US20080046688A1

US20080046688A1 - Processor executing SIMD instructions

Info

Publication number: US20080046688A1
Application number: US11/896,369
Authority: US
Inventors: Tetsuya Tanaka; Hazuki Okabayashi; Taketo Heishi; Hajime Ogawa; Tsuneyuki Suzuki; Tokuzo Kiyohara; Takeshi Tanaka; Hideshi Nishida; Masaki Maeda
Original assignee: Individual
Current assignee: Individual
Priority date: 2002-09-25
Filing date: 2007-08-31
Publication date: 2008-02-21
Also published as: US7281117B2; US20080046690A1; EP1403762A3; TW200945190A; US20040068642A1; US20080046704A1; US7594099B2; JP2004118470A; JP3958662B2; EP1403762A2; CN1497435A; US20080046687A1; TW200411542A; CN100524204C; KR20040027409A

Abstract

A processor according to the present invention includes a decoding unit 20, an operation unit 40 and others. When the decoding unit 20 decodes Instruction vcchk, the operation unit 40 and the like judges whether vector condition flags VC0˜VC3 (110) of a condition flag register (CFR) 32 are all zero or not, and (i) sets condition flags C4 and C5 of the condition flag register (CFR) 32 to 1 and 0, respectively, when all of the vector condition flags VC0˜VC3 are zero, and (ii) sets the condition flags C4 and C5 to 0 and 1, respectively, when not all the vector condition flags are zero. Then, the vector condition flags VC0˜VC3 are stored in the condition flags C0˜C3.

Description

This application is a divisional of application Ser. No. 10/668,358, filed Sep. 24, 2003.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

(1) Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a processor such as a DSP and a CPU, and more particularly to a processor suitable for performing signal processing for sounds, images and others.
(2) Description of the Related Art
With the development in multimedia technologies, processors are increasingly required to be capable of high-speed media processing represented by sound and image signal processing. As existing processors responding to such requirement, there exist Pentium (R)/Pentium (R) III/Pentium 4 (R) MMX/SSE/SSE2 and others produced by the Intel Corporation of the United States supporting SIMD (Single Instruction Multiple Data) instructions. Of them, MMX, for example, is capable of performing the same operations in one instruction on a maximum of eight integers stored in a 64-bit MMX register.
However, there is a problem that such existing processors do not fully satisfy a wide range of requirements concerning media processing.
For example, although capable of operating on multiple data elements in a single instruction and comparing multiple data elements in a single instruction, the existing processors cannot evaluate the results of such comparisons in a single instruction. For example, an existing processor is capable of comparing two data elements stored in 32-bit registers on a byte-by-byte basis, and setting comparison results to four flags. However, it cannot make a judgment on whether all values of these four flags are zero or not in one instruction. For this reason, the processor needs to read out all four flags and execute more than one instruction for judging whether all such values are zero or not. This requires a plurality of instructions for evaluating results every time a comparison is made against another set of pixel values when four pixel values are used as a unit of comparison, resulting in an increased number of instructions and therefore a decreased speed of image processing.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention has been conceived in view of the above problem, and it is an object of this invention to provide a processor capable of executing sophisticated SIMD operations and a processor capable of high-speed digital signal processing suited for multimedia purposes.
As is obvious from the above explanation, the processor according to the present invention is capable of executing a characteristic SIMD instruction for judging whether or not results of operations performed under a SIMD compare instruction are all zero and setting such results to condition flags. This allows a faster extraction of results of SIMD compare instructions (especially, agreement/disagreement of results), as well as a faster comparison processing to be performed on more than one pixel value as a processing unit and a faster detection of the EOF (End Of File) of a file.
Moreover, the processor according to the present invention is capable of executing a characteristic instruction for storing, into a memory and the like, two pieces of byte data stored in one register (byte data stored in the higher 16 bits and byte data stored in the lower 16 bits). This eliminates the need for data type conversions when byte data is handled in 16-bit SIMD, making a speed of processing faster.
Furthermore, the processor according to the present invention is capable of executing a characteristic instruction for storing an immediate value into the higher 16 bits of a register without changing the lower 16 bits of the register. This instruction, when combined with Instruction “mov Rb, I16”, makes it possible for a 32-bit immediate value to be set in a register.
Also, the processor according to the present invention is capable of executing a characteristic instruction for making a switch of objects to be added, depending on the value of a vector condition flag. This makes it possible for a single program to support half-pel motion compensation (motion compensation performed on a per-half-pixel basis) regardless of whether pixels are integer pixels or half pixels.
Moreover, the processor according to the present invention is capable of executing a characteristic instruction for generating a value depending on the sign (positive/negative) of the value held in a register and whether a value held in a register is zero or not. This makes inverse quantization faster in image processing, since 1 is outputted when a certain value is positive, −1 when negative, and 0 when 0.
Furthermore, the processor according to the present invention is capable of executing a characteristic instruction for aligning word data and extracting different word data depending on a vector condition flag. This instruction makes it possible for a single program to support half-pel motion compensation (motion compensation performed on a per-half-pixel basis) regardless of whether pixels are integer pixels or half pixels.
Also, the processor according to the present invention is capable of executing a characteristic instruction for adding two values and further adding 1 when one of the two values is positive. This realizes a faster rounding of an absolute value in image processing.
Moreover, the processor according to the present invention is capable of executing a characteristic instruction for moving values held in arbitrary two registers to two consecutive registers. Since values held in independent two registers are moved in one cycle under this instruction, an effect of reducing the number of cycles in a loop can be achieved. Also, this instruction, which does not involve register renaming (destruction of a register value), is effective when data is moved between loop generations (iterations).
Furthermore, the processor according to the present invention is capable of executing a characteristic instruction for performing branches and setting condition flags (predicates, here) in a loop. This enables a loop to be executed faster by means of PROLOG/EPILOG removal software pipelining.
Also, the processor according to the present invention is capable of executing a characteristic instruction for determining a sum of absolute value differences. This makes the speed faster for summing up absolute value differences in motion prediction as part of image processing.
Moreover, the processor according to the present invention is capable of executing a characteristic instruction for converting a signed value into a saturated signed value at an arbitrary position (digit). This facilitates programming since there is no need for setting a position where saturation is performed to a specific position at the time of assembler programming.
Furthermore, the processor according to the present invention is capable of executing a characteristic instruction for selecting one of the values held in two registers on a word-by-word basis. This allows word data to be stored at an arbitrary position in a register, and therefore enables faster repetitions of data reshuffling. Moreover, this instruction has an effect of increasing the flexibility of SIMD operations.
Also, the processor according to the present invention is capable of executing a characteristic instruction for extending results of a SIMD operation. This allows processing for making data size all the same by performing sign extension or zero extension to be performed in one cycle, after performing the SIMD operations.
Moreover, the processor according to the present invention is capable of executing a characteristic instruction for executing SIMD operations specified by condition flags and the like. This makes it possible for a single program to perform such dynamic processing as one in which the types of operations to be performed are determined depending on results of other processing.
As described above, the processor according to the present invention is capable of performing sophisticated SIMD operations and a wide range of digital signal processing required for multimedia processing at a high speed, and is capable of being employed as a core processor to be commonly used in mobile phone, mobile AV device, digital television, DVD and other devices, the processor according to the present invention is extremely useful in the present age in which the advent of high-performance and cost effective multimedia apparatuses is desired.
Note that it possible to embody the present invention not only as a processor executing the above-mentioned characteristic instructions, but also as an operation processing method intended for a plurality of data elements and the like, and as a program including such characteristic instructions. Also, it should be understood that such a program can be distributed via a recording medium including a CD-ROM and the like as well as via a transmission medium including the internet and the like.
For further information about the technical background to this application, Japanese patent application No. 2002-280077 filed Sep. 25, 2002, is incorporated herein by reference.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other subjects, advantages and features of the invention will become apparent from the following description thereof taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings that illustrate a specific embodiment of the invention. In the Drawings:
FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram showing a processor according to the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing arithmetic and logic/comparison operation units of the processor.
FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a barrel shifter of the processor.
FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a converter of the processor.
FIG. 5 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a divider of the processor.
FIG. 6 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a multiplication/sum of products operation unit of the processor.
FIG. 7 is a block diagram showing a configuration of an instruction control unit of the processor.
FIG. 8 is a diagram showing a configuration of general-purpose registers (R0˜R31) of the processor.
FIG. 9 is a diagram showing a configuration of a link register (LR) of the processor.
FIG. 10 is a diagram showing a configuration of a branch register (TAR) of the processor.
FIG. 11 is a diagram showing a configuration of a program status register (PSR) of the processor.
FIG. 12 is a diagram showing a configuration of a condition flag register (CFR) of the processor.
FIGS. 13A and 13B are diagrams showing configurations of accumulators (M0, M1) of the processor.
FIG. 14 is a diagram showing a configuration of a program counter (PC) of the processor.
FIG. 15 is a diagram showing a configuration of a PC save register (IPC) of the processor.
FIG. 16 is a diagram showing a configuration of a PSR save register (IPSR) of the processor.
FIG. 17 is a timing diagram showing a pipeline behavior of the processor.
FIG. 18 is a timing diagram showing each stage of the pipeline behavior of the processor at the time of executing an instruction.
FIG. 19 is a diagram showing a parallel behavior of the processor.
FIG. 20 is a diagram showing format of instructions executed by the processor.
FIG. 21 is a diagram explaining an instruction belonging to a category “ALUadd (addition) system)”.
FIG. 22 is a diagram explaining an instruction belonging to a category “ALUsub (subtraction) system)”.
FIG. 23 is a diagram explaining an instruction belonging to a category “ALUlogic (logical operation) system and others”.
FIG. 24 is a diagram explaining an instruction belonging to a category “CMP (comparison operation) system”.
FIG. 25 is a diagram explaining an instruction belonging to a category “mul (multiplication) system”.
FIG. 26 is a diagram explaining an instruction belonging to a category “mac (sum of products operation) system”.
FIG. 27 is a diagram explaining an instruction belonging to a category “msu (difference of products) system”.
FIG. 28 is a diagram explaining an instruction belonging to a category “MEMId (load from memory) system”.
FIG. 29 is a diagram explaining an instruction belonging to a category “MEMstore (store in memory) system”.
FIG. 30 is a diagram explaining an instruction belonging to a category “BRA (branch) system”.
FIG. 31 is a diagram explaining an instruction belonging to a category “BSasl (arithmetic barrel shift) system and others”.
FIG. 32 is a diagram explaining an instruction belonging to a category “BSlsr (logical barrel shift) system and others”.
FIG. 33 is a diagram explaining an instruction belonging to a category “CNVvaln (arithmetic conversion) system”.
FIG. 34 is a diagram explaining an instruction belonging to a category “CNV (general conversion) system”.
FIG. 35 is a diagram explaining an instruction belonging to a category “SATvlpk (saturation processing) system”.
FIG. 36 is a diagram explaining an instruction belonging to a category “ETC (et cetera) system”.
FIG. 37 is a diagram showing a behavior of the processor when executing Instruction “vcchk”.
FIG. 38 is a diagram showing a detailed behavior when executing Instruction “vcchk”.
FIG. 39 is a diagram showing a behavior of the processor when executing Instruction “stbh (Ra),Rb”.
FIG. 40 is a diagram showing a detailed behavior when executing Instruction “stbh (Ra),Rb”.
FIG. 41 is a diagram showing a behavior of the processor when executing Instruction “stbhp (Ra),Rb:Rb+1”.
FIG. 42 is a diagram showing a detailed behavior when executing Instruction “stbhp (Ra),Rb:Rb+1”.
FIG. 43 is a diagram showing a behavior of the processor when executing Instruction “sethi Ra,I16”.
FIG. 44 is a diagram showing a detailed behavior when executing Instruction “sethi Ra,I16”.
FIG. 45 is a diagram showing a behavior of the processor when executing Instruction “vaddhvc Rc,Ra,Rb”.
FIG. 46 is a diagram showing a detailed behavior wherein executing Instruction “vaddhvc Rc,Ra,Rb”.
FIG. 47 is a diagram explaining motion estimation in image processing.
FIG. 48 is a diagram showing a behavior of the processor when executing Instruction “vaddrhvc Rc,Ra,Rb”.
FIG. 49 is a diagram showing a detailed behavior when executing Instruction “vaddrhvc Rc,Ra,Rb”.
FIG. 50 is a diagram showing a behavior of the processor when executing Instruction “vsgnh Ra,Rb”.
FIG. 51 is a diagram showing a detailed behavior when executing Instruction “vsgnh Ra,Rb”.
FIG. 52 is a diagram showing a behavior of the processor when executing Instruction “valnvc1 Rc,Ra,Rb”.
FIG. 53 is a diagram showing a detailed behavior when executing Instruction “valnvc1 Rc,Ra,Rb”.
FIG. 54 is a diagram showing a detailed behavior when executing Instruction “valnvc2 Rc,Ra,Rb”.
FIG. 55 is a diagram showing a detailed behavior when executing Instruction “valnvc3 Rc,Ra,Rb”.
FIG. 56 is a diagram showing a detailed behavior when executing Instruction “valnvc4 Rc,Ra,Rb”.
FIG. 57 is a diagram showing a behavior of the processor when executing Instruction “addarvw Rc,Rb,Ra”.
FIG. 58 is a diagram showing a detailed behavior when executing Instruction “addarvw Rc,Rb,Ra”.
FIG. 59 is a diagram showing a behavior when performing “rounding of absolute values (away from zero)”.
FIG. 60 is a diagram showing a behavior of the processor when executing Instruction “movp Rc:Rc+1,Ra,Rb”.
FIG. 61 is a diagram showing a detailed behavior when executing Instruction “movp Rc:Rc+1,Ra,Rb”.
FIG. 62 is a diagram showing a detailed behavior when executing Instruction “jloop C6,Cm,TAR,Ra”.
FIG. 63 is a diagram showing a detailed behavior when executing Instruction “settar C6,Cm,D9”.
FIG. 64 is a diagram showing PROLOG/EPILOG removal 2-stage software pipelining.
FIG. 65 is a diagram showing a list of a source program written in the C language.
FIG. 66 is a diagram showing an example machine language program created using ordinary instructions “jloop” and “settar”.
FIG. 67 is a diagram showing an example machine language program created using Instructions “jloop” and “settar” according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 68 is a diagram showing a detailed behavior when executing Instruction “jloop C6,C2:C4,TAR,Ra”.
FIG. 69 is a diagram showing a detailed behavior when executing Instruction “settar C6,C2:C4,D9”.
FIGS. 70A and 70B are diagrams showing PROLOG/EPILOG removal 3-stage software pipelining.
FIG. 71 is a diagram showing a list of a source program written in the C language.
FIG. 72 is a diagram showing an example machine language program created using ordinary instructions “jloop” and “settar”.
FIG. 73 is a diagram showing an example machine language program created using Instructions “jloop” and “settar” according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 74 is a diagram showing a behavior of the processor when executing Instruction “vsada Rc,Ra,Rb,Rx”.
FIG. 75A is a diagram showing Instruction “vsada Rc,Ra,Rb,Rx”, and FIG. 75B is a diagram showing Instruction “vsada Rc,Ra,Rb”.
FIG. 76 is a diagram showing a behavior of the processor when executing Instruction “satss Rc,Ra,Rb”.
FIG. 77A is a diagram showing Instruction “satss Rc,Ra,Rb” and FIG. 77B is a diagram showing Instruction “satsu Rc,Ra,Rb”.
FIG. 78 is a diagram showing a behavior of the processor when executing Instruction “bytesel Rc,Ra,Rb,Rx”.
FIG. 79A is a diagram showing a detailed behavior when executing Instruction “bytesel Rc,Ra,Rb,Rx”, FIG. 79B is a diagram showing a relationship between the register Rx and byte data to be selected, FIG. 79C is a diagram showing a detailed behavior when executing Instruction “bytesel Rc,Ra,Rb,I12”, and FIG. 79D is a diagram showing a relationship between an immediate value I12 and byte data to be selected.
FIGS. 80A and 80B are diagrams showing a part of SIMD operation results being performed of bit extension (sign-extension or zero-extension).
FIG. 81 is a diagram showing all of SIMD operation results being performed of bit-extension.
FIG. 82 is a diagram showing a SIMD operation specified by condition flags and the like being performed.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

An explanation is given for the architecture of the processor according to the present invention. The processor of the present invention is a general-purpose processor which has been developed targeting at the field of AV media signal processing technology, and instructions issued in this processor offer a higher degree of parallelism than ordinary microcomputers. Used as a core common to mobile phones, mobile AV devices, digital televisions, DVDs and other devices, the processor can improve software usability. Furthermore, the present processor allows multiple high-performance media processes to be performed with high cost effectiveness, and provides a development environment for high-level languages intended for improving development efficiency.
FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram showing the present processor. The processor 1 is comprised of an instruction control unit 10, a decoding unit 20, a register file 30, an operation unit 40, an I/F unit 50, an instruction memory unit 60, a data memory unit 70, an extended register unit 80, and an I/O interface unit 90. The operation unit 40 includes arithmetic and logic/comparison operation units 41˜43, a multiplication/sum of products operation unit 44, a barrel shifter 45, a divider 46, and a converter 47 for performing SIMD instructions. The multiplication/sum of products operation unit 44 is capable of handling maximum of 65-bit accumulation so as not to decrease bit precision. The multiplication/sum of products operation unit 44 is also capable of executing SIMD instructions as in the case of the arithmetic and logic/comparison operation units 41˜43. Furthermore, the processor 1 is capable of parallel execution of an arithmetic and logic/comparison operation instruction on a maximum of three data elements.
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing the arithmetic and logic/comparison operation units 41˜43. Each of the arithmetic and logic/comparison operation units 41˜43 is made up of an ALU unit 41 a, a saturation processing unit 41 b, and a flag unit 41 c. The ALU unit 41 a includes an arithmetic operation unit, a logical operation unit, a comparator, and a TST. The bit widths of operation data to be supported are 8 bits (use four operation units in parallel), 16 bits (use two operation units in parallel) and 32 bits (process 32-bit data using all operation units). For a result of an arithmetic operation, the flag unit 41 c and the like detects an overflow and generates a condition flag. For a result of each of the operation units, the comparator and the TST, an arithmetic shift right, saturation by the saturation processing unit 41 b, the detection of maximum/minimum values, absolute value generation processing are performed.
FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing the configuration of the barrel shifter 45. The barrel shifter 45, which is made up of selectors 45 a and 45 b, a higher bit shifter 45 c, a lower bit shifter 45 d, and a saturation processing unit 45 e, executes an arithmetic shift of data (shift in the 2's complement number system) or a logical shift of data (unsigned shift). Usually, 32-bit or 64-bit data are inputted to and outputted from the barrel shifter 45. The amount of shift of target data stored in the registers 30 a and 30 b are specified by another register or according to its immediate value. An arithmetic or logical shift in the range of left 63 bits and right 63 bits is performed for the data, which is then outputted in an input bit length.
The barrel shifter 45 is capable of shifting 8-, 16-, 32-, and 64-bit data in response to a SIMD instruction. For example, the barrel shifter 45 can shift four pieces of 8-bit data in parallel.
Arithmetic shift, which is a shift in the 2's complement number system, is performed for aligning decimal points at the time of addition and subtraction, for multiplying a power of 2 (2, the 2^ndpower of 2, the −1^stpower of 2) and other purposes.
FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing the configuration of the converter 47. The converter 47 is made up of a saturation block (SAT) 47 a, a BSEQ block 47 b, an MSKGEN block 47 c, a VSUMB block 47 d, a BCNT block 47 e, and an IL block 47 f.
The saturation block (SAT) 47 a performs saturation processing for input data. Having two blocks for the saturation processing of 32-bit data makes it possible to support a SIMD instruction executed for two data elements in parallel.
The BSEQ block 47 b counts consecutive 0s or 1s from the MSB.
The MSKGEN block 47 c outputs a specified bit segment as 1, while outputting the others as 0.
The VSUMB block 47 d divides the input data into specified bit widths, and outputs their total sum.
The BCNT block 47 e counts the number of bits in the input data specified as 1.
The IL block 47 f divides the input data into specified bit widths, and outputs a value which resulted from exchanging the position of each data block.
FIG. 5 is a block diagram showing the configuration of the divider 46. Letting a dividend be 64 bits and a divisor be 32 bits, the divider 46 outputs 32 bits as a quotient and a modulo, respectively. 34 cycles are involved for obtaining a quotient and a modulo. The divider 46 can handle both singed and unsigned data. Note, however, that an identical setting is made concerning the presence/absence of signs of data serving as a dividend and a divisor. Also, the divider 46 has the capability of outputting an overflow flag, and a 0 division flag.
FIG. 6 is a block diagram showing the configuration of the multiplication/sum of products operation unit 44. The multiplication/sum of products operation unit 44, which is made up of two 32-bit multipliers (MUL) 44 a and 44 b, three 64-bit adders (Adder) 44 c˜44 e, a selector 44 f and a saturation processing unit (Saturation) 44 g, performs the following multiplications and sums of products:

- 32×32-bit signed multiplication, sum of products, and difference of products;
- 32×32-bit unsigned multiplication;
- 16×16-bit signed multiplication, sum of products, and difference of products performed on two data elements in parallel; and
- 32×16-bit t signed multiplication, sum of products, and difference of products performed on two data elements in parallel;

The above operations are performed on data in integer and fixed point format (h1, h2, w1, and w2). Also, the results of these operations are rounded and saturated.
FIG. 7 is a block diagram showing the configuration of the instruction control unit 10. The instruction control unit 10, which is made up of an instruction cache 10 a, an address management unit 10 b, instruction buffers 10 c˜10 e, a jump buffer 10 f, and a rotation unit (rotation) 10 g, issues instructions at ordinary times and at branch points. Having three 128-bit instruction buffers (the instruction buffers 10 c˜10 e) makes it possible to support the maximum number of parallel instruction execution. Regarding branch processing, the instruction control unit 10 stores in advance a branch target instruction into the jump buffer 10 f and stores a branch target address into the below-described TAR register before performing a branch (settar instruction). Thus, the instruction control unit 10 performs the branch using the branch target address stored in the TAR register and the branch target instruction stored in the jump buffer 10 f.
Note that the processor 1 is a processor employing the VLIW architecture. The VLIW architecture is an architecture allowing a plurality of instructions (e.g. load, store, operation, and branch) to be stored in a single instruction word, and such instructions are to be executed all at once. By programmers describing a set of instructions which can be executed in parallel as a single issue group, it is possible for such issue group to be processed in parallel. In this specification, the delimiter of an issue group is indicated by “;;”. Notational examples are described below.

EXAMPLE 1

mov r1, 0x23;;
This instruction description indicates that only an instruction “mov” shall be executed.

EXAMPLE 2

mov r1, 0x38
add r0, r1, r2
sub r3, r1, r2;;
These instruction descriptions indicate that three instructions of “mov”, “add” and “sub” shall be executed in parallel.
The instruction control unit 10 identifies an issue group and sends it to the decoding unit 20. The decoding unit 20 decodes the instructions in the issue group, and controls resources required for executing such instructions.
Next, an explanation is given for registers included in the processor 1.

Table 1 below lists a set of registers of the processor 1.

TABLE 1


Register	Bit	No. of
name	width	registers	Usage

R0˜R31	32 bits	32	General-purpose registers. Used as data
			memory pointer, data storage and the
			like when operation instruction is
			executed.
TAR	32 bits	1	Branch register. Used as branch address
			storage at branch point.
LR	32 bits	1	Link register.
SVR	16 bits	2	Save register. Used for saving condition
			flag (CFR) and various modes.
M0˜M1	64 bits	2	Operation registers. Used as data
(MH0:ML0˜MH1˜ML1)			storage when operation instruction is
			executed.

Table 2 below lists a set of flags (flags managed in a condition flag register and the like described later) of the processor 1.

TABLE 2


	Bit	No. of
Flag name	width	flags	Usage

C0˜C7	1	8	Condition flags. Indicate if condition is
			established or not.
VC0˜VC3	1	4	Condition flags for media processing
			extension instruction. Indicate if condition is
			established or not.
OVS	1	1	Overflow flag. Detects overflow at the time
			of operation.
CAS	1	1	Carry flag. Detects carry at the time of
			operation.
BPO	5	1	Specifies bit position. Specifies bit positions
			to be processed when mask processing
			instruction is executed.
ALN	2	1	Specified byte alignment.
FXP	1	1	Fixed point operation mode.
UDR	32	1	Undefined register.

FIG. 8 is a diagram showing the configuration of the general-purpose registers (R0˜R31) 30 a. The general-purpose registers (R0˜R31) 30 a are a group of 32-bit registers that constitute an integral part of the context of a task to be executed and that store data or addresses. Note that the general-purpose registers R30 and R31 are used by hardware as a global pointer and a stack pointer, respectively.
FIG. 9 is a diagram showing the configuration of a link register (LR) 30 c. In connection with this link register (LR) 30 c, the processor 1 also has a save register (SVR) not illustrated in the diagram. The link register (LR) 30 c is a 32-bit register for storing a return address at the time of a function call. Note that the save register (SVR) is a 16-bit register for saving a condition flag (CFR.CF) of the condition flag register at the time of a function call. The link register (LR) 30 c is used also for the purpose of increasing the speed of loops, as in the case of a branch register (TAR) to be explained later. 0 is always read out as the lower 1 bit, but 0 must be written at the time of writing.
For example, when “call (brl, jmpl)” instructions are executed, the processor 1 saves a return address in the link register (LR) 30 c and saves a condition flag (CFR.CF) in the save register (SVR). When “jmp” instruction is executed, the processor 1 fetches the return address (branch target address) from the link register (LR) 30 c, and restores a program counter (PC). Furthermore, when “ret (jmpr)” instruction is executed, the processor 1 fetches the branch target address (return address) from the link register (LR) 30 c, and stores (restores) it in/to the program counter (PC). Moreover, the processor 1 fetches the condition flag from the save register (SVR) so as to store (restore) it in/to a condition flag area CFR.CF in the condition flag register (CFR) 32.
FIG. 10 is a diagram showing the configuration of the branch register (TAR) 30 d. The branch register (TAR) 30 d is a 32-bit register for storing a branch target address, and is used mainly for the purpose of increasing the speed of loops. 0 is always read out as the lower 1 bit, but 0 must be written at the time of writing.
For example, when “jmp” and “jloop” instructions are executed, the processor 1 fetches a branch target address from the branch register (TAR) 30 d, and stores it in the program counter (PC). When the instruction indicated by the address stored in the branch register (TAR) 30 d is stored in a branch instruction buffer, a branch penalty will be 0. An increased loop speed can be achieved by storing the top address of a loop in the branch register (TAR) 30 d.
FIG. 11 is a diagram showing the configuration of a program status register (PSR) 31. The program status register (PSR) 31, which constitutes an integral part of the context of a task to be executed, is a 32-bit register for storing the following processor status information:
Bit SWE: indicates whether the switching of VMP (Virtual Multi-Processor) to LP (Logical Processor) is enabled or disabled.
“0” indicates that switching to LP is disabled and “1” indicates that switching to LP is enabled.
Bit FXP: indicates a fixed point mode. “0” indicates the mode and “1” indicates the mode 1.
Bit IH: is an interrupt processing flag indicating that maskable interrupt processing is ongoing or not. “1” indicates that there is an ongoing interrupt processing and “0” indicates that there is no ongoing interrupt processing. This flag is automatically set on the occurrence of an interrupt. This flag is used to make a distinction of whether interrupt processing or program processing is taking place at a point in the program to which the processor returns in response to “rti” instruction.
Bit EH: is a flag indicating that an error or an NMI is being processed or not. “0” indicates that error/NMI interrupt processing is not ongoing and “1” indicates that error/NMI interrupt processing is ongoing. This flag is masked if an asynchronous error or an NMI occurs when EH=1. Meanwhile, when VMP is enabled, plate switching of VMP is masked.
Bit PL [1:0]: indicates a privilege level. “00” indicates the privilege level 0, i.e., the processor abstraction level, “01” indicates the privilege level 1 (non-settable), “10” indicates the privilege level 2, i.e., the system program level, and “11” indicates the privilege level 3, i.e., the user program level.
Bit LPIE3: indicates whether LP-specific interrupt 3 is enabled or disabled. “1” indicates that an interrupt is enabled and “0” indicates that an interrupt is disabled.
Bit LPIE2: indicates whether LP-specific interrupt 2 is enabled or disabled. “1” indicates that an interrupt is enabled and “0” indicates that an interrupt is disabled.
Bit LPIE1: indicates whether LP-specific interrupt 1 is enabled or disabled. “1” indicates that an interrupt is enabled and “0” indicates that an interrupt is disabled.
Bit LPIE0: indicates whether LP-specific interrupt 0 is enabled or disabled. “1” indicates that an interrupt is enabled and “0” indicates that an interrupt is disabled.
Bit AEE: indicates whether a misalignment exception is enabled or disabled. “1” indicates that a misalignment exception is enabled and “0” indicates that a misalignment exception is disabled.
Bit IE: indicates whether a level interrupt is enabled or disabled. “1” indicates that a level interrupt is enabled and “0” indicates a level interrupt is disabled.
Bit IM [7:0]: indicates an interrupt mask, and ranges from levels 0˜7, each being able to be masked at its own level. Level 0 is the highest level. Of interrupt requests which are not masked by any IMs, only the interrupt request with the highest level is accepted by the processor 1. When an interrupt request is accepted, levels below the accepted level are automatically masked by hardware. IM[0] denotes a mask of level 0, IM[1] a mask of level 1, IM[2] a mask of level 2, IM[3] a mask of level 3, IM[4] a mask of level 4, IM[5] a mask of level 5, IM[6] a mask of level 6, and IM[7] a mask of level 7.
reserved: indicates a reserved bit. 0 is always read out. 0 must be written at the time of writing.
FIG. 12 is a diagram showing the configuration of the condition flag register (CFR) 32. The condition flag register (CFR) 32, which constitutes an integral part of the context of a task to be executed, is a 32-bit register made up of condition flags, operation flags, vector condition flags, an operation instruction bit position specification field, and a SIMD data alignment information field.
Bit ALN [1:0]: indicates an alignment mode. An alignment mode of “valnvc” instruction is set.
Bit BPO [4:0]: indicates a bit position. It is used in an instruction that requires a bit position specification.
Bit VC0˜VC3: are vector condition flags. Starting from a byte on the LSB side or a half word through to the MSB side, each corresponds to a flag ranging from VC0 through to VC3.
Bit OVS: is an overflow flag (summary). It is set on the detection of saturation and overflow. If not detected, a value before the instruction is executed is retained. Clearing of this flag needs to be carried out by software.
Bit CAS: is a carry flag (summary). It is set when a carry occurs under “addc” instruction, or when a borrow occurs under “subc” instruction. If there is no occurrence of a carry under “addc” instruction, or a borrow under “subc” instruction, a value before the instruction is executed is retained. Clearing of this flag needs to be carried out by software.
Bit C0˜C7: are condition flags. The value of the flag C7 is always 1. A reflection of a FALSE condition (writing of 0) made to the flag C7 is ignored.
reserved: indicates a reserved bit. 0 is always read out. 0 must be written at the time of writing.
FIGS. 13A and 13B are diagrams showing the configurations of accumulators (M0, M1) 30 b. Such accumulators (M0, M1) 30 b, which constitute an integral part of the context of a task to be executed, are made up of a 32-bit register MHO-MH1 (register for multiply and divide/sum of products (the higher 32 bits)) shown in FIG. 13A and a 32-bit register MLO-ML1 (register for multiply and divide/sum of products (the lower 32 bits)) shown in FIG. 13B.
The register MHO-MH1 is used for storing the higher 32 bits of operation results at the time of a multiply instruction, while used as the higher 32 bits of the accumulators at the time of a sum of products instruction. Moreover, the register MHO-MH1 can be used in combination with the general-purpose registers in the case where a bit stream is handled. Meanwhile, the register MLO-ML1 is used for storing the lower 32 bits of operation results at the time of a multiply instruction, while used as the lower 32 bits of the accumulators at the time of a sum of products instruction.
FIG. 14 is a diagram showing the configuration of a program counter (PC) 33. This program counter (PC) 33, which constitutes an integral part of the context of a task to be executed, is a 32-bit counter that holds the address of an instruction being executed.
FIG. 15 is a diagram showing the configuration of a PC save register (IPC) 34. This PC save register (IPC) 34, which constitutes an integral part of the context of a task to be executed is a 32-bit register.
FIG. 16 is a diagram showing the configuration of a PSR save register (IPSR) 35. This PSR save register (IPSR) 35, which constitutes an integral part of the context of a task to be executed, is a 32-bit register for saving the program status register (PSR) 31. 0 is always read out as a part corresponding to a reserved bit, but 0 must be written at the time of writing.
Next, an explanation is given for the memory space of the processor 1. In the processor 1, a linear memory space with a capacity of 4 GB is divided into 32 segments, and an instruction SRAM (Static RAM) and a data SRAM are allocated to 128-MB segments. With a 128-MB segment serving as one block, a target block to be accessed is set in a SAR (SRAM Area Register). A direct access is made to the instruction SRAM/data SRAM when the accessed address is a segment set in the SAR, but an access request shall be issued to a bus controller (BCU) when such address is not a segment set in the SAR. An on chip memory (OCM), an external memory, an external device, an I/O port and others are connected to the BUC. Data reading/writing from and to these devices is possible.
FIG. 17 is a timing diagram showing the pipeline behavior of the processor 1. As illustrated in the diagram, the pipeline of the processor 1 basically consists of the following five stages: instruction fetch; instruction assignment (dispatch); decode; execution; and writing.
FIG. 18 is a timing diagram showing each stage of the pipeline behavior of the processor 1 at the time of executing an instruction. In the instruction fetch stage, an access is made to an instruction memory which is indicated by an address specified by the program counter (PC) 33, and the instruction is transferred to the instruction buffers 10 c˜10 e and the like. In the instruction assignment stage, the output of branch target address information in response to a branch instruction, the output of an input register control signal, the assignment of a variable length instruction are carried out, which is followed by the transfer of the instruction to an instruction register (IR). In the decode stage, the IR is inputted to the decoding unit 20, and an operation unit control signal and a memory access signal are outputted. In the execution stage, an operation is executed and the result of the operation is outputted either to the data memory or the general-purpose registers (R0˜R31) 30 a. In the writing stage, a value obtained as a result of data transfer, and the operation results are stored in the general-purpose registers.
The VLIW architecture of the processor 1 allows parallel execution of the above processing on a maximum of three data elements. Therefore, the processor 1 performs the behavior shown in FIG. 18 in parallel at the timing shown in FIG. 19.
Next, an explanation is given for a set of instructions executed by the processor 1 with the above configuration.

Tables 3˜5 list categorized instructions to be executed by the processor 1.

TABLE 3


Category	Operation unit	Instruction operation code

Memory transfer	M	ld, ldh, ldhu, ldb, ldbu, ldp, ldhp, ldbp, ldbh,
instruction (load)		ldbuh, ldbhp, ldbuhp
Memory transfer	M	st, sth, stb, stp, sthp, stbp, stbh, stbhp
instruction (store)
Memory transfer	M	dpref, ldstb
instruction (others)
External register	M	rd, rde, wt, wte
transfer instruction
Branch instruction	B	br, brl, call, jmp, jmpl, jmpr, ret, jmpf, jloop,
		setbb, setlr, settar
Software interrupt	B	rti, pi0, pi0l, pi1, pi1l, pi2, pi2l, pi3, pi3l, pi4,
instruction		pi4l, pi5, pi5l, pi6, pi6l, pi7, pi7l, sc0, sc1, sc2,
		sc3, sc4, sc5, sc6, sc7
VMP/interrupt	B	intd, inte, vmpsleep, vmpsus, vmpswd, vmpswe,
control instruction		vmpwait
Arithmetic operation	A	abs, absvh, absvw, add, addarvw, addc, addmsk,
instruction		adds, addsr, addu, addvh, addvw, neg,
		negvh, negvw, rsub, s1add, s2add, sub,
		subc, submsk, subs, subvh, subvw, max,
		min
Logical operation	A	and, andn, or, sethi, xor, not
instruction
Compare instruction	A	cmpCC, cmpCCa, cmpCCn, cmpCCo, tstn,
		tstna, tstnn, tstno, tstz, tstza, tstzn, tstzo
Move instruction	A	mov, movcf, mvclcas, mvclovs, setlo, vcchk
NOP instruction	A	nop
Shift instruction1	S1	asl, aslvh, aslvw, asr, asrvh, asrvw, lsl, lsr,
		rol, ror
Shift instruction2	S2	aslp, aslpvw, asrp, asrpvw, lslp, lsrp

TABLE 4


Category	Operation unit	Instruction operation code

Extraction instruction	S2	ext, extb, extbu, exth, exthu, extr, extru, extu
Mask instruction	C	msk, mskgen
Saturation	C	sat12, sat9, satb, satbu, sath, satw
instruction
Conversion	C	valn, valn1, valn2, valn3, valnvc1, valnvc2,
instruction		valnvc3, valnvc4, vhpkb, vhpkh, vhunpkb,
		vhunpkh, vintlhb, vintlhh, vintllb, vintllh,
		vlpkb, vlpkbu, vlpkh, vlpkhu, vlunpkb,
		vlunpkbu, vlunpkh, vlunpkhu, vstovb, vstovh,
		vunpk1, vunpk2, vxchngh, vexth
Bit count instruction	C	bcnt1, bseq, bseq0, bseq1
Others	C	byterev, extw, mskbrvb, mskbrvh, rndvh,
		movp
Multiply instruction1	X1	fmulhh, fmulhhr, fmulhw, fmulhww, hmul,
		lmul
Multiply instruction2	X2	fmulww, mul, mulu
Sum of products	X1	fmachh, fmachhr, fmachw, fmachww, hmac,
instruction1		lmac
Sum of products	X2	fmacww, mac
instruction2
Difference of	X1	fmsuhh, fmsuhhr, fmsuhw, fmsuww, hmsu,
products instruction1		lmsu
Difference of	X2	fmsuww, msu
products instruction2
Divide instruction	DIV	div, divu
Debugger instruction	DBGM	dbgm0, dbgm1, dbgm2, dbgm3

TABLE 5


Category	Operation unit	Instruction operation code

SIMD arithmetic	A	vabshvh, vaddb, vaddh, vaddhvc, vaddhvh,
operation instruction		vaddrhvc, vaddsb, vaddsh, vaddsrb, vaddsrh,
		vasubb, vcchk, vhaddh, vhaddhvh,
		vhsubh, vhsubhvh, vladdh, vladdhvh, vlsubh,
		vlsubhvh, vnegb, vnegh, vneghvh, vsaddb,
		vsaddh, vsgnh, vsrsubb, vsrsubh, vssubb,
		vssubh, vsubb, vsubh, vsubhvh, vsubsh,
		vsumh, vsumh2, vsumrh2, vxaddh,
		vxaddhvh, vxsubh, vxsubhvh,
		vmaxb, vmaxh, vminb, vminh, vmovt, vsel
SIMD compare	A	vcmpeqb, vcmpeqh, vcmpgeb, vcmpgeh,
instruction		vcmpgtb, vcmpgth, vcmpleb, vcmpleh, vcmpltb,
		vcmplth, vcmpneb, vcmpneh,
		vscmpeqb, vscmpeqh, vscmpgeb, vscmpgeh,
		vscmpgtb, vscmpgth, vscmpleb, vscmpleh,
		vscmpltb, vscmplth, vscmpneb, vscmpneh
SIMD shift	S1	vaslb, vaslh, vaslvh, vasrb, vasrh, vasrvh,
instruction1		vlslb, vlslh, vlsrb, vlsrh, vrolb, vrolh, vrorb,
		vrorh
SIMD shift	S2	vasl, vaslvw, vasr, vasrvw, vlsl, vlsr
instruction2
SIMD saturation	C	vsath, vsath12, vsath8, vsath8u, vsath9
instruction
Other SIMD	C	vabssumb, vrndvh
instruction
SIMD multiply	X2	vfmulh, vfmulhr, vfmulw, vhfmulh, vhfmulhr,
instruction		vhfmulw, vhmul, vlfmulh, vlfmulhr, vlfmulw,
		vlmul, vmul, vpfmulhww, vxfmulh,
		vxfmulhr, vxfmulw, vxmul
SIMD sum of	X2	vfmach, vfmachr, vfmacw, vhfmach, vhfmachr,
products instruction		vhfmacw, vhmac, vlfmach, vlfmachr,
		vlfmacw, vlmac, vmac, vpfmachww, vxfmach,
		vxfmachr, vxfmacw, vxmac
SIMD difference of	X2	vfmsuh, vfmsuw, vhfmsuh, vhfmsuw, vhmsu,
products instruction		vlfmsuh, vlfmsuw, vlmsu, vmsu, vxfmsuh,
		vxfmsuw, vxmsu

Note that “Operation units” in the above tables refer to operation units used in the respective instructions. More specifically, “A” denotes ALU instruction, “B” branch instruction, “C” conversion instruction, “DIV” divide instruction, “DBGM” debug instruction, “M” memory access instruction, “S1” and “S2” shift instruction, and “X1” and “X2” multiply instruction.
FIG. 20 is a diagram showing the format of the instructions executed by the processor 1.
The following describes what acronyms stand for in the diagrams: “P” is predicate (execution condition: one of the eight condition flags C0˜C7 is specified); “OP” is operation code field; “R” is register field; “I” is immediate field; and “D” is displacement field. Furthermore, predicates, which are flags for controlling whether or not an instruction is executed based on values of the condition flags C0˜C7, serve as a technique that allows instructions to be selectively executed without using a branch instruction and therefore that accelerates the speed of processing.
FIGS. 21˜36 are diagrams explaining outlined functionality of the instructions executed by the processor 1. More specifically, FIG. 21 explains an instruction belonging to the category “ALUadd (addition) system)”; FIG. 22 explains an instruction belonging to the category “ALUsub (subtraction) system)”; FIG. 23 explains an instruction belonging to the category “ALUlogic (logical operation) system and others”; FIG. 24 explains an instruction belonging to the category “CMP (comparison operation) system”; FIG. 25 explains an instruction belonging to the category “mul (multiplication) system”; FIG. 26 explains an instruction belonging to the category “mac (sum of products operation) system”; FIG. 27 explains an instruction belonging to the category “msu (difference of products) system”; FIG. 28 explains an instruction belonging to the category “MEMId (load from memory) system”; FIG. 29 explains an instruction belonging to the category “MEMstore (store in memory) system”; FIG. 30 explains an instruction belonging to the category “BRA (branch) system”; FIG. 31 explains an instruction belonging to the category “BSasl (arithmetic barrel shift) system and others”; FIG. 32 explains an instruction belonging to the category “BSlsr (logical barrel shift) system and others”; FIG. 33 explains an instruction belonging to the category “CNVvaln (arithmetic conversion) system”; FIG. 34 explains an instruction belonging to the category “CNV (general conversion) system”; FIG. 35 explains an instruction belonging to the category “SATvlpk (saturation processing) system”; and FIG. 36 explains an instruction belonging to the category “ETC (et cetera) system”.
The following describes the meaning of each column in these diagrams: “SIMD” indicates the type of an instruction (distinction between SISD (SINGLE) and SIMD); “Size” indicates the size of individual operand to be an operation target; “Instruction” indicates the operation code of an operation; “Operand” indicates the operands of an instruction; “CFR” indicates a change in the condition flag register; “PSR” indicates a change in the processor status register; “Typical behavior” indicates the overview of a behavior; “Operation unit” indicates a operation unit to be used; and “3116” indicates the size of an instruction.

FIGS. 37˜748 are diagrams explaining the detailed functionality of the instructions executed by the processor 1. Note that the meaning of each symbol used for explaining the instructions is as described in Tables 6˜10 below.

TABLE 6


Symbol Meaning

	X[i]	Bit number i of X
	X[i:j]	Bit number j to bit number i of X
	X:Y	Concatenated X and Y

	{n{X}}	n repetitions of X
	sextM(X,N)	Sign-extend X from N bit width to M bit width.
		Default of M is 32.

Default of N is all possible bit widths of X.

	uextM(X,N)	Zero-extend X from N bit width to M bit width.
		Default of M is 32.

Default of N is all possible bit widths of X.

	smul(X,Y)	Signed multiplication X * Y
	umul(X,Y)	Unsigned multiplication X * Y
	sdiv(X,Y)	Integer part in quotient of signed division X/Y
	smod(X,Y)	Modulo with the same sign as dividend.
	udiv(X,Y)	Quotient of unsigned division X/Y
	umod(X,Y)	Modulo
	abs(X)	Absolute value
	bseq(X,Y)	for (i=0; i<32; i++) {
		if (X[31−i] != Y) break;

	}
	result = i;

bcnt(X,Y)

S = 0;

for (i=0; i<32; i++) {

if (X[i] == Y) S++;

	}
	result = S;

	max(X,Y)	result = (X > Y)? X : Y
	min(X,Y)	result = (X < Y)? X : Y;
	tstz(X,Y)	X & Y == 0
	tstn(X,Y)	X & Y != 0

TABLE 7


Symbol	Meaning

Ra Ra[31:0]	Register numbered a (0 <= a <= 31)
Ra+1 R(a+1)[31:0]	Register numbered a+1 (0 <= a <= 30)
Rb Rb[31:0]	Register numbered b (0 <= b <= 31)
Rb+1 R(b+1)[31:0]	Register numbered b+1 (0 <= b <= 30)
Rc Rc[31:0]	Register numbered c (0 <= c <= 31)
Rc+1 R(c+1)[31:0]	Register numbered c+1Register (0 <= c <= 30)
Ra2 Ra2[31:0]	Register numbered a2 (0 <= a2 <= 15)
Ra2+1 R(a2+1)[31:0]	Register numbered a2+1 (0 <= a2 <= 14)
Rb2 Rb2[31:0]	Register numbered b2 (0 <= b2 <= 15)
Rb2+1 R(b2+1)[31:0]	Register numbered b2+1 (0 <= b2 <= 14)
Rc2 Rc2[31:0]	Register numbered c2 (0 <= c2 <= 15)
Rc2+1 R(c2+1)[31:0]	Register numbered c2+1 (0 <= c2 <= 14)
Ra3 Ra3[31:0]	Register numbered a3 (0 <= a3 <= 7)
Ra3+1 R(a3+1)[31:0]	Register numbered a3+1 (0 <= a3 <= 6)
Rb3 Rb3[31:0]	Register numbered b3 (0 <= b3 <= 7)
Rb3+1 R(b3+1)[31:0]	Register numbered b3+1 (0 <= b3 <= 6)
Rc3 Rc3[31:0]	Register numbered c3 (0 <= c3 <= 7)
Rc3+1 R(c3+1)[31:0]	Register numbered c3+1 (0 <= c3 <= 6)
Rx Rx[31:0]	Register numbered x (0 <= x <= 3)

TABLE 8


Symbol	Meaning

+	Addition
−	Subtraction
&	Logical AND
\|	Logical OR
!	Logical NOT
<<	Logical shift left (arithmetic shift left)
>>	Arithmetic shift right
>>>	Logical shift right
{circumflex over ( )}	Exclusive OR
˜	Logical NOT
==	Equal
!=	Not equal
>	Greater than Signed(regard left-and right-part MSBs
	as sign)
>=	Greater than or equal to Signed(regard left-and right-part
	MSBs as sign)
>(u)	Greater than Unsigned(Not regard left-and right-part MSBs
	as sign)
>=(u)	Greater than or equal to Unsigned(Not regard left-and right-part
	MSBs as sign)
<	Less than Signed(regard left-and right-part MSBs as
	sign)
<=	Less than or equal to Signed(regard left-and right-part MSBs as
	sign)
<(u)	Less than Unsigned(Not regard left-and right-part MSBs
	as sign)
<=(u)	Less than or equal to Unsigned(Not regard left-and right-part
	MSBs as sign)

TABLE 9


Symbol Meaning

D(addr) Double word data corresponding to address “addr” in Memory
W(addr) Word data corresponding to address “addr” in Memory
H(addr) Half data corresponding to address “addr” in Memory
B(addr) Byte data corresponding to address “addr” in Memory
B(addr,bus_lock) Access byte data corresponding to address “addr”
in Memory, and lock used bus concurrently (unlockable bus shall
not be locked)
B(addr,bus_unlock) Access byte data corresponding to address “addr”
in Memory, and unlock used bus concurrently (unlock shall be ignored
for unlockable bus and bus which has not been locked)

EREG(num)	Extended register numbered “num”
EREG_ERR	To be 1 if error occurs when immediately previous access is

made to extended register.

To be 0, when there was no error.

<-	Write result
=>	Synonym of instruction (translated by assembler)

reg#(Ra)

Register number of general-purpose register Ra(5-bit value)

0x	Prefix of hexadecimal numbers
0b	Prefix of binary numbers
tmp	Temporally variable
UD	Undefined value (value which is implementation-dependent value

or which varies dynamically)

Dn	Displacement value (n is a natural value indicating the number
	of bits)
In	Immediate value (n is a natural value indicating the number of bits)

TABLE 10


Symbol Meaning

	Explanation for syntax
	if (condition) {
	Executed when condition is met;
	} else {
	Executed when condition is not met;
	}
	Executed when condition A is met, if (condition A); * Not
	executed when condition A is not met

	for (Expression1;Expression2;Expression3)	* Same as C language
	(Expression1)? Expression2:Expression3	* Same as C language

	Explanation for terms
	The following explains terms used for explanations:
	Integer multiplication Multiplication defined as “smul”
	Fixed point multiplication
	Arithmetic shift left is performed after integer operation. When
	PSR.FXP is 0, the amount of shift is 1 bit, and when PSR.FXP
	is 1, 2 bits.
	SIMD operation straight/cross/high/low/pair
	Higher
16 bits and lower 16 bits of half word vector data is
	RH and RL, respectively. When operations performed on at Ra
	register and Rb register are defined as follows:

	straight	Operation is performed between RHa and RHb
	cross	Operation is performed between RHa and RLb, and RLa
	and RHb
	high	Operation is performed between RHa and RHb, and RLa
	and RHb
	low	Operation is performed between RHa and RLb, and RLa
	and RLb
	pair	Operation is performed between RH and RHb, and RH

	and RLb (RH is 32-bit data)

[Instruction vcchk]
Instruction vcchk is a SIMD instruction for judging whether results of a SIMD compare instruction (e.g. vcmpCCb) are all zero or not, and setting the results to the condition flag register (CFR) 32. For example, when
vcchk
the processor judges, as illustrated in FIG. 37, whether the vector condition flags VC0˜VC3 (110) in the condition flag register (CFR) 32 are all zero or not, and sets the condition flags C4 and C5 in the condition flag resister (CFR) 32 to 1 and 0 respectively when all of the vector condition flags VC0˜VC3 (110) are zero, while setting the condition flags C4 and C5 in the condition flag resister (CFR) 32 to 0 and 1 respectively when not all the vector condition flags VC0˜VC3 (110) are zero. Then, the vector condition flags VC0˜VC3 are stored in the condition flags C0˜C3. A detailed behavior is as shown in FIG. 38.
This instruction allows a faster extraction of results of SIMD compare instructions (especially, agreement/disagreement of results), and is effective when detecting the EOF (End Of File) of a file and other purposes.
[Instruction stbh, stbhp]
Instruction stbh is an instruction for storing, into a memory and the like, two pieces of byte data stored in one register (byte data stored in the higher 16 bits and byte data stored in the lower 16 bits). This instruction is paired with Instruction Idbh (for moving data in the opposite direction). For example, when
stbh (Ra), Rb
the processor 1, using the I/F unit 50 and others, stores two pieces of byte data stored in the register Rb (the 16˜23th bits and the 0˜7th bits in the register Rb) into storage locations indicated by addresses specified by the register Ra, as illustrated in FIG. 39. A detailed behavior is as shown in FIG. 40.
Instruction stbhp is an instruction for storing, into a memory and the like, four pieces of byte data stored in two registers (pair registers) (two pieces of byte data stored in the higher 16 bits of the respective registers and two pieces of byte data stored in the lower 16 bits of the respective registers). This instruction is paired with Instruction Idbhp (for moving data in the opposite direction). For example, when
stbhp (Ra), Rb: Rb+1
the processor 1, using the I/F unit 50 and others, stores four pieces of byte data stored in the registers Rb and Rb+1 (the 16˜23th bits and the 0˜7th bits in the respective registers) into storage locations indicated by addresses specified by the register Ra, as illustrated in FIG. 41. A detailed behavior is as shown in FIG. 42.
These instructions eliminate the need for data type conversions when byte data is handled in 16-bit SIMD, leading to a faster processing speed.
[Instruction sethi]
Instruction sethi is an instruction for storing an immediate value in the higher 16 bits of a register without changing the lower 16 bits of the register. For example, when
sethi Ra, I16
the processor 1 stores a 16-bit immediate value (I16) in the higher 16 bits of the register Ra, as shown in FIG. 43. When this is done, there is no change in the lower 16 bits of the register Ra. A detailed behavior is as shown in FIG. 44.
This instruction, when combined with Instruction “mov Rb, I16”, makes it possible for a 32-bit immediate value to be set in a register.
[Instruction vaddhvc, vaddrhvc]
Instruction vaddhvc is a SIMD instruction for making a switch of objects to be added, depending on the value of a vector condition flag. For example, when
vaddhvc Rc, Ra, Rb
the processor 1, using the operation unit 40 and others, adds the value held in the register Ra with the value held in the register Ra or Rb in the half word vector format, and stores the result into the register Rc, as shown in FIG. 45. When this is done, whether the value held in Ra or the value held in Rb is added depends on a value of the vector condition flag VC2. More specifically, when the vector condition flag VC2=1, the value held in the register Ra and the value held in the register Rb are added, and when VC2=0, the value held in the register Ra and the value held in the register Ra are added. A detailed behavior is as shown in FIG. 46.
This instruction is effective when used for motion compensation in image processing. Since a value which resulted from dividing the value held in the addition result register Rc by 2 serves as the average value of Ra or the average value of Ra and Rb, there is an advantage that a single program can support half-pel motion compensation (motion compensation performed on a per-half-pixel basis) regardless of whether pixels are integer pixels or half pixels, as shown in FIG. 47.
Meanwhile, Instruction vaddrhvc is equivalent to an instruction in which rounding is performed in addition to processing of the above-explained Instruction vaddhvc. For example, when
vaddrhvc Rc, Ra, Rb
the processor 1, using the arithmetic and logic/comparison operation unit 41 and others, adds the value held in the register Ra with the value held in the register Ra or Rb in the half word vector format and further adds 1 for rounding, and stores the result into the register Rc, as shown in FIG. 48. Other behavior is equivalent to that of Instruction vaddhvc. A detailed behavior is as shown in FIG. 49.
This instruction is also effective when used for motion compensation in image processing.
Note that as a functionality of each of the above instructions vaddhvc and vaddrhvc, 1-bit shift right (processing to perform a division by 2) may be added. Such functionality enables a processor to directly determine pixel values of integer pixels and half pixels.
Moreover, it may also be possible to define an instruction having functionalities of both Instruction vaddhvc and Instruction vaddrhvc. An example of such instruction is one which is capable of behaving either as Instruction vaddhvc or Instruction vaddhrvc depending on a value of a condition flag. Such an instruction allows a single program to perform processing regardless of whether rounding is performed or not.
[Instruction vsgnh]
Instruction vsgnh is a SIMD instruction for generating a value depending on the sign (positive/negative) of the value held in a register and whether a value held in a register is zero or not. For example, when
vsgnh Ra, Rb
the processor 1 stores one of the following values into the register Rb in half word vector format, as shown in FIG. 50:(i) 1 when the value held in the register Ra is positive, (ii) −1 when the value held in the register Ra is negative, and (iii) 0 when the value held in the register Ra is 0. A detailed behavior is as shown in FIG. 51.
This instruction is effective when used for inverse quantization in image processing since 1 is outputted when a certain value is positive, −1 when negative, and 0 when 0. In the processor 1, in particular, values on which SIMD operations are difficult to be performed can be calculated at an increased speed.
[Instruction valnvc1, valnvc2, valnvc3, valnvc4]
Instruction valnvc1 is a SIMD instruction for byte-aligning data and extracting different byte data depending on a vector condition flag. For example, when
valnvc1 Rc, Ra, Rb
the processor 1, performs byte-alignment by shifting a bit string resulted from concatenating the registers Ra and Rb according to a value indicated by Bit ALN[1:0] of the condition flag register (CFR) 32, and stores four pieces of byte data which have been extracted depending on a value of the vector condition flag VC0, as shown in FIG. 52. More specifically, the processor 1 extracts four pieces of byte data “a, a, b, and b” from byte-aligned data and stores them in the register Rc when the vector condition flag VC0=0, while extracting four pieces of byte data “a, b, b, and c” from byte-aligned data and stores them in the register Rc when the vector condition flag VC0=1. A detailed behavior is as shown in FIG. 53.
This instruction is effective when used for motion compensation in image processing. Since a value resulted from dividing the value held in the addition result register Rc by 2 on a per-half word vector basis equals to “a” and “b”, or (a+b)/2 and (b+c)/2, there is an advantage that a single program can support half-pel motion compensation (motion compensation performed on a per-half-pixel basis) regardless of whether pixels are integer pixels or half pixels, as shown in FIG. 47.
Note that basic behavior of each of Instructions valnvc2, valnvc3, and valnvc4 is the same as that of the above-explained Instruction valnvc1, other than that where in byte-aligned data pieces of byte data are extracted, as shown in FIG. 52. A detailed behavior of the respective instructions is as shown in FIGS. 54, 55 and 56. Thus, these instructions are also effective when used for motion compensation in image processing.
Also note that the present invention is not limited to byte as a unit of alignment, and therefore that half word and half byte may also serve as a unit of alignment.
[Instruction addarvw]
Instruction addarvw is an instruction for adding two values and further adding 1 when one of such values is positive. For example, when
addarvw Rc, Rb, Ra
the processor 1, using the arithmetic and logic/comparison operation unit 41 and others, adds the value held in the register Ra and the value held in the register Rb, as shown in FIG. 57. When this is done, the processor 1 further adds 1 when the value held in the register Ra is positive. A detailed behavior is as shown in FIG. 58.
This instruction is effective when used for “rounding of an absolute value (away from zero)”. As shown in FIG. 59, a value to be rounded is stored in the register Ra, and a value resulted from filling, with 1, a bit corresponding to one lower than the bit to be rounded shall be stored in the register Rb. When this instruction is executed after this, a result generated by rounding the absolute value of the value held in the register Ra (here, the most significant bit is a sign bit, and therefore the value held in Ra is fixed point data which has a point between the second bit and the third bit from the most significant bit) is to be stored in the register Rc. In an example illustrated in FIG. 58, by masking bits other than the higher 2 bits of the register Ra, +1 is obtained for +0.5, and −1 is obtained for −0.5, and absolute value rounding is realized. Thus, this instruction is effective when used for rounding absolute values in image processing.
[Instruction movp]
Instruction movp is an instruction for moving values held in arbitrary two registers to two consecutive registers. For example, when
movp Rc: Rc+1, Ra, Rb
the processor 1, using the I/F unit 50 and others, moves the value held in the register Ra to the register Rc, and moves the value held in the register Rb to the register Rc+1, as shown in FIG. 60. A detailed behavior is as shown in FIG. 61.
Since values held in independent two registers are moved in one cycle under this instruction, an effect of reducing the number of cycles in a loop can be achieved. Also, this instruction, which does not involve register renaming (destruction of a register value), is effective when data is moved between loop generations (iterations).
Note that move (“mov”) is not an exclusive type of operations, and therefore unary operations (e.g. “neg”) and binary operations (“add”) are also in the scope of the present invention. For example, regarding an add instruction in which arbitrary two registers (R0 and R6) and two consecutive registers (R2 and R3) are specified, two add operations, i.e. “R0+R2→R2” and “R6+R3→R3” are performed in a single instruction (in one cycle).
[Instruction jloop, settar]
Instruction jloop is an instruction for performing branches and setting condition flags (predicates, here) in a loop. For example, when
jloop C6, Cm, TAR, Ra
the processor 1 behaves as follows, using the address management unit 10 b and others: (i) sets 1 to the condition flag Cm; (i) sets 0 to the condition flag C6 when the value held in the register Ra is smaller than 0; (iii) adds −1 to the value held in the register Ra and stores the result into the register Ra; and (iv) branches to an address specified by the branch register (TAR) 30 d. When not filled with a branch instruction, the jump buffer 10 f (branch instruction buffer) is filled with a branch target instruction. A detailed behavior is as shown in FIG. 62.
Meanwhile, Instruction settar is an instruction for storing a branch target address in the branch register (TAR) 30 d, and setting condition flags (predicates, here). For example, when
settar C6, Cm, D9
the processor 1 behaves as follows, using the address management unit 10 b and others: (i) stores an address resulted from adding the value held in the program counter (PC) 33 and a displacement value (D9) into the branch register (TAR) 30 d; (ii) fetches the instruction corresponding to such address and stores it in the jump buffer 10 f (branch instruction buffer); and (iii) sets the condition flag C6 to 1 and the condition flag Cm to 0. A detailed behavior is as shown in FIG. 63.
These instructions jloop and settar, which are usually used in pairs, are effective when used for increasing a loop speed by means of PROLOG/EPILOG removal software pipelining. Note that software pipelining, which is a technique to increase a loop speed used by a compiler, allows efficient parallel execution of a plurality of instructions by converting a loop structure into a PROLOG portion, a KERNEL portion and an EPILOG portion, and by overlapping each iteration with the previous iteration and the following iteration regarding the KERNEL portion.
“PROLOG/EPILOG removal” is intended to visually remove a PROLOG portion and an EPILOG portion by using the PROLOG portion and the EPILOG portion as condition execution instructions to be performed according to predicates, as shown in FIG. 64. In PROLOG/EPILOG removal 2-stage software pipelining shown in FIG. 64, the condition flags C6 and C4 are illustrated as predicates for an EPILOG instruction (Stage 2) and a PROLOG instruction (Stage 1), respectively.
The following gives an explanation for the significance of the above Instructions jloop and settar's functionality of moving flags (setting of the condition flag Cm), in comparison with ordinary instructions jloop and settar without such functionality.
When Instruction jloop and Instruction settar according to the present embodiment are not included in an instruction set, i.e. when an instruction set includes only ordinary jloop and settar instructions, the condition flag Cm needs to be moved in the respective ordinary jloop and settar instructions in an independent manner. For this reason, the following problems occur:
(1) There is an increase in the number of flag move instructions, which are unrelated to the original functionality of a loop execution, and the performance of a processor is degraded due to PROLOG/EPILOG removal software pipelining;
(2) Dependency on data among flags grows stronger, and the performance of a processor is degraded due to data dependency among flags, locational limitations and the like; and
(3) There arises the need that there shall be an inter-flag move instruction, which is not originally required to be included in an instruction set, and therefore there will be a scarcity of the bit field space of the instruction set.
For example, when the ordinary jloop and settar instructions are used in a source program written in the C language shown in FIG. 65, a compiler generates a machine language program shown in FIG. 66 by means of PROLOG/EPILOG removal software pipelining. As indicated by the loop part in such machine language program (Label L00023˜Instruction jloop), 3 cycles are involved in loop execution since an instruction for setting the condition flag C4 (Instruction cmpeq) is required. Furthermore, two instructions are required for the setting and resetting of the condition flag C4, reducing the effect of PROLOG/EPILOG removal.
In contrast, when Instruction jloop and Instruction settar according to the present embodiment are included in an instruction set, a compiler generates a machine language program shown in FIG. 67. As indicated by the loop part in such machine language program (Label L00023˜Instruction jloop), the setting and resetting of the condition flag C4 are conducted under Instructions jloop and settar, respectively. This reduces the need for any special instructions, allowing loop execution to complete in 2 cycles.
As is obvious from the above, Instruction “jloop C6, Cm, TAR, Ra” and Instruction “settar C6, Cm, D9” are effective for reducing the number of execution cycles in 2-stage PROLOG/EPILOG removal software pipelining.
Note that the processor 1 supports instructions which are applicable not only to 2-stage software pipelining, but also to 3-stage software pipelining: Instruction “jloop C6, C2: C4, TAR, Ra” and Instruction “settar C6, C2: C4, D9”. These instructions “jloop C6, C2: C4, TAR, Ra” and “settar C6, C2: C4, D9” are equivalent to instructions in which the register Cm in the above-described 2-stage instructions “jloop C6, Cm, TAR, Ra” and “settar C6, Cm, D9” are extended to the registers C2, C3 and C4.
To put it another way, when
jloop C6, C2: C4, TAR, Ra
the processor 1 behaves as follows, using the address management unit 10 b and others: (i) sets the condition flag C4 to 0 when the value held in the register Ra is smaller than 0; (ii) moves the value of the condition flag C3 to the condition flag C2 and moves the value of the condition flag C4 to the condition flags C3 and C6; (iii) adds −1 to the register Ra and stores the result into the register Ra; and (iv) branches to an address specified by the branch register (TAR) 30 d. When not filled with a branch instruction, the jump buffer 10 f (branch instruction buffer) is filled with a branch target instruction. A detailed behavior is as shown in FIG. 68.
Also, when
settar C6, C2: C4, D9
the processor 1 behaves as follows, using the address management unit 10 b and others: (i) stores an address resulted from adding the value held in the program counter (PC) 33 and a displacement value (D9) into the branch register (TAR) 30 d; (ii) fetches the instruction corresponding to such address and stores it in the jump buffer 10 f (branch instruction buffer); and (iii) sets the condition flags C4 and C6 to 1 and the condition flags C2 and C3 to 0. A detailed behavior is as shown in FIG. 69.
FIGS. 70A and 70B show the role of the condition flags in the above 3-stage instructions “jloop C6, C2: C4, TAR, Ra” and “settar C6, C2: C4, D9”. As shown in FIG. 70A, in PROLOG/EPILOG removal 3-stage software pipelining, the condition flags C2, C3 and C4 are predicates intended for Stage 3, Stage 2 and Stage 1, respectively. FIG. 70B is a diagram showing how instruction execution is going on when moving flags in such a case.
FIGS. 71˜73 show program examples illustrating the significance of moving flags in the above instructions “jloop C6, C2: C4, TAR, Ra” and “settar C6, C2: C4, D9”. FIG. 71 shows an example of a source program, FIG. 72 shows an example of a machine language program created by using ordinary instructions jloop and settar without the functionality of moving flags, and FIG. 73 shows an example of a machine language program created by using Instruction jloop and Instruction settar according to the present embodiment that have the functionality of moving flags. As is obvious from the comparison between FIG. 72 and FIG. 73, the use of Instruction jloop and Instruction settar according to the present embodiment that have the functionality of moving flags reduces the number of instructions by five as well as the number of times a loop is executed by one cycle.
Note that the above description applies to software pipelining involving four or more stages, and the number of condition flags for predicate simply needs to be increased in such a case.
In addition to the characteristic instructions described above, the processor 1 is also capable of executing the following characteristic instructions which are not shown in FIGS. 21˜36.
[Instruction vsada]
Instruction vsada is a SIMD instruction for determining a sum of absolute value differences. For example, when
vsada Rc, Ra, Rb Rx
the processor 1, using the arithmetic and logic/comparison operation unit 41 and others, performs SIMD operations for determining differences between the values held in the register Ra and the values held in the register Rb on a byte-by-byte basis (determines the difference between the respective four byte pairs), as shown in FIG. 74, determines the absolute value of each of the four results so as to add them, adds the value held in the register Rx to this addition result, and stores the final result into the register Rc. A detailed behavior is as shown in FIG. 75A.
Note that the processor 1 is also capable of executing an instruction which does not include the last operand (Rx) in the format of the above Instruction vsada. For example, when
vsada Rc, Ra, Rb
the processor 1, using the arithmetic and logic/comparison operation unit 41 and others, performs SIMD operations for determining differences between the values held in the register Ra and the values held in the register Rb on a byte-by-byte basis (determines the difference between the respective four byte pairs), determines the absolute value of each of the four results so as to add them, and stores the result into the register Rc. A detailed behavior is as shown in FIG. 75B.
These instructions vsada are instructions which resulted from compounding Instruction vasubb and Instruction vabssumb. Instruction vasubb is a SIMD instruction for performing subtractions on four pairs of SIMD data on a byte-by-byte basis, and storing the resulting four signs in the condition flag register. Instruction vabssumb, on the other hand, is a SIMD instruction for adding the absolute values of four pairs of SIMD data on a byte-by-byte basis according to the condition flag register, and adding this addition result to another 4-byte data.
Thus, Instruction vsada makes it possible for a sum of absolute value differences to be determined in one cycle and therefore makes the speed of operations faster, as compared with the case where Instruction vasubb and Instruction vabssumb are used in succession. Instruction vasada is effective when used for summing up absolute value differences in motion prediction as part of image processing.
Note that data does not have to be in byte, and therefore half word, half byte and other units are also in the scope of the present invention.
[Instruction satss, satsu]
Instruction satss is an instruction for converting a signed value into a saturated signed value at an arbitrary position (digit). For example, when
satss Rc, Ra, Rb
the processor 1, using the saturation block (SAT) 47 a and others, stores, into the register Rc, a saturated value (complement on 1 of the register Rb) specified by the register Rb when the value held in the register Ra is larger than such saturated value, and stores the value held in the register Ra into the register Rc when the value held in the register Ra is equal to or smaller than the saturated value, as illustrated in FIG. 76. A detailed behavior is as shown in FIG. 77A.
Meanwhile, Instruction satsu is an instruction for converting an unsigned value into a saturated signed value at an arbitrary position (digit). For example, when
satsu Rc, Ra, Rb
the processor 1, using the saturation block (SAT) 47 a and others, stores a saturated value specified by the register Rb into the register Rc when the value held in the register Ra is larger than such saturated value, and stores the value held in the register Ra into the register Rc when the value held in the register Ra is equal to or smaller than the saturated value. A detailed behavior is as shown in FIG. 77B.
The above Instruction satss and Instruction satsu allow saturation processing to be performed at an arbitrary position. This facilitates programming since there is no need for setting a position where saturation is performed to a specific position at the time of assembler programming.
[Instruction bytesel]
Instruction bytesel is an instruction for selecting one of the values held in two registers on a byte-by-byte basis. For example, when
bytesel Rc, Ra, Rb, Rx
the processor 1, using the operation unit 40 and others, stores one of eight pieces of byte data held in the register Ra and the register Rb into the register Rc, on the basis of a value indicated by the register Rx, as illustrated in FIG. 78. This behavior is performed on four pieces of bytes in the register Rc in parallel. A detailed behavior is shown in FIG. 79A, and a relationship between the register Rx and byte data to be selected is shown in FIG. 79B.
Note that the processor 1 behaves in an equivalent manner also for Instruction bytesel in the following format: when
bytesel Rc, Ra, Rb, I12
the processor 1, using the operation unit 40 and others, stores one of eight pieces of byte data held in the register Ra and the register Rb into the register Rc, on the basis of a 12-bit immediate value. This behavior is performed on four pieces of bytes in the register Rc in parallel. A detailed behavior is shown in FIG. 79C, and a relationship between an immediate value I12 and byte data to be selected is shown in FIG. 79D.
Instruction bytesel allows byte data to be stored at an arbitrary position in a register, and therefore makes repetitions of data reshuffling faster. Moreover, this instruction has an effect of increasing the flexibility of SIMD operations.
Note that whether the above byte data is to be stored or not in each of Rc[31:24], Rc[23:16], Rc[15:8], and Rc[7:0] may be specifiable in Instruction “bytesel Rc, Ra, Rb, Rx” explained above, utilizing an empty digit or the like in the register Rx. This allows a byte-by-byte basis selection of whether the value held in the register Rc is to be updated or not.
Note that data does not have to be in byte, and therefore half word, half byte and other units are also in the scope of the present invention.
[Instructions for Extending Results of SIMD Operations]
The processor 1 is also capable of executing SIMD operation-related complementary processing, in addition to the above-explained instructions.
For example, the processor 1, when a certain instruction is issued, performs complementary processing for extending a part of results of SIMD operations (sign extension or zero extension), as illustrated in FIGS. 80A and 80B, which show the processor 1 performing SIMD operations on data at the same positions in respective registers (to be referred to also as “straight positions” hereinafter) or on data at diagonally crossed positions, on a per-half word basis. FIG. 80A illustrates processing for extending the lower half word of a required result to a word, and FIG. 80B illustrates processing for extending the higher half word of a required result to a word.
Note that Instruction vaddh is an example instruction for performing SIMD operations on data at straight positions on a per-half word basis, while Instruction vxaddh is an example instruction for performing SIMD operations on data at diagonally crossed positions on a per-half word basis.
Also note that the processor 1, when a certain instruction is issued, performs complementary processing for extending all results of SIMD operations, as illustrated in FIG. 81. FIG. 81 illustrates the processor 1 performing SIMD operations on pieces of data stored at straight positions or diagonally crossed positions in two registers on a per-half word basis, as well as extending each of resulting two half words to a word.
Such an instruction for extending results of SIMD operation as above is effective when making data size all the same by performing sign extension or zero extension after performing the SIMD operations, enabling SIMD operations and extension processing to be performed in one cycle.
Furthermore, the processor 1 is also capable of executing SIMD operations specified by condition flags and the like, as SIMD operation-related complementary instructions. For example, the processor 1, when condition flags specify that the first and the second operations should be “addition” and “subtraction” respectively, performs additions and subtractions on each of data pairs in two registers at straight positions or diagonally crossed positions on a per-half word basis, as illustrated in FIG. 82.
For example, when the condition flags C0 and C1 are “1 and 0”, the processor 1 behaves as follows, using the arithmetic and logic/comparison operation unit 41 and others:
(1) adds the higher half word of the register Ra with the higher half word of the register Rb, and stores this addition result into the higher half word of the register Rc; and
(2) subtracts the lower half word of the register Rb from the lower half word of the register Ra, and stores this subtraction result into the lower half word of the register Rc.
Such an instruction in which types of SIMD operations are specifiable is effective for processing in which types of operations to be performed are not fixed, and therefore in which an operation shall be determined depending on a result of other processing.
Note that present invention is applicable to a case where the register Rb is not used in the above operations (1) and (2). For example, the processor 1 may:
(1) add the higher half word of the register Ra with the lower half word of the register Ra, and store this addition result into the higher half word of the register Rc; and
(2) subtract the lower half word of the register Ra from the higher half word of the register Ra, and store this subtraction result into the lower half word of the register Rc.

Claims

1. A Single Instruction Multiple Data (SIMD) processor for executing SIMD instructions, comprising:

a decoding unit operable to decode an instruction; and

an execution unit operable to execute the instruction based on a result of the decoding performed by the decoding unit,

wherein the execution unit, when the decoding unit decodes an instruction for making a judgment on comparison results of a SIMD compare instruction executed on a plurality of data elements, judges whether the obtained comparison results are all the same or not among the plurality of data elements, and generates a judgment result.

2. The SIMD processor according to claim 1,

wherein the execution unit judges whether the comparison results are all zero or not, and generates a judgment result.

3. The SIMD processor according to claim 1 further comprising a flag storage unit operable to store a flag,

wherein the execution unit stores, into the flag storage unit, the comparison results of the SIMD compare instruction, together with the generated judgment result.

4-17. (canceled)

18. A SIMD processor for executing SIMD instructions, comprising:

a decoding unit operable to decode an instruction; and

wherein the execution unit, when the decoding unit decodes a SIMD instruction for generating a value according to a sign of each of a plurality of data elements, generates data indicating that each of the plurality of data elements is one of a positive value, zero, and a negative value.

19. The SIMD processor according to claim 18,

wherein the execution unit generates 1, 0, and −1 depending on whether each of the plurality of data elements is a positive value, zero, or a negative value.

20. The SIMD processor according to claim 19,

wherein the SIMD instruction includes a specification of a first register storing the plurality of data elements and a second register storing the data generated by the execution unit, and

the execution unit stores 1, 0, and −1 into a plurality of storage locations in the second register by associating said storage locations with a plurality of storage locations in the first register storing the plurality of data elements.

21. A SIMD processor for executing SIMD instructions, comprising:

a parameter specification unit operable to specify a first parameter and a second parameter;

a decoding unit operable to decode an instruction; and

wherein the execution unit, when the decoding unit decodes an instruction on first data, performs a bit-shift on the first data according to the first parameter, and outputs a plurality of word data at word positions identified by the second parameter, out of obtained shifted data.

22. The SIMD processor according to claim 21,

wherein the execution unit, when the shifted data includes contiguous first˜third word data, generates (i) two pieces of the first word data and two pieces of the second word data in this order when the second parameter indicates a first status, and (ii) one piece of the first word data, two pieces of the second word data, and one piece of the third word data in this order when the second parameter indicates a second status.

23. The SIMD processor according to claim 21,

wherein the execution unit, when the shifted data includes contiguous first˜fourth word data, generates (i) two pieces of the first word data and two pieces of the second word data in this order when the second parameter indicates a first status, and (ii) one piece of the first word data, one piece of the third word data, one piece of the second word data, and one piece of the fourth word data in this order when the second parameter indicates a second status.

24. The SIMD processor according to claim 21,

wherein the first parameter and the second parameter are flags.

25. The SIMD processor according to claim 21,

wherein the word is byte.

26-44. (canceled)

45. A processor for decoding and executing instructions, comprising:

a plurality of “n”-word-long registers;

a decoding unit operable to decode an instruction; and

wherein the execution unit, when the decoding unit decodes an instruction for selecting word data on a word-by-word basis, the instruction including operands specifying first˜third registers and one parameter, stores an “n” piece of word data selected by the parameter into the third register, out of 2“n” pieces of word data stored in the first register and the second register.

46. The processor according to claim 45,

wherein the parameter is a value stored in a fourth register.

47. The processor according to claim 45,

wherein the parameter is an immediate value.

48. The processor according to claim 45,

wherein the parameter includes a flag indicating whether or not the “n” piece of word data is stored individually into each of “n” locations in the third register, and

the execution unit selectively stores or not store the “n” piece of word data into the third register according to the flag.

49. The processor according to claim 45, wherein the word is byte.

50-52. (canceled)

53. A SIMD processor for executing SIMD instructions, comprising:

a flag storage unit operable to store a flag;

a decoding unit operable to decode an instruction; and

wherein the execution unit, when the decoding unit decodes an instruction for performing a SIMD operation on a plurality of data pairs, performs a SIMD operation identified by the flag stored in the flag storage unit on each of the plurality of data pairs.

54. The SIMD processor according to claim 53,

wherein the flag storage unit stores a first flag and a second flag,

the instruction includes a specification of a first data pair and a second data pair, and

the execution unit performs an operation indicated by a value of the first flag on the first data pair, and an operation indicated by a value of the second flag on the second data pair.

55. The SIMD processor according to claim 53,

wherein the flag storage unit stores a first flag and a second flag,

the instruction includes a specification of a data pair, and

the execution unit performs an operation indicated by a value of the first flag on the data pair, and an operation indicated by a value of the second flag on the data pair.