US20090041627A1 - Packaging of microfluidic devices - Google Patents
Packaging of microfluidic devices Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20090041627A1 US20090041627A1 US12/205,949 US20594908A US2009041627A1 US 20090041627 A1 US20090041627 A1 US 20090041627A1 US 20594908 A US20594908 A US 20594908A US 2009041627 A1 US2009041627 A1 US 2009041627A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- reservoir
- micro
- reagent
- moisture
- microfluidic device
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01L—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL LABORATORY APPARATUS FOR GENERAL USE
- B01L3/00—Containers or dishes for laboratory use, e.g. laboratory glassware; Droppers
- B01L3/50—Containers for the purpose of retaining a material to be analysed, e.g. test tubes
- B01L3/502—Containers for the purpose of retaining a material to be analysed, e.g. test tubes with fluid transport, e.g. in multi-compartment structures
- B01L3/5027—Containers for the purpose of retaining a material to be analysed, e.g. test tubes with fluid transport, e.g. in multi-compartment structures by integrated microfluidic structures, i.e. dimensions of channels and chambers are such that surface tension forces are important, e.g. lab-on-a-chip
- B01L3/502707—Containers for the purpose of retaining a material to be analysed, e.g. test tubes with fluid transport, e.g. in multi-compartment structures by integrated microfluidic structures, i.e. dimensions of channels and chambers are such that surface tension forces are important, e.g. lab-on-a-chip characterised by the manufacture of the container or its components
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01L—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL LABORATORY APPARATUS FOR GENERAL USE
- B01L2200/00—Solutions for specific problems relating to chemical or physical laboratory apparatus
- B01L2200/14—Process control and prevention of errors
- B01L2200/142—Preventing evaporation
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01L—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL LABORATORY APPARATUS FOR GENERAL USE
- B01L2200/00—Solutions for specific problems relating to chemical or physical laboratory apparatus
- B01L2200/16—Reagents, handling or storing thereof
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01L—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL LABORATORY APPARATUS FOR GENERAL USE
- B01L2300/00—Additional constructional details
- B01L2300/06—Auxiliary integrated devices, integrated components
- B01L2300/0672—Integrated piercing tool
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01L—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL LABORATORY APPARATUS FOR GENERAL USE
- B01L2400/00—Moving or stopping fluids
- B01L2400/04—Moving fluids with specific forces or mechanical means
- B01L2400/0403—Moving fluids with specific forces or mechanical means specific forces
- B01L2400/0406—Moving fluids with specific forces or mechanical means specific forces capillary forces
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01L—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL LABORATORY APPARATUS FOR GENERAL USE
- B01L2400/00—Moving or stopping fluids
- B01L2400/06—Valves, specific forms thereof
- B01L2400/0677—Valves, specific forms thereof phase change valves; Meltable, freezing, dissolvable plugs; Destructible barriers
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01L—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL LABORATORY APPARATUS FOR GENERAL USE
- B01L2400/00—Moving or stopping fluids
- B01L2400/06—Valves, specific forms thereof
- B01L2400/0677—Valves, specific forms thereof phase change valves; Meltable, freezing, dissolvable plugs; Destructible barriers
- B01L2400/0683—Valves, specific forms thereof phase change valves; Meltable, freezing, dissolvable plugs; Destructible barriers mechanically breaking a wall or membrane within a channel or chamber
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B29—WORKING OF PLASTICS; WORKING OF SUBSTANCES IN A PLASTIC STATE IN GENERAL
- B29K—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBCLASSES B29B, B29C OR B29D, RELATING TO MOULDING MATERIALS OR TO MATERIALS FOR MOULDS, REINFORCEMENTS, FILLERS OR PREFORMED PARTS, e.g. INSERTS
- B29K2509/00—Use of inorganic materials not provided for in groups B29K2503/00 - B29K2507/00, as filler
- B29K2509/08—Glass
Definitions
- This invention relates to microfluidic devices that as can be used for carrying out analysis of biological samples, such as blood, urine and the like. More particularly, the invention relates to the materials for such devices and to their construction.
- Microfluidic devices have been the subject of many patents and patent applications. The general principles of microfluidic devices of the present invention have been discussed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/082,415 and more specific features of such devices are the subject of other applications.
- Such microfluidic devices include very small chambers containing liquid or solid reagents which contact liquid samples as they move through the device via capillary passageways, typically by capillary forces or applied centrifugal force (although other means of moving liquid have been disclosed and could be used in some microfluidic devices).
- the desired quantity of the sample is metered and then passed through one or more chambers where it meets reagents that prepare the sample for subsequent reaction or that react with an analyte in the sample to produce a detectable response, for example, a change in color.
- Microfluidic devices have many advantages over the use of dry reagent strips for testing in the near-patient environment.
- the use of very small samples means that the interaction of the sample with the walls of the device is critical to its performance.
- the sample must be moved in the desired amounts through the capillaries and chambers and must contact dry reagents uniformly, while purging the air that initially filled the spaces in the device.
- Such problems have been considered in other patent applications and need not be discussed further here.
- the present invention is concerned with problems related to practical applications of microfluidic devices, particularly those containing liquid or dry reagents and in which ease of use and shelf life of the devices are important to their success.
- Microfluidic devices can be made, but then not loaded with reagents agents until the time arrives when they are to be used. Such a method has the advantage of assuring that active reagents are used.
- loading the microfluidic device manually with very small amounts of reagents may be difficult to do with precision and could lead to inaccurate analytical results. Therefore, the present inventors believed that fully-functional microfluidic devices would be preferred by their users. That is, the devices should be pre-loaded with reagents and ready to use with minimal preparation. Doing so introduces significant problems, which will be addressed herein.
- a microfluidic device must be keep free of contamination by materials which could prevent it from functioning in its intended manner. It is particularly important to protect the reagents with which the device has been loaded. In some types of analysis, only dry reagents are used. These must be protected from degradation by reaction with the surrounding atmosphere in order to assure that when used, perhaps several years after being manufactured, the reagents perform as intended, providing accurate results. Protection against moisture infiltration is of particular importance.
- liquid reagents, diluents, buffers and the like may be loaded into the microfluidic device.
- Such liquids must be protected from contamination and from change in reagent concentration by loss of solvents and water.
- An advantage of microfluidic devices is their inherent ability to keep reagents separated until used. Thus, it is important also that liquid reagents not be allowed to migrate from the chambers in which they are loaded. Since the devices are small and the samples and reagents are of the microliter size, it will be evident that packaging of the devices is an important consideration, if they are to have acceptable shelf life and reliably provide accurate results.
- the invention relates generally to microfluidic devices having extended shelf life. Dry reagents are placed in the appropriate chambers, where they are protected from contamination and from degradation by contact with moisture. Liquid reagents and the like are placed in micro-reservoirs having a working volume of about 100 ⁇ L or less and are sealed within the microfluidic device. The micro-reservoirs are capable of limiting the escape of moisture from such liquids to a rate within 10% or less over the shelf life of the device.
- the micro-reservoirs are made of plastics having a low moisture transfer rate and that are thick enough to limit the escape of moisture to the desired level.
- the micro-reservoirs are made metal foils, or of plastic films that have been metallized or plastic coated metal foils.
- the invention is a method of making microfluidic devices in which micro-reservoirs are placed in predetermined cavities in the base of the device, filled with the desired liquid reagent and finally sealed within the device.
- the micro-reservoirs are opened so that the sealed cavities become chambers filled with the reagents, thus making them available for the analytical procedure for which the device was intended.
- Various methods may be used to open the micro-reservoirs, including piercing the walls of the micro-reservoirs or rupturing prepared weak spots in the micro-reservoirs.
- the invention is a microfluidic device in which the materials used to make the device prevent transfer of moisture in or out of the device to a rate within 0.01 g/m 2 /day or less to extend shelf life of the device.
- Plastics having a suitably low affinity for moisture are used in thicknesses capable of limiting moisture transfer to the desired amount.
- the base of the device is made of polystyrene having a thickness of at least 2 mm
- the top cover of the device is made of foil having a thickness of at least 0.1 mm or polypropylene having a thickness of at least 1 mm.
- the top cover is adhered to the base with a pressure sensitive adhesive capable of limiting moisture transfer.
- the moisture content of the device is kept at a low value by including moisture absorbents.
- FIG. 1 shows a sectional view through one device of the invention.
- FIG. 2 shows the detail of an encapsulated liquid reagent.
- FIG. 3 shows a sectional view of a second device of the Invention.
- Microfluidic devices sometimes are referred to as “chips”. They are generally small and flat, typically about 1 to 2 inches square (25 to 50 mm square) or circular discs of similar size (e.g. 25 to 120 mm radius).
- the volume of samples supplied to the microfluidic chips are typically small, i.e., about 0.3 to 5 ⁇ L.
- the sample liquids are moved through a series of chambers interconnected by capillary passageways having widths in the range of 10 to 500 ⁇ m, preferably 20 to 100 ⁇ m.
- the minimum permitted depth of the passageways may be determined by the properties of the sample. For example, the depth typically will be at least 5 ⁇ m, but at least 20 ⁇ m when whole blood is the sample.
- capillaries and sample wells can be formed, such as injection molding, laser ablation, diamond milling or embossing. It is preferred to use injection molding in order to minimize cost while reproducing structural features with high fidelity.
- injection molding in order to minimize cost while reproducing structural features with high fidelity.
- a base portion of the chip will be cut or molded to create cavities that will become the desired network of chambers and capillaries.
- a top portion will be attached over the base to complete the chip.
- passageway Alternatively other means may be used, including air pressure, vacuum, electroosmosis, absorbent materials, additional capillarity and the like, which are able to induce the needed pressure change at the junction between passageway's having different cross-sectional areas or surface energies.
- capillary forces make it possible to move liquids by capillary forces alone, without requiring external forces, except for short periods when a capillary stop must be overcome.
- the smaller passageways inherently are more likely to be sensitive to obstruction from particles in the biological samples or the reagents. Consequently, the surface energy of the passageway walls is adjusted as required for use with the sample fluid to be tested, e.g. blood, urine, and the like.
- the capillary passageways may be adjusted to be either hydrophobic or hydrophilic, properties which are defined with respect to the contact angle formed at a solid surface by a liquid sample or reagent.
- a surface is considered hydrophilic if the contact angle is less than 90 degrees and hydrophobic if the contact angle is greater than 90°.
- plasma induced polymerization is carried out at the surface of the passageways.
- Other methods may be used to control the surface energy of the capillary walls, such as coating with hydrophilic or hydrophobic materials, grafting, or corona treatments.
- the surface energy of the capillary walls may be adjusted, i.e. the degree of hydrophilicity or hydrophobicity, for use with the intended sample fluid.
- Movement of liquids through the capillaries may be prevented by capillary stops, which as the name suggests, prevent liquids from flowing through the capillary.
- a hydrophobic capillary stop is typically a smaller passageway having hydrophobic walls. The liquid is not able to pass through the hydrophobic stop because the combination of the small size and the non-wettable walls results in a surface tension force which opposes the entry of the liquid. The liquid in the sample chamber is prevented from entering the capillary until sufficient force is applied, e.g. centrifugal force, to cause the liquid to overcome the opposing surface tension force and to pass through the hydrophobic passageway.
- a hydrophilic stop can also be used, even through the capillary is hydrophilic. Such a stop is wider than the capillary and thus the liquid's surface tension creates a lower force promoting flow of liquid. If the change in width between the capillary and the wider stop is sufficient, then the liquid will stop at the entrance to the capillary stop. Even if the liquid creeps along the hydrophilic walls of the stop, the stop is effective.
- a hydrophilic stop can be the result of an abrupt narrowing of the passageway so that the liquid does not flow through the narrow passageway until appropriate force, such as centrifugal force, is applied.
- Microfluidic devices have many potential uses. Of particular interest to the present inventors are medical tests that are carried out near the patient in order to obtain information promptly, without waiting for analytical results from a laboratory. Thus, a medical condition can be diagnosed more rapidly and treatment begun. Many of such tests are carried out on samples of blood and urine, although other types of samples have been tested, including saliva, spinal fluid, gasteric fluids, water, semen, and waste streams. Dry reagents placed on absorbent materials have often been used for such tests, but they have disadvantages. Microfluidic devices are, in theory, able to overcome these disadvantages by using liquid reagents, which can be separated within the device. Such devices may include dry reagents that also are not in contact with other reagents. However, new problems result, which are overcome in the present invention.
- reagent includes both substances that react with components of the sample and those that prepare the sample for subsequent reaction, such as diluents, buffers, and the like.
- the biological samples may require pretreatment or conditioning before contacting reagents to provide the desired response to an analyte in the sample. For example, washing of a sample with a buffer solution or contacting with a liquid solvent, to separate DNA, proteins or other analytes of interest from the rest of the sample.
- the sample may contact a reagent which removes interfering compounds in the sample, such as trapping intact red blood cells that interfere with color generation.
- Other pretreatments may include a preliminary reaction with an analyte to improve its subsequent response to a reagent.
- Liquid reagents include for example, cell lysis buffers, surfactants, biochemicals such as enzymes, proteins, co-factors, and probes, and suspensions of particles, such as labels, enzymes, substrates, metals or polymers.
- a microfluidic device If a microfluidic device is to have a long shelf life, then the dry reagents must not be degraded by moisture entering from outside the device or from moisture contained in the liquid reagents. If the liquid reagents lose moisture, or other solvents, through the walls of the device, the concentration of these liquids is increased. Therefore, the design and the selection of materials for use in microfluidic devices are very important if the device is to have a long shelf life and perform as intended. In some microfluidic devices, dry reagents will be used. These are usually liquid reagents that have been placed on or in substrates, e.g. absorbent materials and then dried.
- microfluidic device examples include cellulose papers, nitrocellulose, plastic films, polymeric coatings, membranes, glass, porous plastics, polyesters, fibers and porous inorganic media. If the microfluidic device contains only dry reagents, then it is important to maintain them in the dry state until they are ready for use, since by picking up moisture they may lose their effectiveness. Therefore, if a microfluidic device is to have a shelf life of several years, the construction of the device must be such that it limits moisture intrusion.
- the microfluidic device contains both dry reagents and liquid reagents or conditioning agents
- the device contains moisture internally that can create a problem for the shelf life of the dry reagents, and at the same time present difficulties related to the liquid reagents and conditioning agents.
- plastic materials While in theory microfluidic devices could be made from many materials, in practice plastic materials will be preferred for several reasons. Cost is the most obvious reason, since the devices will generally be used once and then discarded. Plastic materials also are useful for high volume manufacturing since molding methods can reproduce such small devices. Also, they will be less likely to be fragile and easily broken during storage or handling. But, with all these advantages, plastic materials are not universally acceptable. They may interact with the reagents: they may transmit moisture to or from the reagents: or they may interfere with accurate measurement of the response of the reagents to an analyte in the sample.
- Plastic materials must not contain solvents or plasticizers or any other compounds which would react with the sample or the reagents to interfere with obtaining an accurate analytical result. For example, traces of solvents, plastic or commonly used mold release agents could cause problems and should be avoided in selecting plastic materials for use in microfluidic devices.
- Moisture transmission is a particularly important property in selecting materials since moisture can damage a dry reagent or allow evaporation of a liquid reagent.
- the materials should inherently transmit water vapor at a very low rate, since no more than 0.01 mg of water should be added to each 1 mg of a dry reagent over the life of the device.
- movement of moisture must be carefully controlled.
- the dry reagents should not receive more than 0.01 mg of water per mg of the reagent over the useful life of the device, water must be prevented from entering through or from the walls of the device. Also, water must be prevented from migrating from the liquid reagent containers. Achieving both objectives involves the careful selection of barrier materials. In general, plastics should not transmit more than 0.01 g H 2 01 m 2 -day, but many plastics cannot meet this requirement, unless a very thick layer of the plastic is used.
- plastics absorb and retain water, for example polycarbonate.
- plastics that have relatively high water absorption include ABS, acetals, acrylics, acrylonitrile, cellulose acetate, ethyl cellulose, alkylvinylalcohols, polyaryletherketones, polyetheretherketones, polyetherketones, melamine formaldehyde, phenolic (formaldehyde), polyamides (e.g., nylon 6, nylon 66, nylon 12), polyamide-imide, polydicyclopentadiene, polyether-imides, polyethersulfones, polyimides, polyphenyleneoxides, polyphthalamide, methylmethacrylate, polyurethanes, polysulfones, polyethersulfones and vinyl formal.
- ABS acetals
- acrylics acrylonitrile
- cellulose acetate ethyl cellulose
- alkylvinylalcohols alkylvinylalcohols
- polystyrene absorbs moisture, it is considered acceptable for use in microfluidic devices, since it will absorb much less water than polycarbonate. When saturated, polystyrene will hold about 0.01-0.03% water.
- plastic materials having similar properties are polypropylene, polybutadiene, polybutylene, epoxies, Teflon®, PET, PTFE and chloro-fluoroethylenes, polyvinylidene fluoride, PE-TFE, PE-CTFE, liquid crystal polymers, Mylar®, polyester, LDPE, HDPE, polymethylpentene, polyphenylene sulfide, polyolefins, PVC, and chlorinated PVC. Glass fibers reduce the ability of plastics to hold water, but do not significantly affect water vapor transfer.
- the thickness chosen will be based on the inherent ability of the plastic to resist transfer of moisture to the desired level, typically about 0.01 g/m 2 -day. Also, since the plastic materials hold small, but significant amounts of water, even if the device is kept in a low humidity environment, water can migrate inside the device. Consequently, it is preferred that moisture absorbents, such as silica gel, salts, or molecular sieves, are placed within the device to assure that dry conditions are maintained.
- moisture absorbents such as silica gel, salts, or molecular sieves
- Liquid reagents must be isolated by barrier materials which prevent migration of water throughout the device, thus avoiding changes in the concentration through transpiration or evaporation and preventing moisture from reaching the dry reagents. Consequently, the selection of materials used as containers may be even more difficult than selection of materials for the device itself. This is complicated by the need to release liquid reagents when the device is to be used.
- the plastic base of most microfluidic devices will be relatively thick, for example about 2 to 8 mm to keep moisture transfer below 0.01 mg of water added for each 1 mg of dry reagent over the shelf life of the device.
- the devices are typically made by cutting or molding the desired features into the base and then covering the face through which the features were cut with a relatively thin layer to complete the device.
- This top layer will be applied with an adhesive, which also may affect the performance of the device. Moisture transfer through this top layer may be significant. However, it cannot be made too thick since it may be necessary to pierce the top layer in order to introduce the sample that is to be measured. Therefore, the top layer must be thin enough to be pierced easily, but tough enough to withstand handling, while at the same time limiting moisture loss or intrusion.
- plastic materials meet these requirements.
- Preferred are polypropylene, polystyrene, PET, polyolefins such as cyclicolefin copolymers, COC, BCOP or LCP, PCTFE, PVC and multilayer materials such as PCTFE, PVC, and CPC with polyesters, polyolefins or polyamides should also be appropriate.
- Other materials which may be used, although not necessarily with equivalent results include polyethylene and polyesters such as Mylar® or SCO.
- a thickness of about 30 to 600 ⁇ m is preferred for most plastic materials. When the preferred polypropylene film is used, the thickness may be about 150 to 300 ⁇ m.
- the moisture transmission of the top layer should be about 0.007 to 0.01 g/m 2 -day, more generally 0.02 g/m 2 -day or below.
- top and bottom layers Another important property of both the top and bottom layers is their optical clarity.
- the response of a reagent to the presence or absence of an analyte in the sample is measured as a change in the color or in its intensity, or in emission, absorbence, reflectance, or transmission of energy
- the area of the top layer over the measuring point should not interfere with the measurement.
- the top layer were to be made of a thin metallized plastic film, such a layer could be easily pierced and it would be a good moisture barrier, but it could not be used over the region in which optical measurements were to be made.
- the preferred polypropylene film is acceptable as a moisture barrier in thin films and pierceable, has adequate optical clarity for use over the detection region, especially as thickness increases.
- Other plastic materials having adequate optical clarity include polystyrene, PET, polyethylene, polyolefin, and polyester, although not all are as satisfactory in other desirable properties as is the preferred polypropylene.
- top layer is secured to the base with an adhesive
- another layer of polymeric material that can affect the operation of the microfluidic device.
- the adhesive can admit or release moisture through the edges between layers where the adhesive is exposed. In general, it is believed that at least 2 mm should be provided between the edges of the device and chambers that contain reagents in order to limit moisture flow.
- Some of the adhesive used will typically be in contact with the sample and, since the surface energy of the adhesive will affect the capillary forces acting on the sample, the adhesive chosen must either have suitable surface energy as supplied or it may require modification by chemical additives. Modification of an adhesive's flow properties, film thickness, application time, application pressure and temperature, and hardness may be needed.
- acrylic adhesives have been found to transmit moisture at a higher rate than is desirable, they are preferred for their other properties, including retaining good adhesion over extended periods of time, clearer sealing without forming bubbles, low air leakage, and better compatibility with reagents.
- Other adhesives which may be used, although not necessarily equivalent to acrylics include silicones and rubber based and modified acrylates.
- metallized plastic films related to those used in packaging consumer products.
- Such films may have a core plastic, e.g., polypropylene, co-extruded with a second plastic that provides a seal on one side and a surface for deposition of metal on the other side.
- Aluminum is commonly applied by vacuum deposition or other methods that leave a very thin metal film.
- Other metals, such as copper, silver, and chromium have been suggested for the metal coating.
- the advantages of such metallized films include their low moisture transmission rate, e.g. 0.001 mg per m 2 -day, and relatively easy removal or puncture.
- metallized films it is preferred to use such metallized films to seal the inlet ports or other openings in a microfluidic device, such as the vents through which air will be released during use of the device.
- Another use is to seal the micro-reservoirs that are used to contain liquid reagents or conditioning agents. They may also be used to form the micro-reservoirs in some embodiments of the invention.
- liquid reagents may be needed, a change in concentration by evaporation is a significant problem.
- no more than 10% of the liquid should escape over the life of the device.
- the liquid reagents must be prevented from moving from their designated chamber until the device is used. There are many possible means by which these requirements might be met. For example, encapsulating the liquid reagent and then releasing it when the device is to be used. There are several practical concerns when implementing encapsulation. First, the size of the reagent volume must be considered. Since there will be only about 1 to 100 microliters, encapsulation of the proper amount is difficult, as is handling and placing the encapsulated reagent in the proper location in the device without rupturing the capsule.
- opening the capsule when the microfluidic device is to be used is a concern, because the reagent must remain available in the device and in the amount needed to carry out the analysis.
- some means must be provided to prevent the reagent from diffusing or moving through the capillary passages connecting the reagent chamber with upstream and downstream chambers.
- Another possibility is blocking the capillary passages with some material, such as a fusible metal that can be removed by heating to provide access to the reagent.
- Another possibility is to provide a weakened location in a barrier that could be opened by the stress created by centrifugal or mechanical force acting on the reagent when a sample is being moved through the device.
- the present inventors discovered a relatively simple solution to the problems just discussed. They propose to place the liquid reagent in a micro-reservoir positioned as part of or in the appropriate chamber in the device and protect the reagent chamber with a metallized plastic film which can seal against the upper surface.
- the shape of the micro-reservoir is an important aspect of the invention, since if it filled the chamber it would not be possible to release the reagent completely. Therefore, the micro-reservoir has a void space in the bottom, leaving space for the reagent to flow out of the cup into the chamber.
- FIG. 2 One suitable design is illustrated in FIG. 2 .
- the micro-reservoir 20 is shown as being generally cylindrical because most chambers in the typical microfluidic device will be round, although the shape of the micro-reservoir could be adapted to the shape of the chamber receiving it.
- the micro-reservoir is tapered so that the bottom can be punctured to release the reagent.
- the material used generally should satisfy the same requirements for the top layer discussed above. It will not have an adverse effect on the reagent and will be thin enough to be readily pierced to release the reagent.
- An aluminized plastic film is the preferred material, but others such as a fusible metal, e.g. a Bi/In/Pb/Sn alloy may be used.
- the micro-reservoir 20 preferably will have a flanged top 22 so that it can rest on the edges of the chamber, as will be seen in the sectional view of a microfluidic device shown in FIG. 1 .
- FIG. 1 illustrates in a sectional view a microfluidic device 10 of the invention.
- one inlet port 12 is shown and one liquid reagent chamber 14 , connected by a capillary passageway 16 .
- the chambers will be connected to vents through which the air is removed as liquid enters. These vents may contain adsorbents or dessicants to remove the small amount of moisture which is present.
- the base 18 of the device is preferably made of polystyrene, which is optically clear enough to allow reading of visual results of reactions that take place during use and which has a relatively low rate of moisture transfer.
- the base 18 is cut away to provide an entry port 12 and inlet chamber 15 for the sample fluid.
- the inlet chamber communicates reagent chamber 14 through a capillary passageway 16 . If the sample liquid is to go immediately into the reagent chamber, the walls of the passageway will be hyrophilic and capillary forces will cause the liquid to be transferred.
- a capillary stop may be provided in the passageway to prevent movement of the liquid until desired. The capillary stop may be overcome by applying centrifugal force, although other means of moving liquid could be used.
- the liquid reagent must be isolated from the chamber in which it is to be used. This is done by placing the reagent in a micro-reservoir 20 which prevent the escape of moisture until the device is to be used.
- the micro-reservoir 20 has a flanged top 22 that is seated on the top sheet 19 that covers the inlet and reagent chambers.
- the micro-reservoir is preferably made of metallized plastic film to assure that microscopic holes in the foil are closed. Aluminum is preferred. It is feasible to use relatively thick plastic films, but they are more difficult to pierce when the liquid reagent is to be released. Similar metallized plastic films 24 are applied after the device has been assembled to cover the inlet port 15 and the reagent chamber 14 .
- the foil covers 24 can be pierced to allow introduction of the sample liquid and to release the reagent into its chamber 14 , where it can react with the sample after it has been transferred to the reagent chamber.
- the liquid could be released by slitting the reagent chamber or applying pressure to rupture it. It is also possible to use a fusible metal that can be melted by local application of heat to release the liquid reagent (or conditioning liquid).
- FIG. 3 illustrates in a sectional view, another microfluidic device 30 of the invention.
- the base 32 has been cut away to form an inlet port 34 , a reagent chamber 36 , and a detection chamber 38 .
- the top portion 40 has openings over the inlet port 34 , the reagent chamber 36 , and the detection chamber 38 .
- An adhesive layer 42 is applied to either the base 32 or the top portion 40 to complete the device, except for the reagent micro-reservoir 44 that is suspended by its flanged top from the top layer 40 and covered with foil seal 46 to isolate the liquid reagent within the device.
- Another foil seal 46 is applied over the inlet port 34 .
- a sample is placed in the inlet port 34 after forming an opening in foil seal 46 .
- the sample passes through capillary 48 into the reagent chamber to react in chamber 36 with the reagent released from the micro-reservoir 44 .
- the reacted sample passes through capillary 50 into detection chamber 38 .
- the top layer 40 is made of a clear plastic, making possible reading the results of the reaction directly from the detection chamber 38 through the top layer 40 .
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Clinical Laboratory Science (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Hematology (AREA)
- Dispersion Chemistry (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Investigating Or Analysing Biological Materials (AREA)
- Sampling And Sample Adjustment (AREA)
- Physical Or Chemical Processes And Apparatus (AREA)
- Investigating Or Analyzing Non-Biological Materials By The Use Of Chemical Means (AREA)
- Automatic Analysis And Handling Materials Therefor (AREA)
Abstract
A microfluidic device containing liquid reagents having an extended shelf life contains the liquid reagents in micro-reservoirs that limit the escape of moisture to less than 10% over the shelf life of the device. The micro-reservoir preferably is made of polypropylene and covered with a metallized plastic film.
Description
- This is a divisional application of U.S. Ser. No. 10/447,969 filed on May 29, 2003.
- This invention relates to microfluidic devices that as can be used for carrying out analysis of biological samples, such as blood, urine and the like. More particularly, the invention relates to the materials for such devices and to their construction.
- Microfluidic devices have been the subject of many patents and patent applications. The general principles of microfluidic devices of the present invention have been discussed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/082,415 and more specific features of such devices are the subject of other applications. Such microfluidic devices include very small chambers containing liquid or solid reagents which contact liquid samples as they move through the device via capillary passageways, typically by capillary forces or applied centrifugal force (although other means of moving liquid have been disclosed and could be used in some microfluidic devices). After a small sample of liquid is added, the desired quantity of the sample is metered and then passed through one or more chambers where it meets reagents that prepare the sample for subsequent reaction or that react with an analyte in the sample to produce a detectable response, for example, a change in color.
- Microfluidic devices have many advantages over the use of dry reagent strips for testing in the near-patient environment. However, the use of very small samples, say up to about 20 microliters, means that the interaction of the sample with the walls of the device is critical to its performance. The sample must be moved in the desired amounts through the capillaries and chambers and must contact dry reagents uniformly, while purging the air that initially filled the spaces in the device. Such problems have been considered in other patent applications and need not be discussed further here. The present invention is concerned with problems related to practical applications of microfluidic devices, particularly those containing liquid or dry reagents and in which ease of use and shelf life of the devices are important to their success.
- Microfluidic devices can be made, but then not loaded with reagents agents until the time arrives when they are to be used. Such a method has the advantage of assuring that active reagents are used. However, loading the microfluidic device manually with very small amounts of reagents may be difficult to do with precision and could lead to inaccurate analytical results. Therefore, the present inventors believed that fully-functional microfluidic devices would be preferred by their users. That is, the devices should be pre-loaded with reagents and ready to use with minimal preparation. Doing so introduces significant problems, which will be addressed herein.
- It will be evident that a microfluidic device must be keep free of contamination by materials which could prevent it from functioning in its intended manner. It is particularly important to protect the reagents with which the device has been loaded. In some types of analysis, only dry reagents are used. These must be protected from degradation by reaction with the surrounding atmosphere in order to assure that when used, perhaps several years after being manufactured, the reagents perform as intended, providing accurate results. Protection against moisture infiltration is of particular importance.
- In other chambers, liquid reagents, diluents, buffers and the like may be loaded into the microfluidic device. Such liquids must be protected from contamination and from change in reagent concentration by loss of solvents and water. An advantage of microfluidic devices is their inherent ability to keep reagents separated until used. Thus, it is important also that liquid reagents not be allowed to migrate from the chambers in which they are loaded. Since the devices are small and the samples and reagents are of the microliter size, it will be evident that packaging of the devices is an important consideration, if they are to have acceptable shelf life and reliably provide accurate results.
- The present inventors have considered these problems and propose the solutions presented in the following description.
- The invention relates generally to microfluidic devices having extended shelf life. Dry reagents are placed in the appropriate chambers, where they are protected from contamination and from degradation by contact with moisture. Liquid reagents and the like are placed in micro-reservoirs having a working volume of about 100 μL or less and are sealed within the microfluidic device. The micro-reservoirs are capable of limiting the escape of moisture from such liquids to a rate within 10% or less over the shelf life of the device. In some embodiments, the micro-reservoirs are made of plastics having a low moisture transfer rate and that are thick enough to limit the escape of moisture to the desired level. In other embodiments, the micro-reservoirs are made metal foils, or of plastic films that have been metallized or plastic coated metal foils.
- In another aspect, the invention is a method of making microfluidic devices in which micro-reservoirs are placed in predetermined cavities in the base of the device, filled with the desired liquid reagent and finally sealed within the device. When the device is to be used, the micro-reservoirs are opened so that the sealed cavities become chambers filled with the reagents, thus making them available for the analytical procedure for which the device was intended. Various methods may be used to open the micro-reservoirs, including piercing the walls of the micro-reservoirs or rupturing prepared weak spots in the micro-reservoirs.
- In a further aspect, the invention is a microfluidic device in which the materials used to make the device prevent transfer of moisture in or out of the device to a rate within 0.01 g/m2/day or less to extend shelf life of the device. Plastics having a suitably low affinity for moisture are used in thicknesses capable of limiting moisture transfer to the desired amount. In a preferred embodiment, the base of the device is made of polystyrene having a thickness of at least 2 mm, the top cover of the device is made of foil having a thickness of at least 0.1 mm or polypropylene having a thickness of at least 1 mm. The top cover is adhered to the base with a pressure sensitive adhesive capable of limiting moisture transfer. In preferred embodiments, the moisture content of the device is kept at a low value by including moisture absorbents.
-
FIG. 1 shows a sectional view through one device of the invention. -
FIG. 2 shows the detail of an encapsulated liquid reagent. -
FIG. 3 shows a sectional view of a second device of the Invention. - Microfluidic devices sometimes are referred to as “chips”. They are generally small and flat, typically about 1 to 2 inches square (25 to 50 mm square) or circular discs of similar size (e.g. 25 to 120 mm radius). The volume of samples supplied to the microfluidic chips are typically small, i.e., about 0.3 to 5 μL. The sample liquids are moved through a series of chambers interconnected by capillary passageways having widths in the range of 10 to 500 μm, preferably 20 to 100 μm. The minimum permitted depth of the passageways may be determined by the properties of the sample. For example, the depth typically will be at least 5 μm, but at least 20 μm when whole blood is the sample.
- While there are several ways in which the capillaries and sample wells can be formed, such as injection molding, laser ablation, diamond milling or embossing. It is preferred to use injection molding in order to minimize cost while reproducing structural features with high fidelity. Generally, a base portion of the chip will be cut or molded to create cavities that will become the desired network of chambers and capillaries. A top portion will be attached over the base to complete the chip.
- With passageways having nominal diameters less than about 200 μm, capillary forces related to the surface energies of the liquid sample and walls predominate. When the walls are welled by the liquid, the liquid moves through the passageway without external forces being applied. Conversely, when the walls are not wetted by a liquid, the liquid attempts to withdraw from the passageway. These general tendencies are employed to cause a liquid to move through a passageway or to stop moving at the junction with another passageway having a different cross-sectional area. If the liquid is at rest, then it can be moved by applying a force, such as the centrifugal force. Alternatively other means may be used, including air pressure, vacuum, electroosmosis, absorbent materials, additional capillarity and the like, which are able to induce the needed pressure change at the junction between passageway's having different cross-sectional areas or surface energies. When the passageways are very small, capillary forces make it possible to move liquids by capillary forces alone, without requiring external forces, except for short periods when a capillary stop must be overcome. However, the smaller passageways inherently are more likely to be sensitive to obstruction from particles in the biological samples or the reagents. Consequently, the surface energy of the passageway walls is adjusted as required for use with the sample fluid to be tested, e.g. blood, urine, and the like.
- The capillary passageways may be adjusted to be either hydrophobic or hydrophilic, properties which are defined with respect to the contact angle formed at a solid surface by a liquid sample or reagent. Typically, a surface is considered hydrophilic if the contact angle is less than 90 degrees and hydrophobic if the contact angle is greater than 90°. Preferably, plasma induced polymerization is carried out at the surface of the passageways. Other methods may be used to control the surface energy of the capillary walls, such as coating with hydrophilic or hydrophobic materials, grafting, or corona treatments. The surface energy of the capillary walls may be adjusted, i.e. the degree of hydrophilicity or hydrophobicity, for use with the intended sample fluid.
- Movement of liquids through the capillaries may be prevented by capillary stops, which as the name suggests, prevent liquids from flowing through the capillary. A hydrophobic capillary stop is typically a smaller passageway having hydrophobic walls. The liquid is not able to pass through the hydrophobic stop because the combination of the small size and the non-wettable walls results in a surface tension force which opposes the entry of the liquid. The liquid in the sample chamber is prevented from entering the capillary until sufficient force is applied, e.g. centrifugal force, to cause the liquid to overcome the opposing surface tension force and to pass through the hydrophobic passageway.
- A hydrophilic stop can also be used, even through the capillary is hydrophilic. Such a stop is wider than the capillary and thus the liquid's surface tension creates a lower force promoting flow of liquid. If the change in width between the capillary and the wider stop is sufficient, then the liquid will stop at the entrance to the capillary stop. Even if the liquid creeps along the hydrophilic walls of the stop, the stop is effective. Alternatively, a hydrophilic stop can be the result of an abrupt narrowing of the passageway so that the liquid does not flow through the narrow passageway until appropriate force, such as centrifugal force, is applied.
- Microfluidic devices have many potential uses. Of particular interest to the present inventors are medical tests that are carried out near the patient in order to obtain information promptly, without waiting for analytical results from a laboratory. Thus, a medical condition can be diagnosed more rapidly and treatment begun. Many of such tests are carried out on samples of blood and urine, although other types of samples have been tested, including saliva, spinal fluid, gasteric fluids, water, semen, and waste streams. Dry reagents placed on absorbent materials have often been used for such tests, but they have disadvantages. Microfluidic devices are, in theory, able to overcome these disadvantages by using liquid reagents, which can be separated within the device. Such devices may include dry reagents that also are not in contact with other reagents. However, new problems result, which are overcome in the present invention.
- It should be understood that the term “reagent” as used here includes both substances that react with components of the sample and those that prepare the sample for subsequent reaction, such as diluents, buffers, and the like. The biological samples may require pretreatment or conditioning before contacting reagents to provide the desired response to an analyte in the sample. For example, washing of a sample with a buffer solution or contacting with a liquid solvent, to separate DNA, proteins or other analytes of interest from the rest of the sample. In other cases, the sample may contact a reagent which removes interfering compounds in the sample, such as trapping intact red blood cells that interfere with color generation. Other pretreatments may include a preliminary reaction with an analyte to improve its subsequent response to a reagent. For example, amplifying the signal generated in response to an analyte. Other pre-treatments and conditioning steps may include mediating, activating and other reactions needed in spectroscopic and electrochemical detection. Liquid reagents include for example, cell lysis buffers, surfactants, biochemicals such as enzymes, proteins, co-factors, and probes, and suspensions of particles, such as labels, enzymes, substrates, metals or polymers.
- If a microfluidic device is to have a long shelf life, then the dry reagents must not be degraded by moisture entering from outside the device or from moisture contained in the liquid reagents. If the liquid reagents lose moisture, or other solvents, through the walls of the device, the concentration of these liquids is increased. Therefore, the design and the selection of materials for use in microfluidic devices are very important if the device is to have a long shelf life and perform as intended. In some microfluidic devices, dry reagents will be used. These are usually liquid reagents that have been placed on or in substrates, e.g. absorbent materials and then dried. Examples of substrates include cellulose papers, nitrocellulose, plastic films, polymeric coatings, membranes, glass, porous plastics, polyesters, fibers and porous inorganic media. If the microfluidic device contains only dry reagents, then it is important to maintain them in the dry state until they are ready for use, since by picking up moisture they may lose their effectiveness. Therefore, if a microfluidic device is to have a shelf life of several years, the construction of the device must be such that it limits moisture intrusion. However, when the microfluidic device contains both dry reagents and liquid reagents or conditioning agents, the device contains moisture internally that can create a problem for the shelf life of the dry reagents, and at the same time present difficulties related to the liquid reagents and conditioning agents.
- While in theory microfluidic devices could be made from many materials, in practice plastic materials will be preferred for several reasons. Cost is the most obvious reason, since the devices will generally be used once and then discarded. Plastic materials also are useful for high volume manufacturing since molding methods can reproduce such small devices. Also, they will be less likely to be fragile and easily broken during storage or handling. But, with all these advantages, plastic materials are not universally acceptable. They may interact with the reagents: they may transmit moisture to or from the reagents: or they may interfere with accurate measurement of the response of the reagents to an analyte in the sample.
- Plastic materials must not contain solvents or plasticizers or any other compounds which would react with the sample or the reagents to interfere with obtaining an accurate analytical result. For example, traces of solvents, plastic or commonly used mold release agents could cause problems and should be avoided in selecting plastic materials for use in microfluidic devices.
- Moisture transmission is a particularly important property in selecting materials since moisture can damage a dry reagent or allow evaporation of a liquid reagent. Thus, the materials should inherently transmit water vapor at a very low rate, since no more than 0.01 mg of water should be added to each 1 mg of a dry reagent over the life of the device. When both types of reagents are loaded into a microfluidic device, which is expected to have a shelf life of several years, movement of moisture must be carefully controlled. Since the dry reagents should not receive more than 0.01 mg of water per mg of the reagent over the useful life of the device, water must be prevented from entering through or from the walls of the device. Also, water must be prevented from migrating from the liquid reagent containers. Achieving both objectives involves the careful selection of barrier materials. In general, plastics should not transmit more than 0.01 g H201 m2-day, but many plastics cannot meet this requirement, unless a very thick layer of the plastic is used.
- Many plastics absorb and retain water, for example polycarbonate. Other plastics that have relatively high water absorption include ABS, acetals, acrylics, acrylonitrile, cellulose acetate, ethyl cellulose, alkylvinylalcohols, polyaryletherketones, polyetheretherketones, polyetherketones, melamine formaldehyde, phenolic (formaldehyde), polyamides (e.g., nylon 6, nylon 66, nylon 12), polyamide-imide, polydicyclopentadiene, polyether-imides, polyethersulfones, polyimides, polyphenyleneoxides, polyphthalamide, methylmethacrylate, polyurethanes, polysulfones, polyethersulfones and vinyl formal.
- Although polystyrene absorbs moisture, it is considered acceptable for use in microfluidic devices, since it will absorb much less water than polycarbonate. When saturated, polystyrene will hold about 0.01-0.03% water. Other plastic materials having similar properties are polypropylene, polybutadiene, polybutylene, epoxies, Teflon®, PET, PTFE and chloro-fluoroethylenes, polyvinylidene fluoride, PE-TFE, PE-CTFE, liquid crystal polymers, Mylar®, polyester, LDPE, HDPE, polymethylpentene, polyphenylene sulfide, polyolefins, PVC, and chlorinated PVC. Glass fibers reduce the ability of plastics to hold water, but do not significantly affect water vapor transfer.
- Since even the preferred plastic materials transmit moisture to some degree, the thickness chosen will be based on the inherent ability of the plastic to resist transfer of moisture to the desired level, typically about 0.01 g/m2-day. Also, since the plastic materials hold small, but significant amounts of water, even if the device is kept in a low humidity environment, water can migrate inside the device. Consequently, it is preferred that moisture absorbents, such as silica gel, salts, or molecular sieves, are placed within the device to assure that dry conditions are maintained.
- Liquid reagents must be isolated by barrier materials which prevent migration of water throughout the device, thus avoiding changes in the concentration through transpiration or evaporation and preventing moisture from reaching the dry reagents. Consequently, the selection of materials used as containers may be even more difficult than selection of materials for the device itself. This is complicated by the need to release liquid reagents when the device is to be used.
- The plastic base of most microfluidic devices will be relatively thick, for example about 2 to 8 mm to keep moisture transfer below 0.01 mg of water added for each 1 mg of dry reagent over the shelf life of the device. However, the devices are typically made by cutting or molding the desired features into the base and then covering the face through which the features were cut with a relatively thin layer to complete the device. This top layer will be applied with an adhesive, which also may affect the performance of the device. Moisture transfer through this top layer may be significant. However, it cannot be made too thick since it may be necessary to pierce the top layer in order to introduce the sample that is to be measured. Therefore, the top layer must be thin enough to be pierced easily, but tough enough to withstand handling, while at the same time limiting moisture loss or intrusion. The inventors have found that certain plastic materials meet these requirements. Preferred are polypropylene, polystyrene, PET, polyolefins such as cyclicolefin copolymers, COC, BCOP or LCP, PCTFE, PVC and multilayer materials such as PCTFE, PVC, and CPC with polyesters, polyolefins or polyamides should also be appropriate. Other materials which may be used, although not necessarily with equivalent results include polyethylene and polyesters such as Mylar® or SCO. A thickness of about 30 to 600 μm is preferred for most plastic materials. When the preferred polypropylene film is used, the thickness may be about 150 to 300 μm. The moisture transmission of the top layer should be about 0.007 to 0.01 g/m2-day, more generally 0.02 g/m2-day or below.
- Another important property of both the top and bottom layers is their optical clarity. When the response of a reagent to the presence or absence of an analyte in the sample is measured as a change in the color or in its intensity, or in emission, absorbence, reflectance, or transmission of energy, the area of the top layer over the measuring point should not interfere with the measurement. For example, if the top layer were to be made of a thin metallized plastic film, such a layer could be easily pierced and it would be a good moisture barrier, but it could not be used over the region in which optical measurements were to be made. Fortunately, the preferred polypropylene film, is acceptable as a moisture barrier in thin films and pierceable, has adequate optical clarity for use over the detection region, especially as thickness increases. Other plastic materials having adequate optical clarity include polystyrene, PET, polyethylene, polyolefin, and polyester, although not all are as satisfactory in other desirable properties as is the preferred polypropylene.
- If the top layer is secured to the base with an adhesive, another layer of polymeric material that can affect the operation of the microfluidic device. The adhesive can admit or release moisture through the edges between layers where the adhesive is exposed. In general, it is believed that at least 2 mm should be provided between the edges of the device and chambers that contain reagents in order to limit moisture flow. Some of the adhesive used will typically be in contact with the sample and, since the surface energy of the adhesive will affect the capillary forces acting on the sample, the adhesive chosen must either have suitable surface energy as supplied or it may require modification by chemical additives. Modification of an adhesive's flow properties, film thickness, application time, application pressure and temperature, and hardness may be needed. Although acrylic adhesives have been found to transmit moisture at a higher rate than is desirable, they are preferred for their other properties, including retaining good adhesion over extended periods of time, clearer sealing without forming bubbles, low air leakage, and better compatibility with reagents. Other adhesives which may be used, although not necessarily equivalent to acrylics include silicones and rubber based and modified acrylates.
- One useful material for limiting moisture migration is metallized plastic films, related to those used in packaging consumer products. Such films may have a core plastic, e.g., polypropylene, co-extruded with a second plastic that provides a seal on one side and a surface for deposition of metal on the other side. Aluminum is commonly applied by vacuum deposition or other methods that leave a very thin metal film. Other metals, such as copper, silver, and chromium have been suggested for the metal coating. The advantages of such metallized films include their low moisture transmission rate, e.g. 0.001 mg per m2-day, and relatively easy removal or puncture. In the present invention, it is preferred to use such metallized films to seal the inlet ports or other openings in a microfluidic device, such as the vents through which air will be released during use of the device. Another use is to seal the micro-reservoirs that are used to contain liquid reagents or conditioning agents. They may also be used to form the micro-reservoirs in some embodiments of the invention.
- Since in many cases, liquid reagents may be needed, a change in concentration by evaporation is a significant problem. Preferably, no more than 10% of the liquid should escape over the life of the device. Also, the liquid reagents must be prevented from moving from their designated chamber until the device is used. There are many possible means by which these requirements might be met. For example, encapsulating the liquid reagent and then releasing it when the device is to be used. There are several practical concerns when implementing encapsulation. First, the size of the reagent volume must be considered. Since there will be only about 1 to 100 microliters, encapsulation of the proper amount is difficult, as is handling and placing the encapsulated reagent in the proper location in the device without rupturing the capsule. Then, opening the capsule when the microfluidic device is to be used is a concern, because the reagent must remain available in the device and in the amount needed to carry out the analysis. One might conclude that it would be best to inject the reagent into the proper well and then place the top layer over the device to prevent the reagent from escaping. However, then some means must be provided to prevent the reagent from diffusing or moving through the capillary passages connecting the reagent chamber with upstream and downstream chambers. One can then consider valving of some type, that can be opened when the device is to be used. Another possibility is blocking the capillary passages with some material, such as a fusible metal that can be removed by heating to provide access to the reagent. Another possibility is to provide a weakened location in a barrier that could be opened by the stress created by centrifugal or mechanical force acting on the reagent when a sample is being moved through the device.
- After considering many possible solutions to the problem of maintaining the viability of liquid reagents and conditioning agents over the useful shelf life of a microfluidic device, the present inventors discovered a relatively simple solution to the problems just discussed. They propose to place the liquid reagent in a micro-reservoir positioned as part of or in the appropriate chamber in the device and protect the reagent chamber with a metallized plastic film which can seal against the upper surface. The shape of the micro-reservoir is an important aspect of the invention, since if it filled the chamber it would not be possible to release the reagent completely. Therefore, the micro-reservoir has a void space in the bottom, leaving space for the reagent to flow out of the cup into the chamber. One suitable design is illustrated in
FIG. 2 . The micro-reservoir 20 is shown as being generally cylindrical because most chambers in the typical microfluidic device will be round, although the shape of the micro-reservoir could be adapted to the shape of the chamber receiving it. The micro-reservoir is tapered so that the bottom can be punctured to release the reagent. The material used generally should satisfy the same requirements for the top layer discussed above. It will not have an adverse effect on the reagent and will be thin enough to be readily pierced to release the reagent. An aluminized plastic film is the preferred material, but others such as a fusible metal, e.g. a Bi/In/Pb/Sn alloy may be used. The micro-reservoir 20 preferably will have a flanged top 22 so that it can rest on the edges of the chamber, as will be seen in the sectional view of a microfluidic device shown inFIG. 1 . -
FIG. 1 illustrates in a sectional view amicrofluidic device 10 of the invention. In this view only oneinlet port 12 is shown and oneliquid reagent chamber 14, connected by acapillary passageway 16. It is to be understood that in other devices of the invention the configuration will be more complex, containing additional chambers interconnected by more capillary passageways. The chambers will be connected to vents through which the air is removed as liquid enters. These vents may contain adsorbents or dessicants to remove the small amount of moisture which is present. Thebase 18 of the device is preferably made of polystyrene, which is optically clear enough to allow reading of visual results of reactions that take place during use and which has a relatively low rate of moisture transfer. However, other materials having similar properties could be used, such as the aluminum coated film described above and plastics providing the necessary moisture barrier. In the configuration shown inFIG. 1 , thebase 18 is cut away to provide anentry port 12 andinlet chamber 15 for the sample fluid. The inlet chamber communicatesreagent chamber 14 through acapillary passageway 16. If the sample liquid is to go immediately into the reagent chamber, the walls of the passageway will be hyrophilic and capillary forces will cause the liquid to be transferred. Alternatively, a capillary stop may be provided in the passageway to prevent movement of the liquid until desired. The capillary stop may be overcome by applying centrifugal force, although other means of moving liquid could be used. The liquid reagent must be isolated from the chamber in which it is to be used. This is done by placing the reagent in a micro-reservoir 20 which prevent the escape of moisture until the device is to be used. InFIG. 1 , the micro-reservoir 20 has a flanged top 22 that is seated on thetop sheet 19 that covers the inlet and reagent chambers. The micro-reservoir is preferably made of metallized plastic film to assure that microscopic holes in the foil are closed. Aluminum is preferred. It is feasible to use relatively thick plastic films, but they are more difficult to pierce when the liquid reagent is to be released. Similar metallizedplastic films 24 are applied after the device has been assembled to cover theinlet port 15 and thereagent chamber 14. When the device is to be used, the foil covers 24 can be pierced to allow introduction of the sample liquid and to release the reagent into itschamber 14, where it can react with the sample after it has been transferred to the reagent chamber. Instead of piercing the cover over the reagent chamber, the liquid could be released by slitting the reagent chamber or applying pressure to rupture it. It is also possible to use a fusible metal that can be melted by local application of heat to release the liquid reagent (or conditioning liquid). -
FIG. 3 illustrates in a sectional view, anothermicrofluidic device 30 of the invention. Thebase 32 has been cut away to form aninlet port 34, areagent chamber 36, and adetection chamber 38. Thetop portion 40 has openings over theinlet port 34, thereagent chamber 36, and thedetection chamber 38. An adhesive layer 42 is applied to either the base 32 or thetop portion 40 to complete the device, except for thereagent micro-reservoir 44 that is suspended by its flanged top from thetop layer 40 and covered withfoil seal 46 to isolate the liquid reagent within the device. Anotherfoil seal 46 is applied over theinlet port 34. - In use, a sample is placed in the
inlet port 34 after forming an opening infoil seal 46. The sample passes throughcapillary 48 into the reagent chamber to react inchamber 36 with the reagent released from the micro-reservoir 44. The reacted sample passes throughcapillary 50 intodetection chamber 38. Thetop layer 40 is made of a clear plastic, making possible reading the results of the reaction directly from thedetection chamber 38 through thetop layer 40.
Claims (30)
1. A method of making microfluidic devices containing liquid reagents comprising:
(a) forming at least one micro-reservoir for a liquid reagent, said micro-reservoir being capable of limiting the escape of moisture from said reagent to less than 10% over the shelf life of the device;
(b) placing said reservoir in a predetermined location in said device;
(c) filling said reservoir with said reagent or conditioning agent; and
(d) sealing said filled reservoir of (c) with an adhesive cover capable of limiting the escape of moisture from said reagent to less than 0.01 g/m2.
2. A method of claim 1 wherein said micro-reservoir is made of polypropylene having a thickness of at least 30 μm.
3. A method of claim 1 wherein said micro-reservoir is made of metallized plastic film.
4. A method of claim 3 wherein said plastic film is metallized with aluminum.
5. A method of claim 1 wherein said adhesive cover is a metallized plastic film.
6. A method of claim 5 wherein said plastic film is metallized with aluminum.
7. A method of claim 1 wherein said adhesive cover is a metal foil.
8. A method of claim 1 wherein said micro-reservoir has a working volume of 100 μL or less.
9. A method of claim 1 wherein said adhesive cover comprises a fusible metal.
10. A micro-reservoir for retaining liquid reagents or conditioning agents in a microfluidic device, said reservoir having a working volume of 100 μL or less and capable of limiting the escape of moisture from said reagent to less than 10% over the shelf life of the microfluidic device.
11. A micro-reservoir of claim 10 wherein said reservoir is made of polypropylene having a thickness of at least 30 μm.
12. A micro-reservoir of claim 10 wherein said reservoir is made of plastic.
13. A micro-reservoir of claim 10 wherein said reservoir is made of metallized plastic film.
14. A micro-reservoir of claim 13 wherein said plastic film is metallized with aluminum.
15. A micro-reservoir of claim 10 wherein said reservoir is sealed with an adhesive cover capable of limiting the escape of moisture from said reagent or conditioning agent to less than 0.01 g/m2 day.
16. A micro-reservoir of claim 15 wherein said adhesive cover is a metallized plastic film.
17. A micro-reservoir of claim 15 wherein said adhesive cover is a metal foil.
18. A micro-reservoir of claim 16 wherein said plastic film is metallized with aluminum.
19. A micro-reservoir of claim 15 wherein said adhesive cover comprises a fusible metal.
20. A microfluidic device for analysis of biological samples having extended shelf life comprising: at least one micro-reservoir containing a liquid reagent or conditioning agent, said reservoir limiting the escape of moisture from said reagent or conditioning agent to less than 10% over the shelf life of said device.
21. A microfluidic device of claim 20 wherein said micro-reservoir is made of polypropylene having a thickness of at least 30 μm.
22. A microfluidic device of claim 20 wherein said micro-reservoir is made of a metallized plastic film.
23. A microfluidic device of claim 22 wherein said plastic film is metallized with aluminum.
24. A microfluidic device of claim 20 wherein said micro-reservoir has a working volume of 100 μL or less.
25. A microfluidic device of claim 20 wherein said reservoir is sealed with an adhesive cover capable of limiting the escape of moisture from said reagent or conditioning agent to less than 0.01 g/m2 day.
26. A microfluidic device of claim 25 wherein said adhesive cover is a metallized plastic film.
27. A microfluidic device of claim 26 wherein said plastic film is metallized with aluminum.
28. A microfluidic device of claim 5 wherein said adhesive cover is a metal foil.
29. A microfluidic device of claim 28 wherein said adhesive cover comprises a fusible metal.
30-36. (canceled)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/205,949 US20090041627A1 (en) | 2003-05-29 | 2008-09-08 | Packaging of microfluidic devices |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/447,969 US7435381B2 (en) | 2003-05-29 | 2003-05-29 | Packaging of microfluidic devices |
US12/205,949 US20090041627A1 (en) | 2003-05-29 | 2008-09-08 | Packaging of microfluidic devices |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/447,969 Division US7435381B2 (en) | 2003-05-29 | 2003-05-29 | Packaging of microfluidic devices |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20090041627A1 true US20090041627A1 (en) | 2009-02-12 |
Family
ID=33451388
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/447,969 Expired - Lifetime US7435381B2 (en) | 2003-05-29 | 2003-05-29 | Packaging of microfluidic devices |
US12/205,949 Abandoned US20090041627A1 (en) | 2003-05-29 | 2008-09-08 | Packaging of microfluidic devices |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/447,969 Expired - Lifetime US7435381B2 (en) | 2003-05-29 | 2003-05-29 | Packaging of microfluidic devices |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US7435381B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1634071B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP4700004B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2527534C (en) |
WO (1) | WO2004105946A2 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US10023897B2 (en) | 2012-05-16 | 2018-07-17 | Phc Holdings Corporation | Biosensor chip, and biosensor device equipped with same |
Families Citing this family (62)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7357898B2 (en) * | 2003-07-31 | 2008-04-15 | Agency For Science, Technology And Research | Microfluidics packages and methods of using same |
US9518899B2 (en) | 2003-08-11 | 2016-12-13 | Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc. | Automated reagent dispensing system and method of operation |
CN100378159C (en) * | 2003-12-19 | 2008-04-02 | 株式会社利其尔 | Resin composition with excellent transferability |
BRPI0509632B1 (en) * | 2004-05-07 | 2015-09-08 | Basf Ag | process for loading contact tubes from a contact tube bundle in a structured manner |
WO2006004939A2 (en) * | 2004-06-29 | 2006-01-12 | University Of Cincinnati | Polymorphisms and haplotypes of the alpha 2c adrenergic receptor gene |
US8097225B2 (en) | 2004-07-28 | 2012-01-17 | Honeywell International Inc. | Microfluidic cartridge with reservoirs for increased shelf life of installed reagents |
WO2006065705A2 (en) | 2004-12-13 | 2006-06-22 | Bayer Healthcare Llc | Self-contained test sensor |
ATE538715T1 (en) | 2005-01-31 | 2012-01-15 | Given Imaging Ltd | SYSTEM FOR IN VIVO ANALYSIS |
EP1707267A1 (en) * | 2005-03-30 | 2006-10-04 | F. Hoffman-la Roche AG | Device having a self sealing fluid port |
JP4769027B2 (en) * | 2005-06-17 | 2011-09-07 | 凸版印刷株式会社 | container |
GB2436616A (en) * | 2006-03-29 | 2007-10-03 | Inverness Medical Switzerland | Assay device and method |
US8459509B2 (en) | 2006-05-25 | 2013-06-11 | Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc. | Fluid dispensing apparatus |
US20110300034A1 (en) * | 2006-06-19 | 2011-12-08 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Disposable, High Pressure Microfluidic Chips |
US8123192B2 (en) * | 2006-10-18 | 2012-02-28 | California Institute Of Technology | Control arrangement for microfluidic devices and related methods and systems |
US7790118B2 (en) * | 2006-10-18 | 2010-09-07 | California Institute Of Technology | Microfluidic devices and related methods and systems |
GB0621520D0 (en) * | 2006-10-28 | 2006-12-06 | P2I Ltd | Novel products |
EP1970711A1 (en) * | 2007-03-16 | 2008-09-17 | Radiometer Medical ApS | Reagent cup device |
US7927866B2 (en) * | 2007-04-19 | 2011-04-19 | American Sterilizer Company | Process challenge device for assessing the effective performance of a biocontamination deactivation process |
US8835157B2 (en) * | 2007-04-25 | 2014-09-16 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Supported reagents, methods, and devices |
ES2687620T3 (en) | 2007-05-04 | 2018-10-26 | Opko Diagnostics, Llc | Device and method for analysis in microfluidic systems |
JP5532218B2 (en) * | 2007-09-10 | 2014-06-25 | 日本電気株式会社 | Sample filling device |
EP2391451B1 (en) | 2009-02-02 | 2018-09-12 | Opko Diagnostics, LLC | Structures for controlling light interaction with microfluidic devices |
JP6110067B2 (en) * | 2009-02-06 | 2017-04-05 | ノースウェスタン ユニバーシティ | Bursable liquid packaging and its use |
JP5242465B2 (en) * | 2009-03-18 | 2013-07-24 | 株式会社東芝 | Sample detection device |
WO2010144683A2 (en) * | 2009-06-12 | 2010-12-16 | Micronics, Inc. | Compositions and methods for dehydrated storage of on-board reagents in microfluidic devices |
JP5721704B2 (en) | 2009-06-12 | 2015-05-20 | マイクロニクス, インコーポレイテッド | Rehydratable matrix for dry storage of TAQ polymerase in microfluidic devices |
WO2011112746A2 (en) * | 2010-03-09 | 2011-09-15 | Netbio, Inc. | Unitary biochip providing sample-in to results-out processing and methods of manufacture |
US8720036B2 (en) | 2010-03-09 | 2014-05-13 | Netbio, Inc. | Unitary biochip providing sample-in to results-out processing and methods of manufacture |
JP5831448B2 (en) * | 2010-04-14 | 2015-12-09 | 日東紡績株式会社 | Test instrument for measuring an analyte in a sample and method for measuring an analyte using the same |
CN102939160B (en) | 2010-04-16 | 2016-10-12 | 欧普科诊断有限责任公司 | System and device for sample analysis |
US20110312654A1 (en) * | 2010-06-17 | 2011-12-22 | Geneasys Pty Ptd | Apparatus for loading oligonucleotide spotting devices and spotting oligonucleotide probes |
US8911689B2 (en) | 2010-07-27 | 2014-12-16 | General Electric Company | Interfacing caps for microfluidic devices and methods of making and using the same |
DE102010035219A1 (en) | 2010-08-24 | 2012-03-01 | Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products Gmbh | Closure device for a reagent container |
US8752732B2 (en) | 2011-02-01 | 2014-06-17 | Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc. | Fluid dispensing system |
BR112013022889B8 (en) | 2011-03-08 | 2022-12-20 | Univ Laval | CENTRIPETAL FLUIDIC DEVICE FOR TESTING COMPONENTS OF A BIOLOGICAL MATERIAL IN A FLUID, TEST APPARATUS AND TESTING METHOD USING SUCH CENTRIPETAL FLUIDIC DEVICE |
JP6041800B2 (en) * | 2011-04-25 | 2016-12-14 | 富士紡ホールディングス株式会社 | Reagent container |
US9196457B2 (en) * | 2011-05-24 | 2015-11-24 | The Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania | Flow cells for electron microscope imaging with multiple flow streams |
JP6096665B2 (en) * | 2011-09-20 | 2017-03-15 | 富士紡ホールディングス株式会社 | Reagent container |
US8932543B2 (en) | 2011-09-21 | 2015-01-13 | Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc. | Automated staining system and reaction chamber |
US8580568B2 (en) | 2011-09-21 | 2013-11-12 | Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc. | Traceability for automated staining system |
TWI638277B (en) | 2012-03-05 | 2018-10-11 | Opko診斷法有限責任公司 | Assy system and method for determining a probability of an event associated with prostate cancer |
CA2879987A1 (en) * | 2012-08-06 | 2014-02-13 | Vivebio, Llc | Matrix and system for preserving biological specimens for qualitative and quantitative analysis |
WO2014083496A1 (en) * | 2012-11-29 | 2014-06-05 | Koninklijke Philips N.V. | Cartridge for uptake and processing of a sample |
FR3000215B1 (en) * | 2012-12-21 | 2016-02-05 | Aneolia | DEVICE AND METHOD FOR TESTING A SAMPLE, ESPECIALLY DISCRIMINATION OF A GAS FROM A SAMPLE |
KR102094496B1 (en) * | 2013-03-11 | 2020-03-30 | 큐 헬스 인코퍼레이티드 | Systems and methods for detection and quantification of analytes |
US20160003815A1 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2016-01-07 | Inanovate, Inc. | Method, system, and device for analyte detection and measurement using longitudinal assay |
US20160236196A1 (en) * | 2013-09-30 | 2016-08-18 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Reagent Holding Container, Liquid Delivery Device, Reagent Discharge Method |
US10076751B2 (en) * | 2013-12-30 | 2018-09-18 | General Electric Company | Systems and methods for reagent storage |
US9399216B2 (en) | 2013-12-30 | 2016-07-26 | General Electric Company | Fluid transport in microfluidic applications with sensors for detecting fluid presence and pressure |
JP2015171754A (en) * | 2014-03-12 | 2015-10-01 | 大日本印刷株式会社 | Micro flow passage device |
USD745423S1 (en) | 2014-05-12 | 2015-12-15 | Cue Inc. | Automated analyzer test cartridge and sample collection device for analyte detection |
US10634602B2 (en) | 2015-06-12 | 2020-04-28 | Cytochip Inc. | Fluidic cartridge for cytometry and additional analysis |
BR122020004273B1 (en) | 2015-07-17 | 2022-11-29 | Cue Health Inc | SAMPLE ANALYSIS CARTRIDGE |
USD799715S1 (en) | 2015-10-23 | 2017-10-10 | Gene POC, Inc. | Fluidic centripetal device |
US20190240655A1 (en) * | 2016-09-14 | 2019-08-08 | Sekisui Chemical Co., Ltd. | Microchip |
US11237161B2 (en) | 2017-01-25 | 2022-02-01 | Cue Health Inc. | Systems and methods for enhanced detection and quantification of analytes |
EP3621736B1 (en) * | 2017-05-11 | 2021-08-18 | Cytochip Inc. | Reagent packaging devices |
WO2019083844A1 (en) | 2017-10-23 | 2019-05-02 | Cytochip Inc. | Devices and methods for measuring analytes and target particles |
GB201901499D0 (en) * | 2019-02-04 | 2019-03-27 | Innospec Ltd | Polymeric materials |
USD975312S1 (en) | 2020-02-14 | 2023-01-10 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | Reagent cartridge |
GB202017920D0 (en) * | 2020-11-13 | 2020-12-30 | Ttp Plc | Sample analysis cartridge |
US20220331802A1 (en) * | 2021-04-16 | 2022-10-20 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Burstable liquid storage package for biological materials and valve substitution |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20020197094A1 (en) * | 2001-06-22 | 2002-12-26 | Gruenbacher Dana Paul | Dosing reservoir |
US6582662B1 (en) * | 1999-06-18 | 2003-06-24 | Tecan Trading Ag | Devices and methods for the performance of miniaturized homogeneous assays |
US6875619B2 (en) * | 1999-11-12 | 2005-04-05 | Motorola, Inc. | Microfluidic devices comprising biochannels |
US20060207877A1 (en) * | 2001-01-30 | 2006-09-21 | Walter Schmidt | Microfluidic device with various surface properties fabricated in multilayer body by plasma etching |
Family Cites Families (123)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3799742A (en) * | 1971-12-20 | 1974-03-26 | C Coleman | Miniaturized integrated analytical test container |
US3798459A (en) * | 1972-10-06 | 1974-03-19 | Atomic Energy Commission | Compact dynamic multistation photometer utilizing disposable cuvette rotor |
US3804533A (en) * | 1972-11-29 | 1974-04-16 | Atomic Energy Commission | Rotor for fluorometric measurements in fast analyzer of rotary |
US3856649A (en) | 1973-03-16 | 1974-12-24 | Miles Lab | Solid state electrode |
US4310399A (en) * | 1979-07-23 | 1982-01-12 | Eastman Kodak Company | Liquid transport device containing means for delaying capillary flow |
US4436610A (en) * | 1980-12-15 | 1984-03-13 | Transidyne General Corporation | Apparatus for measuring electrochemical activity |
US4587220A (en) * | 1983-03-28 | 1986-05-06 | Miles Laboratories, Inc. | Ascorbate interference-resistant composition, device and method for the determination of peroxidatively active substances |
JPS6077768A (en) * | 1983-10-06 | 1985-05-02 | テルモ株式会社 | Liquid dialytic apparatus |
US4534659A (en) * | 1984-01-27 | 1985-08-13 | Millipore Corporation | Passive fluid mixing system |
US4618476A (en) * | 1984-02-10 | 1986-10-21 | Eastman Kodak Company | Capillary transport device having speed and meniscus control means |
US4676274A (en) * | 1985-02-28 | 1987-06-30 | Brown James F | Capillary flow control |
US5164598A (en) | 1985-08-05 | 1992-11-17 | Biotrack | Capillary flow device |
US4963498A (en) * | 1985-08-05 | 1990-10-16 | Biotrack | Capillary flow device |
US4755472A (en) * | 1986-01-16 | 1988-07-05 | Miles Inc. | Stable composition for the determination of peroxidatively active substances |
DE3721237A1 (en) * | 1987-06-27 | 1989-01-05 | Boehringer Mannheim Gmbh | DIAGNOSTIC TEST CARRIER AND METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF |
DE68923198T2 (en) | 1988-03-11 | 1995-11-09 | Fuji Photo Film Co Ltd | Process for processing a silver halide photosensitive color reversal photographic material. |
US4908112A (en) * | 1988-06-16 | 1990-03-13 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. | Silicon semiconductor wafer for analyzing micronic biological samples |
US5096669A (en) * | 1988-09-15 | 1992-03-17 | I-Stat Corporation | Disposable sensing device for real time fluid analysis |
US5939272A (en) * | 1989-01-10 | 1999-08-17 | Biosite Diagnostics Incorporated | Non-competitive threshold ligand-receptor assays |
US5160702A (en) | 1989-01-17 | 1992-11-03 | Molecular Devices Corporation | Analyzer with improved rotor structure |
US5024647A (en) * | 1989-06-13 | 1991-06-18 | The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy | Centrifugal contactor with liquid mixing and flow control vanes and method of mixing liquids of different phases |
US5318894A (en) * | 1990-01-30 | 1994-06-07 | Miles Inc. | Composition, device and method of assaying for peroxidatively active substances |
US5089420A (en) * | 1990-01-30 | 1992-02-18 | Miles Inc. | Composition, device and method of assaying for a peroxidatively active substance utilizing amine borate compounds |
US5922615A (en) * | 1990-03-12 | 1999-07-13 | Biosite Diagnostics Incorporated | Assay devices comprising a porous capture membrane in fluid-withdrawing contact with a nonabsorbent capillary network |
WO1992005282A1 (en) | 1990-09-14 | 1992-04-02 | Biosite Diagnostics, Inc. | Antibodies to complexes of ligand receptors and ligands and their utility in ligand-receptor assays |
DE59108006D1 (en) * | 1991-01-28 | 1996-08-22 | Ciba Geigy Ag | Device for the preparation of samples, in particular for analysis purposes |
SE9100392D0 (en) * | 1991-02-08 | 1991-02-08 | Pharmacia Biosensor Ab | A METHOD OF PRODUCING A SEALING MEANS IN A MICROFLUIDIC STRUCTURE AND A MICROFLUIDIC STRUCTURE COMPRISING SUCH SEALING MEANS |
ATE195808T1 (en) | 1991-04-12 | 2000-09-15 | Biosite Diagnostics Inc | NEW CONJUGATES AND TEST METHODS FOR THE SIMULTANEOUS DETERMINATION OF MULTIPLE LIGANDS |
US5187104A (en) * | 1991-06-06 | 1993-02-16 | Miles Inc. | Nitro or nitroso substituted polyhalogenated phenolsulfonephthaleins as protein indicators in biological samples |
DK0517050T3 (en) * | 1991-06-06 | 1997-03-03 | Bayer Ag | |
US6100099A (en) * | 1994-09-06 | 2000-08-08 | Abbott Laboratories | Test strip having a diagonal array of capture spots |
US5296192A (en) * | 1992-04-03 | 1994-03-22 | Home Diagnostics, Inc. | Diagnostic test strip |
US5222808A (en) * | 1992-04-10 | 1993-06-29 | Biotrack, Inc. | Capillary mixing device |
US5637469A (en) * | 1992-05-01 | 1997-06-10 | Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania | Methods and apparatus for the detection of an analyte utilizing mesoscale flow systems |
US6143576A (en) | 1992-05-21 | 2000-11-07 | Biosite Diagnostics, Inc. | Non-porous diagnostic devices for the controlled movement of reagents |
US5885527A (en) * | 1992-05-21 | 1999-03-23 | Biosite Diagnostics, Inc. | Diagnostic devices and apparatus for the controlled movement of reagents without membrances |
US5290518A (en) * | 1992-08-17 | 1994-03-01 | Eastman Kodak Company | Flexible extraction device with burstable sidewall |
US6037455A (en) * | 1992-11-09 | 2000-03-14 | Biosite Diagnostics Incorporated | Propoxyphene derivatives and protein and polypeptide propoxyphene derivative conjugates and labels |
DE4303923A1 (en) * | 1993-02-10 | 1994-08-11 | Microparts Gmbh | Process for removing plastics from microstructures |
US5529681A (en) * | 1993-03-30 | 1996-06-25 | Microparts Gesellschaft Fur Mikrostrukturtechnik Mbh | Stepped mould inserts, high-precision stepped microstructure bodies, and methods of producing the same |
US6043043A (en) * | 1993-04-02 | 2000-03-28 | Bayer Corporation | Method for the determination of hemoglobin adducts |
US5360595A (en) | 1993-08-19 | 1994-11-01 | Miles Inc. | Preparation of diagnostic test strips containing tetrazolium salt indicators |
US5478751A (en) | 1993-12-29 | 1995-12-26 | Abbott Laboratories | Self-venting immunodiagnositic devices and methods of performing assays |
US5424125A (en) * | 1994-04-11 | 1995-06-13 | Shakespeare Company | Monofilaments from polymer blends and fabrics thereof |
US5627041A (en) * | 1994-09-02 | 1997-05-06 | Biometric Imaging, Inc. | Disposable cartridge for an assay of a biological sample |
US5571684A (en) | 1994-11-07 | 1996-11-05 | Litmus Concepts, Inc. | Assay for proline iminopeptidase and other hydrolytic activities |
US5834314A (en) | 1994-11-07 | 1998-11-10 | Abbott Laboratories | Method and apparatus for metering a fluid |
US5585069A (en) | 1994-11-10 | 1996-12-17 | David Sarnoff Research Center, Inc. | Partitioned microelectronic and fluidic device array for clinical diagnostics and chemical synthesis |
GB9505425D0 (en) * | 1995-03-17 | 1995-05-03 | Unilever Plc | Assay devices |
DE19520298A1 (en) | 1995-06-02 | 1996-12-05 | Bayer Ag | Sorting device for biological cells or viruses |
US6130098A (en) | 1995-09-15 | 2000-10-10 | The Regents Of The University Of Michigan | Moving microdroplets |
DE19536856C2 (en) * | 1995-10-03 | 1997-08-21 | Danfoss As | Micromixer and mixing process |
DE19536901A1 (en) * | 1995-10-04 | 1997-04-10 | Microparts Gmbh | Process for producing integrated electrodes in plastic molds, plastic molds with integrated electrodes and their use |
DE19540292C1 (en) * | 1995-10-28 | 1997-01-30 | Karlsruhe Forschzent | Static micromixer |
DE19541266A1 (en) * | 1995-11-06 | 1997-05-07 | Bayer Ag | Method and device for carrying out chemical reactions using a microstructure lamella mixer |
DE19604289C2 (en) * | 1996-02-07 | 1998-04-23 | Danfoss As | Micromixer |
US6399023B1 (en) * | 1996-04-16 | 2002-06-04 | Caliper Technologies Corp. | Analytical system and method |
US5885470A (en) * | 1997-04-14 | 1999-03-23 | Caliper Technologies Corporation | Controlled fluid transport in microfabricated polymeric substrates |
US5942443A (en) * | 1996-06-28 | 1999-08-24 | Caliper Technologies Corporation | High throughput screening assay systems in microscale fluidic devices |
WO1998000705A1 (en) | 1996-06-28 | 1998-01-08 | Caliper Technologies Corporation | Electropipettor and compensation means for electrophoretic bias |
US5800690A (en) | 1996-07-03 | 1998-09-01 | Caliper Technologies Corporation | Variable control of electroosmotic and/or electrophoretic forces within a fluid-containing structure via electrical forces |
US5826981A (en) * | 1996-08-26 | 1998-10-27 | Nova Biomedical Corporation | Apparatus for mixing laminar and turbulent flow streams |
US6113855A (en) * | 1996-11-15 | 2000-09-05 | Biosite Diagnostics, Inc. | Devices comprising multiple capillarity inducing surfaces |
US6447727B1 (en) * | 1996-11-19 | 2002-09-10 | Caliper Technologies Corp. | Microfluidic systems |
WO1998032526A1 (en) * | 1997-01-24 | 1998-07-30 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Apparatus and method for planar laminar mixing |
US5921678A (en) * | 1997-02-05 | 1999-07-13 | California Institute Of Technology | Microfluidic sub-millisecond mixers |
GB2337113B (en) * | 1997-02-28 | 2001-03-21 | Burstein Lab Inc | Laboratory in a disk |
US5964995A (en) | 1997-04-04 | 1999-10-12 | Caliper Technologies Corp. | Methods and systems for enhanced fluid transport |
US5965375A (en) | 1997-04-04 | 1999-10-12 | Biosite Diagnostics | Diagnostic tests and kits for Clostridium difficile |
DE19716073A1 (en) * | 1997-04-17 | 1998-10-22 | Boehringer Mannheim Gmbh | Dosing device for dispensing small amounts of liquid |
EP0988529B1 (en) * | 1997-04-25 | 2013-06-12 | Caliper Life Sciences, Inc. | Microfluidic devices incorporating improved channel geometries |
US5976336A (en) | 1997-04-25 | 1999-11-02 | Caliper Technologies Corp. | Microfluidic devices incorporating improved channel geometries |
US5932315A (en) * | 1997-04-30 | 1999-08-03 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Microfluidic structure assembly with mating microfeatures |
US6063589A (en) * | 1997-05-23 | 2000-05-16 | Gamera Bioscience Corporation | Devices and methods for using centripetal acceleration to drive fluid movement on a microfluidics system |
US6090251A (en) * | 1997-06-06 | 2000-07-18 | Caliper Technologies, Inc. | Microfabricated structures for facilitating fluid introduction into microfluidic devices |
US5869004A (en) | 1997-06-09 | 1999-02-09 | Caliper Technologies Corp. | Methods and apparatus for in situ concentration and/or dilution of materials in microfluidic systems |
US5959291A (en) * | 1997-06-27 | 1999-09-28 | Caliper Technologies Corporation | Method and apparatus for measuring low power signals |
US6001231A (en) | 1997-07-15 | 1999-12-14 | Caliper Technologies Corp. | Methods and systems for monitoring and controlling fluid flow rates in microfluidic systems |
US5876675A (en) * | 1997-08-05 | 1999-03-02 | Caliper Technologies Corp. | Microfluidic devices and systems |
US6002475A (en) | 1998-01-28 | 1999-12-14 | Careside, Inc. | Spectrophotometric analytical cartridge |
US5989402A (en) | 1997-08-29 | 1999-11-23 | Caliper Technologies Corp. | Controller/detector interfaces for microfluidic systems |
US5965410A (en) | 1997-09-02 | 1999-10-12 | Caliper Technologies Corp. | Electrical current for controlling fluid parameters in microchannels |
DE19741492A1 (en) * | 1997-09-19 | 1999-03-25 | Microparts Gmbh | Process for the production of microstructure bodies |
AU744879B2 (en) * | 1997-09-19 | 2002-03-07 | Aclara Biosciences, Inc. | Apparatus and method for transferring liquids |
US6012902A (en) * | 1997-09-25 | 2000-01-11 | Caliper Technologies Corp. | Micropump |
US6136272A (en) | 1997-09-26 | 2000-10-24 | University Of Washington | Device for rapidly joining and splitting fluid layers |
US6106779A (en) * | 1997-10-02 | 2000-08-22 | Biosite Diagnostics, Inc. | Lysis chamber for use in an assay device |
US5842787A (en) | 1997-10-09 | 1998-12-01 | Caliper Technologies Corporation | Microfluidic systems incorporating varied channel dimensions |
US5958694A (en) * | 1997-10-16 | 1999-09-28 | Caliper Technologies Corp. | Apparatus and methods for sequencing nucleic acids in microfluidic systems |
DE69806499T2 (en) * | 1997-11-12 | 2003-02-27 | Pe Corp Ny Foster City | SERPENTINE-SHAPED ELECTROFORETIC CHANNEL WITH SELF-CORRECTING CURVES |
US5994150A (en) | 1997-11-19 | 1999-11-30 | Imation Corp. | Optical assaying method and system having rotatable sensor disk with multiple sensing regions |
US6074725A (en) * | 1997-12-10 | 2000-06-13 | Caliper Technologies Corp. | Fabrication of microfluidic circuits by printing techniques |
DE19755529A1 (en) * | 1997-12-13 | 1999-06-17 | Roche Diagnostics Gmbh | Analysis system for sample liquids |
US5948227A (en) * | 1997-12-17 | 1999-09-07 | Caliper Technologies Corp. | Methods and systems for performing electrophoretic molecular separations |
US6167910B1 (en) * | 1998-01-20 | 2001-01-02 | Caliper Technologies Corp. | Multi-layer microfluidic devices |
US6100541A (en) * | 1998-02-24 | 2000-08-08 | Caliper Technologies Corporation | Microfluidic devices and systems incorporating integrated optical elements |
DE19815684A1 (en) * | 1998-04-08 | 1999-10-14 | Roche Diagnostics Gmbh | Process for the preparation of analytical aids |
US6123798A (en) * | 1998-05-06 | 2000-09-26 | Caliper Technologies Corp. | Methods of fabricating polymeric structures incorporating microscale fluidic elements |
US6170981B1 (en) * | 1998-05-07 | 2001-01-09 | Purdue Research Foundation | In situ micromachined mixer for microfluidic analytical systems |
DE69800630T2 (en) * | 1998-07-29 | 2001-08-23 | Agilent Technologies Inc | Chip for electrophoretic separation of molecules and method for using the same |
US6540896B1 (en) * | 1998-08-05 | 2003-04-01 | Caliper Technologies Corp. | Open-Field serial to parallel converter |
US6132685A (en) | 1998-08-10 | 2000-10-17 | Caliper Technologies Corporation | High throughput microfluidic systems and methods |
JP3012608B1 (en) * | 1998-09-17 | 2000-02-28 | 農林水産省食品総合研究所長 | Microchannel device and method for producing emulsion using the same |
US6086740A (en) | 1998-10-29 | 2000-07-11 | Caliper Technologies Corp. | Multiplexed microfluidic devices and systems |
US6136610A (en) | 1998-11-23 | 2000-10-24 | Praxsys Biosystems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for performing a lateral flow assay |
DE69934265T8 (en) * | 1998-12-25 | 2007-10-11 | Canon K.K. | Optical scanner and electrophotographic printer using the scanner |
US6150119A (en) | 1999-01-19 | 2000-11-21 | Caliper Technologies Corp. | Optimized high-throughput analytical system |
US6148508A (en) | 1999-03-12 | 2000-11-21 | Caliper Technologies Corp. | Method of making a capillary for electrokinetic transport of materials |
US6656428B1 (en) * | 1999-08-06 | 2003-12-02 | Thermo Biostar, Inc. | Automated point of care detection system including complete sample processing capabilities |
ATE364843T1 (en) * | 1999-08-11 | 2007-07-15 | Asahi Chemical Ind | ANALYSIS CASSETTE AND FLUID FEED CONTROLLER |
US20020112961A1 (en) * | 1999-12-02 | 2002-08-22 | Nanostream, Inc. | Multi-layer microfluidic device fabrication |
ATE345868T1 (en) * | 2000-05-15 | 2006-12-15 | Tecan Trading Ag | DUAL-Flow CENTRIFUGAL MICROFLUID DEVICES |
US6428664B1 (en) * | 2000-06-19 | 2002-08-06 | Roche Diagnostics Corporation | Biosensor |
US20020015959A1 (en) * | 2000-06-23 | 2002-02-07 | Bardell Ronald L. | Fluid mixing in microfluidic structures |
US6734401B2 (en) * | 2000-06-28 | 2004-05-11 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Enhanced sample processing devices, systems and methods |
US6488828B1 (en) * | 2000-07-20 | 2002-12-03 | Roche Diagnostics Corporation | Recloseable biosensor |
WO2002023163A1 (en) * | 2000-09-15 | 2002-03-21 | California Institute Of Technology | Microfabricated crossflow devices and methods |
WO2002023161A1 (en) * | 2000-09-18 | 2002-03-21 | University Of Washington | Microfluidic devices for rotational manipulation of the fluidic interface between multiple flow streams |
WO2002022267A2 (en) * | 2000-09-18 | 2002-03-21 | Micronics, Inc. | Externally controllable surface coatings for microfluidic devices |
US6939451B2 (en) * | 2000-09-19 | 2005-09-06 | Aclara Biosciences, Inc. | Microfluidic chip having integrated electrodes |
ATE336298T1 (en) * | 2000-10-25 | 2006-09-15 | Boehringer Ingelheim Micropart | MICROSTRUCTURED PLATFORM FOR THE STUDY OF A LIQUID |
US6949377B2 (en) * | 2001-03-05 | 2005-09-27 | Ho Winston Z | Chemiluminescence-based microfluidic biochip |
SE0104077D0 (en) * | 2001-10-21 | 2001-12-05 | Gyros Ab | A method and instrumentation for micro dispensation of droplets |
-
2003
- 2003-05-29 US US10/447,969 patent/US7435381B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2004
- 2004-04-30 WO PCT/US2004/013394 patent/WO2004105946A2/en active Application Filing
- 2004-04-30 EP EP04785625.7A patent/EP1634071B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2004-04-30 JP JP2006532520A patent/JP4700004B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2004-04-30 CA CA2527534A patent/CA2527534C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2008
- 2008-09-08 US US12/205,949 patent/US20090041627A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6582662B1 (en) * | 1999-06-18 | 2003-06-24 | Tecan Trading Ag | Devices and methods for the performance of miniaturized homogeneous assays |
US6875619B2 (en) * | 1999-11-12 | 2005-04-05 | Motorola, Inc. | Microfluidic devices comprising biochannels |
US20060207877A1 (en) * | 2001-01-30 | 2006-09-21 | Walter Schmidt | Microfluidic device with various surface properties fabricated in multilayer body by plasma etching |
US20020197094A1 (en) * | 2001-06-22 | 2002-12-26 | Gruenbacher Dana Paul | Dosing reservoir |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US10023897B2 (en) | 2012-05-16 | 2018-07-17 | Phc Holdings Corporation | Biosensor chip, and biosensor device equipped with same |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP1634071A2 (en) | 2006-03-15 |
US7435381B2 (en) | 2008-10-14 |
WO2004105946A2 (en) | 2004-12-09 |
US20040241042A1 (en) | 2004-12-02 |
EP1634071B1 (en) | 2019-07-10 |
EP1634071A4 (en) | 2012-01-25 |
JP4700004B2 (en) | 2011-06-15 |
CA2527534C (en) | 2013-08-13 |
CA2527534A1 (en) | 2004-12-09 |
WO2004105946A3 (en) | 2005-08-11 |
JP2007500850A (en) | 2007-01-18 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7435381B2 (en) | Packaging of microfluidic devices | |
EP0215419B1 (en) | Volume metering capillary gap device for applying a liquid sample onto a reactive surface | |
AU733985B2 (en) | Analytic test element with a capillary channel | |
US6207000B1 (en) | Process for the production of analytical devices | |
US5478751A (en) | Self-venting immunodiagnositic devices and methods of performing assays | |
AU756710B2 (en) | Apparatus for, and method of, varying the rate of flow of fluid along a pathway | |
EP1707267A1 (en) | Device having a self sealing fluid port | |
EP0287883A1 (en) | Test strip device with volume metering capillary gap | |
WO1993020939A1 (en) | Analytical cartridge and system for detecting analytes | |
CA2530585A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for entry and storage of specimens into a microfluidic device | |
HU225008B1 (en) | Multilayered analytical device | |
US20100044918A1 (en) | Method of preparing solid reagent and microfluidic device employing the solid reagent | |
CA2567009A1 (en) | Analytical test element | |
WO1999052633A9 (en) | Test cartridge with a single inlet port | |
JP2009282035A (en) | Sample vessel | |
JPS61153566A (en) | Reagent testing tool and forming method thereof | |
EP2415524A2 (en) | Sealed Device | |
JP5177533B2 (en) | Microchip | |
TWI398636B (en) | Detecting method of liquid sample | |
US11859734B2 (en) | Valve for microfluidic device | |
CN116457098A (en) | Sample analysis cartridge | |
CZ20002021A3 (en) | Analytic testing element with capillary channel |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |