a co-current or counter-current configuration. The ash is either removed dry or as a slag. The nature of a fixed bed gasifier means that the fuel must have high mechanical strength and must be non-caking so that it will form a permeable bed. Thus, certain feedstocks such as processed municipal solid waste, biosolids, ground coal and certain types of biomass are not suited for use in fixed bed reactors. This is particularly true when moisture is present.
  • In a fluidized bed reactor, the pressure drop of the gasifying reactants is adjusted so that the feedstock is lifted or suspended by the gaseous phase. In particular, the carbonaceous fuel is fluidized in oxygen (or air) and steam. The ash is removed dry or as heavy agglomerates that defluidize. The temperatures are relatively low in dry ash gasifiers, so the fuel must be highly reactive; low-grade coals are particularly suitable. Fluidized bed gasifiers are most useful for fuels that form highly corrosive ash that would damage the walls of slagging gasifiers. Biomass fuels generally contain high levels of corrosive ash.
  • In an entrained bed reactor the solid particulate feedstock are carried or “entrained” through the reactor by the reacting gases. In particular, a dry pulverized solid, an atomized liquid carbonaceous fuel or a fuel slurry is gasified with oxygen in co-current flow. The gasification reactions take place in a dense cloud of very fine particles. Most coals are suitable for this type of gasifier because of the high operating temperatures and because the coal particles are well separated from one another. The fuel particles must be much smaller than for other types of gasifiers. This means the fuel must be pulverized, which requires somewhat more energy than for the other types of gasifiers. It also means that feedstocks such as processed municipal solid waste, certain biomass, spent tires and several types of industrial wastes are not well suited for this type of gasifier.
  • In a molten bed reactor higher heat value feedstock (primarily coal) is injected into a molten bath of iron, salt or coal ash contained within a reactor. A reactive gas such as oxygen, steam and/or carbon dioxide is injected into the vessel to control the rate of reaction within the reactor. A shortcoming of current molten bed gasifiers is the inability to process low heat value feedstocks and thus widely varying feedstocks. Often this is because low heat value feedstocks such as municipal solid waste, certain biomass wastes and some household and industrial wastes, when introduced into a molten bath can consume rather than produce heat thus limiting the efficiency of the reactor and possibly endangering the continuity of the process itself.
  • An exemplary molten bed reactor is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,649,867 including a substantially cylindrical vessel which has a substantially oblong section and lateral walls and a bottom wall which are lined with a refractory lining. An orifice for discharging the bath of liquid metal and an orifice for discharging slag supernatant on the bath of liquid metal are provided. In addition, a dome is positioned in a sealed manner on the vessel having in its upper part in the vicinity of one of the ends of the vessel a sealed box for introducing an injecting branch. An orifice is provided in the upper part of the vessel for exhausting the gases produced. A roughly central orifice for introducing additional elements is also provided in the upper part.
  • Another exemplary molten bed reactor is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,865,626. This patent discloses a process for producing gas containing carbon monoxide and hydrogen gas including introducing lump coal by means of a down pipe and one or more inlets in a gasifier head into a gasifier having a fluidized bed region and a free board space or killing region. The coal passes through the killing region into the fluidized bed region and is gasified therein with the aid of oxygen or oxygen-containing gas supplied from an oxygen source and blown into a region below the fluidized bed region. When the coal passes through the free board space it is spontaneously dried and degassed in an endothermic reaction that results in a temperature drop in the free board space and ensures that only coal constituents bringing about a high gasification temperature enter the lower part of the fluidized bed region.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The motivating object of the present invention was the need for a superior waste to energy conversion process allowing for increased fuel flexibility. Specifically, for this invention, the goal is to efficiently and economically produce a high quality synthesis gas from low heat value, widely varying feedstock. Such feedstock can include waste materials contaminated with inorganics as well as low grade natural fuels and industrial by-products. The resulting synthesis gas is of sufficient quality to allow production of electrical power, refining of Fischer-Tropsch liquids, production of methanol or the separation of industrial grade hydrogen. In addition, the present invention provides for improved environmental impact and clean and more environmentally friendly energy production while improving upon current industrial conversion efficiencies. Further, the present invention provides a major new source of energy from material that is currently considered useless, hazardous or not worth harvesting.
  • By fuel flexibility it is meant that the gasifier of the present invention is capable of handling a broad range of wastes from municipal waste, medical waste, biomass to bio-solids, spent tires, and industrial/agriculture waste. This includes a wide range of natural fuels and waste fuels. Further, the gasifier of the present invention can process solids, liquids and gaseous feed streams simultaneously in a single reactor, as well as low heat value feed (3,800 BTU/lb) as raw material. Additionally, the gasifier can tolerate a large content of in-organics and contaminants in the carbonaceous feedstock.
  • By efficiency and economics it is meant that the gasifier exhibits a high thermal conversion efficiency of about 58% to about 65% while operating at ambient pressure, using no air and efficiently using oxygen. It also means that the gasifier can processes large quantities (up to 700 tons per day) of varying feedstock in a single reactor vessel. Further, the gasifier can maintain an exothermic reaction state, thus requiring minimal external heat assist, and generate high quality synthesis gas (250-350 BTU/scf) with a low particulate level.
  • By environmental impact it is meant that the gasifier produces no char, minimal ash, no tar, no oils, no phenols and no ammonia while producing useable by-products such as siliceous slag and pig iron. The gasifier can also efficiently and safely processes high sulfur and contaminated coal and several types of industrial and household hazardous waste. Further the gasifier can recycle and dissociate polluting exhaust gases and green house gases such as carbon dioxide, dioxins, furans, volatile organic gaseous compounds, nitrous oxides and the like.
  • In order to meet the objects of the invention there is provided a molten bed reactor or gasifier including reaction chamber, for the production and collection of a fuel gas, mounted on top of, in fluid communication with and removed from a furnace. Preferably, the furnace is an induction furnace, and more preferably a coreless induction furnace, although a channel induction furnace can be used. The purpose of the furnace is to provide the reaction chamber with a constant source of molten metal, maintain the molten metal at a desired temperature, especially when synthesis gas production within the reaction chamber becomes endothermic due to the presence of low heat value feed, and impart vertical stirring of the molten metal within the reaction chamber for providing efficient conversion of carbonaceous fuel to carbon monoxide and hydrogen gas. Until now, induction furnaces were used primarily for batch processes involving melting and alloying metals.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a front elevational view of a gasifier in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a side elevational view of the gasifier of FIG. 1.
  • FIG. 3 is a vertical sectional view of the gasifier of FIG. 1.
  • FIG. 4 is a vertical sectional view of the gasifier of FIG. 1 showing the chemical reactions that take place within specific locations within the gasifier during gasification.
  • FIG. 5 is a front elevational view of a gasifier in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 6 is a bottom plan view the gasifier of FIG. 5.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIGS. 1 through 4 illustrate a gasifier 10 in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention. FIGS. 5 and 6 illustrate a gasifier 100 in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention. Like portions of gasifier 10 share like numbering with gasifier 100.
  • The present invention is directed to an integrated, multi-stage gasification system designed to maximize the production of synthesis gas from a widely ranging continuous feed stream of both organic and inorganic material. Specifically, seven distinct hardware sections are integrated into a continuous, interactive process designed to gasify solid, liquid and gaseous hydrocarbon material simultaneously. This is done in the presence of inorganic material which would otherwise disrupt a normal gasification process. The feed stream material includes, but is not limited to the mixed waste and natural fuels material of Table 1.
  • TABLE 1
    SOLIDS LIQUIDS GASES
    Raw Waste Process Raw Waste Process Raw Waste Process
    Material By-Products Material By-Products Material By-Products
    Municipal Waxes Paints Waxes Landfill Gas Light
    Solid Waste Propane Gas
    (MSW) (Refineries)
    Medical Glycerins Vegetable Oil Glycerins Sewage Gas Carbon
    Waste Dioxide
    Household Contaminated Mineral Oil Petro- Contaminated Coke Oven
    Hazardous Carbon Chemicals Water Vapor Gas
    Waste
    (HHW)
    Spent Tires Contaminated Contaminated Bottom Oil Hydrogen Digester
    Filters Fuels Sulfide Gas
    Biomass Petroleum Industrial Contaminated
    Coke Solvents Fuels
    Bio-solids Construction HHW Gasifier Oils
    Materials
    Low Sulfur Tars Poly
    Coal Chlorinated
    Butylenes
    Brown Coal Asphalt
    High Sulfur Agricultural
    Coal Waste
  • Each hardware section, or process stage, is designed to accommodate a specific group of feed stream constituents. The arrangement and design of these hardware sections is based upon generating maximum quantities of quality synthesis gas at minimum operational cost. Depending upon the combination of material to be gasified, the best section of the gasifier is selected for material feed in accordance with maintaining the balanced combination of hydrocarbons, carbonaceous materials and reaction gases. This allows control of the overall process as an exothermic reaction, resulting in maximum generation of synthesis gas for minimum expenditure of energy.
  • The following description of the preferred embodiments is merely exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the invention, its application or uses.
  • In FIGS. 1 and 2 there is shown a front elevation of a gasifier 10, which consists of a refractory lined lid 11, an expanded diameter, increased height reaction vessel 12, an induction furnace 13 mounted below and integral with the reaction vessel 12 and a tilt frame 14. Tilt frame 14 consists of a base plate 15, two vertical columns 16, gussets 17 and two hydraulic cylinders 18 to tilt gasifier 10 for maintenance.
  • As illustrated in FIG. 3, refractory lined lid 11 is fitted with an exhaust plenum 21 to remove the synthesis gas 22, one or more top lances 23 to introduce oxygen, carbon dioxide, steam, other gases or liquids 24 and solid material feed 25 into the gasifier, one or more devices to measure the temperature 26 in the gasifier, one or more devices to measure the gas composition 27 and a burner port 28 to house a burner for preheating the gasifier. Exhaust plenum 21 includes a refractory lining 29 for preventing heat loss therethrough.
  • Reaction vessel 12 is fitted with a refractory lining 31 to contain a molten metal 32, a slag 33, a froth 34 and a off-take region 47. Excess slag 33 is continuously removed from the vessel by means of a siphon stagger 35. The solid material feed 25 is introduced from above by means of one or more top lances 23 through lid 11 or through exhaust plenum 21 and lid 11. Solid, liquid or gaseous feed 36 is also introduced by means of one or more side wall injectors 37. Gaseous and liquid feed can also be introduced into froth 34 or off-take region 47 utilizing injector ports located along the side walls of top injection lances 23. On the side walls of top lances 23, one or more side wall ports 48 located in froth 34 and one or more side wall ports 49 located in off-take region 47 can be effectively utilized due to the expanded diameter and increased height (freeboard) of reaction vessel 12. The bottom of reaction vessel 12 is fitted with a water cooled flange 38 to which furnace 13 is attached. One or more bottom injector lances 50 can also be utilized to enhance the mixing action and gasification process from below, again due to the expanded diameter of reaction vessel 12. Solids, liquids or gases may also be introduced through bottom injector lances 50.
  • Preferably, furnace 13 is a coreless induction furnace. The heart of a coreless induction furnace is the coil, which consists of a hollow section of heavy duty, high conductivity copper tubing which is wound into a helical coil. Coil shape is contained within a steel shell and magnetic shielding is used to prevent heating of the supporting shell. To protect it from overheating, the coil is water-cooled, the water being re-circulated and cooled in a cooling tower or chiller.
  • A channel induction furnace can also be used. Channel furnaces however consist of a refractory lined steel shell which contains the molten metal. Attached to the steel shell and connected by a throat is an induction unit which forms the melting component of the furnace. The induction unit consists of an iron core in the form of a ring around which a primary induction coil is wound. This assembly forms a simple transformer in which the molten metal loops comprise the secondary component. The heat generated within the loop causes the metal to circulate into the main well of the furnace. The circulation of the molten metal effects a useful stirring action in the melt. Channel furnaces however suffer the drawback of requiring an initial molten metal charge from another source for cold start. In addition, for normal operation, the feed rate of the carbonaceous material and reaction gases is balanced so that the molten iron retains its high carbon content. This allows operation in the optimum portion of the Fe—C Equilibrium Chart. If this balance should be temporarily lost, and the carbon is depleted from the molten iron, then steel will be made in the bath. This would require a notable increase in temperature to maintain the molten state of the metal while high purity carbon is injected back into the bath to restore the iron. This additional heat requirement would severely strain most channel furnaces. In many cases the channel furnace would have to be shutdown and recharged from a cold start. There is no such problem with a coreless induction furnace which could maintain the required higher temperatures. This ability to sustain continuous operation in the presence of highly varying reactions and feed streams is critical to the overall efficiency and economics of the process. Finally, channel furnaces require additional molten iron depth in order to avoid oxide build up or clogging in the refractory channels. This additional iron is not conducive to the basic gasification reaction efficiency. Therefore, coreless induction furnaces provide a preferred flexibility and adaptability not found in channel furnaces.
  • A second embodiment of this design is shown in FIGS. 5 and 6. This configuration utilizes three induction furnaces 13 on a larger reaction vessel 12 to facilitate a larger molten bath to enable higher capacity material throughputs. Variations in this approach can accommodate 2 or up to 6 induction furnaces 13 for a single reaction vessel 12. The use of multiple induction furnaces 13 for larger reaction vessels 12 allows uniform stirring action and heat distribution, thus enhancing the synthesis gas reaction and avoiding cold spots in the larger molten metal volume. Further, since induction furnaces are single phase devices, each inductor can be connected to one of the three phases of a standard three phase industrial power supply. Thus, use of a phase balancer can be eliminated. As a result, this approach also saves equipment costs while increasing electrical efficiency. In addition, this larger reaction vessel 12 does not utilize a tilt frame for emptying and maintenance, but rather uses a series of tap holes to save on cost and complexity of design. Excess slag during operation is still removed by a siphon slagger.
  • The purpose of induction furnace 13 is to initially melt the solid pig iron and to subsequently stir molten metal 32 during operation. Induction furnace 13 is fitted with a refractory lining 42 which contains molten metal 32. Surrounding refractory lining 42 is a coil 43 which is supported by magnetic shunts 44 which are supported by shunt bolts 45 which fasten to a furnace cage 46.
  • The manner in which gasifier 10 is started is as follows. Once gasifier 10 has been charged with solid pig iron, reaction vessel 12 is preheated to about 2200° F. by means of a gas burner inserted through burner port 28 or alternately through a top mounted port for a lance 23. Electrical power is then applied to induction furnace 13 which melts and superheats molten metal 32 to about 2700° F. The frequencies used for induction melting vary from 50 cycles per second to 10,000 cycles per second. The higher the operating frequency, the greater the maximum amount of power that can be applied to induction furnace 13 and the lower the amount of turbulence induced.
  • When the charge material is molten, the interaction of the magnetic field and the electrical currents flowing in induction coil 43 produce a stirring action within molten metal 32. This stirring action forces molten metal 32 to rise upwards into reaction vessel 12. The degree of stirring action is influenced by the power and frequency applied as well as the size and shape of coil 43 and the density and viscosity of molten metal 32. The stirring action within the molten metal bath is important as it helps with mixing of molten metal 32 as well as homogenizing of temperature throughout induction furnace 13 and reaction vessel 12.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a cross section of a gasifier 10 showing the chemical reactions that take place therein. Oxygen is introduced into molten metal 32 by means of one or more oxygen lances 23. As the oxygen impinges on molten metal 32, which initially consisted of iron, carbon and silicon, the oxygen initially oxidizes the iron to iron oxide as follows:

  • 2Fe+O2=>2FeO   (1)
  • The silicon dissolved in molten metal 32 is then oxidized to silicon dioxide as follows:

  • Si+2FeO=>SiO2+2Fe   (2)
  • Likewise, the carbon dissolved in molten metal 32 is then oxidized to carbon monoxide as follows:

  • C+FeO=>CO+Fe   (3)
  • The oxidation of the iron to iron oxide and silicon to silicon dioxide involves minimal volumetric change. However, as the carbon is oxidized to carbon monoxide, there is a significant increase in volume when a solid is oxidized to a gas. This volumetric expansion causes molten metal 32, the liquid iron oxide, the liquid silicon dioxide and slag 33 to form froth 34.
  • If the carbon is not replenished, the oxygen will remove virtually all of the carbon in molten metal 32 in about fifteen minutes. Thereafter, froth 34 will collapse and the iron will be completely oxidized to iron oxide. To maintain froth 34 and molten metal 32, the carbon must be injected at a rate equal to the rate at which the carbon is being removed by oxidation, as follows:

  • FeO+C=>CO+Fe   (4)
  • This insures that the iron that was oxidized to iron oxide is then subsequently reduced by the carbon returning most of the iron to molten metal 32 so that it can subsequently be re-oxidized thereby allowing the cycle to repeat indefinitely. This continuous recycling is important to the efficiency of the process. Since some of the iron oxide will be carried out of reactor vessel 12 as part of slag 33, there will be a depletion of molten metal 32. Consequently, the iron will have to be added to reactor vessel 12 to maintain the required level of molten metal 32 in the gasifier.
  • As solid feed 25 is injected into molten metal 32, some of it will dissociate into the carbon and hydrogen and some will remain as a hydrocarbon. Likewise, as liquid or gaseous feed 36 is injected into froth 34, slag 33 or molten metal 32, some of it will dissociate into carbon and hydrogen and some will remain as a hydrocarbon. That portion of feeds 25 and 36 that dissociates will cause molten metal 32 to froth as the hydrogen is released as a gas. To dissociate feeds 25 and 36, heat must be provided, as follows:

  • Feeds (25 and 36)+heat=>C+H2   (5)
  • Likewise, that portion of feeds 25 and 36 that is oxidized to carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and water vapor by the oxygen will cause molten metal 32 to froth.

  • Feeds (25 and 36)+Oxygen=>Synthesis Gas   (6)

  • 2C+2H2+2O2=>CO+CO2+H2+H2O+Heat   (6a)
  • The frothing process is most important since it increases the surface area for the following reaction.

  • Feeds (25 and 36)+Iron Oxide=>Synthesis Gas   (7)

  • 2C+2H2+4FeO=>CO+CO2+H2+H2O+4Fe+Heat   (7a)
  • The amount of oxygen added is closely controlled so that the heat released will provide the heat to dissociate feeds 25 and 36 and provide the heat required to elevate the synthesis gas to a temperature high enough to keep froth 34, slag 33 and metal 32 molten. The operating temperature will be in the range of 2700-3000° F.
  • The resulting synthesis gas consists of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, hydrogen and water vapor. The ratio of the products in the synthesis gas is controlled by the following equilibrium:

  • CO+H2O=CO2+H2   (8)
  • The equilibrium constant for equation 7 is equal to:

  • k=[pCO2 ×pH2 ]÷[pCO×pH2O]=[6355÷(−R×T]−[6.24÷(−R×T)]  (9)
  • Where p=Pressure
  • R=Gas Constant
  • T=Temperature
  • Since the equilibrium constant k is temperature dependent, the percentage of each gas will vary with temperature. The higher the temperature the greater the amounts of carbon monoxide and water vapor. Conversely, the lower the temperature, the greater the amounts of carbon dioxide and hydrogen. The ratio of carbon compounds formed to the hydrogen compounds formed is directly proportional to the amount of carbon and hydrogen in feeds 25 and 36.
  • Reaction vessel 12 is maintained under either a slightly negative, neutral or slightly positive pressure to remove the hot synthesis gas via exhaust plenum 21 while maintaining the proper reaction and diffusion of gases from molten metal 32 and slag 33. Exhaust plenum 21 is refractory lined 29 since the synthesis gas exits at temperatures as high as 2700 to 3000° F.
  • Because feeds 25 and 36 contain some metallic elements, they oxidize and become part of slag 33 or molten metal 32. When these metal oxides cause slag 33 to go basic, silica sand can be added to keep slag 33 fluid. Conversely, when these metal oxides cause slag 33 to go acidic, dolomitic limestone can be added to lower the melting point of slag 33 to keep it fluid. It should be noted that slag chemistry in this process is important as it relates to the viscosity of slag 33 and the necessity of controlling the continuity of the synthesis gas production. In addition, just as in a metal refining process, the chemistry of slag 33 is related to the removal of detrimental impurities. In the synthesis gas production, it is advantageous to keep any impurities, such as sulfur and phosphorous, in metal bath 32 or capture these impurities in slag layer 33 rather than having to remove them from the gas stream in some later step. The slag chemistry is monitored by periodic sampling and computer control. Siphon type stagger 35 is employed to continuously remove excess slag 33. Most heavy metals, if present in the feed stream, can also be captured by the molten metal or slag regimes.
  • The following paragraphs now explain important features of each major hardware section.
  • Induction Furnace
  • Induction furnace 13 is integral with but separated from the elevated and expanded diameter reaction vessel 12 and provides the following key features:
      • i) Precisely controlled vertical stirring of the entire molten bed with minimal power consumption. This facilitates circulation of all molten metal 32 with no dead or cold spots thus enabling maximum utilization of all the iron in the gasification process.
      • ii) Power variability in real time to accommodate changes in feed stream heat value and thermal conversion process interaction.
      • iii) Control of vertical stirring turbulence and speed during the volatile thermal conversion reactions.
      • iv) Induction coil 43 protection from volatile reaction vessel 12 molten metal stirring and gasification process by isolation of induction furnace 13 below the primary thermodynamic reactions.
      • v) Adaptable to real time re-charging of the molten metal if the carbon content drops too low.
      • vi) Continuous operation with varying feed stream conditions and gasification conditions
  • Vertical stirring at minimum power is accomplished by the natural movement of metal bath 32 caused by induction coil 43. Control of power variability is achieved by means of a tapped transformer to vary the voltage to coil 43. By mounting elevated, extended diameter reaction vessel 12 on top of induction furnace 13, induction coil 43 and refractory lining 42 are isolated and thus protected from the volatile reactions of the gasification process. The superstructure of induction furnace 13 is specifically configured to support the weight of molten metal 32 and slag 33 in reaction vessel 12.
  • Elevated and Extended Diameter Reaction Vessel
  • Reactor vessel 12, or reaction chamber, is an elevated and extended diameter molten metal reaction section capable of sustaining efficient and stable FeO reaction during the injection of widely varying hydrocarbon material feeds. The extended bed diameter provides enlarged molten metal surface area and thus greater reaction zone potential. With greater surface area, it is also possible to inject multiple feed stream types and multiple process reactants requiring separate injector lance systems 23. This greatly enhances the flexibility of the system to tolerate the widely varying feed stream characteristics.
  • The bottom portion of elevated and extended diameter reaction vessel 12 is a designed curved member. This curved member is capable of supporting the weight of molten metal 32, slag 33, refractory lining 31, the vertical portion of reaction vessel 12, lid 11, exhaust plenum 21 and injection lances 23 while providing superior molten metal flow characteristics. Larger diameter reaction vessels requiring multiple induction furnaces, as shown in FIGS. 5 and 6, can be equipped with square, reinforced bottom sections to allow more uniform metal depth distribution and reduced equipment cost.
  • Reaction vessel 12 can be increased in vertical capacity by adding sections between the reaction vessel 12 and lid 11 interface. This allows an easy, cost-effective increase of iron capacity and froth region 34 volume for changes in feed stream composition and quantity. This design flexibility, coupled with the broad surface area permits extensive control and use of the iron-carbon and oxygen reaction to maintain the exothermic reaction and carbon exchange without depleting the net carbon content of molten metal 32. Top lance 23 and side injection lances 37 are provided in the integrated design to accomplish this flexibility of operation by simple modifications to reaction vessel 12 design.
  • Refractory and insulation material for lining 31 of reaction vessel 12 is specifically selected to accommodate the volatile FeO reaction, Fe-Carbon exchange and the incumbent splashing and spalling which occurs. This material is also used to assure minimal heat loss. This refractory incorporates basic materials such as magnesia and silica in areas in contact with the metal bath and in proximity of the slag line. Above the slag line, where the refractory may be subject to acid, neutral, or even slightly basic conditions, a neutral refractory such as alumina or chromia-alumina spinel would be more appropriate. In off-take region 47 and duct areas, where temperatures will be more moderate, emphasis is placed on abrasion resistance to counteract the effect of any carry-over particulate combined with high gas stream velocity. The sidewall is brick while the bottom refractory is a monolithic. The refractory is installed by means of a staggered joint configuration. The expanded diameter of the reaction vessel 12 allows:
      • i) Variable feed stream injection from multiple top injector lances 23.
      • ii) Multiple (typically 3-6) side lance 37 injection ports to facilitate liquid solid and gaseous feed injection in a variety of configurations.
      • iii) Multiple side lance 37 injection ports to facilitate stirring action in the horizontal plane of the molten bed, thus enhancing total reaction mixing.
      • iv) Varying injection speeds due to multiple locations to enhance and control the size and depth of the molten metal reaction zone.
      • v) Isolation of the total reaction zone in a controllable region.
      • vi) Increased capability to operate in the required region of the Fe—C equilibrium chart for widely varying feed.
    Slag Region
  • The silica slag region is purposely provided in special combinations which:
      • i) Captures and further gasifies carbon particulates escaping the FeO-Iron-Carbon reaction.
      • ii) Captures and neutralizes certain waste gases not productive in the synthesis gas generation process.
      • iii) Captures and neutralizes other non-carbon particulates.
      • iv) Enhances the formation of the appropriate secondary froth reaction zone constituents to support a second synthesis gas production area.
      • v) Coats the surrounding refractory with a protective layer as a result of splashing from the volatile gasification reaction.
      • vi) Provides refractory design transition from molten metal to freeboard areas of gasifying reaction vessel.
    Secondary Reaction Froth Region
  • This section provides a volume large enough to allow control of secondary gasification reaction. Directly above molten metal 32 and slag 33 regions, froth region 34 is typically three to fifteen times the depth of the molten metal section, depending upon the type of mixed feed stream material involved. As previously discussed, during the injection of hydrocarbon material and oxygen into molten metal 32, it is common to experience a frothing or fine material expansion above molten metal 32 and slag section 33. The purpose of froth region 34 is to provide sufficient surface area and height, with the incumbent expanded injection location capability, to create a controlled secondary gas reaction area which provides the following features:
      • i) Allows complete gasification of any hydrocarbon particulates not fully reacted in the molten metal 32 gasification section.
      • ii) Facilitates the introduction of additional hydrocarbon fines and reaction gases to allow additional gasification reaction and boost synthesis gas production. These fines can include coal, spent tires, waxes, waste oils, industrial waste chemicals, and bio-solids.
      • iii) Provides a large transition area for changes in refractory design and thickness.
      • iv) Allows for an extended siliceous slag 33 area and “controlled extended” splash zone thus enhancing refractory coating and synthesis gas production in a continuous process.
      • v) Allows for thicker slag area to accommodate additional slag chemicals for improved synthesis gas filtration and increased residence time.
      • vi) Permits secondary injection of by-products and waste gases (see Table 1) to accelerate and expand synthesis gas formation.
      • vii) Permits secondary injection of gaseous reactants such as oxygen, CO2 or water vapor to control and enhance temperature levels and H2 and CO formation.
    Expandable Off-Take Zone
  • Off-take zone 47 is specifically provided to allow control of the height and intensity of froth region 34 and provide a stable transition of the expanding synthesis gas into lid 11 and exhaust plenum 21. For some feed stream conditions, the height and extent of froth region 34 can grow too rapidly and interfere with the controlled synthesis gas production and transition into lid 11 and plenum 21 sections. Therefore off-take zone 47 is provided to allow injection of pure light gases, oxygen, carbon dioxide, or water vapor to create a hot spot (or cold spot) which will place a controlled cap or limiter to the upper extent of froth region 34. Care must be taken not to inject too much oxygen or carbon/hydrocarbon material into off-take zone 47, resulting in excessive depletion of froth zone 34. As a result, injection into off-take zone 47 is often an intermittent process, occurring only long enough to keep froth 34 out of exhaust plenum 21. This “capping” or stopping of froth region 34 vertical expansion is important to the overall efficiency and control of the gasification process. This area is topped by a flanged connection to lid 11 which allows design expansion of froth region 34 and off-take region 47 due to changes in the feed stream characteristics or quantity, as well as changes in the thermal conversion process. This is accomplished simply by the addition of one or more refractory lined circular sections between off-take region 47 and lid 11. Off-take region 47 also provides an additional “pure injection” zone for certain gaseous materials available from waste by-products, landfills, Fischer Tropsch by-products and digesters as outlined in Table 1.
  • Lid
  • Lid section 11 is designed to:
      • i) Retain the maximum amount of heat in reaction vessel 12.
      • ii) Converge escaping hot synthesis gas flow efficiently to the exhaust plenum 21.
      • iii) Provide first level instrumentation of quality and status of product gases.
      • iv) Resist erosion wear for particulates and high velocity gas flow.
  • Lid 11 has a designed curvature which maximizes the stability of high thermal insulating refractory installation while minimizing surface flow tension and erosion characteristics. The specially selected refractory material is designed to minimize heat loss for reduced thickness. This facilitates maximum inside diameter and minimum exterior (outside) hole-size for exhaust plenum 21.
  • Exhaust Plenum
  • Exhaust plenum 21 is designed to provide:
      • i) Maximum heat retention.
      • ii) Minimum surface tension erosion characteristics.
      • iii) Minimum outside diameter.
      • iv) Efficient gas turning with minimum inside diameter (ID).
      • v) Proper gas escape velocity.
      • vi) Minimum collection of particulates and contaminants in the turn section and downstream areas.
      • vii) Proper reaction vessel pressure.
        These features provide a combined aerodynamic, thermodynamic gas flow, characteristics needed to maximize gasification efficiency and control. Advanced state-of-the-art thermal insulating materials are used to extend life and maximize heat retention.
  • The preferred embodiments of the present invention can process and gasify a large array of mixed wastes and fuels from domestic and industrial applications. These wastes and fuels can be contaminated with a variety of in-organics and hazardous materials. Thus, the present invention allows for versatility and adaptability of design to accommodate a variation of organic and in-organic material and still achieve high efficiency in synthesis gas production. However, this same versatility and adaptability of design implementation can be very useful in other applications and embodiments.

Claims (40)

1. A method of gasifying a carbonaceous fuel comprising,
providing a reaction chamber coupled to an induction furnace,
introducing the carbonaceous fuel into a molten metal contained within the reaction chamber, and
collecting a fuel gas generated within the reaction chamber.
2. The method according to claim 1 wherein the induction furnace is a coreless induction furnace.
3. The method according to claim 1 wherein the reaction chamber is mounted on top of the induction furnace.
4. The method according to claim 1 further comprising circulating the molten metal between the reaction chamber and the induction furnace though an opening in a bottom of the reaction chamber.
5. The method according to claim 1 further comprising heating the molten metal by induction heating.
6. The method according to claim 1 wherein the carbonaceous fuel is selected from the group consisting of municipal solid waste, medical waste, household hazardous waste, spent tires, biomass, bio-solids, industrial wastes, various grades of coal, coke and combinations thereof
7. The method according to claim 1 wherein the carbonaceous fuel is introduced into a froth zone and into an off take zone, each of the froth zone and the take- off zone being within the reaction chamber and directly above the molten metal.
8. The method according to claim 1 wherein the method is a continuous process.
9. A method of producing a fuel gas comprising,
introducing a carbonaceous fuel into a molten metal bath supported above an induction furnace,
heating the molten metal bath using the induction furnace,
generating the fuel gas, and
collecting the fuel gas.
10. The method according to claim 9 wherein the molten metal bath is contained within a reaction chamber mounted on top of the induction furnace, the reaction chamber having an opening through a bottom thereof that is in fluid communication with an interior of the induction furnace.
11. The method according to claim 10 wherein the bottom has an inside working circumference that is at least three times greater than an inside circumference of the interior of the induction furnace.
12. The method according to claim 10 wherein a coreless induction furnace is mounted to the bottom, the coreless induction furnace having an inside that is in fluid communication with a second opening through the bottom of the reaction chamber.
13. The method according to claim 9 further comprising stirring the molten metal bath using the induction furnace.
14. The method according to claim 9 further comprising obtaining a temperature of the molten metal bath, determining whether it is desired to add heat to the molten metal bath based upon the temperature of the molten metal bath, and adding heat to the molten metal bath using the induction furnace in a continuous process as needed.
15. The method according to claim 14 further comprising controlling a height of a froth derived from the molten metal bath by introducing a gas selected from the group consisting of combustible light gases, oxygen, carbon dioxide, steam and combinations thereof into an off take zone located above the molten metal bath.
16. The method according to claim 9 wherein, when the carbonaceous fuel is a low heat value fuel, a temperature of the molten metal bath is maintained within a desired range by adding heat to the molten metal bath.
17. A method of producing a fuel gas comprising,
providing a gasifier including a reaction chamber, a molten metal and an induction furnace,
induction heating the molten metal,
induction stirring the molten metal,
injecting a carbonaceous fuel into the molten metal generating the fuel gas, and collecting the fuel gas.
18. The method according to claim 17 wherein the induction furnace is a coreless induction furnace.
19. The method according to claim 18 wherein the induction furnace is integrally coupled to a bottom of the reaction chamber and the bottom includes an opening through which the molten metal is circulated between the induction furnace and the reaction chamber.
20. The method according to claim 19 wherein the bottom has an inside working circumference that is at least three times greater than a circumference of the opening.
21. The method according to claim 19 wherein a second induction furnace and a third induction furnace are coupled to the bottom of the reaction chamber, each of the induction furnace, the second induction furnace and the third induction furnace, being connected to a respective phase of a three phase industrial power supply.
22. The method according to claim 17 wherein the reaction chamber has a volume that is at least fifteen times greater than an inside working volume of the induction furnace.
23. The method according to claim 17 wherein the carbonaceous fuel and reaction gases are injected into a volume of the molten metal that is isolated from induction furnace.
24. The method according to claim 17 further comprising obtaining a temperature of the molten metal, determining whether the molten metal is at a desired temperature, and adding heat to the molten metal using the induction furnace to achieve the desired temperature.
25. The method according to claim 19 wherein the carbonaceous fuel and one or more reaction gases are introduced into a reaction area contained within the reaction chamber above the molten metal , the reaction area being comprised of contiguous gasification zones, starting from the bottom and moving upward, designated as molten metal gasification zone, a slag gasification zone, a froth gasification zone and an off take gasification zones.
26. The method according to claim 1 further comprising injecting carbon in the carbonaceous fuel into the reaction chamber at a first rate and oxidizing carbon in the reaction chamber to carbon monoxide at a second rate wherein the first rate and the second rate are substantially the same.
27. The method according to claim 1 further comprising injecting carbon in the carbonaceous fuel into the reaction chamber at a first rate and oxidizing the molten metal at a second rate wherein the first rate and the second rate are substantially the same.
28. The method according to claim 1 further comprising oxidizing the molten metal to metal oxide at a first rate and reducing the metal oxide with carbon in the carbonaceous fuel at a second rate wherein the first rate and the second rate are substantially the same.
29. The method according to claim 9 further comprising injecting carbon in the carbonaceous fuel into the reaction chamber at a first rate and oxidizing the carbon in the reaction chamber to carbon monoxide at a second rate wherein the first rate and the second rate are substantially the same.
30. The method according to claim 9 further comprising injecting carbon in the carbonaceous fuel into the reaction chamber at a first rate and oxidizing the molten metal at a second rate wherein the first rate and the second rate are substantially the same.
31. The method according to claim 9 further comprising oxidizing the molten metal to metal oxide at a first rate and reducing the metal oxide with carbon in the carbonaceous fuel at a second rate wherein the first rate and the second rate are substantially the same.
32. The method according to claim 17 further comprising injecting carbon in the carbonaceous fuel into the reaction chamber at a first rate and oxidizing the carbon in the reaction chamber to carbon monoxide at a second rate wherein the first rate and the second rate are substantially the same.
33. The method according to claim 17 further comprising injecting carbon in the carbonaceous fuel into the reaction chamber at a first rate and oxidizing the molten metal at a second rate wherein the first rate and the second rate are substantially the same.
34. The method according to claim 17 further comprising oxidizing the molten metal to metal oxide at a first rate and reducing the metal oxide with carbon in the carbonaceous fuel at a second rate wherein the first rate and the second rate are substantially the same.
35. A method for producing a fuel gas comprising,
providing a reaction chamber containing a molten metal,
oxidizing the molten metal to metal oxide at a first rate,
injecting carbon into the reaction chamber at a second rate,
reducing the metal oxide at a third rate, and
oxidizing the carbon to carbon monoxide at a fourth rate.
36. The method according to claim 35 wherein the first rate, the second rate, the third rate and the fourth rate are substantially the same.
37. The method according to claim 35 wherein the first rate and the third rate are substantially the same.
38. The method according to claim 35 wherein the second rate and the fourth rate are substantially the same.
39. The method according to claim 35 wherein the molten metal is iron and the metal oxide is iron oxide.
40. The method according to claim 35 wherein the carbon is injected in the form of a carbonaceous fuel selected from the group consisting of municipal solid waste, medical waste, household hazardous waste, spent tires, biomass, bio-solids, industrial wastes, various grades of coal, coke and combinations thereof.
US11/860,815 2007-09-25 2007-09-25 Method for producing fuel gas Abandoned US20090077891A1 (en)

Priority Applications (7)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/860,815 US20090077891A1 (en) 2007-09-25 2007-09-25 Method for producing fuel gas
BRPI0817439A BRPI0817439A2 (en) 2007-09-25 2008-09-25 aerator
PCT/US2008/077617 WO2009042744A1 (en) 2007-09-25 2008-09-25 Gasifier
BRPI0817441-5A BRPI0817441A2 (en) 2007-09-25 2008-09-25 Methods for gasifying a carbonaceous fuel, and for producing a combustible gas
EP20080834577 EP2197986A1 (en) 2007-09-25 2008-09-25 Gasifier
PCT/US2008/077616 WO2009042743A1 (en) 2007-09-25 2008-09-25 A method for producing fuel gas
EP20080834661 EP2193183A1 (en) 2007-09-25 2008-09-25 A method for producing fuel gas

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/860,815 US20090077891A1 (en) 2007-09-25 2007-09-25 Method for producing fuel gas

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20090077891A1 true US20090077891A1 (en) 2009-03-26

Family

ID=40470204

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/860,815 Abandoned US20090077891A1 (en) 2007-09-25 2007-09-25 Method for producing fuel gas

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US20090077891A1 (en)

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20060201024A1 (en) * 2004-07-19 2006-09-14 Earthrenew, Inc. Process and system for drying and heat treating materials
US20100297001A1 (en) * 2008-01-22 2010-11-25 Guyomarc H Raymond Method and system for producing integrated hydrogen from organic matter
US20110104770A1 (en) * 2009-10-30 2011-05-05 Tobey Richard E Process for controlling sulfur in a fermentation syngas feed stream
US20110308158A1 (en) * 2010-06-16 2011-12-22 David Pye Pyrolysis waste and biomass treatment
WO2012051750A1 (en) * 2010-10-19 2012-04-26 富士通株式会社 Method, terminal apparatus and base station for transmitting uplink response signal
CN103154210A (en) * 2010-08-16 2013-06-12 能源与环境研究中心基金会 Sandwich gasification process for high-efficiency conversion of carbonaceous fuels to clean syngas with zero residual carbon discharge
US9033259B2 (en) 2010-12-23 2015-05-19 General Electric Company Method and system for mixing reactor feed
US9228744B2 (en) 2012-01-10 2016-01-05 General Electric Company System for gasification fuel injection
US20160242239A1 (en) * 2015-02-18 2016-08-18 Inductotherm Corp. Electric induction melting and holding furnaces for reactive metals and alloys
US9545604B2 (en) 2013-11-15 2017-01-17 General Electric Company Solids combining system for a solid feedstock
WO2023072220A1 (en) * 2021-10-28 2023-05-04 河南工业大学 Method for combined thermal conversion of straw briquette fuel and carbon dioxide

Citations (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2770536A (en) * 1950-12-30 1956-11-13 Stanolind Oil & Gas Co Method for gasification of solid fuels
US3850742A (en) * 1971-10-05 1974-11-26 Exxon Research Engineering Co Hydrocarbon cracking in a regenerable molten media
US4062657A (en) * 1975-05-09 1977-12-13 Eisenwerk-Gesellschaft Maximilianshutte Mbh Method and apparatus for desulphurizing in the gasification of coal
US4181504A (en) * 1975-12-30 1980-01-01 Technology Application Services Corp. Method for the gasification of carbonaceous matter by plasma arc pyrolysis
US4388084A (en) * 1980-12-01 1983-06-14 Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. Process for gasification of solid carbonaceous material
US4441892A (en) * 1979-11-23 1984-04-10 Carbon Gas Technologie Gmbh Process for the gasification of carboniferous material in solid, pulverulent or even lump form
US4545786A (en) * 1978-12-26 1985-10-08 Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. Apparatus for gasifying solid carbonaceous materials
US4559062A (en) * 1984-01-27 1985-12-17 Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. Apparatus for gasification of solid carbonaceous material
US4564389A (en) * 1981-06-10 1986-01-14 Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. Process for coal-gasification and making pig iron
US4649867A (en) * 1984-02-23 1987-03-17 Union Siderurgique Du Nord Et L'est De La France (Usinor) Coal gasification reactor of the type employing a bath of liquid metal
US4865626A (en) * 1985-10-21 1989-09-12 Gero Papst Process for producing gas containing CO and H2
US5395405A (en) * 1993-04-12 1995-03-07 Molten Metal Technology, Inc. Method for producing hydrocarbon gas from waste
US5435814A (en) * 1992-08-13 1995-07-25 Ashland Inc. Molten metal decomposition apparatus
US6110239A (en) * 1996-05-31 2000-08-29 Marathon Ashland Petroleum Llc Molten metal hydrocarbon gasification process
US6350289B1 (en) * 1995-04-13 2002-02-26 Marathon Ashland Petroleum Llc Two-zone molten metal hydrogen-rich and carbon monoxide-rich gas generation process
US6379422B1 (en) * 1999-08-05 2002-04-30 Technological Resources Pty. Ltd. Direct smelting process
US20060000143A1 (en) * 1997-11-04 2006-01-05 Shuichi Nagato Fluidized-bed gasification and combustion furnace
US20060228294A1 (en) * 2005-04-12 2006-10-12 Davis William H Process and apparatus using a molten metal bath

Patent Citations (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2770536A (en) * 1950-12-30 1956-11-13 Stanolind Oil & Gas Co Method for gasification of solid fuels
US3850742A (en) * 1971-10-05 1974-11-26 Exxon Research Engineering Co Hydrocarbon cracking in a regenerable molten media
US4062657A (en) * 1975-05-09 1977-12-13 Eisenwerk-Gesellschaft Maximilianshutte Mbh Method and apparatus for desulphurizing in the gasification of coal
US4181504A (en) * 1975-12-30 1980-01-01 Technology Application Services Corp. Method for the gasification of carbonaceous matter by plasma arc pyrolysis
US4545786A (en) * 1978-12-26 1985-10-08 Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. Apparatus for gasifying solid carbonaceous materials
US4441892A (en) * 1979-11-23 1984-04-10 Carbon Gas Technologie Gmbh Process for the gasification of carboniferous material in solid, pulverulent or even lump form
US4388084A (en) * 1980-12-01 1983-06-14 Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. Process for gasification of solid carbonaceous material
US4564389A (en) * 1981-06-10 1986-01-14 Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. Process for coal-gasification and making pig iron
US4559062A (en) * 1984-01-27 1985-12-17 Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. Apparatus for gasification of solid carbonaceous material
US4649867A (en) * 1984-02-23 1987-03-17 Union Siderurgique Du Nord Et L'est De La France (Usinor) Coal gasification reactor of the type employing a bath of liquid metal
US4865626A (en) * 1985-10-21 1989-09-12 Gero Papst Process for producing gas containing CO and H2
US5435814A (en) * 1992-08-13 1995-07-25 Ashland Inc. Molten metal decomposition apparatus
US5395405A (en) * 1993-04-12 1995-03-07 Molten Metal Technology, Inc. Method for producing hydrocarbon gas from waste
US6350289B1 (en) * 1995-04-13 2002-02-26 Marathon Ashland Petroleum Llc Two-zone molten metal hydrogen-rich and carbon monoxide-rich gas generation process
US6110239A (en) * 1996-05-31 2000-08-29 Marathon Ashland Petroleum Llc Molten metal hydrocarbon gasification process
US20060000143A1 (en) * 1997-11-04 2006-01-05 Shuichi Nagato Fluidized-bed gasification and combustion furnace
US6379422B1 (en) * 1999-08-05 2002-04-30 Technological Resources Pty. Ltd. Direct smelting process
US20060228294A1 (en) * 2005-04-12 2006-10-12 Davis William H Process and apparatus using a molten metal bath

Cited By (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7866060B2 (en) * 2004-07-19 2011-01-11 Earthrenew, Inc. Process and system for drying and heat treating materials
US20110212239A1 (en) * 2004-07-19 2011-09-01 Earthrenew, Inc. Process and system for drying and heat treating materials
US20060201024A1 (en) * 2004-07-19 2006-09-14 Earthrenew, Inc. Process and system for drying and heat treating materials
US8407911B2 (en) 2004-07-19 2013-04-02 Earthrenew, Inc. Process and system for drying and heat treating materials
US20100297001A1 (en) * 2008-01-22 2010-11-25 Guyomarc H Raymond Method and system for producing integrated hydrogen from organic matter
US9011813B2 (en) * 2008-01-22 2015-04-21 Aymar Vernes Method and system for producing integrated hydrogen from organic matter
US8597934B2 (en) 2009-10-30 2013-12-03 Coskata, Inc. Process for controlling sulfur in a fermentation syngas feed stream
US20110104770A1 (en) * 2009-10-30 2011-05-05 Tobey Richard E Process for controlling sulfur in a fermentation syngas feed stream
US20110308158A1 (en) * 2010-06-16 2011-12-22 David Pye Pyrolysis waste and biomass treatment
US8562699B2 (en) * 2010-06-16 2013-10-22 C6 Technologies, Inc. Pyrolysis waste and biomass treatment
US10435638B2 (en) 2010-06-16 2019-10-08 C6 Technologies, Inc. Pyrolysis processing of solid waste from a water treatment plant
US10011792B2 (en) 2010-08-16 2018-07-03 Nikhil Manubhai Patel Sandwich gasification process for high-efficiency conversion of carbonaceous fuels to clean syngas with zero residual carbon discharge
CN103154210A (en) * 2010-08-16 2013-06-12 能源与环境研究中心基金会 Sandwich gasification process for high-efficiency conversion of carbonaceous fuels to clean syngas with zero residual carbon discharge
US11220641B2 (en) 2010-08-16 2022-01-11 Nikhil Manubhai Patel Sandwich gasification process for high-efficiency conversion of carbonaceous fuels to clean syngas with zero residual carbon discharge
US10550343B2 (en) 2010-08-16 2020-02-04 Nikhil Manubhai Patel Sandwich gasification process for high-efficiency conversion of carbonaceous fuels to clean syngas with zero residual carbon discharge
WO2012051750A1 (en) * 2010-10-19 2012-04-26 富士通株式会社 Method, terminal apparatus and base station for transmitting uplink response signal
US9033259B2 (en) 2010-12-23 2015-05-19 General Electric Company Method and system for mixing reactor feed
US9228744B2 (en) 2012-01-10 2016-01-05 General Electric Company System for gasification fuel injection
US9545604B2 (en) 2013-11-15 2017-01-17 General Electric Company Solids combining system for a solid feedstock
US20160242239A1 (en) * 2015-02-18 2016-08-18 Inductotherm Corp. Electric induction melting and holding furnaces for reactive metals and alloys
US11272584B2 (en) * 2015-02-18 2022-03-08 Inductotherm Corp. Electric induction melting and holding furnaces for reactive metals and alloys
WO2023072220A1 (en) * 2021-10-28 2023-05-04 河南工业大学 Method for combined thermal conversion of straw briquette fuel and carbon dioxide

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20090077891A1 (en) Method for producing fuel gas
US20090077889A1 (en) Gasifier
EP0776962A2 (en) Method and apparatus for treating wastes by gasification
CN102459654A (en) Apparatus for and method of production of iron, semi steel and reducing gases
JP2004534903A (en) How to create clean energy from coal
PL190794B1 (en) Method of and apparatus for obtaining flammable and reducing gas from solid fuels
CN201195718Y (en) Novel gasification furnace propitious to recycle heat
WO2013165122A1 (en) Non-melt and partial melt type entrained flow bed gasifier
US20150152344A1 (en) Melt gasifier system
EP1114190B1 (en) Blast furnace with narrowed top section and method of using
CN101003753A (en) Integration installation for producing synthesis gas from coal with high volatile constituent
US4095960A (en) Apparatus and method for the gasification of solid carbonaceous material
EP2193183A1 (en) A method for producing fuel gas
WO2009081282A2 (en) Method of using injector system for making fuel gas
JPH10128288A (en) Gasification treatment of waste product and device therefore
US20160009554A1 (en) Molten metal gasifier
US7238222B2 (en) Thermal synthesis production of steel
AU2019387395B9 (en) Reactor and process for gasifying and/or melting of feed materials
CN210765189U (en) Double-molten-bath organic solid waste blowing gasification device
JP3183226B2 (en) Gasification and melting furnace for waste and gasification and melting method
US20050151307A1 (en) Method and apparatus for producing molten iron
EP3887486A1 (en) Reactor and process for gasifying and/or melting of feed materials
EP4026885A1 (en) Reactor and process for gasifying and/or melting of feed materials and for the production of hydrogen
NO140168B (en) PROCEDURES FOR PERFORMING HEAT-REQUIRED CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES IN A FLOATING LAYER
WO2014132230A1 (en) Molten metal gasifier

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: NEW YORK ENERGY GROUP, INC., ALABAMA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DUCA, WILLIAM J.;BUCHER, KEITH R., II;INGRAM, CHARLES B.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:020407/0615

Effective date: 20071218

AS Assignment

Owner name: GI-GASIFICATION INTERNATIONAL, SA, PORTUGAL

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:NEW YORK ENERGY GROUP, INC.;REEL/FRAME:021856/0061

Effective date: 20080725

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION