US20080085128A1 - Multi-stage method and system for coherent diffractive beam combining - Google Patents
Multi-stage method and system for coherent diffractive beam combining Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20080085128A1 US20080085128A1 US11/543,567 US54356706A US2008085128A1 US 20080085128 A1 US20080085128 A1 US 20080085128A1 US 54356706 A US54356706 A US 54356706A US 2008085128 A1 US2008085128 A1 US 2008085128A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- beams
- light beams
- coherent
- stage
- phase
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 230000001427 coherent effect Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 63
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 36
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 32
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 28
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 claims description 34
- 230000010287 polarization Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000003321 amplification Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 238000003199 nucleic acid amplification method Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 abstract description 15
- 239000000470 constituent Substances 0.000 description 14
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 12
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 10
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000001360 synchronised effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000010521 absorption reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000003491 array Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000013307 optical fiber Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000002310 reflectometry Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003595 spectral effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000853 adhesive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001070 adhesive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003086 colorant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002826 coolant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001902 propagating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002441 reversible effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009897 systematic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G02—OPTICS
- G02B—OPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
- G02B27/00—Optical systems or apparatus not provided for by any of the groups G02B1/00 - G02B26/00, G02B30/00
- G02B27/0087—Phased arrays
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G02—OPTICS
- G02B—OPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
- G02B19/00—Condensers, e.g. light collectors or similar non-imaging optics
- G02B19/0004—Condensers, e.g. light collectors or similar non-imaging optics characterised by the optical means employed
- G02B19/0009—Condensers, e.g. light collectors or similar non-imaging optics characterised by the optical means employed having refractive surfaces only
- G02B19/0014—Condensers, e.g. light collectors or similar non-imaging optics characterised by the optical means employed having refractive surfaces only at least one surface having optical power
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G02—OPTICS
- G02B—OPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
- G02B19/00—Condensers, e.g. light collectors or similar non-imaging optics
- G02B19/0033—Condensers, e.g. light collectors or similar non-imaging optics characterised by the use
- G02B19/0047—Condensers, e.g. light collectors or similar non-imaging optics characterised by the use for use with a light source
- G02B19/0052—Condensers, e.g. light collectors or similar non-imaging optics characterised by the use for use with a light source the light source comprising a laser diode
- G02B19/0057—Condensers, e.g. light collectors or similar non-imaging optics characterised by the use for use with a light source the light source comprising a laser diode in the form of a laser diode array, e.g. laser diode bar
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G02—OPTICS
- G02B—OPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
- G02B27/00—Optical systems or apparatus not provided for by any of the groups G02B1/00 - G02B26/00, G02B30/00
- G02B27/09—Beam shaping, e.g. changing the cross-sectional area, not otherwise provided for
- G02B27/0938—Using specific optical elements
- G02B27/0944—Diffractive optical elements, e.g. gratings, holograms
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G02—OPTICS
- G02B—OPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
- G02B27/00—Optical systems or apparatus not provided for by any of the groups G02B1/00 - G02B26/00, G02B30/00
- G02B27/10—Beam splitting or combining systems
- G02B27/108—Beam splitting or combining systems for sampling a portion of a beam or combining a small beam in a larger one, e.g. wherein the area ratio or power ratio of the divided beams significantly differs from unity, without spectral selectivity
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G02—OPTICS
- G02B—OPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
- G02B27/00—Optical systems or apparatus not provided for by any of the groups G02B1/00 - G02B26/00, G02B30/00
- G02B27/10—Beam splitting or combining systems
- G02B27/1086—Beam splitting or combining systems operating by diffraction only
- G02B27/1093—Beam splitting or combining systems operating by diffraction only for use with monochromatic radiation only, e.g. devices for splitting a single laser source
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G02—OPTICS
- G02B—OPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
- G02B27/00—Optical systems or apparatus not provided for by any of the groups G02B1/00 - G02B26/00, G02B30/00
- G02B27/10—Beam splitting or combining systems
- G02B27/14—Beam splitting or combining systems operating by reflection only
- G02B27/144—Beam splitting or combining systems operating by reflection only using partially transparent surfaces without spectral selectivity
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G02—OPTICS
- G02B—OPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
- G02B27/00—Optical systems or apparatus not provided for by any of the groups G02B1/00 - G02B26/00, G02B30/00
- G02B27/10—Beam splitting or combining systems
- G02B27/14—Beam splitting or combining systems operating by reflection only
- G02B27/145—Beam splitting or combining systems operating by reflection only having sequential partially reflecting surfaces
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01S—DEVICES USING THE PROCESS OF LIGHT AMPLIFICATION BY STIMULATED EMISSION OF RADIATION [LASER] TO AMPLIFY OR GENERATE LIGHT; DEVICES USING STIMULATED EMISSION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION IN WAVE RANGES OTHER THAN OPTICAL
- H01S3/00—Lasers, i.e. devices using stimulated emission of electromagnetic radiation in the infrared, visible or ultraviolet wave range
- H01S3/10—Controlling the intensity, frequency, phase, polarisation or direction of the emitted radiation, e.g. switching, gating, modulating or demodulating
- H01S3/13—Stabilisation of laser output parameters, e.g. frequency or amplitude
- H01S3/1307—Stabilisation of the phase
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01S—DEVICES USING THE PROCESS OF LIGHT AMPLIFICATION BY STIMULATED EMISSION OF RADIATION [LASER] TO AMPLIFY OR GENERATE LIGHT; DEVICES USING STIMULATED EMISSION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION IN WAVE RANGES OTHER THAN OPTICAL
- H01S3/00—Lasers, i.e. devices using stimulated emission of electromagnetic radiation in the infrared, visible or ultraviolet wave range
- H01S3/005—Optical devices external to the laser cavity, specially adapted for lasers, e.g. for homogenisation of the beam or for manipulating laser pulses, e.g. pulse shaping
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01S—DEVICES USING THE PROCESS OF LIGHT AMPLIFICATION BY STIMULATED EMISSION OF RADIATION [LASER] TO AMPLIFY OR GENERATE LIGHT; DEVICES USING STIMULATED EMISSION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION IN WAVE RANGES OTHER THAN OPTICAL
- H01S3/00—Lasers, i.e. devices using stimulated emission of electromagnetic radiation in the infrared, visible or ultraviolet wave range
- H01S3/23—Arrangements of two or more lasers not provided for in groups H01S3/02 - H01S3/22, e.g. tandem arrangements of separate active media
- H01S3/2383—Parallel arrangements
Definitions
- the present invention relates to combining light beams using diffractive beam combining. More specifically, the invention relates to combining a plurality of laser beams in multiple stages, where in each stage, a diffractive optical element operating as a beam combiner diffracts a low power sample of combined beams for use in active phasing.
- High power lasers have many possible applications. In a military application, sufficient energy focused in a laser beam can provide an effective defensive countermeasure against ballistic projectiles. In a commercial application, a high power laser can be used to weld metal components that are too thick to be welded by conventional methods. To improve the effectiveness of the laser in any of these applications, the power transmitted by the beam may be enhanced by focusing the beam to its far-field diffraction limit, i.e., into as small an area as theoretically possible. A laser beam focused to this theoretical limit is said to be diffraction limited. Generally speaking, advancement of the art of high power lasers is impeded by physical limitations encountered when attempting to achieve this limit.
- Lasers by their nature are ideally diffraction limited, such that the smallest possible area of focus is limited by the product of the focal distance and the diffraction limited angle, which is the wavelength of the light divided by the aperture width. Thus, the larger the aperture, the tighter the focus.
- an optimized beam can deliver a 3 kW beam having a diffraction limit of nearly 1.0. In another case, an optimized beam can deliver a 10 to 12 kW beam that is about 1.5 times diffraction limited.
- An objective of ongoing research in this field is to design a laser generator that can deliver 100 kW or more in a near-diffraction-limited beam.
- One method for increasing the power deliverable by lasers is to combine the power of many coherently phased beams of a common wavelength by arranging a plurality of optical fiber emitters in a two-dimensional array.
- a beam splitter may be placed at the output of the array to sample the constituent beams.
- Each of the sampled beams is directed to a phase sensor, and the measured error signals are provided to phase modulators in each beam to ensure all the beams have equal phase.
- the ‘fill factor’ of the composite beam ratio of the composite beam power to a beam that uniformly fills the entire array aperture and has equal peak intensity
- the ‘fill factor’ of the composite beam is only about 70%, due to voids that occur between fibers and also to the Gaussian shape of each beam.
- the focused composite beam has a central peak intensity equal to the fill factor ratio times the maximum intensity possible with an ideal uniform beam, with the remaining power appearing in widely separated side lobes.
- the composite beam has a shape dramatically different than that of the constituent beams, and as a result the composite does not focus as well as the constituents.
- spectral combining in which many incoherent beams, i.e. beams of different wavelengths, are superimposed.
- the beams are transmitted through a prism or grating that aligns the beams along a common path, creating, in essence, a singular beam of multiple colors.
- the composite beam has a shape that is substantially identical to that of the constituent beams. While this technique therefore eliminates the fill factor problem associated with the two-dimensional array, other problems arise from using multiple wavelengths. For one, the complexity of the system increases as each wavelength requires a different oscillator. Furthermore, the propagation angle of each wavelength must be precisely adjusted such that its incidence on the grating is exact, otherwise the beams will misalign.
- each wavelength may behave differently as the beam propagates through various media. Atmospheric absorption is a function of wavelength, therefore a spectrally combined beam directed through air is more susceptible to energy loss than a single-wavelength selected for optimal transmission efficiency.
- Spectral combining has been proposed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,697,192, U.S. Pat. No. 6,327,292, U.S. Pat. No. 6,208,679, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,192,062.
- Another proposed technique for increasing the power in a laser beam is to (coherently) combine, by constructive interference, a plurality of beams into a single coherent beam.
- This technique known as coherent diffractive beam combining, is the subject of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/361,352 filed Feb. 24, 2006, which is incorporated by reference herein as though set forth in full.
- the co-pending application teaches generating a plurality of input beams, all having a common wavelength, using a master oscillator. Each beam is individually amplified and transmitted through a fiber emitter, and the emitter outputs are combined into a single output beam using a diffractive optical element (DOE).
- DOE diffractive optical element
- the technique includes a means for actively controlling the phases of the multiple beams using feedback to optimize the efficiency of the beam combination. This may be accomplished by coupling a phase modulator to each input beam, and by coupling a phase detector to a sampling of the output beam. The sampling is obtained by placing a transmissive beam splitter in the output path that reflects a low power portion of the output to the phase detector. Using electronics, correction signals based on phase deviations detected at the output are fed back to the modulators.
- An exemplary means for effecting active phase control in this fashion is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,708,003, which is also fully incorporated herein by reference. Another active phase detection and control method has been demonstrated by T. M. Shay et al., Proceedings of the SPIE, Vol.
- An advantage of this approach is that, similar to SBC, the combined output beam has a shape that is substantially identical to the composite beams and therefore eliminates the fill factor reduction in the intensity of the focused coherent output beam.
- disadvantages occur when sampling the phases of the high power combined output beams.
- a high power beam passing through a transmissive beam splitter causes thermal distortion that affects the phase measurement accuracy and focusability of the output beam.
- a single detector is used to measure the phases of all the constituent beams. For a very large number of combined beams the accuracy of phase measurement becomes more difficult with a single detector.
- a two-stage system includes a master oscillator for transmitting a light beam at a single wavelength.
- the light beam is split into N beams (where N is any integer) and the phases of the N beams are synchronized by phase modulators using phase correction signals provided to the phase modulators through a first feedback loop.
- a second phase modulation stage splits each of the N beams into M beams (where M is any integer).
- Amplifiers and phase modulators in the second phase modulation stage amplify the beams and synchronize the phases of each N group of M beams using phase correction signals provided to the second stage phase modulators from a second feedback loop.
- optical fiber emitters arrange the beams into a two-dimensional M ⁇ N array, and each beam is directed toward a first diffractive optical element (DOE) at a slightly different propagation angle.
- DOE diffractive optical element
- An optic e.g. lens or curved mirror
- the first DOE operates as a beam combiner to combine the beams into N coherent beams each comprising M beams.
- a sample beam is extracted from the N coherent beams and directed to N separate phase detection means, each of which detects phase variations in each of the M constituent beams.
- Phase correction signals are derived from the detected phases and fed back to the second stage phase modulators.
- the sample beam is diffracted from a periodic sampling grating superimposed on the surface of the first DOE.
- the N coherent beams output from the first DOE are preferably aligned along a single dimension and directed onto a second DOE.
- Relay optics may be used, if necessary, to ensure precision collimation and overlap of the beams incident on the second DOE.
- the second DOE also operates as a beam combiner, combining the N coherent beams into a single, diffraction limited output beam.
- the output beam is sampled, and through phase detection means, phase correction signals for the first stage are derived from the sample and fed back to the first stage phase modulators.
- the output sample is extracted using a periodic sampling grating superimposed on the surface of the second DOE.
- One main advantage of multi-stage coherent diffractive beam combining according to the present invention is that the maximum number of beam phases being measured by any phase detector is reduced to about the square root of the total number of beams being combined.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a multi-stage system according to the invention having two stages for coherent beam combining.
- FIG. 2 is a plot of one example of a periodic phase pattern in a five-beam combiner DOE for splitting a single beam into five diffraction orders.
- FIG. 3 is a plot showing normalized intensities of the five diffraction orders produced by the DOE of FIG. 2 , when used as a beam splitter.
- FIG. 4 is a logarithmic plot of normalized intensities vs. diffraction orders resulting when the DOE of FIG. 2 is used to combine five ideally phased beams.
- FIG. 5 is a plot of another example of a periodic phase pattern in a five-beam combiner DOE having an added sinusoidal sampling grating.
- FIG. 6 is a logarithmic plot of normalized intensities of diffraction orders resulting when the DOE of FIG. 5 is used to combine five ideally phased beams.
- FIG. 7 is a block diagram of another embodiment of a multi-stage system according to the invention that employs a DOE combiner and sampler at each stage.
- the diffractive beam combining method employs a DOE to enable the coherent combination of the output of a plurality of fiber amplifiers transmitting laser beams derived from a common oscillator.
- the beam combination method requires active phasing of the outputs from the fiber amplifiers to lock the phases of the output beams in order to optimize intensity of the composite beam by means of constructive interference. Active phasing is achieved by placing a beam splitter in the path of the composite beam that is diffracted by the DOE. The beam splitter produces a low power sample of the composite beam, and the sample is focused onto a phase detector.
- phase detector In the phase detector, the output phase of each constituent beam is detected by decoding signals that are encoded on each constituent beam. Using electronics, the phases are measured by comparison to reference signals from the master oscillator, and correction signals derived from this comparison are fed back to phase modulators in a low power section of each fiber amplifier to achieve optimal phasing.
- Multi-stage coherent diffractive beam combining refers to a beam combining system or method that combines beams in plural stages, wherein a diffractive optical element operating as a beam combiner is employed at each stage.
- the phase detection method discussed in the context of single stage coherent beam combining may be impractical as the number of beams being detected becomes very large.
- a multi-stage coherent diffractive beam combining system and method is now disclosed.
- the multi-stage concept allows scaling to a much larger number of total combined beams without requiring detection of all constituent phases in a single combined beam.
- FIG. 1 shows a schematic of a multi-stage beam combining system according to the invention.
- the multi-stage system consists of two beam combining stages, each stage having a feedback loop.
- a master oscillator 11 provides a master signal oscillating a wavelength ⁇ to a first phase modulation stage, which includes phase modulators 12 and a beam splitter 13 .
- the master signal is split into N optical signals by beam splitter 13 .
- Each of the N signals is passed through a corresponding one of N first stage feedback dependent phase modulators 12 for phase correction.
- Each of the N modulated first stage output beams is then input to a second modulation stage, which includes phase modulators 14 and N beam splitters 73 .
- the N modulated first stage beams are each split M ways by a beam splitter 73 .
- Each of the M ⁇ N second stage beams is then phase-corrected by means of a feedback dependent second stage phase modulator 14 .
- each second stage beam is amplified by one of M ⁇ N optical amplifiers 15 to a desired power level.
- Each group of M beams is then collected into a linear array of fiber emitters 17 . N of these linear arrays are brought together to form a two-dimensional fiber array 19 .
- fiber array 19 consists of M rows and N columns. Each of the N columns is a linear array of M fiber emitters 17 and consists of M amplified beams that originate from just one of the N first stage output beams. Therefore a phase change applied to a first stage phase modulator 12 is common and will not alter the relative phases of the M beams within the corresponding array column.
- fiber emitters 17 are selected to transmit beams of like polarization.
- a single reflective or transmissive collimating optic 23 may be used to collimate all the diverging beams 21 from fiber array 19 .
- the output of collimating optic 23 results in an array 24 of collimated beams.
- each beam present in array 24 has a propagation angle that may be determined by the location of a corresponding individual fiber emitter within two-dimensional array 19 .
- An M:1 DOE combiner 75 is located in the back focal plane of collimating optic 23 , to ensure optimal overlap of the beams in collimated beam array 24 that are incident on DOE combiner 75 .
- DOE combiner 75 is oriented to combine the incident beams along the columns of array 24 .
- DOE combiner 75 can efficiently combine each group of M beams per array column, i.e. N groups of M beams are coherently combined without reduction in fill factor.
- the result is a row of N coherently combined output beams 77 , each having a different propagation angle determined by the position of the N columns within the two-dimensional array 19 .
- the intensity of each coherent combination of M beams is maximized along a single diffraction order.
- the single diffraction order is the 0 th diffraction order.
- at least one coherent combination of M beams has a maximum intensity along the 0 th diffraction order.
- a feedback control loop for the second modulation stage is provided to correct these variations and lock the phases of each group of M beams to ensure maximum efficiency in coherent combinations thereof.
- a beam sampler 79 directs a low power sample 31 from output beams 77 to N independent phase detectors 35 .
- Additional focusing or collimating optics 81 e.g. a lens or curved mirror
- Phase detection stage 35 provides a means for detecting the phase of each of the M beams that form one of the N groups of output beam 77 .
- each detector 35 need only measure M constituent phases in the respective combined sample beams 31 , using a phase detection method known in the art.
- encoded signals may be applied to each of the M ⁇ N optical signals at the second phase modulation stage. Then, at phase detection stage 35 , synchronous detection of the coded signals on each beam can be used to measure the output phase of each constituent beam.
- N phase controllers 37 apply correction signals to lock the M measured phases at each wavelength to a single uniform value.
- systematic variations caused by the sampling optics or decoding electronics may require adjustment of each of the M phases to differing optimized values. These values can be determined by a calibration procedure that optimizes the combination efficiency of each group of M beams into a desired diffraction order.
- the phase controllers 37 compare the measured phases to these optimized reference values and derive correction signals based on the comparisons at each of N wavelengths.
- the M ⁇ N correction signals are fed back to M ⁇ N phase modulators 73 , which lock the phases of each group of M optical signals according to the correction signals to optimize the combination efficiency for each of the N groups of M beams.
- Various known techniques for synchronous phase detection of optical signals may be employed in the feedback loop without departing from the scope of the present invention. Examples of such techniques are discussed in greater detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/361,352, U.S. Pat. No. 6,366,356, U.S. Pat. No. 6,708,003, and T. M. Shay et al., Proceedings of the SPIE, Vol. 5550, pp 313-319 (2004). These techniques should be selected to allow the combined beams to be phased for maximum combination efficiency.
- the row array of N collimated output beams 77 is image relayed by means of image relay optics 83 onto a second stage N:1 DOE combiner 85 .
- the second stage DOE 85 is preferably oriented substantially orthogonally to the first stage DOE 75 , so that beams 77 are combined along rows rather than columns.
- the output of DOE 85 is a single, coherent beam 87 , and is the final output of the multi-stage system.
- a feedback control loop for the first modulation stage is provided to correct phase variations and lock the phases of each of N constituent beams of coherent output beam 87 to ensure maximum efficiency of combination.
- output beam 87 is sampled using a sampling optic or beam splitter 89 , and the resulting sample beam 91 is incident on a single phase detector 95 .
- sample 91 may be focused by means of a collimating optic 93 .
- Phase detector 95 measures the phases of the N constituent first stage beams.
- a synchronous detection means in phase detector 95 detects a dither or other orthogonal coding provided by the N first stage modulators in order to distinguish the constituent beams.
- the synchronous detection means may be similar to that used in the second stage feedback loop.
- the measured phases are used to provide feedback to the first stage modulators.
- a single, synchronous N-beam phase controller 97 compares the measured phases to reference values, and derives correction signals based on the comparisons. These reference values can be determined by a calibration procedure that optimizes the combination efficiency of the N beams into a desired diffraction order.
- the correction signals are fed back to phase modulators 13 , which lock the phases of each N signal issuing from master oscillator 11 according to the correction signals, thereby optimizing the combination efficiency of coherent output beam 87 .
- coherent output beam 87 is achieved using N independent phase detectors 35 in the second stage feedback, plus a single independent phase detector 95 in the first stage feedback.
- M ⁇ N beams are combined using N+1 total independent phase detectors.
- the maximum number of beam phases that must be measured from a sampled combined beam by any single phase detector is the greater of the two values M or N.
- the number of beam phases measured by a detector is advantageously reduced to about the square root of the total number of beams being combined.
- phase variations imposed by the first stage modulators are common to each group of M beams they should not affect the operation of the first stage combiner. However, it is possible that modulation from the first stage feedback loop may become a source of phase noise for the second stage combiner. This potential issue can be mitigated by designing the first stage feedback loop to have much larger bandwidth than the second stage.
- first stage modulators may be avoided by adding a common modulation signal electronically to all M inputs of a group of second stage modulators.
- the concern with this approach is the potential for introducing differential phase modulation among the M beams in a group by a first stage phase change. Precise RF phasing and equivalence of the common phase change among the M modulators is needed, otherwise undesirable crosstalk between the feedback loops may result.
- DOEs can be designed to efficiently combine or split an arbitrarily large number of beams, in 1D or 2D arrays.
- the subject DOE has a pattern of parallel precisely-shaped main grooves etched on its surface, which upon reflection or transmission produces the 1D periodic phase pattern 43 plotted in FIG. 2 in waves (one wave equals 2 ⁇ radians).
- one wave of phase corresponds to an etch depth of ⁇ /2 or ⁇ /(n ⁇ 1), respectively, where n is the index of refraction of the DOE substrate.
- the phase pattern 43 corresponds to an appropriately scaled etch depth pattern on the DOE surface. If a single beam is incident on this DOE, approximately 98% of the power is split among five diffracted orders in a linear array. The remaining approximate 2% of power is distributed among spurious output beams diffracted at higher orders. A normalized plot of the distribution of the beam intensity among all diffracted orders is shown in FIG. 3 . Note that the angles of the diffracted orders of the DOE are given by the usual grating equation. For an input beam at normal incidence the diffracted angle of the mth order is
- ⁇ is the wavelength and P is the period of the phase pattern on the DOE.
- Coherent beam combining is achieved by using the DOE “in reverse”. That is, if (in the foregoing example) the five input beams are properly phased and pointed and have equal power, the DOE is designed to provide optimal efficiency of combination at about 96%. This efficiency is shown by the normalized intensities 45 of the diffracted orders plotted in FIG. 4 .
- the desired output beam is the 0 th diffracted order, which has an intensity about two orders of magnitude higher than the intensity of any other diffraction order, as shown.
- the DOE provides an optimal combination efficiency equal to the splitting efficiency of about 98%.
- FIGS. 5-6 illustrate the sampling capability of a DOE.
- the design of the five-beam combiner DOE of FIGS. 2-3 may be modified by adding a weak, short-period sinusoidal sampling grating.
- the peak- to-peak phase value of this particular sampling grating is selected as 1/50 th of a wave.
- a plot of the phase of the modified DOE with sampling grating is shown in FIG. 5 .
- the resulting phase pattern 47 appears as the short-period sinusoid superimposed on periodic phase pattern 43 .
- phased input beams are diffracted to produce the output shown in FIG. 6 . Note that in FIG.
- the central group of diffraction order intensities 45 centered about the 0 th order is the same distribution shown in the plot of FIG. 4 .
- the left-hand diffraction order intensities 49 , and right-hand diffraction order intensities 51 are centered about the ⁇ 50 th and +50 th orders, respectively.
- Each of these intensity groups 49 and 51 provides a low-power representation of the distribution of intensities 45 .
- the DOE embodiment illustrated in FIGS. 5-6 has sampling grating grooves situated in parallel to the main grooves and therefore the sampled beam is in the same plane as the fiber array and spurious diffracted output beams.
- the period of the sampling grating in this example is taken to be 1/50 th of the DOE combiner period, and thus the beam sample is diffracted at an angle corresponding to the +50 th diffracted order of the combiner.
- the sampled beam diffraction order intensities 49 and 51 are well separated from the spurious diffracted orders of the DOE combiner function. Skilled artisans should recognize that many other DOE embodiments are possible, wherein a sampling grating comprising a set of grooves is applied in any direction relative to the DOE combiner function such that the sampled beam departs the DOE in any convenient direction.
- the sampling grating phase depth is selected to be 1/50 th of a wave.
- the sample intensity in either of the two ⁇ 50 th sampled orders is approximately 1 ⁇ 10 ⁇ 3 of the main (0 h order) output beam.
- each of the primary sampled ⁇ 50 th orders provides an identical low power copy of the fully combined beam.
- a weak sinusoidal phase grating can be adjusted according to a desired sample fraction of approximately 2.5 ⁇ 2 , where ⁇ 2 is the peak-to-peak phase amplitude of the grating measured in waves.
- the sinusoidal shape of a sampling grating leads to equal sampled beam intensities in both ⁇ 50 th orders.
- a “blazed” (i.e. more triangular) shape can be used to preferentially diffract light primarily into one of these orders, as is well understood in the grating art.
- sampling grating and the DOE combiner itself are dispersive, i.e. they have diffracted order angles that are wavelength dependent. At normal incidence, the dispersion for a grating with period P is given by
- a smaller period or a larger diffraction angle leads to larger dispersion.
- this may lead to a limitation on diffraction angle.
- it may be necessary to compensate for a sample beam having such a large dispersion, for example, by placing a compensation grating in the path of the diffracted sample.
- FIG. 7 A second embodiment of a multi-stage coherent diffractive beam combining system is shown in FIG. 7 .
- the optics in this embodiment are simplified by eliminating beam samplers 79 and 89 from the optical circuit, and employing DOEs fabricated with integral sampling gratings.
- the means for extracting a sample beam 31 or 91 is achieved by placing a weak periodic sampling grating superimposed on the surface of DOE combiners 98 and 99 .
- the sampling grating enables each DOE 98 and 99 to diffract a low power sample beam for the second and first stage feedback loops, respectively.
- Each DOE 98 and 99 therefore performs the following functions: combining plural input beams into one or more coherent output beams, and diffracting a low power sample of the coherent output. Operation of the embodiment shown in FIG. 7 is otherwise similar to the operation of the embodiment shown in FIG. 1 .
- a DOE comprises a highly reflective dielectric stack on its surface having greater than 99% reflectivity to minimize power absorption.
- any DOE described herein may be fabricated as a transmissive element.
- reflective elements are preferred primarily because the non-reflecting side of a reflective element may be configured for cooling without introducing material into the optical path.
- DOE 98 is shown with an optional cooling means 42 abutting the non-reflecting side. Cooling means 42 may be any type of heat sink suitable for removing heat from DOE 98 to ensure optical stability.
- cooling means 42 may be a finned metal heat sink contacted to a DOE by an adhesive with high thermal conductivity, a surface exposed to forced air, a conduit for the flow of coolant such as water, or a combination of any of the foregoing.
- each phase detector is only required to extract phases from at most M or N beams, yet the total number of combined beams in coherent output beam 87 is M ⁇ N. This approach thereby facilitates scaling to a much larger number of beams at a single wavelength than may be possible with the prior art.
Abstract
Description
- This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/361,352 filed Feb. 24, 2006; U.S. patent application Ser. No. ______, a.k.a. Snell & Wilmer Dkt. No. 54361-2500 entitled “Method And System For Coherent Beam Combining Using An Integrated Diffractive Beam Combiner And Sampler” filed concurrently herewith; U.S. patent application Ser. No. ______, a.k.a. Snell & Wilmer Dkt. No. 54361-2600 entitled “Method and System For Diffractive Beam Combining Using DOE Combiner With Passive Phase Control” filed concurrently herewith; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. ______, a.k.a. Snell & Wilmer Dkt. No. 54361-2700 entitled “Method And System For Hybrid Coherent And Incoherent Diffractive Beam Combining” filed concurrently herewith; all of which are fully incorporated herein by reference.
- 1. Field of the Invention
- The present invention relates to combining light beams using diffractive beam combining. More specifically, the invention relates to combining a plurality of laser beams in multiple stages, where in each stage, a diffractive optical element operating as a beam combiner diffracts a low power sample of combined beams for use in active phasing.
- 2. Description of Related Art
- High power lasers have many possible applications. In a military application, sufficient energy focused in a laser beam can provide an effective defensive countermeasure against ballistic projectiles. In a commercial application, a high power laser can be used to weld metal components that are too thick to be welded by conventional methods. To improve the effectiveness of the laser in any of these applications, the power transmitted by the beam may be enhanced by focusing the beam to its far-field diffraction limit, i.e., into as small an area as theoretically possible. A laser beam focused to this theoretical limit is said to be diffraction limited. Generally speaking, advancement of the art of high power lasers is impeded by physical limitations encountered when attempting to achieve this limit.
- Lasers by their nature are ideally diffraction limited, such that the smallest possible area of focus is limited by the product of the focal distance and the diffraction limited angle, which is the wavelength of the light divided by the aperture width. Thus, the larger the aperture, the tighter the focus. However, there are practical limitations on the size of an aperture that can be designed for any optical apparatus. Imperfections in the optics may cause degradations in the laser wavefront that affect the focus, and in high power applications, thermal variations contribute to the degradation. This limits the designer's ability to focus the beam, resulting in a focal spot somewhat greater than 1.0 times the diffraction limit (1.0×DL). Practically speaking, the designer's goal is to achieve a near-diffraction-limited laser (i.e., one that approaches 1.0×DL) that operates at as high a power level as possible.
- At present, the most advanced near-diffraction-limited laser beams cannot deliver enough power per unit area to serve effectively in high-power applications. In one case, an optimized beam can deliver a 3 kW beam having a diffraction limit of nearly 1.0. In another case, an optimized beam can deliver a 10 to 12 kW beam that is about 1.5 times diffraction limited. An objective of ongoing research in this field is to design a laser generator that can deliver 100 kW or more in a near-diffraction-limited beam.
- One method for increasing the power deliverable by lasers is to combine the power of many coherently phased beams of a common wavelength by arranging a plurality of optical fiber emitters in a two-dimensional array. A beam splitter may be placed at the output of the array to sample the constituent beams. Each of the sampled beams is directed to a phase sensor, and the measured error signals are provided to phase modulators in each beam to ensure all the beams have equal phase. However, even in the most tightly packed array, the ‘fill factor’ of the composite beam (ratio of the composite beam power to a beam that uniformly fills the entire array aperture and has equal peak intensity) is only about 70%, due to voids that occur between fibers and also to the Gaussian shape of each beam. The end result is a reduction in brightness by the fill factor ratio—the focused composite beam has a central peak intensity equal to the fill factor ratio times the maximum intensity possible with an ideal uniform beam, with the remaining power appearing in widely separated side lobes. In other words the composite beam has a shape dramatically different than that of the constituent beams, and as a result the composite does not focus as well as the constituents.
- Another known method for combining beams is spectral combining, in which many incoherent beams, i.e. beams of different wavelengths, are superimposed. The beams are transmitted through a prism or grating that aligns the beams along a common path, creating, in essence, a singular beam of multiple colors. Thus the composite beam has a shape that is substantially identical to that of the constituent beams. While this technique therefore eliminates the fill factor problem associated with the two-dimensional array, other problems arise from using multiple wavelengths. For one, the complexity of the system increases as each wavelength requires a different oscillator. Furthermore, the propagation angle of each wavelength must be precisely adjusted such that its incidence on the grating is exact, otherwise the beams will misalign. More importantly, each wavelength may behave differently as the beam propagates through various media. Atmospheric absorption is a function of wavelength, therefore a spectrally combined beam directed through air is more susceptible to energy loss than a single-wavelength selected for optimal transmission efficiency. Spectral combining has been proposed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,697,192, U.S. Pat. No. 6,327,292, U.S. Pat. No. 6,208,679, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,192,062.
- Another proposed technique for increasing the power in a laser beam is to (coherently) combine, by constructive interference, a plurality of beams into a single coherent beam. This technique, known as coherent diffractive beam combining, is the subject of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/361,352 filed Feb. 24, 2006, which is incorporated by reference herein as though set forth in full. In general, the co-pending application teaches generating a plurality of input beams, all having a common wavelength, using a master oscillator. Each beam is individually amplified and transmitted through a fiber emitter, and the emitter outputs are combined into a single output beam using a diffractive optical element (DOE). The technique includes a means for actively controlling the phases of the multiple beams using feedback to optimize the efficiency of the beam combination. This may be accomplished by coupling a phase modulator to each input beam, and by coupling a phase detector to a sampling of the output beam. The sampling is obtained by placing a transmissive beam splitter in the output path that reflects a low power portion of the output to the phase detector. Using electronics, correction signals based on phase deviations detected at the output are fed back to the modulators. An exemplary means for effecting active phase control in this fashion is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,708,003, which is also fully incorporated herein by reference. Another active phase detection and control method has been demonstrated by T. M. Shay et al., Proceedings of the SPIE, Vol. 5550, pp. 313-319 (2004), which is also fully incorporated herein by reference. An advantage of this approach is that, similar to SBC, the combined output beam has a shape that is substantially identical to the composite beams and therefore eliminates the fill factor reduction in the intensity of the focused coherent output beam. However, disadvantages occur when sampling the phases of the high power combined output beams. A high power beam passing through a transmissive beam splitter causes thermal distortion that affects the phase measurement accuracy and focusability of the output beam. Also in this method, a single detector is used to measure the phases of all the constituent beams. For a very large number of combined beams the accuracy of phase measurement becomes more difficult with a single detector.
- The present invention provides a system and a related method for multi-stage diffractive beam combining for coherently combining a large number of light beams at a single wavelength into single high-power diffraction limited beam. In a preferred embodiment, a two-stage system includes a master oscillator for transmitting a light beam at a single wavelength. At a first phase modulation stage, the light beam is split into N beams (where N is any integer) and the phases of the N beams are synchronized by phase modulators using phase correction signals provided to the phase modulators through a first feedback loop. A second phase modulation stage splits each of the N beams into M beams (where M is any integer). Amplifiers and phase modulators in the second phase modulation stage amplify the beams and synchronize the phases of each N group of M beams using phase correction signals provided to the second stage phase modulators from a second feedback loop. From the second phase modulation stage, optical fiber emitters arrange the beams into a two-dimensional M×N array, and each beam is directed toward a first diffractive optical element (DOE) at a slightly different propagation angle. An optic (e.g. lens or curved mirror) may be used to collimate and overlap the beams for precise incidence on the first DOE. The first DOE operates as a beam combiner to combine the beams into N coherent beams each comprising M beams. In the second feedback loop, a sample beam is extracted from the N coherent beams and directed to N separate phase detection means, each of which detects phase variations in each of the M constituent beams. Phase correction signals are derived from the detected phases and fed back to the second stage phase modulators. In one embodiment, the sample beam is diffracted from a periodic sampling grating superimposed on the surface of the first DOE.
- The N coherent beams output from the first DOE are preferably aligned along a single dimension and directed onto a second DOE. Relay optics may be used, if necessary, to ensure precision collimation and overlap of the beams incident on the second DOE. The second DOE also operates as a beam combiner, combining the N coherent beams into a single, diffraction limited output beam. In the first feedback loop, the output beam is sampled, and through phase detection means, phase correction signals for the first stage are derived from the sample and fed back to the first stage phase modulators. In one embodiment, the output sample is extracted using a periodic sampling grating superimposed on the surface of the second DOE.
- One main advantage of multi-stage coherent diffractive beam combining according to the present invention is that the maximum number of beam phases being measured by any phase detector is reduced to about the square root of the total number of beams being combined.
- Other systems, methods, features and advantages of the invention will be or will become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following figures and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features and advantages be included within this description, be within the scope of the invention, and be protected by the accompanying claims. The invention will be better understood upon consideration of the specification and the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numerals designate like parts throughout the figures, and wherein:
-
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a multi-stage system according to the invention having two stages for coherent beam combining. -
FIG. 2 is a plot of one example of a periodic phase pattern in a five-beam combiner DOE for splitting a single beam into five diffraction orders. -
FIG. 3 is a plot showing normalized intensities of the five diffraction orders produced by the DOE ofFIG. 2 , when used as a beam splitter. -
FIG. 4 is a logarithmic plot of normalized intensities vs. diffraction orders resulting when the DOE ofFIG. 2 is used to combine five ideally phased beams. -
FIG. 5 is a plot of another example of a periodic phase pattern in a five-beam combiner DOE having an added sinusoidal sampling grating. -
FIG. 6 is a logarithmic plot of normalized intensities of diffraction orders resulting when the DOE ofFIG. 5 is used to combine five ideally phased beams. -
FIG. 7 is a block diagram of another embodiment of a multi-stage system according to the invention that employs a DOE combiner and sampler at each stage. - Single Stage Coherent Diffractive Beam Combining
- A coherent diffractive beam combining method has been proposed in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/361,352 by inventors named in the present application. In general, the diffractive beam combining method employs a DOE to enable the coherent combination of the output of a plurality of fiber amplifiers transmitting laser beams derived from a common oscillator. The beam combination method requires active phasing of the outputs from the fiber amplifiers to lock the phases of the output beams in order to optimize intensity of the composite beam by means of constructive interference. Active phasing is achieved by placing a beam splitter in the path of the composite beam that is diffracted by the DOE. The beam splitter produces a low power sample of the composite beam, and the sample is focused onto a phase detector. In the phase detector, the output phase of each constituent beam is detected by decoding signals that are encoded on each constituent beam. Using electronics, the phases are measured by comparison to reference signals from the master oscillator, and correction signals derived from this comparison are fed back to phase modulators in a low power section of each fiber amplifier to achieve optimal phasing.
- Multi-Stage Coherent Diffractive Beam Combining
- Multi-stage coherent diffractive beam combining, as used herein, refers to a beam combining system or method that combines beams in plural stages, wherein a diffractive optical element operating as a beam combiner is employed at each stage. The phase detection method discussed in the context of single stage coherent beam combining may be impractical as the number of beams being detected becomes very large. To reduce this burden, a multi-stage coherent diffractive beam combining system and method is now disclosed. The multi-stage concept allows scaling to a much larger number of total combined beams without requiring detection of all constituent phases in a single combined beam.
-
FIG. 1 shows a schematic of a multi-stage beam combining system according to the invention. In this embodiment, the multi-stage system consists of two beam combining stages, each stage having a feedback loop. Amaster oscillator 11 provides a master signal oscillating a wavelength λ to a first phase modulation stage, which includesphase modulators 12 and abeam splitter 13. At the first modulation stage, the master signal is split into N optical signals bybeam splitter 13. Each of the N signals is passed through a corresponding one of N first stage feedbackdependent phase modulators 12 for phase correction. Each of the N modulated first stage output beams is then input to a second modulation stage, which includesphase modulators 14 andN beam splitters 73. - At the second modulation stage, the N modulated first stage beams are each split M ways by a
beam splitter 73. For simplicity,FIG. 1 shows N=3 and M=5; however, N and M may each assume any integer value. Each of the M×N second stage beams is then phase-corrected by means of a feedback dependent secondstage phase modulator 14. Also at the second modulation stage, each second stage beam is amplified by one of M×Noptical amplifiers 15 to a desired power level. Each group of M beams is then collected into a linear array offiber emitters 17. N of these linear arrays are brought together to form a two-dimensional fiber array 19. - In one embodiment,
fiber array 19 consists of M rows and N columns. Each of the N columns is a linear array ofM fiber emitters 17 and consists of M amplified beams that originate from just one of the N first stage output beams. Therefore a phase change applied to a firststage phase modulator 12 is common and will not alter the relative phases of the M beams within the corresponding array column. In another embodiment,fiber emitters 17 are selected to transmit beams of like polarization. - Referring again to
FIG. 1 , a single reflective ortransmissive collimating optic 23 may be used to collimate all the diverging beams 21 fromfiber array 19. The output of collimatingoptic 23 results in anarray 24 of collimated beams. Thus, each beam present inarray 24 has a propagation angle that may be determined by the location of a corresponding individual fiber emitter within two-dimensional array 19. An M:1DOE combiner 75 is located in the back focal plane of collimatingoptic 23, to ensure optimal overlap of the beams in collimatedbeam array 24 that are incident onDOE combiner 75. -
DOE combiner 75 is oriented to combine the incident beams along the columns ofarray 24. When the beams are properly phased,DOE combiner 75 can efficiently combine each group of M beams per array column, i.e. N groups of M beams are coherently combined without reduction in fill factor. The result is a row of N coherently combinedoutput beams 77, each having a different propagation angle determined by the position of the N columns within the two-dimensional array 19. In a preferred embodiment, the intensity of each coherent combination of M beams is maximized along a single diffraction order. In one embodiment, the single diffraction order is the 0th diffraction order. In another embodiment, at least one coherent combination of M beams has a maximum intensity along the 0th diffraction order. Some amount of spurious diffractedoutput beams 29 of minimal intensity also emerge fromDOE 75. - Due to differences in the lengths of fibers in
array 19, and to variations caused by vibrations and temperature fluctuations, slight variations in phase may occur in each of the M×N beams 21 emerging from the array. A feedback control loop for the second modulation stage is provided to correct these variations and lock the phases of each group of M beams to ensure maximum efficiency in coherent combinations thereof. In this second stage feedback loop, abeam sampler 79 directs alow power sample 31 fromoutput beams 77 to Nindependent phase detectors 35. Additional focusing or collimating optics 81 (e.g. a lens or curved mirror) may be placed into the path of sample beams 31, as needed, to focus sample beams 31 ontophase detectors 35. -
Phase detection stage 35 provides a means for detecting the phase of each of the M beams that form one of the N groups ofoutput beam 77. Thus, eachdetector 35 need only measure M constituent phases in the respective combined sample beams 31, using a phase detection method known in the art. - In one embodiment, encoded signals may be applied to each of the M×N optical signals at the second phase modulation stage. Then, at
phase detection stage 35, synchronous detection of the coded signals on each beam can be used to measure the output phase of each constituent beam. Ideally,N phase controllers 37 apply correction signals to lock the M measured phases at each wavelength to a single uniform value. However, systematic variations caused by the sampling optics or decoding electronics may require adjustment of each of the M phases to differing optimized values. These values can be determined by a calibration procedure that optimizes the combination efficiency of each group of M beams into a desired diffraction order. Thephase controllers 37 compare the measured phases to these optimized reference values and derive correction signals based on the comparisons at each of N wavelengths. The M×N correction signals are fed back to M×N phase modulators 73, which lock the phases of each group of M optical signals according to the correction signals to optimize the combination efficiency for each of the N groups of M beams. Various known techniques for synchronous phase detection of optical signals (e.g. encoding using distinct dither frequencies, CDMA, TDMA, etc.) may be employed in the feedback loop without departing from the scope of the present invention. Examples of such techniques are discussed in greater detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/361,352, U.S. Pat. No. 6,366,356, U.S. Pat. No. 6,708,003, and T. M. Shay et al., Proceedings of the SPIE, Vol. 5550, pp 313-319 (2004). These techniques should be selected to allow the combined beams to be phased for maximum combination efficiency. - To ensure adequate beam overlap, the row array of N collimated output beams 77 is image relayed by means of
image relay optics 83 onto a second stage N:1DOE combiner 85. Thesecond stage DOE 85 is preferably oriented substantially orthogonally to thefirst stage DOE 75, so thatbeams 77 are combined along rows rather than columns. The output ofDOE 85 is a single,coherent beam 87, and is the final output of the multi-stage system. - A feedback control loop for the first modulation stage is provided to correct phase variations and lock the phases of each of N constituent beams of
coherent output beam 87 to ensure maximum efficiency of combination. In this first stage feedback loop,output beam 87 is sampled using a sampling optic orbeam splitter 89, and the resultingsample beam 91 is incident on asingle phase detector 95. In one embodiment,sample 91 may be focused by means of acollimating optic 93.Phase detector 95 measures the phases of the N constituent first stage beams. A synchronous detection means inphase detector 95 detects a dither or other orthogonal coding provided by the N first stage modulators in order to distinguish the constituent beams. The synchronous detection means may be similar to that used in the second stage feedback loop. In the first stage feedback loop, the measured phases are used to provide feedback to the first stage modulators. A single, synchronous N-beam phase controller 97 compares the measured phases to reference values, and derives correction signals based on the comparisons. These reference values can be determined by a calibration procedure that optimizes the combination efficiency of the N beams into a desired diffraction order. The correction signals are fed back tophase modulators 13, which lock the phases of each N signal issuing frommaster oscillator 11 according to the correction signals, thereby optimizing the combination efficiency ofcoherent output beam 87. - It should be appreciated that
coherent output beam 87 is achieved using Nindependent phase detectors 35 in the second stage feedback, plus a singleindependent phase detector 95 in the first stage feedback. Thus, M×N beams are combined using N+1 total independent phase detectors. In addition, the maximum number of beam phases that must be measured from a sampled combined beam by any single phase detector is the greater of the two values M or N. Compared to single-DOE systems, the number of beam phases measured by a detector is advantageously reduced to about the square root of the total number of beams being combined. - Since the phase variations imposed by the first stage modulators are common to each group of M beams they should not affect the operation of the first stage combiner. However, it is possible that modulation from the first stage feedback loop may become a source of phase noise for the second stage combiner. This potential issue can be mitigated by designing the first stage feedback loop to have much larger bandwidth than the second stage.
- In an alternative embodiment, separate first stage modulators may be avoided by adding a common modulation signal electronically to all M inputs of a group of second stage modulators. The concern with this approach is the potential for introducing differential phase modulation among the M beams in a group by a first stage phase change. Precise RF phasing and equivalence of the common phase change among the M modulators is needed, otherwise undesirable crosstalk between the feedback loops may result.
- To further illustrate a DOE design appropriate for use in the foregoing embodiments, consider a simple DOE that splits a single beam into five diffracted beams' in a 1D array. This simplified example is presented for illustration purposes only. DOEs can be designed to efficiently combine or split an arbitrarily large number of beams, in 1D or 2D arrays. The subject DOE has a pattern of parallel precisely-shaped main grooves etched on its surface, which upon reflection or transmission produces the 1D
periodic phase pattern 43 plotted inFIG. 2 in waves (one wave equals 2π radians). For a reflective or transmissive DOE one wave of phase corresponds to an etch depth of λ/2 or λ/(n−1), respectively, where n is the index of refraction of the DOE substrate. Thus, thephase pattern 43 corresponds to an appropriately scaled etch depth pattern on the DOE surface. If a single beam is incident on this DOE, approximately 98% of the power is split among five diffracted orders in a linear array. The remaining approximate 2% of power is distributed among spurious output beams diffracted at higher orders. A normalized plot of the distribution of the beam intensity among all diffracted orders is shown inFIG. 3 . Note that the angles of the diffracted orders of the DOE are given by the usual grating equation. For an input beam at normal incidence the diffracted angle of the mth order is -
sin θm =mλ/P (1) - where λ is the wavelength and P is the period of the phase pattern on the DOE.
- Coherent beam combining is achieved by using the DOE “in reverse”. That is, if (in the foregoing example) the five input beams are properly phased and pointed and have equal power, the DOE is designed to provide optimal efficiency of combination at about 96%. This efficiency is shown by the normalized
intensities 45 of the diffracted orders plotted inFIG. 4 . In this example, the desired output beam is the 0th diffracted order, which has an intensity about two orders of magnitude higher than the intensity of any other diffraction order, as shown. In another embodiment, when the relative powers of the input beams are adjusted to match the distribution ofFIG. 3 , the DOE provides an optimal combination efficiency equal to the splitting efficiency of about 98%. -
FIGS. 5-6 illustrate the sampling capability of a DOE. In one embodiment, the design of the five-beam combiner DOE ofFIGS. 2-3 may be modified by adding a weak, short-period sinusoidal sampling grating. The peak- to-peak phase value of this particular sampling grating is selected as 1/50th of a wave. A plot of the phase of the modified DOE with sampling grating is shown inFIG. 5 . Here, the resultingphase pattern 47 appears as the short-period sinusoid superimposed onperiodic phase pattern 43. When properly aligned to the modified DOE, ideally phased input beams are diffracted to produce the output shown inFIG. 6 . Note that inFIG. 6 , the central group ofdiffraction order intensities 45 centered about the 0th order is the same distribution shown in the plot ofFIG. 4 . The left-handdiffraction order intensities 49, and right-handdiffraction order intensities 51, are centered about the −50th and +50th orders, respectively. Each of theseintensity groups intensities 45. - The DOE embodiment illustrated in
FIGS. 5-6 has sampling grating grooves situated in parallel to the main grooves and therefore the sampled beam is in the same plane as the fiber array and spurious diffracted output beams. The period of the sampling grating in this example is taken to be 1/50th of the DOE combiner period, and thus the beam sample is diffracted at an angle corresponding to the +50th diffracted order of the combiner. As shown inFIG. 6 , the sampled beamdiffraction order intensities - In the foregoing example, the sampling grating phase depth is selected to be 1/50th of a wave. As a result the sample intensity in either of the two ±50th sampled orders is approximately 1×10−3 of the main (0 h order) output beam. As shown in
FIG. 6 , each of the primary sampled ±50th orders provides an identical low power copy of the fully combined beam. In general, a weak sinusoidal phase grating can be adjusted according to a desired sample fraction of approximately 2.5 φ2, where φ2 is the peak-to-peak phase amplitude of the grating measured in waves. The sinusoidal shape of a sampling grating leads to equal sampled beam intensities in both ±50th orders. In other embodiments of a DOE sampling grating, a “blazed” (i.e. more triangular) shape can be used to preferentially diffract light primarily into one of these orders, as is well understood in the grating art. However, for very high power applications, it may be necessary for the surface of the DOE to be etched more smoothly without any precipitous jumps. This advantageously allows the etched DOE to be over-coated with a very high reflectivity, low-absorption multilayer stack that conforms well and preserves the precise surface shape of the DOE. - It is noted that the sampling grating and the DOE combiner itself are dispersive, i.e. they have diffracted order angles that are wavelength dependent. At normal incidence, the dispersion for a grating with period P is given by
-
dθ/dλ=m/P cosθ=tan θ/λ (2) - Thus, a smaller period or a larger diffraction angle leads to larger dispersion. Depending on the bandwidth requirements for the system this may lead to a limitation on diffraction angle. In some embodiments, it may be necessary to compensate for a sample beam having such a large dispersion, for example, by placing a compensation grating in the path of the diffracted sample.
- A second embodiment of a multi-stage coherent diffractive beam combining system is shown in
FIG. 7 . The optics in this embodiment are simplified by eliminatingbeam samplers sample beam DOE combiners DOE DOE FIG. 7 is otherwise similar to the operation of the embodiment shown inFIG. 1 . - Throughout the disclosure, the various DOEs are shown in the figures as reflective optical elements. In one preferred embodiment, a DOE comprises a highly reflective dielectric stack on its surface having greater than 99% reflectivity to minimize power absorption. Alternatively, any DOE described herein may be fabricated as a transmissive element. However, reflective elements are preferred primarily because the non-reflecting side of a reflective element may be configured for cooling without introducing material into the optical path. In the example of
FIG. 7 ,DOE 98 is shown with an optional cooling means 42 abutting the non-reflecting side. Cooling means 42 may be any type of heat sink suitable for removing heat fromDOE 98 to ensure optical stability. For example, cooling means 42 may be a finned metal heat sink contacted to a DOE by an adhesive with high thermal conductivity, a surface exposed to forced air, a conduit for the flow of coolant such as water, or a combination of any of the foregoing. - An advantage of any of the embodiments according to the present invention is that each phase detector is only required to extract phases from at most M or N beams, yet the total number of combined beams in
coherent output beam 87 is M×N. This approach thereby facilitates scaling to a much larger number of beams at a single wavelength than may be possible with the prior art. - The foregoing disclosure presents various embodiments of multi-stage coherent diffractive beam combining methods and systems having two stages. It will be apparent to skilled artisans that other embodiments are possible wherein more than two stages may be cascaded, wherein each stage combines a series of coherent beams diffracted from a previous stage. For example, as the number of beams to be combined becomes very large, it may be more practical to employ a DOE combiner at an initial or intermediate stage for combining partial rows or partial columns of beams propagating from an array. Additional DOE combiners in one or more downstream stages may then complete the row or column combination.
- The invention has been presented in an illustrative style. The terminology employed throughout should be read in an exemplary rather than a limiting manner. While various exemplary embodiments have been shown and described, it should be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that there are many more embodiments that are within the scope of the subject invention. Accordingly, the invention is not to be restricted, except in light of the appended claims and their equivalents.
Claims (20)
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/543,567 US7346085B1 (en) | 2006-10-05 | 2006-10-05 | Multi-stage method and system for coherent diffractive beam combining |
PCT/US2007/078301 WO2008045655A2 (en) | 2006-10-05 | 2007-09-12 | Multi-stage method and system for coherent diffractive beam combining |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/543,567 US7346085B1 (en) | 2006-10-05 | 2006-10-05 | Multi-stage method and system for coherent diffractive beam combining |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US7346085B1 US7346085B1 (en) | 2008-03-18 |
US20080085128A1 true US20080085128A1 (en) | 2008-04-10 |
Family
ID=39182263
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/543,567 Active 2027-04-20 US7346085B1 (en) | 2006-10-05 | 2006-10-05 | Multi-stage method and system for coherent diffractive beam combining |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7346085B1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2008045655A2 (en) |
Cited By (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090185176A1 (en) * | 2008-01-23 | 2009-07-23 | Livingston Peter M | Diffractive method for control of piston error in coherent phased arrays |
WO2010084796A1 (en) | 2009-01-23 | 2010-07-29 | 株式会社フジクラ | Optical multiplexer and fiber laser |
JP2011043808A (en) * | 2009-08-07 | 2011-03-03 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corp | All-fiber integrated high power coherent beam combination |
US20110222574A1 (en) * | 2010-03-09 | 2011-09-15 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Two-dimensional wavelength-beam-combining of lasers using first-order grating stack |
US20110292498A1 (en) * | 2010-05-27 | 2011-12-01 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | High peak power optical amplifier |
US8531772B2 (en) | 2008-11-04 | 2013-09-10 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | External-cavity one-dimensional multi-wavelength beam combining of two-dimensional laser elements |
JP2013197280A (en) * | 2012-03-19 | 2013-09-30 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Optical phase synchronization laser |
JP2014052655A (en) * | 2008-05-15 | 2014-03-20 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corp | Diffractive optical element |
US9620928B2 (en) | 2010-07-16 | 2017-04-11 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Continuous wave or ultrafast lasers |
CN109818247A (en) * | 2019-01-30 | 2019-05-28 | 中国人民解放军国防科技大学 | Coherent combination phase control method and system for laser array |
DE102010052950B4 (en) * | 2010-08-31 | 2020-11-05 | Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena | Optical amplifier arrangement |
Families Citing this family (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7791786B2 (en) * | 2005-08-10 | 2010-09-07 | Arete' Associates | Afocal beam steering system corrected for excess diffraction due to phase error from microelectromechenical mirror offsets |
US8514485B2 (en) * | 2009-08-07 | 2013-08-20 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation | Passive all-fiber integrated high power coherent beam combination |
US8184361B2 (en) * | 2009-08-07 | 2012-05-22 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation | Integrated spectral and all-fiber coherent beam combination |
US8184363B2 (en) * | 2009-08-07 | 2012-05-22 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation | All-fiber integrated high power coherent beam combination |
IL206143A (en) | 2010-06-02 | 2016-06-30 | Eyal Shekel | Coherent optical amplifier |
FR2968468B1 (en) * | 2010-12-06 | 2013-04-12 | Cilas | METHOD AND LASER OSCILLATOR FOR GENERATING A LASER BEAM |
US8922771B2 (en) | 2011-10-31 | 2014-12-30 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation | Multichannel polarization stabilizer |
US8922772B2 (en) | 2011-10-31 | 2014-12-30 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation | Multichannel polarization stabilization employing synchronous phase-locking methods |
US8837033B2 (en) | 2012-11-21 | 2014-09-16 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation | Nested loop coherent beam combining system |
US9417366B2 (en) | 2013-07-30 | 2016-08-16 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation | Hybrid diffractive optical element and spectral beam combination grating |
US9991678B1 (en) | 2014-07-30 | 2018-06-05 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation | Dispersion compensated diffractive optical element beam combiner |
US9735537B1 (en) | 2016-04-12 | 2017-08-15 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation | Hybrid spectral and coherent beam combiner utilizing 1D fiber arrays |
US10008821B1 (en) * | 2017-02-01 | 2018-06-26 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation | Wavelength-switched multi-turret fiber laser system |
US10516246B2 (en) * | 2017-08-24 | 2019-12-24 | United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of Nasa | Spatially-distributed gain element self-phase-locked, laser apparatus and method |
US10705269B2 (en) | 2018-03-30 | 2020-07-07 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation | Fabrication method of a diffractive optic for hybrid coherent and spectral beam combination |
IL260702B (en) * | 2018-07-19 | 2021-08-31 | Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd | Coherent beam combination (cbc) systems and methods |
US11757248B2 (en) * | 2019-07-19 | 2023-09-12 | Raytheon Company | System and method for spectral line shape optimization for spectral beam combining of fiber lasers |
CN113823996B (en) * | 2021-07-28 | 2023-01-03 | 中国工程物理研究院应用电子学研究所 | Method and system for realizing high-power near-diffraction limit semiconductor laser |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6192062B1 (en) * | 1998-09-08 | 2001-02-20 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Beam combining of diode laser array elements for high brightness and power |
US6208679B1 (en) * | 1998-09-08 | 2001-03-27 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | High-power multi-wavelength external cavity laser |
US6327292B1 (en) * | 1998-09-08 | 2001-12-04 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | External cavity laser source using spectral beam combining in two dimensions |
US6366356B1 (en) * | 1999-04-01 | 2002-04-02 | Trw Inc. | High average power fiber laser system with high-speed, parallel wavefront sensor |
US6697192B1 (en) * | 2000-11-08 | 2004-02-24 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | High power, spectrally combined laser systems and related methods |
US6708003B1 (en) * | 1999-12-16 | 2004-03-16 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | Optical energy transmission system utilizing precise phase and amplitude control |
Family Cites Families (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5694408A (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 1997-12-02 | Mcdonnell Douglas Corporation | Fiber optic laser system and associated lasing method |
DE19700720A1 (en) * | 1997-01-11 | 1998-07-16 | Ldt Gmbh & Co | Method and device for generating a coherent light beam |
US6061170A (en) * | 1998-03-16 | 2000-05-09 | Mcdonnell Douglas Corporation | Dual frequency laser amplifier array and operating method therefor |
-
2006
- 2006-10-05 US US11/543,567 patent/US7346085B1/en active Active
-
2007
- 2007-09-12 WO PCT/US2007/078301 patent/WO2008045655A2/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6192062B1 (en) * | 1998-09-08 | 2001-02-20 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Beam combining of diode laser array elements for high brightness and power |
US6208679B1 (en) * | 1998-09-08 | 2001-03-27 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | High-power multi-wavelength external cavity laser |
US6327292B1 (en) * | 1998-09-08 | 2001-12-04 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | External cavity laser source using spectral beam combining in two dimensions |
US6366356B1 (en) * | 1999-04-01 | 2002-04-02 | Trw Inc. | High average power fiber laser system with high-speed, parallel wavefront sensor |
US6708003B1 (en) * | 1999-12-16 | 2004-03-16 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | Optical energy transmission system utilizing precise phase and amplitude control |
US6697192B1 (en) * | 2000-11-08 | 2004-02-24 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | High power, spectrally combined laser systems and related methods |
Cited By (20)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7756169B2 (en) * | 2008-01-23 | 2010-07-13 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation | Diffractive method for control of piston error in coherent phased arrays |
US20090185176A1 (en) * | 2008-01-23 | 2009-07-23 | Livingston Peter M | Diffractive method for control of piston error in coherent phased arrays |
JP2014052655A (en) * | 2008-05-15 | 2014-03-20 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corp | Diffractive optical element |
JP2016118805A (en) * | 2008-05-15 | 2016-06-30 | ノースロップ グラマン システムズ コーポレイションNorthrop Grumman Systems Corporation | Diffractive optical element |
DE102009061791B3 (en) | 2008-05-15 | 2021-10-28 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation (n.d.Ges.d. Staates Delaware) | Method for forming a diffractive optical element |
DE102009018069B4 (en) * | 2008-05-15 | 2018-01-25 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation (n.d.Ges.d. Staates Delaware) | Diffractive optical element |
US8531772B2 (en) | 2008-11-04 | 2013-09-10 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | External-cavity one-dimensional multi-wavelength beam combining of two-dimensional laser elements |
WO2010084796A1 (en) | 2009-01-23 | 2010-07-29 | 株式会社フジクラ | Optical multiplexer and fiber laser |
US9184556B2 (en) | 2009-01-23 | 2015-11-10 | Fujikura Ltd. | Optical multiplexer and fiber laser |
JP2011043808A (en) * | 2009-08-07 | 2011-03-03 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corp | All-fiber integrated high power coherent beam combination |
US8614853B2 (en) | 2010-03-09 | 2013-12-24 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Two-dimensional wavelength-beam-combining of lasers using first-order grating stack |
US9575325B2 (en) | 2010-03-09 | 2017-02-21 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Two-dimensional wavelength-beam-combining of lasers using first-order grating stack |
US20110222574A1 (en) * | 2010-03-09 | 2011-09-15 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Two-dimensional wavelength-beam-combining of lasers using first-order grating stack |
US20110292498A1 (en) * | 2010-05-27 | 2011-12-01 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | High peak power optical amplifier |
US9136667B2 (en) | 2010-05-27 | 2015-09-15 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | High peak power optical amplifier |
US8531761B2 (en) * | 2010-05-27 | 2013-09-10 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | High peak power optical amplifier |
US9620928B2 (en) | 2010-07-16 | 2017-04-11 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Continuous wave or ultrafast lasers |
DE102010052950B4 (en) * | 2010-08-31 | 2020-11-05 | Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena | Optical amplifier arrangement |
JP2013197280A (en) * | 2012-03-19 | 2013-09-30 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Optical phase synchronization laser |
CN109818247A (en) * | 2019-01-30 | 2019-05-28 | 中国人民解放军国防科技大学 | Coherent combination phase control method and system for laser array |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2008045655A3 (en) | 2009-07-02 |
US7346085B1 (en) | 2008-03-18 |
WO2008045655A2 (en) | 2008-04-17 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7346085B1 (en) | Multi-stage method and system for coherent diffractive beam combining | |
US7468832B2 (en) | Method and system for coherent beam combining using an integrated diffractive beam combiner and sampler | |
US7436588B2 (en) | Method and system for hybrid coherent and incoherent diffractive beam combining | |
US7339727B1 (en) | Method and system for diffractive beam combining using DOE combiner with passive phase control | |
US7440174B2 (en) | Coherent fiber diffractive optical element beam combiner | |
US7088743B2 (en) | Laser source comprising amplifier and adaptive wavefront/polarization driver | |
US7336363B2 (en) | Interferometric beam combination | |
US20020181035A1 (en) | Method and system for combining multiple low power laser sources to achieve high efficiency, high power outputs using transmission holographic methodologies | |
US8792526B2 (en) | Coherent laser array control system and method | |
US10250013B2 (en) | Laser system including optical amplification subsystem providing an amplified laser output | |
CN111725696B (en) | Piston phase regulation and control system and method of laser coherent array | |
Drachenberg et al. | High-power spectral beam combining of fiber lasers with ultra high-spectral density by thermal tuning of volume Bragg gratings | |
US11681152B2 (en) | Coherent beam combining (CBC) fiber laser amplifier system | |
US11681151B2 (en) | Hybrid coherent beam combining (CBC) and spectral beam combining (SBC) fiber laser amplifier system | |
EP2923420B1 (en) | Nested feedback loop coherent beam combining laser system | |
US9991678B1 (en) | Dispersion compensated diffractive optical element beam combiner | |
US11446776B2 (en) | Method for assembling a hollow core optical fiber array launcher | |
US6487022B1 (en) | Transmitter using uniform intensity transmission for a wireless optical communication system | |
CN113394653B (en) | Laser coherent array and control method | |
US6157755A (en) | Laser system | |
JP3527664B2 (en) | Multi-wavelength laser modulation optical system | |
WO2008045652A2 (en) | Method and system for diffractive beam combining using doe combiner with passive phase control | |
GB2589779A (en) | Methods and systems for spectral beam-combining | |
Wickham et al. | Coherent combination of fiber lasers with a diffractive optical element | |
RU2470334C2 (en) | Method of amplifying laser radiation and apparatus for realising said method |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ROTHENBERG, JOSHUA E.;RICE, ROBERT R.;WICKHAM, MICHAEL G.;REEL/FRAME:019326/0760 Effective date: 20061004 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: NORTHROP GRUMMAN SPACE & MISSION SYSTEMS CORP.,CAL Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORTION;REEL/FRAME:023699/0551 Effective date: 20091125 Owner name: NORTHROP GRUMMAN SPACE & MISSION SYSTEMS CORP., CA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORTION;REEL/FRAME:023699/0551 Effective date: 20091125 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION,CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:NORTHROP GRUMMAN SPACE & MISSION SYSTEMS CORP.;REEL/FRAME:023915/0446 Effective date: 20091210 Owner name: NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:NORTHROP GRUMMAN SPACE & MISSION SYSTEMS CORP.;REEL/FRAME:023915/0446 Effective date: 20091210 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1553); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 12 |