Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20090046728 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 12/259,296
Publication date19 Feb 2009
Filing date27 Oct 2008
Priority date13 Sep 2000
Also published asEP1319300A2, US7444398, WO2002023855A2, WO2002023855A3
Publication number12259296, 259296, US 2009/0046728 A1, US 2009/046728 A1, US 20090046728 A1, US 20090046728A1, US 2009046728 A1, US 2009046728A1, US-A1-20090046728, US-A1-2009046728, US2009/0046728A1, US2009/046728A1, US20090046728 A1, US20090046728A1, US2009046728 A1, US2009046728A1
InventorsAbraham R. Matthews
Original AssigneeFortinet, Inc.
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
System and method for delivering security services
US 20090046728 A1
Abstract
Systems and methods are provided for delivering security services. According to one embodiment, multiple virtual routers are established within a service processing switch, which is operable to be logically interposed between a public communications network and multiple subscriber sites. Each of the virtual routers has associated therewith a subset of processing and storage resources of the service processing switch. Subscribers are provided with respective sets of customized application layer services. Subscriber resource isolation is provided by partitioning the virtual routers between the subscribers including allocating and configuring partitions, having subsets of the virtual routers, to the subscribers. Changeable provisioning of processing capacity between the subscribers is provided by dynamically reallocating resources of the service processing switch between the partitions based on comparative processing demands of the customized application layer services.
Images(16)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(13)
1-18. (canceled)
19. A method comprising:
establishing a plurality of virtual routers within a service processing switch, the service processing switch operable to be logically interposed between a public communications network and a plurality of subscriber sites and provide services to a plurality of subscribers of a service provider, each of the plurality of virtual routers having associated therewith a subset of processing and storage resources of the service processing switch;
providing a first subscriber and a second subscriber of the plurality of subscribers with a first set of customized application layer services and a second set of customized application layer services, respectively, and providing subscriber resource isolation by partitioning the plurality of virtual routers between the first subscriber and the second subscriber including (i) allocating and configuring a first partition, comprising a first subset of the plurality of virtual routers, to the first subscriber and (ii) allocating and configuring a second partition, comprising a second subset of the plurality of virtual routers, to the second subscriber; and
providing changeable provisioning of processing capacity between the first subscriber and the second subscriber by dynamically reallocating resources of the service processing switch between the first partition and the second partition based on comparative processing demands of the first set of customized application layer services and the second set of customized application layer services.
20. The method of claim 19, wherein the first set of customized application layer services comprises one or more of firewall protection, web site hosting, internet services, e-mail services and virtual private network services.
21. The method of claim 19, wherein in said providing changeable provisioning of processing capacity between the first subscriber and the second subscriber is controlled by a services management system of the service provider.
22. An Internet Protocol (IP) service delivery platform comprising:
a first service processing switch operable within a first point-of presence (POP) to provide customized application layer services to a plurality of subscribers of a service provider, the first POP being associated with a first site of a first subscriber of the plurality of subscribers and a first site of a second subscriber of the plurality of subscribers, the first service processing switch including a first set of processing resources and having established therein a first set of virtual routers among which the first set of processing resources are initially allocated;
a second service processing switch communicatively coupled with the first service processing switch via a network and operable within a second POP to provide customized application layer services to the plurality of subscribers, the second POP being associated with a second site of the first subscriber and a second site of the second subscriber, the second service processing switch including a second set of processing resources and having established therein a second set of virtual routers among which the second set of processing resources are initially allocated;
wherein isolation between processing resources associated with a first set of customized application layer services being provided to the first subscriber and those associated with a second set of customized application layer services being provided to the second subscriber is accomplished by partitioning of the first set of virtual routers and the second set of virtual routers between the first subscriber and the second subscriber including (i) allocating and configuring a first partition, comprising a first subset of the first set of virtual routers and a first subset of the second set of virtual routers, to the first subscriber and (ii) allocating and configuring a second partition, comprising a second subset of the first set of virtual routers and a second subset of the second set of virtual routers, to the second subscriber; and
wherein the first and second service processing switches are operable to provide changeable provisioning of processing capacity between the first subscriber and the second subscriber by dynamically reallocating the first set of processing resources or the second set of processing resources between the first partition and the second partition based on comparative processing demands of the first subscriber and the second subscriber.
23. The IP service delivery platform of claim 22, wherein the first subscriber is provided with a first virtual private network (VPN) communicatively coupling the first site of the first subscriber with the second site of the first subscriber by establishing a first secure communication channel through the network and interconnecting virtual routers of the first partition.
24. The IP service delivery platform of claim 23, wherein the second subscriber is provided with a second VPN communicatively coupling the first site of the second subscriber with the second site of the second subscriber by establishing a second secure communication channel through the network and interconnecting virtual routers of the second partition.
25. The IP service delivery platform of claim 24, wherein the first secure communication channel and the second secure communication channel are established by sharing a single secure tunnel between the first service processing switch and the second service processing switch.
26. The IP service delivery platform of claim 22, further comprising a services management system communicatively coupled with the first service processing switch and the second service processing switch and wherein said changeable provisioning of processing capacity is responsive to directives issued by the services management system.
27. A service processing switch operable within a service provider network logically interposed between a public communications network and a plurality of subscriber sites to provide services to a plurality of subscribers of a service provider, the service processing switch comprising:
a plurality of service blades each having a plurality of processing resources and a plurality of storage resources;
a plurality of virtual routers each having associated therewith a subset of the plurality of processing resources and a subset of the plurality of storage resources;
wherein isolation between those of the plurality of processing resources and those of the plurality of storage resources associated with a first set of customized application layer services being provided to a first subscriber of the plurality of subscribers and those associated with a second set of customized application layer services being provided to a second subscriber of the plurality of subscribers is accomplished by partitioning of the plurality of virtual routers into a first partition and a second partition including (i) allocating and configuring the first partition, comprising a first subset of the plurality of virtual routers, to the first subscriber and (ii) allocating and configuring the second partition, comprising a second subset of the plurality of virtual routers, to the second subscriber; and
wherein the service processing switch is operable to provide changeable provisioning of resource capacity between the first subscriber and the second subscriber by dynamically reallocating the plurality of processing resources or the plurality of storage resources between the first partition and the second partition based on comparative needs of the first subscriber and the second subscriber.
28. A method comprising:
a step for establishing a plurality of virtual routers within a service processing switch, the service processing switch operable to be logically interposed between a public communications network and a plurality of subscriber sites and provide services to a plurality of subscribers of a service provider, each of the plurality of virtual routers having associated therewith a subset of processing and storage resources of the service processing switch;
a step for providing a first subscriber and a second subscriber of the plurality of subscribers with a first set of customized application layer services and a second set of customized application layer services, respectively, and providing subscriber resource isolation by partitioning the plurality of virtual routers between the first subscriber and the second subscriber; and
a step for dynamically reallocating resources of the service processing switch to address relative processing demands of the first set of customized application layer services and the second set of customized application layer services.
29. An Internet Protocol (IP) service delivery platform comprising:
a first service processing switch means operable within a first point-of presence (POP) for providing customized application layer services to a plurality of subscribers of a service provider, the first POP being associated with a first site of a first subscriber of the plurality of subscribers and a first site of a second subscriber of the plurality of subscribers, the first service processing switch means including a first set of processing resources and having established therein a first set of virtual routers among which the first set of processing resources are initially allocated;
a second service processing switch means, communicatively coupled with the first service processing switch via a network and operable within a second POP, for providing customized application layer services to the plurality of subscribers, the second POP being associated with a second site of the first subscriber and a second site of the second subscriber, the second service processing switch including a second set of processing resources and having established therein a second set of virtual routers among which the second set of processing resources are initially allocated;
wherein isolation between processing resources associated with a first set of customized application layer services being provided to the first subscriber and those associated with a second set of customized application layer services being provided to the second subscriber is accomplished by partitioning of the first set of virtual routers and the second set of virtual routers between the first subscriber and the second subscriber including (i) allocating and configuring a first partition, comprising a first subset of the first set of virtual routers and a first subset of the second set of virtual routers, to the first subscriber and (ii) allocating and configuring a second partition, comprising a second subset of the first set of virtual routers and a second subset of the second set of virtual routers, to the second subscriber; and
wherein the first service processing switch means and the second service processing switch means are further operable to provide changeable provisioning of processing capacity between the first subscriber and the second subscriber by dynamically reallocating the first set of processing resources or the second set of processing resources between the first partition and the second partition based on comparative processing demands of the first subscriber and the second subscriber.
30. A program storage device readable by a service processing switch, tangibly embodying a program of instructions executable by the service processing switch to perform method steps for providing customized application layer services to a plurality of subscribers of a service provider, said method steps comprising:
establishing a plurality of virtual routers within the service processing switch, the service processing switch operable to be logically interposed between a public communications network and a plurality of subscriber sites and provide services to the plurality of subscribers, each of the plurality of virtual routers having associated therewith a subset of processing and storage resources of the service processing switch;
providing a first subscriber and a second subscriber of the plurality of subscribers with a first set of customized application layer services and a second set of customized application layer services, respectively, and providing subscriber resource isolation by partitioning the plurality of virtual routers between the first subscriber and the second subscriber including (i) allocating and configuring a first partition, comprising a first subset of the plurality of virtual routers, to the first subscriber and (ii) allocating and configuring a second partition, comprising a second subset of the plurality of virtual routers, to the second subscriber; and
providing changeable provisioning of processing capacity between the first subscriber and the second subscriber by dynamically reallocating resources of the service processing switch between the first partition and the second partition based on comparative processing demands of the first set of customized application layer services and the second set of customized application layer services.
Description
    CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED INVENTIONS
  • [0001]
    This application is related to a co-pending commonly assigned application titled “PACKET ROUTING SYSTEM AND METHOD” by inventor Abraham R. Matthews and Steven P. Weir, attorney docket 1384.002US1, and to two provisional applications each titled “SYSTEMS AND METHOD FOR DELIVERING INTERNETWORKING SERVICES” attorney dockets 1384.012PRV AND 1384.013PRV each filed on even date herewith, all incorporated herein by reference.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • [0002]
    This invention relates to the field of internet processors, and more specifically to a method and apparatus of delivering security services such as firewalls.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0003]
    The service provider game has grown extremely crowded and fiercely competitive, with numerous players offering similar products and services. While having a large number of comparable services is arguably beneficial to the enterprise, it poses a host of potentially disastrous consequences for a service provider. If all competitors in a given market are offering services that are indistinguishable by the customer base, the burden of differentiation falls squarely on cost, with the least-cost competitor emerging “victorious”. Jockeying for the cost-leader position rapidly drives down service pricing, reducing margins to rubble and rendering the service a commodity. Furthermore, numerous offerings that are similar in attributes and cost make it very difficult to lock in customers.
  • [0004]
    Operational costs also present a significant challenge to service providers. Cumbersome, manual provisioning processes are the primary culprits. Customer orders must be manually entered and processed through numerous antiquated back-end systems that have been pieced together. Once the order has been processed, a truck roll is required for onsite installation and configuration of Customer Premises Equipment (CPE), as well as subsequent troubleshooting tasks. This is a slow and expensive process that cuts into margins and forces significant up-front charges to be imposed on the customer. In order to be successful in today's market, service providers must leverage the public network to offer high-value, differentiated services that maximize margins while controlling capital and operational costs. These services must be rapidly provisioned and centrally managed so that time-to-market and, more importantly, time-to-revenue are minimized. Traditional methods of data network service creation, deployment, and management present significant challenges to accomplishing these goals, calling for a new network service model to be implemented.
  • [0005]
    Basic Internet access, a staple of service provider offerings, has been commoditized to the point that margins are nearly non-existent. This fact has driven service providers to look for new value-added features and services to layer over basic connectivity so that they are able to differentiate on factors other than cost. The most significant opportunity for differentiation is found in managed network services. Managed network services enable enterprise IT organizations to outsource time-consuming tactical functions so that they can focus strategic core business initiatives.
  • [0006]
    Enterprise customers are now demanding cost-effective, outsourced connectivity and security services, such as Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) and managed firewall services. Enterprise networks are no longer segregated from the outside world; IT managers are facing mounting pressure to connect disparate business units, satellite sites, business partners, and suppliers to their corporate network, and then to the Internet. This raises a multitude of security concerns that are often beyond the core competencies of enterprise IT departments. To compound the problem, skilled IT talent is an extremely scarce resource. Service providers, with expert staff and world-class technology and facilities, are well positioned to deliver these services to enterprise customers.
  • [0007]
    While IT managers clearly see the value in utilizing managed network services, there are still barriers to adoption. Perhaps the most significant of these is the fear of losing control of the network to the service provider. In order to ease this fear, a successful managed network service offering must provide comprehensive visibility to the customer, enabling them to view configurations and performance statistics, as well as to request updates and changes. Providing IT managers with powerful Customer Network Management (CNM) tools bolsters confidence in the managed network service provider and can actually streamline the service provisioning and maintenance cycle.
  • Customer Premises Equipment (CPE)-based Managed Firewall Services
  • [0008]
    Data network service providers have traditionally rolled out managed network service offerings by deploying specialized CPE devices at the customer site. This CPE is either a purpose-built network appliance that, in addition to providing specific service features, may also serve some routing function, or a mid to high-end enterprise-class server platform, typically UNIX-based. In the case of a managed firewall solution, the CPE device provides services that may include VPN tunnel termination, encryption, packet filtering, access control listings, and log files. The CPE at each customer site is aggregated at a multiplexer via leased lines and/or public Frame Relay PVCs (permanent virtual circuits) at the service provider POP (point of presence), then into a high-end access router and across the WAN (wide area network).
  • [0009]
    In many cases, service providers and enterprise customers find it too expensive and cumbersome to deploy CPE-based security at every site, but rather deploy secure Internet access points at one or two of the largest corporate sites. In this model, all remote site Internet traffic is backhauled across the WAN to the secure access point and then out onto the Internet, resulting in increased traffic on the corporate network and performance sacrifices.
  • [0010]
    Service providers face significant challenges when deploying, managing and maintaining CPE-based managed firewall services. When a customer expresses interest in utilizing such a service, a consultation with experienced security professionals is required to understand the corporate network infrastructure and site-specific security requirements, yielding a complex set of security policies. This may be accomplished through a set of conference calls or a number of on-site visits. Once the security requirements and policies have been identified, the service provider must procure the CPE device. In some cases, the equipment vendor may provide some level of pre-configuration based upon parameters supplied by the service provider. While CPE vendors are driving towards delivering fully templatized, pre-configured systems that are plug-and-play by enterprise staff, most service providers still assume the responsibility for on-site, hands-on configuration, and a truck-roll to each of the customer sites is necessary. This is particularly true in server-based CPE systems, where a relatively high degree of technical sophistication and expertise is required to install and configure a UNIX-based system.
  • [0011]
    Typically, a mid-level hardware and security specialist is sent onsite, along with an account manager, to complete the CPE installation and configuration. This specialist may be a service provider employee or a systems integrator/Value-Added Reseller (VAR) who has been contracted by the service provider to complete CPE rollout. This complex process begins with physical integration of the CPE device into the customer network. In the case of a CPE appliance, where the OS and firewall/VPN software components have been pre-loaded, the tech can immediately proceed to the system configuration phase. Server-based CPE services, however, require the additional time-consuming step of loading the system OS and software feature sets, adding a further degree of complexity.
  • [0012]
    In the configuration phase, the tech attempts to establish contact between the CPE device and central management system at the service provider NOC (network operations center). In cases where the device has not been previously assigned an IP address, an out-of-band signaling mechanism is required to complete the connection, typically a modem and a POTS line. If the integration process has been successful, NOC staff should be able to take over the process, pushing specific policy configurations (and possibly an IP address) down to the CPE device through a browser-driven management interface. This entire process must be repeated for every enterprise site utilizing the managed firewall service.
  • [0013]
    Additionally, maintenance processes and costs for CPE-based managed firewall services can also be overwhelming to both the service provider and enterprise customers. Enterprises are forced to either keep cold spares onsite or be faced with periods of absent security when their firewall fails, a situation that is unacceptable to most of today's information intensive corporations. Service providers must have an inventory of spares readily available, as well as staff resources that can, if necessary, go onsite to repeat the system configuration process. Troubleshooting thousands of CPE devices that have been deployed at customer sites is an extremely formidable challenge, requiring extensive call center support resources, as well technicians that can be quickly deployed onsite.
  • [0014]
    As CPE-based firewall services have traditionally been deployed in private enterprise networks, the original management systems for these devices have difficulty scaling up to manage several large, multi-site service provider customers. CPE device vendors are scrambling to ramp up these systems to carrier-grade and scale. Firewall management systems are typically GUT-based (graphical user interface-based), browser-driven interfaces that run on industrial grade UNIX platforms in the service provider NOC. The management system interfaces with the CPE devices based on IP address. The CPE-based managed firewall model faces service providers with another issue: capital costs. In addition to the significant costs required to build out a POP/access infrastructure, including multiplexers and high-capacity access routers, the service provider must also assume the initial costs of the CPE device, including firewall and VPN software licensing charges. In many cases, these costs are passed on to the customer. This creates steep up-front costs that, coupled with per-site installation charges, can present a serious barrier to service adoption. In markets where several service providers are offering managed firewall services, a service provider may absorb the CPE cost to obtain a price leadership position, cutting deeply into margins.
  • [0015]
    The CPE-based model is also limited when rolling out services beyond the managed firewall offering. New services, such as intrusion detection, may require additional hardware and/or software. This results in higher capital costs, as well as another expensive truck roll.
  • [0016]
    Thus, there is a need for a method and apparatus of delivering a variety of network services, for example security services such as firewalls.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0017]
    The present invention provides a flexible, scalable hardware and software platform that allows a service provider to easily provide internet services, virtual private network services, firewall services, etc., to a plurality of customers. This solution can be changes to provision each customer with more or less processing power and storage, according to individual changing needs.
  • [0018]
    One aspect of the present invention provides a method of delivering security services. This method includes connecting a plurality of processors in a ring configuration within a first processing system, establishing a secure connection between the processors in the ring configuration across an internet protocol (IP) connection to a second processing system to form a tunnel, and providing both router services and host services for a customer using the plurality of processors in the ring configuration and using the second processing system.
  • [0019]
    Another aspect of the present invention provides a system of delivering security services. This system includes a plurality of processors in a ring configuration within a first processing system, and means for establishing a secure connection 418 between the processors in the ring configuration across an internet protocol (IP) connection to a second processing system to form a tunnel, and for providing both router services and host services for a customer using the plurality of processors in the ring configuration and using the second processing system.
  • [0020]
    Yet another aspect of the present invention provides a system 201 for delivering security services. This second system includes a plurality of processors within a first processing system connected in a ring configuration, and a tunnel formed using a secure connection between the processors in the ring configuration across an internet protocol (IP) connection to a second processing system, wherein both router services and host services are provided for a customer using the plurality of processors in the ring configuration and using the second processing system.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0021]
    FIG. 1 is a block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention, system 100 having a plurality of ISP boxes 10 connected to the internet 99
  • [0022]
    FIG. 2 is a block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention, service provider network 200.
  • [0023]
    FIG. 3 is a block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention, an IP service delivery platform 300.
  • [0024]
    FIG. 4 is a block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention, a system 400 providing a plurality of virtual private networks 410, 420, 430, 440.
  • [0025]
    FIG. 5 is a block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention, a ring-network hardware platform 230.
  • [0026]
    FIG. 6 is a block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention, service processing switch 600.
  • [0027]
    FIG. 7 is a block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention, service system 700 including conventional existing network elements.
  • [0028]
    FIG. 8 is a block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention, hardware elements 230 and software elements 220.
  • [0029]
    FIG. 9 is a block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention, multiprocessor system 900 using ring network 932.
  • [0030]
    FIG. 10 shows a block diagram of a system 1000 for comparison.
  • [0031]
    FIG. 11 shows a block diagram of a system 100 for comparison.
  • [0032]
    FIG. 12 shows a block diagram of a system 1200 for comparison.
  • [0033]
    FIG. 13 shows a block diagram of a system 1300 for comparison.
  • [0034]
    FIG. 14 shows a graph of CheckPoint operational “soft” costs 1400.
  • [0035]
    FIG. 15 shows a graph of five year total capital cost 1500.
  • DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • [0036]
    In the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and in which are shown by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. It is understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention.
  • [0037]
    The leading digit(s) of reference numbers appearing in the Figures generally corresponds to the Figure number in which that component is first introduced, such that the same reference number is used throughout to refer to an identical component which appears in multiple Figures. Signals and connections may be referred to by the same reference number or label, and the actual meaning will be clear from its use in the context of the description.
  • [0038]
    In some embodiments, the present invention deploys one or more virtual private networks (VPNs) running on one or more carrier-class platforms that scale to provide cost-effective solutions for internet service providers (ISPs). In particular, security services such as firewalls can be provided by the ISPs for services they provide to their customers, wherein a plurality of customers are hosted on a single network of processors. An ISP is providing hosting services (e.g., hosting an internet web site for a customer) and routing (moving data to and from the internet) for their customers.
  • [0039]
    FIG. 1 shows one embodiment of the present invention having a system 100 that includes a plurality of similar ISP (internet service provider) boxes 110 connected to the internet 99. In this embodiment, each box 110 represents a subsystem having routing services provided by a block called access router 111, and hosting services provided by blocks 113 and 114. The ISP is typically a company that provides internet services (such as connectivity to the internet, as well as servers that store data and provide data according to requests by users, and network connectivity to users) to a plurality of customers including customer A and customer B. In some embodiments, customer premises equipment 117 and 118 (also called CPE 117 and 118, this is hardware and the software that controls the hardware, that is installed at the customer's premises; this can include servers, routers and switches, and the network connecting to individual user's workstations, and various interfaces to external communications networks) is used to provide at least a portion of the function to support customers A and B respectively, and the ISP 110 provides the rest in blocks 113 and 114 respectively. The function to support customers includes such things as web site hosting, database and other servers, e-mail services, etc. The customer's CPE 117 and 118 connect to the ISP through, e.g., access router 111 and security services 112 to customer A site one 113 and customer B site one 114, and also to the internet 99 in a manner that isolates customer A and customer B from one another except for communications and E-mail that would normally pass across the internet 99.
  • [0040]
    Further, by establishing secure connections between two ISP boxes 110 across the internet 99, a virtual private network or VPN 410 (see FIG. 4 below) can be created. This function allows, for example, customer A's office at a first site (e.g., headquarters 117) to connect seamlessly to customer A's office at a second site (e.g., branch office 119) using what appears to them as a private network, but which actually includes some CPE at site 117, some services 113 provided within ISP 110.1, a secure encrypted connection across internet 99, some services also in ISP 110.2, and some CPE at site 119. Users at sites 117 and 119 can communicate with one another and share data and servers as if they were on a single private network provided by, e.g., VPN 410.
  • [0041]
    FIG. 2 is a block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention, service provider (SP) network 200. A conventional network “cloud” 98 includes the SP's internet protocol (IP) or asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) core, as is well known in the internet art. IP system 201 connects to such existing infrastructure 98, as well as to other optional conventional hardware such as described in FIG. 2 below, to provide SP network 200. IP System 201 provides hardware 230 and software 220 to provide a plurality of virtual routers (VRs) 210. Each VR 210 provides support for router services and server services such as those that provide customer site services 113 of FIG. 1. Each VR 210 is supported by an object group 211, which is a group of generally dissimilar objects such as routing object 212, packet filtering object 213, firewall object 212, network address translation (NAT) object 215, and/or other objects. In some embodiments, each VR 210 is a separate instantiation.
  • [0042]
    In some embodiments, software 220 includes IP network operating system (IPNOS) 223, service management system (SMS) 221 (e.g., in some embodiments, this is the Invision™ software from CoSine Communications Inc., assignee of the present invention), and customer network management system (CNMS) 222 (e.g., in some embodiments, this is the Ingage™ software from CoSine Communications Inc., assignee of the present invention). SMS 221 provides such services as configuration of blades 239, defining subscribers, determining services, and generation of IP security (IPSec) public/private key pairs. CNMS 222 provides such services as providing subscribers (customers) visibility to services. In some embodiments, CNMS software runs at least in part in a user's CPE or workstation, typically at a company's information services (IS) headquarters.
  • [0043]
    In some embodiments, IP server switch (IPSX) hardware 230 includes one or more scalable hardware enclosures, each having a plurality of service “blades” 239 (i.e., an insertable and removable printed circuit card having one or more processors, each having its own CPU and memory) each connected in a ring configuration (such as a counter-rotating dual ring 232). In some embodiments, three types of blades 239 are provided: control blade(s) 234, processor blade(s) 236, and access blade(s) 238, IPSX hardware also includes highly available, redundant, and hot-swappable hardware support 240 including power supplies 241 and fans 242.
  • [0044]
    FIG. 3 is a block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention, an IF service delivery platform (IPSDP) 300. The hardware and software of SP network 200 can be viewed as generating various network “clouds” such as edge cloud 95, access concentration cloud 96, and service processing cloud 97. These are built upon the existing conventional SP's IP or ATM core cloud 98 and they connect to the external internet cloud 99. IPSDP 300 includes an ISP's SP network 200 connected to one or more customer's offices 301 each of which includes some amount of CPE 110. In the embodiment shown, three corporate remote offices 301.1 are connected to SP network 200 using various conventional communications devices, well known to the art, such as frame relay switch 326, M13 multiplexor (mux) 327, DSLAM (digital subscriber link access multiplexor) 328, and dial-up RAS (remote access server) 329 (used to receive dial-up connections, for example, from the modem 311 connected to laptop computer 316 in portable system 310 of dial-up telecommuter 301.3). In the embodiment shown, SP network 200 includes two systems 201, on connecting through frame relay switch 326, M13 multiplexor (mux) 327, DSLAM 328, and dial-up RAS 329 to remote office's CPE 110, and the other connecting directly to the customer's corporate headquarter's CPE 1110 (which also includes a control and monitoring function provided by CNMS 222) using conventional communications protocols such as frame relay (FR, an access standard defined by the ITU-T in the 1.122 recommendation “Framework for Providing Additional Packet Mode Bearer Services”), internet protocol (IP), FT1 (fractional T1), T1/E1 (a digital transmission link with capacity of 1.544 Megabits per second), FT3 (fractional T3), T3 (capacity of 28 T1 lines), and/or OC3 (optical carrier level 3=three times the OC1 rate of 51.840 Mbps)(each of which is a conventional communications service well known to the art).
  • [0045]
    In some embodiments, IPDSP 300 provides a VPN 410, using secure connections across the internet 99, to connect remote offices 301 to one another.
  • [0046]
    FIG. 4 is a block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention, a system 400 providing a plurality of virtual private networks 410, 420, 430, 440. VPNs 420, 430, and 440 are each equivalent to the VPN 410 that supports subscriber 1, except that they are for other subscribers. Each subscriber has a set of partitioned virtual routers 210. For example, subscriber 1 has two locations, 411 and 412, connected in a VPN 410. VR 210 at location 411 can include some CPE 110 as well as support provided in system 201-1. VR 210 at location 412 can include some CPE 110 as well as support provided in system 201-2. These two VRs 210 establish a “tunnel,” a secure connection, that allows them to maintain secure communications that support the VPN 410 even across packet networks such as the internet 99. Each VR 210 is the equivalent of an independent hardware router. Since each VR 410 is supported by an object group 211, objects can be easily added or omitted to enable customized services on a subscriber-by-subscriber basis to meet each subscribers individual needs. SMS 221 running on SP network 200 allows ease of service provisioning (dynamically adding additional processors/processing power when needed, reducing the processors/processing power used for VPN 410 when not needed). In some embodiments, IPNOS 223 uses an open Application Program Interface (API) to enable new services to be added to the platform whenever needed.
  • [0047]
    In some embodiments, system 401 at a first site (e.g., an ISP premises locally connected to a customer office) includes IPSX 201-1 having a VR 210 connected to CPE 117. This system 401 appears to the outside world as a single router having firewall services, server(s) and user(s), etc. These functions can be provided by either or both VR 210 and CPE 117, thus allowing a customer to outsource many or most of these services to the service provider and IPSX 201-1. Similarly, system 402 at a second site (e.g., another ISP premises locally connected to a remote office of the same customer) includes IPSX 201-2 having a VR 210 connected to CPE 119. This system 402 also appears to the outside world as a single router having firewall services, server(s) and user(s), etc. These functions can be provided by either or both VR 210 and CPE 119, thus allowing a customer to outsource many or most of these services to the service provider and IPSX 201-2.
  • [0048]
    FIG. 5 is a block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention, a ring-network hardware platform 230. Hardware platform 230 includes plurality of service “blades” 239 (i.e., an insertable and removable printed circuit card having one or more processors, each having its own CPU and memory) each connected in a ring configuration (such as a counter-rotating dual ring 232). In some embodiments, three types of blades 239 are provided: control blade 234 (not shown here), processor blades 236 (providing such functions as point-to-point (PPTP) connectivity, firewall protection against hacking, intruders, or accidental access), and access blades 238 (providing such functions as NAT, encryption, and routing).
  • [0049]
    FIG. 6 is a block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention, service processing switch 600. In some embodiments, service processing switch 600 includes a hardware enclosure 230 having power supplies 241 that are hot-swappable, redundant, capable of automatic failover (when one fails, others take over), and which can be AC or DC sourced. In some embodiments, dual hot-swappable, variable speed fans 242 are provided. In some embodiments, software updates can be made without system downtime by swapping out all object groups 211 (virtual routers), changing the software modules, and then resuming processing. In some embodiments, all service blades 239 are hot-swappable (they can be removed and/or inserted without bringing the system down) and include automatic failover from primary mode to protect mode. In some embodiments, dual counter-rotating rings 232 support primary and protect redundancy. In some embodiments, system 600 provides NEBS Level 3 compliance and is Y2K ready, provides SONET (synchronous optical network) 1+1 Line Protection Switching, and includes integrated metallic cross-connects to enable DS3 (digital signal level 3; 44,736,000 bits per second) blade automatic failover without touching the facility.
  • [0050]
    FIG. 7 is a block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention, an integrated system 700 including conventional existing network elements. Integrated system 700 optionally includes conventional frame relay switch 326, M13 mux 327, DSLAM (DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER LINK ACCESS MULTIPLEXOR) 328, and RAS (REMOTE ACCESS SERVER) 329 connecting to customer's equipment such as CPE router 110 and dial-up system 310. In some embodiments, integrated system 700 optionally includes a core IP router 720 and/or a core ATM switch as part of an SP core 98. This provides support for a large number of conventional technology standards, and interoperability with existing access-concentration and core-network elements. It also offers interworking between frame-relay networks and IP networks. Network address translation (NAT) enables enterprise subscribers to leave their network addressing untouched. It also enables one to merge IP and legacy networks into one, with continuity of service (COS) guarantees.
  • [0051]
    FIG. 8 is a block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention, hardware elements 230 and software elements 220. Hardware elements 230 include a 26-slot, two-sided chassis 831 having a 22-gigabit per second (Gbps) ring midplane 832. Service blades 239 can be hot plugged into midplane 832 form either side of chassis 831. Three types of service blades 239 are provided: control blades 234, processor blades 236, and access blades 238. In some embodiments, four processors are provided on each service blade 239, each processor having a CPU and its own memory, allowing specialized processing to be performed on various different daughter cards of the blades 239.
  • [0052]
    In some embodiments, a single system chassis 831 provides a redundant back plane and blade-termination facilities 832. The access blades 238, processor blades 236, control blades 234, power supplies 241 and fan trays 242 are designed for hot-swappable operation any of these components may be removed from service while the entire system remains operational. The metallic cross connect is a passive system that provides fail-over support to allow DS3 and DS1 access facilities to be switched from one access blade to another access blade should an access port or card fail. The phase 1 chassis provides 26 universal slots, each of which may be populated with control blades, access blades, and processor blades. To operate, the chassis must contain at least one control blade. Up to two control blades may be operational in a chassis at the same time. Access blades are added as input/output requirements grow, and processor blades are added as computation requirements scale.
  • [0053]
    In some embodiments, each system 230 supports up to twenty-five processing blades (PB) 236. Each processor blade 236 is designed to support three hundred Mbps of full duplex traffic while delivering IP services including application firewall, LT2P, PPTP, NAT, VPN router.
  • [0054]
    In some embodiments, each system 230 supports up to two control blades (CB) 234. CBs 234 provide overall system supervision, IP route calculation, software update management, and network management statistics logging services. When two CBs 234 are operational within a chassis 831, they remain synchronized such that should either CB 234 fail, the other CB 234 automatically takes over system operation. In this process all active services remain in progress. Each control blade 234 is hot swappable, so that when proper procedures are followed, a failed or malfunctioning CB 234 may be removed from on operational system 230 without bringing down any customer services.
  • [0055]
    In some embodiments, each CB 234 provides four ethernet interfaces for management traffic. Each ethernet interface has a distinct collision domain and may each be configured with a primary and secondary IP address. Ethernet interfaces designated for management use may be configured for primary and protected configurations, both sharing the same IP address, reducing ISP IP address requirements. The CB 234 ethernet interfaces may be configured for fully meshed communications over diverse paths to diverse operating systems. Each CB 234 is also equipped with a random # seed generator for use in security applications.
  • [0056]
    In some embodiments, each system 230 supports up to twenty-five access blades (AB) 238. Access blades 238 provide physical line termination, hardware-assisted IP forwarding, hardware assisted encryption services, and hardware assisted queue management. Each access blade 238 is hot swappable, so that when proper procedures are followed, a failed or malfunctioning ab may be removed from on operational system 230 without bringing down any customer services. In some embodiments, 10/100 ethernet-, DS3-, and OC3-type access blades are supported by system 230.
  • [0057]
    FIG. 9 is a block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention, multiprocessor system 900 using ring network 932. In some embodiments, each of two network rings 933 and 934 connect nodes 931 together, where each blade 239 includes one or more nodes 931, and each node 931 is connected to one or more processors 930. In some embodiments, each processor is a high-performance processor such as an R12K processor from MIPS Corporation. In one embodiment, each blade 239 includes four nodes 931, each having one processor 930. Each processor 930 include its own CPU (central processing unit) 935 and memory 936, and optionally includes other hardware such as routers, encryption hardware, etc. Software tasks, in some embodiments, are split up such that one processor operates on one part of the data (e.g., the Level 7 processing) and another processor operates on another part of the data (e.g., the Level 3 processing). In other embodiments, the various processing portions of a task all run on a single processor, multiprocessing with other tasks that share that processor. Thus, the hardware provides scalability, where low-end systems include few processors that do all the work, and high-end systems include one hundred or more processors and the work is distributed among the processors for greater speed and throughput. In some embodiments, the plurality of processors 930 in the ring configuration includes forming dual counter rotating ring connections 933 and 934, each connecting to each of the plurality of processors 930.
  • [0058]
    In some embodiments, a separate control ring 935 is provided, connected to all processors 930. Data passed on the control ring 935 allows control communications to be passed between processors, and in particular, allows the control blade to configure and control the other blades in IPSX 201. In other embodiments, control ring 935 is omitted, and its function is overlaid on rings 933 and 934.
  • [0059]
    Logical Queue Identifiers
  • [0060]
    In some embodiments, rings 933 and 934 are packet-passing rings. Each packet 950 placed in the rings includes a data portion 953 and a processor element identifier (PEID 951) that identifies for each node 931 which processor that packet is destined for, for example a 16-hit PEID that specifies one of 65526 PEs. If the PEID matches a processor on its particular node, the node 931 passes the packet to the proper processor 930; if not, the packet is forwarded to the next node 931. In some embodiments, each packet also includes a logical queue identifier (LQID) that identifies a software entity (for example, an object group for a particular VR 210) residing on that processor 930 for which the packet is destined.
  • [0061]
    In some embodiments, every node 931 has a unique, globally unique (i.e., unique within an IPSX 201, or within an ISP having a plurality of IPSXs 201) PEW) 951. In some embodiments, the way this is done is that one takes the blade ID (e.g., five bits) and you append the PE number, which is, for example, a eleven bits. Put that together in some fashion and you'll get a unique ID that is globally unique within some hardware configuration. Note that packets including this PEID 951 are routable. Just by looking at the PEID 951, the system 201 has a topological structure so that it can route based on purely the PEID 951. The next thing to keep in mind is that system 201 is managing multiple virtual context. Each VR 210 in a system 201 is a virtual router to which packet are to be directed. When packets come into node N 931 for example, system 201 needs to be able to steer it to the appropriate logical entity, i.e., to the appropriate context and to the object channel that it represents. Thus, a logical queue ID 952 is appended that is unique within the destination processor (PE) 930. If an object in a processor 930 on node 1 930 wants to set up a channel to another object a processor 930 on node N 930, they need to use the LQID 952. A first LQID 952 and PEID 951 together represent the local end, and a second LQID 952 and PEID 951 together represent the remote end of the object and so the system can map the corresponding object channel, defining the object channel that is going across the network. From a networking perspective, PEID 951 looks like your IP address that routes packets like an IP address. But once you go to a particular node 931, the LQID looks like the UDP (User Datagram Protocol, a TCP/IP protocol describing how messages reach programs within a destination computer) code number. So system 201 (e.g., SMS 221) essentially signals and negotiates the proper LQID to have a channel going between those ends. This allows all the traffic coming into a PE 930 to be steered along the appropriate object path to the appropriate object channel on that object.
  • [0062]
    In some embodiments, an object could be talking on another channel to another object, or to the same object, using a different channel. In which case each channel uses a different LQID 952, but the same PEID 951.
  • [0063]
    In some embodiments, system 201 sets up a shortcut that circumvents traffic that otherwise would be transmitted outside system 201 and then back in (e.g., traffic between two different VRs 210 supporting different customers). To set up such a shortcut, system 201 allocates a different LQID 952 for the shortcut. Thus, an object channel has the normal point-to-point path for normal traffic and has a multi-point-to-point path which is used for shortcut traffic. So when packets come in to the object it knows whether the packet came in on the normal path or on the shortcut path. Similarly, when the object wants to use a shortcut, it also needs to allocate a different LQID for its outbound shortcut traffic. One interesting distinction of shortcut paths is that the normal point-to-point is bidirectional and data can flow in both directions, but shortcuts data flow flows in only one direction. So a receive site can have any number of transferred sites. Any number of objects can be transmitting to the same receive site. That is why it is called multi-point-to-point.
  • [0064]
    Further, some embodiments have different levels of shortcuts. For example, a packet can be sequentially passed to successive destinations in some embodiments. Thus there can be a complex multistage path. The shortcuts can trickle down to the ultimate end, where the packet cascades. Further, if one object knows a shortcut, it can tell other objects about its shortcut. So the other object does not have to come to the first object and then be directed to the shortcut destination, but rather can directly use the shortcut it has learned about.
  • [0065]
    While service providers recognize the tremendous revenue potential of managed firewall services, the cost of deploying, managing and maintaining such services via traditional CPE-based methods is somewhat daunting. Service providers are now seeking new service delivery mechanisms that minimize capital and operational costs while enabling high-margin, value-added public network services that are easily provisioned, managed, and repeated. Rolling out a network-based managed firewall service is a promising means by which to accomplish this. Deploying an IP Service Delivery Platform in the service provider network brings the intelligence of a managed firewall service out of the customer premises and into the service provider's realm of control.
  • [0066]
    An IP Service Delivery Platform consists of three distinct components. The first is an intelligent, highly scalable IP Service Processing Switch. Next is a comprehensive Service Management System (SMS) to enable rapid service provisioning and centralized system management. The last component is a powerful Customer Network Management (CNM) system which provides enterprise customers with detailed network and service performance systems, enable self-provisioning, and eases IT managers fears of losing control of managed network services.
  • [0067]
    In a network-based managed firewall service model, the service provider replaces the high-capacity access concentration router at the POP with an IP Service Processing Switch. This is higher-capacity, more robust, and more intelligent access switch, with scalable processing up to 100+RISC CPUs. Just as with the access router, additional customer access capacity is added via installing additional port access blades to the IP Service Processing Switch chassis. Unlike conventional access routers, however, additional processor blades are added to ensure wire-speed performance and service processing.
  • [0068]
    The intelligence resident in the IP Service Processing Switch eliminates the need to deploy CPE devices at each protected customer site. Deployment, configuration, and management of the managed firewall service all take place between the IP Service Processing Switch 230 and its Service Management System 221, which resides on a high-end UNIX platform at the service provider NOC. The customer also has the ability to initiate service provisioning and augmentation via a web-based Customer Network Management tool that typically resides at the customer's headquarters site. This is an entirely different service delivery paradigm, requiring minimal or no truck rolls or on-site intervention.
  • [0069]
    To roll out a managed network-based firewall service, the service provider's security staff provides a consultation to the enterprise, thereby gaining an understanding of the corporate network infrastructure and developing appropriate security policies (this is a similar process to the CPE model). Once this has been accomplished, the NOC security staff remotely accesses the IP Service Processing Switch (using the Service Management System 221) at the regional POP serving the enterprise customer, and the firewall service is provisioned and configured remotely.
  • [0070]
    This model enables the service provider to leverage the enterprise's existing services infrastructure (leased lines and Frame Relay PVCs) to deliver new, value-added services without the requirement of a truck roll. All firewall and VPN functionality resides on the IP Service Processing Switch at the POP, thus freeing the service provider from onsite systems integration and configuration and effectively hiding the technology from the enterprise customer. Firewall inspection and access control functions, as well as VPN tunneling and encryption, take place at the IP Service Processing Switch and across the WAN, while the enterprise's secure leased line or Frame Relay PVC (permanent virtual circuit) access link remains in place. The customer interface is between its router and the IP Service Processing Switch (acting as an access router), just as it was prior to the rollout of the managed firewall service. Additionally, the customer has visibility into and control over its segment of the network via the CNM that typically resides at the headquarters site.
  • [0000]
    TABLE 1
    Comparison Between CPE-based and Network-based
    Managed Firewall Turn-up Processes
    Process CPE-based Model Network-based Model
    Service Security consultation to Security consultation to
    Preparation identify customer identify customer
    requirements/policies requirements/policies
    CPE device(s) ordered
    CPE device(s) preconfigured
    CPE device(s) shipped to
    customer site
    Service Rollout Security technician deployed Service provisioning
    to site(s) and policy
    OS/Firewall/VPN software configuration deployed
    loaded (server-based model) from NOC via Service
    Physical network integration Management System
    of device (SMS) - No truck roll
    needed
    Additional Repeat above for each Add configuration
    Service additional service template to SMS and
    Deployment duplicate across all
    service points, provision
    with CNM - No truck
    roll
    Maintenance/ Technician on phone with Technician at POP
    Support customer testing CPE and testing equipment
    technician at POP testing
    equipment
    Maintain inventory of spare Order
    units/components in service spares/replacement
    region from central vendor
    Ship spares to customer site repository - No truck
    as needed roll necessary
    Deploy technician to Integrate replacement
    customer site to complete unit component at POP
    repairs if necessary
  • [0071]
    The network-based firewall model also enables service providers to quickly and cost-effectively roll out managed firewall solutions at all enterprise customer sites. As a result secure Internet access can be provided to every site, eliminating the performance and complexity issues associated with backhauling Internet traffic across the WAN to and from a centralized secure access point.
  • [0072]
    As the IP Service Delivery Platform is designed to enable value-added public network services, it is a carrier-grade system that is more robust and higher-capacity than traditional access routers, and an order of magnitude more scalable and manageable than CPE-based systems. The platform's Service Management System enables managed firewall services, as well as a host of other managed network services, to be provisioned, configured, and managed with point-and-click simplicity, minimizing the need for expensive, highly skilled security professionals and significantly cutting service rollout lead-times. The Service Management System is capable of supporting a fleet of IP Service Processing Switches and tens of thousands of enterprise networks, and interfaces to the platform at the POP from the NOC via IP address. Support for incremental additional platforms and customers is added via modular software add-ons. Services can be provisioned via the SMS system's simple point and click menus, as well as requested directly by the customer via the CNM system.
  • [0073]
    Deployment of a robust IP Service Delivery Platform in the carrier network enables service providers to rapidly turn-up high value, managed network-based services at a fraction of the capital and operational costs of CPE-based solutions. This enables service providers to gain a least-cost service delivery and support structure. Additionally, it enables them to gain higher margins and more market share than competitors utilizing traditional service delivery mechanisms—even while offering managed firewall services at a lower customer price point.
  • Business Case
  • [0074]
    This business case highlights the difference between traditional CPE-based managed firewall services (both appliance and server-based models) and managed, network-based firewall services. This comparison is based upon both capital costs and incremental operational or “soft” costs.
  • [0075]
    This business case is modeled around a theoretical North American service provider that is rolling out a managed firewall service. The service provider has ten regional Points of Presence (POPs) across the US, and a single Network Operations Center (NOC). The business case examines growth of the managed firewall service customer base yearly over a five-year period.
  • Assumptions
  • [0076]
    Three unique customer profiles
      • 5 site (4 branch sites+headquarters)
      • 50 site (49 branch sites+headquarters)
      • 200 site (199 branch sites+headquarters)
  • [0080]
    Each unique customer profile has the following access requirements
      • 5 site customers
        • branch sites—56 Kbps
        • headquarters—T1
      • 50 site customers
        • branch sites—56 Kbps
        • headquarters—T1
      • 200 site customers
        • branch sites—128 Kbps
        • headquarters—T3
      • Greater than 500 employees at 200 site customers' headquarters
      • Less than 500 employees at 5 site and 50 site customers' headquarters
      • Static Model—bandwidth will not change over time
      • Equal distribution of customers across each of the ten POPs
      • a traditional multiplexer resides at each POP to aggregate access circuits up to channelized T3 interfaces in both the access router and the IP Service Processing Switch
      • No oversubscription through the access router/IP Service Processing Switch (ingress bandwidth=egress bandwidth)
      • An initial consultation to define customer security requirements and policies has taken place
      • Each customer site has router in place
      • List pricing (no discounts) as of January 2000
      • $150/hour billable rate for mid-level security specialist
        When to Deploy Network-Based vs. CPE-based Firewall Services
  • [0100]
    The cost benefits of a managed, network-based Firewall Service Model becomes apparent when Service Providers are deploying managed firewall services to more than twenty-nine enterprise sites. By examining the hardware and software costs alone, a network-based model becomes more cost effective to Service Providers as they begin to roll services to more than thirty sites.
  • [0101]
    A Check Point firewall solution (one based on Check Point hardware) would cost Service Providers $478,000 to support thirty enterprise sites; whereas, a network-based firewall solution using the IP Service Delivery supports thirty enterprise sites for $450,000 with the ability to support an additional twenty-five sites without an increase in cost. If the Service Provider wanted to deploy services to twenty-five additional sites using a Check Point solution, the total cost of support fifty-five sites would be $835,000-$385,000 more than the network-based IP Service Delivery Platform. The savings of the network-based solution would continue to scale as additional sites were added incrementally.
  • [0102]
    If the enterprise customer does not have a Cisco 7513 or a comparable router installed at these sites, Service Providers would be forced to incur even greater initial start-up costs with the Check Point solution. If routers were to be installed at each enterprise site, the network-based Firewall solution would become the more cost-effective alternative when Service Providers needed to roll out services to more than twenty-one enterprise sites.
  • Business Case—Models
  • [0103]
    This business case will explore four specific managed firewall service delivery architectures as described by interviewed service providers, systems integrators, and hardware/software vendors.
  • CPE-Based Models Architecture One: Check Point/Nokia Appliance
  • [0104]
    This architecture employs a firewall/VPN CPE appliance, traditional access router, and software-based centralized management system to deliver a managed firewall solution. The specific components of this solution include:
      • Check Point/Nokia VPN-1/IP-330 appliance (50 user license) at branch sites
      • Check Point VPN-1/Firewall-1 software module (unlimited user license) on Sun Enterprise Ultra 250 server platform at headquarters
      • Cisco 7513 access router at the service provider's POP (redundant power, redundant RSP4)
      • Check Point Provider-1 management system at the service provider's NOC (supports 50 customers/module) with unlimited sites/customer on Sun Ultra 60 platform at Network Operations Center (NOC)
  • [0109]
    FIG. 10 shows a block diagram of a system 1000 providing a Managed Firewall Service with a CbeckPoint/Nokia Appliance Solution
  • Architecture Two: Check Point Server
  • [0110]
    This architecture employs a firewall/VPN CPE server, traditional access router, and software-based centralized management system to deliver a managed firewall solution. The specific components of this solution include:
      • Check Point VPN-1/Firewall-1 software module (50 user license) on Sun 5S server platform at branch sites
      • Check Point VPN-1/Firewall-1 software module (unlimited user license) on Sun Enterprise Ultra 250 server platform at headquarters
      • Cisco 7513 access router at the service provider POP (redundant power, redundant RSP4)
      • Check Point Provider-1 management system (supports 50 customers/module) with unlimited sites/customer on Sun Ultra 60 platform at NOC
  • [0115]
    FIG. 11 shows a block diagram of a system 1100, providing a Managed Firewall Service with a CheckPoint Firewall-1 Server-based Solution.
  • Architecture Three WatchGuard Appliance Model
  • [0116]
    This architecture employs a firewalll/VPN CPE appliance, traditional access router, and software-based centralized management system to deliver a managed firewall solution. The specific components of this solution include:
      • WatchGuard Firebox II Plus appliance at branch sites
      • Cisco 7513 access router at the service provider POP (redundant power, redundant RSP4)
      • WatchGuard for MSS management system (supports 500 customers/module) with unlimited sites/customer on Compaq Proliant 3000 Windows NT workstation platform, Event Processor on Sun Microsystems 5S server platform
  • [0120]
    FIG. 12 shows a block diagram of a system 1200, providing a Managed Firewall Service with a WatchGuard Appliance Solution. The CPE-based managed firewall service model requires installation and configuration of system components at three network points: the service provider POP, the service provider NOC, and the customer premises.
  • POP Infrastructure
  • [0121]
    Each of the three CPE-based architectures explored in this analysis employs an identical POP infrastructure. This access infrastructure is based on the Cisco 7513 router. The base configuration for the 7513 includes:
      • 13-slot chassis
      • IOS Service Provider system software
      • (2) power supplies
      • (2) Route Switch Processors (RSP4)
      • (2) RSP4 128 MB DRAM Option
      • (2) RSP4 20 MB Flash Card Option
      • 2-port Fast Ethernet Card
      • 64 MB DRAM Option
      • 8 MB SRAM Option
  • [0131]
    The RSP4 cards in this base configuration each consume one slot in the chassis, leaving 11 remaining for port adapters. An Ethernet card is added for software uploads. Ingress traffic is supported via dual-port channelized and/or dual-port unchannelized T3 cards (for dedicated T3 connections). Each channelized T3 port can support up to 128 DS0 or NxT1 channels Single-port OC-3 POS cards provide connectivity to the network uplink on the egress side. These cards each occupy a single slot. Each card requires a programmable Versatile Interface Processor (VIP2), as well as an additional 64 MB of DRAM and 8 MB of SRAM. The VIP2 and additional memory reside on the T3/OC-3 cards and do not consume additional slots.
  • [0132]
    As described in the assumptions, a traditional multiplexer exists at each POP to aggregate various sub-T1 customer access links up to the channelized T3 interfaces on the Cisco 7513 router. As the POP infrastructure installation and configuration processes are uniform across all managed firewall service models explored in this analysis, the costs associated with these processes will not be quantified.
  • Network-Based Model of the Present Invention—Architecture Four
  • [0133]
    IP Service Delivery Platform 300 that includes an IP Service Processing Switch (IPSX 230), a Service Management System (SMS 221) and a Customer Network Management System (CNMS 222).
  • [0134]
    This architecture employs an IP Service Processing Switch and a software-based centralized SMS to deliver a managed firewall solution. The specific components of this solution include:
      • IPSX 230 (IP Service Processing Switch) at service provider POP
      • Service Management System 221 on Sun Ultra 60 server at service provider NOC
      • InGage™ Customer Network Management System at the subscriber's headquarters
  • [0138]
    FIG. 13 shows a block diagram of a system 1300 that provides a Managed Firewall Service with CoSine's Network-based Solution of the present invention.
  • POP Infrastructure
  • [0139]
    The POP access infrastructure in the network-based managed firewall service model is based on the CoSine Communications IPSX 9000 Service Processing Switch. The base configuration for the switch includes:
      • 26-slot chassis
      • Redundant power supply
      • IPNOS Base Software
      • Ring Bridge & Ring Bridge Pass-Thru (to complete midplane)
      • Control Blade (for communications with Invision Services Management System)
      • Dual-port Channelized DS3 Access Blade
      • Dual-port Unchannelized DS3 Access Blades
      • Processor Blade
      • OC-3c POS Trunk Blade
  • [0149]
    The following tables analyze the cost structure of all of the above models and projects these costs out over 5 years:
  • [0000]
    TABLE 2
    Capital Cost Summary for First Year Deployment
    of the Four Managed Firewall Scenarios
    Firewall
    implementation Total
    scenarios Year Customers* Cost
    Solution 1 Check
    Point Appliance
    Checkpoint 1 90 $.9 M
    Provider 1
    (management
    system)
    Check 1 90 $37 M
    Point/Nokia 10
    POP Appliance
    Total Check Point $37.9 M
    #1 w/0 Cisco
    Adding Cisco to 1 90 +$2 M
    Checkpoint
    Total Check Point + $39.9 M
    Cisco
    Solution 2 Check
    Point Server
    Checkpoint 1 90 $.9 M
    Provider 1
    (management
    system)
    Checkpoint Nokia 1 90 $31 M
    10 POP Server
    Total Check Point $31.9 M
    #2
    Adding Cisco to 1 90 +$2 M
    Checkpoint
    Total Check Point + $33.9 M
    Cisco
    Solution 3
    WatchGuard
    WatchGuard 10 1 90 $14 M
    POP Appliance
    Model
    WatchGuard NOC 1 90 $.07
    Appliance Model
    Management
    Total $14.07 M
    WatchGuard
    Adding Cisco to 1 90 +$2 M
    WatchGuard
    Total $16.07 M
    WatchGuard +
    Cisco
    Solution 4 CoSine
    CoSine 10 POP 1 90 $12 M
    Model (IPSX
    9000)
    CoSine NOC 1 90 $1.2 M
    (Invision Service
    Management
    System)
    Total CoSine $13.2 M
    Solution $13.2 M
    Savings over 1st year $39.9 − $13.2 =
    Check Point #1 $26.7 M
    Savings over 1st year $31.9 − $13.2 =
    Check Point #2 $18.7 M
    Savings over 1st year $16.07 − $13.2 =
    WatchGuard $2.87 M
    Capital Costs spread - first year
    *Total number of customers is based on a spread across 5, 50 and 200 site configurations.
    Pricing listed is based on information from January of 2000 and is subject to change.
  • [0000]
    TABLE 3
    Capital Cost Summary for the Fifth Year Deployment
    of the Four Managed Firewall Scenarios
    Firewall implementation Total
    scenarios Year Customers* Cost
    1. Solution 1 Check Point
    Appliance
    Checkpoint Provider 1 5 1880 $3.8 M
    (management system)
    Check Point/Nokia 10 POP 5 1880 $692 M
    Appliance
    Total Check Point #1 w/0 $705.8 M
    Cisco
    Adding Cisco to Checkpoint 5 1880 +$26 M
    Total Check Point + Cisco $731.8 M
    2. Solution 2 Check Point
    Server
    Checkpoint Provider 1 5 1880 $3.8 M
    (management system)
    Checkpoint Nokia 10 POP 5 1880 $590 M
    Server
    Total Check Point #2 $593.8 M
    Adding Cisco to Checkpoint 5 1880 $26 M
    Total Check Point + Cisco $619.8 M
    3. Solution 3 WatchGuard
    WatchGuard 10 POP 5 1880 $268 M
    Appliance Model
    WatchGuard NOC 5 1880 $.25
    Appliance Model
    Management
    Total WatchGuard $268.25 M
    Adding Cisco to WatchGuard 5 1880 $26 M
    Total WatchGuard + Cisco $294.25 M
    4. Solution 4 CoSine
    CoSine 10 POP Model 5 1880 $106 M
    (IPSX 9000)
    CoSine NOC 5 1880 $1.2 M
    (Invision Service Management
    System)
    Total CoSine Solution $107.2 M
    Savings over Check Point #1 5th $731.8 − $107.2 =
    year $624.6 M
    Savings over Check Point #2 5th $619.8 − $107.2 =
    year $512.6 M
    Savings over WatchGuard 5th $294.25 − $107.2 =
    year $187.05 M
    Capital Costs spread - fifth year
    *Total number of customers is based on a spread across 5, 50 and 200 site configurations.
    Pricing listed is based on information from January of 2000 and is subject to change.
  • Analysis
  • [0150]
    Analysis of the four service delivery architectures for deploying a managed firewall service reveals extremely compelling data in favor of implementing the network-based model based on the CoSine Communications IP Service Delivery Platform. Significant advantages are gained by utilizing this model in each of the following areas.
  • Operational “Soft” Costs
  • [0151]
    The network-based managed firewall solution eliminates most of the steep operational costs that are associated with deploying a CPE-based solution, specifically the per site truck roll and device installation charges. The CheckPoint server-based CPE deployment and installation operational costs alone exceed the total five-year capital equipment investment required in the CoSine Communications network-based model. These costs 1400 are shown in FIG. 14. Though the installation and configuration costs for the POP and NOC build-outs are not quantified in this study due to the uniformity of these processes across all solutions, it is worthy to note that the greater capacity of the CoSine IPSX 9000 Service Processing Switch and Invision Service Management System result in fewer components (switch chassis, NOC servers and software) that need to be installed and configured.
  • [0152]
    FIG. 14 shows a graph CheckPoint Operational “soft” Costs 1400. This chart represents only operational costs associated with the Check Point CPE appliance and server models. In the context of this model, there are no soft costs associated with the CoSine Communications network-based model or the WatchGuard CPE appliance model.
  • [0000]
    Server Appliance
    Truck Roll Security Tech/hr Installation (hr) Installation (hr)
    $500 $150 12 4
    *Assumptions for “soft” cost calculations.
  • [0153]
    Capital Costs
  • [0154]
    The network-based managed firewall solution has total capital costs that, over the five-year customer growth period of this study, are an order of magnitude less than the CPE-based solutions. The total capital costs for each solution are shown in FIG. 15.
  • [0155]
    FIG. 15 shows a graph of five year total capital cost 1500.
  • Time to Market, Time to Revenue
  • [0156]
    The network-based managed firewall solution enables service providers to greatly shorten the lead-time required to deploy the managed firewall service. The removal of the CPE component from the service offering eliminates the need to procure the device, eliminating a 1-2 week delay in service rollout. This also eliminates the 2-4 week delay that is associated with scheduling an onsite installation.
  • Complexity
  • [0157]
    The network-based managed firewall solution greatly reduces the complexity associated with deploying the service. The number of distributed devices is reduced from thousands of remote customer sites to only 10 already staffed POPs, simplifying management and maintenance significantly.
  • [0158]
    The network-based managed firewall service model creates a new source of revenue for service providers that is scalable, repeatable, and cost-effective. Leveraging centrally-managed services enables service providers to derive greater value from the existing basic access infrastructure. The network-based model eliminates expensive onsite installation and maintenance required of CPE-based solutions, and provides a foundation to deploy additional value-added services via the same delivery mechanism. Elimination of the CPE device also effectively hides the technology of the managed firewall solution from the customer, reducing internal network complexity and technical anxiety.
  • [0159]
    The CoSine Communications IP Service Delivery Platform 300 enables service providers to reap the benefits of deploying a network-based managed firewall service. The IPSX 9000 Service Processing Switch is a robust, high-availability platform that is capable of supporting hundreds of customer sites and network-based firewalls. The Invision Services Management System is capable of rapidly provisioning and managing thousands of managed firewall customers throughout an extensive nationwide network, enabling service providers to leverage volume security services driven by fewer staff resources. And the InGage™ Customer Network Management System empowers customer IT managers to view and augment managed network services. The IP Service Delivery Platform positions service providers to continuously deploy new value-added services to their customer base, maximizing revenues and creating customer lock-in.
  • [0160]
    Service providers utilizing the IP Service Delivery Platform 300 are to gain a significant competitive edge in deploying high-value IP-based services. The CoSine Communications solution of the present invention enables services providers to save up to 85% on the capital costs associated with deploying a managed firewall service over traditional CPE-based approaches. Additionally, the CoSine solution of the present invention virtually eliminates the steep operational “soft” costs that plague the CPE approach, which total $79-161M in the 5-year model architecture. These savings add up to literally tens to hundreds of millions of dollars over a five-year period. Furthermore, as customer numbers and bandwidth requirements increase over time, so do the cost savings. This enables service providers to gain a cost-leadership position while greatly increasing revenues.
  • [0161]
    In closing, the IP Service Delivery Platform (IPSDP 300) is an ideal solution for service providers seeking to offer high value managed, network-based firewall services.
  • [0162]
    One aspect of the present invention provides a method of packet routing. The method includes connecting a plurality of processors in a network, assigning a unique processor identifier (PEID) to each of the processors, routing a first packet to a first one of the processors across the network, wherein each such packet includes a PEID value corresponding to a PEID of one of the processors, and wherein the routing to the first processor is based on the PEID value in the first packet, establishing a plurality of objects in the first processor, assigning a logical queue identifier (LQID) to a first one of the objects in the first processor, wherein each packet also includes an LQID value corresponding to an LQID of one of the objects, and routing the first packet to the first object based on the LQID value in the first packet.
  • [0163]
    Some embodiments further include assigning a plurality of different LQIDs to the first object.
  • [0164]
    Some embodiments further include routing a plurality of packets, each having a different LQID, to the first object based on the LQID value in each respective packet.
  • [0165]
    In some embodiments, the first object is associated with a virtual router (VR).
  • [0166]
    Some embodiments further include establishing the first LQID with the first object to be used for point-to-point data traffic, and establishing a second LQID with the first object to be used for shortcut data traffic.
  • [0167]
    In some embodiments, the network is configured in a ring topology.
  • [0168]
    Another aspect of the present invention provides a system for routing packets. This system includes a plurality of processors coupled to one another using a network, wherein each of the processors a unique processor identifier (PEID), wherein a first packet is routed into a first one of the processors across the network, wherein each such packet includes a PEID value corresponding to a PEID of one of the processors, and wherein the routing to the first processor is based on the PEID value in the first packet, a plurality of objects in the first processor, wherein each such object is assigned a logical queue identifier (LQID), wherein each packet also includes an LQID value corresponding to an LQID of one of the objects, and software for routing the first packet to the first object based on the LQID value in the first packet.
  • [0169]
    In some embodiments, a plurality of different LQIDs are simultaneously assigned to the first object.
  • [0170]
    In some embodiments, the means for routing includes means for routing a plurality of packets, each having a different LQID, to the first object based on the LQID value in each respective packet.
  • [0171]
    In some embodiments, the first object is associated with a virtual router (VR).
  • [0172]
    In some embodiments, the first LQID is associated with the first object to be used for point-to-point data traffic, and a second LQID is associated with the first object to be used for shortcut data traffic.
  • [0173]
    In some embodiments, the network is configured in a ring topology.
  • [0174]
    Still another aspect of the present invention provides a system for routing packets. This system includes a plurality of processors coupled to one another using a network, wherein each of the processors a unique processor identifier (PEID), wherein a first packet is routed into a first one of the processors across the network, wherein each such packet includes a PEID value corresponding to a PEID of one of the processors, and wherein the routing to the first processor is based on the PEID value in the first packet, and a plurality of objects in the first processor, wherein each such object is assigned a logical queue identifier (LQID), wherein each packet also includes an LQID value corresponding to an LQID of one of the objects, wherein the first packet is routed to the first object based on the LQID value in the first packet.
  • [0175]
    Some embodiments further include a services management system that provides changeable provisioning of processor capacity among a plurality of customers.
  • [0176]
    Some embodiments further include a services management system that provides firewall protection for each of a plurality of customers.
  • [0177]
    The network-based managed firewall service model creates a new source of revenue for service providers that is scalable, repeatable, and cost-effective. Leveraging centrally-managed services enables service providers to derive greater value from the existing basic access infrastructure. The network-based model eliminates expensive onsite installation and maintenance required of CPE-based solutions, and provides a foundation to deploy additional value-added services via the same delivery mechanism. Elimination of the CPE device also effectively hides the technology of the managed firewall solution from the customer, reducing internal network complexity and technical anxiety.
  • [0178]
    The CoSine Communications IP Service Delivery Platform 300 enables service providers to reap the benefits of deploying a network-based managed firewall service. The IPSX 9000 Service Processing Switch is a robust, high-availability platform that is capable of supporting hundreds of customer sites and network-based firewalls. The InVision Services Management System is capable of rapidly provisioning and managing thousands of managed firewall customers throughout an extensive nationwide network, enabling service providers to leverage volume security services driven by fewer staff resources. And the InGage™ Customer Network Management System empowers customer IT managers to view and augment managed network services. The IP Service Delivery Platform positions service providers to continuously deploy new value-added services to their customer base, maximizing revenues and creating customer lock-in.
  • [0179]
    Service providers utilizing the IP Service Delivery Platform 300 are to gain a significant competitive edge in deploying high-value IP-based services. The CoSine Communications solution enables services providers to save up to 85% on the capital costs associated with deploying a managed firewall service over traditional CPE-based approaches. Additionally, the CoSine solution of the present invention virtually eliminates the steep operational “soft” costs that plague the CPE approach, which total $79-161M in the 5-year model architecture. These savings add up to literally tens to hundreds of millions of dollars over a five-year period. Furthermore, as customer numbers and bandwidth requirements increase over time, so do the cost savings. This enables service providers to gain a cost-leadership position while greatly increasing revenues.
  • [0180]
    In closing, the IP Service Delivery Platform (IPSDP 300) is an ideal solution for service providers seeking to offer high value managed, network-based firewall services.
  • [0181]
    In some embodiments, a set of one or more management consultants to the networking industry help equipment vendors, service providers and enterprises make strategic decisions, mitigate risk and affect change through business and technology consulting engagements. This approach is tailored to each client's specific issues, objectives and budget.
  • [0182]
    These consultants are leaders in the networking industry and influence its direction though confidential engagements for industry leaders and through public appearances and trade magazine articles. These interactions assure clients that they will be among the first to know of the latest industry concepts and emerging technology trends.
  • [0183]
    Each consulting engagement is uniquely structured-no forced methodologies or canned reports are employed. An integrated client/management consultant case team respecting and soliciting the opinions of everyone is formed for each engagement.
  • CONCLUSION
  • [0184]
    The present invention provides a flexible, scalable hardware and software platform that allows a service provider to easily provide internet services, virtual private network services, firewall services, etc., to a plurality of customers. This solution can be changes to provision each customer with more or less processing power and storage, according to individual changing needs.
  • [0185]
    One aspect of the present invention provides a method of delivering security services. This method includes connecting a plurality of processors 930 in a ring configuration within a first processing system, establishing a secure connection between the processors in the ring configuration across an internet protocol (IP) connection to a second processing system to form a tunnel, and providing both router services and host services for a customer using the plurality of processors in the ring configuration and using the second processing system.
  • [0186]
    In some embodiments, one or more processors In some embodiments, to support a communications network, the plurality of processors includes one or more control processors, one or more access processors, and one or more processing processors.
  • [0187]
    In some embodiments, for each of a plurality of customers, a virtual router 210 is formed in the first processing system 401 and is operably connected to a virtual router 210 formed in the second system 402.
  • [0188]
    In some embodiments, for each of a plurality of customers, a virtual private network 410 is formed using a virtual router 210 formed in the first processing system 401 and operably connected to a virtual router 210 formed in the second system 402.
  • [0189]
    In some embodiments, the connecting a plurality of processors in the ring configuration includes forming dual counter rotating ring connections 933 and 934, each connecting to each of the plurality of processors 930.
  • [0190]
    Another aspect of the present invention provides a system of delivering security services. This system 201 includes a plurality of processors 230 in a ring configuration within a first processing system 401, and means for establishing a secure connection 418 between the processors in the ring configuration 411 across an internet protocol (IP) connection to a second processing system 412 to form a tunnel, and for providing both router services and host services for a customer using the plurality of processors in the ring configuration 411 and using the second processing system 412.
  • [0191]
    In some embodiments, to support a communications network, the plurality of processors includes one or more control processors, one or more access processors, and one or more processing processors.
  • [0192]
    In some embodiments, for each of a plurality of customers, a virtual router is formed in the first processing system and is operably connected to a virtual router formed in the second system.
  • [0193]
    In some embodiments of this system, for each of a plurality of customers, a virtual private network is formed using a virtual router formed in the first processing system and operably connected to a virtual router formed in the second system.
  • [0194]
    In some embodiments of this system, the plurality of processors in the ring configuration includes dual counter rotating ring connections, each connecting to each of the plurality of processors.
  • [0195]
    Yet another aspect of the present invention provides a system 201 for delivering security services. This second system 201 includes a plurality of processors within a first processing system connected in a ring configuration, and a tunnel formed using a secure connection between the processors in the ring configuration across an internet protocol (IP) connection to a second processing system, wherein both router services and host services are provided for a customer using the plurality of processors in the ring configuration and using the second processing system.
  • [0196]
    In some embodiments of this second system, to support a communications network, the plurality of processors 930 includes one or more control processors 234, one or more access processors 238, and one or more processing processors 236. In some embodiments, one or more of these processors is packaged on a blade 239.
  • [0197]
    In some embodiments of this second system, for each of a plurality of customers, a virtual router 210 is formed in the first processing system 401 and is operably connected to a virtual router 210 formed in the second system 402.
  • [0198]
    In some embodiments of this second system, for each of a plurality of customers, a virtual private network 410 is formed using a virtual router 210 formed in the first processing system 401 and operably connected to a virtual router 210 formed in the second system 410.
  • [0199]
    In some embodiments of this second system, the plurality of processors 230 in the ring configuration includes dual counter rotating ring connections 932 and 933, each connecting to each of the plurality of processors 930.
  • [0200]
    Some embodiments of this second system further include a services management system 221 that provides changeable provisioning of processor capacity among a plurality of customers.
  • [0201]
    Some embodiments of this second system further include a services management system 221 that provides firewall protection for each of a plurality of customers.
  • [0202]
    Some embodiments of this second system further include a services management system 221 that provides provisioning of processor capacity among a plurality of customers, wherein each customer's resources are isolated from those of all the other customers.
  • [0203]
    It is understood that the above description is intended to be illustrative, and not restrictive. Many other embodiments will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the above description. The scope of the invention should, therefore, be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4590468 *10 Mar 198320 May 1986Western Digital CorporationToken access controller protocol and architecture
US4667323 *3 Sep 198519 May 1987Allen-Bradley Company, Inc.Industrialized token passing network
US4726018 *25 Aug 198616 Feb 1988International Business Machines CorporationMethod of providing priority access to a transmission communication ring
US5371852 *14 Oct 19926 Dec 1994International Business Machines CorporationMethod and apparatus for making a cluster of computers appear as a single host on a network
US5491691 *16 Aug 199413 Feb 1996Motorola, Inc.Method and apparatus for pacing asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) data cell transmission
US5598414 *4 Jun 199328 Jan 1997Walser; Robert A.Access to transmit on a message priority basis
US5825772 *2 Apr 199620 Oct 1998Cabletron Systems, Inc.Distributed connection-oriented services for switched communications networks
US5825891 *29 Oct 199720 Oct 1998Raptor Systems, Inc.Key management for network communication
US5875290 *27 Mar 199723 Feb 1999International Business Machines CorporationMethod and program product for synchronizing operator initiated commands with a failover process in a distributed processing system
US5892924 *31 Jan 19966 Apr 1999Ipsilon Networks, Inc.Method and apparatus for dynamically shifting between routing and switching packets in a transmission network
US5920705 *30 Jan 19976 Jul 1999Nokia Ip, Inc.Method and apparatus for dynamically shifting between routing and switching packets in a transmission network
US5964847 *10 Mar 199712 Oct 1999International Business Machines CorporationMobile client computer interacting with docking device
US6134226 *31 Dec 199817 Oct 2000Motorola, Inc.Method and system for allocating a system resource to subscribers of a wireless communications system
US6173399 *12 Jun 19979 Jan 2001Vpnet Technologies, Inc.Apparatus for implementing virtual private networks
US6212556 *21 Apr 19993 Apr 2001Webxchange, Inc.Configurable value-added network (VAN) switching
US6226296 *21 May 19971 May 2001Physical Optics CorporationMetropolitan area network switching system and method of operation thereof
US6243580 *23 Nov 19995 Jun 2001Amsc Subsidiary CorporationPriority and preemption service system for satellite related communication using central controller
US6246682 *5 Mar 199912 Jun 2001Transwitch Corp.Method and apparatus for managing multiple ATM cell queues
US6256295 *25 Sep 19973 Jul 2001Nortel Networks LimitedMethod and apparatus for determining multiple minimally-overlapping paths between nodes in a network
US6286038 *3 Aug 19984 Sep 2001Nortel Networks LimitedMethod and apparatus for remotely configuring a network device
US6324583 *17 Nov 199827 Nov 2001International Business Machines Corp.Method and apparatus for enabling communication between dissimilar protocol stacks
US6339782 *21 Nov 199715 Jan 2002International Business Machines CorporationPersistence mechanism and method for objects
US6343083 *9 Apr 199829 Jan 2002Alcatel Usa Sourcing, L.P.Method and apparatus for supporting a connectionless communication protocol over an ATM network
US6453406 *13 Dec 199317 Sep 2002Compaq Computer CorporationMultiprocessor system with fiber optic bus interconnect for interprocessor communications
US6463061 *19 Jan 19998 Oct 2002Cisco Technology, Inc.Shared communications network employing virtual-private-network identifiers
US6466976 *3 Dec 199815 Oct 2002Nortel Networks LimitedSystem and method for providing desired service policies to subscribers accessing the internet
US6487666 *15 Jan 199926 Nov 2002Cisco Technology, Inc.Intrusion detection signature analysis using regular expressions and logical operators
US6542502 *26 Jan 19961 Apr 2003International Business Machines CorporationMulticasting using a wormhole routing switching element
US6542515 *19 May 19991 Apr 2003Sun Microsystems, Inc.Profile service
US6597956 *2 Aug 200022 Jul 2003Terraspring, Inc.Method and apparatus for controlling an extensible computing system
US6609153 *24 Dec 199819 Aug 2003Redback Networks Inc.Domain isolation through virtual network machines
US6611498 *24 Sep 199826 Aug 2003Worldcom, Inc.Integrated customer web station for web based call management
US6611522 *18 Jun 199926 Aug 2003Juniper Networks, Inc.Quality of service facility in a device for performing IP forwarding and ATM switching
US6625650 *25 Jun 199923 Sep 2003Intel CorporationSystem for multi-layer broadband provisioning in computer networks
US6633571 *9 Sep 199914 Oct 2003Hitachi, Ltd.VPN composing method, interwork router, packet communication method, data communication apparatus, and packet relaying apparatus
US6640248 *9 Jul 199928 Oct 2003Malibu Networks, Inc.Application-aware, quality of service (QoS) sensitive, media access control (MAC) layer
US6654787 *31 Dec 199825 Nov 2003Brightmail, IncorporatedMethod and apparatus for filtering e-mail
US6668282 *2 Aug 200023 Dec 2003International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method to monitor and determine if an active IPSec tunnel has become disabled
US6674756 *23 Feb 20006 Jan 2004AlcatelMulti-service network switch with multiple virtual routers
US6680922 *9 Jul 199920 Jan 2004Malibu Networks, Inc.Method for the recognition and operation of virtual private networks (VPNs) over a wireless point to multi-point (PtMP) transmission system
US6694437 *22 Jun 199917 Feb 2004Institute For Information TechnologySystem and method for on-demand access concentrator for virtual private networks
US6701449 *20 Apr 20002 Mar 2004Ciprico, Inc.Method and apparatus for monitoring and analyzing network appliance status information
US6732314 *26 May 20004 May 20043Com CorporationMethod and apparatus for L2TP forward error correction
US6763236 *25 Jun 200113 Jul 2004Nokia Mobile Phones, Ltd.Resource allocating and service providing over a wireless network
US6775284 *7 Jan 200010 Aug 2004International Business Machines CorporationMethod and system for frame and protocol classification
US6785224 *26 Dec 200031 Aug 2004Fujitsu LimitedRing configuring method and node apparatus used in the ring
US6785691 *13 Oct 199931 Aug 2004Avaya Technology Corp.Object oriented processing system and data sharing environment for applications therein
US6807181 *19 May 199919 Oct 2004Sun Microsystems, Inc.Context based control data
US6816462 *2 Aug 20009 Nov 2004International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method to determine connectivity of a VPN secure tunnel
US6820210 *17 Apr 200316 Nov 2004Cisco Technology, Inc.System and method for fault recovery for a two line bi-directional ring network
US6822958 *25 Sep 200023 Nov 2004Integrated Device Technology, Inc.Implementation of multicast in an ATM switch
US6920146 *5 Oct 199819 Jul 2005Packet Engines IncorporatedSwitching device with multistage queuing scheme
US6920580 *20 Aug 200119 Jul 2005Network Appliance, Inc.Negotiated graceful takeover in a node cluster
US6980526 *26 Mar 200127 Dec 2005Margalla Communications, Inc.Multiple subscriber videoconferencing system
US6985956 *2 Nov 200110 Jan 2006Sun Microsystems, Inc.Switching system
US7020143 *18 Jun 200128 Mar 2006Ericsson Inc.System for and method of differentiated queuing in a routing system
US7054311 *27 Jul 200130 May 20064198638 Canada Inc.Methods and apparatus for storage and processing of routing information
US7058716 *19 Jul 20046 Jun 2006Covad Communications Group, Inc.Automatic configuration and provisioning of virtual circuits for initial installation of high bandwidth connections
US7089293 *2 Nov 20018 Aug 2006Sun Microsystems, Inc.Switching system method for discovering and accessing SCSI devices in response to query
US7174372 *13 Sep 20006 Feb 2007Fortinet, Inc.System and method for managing router metadata
US7187676 *4 Jun 20026 Mar 2007Sun Microsystems, Inc.Apparatus and method for steering a communication to an open stream
US7499398 *16 Apr 20033 Mar 2009International Business Machines CorporationMethod and system for oversubscribing bandwidth in a communications network
US20010024425 *18 Jan 200127 Sep 2001Tomohiro TsunodaData communication system and receiving apparatus to be used for such system
US20010033580 *5 Dec 200025 Oct 2001Dorsey Paul C.Multi-protocol packet translator
US20020023171 *20 Mar 200121 Feb 2002Garrett John W.Service selection in a shared access network using policy routing
US20020062344 *11 Sep 199823 May 2002Tatu YlonenMethod and arrangement for secure tunneling of data between virtual routers
US20020071389 *21 Nov 200113 Jun 2002Hyun-Chul SeoData structure for implementation of traffic engineering function in multiprotocol label switching system and storage medium for storing the same
US20020097730 *19 Oct 200125 Jul 2002Cresent Networks, Inc.Network device virtual Interface
US20020150093 *3 Aug 200117 Oct 2002Maximilian OttHigh-performance addressing and routing of data packets with semantically descriptive labels in a computer network
US20020162025 *31 Jan 200231 Oct 2002Sutton Lorin R.Identifying unwanted electronic messages
US20020186667 *7 Jun 200112 Dec 2002Corrigent Systems Ltd.Communication in a bidirectional ring network with single-direction receiving
US20030012209 *16 Jul 200116 Jan 2003International Business Machines CorporationNetwork access traffic sorter
US20030026262 *29 Jul 20026 Feb 2003Patrik JarlChannel resource allocation arrangement and method
US20030055920 *17 Sep 200120 Mar 2003Deepak KakadiaMethod and apparatus for automatic quality of service configuration based on traffic flow and other network parameters
US20030063590 *2 Oct 20013 Apr 2003Seshadri MohanMultimedia personalized call management (MPCM)
US20030112799 *17 Nov 200119 Jun 2003Ravi ChandraMethod and apparatus for multiple contexts and layer 3 virtual private networks
US20030174650 *27 Jan 200318 Sep 2003Broadcom CorporationWeighted fair queuing (WFQ) shaper
US20040019651 *29 Jul 200229 Jan 2004Andaker Kristian L. M.Categorizing electronic messages based on collaborative feedback
US20040037279 *23 Aug 200226 Feb 2004David ZeligVirtual private LAN service using a multicast protocol
US20040054886 *29 Sep 200118 Mar 2004Dickinson Robert D.E-mail firewall with stored key encryption/decryption
US20040160900 *26 Aug 200319 Aug 2004Martin LundSystem and method for communicating using a multiserver platform
US20040193922 *2 Oct 200330 Sep 2004Jean-Christophe BandiniMethod and system for filtering communication
US20040199567 *26 Aug 20037 Oct 2004Martin LundSystem and method for integrating multiserver platforms
US20040199568 *26 Aug 20037 Oct 2004Martin LundSystem and method for communicating between servers using a multi-server platform
US20040199569 *26 Aug 20037 Oct 2004Mohan KalkunteMethod and system for handling traffic for server systems
US20050002417 *25 Aug 20036 Jan 2005Kelly Thomas J.Systems and methods for performing protocol conversions in a work machine
US20050055306 *20 Oct 200410 Mar 2005Science Applications International CorporationUser-defined dynamic collaborative environments
US20050081059 *9 Aug 200414 Apr 2005Bandini Jean-Christophe DenisMethod and system for e-mail filtering
US20050108340 *13 May 200419 May 2005Matt GleesonMethod and apparatus for filtering email spam based on similarity measures
US20050113114 *26 Nov 200326 May 2005Nokia CorporationMethod and apparatus to provide efficient routing of packets for a network initiated data session
US20050147095 *30 Dec 20037 Jul 2005Intel CorporationIP multicast packet burst absorption and multithreaded replication architecture
US20050163115 *16 Apr 200428 Jul 2005Sitaram DontuDistributed forwarding in virtual network devices
US20060087969 *24 Oct 200527 Apr 2006Slt Logic LlcSystem and method for hierarchical policing of flows and subflows of a data stream
US20070237172 *7 Apr 200611 Oct 2007Corrigent Systems Ltd.Two-way link aggregation
US20080317040 *30 Aug 200825 Dec 2008Fortinet, Inc.Managing hierarchically organized subscriber profiles
US20080317231 *30 Aug 200825 Dec 2008Fortinet, Inc.Managing hierarchically organized subscriber profiles
US20080320553 *30 Aug 200825 Dec 2008Fortinet, Inc.Managing hierarchically organized subscriber profiles
US20090007228 *30 Aug 20081 Jan 2009Fortinet, Inc.Managing hierarchically organized subscriber profiles
US20090073977 *29 Oct 200819 Mar 2009Fortinet, Inc.Routing traffic through a virtual router-based network switch
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US772005319 May 200818 May 2010Fortinet, Inc.Service processing switch
US781845219 Oct 2010Fortinet, Inc.Distributed virtual system to support managed, network-based services
US784381330 Aug 200830 Nov 2010Fortinet, Inc.Managing hierarchically organized subscriber profiles
US786936111 Jan 2011Fortinet, Inc.Managing hierarchically organized subscriber profiles
US787668330 Aug 200825 Jan 2011Fortinet, Inc.Managing hierarchically organized subscriber profiles
US789066329 Jul 200615 Feb 2011Fortinet, Inc.Identifying nodes in a ring network
US793326926 Apr 2011Fortinet, Inc.Hardware-accelerated packet multicasting in a virtual routing system
US796161530 Aug 200814 Jun 2011Fortinet, Inc.Managing hierarchically organized subscriber profiles
US806850310 Mar 200729 Nov 2011Fortinet, Inc.Network packet steering via configurable association of processing resources and netmods or line interface ports
US806923329 Nov 2011Fortinet, Inc.Switch management system and method
US811169029 Oct 20087 Feb 2012Google Inc.Routing traffic through a virtual router-based network switch
US821334712 Feb 20093 Jul 2012Fortinet, Inc.Scalable IP-services enabled multicast forwarding with efficient resource utilization
US8364842 *5 Nov 200929 Jan 2013Novell, Inc.System and method for reduced cloud IP address utilization
US8396954 *12 Mar 2013Aryaka Networks, Inc.Routing and service performance management in an application acceleration environment
US8705417 *6 Jul 201022 Apr 2014Cisco Technology, Inc.In-network home gateway for hybrid fiber-coax network
US8825829 *11 Feb 20132 Sep 2014Aryaka Networks, Inc.Routing and service performance management in an application acceleration environment
US9122533 *5 Nov 20091 Sep 2015Novell, Inc.System and method for reducing cloud IP address utilization using a distributor registry
US939196427 Jan 201612 Jul 2016Fortinet, Inc.Tunnel interface for securing traffic over a network
US20060265519 *29 Jul 200623 Nov 2006Fortinet, Inc.Identifying nodes in a ring network
US20070083528 *6 Nov 200612 Apr 2007Fortinet, Inc.Switch management system and method
US20070147368 *10 Mar 200728 Jun 2007Fortinet, Inc.Network packet steering via configurable association of processing resources and netmods or line interface ports
US20070291755 *3 Sep 200720 Dec 2007Fortinet, Inc.Hardware-accelerated packet multicasting in a virtual routing system
US20090073977 *29 Oct 200819 Mar 2009Fortinet, Inc.Routing traffic through a virtual router-based network switch
US20100235526 *16 Sep 2010Novell, Inc.System and method for reducing cloud ip address utilization using a distributor registry
US20100235539 *5 Nov 200916 Sep 2010Novell, Inc.System and method for reduced cloud ip address utilization
US20100235630 *16 Sep 2010Novell, Inc.System and method for providing key-encrypted storage in a cloud computing environment
US20110002245 *6 Jan 2011Cisco Technology, Inc.In-network home gateway for hybrid fiber-coax network
US20120179796 *24 Jun 201012 Jul 2012Ashwath NagarajRouting and service performance management in an application acceleration environment
US20130254365 *11 Feb 201326 Sep 2013Ajit GuptaRouting and service performance management in an application acceleration environment
Classifications
U.S. Classification370/397
International ClassificationH04L12/66, G06F13/00, H04L12/28, H04L29/06
Cooperative ClassificationH04L29/06, H04L63/0272
European ClassificationH04L63/02C, H04L29/06