US20080031809A1 - Controlling the synthesis gas composition of a steam methane reformer - Google Patents
Controlling the synthesis gas composition of a steam methane reformer Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20080031809A1 US20080031809A1 US11/489,298 US48929806A US2008031809A1 US 20080031809 A1 US20080031809 A1 US 20080031809A1 US 48929806 A US48929806 A US 48929806A US 2008031809 A1 US2008031809 A1 US 2008031809A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- ratio
- hydrogen
- steam
- synthesis gas
- carbonaceous material
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C01—INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C01B—NON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
- C01B3/00—Hydrogen; Gaseous mixtures containing hydrogen; Separation of hydrogen from mixtures containing it; Purification of hydrogen
- C01B3/02—Production of hydrogen or of gaseous mixtures containing a substantial proportion of hydrogen
- C01B3/32—Production of hydrogen or of gaseous mixtures containing a substantial proportion of hydrogen by reaction of gaseous or liquid organic compounds with gasifying agents, e.g. water, carbon dioxide, air
- C01B3/34—Production of hydrogen or of gaseous mixtures containing a substantial proportion of hydrogen by reaction of gaseous or liquid organic compounds with gasifying agents, e.g. water, carbon dioxide, air by reaction of hydrocarbons with gasifying agents
- C01B3/38—Production of hydrogen or of gaseous mixtures containing a substantial proportion of hydrogen by reaction of gaseous or liquid organic compounds with gasifying agents, e.g. water, carbon dioxide, air by reaction of hydrocarbons with gasifying agents using catalysts
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G2/00—Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures of undefined composition from oxides of carbon
- C10G2/30—Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures of undefined composition from oxides of carbon from carbon monoxide with hydrogen
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10J—PRODUCTION OF PRODUCER GAS, WATER-GAS, SYNTHESIS GAS FROM SOLID CARBONACEOUS MATERIAL, OR MIXTURES CONTAINING THESE GASES; CARBURETTING AIR OR OTHER GASES
- C10J3/00—Production of combustible gases containing carbon monoxide from solid carbonaceous fuels
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10K—PURIFYING OR MODIFYING THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF COMBUSTIBLE GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE
- C10K1/00—Purifying combustible gases containing carbon monoxide
- C10K1/02—Dust removal
- C10K1/024—Dust removal by filtration
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10K—PURIFYING OR MODIFYING THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF COMBUSTIBLE GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE
- C10K1/00—Purifying combustible gases containing carbon monoxide
- C10K1/08—Purifying combustible gases containing carbon monoxide by washing with liquids; Reviving the used wash liquors
- C10K1/10—Purifying combustible gases containing carbon monoxide by washing with liquids; Reviving the used wash liquors with aqueous liquids
- C10K1/12—Purifying combustible gases containing carbon monoxide by washing with liquids; Reviving the used wash liquors with aqueous liquids alkaline-reacting including the revival of the used wash liquors
- C10K1/14—Purifying combustible gases containing carbon monoxide by washing with liquids; Reviving the used wash liquors with aqueous liquids alkaline-reacting including the revival of the used wash liquors organic
- C10K1/143—Purifying combustible gases containing carbon monoxide by washing with liquids; Reviving the used wash liquors with aqueous liquids alkaline-reacting including the revival of the used wash liquors organic containing amino groups
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10K—PURIFYING OR MODIFYING THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF COMBUSTIBLE GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE
- C10K1/00—Purifying combustible gases containing carbon monoxide
- C10K1/08—Purifying combustible gases containing carbon monoxide by washing with liquids; Reviving the used wash liquors
- C10K1/16—Purifying combustible gases containing carbon monoxide by washing with liquids; Reviving the used wash liquors with non-aqueous liquids
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10K—PURIFYING OR MODIFYING THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF COMBUSTIBLE GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE
- C10K1/00—Purifying combustible gases containing carbon monoxide
- C10K1/08—Purifying combustible gases containing carbon monoxide by washing with liquids; Reviving the used wash liquors
- C10K1/16—Purifying combustible gases containing carbon monoxide by washing with liquids; Reviving the used wash liquors with non-aqueous liquids
- C10K1/165—Purifying combustible gases containing carbon monoxide by washing with liquids; Reviving the used wash liquors with non-aqueous liquids at temperatures below zero degrees Celsius
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C01—INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C01B—NON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
- C01B2203/00—Integrated processes for the production of hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/02—Processes for making hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/0205—Processes for making hydrogen or synthesis gas containing a reforming step
- C01B2203/0227—Processes for making hydrogen or synthesis gas containing a reforming step containing a catalytic reforming step
- C01B2203/0233—Processes for making hydrogen or synthesis gas containing a reforming step containing a catalytic reforming step the reforming step being a steam reforming step
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C01—INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C01B—NON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
- C01B2203/00—Integrated processes for the production of hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/04—Integrated processes for the production of hydrogen or synthesis gas containing a purification step for the hydrogen or the synthesis gas
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C01—INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C01B—NON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
- C01B2203/00—Integrated processes for the production of hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/06—Integration with other chemical processes
- C01B2203/062—Hydrocarbon production, e.g. Fischer-Tropsch process
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C01—INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C01B—NON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
- C01B2203/00—Integrated processes for the production of hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/08—Methods of heating or cooling
- C01B2203/0805—Methods of heating the process for making hydrogen or synthesis gas
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C01—INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C01B—NON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
- C01B2203/00—Integrated processes for the production of hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/12—Feeding the process for making hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/1205—Composition of the feed
- C01B2203/1211—Organic compounds or organic mixtures used in the process for making hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/1235—Hydrocarbons
- C01B2203/1241—Natural gas or methane
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C01—INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C01B—NON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
- C01B2203/00—Integrated processes for the production of hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/12—Feeding the process for making hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/1258—Pre-treatment of the feed
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C01—INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C01B—NON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
- C01B2203/00—Integrated processes for the production of hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/12—Feeding the process for making hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/1258—Pre-treatment of the feed
- C01B2203/1264—Catalytic pre-treatment of the feed
- C01B2203/127—Catalytic desulfurisation
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C01—INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C01B—NON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
- C01B2203/00—Integrated processes for the production of hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/14—Details of the flowsheet
- C01B2203/148—Details of the flowsheet involving a recycle stream to the feed of the process for making hydrogen or synthesis gas
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C01—INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C01B—NON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
- C01B2203/00—Integrated processes for the production of hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/80—Aspect of integrated processes for the production of hydrogen or synthesis gas not covered by groups C01B2203/02 - C01B2203/1695
- C01B2203/84—Energy production
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G2300/00—Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
- C10G2300/10—Feedstock materials
- C10G2300/1003—Waste materials
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G2300/00—Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
- C10G2300/10—Feedstock materials
- C10G2300/1011—Biomass
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G2300/00—Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
- C10G2300/40—Characteristics of the process deviating from typical ways of processing
- C10G2300/42—Hydrogen of special source or of special composition
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G2300/00—Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
- C10G2300/80—Additives
- C10G2300/805—Water
- C10G2300/807—Steam
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10J—PRODUCTION OF PRODUCER GAS, WATER-GAS, SYNTHESIS GAS FROM SOLID CARBONACEOUS MATERIAL, OR MIXTURES CONTAINING THESE GASES; CARBURETTING AIR OR OTHER GASES
- C10J2300/00—Details of gasification processes
- C10J2300/09—Details of the feed, e.g. feeding of spent catalyst, inert gas or halogens
- C10J2300/0913—Carbonaceous raw material
- C10J2300/0916—Biomass
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10J—PRODUCTION OF PRODUCER GAS, WATER-GAS, SYNTHESIS GAS FROM SOLID CARBONACEOUS MATERIAL, OR MIXTURES CONTAINING THESE GASES; CARBURETTING AIR OR OTHER GASES
- C10J2300/00—Details of gasification processes
- C10J2300/09—Details of the feed, e.g. feeding of spent catalyst, inert gas or halogens
- C10J2300/0913—Carbonaceous raw material
- C10J2300/0946—Waste, e.g. MSW, tires, glass, tar sand, peat, paper, lignite, oil shale
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10J—PRODUCTION OF PRODUCER GAS, WATER-GAS, SYNTHESIS GAS FROM SOLID CARBONACEOUS MATERIAL, OR MIXTURES CONTAINING THESE GASES; CARBURETTING AIR OR OTHER GASES
- C10J2300/00—Details of gasification processes
- C10J2300/09—Details of the feed, e.g. feeding of spent catalyst, inert gas or halogens
- C10J2300/0953—Gasifying agents
- C10J2300/0966—Hydrogen
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10J—PRODUCTION OF PRODUCER GAS, WATER-GAS, SYNTHESIS GAS FROM SOLID CARBONACEOUS MATERIAL, OR MIXTURES CONTAINING THESE GASES; CARBURETTING AIR OR OTHER GASES
- C10J2300/00—Details of gasification processes
- C10J2300/09—Details of the feed, e.g. feeding of spent catalyst, inert gas or halogens
- C10J2300/0953—Gasifying agents
- C10J2300/0973—Water
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10J—PRODUCTION OF PRODUCER GAS, WATER-GAS, SYNTHESIS GAS FROM SOLID CARBONACEOUS MATERIAL, OR MIXTURES CONTAINING THESE GASES; CARBURETTING AIR OR OTHER GASES
- C10J2300/00—Details of gasification processes
- C10J2300/16—Integration of gasification processes with another plant or parts within the plant
- C10J2300/164—Integration of gasification processes with another plant or parts within the plant with conversion of synthesis gas
- C10J2300/1656—Conversion of synthesis gas to chemicals
- C10J2300/1659—Conversion of synthesis gas to chemicals to liquid hydrocarbons
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10J—PRODUCTION OF PRODUCER GAS, WATER-GAS, SYNTHESIS GAS FROM SOLID CARBONACEOUS MATERIAL, OR MIXTURES CONTAINING THESE GASES; CARBURETTING AIR OR OTHER GASES
- C10J2300/00—Details of gasification processes
- C10J2300/18—Details of the gasification process, e.g. loops, autothermal operation
- C10J2300/1807—Recycle loops, e.g. gas, solids, heating medium, water
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E20/00—Combustion technologies with mitigation potential
- Y02E20/16—Combined cycle power plant [CCPP], or combined cycle gas turbine [CCGT]
- Y02E20/18—Integrated gasification combined cycle [IGCC], e.g. combined with carbon capture and storage [CCS]
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E50/00—Technologies for the production of fuel of non-fossil origin
- Y02E50/30—Fuel from waste, e.g. synthetic alcohol or diesel
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P20/00—Technologies relating to chemical industry
- Y02P20/141—Feedstock
- Y02P20/145—Feedstock the feedstock being materials of biological origin
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P30/00—Technologies relating to oil refining and petrochemical industry
- Y02P30/20—Technologies relating to oil refining and petrochemical industry using bio-feedstock
Definitions
- the field of the invention is the production of synthesis gas.
- Liquid transportation fuels have inherent advantages over gaseous fuels, having higher energy densities than gaseous fuels at the same pressure and temperature. Liquid fuels can be stored at atmospheric or low pressures whereas to achieve liquid fuel energy densities, a gaseous fuel would have to be stored in a tank on a vehicle at high pressures that can be a safety concern in the case of leaks or sudden rupture. The distribution of liquid fuels is much easier than gaseous fuels, using simple pumps and pipelines. The liquid fueling infrastructure of the existing transportation sector ensures easy integration into the existing market of any production of clean-burning synthetic liquid transportation fuels.
- synthesis gas a mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide, also referred to as “syngas”
- syngas a mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide
- Such a process allows for the application of current state-of-art engine exhaust after-treatment methods for NO x reduction, removal of toxic particulates present in diesel engine exhaust, and the reduction of normal combustion product pollutants, currently accomplished by catalysts that are poisoned quickly by any sulfur present, as is the case in ordinary stocks of petroleum derived diesel fuel, reducing the catalyst efficiency.
- Fischer-Tropsch liquid fuels, produced from synthesis gas are sulfur-free, aromatic free, and in the case of synthetic diesel fuel have an ultrahigh cetane value.
- Biomass material is the most commonly processed carbonaceous waste feed stock used to produce renewable fuels. Waste plastic, rubber, manure, crop residues, forestry, tree and grass cuttings and biosolids from waste water (sewage) treatment are also candidate feed stocks for conversion processes. Biomass feed stocks can be converted to produce electricity, heat, valuable chemicals or fuels. California tops the nation in the use and development of several biomass utilization technologies. Each year in California, more than 45 million tons of municipal solid waste is discarded for treatment by waste management facilities. Approximately half this waste ends up in landfills. For example, in just the Riverside County, California area, it is estimated that about 4000 tons of waste wood are disposed of per day. According to other estimates, over 100,000 tons of biomass per day are dumped into landfills in the Riverside County collection area.
- This municipal waste comprises about 30% waste paper or cardboard, 40% organic (green and food) waste, and 30% combinations of wood, paper, plastic and metal waste.
- the carbonaceous components of this waste material have chemical energy that could be used to reduce the need for other energy sources if it can be converted into a clean-burning fuel.
- These waste sources of carbonaceous material are not the only sources available. While many existing carbonaceous waste materials, such as paper, can be sorted, reused and recycled, for other materials, the waste producer would not need to pay a tipping fee, if the waste were to be delivered directly to a conversion facility. A tipping fee, presently at $30-$35 per ton, is usually charged by the waste management agency to offset disposal costs. Consequently not only can disposal costs be reduced by transporting the waste to a waste-to-synthetic fuels processing plant, but additional waste would be made available because of the lowered cost of disposal.
- An example of the latter process is the Hynol Methanol Process, which uses hydro-gasification and steam reformer reactors to synthesize methanol using a co-feed of solid carbonaceous materials and natural gas, and which has a demonstrated carbon conversion efficiency of >85% in bench-scale demonstrations.
- Synthesis gas can be produced through one of two major chemical processes, steam reforming and partial oxidation.
- Steam reforming is used when the feed consists of light hydrocarbons such as natural gas, and when hydrogen is the main product.
- Partial oxidation is used with heavier feeds, or when a relatively high yield of carbon monoxide is desired.
- Table 1 summarizes various commercial processes under operation for the production of synthesis gas [1].
- the ratio of hydrogen to carbon monoxide in the synthesis gas is called the syngas ratio and is strongly dependent on the process used and the nature of the feedstock.
- Syngas is used as a feedstock in the manufacture of various chemicals and also in the gas-to-liquid processes, which use the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (FTS) to produce liquid fuels.
- FTS Fischer-Tropsch synthesis
- syngas can be used in the so called integrated gasification combined cycle, where it is directly burned with air to produce the heat necessary to operate steam turbines used in electricity generation.
- the H 2 /Co ratio of syngas needs to be adjusted. Table 2 summarizes the optimum syngas ratios required for different processes [2].
- the syngas ratio can be lowered by using the pressure swing adsorption process or by using hydrogen membrane systems.
- adding a downstream water-gas shift reactor can increase the syngas ratio.
- Carbon monoxide and hydrogen are produced in the SMR by using steam and methane as the feed. Heating process water in a steam generator produces the required steam.
- the methane is usually supplied in the form of compressed natural gas, or by means of a light molecular weight off-gas stream from a chemical or refinery process.
- This invention provides an improved, economical method to control the synthesis gas composition obtained from a steam methane reformer that obtains its feedstock as product gas directly from a steam hydro-gasification reactor.
- the method allows control of the H 2 /CO ratio by adjusting the hydrogen feed and the water content of feedstock into the SHR that supplies the SMR.
- the steam and methane rich product gas of the SHR is generated by means of hydro-gasification of the slurry, which is a mixture of carbonaceous material and water.
- This product gas, a mixture of methane rich gas and steam, where the steam is present as a result of the superheating the water in the feedstock, serves as an ideal feed stream for the SMR.
- Impurities are removed from the SHR product stream, such as fine particles of ash & char, hydrogen sulfide and other inorganic components.
- the mass percentages of the product stream at each stage of the process are calculated using a modeling program, such as the ASPEN PLUSTM equilibrium process that can relate the synthesis gas ratio of hydrogen to carbon monoxide to conversion ratios of the carbon content of the carbonaceous material.
- a sensitivity analysis can be performed that enables one determine the optimum composition of the slurry feedstock to the SHR to obtain a desired syngas ratio output of the SMR.
- the ratio of hydrogen to slurry water is determined by analysis of the effect on the synthesis gas ratio of (a) the ratio of solid content of the carbonaceous material to the slurry water and (b) the ratio of the hydrogen to carbon content of the carbonaceous material. This enables one to adjust the hydrogen feed and the water content of feedstock into the SHR that supplies the SMR to provide the desired ratio of hydrogen to carbon monoxide in the synthesis gas output of the SMR.
- a process for converting carbonaceous material to synthesis gas comprising simultaneously heating carbonaceous material in an SHR in the presence of a predetermined ratio of hydrogen and water in the form of steam, at a temperature and pressure sufficient to generate a stream of methane and carbon monoxide rich gas product, which can be called a producer gas.
- Impurities are removed from the producer gas stream substantially at the process temperature and pressure, and the resultant producer gas is subjected to steam methane reforming in an SMR under conditions whereby synthesis gas comprising hydrogen and carbon monoxide is generated having a hydrogen/carbon monoxide ratio determined by the ratio of hydrogen and water in the SHR.
- FIG. 1 is a flow diagram of the process of this invention
- FIG. 2 is a flow diagram of the mass balance of the process.
- FIG. 3 is a sensitivity analysis using the ASPEN PLUSTM modeling program showing various conversions and the syngas ratio when parameters of solid to water ratio and hydrogen to carbon ratio are varied.
- This invention enables one to control of the H 2 /CO ratio output of an SMR by adjusting the hydrogen feed and the water content of feedstock into the SHR that supplies the SMR.
- the steam and methane rich product gas of the SHR is generated by means of hydro-gasification of the slurry, which is a mixture of carbonaceous material and water.
- the mass percentages of the product stream at each stage of the process are calculated using a modeling program, such as the ASPEN PLUSTM equilibrium process.
- a sensitivity analysis can be performed that enables one determine the optimum composition of the slurry feedstock to the SHR to obtain a desired syngas ratio output of the SMR.
- Impurities are removed from the SHR product stream, such as fine particles of ash & char, hydrogen sulfide and other inorganic components. These impurities must be removed in order to prevent poisoning of the catalyst used in the SMR.
- a combination of particulate filters, a solvent wash (amines, SelexolTM, RectisolTM), and hydro-desulphurization by means of the Claus process are used for this purpose.
- H 2 S is partially oxidized with air in a reaction furnace at high temperatures (1000-1400° C.).
- a gas cleanup unit that operates at process pressures and at a temperature above the steam condensation point. The unit is located between the SHR and SMR.
- a process for converting carbonaceous material to synthesis gas of a desired H 2 /CO ratio comprising simultaneously heating carbonaceous material in an SHR in the presence of a predetermined ratio of hydrogen and water in the form of steam, at a temperature and pressure sufficient to generate a stream of methane and carbon monoxide rich gas product, which can be called a producer gas, the ratio of hydrogen and water being determined by a modeling program, such as the ASPEN PLUSTM equilibrium process.
- a sensitivity analysis is performed that enables one determine the optimum composition of the slurry feedstock to the SHR to obtain a desired syngas ratio output of the SMR.
- Impurities are removed from the producer gas stream substantially at the process temperature and pressure, and the resultant producer gas is subjected to steam methane reforming in an SMR under conditions whereby synthesis gas comprising hydrogen and carbon monoxide is generated having a hydrogen/carbon monoxide ratio determined by the ratio of hydrogen and water in the SHR.
- the carbonaceous material is simultaneously heated in the presence of both hydrogen and steam, at a temperature of about 790° C. to about 850° C. and pressure about 132 psi to 560 psi whereby to generate a stream of methane and carbon monoxide rich producer gas.
- Impurities are removed from the producer gas stream substantially at the process temperature and pressure, following which the resultant producer gas is subjected to steam methane reforming under conditions whereby to generate the desired synthesis gas ratio of hydrogen and carbon monoxide.
- the required H 2 :CO mole ratio of a Fischer-Tropsch reactor with a cobalt based catalyst is 2.1:1.
- a H 2 /CO mole ratio range of about 3 to 1 can be achieved to provide an excess of hydrogen, which can be separated and fed into the SHR to make a self-sustainable process, i.e., without requiring any external hydrogen feed.
- the synthesis gas generated by the steam methane reforming can be fed into a Fischer-Tropsch reactor under conditions whereby a liquid fuel is produced. Exothermic heat from the Fischer-Tropsch reaction can be transferred to the hydro-gasification reaction and/or steam methane reforming reaction.
- FIG. 1 is a flow diagram of a SHR to SMR process in which a desired H 2 /CO ratio output of an SMR is obtained by adjusting the hydrogen feed and the water content of feedstock into the SHR that supplies the SMR.
- An internally generated hydrogen feed 10 is fed into an SHR 12 along with a carbonaceous feedstock 14 and water 16 , which are heated to 750° C. at 400 psi in the SHR 12 .
- the resulting producer gas is directed to a gas clean up filter 18 , e.g. a candle filter assembly, at about 350° C. at about 400 psi.
- the effluent is directed to an SMR 20 where synthesis gas is generated and fed to a Fischer-Tropsch reactor 22 ., from which pure water 24 , and diesel fuel and/or wax 26 is obtained. A portion of hydrogen is diverted from the SMR 20 , at 28 to be fed back to the HGR 12 . Heat 30 from the Fischer-Tropsch reactor 22 is used to supplement the heat at the SMR.
- a mass balance process flow diagram is shown in FIG. 2 .
- the mass percentages of the product stream at each stage of the process are provided in the figure.
- ASPEN PLUSTM equilibrium process modeling was used to calculate these values.
- ASPEN PLUSTM is a commercial computer modeling program that allows a process model to be created by specifying the chemical components and operating conditions. The program takes all of the specifications and simulates the model, executing all necessary calculations needed to solve the outcome of the system, hence predicting its behavior. When the calculations are complete, ASPEN PLUSTM lists the results, stream by stream and unit by unit, and can present the data in graphical form with determining ordinate and abscissa
- an SHR feedstock of hydrogen and 41% coal slurry results in the production of synthesis gas with a 3.4:l mole ratio of hydrogen to carbon monoxide in the SMR.
- the required feed hydrogen for the SHR can be supplied through external means or by internal feedback of a portion of the hydrogen produced in the SMR.
- a slurry of 41% coal, 52% water and 7% hydrogen is used, obtained following the procedures of Norbeck et al. U.S. Ser. No. 10/911,348.
- the filter is operating at 300° C. and 28 atmospheres of pressure.
- Any filter capable of operating at the process temperature can be used at the gas cleanup station.
- One such commercially available filter is a candle filter, which is well known to the art. See, for example U.S. Pat. No. 5,474,586, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
- An available gas cleanup unit that can be used in this invention is what is known as a candle filter in which a series of candle-shaped filters are carried in a filter vessel.
- the candle filters are made of stainless steel metal frit to remove fine particulate matter (ash, inorganic salts and unreacted char) from the gas stream.
- the slurry is fed into the vessel at a bottom inlet and filtrate is taken out at a top outlet.
- Particulate matter is taken from another outlet as cake.
- Sulfur impurities existing in the SHR product gas mostly in the form of hydrogen sulfide, are removed by passing the product gas through a packed bed of metal oxide sorbents in the gas cleanup unit, particulate matter being taken from a cake outlet.
- Active sorbents include, but are not limited to, Zn based oxides such as zinc oxide, sold by Süd-Chemie, Louisville, Ky.
- Porous metal filter elements are available from Bekaert in Marietta, Ga. in the appropriate forms and sizes, such as Bekpor® Porous Media-which is made from stainless steel sintered fiber matrix with a pore size of 1. These sorbents and filter elements allow the effects of pressure drop and gas-solid mass transfer limitations to be minimized. At a pressure of 28 atm., temperatures in the range of 300° C. to 500° C. and space velocities up to 2000/hr have been used in the desulphurization of SHR product gas.
- the hydrogen sulfide content of the gas is diminished by means of sulfidation of the sorbents to levels low enough to avoid the deactivation of the SMR catalyst.
- the used sorbents in the gas cleanup unit can either be replaced with fresh sorbents or regenerated in-situ with diluted air in parallel multiple sorbent beds.
- the output of the SHR-cleanup unit is a methane rich, producer gas containing 36 wt % CH 4 , 2 wt % H 2 , 2 wt % CO, 3 wt % CO 2 , and 57 wt % H 2 O, having a steam to methane mole ratio of 1:4.
- the output of the SHR is fed to the SMR, which is operating at 800° C. and 28 atmospheres to yield synthesis gas having a mole ratio of H 2 to CO of 3.4, and containing 4 wt % CH 4 , 14 wt % H 2 , 58 wt % CO, 3 wt % CO 2 , and 21 wt % H 2 O.
- the syngas ratio obtained from the SMR can be adjusted by varying the solid to water ratio and hydrogen to carbon ratio in the SHR feedstock. Sensitivity analysis was performed using the ASPEN PLUSTM equilibrium modeling tool by varying these parameters. The results are in FIG. 3 , showing various conversions and the syngas ratio when parameters of solid to water ratio and hydrogen to carbon ratio are varied.
- the solid lines ( ) represent the percentage of carbon converted to CH 4 (mole CH 4 /mole C in ).
- the long dashed lines ( ) represent the percentage of carbon converted to CO (mole CO/mole C in ).
- the dotted lines ( ) represent the percentage of carbon converted to CO 2 (mole CO 2 /mole C in ).
- the dash-dot-dot-dash lines ( ) represent sustainable H 2 , and the short dashed lines ( ) represent the syngas ratio of H 2 /CO (mole H 2 /mole CO).
- FIG. 3 clearly demonstrates that the final syngas ratio can be adjusted by adjusting the water to solid ratio (represented as H 2 O/ Cin mass ratio in FIG. 3 ) and the hydrogen to carbon ratio of the feedstock.
- H 2 O/ Cin mass ratio in FIG. 3 the water to solid ratio
- the desired syngas ratio for the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (2.1:1) was found to be 3.1 when the mole ratio of hydrogen to carbon in the feed was set to one.
- the process of this invention can produce composition of synthesis gas having a H 2 :CO mole ratio range of 1:1 to 6:1.
- the resulting effluent is a synthesis of gases rich in hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and steam. Hydrogen produced in the SMR is recycled back to the HGR. Consequently, no outside source of hydrogen is needed to maintain steady state operation.
- the HGR and SMR processes therefore, may be considered to be chemically self-sustaining.
- the remaining synthesis gas is then available for the production of fuels and process heat.
- the synthesis gas is fed to a Fischer-Tropsch reactor in a process that can produce a zero-sulfur, ultrahigh cetane value diesel-like fuel and valuable paraffin wax products.
- the absence of sulfur enables low pollutant and particle emitting diesel fuels to be realized.
- Useful by-products can be produced, foe example, purified water, which can be re-cycled to create the slurry feed into the process.
- the Fischer-Tropsch reactions also produce tail gas that contains hydrogen, CO, CO 2 , and some light hydrocarbon gases. Hydrogen can be stripped out of the tail gas and recycled either to the HGR or the Fischer-Tropsch reactor. Any small amounts of other gases such as CO and CO may be flared off.
Abstract
A method for controlling the synthesis gas composition obtained from a steam methane reformer (SMR) that obtains its feedstock as product gas directly from a steam hydro-gasification reactor SHR). The method allows control of the H2/CO syngas ratio by adjusting the hydrogen feed and the water content of feedstock into a steam hydro-gasification reactor that supplies the SMR. The steam and methane rich product gas of the SHR is generated by means of hydro-gasification of a slurry of carbonaceous material and water. The mass percentages of the product stream at each stage of the process are calculated using a modeling program, such as the ASPEN PLUS™ equilibrium process. By varying the parameters of solid to water ratio and hydrogen to carbon ratio, a sensitivity analysis can be performed that enables one determine the optimum composition of the slurry feedstock to the SHR to obtain a desired syngas ratio output of the SMR. Thus one can adjust the hydrogen feed and the water content of feedstock into the SHR that supplies the SMR to determine the syngas ratio output of the SMR.
Description
- The field of the invention is the production of synthesis gas.
- There is a need to identify new sources of chemical energy and methods for its conversion into alternative transportation fuels, driven by many concerns including environmental, health, safety issues, and the inevitable future scarcity of petroleum-based fuel supplies. The number of internal combustion engine fueled vehicles worldwide continues to grow, particularly in the midrange of developing countries. The worldwide vehicle population outside the U.S., which mainly uses diesel fuel, is growing faster than inside the U.S. This situation may change as more fuel-efficient vehicles, using hybrid and/or diesel engine technologies, are introduced to reduce both fuel consumption and overall emissions. Since the resources for the production of petroleum-based fuels are being depleted, dependency on petroleum will become a major problem unless non-petroleum alternative fuels, in particular clean-burning synthetic diesel fuels, are developed. Moreover, normal combustion of petroleum-based fuels in conventional engines can cause serious environmental pollution unless strict methods of exhaust emission control are used. A clean burning synthetic diesel fuel can help reduce the emissions from diesel engines.
- The production of clean-burning transportation fuels requires either the reformulation of existing petroleum-based fuels or the discovery of new methods for power production or fuel synthesis from unused materials. There are many sources available, derived from either renewable organic or waste carbonaceous materials. Utilizing carbonaceous waste to produce synthetic fuels is an economically viable method since the input feed stock is already considered of little value, discarded as waste, and disposal is often polluting. Alternatively, one can use coal as a feedstock to upgrade low grade dirty solid fuel to a value added convenient clean liquid fuel, such as high quality, environment friendly synthetic diesel or other hydrocarbon fuels.
- Liquid transportation fuels have inherent advantages over gaseous fuels, having higher energy densities than gaseous fuels at the same pressure and temperature. Liquid fuels can be stored at atmospheric or low pressures whereas to achieve liquid fuel energy densities, a gaseous fuel would have to be stored in a tank on a vehicle at high pressures that can be a safety concern in the case of leaks or sudden rupture. The distribution of liquid fuels is much easier than gaseous fuels, using simple pumps and pipelines. The liquid fueling infrastructure of the existing transportation sector ensures easy integration into the existing market of any production of clean-burning synthetic liquid transportation fuels.
- The availability of clean-burning liquid transportation fuels is a national priority. Producing synthesis gas (a mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide, also referred to as “syngas”) cleanly and efficiently from carbonaceous sources, that can be subjected to a Fischer-Tropsch process to produce clean and valuable synthetic gasoline and diesel fuels, will benefit both the transportation sector and the health of society. Such a process allows for the application of current state-of-art engine exhaust after-treatment methods for NOx reduction, removal of toxic particulates present in diesel engine exhaust, and the reduction of normal combustion product pollutants, currently accomplished by catalysts that are poisoned quickly by any sulfur present, as is the case in ordinary stocks of petroleum derived diesel fuel, reducing the catalyst efficiency. Typically, Fischer-Tropsch liquid fuels, produced from synthesis gas, are sulfur-free, aromatic free, and in the case of synthetic diesel fuel have an ultrahigh cetane value.
- Biomass material is the most commonly processed carbonaceous waste feed stock used to produce renewable fuels. Waste plastic, rubber, manure, crop residues, forestry, tree and grass cuttings and biosolids from waste water (sewage) treatment are also candidate feed stocks for conversion processes. Biomass feed stocks can be converted to produce electricity, heat, valuable chemicals or fuels. California tops the nation in the use and development of several biomass utilization technologies. Each year in California, more than 45 million tons of municipal solid waste is discarded for treatment by waste management facilities. Approximately half this waste ends up in landfills. For example, in just the Riverside County, California area, it is estimated that about 4000 tons of waste wood are disposed of per day. According to other estimates, over 100,000 tons of biomass per day are dumped into landfills in the Riverside County collection area. This municipal waste comprises about 30% waste paper or cardboard, 40% organic (green and food) waste, and 30% combinations of wood, paper, plastic and metal waste. The carbonaceous components of this waste material have chemical energy that could be used to reduce the need for other energy sources if it can be converted into a clean-burning fuel. These waste sources of carbonaceous material are not the only sources available. While many existing carbonaceous waste materials, such as paper, can be sorted, reused and recycled, for other materials, the waste producer would not need to pay a tipping fee, if the waste were to be delivered directly to a conversion facility. A tipping fee, presently at $30-$35 per ton, is usually charged by the waste management agency to offset disposal costs. Consequently not only can disposal costs be reduced by transporting the waste to a waste-to-synthetic fuels processing plant, but additional waste would be made available because of the lowered cost of disposal.
- The burning of wood in a wood stove is a simple example of using biomass to produce heat energy. Unfortunately, open burning of biomass waste to obtain energy and heat is not a clean and efficient method to utilize the calorific value. Today, many new ways of utilizing carbonaceous waste are being discovered. For example, one way is to produce synthetic liquid transportation fuels, and another way is to produce energetic gas for conversion into electricity.
- Using fuels from renewable biomass sources can actually decrease the net accumulation of greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, while providing clean, efficient energy for transportation. One of the principal benefits of co-production of synthetic liquid fuels from biomass sources is that it can provide a storable transportation fuel while reducing the effects of greenhouse gases contributing to global warming. In the future, these co-production processes could provide clean-burning fuels for a renewable fuel economy that could be sustained continuously.
- A number of processes exist to convert biomass and other carbonaceous materials to clean-burning transportation fuels, but they tend to be too expensive to compete on the market with petroleum-based fuels, or they produce volatile fuels, such as methanol and ethanol that have vapor pressure values too high for use in high pollution areas, such as the Southern California air-basin, without legislative exemption from clean air regulations. An example of the latter process is the Hynol Methanol Process, which uses hydro-gasification and steam reformer reactors to synthesize methanol using a co-feed of solid carbonaceous materials and natural gas, and which has a demonstrated carbon conversion efficiency of >85% in bench-scale demonstrations.
- Synthesis gas can be produced through one of two major chemical processes, steam reforming and partial oxidation. Steam reforming is used when the feed consists of light hydrocarbons such as natural gas, and when hydrogen is the main product. Partial oxidation is used with heavier feeds, or when a relatively high yield of carbon monoxide is desired. Table 1 summarizes various commercial processes under operation for the production of synthesis gas [1].
-
TABLE 1 Syngas Ratio Chemical Process Feedstock (H2/Co, mole) Steam Reforming Natural gas, steam 4.76 Steam Reforming Methane, steam 3 Steam Reforming Naptha, steam 2 Steam Reforming Natural gas, CO2, steam 2 Partial Oxidation Coal, steam, O2 0.68 Partial Oxidation Coal, steam, O2 0.46 Partial Oxidation Coal, steam, O2 2.07 - The ratio of hydrogen to carbon monoxide in the synthesis gas is called the syngas ratio and is strongly dependent on the process used and the nature of the feedstock.
- Syngas is used as a feedstock in the manufacture of various chemicals and also in the gas-to-liquid processes, which use the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (FTS) to produce liquid fuels. Alternatively, syngas can be used in the so called integrated gasification combined cycle, where it is directly burned with air to produce the heat necessary to operate steam turbines used in electricity generation. Depending on the desired usage, the H2/Co ratio of syngas needs to be adjusted. Table 2 summarizes the optimum syngas ratios required for different processes [2].
-
TABLE 2 Syngas Ratio Required Desired Product Chemical Process (H2/Co, mole) Synthetic fuels FTS - Co catalyst 2.05–2.15 Synthetic fuels FTS - Fe catalyst 1.65 Methanol 2 Ethylene glycol 1.5 Acetic acid 1 Benzene-toluene-xylene 1.5 - In general, the syngas ratio can be lowered by using the pressure swing adsorption process or by using hydrogen membrane systems. Alternatively, adding a downstream water-gas shift reactor can increase the syngas ratio.
- A process was developed in our laboratories to produce synthesis gas in which a slurry of particles of carbonaceous material in water, and hydrogen from an internal source, are fed into a hydro-gasification reactor under conditions to generate rich producer gas. This is fed along with steam into a steam pyrolytic reformer under conditions to generate synthesis gas. This process is described in detail in Norbeck et al. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/503,435 (published as US 2005/0256212), entitled: “Production Of Synthetic Transportation Fuels From Carbonaceous Material Using Self-Sustained Hydro-Gasification.” In a further version of the process, using a steam hydro-gasification reactor (SHR) the carbonaceous material is heated simultaneously in the presence of both hydrogen and steam to undergo steam pyrolysis and hydro-gasification in a single step. This process is described in detail in Norbeck et al. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/911,348 (published as US 2005/0032920), entitled: “Steam Pyrolysis As A Process to Enhance The Hydro-Gasification of Carbonaceous Material.” The disclosures of U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 10/503,435 and 10/911,348 are incorporated herein by reference.
- Producing synthesis gas via gasification and producing a liquid fuel from synthesis gas are totally different processes. Of particular interest to the present invention is the production of synthesis gas using a steam methane reformer (SMR), a reactor that is widely used to produce synthesis gas for the production of liquid fuels and other chemicals. The reactions taking place in the SMR can be written as follows.
-
CH4+H2O→CO+3H2 (1) -
or -
CH4+2H2O→CO2+4H2 (2) - Carbon monoxide and hydrogen are produced in the SMR by using steam and methane as the feed. Heating process water in a steam generator produces the required steam. The methane is usually supplied in the form of compressed natural gas, or by means of a light molecular weight off-gas stream from a chemical or refinery process.
- This invention provides an improved, economical method to control the synthesis gas composition obtained from a steam methane reformer that obtains its feedstock as product gas directly from a steam hydro-gasification reactor. The method allows control of the H2/CO ratio by adjusting the hydrogen feed and the water content of feedstock into the SHR that supplies the SMR.
- As described above, the steam and methane rich product gas of the SHR is generated by means of hydro-gasification of the slurry, which is a mixture of carbonaceous material and water. This product gas, a mixture of methane rich gas and steam, where the steam is present as a result of the superheating the water in the feedstock, serves as an ideal feed stream for the SMR. Impurities are removed from the SHR product stream, such as fine particles of ash & char, hydrogen sulfide and other inorganic components.
- The mass percentages of the product stream at each stage of the process are calculated using a modeling program, such as the ASPEN PLUS™ equilibrium process that can relate the synthesis gas ratio of hydrogen to carbon monoxide to conversion ratios of the carbon content of the carbonaceous material. In accordance with the invention, by varying the parameters of solid to water ratio and hydrogen to carbon ratio, a sensitivity analysis can be performed that enables one determine the optimum composition of the slurry feedstock to the SHR to obtain a desired syngas ratio output of the SMR. Thus, the ratio of hydrogen to slurry water is determined by analysis of the effect on the synthesis gas ratio of (a) the ratio of solid content of the carbonaceous material to the slurry water and (b) the ratio of the hydrogen to carbon content of the carbonaceous material. This enables one to adjust the hydrogen feed and the water content of feedstock into the SHR that supplies the SMR to provide the desired ratio of hydrogen to carbon monoxide in the synthesis gas output of the SMR.
- More particularly, a process is provided for converting carbonaceous material to synthesis gas, comprising simultaneously heating carbonaceous material in an SHR in the presence of a predetermined ratio of hydrogen and water in the form of steam, at a temperature and pressure sufficient to generate a stream of methane and carbon monoxide rich gas product, which can be called a producer gas. Impurities are removed from the producer gas stream substantially at the process temperature and pressure, and the resultant producer gas is subjected to steam methane reforming in an SMR under conditions whereby synthesis gas comprising hydrogen and carbon monoxide is generated having a hydrogen/carbon monoxide ratio determined by the ratio of hydrogen and water in the SHR.
- For a more complete understanding of the present invention, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing, in which:
-
FIG. 1 is a flow diagram of the process of this invention; -
FIG. 2 is a flow diagram of the mass balance of the process; and -
FIG. 3 is a sensitivity analysis using the ASPEN PLUS™ modeling program showing various conversions and the syngas ratio when parameters of solid to water ratio and hydrogen to carbon ratio are varied. - This invention enables one to control of the H2/CO ratio output of an SMR by adjusting the hydrogen feed and the water content of feedstock into the SHR that supplies the SMR. The steam and methane rich product gas of the SHR is generated by means of hydro-gasification of the slurry, which is a mixture of carbonaceous material and water. This product gas, a mixture of methane rich gas and steam, where the steam is present as a result of the superheating the water in the feedstock, serves as an ideal feed stream for the SMR.
- The mass percentages of the product stream at each stage of the process are calculated using a modeling program, such as the ASPEN PLUS™ equilibrium process. By varying the parameters of solid to water ratio and hydrogen to carbon ratio, a sensitivity analysis can be performed that enables one determine the optimum composition of the slurry feedstock to the SHR to obtain a desired syngas ratio output of the SMR. Thus one can adjust the hydrogen feed and the water content of feedstock into the SHR that supplies the SMR to determine the syngas ratio output of the SMR.
- Impurities are removed from the SHR product stream, such as fine particles of ash & char, hydrogen sulfide and other inorganic components. These impurities must be removed in order to prevent poisoning of the catalyst used in the SMR. Conventionally, a combination of particulate filters, a solvent wash (amines, Selexol™, Rectisol™), and hydro-desulphurization by means of the Claus process are used for this purpose. In the Claus process, H2S is partially oxidized with air in a reaction furnace at high temperatures (1000-1400° C.). Sulfur is formed, but some H2S remains unreacted, and some SO2 is made requiring that the remaining H2S be reacted with the SO2 at lower temperatures (about 200-350° C.) over a catalyst to make more sulfur. To maintain the SMR feed stream at high temperatures, a gas cleanup unit is provided that operates at process pressures and at a temperature above the steam condensation point. The unit is located between the SHR and SMR.
- More particularly, a process is provided for converting carbonaceous material to synthesis gas of a desired H2/CO ratio, comprising simultaneously heating carbonaceous material in an SHR in the presence of a predetermined ratio of hydrogen and water in the form of steam, at a temperature and pressure sufficient to generate a stream of methane and carbon monoxide rich gas product, which can be called a producer gas, the ratio of hydrogen and water being determined by a modeling program, such as the ASPEN PLUS™ equilibrium process. In accordance with the invention, by varying the parameters of solid to water ratio and hydrogen to carbon ratio, a sensitivity analysis is performed that enables one determine the optimum composition of the slurry feedstock to the SHR to obtain a desired syngas ratio output of the SMR. Impurities are removed from the producer gas stream substantially at the process temperature and pressure, and the resultant producer gas is subjected to steam methane reforming in an SMR under conditions whereby synthesis gas comprising hydrogen and carbon monoxide is generated having a hydrogen/carbon monoxide ratio determined by the ratio of hydrogen and water in the SHR.
- In a specific process, for converting municipal waste, biomass, wood, coal, or a natural or synthetic polymer to synthesis gas, the carbonaceous material is simultaneously heated in the presence of both hydrogen and steam, at a temperature of about 790° C. to about 850° C. and pressure about 132 psi to 560 psi whereby to generate a stream of methane and carbon monoxide rich producer gas. Impurities are removed from the producer gas stream substantially at the process temperature and pressure, following which the resultant producer gas is subjected to steam methane reforming under conditions whereby to generate the desired synthesis gas ratio of hydrogen and carbon monoxide. For example, the required H2:CO mole ratio of a Fischer-Tropsch reactor with a cobalt based catalyst is 2.1:1. By appropriate adjustment, as described below, of the H2/H2O ratio, a H2/CO mole ratio range of about 3 to 1 can be achieved to provide an excess of hydrogen, which can be separated and fed into the SHR to make a self-sustainable process, i.e., without requiring any external hydrogen feed. The synthesis gas generated by the steam methane reforming can be fed into a Fischer-Tropsch reactor under conditions whereby a liquid fuel is produced. Exothermic heat from the Fischer-Tropsch reaction can be transferred to the hydro-gasification reaction and/or steam methane reforming reaction.
-
FIG. 1 is a flow diagram of a SHR to SMR process in which a desired H2/CO ratio output of an SMR is obtained by adjusting the hydrogen feed and the water content of feedstock into the SHR that supplies the SMR. An internally generatedhydrogen feed 10 is fed into anSHR 12 along with acarbonaceous feedstock 14 andwater 16, which are heated to 750° C. at 400 psi in theSHR 12. The resulting producer gas is directed to a gas clean upfilter 18, e.g. a candle filter assembly, at about 350° C. at about 400 psi. From there, after removal of sulfur and ash, the effluent is directed to anSMR 20 where synthesis gas is generated and fed to a Fischer-Tropsch reactor 22., from whichpure water 24, and diesel fuel and/orwax 26 is obtained. A portion of hydrogen is diverted from theSMR 20, at 28 to be fed back to theHGR 12.Heat 30 from the Fischer-Tropsch reactor 22 is used to supplement the heat at the SMR. - Operating the unit above the bubbling temperature of the water allows the water to be present as steam in the gaseous product stream from the SHR, thereby enabling the process to retain most of the sensible heat in the effluent stream. The following example will illustrate the invention.
- A mass balance process flow diagram is shown in
FIG. 2 . The mass percentages of the product stream at each stage of the process are provided in the figure. ASPEN PLUS™ equilibrium process modeling was used to calculate these values. ASPEN PLUS™ is a commercial computer modeling program that allows a process model to be created by specifying the chemical components and operating conditions. The program takes all of the specifications and simulates the model, executing all necessary calculations needed to solve the outcome of the system, hence predicting its behavior. When the calculations are complete, ASPEN PLUS™ lists the results, stream by stream and unit by unit, and can present the data in graphical form with determining ordinate and abscissa - As shown in
FIG. 2 , an SHR feedstock of hydrogen and 41% coal slurry results in the production of synthesis gas with a 3.4:l mole ratio of hydrogen to carbon monoxide in the SMR. The required feed hydrogen for the SHR can be supplied through external means or by internal feedback of a portion of the hydrogen produced in the SMR. In a particular example, a slurry of 41% coal, 52% water and 7% hydrogen is used, obtained following the procedures of Norbeck et al. U.S. Ser. No. 10/911,348. This results in an output from the SHR to the cleanup filter of a gaseous mixture containing 32 wt % CH4, 2 wt % H2, 2 wt % CO, 3 wt % CO2, 51 wt % H2O, 4 wt % ash, 5 wt % char, and 1 wt % other impurities. - In this example, the filter is operating at 300° C. and 28 atmospheres of pressure. Any filter capable of operating at the process temperature can be used at the gas cleanup station. One such commercially available filter is a candle filter, which is well known to the art. See, for example U.S. Pat. No. 5,474,586, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. An available gas cleanup unit that can be used in this invention is what is known as a candle filter in which a series of candle-shaped filters are carried in a filter vessel. The candle filters are made of stainless steel metal frit to remove fine particulate matter (ash, inorganic salts and unreacted char) from the gas stream. The slurry is fed into the vessel at a bottom inlet and filtrate is taken out at a top outlet. Particulate matter is taken from another outlet as cake. Sulfur impurities existing in the SHR product gas, mostly in the form of hydrogen sulfide, are removed by passing the product gas through a packed bed of metal oxide sorbents in the gas cleanup unit, particulate matter being taken from a cake outlet.
- Active sorbents include, but are not limited to, Zn based oxides such as zinc oxide, sold by Süd-Chemie, Louisville, Ky. Porous metal filter elements are available from Bekaert in Marietta, Ga. in the appropriate forms and sizes, such as Bekpor® Porous Media-which is made from stainless steel sintered fiber matrix with a pore size of 1. These sorbents and filter elements allow the effects of pressure drop and gas-solid mass transfer limitations to be minimized. At a pressure of 28 atm., temperatures in the range of 300° C. to 500° C. and space velocities up to 2000/hr have been used in the desulphurization of SHR product gas. The hydrogen sulfide content of the gas is diminished by means of sulfidation of the sorbents to levels low enough to avoid the deactivation of the SMR catalyst. The used sorbents in the gas cleanup unit can either be replaced with fresh sorbents or regenerated in-situ with diluted air in parallel multiple sorbent beds.
- The output of the SHR-cleanup unit is a methane rich, producer gas containing 36 wt % CH4, 2 wt % H2, 2 wt % CO, 3 wt % CO2, and 57 wt % H2O, having a steam to methane mole ratio of 1:4. The output of the SHR is fed to the SMR, which is operating at 800° C. and 28 atmospheres to yield synthesis gas having a mole ratio of H2 to CO of 3.4, and containing 4 wt % CH4, 14 wt % H2, 58 wt % CO, 3 wt % CO2, and 21 wt % H2O.
- The syngas ratio obtained from the SMR can be adjusted by varying the solid to water ratio and hydrogen to carbon ratio in the SHR feedstock. Sensitivity analysis was performed using the ASPEN PLUS™ equilibrium modeling tool by varying these parameters. The results are in
FIG. 3 , showing various conversions and the syngas ratio when parameters of solid to water ratio and hydrogen to carbon ratio are varied. The solid lines () represent the percentage of carbon converted to CH4 (mole CH4/mole Cin). The long dashed lines () represent the percentage of carbon converted to CO (mole CO/mole Cin). The dotted lines () represent the percentage of carbon converted to CO2 (mole CO2/mole Cin). The dash-dot-dot-dash lines () represent sustainable H2, and the short dashed lines () represent the syngas ratio of H2/CO (mole H2/mole CO). - The last parameter is of key interest in this invention.
FIG. 3 clearly demonstrates that the final syngas ratio can be adjusted by adjusting the water to solid ratio (represented as H2O/ Cin mass ratio inFIG. 3 ) and the hydrogen to carbon ratio of the feedstock. Thus, an optimum composition of the slurry to obtain a sustainable hydrogen feedback and the desired syngas ratio for the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (2.1:1) was found to be 3.1 when the mole ratio of hydrogen to carbon in the feed was set to one. - More generally, the process of this invention can produce composition of synthesis gas having a H2:CO mole ratio range of 1:1 to 6:1. The resulting effluent is a synthesis of gases rich in hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and steam. Hydrogen produced in the SMR is recycled back to the HGR. Consequently, no outside source of hydrogen is needed to maintain steady state operation. The HGR and SMR processes, therefore, may be considered to be chemically self-sustaining. The remaining synthesis gas is then available for the production of fuels and process heat.
- In an embodiment of the invention, the synthesis gas is fed to a Fischer-Tropsch reactor in a process that can produce a zero-sulfur, ultrahigh cetane value diesel-like fuel and valuable paraffin wax products. The absence of sulfur enables low pollutant and particle emitting diesel fuels to be realized. Useful by-products can be produced, foe example, purified water, which can be re-cycled to create the slurry feed into the process. The Fischer-Tropsch reactions also produce tail gas that contains hydrogen, CO, CO2, and some light hydrocarbon gases. Hydrogen can be stripped out of the tail gas and recycled either to the HGR or the Fischer-Tropsch reactor. Any small amounts of other gases such as CO and CO may be flared off.
- Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Moreover, the scope of the present application is not intended to be limited to the particular embodiments of the process and apparatus described in the specification. As one of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate from the disclosure of the present invention, processes and apparatuses, presently existing or later to be developed that perform substantially the same function or achieve substantially the same result as the corresponding embodiments described herein may be utilized according to the present invention. Accordingly, the appended claims are intended to include such processes and use of such apparatuses within their scope.
-
- 1. Van der Laan, G. P., Thesis, University of Groningen, Netherlands, 1999.
- 2. Sheldon, R. A., Chemicals from Synthesis Gas, 1983 and FT Technology: Studies in surf Science and Catalysis, ed. Steynberg, A., Dry, M. E., Vol 152, 2004.
Claims (12)
1. A process for converting carbonaceous material in a water containing slurry to synthesis gas having a desired ratio of hydrogen to carbon monoxide in the synthesis gas, comprising:
providing a predetermined ratio of hydrogen to slurry water to a steam hydro-gasification reactor;
simultaneously heating the carbonaceous material in the presence of both said hydrogen and steam, at a temperature and pressure sufficient to generate a stream of methane and carbon monoxide rich gas product;
removing impurities from the producer gas stream; and
subjecting the resultant producer gas to steam methane reforming under conditions whereby synthesis gas comprising said desired ratio of hydrogen and carbon monoxide is generated.
2. The process of claim 1 wherein at least part of said slurry water is provided in the form of steam.
3. The process of claim 1 wherein the ratio of hydrogen to slurry water is determined by analysis of the effect on the synthesis gas ratio of (a) the ratio of solid content of the carbonaceous material to the slurry water and (b) the ratio of the hydrogen to carbon content of the carbonaceous material.
4. The process of claim 3 wherein said analysis is a sensitivity analysis using a modeling computer program that relates the synthesis gas ratio of hydrogen to carbon monoxide to conversion ratios of the carbon content of the carbonaceous material.
5. The process of claim 4 wherein the computer program is a modeling program.
6. The process of claim 5 wherein the computer program uses the ASPEN PLUS™ equilibrium process.
7. The process of claim 1 wherein the steam methane reforming is conducted under conditions whereby the composition of synthesis gas produced has a H2: CO mole ratio range of 1.1 to 6.1.
8. The process of claim 1 wherein steam methane reforming is conducted under conditions whereby the composition of synthesis gas produced has a H2: CO mole ratio of 3:1.
9. The process of claim 1 wherein the carbonaceous material comprises municipal waste, biomass, wood, coal, or a natural or synthetic polymer.
10. The process of claim 1 in which synthesis gas generated by the steam methane reforming is fed into a Fischer-Tropsch reactor under conditions whereby a liquid fuel is produced.
11. A process for converting municipal waste, biomass, wood, coal, or a natural or synthetic polymer, in a water containing slurry to synthesis gas, comprising:
providing a predetermined ratio of hydrogen to slurry water to a steam hydro-gasification reactor, the ratio of hydrogen to slurry water being determined by analysis of the effect on the synthesis gas ratio of (a) the ratio of solid content of the carbonaceous material to the slurry water and (b) the ratio of the hydrogen to carbon content of the carbonaceous material that would produce synthesis gas comprising hydrogen and carbon monoxide at a H2:CO mole ratio range of 1:1 to 6:1;
simultaneously heating carbonaceous material in the presence of both said hydrogen and steam, at a temperature of about 790° C. to about 850° C. and pressure about 132 psi to 560 psi whereby to generate a stream of methane and carbon monoxide rich gas product;
removing impurities from the producer gas stream substantially at said temperature and pressure;
subjecting the resultant producer gas to steam methane reforming under conditions whereby to generate synthesis gas comprising hydrogen and carbon monoxide at a H2:CO mole ratio range of 1:1 to 6:1; and
feeding synthesis gas generated by the steam methane reforming into a Fischer-Tropsch reactor under conditions whereby a liquid fuel is produced.
12. The process of claim 11 comprising transferring exothermic heat from the Fischer-Tropsch reaction to the hydro-gasification reaction and/or steam methane reforming reaction.
Priority Applications (17)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/489,298 US20080031809A1 (en) | 2006-07-18 | 2006-07-18 | Controlling the synthesis gas composition of a steam methane reformer |
US11/879,241 US8268026B2 (en) | 2006-07-18 | 2007-07-16 | Controlling the synthesis gas composition of a steam methane reformer |
MX2009000698A MX2009000698A (en) | 2006-07-18 | 2007-07-17 | Controlling the synthesis gas composition of a steam methane reformer. |
CN2007800270935A CN101489914B (en) | 2006-07-18 | 2007-07-17 | Controlling the synthesis gas composition of a steam methane reformer |
CA002657568A CA2657568A1 (en) | 2006-07-18 | 2007-07-17 | Controlling the synthesis gas composition of a steam methane reformer |
AU2007275752A AU2007275752B2 (en) | 2006-07-18 | 2007-07-17 | Controlling the synthesis gas composition of a steam methane reformer |
EP07796888A EP2046678A4 (en) | 2006-07-18 | 2007-07-17 | Controlling the synthesis gas composition of a steam methane reformer |
BRPI0711687-0A BRPI0711687A2 (en) | 2006-07-18 | 2007-07-17 | process for converting a carboniferous material into water containing slurry for gas synthesis having a desired hydrogen radius for carbon monoxide in the gas synthesis and process for converting municipal waste and waste, biomass, wood, coal or a natural polymer or synthetic |
JP2009520795A JP2009543933A (en) | 2006-07-18 | 2007-07-17 | Control of synthesis gas composition in steam methane reformer |
PCT/US2007/016144 WO2008010994A2 (en) | 2006-07-18 | 2007-07-17 | Controlling the synthesis gas composition of a steam methane reformer |
ARP070103204A AR061922A1 (en) | 2006-07-18 | 2007-07-18 | A PROCESS FOR COVERING CARBONACEOUS MATERIAL IN WATER THAT CONTAINS MILK IN SYNTHESIS GAS THAT HAVE A DESIRED CARBON MONOXIDE HYDROGEN RELATIONSHIP IN SYNTHESIS GAS AND A PROCESS FOR CONVERTING MUNICIPAL, BIOMASBIAN OR NATURAL NATURE A WATER Q |
TW096126102A TW200815280A (en) | 2006-07-18 | 2007-07-18 | Controlling the synthesis gas composition of a steam methane reformer |
US12/400,640 US8603430B2 (en) | 2002-02-05 | 2009-03-09 | Controlling the synthesis gas composition of a steam methane reformer |
US12/799,381 US20100285576A1 (en) | 2004-08-03 | 2010-04-23 | Method to produce synthesis gas or liquid fuels from commingled algae and coal feedstock using a steam-hydrogasification reactor and a steam methane reformer with CO2 utilization through an algae farm |
US12/783,228 US8771388B2 (en) | 2004-08-03 | 2010-05-19 | Method to produce methane rich fuel gas from carbonaceous feedstocks using a steam hydrogasification reactor and a water gas shift reactor |
US13/496,296 US9493721B2 (en) | 2002-02-05 | 2010-09-22 | Method to produce methane rich fuel gas from carbonaceous feedstocks using a steam hydrogasification reactor and a water gas shift reactor |
US13/038,134 US9822309B2 (en) | 2002-02-05 | 2011-03-01 | High carbon concentration biomass and biosolids slurry preparation using a hydro-thermal pretreatment |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/489,298 US20080031809A1 (en) | 2006-07-18 | 2006-07-18 | Controlling the synthesis gas composition of a steam methane reformer |
Related Parent Applications (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/911,348 Continuation-In-Part US7500997B2 (en) | 2002-02-05 | 2004-08-03 | Steam pyrolysis as a process to enhance the hydro-gasification of carbonaceous materials |
US11/489,299 Continuation-In-Part US20080016770A1 (en) | 2002-02-05 | 2006-07-18 | Method for high energy density biomass-water slurry |
US11/879,266 Continuation-In-Part US7897649B2 (en) | 2002-02-05 | 2007-07-16 | Operation of a steam methane reformer by direct feeding of steam rich producer gas from steam hydro-gasification |
Related Child Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/489,353 Continuation-In-Part US20080021120A1 (en) | 2002-02-05 | 2006-07-18 | Operation of a steam hydro-gasifier in a fluidized bed reactor |
US11/879,241 Continuation-In-Part US8268026B2 (en) | 2002-02-05 | 2007-07-16 | Controlling the synthesis gas composition of a steam methane reformer |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20080031809A1 true US20080031809A1 (en) | 2008-02-07 |
Family
ID=38957307
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/489,298 Abandoned US20080031809A1 (en) | 2002-02-05 | 2006-07-18 | Controlling the synthesis gas composition of a steam methane reformer |
US11/879,241 Expired - Fee Related US8268026B2 (en) | 2002-02-05 | 2007-07-16 | Controlling the synthesis gas composition of a steam methane reformer |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/879,241 Expired - Fee Related US8268026B2 (en) | 2002-02-05 | 2007-07-16 | Controlling the synthesis gas composition of a steam methane reformer |
Country Status (11)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US20080031809A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2046678A4 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2009543933A (en) |
CN (1) | CN101489914B (en) |
AR (1) | AR061922A1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2007275752B2 (en) |
BR (1) | BRPI0711687A2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2657568A1 (en) |
MX (1) | MX2009000698A (en) |
TW (1) | TW200815280A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2008010994A2 (en) |
Cited By (25)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060201024A1 (en) * | 2004-07-19 | 2006-09-14 | Earthrenew, Inc. | Process and system for drying and heat treating materials |
US20090043686A1 (en) * | 2007-08-10 | 2009-02-12 | Archer-Daniels-Midland Company | Processing arrangements for biomass byproducts and biomass derivative products |
WO2010104732A2 (en) * | 2009-03-09 | 2010-09-16 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Controlling the synthesis gas composition of a steam methane reformer |
US8946308B2 (en) | 2008-12-17 | 2015-02-03 | Saudi Basic Industries Corporation | Process for increasing the carbon monoxide content of a syngas mixture |
WO2015183426A1 (en) * | 2014-05-27 | 2015-12-03 | Advanced Green Technologies, Llc | Method and system for converting flare gas |
US9371227B2 (en) | 2009-09-08 | 2016-06-21 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Integration of reforming/water splitting and electrochemical systems for power generation with integrated carbon capture |
US9376318B2 (en) | 2008-09-26 | 2016-06-28 | The Ohio State University | Conversion of carbonaceous fuels into carbon free energy carriers |
US9518236B2 (en) | 2009-09-08 | 2016-12-13 | The Ohio State University Research Foundation | Synthetic fuels and chemicals production with in-situ CO2 capture |
US9616403B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2017-04-11 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Systems and methods for converting carbonaceous fuels |
WO2017141138A1 (en) * | 2016-02-16 | 2017-08-24 | Sabic Global Technologies B.V. | Conversion of adjusted methane steam reforming gas composition with co2 for the production of syngas composition for oxo-synthesis |
US9777920B2 (en) | 2011-05-11 | 2017-10-03 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Oxygen carrying materials |
US9777237B2 (en) | 2014-11-12 | 2017-10-03 | Element 1 Corp. | Refining assemblies and refining methods for rich natural gas |
US9828561B2 (en) | 2014-11-12 | 2017-11-28 | Element 1 Corp. | Refining assemblies and refining methods for rich natural gas |
US9903584B2 (en) | 2011-05-11 | 2018-02-27 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Systems for converting fuel |
US10010847B2 (en) | 2010-11-08 | 2018-07-03 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Circulating fluidized bed with moving bed downcomers and gas sealing between reactors |
US10022693B2 (en) | 2014-02-27 | 2018-07-17 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Systems and methods for partial or complete oxidation of fuels |
US10144640B2 (en) | 2013-02-05 | 2018-12-04 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Methods for fuel conversion |
US10549236B2 (en) | 2018-01-29 | 2020-02-04 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Systems, methods and materials for NOx decomposition with metal oxide materials |
US10870810B2 (en) | 2017-07-20 | 2020-12-22 | Proteum Energy, Llc | Method and system for converting associated gas |
US11090624B2 (en) | 2017-07-31 | 2021-08-17 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Reactor system with unequal reactor assembly operating pressures |
US11111143B2 (en) | 2016-04-12 | 2021-09-07 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Chemical looping syngas production from carbonaceous fuels |
US11119092B2 (en) | 2018-02-27 | 2021-09-14 | Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. | Biogas quality evaluation device, biogas quality evaluation method, and program |
US11413574B2 (en) | 2018-08-09 | 2022-08-16 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Systems, methods and materials for hydrogen sulfide conversion |
US11453626B2 (en) | 2019-04-09 | 2022-09-27 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Alkene generation using metal sulfide particles |
EP3990586A4 (en) * | 2019-06-27 | 2023-07-26 | Hallett, Douglas John Frederick | Process for reducing an organic material to produce methane and/or hydrogen |
Families Citing this family (32)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
PL2190950T3 (en) * | 2007-07-20 | 2017-04-28 | Upm-Kymmene Oyj | Method and apparatus for producing liquid biofuel from solid biomass |
GB0805020D0 (en) * | 2008-03-18 | 2008-04-16 | Al Chalabi Rifat | Active reformer |
US8845771B2 (en) * | 2008-07-23 | 2014-09-30 | Latif Mahjoob | System and method for converting solids into fuel |
GB0823449D0 (en) * | 2008-12-24 | 2009-01-28 | Johnson Matthey Plc | Process |
ZA201007712B (en) * | 2009-10-28 | 2011-07-27 | Univ Of The Witwatersrand | Conversion of carbon containing feedstock |
JP4999907B2 (en) * | 2009-11-13 | 2012-08-15 | 民朗 金辺 | Hydrogen gas production method |
US8859831B2 (en) * | 2011-08-02 | 2014-10-14 | Gas Technology Institute | Removal of hydrogen sulfide as ammonium sulfate from hydropyrolysis product vapors |
JP6652694B2 (en) | 2011-08-04 | 2020-02-26 | カニンガム,スティーブン,エル. | Plasma arc furnace and applications |
JP5016728B2 (en) * | 2011-10-13 | 2012-09-05 | 民朗 金辺 | Hydrogen gas production method |
JP5016727B2 (en) * | 2011-10-13 | 2012-09-05 | 民朗 金辺 | Hydrogen gas production method |
FI20116107L (en) * | 2011-11-09 | 2013-05-10 | Upm Kymmene Corp | Method and system for producing liquid fuel from biomass |
JP5167422B2 (en) * | 2012-01-12 | 2013-03-21 | 民朗 金辺 | Hydrogen gas production method |
CA2776369C (en) * | 2012-05-09 | 2014-01-21 | Steve Kresnyak | Enhancement of fischer-tropsch process for hydrocarbon fuel formulation in a gtl environment |
US9290422B2 (en) * | 2012-11-27 | 2016-03-22 | Praxair Technology, Inc. | Hybrid plant for liquid fuel production |
CN103395742B (en) * | 2013-08-05 | 2015-05-06 | 四川亚联高科技股份有限公司 | New water carbon ratio control device |
CN103838265B (en) * | 2014-03-07 | 2016-09-28 | 西北化工研究院 | A kind of in the control system producing synthesis gas time control hydrogen and carbon monoxide ratio |
CA2947606A1 (en) | 2014-05-09 | 2015-11-12 | Stephen L. Cunningham | Arc furnace smeltering system & method |
CN105132056B (en) * | 2015-08-25 | 2018-07-06 | 中国五环工程有限公司 | Lignite steam hydro-gasification process for producing natural and its system |
WO2017132542A1 (en) * | 2016-01-28 | 2017-08-03 | Barry Liss | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR REDUCING NOx EMISSIONS FROM GASIFICATION POWER PLANTS |
CN116231017A (en) | 2016-05-03 | 2023-06-06 | 碳十二公益企业 | Reactor with advanced architecture for electrochemical reactions of carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide and other chemical compounds |
CN107298990A (en) * | 2017-07-12 | 2017-10-27 | 长江大学 | The devices and methods therefor that coal vapor/hydrogen gasifies altogether |
US11512403B2 (en) | 2018-01-22 | 2022-11-29 | Twelve Benefit Corporation | System and method for carbon dioxide reactor control |
JP2019157123A (en) * | 2018-03-09 | 2019-09-19 | 大阪瓦斯株式会社 | Gasification process for carbonaceous material |
CN108865285A (en) * | 2018-07-16 | 2018-11-23 | 西南石油大学 | It is a kind of using coal and natural gas as the oil of raw material-Electricity Federation production. art |
US11578415B2 (en) | 2018-11-28 | 2023-02-14 | Twelve Benefit Corporation | Electrolyzer and method of use |
KR20210131999A (en) | 2018-12-18 | 2021-11-03 | 오푸스-12 인코포레이티드 | Electrolyzer and how to use it |
IT201900008277A1 (en) * | 2019-06-06 | 2020-12-06 | Amec Foster Wheeler Italiana S R L | HYDROGEN PRODUCTION PROCESS |
CN115380132A (en) | 2019-11-25 | 2022-11-22 | 十二益公司 | Membrane electrode assembly for COx reduction |
GB2593231B (en) | 2020-03-17 | 2022-03-23 | Velocys Tech Limited | Process |
GB2595004B (en) | 2020-05-13 | 2023-05-17 | Velocys Tech Limited | Production of synthetic fuels |
CN113620240B (en) * | 2021-06-29 | 2022-08-19 | 东北大学 | Method for determining technological parameters for preparing hydrogen-based reducing gas |
US11939284B2 (en) | 2022-08-12 | 2024-03-26 | Twelve Benefit Corporation | Acetic acid production |
Family Cites Families (50)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP3153091B2 (en) * | 1994-03-10 | 2001-04-03 | 株式会社荏原製作所 | Waste treatment method and gasification and melting and combustion equipment |
US2987387A (en) * | 1958-12-30 | 1961-06-06 | Texaco Inc | Method for the production of carbon monoxide from solid fuels |
US3985519A (en) * | 1972-03-28 | 1976-10-12 | Exxon Research And Engineering Company | Hydrogasification process |
US3929431A (en) * | 1972-09-08 | 1975-12-30 | Exxon Research Engineering Co | Catalytic reforming process |
NL171597C (en) * | 1972-12-15 | 1983-04-18 | Shell Int Research | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR THE PREPARATION OF GAS BY PARTIAL COMBUSTION FOLLOWED BY CARBURING. |
US3847567A (en) * | 1973-08-27 | 1974-11-12 | Exxon Research Engineering Co | Catalytic coal hydrogasification process |
US3926775A (en) * | 1973-11-01 | 1975-12-16 | Wilburn C Schroeder | Hydrogenation of coal |
US4032305A (en) * | 1974-10-07 | 1977-06-28 | Squires Arthur M | Treating carbonaceous matter with hot steam |
US3957460A (en) * | 1975-09-09 | 1976-05-18 | The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Energy Research And Development Administration | Oxidation of coal-water slurry feed to hydrogasifier |
US4012311A (en) * | 1975-10-30 | 1977-03-15 | Cities Service Company | Short residence time low pressure hydropyrolysis of carbonaceous materials |
US4158697A (en) * | 1975-12-29 | 1979-06-19 | Clean Energy Corporation | Coal treatment apparatus |
US4073698A (en) * | 1976-06-04 | 1978-02-14 | Energetics Science, Inc. | Method and device for the detection and measurement of carbon monoxide in the presence of hydrogen |
US4118204A (en) * | 1977-02-25 | 1978-10-03 | Exxon Research & Engineering Co. | Process for the production of an intermediate Btu gas |
US4372755A (en) * | 1978-07-27 | 1983-02-08 | Enrecon, Inc. | Production of a fuel gas with a stabilized metal carbide catalyst |
US4211540A (en) * | 1978-12-29 | 1980-07-08 | Fluor Corporation | Process for the manufacture of fuel gas |
US4244706A (en) * | 1979-09-10 | 1981-01-13 | The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy | Process for gasifying carbonaceous material from a recycled condensate slurry |
US4341530A (en) * | 1979-12-05 | 1982-07-27 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Department Of Energy | Slurry atomizer for a coal-feeder and dryer used to provide coal at gasifier pressure |
US4385905A (en) * | 1980-04-04 | 1983-05-31 | Everett Metal Products, Inc. | System and method for gasification of solid carbonaceous fuels |
DE3033796A1 (en) * | 1980-09-09 | 1982-04-22 | Bayer Ag, 5090 Leverkusen | ELECTROCHEMICAL SENSOR FOR DETECTING REDUCING GASES, ESPECIALLY CARBON MONOXIDE, HYDRAZINE AND HYDROGEN IN AIR |
US4397888A (en) * | 1981-01-14 | 1983-08-09 | Westinghouse Electric Corp. | Thick film sensor for hydrogen and carbon monoxide |
US4526903A (en) * | 1981-01-23 | 1985-07-02 | Dut Pty Limited | Process for the production of synthesis gas from coal |
US4833171A (en) * | 1981-01-27 | 1989-05-23 | Sweeney Maxwell P | Synthesis gas system |
US4348487A (en) * | 1981-11-02 | 1982-09-07 | Exxon Research And Engineering Co. | Production of methanol via catalytic coal gasification |
US4560547A (en) * | 1982-06-28 | 1985-12-24 | Institute Of Gas Technology | Production of hydrogen from oil shale |
US4483691A (en) * | 1982-09-30 | 1984-11-20 | Engelhard Corporation | Production of synthetic natural gas from coal gasification liquid by-products |
US4597776A (en) * | 1982-10-01 | 1986-07-01 | Rockwell International Corporation | Hydropyrolysis process |
CA1300885C (en) * | 1986-08-26 | 1992-05-19 | Donald S. Scott | Hydrogasification of biomass to produce high yields of methane |
US5427762A (en) * | 1987-05-27 | 1995-06-27 | Hydrocarb Corporation | Process for the conversion of carbonaceous feedstocks to particulate carbon and methanol |
US4983296A (en) * | 1989-08-03 | 1991-01-08 | Texaco Inc. | Partial oxidation of sewage sludge |
US5354547A (en) * | 1989-11-14 | 1994-10-11 | Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. | Hydrogen recovery by adsorbent membranes |
US5250175A (en) * | 1989-11-29 | 1993-10-05 | Seaview Thermal Systems | Process for recovery and treatment of hazardous and non-hazardous components from a waste stream |
US5656044A (en) * | 1992-05-07 | 1997-08-12 | Hylsa S.A. De C.V. | Method and apparatus for gasification of organic materials |
US5628930A (en) | 1992-10-27 | 1997-05-13 | Alliance Pharmaceutical Corp. | Stabilization of fluorocarbon emulsions |
US5344848A (en) * | 1993-05-27 | 1994-09-06 | Meyer Steinberg | Process and apparatus for the production of methanol from condensed carbonaceous material |
USRE35377E (en) * | 1993-05-27 | 1996-11-12 | Steinberg; Meyer | Process and apparatus for the production of methanol from condensed carbonaceous material |
US5439580A (en) * | 1993-11-05 | 1995-08-08 | The Ohio State University | Solid-state gas sensor for carbon monoxide and hydrogen |
US5496859A (en) * | 1995-01-28 | 1996-03-05 | Texaco Inc. | Gasification process combined with steam methane reforming to produce syngas suitable for methanol production |
US6053954A (en) * | 1996-06-14 | 2000-04-25 | Energy & Environmental Research Center | Methods to enhance the characteristics of hydrothermally prepared slurry fuels |
US20030022035A1 (en) * | 1997-11-07 | 2003-01-30 | Galloway Terry R. | Process and system for converting carbonaceous feedstocks into energy without greenhouse gas emissions |
ITMI980865A1 (en) | 1998-04-23 | 1999-10-23 | Eniricerche S P A Ora Enitecno | PROCEDURE FOR THE PREPARATION OF HYDROCARBONS FROM SYNTHESIS GAS |
US6257980B1 (en) * | 1998-12-24 | 2001-07-10 | B.I.S., L.L.C. | Method and apparatus for identifying a winner in a bingo game |
US6225358B1 (en) * | 1999-02-16 | 2001-05-01 | Syntroleum Corporation | System and method for converting light hydrocarbons to heavier hydrocarbons with improved water disposal |
US6495610B1 (en) * | 2000-06-19 | 2002-12-17 | Imperial Chemical Industries Plc | Methanol and hydrocarbons |
US6612269B2 (en) * | 2000-08-11 | 2003-09-02 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Apparatus and method for operating internal combustion engines from variable mixtures of gaseous fuels |
JP2002155288A (en) * | 2000-11-21 | 2002-05-28 | Yukuo Katayama | Method for coal gasification |
JP2005517053A (en) * | 2002-02-05 | 2005-06-09 | ザ リージェンツ オブ ザ ユニバーシティ オブ カリフォルニア | Production of synthetic transportation fuel from carbonaceous materials using self-supporting hydrogenation gasification |
US7619012B2 (en) * | 2006-07-18 | 2009-11-17 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Method and apparatus for steam hydro-gasification in a fluidized bed reactor |
US7500997B2 (en) * | 2002-02-05 | 2009-03-10 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Steam pyrolysis as a process to enhance the hydro-gasification of carbonaceous materials |
US8349288B2 (en) | 2006-12-06 | 2013-01-08 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Process for enhancing the operability of hot gas cleanup for the production of synthesis gas from steam-hydrogasification producer gas |
US20050165261A1 (en) * | 2003-03-14 | 2005-07-28 | Syntroleum Corporation | Synthetic transportation fuel and method for its production |
-
2006
- 2006-07-18 US US11/489,298 patent/US20080031809A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2007
- 2007-07-16 US US11/879,241 patent/US8268026B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2007-07-17 WO PCT/US2007/016144 patent/WO2008010994A2/en active Application Filing
- 2007-07-17 JP JP2009520795A patent/JP2009543933A/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2007-07-17 AU AU2007275752A patent/AU2007275752B2/en not_active Ceased
- 2007-07-17 CA CA002657568A patent/CA2657568A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2007-07-17 EP EP07796888A patent/EP2046678A4/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2007-07-17 MX MX2009000698A patent/MX2009000698A/en active IP Right Grant
- 2007-07-17 CN CN2007800270935A patent/CN101489914B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2007-07-17 BR BRPI0711687-0A patent/BRPI0711687A2/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2007-07-18 TW TW096126102A patent/TW200815280A/en unknown
- 2007-07-18 AR ARP070103204A patent/AR061922A1/en unknown
Cited By (41)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7866060B2 (en) * | 2004-07-19 | 2011-01-11 | Earthrenew, Inc. | Process and system for drying and heat treating materials |
US20110212239A1 (en) * | 2004-07-19 | 2011-09-01 | Earthrenew, Inc. | Process and system for drying and heat treating materials |
US8407911B2 (en) | 2004-07-19 | 2013-04-02 | Earthrenew, Inc. | Process and system for drying and heat treating materials |
US20060201024A1 (en) * | 2004-07-19 | 2006-09-14 | Earthrenew, Inc. | Process and system for drying and heat treating materials |
US20090043686A1 (en) * | 2007-08-10 | 2009-02-12 | Archer-Daniels-Midland Company | Processing arrangements for biomass byproducts and biomass derivative products |
US9376318B2 (en) | 2008-09-26 | 2016-06-28 | The Ohio State University | Conversion of carbonaceous fuels into carbon free energy carriers |
US10081772B2 (en) | 2008-09-26 | 2018-09-25 | The Ohio State University | Conversion of carbonaceous fuels into carbon free energy carriers |
US8946308B2 (en) | 2008-12-17 | 2015-02-03 | Saudi Basic Industries Corporation | Process for increasing the carbon monoxide content of a syngas mixture |
US9249079B2 (en) | 2008-12-17 | 2016-02-02 | Saudi Basic Industries Corporation | Process for increasing the carbon monoxide content of a syngas mixture |
WO2010104732A2 (en) * | 2009-03-09 | 2010-09-16 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Controlling the synthesis gas composition of a steam methane reformer |
WO2010104732A3 (en) * | 2009-03-09 | 2011-01-13 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Controlling the synthesis gas composition of a steam methane reformer |
AU2010222913B2 (en) * | 2009-03-09 | 2015-02-12 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Controlling the synthesis gas composition of a steam methane reformer |
US10865346B2 (en) | 2009-09-08 | 2020-12-15 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Synthetic fuels and chemicals production with in-situ CO2 capture |
US9518236B2 (en) | 2009-09-08 | 2016-12-13 | The Ohio State University Research Foundation | Synthetic fuels and chemicals production with in-situ CO2 capture |
US10253266B2 (en) | 2009-09-08 | 2019-04-09 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Synthetic fuels and chemicals production with in-situ CO2 capture |
US9371227B2 (en) | 2009-09-08 | 2016-06-21 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Integration of reforming/water splitting and electrochemical systems for power generation with integrated carbon capture |
US10010847B2 (en) | 2010-11-08 | 2018-07-03 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Circulating fluidized bed with moving bed downcomers and gas sealing between reactors |
US10502414B2 (en) | 2011-05-11 | 2019-12-10 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Oxygen carrying materials |
US9903584B2 (en) | 2011-05-11 | 2018-02-27 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Systems for converting fuel |
US9777920B2 (en) | 2011-05-11 | 2017-10-03 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Oxygen carrying materials |
US10144640B2 (en) | 2013-02-05 | 2018-12-04 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Methods for fuel conversion |
US10501318B2 (en) | 2013-02-05 | 2019-12-10 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Methods for fuel conversion |
US9616403B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2017-04-11 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Systems and methods for converting carbonaceous fuels |
US10022693B2 (en) | 2014-02-27 | 2018-07-17 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Systems and methods for partial or complete oxidation of fuels |
WO2015183426A1 (en) * | 2014-05-27 | 2015-12-03 | Advanced Green Technologies, Llc | Method and system for converting flare gas |
US9777237B2 (en) | 2014-11-12 | 2017-10-03 | Element 1 Corp. | Refining assemblies and refining methods for rich natural gas |
US10273423B2 (en) | 2014-11-12 | 2019-04-30 | Element 1 Corp. | Refining assemblies and refining methods for rich natural gas |
US9828561B2 (en) | 2014-11-12 | 2017-11-28 | Element 1 Corp. | Refining assemblies and refining methods for rich natural gas |
US10689590B2 (en) | 2014-11-12 | 2020-06-23 | Element 1 Corp. | Refining assemblies and refining methods for rich natural gas |
WO2017141138A1 (en) * | 2016-02-16 | 2017-08-24 | Sabic Global Technologies B.V. | Conversion of adjusted methane steam reforming gas composition with co2 for the production of syngas composition for oxo-synthesis |
US11111143B2 (en) | 2016-04-12 | 2021-09-07 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Chemical looping syngas production from carbonaceous fuels |
US10870810B2 (en) | 2017-07-20 | 2020-12-22 | Proteum Energy, Llc | Method and system for converting associated gas |
US11505755B2 (en) | 2017-07-20 | 2022-11-22 | Proteum Energy, Llc | Method and system for converting associated gas |
US11090624B2 (en) | 2017-07-31 | 2021-08-17 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Reactor system with unequal reactor assembly operating pressures |
US10549236B2 (en) | 2018-01-29 | 2020-02-04 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Systems, methods and materials for NOx decomposition with metal oxide materials |
US11119092B2 (en) | 2018-02-27 | 2021-09-14 | Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. | Biogas quality evaluation device, biogas quality evaluation method, and program |
US11413574B2 (en) | 2018-08-09 | 2022-08-16 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Systems, methods and materials for hydrogen sulfide conversion |
US11826700B2 (en) | 2018-08-09 | 2023-11-28 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Systems, methods and materials for hydrogen sulfide conversion |
US11453626B2 (en) | 2019-04-09 | 2022-09-27 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Alkene generation using metal sulfide particles |
US11767275B2 (en) | 2019-04-09 | 2023-09-26 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Alkene generation using metal sulfide particles |
EP3990586A4 (en) * | 2019-06-27 | 2023-07-26 | Hallett, Douglas John Frederick | Process for reducing an organic material to produce methane and/or hydrogen |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
AU2007275752B2 (en) | 2012-07-12 |
US8268026B2 (en) | 2012-09-18 |
BRPI0711687A2 (en) | 2011-12-20 |
US20080021121A1 (en) | 2008-01-24 |
EP2046678A2 (en) | 2009-04-15 |
WO2008010994A2 (en) | 2008-01-24 |
AU2007275752A1 (en) | 2008-01-24 |
CN101489914A (en) | 2009-07-22 |
JP2009543933A (en) | 2009-12-10 |
EP2046678A4 (en) | 2011-04-06 |
MX2009000698A (en) | 2009-01-30 |
CN101489914B (en) | 2012-12-26 |
AR061922A1 (en) | 2008-10-01 |
TW200815280A (en) | 2008-04-01 |
CA2657568A1 (en) | 2008-01-24 |
WO2008010994A3 (en) | 2008-12-31 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8268026B2 (en) | Controlling the synthesis gas composition of a steam methane reformer | |
US8603430B2 (en) | Controlling the synthesis gas composition of a steam methane reformer | |
US7897649B2 (en) | Operation of a steam methane reformer by direct feeding of steam rich producer gas from steam hydro-gasification | |
US8349288B2 (en) | Process for enhancing the operability of hot gas cleanup for the production of synthesis gas from steam-hydrogasification producer gas | |
US7619012B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for steam hydro-gasification in a fluidized bed reactor | |
US20080021120A1 (en) | Operation of a steam hydro-gasifier in a fluidized bed reactor | |
US8143319B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for steam hydro-gasification with increased conversion times | |
Park et al. | Operation of a steam hydro-gasifier in a fluidized bed reactor |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, THE, CALI Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:PARK, CHAN SEUNG;NORBECK, JOSEPH M.;REEL/FRAME:018289/0381 Effective date: 20060901 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |