US20060224771A1 - Invitation for transferring objects in a communications network - Google Patents

Invitation for transferring objects in a communications network Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20060224771A1
US20060224771A1 US11/095,284 US9528405A US2006224771A1 US 20060224771 A1 US20060224771 A1 US 20060224771A1 US 9528405 A US9528405 A US 9528405A US 2006224771 A1 US2006224771 A1 US 2006224771A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
invitation
recipient
transfer
objects
issuing
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/095,284
Inventor
Jeremy Roschelle
John Brecht
Mark Fry
Lana Moore
Sandhya Karachiwala
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
SRI International Inc
Texas Instruments Inc
Original Assignee
SRI International Inc
Texas Instruments Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by SRI International Inc, Texas Instruments Inc filed Critical SRI International Inc
Priority to US11/095,284 priority Critical patent/US20060224771A1/en
Assigned to SRI INTERNATIONAL reassignment SRI INTERNATIONAL ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ROSCHELLE, JEREMY, BRECHT, JOHN
Assigned to TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED reassignment TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: FRY, MARK DENNIS, KARACHIWALA, SANDHYA, MOORE, LANA
Publication of US20060224771A1 publication Critical patent/US20060224771A1/en
Priority to US12/464,418 priority patent/US8656044B2/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/01Protocols
    • H04L67/06Protocols specially adapted for file transfer, e.g. file transfer protocol [FTP]
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/50Network services
    • H04L67/60Scheduling or organising the servicing of application requests, e.g. requests for application data transmissions using the analysis and optimisation of the required network resources
    • H04L67/62Establishing a time schedule for servicing the requests

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to a method for digital communications, and more particularly to a method for the transferring of objects in a communications network.
  • Situations can arise in a communications network when it is desired that objects, such as data, multimedia, and so forth, be transferred from a plurality of devices to a single device or from the single device to the plurality of devices.
  • An example of such a communications network can be seen in a classroom situation, wherein a single device (which can be used by an instructor) is connected to a plurality of devices (which can be used by students). The instructor can distribute information (in the form of data, multimedia, and so on) to the students or the students can submit information to the instructor.
  • the single device can transmit an invitation to each of the plurality of devices and request that the objects be provided.
  • the invitation may include a specified name(s) that should be applied to the object(s).
  • the invitation may include a recommended name for the object, such as “Student_Name—Object_Name,” “Homework—Friday—Week 3 ,” or “Journal Entries—Week 4 ,” and so forth, as well as contain instructions on how to proceed.
  • the specification of the name for the object can help simplify the handling and organization of the object when they are received at the single device.
  • the invitation can also be used to provide the object to the plurality of devices.
  • the invitation can include the object necessary for an assignment or for an examination. Note that the term object may be used in both the singular and plural sense.
  • Another technique can involve the use of a message that is provided to each of the plurality of devices and can contain information regarding a desired location where to store the requested object or where to obtain the object.
  • This technique can be referred to as a ‘file server’ technique since a location (typically on a server of some type) is specified (by the message) for use as either a storage location or a server location for the object. The recipients of the message can then navigate to the specified location and retrieve the object or place its own object.
  • One disadvantage of the prior art is that when there is a response to the invitation by the plurality of devices, a situation may be created wherein there is insufficient network bandwidth to support the transfer of the object. This can especially be a problem in wireless communications networks where network bandwidth can be limited. The insufficient network bandwidth can lead to a significantly degraded performance that can substantially delay the transfer of the object.
  • a second disadvantage of the prior art is that it is possible that the users assign a name to the object that is different from the recommended name. This inconsistent naming can make it difficult to organize the multiple objects received from the users.
  • Yet another disadvantage of the prior art is that the users can produce a wide variety of object types in response to an invitation. For example, in the instructor/student environment, one student may produce a simple text file while another may produce a complex multimedia presentation consisting of many files in response to the same assignment. This can lead to further difficulty in the organization of the multiple objects received from the users as well as increasing the potential for the instructor to misplace files.
  • a method for initiating a transfer of an object with context with an invitation comprises defining an object location, providing descriptive information for the invitation, specifying a recipient of the invitation, and issuing the invitation.
  • a method for transferring objects in a communications network with an invitation comprises defining an object location, providing descriptive information for the invitation, specifying a recipient of the invitation, issuing the invitation, receiving a response to the invitation, and initiating the transfer of the object.
  • An advantage of a preferred embodiment of the present invention is that the invitation can be used schedule access to the communications network during the transfer of the object to help reduce the contention for network bandwidth, which can be detrimental to overall network performance. By spreading network bandwidth demand over time, it can be possible to achieved good transfer data rates for all transfers.
  • a further advantage of a preferred embodiment of the present invention is that the invitation can be used to transfer an object of any arbitrary name to a specified location and correctly label the object so that it can be readily identified.
  • the proper labeling can reduce the likelihood of misplacing the object that can occur when the object must have a specified name.
  • Yet another advantage of a preferred embodiment of the present invention is that the invitation can logically group multiple objects together to help prevent confusion when multiple objects are transferred.
  • the invitation can logically group multiple objects together to help prevent confusion when multiple objects are transferred.
  • the multiple objects can be kept together to help prevent object loss as well as confusion.
  • Another advantage of a preferred embodiment of the present invention is that the invitation can be embedded with specifics such as storage locations, server addresses, and so forth. This prevents the recipients of the invitations from having to know such technical information as well as preventing mistakes of incorrectly entering (or selecting) addresses that can result in the misplacement of the objects.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram of an exemplary communications network
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram of interactions between an instructor and students, when the instructor requests the submission of work created by the students;
  • FIGS. 3 a and 3 b are diagrams of the creation of an invitation to request the submission of objects and the operation of a receiver of the invitation, according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention
  • FIGS. 4 a and 4 b are diagrams of the creation of an invitation to request the retrieval of posted objects and the operation of a receiver of the invitation, according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a diagram of the creation of an invitation, wherein scheduling is used to reduce network contention, according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • the present invention will be described with respect to preferred embodiments in a specific context, namely a communications network for use in an instructional setting with a host device, used by an instructor, and a plurality of other devices coupled to the host device, wherein the other devices are used by the students.
  • the invention may also be applied, however, to other communications networks wherein a single device wishes to transfer objects to multiple other devices or receive objects from multiple other devices.
  • FIG. 1 there is shown a diagram illustrating an exemplary communications network 100 .
  • the communications network 100 illustrates an instructional setting wherein a computer 105 being used by an instructor 107 can be coupled to one or more devices (electronic devices) 110 .
  • the devices 110 can be used by students 112 on an individual basis or in a group sharing fashion.
  • the coupling between the computer 105 and the devices 110 can be either with a wired connection 115 or a wireless connection 120 or a combination of both.
  • the communications network 100 can feature a combination of wired and wireless connections. Note that while the diagram in FIG.
  • the communications network 100 can have multiple computers 105 that can be coupled to the devices 110 .
  • the instructional setting may have several instructors 107 , each with a separate computer 105 .
  • One possible use of the communications network 100 can be the distribution of objects, such as data, multimedia, information, and so forth, between the computer 105 and the devices 110 .
  • the distribution of the objects can originate at the computer 105 or terminate at the computer 105 .
  • the students 112 can use the communications network 100 to submit work to the instructor 107 or retrieve assignments, examinations, information from the instructor 107 .
  • the communications network 100 can be used to exchange information between a single device and multiple devices.
  • FIG. 2 there is shown a diagram illustrating an exemplary interaction between instructor and students (and their electronic devices) when the instructor requests that the students submit work.
  • actions made by the instructor 107 and the students 112 are displayed along a vertical axis with time increasing in a descending direction.
  • the instructor 107 can initiate the submission of the work from the students 112 by transmitting a “turn in” request (shown in FIG. 2 as line 200 ) from a computer, such as the computer 105 , to the students 112 via their devices, such as the devices 110 .
  • the “turn in” request 200 is provided to each of the students 112 , shown in FIG. 2 as lines 201 and 202 .
  • the “turn in” request 200 may simply be broadcast to each one of the devices 110 from the computer 105 . Alternatively, the “turn in” request 200 may be directed at a subset of students 112 .
  • the “turn in” request 200 may specify what the instructor 107 wishes the students 112 to turn in (an object, such as files, documents, and so forth) and where to turn in the object. As each of the students 112 receives the “turn in” request 200 , the students can select the object to turn in and submit the object. The transfers of the object resulting from the students 112 turning in the requested work is shown in FIG. 2 as lines 205 , 207 , and 209 . Note that it may be possible that the student may submit more than one object in response to the “turn in” request. In such a situation, the term object can be used to also refer to the multiple objects.
  • a student may have incorrectly named the object that is being submitted. This misnamed object can provide difficulties for the instructor 107 when it comes time for the instructor 107 to evaluate the work of the student. The difficulties may include not being able to locate the object since it is named incorrectly, not being able to associate the object with the student who submitted the work, and so forth.
  • Another problem that may arise is that it can be difficult for the instructor 107 to associate an object with a student if each of the students 112 submits objects with the same name.
  • students may create different numbers and types of objects in response to a particular assignment. For example, in response to an assignment, one student may produce a simple text file, while another may produce a complex multimedia document with a multitude of files and documents.
  • Yet another problem may arise if the students 112 should attempt to submit their work at substantially the same time. If the students 112 attempt to submit their work at the same time, it may be possible for the communications network 100 to become saturated and the performance (data transfer rate) of the communications network 100 could drop to a very low level. This could greatly increase the amount of time required to successfully transfer the students' work.
  • a different “turn in” request (also referred to as an invitation) can be devised to help alleviate the problems discussed above. It can be possible to assign a unique identifier to each student's object so that the instructor 107 can readily identify the work. Additionally, when a student submits multiple objects, the multiple objects can be physically or logically grouped into a single object to help reduce problems such as misplacing objects or losing some of the objects. Furthermore, the submissions of the students' work can be scheduled to help reduce contention for network resources and therefore, improving network performance.
  • FIGS. 3 a and 3 b there are shown flow diagrams illustrating the creation of an invitation to request the submission of an object and the operation of a receiver of the invitation, according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • the diagram shown in FIG. 3 a illustrates an exemplary sequence of events 300 in the creation of an invitation to request the submission of an object by a recipient of the invitation.
  • the sequence of events 300 can begin with the specification of a desired location for storing the object (block 305 ).
  • the desired location may be a directory on a storage device, for example.
  • the creator of the invitation can specify the desired location by browsing a file structure tree and then selecting the desired location from the file structure tree (or something similar), for example.
  • the desired location can be specified by a user that is transmitting the invitation and can be set so that the recipient of the invitation can or cannot change the desired location. If the desired location is set so that it cannot be changed, then the object submitted by the recipient can be ensured of being placed in the desired location, simplifying the location of the object at a later time.
  • the user can add descriptive information and/or instructions (block 310 ). The descriptive information and/or instructions can be used by the user to provide any necessary information to the recipient of the invitation on how to respond to the invitation, remind the recipient about submitting the object, and so forth.
  • the user can specify the recipient(s) of the invitation (block 315 ) and then issue the invitation (block 320 ).
  • the specification of the recipient(s) does not necessarily need to occur immediately prior to the issuance of the invitation.
  • the creator of the invitation may specify the recipient(s) of the invitation at any time prior to the issuance of the invitation in block 320 .
  • the issuance of the invitation can result in the transmission of the invitation to the recipient(s) of the invitation.
  • the invitations can be transmitted immediately or they may be scheduled for subsequent transmission.
  • One reason to schedule the transmission of the invitation can be to potentially reduce network resource contention by transmitting some fraction of the total number of invitations at any given time. Another reason to schedule the transmission could be to permit the user to schedule the invitation at a time advance of when the user desires the invitations to be transmitted and not have to create the invitations at the desired transmission time.
  • the invitation is provided to each of the recipients.
  • the object is transferred from the recipient to the desired location for storing the object. If there is more than one recipient, then the object from each recipient can be assigned a unique identifier to help prevent identification problems.
  • the objects can be grouped into a single unit to simplify transfer and help to prevent confusion, the combination of the multiple objects into a single unit is discussed below.
  • the diagram shown in FIG. 3 b illustrates an exemplary sequence of events 350 that can occur at a recipient of an invitation that requests the submission of an object.
  • the sequence of events 350 can begin after the recipient of the invitation actually receives the invitation.
  • the invitation may be received at the recipient over a wired or wireless communications link.
  • the invitation can be displayed to the user (block 355 ).
  • the invitation can be displayed on a display of a device that the user is operating, for example.
  • the display of the invitation can include audio and video cues to help the user take notice of the arrival of the invitation.
  • the user After reading the invitation (the content of which was supplied by the creator of the invitation, such as shown in block 310 of FIG. 3 a ), the user can select the object to submit to the creator of the invitation (block 360 ).
  • the user can select the object that he/she desires to submit and if the user selects multiple objects, they can either be physically or logically combined into a single unit.
  • the user can select the object to be submitted by browsing a file structure tree and then selecting the object, for example. Alternatively, if the user knows the specific location of the object, he/she can enter it directly.
  • the combination of multiple objects into a single unit can simply the transmittal and processing of the objects when submissions from multiple sources are expected.
  • the invitation may contain a script or an application to actually perform the combination of multiple objects into a single unit. Alternatively, the invitation may be permitted to make use of applications, such as a file archive utility, installed in the device of the user to perform the combination operation.
  • the invitation can also be able to specify a unique name (or identifier) for the object to enable easy identification of the object after it has been transmitted.
  • the invitation may be able to suggest a default name for the object being submitted by the user. However, depending upon implementation and/or permissions set by the creator of the invitation, the user may or may not be able to change the default name. Regardless, the invitation can attach a unique identifier to the submitted object.
  • the user can respond to the invitation (block 365 ).
  • Responding to the invitation can result in the actual submission of the selected object and can involve the assignment of the unique identifier to the object, the combination of multiple objects into a single unit, and the transmission of the object.
  • the invitation may also specify a destination for the object. Again, the user may or may not be able to change the destination of the object, depending upon implementation and/or permissions set by the creator of the invitation.
  • a metatag (or a group of metatags if more than one objects are selected for transfer) can be transferred in its place.
  • the metatag can provide an address to access the object so that the actual object can be retrieved when needed, rather than having the object immediately transferred when the recipient responds to the invitation.
  • the use of metatags can help alleviate potential network resource contention issues as well as object storage problems at the recipient.
  • the use of invitations to initiate submissions of an object can lead to a situation wherein the object from a plurality of recipients can all be located at a desired location as well as having unique identifiers that will make it simple to locate the submitted objects. Additionally, the submission of multiple objects from a single recipient can be readily supported by combining the multiple objects into a single unit.
  • the use of the invitations can also permit the creator of the invitations to logically group the submitted objects into logical and physical groupings that can permit efficient organization and storage of the submitted objects. For example, in an instructor/student environment, an instructor can group submissions by students into different classes, assignments, weeks, terms, and so forth.
  • FIGS. 4 a and 4 b there are shown flow diagrams illustrating the creation of an invitation to request the retrieval of a posted object and the operation of a receiver of the invitation, according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • the diagram shown in FIG. 4 a illustrates an exemplary sequence of events 400 in the creation of an invitation to initiate a transfer of an object to a recipient.
  • the sequence of events 400 can begin with the specification of the object to be transferred by providing a source of the object (block 405 ).
  • the creator of the invitation can browse a file structure tree to specify the object to be transferred.
  • the objects may or may not be logically or physically grouped into a single unit prior to transfer and the creator of the invitation may specify a single unit or the individual objects to be transferred.
  • the creator of the invitation can provide descriptive information or instructions regarding the object (block 410 ). For example, the creator can provide a description of the object that will be transferred if the recipient responds to the invitation, instructions on what the recipient can or is expected to do with the object once the objects have been transferred, and so on.
  • the creator of the invitation can then specify the recipient(s) of the invitation (block 415 ) and then issue the invitation (block 420 ), which will result in the transmission of the invitation to one or more recipients.
  • the specification of the recipient(s) does not necessarily need to occur immediately prior to the issuance of the invitation.
  • the creator of the invitation may specify the recipient(s) of the invitation at any time prior to the issuance of the invitation in block 420 .
  • the diagram shown in FIG. 4 b illustrates an exemplary sequence of events 450 that can occur at a recipient of an invitation that requests a transfer of an object.
  • the sequence of events 450 can begin after the recipient of the invitation actually receives the invitation.
  • the invitation can be displayed to the user (block 455 ).
  • the user can select a destination where the transferred object will be stored (block 460 ).
  • the user can respond to the invitation (block 465 ). Responding to the invitation can result in the immediate transfer of the object to the user or may result in the scheduling of a subsequent transfer of the object to the user, depending upon the implementation of the invitation.
  • One possible technique that can help reduce contention for network resources is to spread out the demand for the network resources over time so that there is not a large number of users receiving invitations and then demanding network resources at any given time.
  • FIG. 5 there is shown a flow diagram illustrating the creation of an invitation, wherein scheduling is used to reduce network contention, according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • the diagram shown in FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary sequence of events 500 in the creation of an invitation that can be used to either request the submission of an object or the retrieval of a posted object.
  • the sequence of events 500 can begin with the creator of the invitation defining either a source or a destination of the object being transferred (block 505 ). If the invitation is to be used to request the recipient of the initiation to submit an object, then the creator can define a destination where the submitted object will be stored. If the invitation is to be used to inform the recipient to retrieve a specified object, then the creator can define a source of the object.
  • the creator of the invitation can provide descriptive information and/or instructions for the invitation (block 510 ).
  • the descriptive information may provide the recipient information regarding the object that they are to submit or receive, while the instructions may provide the recipient with needed help on how to respond to the invitation, for example.
  • scheduling information can be provided (block 515 ).
  • the scheduling information can be provided by the creator of the invitation.
  • the scheduling information can be generated by the electronic device used by the creator to transmit the invitation.
  • An exemplary schedule for invitation transmission times based different groups of recipients is shown in block 520 .
  • An example of creator generated scheduling can be a list of recipients of the invitation and time when the invitation should be transmitted to each of the recipients. Another variation can be a list of recipients of the invitation and a time that corresponds to a delay that is assessed on the recipient after the recipient responds to the invitation prior to the transfer of the object.
  • each invitation may be assigned a randomly selected transmit time, or alternatively, a randomly selected delay may be assigned to each invitation.
  • Yet another preferred embodiment may be having a list of delays with a delay associated with each recipient and then referencing the list of delay when scheduling the transmission of the invitation or the forced delay.
  • the scheduling can also occur for groups of recipients, as long as the number of recipients within a group is not so large that their resulting object transfers would negatively affect network performance.
  • the recipient(s) of the invitation can be specified (block 525 ) and then the invitations can be issued (block 530 ). If the scheduling affects the transmit time of the invitations, such as the exemplary scheduling shown in block 520 , then an invitation will be transmitted only when its scheduled time is equal to the local time at the electronic device transmitting the invitations. If the scheduling affects a delay asserted on each invitation response, then the delay may be inserted into the invitation and all invitations can be transmitted at substantially the same time.

Abstract

Method for transferring objects in a communications network. A preferred embodiment comprises defining a location of an object to be transferred, providing descriptive information for an invitation, specifying a recipient of the invitation, and issuing the invitation. The invitation can provide a way for a creator of the invitation to provide contextual information, such as object names, instructional and descriptive information related to the object, and so forth, to the recipient to help reduce confusion. Furthermore, the invitation can permit the combination of multiple objects (by the recipient or the creator) to further reduce confusion and the loss of objects. Scheduling can be added to help reduce network resource contention when there are large numbers of objects to be transferred.

Description

    TECHNICAL FIELD
  • The present invention relates generally to a method for digital communications, and more particularly to a method for the transferring of objects in a communications network.
  • BACKGROUND
  • Situations can arise in a communications network when it is desired that objects, such as data, multimedia, and so forth, be transferred from a plurality of devices to a single device or from the single device to the plurality of devices. An example of such a communications network can be seen in a classroom situation, wherein a single device (which can be used by an instructor) is connected to a plurality of devices (which can be used by students). The instructor can distribute information (in the form of data, multimedia, and so on) to the students or the students can submit information to the instructor.
  • In a situation when the single device desires objects from the plurality of devices, the single device can transmit an invitation to each of the plurality of devices and request that the objects be provided. The invitation may include a specified name(s) that should be applied to the object(s). For example, in the instructor/student environment, the invitation may include a recommended name for the object, such as “Student_Name—Object_Name,” “Homework—Friday—Week 3,” or “Journal Entries—Week 4,” and so forth, as well as contain instructions on how to proceed. The specification of the name for the object can help simplify the handling and organization of the object when they are received at the single device. In addition to being used to request the transmission of an object, the invitation can also be used to provide the object to the plurality of devices. For example, in the instructor/student environment, the invitation can include the object necessary for an assignment or for an examination. Note that the term object may be used in both the singular and plural sense.
  • Another technique can involve the use of a message that is provided to each of the plurality of devices and can contain information regarding a desired location where to store the requested object or where to obtain the object. This technique can be referred to as a ‘file server’ technique since a location (typically on a server of some type) is specified (by the message) for use as either a storage location or a server location for the object. The recipients of the message can then navigate to the specified location and retrieve the object or place its own object.
  • One disadvantage of the prior art is that when there is a response to the invitation by the plurality of devices, a situation may be created wherein there is insufficient network bandwidth to support the transfer of the object. This can especially be a problem in wireless communications networks where network bandwidth can be limited. The insufficient network bandwidth can lead to a significantly degraded performance that can substantially delay the transfer of the object.
  • A second disadvantage of the prior art is that it is possible that the users assign a name to the object that is different from the recommended name. This inconsistent naming can make it difficult to organize the multiple objects received from the users.
  • Yet another disadvantage of the prior art is that the users can produce a wide variety of object types in response to an invitation. For example, in the instructor/student environment, one student may produce a simple text file while another may produce a complex multimedia presentation consisting of many files in response to the same assignment. This can lead to further difficulty in the organization of the multiple objects received from the users as well as increasing the potential for the instructor to misplace files.
  • An additional disadvantage of the prior art is that the file server solution can lead to difficulties for the users when they need to navigate through potentially complex file structures to locate the object that they are to retrieve or to find locations where they are to place the object. This can lead to the object being placed in incorrect locations and/or the inability to locate the object.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • These and other problems are generally solved or circumvented, and technical advantages are generally achieved, by preferred embodiments of the present invention which provides a method for the transfer of objects in a communications network.
  • In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a method for initiating a transfer of an object with context with an invitation is provided. The method comprises defining an object location, providing descriptive information for the invitation, specifying a recipient of the invitation, and issuing the invitation.
  • In accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention, a method for transferring objects in a communications network with an invitation is provided. The method comprises defining an object location, providing descriptive information for the invitation, specifying a recipient of the invitation, issuing the invitation, receiving a response to the invitation, and initiating the transfer of the object.
  • An advantage of a preferred embodiment of the present invention is that the invitation can be used schedule access to the communications network during the transfer of the object to help reduce the contention for network bandwidth, which can be detrimental to overall network performance. By spreading network bandwidth demand over time, it can be possible to achieved good transfer data rates for all transfers.
  • A further advantage of a preferred embodiment of the present invention is that the invitation can be used to transfer an object of any arbitrary name to a specified location and correctly label the object so that it can be readily identified. The proper labeling can reduce the likelihood of misplacing the object that can occur when the object must have a specified name.
  • Yet another advantage of a preferred embodiment of the present invention is that the invitation can logically group multiple objects together to help prevent confusion when multiple objects are transferred. By grouping multiple objects into a single logical object, such as by object name, device, user name, or so forth, the multiple objects can be kept together to help prevent object loss as well as confusion.
  • Another advantage of a preferred embodiment of the present invention is that the invitation can be embedded with specifics such as storage locations, server addresses, and so forth. This prevents the recipients of the invitations from having to know such technical information as well as preventing mistakes of incorrectly entering (or selecting) addresses that can result in the misplacement of the objects.
  • The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features and technical advantages of the present invention in order that the detailed description of the invention that follows may be better understood. Additional features and advantages of the invention will be described hereinafter which form the subject of the claims of the invention. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the conception and specific embodiments disclosed may be readily utilized as a basis for modifying or designing other structures or processes for carrying out the same purposes of the present invention. It should also be realized by those skilled in the art that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • For a more complete understanding of the present invention, and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram of an exemplary communications network;
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram of interactions between an instructor and students, when the instructor requests the submission of work created by the students;
  • FIGS. 3 a and 3 b are diagrams of the creation of an invitation to request the submission of objects and the operation of a receiver of the invitation, according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention;
  • FIGS. 4 a and 4 b are diagrams of the creation of an invitation to request the retrieval of posted objects and the operation of a receiver of the invitation, according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention; and
  • FIG. 5 is a diagram of the creation of an invitation, wherein scheduling is used to reduce network contention, according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS
  • The making and using of the presently preferred embodiments are discussed in detail below. It should be appreciated, however, that the present invention provides many applicable inventive concepts that can be embodied in a wide variety of specific contexts. The specific embodiments discussed are merely illustrative of specific ways to make and use the invention, and do not limit the scope of the invention.
  • The present invention will be described with respect to preferred embodiments in a specific context, namely a communications network for use in an instructional setting with a host device, used by an instructor, and a plurality of other devices coupled to the host device, wherein the other devices are used by the students. The invention may also be applied, however, to other communications networks wherein a single device wishes to transfer objects to multiple other devices or receive objects from multiple other devices.
  • With reference now to FIG. 1, there is shown a diagram illustrating an exemplary communications network 100. The communications network 100, as shown in FIG. 1, illustrates an instructional setting wherein a computer 105 being used by an instructor 107 can be coupled to one or more devices (electronic devices) 110. The devices 110 can be used by students 112 on an individual basis or in a group sharing fashion. The coupling between the computer 105 and the devices 110 can be either with a wired connection 115 or a wireless connection 120 or a combination of both. As shown in FIG. 1, the communications network 100 can feature a combination of wired and wireless connections. Note that while the diagram in FIG. 1 displays a single computer 105, in practice, the communications network 100 can have multiple computers 105 that can be coupled to the devices 110. For example, a situation may arise wherein the instructional setting may have several instructors 107, each with a separate computer 105.
  • One possible use of the communications network 100 can be the distribution of objects, such as data, multimedia, information, and so forth, between the computer 105 and the devices 110. The distribution of the objects can originate at the computer 105 or terminate at the computer 105. For example, the students 112 can use the communications network 100 to submit work to the instructor 107 or retrieve assignments, examinations, information from the instructor 107. In general, the communications network 100 can be used to exchange information between a single device and multiple devices.
  • With reference now to FIG. 2, there is shown a diagram illustrating an exemplary interaction between instructor and students (and their electronic devices) when the instructor requests that the students submit work. As shown in the diagram in FIG. 2, actions made by the instructor 107 and the students 112 are displayed along a vertical axis with time increasing in a descending direction. The instructor 107 can initiate the submission of the work from the students 112 by transmitting a “turn in” request (shown in FIG. 2 as line 200) from a computer, such as the computer 105, to the students 112 via their devices, such as the devices 110. The “turn in” request 200 is provided to each of the students 112, shown in FIG. 2 as lines 201 and 202. The “turn in” request 200 may simply be broadcast to each one of the devices 110 from the computer 105. Alternatively, the “turn in” request 200 may be directed at a subset of students 112.
  • The “turn in” request 200 may specify what the instructor 107 wishes the students 112 to turn in (an object, such as files, documents, and so forth) and where to turn in the object. As each of the students 112 receives the “turn in” request 200, the students can select the object to turn in and submit the object. The transfers of the object resulting from the students 112 turning in the requested work is shown in FIG. 2 as lines 205, 207, and 209. Note that it may be possible that the student may submit more than one object in response to the “turn in” request. In such a situation, the term object can be used to also refer to the multiple objects.
  • Several problems may arise from this type of interaction. For example, a student may have incorrectly named the object that is being submitted. This misnamed object can provide difficulties for the instructor 107 when it comes time for the instructor 107 to evaluate the work of the student. The difficulties may include not being able to locate the object since it is named incorrectly, not being able to associate the object with the student who submitted the work, and so forth. Another problem that may arise is that it can be difficult for the instructor 107 to associate an object with a student if each of the students 112 submits objects with the same name. Furthermore, students may create different numbers and types of objects in response to a particular assignment. For example, in response to an assignment, one student may produce a simple text file, while another may produce a complex multimedia document with a multitude of files and documents.
  • Yet another problem may arise if the students 112 should attempt to submit their work at substantially the same time. If the students 112 attempt to submit their work at the same time, it may be possible for the communications network 100 to become saturated and the performance (data transfer rate) of the communications network 100 could drop to a very low level. This could greatly increase the amount of time required to successfully transfer the students' work.
  • A different “turn in” request (also referred to as an invitation) can be devised to help alleviate the problems discussed above. It can be possible to assign a unique identifier to each student's object so that the instructor 107 can readily identify the work. Additionally, when a student submits multiple objects, the multiple objects can be physically or logically grouped into a single object to help reduce problems such as misplacing objects or losing some of the objects. Furthermore, the submissions of the students' work can be scheduled to help reduce contention for network resources and therefore, improving network performance.
  • With reference now to FIGS. 3 a and 3 b, there are shown flow diagrams illustrating the creation of an invitation to request the submission of an object and the operation of a receiver of the invitation, according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention. The diagram shown in FIG. 3 a illustrates an exemplary sequence of events 300 in the creation of an invitation to request the submission of an object by a recipient of the invitation. The sequence of events 300 can begin with the specification of a desired location for storing the object (block 305). The desired location may be a directory on a storage device, for example. The creator of the invitation can specify the desired location by browsing a file structure tree and then selecting the desired location from the file structure tree (or something similar), for example. According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the desired location can be specified by a user that is transmitting the invitation and can be set so that the recipient of the invitation can or cannot change the desired location. If the desired location is set so that it cannot be changed, then the object submitted by the recipient can be ensured of being placed in the desired location, simplifying the location of the object at a later time. After specifying the storage location of the object (block 305), the user can add descriptive information and/or instructions (block 310). The descriptive information and/or instructions can be used by the user to provide any necessary information to the recipient of the invitation on how to respond to the invitation, remind the recipient about submitting the object, and so forth.
  • After the user completes the addition of the descriptive information and/or instructions (block 310), the user can specify the recipient(s) of the invitation (block 315) and then issue the invitation (block 320). The specification of the recipient(s) does not necessarily need to occur immediately prior to the issuance of the invitation. The creator of the invitation may specify the recipient(s) of the invitation at any time prior to the issuance of the invitation in block 320. The issuance of the invitation can result in the transmission of the invitation to the recipient(s) of the invitation. According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the invitations can be transmitted immediately or they may be scheduled for subsequent transmission. One reason to schedule the transmission of the invitation can be to potentially reduce network resource contention by transmitting some fraction of the total number of invitations at any given time. Another reason to schedule the transmission could be to permit the user to schedule the invitation at a time advance of when the user desires the invitations to be transmitted and not have to create the invitations at the desired transmission time.
  • After the invitation is issued, the invitation is provided to each of the recipients. After a recipient responds to the invitation, the object is transferred from the recipient to the desired location for storing the object. If there is more than one recipient, then the object from each recipient can be assigned a unique identifier to help prevent identification problems. When a recipient has more than one object to submit, the objects can be grouped into a single unit to simplify transfer and help to prevent confusion, the combination of the multiple objects into a single unit is discussed below.
  • The diagram shown in FIG. 3 b illustrates an exemplary sequence of events 350 that can occur at a recipient of an invitation that requests the submission of an object. The sequence of events 350 can begin after the recipient of the invitation actually receives the invitation. Depending upon the type of communications network, the invitation may be received at the recipient over a wired or wireless communications link. After receiving the invitation, the invitation can be displayed to the user (block 355). The invitation can be displayed on a display of a device that the user is operating, for example. The display of the invitation can include audio and video cues to help the user take notice of the arrival of the invitation. After reading the invitation (the content of which was supplied by the creator of the invitation, such as shown in block 310 of FIG. 3 a), the user can select the object to submit to the creator of the invitation (block 360).
  • According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the user can select the object that he/she desires to submit and if the user selects multiple objects, they can either be physically or logically combined into a single unit. The user can select the object to be submitted by browsing a file structure tree and then selecting the object, for example. Alternatively, if the user knows the specific location of the object, he/she can enter it directly. The combination of multiple objects into a single unit can simply the transmittal and processing of the objects when submissions from multiple sources are expected. The invitation may contain a script or an application to actually perform the combination of multiple objects into a single unit. Alternatively, the invitation may be permitted to make use of applications, such as a file archive utility, installed in the device of the user to perform the combination operation. In addition to combining objects into a single unit, the invitation can also be able to specify a unique name (or identifier) for the object to enable easy identification of the object after it has been transmitted. According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the invitation may be able to suggest a default name for the object being submitted by the user. However, depending upon implementation and/or permissions set by the creator of the invitation, the user may or may not be able to change the default name. Regardless, the invitation can attach a unique identifier to the submitted object.
  • After selecting the object that he/she wishes to submit (block 360), the user can respond to the invitation (block 365). Responding to the invitation can result in the actual submission of the selected object and can involve the assignment of the unique identifier to the object, the combination of multiple objects into a single unit, and the transmission of the object. In addition to being able to suggest a name for the object, the invitation may also specify a destination for the object. Again, the user may or may not be able to change the destination of the object, depending upon implementation and/or permissions set by the creator of the invitation.
  • According to yet another preferred embodiment of the present invention, rather than transferring the object selected by the recipient, a metatag (or a group of metatags if more than one objects are selected for transfer) can be transferred in its place. When received, the metatag can provide an address to access the object so that the actual object can be retrieved when needed, rather than having the object immediately transferred when the recipient responds to the invitation. The use of metatags can help alleviate potential network resource contention issues as well as object storage problems at the recipient.
  • Depending upon implementation and/or permissions, the use of invitations to initiate submissions of an object can lead to a situation wherein the object from a plurality of recipients can all be located at a desired location as well as having unique identifiers that will make it simple to locate the submitted objects. Additionally, the submission of multiple objects from a single recipient can be readily supported by combining the multiple objects into a single unit. The use of the invitations can also permit the creator of the invitations to logically group the submitted objects into logical and physical groupings that can permit efficient organization and storage of the submitted objects. For example, in an instructor/student environment, an instructor can group submissions by students into different classes, assignments, weeks, terms, and so forth.
  • With reference now to FIGS. 4 a and 4 b, there are shown flow diagrams illustrating the creation of an invitation to request the retrieval of a posted object and the operation of a receiver of the invitation, according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention. The diagram shown in FIG. 4 a illustrates an exemplary sequence of events 400 in the creation of an invitation to initiate a transfer of an object to a recipient. The sequence of events 400 can begin with the specification of the object to be transferred by providing a source of the object (block 405). As discussed previously, the creator of the invitation can browse a file structure tree to specify the object to be transferred. According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, if multiple objects are to be transferred, the objects may or may not be logically or physically grouped into a single unit prior to transfer and the creator of the invitation may specify a single unit or the individual objects to be transferred.
  • After providing the source of the object, the creator of the invitation can provide descriptive information or instructions regarding the object (block 410). For example, the creator can provide a description of the object that will be transferred if the recipient responds to the invitation, instructions on what the recipient can or is expected to do with the object once the objects have been transferred, and so on. The creator of the invitation can then specify the recipient(s) of the invitation (block 415) and then issue the invitation (block 420), which will result in the transmission of the invitation to one or more recipients. As discussed above, the specification of the recipient(s) does not necessarily need to occur immediately prior to the issuance of the invitation. The creator of the invitation may specify the recipient(s) of the invitation at any time prior to the issuance of the invitation in block 420.
  • The diagram shown in FIG. 4 b illustrates an exemplary sequence of events 450 that can occur at a recipient of an invitation that requests a transfer of an object. The sequence of events 450 can begin after the recipient of the invitation actually receives the invitation. After receiving the invitation, the invitation can be displayed to the user (block 455). After reading the invitation, the user can select a destination where the transferred object will be stored (block 460). Then, the user can respond to the invitation (block 465). Responding to the invitation can result in the immediate transfer of the object to the user or may result in the scheduling of a subsequent transfer of the object to the user, depending upon the implementation of the invitation.
  • As discussed above, the immediate acceptance of an invitation by a large number of recipients can result in an oversaturated communications network that can lead to poor network performance. Therefore, there may be a desire to help reduce the contention for network resources. One possible technique that can help reduce contention for network resources is to spread out the demand for the network resources over time so that there is not a large number of users receiving invitations and then demanding network resources at any given time.
  • With reference now to FIG. 5, there is shown a flow diagram illustrating the creation of an invitation, wherein scheduling is used to reduce network contention, according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention. The diagram shown in FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary sequence of events 500 in the creation of an invitation that can be used to either request the submission of an object or the retrieval of a posted object. The sequence of events 500 can begin with the creator of the invitation defining either a source or a destination of the object being transferred (block 505). If the invitation is to be used to request the recipient of the initiation to submit an object, then the creator can define a destination where the submitted object will be stored. If the invitation is to be used to inform the recipient to retrieve a specified object, then the creator can define a source of the object.
  • After the definition of the source or destination of the object (block 505), the creator of the invitation can provide descriptive information and/or instructions for the invitation (block 510). As discussed previously, the descriptive information may provide the recipient information regarding the object that they are to submit or receive, while the instructions may provide the recipient with needed help on how to respond to the invitation, for example. Once the invitation has been completely specified by the creator, scheduling information can be provided (block 515). According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the scheduling information can be provided by the creator of the invitation. Alternatively, the scheduling information can be generated by the electronic device used by the creator to transmit the invitation. An exemplary schedule for invitation transmission times based different groups of recipients is shown in block 520.
  • An example of creator generated scheduling can be a list of recipients of the invitation and time when the invitation should be transmitted to each of the recipients. Another variation can be a list of recipients of the invitation and a time that corresponds to a delay that is assessed on the recipient after the recipient responds to the invitation prior to the transfer of the object. Similarly, if the scheduling information is to be generated by the electronic device, then each invitation may be assigned a randomly selected transmit time, or alternatively, a randomly selected delay may be assigned to each invitation. Yet another preferred embodiment may be having a list of delays with a delay associated with each recipient and then referencing the list of delay when scheduling the transmission of the invitation or the forced delay. In addition to scheduling invitations (or delays) for each recipient, the scheduling can also occur for groups of recipients, as long as the number of recipients within a group is not so large that their resulting object transfers would negatively affect network performance.
  • After the scheduling has been completed (block 515), then the recipient(s) of the invitation can be specified (block 525) and then the invitations can be issued (block 530). If the scheduling affects the transmit time of the invitations, such as the exemplary scheduling shown in block 520, then an invitation will be transmitted only when its scheduled time is equal to the local time at the electronic device transmitting the invitations. If the scheduling affects a delay asserted on each invitation response, then the delay may be inserted into the invitation and all invitations can be transmitted at substantially the same time.
  • Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
  • Moreover, the scope of the present application is not intended to be limited to the particular embodiments of the process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter, means, methods and steps described in the specification. As one of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate from the disclosure of the present invention, processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps, presently existing or later to be developed, that perform substantially the same function or achieve substantially the same result as the corresponding embodiments described herein may be utilized according to the present invention. Accordingly, the appended claims are intended to include within their scope such processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps.

Claims (21)

1. A method for initiating a transfer of an object with context with an invitation, the method comprising:
in the invitation, defining an object location;
providing descriptive information for the invitation;
specifying a recipient of the invitation; and
issuing the invitation.
2. The method of claim 1 further comprising prior to the issuing, providing an identifier for the object.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the transfer comprises transmitting the object to the recipient, and wherein the defining comprises defining a source location of the object to be transferred.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the transfer comprises receiving the object from the recipient, and wherein the defining comprises defining a destination location of the object to be transferred.
5. The method of claim 1 further comprising prior to the issuing, providing scheduling information for the invitation.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein the scheduling information comprises a transmission time for the invitation.
7. The method of claim 5, wherein the scheduling information comprises a delay that is imparted prior to the transfer of the object.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein there are a plurality of recipients for the invitation, and wherein the transfer of the object occurs with each recipient.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein the transfer comprises receiving the object from the recipient, and the method further comprises after the issuing, assigning a unique identifier that is based upon an identity of the recipient of the invitation.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the object comprises a plurality of objects, and wherein the plurality of objects is grouped into a single unit prior to transfer.
11. The method of claim 1, wherein the descriptive information further comprises instructions for responding to the invitation.
12. A method for transferring objects in a communications network with an invitation, the method comprising:
defining an object location;
providing descriptive information for the invitation;
specifying a recipient of the invitation;
issuing the invitation;
receiving a response to the invitation; and
initiating the transfer of the object.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein the transfer comprises transmitting the object to the recipient, and the method further comprising:
at the recipient,
selecting a destination for the object; and
responding to the invitation.
14. The method of claim 12, wherein the transfer comprises receiving the object from the recipient, and the method further comprising:
at the recipient,
selecting the object to transfer; and
responding to the invitation.
15. The method of claim 12, wherein the transfer comprises receiving the object from the recipient, and the method further comprising after the issuing:
receiving a response to the invitation; and
assigning a unique identifier to the object.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein there are a plurality of recipients, wherein each recipient responds independently to the invitation, and wherein an object transferred by a recipient is assigned a unique identifier based upon an identity of the recipient.
17. The method of claim 12 further comprising prior to the issuing, providing a scheduled transmission time for the invitation.
18. The method of claim 17, wherein an invitation is not issued until a local time of a device issuing the invitation is not substantially equal to the scheduled transmission time of the invitation.
19. The method of claim 17, wherein there are a plurality of recipients, and wherein the transmission time is different for each recipient.
20. The method of claim 12 further comprising prior to the initiating, imparting a delay.
21. The method of claim 20, wherein there are a plurality of recipients, and wherein the delay is different for each recipient.
US11/095,284 2005-03-30 2005-03-30 Invitation for transferring objects in a communications network Abandoned US20060224771A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/095,284 US20060224771A1 (en) 2005-03-30 2005-03-30 Invitation for transferring objects in a communications network
US12/464,418 US8656044B2 (en) 2005-03-30 2009-05-12 Invitation for transferring objects in a communications network

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/095,284 US20060224771A1 (en) 2005-03-30 2005-03-30 Invitation for transferring objects in a communications network

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/464,418 Continuation US8656044B2 (en) 2005-03-30 2009-05-12 Invitation for transferring objects in a communications network

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20060224771A1 true US20060224771A1 (en) 2006-10-05

Family

ID=37071945

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/095,284 Abandoned US20060224771A1 (en) 2005-03-30 2005-03-30 Invitation for transferring objects in a communications network
US12/464,418 Active 2026-05-09 US8656044B2 (en) 2005-03-30 2009-05-12 Invitation for transferring objects in a communications network

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/464,418 Active 2026-05-09 US8656044B2 (en) 2005-03-30 2009-05-12 Invitation for transferring objects in a communications network

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US20060224771A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10339827B2 (en) * 2016-03-04 2019-07-02 GraphR Applications, LLC Computer-implemented system and method for administering an examination

Citations (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3970374A (en) * 1974-02-27 1976-07-20 Copp John C Optical visual communication system
US4907146A (en) * 1986-10-07 1990-03-06 Giancarlo Caporali Interactive video network between one master computer and a plurality of slave computers
US5176520A (en) * 1990-04-17 1993-01-05 Hamilton Eric R Computer assisted instructional delivery system and method
US5318450A (en) * 1989-11-22 1994-06-07 Gte California Incorporated Multimedia distribution system for instructional materials
US5628011A (en) * 1993-01-04 1997-05-06 At&T Network-based intelligent information-sourcing arrangement
US5823788A (en) * 1995-11-13 1998-10-20 Lemelson; Jerome H. Interactive educational system and method
US5904484A (en) * 1996-12-23 1999-05-18 Burns; Dave Interactive motion training device and method
US7114126B2 (en) * 2001-07-18 2006-09-26 Wireless Generation, Inc. System and method for real-time observation assessment
US7218941B1 (en) * 2003-03-12 2007-05-15 Spotlight Mobile, Inc. System for connecting users with location specific information from official and unofficial sources
US7302465B2 (en) * 2001-10-22 2007-11-27 Comverse, Inc. Distributed multimedia transfer
US7353080B2 (en) * 2004-02-19 2008-04-01 Walker Digital, Llc Products and processes for controlling access to vending machine products
US7409452B2 (en) * 2003-02-28 2008-08-05 Xerox Corporation Method and apparatus for controlling document service requests from a mobile device
US7440746B1 (en) * 2003-02-21 2008-10-21 Swan Joseph G Apparatuses for requesting, retrieving and storing contact records
US7444315B2 (en) * 2004-08-12 2008-10-28 Sap Aktiengesellschaft Virtual community generation

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6654785B1 (en) 1998-03-02 2003-11-25 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. System for providing a synchronized display of information slides on a plurality of computer workstations over a computer network
US7118498B2 (en) * 2000-06-16 2006-10-10 Skyhawke Technologies, Llc Personal golfing assistant and method and system for graphically displaying golf related information and for collection, processing and distribution of golf related data
US6879838B2 (en) * 2001-04-20 2005-04-12 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Distributed location based service system
US7284191B2 (en) * 2001-08-13 2007-10-16 Xerox Corporation Meta-document management system with document identifiers
US7058392B1 (en) * 2002-12-03 2006-06-06 At&T Corp. Systems, methods and devices for reliable asynchronous message transmissions
US7433712B2 (en) * 2003-02-06 2008-10-07 Modu Ltd. Multi-access solid state memory devices and a telephone utilizing such

Patent Citations (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3970374A (en) * 1974-02-27 1976-07-20 Copp John C Optical visual communication system
US4907146A (en) * 1986-10-07 1990-03-06 Giancarlo Caporali Interactive video network between one master computer and a plurality of slave computers
US5318450A (en) * 1989-11-22 1994-06-07 Gte California Incorporated Multimedia distribution system for instructional materials
US5176520A (en) * 1990-04-17 1993-01-05 Hamilton Eric R Computer assisted instructional delivery system and method
US5628011A (en) * 1993-01-04 1997-05-06 At&T Network-based intelligent information-sourcing arrangement
US5823788A (en) * 1995-11-13 1998-10-20 Lemelson; Jerome H. Interactive educational system and method
US5904484A (en) * 1996-12-23 1999-05-18 Burns; Dave Interactive motion training device and method
US7114126B2 (en) * 2001-07-18 2006-09-26 Wireless Generation, Inc. System and method for real-time observation assessment
US7302465B2 (en) * 2001-10-22 2007-11-27 Comverse, Inc. Distributed multimedia transfer
US7440746B1 (en) * 2003-02-21 2008-10-21 Swan Joseph G Apparatuses for requesting, retrieving and storing contact records
US7409452B2 (en) * 2003-02-28 2008-08-05 Xerox Corporation Method and apparatus for controlling document service requests from a mobile device
US7218941B1 (en) * 2003-03-12 2007-05-15 Spotlight Mobile, Inc. System for connecting users with location specific information from official and unofficial sources
US7353080B2 (en) * 2004-02-19 2008-04-01 Walker Digital, Llc Products and processes for controlling access to vending machine products
US7444315B2 (en) * 2004-08-12 2008-10-28 Sap Aktiengesellschaft Virtual community generation

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US8656044B2 (en) 2014-02-18
US20090215020A1 (en) 2009-08-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6594652B1 (en) Electronic discussion system for exchanging information among users creating opinion indexes in accordance with content of each options
JP2557196B2 (en) Method and apparatus for profile transfer to calendar event
US5974446A (en) Internet based distance learning system for communicating between server and clients wherein clients communicate with each other or with teacher using different communication techniques via common user interface
Bergman et al. Folder versus tag preference in personal information management
US8214355B2 (en) Small table: multitenancy for lots of small tables on a cloud database
US20140222917A1 (en) Sharable Reference to Shared Content in a Cloud Storage
JP5356657B2 (en) Content distribution apparatus and content distribution method
US20070244919A1 (en) Resource association
US20030182358A1 (en) System and method for distance learning
US20080104219A1 (en) Content Sharing System, Content Management Server, Client Station, Method for Managing Content, Method for Acquiring Content, and Program
CN104040545A (en) Intelligent data delivery and storage based on data characteristics
US20100036907A1 (en) Digital living network alliance (DLNA) server that serves contents from IVL services
CN109889424A (en) Information processing method, device and storage medium
US20040125126A1 (en) Video browsing system
MX2014006002A (en) Enabling service features within productivity applications.
US9946805B2 (en) System and method for displaying services capable of pasting document stored on a cloud-based cross-clipboard
CN112000911A (en) Page management method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium
WO2020134752A1 (en) Method and apparatus for issuing message, and storage medium
CN112769919B (en) Distribution method and device of push tasks, storage medium and electronic equipment
CN104639974A (en) Information pushing method and device
US8656044B2 (en) Invitation for transferring objects in a communications network
CN106210810A (en) A kind of advertisement information processing method and device
WO2019190718A1 (en) Share pools for sharing files via a storage service
JP6405790B2 (en) CONFERENCE MANAGEMENT DEVICE, MATERIAL REGISTRATION METHOD, PROGRAM, AND CONFERENCE SYSTEM
CN104750735A (en) Resource information presentation method, device and system based on location based service

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED, TEXAS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:FRY, MARK DENNIS;MOORE, LANA;KARACHIWALA, SANDHYA;REEL/FRAME:016475/0427

Effective date: 20050330

Owner name: SRI INTERNATIONAL, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ROSCHELLE, JEREMY;BRECHT, JOHN;REEL/FRAME:016475/0431;SIGNING DATES FROM 20050315 TO 20050318

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION