US20070220540A1 - Methods and systems for facilitating the provision of opinions to a shopper from a panel of peers - Google Patents

Methods and systems for facilitating the provision of opinions to a shopper from a panel of peers Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20070220540A1
US20070220540A1 US11/751,999 US75199907A US2007220540A1 US 20070220540 A1 US20070220540 A1 US 20070220540A1 US 75199907 A US75199907 A US 75199907A US 2007220540 A1 US2007220540 A1 US 2007220540A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
shopper
participants
image
garment
participant
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/751,999
Inventor
Jay Walker
Wen Lin
Russell Sammon
Norman Gilman
Geoffrey Gelman
Dean Alderucci
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US11/751,999 priority Critical patent/US20070220540A1/en
Publication of US20070220540A1 publication Critical patent/US20070220540A1/en
Assigned to IGT reassignment IGT LICENSE (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: WALKER DIGITAL GAMING HOLDING, LLC, WALKER DIGITAL GAMING, LLC, WALKER DIGITAL, LLC, WDG EQUITY, LLC
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
    • G06Q30/0241Advertisements
    • G06Q30/0251Targeted advertisements
    • G06Q30/0269Targeted advertisements based on user profile or attribute
    • G06Q30/0271Personalized advertisement
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • G06Q30/0601Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • G06Q30/0601Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
    • G06Q30/0631Item recommendations
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • G06Q30/0601Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
    • G06Q30/0633Lists, e.g. purchase orders, compilation or processing
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • G06Q30/0601Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
    • G06Q30/0641Shopping interfaces
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • G06Q30/0601Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
    • G06Q30/0641Shopping interfaces
    • G06Q30/0643Graphical representation of items or shoppers

Definitions

  • shopping can be a social experience. Indeed, family members and/or friends often go shopping together.
  • One of the advantages (or in some cases, disadvantages) of shopping with friends or family is the opportunity to receive comments from friends and family on garments that one is trying on and/or considering purchasing.
  • comments and approval from friends, family members or fellow shoppers are an essential part of the purchasing decision process in that only with such comments and approval is the shopper able to overcome the anxiety which may be involved in deciding whether to purchase an item.
  • on-line shopping experience is very different from the in-store shopping experience.
  • on-line shopping can be attractive for many reasons, including especially convenience, it lacks the richness of sensory input that is available in a retail store. It particularly lacks the opportunity to try on garments and to receive input from other shoppers, including those whom one has accompanied to the store. It also lacks the psychological encouragement that many shoppers need in order to reach a decision to buy a garment.
  • the well-known catalog merchant Lands' End has provided a “Shop with a friend” feature on its retail website (www.landsend.com).
  • This feature is described in an article written by Melinda Rice which appeared in the Mar. 2, 2000 edition of the Dallas Morning News and was entitled “Sites Encourage Shoppers to Bring a Friend Along”.
  • the “Shop with a friend” feature is limited to linking two users together.
  • the two shoppers each select a password and agree upon a time to meet at the Lands' End website. At the appointed time, each user clicks on an icon for the feature. Based on the password, the browsers of the two users are linked and the users are allowed to “shop” together, by sharing the same web pages while talking on the phone or chatting on-line.
  • the Lands' End web site offers another feature, referred to therein as “Your Personal Model”.
  • This feature allows a user to define a “3-D model” for the shopper's body based on inputs provided by the user, such as body measurements.
  • a garment is selected for a “virtual try-on”
  • an image of the garment is combined with an image based on the virtual model to provide a combined image that represents to some extent how the user might appear while wearing the garment.
  • the virtual models bear, in general, only a small degree of resemblance to an actual image of the user.
  • the present inventors have recognized the desirability of increasing the opportunities to interact with others and to receive fashion advice on-line.
  • the present inventors have further recognized that there are opportunities to enhance the in-store shopping experience by providing Internet-based features.
  • FIG. 1 is a flow chart that provides an overview of a method provided in accordance with one embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a system provided in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram representation of a merchant server that is part of the system of FIG. 2 ;
  • FIG. 4 is a tabular representation of a customer database that is shown in FIG. 3 ;
  • FIG. 5 is a tabular representation of a participant database that is shown in FIG. 3 ;
  • FIG. 6 is a tabular representation of a profile database that is shown in FIG. 3 ;
  • FIG. 7 shows a screen display provided in accordance with the invention for entering profile information to be stored in the profile database of FIG. 6 ;
  • FIG. 8 is a tabular representation of a request database that is shown in FIG. 3 ;
  • FIG. 9 is a tabular representation of a response database that is shown in FIG. 3 ;
  • FIG. 10 is a tabular representation of a feedback database that is shown in FIG. 3 ;
  • FIG. 11 is a flow chart that illustrates a method carried out using the system of FIG. 2 in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 12 shows a screen display provided in accordance with one embodiment of the invention for entering data for defining a request for feedback from a panel of participants;
  • FIG. 13 shows a pop-up display provided in accordance with one embodiment of the invention, to solicit participation in a panel by a prospective participant;
  • FIG. 14 shows a screen display provided in accordance with one embodiment of the invention to a participant who has indicated a willingness to participate in a panel
  • FIG. 15 shows a screen display provided according to one embodiment of the invention to a shopper to provide feedback based on responses from a panel of participants;
  • FIG. 16 shows another screen display for providing feedback to a shopper based on responses from a panel of participants, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 17 is a schematic representation of a kiosk arrangement provided in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 18 is a block diagram representation of a system provided in accordance with one embodiment of the invention and including the kiosk arrangement of FIG. 17 ;
  • FIG. 19 is a flow chart that illustrates a method carried out using the system of FIGS. 17 and 18 according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 20 is a plan diagram of a cellular telephone of a participant, displaying a request for an opinion regarding a garment, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 21 is a plan diagram of a cellular telephone of a shopper, displaying results of a request for an opinion regarding a garment, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • a method comprises receiving, from a shopper, a request for opinions regarding a garment and determining an image of the garment.
  • the image of the garment may be, for example, also received from the shopper or retrieved from memory based on an identifier of the garment received from the shopper.
  • the method further comprises selecting, for the shopper, a plurality of peers to provide the opinion, the peers being selected based on a characteristic associated with the shopper.
  • the characteristic may comprise, for example, a characteristic possessed by the shopper and/or a characteristic the shopper desires at least one peer to possess.
  • the shopper may desire opinions regarding a garment from other teenage girls who live in the same state, city or county as the shopper.
  • the method further comprises outputting to each of the plurality of peers the request for the opinion and the image of the garment, receiving responses to the request from at least a subset of the plurality of peers, and outputting, to the shopper, an indication of the opinions of the peers regarding the garment, the opinions of the peers being determined based on the received responses.
  • Outputting the indication of the opinions may comprise, for example, outputting a percentage of the peers who provided a positive response to the garment (e.g., “buy it” or “thumbs up”) and a percentage of the peers who provided a negative response to the garment (e.g., “don't buy it” or “thumbs down”). The percentages may be determined, for example, based only on the peers who responded to the request.
  • a method comprises receiving an image from a shopper, the image depicting a garment and selecting for the shopper, substantially at a time the image is received, a plurality of participants to whom the image is to be output.
  • Each of the participants of the plurality of participants may be selected based on a characteristic specified by a shopper associated with the garment.
  • the characteristic may comprise, for example, a characteristic possessed by the shopper and/or a characteristic the shopper desires at least one participant to possess.
  • the method further comprises causing, substantially at a time the plurality of participants is selected, the image to be output to each participant of the plurality of participants by causing a cellular telephone of the participant to display the image.
  • a request for an opinion regarding the garment may be output in association with the image.
  • the method further comprises collecting responses to the request for a predetermined period of time from a time at which the image was output, wherein the predetermined period of time is not greater than ten minutes, and outputting an indication of the collected responses to the shopper.
  • Collecting the responses may comprise, for example, collecting the responses until one of the following conditions occurs: (i) an end of a predetermined period of time occurs, or (ii) a minimum number of responses are received.
  • a method for operating a shopper information system includes generating an image of a shopper, distributing the image to a plurality of participants, and receiving responses to the image from the plurality of participants.
  • One or more embodiments may further include processing the received responses, which may take the form of performing a statistical analysis of the received responses in real time. The processed responses or results of the processing may then be transmitted to the shopper.
  • One or more embodiments may include selecting a garment to be included in the image.
  • the shopper may don the garment and then an image of the shopper wearing the garment may be captured.
  • the image of the selected garment may be combined with an image of the shopper.
  • the image of the shopper may have been captured photographically or may be a virtual model or the like generated based on input provided by the shopper or by another user.
  • One or more embodiments of the present invention may include receiving input from the shopper to define characteristics of the participants, and assembling the participants based on the received input.
  • the assembling step may include selecting a panel of participants from a pool of participants.
  • the responses from the participants may be provided to the shopper substantially immediately upon receiving the responses, i.e. in real time.
  • the processing of the responses may include accumulating the responses.
  • One or more embodiments of the present invention may include generating a question to be distributed to the participants together with the image of the shopper.
  • the responses may include a selection of one of two alternatives posed by the question distributed to the participants.
  • the responses may include a selection of one of a range of alternatives posed by the question, and/or open-ended text responses to the question.
  • a method for operating a shopper information network includes logging on to a shopping website, retrieving a shopper image that represents a shopper, selecting a garment, combining an image of the selected garment with the shopper image to form a combined image, requesting a panel of participants, defining desired characteristics of the panel of participants, defining a query, determining availability of participants who match the defined desired characteristics, transmitting the query and the combined image to participants determined to be available, receiving responses to the query from participants to whom the query and the combined image were transmitted, processing the received responses and transmitting the processed responses to the shopper.
  • the processing step may include calculating respective percentages for categories of the received responses, and the method may further include presenting the calculated percentages to the shopper.
  • the calculated percentages may be presented as a pie chart or a bar chart or in some other manner.
  • the manner of presentation of the percentages may be defined by the shopper.
  • One or more embodiments of the present invention may include selecting a second garment and the combined image may include an image of the second garment.
  • the on-line shopper may virtually “try on” an outfit or ensemble of two or more garments, and may receive comments on the outfit from participants contacted through on-line communication.
  • a method of operating a shopper information system includes capturing an image of a shopper who is wearing a garment, entering a query, defining a panel of participants, transmitting the query and the image to the panel of participants, receiving responses to the query from the participants, and presenting the responses to the shopper.
  • One or more embodiments may include scanning a product identifier code for the garment.
  • a shopper information system includes a processor and a memory which is connected to the processor and stores a program, the processor being operative with the program to store an image of a shopper, distribute the image to a plurality of participants, and receive responses to the image from a plurality of participants.
  • a shopper information kiosk includes a kiosk structure, an image device, mounted on the kiosk structure, for converting an image to digital image data, a memory for storing the digital image data, a processor connected to the memory, a communication device for connecting the processor to a data network, an input device for providing shopper input to the processor, and a display for displaying information to a shopper, the processor being programmed to control the image device to capture an image of the shopper, distribute the captured image to a plurality of participants via the communication device, and present to the shopper via the display responses to the distributed image received from the participants.
  • the image device may include a digital camera, and the shopper information kiosk may further include a scanner connected to the processor for entering garment information.
  • a method for operating a shopper information system includes storing respective profiles for each participant of a pool of participants, generating an image of a shopper, receiving a request for a panel of participants, the request specifying at least one participant characteristic, selecting a panel of participants from the pool of participants based on the stored profiles and the specified at least one participant characteristic, and distributing the image of the shopper to the selected panel of participants.
  • the method according to one or more embodiments of the present invention may further include receiving responses to the image from the panel of participants and providing feedback to the shopper on the basis of the received responses.
  • the step of generating the image of the shopper may occur either before or after receiving the request for the panel of participants.
  • shoppers are allowed to solicit opinions from numerous peers or others with regard to a garment that the shopper is trying on during an in-store visit or virtually trying on during on-line shopping.
  • a communication network such as the Internet
  • the shopper can purchase with confidence, having received reactions from a considerable number of people as to whether garment is right for the shopper. This can help the shopper to overcome the anxiety which often accompanies a purchasing decision. Since a more confident shopper tends to purchase items more quickly and more often, the system and method of the present invention is also advantageous to retailers by tending to increase sales of the retailers' products.
  • garment includes any article of wearing apparel, including shoes, handbags, belts, hats and other accessories and jewelry.
  • merchant includes retailers, manufacturers, on-line sellers or other sellers of fashion products.
  • panel a group of participants who respond to a particular request for an opinion from a shopper.
  • participant an individual who responds to a shopper's request for an opinion or who indicates a willingness to respond to shoppers' requests for opinions.
  • the term “participant” shall be synonymous with the term “peer” herein.
  • pool a group of participants who have registered as potential respondents to requests from shoppers.
  • query includes a shopper's request for a fashion opinion; may include a specific question selected or entered by a shopper. response: any information provided by a participant in response to a query from a shopper.
  • shopper an individual who is considering the purchase of a garment or other item.
  • the term “shopper” shall be synonymous with the term “customer” herein.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a method that provides an overview of some embodiments of the present invention.
  • the method of FIG. 1 begins with a step 102 in which an image is generated of a shopper who is wearing a garment.
  • the image may be generated by a camera such as a digital camera, or maybe a composite image of a virtual model or other previously-stored representation of a shopper, merged with an image of a garment shown as being worn by the virtual model or representation of the shopper.
  • a panel of participants is assembled.
  • the participants are selected to match characteristics that are specified by the shopper.
  • the shopper may wish to receive a fashion opinion from the shopper's peers, in which case the panel of participants is selected to match characteristics of the shopper such as age, gender, income level, preferred style and social attitudes, geographical area of residence, and so forth.
  • the panel of participants may be selected based on a group defined by the shopper to be different from the shopper. For example, a female shopper may wish to know whether a garment that the shopper is trying on will appeal to men.
  • the selection of the participants for the panel may be based upon profile information that the participants have previously provided to indicate demographic and other information for the participants.
  • the assembling of the panel may be via instant messaging or like technology, executed in real time.
  • the image of the shopper wearing the garment is distributed by Internet communications to the selected participants (step 106 ), and the participants are asked to provide their opinions.
  • the resulting responses are then received (step 108 ) and processed or otherwise manipulated into a form suitable for being provided to the shopper.
  • the resulting processed responses, or information obtained from the responses, is then presented to the shopper as feedback (step 110 ).
  • a shopper while trying on a garment or considering purchase of a garment on-line, is able to solicit opinions from a potentially large number of third parties on the basis of an image of the shopper wearing the garment or a representation of the shopper wearing the garment. Responses from the participants are solicited and received in real time so that the shopper can make an informed judgement as to the suitability of the garment for the shopper.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram that illustrates a system for providing an on-line environment in which the present invention may be applied.
  • reference numeral 200 generally indicates the system of this aspect of the invention.
  • the system 200 includes a merchant server 202 connected via Internet 204 to a shopper terminal 206 and participant terminals 208 .
  • All of the hardware making up the system 200 may be conventional, programmed to carry out methods of the present invention.
  • the merchant server 202 may be constituted by one or more conventional server computers (e.g., of the type employed for retail website hosting applications).
  • the shopper terminal 206 and the participant terminals 208 may be conventional personal computers or other devices used to interact with web servers via the Internet.
  • a shopper terminal 206 and/or a participant terminal 208 may each comprise, for example, one or more of (i) a personal computer, (ii) a laptop computer, (iii) a handheld computer such as a cellular telephone, a land-line telephone, a pager, a personal digital assistant and/or a digital camera, (iv) a kiosk, (v) an automated teller machine, (vi) a gaming device, (vii) a game console, and/or (viii) a vending machine.
  • a shopper who uses a shopper terminal 206 receives opinions from a number (e.g., three, five, ten, or dozens or even hundreds) of participants utilizing participant terminals 208 , of which only two are explicitly shown in FIG. 2 .
  • a number e.g., three, five, ten, or dozens or even hundreds
  • a single merchant server 202 may be operative to permit solicitation of fashion opinions from plural shopper terminals at a given time, although only one shopper terminal 206 is shown in FIG. 2 . It should also be understood that, although only one shopper terminal 206 is shown in the drawing, the merchant server 202 may be operative to serve a plurality of shopper terminals 206 .
  • the merchant server 202 may comprise one or more servers working together.
  • the more than one servers may be located in different locations and may communicate via a communication network.
  • the merchant server 202 may refer to any device that may communicate with one or more shopper terminals 206 , one or more participant terminals 208 , one or more third-party servers, one or more remote controllers, and/or other network nodes, and may be capable of relaying communications to and from each.
  • an entity distinct from a merchant from which the shopper is considering a purchase may facilitate aspects of the present invention.
  • a system operated by an entity distinct from a merchant e.g., a cellular telephone service provider, a Internet Service Provider, or another entity.
  • This entity may receive requests for opinions from shoppers, select participants for the shopper, transmit a request for an opinion to the participants on behalf of the shopper, collect and/or analyze the responses and provide an indication of the responses to the shopper.
  • the merchant server 202 may comprise a server operated by such an entity rather than by a merchant.
  • the system 200 may include a third party server that is operable to communicate with a plurality of merchant servers, each merchant server being operated by a merchant, and with a plurality of participant terminals 208 .
  • the system 200 may comprise a third party server that is operable to communicate directly with a plurality of shopper terminals 206 and a plurality of participant terminals 208 .
  • a shopper uses a shopper terminal 206 comprising a cellular telephone equipped with a camera.
  • the shopper may use the camera to capture an image of a garment the shopper is considering purchasing.
  • the shopper may transmit the image of the garment to the third party server.
  • the third party server may select a plurality of participants and transmit the image to the cellular telephones of the plurality of participants (e.g., using cellular telephone numbers stored in association with each selected participant in a database of participants registered with the third party server).
  • the participants may submit opinions to the third party server (e.g., “worth buying”, “not worth buying”).
  • the third party server may then transmit an indication of the opinions to the shopper's cellular telephone (e.g., “76% say ‘Buy It’ and 24% say “Don't Buy It”).
  • the merchant at which the shopper is considering purchasing the garment may not be involved in the process of soliciting opinions regarding the garment for the shopper.
  • the system of the present invention utilizes a 3G network to transmit information to and from cellular telephones.
  • FIG. 3 is a simplified block diagram representation of the merchant server 202 .
  • the merchant server 202 includes a CPU or processor 302 , one or more communication ports 304 and a mass storage device 306 .
  • all hardware components of the merchant server 202 may be conventional.
  • additional conventional components of the merchant server 202 such as embedded and working memory, a clock module, data buses and so forth, are omitted from the drawing.
  • the processor 302 generally controls the functions of the merchant server 202 and is in communication with the communication port 304 and the mass storage device 306 .
  • the communication port 304 may be conventional circuitry that allows the processor 302 to engage in data communication with other devices via the Internet or other communication channels.
  • the mass storage device 306 may include one or more hard drives.
  • Stored on the mass storage device 306 is a program 308 that controls the processor 302 in accordance with the invention.
  • the program 308 may also include conventional program elements such as operating system software, device drivers, and communication software.
  • the program 308 may also include program elements required for operation of the merchant server 202 as a retail shopping website. Such program elements are well known to those who are skilled in the art and need not be described further. The aspects of the program 308 related to practicing embodiments of the present invention will be described in more detail below.
  • Also stored by the mass storage device 306 are a customer database 310 , a participant database 312 , a profile database 314 , a request database 316 , a response database 318 , a feedback database 320 , a shopper image database 322 , a product database 324 , a garment image database 326 , a combined image database 328 and a transaction database 330 . It should be noted that in one or more embodiments different information, additional information, or a subset of the information illustrated in these databases may be used. Further, the information may be stored in a configuration different from that illustrated in databases 310 through 330 .
  • FIG. 4 is a simplified tabular representation of the customer database 310 shown in FIG. 3 .
  • the table of FIG. 4 includes a column 402 for customer identifiers, a column 404 for customer names, a column 406 for customer addresses, a column 408 for customer e-mail addresses, a column 410 for customer credit card account numbers, and a column 412 for pointers to respective customer images in the shopper image database 322 .
  • the entries in column 402 are identifying codes that uniquely identify each customer.
  • the entries in columns 404 - 410 are self explanatory, and are items of information that are conventionally stored in customer databases of retail shopping websites.
  • the image identifiers in column 412 are pointers to the respective images captured or generated based on customer input for each customer who wishes to avail himself or herself of the features of the present invention and for whom a corresponding image has been stored in the shopper image database 322 . It will be noted that not all shoppers have elected to apply for the fashion opinion feature of the present invention and consequently some customers do not have an entry under column 412 .
  • the customer database will contain a large number of entries, corresponding to a large number of customers. It should also be understood that the customer database may store additional items of information of the types customarily stored for retail on-line shopping applications, including information such as preferred shipping carrier and preferred mode of shipment. The customer database may also include a historical record of purchases that have been made by the customers. In embodiments where information is transmitted to and/or from a customer via a cellular telephone or other mobile device, the telephone number and/or other information required to contact the cellular telephone or other mobile device may be stored in the customer database for one or more customer records.
  • FIG. 5 is a simplified tabular representation of the participant database 312 shown in FIG. 3 .
  • the table of FIG. 12 includes a column 502 for customer identifiers, a column 504 for participant identifiers, a column 506 for participant names, a column 508 for participant e-mail addresses and a column 510 which contains rating information for participants.
  • the participant database 312 may store cellular telephone numbers for the participants.
  • participant identifier For participants who are customers, the corresponding customer identifier is entered in column 502 and no participant identifier is provided. For participants who are not customers, a participant identifier is issued to uniquely identify the participant and is entered in column 504 . In one or more embodiments, participants are not employees (e.g., customer service representatives) of the merchant operating merchant server 202 .
  • the entries under columns 506 and 508 are self-explanatory. It is noted that, although only women's names are shown in the tables of FIGS. 4 and 5 , it is contemplated that men as well as women may be customers and participants. Furthermore, it is contemplated that the present invention may be implemented in websites that have only men as customers and/or as participants.
  • the rating information in column 510 is indicative of ratings that have been accorded to the participants to reflect the extent to which participants have participated frequently, conscientiously and/or effectively in panels responding to shoppers' queries for fashion opinions. Rating of participants will be discussed further herein below.
  • the telephone number and/or other information required to contact the cellular telephone or other mobile device may be stored in the participant database for one or more participant records.
  • FIG. 6 is a simplified tabular representation of the profile database 314 shown in FIG. 3 .
  • the table of FIG. 6 includes a column 602 for customer identifiers, a column 604 for participant identifiers, a column 606 for the age of the profiled individual, a column 608 for the gender of the profiled individual, a column 610 for the income level for the profiled individual and a column 612 for the self-described social attitude of the profiled individual.
  • a customer identifier is provided for profiled individuals who are customers; for profiled individuals who are not customers, participant identifiers are provided.
  • the age, gender and income level columns 606 - 610 are self explanatory, and are representative of the various kinds of demographic information that may be stored in the profile database.
  • Other examples of demographic information that may be provided are type of neighborhood of residence (e.g., urban, suburban, ex-urban), and geographic region (e.g., northeast, south, midwest, west coast). In cases where the profiled individual's address is available, both the type of neighborhood and the geographic region may be derived automatically from the individual's zip code.
  • Other kinds of demographic information that may be included, though not indicated in the drawing, are race, ethnic background, religion, marital status, and occupation.
  • Column 612 contains data indicative of the profiled individual's own characterization of her social attitudes. It will be seen that the designations shown in FIG. 6 include categories such as “party animal”, “buttoned down”, “shy”, “vamp”, “and “yuppie”. Numerous other potential categories may be provided, including, for example, “grunge”, “debutante”, and “biker chick”.
  • the profile database may include more than one column for subjective categories by which the profiled individual can characterize himself or herself. For example, there may be separate columns for personas projected by the profiled individual in work situations and in social situations, respectively.
  • a plurality of participants may be selected to provide an opinion to a shopper regarding a garment based on a characteristic associated with the shopper.
  • the characteristic may comprise a characteristic possessed by the shopper and/or a characteristic the shopper desires one or more participants to possess.
  • the shopper may specify that at least one participant should be of a certain gender, income level, age and/or self-described social attitude.
  • a participant may be selected such that the participant shares at least a predetermined number of (or a predetermined particular one or more) characteristics with the shopper requesting the opinions.
  • the merchant server 202 may be programmed to only select participants for a shopper who are within a predetermined range of the shopper's age, are of the same self-described social attitude as the shopper and live within a predetermined geographical range of the shopper.
  • FIG. 7 represents a screen display provided to customers and/or participants to permit them to enter profile information.
  • the display of FIG. 7 includes fields 702 and 704 for entering first and last names.
  • Field 706 is for entering the individual's e-mail address.
  • At field 708 the individual's age is entered and check boxes at 710 allow the individual to enter his or her gender.
  • a pull down menu is provided to allow the individual to select his or her occupation from a number of alternative occupations included in the menu.
  • a pull down menu provided at 714 allows the individual to select an appropriate income level.
  • Additional pull down menus at 716 and 718 allow the individual to select subjective categories such as a social attitude category and a dressing style.
  • Via a button 720 the individual may indicate completion of the profile information.
  • a button 722 can be used to cancel entry of the profile information. It will be recognized that the screen display of FIG. 7 is only an example of many different alternative screen displays that may be provided for entering profile information. For example, the number and purposes of data entry fields and pull down menus may be different from those shown in FIG. 7 .
  • the types of demographic and/or subjective information to be collected may be varied in a large number of ways.
  • FIG. 8 is a simplified tabular representation of the request database 316 shown in FIG. 3 .
  • the table of FIG. 8 has a column 802 for combined image identifiers, a column 804 for customer identifiers, a column 806 for request identifiers, a column 808 for request category information, a column 810 for panel size information and a column 812 for panel composition information.
  • the entries in column 802 are pointers to images stored in the combined image database 328 shown in FIG. 3 .
  • the images in the database 328 are formed by combining image information representative of the shopper, such as a virtual model of the shopper, together with image information which shows a garment selected for a virtual try on by the shopper.
  • the customer identifiers in column 804 have previously been discussed, and uniquely identify the shopper who is submitting the corresponding request for a fashion opinion.
  • the request identifiers in column 806 uniquely identify each request submitted by shoppers who use the feature of the present invention.
  • the information in column 808 characterizes each request by the nature of the feedback requested by the shopper.
  • simple binary feedback e.g., yes/no or “buy it”/“don't buy it”.
  • Other possibilities are responses in a range of responses such as, on a scale of 1 to 5, is this garment very unattractive, somewhat unattractive, average, somewhat attractive, very attractive.
  • Another possible kind of request category solicits open-ended text responses.
  • Another possible type of response would allow three alternatives, namely yes, no or maybe or “looks great”/“looks ok”/“looks terrible”.
  • the various types of requested feedback can be combined. For example, a request for yes/no/maybe feedback can be combined with a request for open-ended text responses.
  • a shopper may be unable to request different types of feedback.
  • the system may be programmed to always solicit only a single type of feedback (e.g., “Buy It”/“Don't Buy It” or “Thumbs Up”/“Thumbs Down”).
  • Column 810 records data, which indicates the size of the panel as requested by the shopper.
  • the shopper may request a size of the panel by specifying a number of participants to whom the image (e.g., image of a garment, image of the shopper wearing the garment, or image of a virtual model of the shopper combined with an image of a garment) is to be output.
  • the shopper may request a size of the panel by specifying a number of responses that are to be collected.
  • the shopper may request a size of a panel by specifying a relative size of a panel (e.g., small, large, huge) without specifying a particular number of participants.
  • each relative size of the panel may be associated with a respective range of participants (e.g., three to five participants is a small panel, six to ten participants is a medium panel, eleven to twenty participants is a large panel, and over twenty participants is a huge panel) to whom the image is to be output or from whom responses are to be collected.
  • a shopper may specify that the indication of the opinions is to be output to the shopper (and, e.g., the solicitation for opinions ended) when ten responses have been received.
  • a shopper may specify a period of time for which responses are to be collected, in lieu of or in addition to specifying a size of a panel. For example, a shopper may specify that responses are to be collected for sixty seconds (e.g., from a time at which the request for opinions is output to participants) and the indication of opinions should thus include an indication of whatever opinions are received within the sixty seconds.
  • a panel size and/or a period of time for which responses to a request for an opinion are collected may be parameters set by the system operator and not by the shopper.
  • each shopper requesting an opinion is provided with an indication of whatever opinions are collected during a predetermined period of time (e.g., sixty seconds).
  • a request for opinions may be output to a predetermined number of qualified participants (e.g., participants selected based on a characteristic associated with the shopper) or to all currently available qualified participants and responses collected for the following predetermined period of time (e.g., sixty seconds).
  • a predetermined period of time e.g., sixty seconds
  • Column 812 provides information that represents the shopper's requested characteristics for the participants who will make up the panel. It should be noted that for purposes of illustration the participant characteristics are set forth in simplified form in FIG. 8 . In a practical embodiment of the invention, there may be several different parameters that have been defined by the shopper to request the type of participants in which the shopper is interested.
  • a shopper may pay for using the system of the present invention.
  • the shopper may pay per request submitted or on a subscription basis (e.g., a shopper may pay an extra fee to the shopper's cellular service provider in exchange for a feature wherein the shopper may request fashion opinions).
  • different fees may provide the shopper with access to more flexibility in submitting requests. For example, an increased fee may allow a shopper to increase the size of the panel, request different types of feedback, and/or select more tailored characteristics of participants to be included on a panel.
  • a shopper may be allowed to include information in addition to the image with the request to the panel of participants. For example, an indication of the price of the garment, the designer of the garment, the material(s) of which the garment is made, an occasion to which the garment is to be worn may be included with the image and/or an additional image (e.g., an image of the garment in a different color, closer up, or at a different angle). In one embodiment, the shopper may be charged an extra fee for including information in addition to the image with the request.
  • FIG. 9 is a tabular representation of the response database 318 shown in FIG. 3 .
  • the table of FIG. 9 includes a column 902 for storing response identifiers, a column 904 for storing response outcomes, a column 906 for storing text portions of responses, a column 908 for storing request identifiers, and a column 910 for storing participant identifiers.
  • the response identifiers stored in column 902 uniquely identify each of the responses received and stored in the response database.
  • the response outcomes of column 904 are indicative of specific alternatives selected in the responses with regard to the queries that prompted the responses. Thus, in the case of a binary (yes/no) query, a “yes” or “no” portion of the response is stored in column 904 .
  • the query calls for a multiple-choice response or a choice within a range of responses, the corresponding selected alternative response is stored in column 904 .
  • the text is stored in the corresponding field under column 906 .
  • the request identifier stored in column 908 indicates the particular request which prompted the respective response.
  • the participant identifier in column 910 identifies the participant who provided the respective response.
  • a participant may be allowed to rate the opinion provided by the participant.
  • the participant may be allowed to indicate a degree of confidence, strength or certainty of the participant's opinion. For example, if the participant is voting “Buy It”, the participant may be allowed to indicate a strength of the participant's opinion (e.g., on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being the strongest).
  • a participant may be allowed to indicate a reason for the participant's response. For example, if the participant is providing a text response, the text may indicate the reason why the participant is of the opinion indicated in the response (e.g., why the participant is of the opinion that the shopper should not purchase the garment in the image).
  • the participant may still be allowed to indicate the reason for the response (e.g., in text format or by selecting one of a plurality of predetermined choices, such as “price”, “color”, “dated look”, “fit”, etc.).
  • a shopper and participant may be allowed to communicate with one another.
  • a shopper may find a particular response (e.g., a text response) particularly interesting and may request to communicate with the participant who provided the response.
  • a participant may find that the participant has a variety of information to provide to the shopper (e.g., advice about what styles would be particularly flattering to the shopper) that would best be conveyed by communicating with the shopper rather than in the response to the request for an opinion.
  • one or both of the shopper and participant may be provided contact information via which the other may be contacted (e.g., telephone number or e-mail address).
  • the shopper and participant may communicate directly with one another.
  • the shopper and participant may be allowed to communicate with one another via the merchant server 202 .
  • the merchant server 202 may relay messages between the shopper and participant or the shopper and participant may communicate via a chat room maintained by the merchant server 202 .
  • FIG. 10 is a tabular representation of the feedback database 320 shown in FIG. 3 .
  • Each entry in the table of FIG. 10 contains summary and/or other accumulated information that was obtained by receiving, accumulating and processing all responses for a particular request.
  • the table of FIG. 10 includes a column 1002 for request identifiers; a column 1004 for data obtained by accumulating and analyzing response outcomes for the respective request, column 1006 for the participant identifiers for all of the participants who responded to the request, column 1008 for collecting all of the open ended text responses for the respective request, column 1010 for offer identifiers that identify offers that are applicable to response feedback provided for a respective request, and column 1012 which contains descriptions of applicable offers. Offers provided in connection with feedback for shoppers' requests will be discussed further below.
  • entries corresponding to feedback for only two requests are shown in the table of FIG. 10 , it is to be understood that in a practical embodiment of the invention the number of entries may be much larger, corresponding to feedback stored for a large number of requests.
  • the shopper may be allowed to access more detailed information regarding the responses. For example, the shopper may be allowed to access any additional information provided by a participant with a response (e.g., the text of the response and/or the reasons for the opinion). For example, the shopper may be allowed to select a “more details” option on a screen of the shopper terminal 206 .
  • the information in the feedback database 320 and/or the response database may be utilized to provide more detailed information about responses to the shopper.
  • the feedback database 320 may include the response identifier of each response used to determine the data in column 1004 .
  • the records of the responses corresponding to the response identifiers may be retrieved from the response database 318 and any additional data stored for each response in the retrieved records may be output to the shopper.
  • the participant identifier corresponding to the response may be retrieved from the response record of the response database 318 .
  • the contact information for the participant may then be retrieved from the participant database 312 and utilized to allow the shopper to communicate with the participant.
  • the contact information may be provided to the shopper, with the participant's permission.
  • a message from the shopper may be relayed to the participant using the contact information.
  • the shopper image database 322 , the product database 324 , the garment image database 326 , the combined image database 328 and the transaction database 330 need not be described in detail but will now be briefly discussed.
  • the shopper image database 322 stores image data that is to be used to represent the shoppers' appearance during virtual “try-ons” of garments. As noted before, the data in this database may be derived from one or more photographs of the shoppers and/or may represent virtual models of the shoppers.
  • the product database 324 may have the same format as conventional data structures maintained for existing retail-shopping websites to store data regarding products available for on-line sale.
  • the garment image database 326 stores image data that represents the appearance of garments that may be virtually “tried on” and/or that are available for purchase by a shopper.
  • the garment data is available to be combined with the shopper image data to provide a representation of the shopper “trying on” a selected garment. Additionally, the garment data is available for transmission to a participant for an opinion
  • a garment image database 326 is used to retrieve an image of a garment a shopper is considering purchasing.
  • a shopper may input a garment identifier into shopper terminal 206 and transmit the garment identifier to the merchant server 202 along with a request for opinions regarding the garment.
  • the shopper may input the garment identifier, for example, by scanning a bar code associated with the garment using a bar code peripheral device of the shopper terminal 206 .
  • the shopper may input the garment identifier by typing it using a keypad of the shopper identifier.
  • Other input devices e.g., touch screens, microphones, etc.
  • the merchant server 202 may maintain a database of garment images (or have access to one or more of such databases), such as garment image database 326 .
  • Each garment image in such a database may correspond to a garment identifier.
  • the garment image database 326 may store additional information about a garment (e.g., designer, color, material, or other description). In one embodiment, such additional information about the garment may be included in the request for an opinion that is transmitted to a participant.
  • the combined image database 328 stores data corresponding to images formed by combining shopper image data with garment image data.
  • the transaction database 330 may resemble conventional data structures employed in connection with retail shopping websites to keep track of purchases transacted through the website.
  • the transaction database 330 may store, for example, information about garments purchased (e.g., time of purchase, purchase total, items purchased, payment identifier).
  • the transaction database 330 may store information about a request for opinions submitted by a shopper (e.g., time of request, price paid for request, etc.).
  • a shopper logs on to a retail shopping website. This may occur in an entirely conventional manner.
  • the shopper invokes a “request opinion” function provided in accordance with the invention at the retail shopping website. The selection of this function may be accomplished by such conventional techniques as clicking on a suitable link, actuating a virtual button, or selecting an item from a menu.
  • an image that represents the shopper is retrieved.
  • the image may be a virtual model that has previously been created for the shopper based on input provided by the shopper. Creation of such a virtual model may be in accordance with known techniques, such as those employed for the “Your Personal Model” feature of the Lands' End shopping website (www.landsend.com).
  • the image of the shopper may be based upon one or more photographs of the shopper. Such photographs may have been scanned in to the shopper's computer and then transmitted to the website or may be captured by a camera interfaced to the shopper's computer.
  • the shopper may have visited a retail store or service location affiliated with the shopping website to have one or more photographs taken for transmittal to the website.
  • scanning technology such as laser scanning of the type used for Levi's custom jeans may be employed to generate a model of the shopper that very closely approximates the actual shape of the shopper's body.
  • the shopper may select (or may previously have selected) a “dummy” image of a kind that resembles the shopper's body type. The selected dummy then serves as an image of the shopper. Shoppers who wish to preserve their anonymity may be permitted to edit their images so as to obscure their faces.
  • step 1108 the stopper selects one or more garments that the shopper desires to virtually “try on”. It will be noted that step 1108 may be performed prior to steps 1104 and 1106 . Selection of the garment may be performed in accordance with known techniques.
  • an image of the selected garment or garments is retrieved from the garment image database 326 and is combined with the shopper image retrieved at step 1106 to provide a representation of the shopper wearing the selected garment.
  • the resulting combined image is then available for distribution to participants to obtain their opinions as to the attractiveness of the garment or garments and/or their suitability for purchase by the shopper.
  • the shopper indicates characteristics of participants from whom the shopper wishes to receive an opinion in regard to the selected garment or garments.
  • the shopper's selection of participant characteristics may be facilitated by a screen display of the type shown in FIG. 12 .
  • a checkbox 1202 may be selected if the shopper wishes to receive opinions from any available participant. If the shopper selects checkbox 1204 , a previously entered definition of a participant panel is invoked.
  • a checkbox 1206 is available to permit the shopper to select a panel of participants made up of his or her peers. It is to be understood that a peer group participant panel would be made up of participants who have the same demographic characteristics and social attitudes and/or other profile characteristics as the shopper. The definition of the shopper's peer group may be based on a profile that the shopper has previously entered into the website, as discussed in connection with FIG. 7 . It should be noted that the peer group panel definition invoked by checkbox 1206 may be the same as the standard participant panel definition invoked by checkbox 1204 . That is, the shopper's “standard” participant panel definition may be the same as his or her peer group.
  • a checkbox indicated at 1207 permits the shopper to select a previously defined panel of specific individuals who are friends or acquaintances of the shopper.
  • the shopper may elect to define the participant panel in terms of specific characteristics by actuating other elements of the screen display of FIG. 12 .
  • a pull down menu 1208 allows the shopper to specify an age category for the panel of participants. If the shopper wishes to select two or more of the age categories available from the pull down menu 1208 , this may be done by actuating a button 1210 in cooperation with the pull down menu 1208 .
  • Checkboxes provided at 1212 allow the shopper to select the gender or genders of the participants to be included in the panel.
  • a pull down menu provided at 1214 allows the shopper to specify the occupation of participants to be included in the panel.
  • a button provided at 1216 allows the participant to select more than one occupation from the menu 1214 .
  • a pull down menu provided at 1218 allows the shopper to designate an income level of participants to be included in the panel, and a button 1220 to be used in conjunction with the menu 1218 allows more than one income level to be designated.
  • Pull down menus 1222 and 1224 may be used by the shopper to designate social categories and dressing styles of participants to be included in the panel. Buttons 1226 and 1228 , respectively associated with the menus 1222 and 1224 , permit the shopper to select more than one item from the respective menus.
  • the desired size of the panel can be defined by using the pull down menu indicated at 1230 .
  • the pull down menu indicated at 1230 There are trade-offs involved in selecting the size of the panel. In general, the larger the panel, the more confident the shopper may feel that he or she has received a sound opinion on the selected garment or garments. On the other hand, larger panels may take longer to assemble and to receive responses from, and, in some circumstances, a sufficient number of participants may not be available to provide a panel of the size requested by the shopper.
  • a “submit” button 1232 When the shopper is satisfied with the definition of the participant panel as input via the screen display of FIG. 12 , he or she may actuate a “submit” button 1232 . If the shopper wishes to revise the participant panel definition or to exit from the process of selecting a panel without going forward, then a “cancel” button 1234 may be actuated. If the shopper desires to store the panel definition defined in the screen display of FIG. 12 as a standard profile for his or her participant panels, then a button 1236 may be actuated.
  • the layout of the screen display of FIG. 12 may be varied and that items for defining the panel may be omitted from or added to those shown in FIG. 12 .
  • elements for prescribing the geographical location of participants may be added, and there may be different or additional categories of subjective or self-defined categories in addition to those represented by the menus 1222 and 1224 .
  • the display of FIG. 12 may also include a field (not shown) in which the shopper may enter a specific query to be posed to the participants.
  • the query might be something like, “This blouse costs $50.00; is it a good buy?” or “Do these shoulder pads look right?” Or there may be a pull down menu that allows the shopper to select from among a number of pre-stored queries.
  • the system may pose a standard query to the participants, as will be seen in connection with FIG. 14 . It is contemplated that the opportunity for the shopper to enter or select a query may be provided in a screen display that is separate from the panel definition display of FIG. 12 .
  • step 1112 in FIG. 11 may occur before one or more of the steps 1106 through 1110 .
  • the merchant server 202 proceeds to assemble the panel and distribute the combined image to the panel of participants (step 1114 ).
  • Participants selected to receive the image are determined by comparing profiles of available members of a pool of participants with the characteristics selected by the shopper at step 1112 .
  • Participants may indicate their availability to be members of a panel in a number of different ways. For example, a participant may download a client application to the participant's terminal to support a function like the “instant messaging” function available through the AOL Internet service or to support the well-known “ICQ” function. In another embodiment, participants may log onto a suitable page of the merchant website to indicate their availability.
  • the merchant website selects each available participant who matches the shopper's selected criteria as a potential participant for the panel.
  • a message like that shown in FIG. 13 is sent to the selected participants to determine whether the available participants are, in fact, interested in participating in a panel. If the participant selects the OK button 1302 shown in FIG. 13 , then a display page like that shown in FIG. 14 is sent from the merchant server to the participant's terminal.
  • the display of FIG. 14 includes an image 1402 which is the combined image generated at step 1110 .
  • checkboxes 1404 , 1406 and 1408 that respectively allow the participant to register a positive, neutral or negative opinion based on the image 1402 .
  • a field 1410 is also provided to permit the participant to enter additional comments in the form of open-ended text.
  • the participant may be prompted to select one of a range of five alternatives, e.g.: How does this look on a scale of 5? In this case the possible alternatives may be 5—excellent, 4—good, 3—average, 2—poor, 1—terrible.
  • responses entered by participants via the display of FIG. 14 are received by the merchant server (step 1116 ) and the received responses are then processed (step 1118 ) by, for example, performing a statistical analysis to determine what percentage of the responses were favorable, unfavorable and neutral. Based on the processing of the responses, feedback is then provided to the shopper (step 1120 ) to indicate to the shopper the results of the responses from the panel of participants.
  • FIG. 15 shows one example of how the feedback may be presented to the shopper.
  • a pie chart 1502 presents results of the statistical analysis of the responses from the participants.
  • the responses from the participants were in general very favorable, with three-quarters of the participants indicating that the shopper looked “great” in the selected garment or garments. Consequently, a button 1504 is provided in the display of FIG. 15 to allow the shopper to immediately indicate selection of the garment or garments for purchase. Actuation of the button 1504 may, for example, invoke a “one-click” purchase routine, like that described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,960,411. Alternatively, actuation of the button 1504 may add the selected garment or garments to a virtual “shopping cart”. Virtual shopping carts are widely used in connection with retail shopping websites and need not be described further.
  • buttons 1506 are also provided in the display of FIG. 15 .
  • Actuation of the button 1506 allows the shopper to gain access to the open-ended text comments that were entered by the participants as part of their responses. (Of course, no button 1506 is provided in cases where none of the participants provided text responses.)
  • the comments may simply be streamed in the order in which they were received.
  • a key word analysis of the comments may have been made as part of the processing of the responses carried out at step 1118 ( FIG. 11 ). On the basis of the key word analysis, the comments may be grouped together and may be accessible via headings that correspond to keywords detected in the responses. Examples of key words that may be used to analyze text comments are “color”, “pattern”, or “cut”.
  • FIG. 16 is an example of another screen display that may be provided in accordance with the invention to give the shopper feedback based on the responses from the panel of participants.
  • This screen display includes a “thumbs up” symbol 1602 to indicate that the reaction of the panel of participants to the garment in the combined image was a positive reaction. If the reaction were negative, a “thumbs down” symbol might be provided. If the responses were mixed (neither predominantly positive nor predominantly negative), a “shoulder shrug” image might be provided.
  • a button 1603 may be provided, including a pie chart showing results of a statistical analysis of the responses.
  • Other manners of presenting the statistical analysis may also be used, such as a bar chart, or a table showing percentages in numerical form.
  • the shopper can also get more information about the responses from the panel of participants by actuating a “see comments” button 1606 .
  • This button performs the same functions as the button 1506 which was discussed in connection with FIG. 15 .
  • the display of FIG. 16 includes a “Buy it now” button 1604 that corresponds to, and may provide the same functions as, the button 1504 discussed in connection with FIG. 15 .
  • the screen displays of FIGS. 15 and 16 have a marketing function in that the merchant server allows the shopper to initiate purchasing of the selected garment or garments by actuating buttons 1504 or 1604 , as the case may be.
  • These screen displays or similar displays may be used for other marketing purposes as well.
  • a button or link may be included in the screen display to allow the shopper to access alternative garments that the shopper may virtually “try on” or select for purchase.
  • Such a button may indicate, for example, “try a different color”.
  • a suggestion or alternative offer included in the feedback screen may be selected by the server based on an analysis of the responses provided by the participants.
  • the feedback screen may serve as a vehicle for other marketing overtures, as well.
  • a button or display may be included in the screen of FIG. 15 to offer the shopper a discount to buy the selected garment or garments.
  • the screen display of FIG. 15 or FIG. 16 may include a portion that suggests an accessory that goes with the selected garment or garments.
  • the suggestion to purchase the accessory may include a discount offer or a package price offer to give the shopper an incentive to purchase the accessory together with the selected garment or garments. It is also contemplated to offer a package price for the selected garment and an item other than an accessory.
  • a package price may be offered for the selected garment plus a matching or coordinating blouse.
  • U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/360,422 entitled “Determination and Presentation of Package Pricing Offers in Response to Customer Interest in a Product”, which is commonly assigned with the present application, discloses techniques for presenting package pricing in an on-line retail shopping environment. The disclosure of the '422 application is incorporated herein by reference.
  • buttons 1504 and 1604 may be added to the display of FIG. 14 so that the participant is allowed to initiate purchase of the garment shown in image 1402 .
  • a pop up message such as “Do you want to buy the garment?” may be actuated if the participant indicates a positive response to the image such as by actuating checkbox 1404 in the screen display of FIG. 14 .
  • the on-line fashion opinion feature described herein provides benefits for the merchant, for the shopper, and for the participants.
  • this feature provides excellent opportunities for the merchant to contribute to the shopper's decision-making process.
  • the information generated from the responses from the participants may help overcome any anxiety or reluctance the shopper may have in regard to purchasing the selected garment or garments. Consequently, this feature may make the difference between an order received from the shopper and an order lost.
  • the on-line fashion opinion feature may serve as a marketing tool to acquire and retain customers.
  • the screen displays by which the server communicates with the shopper provide what may be a highly effective channel through which the merchant may offer to the shopper promotions, discounts, up sells and other marketing opportunities.
  • the fashion opinion feature of the present invention can also operate as an effective and low-cost market research tool.
  • each request for participants' opinions may function as an on-line focus group concerning the garment or garments that the shopper is virtually trying on.
  • the data representing the participants' responses is potentially very valuable, and may be analyzed by the merchant to detect fashion trends and to learn how various groups of customers or potential customers are perceiving the merchant's product offerings. This data, or information obtained by analyzing it, may also be sold to designers or other suppliers of fashion items.
  • the fashion opinion process disclosed herein also enhances the merchant's market presence vis-à-vis the participants.
  • the merchant's name is included in the request.
  • the participant's awareness of the merchant is reinforced.
  • participants do respond they are exposed to the item of merchandise that has been selected by the shopper, which may cause the participant to develop an interest in purchasing the item.
  • the interaction of the merchant server with the participant may include presenting the participant with an opportunity to purchase the garment that is included in the image to which the participant is responding.
  • the participants' responses to the request for an opinion becomes selling opportunities for the merchant.
  • this on-line opinion feature is also beneficial in a number of ways.
  • the information received as a result of the participants' responses may help the shopper to make an informed decision and may aid the shopper in overcoming the anxiety which often accompanies a decision as to whether to purchase a garment. If the shopper is concerned as to whether the garment will prove acceptable to his or her peers, then he or she may request opinions from participants who are similar to the shopper in demographic and/or subjective characteristics.
  • the shopper If the shopper wishes to determine whether the garment or garments will appeal to a group of people other than the shopper's peers (e.g., to determine whether the garment will appeal to members of the opposite sex) the shopper again can specify an appropriate group of participants from which opinions are to be received.
  • the shopper may also benefit by receiving targeted offers, such as those described above, that are relevant to the potential purchase of the garment. For example, as noted before, if the response from the participants to a particular garment is mixed, the shopper may receive an incentive to purchase the garment, notwithstanding the less than positive response from the participants. Other offers that may be provided to the shopper, as also noted above, may provide favorable deals if the selected garment or garments are purchased together with other items.
  • the fashion opinion feature may also enhance the overall on-line shopping experience. Many shoppers may find that there is substantial entertainment value simply in selecting a garment, and observing the resulting combined image when the garment is “tried on” the virtual model or other representation of the shopper. The entertainment value may be further increased by having the combined image sent to participants (perhaps a large number of participants) and then reading their comments or other responses to the combined image. It will be understood that the present invention allows each shopper to assume the role of “fashion model”.
  • Entertainment value is also one of the benefits of the fashion opinion feature from the point of view of the participants. Participants may find it very enjoyable to observe what shoppers are considering buying and “trying on”. In effect participants are permitted by the invention to be attendees at a virtual fashion show. They may also enjoy having the opportunity to express their opinion about the potential purchases. At the same time, participants have the opportunity to learn what kinds of fashions are being made available by merchants. This can give participants ideas about how the participants may wish to expand their own wardrobes.
  • the participants may earn favorable ratings by responding to queries, or merely by being available to respond.
  • merchants may provide a number of incentives, such as a preferred customer status, an opportunity to preview designer collections that are not yet available to the public, or access to merchandise that is in limited supply.
  • the merchant may also provide discounts or other monetary benefits to highly rated participants.
  • FIGS. 17 and 18 illustrate a hardware arrangement provided to implement the present invention in an in-store environment.
  • FIG. 17 shows a dressing room 1700 that includes a wall 1702 on which a camera 1704 is mounted.
  • Camera 1704 may be a conventional color video camera, and includes an optical system 1705 .
  • a digital camera may be employed.
  • a shopper 1706 is standing in the field of view of the camera 1704 .
  • the shopper is wearing garments 1708 .
  • Conveniently mounted on the wall 1702 is a user interface 1710 by which the shopper 1706 may input instructions for performing the present invention.
  • the user interface 1710 may include, for example, a touch screen 1712 and a magnetic stripe card reader 1714 .
  • FIG. 18 Electronic components of the system are illustrated in block diagram form in FIG. 18 .
  • the system also includes a merchant server 1802 and a frame grabber 1804 .
  • the merchant server 1802 includes memory components 1806 and communication ports 1808 .
  • the memory components 1806 provide program, working and database storage.
  • the communication ports 1808 provide an interface between the merchant server 1802 and the Internet 204 and participant terminals 208 .
  • the merchant server 1802 is connected to the user interface 1710 to receive input from the shopper and to provide output to the shopper.
  • the frame grabber 1804 is connected between the merchant server 1802 and the camera 1704 . Under control of the merchant server 1802 , the frame grabber 1804 captures and digitizes video signal frames provided by the camera 1704 . The digitized frames are stored in the memory 1806 of the merchant server 1802 .
  • FIG. 19 is a flow chart that illustrates operation of the system of FIGS. 17 and 18 .
  • the shopper dons the garment or garments in regard to which he or she desires to receive opinions from a panel of participants.
  • the shopper enters his or her customer identifier into the system. This may be done by entering numerical data via the touch screen 1712 . Alternatively, a shopper identification card or the shopper's credit card may be read by the card reader 1714 . As another alternative the shopper may enter his or her name via the touch screen.
  • the shopper enters into the system an identification code that identifies the garment that he or she is trying on. This code may also be entered via the touch screen 1712 .
  • the user interface 1710 may include a bar code scanner that the shopper may use to scan a bar code on a price tag that has been affixed to the garment.
  • steps 1902 , 1904 and 1906 are performed is not critical. However, it may be more efficient for the shopper to don the garment before entering the information referred to in connection with steps 1904 and 1906 .
  • the shopper uses the user interface 1710 to signal the system to capture an image of the shopper while wearing the garment. This step is represented at 1908 in FIG. 19 .
  • the capturing of the shopper's image is delayed by a certain period, say five seconds, after he or she signals for the image to be captured. This allows the shopper enough time to assume an appropriate pose for the image to be captured.
  • Decision block 1910 represents a determination by the shopper as to whether the image is acceptable. If not, the shopper may again signal the system to capture another image of the shopper.
  • Step 1912 represents the shopper entering his or her selection of desired characteristics for the panel of participants who will provide their opinion on the garment. It is to be noted that step 1912 may be performed prior to some or all of steps 1902 through 1910 . Step 1912 may be like step 1112 of FIG. 11 , and may use an interface screen like that of FIG. 12 . However, the display of FIG. 12 may be adapted for ease of use with a touch screen interface. It may also be desirable to simplify the screen display of FIG. 12 , since the shopper may not wish to spend as much time at the interface 1710 as he or she may be willing to spend when entering information via his or her own computer terminal as in the on-line embodiment described above.
  • steps 1914 , 1916 , 1918 and 1920 may generally correspond to steps 1114 - 1120 of FIG. 11 .
  • the user interface 1710 may be used by the system for in-store promotions, and for any other purpose that an in-store kiosk may be put to. For example, since the system knows what garment or garments the shopper is trying on, the system may also suggest to the shopper accessories and/or matching or coordinating garments to purchase in addition to the garment being tried on.
  • the system may suggest alternative garments for the shopper to try on.
  • the system may include a function to permit the shopper to summon a member of the store's sales staff to help the shopper, for example, to locate an alternative garment, an accessory, or a matching or complementary garment, that has been recommended by the system.
  • the arrangement of FIG. 17 may operate as a self-checkout station.
  • FIGS. 17-19 Advantages offered by the embodiment of FIGS. 17-19 are similar to those of the previous embodiment. As before, this embodiment allows a retailer to provide an additional service to the shopper, including opportunities for marketing both to the shopper and to the participants.
  • the availability of opinions from third parties may help the shopper overcome any anxiety or hesitation in regard to the purchase, and may generally make the shopping experience more enjoyable.
  • the benefits for participants are much the same as in the on-line embodiment described above.
  • the fashion opinion system may be administered either by a merchant's on-line shopping website server or by a server that may be installed in the merchant's store.
  • the fashion opinion system may be administered by a service bureau that is under contract with the merchant and that may provide similar services for other merchants. Information gathered by the service bureau server regarding requests for opinions and responses may be transmitted to merchants' computers.
  • the participants' involvement ends when they have provided their responses to the shopper's query.
  • shoppers are permitted, or the system is arranged, to ask follow-up questions of the participants and the participants are allowed to respond.
  • the system itself or a shopper may inquire of participants who gave negative opinions whether their opinion related to the garment itself or simply how the garment looked on the shopper.
  • a parental override could be implemented by allowing parents to indicate to a system that any time a child tries on clothing that the parent considers unsuitable, a negative result will be reported.
  • the results could also be skewed at the request of a third party, in a positive direction, so that the third party encourages the shopper, in effect, to purchase clothes that the third party approves of. It is contemplated that the third party may be charged a fee by the system for the privilege of skewing the results.
  • the user interface is configured as a kiosk embedded in a wall of a dressing room, with the wall of the dressing room serving as a kiosk structure.
  • a camera and user interface may be implemented as a compact, portable, personal digital assistant (PDA) in wireless communication with the merchant server 1802 ( FIG. 18 ).
  • PDA personal digital assistant
  • Cellular telephone 2000 may comprise a participant terminal 208 , in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
  • the cellular telephone 2000 may be, for example, programmed to operate on a 3G network.
  • the cellular telephone 2000 may be operable to receive and display images (e.g., images of garments, images of a shopper wearing a garment, and/or images of a virtual model of a shopper combined with an image of a garment).
  • images e.g., images of garments, images of a shopper wearing a garment, and/or images of a virtual model of a shopper combined with an image of a garment.
  • Cellular telephone 2000 includes a display screen 2010 and a keypad area 2020 .
  • the display screen 2010 is displaying an image of a garment, additional information about the garment (price and material) and a request for an opinion regarding the garment.
  • the request for an opinion instructs the participant to vote either that the shopper should buy the garment or not buy the garment.
  • the participant may respond to the request for the opinion by pressing the appropriate keys on the keypad 2020 , as instructed in the request for the opinion (i.e., by pressing “1” to vote that the shopper should buy the garment and pressing “2” to vote that the shopper should not buy the garment).
  • Cellular telephone 2000 also includes a speaker 2030 and a microphone 2040 .
  • the speaker 2030 may be utilized to transmit a request for an opinion to a participant.
  • a computerized message or human operator may output the request for the opinion to the participant (e.g., by telling the participant to press “1” to vote that the shopper should buy the garment or press “2” to vote that the shopper should not buy the garment).
  • a participant may be allowed to provide an opinion and thus respond to a request for an opinion utilizing microphone 2040 .
  • the participant may speak the words “Buy It” or “Don't Buy It” or another choice of words conveying the participant's response to the request for the opinion into the speaker 2040 .
  • a voice recognition module of the merchant server 202 or another computing device operating to facilitate embodiments of the invention may determine the participant's response by analyzing the participant's spoken words and converting them to text.
  • Cellular telephone 2100 may comprise a shopper terminal 206 , in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
  • the cellular telephone 2100 like cellular telephone 2000 , may be, for example, programmed to operate on a 3G network.
  • the cellular telephone 2100 may be operable to receive and display indications of responses to requests for opinions.
  • Cellular telephone 2100 includes a display screen 2110 and a keypad area 2120 .
  • the display screen 2110 is displaying an indication of results of a request for opinions. Additionally, the display screen is displaying instructions to the shopper for obtaining further details regarding the results. For example, by pressing “#”, the shopper may be presented with additional details of one or more responses (e.g., the full text of one or more responses) or may be connected to a human operator who may answer any questions the shopper may have about the results.
  • the shopper may use keypad area 2120 to obtain the additional details, per the instructions.
  • the cellular telephone 2100 includes a speaker 2130 and a microphone 2140 .
  • the shopper may utilize the speaker 2130 and/or the microphone 2140 to communicate with the merchant server or other computing device or entity facilitating aspects of the present invention.
  • the results of the request for opinions may be output to the shopper via speaker 2130 .
  • the shopper may request additional details regarding the results by speaking into the microphone 2140 or may communicate with a human operator regarding the additional details of the results using the microphone 2140 .
  • the display area 2010 of cellular telephone 2000 and the display area 2110 of cellular telephone 2100 may be color displays operable to display detailed graphical images to the participant and shopper, respectively.
  • the display areas 2010 and 2110 may comprise color Liquid Crystal Displays (LCDs).
  • the cellular telephone 2100 of the shopper may include an image capturing peripheral, such as a digital camera.
  • the shopper may use the image capturing peripheral to capture an image of a garment and/or an image of the shopper wearing the garment, for output to the one or more participants to whom the request for opinions is to be output.
  • a rating system may be employed for participants.
  • the purpose of such a system may be to encourage participants to take part in the system and to participate conscientiously and effectively. For example, if a participant provides a particularly insightful and lengthy response, the shopper may indicate that the participant should receive an enhanced rating.
  • the system may automatically provide ratings for participants based on availability, participation and/or length of responses.
  • participants may receive benefits from a system administrator or from the retailer when participants achieve a certain rating level. It is expected that good will of participants and a participant rating system, if implemented, will suffice to produce honest responses from participants. However, if certain participants appear to be providing only negative opinions for the purpose of annoying shoppers, the merchant may choose to screen out such participants.
  • Shoppers may be given the option only to receive responses from participants who have relatively high ratings.
  • the system may provide that participants who have not participated (i.e., new participants), may have a default rating at a low level. Participants may also be rated based on their history as customers of a retailer. That is, participants who have bought a considerable amount of merchandise from a merchant may be accorded an enhanced rating because the participant's purchases.
  • the present invention has been discussed in connection with trying on garments, but is also applicable to items such as cosmetics, eyeglasses, hairstyles and plastic surgery.
  • plastic surgery cannot be “tried on”, but an image or virtual image of the shopper (prospective patient) can be manipulated to indicate how the shopper will appear after the surgery has been performed.
  • merchants may be enabled to suggest alternative or complementary items relative to garments that the shopper is trying on or virtually trying on. It is contemplated that this marketing channel may be made available by the retailer to clothing manufacturers or designers, for a fee.
  • participant may take part in a purchase transaction involving a selected garment. For example, if a participant is a relative, friend or acquaintance of the shopper, the participant may be given the option of subsidizing the purchase or of purchasing the garment as a gift for the shopper. Alternatively, a participant may be a representative of another merchant who makes a cross-subsidy offer to the shopper in connection with the purchase of the garment.
  • the system may recommend to the shopper a garment or garments that was favorably reviewed for another shopper or shoppers having a similar body type.
  • the present invention may include a number of features to enhance the entertainment value of the system from the point of view of the participants.
  • participant when participants are invited to join a panel, they are informed of demographic or other characteristics of the shopper, and make a decision on whether to participate based on the shopper's characteristics. In another embodiment, participants are given the option of requesting information about the shopper.
  • participants are permitted to view shopper/garment combined images, and possibly also to provide responses, even when the participants do not match the participant characteristics selected by the shopper. In such cases, the non-matching participants' responses may not be used to generate the feedback for the shopper.
  • the participants may be allowed to search for shopper/garment images to view based on shopper characteristics, after logging on to a suitable website. Also, or alternatively, shoppers may be rated based on responses from the participants and participants may search for shoppers to view based on ratings categories such as “top ten shoppers”, “worst ten shoppers”, “most improved shopper”. Participants and/or shoppers may also be allowed to view lists of garments included in highly rated shopper/garment images.
  • shoppers may be permitted to define a diverse panel of participants while receiving feedback that is divided by categories of participants.
  • participants may be compensated for providing opinions to shoppers.
  • participants may be provided with a benefit in exchange for each opinion provided or in exchange for every predetermined number of opinions provided.
  • benefits include, but are not limited to, monetary fees, entries into sweepstakes or lotteries, discounts on merchandise or services, or access to the present system for purposes of requesting opinions from other participants. In the latter example, the participant who receives this benefit becomes a shopper when requesting an opinion.
  • steps may be taken to maintain the anonymity of a shopper who requests an opinion regarding a garment. For example, if an image of a shopper is transmitted along with the request for an opinion, the face of the shopper may be blurred, removed or replaced in the image. In an example where only the image of the garment is transmitted, the request for an opinion that is transmitted to a participant may not include any information identifying the shopper who requested the opinion (e.g., the shopper's name or other identifying information may not be transmitted).
  • a shopper is provided with the results of a request for opinions within a very short time of submitting such a request.
  • a shopper may be provided with the results within a one or a few minutes of submitting the request.
  • the selection of participants for a panel and the output of the image and/or request for opinions to participants may be performed substantially immediately upon receiving the request for opinions from the shopper.
  • the participants may be provided with a maximum period of time within which to respond to a request for an opinion.
  • a participant may be provided with a maximum period of time of one to ten minutes within which to respond to an opinion.
  • the system may wait for responses to be received from participants for the maximum period of time and then determine the results of the query (e.g., determine the indication to output to the shopper, such as percentage of participants who voted “Buy It” versus the percentage of participants who voted “Don't Buy It”) at the end of the period of time, regardless of whether all participants have responded.
  • determine the results of the query e.g., determine the indication to output to the shopper, such as percentage of participants who voted “Buy It” versus the percentage of participants who voted “Don't Buy It”
  • the period of time for accumulating responses may be set such that the process of collecting opinions and outputting the indication of the results of the request for opinions is performed within a short period of time.
  • the short period of time may be measured from a time at which the request is received from the shopper.
  • the short period of time may be such that it allows the shopper to make a decision regarding the desirability of the garment based on the indication of the opinions while a shopper is conducting a shopping session during which the shopper submitted the request for opinions. For example, it may determined that it is reasonable for a shopper to wait five minutes for the results of the request for opinions from the time the shopper submits the request for opinions.
  • the shopper may be determined that the shopper is likely to continue browsing or trying on garments at the merchant for such a period of time. In another example, it may be determined that it is reasonable for a shopper to only wait one minute or as long as one hour for the results of the request for opinions.
  • a shopper when submitting a request for opinions may indicate the duration of time the shopper is willing to wait for the results of a request for opinions.
  • a minimum number of responses may be associated with a request for opinions.
  • the process of accumulating responses may end when the minimum number of responses are received, even if the maximum period of time for accumulating responses has not ended.
  • the responses may continue to be accumulated until the end of the maximum period of time.
  • the shopper may be provided with a message indicating that the request for opinions did not yield a sufficient number of opinions.
  • the shopper may be provided an opportunity (either when first submitting a request for opinions or upon receiving an indication that a minimum number of opinions were not received) to request that the results of the request for opinions be provided to the shopper despite the minimum number of opinions not being received.

Abstract

In accordance with one or more embodiments, a system determines an image, selects a panel of participants, and outputs the image to each of the participants of the panel of participants. The image may be an image of a garment a shopper is considering purchasing, an image of the shopper wearing the garment, or an image of a virtual model of the shopper combined with an image of the garment. The panel of participants may be selected based on a characteristic associated with the shopper. The image may be output to the panel of participants along with a request for an opinion regarding the garment (e.g., “Buy It” or “Don't Buy It”). The responses may be collected from the participants and an indication of the results may be output to the shopper.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
  • The present application is a division of application Ser. No.10/864,834 filed Jun. 9, 2004 in the name of Walker et al. and entitled, METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR FACILITATING THE PROVISION OF OPINIONS TO A SHOPPER FROM A PANEL OF PEERS;
  • which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 09/602,948, filed Jun. 26, 2000 in the name of Walker et al. and entitled SHOPPER INFORMATION SYSTEM WITH PEER INPUT, now abandoned; and
  • which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/210,946, which was filed Jun. 12, 2000 in the name of Walker et al. and entitled SHOPPER INFORMATION SYSTEM WITH PEER INPUT.
  • The content of each of these applications is incorporated herein by reference.
  • BACKGROUND
  • While some people hate shopping, or at least profess to hate it, others enjoy shopping and consider shopping to be one of their favorite leisure activities. For some, one of the most enjoyable parts of shopping is trying on garments and observing how the shopper appears in the garment that is tried on. Shoppers also may derive entertainment from observing fellow shoppers as the fellow shoppers are trying on garments. It can also be an enjoyable part of the shopping experience to exchange comments and advice with other shoppers regarding garments that are being tried on.
  • In short, shopping can be a social experience. Indeed, family members and/or friends often go shopping together. One of the advantages (or in some cases, disadvantages) of shopping with friends or family is the opportunity to receive comments from friends and family on garments that one is trying on and/or considering purchasing. For some shoppers, comments and approval from friends, family members or fellow shoppers are an essential part of the purchasing decision process in that only with such comments and approval is the shopper able to overcome the anxiety which may be involved in deciding whether to purchase an item.
  • The on-line shopping experience is very different from the in-store shopping experience. Although on-line shopping can be attractive for many reasons, including especially convenience, it lacks the richness of sensory input that is available in a retail store. It particularly lacks the opportunity to try on garments and to receive input from other shoppers, including those whom one has accompanied to the store. It also lacks the psychological encouragement that many shoppers need in order to reach a decision to buy a garment.
  • Attempts have been made to try to duplicate some of the social and sensory elements of in-store shopping, in an on-line environment, subject to the inherent limitations of such an environment.
  • For example, the well-known catalog merchant Lands' End has provided a “Shop with a friend” feature on its retail website (www.landsend.com). This feature is described in an article written by Melinda Rice which appeared in the Mar. 2, 2000 edition of the Dallas Morning News and was entitled “Sites Encourage Shoppers to Bring a Friend Along”. As described in this article, the “Shop with a friend” feature is limited to linking two users together. Before the joint shopping experience, the two shoppers each select a password and agree upon a time to meet at the Lands' End website. At the appointed time, each user clicks on an icon for the feature. Based on the password, the browsers of the two users are linked and the users are allowed to “shop” together, by sharing the same web pages while talking on the phone or chatting on-line.
  • The Lands' End web site offers another feature, referred to therein as “Your Personal Model”. This feature allows a user to define a “3-D model” for the shopper's body based on inputs provided by the user, such as body measurements. When a garment is selected for a “virtual try-on”, an image of the garment is combined with an image based on the virtual model to provide a combined image that represents to some extent how the user might appear while wearing the garment. Because of the limited number of options available for inputting information, the virtual models bear, in general, only a small degree of resemblance to an actual image of the user.
  • The present inventors have recognized the desirability of increasing the opportunities to interact with others and to receive fashion advice on-line. The present inventors have further recognized that there are opportunities to enhance the in-store shopping experience by providing Internet-based features.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a flow chart that provides an overview of a method provided in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a system provided in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram representation of a merchant server that is part of the system of FIG. 2;
  • FIG. 4 is a tabular representation of a customer database that is shown in FIG. 3;
  • FIG. 5 is a tabular representation of a participant database that is shown in FIG. 3;
  • FIG. 6 is a tabular representation of a profile database that is shown in FIG. 3;
  • FIG. 7 shows a screen display provided in accordance with the invention for entering profile information to be stored in the profile database of FIG. 6;
  • FIG. 8 is a tabular representation of a request database that is shown in FIG. 3;
  • FIG. 9 is a tabular representation of a response database that is shown in FIG. 3;
  • FIG. 10 is a tabular representation of a feedback database that is shown in FIG. 3;
  • FIG. 11 is a flow chart that illustrates a method carried out using the system of FIG. 2 in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;
  • FIG. 12 shows a screen display provided in accordance with one embodiment of the invention for entering data for defining a request for feedback from a panel of participants;
  • FIG. 13 shows a pop-up display provided in accordance with one embodiment of the invention, to solicit participation in a panel by a prospective participant;
  • FIG. 14 shows a screen display provided in accordance with one embodiment of the invention to a participant who has indicated a willingness to participate in a panel;
  • FIG. 15 shows a screen display provided according to one embodiment of the invention to a shopper to provide feedback based on responses from a panel of participants;
  • FIG. 16 shows another screen display for providing feedback to a shopper based on responses from a panel of participants, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;
  • FIG. 17 is a schematic representation of a kiosk arrangement provided in accordance with an embodiment of the invention;
  • FIG. 18 is a block diagram representation of a system provided in accordance with one embodiment of the invention and including the kiosk arrangement of FIG. 17;
  • FIG. 19 is a flow chart that illustrates a method carried out using the system of FIGS. 17 and 18 according to an embodiment of the invention;
  • FIG. 20 is a plan diagram of a cellular telephone of a participant, displaying a request for an opinion regarding a garment, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention; and
  • FIG. 21 is a plan diagram of a cellular telephone of a shopper, displaying results of a request for an opinion regarding a garment, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • According to one or more embodiments, a method comprises receiving, from a shopper, a request for opinions regarding a garment and determining an image of the garment. The image of the garment may be, for example, also received from the shopper or retrieved from memory based on an identifier of the garment received from the shopper. The method further comprises selecting, for the shopper, a plurality of peers to provide the opinion, the peers being selected based on a characteristic associated with the shopper. The characteristic may comprise, for example, a characteristic possessed by the shopper and/or a characteristic the shopper desires at least one peer to possess. For example, if the shopper is a teenage girl, the shopper may desire opinions regarding a garment from other teenage girls who live in the same state, city or county as the shopper. The method further comprises outputting to each of the plurality of peers the request for the opinion and the image of the garment, receiving responses to the request from at least a subset of the plurality of peers, and outputting, to the shopper, an indication of the opinions of the peers regarding the garment, the opinions of the peers being determined based on the received responses. Outputting the indication of the opinions may comprise, for example, outputting a percentage of the peers who provided a positive response to the garment (e.g., “buy it” or “thumbs up”) and a percentage of the peers who provided a negative response to the garment (e.g., “don't buy it” or “thumbs down”). The percentages may be determined, for example, based only on the peers who responded to the request.
  • According to one or more embodiments, a method comprises receiving an image from a shopper, the image depicting a garment and selecting for the shopper, substantially at a time the image is received, a plurality of participants to whom the image is to be output. Each of the participants of the plurality of participants may be selected based on a characteristic specified by a shopper associated with the garment. The characteristic may comprise, for example, a characteristic possessed by the shopper and/or a characteristic the shopper desires at least one participant to possess. The method further comprises causing, substantially at a time the plurality of participants is selected, the image to be output to each participant of the plurality of participants by causing a cellular telephone of the participant to display the image. A request for an opinion regarding the garment may be output in association with the image. The method further comprises collecting responses to the request for a predetermined period of time from a time at which the image was output, wherein the predetermined period of time is not greater than ten minutes, and outputting an indication of the collected responses to the shopper. Collecting the responses may comprise, for example, collecting the responses until one of the following conditions occurs: (i) an end of a predetermined period of time occurs, or (ii) a minimum number of responses are received.
  • According to one or more embodiments, a method for operating a shopper information system includes generating an image of a shopper, distributing the image to a plurality of participants, and receiving responses to the image from the plurality of participants. One or more embodiments may further include processing the received responses, which may take the form of performing a statistical analysis of the received responses in real time. The processed responses or results of the processing may then be transmitted to the shopper.
  • One or more embodiments may include selecting a garment to be included in the image. Alternatively, in an in-store embodiment, the shopper may don the garment and then an image of the shopper wearing the garment may be captured. In an on-line embodiment, the image of the selected garment may be combined with an image of the shopper. The image of the shopper may have been captured photographically or may be a virtual model or the like generated based on input provided by the shopper or by another user.
  • One or more embodiments of the present invention may include receiving input from the shopper to define characteristics of the participants, and assembling the participants based on the received input. The assembling step may include selecting a panel of participants from a pool of participants. The responses from the participants may be provided to the shopper substantially immediately upon receiving the responses, i.e. in real time. The processing of the responses may include accumulating the responses.
  • One or more embodiments of the present invention may include generating a question to be distributed to the participants together with the image of the shopper. The responses may include a selection of one of two alternatives posed by the question distributed to the participants. In addition or alternatively, the responses may include a selection of one of a range of alternatives posed by the question, and/or open-ended text responses to the question.
  • In one or more embodiments of the present invention, a method for operating a shopper information network includes logging on to a shopping website, retrieving a shopper image that represents a shopper, selecting a garment, combining an image of the selected garment with the shopper image to form a combined image, requesting a panel of participants, defining desired characteristics of the panel of participants, defining a query, determining availability of participants who match the defined desired characteristics, transmitting the query and the combined image to participants determined to be available, receiving responses to the query from participants to whom the query and the combined image were transmitted, processing the received responses and transmitting the processed responses to the shopper.
  • The processing step may include calculating respective percentages for categories of the received responses, and the method may further include presenting the calculated percentages to the shopper. The calculated percentages may be presented as a pie chart or a bar chart or in some other manner. The manner of presentation of the percentages may be defined by the shopper.
  • One or more embodiments of the present invention may include selecting a second garment and the combined image may include an image of the second garment. Thus, the on-line shopper may virtually “try on” an outfit or ensemble of two or more garments, and may receive comments on the outfit from participants contacted through on-line communication.
  • According to one or more embodiments of the present invention, a method of operating a shopper information system includes capturing an image of a shopper who is wearing a garment, entering a query, defining a panel of participants, transmitting the query and the image to the panel of participants, receiving responses to the query from the participants, and presenting the responses to the shopper.
  • One or more embodiments may include scanning a product identifier code for the garment.
  • According to one or more embodiments of the present invention, a shopper information system includes a processor and a memory which is connected to the processor and stores a program, the processor being operative with the program to store an image of a shopper, distribute the image to a plurality of participants, and receive responses to the image from a plurality of participants.
  • According to one or more embodiments of the present invention, a shopper information kiosk includes a kiosk structure, an image device, mounted on the kiosk structure, for converting an image to digital image data, a memory for storing the digital image data, a processor connected to the memory, a communication device for connecting the processor to a data network, an input device for providing shopper input to the processor, and a display for displaying information to a shopper, the processor being programmed to control the image device to capture an image of the shopper, distribute the captured image to a plurality of participants via the communication device, and present to the shopper via the display responses to the distributed image received from the participants.
  • The image device may include a digital camera, and the shopper information kiosk may further include a scanner connected to the processor for entering garment information.
  • According to one or more embodiments of the present invention, a method for operating a shopper information system includes storing respective profiles for each participant of a pool of participants, generating an image of a shopper, receiving a request for a panel of participants, the request specifying at least one participant characteristic, selecting a panel of participants from the pool of participants based on the stored profiles and the specified at least one participant characteristic, and distributing the image of the shopper to the selected panel of participants.
  • The method according to one or more embodiments of the present invention may further include receiving responses to the image from the panel of participants and providing feedback to the shopper on the basis of the received responses. The step of generating the image of the shopper may occur either before or after receiving the request for the panel of participants.
  • In accordance with one or more embodiments of the present invention, shoppers are allowed to solicit opinions from numerous peers or others with regard to a garment that the shopper is trying on during an in-store visit or virtually trying on during on-line shopping. With the benefit of opinions from others gathered via a communication network such as the Internet, the shopper can purchase with confidence, having received reactions from a considerable number of people as to whether garment is right for the shopper. This can help the shopper to overcome the anxiety which often accompanies a purchasing decision. Since a more confident shopper tends to purchase items more quickly and more often, the system and method of the present invention is also advantageous to retailers by tending to increase sales of the retailers' products.
  • The following definitions shall apply in this specification and in the appended claims:
    garment: includes any article of wearing apparel, including shoes, handbags, belts,
    hats and other accessories and jewelry.
    merchant: includes retailers, manufacturers, on-line sellers or other sellers of fashion
    products.
    panel: a group of participants who respond to a particular request for an opinion
    from a shopper.
    participant: an individual who responds to a shopper's request for an opinion or who
    indicates a willingness to respond to shoppers' requests for opinions. The
    term “participant” shall be synonymous with the term “peer” herein.
    pool: a group of participants who have registered as potential respondents to
    requests from shoppers.
    query: includes a shopper's request for a fashion opinion; may include a specific
    question selected or entered by a shopper.
    response: any information provided by a participant in response to a query from a
    shopper.
    shopper: an individual who is considering the purchase of a garment or other item.
    The term “shopper” shall be synonymous with the term “customer” herein.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a method that provides an overview of some embodiments of the present invention.
  • The method of FIG. 1 begins with a step 102 in which an image is generated of a shopper who is wearing a garment. The image may be generated by a camera such as a digital camera, or maybe a composite image of a virtual model or other previously-stored representation of a shopper, merged with an image of a garment shown as being worn by the virtual model or representation of the shopper.
  • Next, at step 104, a panel of participants is assembled. As will be seen, the participants are selected to match characteristics that are specified by the shopper. Thus, the shopper may wish to receive a fashion opinion from the shopper's peers, in which case the panel of participants is selected to match characteristics of the shopper such as age, gender, income level, preferred style and social attitudes, geographical area of residence, and so forth. Alternatively, the panel of participants may be selected based on a group defined by the shopper to be different from the shopper. For example, a female shopper may wish to know whether a garment that the shopper is trying on will appeal to men.
  • The selection of the participants for the panel may be based upon profile information that the participants have previously provided to indicate demographic and other information for the participants.
  • The assembling of the panel may be via instant messaging or like technology, executed in real time.
  • As participants who are qualified and willing to participate are identified, the image of the shopper wearing the garment is distributed by Internet communications to the selected participants (step 106), and the participants are asked to provide their opinions. The resulting responses are then received (step 108) and processed or otherwise manipulated into a form suitable for being provided to the shopper. The resulting processed responses, or information obtained from the responses, is then presented to the shopper as feedback (step 110).
  • To summarize, a shopper, while trying on a garment or considering purchase of a garment on-line, is able to solicit opinions from a potentially large number of third parties on the basis of an image of the shopper wearing the garment or a representation of the shopper wearing the garment. Responses from the participants are solicited and received in real time so that the shopper can make an informed judgement as to the suitability of the garment for the shopper.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram that illustrates a system for providing an on-line environment in which the present invention may be applied. In FIG. 2, reference numeral 200 generally indicates the system of this aspect of the invention. The system 200 includes a merchant server 202 connected via Internet 204 to a shopper terminal 206 and participant terminals 208.
  • All of the hardware making up the system 200 may be conventional, programmed to carry out methods of the present invention. Thus the merchant server 202 may be constituted by one or more conventional server computers (e.g., of the type employed for retail website hosting applications). The shopper terminal 206 and the participant terminals 208 may be conventional personal computers or other devices used to interact with web servers via the Internet. A shopper terminal 206 and/or a participant terminal 208 may each comprise, for example, one or more of (i) a personal computer, (ii) a laptop computer, (iii) a handheld computer such as a cellular telephone, a land-line telephone, a pager, a personal digital assistant and/or a digital camera, (iv) a kiosk, (v) an automated teller machine, (vi) a gaming device, (vii) a game console, and/or (viii) a vending machine.
  • According to some embodiments of the present invention, a shopper who uses a shopper terminal 206 receives opinions from a number (e.g., three, five, ten, or dozens or even hundreds) of participants utilizing participant terminals 208, of which only two are explicitly shown in FIG. 2.
  • It should be understood that a single merchant server 202 may be operative to permit solicitation of fashion opinions from plural shopper terminals at a given time, although only one shopper terminal 206 is shown in FIG. 2. It should also be understood that, although only one shopper terminal 206 is shown in the drawing, the merchant server 202 may be operative to serve a plurality of shopper terminals 206.
  • It should be further be understood that the merchant server 202 may comprise one or more servers working together. In embodiments in which more than one server comprises merchant server 202, the more than one servers may be located in different locations and may communicate via a communication network. The merchant server 202 may refer to any device that may communicate with one or more shopper terminals 206, one or more participant terminals 208, one or more third-party servers, one or more remote controllers, and/or other network nodes, and may be capable of relaying communications to and from each.
  • It should further be understood that, in one or more embodiments, an entity distinct from a merchant from which the shopper is considering a purchase may facilitate aspects of the present invention. For example, Applicants envision a system operated by an entity distinct from a merchant (e.g., a cellular telephone service provider, a Internet Service Provider, or another entity). This entity may receive requests for opinions from shoppers, select participants for the shopper, transmit a request for an opinion to the participants on behalf of the shopper, collect and/or analyze the responses and provide an indication of the responses to the shopper. Thus, in some embodiments, the merchant server 202 may comprise a server operated by such an entity rather than by a merchant. In other embodiments, the system 200 may include a third party server that is operable to communicate with a plurality of merchant servers, each merchant server being operated by a merchant, and with a plurality of participant terminals 208. In yet other embodiments, the system 200 may comprise a third party server that is operable to communicate directly with a plurality of shopper terminals 206 and a plurality of participant terminals 208.
  • For example, Applicants envision one implementation of embodiments of the present invention wherein a shopper uses a shopper terminal 206 comprising a cellular telephone equipped with a camera. The shopper may use the camera to capture an image of a garment the shopper is considering purchasing. The shopper may transmit the image of the garment to the third party server. The third party server may select a plurality of participants and transmit the image to the cellular telephones of the plurality of participants (e.g., using cellular telephone numbers stored in association with each selected participant in a database of participants registered with the third party server). The participants may submit opinions to the third party server (e.g., “worth buying”, “not worth buying”). The third party server may then transmit an indication of the opinions to the shopper's cellular telephone (e.g., “76% say ‘Buy It’ and 24% say “Don't Buy It”). In such an embodiment, the merchant at which the shopper is considering purchasing the garment may not be involved in the process of soliciting opinions regarding the garment for the shopper. In one or more embodiments, the system of the present invention utilizes a 3G network to transmit information to and from cellular telephones.
  • FIG. 3 is a simplified block diagram representation of the merchant server 202. The merchant server 202 includes a CPU or processor 302, one or more communication ports 304 and a mass storage device 306. As noted before, all hardware components of the merchant server 202 may be conventional. To simplify the drawing, additional conventional components of the merchant server 202, such as embedded and working memory, a clock module, data buses and so forth, are omitted from the drawing.
  • The processor 302 generally controls the functions of the merchant server 202 and is in communication with the communication port 304 and the mass storage device 306. The communication port 304 may be conventional circuitry that allows the processor 302 to engage in data communication with other devices via the Internet or other communication channels. The mass storage device 306 may include one or more hard drives. Stored on the mass storage device 306 is a program 308 that controls the processor 302 in accordance with the invention. The program 308 may also include conventional program elements such as operating system software, device drivers, and communication software. The program 308 may also include program elements required for operation of the merchant server 202 as a retail shopping website. Such program elements are well known to those who are skilled in the art and need not be described further. The aspects of the program 308 related to practicing embodiments of the present invention will be described in more detail below.
  • Also stored by the mass storage device 306 are a customer database 310, a participant database 312, a profile database 314, a request database 316, a response database 318, a feedback database 320, a shopper image database 322, a product database 324, a garment image database 326, a combined image database 328 and a transaction database 330. It should be noted that in one or more embodiments different information, additional information, or a subset of the information illustrated in these databases may be used. Further, the information may be stored in a configuration different from that illustrated in databases 310 through 330.
  • Except to the extent that these databases are conventional data structures maintained in retail shopping websites, more detailed descriptions of these databases now follow.
  • FIG. 4 is a simplified tabular representation of the customer database 310 shown in FIG. 3. The table of FIG. 4 includes a column 402 for customer identifiers, a column 404 for customer names, a column 406 for customer addresses, a column 408 for customer e-mail addresses, a column 410 for customer credit card account numbers, and a column 412 for pointers to respective customer images in the shopper image database 322.
  • The entries in column 402 are identifying codes that uniquely identify each customer. The entries in columns 404-410 are self explanatory, and are items of information that are conventionally stored in customer databases of retail shopping websites. The image identifiers in column 412 are pointers to the respective images captured or generated based on customer input for each customer who wishes to avail himself or herself of the features of the present invention and for whom a corresponding image has been stored in the shopper image database 322. It will be noted that not all shoppers have elected to apply for the fashion opinion feature of the present invention and consequently some customers do not have an entry under column 412.
  • Although only three entries are shown in the table of FIG. 4, it is to be understood that, in a typical implementation of the invention, the customer database will contain a large number of entries, corresponding to a large number of customers. It should also be understood that the customer database may store additional items of information of the types customarily stored for retail on-line shopping applications, including information such as preferred shipping carrier and preferred mode of shipment. The customer database may also include a historical record of purchases that have been made by the customers. In embodiments where information is transmitted to and/or from a customer via a cellular telephone or other mobile device, the telephone number and/or other information required to contact the cellular telephone or other mobile device may be stored in the customer database for one or more customer records.
  • FIG. 5 is a simplified tabular representation of the participant database 312 shown in FIG. 3. The table of FIG. 12 includes a column 502 for customer identifiers, a column 504 for participant identifiers, a column 506 for participant names, a column 508 for participant e-mail addresses and a column 510 which contains rating information for participants. In embodiments in which participants are contacted via cellular telephones (e.g., images and/or requests for opinions are transmitted to the participants via cellular telephones on a 3G network), the participant database 312 may store cellular telephone numbers for the participants.
  • It is noted that participants need not be customers of the merchant who maintains the merchant server (in embodiments wherein the server is operated by a merchant). Consequently, there may be no customer identifier available for the participant. For participants who are customers, the corresponding customer identifier is entered in column 502 and no participant identifier is provided. For participants who are not customers, a participant identifier is issued to uniquely identify the participant and is entered in column 504. In one or more embodiments, participants are not employees (e.g., customer service representatives) of the merchant operating merchant server 202.
  • The entries under columns 506 and 508 are self-explanatory. It is noted that, although only women's names are shown in the tables of FIGS. 4 and 5, it is contemplated that men as well as women may be customers and participants. Furthermore, it is contemplated that the present invention may be implemented in websites that have only men as customers and/or as participants.
  • Although only four entries are shown in FIG. 5, it is contemplated that the number of entries, corresponding to a pool of potentially available participants, may be very large and may be larger than the number of customers in the customer database.
  • The rating information in column 510 is indicative of ratings that have been accorded to the participants to reflect the extent to which participants have participated frequently, conscientiously and/or effectively in panels responding to shoppers' queries for fashion opinions. Rating of participants will be discussed further herein below.
  • In embodiments where information is transmitted to and/or from a participant via a cellular telephone or other mobile device, the telephone number and/or other information required to contact the cellular telephone or other mobile device may be stored in the participant database for one or more participant records.
  • FIG. 6 is a simplified tabular representation of the profile database 314 shown in FIG. 3. The table of FIG. 6 includes a column 602 for customer identifiers, a column 604 for participant identifiers, a column 606 for the age of the profiled individual, a column 608 for the gender of the profiled individual, a column 610 for the income level for the profiled individual and a column 612 for the self-described social attitude of the profiled individual.
  • As in the table of FIG. 5, a customer identifier is provided for profiled individuals who are customers; for profiled individuals who are not customers, participant identifiers are provided. The age, gender and income level columns 606-610 are self explanatory, and are representative of the various kinds of demographic information that may be stored in the profile database. Other examples of demographic information that may be provided are type of neighborhood of residence (e.g., urban, suburban, ex-urban), and geographic region (e.g., northeast, south, midwest, west coast). In cases where the profiled individual's address is available, both the type of neighborhood and the geographic region may be derived automatically from the individual's zip code. Other kinds of demographic information that may be included, though not indicated in the drawing, are race, ethnic background, religion, marital status, and occupation.
  • Column 612 contains data indicative of the profiled individual's own characterization of her social attitudes. It will be seen that the designations shown in FIG. 6 include categories such as “party animal”, “buttoned down”, “shy”, “vamp”, “and “yuppie”. Numerous other potential categories may be provided, including, for example, “grunge”, “debutante”, and “biker chick”.
  • It is also contemplated that the profile database may include more than one column for subjective categories by which the profiled individual can characterize himself or herself. For example, there may be separate columns for personas projected by the profiled individual in work situations and in social situations, respectively.
  • As described above, in one or more embodiments a plurality of participants may be selected to provide an opinion to a shopper regarding a garment based on a characteristic associated with the shopper. The characteristic may comprise a characteristic possessed by the shopper and/or a characteristic the shopper desires one or more participants to possess. For example, the shopper may specify that at least one participant should be of a certain gender, income level, age and/or self-described social attitude. In another example, a participant may be selected such that the participant shares at least a predetermined number of (or a predetermined particular one or more) characteristics with the shopper requesting the opinions. For example, the merchant server 202 may be programmed to only select participants for a shopper who are within a predetermined range of the shopper's age, are of the same self-described social attitude as the shopper and live within a predetermined geographical range of the shopper.
  • FIG. 7 represents a screen display provided to customers and/or participants to permit them to enter profile information. The display of FIG. 7 includes fields 702 and 704 for entering first and last names. Field 706 is for entering the individual's e-mail address. At field 708 the individual's age is entered and check boxes at 710 allow the individual to enter his or her gender.
  • At 712 a pull down menu is provided to allow the individual to select his or her occupation from a number of alternative occupations included in the menu. A pull down menu provided at 714 allows the individual to select an appropriate income level. Additional pull down menus at 716 and 718 allow the individual to select subjective categories such as a social attitude category and a dressing style. Via a button 720 the individual may indicate completion of the profile information. A button 722 can be used to cancel entry of the profile information. It will be recognized that the screen display of FIG. 7 is only an example of many different alternative screen displays that may be provided for entering profile information. For example, the number and purposes of data entry fields and pull down menus may be different from those shown in FIG. 7. The types of demographic and/or subjective information to be collected may be varied in a large number of ways.
  • FIG. 8 is a simplified tabular representation of the request database 316 shown in FIG. 3. The table of FIG. 8 has a column 802 for combined image identifiers, a column 804 for customer identifiers, a column 806 for request identifiers, a column 808 for request category information, a column 810 for panel size information and a column 812 for panel composition information.
  • The entries in column 802 are pointers to images stored in the combined image database 328 shown in FIG. 3. As will be understood from subsequent discussion, the images in the database 328 are formed by combining image information representative of the shopper, such as a virtual model of the shopper, together with image information which shows a garment selected for a virtual try on by the shopper.
  • The customer identifiers in column 804 have previously been discussed, and uniquely identify the shopper who is submitting the corresponding request for a fashion opinion. The request identifiers in column 806 uniquely identify each request submitted by shoppers who use the feature of the present invention.
  • The information in column 808 characterizes each request by the nature of the feedback requested by the shopper. Among the different possible categories is simple binary feedback (e.g., yes/no or “buy it”/“don't buy it”). Other possibilities are responses in a range of responses such as, on a scale of 1 to 5, is this garment very unattractive, somewhat unattractive, average, somewhat attractive, very attractive. Another possible kind of request category solicits open-ended text responses. Another possible type of response would allow three alternatives, namely yes, no or maybe or “looks great”/“looks ok”/“looks terrible”. In addition, the various types of requested feedback can be combined. For example, a request for yes/no/maybe feedback can be combined with a request for open-ended text responses.
  • In one embodiment, a shopper may be unable to request different types of feedback. For example, the system may be programmed to always solicit only a single type of feedback (e.g., “Buy It”/“Don't Buy It” or “Thumbs Up”/“Thumbs Down”).
  • Column 810 records data, which indicates the size of the panel as requested by the shopper. In one or more embodiments, the shopper may request a size of the panel by specifying a number of participants to whom the image (e.g., image of a garment, image of the shopper wearing the garment, or image of a virtual model of the shopper combined with an image of a garment) is to be output. In another embodiment, the shopper may request a size of the panel by specifying a number of responses that are to be collected. In another embodiment, the shopper may request a size of a panel by specifying a relative size of a panel (e.g., small, large, huge) without specifying a particular number of participants. In such an embodiment, each relative size of the panel may be associated with a respective range of participants (e.g., three to five participants is a small panel, six to ten participants is a medium panel, eleven to twenty participants is a large panel, and over twenty participants is a huge panel) to whom the image is to be output or from whom responses are to be collected. For example, a shopper may specify that the indication of the opinions is to be output to the shopper (and, e.g., the solicitation for opinions ended) when ten responses have been received.
  • It should be noted that, in one or more embodiments, a shopper may specify a period of time for which responses are to be collected, in lieu of or in addition to specifying a size of a panel. For example, a shopper may specify that responses are to be collected for sixty seconds (e.g., from a time at which the request for opinions is output to participants) and the indication of opinions should thus include an indication of whatever opinions are received within the sixty seconds.
  • It should further be noted that, in one or more embodiments, a panel size and/or a period of time for which responses to a request for an opinion are collected may be parameters set by the system operator and not by the shopper. For example, in one embodiment, each shopper requesting an opinion is provided with an indication of whatever opinions are collected during a predetermined period of time (e.g., sixty seconds). Thus, for example, a request for opinions may be output to a predetermined number of qualified participants (e.g., participants selected based on a characteristic associated with the shopper) or to all currently available qualified participants and responses collected for the following predetermined period of time (e.g., sixty seconds). At the end of the predetermined period of time, an indication of the responses received during the predetermined period of time may be output to the shopper.
  • Column 812 provides information that represents the shopper's requested characteristics for the participants who will make up the panel. It should be noted that for purposes of illustration the participant characteristics are set forth in simplified form in FIG. 8. In a practical embodiment of the invention, there may be several different parameters that have been defined by the shopper to request the type of participants in which the shopper is interested.
  • In one or more embodiments, a shopper may pay for using the system of the present invention. For example, the shopper may pay per request submitted or on a subscription basis (e.g., a shopper may pay an extra fee to the shopper's cellular service provider in exchange for a feature wherein the shopper may request fashion opinions). In such embodiments, different fees may provide the shopper with access to more flexibility in submitting requests. For example, an increased fee may allow a shopper to increase the size of the panel, request different types of feedback, and/or select more tailored characteristics of participants to be included on a panel.
  • In one embodiment, a shopper may be allowed to include information in addition to the image with the request to the panel of participants. For example, an indication of the price of the garment, the designer of the garment, the material(s) of which the garment is made, an occasion to which the garment is to be worn may be included with the image and/or an additional image (e.g., an image of the garment in a different color, closer up, or at a different angle). In one embodiment, the shopper may be charged an extra fee for including information in addition to the image with the request.
  • FIG. 9 is a tabular representation of the response database 318 shown in FIG. 3. The table of FIG. 9 includes a column 902 for storing response identifiers, a column 904 for storing response outcomes, a column 906 for storing text portions of responses, a column 908 for storing request identifiers, and a column 910 for storing participant identifiers. The response identifiers stored in column 902 uniquely identify each of the responses received and stored in the response database. The response outcomes of column 904 are indicative of specific alternatives selected in the responses with regard to the queries that prompted the responses. Thus, in the case of a binary (yes/no) query, a “yes” or “no” portion of the response is stored in column 904. Similarly, where the query calls for a multiple-choice response or a choice within a range of responses, the corresponding selected alternative response is stored in column 904.
  • Where the response includes open-ended text, the text is stored in the corresponding field under column 906.
  • The request identifier stored in column 908 indicates the particular request which prompted the respective response. The participant identifier in column 910 identifies the participant who provided the respective response.
  • In one or more embodiments, a participant may be allowed to rate the opinion provided by the participant. For example, the participant may be allowed to indicate a degree of confidence, strength or certainty of the participant's opinion. For example, if the participant is voting “Buy It”, the participant may be allowed to indicate a strength of the participant's opinion (e.g., on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being the strongest). In another embodiment, a participant may be allowed to indicate a reason for the participant's response. For example, if the participant is providing a text response, the text may indicate the reason why the participant is of the opinion indicated in the response (e.g., why the participant is of the opinion that the shopper should not purchase the garment in the image). In another example, if the participant is providing a binary “Buy It”/“Don't Buy It” response, the participant may still be allowed to indicate the reason for the response (e.g., in text format or by selecting one of a plurality of predetermined choices, such as “price”, “color”, “dated look”, “fit”, etc.).
  • In one or more embodiments, a shopper and participant may be allowed to communicate with one another. For example, a shopper may find a particular response (e.g., a text response) particularly intriguing and may request to communicate with the participant who provided the response. In another example, a participant may find that the participant has a variety of information to provide to the shopper (e.g., advice about what styles would be particularly flattering to the shopper) that would best be conveyed by communicating with the shopper rather than in the response to the request for an opinion. In an embodiment where a shopper and participant are allowed to communicate, one or both of the shopper and participant may be provided contact information via which the other may be contacted (e.g., telephone number or e-mail address). In such an embodiment, the shopper and participant may communicate directly with one another. In another embodiment, the shopper and participant may be allowed to communicate with one another via the merchant server 202. For example, the merchant server 202 may relay messages between the shopper and participant or the shopper and participant may communicate via a chat room maintained by the merchant server 202.
  • FIG. 10 is a tabular representation of the feedback database 320 shown in FIG. 3. Each entry in the table of FIG. 10 contains summary and/or other accumulated information that was obtained by receiving, accumulating and processing all responses for a particular request. The table of FIG. 10 includes a column 1002 for request identifiers; a column 1004 for data obtained by accumulating and analyzing response outcomes for the respective request, column 1006 for the participant identifiers for all of the participants who responded to the request, column 1008 for collecting all of the open ended text responses for the respective request, column 1010 for offer identifiers that identify offers that are applicable to response feedback provided for a respective request, and column 1012 which contains descriptions of applicable offers. Offers provided in connection with feedback for shoppers' requests will be discussed further below.
  • Although entries corresponding to feedback for only two requests are shown in the table of FIG. 10, it is to be understood that in a practical embodiment of the invention the number of entries may be much larger, corresponding to feedback stored for a large number of requests.
  • In one or more embodiments in which a shopper is provided with an indication of the responses received in response to the shopper's query for opinions regarding a garment in simplified form (e.g., percentage of positive opinions versus percentage of negative opinions), the shopper may be allowed to access more detailed information regarding the responses. For example, the shopper may be allowed to access any additional information provided by a participant with a response (e.g., the text of the response and/or the reasons for the opinion). For example, the shopper may be allowed to select a “more details” option on a screen of the shopper terminal 206.
  • The information in the feedback database 320 and/or the response database may be utilized to provide more detailed information about responses to the shopper. For example, the feedback database 320 may include the response identifier of each response used to determine the data in column 1004. The records of the responses corresponding to the response identifiers may be retrieved from the response database 318 and any additional data stored for each response in the retrieved records may be output to the shopper. Additionally, should the shopper indicate a desire to communicate with a participant who provided a particular response, the participant identifier corresponding to the response may be retrieved from the response record of the response database 318. The contact information for the participant may then be retrieved from the participant database 312 and utilized to allow the shopper to communicate with the participant. For example, the contact information may be provided to the shopper, with the participant's permission. Alternatively, a message from the shopper may be relayed to the participant using the contact information.
  • The shopper image database 322, the product database 324, the garment image database 326, the combined image database 328 and the transaction database 330 need not be described in detail but will now be briefly discussed.
  • The shopper image database 322 stores image data that is to be used to represent the shoppers' appearance during virtual “try-ons” of garments. As noted before, the data in this database may be derived from one or more photographs of the shoppers and/or may represent virtual models of the shoppers.
  • The product database 324 may have the same format as conventional data structures maintained for existing retail-shopping websites to store data regarding products available for on-line sale.
  • The garment image database 326 stores image data that represents the appearance of garments that may be virtually “tried on” and/or that are available for purchase by a shopper. The garment data is available to be combined with the shopper image data to provide a representation of the shopper “trying on” a selected garment. Additionally, the garment data is available for transmission to a participant for an opinion
  • In one embodiment, a garment image database 326 is used to retrieve an image of a garment a shopper is considering purchasing. For example, a shopper may input a garment identifier into shopper terminal 206 and transmit the garment identifier to the merchant server 202 along with a request for opinions regarding the garment. The shopper may input the garment identifier, for example, by scanning a bar code associated with the garment using a bar code peripheral device of the shopper terminal 206. Alternatively, the shopper may input the garment identifier by typing it using a keypad of the shopper identifier. Other input devices (e.g., touch screens, microphones, etc.) would be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art after reading the present disclosure. The merchant server 202 may maintain a database of garment images (or have access to one or more of such databases), such as garment image database 326. Each garment image in such a database may correspond to a garment identifier. Thus, once the garment identifier is received from the shopper, the image corresponding to the garment identifier may be retrieved from the database and transmitted to each selected participant. In one or more embodiments, the garment image database 326 may store additional information about a garment (e.g., designer, color, material, or other description). In one embodiment, such additional information about the garment may be included in the request for an opinion that is transmitted to a participant.
  • The combined image database 328 stores data corresponding to images formed by combining shopper image data with garment image data.
  • The transaction database 330 may resemble conventional data structures employed in connection with retail shopping websites to keep track of purchases transacted through the website. The transaction database 330 may store, for example, information about garments purchased (e.g., time of purchase, purchase total, items purchased, payment identifier). In another example, the transaction database 330 may store information about a request for opinions submitted by a shopper (e.g., time of request, price paid for request, etc.).
  • Operation of an on-line embodiment of the invention will now be described with reference to FIG. 11.
  • At step 1102 in FIG. 11, a shopper logs on to a retail shopping website. This may occur in an entirely conventional manner. Next, at step 1104, the shopper invokes a “request opinion” function provided in accordance with the invention at the retail shopping website. The selection of this function may be accomplished by such conventional techniques as clicking on a suitable link, actuating a virtual button, or selecting an item from a menu.
  • Then, at step 1106, an image that represents the shopper is retrieved. The image may be a virtual model that has previously been created for the shopper based on input provided by the shopper. Creation of such a virtual model may be in accordance with known techniques, such as those employed for the “Your Personal Model” feature of the Lands' End shopping website (www.landsend.com). Alternatively, or in addition, the image of the shopper may be based upon one or more photographs of the shopper. Such photographs may have been scanned in to the shopper's computer and then transmitted to the website or may be captured by a camera interfaced to the shopper's computer. As still another alternative, the shopper may have visited a retail store or service location affiliated with the shopping website to have one or more photographs taken for transmittal to the website. In addition, or alternatively, at such a retail store or service location, scanning technology such as laser scanning of the type used for Levi's custom jeans may be employed to generate a model of the shopper that very closely approximates the actual shape of the shopper's body. As still another alternative, the shopper may select (or may previously have selected) a “dummy” image of a kind that resembles the shopper's body type. The selected dummy then serves as an image of the shopper. Shoppers who wish to preserve their anonymity may be permitted to edit their images so as to obscure their faces.
  • At step 1108 the stopper selects one or more garments that the shopper desires to virtually “try on”. It will be noted that step 1108 may be performed prior to steps 1104 and 1106. Selection of the garment may be performed in accordance with known techniques.
  • At step 1110 an image of the selected garment or garments is retrieved from the garment image database 326 and is combined with the shopper image retrieved at step 1106 to provide a representation of the shopper wearing the selected garment. The resulting combined image is then available for distribution to participants to obtain their opinions as to the attractiveness of the garment or garments and/or their suitability for purchase by the shopper.
  • At step 1112 the shopper indicates characteristics of participants from whom the shopper wishes to receive an opinion in regard to the selected garment or garments. The shopper's selection of participant characteristics may be facilitated by a screen display of the type shown in FIG. 12. In the display of FIG. 12 a checkbox 1202 may be selected if the shopper wishes to receive opinions from any available participant. If the shopper selects checkbox 1204, a previously entered definition of a participant panel is invoked.
  • A checkbox 1206 is available to permit the shopper to select a panel of participants made up of his or her peers. It is to be understood that a peer group participant panel would be made up of participants who have the same demographic characteristics and social attitudes and/or other profile characteristics as the shopper. The definition of the shopper's peer group may be based on a profile that the shopper has previously entered into the website, as discussed in connection with FIG. 7. It should be noted that the peer group panel definition invoked by checkbox 1206 may be the same as the standard participant panel definition invoked by checkbox 1204. That is, the shopper's “standard” participant panel definition may be the same as his or her peer group.
  • A checkbox indicated at 1207 permits the shopper to select a previously defined panel of specific individuals who are friends or acquaintances of the shopper.
  • If the shopper does not elect the all-inclusive or previously specified participant panel definitions that may be invoked by one of the checkboxes 1202-1207, the shopper may elect to define the participant panel in terms of specific characteristics by actuating other elements of the screen display of FIG. 12. For example, a pull down menu 1208 allows the shopper to specify an age category for the panel of participants. If the shopper wishes to select two or more of the age categories available from the pull down menu 1208, this may be done by actuating a button 1210 in cooperation with the pull down menu 1208.
  • Checkboxes provided at 1212 allow the shopper to select the gender or genders of the participants to be included in the panel.
  • A pull down menu provided at 1214 allows the shopper to specify the occupation of participants to be included in the panel. A button provided at 1216 allows the participant to select more than one occupation from the menu 1214.
  • A pull down menu provided at 1218 allows the shopper to designate an income level of participants to be included in the panel, and a button 1220 to be used in conjunction with the menu 1218 allows more than one income level to be designated. Pull down menus 1222 and 1224 may be used by the shopper to designate social categories and dressing styles of participants to be included in the panel. Buttons 1226 and 1228, respectively associated with the menus 1222 and 1224, permit the shopper to select more than one item from the respective menus.
  • The desired size of the panel can be defined by using the pull down menu indicated at 1230. There are trade-offs involved in selecting the size of the panel. In general, the larger the panel, the more confident the shopper may feel that he or she has received a sound opinion on the selected garment or garments. On the other hand, larger panels may take longer to assemble and to receive responses from, and, in some circumstances, a sufficient number of participants may not be available to provide a panel of the size requested by the shopper.
  • When the shopper is satisfied with the definition of the participant panel as input via the screen display of FIG. 12, he or she may actuate a “submit” button 1232. If the shopper wishes to revise the participant panel definition or to exit from the process of selecting a panel without going forward, then a “cancel” button 1234 may be actuated. If the shopper desires to store the panel definition defined in the screen display of FIG. 12 as a standard profile for his or her participant panels, then a button 1236 may be actuated.
  • It should be recognized that the layout of the screen display of FIG. 12 may be varied and that items for defining the panel may be omitted from or added to those shown in FIG. 12. For example, elements for prescribing the geographical location of participants may be added, and there may be different or additional categories of subjective or self-defined categories in addition to those represented by the menus 1222 and 1224.
  • The display of FIG. 12 may also include a field (not shown) in which the shopper may enter a specific query to be posed to the participants. The query might be something like, “This blouse costs $50.00; is it a good buy?” or “Do these shoulder pads look right?” Or there may be a pull down menu that allows the shopper to select from among a number of pre-stored queries. In the absence of such a query being entered or selected by the shopper, the system may pose a standard query to the participants, as will be seen in connection with FIG. 14. It is contemplated that the opportunity for the shopper to enter or select a query may be provided in a screen display that is separate from the panel definition display of FIG. 12.
  • It should also be noted that the definition of the participant panel represented by step 1112 in FIG. 11 may occur before one or more of the steps 1106 through 1110.
  • Once the combined image representing the shopper and the selected garment or garments has been generated and the participant panel has been defined, the merchant server 202 proceeds to assemble the panel and distribute the combined image to the panel of participants (step 1114).
  • Participants selected to receive the image are determined by comparing profiles of available members of a pool of participants with the characteristics selected by the shopper at step 1112. Participants may indicate their availability to be members of a panel in a number of different ways. For example, a participant may download a client application to the participant's terminal to support a function like the “instant messaging” function available through the AOL Internet service or to support the well-known “ICQ” function. In another embodiment, participants may log onto a suitable page of the merchant website to indicate their availability.
  • Until the desired number of participants have received the image and responded to the shopper's request for feedback, the merchant website selects each available participant who matches the shopper's selected criteria as a potential participant for the panel. A message like that shown in FIG. 13 is sent to the selected participants to determine whether the available participants are, in fact, interested in participating in a panel. If the participant selects the OK button 1302 shown in FIG. 13, then a display page like that shown in FIG. 14 is sent from the merchant server to the participant's terminal. It will be noted that the display of FIG. 14 includes an image 1402 which is the combined image generated at step 1110. Also shown in FIG. 14 are checkboxes 1404, 1406 and 1408 that respectively allow the participant to register a positive, neutral or negative opinion based on the image 1402. A field 1410 is also provided to permit the participant to enter additional comments in the form of open-ended text.
  • Instead of the three checkboxes shown in FIG. 14, only two alternatives, i.e. positive and negative, may be provided. Also, more than three alternatives may be provided. For example, the participant may be prompted to select one of a range of five alternatives, e.g.: How does this look on a scale of 5? In this case the possible alternatives may be 5—excellent, 4—good, 3—average, 2—poor, 1—terrible.
  • Referring once more to FIG. 11, responses entered by participants via the display of FIG. 14, or a similar display, are received by the merchant server (step 1116) and the received responses are then processed (step 1118) by, for example, performing a statistical analysis to determine what percentage of the responses were favorable, unfavorable and neutral. Based on the processing of the responses, feedback is then provided to the shopper (step 1120) to indicate to the shopper the results of the responses from the panel of participants.
  • FIG. 15 shows one example of how the feedback may be presented to the shopper. In FIG. 15, a pie chart 1502 presents results of the statistical analysis of the responses from the participants. For the purposes of the display of FIG. 15 it has been assumed that the responses from the participants were in general very favorable, with three-quarters of the participants indicating that the shopper looked “great” in the selected garment or garments. Consequently, a button 1504 is provided in the display of FIG. 15 to allow the shopper to immediately indicate selection of the garment or garments for purchase. Actuation of the button 1504 may, for example, invoke a “one-click” purchase routine, like that described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,960,411. Alternatively, actuation of the button 1504 may add the selected garment or garments to a virtual “shopping cart”. Virtual shopping carts are widely used in connection with retail shopping websites and need not be described further.
  • Also provided in the display of FIG. 15 is a “see comments” button 1506. Actuation of the button 1506 allows the shopper to gain access to the open-ended text comments that were entered by the participants as part of their responses. (Of course, no button 1506 is provided in cases where none of the participants provided text responses.) The comments may simply be streamed in the order in which they were received. As another alternative, a key word analysis of the comments may have been made as part of the processing of the responses carried out at step 1118 (FIG. 11). On the basis of the key word analysis, the comments may be grouped together and may be accessible via headings that correspond to keywords detected in the responses. Examples of key words that may be used to analyze text comments are “color”, “pattern”, or “cut”. Key word analysis techniques that may be employed in analyzing the text comments are discussed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/540,498, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Administering a Survey via a Computer Network”, which is commonly assigned with the present application. The disclosure of the '498 application is incorporated herein by reference.
  • FIG. 16 is an example of another screen display that may be provided in accordance with the invention to give the shopper feedback based on the responses from the panel of participants. This screen display includes a “thumbs up” symbol 1602 to indicate that the reaction of the panel of participants to the garment in the combined image was a positive reaction. If the reaction were negative, a “thumbs down” symbol might be provided. If the responses were mixed (neither predominantly positive nor predominantly negative), a “shoulder shrug” image might be provided.
  • If the shopper is interested in receiving more information about the responses from the panel of participants, he or she may actuate a button 1603. In response to actuation of this button, a display like that of FIG. 15 may be provided, including a pie chart showing results of a statistical analysis of the responses. Other manners of presenting the statistical analysis may also be used, such as a bar chart, or a table showing percentages in numerical form.
  • The shopper can also get more information about the responses from the panel of participants by actuating a “see comments” button 1606. This button performs the same functions as the button 1506 which was discussed in connection with FIG. 15. In addition, the display of FIG. 16 includes a “Buy it now” button 1604 that corresponds to, and may provide the same functions as, the button 1504 discussed in connection with FIG. 15.
  • It is noted that the screen displays of FIGS. 15 and 16 have a marketing function in that the merchant server allows the shopper to initiate purchasing of the selected garment or garments by actuating buttons 1504 or 1604, as the case may be. These screen displays or similar displays may be used for other marketing purposes as well. For example, if the feedback provided by the screen display is indicative of an unfavorable reaction to the combined image, then a button or link may be included in the screen display to allow the shopper to access alternative garments that the shopper may virtually “try on” or select for purchase. Such a button may indicate, for example, “try a different color”. A suggestion or alternative offer included in the feedback screen may be selected by the server based on an analysis of the responses provided by the participants.
  • The feedback screen may serve as a vehicle for other marketing overtures, as well. For example, if the reaction from the panel of participants is a mixed reaction, a button or display may be included in the screen of FIG. 15 to offer the shopper a discount to buy the selected garment or garments. Where the reaction is a favorable reaction, the screen display of FIG. 15 or FIG. 16 may include a portion that suggests an accessory that goes with the selected garment or garments. The suggestion to purchase the accessory may include a discount offer or a package price offer to give the shopper an incentive to purchase the accessory together with the selected garment or garments. It is also contemplated to offer a package price for the selected garment and an item other than an accessory. For example, if the selected garment is a pair of slacks, a package price may be offered for the selected garment plus a matching or coordinating blouse. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/360,422, entitled “Determination and Presentation of Package Pricing Offers in Response to Customer Interest in a Product”, which is commonly assigned with the present application, discloses techniques for presenting package pricing in an on-line retail shopping environment. The disclosure of the '422 application is incorporated herein by reference.
  • It is also contemplated to incorporate marketing functions in the server's communications with participants. For example, a “buy it now” button like buttons 1504 and 1604 (FIGS. 15 and 16 respectively) may be added to the display of FIG. 14 so that the participant is allowed to initiate purchase of the garment shown in image 1402. Alternatively, a pop up message such as “Do you want to buy the garment?” may be actuated if the participant indicates a positive response to the image such as by actuating checkbox 1404 in the screen display of FIG. 14.
  • The on-line fashion opinion feature described herein provides benefits for the merchant, for the shopper, and for the participants.
  • From the point of view of the merchant, this feature provides excellent opportunities for the merchant to contribute to the shopper's decision-making process. Perhaps most important, the information generated from the responses from the participants may help overcome any anxiety or reluctance the shopper may have in regard to purchasing the selected garment or garments. Consequently, this feature may make the difference between an order received from the shopper and an order lost. Thus the on-line fashion opinion feature may serve as a marketing tool to acquire and retain customers. Moreover, the screen displays by which the server communicates with the shopper provide what may be a highly effective channel through which the merchant may offer to the shopper promotions, discounts, up sells and other marketing opportunities.
  • The fashion opinion feature of the present invention can also operate as an effective and low-cost market research tool. In essence, each request for participants' opinions may function as an on-line focus group concerning the garment or garments that the shopper is virtually trying on. The data representing the participants' responses is potentially very valuable, and may be analyzed by the merchant to detect fashion trends and to learn how various groups of customers or potential customers are perceiving the merchant's product offerings. This data, or information obtained by analyzing it, may also be sold to designers or other suppliers of fashion items.
  • Also, since demographic and other information about shoppers may also be available, it may be possible to develop additional market intelligence simply by analyzing the requests for opinions by shopper, to spot trends in terms of what items are appealing to which groups of customers.
  • The fashion opinion process disclosed herein also enhances the merchant's market presence vis-à-vis the participants. Preferably every time the participant is invited to respond to a request for an opinion, the merchant's name is included in the request. Thus the participant's awareness of the merchant is reinforced. Furthermore, when participants do respond, they are exposed to the item of merchandise that has been selected by the shopper, which may cause the participant to develop an interest in purchasing the item. In one embodiment, as noted above, the interaction of the merchant server with the participant may include presenting the participant with an opportunity to purchase the garment that is included in the image to which the participant is responding. Thus the participants' responses to the request for an opinion becomes selling opportunities for the merchant.
  • From the point of view of the shopper, this on-line opinion feature is also beneficial in a number of ways. For example, as noted above, the information received as a result of the participants' responses may help the shopper to make an informed decision and may aid the shopper in overcoming the anxiety which often accompanies a decision as to whether to purchase a garment. If the shopper is concerned as to whether the garment will prove acceptable to his or her peers, then he or she may request opinions from participants who are similar to the shopper in demographic and/or subjective characteristics. If the shopper wishes to determine whether the garment or garments will appeal to a group of people other than the shopper's peers (e.g., to determine whether the garment will appeal to members of the opposite sex) the shopper again can specify an appropriate group of participants from which opinions are to be received.
  • The shopper may also benefit by receiving targeted offers, such as those described above, that are relevant to the potential purchase of the garment. For example, as noted before, if the response from the participants to a particular garment is mixed, the shopper may receive an incentive to purchase the garment, notwithstanding the less than positive response from the participants. Other offers that may be provided to the shopper, as also noted above, may provide favorable deals if the selected garment or garments are purchased together with other items.
  • Furthermore, the fashion opinion feature may also enhance the overall on-line shopping experience. Many shoppers may find that there is substantial entertainment value simply in selecting a garment, and observing the resulting combined image when the garment is “tried on” the virtual model or other representation of the shopper. The entertainment value may be further increased by having the combined image sent to participants (perhaps a large number of participants) and then reading their comments or other responses to the combined image. It will be understood that the present invention allows each shopper to assume the role of “fashion model”.
  • Entertainment value is also one of the benefits of the fashion opinion feature from the point of view of the participants. Participants may find it very enjoyable to observe what shoppers are considering buying and “trying on”. In effect participants are permitted by the invention to be attendees at a virtual fashion show. They may also enjoy having the opportunity to express their opinion about the potential purchases. At the same time, participants have the opportunity to learn what kinds of fashions are being made available by merchants. This can give participants ideas about how the participants may wish to expand their own wardrobes.
  • It is also contemplated, in some embodiments, that the participants may earn favorable ratings by responding to queries, or merely by being available to respond. For participants who earn favorable ratings, merchants may provide a number of incentives, such as a preferred customer status, an opportunity to preview designer collections that are not yet available to the public, or access to merchandise that is in limited supply. The merchant may also provide discounts or other monetary benefits to highly rated participants.
  • It can therefore be seen that the fashion opinion feature described herein is advantageous to all involved.
  • In addition to the on-line embodiment described above, it is also contemplated to provide an embodiment of the present invention for use by shoppers who are physically trying on clothes at a “bricks and mortar” retail store. FIGS. 17 and 18 illustrate a hardware arrangement provided to implement the present invention in an in-store environment.
  • FIG. 17 shows a dressing room 1700 that includes a wall 1702 on which a camera 1704 is mounted. Camera 1704 may be a conventional color video camera, and includes an optical system 1705. Alternatively, a digital camera may be employed. A shopper 1706 is standing in the field of view of the camera 1704. The shopper is wearing garments 1708. Conveniently mounted on the wall 1702 is a user interface 1710 by which the shopper 1706 may input instructions for performing the present invention. The user interface 1710 may include, for example, a touch screen 1712 and a magnetic stripe card reader 1714.
  • Electronic components of the system are illustrated in block diagram form in FIG. 18. In addition to the user interface 1710 and the camera 1704 discussed in connection with FIG. 17, and the Internet 204 and participant terminals 208 discussed in connection with FIG. 2, the system also includes a merchant server 1802 and a frame grabber 1804. The merchant server 1802 includes memory components 1806 and communication ports 1808. The memory components 1806 provide program, working and database storage. The communication ports 1808 provide an interface between the merchant server 1802 and the Internet 204 and participant terminals 208.
  • The merchant server 1802 is connected to the user interface 1710 to receive input from the shopper and to provide output to the shopper. The frame grabber 1804 is connected between the merchant server 1802 and the camera 1704. Under control of the merchant server 1802, the frame grabber 1804 captures and digitizes video signal frames provided by the camera 1704. The digitized frames are stored in the memory 1806 of the merchant server 1802.
  • FIG. 19 is a flow chart that illustrates operation of the system of FIGS. 17 and 18. At step 1902, the shopper dons the garment or garments in regard to which he or she desires to receive opinions from a panel of participants. At step 1904 the shopper enters his or her customer identifier into the system. This may be done by entering numerical data via the touch screen 1712. Alternatively, a shopper identification card or the shopper's credit card may be read by the card reader 1714. As another alternative the shopper may enter his or her name via the touch screen.
  • At step 1906 the shopper enters into the system an identification code that identifies the garment that he or she is trying on. This code may also be entered via the touch screen 1712. As an alternative, the user interface 1710 may include a bar code scanner that the shopper may use to scan a bar code on a price tag that has been affixed to the garment.
  • It will be recognized that the order in which steps 1902, 1904 and 1906 are performed is not critical. However, it may be more efficient for the shopper to don the garment before entering the information referred to in connection with steps 1904 and 1906.
  • After donning the garment, and either before or after entering the information referred to in connection with steps 1904 and 1906, the shopper uses the user interface 1710 to signal the system to capture an image of the shopper while wearing the garment. This step is represented at 1908 in FIG. 19. Preferably, the capturing of the shopper's image is delayed by a certain period, say five seconds, after he or she signals for the image to be captured. This allows the shopper enough time to assume an appropriate pose for the image to be captured.
  • It is preferred that the shopper's image as captured by the system via the camera 1704 be displayed on the touch screen 1712 for review and approval by the shopper. Decision block 1910 represents a determination by the shopper as to whether the image is acceptable. If not, the shopper may again signal the system to capture another image of the shopper.
  • Step 1912 represents the shopper entering his or her selection of desired characteristics for the panel of participants who will provide their opinion on the garment. It is to be noted that step 1912 may be performed prior to some or all of steps 1902 through 1910. Step 1912 may be like step 1112 of FIG. 11, and may use an interface screen like that of FIG. 12. However, the display of FIG. 12 may be adapted for ease of use with a touch screen interface. It may also be desirable to simplify the screen display of FIG. 12, since the shopper may not wish to spend as much time at the interface 1710 as he or she may be willing to spend when entering information via his or her own computer terminal as in the on-line embodiment described above.
  • Following step 1912 in FIG. 19 are steps 1914, 1916, 1918 and 1920, which may generally correspond to steps 1114-1120 of FIG. 11. It will be understood that features of the process of FIG. 11 that are only applicable to on-line shopping would not be included in the process of FIG. 19. However, the user interface 1710 may be used by the system for in-store promotions, and for any other purpose that an in-store kiosk may be put to. For example, since the system knows what garment or garments the shopper is trying on, the system may also suggest to the shopper accessories and/or matching or coordinating garments to purchase in addition to the garment being tried on. In addition, when the feedback from the participants is unfavorable or mixed, the system may suggest alternative garments for the shopper to try on. The system may include a function to permit the shopper to summon a member of the store's sales staff to help the shopper, for example, to locate an alternative garment, an accessory, or a matching or complementary garment, that has been recommended by the system. With the addition of a receipt printer, the arrangement of FIG. 17 may operate as a self-checkout station.
  • Advantages offered by the embodiment of FIGS. 17-19 are similar to those of the previous embodiment. As before, this embodiment allows a retailer to provide an additional service to the shopper, including opportunities for marketing both to the shopper and to the participants.
  • For the shopper, the availability of opinions from third parties may help the shopper overcome any anxiety or hesitation in regard to the purchase, and may generally make the shopping experience more enjoyable. The benefits for participants are much the same as in the on-line embodiment described above.
  • In the embodiments discussed above, the fashion opinion system may be administered either by a merchant's on-line shopping website server or by a server that may be installed in the merchant's store. However, alternative configurations are contemplated. For example, the fashion opinion system may be administered by a service bureau that is under contract with the merchant and that may provide similar services for other merchants. Information gathered by the service bureau server regarding requests for opinions and responses may be transmitted to merchants' computers.
  • In the embodiments described above, the participants' involvement ends when they have provided their responses to the shopper's query. However, it is contemplated to modify these embodiments such that shoppers are permitted, or the system is arranged, to ask follow-up questions of the participants and the participants are allowed to respond. For example, either the system itself or a shopper may inquire of participants who gave negative opinions whether their opinion related to the garment itself or simply how the garment looked on the shopper.
  • It is also contemplated to permit shoppers to engage in on-line chat with a selected one or ones of the participants to follow up on comments that the participants made, or simply to ask participants to provide more information. As an example, if only one participant in a panel gave a negative opinion, the shopper may wish to follow up with the participant to find out what the participant did not like about the image that was sent to the participant.
  • Although it may be preferable to report the participants' opinions exactly as received, it is also contemplated to allow an interested third party to skew the reported results. For example, a parental override could be implemented by allowing parents to indicate to a system that any time a child tries on clothing that the parent considers unsuitable, a negative result will be reported. The results could also be skewed at the request of a third party, in a positive direction, so that the third party encourages the shopper, in effect, to purchase clothes that the third party approves of. It is contemplated that the third party may be charged a fee by the system for the privilege of skewing the results.
  • In the embodiment of the invention illustrated in FIGS. 17-19, the user interface is configured as a kiosk embedded in a wall of a dressing room, with the wall of the dressing room serving as a kiosk structure. As an alternative, it is contemplated to mount the camera and the user interface in a stand-alone kiosk structure. As still another alternative, a camera and user interface may be implemented as a compact, portable, personal digital assistant (PDA) in wireless communication with the merchant server 1802 (FIG. 18).
  • Referring now to FIG. 20, a plan diagram of a cellular telephone 2000 is illustrated. Cellular telephone 2000 may comprise a participant terminal 208, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The cellular telephone 2000 may be, for example, programmed to operate on a 3G network. The cellular telephone 2000 may be operable to receive and display images (e.g., images of garments, images of a shopper wearing a garment, and/or images of a virtual model of a shopper combined with an image of a garment). Thus, when a shopper submits a request for opinions regarding a garment, an image of the garment along with a query may be transmitted to the cellular telephone of each participant selected for the panel that is to provide an opinion to the shopper.
  • Cellular telephone 2000 includes a display screen 2010 and a keypad area 2020. The display screen 2010 is displaying an image of a garment, additional information about the garment (price and material) and a request for an opinion regarding the garment. The request for an opinion instructs the participant to vote either that the shopper should buy the garment or not buy the garment. The participant may respond to the request for the opinion by pressing the appropriate keys on the keypad 2020, as instructed in the request for the opinion (i.e., by pressing “1” to vote that the shopper should buy the garment and pressing “2” to vote that the shopper should not buy the garment).
  • Cellular telephone 2000 also includes a speaker 2030 and a microphone 2040. In one or more embodiments, the speaker 2030 may be utilized to transmit a request for an opinion to a participant. For example, a computerized message or human operator may output the request for the opinion to the participant (e.g., by telling the participant to press “1” to vote that the shopper should buy the garment or press “2” to vote that the shopper should not buy the garment). In one or more embodiments, a participant may be allowed to provide an opinion and thus respond to a request for an opinion utilizing microphone 2040. For example, the participant may speak the words “Buy It” or “Don't Buy It” or another choice of words conveying the participant's response to the request for the opinion into the speaker 2040. A voice recognition module of the merchant server 202 or another computing device operating to facilitate embodiments of the invention may determine the participant's response by analyzing the participant's spoken words and converting them to text.
  • Referring now to FIG. 21, a plan diagram of a cellular telephone 2100 is illustrated. Cellular telephone 2100 may comprise a shopper terminal 206, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The cellular telephone 2100, like cellular telephone 2000, may be, for example, programmed to operate on a 3G network. The cellular telephone 2100 may be operable to receive and display indications of responses to requests for opinions.
  • Cellular telephone 2100 includes a display screen 2110 and a keypad area 2120. The display screen 2110 is displaying an indication of results of a request for opinions. Additionally, the display screen is displaying instructions to the shopper for obtaining further details regarding the results. For example, by pressing “#”, the shopper may be presented with additional details of one or more responses (e.g., the full text of one or more responses) or may be connected to a human operator who may answer any questions the shopper may have about the results. The shopper may use keypad area 2120 to obtain the additional details, per the instructions.
  • The cellular telephone 2100 includes a speaker 2130 and a microphone 2140. In one or more embodiments, the shopper may utilize the speaker 2130 and/or the microphone 2140 to communicate with the merchant server or other computing device or entity facilitating aspects of the present invention. For example, the results of the request for opinions may be output to the shopper via speaker 2130. In another example, the shopper may request additional details regarding the results by speaking into the microphone 2140 or may communicate with a human operator regarding the additional details of the results using the microphone 2140.
  • It should be noted that the display area 2010 of cellular telephone 2000 and the display area 2110 of cellular telephone 2100 may be color displays operable to display detailed graphical images to the participant and shopper, respectively. For example, the display areas 2010 and 2110 may comprise color Liquid Crystal Displays (LCDs).
  • It should further be noted that, in one or more embodiments, the cellular telephone 2100 of the shopper may include an image capturing peripheral, such as a digital camera. The shopper may use the image capturing peripheral to capture an image of a garment and/or an image of the shopper wearing the garment, for output to the one or more participants to whom the request for opinions is to be output.
  • It was described above that a rating system may be employed for participants. The purpose of such a system may be to encourage participants to take part in the system and to participate conscientiously and effectively. For example, if a participant provides a particularly insightful and lengthy response, the shopper may indicate that the participant should receive an enhanced rating. Alternatively, the system may automatically provide ratings for participants based on availability, participation and/or length of responses. As noted above, participants may receive benefits from a system administrator or from the retailer when participants achieve a certain rating level. It is expected that good will of participants and a participant rating system, if implemented, will suffice to produce honest responses from participants. However, if certain participants appear to be providing only negative opinions for the purpose of annoying shoppers, the merchant may choose to screen out such participants.
  • Shoppers may be given the option only to receive responses from participants who have relatively high ratings. The system may provide that participants who have not participated (i.e., new participants), may have a default rating at a low level. Participants may also be rated based on their history as customers of a retailer. That is, participants who have bought a considerable amount of merchandise from a merchant may be accorded an enhanced rating because the participant's purchases.
  • The present invention has been discussed in connection with trying on garments, but is also applicable to items such as cosmetics, eyeglasses, hairstyles and plastic surgery. Of course, plastic surgery cannot be “tried on”, but an image or virtual image of the shopper (prospective patient) can be manipulated to indicate how the shopper will appear after the surgery has been performed.
  • It was noted above that merchants may be enabled to suggest alternative or complementary items relative to garments that the shopper is trying on or virtually trying on. It is contemplated that this marketing channel may be made available by the retailer to clothing manufacturers or designers, for a fee.
  • It is also contemplated that participants may take part in a purchase transaction involving a selected garment. For example, if a participant is a relative, friend or acquaintance of the shopper, the participant may be given the option of subsidizing the purchase or of purchasing the garment as a gift for the shopper. Alternatively, a participant may be a representative of another merchant who makes a cross-subsidy offer to the shopper in connection with the purchase of the garment.
  • Where the shopper image is a virtual model, the system may recommend to the shopper a garment or garments that was favorably reviewed for another shopper or shoppers having a similar body type.
  • The present invention may include a number of features to enhance the entertainment value of the system from the point of view of the participants.
  • According to one such feature, when participants are invited to join a panel, they are informed of demographic or other characteristics of the shopper, and make a decision on whether to participate based on the shopper's characteristics. In another embodiment, participants are given the option of requesting information about the shopper.
  • According to another feature, participants are permitted to view shopper/garment combined images, and possibly also to provide responses, even when the participants do not match the participant characteristics selected by the shopper. In such cases, the non-matching participants' responses may not be used to generate the feedback for the shopper. The participants may be allowed to search for shopper/garment images to view based on shopper characteristics, after logging on to a suitable website. Also, or alternatively, shoppers may be rated based on responses from the participants and participants may search for shoppers to view based on ratings categories such as “top ten shoppers”, “worst ten shoppers”, “most improved shopper”. Participants and/or shoppers may also be allowed to view lists of garments included in highly rated shopper/garment images.
  • It is also contemplated that shoppers may be permitted to define a diverse panel of participants while receiving feedback that is divided by categories of participants.
  • In one or more embodiments, participants may be compensated for providing opinions to shoppers. For example, participants may be provided with a benefit in exchange for each opinion provided or in exchange for every predetermined number of opinions provided. Examples of benefits that may be provided include, but are not limited to, monetary fees, entries into sweepstakes or lotteries, discounts on merchandise or services, or access to the present system for purposes of requesting opinions from other participants. In the latter example, the participant who receives this benefit becomes a shopper when requesting an opinion.
  • In one or more embodiments, steps may be taken to maintain the anonymity of a shopper who requests an opinion regarding a garment. For example, if an image of a shopper is transmitted along with the request for an opinion, the face of the shopper may be blurred, removed or replaced in the image. In an example where only the image of the garment is transmitted, the request for an opinion that is transmitted to a participant may not include any information identifying the shopper who requested the opinion (e.g., the shopper's name or other identifying information may not be transmitted).
  • It should be understood that, in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present invention, a shopper is provided with the results of a request for opinions within a very short time of submitting such a request. For example, a shopper may be provided with the results within a one or a few minutes of submitting the request. In order to accomplish this, the selection of participants for a panel and the output of the image and/or request for opinions to participants may be performed substantially immediately upon receiving the request for opinions from the shopper. Further, the participants may be provided with a maximum period of time within which to respond to a request for an opinion. For example, a participant may be provided with a maximum period of time of one to ten minutes within which to respond to an opinion. In such an embodiment, the system may wait for responses to be received from participants for the maximum period of time and then determine the results of the query (e.g., determine the indication to output to the shopper, such as percentage of participants who voted “Buy It” versus the percentage of participants who voted “Don't Buy It”) at the end of the period of time, regardless of whether all participants have responded.
  • In one embodiment the period of time for accumulating responses may be set such that the process of collecting opinions and outputting the indication of the results of the request for opinions is performed within a short period of time. The short period of time may be measured from a time at which the request is received from the shopper. The short period of time may be such that it allows the shopper to make a decision regarding the desirability of the garment based on the indication of the opinions while a shopper is conducting a shopping session during which the shopper submitted the request for opinions. For example, it may determined that it is reasonable for a shopper to wait five minutes for the results of the request for opinions from the time the shopper submits the request for opinions. For example, it may be determined that the shopper is likely to continue browsing or trying on garments at the merchant for such a period of time. In another example, it may be determined that it is reasonable for a shopper to only wait one minute or as long as one hour for the results of the request for opinions.
  • In one embodiment, a shopper when submitting a request for opinions (or at another time, such as when signing up for a subscription to the service in accordance with the present invention) may indicate the duration of time the shopper is willing to wait for the results of a request for opinions.
  • In another embodiment, a minimum number of responses may be associated with a request for opinions. In such an embodiment, the process of accumulating responses may end when the minimum number of responses are received, even if the maximum period of time for accumulating responses has not ended. Alternatively, the responses may continue to be accumulated until the end of the maximum period of time. In one embodiment, if at the end of the maximum period of time a minimum number of responses have not been received, the shopper may be provided with a message indicating that the request for opinions did not yield a sufficient number of opinions. In one embodiment, the shopper may be provided an opportunity (either when first submitting a request for opinions or upon receiving an indication that a minimum number of opinions were not received) to request that the results of the request for opinions be provided to the shopper despite the minimum number of opinions not being received.
  • Although the present invention has been described with respect to preferred embodiments thereof, those skilled in the art will note that various substitutions, modifications and variations may be made with respect to the embodiments described herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.

Claims (5)

1. A method, comprising:
receiving an image from a shopper, the image depicting a garment;
selecting for the shopper, substantially at a time the image is received, a plurality of participants to whom the image is to be output, each of the participants of the plurality of participants being selected based on
a characteristic specified by a shopper associated with the garment;
causing, substantially at a time the plurality of participants is selected, the image to be output to each participant of the plurality of participants by causing a cellular telephone of the participant to display the image,
wherein a request for an opinion regarding the garment is output in association with the image;
collecting responses to the request for a predetermined period of time from a time at which the image was output,
wherein the predetermined period of time is not longer than ten minutes; and
outputting an indication of the collected responses to the shopper.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the selecting is further based on a current availability of the participant.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein collecting comprises:
collecting responses to the request until (i) ten minutes from a time at which the image was output passes, or (ii) a minimum number of responses are received.
4. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
providing the shopper with information that allows the shopper to communicate with at least one participant.
5. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
providing compensation to at least one participant in exchange for at least one response to a request for an opinion that the participant provided.
US11/751,999 2000-06-12 2007-05-22 Methods and systems for facilitating the provision of opinions to a shopper from a panel of peers Abandoned US20070220540A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/751,999 US20070220540A1 (en) 2000-06-12 2007-05-22 Methods and systems for facilitating the provision of opinions to a shopper from a panel of peers

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US21094600P 2000-06-12 2000-06-12
US60294800A 2000-06-26 2000-06-26
US10/864,834 US7526440B2 (en) 2000-06-12 2004-06-09 Method, computer product, and apparatus for facilitating the provision of opinions to a shopper from a panel of peers
US11/751,999 US20070220540A1 (en) 2000-06-12 2007-05-22 Methods and systems for facilitating the provision of opinions to a shopper from a panel of peers

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/864,834 Division US7526440B2 (en) 2000-06-12 2004-06-09 Method, computer product, and apparatus for facilitating the provision of opinions to a shopper from a panel of peers

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20070220540A1 true US20070220540A1 (en) 2007-09-20

Family

ID=35510408

Family Applications (6)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/864,834 Expired - Lifetime US7526440B2 (en) 2000-06-12 2004-06-09 Method, computer product, and apparatus for facilitating the provision of opinions to a shopper from a panel of peers
US11/751,999 Abandoned US20070220540A1 (en) 2000-06-12 2007-05-22 Methods and systems for facilitating the provision of opinions to a shopper from a panel of peers
US12/431,470 Expired - Lifetime US8224716B2 (en) 2000-06-12 2009-04-28 Methods and systems for facilitating the provision of opinions to a shopper from a panel of peers
US13/180,297 Abandoned US20110270713A1 (en) 2000-06-12 2011-07-11 Methods and systems for facilitating the provision of opinions to a shopper from a panel of peers
US13/548,096 Abandoned US20120284085A1 (en) 2000-06-12 2012-07-12 Methods and Systems for Facilitating the Provision of Opinions to a Shopper from a Panel of Peers
US13/548,507 Expired - Lifetime US8521612B2 (en) 2000-06-12 2012-07-13 Methods and systems for facilitating the provision of opinions to a shopper from a panel of peers

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/864,834 Expired - Lifetime US7526440B2 (en) 2000-06-12 2004-06-09 Method, computer product, and apparatus for facilitating the provision of opinions to a shopper from a panel of peers

Family Applications After (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/431,470 Expired - Lifetime US8224716B2 (en) 2000-06-12 2009-04-28 Methods and systems for facilitating the provision of opinions to a shopper from a panel of peers
US13/180,297 Abandoned US20110270713A1 (en) 2000-06-12 2011-07-11 Methods and systems for facilitating the provision of opinions to a shopper from a panel of peers
US13/548,096 Abandoned US20120284085A1 (en) 2000-06-12 2012-07-12 Methods and Systems for Facilitating the Provision of Opinions to a Shopper from a Panel of Peers
US13/548,507 Expired - Lifetime US8521612B2 (en) 2000-06-12 2012-07-13 Methods and systems for facilitating the provision of opinions to a shopper from a panel of peers

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (6) US7526440B2 (en)
WO (1) WO2005124641A2 (en)

Cited By (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080126478A1 (en) * 2004-12-16 2008-05-29 Renovo Limited Information Collection System
US20080228555A1 (en) * 2007-03-14 2008-09-18 Xerox Corporation Graphical user interface for presenting image evaluation information
US20080306787A1 (en) * 2005-04-13 2008-12-11 Craig Hamilton Method and System for Automatically Measuring Retail Store Display Compliance
US20090100104A1 (en) * 2007-10-12 2009-04-16 Kavlick Jeffrey J System and method for supporting attendance at a spectator event
US20100094696A1 (en) * 2008-10-14 2010-04-15 Noel Rita Molinelli Personal style server
US20100094706A1 (en) * 2006-06-24 2010-04-15 Oz Gabai Method and system for directing information to a plurality of users
US20110041083A1 (en) * 2007-12-12 2011-02-17 Oz Gabai System and methodology for providing shared internet experience
US20110040539A1 (en) * 2009-08-12 2011-02-17 Szymczyk Matthew Providing a simulation of wearing items such as garments and/or accessories
US20110107370A1 (en) * 2009-11-03 2011-05-05 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. System for media program management
US20120054838A1 (en) * 2010-09-01 2012-03-01 Lg Electronics Inc. Mobile terminal and information security setting method thereof
US20120185886A1 (en) * 2011-01-13 2012-07-19 Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. Method and apparatus for interacting with a set-top box using widgets
US8332294B1 (en) 2008-04-02 2012-12-11 Capital One Financial Corporation Method and system for collecting and managing feedback from account users via account statements
US20130173226A1 (en) * 2012-01-03 2013-07-04 Waymon B. Reed Garment modeling simulation system and process
US20130170715A1 (en) * 2012-01-03 2013-07-04 Waymon B. Reed Garment modeling simulation system and process
US20140279233A1 (en) * 2013-03-14 2014-09-18 Andrew Man-Hon Lau System and method for an affinity capture, user feedback and affinity analysis
RU2544736C2 (en) * 2008-06-16 2015-03-20 Санрайз Р Энд Д Холдингз, Ллс. System for acquiring information from customers and influencing customer decision on commodity acquisition
US20160007058A1 (en) * 2014-07-07 2016-01-07 TCL Research America Inc. System and method for video program recognition
US9652654B2 (en) 2012-06-04 2017-05-16 Ebay Inc. System and method for providing an interactive shopping experience via webcam
US9892447B2 (en) 2013-05-08 2018-02-13 Ebay Inc. Performing image searches in a network-based publication system
US10198486B2 (en) 2012-06-30 2019-02-05 Ebay Inc. Recommendation filtering based on common interests
US10339613B2 (en) 2007-08-23 2019-07-02 Ebay Inc. Viewing shopping information on a network based social platform
US20200143456A1 (en) * 2014-06-25 2020-05-07 Ebay Inc. Digital avatars in online marketplaces
US10984126B2 (en) 2007-08-23 2021-04-20 Ebay Inc. Sharing information on a network-based social platform

Families Citing this family (127)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9418381B2 (en) 2000-04-14 2016-08-16 Citigroup Credit Services, Inc. (USA) Method and system for notifying customers of transaction opportunities
US8346677B1 (en) * 2000-12-29 2013-01-01 Citicorp Development Center, Inc. Method and system for conducting commerce over a wireless communication network
US8725632B2 (en) 2000-01-13 2014-05-13 Citicorp Development Center, Inc. Method and system for conducting financial and non-financial transactions using a wireless device
US7526440B2 (en) * 2000-06-12 2009-04-28 Walker Digital, Llc Method, computer product, and apparatus for facilitating the provision of opinions to a shopper from a panel of peers
US6952716B1 (en) * 2000-07-12 2005-10-04 Treehouse Solutions, Inc. Method and system for presenting data over a network based on network user choices and collecting real-time data related to said choices
US9310892B2 (en) 2000-11-06 2016-04-12 Nant Holdings Ip, Llc Object information derived from object images
US8224078B2 (en) 2000-11-06 2012-07-17 Nant Holdings Ip, Llc Image capture and identification system and process
US7899243B2 (en) 2000-11-06 2011-03-01 Evryx Technologies, Inc. Image capture and identification system and process
US7680324B2 (en) * 2000-11-06 2010-03-16 Evryx Technologies, Inc. Use of image-derived information as search criteria for internet and other search engines
US7565008B2 (en) 2000-11-06 2009-07-21 Evryx Technologies, Inc. Data capture and identification system and process
US7336779B2 (en) * 2002-03-15 2008-02-26 Avaya Technology Corp. Topical dynamic chat
US7415417B2 (en) * 2002-03-15 2008-08-19 Avaya Technology Corp. Presence awareness agent
ATE375570T1 (en) * 2002-06-10 2007-10-15 Accenture Global Services Gmbh INTERACTIVE TRYING ROOM
JP2004086803A (en) * 2002-08-29 2004-03-18 Fujitsu Ltd Information processing method and device for virtual try-on
JP2004171275A (en) * 2002-11-20 2004-06-17 Nec Corp Article information providing system and article information providing server
US8094804B2 (en) * 2003-09-26 2012-01-10 Avaya Inc. Method and apparatus for assessing the status of work waiting for service
US20060080182A1 (en) * 2003-10-21 2006-04-13 Thompson Robert J Web-based size information system and method
US9818148B2 (en) 2013-03-05 2017-11-14 Rtc Industries, Inc. In-store item alert architecture
US8938396B2 (en) 2004-02-03 2015-01-20 Rtc Industries, Inc. System for inventory management
US10339495B2 (en) 2004-02-03 2019-07-02 Rtc Industries, Inc. System for inventory management
US9898712B2 (en) 2004-02-03 2018-02-20 Rtc Industries, Inc. Continuous display shelf edge label device
US7953859B1 (en) * 2004-03-31 2011-05-31 Avaya Inc. Data model of participation in multi-channel and multi-party contacts
US8000989B1 (en) 2004-03-31 2011-08-16 Avaya Inc. Using true value in routing work items to resources
US7734032B1 (en) 2004-03-31 2010-06-08 Avaya Inc. Contact center and method for tracking and acting on one and done customer contacts
US8738412B2 (en) * 2004-07-13 2014-05-27 Avaya Inc. Method and apparatus for supporting individualized selection rules for resource allocation
US7949121B1 (en) 2004-09-27 2011-05-24 Avaya Inc. Method and apparatus for the simultaneous delivery of multiple contacts to an agent
US8234141B1 (en) 2004-09-27 2012-07-31 Avaya Inc. Dynamic work assignment strategies based on multiple aspects of agent proficiency
US7760713B2 (en) * 2004-10-15 2010-07-20 Tran Bao Q Camera-phone barcode scanning support
US20060085233A1 (en) * 2004-10-18 2006-04-20 Emergency 24, Inc. Peer-to-peer complaint system and method
US20060149638A1 (en) * 2005-01-06 2006-07-06 Allen Anita L Electronic personalized clothing makeover assistant
US7882043B2 (en) * 2005-01-07 2011-02-01 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatuses for facilitating spontaneous shopping collaboration
US7624102B2 (en) * 2005-01-28 2009-11-24 Microsoft Corporation System and method for grouping by attribute
US7809127B2 (en) * 2005-05-26 2010-10-05 Avaya Inc. Method for discovering problem agent behaviors
US20070005174A1 (en) * 2005-06-29 2007-01-04 Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications Ab Virtual apparel fitting
US10510087B2 (en) * 2005-07-07 2019-12-17 Sermo, Inc. Method and apparatus for conducting an information brokering service
US20090006218A1 (en) * 2005-07-08 2009-01-01 Gmarket Inc. System and Method for Sharing Gains to Promote Sales Through Evaluation Contents of Goods on Web Site
US7779042B1 (en) 2005-08-08 2010-08-17 Avaya Inc. Deferred control of surrogate key generation in a distributed processing architecture
US7822587B1 (en) 2005-10-03 2010-10-26 Avaya Inc. Hybrid database architecture for both maintaining and relaxing type 2 data entity behavior
US7787609B1 (en) 2005-10-06 2010-08-31 Avaya Inc. Prioritized service delivery based on presence and availability of interruptible enterprise resources with skills
US7752230B2 (en) * 2005-10-06 2010-07-06 Avaya Inc. Data extensibility using external database tables
US20070112637A1 (en) * 2005-11-14 2007-05-17 The Procter & Gamble Company Interactive peer validation for product choices
US20070150370A1 (en) * 2005-11-15 2007-06-28 Staib William E System for Increasing On-Line Shopping Presence
US8737173B2 (en) * 2006-02-24 2014-05-27 Avaya Inc. Date and time dimensions for contact center reporting in arbitrary international time zones
US7529795B2 (en) 2006-03-20 2009-05-05 Stragent, Llc Message board aggregator
US20080040742A1 (en) * 2006-08-11 2008-02-14 Sbc Knowledge Ventures L.P. Method and system for inserting advertisement data into an internet protocol television network
US7936867B1 (en) 2006-08-15 2011-05-03 Avaya Inc. Multi-service request within a contact center
WO2008024467A2 (en) * 2006-08-23 2008-02-28 Iain Saul Promotional system
US8391463B1 (en) 2006-09-01 2013-03-05 Avaya Inc. Method and apparatus for identifying related contacts
US8811597B1 (en) 2006-09-07 2014-08-19 Avaya Inc. Contact center performance prediction
US8938063B1 (en) 2006-09-07 2015-01-20 Avaya Inc. Contact center service monitoring and correcting
US7647351B2 (en) 2006-09-14 2010-01-12 Stragent, Llc Web scrape template generation
US20080126190A1 (en) * 2006-09-25 2008-05-29 Christopher James Gosnell Method of Providing Clothing by Subscription
US8224298B2 (en) * 2007-02-05 2012-07-17 Boadin Technology, LLC Systems and methods for mobile media services utilizing a short form command structure
US20090082111A1 (en) * 2007-04-06 2009-03-26 Smith Michael J System and method for connecting users based on common interests, such as shared interests of representations of professional athletes
US8977631B2 (en) 2007-04-16 2015-03-10 Ebay Inc. Visualization of reputation ratings
US8260687B2 (en) * 2007-04-16 2012-09-04 Ebay Inc. Distributed commerce application-widget
US20090019053A1 (en) * 2007-07-13 2009-01-15 Yahoo! Inc. Method for searching for and marketing fashion garments online
US20080177557A1 (en) * 2007-08-24 2008-07-24 Iain Saul Promotional system
US7756756B1 (en) 2007-09-12 2010-07-13 Amazon Technologies, Inc. System and method of providing recommendations
US8504534B1 (en) 2007-09-26 2013-08-06 Avaya Inc. Database structures and administration techniques for generalized localization of database items
US10083420B2 (en) 2007-11-21 2018-09-25 Sermo, Inc Community moderated information
US8046272B1 (en) * 2008-01-17 2011-10-25 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Systems and methods for facilitating real-time product inquiries during online shopping
US8117242B1 (en) 2008-01-18 2012-02-14 Boadin Technology, LLC System, method, and computer program product for performing a search in conjunction with use of an online application
US8117225B1 (en) 2008-01-18 2012-02-14 Boadin Technology, LLC Drill-down system, method, and computer program product for focusing a search
US8856182B2 (en) 2008-01-25 2014-10-07 Avaya Inc. Report database dependency tracing through business intelligence metadata
US9495386B2 (en) 2008-03-05 2016-11-15 Ebay Inc. Identification of items depicted in images
CN102084391A (en) 2008-03-05 2011-06-01 电子湾有限公司 Method and apparatus for image recognition services
US20090259499A1 (en) * 2008-04-09 2009-10-15 Sudhir Bhojwani Method and system employing a mobile device for soliciting user experience sharing
US20090276291A1 (en) * 2008-05-01 2009-11-05 Myshape, Inc. System and method for networking shops online and offline
US20090287588A1 (en) * 2008-05-19 2009-11-19 Jean Ourega Dobe Method, a system and a user interface for shopping using a communication network
US9171415B2 (en) * 2008-07-07 2015-10-27 Peacock Myers, P.C. Secure cabinet for dispensing items
US9128981B1 (en) 2008-07-29 2015-09-08 James L. Geer Phone assisted ‘photographic memory’
US8131458B1 (en) 2008-08-22 2012-03-06 Boadin Technology, LLC System, method, and computer program product for instant messaging utilizing a vehicular assembly
US8190692B1 (en) 2008-08-22 2012-05-29 Boadin Technology, LLC Location-based messaging system, method, and computer program product
US8078397B1 (en) 2008-08-22 2011-12-13 Boadin Technology, LLC System, method, and computer program product for social networking utilizing a vehicular assembly
US8073590B1 (en) 2008-08-22 2011-12-06 Boadin Technology, LLC System, method, and computer program product for utilizing a communication channel of a mobile device by a vehicular assembly
US8265862B1 (en) 2008-08-22 2012-09-11 Boadin Technology, LLC System, method, and computer program product for communicating location-related information
US20100076819A1 (en) * 2008-09-25 2010-03-25 Myshape, Inc. System and Method for Distilling Data and Feedback From Customers to Identify Fashion Market Information
US20100265311A1 (en) * 2009-04-16 2010-10-21 J. C. Penney Corporation, Inc. Apparatus, systems, and methods for a smart fixture
US20110022499A1 (en) * 2009-07-23 2011-01-27 Shakira Nida Hogan Personal mobile shopping network - a method of sales and retailing involving multimedia messaging feature of mobile cellular phones and PDA devices
US20110040602A1 (en) * 2009-08-11 2011-02-17 Daniel Ramesh Kurani Method and system for facilitating and aggregating surveys and opinions
US8745067B2 (en) * 2009-08-12 2014-06-03 Google Inc. Presenting comments from various sources
US8565386B2 (en) 2009-09-29 2013-10-22 Avaya Inc. Automatic configuration of soft phones that are usable in conjunction with special-purpose endpoints
US9516069B2 (en) 2009-11-17 2016-12-06 Avaya Inc. Packet headers as a trigger for automatic activation of special-purpose softphone applications
US9164577B2 (en) 2009-12-22 2015-10-20 Ebay Inc. Augmented reality system, method, and apparatus for displaying an item image in a contextual environment
US8437871B2 (en) * 2009-12-22 2013-05-07 Young-A KO Method for taking body measurements with digital clothing
US9141668B2 (en) * 2009-12-29 2015-09-22 International Business Machines Corporation Expert locator based on user polling
US20110184780A1 (en) * 2010-01-21 2011-07-28 Ebay Inc. INTEGRATION OF eCOMMERCE FEATURES INTO SOCIAL NETWORKING PLATFORM
WO2011119987A2 (en) * 2010-03-26 2011-09-29 Jeanine Stein Computer interface for online commerce with community features
JP2013543603A (en) * 2010-05-20 2013-12-05 エルジェイエル,インコーポレイテッド An event-based mutual network that recommends, compares, and evaluates personal appearance styles
JP5636588B2 (en) * 2010-07-20 2014-12-10 スキルアップジャパン株式会社 Emergency patient treatment support system
US8548864B2 (en) * 2010-12-07 2013-10-01 International Business Machines Corporation Managing transmission of information
US8799300B2 (en) * 2011-02-10 2014-08-05 Microsoft Corporation Bookmarking segments of content
US20120297314A1 (en) * 2011-03-25 2012-11-22 Select2gether, Inc. Social interaction toolbar
US20120303415A1 (en) * 2011-05-25 2012-11-29 Ari Edelson System and method of providing recommendations
EP2538375A1 (en) * 2011-06-23 2012-12-26 NV Mobicage A communication platform for iterative multiparty convergence towards a microdecision
US9076172B1 (en) 2011-06-29 2015-07-07 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Generating item suggestions from a profile-based group
US8615448B1 (en) 2011-06-29 2013-12-24 Amazon Technologies, Inc. System, method, and computer readable medium for facilitating stylist provided recommendations
US20130018763A1 (en) * 2011-07-14 2013-01-17 Dare Ajala Systems and methods for creating and using a graphical representation of a shopper
US8893010B1 (en) 2011-07-20 2014-11-18 Google Inc. Experience sharing in location-based social networking
US20130066741A1 (en) * 2011-09-13 2013-03-14 Laurence B. Compton Method of Selling Products Over a Network
US9449342B2 (en) 2011-10-27 2016-09-20 Ebay Inc. System and method for visualization of items in an environment using augmented reality
US20140279235A1 (en) * 2011-12-20 2014-09-18 Thomas E. Sandholm Enabling collaborative reactions to images
US9240059B2 (en) 2011-12-29 2016-01-19 Ebay Inc. Personal augmented reality
US10846766B2 (en) 2012-06-29 2020-11-24 Ebay Inc. Contextual menus based on image recognition
US20140067564A1 (en) 2012-08-30 2014-03-06 Ebay Inc. Shopping list creator and optimizer
GB201216797D0 (en) * 2012-09-20 2012-11-07 Palmer Paul Method for conducting an online poll
US20140089135A1 (en) * 2012-09-27 2014-03-27 Bonfire Holdings, Inc. System and method for enabling a real time shared shopping experience
US10357118B2 (en) 2013-03-05 2019-07-23 Rtc Industries, Inc. Systems and methods for merchandizing electronic displays
US9008283B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2015-04-14 Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. Customer portal of an intelligent automated agent for a contact center
JP6142616B2 (en) * 2013-03-27 2017-06-07 富士通株式会社 Discussion support program, discussion support method, and information processing apparatus
EP2984615A1 (en) * 2013-04-12 2016-02-17 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Object opinion registering device for guiding a person in a decision making situation
US9684927B2 (en) * 2013-05-31 2017-06-20 Oracle International Corporation Consumer purchase decision scoring tool
US9589535B2 (en) 2013-07-19 2017-03-07 Paypal, Inc. Social mobile game for recommending items
US20150026016A1 (en) * 2013-07-19 2015-01-22 Delicious Ltd. System and method of producing model figure of person with associated clothing
US9773018B2 (en) 2013-08-13 2017-09-26 Ebay Inc. Mapping item categories to ambiguous queries by geo-location
US9595055B2 (en) * 2013-11-27 2017-03-14 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Feedback service
US20150193793A1 (en) * 2014-01-09 2015-07-09 Gene Cook Hall Method for sampling respondents for surveys
US10366174B2 (en) * 2014-03-13 2019-07-30 Ebay Inc. Social fitting room experience utilizing interactive mirror and polling of target users experienced with garment type
GB201412996D0 (en) * 2014-07-22 2014-09-03 Simple Matters Ltd Chat system
JP6346824B2 (en) * 2014-08-05 2018-06-20 セイコーエプソン株式会社 Tape printing apparatus and print data generation method in tape printing apparatus
US9922357B2 (en) * 2014-09-18 2018-03-20 Adobe Systems Incorporated Interactive notifications for mobile commerce applications
US11308544B2 (en) 2014-09-26 2022-04-19 Monjeri Investments, Llc System and method to generate shoppable content and increase advertising revenue in social networking using contextual advertising
US11109692B2 (en) 2014-11-12 2021-09-07 Rtc Industries, Inc. Systems and methods for merchandizing electronic displays
US11182738B2 (en) 2014-11-12 2021-11-23 Rtc Industries, Inc. System for inventory management
US10268780B2 (en) * 2015-10-07 2019-04-23 International Business Machines Corporation Learning hashtag relevance
KR20210106285A (en) * 2020-02-20 2021-08-30 라인플러스 주식회사 Method and system for evaluating content on instant messaging application

Citations (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4870579A (en) * 1987-10-01 1989-09-26 Neonics, Inc. System and method of predicting subjective reactions
US4996642A (en) * 1987-10-01 1991-02-26 Neonics, Inc. System and method for recommending items
US5227874A (en) * 1986-03-10 1993-07-13 Kohorn H Von Method for measuring the effectiveness of stimuli on decisions of shoppers
US5583763A (en) * 1993-09-09 1996-12-10 Mni Interactive Method and apparatus for recommending selections based on preferences in a multi-user system
US5690497A (en) * 1993-02-05 1997-11-25 National Computer Systems, Inc. Dynamic on-line scoring method
US5790426A (en) * 1996-04-30 1998-08-04 Athenium L.L.C. Automated collaborative filtering system
US5913204A (en) * 1996-08-06 1999-06-15 Kelly; Thomas L. Method and apparatus for surveying music listener opinion about songs
US5918014A (en) * 1995-12-27 1999-06-29 Athenium, L.L.C. Automated collaborative filtering in world wide web advertising
US5930769A (en) * 1996-10-07 1999-07-27 Rose; Andrea System and method for fashion shopping
US6041311A (en) * 1995-06-30 2000-03-21 Microsoft Corporation Method and apparatus for item recommendation using automated collaborative filtering
US20020007303A1 (en) * 2000-05-01 2002-01-17 Brookler Brent D. System for conducting electronic surveys
US20020151283A1 (en) * 2001-04-02 2002-10-17 Pallakoff Matthew G. Coordinating images displayed on devices with two or more displays
US20040034561A1 (en) * 2000-04-07 2004-02-19 Smith Glen David Interactive marketing system
US6901379B1 (en) * 2000-07-07 2005-05-31 4-D Networks, Inc. Online shopping with virtual modeling and peer review
US7155070B2 (en) * 2001-03-29 2006-12-26 Fotomedia Technologies, Llc Visual cell phone notification of processed film images

Family Cites Families (36)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6443840B2 (en) * 1986-03-10 2002-09-03 Response Reward Systems, L.C. Evaluation of responses of participatory broadcast audience with prediction of winning contestants; monitoring, checking and controlling of wagering, and automatic crediting and couponing
US5832457A (en) * 1991-05-06 1998-11-03 Catalina Marketing International, Inc. Method and apparatus for selective distribution of discount coupons based on prior customer behavior
JP3543395B2 (en) * 1994-11-17 2004-07-14 株式会社日立製作所 Service provision and usage
US6049777A (en) * 1995-06-30 2000-04-11 Microsoft Corporation Computer-implemented collaborative filtering based method for recommending an item to a user
US6314420B1 (en) * 1996-04-04 2001-11-06 Lycos, Inc. Collaborative/adaptive search engine
IL126909A0 (en) * 1996-05-07 1999-09-22 Webline Communications Corp Method and apparatus for coordinating internet multi-media content with telephone and audio communications
US5862223A (en) * 1996-07-24 1999-01-19 Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership Method and apparatus for a cryptographically-assisted commercial network system designed to facilitate and support expert-based commerce
US6513014B1 (en) * 1996-07-24 2003-01-28 Walker Digital, Llc Method and apparatus for administering a survey via a television transmission network
US6233564B1 (en) * 1997-04-04 2001-05-15 In-Store Media Systems, Inc. Merchandising using consumer information from surveys
US20010013009A1 (en) * 1997-05-20 2001-08-09 Daniel R. Greening System and method for computer-based marketing
US6549890B2 (en) * 1997-08-29 2003-04-15 Superbserv, Inc. Interactive computer system and data analysis method
US6310627B1 (en) * 1998-01-20 2001-10-30 Toyo Boseki Kabushiki Kaisha Method and system for generating a stereoscopic image of a garment
US6332154B2 (en) * 1998-09-11 2001-12-18 Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. Method and apparatus for providing media-independent self-help modules within a multimedia communication-center customer interface
US6477504B1 (en) * 1998-03-02 2002-11-05 Ix, Inc. Method and apparatus for automating the conduct of surveys over a network system
US6064980A (en) * 1998-03-17 2000-05-16 Amazon.Com, Inc. System and methods for collaborative recommendations
US6298446B1 (en) * 1998-06-14 2001-10-02 Alchemedia Ltd. Method and system for copyright protection of digital images transmitted over networks
US6510462B2 (en) * 1998-09-01 2003-01-21 Nielsen Media Research, Inc. Collection of images in Web use reporting system
US20020002596A1 (en) * 1998-09-03 2002-01-03 Sony Corporation Apparatus and method for retrieving information over a computer network
US6307568B1 (en) * 1998-10-28 2001-10-23 Imaginarix Ltd. Virtual dressing over the internet
DE19851334C2 (en) * 1998-11-06 2000-09-28 Aventis Behring Gmbh Flexible fibrin-based wound dressing and process for its manufacture
US6134548A (en) * 1998-11-19 2000-10-17 Ac Properties B.V. System, method and article of manufacture for advanced mobile bargain shopping
US7062454B1 (en) * 1999-05-06 2006-06-13 Jarbridge, Inc. Previewing system and method
US7219072B1 (en) * 1999-06-01 2007-05-15 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for co-browsing in electronic commerce
US7251607B1 (en) * 1999-07-06 2007-07-31 John Peter Veschi Dispute resolution method
US7085820B1 (en) * 1999-08-30 2006-08-01 Opinionlab, Inc. System and method for reporting to a website owner user reactions to particular web pages of a website
US6850896B1 (en) * 1999-10-28 2005-02-01 Market-Touch Corporation Method and system for managing and providing sales data using world wide web
AU2592701A (en) * 1999-12-23 2001-07-03 My-E-Surveys.Com, Llc System and methods for internet commerce and communication based on customer interaction and preferences
US6826540B1 (en) * 1999-12-29 2004-11-30 Virtual Personalities, Inc. Virtual human interface for conducting surveys
US7720707B1 (en) * 2000-01-07 2010-05-18 Home Producers Network, Llc Method and system for compiling a consumer-based electronic database, searchable according to individual internet user-defined micro-demographics
US6963848B1 (en) * 2000-03-02 2005-11-08 Amazon.Com, Inc. Methods and system of obtaining consumer reviews
US7149665B2 (en) * 2000-04-03 2006-12-12 Browzwear International Ltd System and method for simulation of virtual wear articles on virtual models
US7526440B2 (en) * 2000-06-12 2009-04-28 Walker Digital, Llc Method, computer product, and apparatus for facilitating the provision of opinions to a shopper from a panel of peers
GB2366882A (en) * 2000-09-19 2002-03-20 Ncr Int Inc A data warehouse and brokerage system
US7043760B2 (en) * 2000-10-11 2006-05-09 David H. Holtzman System and method for establishing and managing relationships between pseudonymous identifications and memberships in organizations
US20020062368A1 (en) * 2000-10-11 2002-05-23 David Holtzman System and method for establishing and evaluating cross community identities in electronic forums
US8200477B2 (en) * 2003-10-22 2012-06-12 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for extracting opinions from text documents

Patent Citations (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5227874A (en) * 1986-03-10 1993-07-13 Kohorn H Von Method for measuring the effectiveness of stimuli on decisions of shoppers
US4870579A (en) * 1987-10-01 1989-09-26 Neonics, Inc. System and method of predicting subjective reactions
US4996642A (en) * 1987-10-01 1991-02-26 Neonics, Inc. System and method for recommending items
US5690497A (en) * 1993-02-05 1997-11-25 National Computer Systems, Inc. Dynamic on-line scoring method
US5583763A (en) * 1993-09-09 1996-12-10 Mni Interactive Method and apparatus for recommending selections based on preferences in a multi-user system
US6041311A (en) * 1995-06-30 2000-03-21 Microsoft Corporation Method and apparatus for item recommendation using automated collaborative filtering
US5918014A (en) * 1995-12-27 1999-06-29 Athenium, L.L.C. Automated collaborative filtering in world wide web advertising
US5790426A (en) * 1996-04-30 1998-08-04 Athenium L.L.C. Automated collaborative filtering system
US5913204A (en) * 1996-08-06 1999-06-15 Kelly; Thomas L. Method and apparatus for surveying music listener opinion about songs
US5930769A (en) * 1996-10-07 1999-07-27 Rose; Andrea System and method for fashion shopping
US20040034561A1 (en) * 2000-04-07 2004-02-19 Smith Glen David Interactive marketing system
US20020007303A1 (en) * 2000-05-01 2002-01-17 Brookler Brent D. System for conducting electronic surveys
US6901379B1 (en) * 2000-07-07 2005-05-31 4-D Networks, Inc. Online shopping with virtual modeling and peer review
US7155070B2 (en) * 2001-03-29 2006-12-26 Fotomedia Technologies, Llc Visual cell phone notification of processed film images
US20020151283A1 (en) * 2001-04-02 2002-10-17 Pallakoff Matthew G. Coordinating images displayed on devices with two or more displays

Cited By (42)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080126478A1 (en) * 2004-12-16 2008-05-29 Renovo Limited Information Collection System
US20080306787A1 (en) * 2005-04-13 2008-12-11 Craig Hamilton Method and System for Automatically Measuring Retail Store Display Compliance
US8429004B2 (en) * 2005-04-13 2013-04-23 Store Eyes, Inc. Method and system for automatically measuring retail store display compliance
US8719092B2 (en) 2006-06-24 2014-05-06 Bio-Ride Ltd. Method and system for directing information to a plurality of users
US20100094706A1 (en) * 2006-06-24 2010-04-15 Oz Gabai Method and system for directing information to a plurality of users
US20080228555A1 (en) * 2007-03-14 2008-09-18 Xerox Corporation Graphical user interface for presenting image evaluation information
US8781886B2 (en) * 2007-03-14 2014-07-15 Xerox Corporation Graphical user interface for presenting image evaluation information
US11106819B2 (en) 2007-08-23 2021-08-31 Ebay Inc. Sharing information on a network-based social platform
US10984126B2 (en) 2007-08-23 2021-04-20 Ebay Inc. Sharing information on a network-based social platform
US11869097B2 (en) 2007-08-23 2024-01-09 Ebay Inc. Viewing shopping information on a network based social platform
US11803659B2 (en) 2007-08-23 2023-10-31 Ebay Inc. Sharing information on a network-based social platform
US10339613B2 (en) 2007-08-23 2019-07-02 Ebay Inc. Viewing shopping information on a network based social platform
US11080797B2 (en) 2007-08-23 2021-08-03 Ebay Inc. Viewing shopping information on a network based social platform
US20090100104A1 (en) * 2007-10-12 2009-04-16 Kavlick Jeffrey J System and method for supporting attendance at a spectator event
US20110041083A1 (en) * 2007-12-12 2011-02-17 Oz Gabai System and methodology for providing shared internet experience
US8332294B1 (en) 2008-04-02 2012-12-11 Capital One Financial Corporation Method and system for collecting and managing feedback from account users via account statements
RU2544736C2 (en) * 2008-06-16 2015-03-20 Санрайз Р Энд Д Холдингз, Ллс. System for acquiring information from customers and influencing customer decision on commodity acquisition
US8751335B2 (en) * 2008-10-14 2014-06-10 Noel Rita Molinelli Personal style server
US20100094696A1 (en) * 2008-10-14 2010-04-15 Noel Rita Molinelli Personal style server
US20120313969A1 (en) * 2009-08-12 2012-12-13 Zugara, Inc. Providing a simulation of wearing items such as garments and/or accessories
US8275590B2 (en) * 2009-08-12 2012-09-25 Zugara, Inc. Providing a simulation of wearing items such as garments and/or accessories
US20110040539A1 (en) * 2009-08-12 2011-02-17 Szymczyk Matthew Providing a simulation of wearing items such as garments and/or accessories
US10482517B2 (en) 2009-08-12 2019-11-19 Zugara, Inc. Providing a simulation of wearing items such as garments and/or accessories
US9183581B2 (en) * 2009-08-12 2015-11-10 Zugara, Inc. Providing a simulation of wearing items such as garments and/or accessories
US9462318B2 (en) * 2009-11-03 2016-10-04 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. System for media program management
US20110107370A1 (en) * 2009-11-03 2011-05-05 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. System for media program management
US9794611B2 (en) 2009-11-03 2017-10-17 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. System for media program management
US8813193B2 (en) * 2010-09-01 2014-08-19 Lg Electronics Inc. Mobile terminal and information security setting method thereof
US20120054838A1 (en) * 2010-09-01 2012-03-01 Lg Electronics Inc. Mobile terminal and information security setting method thereof
US8984562B2 (en) * 2011-01-13 2015-03-17 Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. Method and apparatus for interacting with a set-top box using widgets
US20120185886A1 (en) * 2011-01-13 2012-07-19 Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. Method and apparatus for interacting with a set-top box using widgets
US20130170715A1 (en) * 2012-01-03 2013-07-04 Waymon B. Reed Garment modeling simulation system and process
US20130173226A1 (en) * 2012-01-03 2013-07-04 Waymon B. Reed Garment modeling simulation system and process
US9652654B2 (en) 2012-06-04 2017-05-16 Ebay Inc. System and method for providing an interactive shopping experience via webcam
US10198486B2 (en) 2012-06-30 2019-02-05 Ebay Inc. Recommendation filtering based on common interests
US20140279233A1 (en) * 2013-03-14 2014-09-18 Andrew Man-Hon Lau System and method for an affinity capture, user feedback and affinity analysis
US9530160B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2016-12-27 Nanigans, Inc. System and method for an affinity capture, user feedback and affinity analysis
US9892447B2 (en) 2013-05-08 2018-02-13 Ebay Inc. Performing image searches in a network-based publication system
US20200143456A1 (en) * 2014-06-25 2020-05-07 Ebay Inc. Digital avatars in online marketplaces
US11494833B2 (en) * 2014-06-25 2022-11-08 Ebay Inc. Digital avatars in online marketplaces
US20160007058A1 (en) * 2014-07-07 2016-01-07 TCL Research America Inc. System and method for video program recognition
US9432702B2 (en) * 2014-07-07 2016-08-30 TCL Research America Inc. System and method for video program recognition

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US8521612B2 (en) 2013-08-27
US20090228342A1 (en) 2009-09-10
WO2005124641A2 (en) 2005-12-29
US8224716B2 (en) 2012-07-17
US20120284085A1 (en) 2012-11-08
US20110270713A1 (en) 2011-11-03
US20050027612A1 (en) 2005-02-03
US20120278420A1 (en) 2012-11-01
US7526440B2 (en) 2009-04-28
WO2005124641A3 (en) 2007-02-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8521612B2 (en) Methods and systems for facilitating the provision of opinions to a shopper from a panel of peers
US6901379B1 (en) Online shopping with virtual modeling and peer review
US6903756B1 (en) Merged images viewed via a virtual storage closet
US9129329B2 (en) System and method for providing electronic multi-merchant gift registry services over a distributed network
US20100023428A1 (en) Merging image data based on prospective shopping basket selection
US20010039517A1 (en) Method for selling product and product sales system
CN101981587A (en) Analyzing transactional data
JP2001175766A (en) System and method for constructing made-to-order type shopping mall
KR20000058351A (en) Electronic commerce of a local area on the internet
US20220012791A1 (en) System and Method for Real-Time Garment Recommendations
Abdul Aziz et al. The usage of Instagram and e-commerce platform during COVID-19 among mothers
KR100699138B1 (en) Method for lending and selling custom and intelligent system thereof
KR20000030717A (en) Purchasing price falls with increasing number of people and e-commerce through customized shopping and reverse joint purchase
KR20010078833A (en) Method for electronic commercial business focusing on community on internet
JP2006004303A (en) Collecting/managing apparatus of combination information of articles or the like/method/program
KR20200143759A (en) Artificial intelligence chat robot based outlet commerce service providing method
Etebari Intelligent wardrobe: using mobile devices, recommender systems and social networks to advise on clothing choice
KR100432410B1 (en) Method and system for providing service and payment by using internet chatting system
US20240054549A1 (en) Systems and Methods for Distributed Commerce Based on a Token Economy
Li et al. An appraisal mechanism for a social marketplace
KR20090000166A (en) The internet accompaniment shopping service method which accompanies the shopping guide and the system
KR20050087764A (en) Method for request clothing the thing desired using communication network
KR20090044738A (en) Method for managing e-commerce using web cam and ucc
Scholdra et al. Reimagining personalization in the physical store
Hidayati Gen Z's Perspective: Unveiling the Impact of Emotion and Cognitive in Shaping Customer Experience in Omnichannel Context

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION

AS Assignment

Owner name: IGT, NEVADA

Free format text: LICENSE;ASSIGNORS:WALKER DIGITAL GAMING, LLC;WALKER DIGITAL GAMING HOLDING, LLC;WDG EQUITY, LLC;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:033501/0023

Effective date: 20090810