|Publication number||US20060224088 A1|
|Application number||US 11/391,988|
|Publication date||5 Oct 2006|
|Filing date||29 Mar 2006|
|Priority date||29 Mar 2005|
|Also published as||CA2600613A1, CN104887235A, EP1868498A2, EP1868498A4, EP1868498B1, EP2510873A2, EP2510873A3, EP2510873B1, EP2510874A2, EP2510874A3, US7918887, US8372147, US8372153, US8444654, US8449556, US8761859, US20110118565, US20110118566, US20110118567, US20110124981, US20130225949, US20140330105, WO2006105098A2, WO2006105098A3|
|Publication number||11391988, 391988, US 2006/0224088 A1, US 2006/224088 A1, US 20060224088 A1, US 20060224088A1, US 2006224088 A1, US 2006224088A1, US-A1-20060224088, US-A1-2006224088, US2006/0224088A1, US2006/224088A1, US20060224088 A1, US20060224088A1, US2006224088 A1, US2006224088A1|
|Original Assignee||Roche Martin W|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (81), Referenced by (32), Classifications (31), Legal Events (1)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application claims the priority, under 35 U.S.C. §119, of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/665,797 filed Mar. 29, 2005, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Nos. 60/763,761 and 60/763,869 filed Feb. 1, 2006, the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
The present invention lies in the field of medical devices, in particular, in the field of externally applied and embedded sensor systems for detecting specific parameters of a physiological (e.g., musculoskeletal) system and determining the exact anatomic site of activity, and methods for detecting parameters of anatomical sites.
Sensor technology has been disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,621,278, 6,856,141, and 6,984,993 to Ariav and assigned to Nexense Ltd. (the “Nexense patents”).
It would be beneficial to apply existing sensor technology to biometric data sensing applications so that health care personnel can determine characteristics of anatomic sites.
It is accordingly an object of the present invention to provide a sensor system that can detect specific parameters (e.g., of a musculoskeletal system) and determine the exact anatomic site of activity and methods for detecting parameters of anatomical sites that overcome the hereinafore-mentioned disadvantages of the heretofore-known devices and methods of this general type and that provides an externally applied and/or embedded sensor to give healthcare providers real time information regarding their patients. The information can include pathological processes as well as information regarding surgical procedures and implanted devices. The sensors can be activated by internal or external mechanisms, and the information relayed through wireless pathways. The sensor system will allow early intervention or modification of an implant system and can use existing sensors. For example, the sensors disclosed in Nexense patents can be used.
Other features that are considered as characteristic for the invention are set forth in the appended claims.
Although the invention is illustrated and described herein as embodied in a sensor system that can detect specific body parameters and determine exact anatomic site of activity and methods for detection, it is, nevertheless, not intended to be limited to the details shown because various modifications and structural changes may be made therein without departing from the spirit of the invention and within the scope and range of equivalents of the claims.
The construction and method of operation of the invention, however, together with additional objects and advantages thereof, will be best understood from the following description of specific embodiments when read in connection with the accompanying drawings.
Advantages of embodiments the present invention will be apparent from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments thereof, which description should be considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
Aspects of the invention are disclosed in the following description and related drawings directed to specific embodiments of the invention. Alternate embodiments may be devised without departing from the spirit or the scope of the invention. Additionally, well-known elements of exemplary embodiments of the invention will not be described in detail or will be omitted so as not to obscure the relevant details of the invention.
Before the present invention is disclosed and described, it is to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting. It must be noted that, as used in the specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
While the specification concludes with claims defining the features of the invention that are regarded as novel, it is believed that the invention will be better understood from a consideration of the following description in conjunction with the drawing figures, in which like reference numerals are carried forward. The figures of the drawings are not drawn to scale.
An externally applied sensor system according to the present invention can be used to evaluate skin integrity and pathological pressure that can lead to skin ischemia and ultimately skin breakdown (Decubiti). It is important to detect certain parameters that can lead to skin breakdown. Elements such as pressure, time, shear, and vascular flow, for example, are important to detect. The specific anatomic location is needed.
The sensor system of the present invention can be embedded in a thin, adhesive, conforming material that is applied to specific areas of concern. Exemplary areas include the heel, hips, sacrum, and other areas of risk. These sensors map out the anatomic area. If threshold parameters are exceeded, the sensors inform a telemetric receiver that, in turn, activates an alarm to the nurse or other health care professional. In one specific application, the information is used to control the bed that the patient is lying upon to relieve the area of concern. In particular, adjustment of aircells in the mattress can be made to unload the affected area of concern.
The external sensor system can be configured in various ways. In an exemplary embodiment, a sensor is disposed within a thin, conformable adhesive that is applied directly to the patient's body and is powered by a thin lithium battery. This sensor(s) document specific parameters such as pressure, time, shear, and vascular flow. The sensor telemetrically informs a receiving unit and sets an alarm if certain pre-programmed parameters are exceeded. In one embodiment where a visual aid is provided (such as a computer screen displaying the patient's body outline, the exact area of concern can be highlighted and, thereby, visualized by the health care professional.
Embedded sensors are needed to detect certain internal parameters that are not directly visible to the human eye. These sensors will be used in specific locations to detect specific parameters.
One way of embedding a sensor is through an open surgical procedure. During such a surgical procedure, the sensor is embedded by the surgeon directly into bone or soft tissue or is attached directly to a secured implant (e.g., a prosthesis (hip, knee)). The sensor system is used during the surgical procedure to inform the surgeon on the position and/or function of the implant and of soft tissue balance and/or alignment. The sensor is directly embedded with a penetrating instrument that releases the sensor at a predetermined depth. The sensor is attached to the secured implant with a specific locking system or adhesive. The sensor is activated prior to closure for validating the sensor.
Another way of embedding a sensor is through a percutaneous procedure. The ability to implant sensors in specific locations is important to evaluate internal systems. Sensors of varying diameters can be implanted into bone, soft tissue, and/or implants. The procedure is applied under visualization supplied, for example, by fluoroscopy, ultrasound imaging, and CAT scanning. Such a procedure can be performed under local or regional anesthesia. The parameters evaluated are as set forth herein. The percutaneous system includes a thin instrument with a sharp trocar that penetrates the necessary tissue plains and a deployment arm releases the sensor(s) at predetermined depth(s). The instrument could also house the necessary navigation system to determine the specific anatomic location required.
The parameters to be evaluated and time factors determine the energy source required for the embedded sensor. Short time frames (up to 5 years) allow the use of a battery. Longer duration needs suggest use of external activation or powering systems or the use of the patient's kinetic energy to supply energy to the sensor system. These activation systems can be presently utilized. The sensors would also be activated at predetermined times to monitor implant cycles, abnormal motion and implant wear thresholds.
Information is received telemetrically. In one exemplary embodiment, the sensors are preprogrammed to “activate” and send required information if a specific threshold is exceeded. The sensors could also be activated and used to relay information to an external receiver. Further applications allow readjustment of a “smart implant” to release specific medications, biologics, or other substances, or to readjust alignment or modularity of the implant.
The sensor system is initially activated and read in a doctor's office and further activation can occur in the patient's house, with the patient having ability to send the information through Internet applications, for example, to the physician.
Software will be programmed to receive the information, process it, and, then, relay it to the healthcare provider.
The sensor system of the present invention has many different applications. For example, it can be used to treat osteoporosis. Osteoporosis is a pathological condition of bone that is characterized by decreased bone mass and increased risk of fracture. It is well accepted that bone-mineral content and bone-mineral density are associated with bone strength.
Bone density is an extremely important parameter of the musculoskeletal system to evaluate. Bone density measurements are used to quantify a person's bone strength and ultimately predict the increased risks associated with osteoporosis. Bone loss leads to fractures, spinal compression, and implant loosening. Presently, physicians use external methods such as specialized X-rays.
The unit of measurement for bone densitometry is bone-mineral content, expressed in grams. Bone density changes are important in the evaluation of osteoporosis, bone healing, and implant loosening from stress shielding. Another important evaluation is in regard to osteolysis. osteolysis can destroy bone in a silent manner. It is a pathological reaction of the host to bearing wear, such as polyethylene. The polyethylene particles activate an immune granulomatous response that initially affects the bone surrounding the implant. Bone density changes will occur prior to cystic changes that lead to severe bone loss and implant failure.
There are multiple external systems that can evaluate bone density. The problems with such systems encountered are related to the various systems themselves, but also to the socio-economic constraints of getting the patient into the office to evaluate a painless disease; coupled with the constricted payment allocations that cause long intervals between evaluations.
Sensors used according to the present invention allow evaluation of changes in bone density, enabling health care providers to know real time internal data. Application of the sensors can assess osteoporosis and its progression and/or response to treatment. By evaluating changes in bone density, the sensors provide early information regarding fracture healing and early changes of osteolysis (bone changes relating to polyethylene wear in implants).
Although the instrumentation various with different modalities, all record the attenuation of a beam of energy as it passes through bone and soft tissue. Comparisons of results are necessarily limited to bones of equal shape, which assumes a constant relationship between the thickness of the bone and the area that is scanned. Moreover, the measurements are strictly skeletal-site-specific; thus, individuals can be compared only when identical locations in the skeleton are studied.
Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry can be used to detect small changes in bone-mineral content at multiple anatomical sites. A major disadvantage of the technique is that it does not enable the examiner to differentiate between cortical and trabecular bone. Quantitative ultrasound, in contrast to other bone-densitometry methods that measure only bone-mineral content, can measure additional properties of bone such as mechanical integrity. Propagation of the ultrasound wave through bone is affected by bone mass, bone architecture, and the directionality of loading. Quantitative ultrasound measurements as measures for assessing the strength and stiffness of bone are based on the processing of the received ultrasound signals. The speed of sound and the ultrasound wave propagates through the bone and the soft tissue. Prosthetic loosening or subsidence, and fracture of the femur/tibia/acetabulum or the prosthesis, are associated with bone loss. Consequently, an accurate assessment of progressive quantifiable changes in periprosthetic bone-mineral content may help the treating surgeon to determine when to intervene in order to preserve bone stock for revision arthroplasty. This information helps in the development of implants for osteoporotic bone, and aids in the evaluation of medical treatment of osteoporoses and the effects of different implant coatings.
The sensor system of the present invention can be used to evaluate function of internal implants. Present knowledge of actual implant function is poor. Physicians continue to use external methods, including X-rays, bone scans, and patient evaluation. However, they are typically left only with open surgical exploration for actual investigation of function. Using sensors according to the present invention permits detection of an implant's early malfunction and impending catastrophic failure. As such, early intervention is made possible. This, in turn, decreases a patient's morbidity, decreases future medical care cost, and increases the patient's quality of life.
The sensors can be attached directly to implant surfaces (pre-operatively and/or intra-operatively) and/or directly to the implant-bone interface. Sensors can be implanted into the bone and soft tissue as well. In such an application, the physician could evaluate important parameters of the implant-host system. Exemplary parameters that could be measured include: implant stability, implant motion, implant wear, implant cycle times, implant identification, implant pressure/load, implant integration, joint fluid analysis, articulating surfaces information, ligament function, and many more.
Application of sensors according to the invention allows one to determine if the implant is unstable and/or if excessive motion or subsidence occurs. In an exemplary application, the sensor can be configured to release an orthobiologic from an activated implanted module to increase integration. Alternatively and/or additionally, the implant system with the sensors can be used to adjust the angle/offset/soft tissue tension to stabilize the implant if needed.
Sensors can be used to detect whether or not implant bearings are wearing out. Detectable bearing parameters include early wear, increased friction, etc. An early alarm warning from the sensor could enable early bearing exchange prior to catastrophic failure.
A joint implant sensor can detect an increase in heat, acid, or other physical property. Such knowledge would provide the physician with an early infection warning. In an exemplary infection treatment application, the sensor can activate a embedded module that releases an antibiotic.
The sensors can be used to analyze knee surgeries. Such sensors can be placed posteriorly in the knee to evaluate popliteal artery flow, pressure, and/or rhythm. A femoral implant sensor is placed anteriorly to monitor femoral artery/venous flow, pressure, and/or rhythm. An internal vascular monitor can be part of the implant and include devices to release antihypertensive or anti-arrthymic modules to modify vascular changes when needed.
In one embodiment, the internal orthopedic implant is, itself, the sensor of the present invention. In a trauma situation, for example, the reduction screw can be both the implant and the sensor. Such a screw can detect abnormal motion at the fracture site and confirm increase in density (i.e., healing). Such an application allows percutaneous implantation of bone morphogenic protein (BMP) to aid in healing or a percutaneous adjustment of the hardware.
The sensor of the present invention can be used in spinal implants. A sensor placed in the spine/vertebrae can detect abnormal motion at a fusion site. The sensor evaluates spinal implant integration at the adjacent vertebral segments and/or detects adjacent vertebral segment instability. Implanted sensors can activate a transitioning stabilizing system or implant and determine the areas of excessive motion to enable percutaneous stability from hardware or an orthobiologic. Referring now to the figures of the drawings in detail and first, particularly to
The sensor 3 can be part of hardware used in the hip and/or the spine. The sensor 3 can be placed at various depths to allow evaluation of the cortex as well as the travecular bone. With two deployed sensors 3, the distance between the sensors 3 can be determined at the area of concern and the power field that can be generated. The energy fields can be standard energy sources such as ultrasound, radiofrequency, and/or electromagnetic fields. The deflection of the energy wave over time, for example, will allow the detection of changes in the desired parameter that is being evaluated.
An exemplary external monitoring sensor system according to FIGS. 6 to 8 enables on-contact nightly reads on bone mineral content and density. The sensor system can also enables a transfer of energy waves in a vibratory pattern that can mimic load on the bone and lead to improved bone mineral content and density. The sensors can also send energy waves through or across an implant to, thus, aid in healing of a fracture.
Fracturing of a hip and a spinal vertebra is common with respect to osteoporosis and trauma.
External and internal energy waves sent with sensors according to the invention can be used during the treatment of fractures and spinal fusions.
The use of ultrasound, pulsed electromagnetic fields, combined magnetic fields, capacitive coupling, and direct electrical current have been studied in their effects on the up regulation of growth factors. Pulsed Ultrasound has shown to activate “integrins,” which are receptors on cell surfaces that, when activated, produce an intracellular cascade. Proteins involved in inflammation, angiogenesis, and bone healing are expressed. These proteins include bone morphogenic protein (BMP)-7, alkaline phosphatase, vascular endothelial growth factor and insulin growth factor (IGF)-1. The use of pulsed electromagnetic fields have shown increased bone healing times in animals. Various waveforms affect the bone in different ways.
A sensor system using quantitative ultrasound can be used to evaluate calcaneal bone density externally. The system according to the invention is attached to the patients' bed and, by using external ultrasound wave forms as shown in
The sensor system according to the present invention depicts mainly the hip and spine, but can be applied to all skeletal segments of the body. FIGS. 12 to 18 depict various orientations of sensors according to the invention for treating the knee, hip, and vertebrae.
Sensors according to the invention are used in multiple orthopedic applications, including intra-operative joint implant alignment. Sensors and monitoring devices/systems that can be used include any of those well known in the art, such as those described in the Nexense patents. Computer assisted surgery is also commonplace.
Presently, the use of pins in the femur and tibia, allow arrays to be attached to the bones. Such attachment helps in spatial orientation of the knee/hip joint during the operation. These arrays are recognized by infrared optics or by electromagnetic devices (see
The time associated with inserting the pins, locking the arrays, registering the joint topography contributes to a significantly long procedure duration. There is still a need to individually touch multiple points on the femur and tibia to allow the computer to visualize the topography of the knee. The time for transmission of information from the sensors to the receiver also causes a potential delay. Therefore, it would be desireable to reduce or eliminate each of these problems.
Methods according to the invention include implanting the sensors in the field of surgery, using the sensors during surgery, and using the implanted sensors post-operatively to evaluate various desired parameters.
An ultrasonic cannula system 180 allows external non-radiating visualization of the sensor placement as shown in
The ultrasonic wave also exhibits a thru-beam to the tibia. Here, the transmitter beams the ultrasonic wave to a separate receiver 190. The femur/tibia deflect the beam triggering the receiver output. The added ability of the embedded sensors 7 to continually reflect the ultrasonic beam to the network of sensors 7 allows precise three-dimensional information. The sensor 7 is programmed to compensate for irregular surfaces and variable surface temperature. The measurement of bone is based on the processing of the received ultrasound signals. Speed of the sound and the ultrasound velocity both provide measurements on the basis of how rapidly the ultrasound wave propagates through the bone and the soft tissue. These measures characteristics permit creation of a rapid three-dimensional geometry, which information can be externally sent to the computer system that will allow integration of the prosthesis as shown in
In order for the sensor system to obtain the needed information regarding the spatial three dimensional topography of the joint, a minimum of three sensors are needed to be implanted into each bone that is an integral part of the joint. The deployment of the sensor can be by a single cannula (
Once the sensor system has been inserted, the external energy wave that will be used can be ultrasonic, or electromagnetic. The use of the optical array method could, therefore, be avoided. The deflection of the energy through the various mediums (cartilage and bone) and the time element of the energy wave is received by the sensors 8 and/or reflected back to the external receiver. By having the various sensors 8, a three-dimensional model is depicted. This enables the surgeon to embed the sensors (
FIGS. 34 to 37 depict the development of “smart” inserters and “smart” instruments. The handle 210 of the inserter/instrument houses an array of sensors 8 to aid in the precise cutting of the bone (
The implanted sensor system following prosthesis insertion is depicted in
The sensor system of the present invention can be used pre-operatively to follow the progression of joint pathology and the different treatment interventions. The system can be used intra-operatively to aid in the implantation of the prosthesis/instrumentation/hardware. In the spine, the affects on the neural elements can be evaluated, as well as the vascular changes during surgery, especially corrective surgery. The sensors can, then, be used post-operatively to evaluate changes over time and dynamic changes. The sensor are activated intra-operatively and parameter readings are stored. Immediately post-operatively, the sensor is activated and a baseline is known.
The sensor system allows evaluation of the host bone and tissue regarding, but not limited to bone density, fluid viscosity, temperature, strain, pressure, angular deformity, vibration, vascular/venous/lymphatic flow, load, torque, distance, tilt, shape, elasticity, motion, and others. Because the sensors span a joint space, they can detect changes in the implant function. Examples of implant functions include bearing wear, subsidence, bone integration, normal and abnormal motion, heat, change in viscosity, particulate matter, kinematics, to name a few.
The sensors can be powered by internal batteries or by external measures. A patient could be evaluated in bed at night by a non-contact activation system that can use radio frequency or electromagnetic/ultrasonic energy. The sensor systems' energy signal can penetrate the bed, activate the sensors, and transmit to a receiver that also can be attached to the bed. The sensors can be “upgraded” over time (e.g., with appropriate software enhancements) to evaluate various parameters. The sensors can be modified by an external device, such as a flash drive. For example, a set of embedded sensors can monitor the progression of a spinal fusion that is instrumented. Once a given parameter is confirmed, the same sensors can be re-programmed to monitor the adjacent spinal segments to predict increased stress and, ultimately, subluxation of an adjacent level.
Another feature of the sensor system is that it can rotate through a series of sensor parameters during an evaluation period. An example of such rotation can be evaluation of the bone density as the patient sleeps, and, following this, an evaluation of vascular joint fluid viscosity, and bearing surfaces. Such evaluation can occur on a fixed time sequence on specific intervals or randomly as desired. The information can telemetrically sent to the health care provider by current telephonic devices. Likewise, the patient can be evaluated in the doctor's office with an external sensor activator. The patient could, then, go through a series of motions that allow the physician to evaluate implant function, including such parameters as load, torque, motion, stability, etc.
The software system houses the sensor information in a grid that allows interval comparisons. The physician, then, evaluates the data and functions that fall outside the standard deviations are highlighted, with these parameters being further evaluated.
Even though these sensor systems are discussed herein mainly with respect to the knee, hip, and spine, these systems can be applied to any of the skeletal systems in the body.
Use of the system has been explained in the description of the present invention for a musculoskeletal sensor system. It is to be noted, however, that the present invention is not so limited. The device and method according to the invention can be used with any need.
The foregoing description and accompanying drawings illustrate the principles, preferred embodiments and modes of operation of the invention. However, the invention should not be construed as being limited to the particular embodiments discussed above. Additional variations of the embodiments discussed above will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
Therefore, the above-described embodiments should be regarded as illustrative rather than restrictive. Accordingly, it should be appreciated that variations to those embodiments can be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the following claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4936308 *||1 Nov 1988||26 Jun 1990||Agency Of Industrial Science & Technology||Method and apparatus for measuring acoustic characteristics and temperature|
|US5197488 *||5 Apr 1991||30 Mar 1993||N. K. Biotechnical Engineering Co.||Knee joint load measuring instrument and joint prosthesis|
|US5360016 *||22 Mar 1993||1 Nov 1994||N. K. Biotechnical Engineering Company||Force transducer for a joint prosthesis|
|US5425775 *||2 Nov 1993||20 Jun 1995||N.K. Biotechnical Engineering Company||Method for measuring patellofemoral forces|
|US5470354 *||10 Aug 1994||28 Nov 1995||Biomet Inc.||Force sensing apparatus and method for orthopaedic joint reconstruction|
|US5683396 *||20 Feb 1996||4 Nov 1997||Smith & Nephew, Inc.||Orthopaedic cutting instrumentation with cam locking arrangement|
|US5688279 *||11 Jan 1996||18 Nov 1997||Depuy Orthopedics, Inc.||Alignment guide for a bone cutting block|
|US5702429 *||4 Apr 1996||30 Dec 1997||Medtronic, Inc.||Neural stimulation techniques with feedback|
|US5853745 *||26 Mar 1997||29 Dec 1998||Baylor College Of Medicine||Medical implant having a durable, resilient and effective antimicrobial coating|
|US5871018 *||6 Jun 1997||16 Feb 1999||Delp; Scott L.||Computer-assisted surgical method|
|US5921929 *||26 Sep 1997||13 Jul 1999||Metra Biosystems, Inc.||Ultrasonic waveform assay for bone assessment using values mapped over a region|
|US6014588 *||7 Apr 1998||11 Jan 2000||Fitz; William R.||Facet joint pain relief method and apparatus|
|US6063091 *||13 Oct 1998||16 May 2000||Stryker Technologies Corporation||Methods and tools for tibial intermedullary revision surgery and associated tibial components|
|US6090114 *||29 Jun 1999||18 Jul 2000||Stryker Howmedica Osteonics Corp.||Tibial plateau resection guide|
|US6228089 *||19 Dec 1997||8 May 2001||Depuy International Limited||Device for positioning and guiding a surgical instrument during orthopaedic interventions|
|US6245109 *||2 Jun 2000||12 Jun 2001||Intellijoint Systems, Ltd.||Artificial joint system and method utilizing same for monitoring wear and displacement of artificial joint members|
|US6493588 *||17 Dec 1998||10 Dec 2002||Mmc/Gatx Partnership No. 1||Electro-nerve stimulator systems and methods|
|US6505075 *||22 May 2000||7 Jan 2003||Richard L. Weiner||Peripheral nerve stimulation method|
|US6558391 *||23 Dec 2000||6 May 2003||Stryker Technologies Corporation||Methods and tools for femoral resection in primary knee surgery|
|US6573706 *||31 Jan 2001||3 Jun 2003||Intellijoint Systems Ltd.||Method and apparatus for distance based detection of wear and the like in joints|
|US6583630 *||31 Jan 2001||24 Jun 2003||Intellijoint Systems Ltd.||Systems and methods for monitoring wear and/or displacement of artificial joint members, vertebrae, segments of fractured bones and dental implants|
|US6621278 *||24 Oct 2001||16 Sep 2003||Nexense Ltd.||High-precision measuring method and apparatus|
|US6645214 *||12 Nov 2001||11 Nov 2003||Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc.||Apparatus and method for bone positioning|
|US6701174 *||7 Apr 2000||2 Mar 2004||Carnegie Mellon University||Computer-aided bone distraction|
|US6758850 *||29 Mar 2002||6 Jul 2004||Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc.||Instruments and methods for flexion gap adjustment|
|US6821299 *||21 Mar 2003||23 Nov 2004||Zimmer Technology, Inc.||Implantable prosthesis for measuring six force components|
|US6856141 *||10 Jul 2003||15 Feb 2005||Nexense Ltd.||High-precision measuring method and apparatus|
|US6920347 *||21 Jun 2002||19 Jul 2005||Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc.||Trajectory storage apparatus and method for surgical navigation systems|
|US6925339 *||4 Feb 2003||2 Aug 2005||Zimmer Technology, Inc.||Implant registration device for surgical navigation system|
|US6984993 *||3 Jun 2004||10 Jan 2006||Nexense Ltd.||Method and apparatus for making high-precision measurements|
|US7018416 *||19 Feb 2002||28 Mar 2006||Zimmer Spine, Inc.||Bone implants and methods|
|US7022141 *||20 Dec 2002||4 Apr 2006||Depuy Products, Inc.||Alignment device for modular implants and method|
|US7029477 *||20 Dec 2002||18 Apr 2006||Zimmer Technology, Inc.||Surgical instrument and positioning method|
|US7080554 *||13 May 2004||25 Jul 2006||Nexense Ltd.||High-precision measuring method and apparatus|
|US7156853 *||25 Sep 2003||2 Jan 2007||Zimmer Kabushiki Kaisha||Measuring apparatus for total knee replacement operation|
|US7190273 *||31 Mar 2004||13 Mar 2007||Depuy Products, Inc.||Joint endoprosthesis with ambient condition sensing|
|US7195645 *||9 Jul 2004||27 Mar 2007||Depuy Products, Inc.||In vivo joint space measurement device and method|
|US7206627 *||6 Mar 2003||17 Apr 2007||Z-Kat, Inc.||System and method for intra-operative haptic planning of a medical procedure|
|US7266989 *||10 May 2005||11 Sep 2007||Nexense Ltd.||Sensor system for high-precision measurements of temperature, composition, and/or pressure of a fluid|
|US7313491 *||11 Jan 2006||25 Dec 2007||Nexense Ltd.||Method and apparatus for high-precision measurement of frequency|
|US7325640 *||2 Dec 2004||5 Feb 2008||Mitsubishi Jidosha Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Power transmission system for four-wheel drive vehicle|
|US7366562 *||17 Oct 2003||29 Apr 2008||Medtronic Navigation, Inc.||Method and apparatus for surgical navigation|
|US7442196 *||6 Feb 2004||28 Oct 2008||Synvasive Technology, Inc.||Dynamic knee balancer|
|US7458977 *||4 Feb 2003||2 Dec 2008||Zimmer Technology, Inc.||Surgical navigation instrument useful in marking anatomical structures|
|US7488324 *||8 Dec 2003||10 Feb 2009||Biomet Manufacturing Corporation||Femoral guide for implanting a femoral knee prosthesis|
|US7520179 *||30 Dec 2004||21 Apr 2009||Nexense Ltd.||Method and apparatus for measuring force particularly torque|
|US7522701 *||20 Dec 2005||21 Apr 2009||General Electric Company||System and method for image composition using position sensors|
|US7525309 *||30 Dec 2005||28 Apr 2009||Depuy Products, Inc.||Magnetic sensor array|
|US7527632 *||31 Mar 2003||5 May 2009||Cordis Corporation||Modified delivery device for coated medical devices|
|US7533571 *||12 Feb 2004||19 May 2009||Nexense Ltd.||Apparatus for making high-sensitivity measurements of various parameters, and sensors particularly useful in such apparatus|
|US7542791 *||5 Mar 2004||2 Jun 2009||Medtronic Navigation, Inc.||Method and apparatus for preplanning a surgical procedure|
|US7547307 *||27 Aug 2002||16 Jun 2009||Smith & Nephew, Inc.||Computer assisted knee arthroplasty instrumentation, systems, and processes|
|US7578821 *||25 Oct 2004||25 Aug 2009||Synvasive Technology, Inc.||Dynamic knee balancer with pressure sensing|
|US7606613 *||5 Sep 2002||20 Oct 2009||Medtronic Navigation, Inc.||Navigational guidance via computer-assisted fluoroscopic imaging|
|US7710124 *||8 Feb 2005||4 May 2010||Nexense Ltd.||Method and apparatus for detecting panel conditions|
|US7716988 *||24 Jan 2007||18 May 2010||Nexense Ltd.||Apparatus for use in controlling snoring and sensor unit particularly useful therein|
|US20020029784 *||1 Oct 2001||14 Mar 2002||Izex Technologies, Inc.||Database management for an orthopedic treatment system|
|US20040054302 *||12 Apr 2001||18 Mar 2004||Jacek Czernicki||Method and device for determining the anatomical condition of a human being or an animal and a strength training machine and a computer programme which is saved to a memory medium|
|US20040127793 *||1 Jul 2003||1 Jul 2004||Mendlein John D.||Methods and devices for improving ultrasonic measurements using multiple angle interrogation|
|US20050012610 *||31 Mar 2004||20 Jan 2005||Yen-Shuo Liao||Joint endoprosthesis with ambient condition sensing|
|US20050015002 *||18 Jul 2003||20 Jan 2005||Dixon Gary S.||Integrated protocol for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of bone mass degradation|
|US20050020941 *||24 Jul 2003||27 Jan 2005||Samih Tarabichi||Dynamic spacer for total knee arthroplasty|
|US20050176823 *||10 Feb 2004||11 Aug 2005||Diaz Robert L.||Intra-operative procedure for post-operative pain control|
|US20050273170 *||8 Jun 2004||8 Dec 2005||Navarro Richard R||Prosthetic intervertebral spinal disc with integral microprocessor|
|US20060004431 *||30 Jun 2005||5 Jan 2006||Fuller Thomas A||Prophylactic bactericidal implant|
|US20060036324 *||3 Aug 2005||16 Feb 2006||Dan Sachs||Adjustable spinal implant device and method|
|US20060058798 *||18 Aug 2005||16 Mar 2006||Roman Shawn D||Bone distractor with ratchet mechanism|
|US20060093646 *||28 Oct 2005||4 May 2006||Cima Michael J||Orthopedic and dental implant devices providing controlled drug delivery|
|US20060204738 *||12 Jan 2006||14 Sep 2006||Nanosys, Inc.||Medical device applications of nanostructured surfaces|
|US20060232408 *||18 Apr 2005||19 Oct 2006||Sdgi Holdings, Inc.||Method and apparatus for implant identification|
|US20060246103 *||15 May 2006||2 Nov 2006||Ralph James D||Implantable devices for the delivery of therapeutic agents to an orthopaedic surgical site|
|US20060271112 *||27 Jul 2006||30 Nov 2006||Martinson James B||Instrumented orthopedic and other medical implants|
|US20070134287 *||9 Dec 2005||14 Jun 2007||Biomet Manufacturing Corp||Method for coating biocompatible substrates with antibiotics|
|US20070219561 *||20 Dec 2006||20 Sep 2007||Perception Raisonnement Action En Medecine||Distractor system|
|US20070272747 *||25 May 2006||29 Nov 2007||Woods Sherrod A||Method and system for managing inventories of orthopaedic implants|
|US20080287856 *||10 Jun 2008||20 Nov 2008||Biomed Solutions Llc||Process and apparatus for treating biological organisms|
|US20080300481 *||31 May 2007||4 Dec 2008||General Electric Company, A New York Corporation||Dynamic reference method and system for use with surgical procedures|
|US20080312530 *||17 Jul 2008||18 Dec 2008||Malackowski Donald W||Implantable marker for a surgical navigation system, the marker having a spike for removably securing the marker to the tissue to be tracked|
|US20090000627 *||23 Jun 2008||1 Jan 2009||Mako Surgical Corp.||Haptic guidance system and method|
|US20090105557 *||17 Oct 2008||23 Apr 2009||Integrated Sensing Systems, Inc.||System having wireless implantable sensor|
|US20090187120 *||23 Jul 2009||Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.||Implantable sensor and associated methods|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7604629||19 Apr 2007||20 Oct 2009||Medtronic Inc.||Multi-parameter infection monitoring|
|US7611483||19 Apr 2007||3 Nov 2009||Medtronic, Inc.||Indicator metrics for infection monitoring|
|US7682355||19 Apr 2007||23 Mar 2010||Medtronic, Inc.||Refined infection monitoring|
|US7734353||19 Apr 2007||8 Jun 2010||Medtronic Inc.||Controlling temperature during recharge for treatment of infection or other conditions|
|US7766862||31 Jan 2008||3 Aug 2010||Medtronic, Inc.||Baseline acquisition for infection monitoring|
|US7822465||25 Apr 2007||26 Oct 2010||Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.||Device and method for image-based device performance measurement|
|US7842092||28 Dec 2006||30 Nov 2010||Mako Surgical Corp.||Prosthetic device and system and method for implanting prosthetic device|
|US7976534||28 Jul 2009||12 Jul 2011||Medtronic, Inc.||Event triggered infection monitoring|
|US7993269 *||17 Feb 2006||9 Aug 2011||Medtronic, Inc.||Sensor and method for spinal monitoring|
|US8051720||31 Oct 2006||8 Nov 2011||Ao Technology Ag||Method and device for measuring the local mechanical resistance of a porous body|
|US8078440||19 Sep 2008||13 Dec 2011||Smith & Nephew, Inc.||Operatively tuning implants for increased performance|
|US8095198 *||31 Jan 2006||10 Jan 2012||Warsaw Orthopedic. Inc.||Methods for detecting osteolytic conditions in the body|
|US8100950 *||24 Jul 2008||24 Jan 2012||The Cleveland Clinic Foundation||Oblique lumbar interbody fusion|
|US8126736||23 Jan 2009||28 Feb 2012||Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.||Methods and systems for diagnosing, treating, or tracking spinal disorders|
|US8197489||27 Jun 2008||12 Jun 2012||Depuy Products, Inc.||Knee ligament balancer|
|US8376937||28 Jan 2010||19 Feb 2013||Warsaw Orhtopedic, Inc.||Tissue monitoring surgical retractor system|
|US8521492||22 Nov 2011||27 Aug 2013||Smith & Nephew, Inc.||Tuning implants for increased performance|
|US8551023||31 Mar 2009||8 Oct 2013||Depuy (Ireland)||Device and method for determining force of a knee joint|
|US8556830||31 Mar 2009||15 Oct 2013||Depuy||Device and method for displaying joint force data|
|US8562617||23 May 2012||22 Oct 2013||DePuy Synthes Products, LLC||Knee ligament balancer|
|US8597210||31 Mar 2009||3 Dec 2013||Depuy (Ireland)||System and method for displaying joint force data|
|US8685093||23 Jan 2009||1 Apr 2014||Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.||Methods and systems for diagnosing, treating, or tracking spinal disorders|
|US8721568||31 Mar 2009||13 May 2014||Depuy (Ireland)||Method for performing an orthopaedic surgical procedure|
|US8740817||31 Mar 2009||3 Jun 2014||Depuy (Ireland)||Device and method for determining forces of a patient's joint|
|US8915866||18 Jan 2008||23 Dec 2014||Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.||Implantable sensor and associated methods|
|US9095284||28 Oct 2010||4 Aug 2015||Medtronic, Inc.||Distance measurement using implantable acoustic transducers|
|US9107580||10 Nov 2010||18 Aug 2015||Universite Pierre Et Marie Curie (Paris 6)||Device for measuring the activity of the spinal cord of a vertebra|
|US20100204551 *||12 Aug 2010||Martin William Roche||Detection, Prevention and Treatment of Infections in Implantable Devices|
|EP2490732A2 *||19 Oct 2010||29 Aug 2012||Yehoshua Shachar||A remotely activated piezoelectric pump for delivery of biological agents to the intervertebral disc and spine|
|WO2008052367A1 *||31 Oct 2006||8 May 2008||Ao Technology Ag||Method and device for measuring the local mechanical resistance of a porous body|
|WO2008130406A1 *||20 Apr 2007||30 Oct 2008||Medtronic Inc||Infection monitoring|
|WO2012057868A1 *||29 Apr 2011||3 May 2012||Medtronic, Inc.||Distance measurement using implantable acoustic transducers|
|U.S. Classification||600/587, 600/595, 600/504|
|International Classification||A61B5/02, A61B5/103|
|Cooperative Classification||A61B5/0086, A61B5/1459, A61B5/4851, A61B5/076, A61B5/447, A61B5/0031, A61B5/6878, A61B5/4509, A61B8/0875, A61B5/4523, A61B5/11, A61B5/4533, A61B5/6846, A61B5/4528, A61B5/4504|
|European Classification||A61B5/45B4, A61B5/45K, A61B5/45B, A61B5/45M, A61B5/68D, A61B5/45H, A61B5/00B9, A61B5/44B10, A61B8/08R, A61B5/11, A61B5/07D|