US20060216380A1 - Antimicrobial salt solutions for food safety applications - Google Patents

Antimicrobial salt solutions for food safety applications Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20060216380A1
US20060216380A1 US11/444,066 US44406606A US2006216380A1 US 20060216380 A1 US20060216380 A1 US 20060216380A1 US 44406606 A US44406606 A US 44406606A US 2006216380 A1 US2006216380 A1 US 2006216380A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
acid
solution
ppm
sodium
salt
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/444,066
Inventor
Robert Koefod
Timothy Freier
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Cargill Inc
Original Assignee
Cargill Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Cargill Inc filed Critical Cargill Inc
Priority to US11/444,066 priority Critical patent/US20060216380A1/en
Publication of US20060216380A1 publication Critical patent/US20060216380A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23L—FOODS, FOODSTUFFS, OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES A21D OR A23B-A23J; THEIR PREPARATION OR TREATMENT, e.g. COOKING, MODIFICATION OF NUTRITIVE QUALITIES, PHYSICAL TREATMENT; PRESERVATION OF FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS, IN GENERAL
    • A23L3/00—Preservation of foods or foodstuffs, in general, e.g. pasteurising, sterilising, specially adapted for foods or foodstuffs
    • A23L3/34—Preservation of foods or foodstuffs, in general, e.g. pasteurising, sterilising, specially adapted for foods or foodstuffs by treatment with chemicals
    • A23L3/3454—Preservation of foods or foodstuffs, in general, e.g. pasteurising, sterilising, specially adapted for foods or foodstuffs by treatment with chemicals in the form of liquids or solids
    • A23L3/358—Inorganic compounds
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23B—PRESERVING, e.g. BY CANNING, MEAT, FISH, EGGS, FRUIT, VEGETABLES, EDIBLE SEEDS; CHEMICAL RIPENING OF FRUIT OR VEGETABLES; THE PRESERVED, RIPENED, OR CANNED PRODUCTS
    • A23B4/00—General methods for preserving meat, sausages, fish or fish products
    • A23B4/02—Preserving by means of inorganic salts
    • A23B4/023—Preserving by means of inorganic salts by kitchen salt or mixtures thereof with inorganic or organic compounds
    • A23B4/0235—Preserving by means of inorganic salts by kitchen salt or mixtures thereof with inorganic or organic compounds with organic compounds or biochemical products
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23B—PRESERVING, e.g. BY CANNING, MEAT, FISH, EGGS, FRUIT, VEGETABLES, EDIBLE SEEDS; CHEMICAL RIPENING OF FRUIT OR VEGETABLES; THE PRESERVED, RIPENED, OR CANNED PRODUCTS
    • A23B4/00—General methods for preserving meat, sausages, fish or fish products
    • A23B4/14—Preserving with chemicals not covered by groups A23B4/02 or A23B4/12
    • A23B4/18—Preserving with chemicals not covered by groups A23B4/02 or A23B4/12 in the form of liquids or solids
    • A23B4/20—Organic compounds; Microorganisms; Enzymes
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23B—PRESERVING, e.g. BY CANNING, MEAT, FISH, EGGS, FRUIT, VEGETABLES, EDIBLE SEEDS; CHEMICAL RIPENING OF FRUIT OR VEGETABLES; THE PRESERVED, RIPENED, OR CANNED PRODUCTS
    • A23B4/00—General methods for preserving meat, sausages, fish or fish products
    • A23B4/14—Preserving with chemicals not covered by groups A23B4/02 or A23B4/12
    • A23B4/18—Preserving with chemicals not covered by groups A23B4/02 or A23B4/12 in the form of liquids or solids
    • A23B4/24—Inorganic compounds
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23L—FOODS, FOODSTUFFS, OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES A21D OR A23B-A23J; THEIR PREPARATION OR TREATMENT, e.g. COOKING, MODIFICATION OF NUTRITIVE QUALITIES, PHYSICAL TREATMENT; PRESERVATION OF FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS, IN GENERAL
    • A23L13/00—Meat products; Meat meal; Preparation or treatment thereof
    • A23L13/70—Tenderised or flavoured meat pieces; Macerating or marinating solutions specially adapted therefor
    • A23L13/72—Tenderised or flavoured meat pieces; Macerating or marinating solutions specially adapted therefor using additives, e.g. by injection of solutions
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23L—FOODS, FOODSTUFFS, OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES A21D OR A23B-A23J; THEIR PREPARATION OR TREATMENT, e.g. COOKING, MODIFICATION OF NUTRITIVE QUALITIES, PHYSICAL TREATMENT; PRESERVATION OF FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS, IN GENERAL
    • A23L3/00—Preservation of foods or foodstuffs, in general, e.g. pasteurising, sterilising, specially adapted for foods or foodstuffs
    • A23L3/34—Preservation of foods or foodstuffs, in general, e.g. pasteurising, sterilising, specially adapted for foods or foodstuffs by treatment with chemicals
    • A23L3/3454—Preservation of foods or foodstuffs, in general, e.g. pasteurising, sterilising, specially adapted for foods or foodstuffs by treatment with chemicals in the form of liquids or solids
    • A23L3/3463—Organic compounds; Microorganisms; Enzymes
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02A—TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02A40/00—Adaptation technologies in agriculture, forestry, livestock or agroalimentary production
    • Y02A40/90—Adaptation technologies in agriculture, forestry, livestock or agroalimentary production in food processing or handling, e.g. food conservation

Definitions

  • This invention relates to antimicrobial solutions for food safety and quality applications.
  • the prevention of contamination of food product by pathogenic microorganisms is important to protect public health.
  • the reduction of spoilage microorganisms in food manufacturing facilities can extend product shelf lives and reduce the amount of food that is discarded as waste.
  • the invention described herein is a food-safe solution than may be used in a variety of applications to control microorganisms in food plant operations, including the disinfection of food processing equipment as well as disinfection of the food product itself.
  • the invention consists of a mixture of a salt, such as sodium chloride, with an acid and a surfactant, such as sodium lauryl sulfate.
  • Suitable acids include citlic, malic, acetic, propionic, lactic, benzoic, ascorbic, isoascorbic, sorbic, phosphoric, hydrochloric, malic, tartaric, adipic, succinic, glutaric, salicylic, and sulfuric acids as well as sodium bisulfate.
  • the salt can be selected from inorganic salts including the sodium, potassium, magnesium, calcium, iron, and ammonium salts of chloride, sulfate, nitrate, phosphate, carbonate, and hydroxide.
  • Suitable surfactants include sodium lauryl sulfate, linear alkylbenzene sulfonates, alcohol sulfates, alpha-olefin sulfonates, alcohol ethoxylates, nonylphenyl ethoxylates, alkylpolyglucosides, fatty alkanoamides, fatty amine oxides, sodium dioctylsulfosuccinate, dodecylbenzene sulfonic acid and its salts, the sodium salt of sulfonated oleic acid, sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate, and dodecyldiphenyloxide-disulfonic acid and its salts.
  • a preferred formulation contains between 25 ppm and 25,000 ppm surfactant, between 0.1% acid and 25% acid, and between 72.5% and 99.9% salt. This blend can then be dissolved in water to make a solution ranging in concentration from about 1% total solids by weight up to the saturation point, which can be used as an antimicrobial solution for food safety applications.
  • Salt has been used for thousands of years as a food preservative. Generally, however, salt solutions alone are not sufficiently effective as. antibacterial agents, as they do not provide a speedy mechanism for killing unwanted bacteria that permits their exclusive use in food processing environments.
  • a problem associated with the antimicrobial solutions for food safety applications that precede the present invention is that they do not provide an improved antimicrobial solution for food safety applications having operating parameters adaptable to a multiplicity of applications in the food processing industry.
  • Another problem associated with the antimicrobial solutions for food safety applications that precede the present invention is that they do not provide an antimicrobial solution for food safety applications having safe, acceptable ingredients for use in food processing to prevent bacteria from accumulating in food processing operations.
  • antimicrobial solutions for food safety applications may contain or lead to toxic and/or environmentally undesirable additives.
  • they may contain quaternary ammonium chloride as the anti-bacterial ingredient, or they may form chlorinated or brominated byproducts, or they may contain phosphates.
  • the present invention constitutes antimicrobial solutions for food safety applications that seek to overcome the problems discussed above while at the same time providing a simple, relatively easily implemented treatment and method that is readily adapted to a variety of applications.
  • It is therefore an object of the present invention is to provide an improved antimicrobial solution for food safety applications.
  • Another object of the present invention is to provide an antimicrobial solution for food safety applications having acceptable ingredients for use in food processing to prevent microorganisms from accumulating in food processing operations.
  • Yet another object of the present invention is to provide an antimicrobial solution for food safety applications that can be used at temperatures below room temperature, and preferably below the normal freezing point of water X,(0° C.).
  • Still a further object of the present invention is to provide an antimicrobial solution for food safety applications that does not rely on the presence of generally toxic or hazardous chemicals as the anti-microbial ingredient.
  • Still a further object of the present invention is to provide an antimicrobial solution for food safety applications that is relatively inexpensive to purchase, use and maintain.
  • the present invention provides an antimicrobial solution for food safety applications that seeks to overcome the problems discussed above.
  • salt has also been used for thousands of years as a food preservative. However, it has been discovered that inorganic salts act synergistically with the acid/surfactant ingredients to provide a significant and unexpected increase in their antibacterial effectiveness.
  • a bacterial culture suspension ( Escherichia coli ATCC 11229) that had been incubated for 24 hours in Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth and had an initial inoculum count of about 10 9 CFU/ml was serially diluted in cold Butterfield's Phosphate Buffered Water (BPBW) to 10 5 CFU/ml.
  • BHI Brain Heart Infusion
  • BBPW Phosphate Buffered Water
  • a 1.0 ml aliquot of this suspension was added to 100 ml of test solution at room temperature and mixed well, providing an initial inoculum of 10 3 CFU/ml.
  • TSA tryptic soy agar
  • Contamination by Listeria monocytogenes is of particular concern in many ready-to-eat meat, poultry, seafood and dairy processing chill brine applications because it is known to survive in high salt concentrations and because many of the currently available disinfectant chemicals are either not suitable for direct food contact or become ineffective at the cold temperatures of the chill bath.
  • Brine chillers are used. extensively to cool frankfurters and other sausage products in continuous-cook operations. Dozens of nationwide recalls and at least one large food-borne outbreak have been caused by L. monocytogenes contamination of these types of products.
  • Tests were run on 17% by weight solutions of formulas consisting of between 0.3% and 6.0% citric acid, between 50 and 500 ppm SLS, and between 94% and 99.7% sodium chloride. Test solutions were cooled to ⁇ 6.7° C. and inoculated with several strains of L. monocytogenes . Within 4 hours most solutions showed a 3 log kill of microorganisms and within 24 hours nearly all solutions showed 100% kill of the inoculum. A brine solution made up of sodium chloride alone caused less than a 1 log reduction of the L. monocytogenes over a 24-hour period.
  • One application is for a disinfecting meat bath/rinse. Bacterial contamination during slaughter is typically highest at the surface of the meat, and these solutions may be used as a method to kill bacteria directly on the meat surface in a manner that is food safe and will impart no toxic chemicals to the meat.
  • a solution of the antimicrobial salt could be sprayed or showered on to animal carcasses or the carcasses could be directly immersed in a bath of the solution.
  • the brine could be pre-chilled to provide a simultaneous cooling and disinfection.
  • the antimicrobial brine can also be used to wash animals prior to slaughter, to minimize contamination from the animals' hides, skins or feathers. It can also be used as a disinfection wash/chill step for beef trim.
  • Another application for this invention is for beef injection brines.
  • Brines are injected into enhanced beef products, and there is concern that the brine may drive bacteria, such as E. coli O157:H7, from the surface into internal areas of the meat. Cooking intact cuts of beef to rare or medium-rare doneness could then lead to food-borne illness. Another concern is that the brine, which is recycled in the process, will become contaminated. Under the current regulatory environment, it is crucial that beef processors are able to prove lot-to-lot separation. Use of a validated antimicrobial in the injected brine solution could prevent the brine injection system from tying together multiple production lots. Other potential uses in the meat industry include hide curing, offal chilling and natural casing preservation.
  • An antimicrobial salt solution could be used in poultry chill tanks to reduce this contamination and provide an energy-efficient cooling step, thus improving product shelf life and quality.
  • Yet another application is as a wash to kill salmonella on eggs. Also, hard-boiled eggs are often pre-disinfected and shipped in brine. Use of these formulas would permit the disinfection step to be carried out in the storage brine itself. Yet another application is a wash to disinfect produce, which can become contaminated with salmonella and other pathogenic bacteria in the field.
  • the first set (samples 1- 12 in Table 4 below) was prepared in hard tap water and contained about 17.0% by mass of the formulation. These samples were inoculated with 10 3 CFU/ml L. monocytogenes by the same procedure as described above.
  • a second set of samples was prepared from brine taken from a ready-to-eat meat processing operation. The recirculated brine had been used to chill packaged meat for one week. After a week of use the brine typically contains various types of aerobic psychrotrophic and mesophilic bacteria. This experiment was done in order to determine if the additives would kill the microorganisms naturally occurring in actual process brine from a plant.
  • L. monocytogenes The effectiveness of antimicrobial salt formulas was tested against L. monocytogenes in a biofilm.
  • Stainless steel coupons (2 ⁇ 5 cm, type 302 stainless steel, 2B finish) were cleaned in acetone followed by an alkaline detergent and distilled water and then dried in an autoclave at 121° C. for 15 minutes.
  • a culture of L. monocytogenes (Scott A—serotype 4b) was prepared by inoculating 10 mL of TSA and incubating overnight at 35° C. 50 mL of sterile TSA+0.6% yeast extract (YE) was aseptically dispensed into sterile disposable conical shaped plastic tubes and one drop of overnight grown L. mono culture was added to each tube.
  • Inoculated tubes were incubated at 25° C. for approximately 48 hours. After the biofilm had formed on the coupons, a coupon was aseptically removed from the tube and gently rinsed with distilled water to remove unattached cells. Coupons were then immersed in cold antimicrobial test solution ( ⁇ 6.7° C.) and incubated over different time intervals (1 hour, 24 hours, and 5 days). After incubation period, the coupon was shaken in a tube containing 40 mL of sterile PBW and 10 sterile glass beads (4 mm) for 2 minutes two remove the cells attached to the coupon biofilm. The cells were plated in the PBW on TSA+0.6% YE using appropriate dilutions and incubated at 35° C. for 48 hours.
  • test solutions containing 17% by weight of formulas containing various levels of sodium chloride, 100 ppm sodium lauryl sulfate, and various levels of different acids were tested for effectiveness in killing L. monocytogenes at cold temperatures.
  • test solutions containing 17% by weight of formulas containing 99.7% sodium chloride, 0.3% citric acid, and 500 ppm of various types of surfactants were tested for effectiveness in killing L. monocytogenes at cold temperatures.
  • the same test procedure was used as described above (test solutions were plated on MOX TAL (Modified Oxford Medium with a Thin Agar Layer) with TSA). Results are given in Table 8.
  • a chilling brine is maintained at a temperature of about ⁇ 3.9° C. is employed.
  • the chilling brine comprises between about 0.3% and about 1.0% citric acid.
  • the citric acid concentration may be increased to as high as about 2.0%.
  • Between about 100 and about 500 ppm SLS is utilized.
  • the balance of the brine formulation is NaCl, and the formulation is mixed with water to a solution of about 9% to about 12%.
  • a chilling brine is maintained at a temperature of about ⁇ 6.7° C.
  • the chilling brine comprises between about 0.3% and about 1.0% citric acid.
  • the citric acid concentration may be increased to as high as about 2.0%.
  • Between about 100 and about 500 ppm SLS is utilized.
  • the balance of the brine formulation is NaCl, and the formulation is mixed with water to a solution of about 15% to about 17%.
  • the data indicate that solutions of salt, acid, and surfactant provide efficient kill of bacteria even at temperatures below the freezing point of water.
  • Salts such as sodium sulfate, sodium chloride, and magnesium sulfate act synergistically with the acid and surfactant to enhance the antimicrobial effectiveness.
  • the formulations are shown to be effective in killing pathogenic bacteria such as L. monocytogenes.
  • the formulas were shown to be effective both in freshly prepared brines and in actual spent process chill brine from a ready-to-eat meat plant.
  • the levels of acid and surfactant may be varied to suit the particular application; reducing the concentration of the acid may be compensated by raising the concentration of surfactant and vice versa.
  • the formulas are also shown to be effective at killing bacteria within a biofilm.

Abstract

Antimicrobial salt solutions for food safety and quality applications are disclosed. Because these solutions contain a substantial concentration of salt, they are adaptable to a variety of food-processing applications, such as for chilling brine applications, disinfecting meat baths/tinses, beef injection brines, poultry chill tanks, brines used in cheese manufacture, as a wash to kill salmonella on hard-boiled eggs, and as a wash to disinfect produce, which can become contaminated with salmonella and other pathogenic bacteria in the field. These make use of concentrated salt solutions that depress the freezing point of the solution, to provide a low temperature bath or shower in which food products can be cooled. A preferred formulation contains between 25 ppm and 25,000 ppm surfactant, between 0.1% acid and 25% acid, and between 72.5% and 99.9% salt. This blend can then be dissolved in water to make a solution of between about 1% total solids by weight up to the saturation point, which can be used as an antimicrobial solution for food safety applications. An even more preferred range of solutions would be 17% by weight of between 0.3% and 6.0% citric acid, between 50 and 500 ppm SLS, and between 94% and 99.7% sodium chloride, and can be used in process temperatures of about −6.7° C.

Description

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Field of the invention
  • This invention relates to antimicrobial solutions for food safety and quality applications. The prevention of contamination of food product by pathogenic microorganisms is important to protect public health. The reduction of spoilage microorganisms in food manufacturing facilities can extend product shelf lives and reduce the amount of food that is discarded as waste. There is a need for improved methods of controlling microorganisms in food production plants. Bacteria, yeast and molds can accumulate at a variety of different points in a food manufacturing operation; the more points at which viable microorganisms can be controlled, the lower the chances of food contamination and the safer the manufacturing process.
  • The invention described herein is a food-safe solution than may be used in a variety of applications to control microorganisms in food plant operations, including the disinfection of food processing equipment as well as disinfection of the food product itself. The invention consists of a mixture of a salt, such as sodium chloride, with an acid and a surfactant, such as sodium lauryl sulfate. Suitable acids include citlic, malic, acetic, propionic, lactic, benzoic, ascorbic, isoascorbic, sorbic, phosphoric, hydrochloric, malic, tartaric, adipic, succinic, glutaric, salicylic, and sulfuric acids as well as sodium bisulfate. The salt can be selected from inorganic salts including the sodium, potassium, magnesium, calcium, iron, and ammonium salts of chloride, sulfate, nitrate, phosphate, carbonate, and hydroxide. Suitable surfactants include sodium lauryl sulfate, linear alkylbenzene sulfonates, alcohol sulfates, alpha-olefin sulfonates, alcohol ethoxylates, nonylphenyl ethoxylates, alkylpolyglucosides, fatty alkanoamides, fatty amine oxides, sodium dioctylsulfosuccinate, dodecylbenzene sulfonic acid and its salts, the sodium salt of sulfonated oleic acid, sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate, and dodecyldiphenyloxide-disulfonic acid and its salts.
  • A preferred formulation contains between 25 ppm and 25,000 ppm surfactant, between 0.1% acid and 25% acid, and between 72.5% and 99.9% salt. This blend can then be dissolved in water to make a solution ranging in concentration from about 1% total solids by weight up to the saturation point, which can be used as an antimicrobial solution for food safety applications.
  • 2. Description of prior art
  • The use of acids and surfactants as antibacterial agents is known. These cannot be used in environments where operation at low temperature is required, as their effectiveness drops off significantly at lower temperature and, of course, operation below 0° C. is typically prevented by freezing.
  • Other antibacterial agents have been identified, but their use is problematic due to their non-food quality status. For example, a wide variety of chemical disinfecting agents are in use in food plants. However, there are often disadvantages to these chemicals. In some instances they are too toxic to come into direct contact with the food itself, and many present worker safety or environmental waste disposal issues. In other instances they are insufficiently effective to provide adequate kill of microorganisms, especially at low temperatures. Additionally, the relatively high cost of these chemicals adds to the cost of food production and, consequently, increases the cost of the end product itself.
  • Salt has been used for thousands of years as a food preservative. Generally, however, salt solutions alone are not sufficiently effective as. antibacterial agents, as they do not provide a speedy mechanism for killing unwanted bacteria that permits their exclusive use in food processing environments.
  • Thus, a problem associated with the antimicrobial solutions for food safety applications that precede the present invention is that they do not provide an improved antimicrobial solution for food safety applications having operating parameters adaptable to a multiplicity of applications in the food processing industry.
  • Another problem associated with the antimicrobial solutions for food safety applications that precede the present invention is that they do not provide an antimicrobial solution for food safety applications having safe, acceptable ingredients for use in food processing to prevent bacteria from accumulating in food processing operations.
  • Yet another problem associated with the antimicrobial solutions for food safety applications that precede the present invention is that they do not provide an antimicrobial solution for food safety applications that can be used at temperatures below room temperature, and preferably below the normal freezing point of water (0° C.).
  • Still a further problem associated with the antimicrobial solutions for food safety applications that precede the present invention is that they may contain or lead to toxic and/or environmentally undesirable additives. For example, they may contain quaternary ammonium chloride as the anti-bacterial ingredient, or they may form chlorinated or brominated byproducts, or they may contain phosphates.
  • Yet another problem associated with the antimicrobial solutions for food safety applications that precede the present invention is that they do not provide an antimicrobial solution for food safety applications that is relatively inexpensive to purchase, use and maintain.
  • For the foregoing reasons, there has been defined a long felt and unsolved need for antimicrobial solutions for food safety applications that are comparatively inexpensive to use and maintain and are adaptable to accommodate a variety of operating conditions. In contrast to the foregoing, the present invention constitutes antimicrobial solutions for food safety applications that seek to overcome the problems discussed above while at the same time providing a simple, relatively easily implemented treatment and method that is readily adapted to a variety of applications.
    • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • Early screening tests of a preferred embodiment revealed an unexpected, synergistic effect between sodium chloride and the acid/SLS (sodium lauryl sulfate) antimicrobial additive. Replicate tests were run to determine if this effect was significant. Solutions were also prepared containing an identical concentration of acid and SLS but no sodium chloride. Results of these tests run with multiple replicates illustrate that for both the citric acid/SLS and malic acid/SLS additives, the number of microorganisms remaining alive after 30 minutes is much lower when salt is present than when there is no salt present.
  • It is therefore an object of the present invention is to provide an improved antimicrobial solution for food safety applications.
  • Another object of the present invention is to provide an antimicrobial solution for food safety applications having acceptable ingredients for use in food processing to prevent microorganisms from accumulating in food processing operations.
  • Yet another object of the present invention is to provide an antimicrobial solution for food safety applications that can be used at temperatures below room temperature, and preferably below the normal freezing point of water X,(0° C.).
  • Still a further object of the present invention is to provide an antimicrobial solution for food safety applications that does not rely on the presence of generally toxic or hazardous chemicals as the anti-microbial ingredient.
  • Still a further object of the present invention is to provide an antimicrobial solution for food safety applications that is relatively inexpensive to purchase, use and maintain.
  • For the foregoing reasons, there has been defined a long felt and unsolved need for an improved antimicrobial solution for food safety applications. The present invention provides an antimicrobial solution for food safety applications that seeks to overcome the problems discussed above.
    • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PRESENTLY PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • The use of acids and surfactants as antibacterial agents is known. Salt has also been used for thousands of years as a food preservative. However, it has been discovered that inorganic salts act synergistically with the acid/surfactant ingredients to provide a significant and unexpected increase in their antibacterial effectiveness.
  • Early screening tests indicated that there was an unexpected synergistic effect between sodium chloride and the acid/SLS (sodium lauryl sulfate) antibacterial additive. Replicate tests were run to determine if this effect was statistically significant. Ten percent by weight solutions were prepared of a formula of 0.6% citric or malic acid, 100 ppm SLS, and 99.4% sodium chloride. Solutions were also prepared containing an identical concentration of acid and SLS but no sodium chloride. A bacterial culture suspension (Escherichia coli ATCC 11229) that had been incubated for 24 hours in Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth and had an initial inoculum count of about 109 CFU/ml was serially diluted in cold Butterfield's Phosphate Buffered Water (BPBW) to 105 CFU/ml. A 1.0 ml aliquot of this suspension was added to 100 ml of test solution at room temperature and mixed well, providing an initial inoculum of 103 CFU/ml. After 30 minutes, the E. coli populations were enumerated by plating on tryptic soy agar (TSA), making serial dilutions as necessary in BPBW. Plates were incubated at 35° C.±2° C. for approximately 24 hours. Colonies were then counted and compared to the initial inoculum counts. Results of these tests run on 16 replicates of each test solution are given in Table 1.
    TABLE 1
    Effectiveness of Acid/SLS Solutions with and without Salt on E. coli
    Average Conc.
    Test Solution of E. Coli (CFU/ml)
    citric acid, SLS, with salt 540
    citric acid, SLS, without salt 1054
    malic acid, SLS, with salt 141
    malic acid, SLS, without salt 2419
  • It can be seen that for both the citric acid/SLS and malic acid/SLS additives, the number of bacteria remaining alive after 30 minutes is much lower when salt is present than when there is no salt present. Analysis of the data indicates that there is a statistically significant increase in kill in the presence of salt (p<0.05). In contrast, a 10% solution of pure sodium chloride does not provide any significant kill of the test microorganisms.
  • The fact that these formulas contain a substantial concentration of salt makes them ideal for a variety of applications. For instance, they are ideal for chilling brine applications. Chilling brines make use of concentrated salt solutions that depress the freezing point of the solution to provide a low temperature bath or shower in which food products can be efficiently cooled. Bacterial contamination of the chill brine is a food safety hazard, requiring that the brine be frequently disposed and often requiring rigorous cleaning of the equipment to remove bacterial biofilms. Contamination by Listeria monocytogenes is of particular concern in many ready-to-eat meat, poultry, seafood and dairy processing chill brine applications because it is known to survive in high salt concentrations and because many of the currently available disinfectant chemicals are either not suitable for direct food contact or become ineffective at the cold temperatures of the chill bath. Brine chillers are used. extensively to cool frankfurters and other sausage products in continuous-cook operations. Dozens of nationwide recalls and at least one large food-borne outbreak have been caused by L. monocytogenes contamination of these types of products.
  • Tests were run on 17% by weight solutions of formulas consisting of between 0.3% and 6.0% citric acid, between 50 and 500 ppm SLS, and between 94% and 99.7% sodium chloride. Test solutions were cooled to −6.7° C. and inoculated with several strains of L. monocytogenes. Within 4 hours most solutions showed a 3 log kill of microorganisms and within 24 hours nearly all solutions showed 100% kill of the inoculum. A brine solution made up of sodium chloride alone caused less than a 1 log reduction of the L. monocytogenes over a 24-hour period.
  • Many applications for these formulas are envisioned. One application is for a disinfecting meat bath/rinse. Bacterial contamination during slaughter is typically highest at the surface of the meat, and these solutions may be used as a method to kill bacteria directly on the meat surface in a manner that is food safe and will impart no toxic chemicals to the meat. A solution of the antimicrobial salt could be sprayed or showered on to animal carcasses or the carcasses could be directly immersed in a bath of the solution. The brine could be pre-chilled to provide a simultaneous cooling and disinfection. The antimicrobial brine can also be used to wash animals prior to slaughter, to minimize contamination from the animals' hides, skins or feathers. It can also be used as a disinfection wash/chill step for beef trim.
  • Another application for this invention is for beef injection brines. Brines are injected into enhanced beef products, and there is concern that the brine may drive bacteria, such as E. coli O157:H7, from the surface into internal areas of the meat. Cooking intact cuts of beef to rare or medium-rare doneness could then lead to food-borne illness. Another concern is that the brine, which is recycled in the process, will become contaminated. Under the current regulatory environment, it is crucial that beef processors are able to prove lot-to-lot separation. Use of a validated antimicrobial in the injected brine solution could prevent the brine injection system from tying together multiple production lots. Other potential uses in the meat industry include hide curing, offal chilling and natural casing preservation.
  • In the poultry industry, contamination of the carcasses by Salmonella spp. and Campylobacter spp. is a major public health concern. An antimicrobial salt solution could be used in poultry chill tanks to reduce this contamination and provide an energy-efficient cooling step, thus improving product shelf life and quality.
  • Brines used in cheese manufacture present another application for this invention. Cheese manufacture often involves a prolonged soak in concentrated brine. This step can introduce a significant risk for L. monocyotogenes contamination. This risk could be minimized through the use of an antimicrobial salt solution in the brine.
  • Yet another application is as a wash to kill salmonella on eggs. Also, hard-boiled eggs are often pre-disinfected and shipped in brine. Use of these formulas would permit the disinfection step to be carried out in the storage brine itself. Yet another application is a wash to disinfect produce, which can become contaminated with salmonella and other pathogenic bacteria in the field.
  • The following examples further illustrate the synergistic and unexpected results from combining acid/surfactant with salt. An experiment was run to determine if solutions containing sodium chloride, sodium lauryl sulfate, and various acids would kill L. monocytogenes at cold temperatures. The following test procedure was used: A bacterial culture suspension (L. monocytogenes H2446 [CDC Global Standard]; Scott A-serotype 4b; 12243-serotype 1/2a; and a recent cooked meat and poultry facility isolate, WP4) that had been incubated for at least 5 days in BHI broth and had an initial inoculum count of about 109 CFU/ml was serially diluted in cold BPBW to 105 CFU/ml. A 1.0 ml aliquot of this suspension was added to 100 ml of cold (−7° C.+/−2° C.) test solution and mixed well, providing an initial incoculum of 103 CFU/ml. The test solutions were incubated at −7° C.+/−2° C. for the duration of the experiment. At intervals of 0, 4, and 24 hours the L. monocytogenes populations in the test solutions were determined on Modified Oxford agar (MOX). MOX plates were incubated at 35° C.+/−2° C. for approximately 48 hours. Colonies were then counted and compared to the initial inoculum counts.
  • Results are given in Table 2. Each test solution was a 17% by: weight solution of the listed formula prepared in soft water.
    TABLE 2
    Effect of Solutions of NaCl, SLS and various acids on L. monocytogenes
    Time 0 4 hr 24 hr Water
    Sample CFU/ml CFU/ml CFU/ml pH Activity
    100% NaCl 1550 1250 1170 7.88 0.88
    2.0% Malic Acid, 500 ppm SLS, 98.0% NaCl 0 0 0 1.21 ND
    5.0% Na Bisulfate, 500 ppm SLS, 95.0% NaCl 0 0 0 0.81 0.883
    Water Control 1270 400 0 9.34 0.999
    0.3% Malic Acid, 100 ppm SLS, 99.7% NaCl 480 5 0 4.1 ND
    0.5% Malic Acid, 100 ppm SLS, 99.5% NaCl 176 0 0 3.31 ND
    0.7% Malic Acid, 100 ppm SLS, 99.3% NaCl 117 0 0 2.99 0.88 
    0.3% Citric Acid, 500 ppm SLS, 99.7% NaCl 5 0 0 4.14 ND
    0.5% Citric Acid, 500 ppm SLS, 99.5% NaCl 0 0 0 3.37 ND
    0.7% Citric Acid, 500 ppm SLS, 99.3% NaCl 0 0 0 2.98 0.88 
    0.3% Malic Acid, 500 ppm SLS, 99.7% NaCl 11 0 0 4.15 ND
    0.5% Malic Acid, 500 ppm SLS, 99.5% NaCl 3 0 0 3.39 ND
    0.7% Malic Acid, 500 ppm SLS, 99.3% NaCl 0 0 0 3.06 0.879
    1.0% Citric Acid, 500 ppm SLS, 99.0% NaCl 0 0 0 2.69 ND
    1.0% Malic Acid, 500 ppm SLS, 99.0% NaCl 0 0 0 2.81 ND
    2.0% Lactic Acid, 500 ppm SLS, 98.0% NaCl 0 0 0 2.65 0.885
    2.0% Phosphoric Acid (75%), 500 ppm SLS, 0 0 0 1.52 0.884
    98.0% NaCl
    1.0% Benzoic Acid, 500 ppm SLS, 99.0% NaCl 0 0 0 3.93 0.879
    2.0% Citric Acid, 500 ppm SLS, 98.0% NaCl 0 0 0 2.3 0.884
    2.0% Malic Acid, 500 ppm SLS, 98.0% NaCl 0 0 0 2.46 0.882
  • In another experiment, 17% by weight solutions of formulas containing various levels of sodium chloride, citric acid, and sodium lauryl sulfate were tested for effectiveness in killing L. monocytogenes at cold temperatures. The same test procedure was used as described above, except test solutions were plated on MOX with a Thin Agar Overlay of TSA (to aid in the recovery of injured cells). Results are given in Table 3. The data indicate that the relative amounts of acid and surfactant can be varied to suit different applications. In pH sensitive applications, the acid may be decreased without losing effectiveness if the level of surfactant is increased. Similarly, in applications where a lower level of surfactant is desired, the performance can be maintained by raising the concentration of acid.
    TABLE 3
    Effect of Solutions of NaCl, SLS, and Citric Acid
    on L. monocytogenes at −6.7° C.
    4 hr 24 hr
    Sample Time 0 CFU/ml CFU/ml CFU/ml pH
    100% NaCl ˜7000 ˜6250 2290 7.66
    0.3% Citric Acid, 50 ppm SLS, 99.7% NaCl ˜4940 163 0 4.19
    0.3% Citric Acid, 100 ppm SLS, 99.7% NaCl 2230 97 0 4.27
    0.3% Citric Acid, 150 ppm SLS, 99.7% NaCl 3080 105 0 4.3
    0.3% Citric Acid, 200 ppm SLS, 99.7% NaCl 1970 42 0 4.28
    0.3% Citric Acid, 300 ppm SLS, 99.7% NaCl 1490 20 0 4.3
    0.3% Citric Acid, 400 ppm SLS, 99.7% NaCl 221 1 0 4.29
    0.3% Citric Acid, 500 ppm SLS, 99.7% NaCl 99 0 0 4.32
    0.5% Citric Acid, 50 ppm SLS, 99.5% NaCl 3360 0 0 3.54
    0.5% Citric Acid, 100 ppm SLS, 99.5% NaCl 3180 1 0 3.54
    0.7% Citric Acid, 50 ppm SLS, 99.3% NaCl 3710 0 0 3.14
    0.7% Citric Acid, 100 ppm SLS, 99.3% NaCl 1020 0 0 3.13
    1.0% Citric Acid, 50 ppm SLS, 99.0% NaCl 1840 0 0 2.82
    1.0% Citric Acid, 100 ppm SLS, 99.0% NaCl 970 0 0 2.82
    2.0% Citric Acid, 50 ppm SLS, 98.0% NaCl 114 0 0 2.41
    2.0% Citric Acid, 100 ppm SLS, 98.0% NaCl 479 0 0 2.41
    4.0% Citric Acid, 50 ppm SLS, 96.0% NaCl 6 0 0 2.12
    4.0% Citric Acid, 100 ppm SLS, 96.0% NaCl 1 0 0 2.12
    6.0% Citric Acid, 50 ppm SLS, 94.0% NaCl 1 0 0 1.99
  • In another experiment, two sets of solutions were tested. The first set (samples 1- 12 in Table 4 below) was prepared in hard tap water and contained about 17.0% by mass of the formulation. These samples were inoculated with 103 CFU/ml L. monocytogenes by the same procedure as described above. A second set of samples was prepared from brine taken from a ready-to-eat meat processing operation. The recirculated brine had been used to chill packaged meat for one week. After a week of use the brine typically contains various types of aerobic psychrotrophic and mesophilic bacteria. This experiment was done in order to determine if the additives would kill the microorganisms naturally occurring in actual process brine from a plant. Since the spent chill brine samples already contained NaCl, citric acid and/or SLS was added to provide an effective concentration of additive. One set of these samples (samples 13-17) were inoculated with 103 L. monocytogenes and the other set (samples 18-22) contained only the naturally occurring organisms in the spent chill brine. Results are given in Table 4 below. The data indicate that at lower acid levels, the SLS increases the effectiveness of the mixture, but at higher acid levels, the SLS is not necessary. The results show the formulations are effective in hard water. The results also demonstrate that the formulations effectively kill L. monocytogenes as well as the naturally occurring microorganisms in spent chill brine from an actual meat processing plant.
    TABLE 4
    Effects of Antimicrobial Salt Formulas in Hard Water and in Spent Chill
    Brine
    Time 0 2 hr 24 hr
    Sample cfu/ml cfu/ml cfu/ml
    100% NaCl 760 1100 1100
    0.3% Citric Acid, 100 ppm SLS, 99.7% 730 670 29
    NaCl
    0.3% Citric Acid, 99.7% NaCl 1460 1330 830
    0.5% Citric Acid, 100 ppm SLS, 99.5% 890 240 0
    NaCl
    0.5% Citric Acid, 99.5% NaCl 1060 1170 330
    0.7% Citric Acid, 100 ppm SLS, 99.3% 1010 14 0
    NaCl
    0.7% Citric Acid, 99.3% NaCl 1040 1030 3
    1.0% Citric Acid, 100 ppm SLS, 99.0% 840 0 0
    NaCl
    1.0% Citric Acid, 99.0% NaCl 990 340 0
    2.0% Citric Acid, 98.0% NaCl 910 0 0
    4.0% Citric Acid, 96.0% NaCl 1110 0 0
    6.0% Citric Acid, 94.0% NaCl 950 0 0
    Brine Control with L. mono 1260 1290 600
    1% Citric Acid in Brine with L. mono 1050 0 0
    2% Citric Acid in Brine with L. mono 1140 0 0
    1% Citric Acid + 50 ppm SLS in Brine with 1090 0 0
    L. mono
    2% Citric Acid + 50 ppm SLS in Brine with 1070 0 0
    L. mono
    Brine Control 6000 3100 2000
    1% Citric Acid in Brine 2490 190 4
    2% Citric Acid in Brine 1670 6 0
    1% Citric Acid + 50 ppm SLS in Brine 2520 122 0
    2% Citric Acid + 50 ppm SLS in Brine 1480 6 0
  • A test was run to determine if salts other than sodium chloride would show a synergistic antimicrobial effect with an acid and sodium lauryl sulfate. Solutions containing 0.6409 grams malic acid and 0.0107 grams sodium lauryl sulfate per liter were prepared with and without 107.0 grams of various salts (added on an anhydrous basis). Solutions were inoculated with E. coli as described above and the amount of bacterial kill was measured to determine if the added salt caused an increase in the effectiveness of the acid/surfactant active ingredients. Results are shown in Table 5.
    TABLE 5
    Effect of Different Salts on the Antimicrobial Action of Malic
    Acid/SLS
    Solution (salt added) % Kill of E. Coli
    No salt addition 4.4% 
    Sodium sulfate 87%
    Magnesium chloride 56%
    Potassium chloride 18%
    Sodium chloride 78%
    Potassium sulfate 34%
    Calcium chloride 55%
    Magnesium sulfate 93%
  • Tests run on solutions containing only the salt and no other ingredient indicate that sodium sulfate, potassium chloride and potassium sulfate provide no bacterial kill. Magnesium chloride solution provided 61% kill, calcium chloride provided 26% kill, and magnesium sulfate provided 10% kill. Thus, based on the data developed thus far, sodium sulfate, sodium chloride, and magnesium sulfate appear to significantly increase the effectiveness of the acid/surfactant antimicrobial agent, even though the salts provide little kill on their own.
  • The effectiveness of antimicrobial salt formulas was tested against L. monocytogenes in a biofilm. Stainless steel coupons (2×5 cm, type 302 stainless steel, 2B finish) were cleaned in acetone followed by an alkaline detergent and distilled water and then dried in an autoclave at 121° C. for 15 minutes. A culture of L. monocytogenes (Scott A—serotype 4b) was prepared by inoculating 10 mL of TSA and incubating overnight at 35° C. 50 mL of sterile TSA+0.6% yeast extract (YE) was aseptically dispensed into sterile disposable conical shaped plastic tubes and one drop of overnight grown L. mono culture was added to each tube. Inoculated tubes were incubated at 25° C. for approximately 48 hours. After the biofilm had formed on the coupons, a coupon was aseptically removed from the tube and gently rinsed with distilled water to remove unattached cells. Coupons were then immersed in cold antimicrobial test solution (−6.7° C.) and incubated over different time intervals (1 hour, 24 hours, and 5 days). After incubation period, the coupon was shaken in a tube containing 40 mL of sterile PBW and 10 sterile glass beads (4 mm) for 2 minutes two remove the cells attached to the coupon biofilm. The cells were plated in the PBW on TSA+0.6% YE using appropriate dilutions and incubated at 35° C. for 48 hours.
  • Results on triplicate samples of antimicrobial test solutions are given in Table 6 below. Each solution contained 17% by weight of a formula consisting of the percentages of citric acid and SLS listed in Table 6, with the balance of the formula being NaCl in each case. The data indicate that not only are the antimicrobial salt solutions effective at killing bacteria suspended in solution, they are also effective at killing bacteria within a biofilm.
    TABLE 6
    Log Concentration of L. mono in Antimicrobial Salt Solutions
    Sample 1 Hour 24 Hours 5 days
    0.3% citric acid, 100 ˜5.08 4.59 1.38
    ppm SLS
    0.3% citric acid, 100 ˜4.90 3.85 1.79
    ppm SLS
    0.3% citric acid, 100 ppm ˜4.81 3.48 1.92
    SLS
    0.3% citric acid, 500 ppm 4.81 4.76 2.23
    SLS
    0.3% citric acid, 500 ppm 4.90 3.48 2.18
    SLS
    0.3% citric acid, 500 ppm ˜5.18 3.48 2.36
    SLS
    0.7% citric acid, 100 ppm 1.88 0 0
    SLS
    0.7% citric acid, 100 ppm 2.02 0 0
    SLS
    0.7% citric acid, 100 ppm 1.28 0 0
    SLS
    0.7% citric acid, 500 ppm 0.70 1.00 0.90
    SLS
    0.7% citric acid, 500 ppm 0.90 0.70 0.30
    SLS
    0.7% citric acid, 500 ppm 0.85 0 0
    SLS
    2.0% citric acid, 100 ppm 0 0 ND
    SLS
    2.0% citric acid, 100 ppm 0 0 ND
    SLS
    2.0% citric acid, 100 ppm 0 0 ND
    SLS
    2.0% citric acid, 500 ppm 0 0 ND
    SLS
    2.0% citric acid, 500 ppm 0 0 ND
    SLS
    2.0% citric acid, 500 ppm 0 0 ND
    SLS
    6.0% citric acid, 100 ppm 0 0 ND
    SLS
    6.0% citric acid, 100 ppm 0 0 ND
    SLS
    6.0% citric acid, 100 ppm 0 0 ND
    SLS
    6.0% citric acid, 500 ppm 0 0 ND
    SLS
    6.0% citric acid, 500 ppm 0 0 ND
    SLS
    6.0% citric acid, 500 ppm 0 0 ND
    SLS
    12.0% citric acid, 0 0 ND
    100 ppm SLS
    12.0% citric acid, 0 0 ND
    100 ppm SLS
    12.0% citric acid, 0 0 ND
    100 ppm SLS
    12.0% citric acid, 0 0 ND
    500 ppm SLS
    12.0% citric acid, 0 0 ND
    500 ppm SLS
    12.0% citric acid, 0 0 ND
    500 ppm SLS
    Salt Control A ˜5.04 ˜7.15 7.65
    Salt Control B ˜5.48 ˜7.15 7.42
    Salt Control C ˜5.48 ˜7.11 7.65
    Water Control ˜5.18 ˜7.18 7.54
  • Another set of experiments was done in order to determine the effectiveness of different acids and different types of surfactants in the antimicrobial salt formulations. In one experiment, test solutions containing 17% by weight of formulas containing various levels of sodium chloride, 100 ppm sodium lauryl sulfate, and various levels of different acids were tested for effectiveness in killing L. monocytogenes at cold temperatures. The same test procedure was used as described above (test solutions were plated on MOX TAL (Modified Oxford Medium with a Thin Agar Layer) with TSA). Results are given in Table 7.
    TABLE 7
    Effect of Different Acids on the Antimicrobial Action of NaCl/Acid/SLS
    Sample Time 0 (CFU/ml) Time 4 Hours (CFU/ml)
    Salt control 850 1380
    Salt + 100 ppm SLS 980 890
    0.5% citric acid, 1230 18
    100 ppm SLS, 99.5% NaCl
    0.9% succinic acid, 1070 69
    100 ppm SLS, 99.1% NaCl
    1.5% isoascorbic acid, 1140 59
    100 ppm SLS, 98.5% NaCl
    1.8% adipic acid, 900 4
    100 ppm SLS, 98.2% NaCl
    1.6% sorbic acid, 820 500
    100 ppm SLS, 98.4% NaCl
    1.3% acetic acid, 1070 230
    100 ppm SLS, 98.7% NaCl
    2.1% propionic acid, 1440 6
    100 ppm SLS, 97.9% NaCl
    0.6% lactic acid, 1050 220
    100 ppm SLS, 99.4% NaCl
    1.6% ascorbic acid, 1230 54
    100 ppm SLS, 98.4% NaCl
    0.3% formic acid, 1930 38
    100 ppm SLS, 99.7% NaCl
    0.3% phosphoric acid, 1050 17
    100 ppm SLS, 99.7% NaCl
    0.1% hydrochloric acid, 1100 44
    100 ppm SLS, 99.9% NaCl
    0.3% tartaric acid, 1180 410
    100 ppm SLS, 99.7% NaCl
    1.1% glutaric acid, 610 180
    100 ppm SLS, 98.9% NaCl
    1.2% benzoic acid, 1020 17
    100 ppm SLS, 98.8% NaCl
    0.5% salicylic acid, 1100 5
    100 ppm SLS, 99.5% NaCl
    0.2% sulfuric acid, 830 0
    100 ppm SLS, 99.8% NaCl
  • In another experiment, test solutions containing 17% by weight of formulas containing 99.7% sodium chloride, 0.3% citric acid, and 500 ppm of various types of surfactants were tested for effectiveness in killing L. monocytogenes at cold temperatures. The same test procedure was used as described above (test solutions were plated on MOX TAL (Modified Oxford Medium with a Thin Agar Layer) with TSA). Results are given in Table 8.
    TABLE 8
    Effect of Different Acids on the Antimicrobial Action of NaCl/Acid/SLS
    Time 4
    Surfactant Tested Time 0 (CFU/ml) Hours (CFU/ml)
    Salt Control (no additive) 880 610
    polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene 820 610
    block polymer
    sodium salt of sulfonated 240 0
    oleic acid
    sodium xylene sulfonate 910 820
    dodecyl diphenyl oxide 0 0
    disulfonate
    sodium linear alkyl- 490 0
    benzene sulfonate
    alpha-olefin sulfonate 370 0
    alkylpolyglucoside 280 0
    nonylphenol ethoxylate 460 0
    fatty alkanolamide 470 0
    alcohol ethoxylate 1080 1
    lauramine oxide 2 0
  • As presently under development, especially preferred embodiments of the antimicrobial formulations can be operated under two sets of conditions. In one, a chilling brine is maintained at a temperature of about −3.9° C. is employed. The chilling brine comprises between about 0.3% and about 1.0% citric acid. The citric acid concentration may be increased to as high as about 2.0%. Between about 100 and about 500 ppm SLS is utilized. The balance of the brine formulation is NaCl, and the formulation is mixed with water to a solution of about 9% to about 12%. In another chilling brine application, a chilling brine is maintained at a temperature of about −6.7° C. The chilling brine comprises between about 0.3% and about 1.0% citric acid. Again, the citric acid concentration may be increased to as high as about 2.0%. Between about 100 and about 500 ppm SLS is utilized. The balance of the brine formulation is NaCl, and the formulation is mixed with water to a solution of about 15% to about 17%.
  • Thus, the data indicate that solutions of salt, acid, and surfactant provide efficient kill of bacteria even at temperatures below the freezing point of water. Salts such as sodium sulfate, sodium chloride, and magnesium sulfate act synergistically with the acid and surfactant to enhance the antimicrobial effectiveness. The formulations are shown to be effective in killing pathogenic bacteria such as L. monocytogenes. The formulas were shown to be effective both in freshly prepared brines and in actual spent process chill brine from a ready-to-eat meat plant. The levels of acid and surfactant may be varied to suit the particular application; reducing the concentration of the acid may be compensated by raising the concentration of surfactant and vice versa. In addition to effectively killing bacteria suspended in solutions, the formulas are also shown to be effective at killing bacteria within a biofilm.
  • While in the foregoing specification this invention has been described in relation to certain preferred embodiments thereof, and many details have been set forth for purpose of illustration, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the invention is susceptible to additional embodiments and that certain of the details described herein can be varied considerably without departing from the basic principles of the invention.

Claims (12)

1. An antimicrobial formulation for use in solution comprising, in combination:
between about 25 ppm and about 25,000 ppm surfactant selected from the group consisting of sodium lauryl sulfate, linear alkylbenzene sulfonates, alcohol sulfates, alpha-olefin sulfonates, alcohol ethoxylates, nonylphenyl ethoxylates, alkylpolyglucosides, fatty alkanoamides, fatty amine oxides, sodium dioctylsulfosuccinate, dodecylbenzene sulfonic acid and salts thereof, the sodium salt of sulfonated oleic acid, sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate, dodecyldiphenyloxide-disulfonic acid and salts thereof;
between about 0.1% and 25% acid selected from the group consisting of citric, malic, acetic, propionic, lactic, benzoic, ascorbic, isoascorbic, sorbic, phosphoric, hydrochloric, malic, tartaric, adipic, succinic, glutaric, salicylic, sulfuric acid and sodium bisulfate; and
between about 72.5% and 99.9% inorganic salt selected from the group consisting of sodium, potassium, magnesium, calcium, iron, and ammonium salts of chloride, sulfate, nitrate, phosphate, carbonate, and hydroxide.
2. An antimicrobial salt for use in Solution comprising, in combination:
between about 0.3% and about 6.0% citric acid;
between about 50 and about 500 ppm sodium lauryl sulfate; and
between about 94% and about 99.7% sodium chloride.
3. The antimicrobial salt for use in solution as claimed in claim 2, further comprising:
between about 0.3% and about 1.0% citric acid;
between about 100 and about 500 ppm sodium lauryl sulfate; and
between about 99% and about 99.7% sodium chloride.
4. A method for food processing comprising:
formulating a food product chilling solution containing a combination of an acid, a surfactant and a salt in an amount effective to kill microorganisms in the solution;
maintaining the solution at a temperature of less than about 0° C.; and
immersing a food product to be processed in the solution for a time sufficient to substantially reduce the presence of microorganisms on the food product;
the acid being selected from the group consisting g of citric, malic, acetic, propionic, lactic, benzoic, ascorbic, isoascorbic, sorbic, phosphoric, hydrochloric, malic, tartaric, adipic, succinic, glutaric, salicylic, sulfuric acid and sodium bisulfate;
the surfactant being selected from the group consisting of sodium lauryl sulfate, linear alkylbenzene sulfonates, alcohol sulfates, alpha-olefin sulfonates, alcohol ethoxylates, nonylphenyl ethoxylates, alkylpolyglucosides, fatty alkanoamides, fatty amine oxides, sodium dioctylsulfosuccinate, dodecylbenzene sulfonic acid and salts thereof, the sodium salt of sulfonated oleic acid, sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate, dodecyldiphenyloxide-disulfonic acid and salts thereof, and
the salt being sodium, potassium, magnesium, calcium, iron, and ammonium salts of chloride, sulfate, nitrate, phosphate, carbonate, and hydroxide.
5. The method for food processing as described in claim 4, wherein the acid is further selected from the group consisting of citric and malic acid, the surfactant is sodium lauryl sulfate and the salt is sodium chloride.
6. The method for food processing as described in claim 5, wherein the acid is citric acid.
7. The method for food processing as described in claim 4, wherein the solution is maintained at a temperature of less than about −3.9° C.
8. The method for food processing as described in claim 4, wherein the solution is maintained at a temperature of less than about −6.7° C.
9. The method for food processing as described in claim 5, wherein the solution is maintained at a temperature of less than about −3.9° C.
10. The method for food processing as described in claim 5, wherein the solution is maintained at a temperature of less than about −6.7° C.
11. The method for food processing as described in claim 6, wherein the solution is maintained at a temperature of less than about −3.9° C.
12. The method for food processing as described in claim 6, wherein the solution is maintained at a temperature of less than about −6.7° C.
US11/444,066 2003-06-12 2006-05-30 Antimicrobial salt solutions for food safety applications Abandoned US20060216380A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/444,066 US20060216380A1 (en) 2003-06-12 2006-05-30 Antimicrobial salt solutions for food safety applications

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/460,769 US7090882B2 (en) 2003-06-12 2003-06-12 Antimicrobial salt solutions for food safety applications
US11/444,066 US20060216380A1 (en) 2003-06-12 2006-05-30 Antimicrobial salt solutions for food safety applications

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/460,769 Continuation US7090882B2 (en) 2003-06-12 2003-06-12 Antimicrobial salt solutions for food safety applications

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20060216380A1 true US20060216380A1 (en) 2006-09-28

Family

ID=33511080

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/460,769 Active 2024-05-25 US7090882B2 (en) 2003-06-12 2003-06-12 Antimicrobial salt solutions for food safety applications
US11/444,066 Abandoned US20060216380A1 (en) 2003-06-12 2006-05-30 Antimicrobial salt solutions for food safety applications

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/460,769 Active 2024-05-25 US7090882B2 (en) 2003-06-12 2003-06-12 Antimicrobial salt solutions for food safety applications

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (2) US7090882B2 (en)
WO (1) WO2005000029A2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090098254A1 (en) * 2007-10-12 2009-04-16 Robert Ty Baublits Methods And Compositions For Improving Sensory And Shelf Life Characteristics Of Raw Meat Products

Families Citing this family (43)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
BR0314072A (en) * 2002-09-06 2005-10-18 Excel Corp Animal carcass microbial reduction method
US7588696B2 (en) * 2003-06-12 2009-09-15 Cargill, Incorporated Antimicrobial water softener salt and solutions
US7658959B2 (en) * 2003-06-12 2010-02-09 Cargill, Incorporated Antimicrobial salt solutions for food safety applications
US7090882B2 (en) * 2003-06-12 2006-08-15 Cargill, Incorporated Antimicrobial salt solutions for food safety applications
US7883732B2 (en) * 2003-06-12 2011-02-08 Cargill, Incorporated Antimicrobial salt solutions for cheese processing applications
US20070104809A1 (en) 2003-08-22 2007-05-10 Danisco A/S Composition comprising a bacteriocin and an extract from a plant of the labiatae family
US20050100646A1 (en) * 2003-11-12 2005-05-12 Giacobbe Frederick W. Cold shock method improvements
US20060075922A1 (en) * 2004-08-26 2006-04-13 Supik Albert P Controlled-acidity composition
DE102005020327A1 (en) * 2005-04-30 2006-11-09 Multibind Biotec Gmbh Decontamination solutions and their use for denaturation, modification, degradation, solubilization and removal of proteins, nucleic acid molecules and microorganisms from surfaces
JP5091137B2 (en) * 2005-07-25 2012-12-05 イーコラブ インコーポレイティド Antibacterial composition and packaged food processing method
US8445419B2 (en) 2005-07-25 2013-05-21 Ecolab Usa Inc. Antimicrobial compositions for use on food products
MX2008000725A (en) * 2005-07-25 2008-03-18 Ecolab Inc Antimicrobial compositions for use on food products.
US20080274242A1 (en) * 2006-07-21 2008-11-06 Ecolab Inc. Antimicrobial compositions and methods for treating packaged food products
US20070110788A1 (en) * 2005-11-14 2007-05-17 Hissong James B Injectable formulation capable of forming a drug-releasing device
US8486472B2 (en) * 2006-01-18 2013-07-16 Cargill, Incorporated Antimicrobial salt solutions for food safety applications
US7959943B2 (en) * 2006-05-10 2011-06-14 Medtronics Xomed, Inc. Solvating system and sealant for medical use in the middle or inner ear
US7976873B2 (en) * 2006-05-10 2011-07-12 Medtronic Xomed, Inc. Extracellular polysaccharide solvating system for treatment of bacterial ear conditions
US20070264296A1 (en) * 2006-05-10 2007-11-15 Myntti Matthew F Biofilm extracellular polysachharide solvating system
US7993675B2 (en) * 2006-05-10 2011-08-09 Medtronic Xomed, Inc. Solvating system and sealant for medical use in the sinuses and nasal passages
US9907322B2 (en) * 2006-05-19 2018-03-06 Solae Llc Structured protein product
US7642227B2 (en) * 2006-08-07 2010-01-05 Melaleuca, Inc. Cleansing and disinfecting compositions
US8088095B2 (en) * 2007-02-08 2012-01-03 Medtronic Xomed, Inc. Polymeric sealant for medical use
US9259006B2 (en) * 2008-01-30 2016-02-16 Smartwash Solutions, Llc Antimicrobial compositions and methods of use thereof
CA2727432C (en) 2008-06-12 2016-10-11 Medtronic Xomed, Inc. Method for treating chronic wounds with an extracellular polymeric substance solvating system
DE202008017939U1 (en) 2008-10-02 2011-08-22 Taylor Fresh Foods, Inc. Antimicrobial composition
EP2346324A4 (en) * 2008-10-06 2012-10-10 Microbial Defense Systems Llc Antimicrobial composition and methods of making and using same
US20100098782A1 (en) * 2008-10-16 2010-04-22 Johnsondiversey, Inc. Use of sodium acid sulfate as a disinfectant
US20140272041A1 (en) * 2009-09-25 2014-09-18 Birko Corporation Methods of reducing pathogens during processing or post-processing of beef, poultry and other meat products
US8496972B2 (en) * 2009-10-26 2013-07-30 John Alex Lopes Cleaning, disinfecting and microbicidal compositions
US20170127691A9 (en) * 2010-02-25 2017-05-11 John Bean Technologies Corporation Method of Injection of an Antimicrobial Composition for Rapid Cooling of Poultry During Processing
US20130251819A1 (en) * 2010-07-09 2013-09-26 Jones-Hamilton Co. Method of Reducing Microbes on Food
EP2706845B1 (en) 2011-05-10 2021-06-23 Next Science IP Holdings Pty Ltd Antimicrobial solid and methods of making and using same
EP2763665B1 (en) 2011-10-08 2019-08-28 Next Science IP Holdings Pty Ltd Antimicrobial compositions and methods employing same
US11785958B2 (en) * 2013-06-11 2023-10-17 Edgardo Torrens-Figueroa Method and process for making natural cut pork chops
US11028348B2 (en) 2014-10-09 2021-06-08 ProNatural Brands, LLC Naturally-derived antimicrobial cleaning solutions
US10076115B2 (en) 2014-10-09 2018-09-18 ProNatural Brands, LLC Naturally-derived surface sanitizer and disinfectant
JP6814154B2 (en) 2015-03-13 2021-01-13 ジーイーエイ・フード・ソリューションズ・バーケル・ベスローテン・フェンノートシャップ Methods for cleaning and storing mold drums
BR112018001002B1 (en) 2015-07-17 2022-06-21 Next Science IP Holdings Pty Ltd Antimicrobial composition effective against endospores
US10512270B2 (en) 2016-04-01 2019-12-24 Eagle Us 2 Llc Acid tablet composition and methods of preparing and using the same
WO2018005702A1 (en) 2016-06-30 2018-01-04 Next Science, Llc Antimicrobial compositions and methods employing same
US10400198B2 (en) 2016-08-25 2019-09-03 Eagle Us 2 Llc Method of sanitizing a surface
BR112020005885A2 (en) * 2017-09-26 2020-09-29 Ecolab Usa Inc. antimicrobial, virucide, solid antimicrobial and solid virucide compositions, and methods for using an antimicrobial composition and inactivating a virus.
US11560339B2 (en) 2019-05-30 2023-01-24 Koch Agronomie Services, LLC Micronutrient foliar solutions

Citations (63)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2005999A (en) * 1934-03-26 1935-06-25 Augsburg Publishing House Greeting card assembly
US3216932A (en) * 1962-11-08 1965-11-09 Diamond Crystal Salt Co Salt product and method of making and using same
US3806615A (en) * 1970-06-03 1974-04-23 Exxon Research Engineering Co Aliphatic diols and their esters as antimicrobial additives for cheese and meats
US4002775A (en) * 1973-07-09 1977-01-11 Kabara Jon J Fatty acids and derivatives of antimicrobial agents
US4067997A (en) * 1975-05-21 1978-01-10 Med-Chem Laboratories Synergistic microbecidal composition and method
US4160820A (en) * 1977-11-28 1979-07-10 General Mills, Inc. Plaque inhibiting composition and method
US4189481A (en) * 1975-11-18 1980-02-19 Michigan State University Antimicrobial compositions
US4299852A (en) * 1979-09-12 1981-11-10 Kabushiki Kaishaveno Seiyakuoyo Kenkyojo Process for the preparation of botulinal resistant meat products
US4363763A (en) * 1980-02-25 1982-12-14 The Procter & Gamble Company Polyol esters of alpha-hydroxy carboxylic acids
US4469635A (en) * 1980-12-24 1984-09-04 The Procter & Gamble Company Polyol esters of alpha-hydroxy carboxylic acids
US4485029A (en) * 1984-03-19 1984-11-27 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Disinfecting method and compositions
US4539212A (en) * 1983-06-03 1985-09-03 The Procter & Gamble Company Sterilization and stabilization process for meat analog products
US4576728A (en) * 1983-11-11 1986-03-18 The Procter & Gamble Company Cleaning compositions
US4722941A (en) * 1978-06-07 1988-02-02 Kali-Chemie Pharma Gmbh Readily absorbable pharmaceutical compositions of per se poorly absorbable pharmacologically active agents and preparation thereof
US4749508A (en) * 1985-02-05 1988-06-07 Kay Chemical Company Floor cleaning compositions and their use
US4749561A (en) * 1984-05-09 1988-06-07 Lever Brothers Company Dentifrice compositions
US4820449A (en) * 1986-11-24 1989-04-11 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Cleaning block for flush toilet tanks
US4908147A (en) * 1986-02-19 1990-03-13 Ciba-Geigy Corporation Aqueous self preserving soft contact lens solution and method
US4921694A (en) * 1987-06-24 1990-05-01 Beiersdorf Aktiengesellschaft Deodorizing and antimicrobial composition for use in cosmetic or topical formulations
US4938953A (en) * 1988-08-09 1990-07-03 The Upjohn Company Self-preserving conditioning shampoo formulation
US5079036A (en) * 1990-07-27 1992-01-07 Betz Laboratories, Inc. Method of inhibiting freezing and improving flow and handleability characteristics of solid, particulate materials
US5093140A (en) * 1988-07-20 1992-03-03 Eisai Co., Ltd. Aqueous bactericide for animal treatment
US5208257A (en) * 1986-04-21 1993-05-04 Kabara Jon J Topical antimicrobial pharmaceutical compositions and methods
US5219887A (en) * 1991-06-07 1993-06-15 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Disinfecting shampoo composition for animals
US5284833A (en) * 1991-06-24 1994-02-08 Carrington Laboratories, Inc. Wound cleanser
US5364650A (en) * 1992-10-31 1994-11-15 Guthery B Eugene Disinfecting product
US5378731A (en) * 1991-06-07 1995-01-03 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Medicated shampoo
US5460833A (en) * 1993-09-14 1995-10-24 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Disinfectant composition
US5460802A (en) * 1994-07-18 1995-10-24 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Oral disinfectant for companion animals
US5520575A (en) * 1994-12-02 1996-05-28 Iowa State University Research Foundation Method for reducing contamination of animal carcasses during slaughtering
US5569461A (en) * 1995-02-07 1996-10-29 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Topical antimicrobial composition and method
US5585028A (en) * 1993-11-01 1996-12-17 Robert E. Tyler Fire fighting and cooling composition
US5622708A (en) * 1988-09-21 1997-04-22 Ecolab Inc. Erodible sanitizing caulk
US5632153A (en) * 1995-08-24 1997-05-27 Foodbrands America, Incorporated System and process for cleansing brine in a food-chilling circuit
US5756107A (en) * 1994-12-21 1998-05-26 Cosmederm Technologies Formulations and methods for reducing skin irritation
US5792473A (en) * 1994-03-01 1998-08-11 Gerhard Gergely Granular product or tablet containing an effervescent system and an active pharmaceutical substance, as well as a method for its preparation
US5909745A (en) * 1996-02-26 1999-06-08 Alcon Laboratories, Inc. Use of carbon dioxide and carbonic acid to clean contact lenses
US5968539A (en) * 1997-06-04 1999-10-19 Procter & Gamble Company Mild, rinse-off antimicrobial liquid cleansing compositions which provide residual benefit versus gram negative bacteria
US5980375A (en) * 1998-04-13 1999-11-09 Chad Company Of Missouri, Inc. Method and apparatus for antimicrobial treatment of animal carcasses
US6121215A (en) * 1999-08-27 2000-09-19 Phyzz, Inc. Foaming effervescent bath product
US6183757B1 (en) * 1997-06-04 2001-02-06 Procter & Gamble Company Mild, rinse-off antimicrobial cleansing compositions which provide improved immediate germ reduction during washing
US6190675B1 (en) * 1997-06-04 2001-02-20 Procter & Gamble Company Mild, rinse-off antimicrobial liquid cleansing compositions which provide improved residual benefit versus gram positive bacteria
US6194370B1 (en) * 1996-12-31 2001-02-27 The Procter & Gamble Company Cost effective stain and soil removal aqueous heavy duty liquid laundry detergent compositions
US6197315B1 (en) * 1997-06-04 2001-03-06 Procter & Gamble Company Antimicrobial wipes which provide improved residual benefit versus gram negative bacteria
US6197738B1 (en) * 1990-08-02 2001-03-06 Robert R. Regutti Nontoxic sanitizing cleanser based on organic acids and methods of using same
US6214363B1 (en) * 1997-11-12 2001-04-10 The Procter & Gamble Company Liquid antimicrobial cleansing compositions which provide residual benefit versus gram negative bacteria
US6214783B1 (en) * 1998-12-02 2001-04-10 Colgate Palmolive Company High foaming, grease cutting light duty liquid detergent
US6217887B1 (en) * 1997-06-04 2001-04-17 The Procter & Gamble Company Leave-on antimicrobial compositions which provide improved immediate germ reduction
US6231843B1 (en) * 1997-05-15 2001-05-15 Wella Aktiengesellschaft Hair shampoo having gloss-enhancing properties
US6284259B1 (en) * 1997-11-12 2001-09-04 The Procter & Gamble Company Antimicrobial wipes which provide improved residual benefit versus Gram positive bacteria
US6287577B1 (en) * 1997-11-12 2001-09-11 The Procter & Gamble Company Leave-on antimicrobial compositions which provide improved residual benefit versus gram positive bacteria
US20020004464A1 (en) * 2000-04-05 2002-01-10 Nelson Erik B. Viscosity reduction of viscoelastic surfactant based fluids
US6376438B1 (en) * 1997-10-30 2002-04-23 Stockhausen Gmbh & Co. Kg Skin-compatible hand cleanser, especially a course hand cleanser
US6407143B1 (en) * 1999-12-22 2002-06-18 Sandia Corporation Method and solvent composition for regenerating an ion exchange resin
US20020098210A1 (en) * 1997-06-23 2002-07-25 Hahn Gary S. Formulations and methods for reducing skin irritation
US6432885B1 (en) * 1999-08-26 2002-08-13 Osca, Inc. Well treatment fluids and methods for the use thereof
US6475499B2 (en) * 2000-01-21 2002-11-05 L'oreal Composition for washing keratin materials, based on weakly ethoxylated sorbitan ester
US20020182267A1 (en) * 1996-10-23 2002-12-05 The Research Foundation Of The State University Of New York At Stony Brook Compositions to control oral microbial oxidation-reduction (Eh) levels
US20030176500A1 (en) * 2000-06-20 2003-09-18 Koen Molly Medium chain fatty acids applicable as antimicrobial agents
US20030180377A1 (en) * 2002-02-12 2003-09-25 Ramirez Jose A. Enhanced activity hydrogen peroxide disinfectant
US20030185902A1 (en) * 2002-03-28 2003-10-02 Ecolab Inc. Antimicrobial and antiviral compositions containing an oxidizing species
US20040253352A1 (en) * 2003-06-12 2004-12-16 Koefod Robert Scott Antimicrobial salt solutions for food safety applications
US6867233B2 (en) * 2000-02-28 2005-03-15 The Procter & Gamble Company Acidic antimicrobial compositions for treating food and food contact surfaces and methods of use thereof

Family Cites Families (31)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA1331559C (en) 1986-04-21 1994-08-23 Jon Joseph Kabara Antimicrobial preservative compositions and methods
CA1302280C (en) 1986-04-21 1992-06-02 Jon Joseph Kabara Topical antimicrobial pharmaceutical compositions and methods
AU7694787A (en) 1986-07-11 1988-02-10 Oral Research Laboratories, Inc. Compositions for the prolonged action of anti-plaque agents
US4779508A (en) * 1987-06-15 1988-10-25 Evans Products, Inc. Drumhead construction
IL86899A0 (en) 1987-09-18 1988-11-30 Monsanto Co Control of bacteria on chicken carcasses
AU617016B2 (en) 1988-11-08 1991-11-14 Unilever Plc Detergent compositions
EP0587797B1 (en) 1991-06-07 1995-03-01 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Disinfecting shampoo composition for animals
US5227086A (en) 1992-03-20 1993-07-13 The Procter & Gamble Company Framed skin pH cleansing bar
US5262079A (en) 1992-03-20 1993-11-16 The Procter & Gamble Company Framed neutral pH cleansing bar
US5466680A (en) 1992-03-26 1995-11-14 Cytologics, Inc. Method and compositions for enhancing white blood cell functioning on a mucosal or cutaneous surface
US5292525A (en) 1992-10-14 1994-03-08 Merck & Co., Inc. Method and composition for removing an alginate from a cutaneous substrate
ES2136157T3 (en) 1994-03-01 1999-11-16 Gerhard Gergely GRANULAR OR COMPRESSED PRODUCT CONTAINING AN EFFERVESCENT SYSTEM AND AN ACTIVE PHARMACEUTICAL SUBSTANCE, AS WELL AS A PROCEDURE FOR ITS PREPARATION.
US5681802A (en) 1994-06-01 1997-10-28 Lever Brothers Company, Division Of Conopco, Inc. Mild antimicrobial liquid cleansing formulations comprising buffering compound or compounds as potentiator of antimicrobial effectiveness
JP2789306B2 (en) 1994-11-15 1998-08-20 株式会社第一ラジオアイソトープ研究所 Immunological measurement method of insulin-like growth factor and kit for measuring insulin-like growth factor
US5817518A (en) 1995-12-18 1998-10-06 Coulter International Corp. Reagent and method for differential determination of leukocytes in blood
US6562776B1 (en) 1996-02-08 2003-05-13 Huntsman Petrochemical Corporation Solid alkylbenzene sulfonates and cleaning compositions having enhanced water hardness tolerance
WO1998009520A1 (en) 1996-09-06 1998-03-12 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Antimicrobial compositions
CN1265027A (en) 1997-06-04 2000-08-30 普罗克特和甘保尔公司 Mild, rinse-off antimicrobial liquid cleansing compsns.
WO1998055095A1 (en) 1997-06-04 1998-12-10 The Procter & Gamble Company Liquid antimicrobial cleansing compositions which provide residual benefit versus gram negative bacteria
JP3399789B2 (en) 1997-07-15 2003-04-21 理化学研究所 Plant disease control agent
US5965508A (en) 1997-10-21 1999-10-12 Stepan Company Soap bar compositions comprising alpha sulfonated fatty acid alkyl esters and long chain fatty acids
EP1047760A1 (en) 1998-01-13 2000-11-02 The Procter & Gamble Company Granular compositions having improved dissolution
WO2000001238A1 (en) 1998-07-06 2000-01-13 Kajander E Olavi Methods for eradication of nanobacteria
US6143704A (en) 1998-10-13 2000-11-07 Lever Brothers Company, Division Of Conopco, Inc. Soap bars with little or no synthetic surfactant comprising organic salts
WO2000030460A1 (en) 1998-11-19 2000-06-02 The Procter & Gamble Company Microorganism reduction methods and compositions for food
US6413529B1 (en) 1999-04-13 2002-07-02 The Procter & Gamble Company Antimicrobial wipes which provide improved residual benefit versus gram negative bacteria
BR0010740B1 (en) 1999-05-21 2012-11-27 antimicrobial article, surgical garment, facial mask, and process for producing antimicrobial article.
AU4503701A (en) 1999-11-24 2001-06-25 3M Innovative Properties Company Fruit, vegetable, and seed disinfectants
US20030215401A1 (en) 2000-08-21 2003-11-20 David Estrada Dental composition for hypersensitve teeth
AU2001291141A1 (en) 2000-09-19 2002-04-02 Huntsman Petrochemical Corporation Alkyl toluene sulfonate detergents
GB0030671D0 (en) 2000-12-15 2001-01-31 Unilever Plc Detergent compositions

Patent Citations (66)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2005999A (en) * 1934-03-26 1935-06-25 Augsburg Publishing House Greeting card assembly
US3216932A (en) * 1962-11-08 1965-11-09 Diamond Crystal Salt Co Salt product and method of making and using same
US3806615A (en) * 1970-06-03 1974-04-23 Exxon Research Engineering Co Aliphatic diols and their esters as antimicrobial additives for cheese and meats
US4002775A (en) * 1973-07-09 1977-01-11 Kabara Jon J Fatty acids and derivatives of antimicrobial agents
US4067997A (en) * 1975-05-21 1978-01-10 Med-Chem Laboratories Synergistic microbecidal composition and method
US4189481A (en) * 1975-11-18 1980-02-19 Michigan State University Antimicrobial compositions
US4160820A (en) * 1977-11-28 1979-07-10 General Mills, Inc. Plaque inhibiting composition and method
US4722941A (en) * 1978-06-07 1988-02-02 Kali-Chemie Pharma Gmbh Readily absorbable pharmaceutical compositions of per se poorly absorbable pharmacologically active agents and preparation thereof
US4299852A (en) * 1979-09-12 1981-11-10 Kabushiki Kaishaveno Seiyakuoyo Kenkyojo Process for the preparation of botulinal resistant meat products
US4363763A (en) * 1980-02-25 1982-12-14 The Procter & Gamble Company Polyol esters of alpha-hydroxy carboxylic acids
US4469635A (en) * 1980-12-24 1984-09-04 The Procter & Gamble Company Polyol esters of alpha-hydroxy carboxylic acids
US4539212A (en) * 1983-06-03 1985-09-03 The Procter & Gamble Company Sterilization and stabilization process for meat analog products
US4576728A (en) * 1983-11-11 1986-03-18 The Procter & Gamble Company Cleaning compositions
US4485029A (en) * 1984-03-19 1984-11-27 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Disinfecting method and compositions
US4749561A (en) * 1984-05-09 1988-06-07 Lever Brothers Company Dentifrice compositions
US4749508A (en) * 1985-02-05 1988-06-07 Kay Chemical Company Floor cleaning compositions and their use
US4908147A (en) * 1986-02-19 1990-03-13 Ciba-Geigy Corporation Aqueous self preserving soft contact lens solution and method
US5208257A (en) * 1986-04-21 1993-05-04 Kabara Jon J Topical antimicrobial pharmaceutical compositions and methods
US4820449A (en) * 1986-11-24 1989-04-11 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Cleaning block for flush toilet tanks
US4921694A (en) * 1987-06-24 1990-05-01 Beiersdorf Aktiengesellschaft Deodorizing and antimicrobial composition for use in cosmetic or topical formulations
US5093140A (en) * 1988-07-20 1992-03-03 Eisai Co., Ltd. Aqueous bactericide for animal treatment
US4938953A (en) * 1988-08-09 1990-07-03 The Upjohn Company Self-preserving conditioning shampoo formulation
US5622708A (en) * 1988-09-21 1997-04-22 Ecolab Inc. Erodible sanitizing caulk
US5079036A (en) * 1990-07-27 1992-01-07 Betz Laboratories, Inc. Method of inhibiting freezing and improving flow and handleability characteristics of solid, particulate materials
US6197738B1 (en) * 1990-08-02 2001-03-06 Robert R. Regutti Nontoxic sanitizing cleanser based on organic acids and methods of using same
US5380756A (en) * 1991-06-07 1995-01-10 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Disinfecting shampoo composition for animals
US5378731A (en) * 1991-06-07 1995-01-03 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Medicated shampoo
US5219887A (en) * 1991-06-07 1993-06-15 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Disinfecting shampoo composition for animals
US5284833A (en) * 1991-06-24 1994-02-08 Carrington Laboratories, Inc. Wound cleanser
US5364650A (en) * 1992-10-31 1994-11-15 Guthery B Eugene Disinfecting product
US5460833A (en) * 1993-09-14 1995-10-24 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Disinfectant composition
US5490992A (en) * 1993-09-14 1996-02-13 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Disinfectant composition
US5585028A (en) * 1993-11-01 1996-12-17 Robert E. Tyler Fire fighting and cooling composition
US5792473A (en) * 1994-03-01 1998-08-11 Gerhard Gergely Granular product or tablet containing an effervescent system and an active pharmaceutical substance, as well as a method for its preparation
US5460802A (en) * 1994-07-18 1995-10-24 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Oral disinfectant for companion animals
US5520575A (en) * 1994-12-02 1996-05-28 Iowa State University Research Foundation Method for reducing contamination of animal carcasses during slaughtering
US5756107A (en) * 1994-12-21 1998-05-26 Cosmederm Technologies Formulations and methods for reducing skin irritation
US5569461A (en) * 1995-02-07 1996-10-29 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Topical antimicrobial composition and method
US5632153A (en) * 1995-08-24 1997-05-27 Foodbrands America, Incorporated System and process for cleansing brine in a food-chilling circuit
US5909745A (en) * 1996-02-26 1999-06-08 Alcon Laboratories, Inc. Use of carbon dioxide and carbonic acid to clean contact lenses
US20020182267A1 (en) * 1996-10-23 2002-12-05 The Research Foundation Of The State University Of New York At Stony Brook Compositions to control oral microbial oxidation-reduction (Eh) levels
US6194370B1 (en) * 1996-12-31 2001-02-27 The Procter & Gamble Company Cost effective stain and soil removal aqueous heavy duty liquid laundry detergent compositions
US6231843B1 (en) * 1997-05-15 2001-05-15 Wella Aktiengesellschaft Hair shampoo having gloss-enhancing properties
US6190675B1 (en) * 1997-06-04 2001-02-20 Procter & Gamble Company Mild, rinse-off antimicrobial liquid cleansing compositions which provide improved residual benefit versus gram positive bacteria
US5968539A (en) * 1997-06-04 1999-10-19 Procter & Gamble Company Mild, rinse-off antimicrobial liquid cleansing compositions which provide residual benefit versus gram negative bacteria
US6197315B1 (en) * 1997-06-04 2001-03-06 Procter & Gamble Company Antimicrobial wipes which provide improved residual benefit versus gram negative bacteria
US6183757B1 (en) * 1997-06-04 2001-02-06 Procter & Gamble Company Mild, rinse-off antimicrobial cleansing compositions which provide improved immediate germ reduction during washing
US6217887B1 (en) * 1997-06-04 2001-04-17 The Procter & Gamble Company Leave-on antimicrobial compositions which provide improved immediate germ reduction
US20020098210A1 (en) * 1997-06-23 2002-07-25 Hahn Gary S. Formulations and methods for reducing skin irritation
US6376438B1 (en) * 1997-10-30 2002-04-23 Stockhausen Gmbh & Co. Kg Skin-compatible hand cleanser, especially a course hand cleanser
US6287577B1 (en) * 1997-11-12 2001-09-11 The Procter & Gamble Company Leave-on antimicrobial compositions which provide improved residual benefit versus gram positive bacteria
US6214363B1 (en) * 1997-11-12 2001-04-10 The Procter & Gamble Company Liquid antimicrobial cleansing compositions which provide residual benefit versus gram negative bacteria
US6284259B1 (en) * 1997-11-12 2001-09-04 The Procter & Gamble Company Antimicrobial wipes which provide improved residual benefit versus Gram positive bacteria
US5980375A (en) * 1998-04-13 1999-11-09 Chad Company Of Missouri, Inc. Method and apparatus for antimicrobial treatment of animal carcasses
US6214783B1 (en) * 1998-12-02 2001-04-10 Colgate Palmolive Company High foaming, grease cutting light duty liquid detergent
US6432885B1 (en) * 1999-08-26 2002-08-13 Osca, Inc. Well treatment fluids and methods for the use thereof
US6121215A (en) * 1999-08-27 2000-09-19 Phyzz, Inc. Foaming effervescent bath product
US6407143B1 (en) * 1999-12-22 2002-06-18 Sandia Corporation Method and solvent composition for regenerating an ion exchange resin
US6475499B2 (en) * 2000-01-21 2002-11-05 L'oreal Composition for washing keratin materials, based on weakly ethoxylated sorbitan ester
US6867233B2 (en) * 2000-02-28 2005-03-15 The Procter & Gamble Company Acidic antimicrobial compositions for treating food and food contact surfaces and methods of use thereof
US20020004464A1 (en) * 2000-04-05 2002-01-10 Nelson Erik B. Viscosity reduction of viscoelastic surfactant based fluids
US20030176500A1 (en) * 2000-06-20 2003-09-18 Koen Molly Medium chain fatty acids applicable as antimicrobial agents
US20030180377A1 (en) * 2002-02-12 2003-09-25 Ramirez Jose A. Enhanced activity hydrogen peroxide disinfectant
US20030185902A1 (en) * 2002-03-28 2003-10-02 Ecolab Inc. Antimicrobial and antiviral compositions containing an oxidizing species
US20040253352A1 (en) * 2003-06-12 2004-12-16 Koefod Robert Scott Antimicrobial salt solutions for food safety applications
US7090882B2 (en) * 2003-06-12 2006-08-15 Cargill, Incorporated Antimicrobial salt solutions for food safety applications

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090098254A1 (en) * 2007-10-12 2009-04-16 Robert Ty Baublits Methods And Compositions For Improving Sensory And Shelf Life Characteristics Of Raw Meat Products

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20040253352A1 (en) 2004-12-16
WO2005000029A3 (en) 2005-09-15
US7090882B2 (en) 2006-08-15
WO2005000029A2 (en) 2005-01-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7090882B2 (en) Antimicrobial salt solutions for food safety applications
US7658959B2 (en) Antimicrobial salt solutions for food safety applications
US8623439B2 (en) Antimicrobial salt solutions for cheese processing applications
EP0749275B1 (en) Removing bacteria from poultry and other meats
US5490992A (en) Disinfectant composition
JP4226778B2 (en) How to optimize the efficacy of a chlorite disinfectant spray for poultry and other meats
US20070269563A1 (en) Compositions and methods for reducing microbial contamination in meat processing
WO2006051420A1 (en) Antibacterial composition and methods thereof
US20080213444A1 (en) Compositions and methods for reducing microbial contamination in meat processing
Taylor et al. Alternatives to traditional antimicrobials for organically processed meat and poultry
Stopforth et al. Effect of simulated spray chilling with chemical solutions on acid-habituated and non–acid-habituated Escherichia coli O157: H7 cells attached to beef carcass tissue
EP1261318B1 (en) A concentrated solution of quaternary ammonium compounds and methods of use
Taormina et al. Evaluation of hot-water and sanitizer dip treatments of knives contaminated with bacteria and meat residue
KR100885511B1 (en) Composition for growth inhibition of pathogenic microorganisms on meats during distribution using natural additives
US8486472B2 (en) Antimicrobial salt solutions for food safety applications
RU2327390C2 (en) Processing method of animal carcass or vegetable material
Hong et al. Survival of Escherichia coli O157: H7 and Salmonella typhimurium inoculated on chicken by aqueous chlorine dioxide treatment
US20220183307A1 (en) Methods of reducing or eliminating pathogenic bacteria
WO2007145783A2 (en) Compositions and methods for reducing microbial contamination in meat processing
US20110086146A1 (en) Antimicrobial compositions for meat processing
Winkler et al. Reference document: Antimicrobial interventions for beef
BR102021004173A2 (en) SOPHOROLIPIDS AS A DECONTAMINANT IN THE REDUCTION OF THERMAL TOLERANT COLIFORMS AND ESCHERICHIA COLI IN THE STAGE OF PRE-COOLING POULTRY
Ellebracht Evaluation of peroxyacetic acid as a potential pre-grinding treatment for control of enteric pathogens on fresh beef trim
CA2716051A1 (en) Antimicrobial compositions for meat processing
Paulsen et al. Vienna, Austria

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION