US20060188880A1 - Method for detecting an analyte in a sample - Google Patents

Method for detecting an analyte in a sample Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20060188880A1
US20060188880A1 US10/539,628 US53962803A US2006188880A1 US 20060188880 A1 US20060188880 A1 US 20060188880A1 US 53962803 A US53962803 A US 53962803A US 2006188880 A1 US2006188880 A1 US 2006188880A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
oligonucleotides
detection
analyte
reporter
probes
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/539,628
Inventor
Silke Hinnah
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Evotec OAI AG
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US10/539,628 priority Critical patent/US20060188880A1/en
Assigned to EVOTEC AG reassignment EVOTEC AG ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: STURMER, WERNER, SCHAFER, MICHAELA, GALL, KARSTEN, JAGER, STEFAN, LAMBRU, DAGMAR, DROGE, SONJA, HINNAH, SILKE
Publication of US20060188880A1 publication Critical patent/US20060188880A1/en
Priority to US12/662,896 priority patent/US8580577B2/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/68Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
    • C12Q1/6813Hybridisation assays
    • C12Q1/6816Hybridisation assays characterised by the detection means
    • C12Q1/6818Hybridisation assays characterised by the detection means involving interaction of two or more labels, e.g. resonant energy transfer
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/68Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/68Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
    • C12Q1/6813Hybridisation assays
    • C12Q1/6834Enzymatic or biochemical coupling of nucleic acids to a solid phase
    • C12Q1/6837Enzymatic or biochemical coupling of nucleic acids to a solid phase using probe arrays or probe chips
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/53Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor
    • G01N33/543Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor with an insoluble carrier for immobilising immunochemicals
    • G01N33/54306Solid-phase reaction mechanisms

Definitions

  • the present invention pertains to a method for detecting an analyte in a sample utilizing probes interacting with the analytes.
  • nucleic acids The detection and preferably quantitative analysis of nucleic acids is an important tool in the molecular biology laboratory. Examples are genetic tests, virus diagnostics, and analysis of polymorphisms.
  • DNA/RNA quantification systems To date a number of DNA/RNA quantification systems have been developed. Typically, such quantification systems rely on an amplification step being performed exponentially (realized by Polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which is based on a specific, multiple turnover replication of the nucleic acid section to be identified) or linearly (realized by enzymatic turnover).
  • PCR Polymerase chain reaction
  • Many detection and quantification systems rely on detecting analytes by labeled probes added to the sample in surplus. A part of the labeled probes binds to the analytes.
  • washing steps are indispensable to reduce the background signals stemming from unbound probes.
  • washing steps are difficult to manage, if manageable at all, in an automated way. Automation, on the other hand, is a prerequisite for high throughput applications typical in mass diagnostics, drug testing and development and alike situations.
  • An object of the present invention is to provide a sensitive method for the detection of low concentrations of analytes, such as nucleic acids.
  • the method should in particular be feasible (i) without additional amplification steps thereby allowing a direct detection of the analyte and (ii) in a homogeneous format without relying on washing or other separation steps.
  • the object of the present invention is accomplished by a method for detecting an analyte in a sample comprising the steps of
  • the object of the present invention is accomplished by a method comprising the steps of
  • the method of the invention is advantageous since no washing steps and no amplification of the signal is necessary. Consequently, in a preferred embodiment the method is indeed conducted in a homogeneous format.
  • a direct detection of the analytes by the use of detection oligonucleotides becomes possible.
  • well established confocal detection systems and devices become applicable.
  • the signal intensity of the first reporter labeling the detection probe bound to the analyte which is e.g. fluorescent light, is directly linked to the amount of analytes, omitting any amplifying turnover step. Consequently, the present invention allows for a quantification of the analyte.
  • the analyte comprises at least two binding sites, one for the capture probe and another one for the detection probe.
  • the first and/or second reporter is luminescent, in particular fluorescent.
  • the first and/or second reporter is a dye.
  • the detection probes, in particular the detection oligonucleotides are labeled with a first fluorescent dye and/or the solid support is labeled with a second fluorescent dye.
  • Typical dyes include rhodamine dyes such as rhodamine-6-G, tetramethylrhodamine or rhodamine green, oxazine dyes, fluorescein, and the like.
  • a hybrid between detection oligonucleotides and analytes is formed.
  • This complex is bound to the solid support via the hybridization of the analyte to capture oligonucleotides.
  • the concentration of the detection oligonucleotides should not be the limiting factor in this first hybridization reaction. Therefore, the detection oligonucleotides are typically added to the sample in high amounts because the actual amount of analyte is usually unknown.
  • the detection of detection oligonucleotides is conducted in the presence of quenching oligonucleotides hybridizing to surplus detection oligonucleotides not being bound to the analyte and thereby quenching at least partially an emission of the first reporter of said surplus detection oligonucleotides. It is preferred that the hybrid between detection oligonucleotides and analyte has a higher melting temperature than a hybrid between detection oligonucleotides and quenching oligonucleotides.
  • the melting temperature of the hybrid between detection oligonucleotides and analyte is at least 1° C., more preferably at least 2° C., even more preferably at least 5° C. and most preferably at least 10° C. higher than the melting temperature of the hybrid between detection oligonucleotides and quenching oligonucleotides under test conditions.
  • contacting the sample with the detection oligonucleotides is performed under first hybridization conditions allowing the generation of a stable hybrid between detection oligonucleotides and analyte.
  • Second hybridization conditions allowing the generation of a stable hybrid is between surplus detection oligonucleotides not being bound to the analyte and quenching oligonucleotides. Said second hybridization conditions do not destabilize the hybrid between detection oligonucleotides and analyte formed under said first hybridization conditions.
  • the capture probes in particular the capture oligonucleotides, are covalently bound to the solid support. It is however alternatively also possible to utilize capture probes, in particular capture oligonucleotides, which are capable of binding to the solid support via affinity interaction.
  • the capture probes/capture oligonucleotides comprise a first affinity unit capable of binding to a second affinity unit attached to the solid support.
  • the first affinity unit might be biotin and the second affinity unit might be streptavidin or avidin.
  • a typical solid support may be a bead, a cell, a pollen, or a plurality thereof.
  • streptavidin coated polystyrene beads from Spherotech, Libertyville, Ill. 60048 are used having a diameter of about 6 ⁇ m.
  • the analyte is bound to the support by a capture probe.
  • the capture probe of the invention may comprise a first portion bound to the support and a second portion capable of binding the analyte.
  • Each support may comprise a multitude of capture probes.
  • the first reporter labeling the detection probes/detection oligonucleotides differs from the second reporter labeling the solid support in its excitation wavelength and/or its emission wavelength.
  • the reporters in such a way as to have different emission wavelengths (e.g. dyes emitting light at a wavelength of 565 nm for the first reporter and 690 nm for the second reporter; see examples below), these can be easily distinguished during detection.
  • the difference in the excitation wavelength and/or emission wavelength between first and second reporter is typically at least 10 nm, preferably at least 20 nm, even more preferably at least 50 nm and most preferably at least 100 nm.
  • the detection oligonucleotides comprise a linker sequence.
  • This linker sequence links the sequence of the detection oligonucleotide complementary to the analyte with the first reporter.
  • the capture oligonucleotides may also comprise a linker sequence, linking the sequence of the capture oligonucleotide complementary to analyte with the affinity unit or the solid support (see e.g. the T15 linker mentioned in the examples below).
  • the use of the linker sequences serves to spatially separate the first and second reporter from each other (in the complex of detection oligonucleotides/analyte/capture oligonucleotides/solid support labeled with second reporter). Otherwise unfavorable interactions between these reporters may occur (e.g. FRET) which may reduce the signal emitted by the first reporter used to detect and quantify the analyte.
  • the present invention is utilized in a multiplex format. At least two different analytes may be detected by providing at least two different sets of detection probes/detection oligonucleotides and at least two different sets of capture probes/capture oligonucleotides.
  • the first set of detection oligonucleotides is complementary to the first analyte and the second set of detection oligonucleotides is complementary to the second analyte.
  • the different sets of detection probes/detection oligonucleotides are preferably labeled with different reporters. The reporters of one set are identical, have the same excitation wavelength and/or the same emission wavelength.
  • the reporters of the detection probes/detection oligonucleotides are identical in the different sets.
  • the first analyte may be captured on the first solid support (such as a small bead) by a first affinity interaction.
  • the second analyte may be captured on the second solid support (such as a large bead) by a second affinity interaction.
  • the solid supports may be differentiated from each other by applying image analysis tools.
  • Detecting the detection oligonucleotides bound to the first analyte can be conducted by utilizing a mask of the small beads whereas detecting the detection oligonucleotides bound to the second analyte can be conducted by utilizing a mask of the large beads.
  • the detection of the detection probes/detection oligonucleotides can be performed applying imaging in combination with the generation of a mask.
  • the solid support is labeled with a second reporter different from the one utilized to label the detection probes/detection oligonucleotides.
  • An image is recorded at the emission wavelength of said second reporter.
  • a mask is generated and applied to an image of the sample used for the above mentioned detection. It is preferred that the image recorded at the emission wavelength of the second reporter is recorded simultaneously with the image used for detecting the detection probes/detection oligonucleotides utilizing two detectors. This latter image is typically recorded at a wavelength different from the emission wavelength of the second reporter (see FIG. 5 below).
  • the image of the sample used for detecting the detection probes/detection oligonucleotides typically is acquired at the emission wavelength of the first reporter. It is preferred to correct the image recorded at the emission wavelength of the second reporter in such a way that it spatially matches with the image used for detecting the detection probes/detection oligonucleotides. Alternatively, the latter image may be corrected to match the first image.
  • the quenching probes/quenching oligonucleotides comprise a quenching unit, said quenching unit preferably being a dye.
  • the first reporter is a donor of a Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) donor-acceptor-pair and the quenching unit is an acceptor of said donor-acceptor-pair.
  • the quenching unit is a dark quencher which quenches at least partially the emission of the first reporter by dissipating the energy of the excited state of the first reporter into the environment.
  • FRET Förster resonance energy transfer
  • such quantification may be performed by determining an amount of detection probes/detection oligonucleotides bound to the analyte.
  • the signal stemming from the first reporter labeling such bound probes is related to the amount of the analyte.
  • the amount of detection probes/detection oligonucleotides bound to the analyte may be expressed as the emission intensity emitted by the first reporter.
  • the method according to the present invention preferably comprises the additional step of determining an intensity of a background emission in the vicinity of the solid support and considering such intensity when determining the amount of detection probes/detection oligonucleotides.
  • the detection probes may be aptameres, oligonucleotides, or antibodies.
  • Analytes may be proteins or nucleic acids, in particular mRNA.
  • the sample potentially comprising the analyte may be a cell lysate, in particular a crude cell lysate, or an in vitro prepared sample.
  • the method according to the present invention is particularly useful in screening for potentially pharmaceutically active substances, in diagnostics, or in determining any potential side effects of drugs.
  • the probe having the first reporter is a fluorescent probe and there are only a few analytes present it normally happens that the probe is present in an excess. Non-bound probe then emits fluorescent light which may cause a lowering of the sensitivity of the measurement.
  • Imaging can preferably be performed utilizing confocal optics. Confocal optics spatially limit the measurement volume to a very narrow well-defined focal plane thus reducing background signals. In addition, it is advantageous to add a quencher of a fluorescence of the first reporter unit and to reduce the background thereby.
  • the background signal can be eliminated by mathematical methods.
  • the background signal is quantified in the vicinity of the solid support (though having sufficient distance to it) and subtracted from the signal of first reporter.
  • the probe having the first reporter is used for detecting the actual analyte, whereas the second reporter serves as marker for the solid support itself to which the analyte is bound, if present.
  • the second reporter allows the localization of the solid support and the subsequent generation of a mask which improves the accuracy of the measurement.
  • the reporter are dyes having different absorption maxima and/or, if they are fluorescent dyes, different emission spectra. The skilled person readily understands how to choose the dyes according to the fluorescent filters in the measuring device which filters separate the excitation and/or emission bands of the two dyes.
  • FIG. 1 depicts the result of a hybridization reaction utilizing detection oligonucleotides (DO), capture oligonucleotides (CO) and beads to detect a nucleic acid.
  • DO detection oligonucleotides
  • CO capture oligonucleotides
  • FIG. 2 depicts the measures taught by the present invention to improve the sensitivity of the assay principle shown in FIG. 1 .
  • FIG. 3 shows an embodiment of the improved assay principle applying detection oligonucleotides labeled with rhodamine-6G, FRET quencher oligonucleotides and beads labeled with a red oxazine dye.
  • FIG. 4 depicts details of the assay principle taught by the present invention for the detection of c-fos mRNA.
  • FIG. 5 shows signal images and reference images of beads at different concentrations of the target RNA analyte.
  • the signal image was recorded at the emission wavelength of the first reporter labeling the detection oligonucleotides (565 nm), whereas the reference image was recorded at the emission wavelength of the second reporter labeling the beads (690 nm).
  • FIG. 6 shows a strategy for image analysis according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 7 depicts the results of c-fos RNA titration. Due to the logarithmic scale, the control is represented as 1*10 3 copies (though in fact it does not contain any in vitro prepared c-fos RNA).
  • the average fluorescence intensity per bead pixel relates to the amount of c-fos RNA analyte labeled with detection oligonucleotides and bound to the beads via the capture oligonucleotides.
  • FIG. 8 shows the average fluorescence intensity per bead pixel at various PMA concentrations (c-fos experiments).
  • the fluorescence intensity depicted in this FIG. 8 stems from emission of the detection oligonucleotides bound indirectly to the bead (via the analyte/capture oligonucleotide; see also FIGS. 1 and 2 ).
  • FIG. 9 shows the average fluorescence intensity per bead pixel at various 3-methylcholanthrene concentrations (cyp1A1 experiments).
  • the fluorescence intensity depicted in this FIG. 9 stems from emission of the detection oligonucleotides bound indirectly to the bead (via the analyte/capture oligonucleotide; see also FIGS. 1 and 2 ).
  • the results of measuring three sample plates are depicted (see also example 2).
  • FIG. 10 relates to example 1a. It shows the average fluorescence intensity of the emission of the reporter labeling the detection oligonucleotides per bead pixel as a function of RNA copies per well (average of 4 wells per concentration). Due to the logarithmic scale, the control is represented as 1E+03 RNA copies/well.
  • Two different kinds of image analysis have been performed. In the first analysis, the bead recognition was performed on the signal image obtained at the emission wavelength of the dye labeling the detection oligonucleotides. In the second analysis, the bead recognition was performed on the respective reference image obtained at the emission wavelength of the dye labeling the beads. The signal emission is related to the mRNA analyte concentration and thus decreases with decreasing mRNA concentration.
  • FIG. 11 relates to example 1a. Representative images from the image analysis of experiments depicted in FIGS. 7 and 10 are shown.
  • FIG. 11 shows the results of bead recognition performed on (i) signal images obtained at the emission wavelength of the dye labeling the detection oligonucleotides and (ii) reference images obtained at the emission wavelength of the dye labeling the beads, at different concentrations of the target c-fos RNA analyte.
  • the left column demonstrates that a reliable bead recognition performed on signal images is possible only in case of high analyte concentrations. At lower concentrations in the order of 2.5*10 6 RNA copies/well, beads are not recognizable anymore.
  • This kind of bead recognition corresponds to an experimental set-up conducted without the use of the second dye for labeling the beads (independently of the analyte concentration).
  • the right column demonstrates that the bead recognition performed on reference images functions independently of analyte concentration.
  • FIG. 12 shows the results of c-fos RNA titration with and without FQO (see also example 4). Due to the logarithmic scale, the control is represented as 1*10 3 copies (though in fact it does not contain any in vitro prepared c-fos RNA).
  • the average fluorescence intensity at the emission wavelength of the first reporter per bead pixel relates to the amount of c-fos RNA analyte labeled with detection oligonucleotides and bound to the beads via the capture oligonucleotides.
  • the figure demonstrates that the dynamic range of the signal fluorescence intensity is significantly broader in the presence of FQO than in its absence. Consequently, the lower detection limit for the analyte is improved in the presence of FQO.
  • FIG. 1 depicts schematically that detection oligonucleotides (DO) labeled with a first dye are used to label the analyte nucleic acid.
  • DO detection oligonucleotides
  • CO biotinylated capture oligonucleotides
  • FIG. 2 depicts measures according to the present invention that are taken alone or in combination to reach an improved sensitivity of the assay.
  • the streptavidin coated beads may be labeled by biotinylated second dyes to allow their reliable detection independent of the analyte concentration. So called 2-channel measurements can be conducted by detecting both the signal of the labeled detection oligonucleotides bound to the analyte-CO-bead complex and the reference emission of the biotinylated second dye.
  • the background signal caused by unbound fluorescent detection oligonucleotides may be minimized using quencher oligonucleotides hybridizing to the free surplus detection oligonucleotides.
  • FIG. 3 A specific embodiment of the assay principle according to the present invention is depicted in more detail in FIG. 3 .
  • a number of about 20 detection oligonucleotides (DO) marked with the fluorescent dye rhodamine-6G is used to label the target mRNA, i.e. the analyte, specifically.
  • the resulting fluorescent complex is captured to streptavidin coated beads via hybridization of biotinylated so-called capture oligonucleotides (CO).
  • the fluorescence intensity on the beads may be recorded using high speed dual channel confocal imaging.
  • the fluorescence intensity of the detection oligonucleotides bound indirectly to the beads (via analyte/CO-complex) is linearly related to the mRNA concentration.
  • additional steps can be taken according to the present invention, namely the unspecific labeling of the beads with a second color (such as biotinylated red oxazine dye) to allow their reliable detection independently of the RNA concentration.
  • a second color such as biotinylated red oxazine dye
  • FQO FRET quencher oligonucleotides
  • FIG. 4 An even more detailed example is given in FIG. 4 :
  • the c-fos mRNA is labeled with two detection oligonucleotides (19 cF-DO and 20 cF-DO; for numbering of c-Fos oligonucleotides see Table 1).
  • a biotinylated capture oligonucleotide (6 cf-CO) serves for binding to the bead (bead not depicted).
  • the quenching of surplus DO (19 cF-DO) by its specific FQO (19 cF-FQO) is demonstrated.
  • HepG2 hepatoma cells were maintained in DMEM-F12 (Gibco, catalogue no. 31331-028), supplemented with 10% FCS (Gibco, catalogue no. 10500-064) at 37° C. and 5% CO 2 .
  • A549 cells were maintained in DMEM-F12 (Gibco, catalogue no. 31331-028), supplemented with 5% FCS (Gibco, catalogue no. 10500-064) at 37° C. and 5% CO 2 .
  • the lysis buffer contained DEPC-treated water (RNase free) with 100 mM Tris/HCl pH 8.0, 10 mM EDTA pH 8.0, 0.5 M LiCl, 5 mM DTT, 1% (w/v) LiDS and 1 mg/ml Proteinase K (Roche Diagnostics, catalogue no. 1000144).
  • a stock solution of the lysis buffer without Proteinase K was prepared and stored at ⁇ 20° C., freshly prepared Proteinase K was added before each experiment. All chemicals were purchased in highest quality (“for molecular biology”) from Sigma-Aldrich.
  • SA beads Streptavidin coated polystyrene beads with a diameter of 6.7 ⁇ m and a concentration of 3.8*10 4 beads/ ⁇ l were purchased from Spherotech (Cat. No. SVP-60-5).
  • a red oxazine dye was biotinylated using standard procedures. A 50 ⁇ M stock solution of the biotinylated red oxazine dye in DMSO was prepared.
  • correction images with appropriate dye solutions, pre-stained beads and dark images were recorded.
  • these images were used for correction of assay images with regard to camera noise and irregularities of illumination.
  • the image pairs from detectors 1 and 2 were spatially adjusted to achieve optimal overlap.
  • the signal intensity on the beads is linear dependent on the analyte concentration, i.e. in the present example the mRNA concentration.
  • an image of the sample was acquired at 690 nm by the second CCD detector. This image is called the reference image. At this wavelength, the emission of the biotinylated red oxazine dye is seen.
  • the fluorescence of the biotinylated red oxazine dye bound to the beads can be seen as a red ring in the reference image (see FIG. 6 , left picture).
  • This emission of the dyes bound to the beads can be distinguished from the background emission of the unbound biotinylated red oxazine dye through threshold techniques. This fluorescence intensity is constant and not dependent on the mRNA analyte concentration, see FIG. 5 for illustration. At extremely high mRNA is concentrations it may become inversely related to the mRNA concentrations due to limited streptavidin binding sites, however, under physiological conditions and in the experiments presented here this was not the case.
  • the analysis of the images was performed with image analysis software as follows. Segmentation of the beads from the background was performed on a pixel-basis in the reference image. As can be seen in FIG. 6 (left picture), detected beads are marked by a ring. A mask of these rings corresponding to detected beads was generated from the reference image. This mask was applied to the signal image (see FIG. 6 , right picture). Areas within the outer boundary of the ring were evaluated for fluorescence intensity stemming from the DO-analyte-CO complex bound to the bead. It was particularly advantageous to further reduce distorting background signals of free DO not completely quenched by determining the local background intensity in a circular region near every single bead in the signal image. Such local background intensity was then subtracted from the signal intensity.
  • the final result was the mean fluorescence intensity/bead pixel of the signal image.
  • the intensity was averaged over all correctly detected beads of the image.
  • the beads were usually comprised in wells of micro- or nanotiter plates and in some cases, several images were taken of each well. In this instance, the intensity was averaged over all images of one well.
  • a set of 19 detection oligonucleotides (DO) and 8 capture oligonucleotides (CO) was chosen.
  • DO were labeled with rhodamine-6G at the 5′ terminus.
  • the CO comprised a nucleotide sequence complementary to a sequence of the analyte, a T15-linker at the 5′ terminus and biotin.
  • the oligonucleotides were complementary to parts of the nucleotide sequence of the c-fos mRNA, had a minimal melting temperature Tm of 63° C. with a length varying between 17-26 nucleotides (nt), depending on GC-content.
  • the CO were chosen in a way that they were spaced relatively evenly between the DO. Furthermore, every DO was chosen to have the nucleotide A, C or T at the 5′ terminus, because G is a known quencher of rhodamine-6G fluorescence.
  • FRET Förster resonance energy transfer quencher oligonucleotides
  • oligonucleotides Stock solutions of oligonucleotides were prepared in TE-buffer (DEPC-treated water with 10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA pH 8.0) at a concentration of 100 ⁇ M and frozen at ⁇ 80° C.
  • DO-, CO-, UO- and FQO-mixtures were prepared (by adding equal amounts of each oligonucleotide solution) at a concentration of 100 ⁇ M.
  • the DO-mixture comprised 19 different detection oligonucleotides, each individual oligonucleotide in this mixture was present at a concentration of 5.26 ⁇ M.
  • the concentration of each individual oligonucleotide (FQO) was also 5.26 ⁇ M, whereas the individual concentration of each CO was 12.5 ⁇ M for CO-mixture and the individual concentration of each UO was 16.66 ⁇ M for UO-mixture.
  • the following table 1 shows a complete list of all oligonucleotides used for the detection of c-fos mRNA analyte.
  • the position given below for the CO, DO and UO refers to the position on a DNA strand complementary to the mRNA analyte.
  • A549 cells were stimulated with a cytokine mixture (16.5 ng/ml IFN- ⁇ , 41.7 ng/ml IL-1 ⁇ and 25 ng/ml TNF- ⁇ ) to induce c-fos mRNA expression. After 1 h the total RNA was isolated (QIAGEN, RNeasy Mini Protocol for RNA Cleanup). Then the 1143 nucleotides long coding sequence of c-fos (Genbank Accession-number K00650) was prepared by RT-PCR with two specific primers (forward primer: 5′ GCG MT TCC TCG GGC TTC AAC GCA GA 3′, reverse primer: 5′ ATG GAT CCC AGC GTG GGT GAG CTG A 3′).
  • primers contained an additional BamHI and EcoRI restriction site, respectively.
  • the success of the PCR was verified via Agarose gelelectrophoresis and the PCR product was purified (QIAquick PCR Purification Kit).
  • the PCR product was cloned into the vector pBluescript II KS(+/ ⁇ ) using the EcoRI and BamHI restriction sites.
  • the resulting product was used for transformation of E. coli Top10 F′ cells, several clones were picked and amplified.
  • the constructs were verified by complete sequencing and amplified in E. coli —TOP 10 F′ cells, purified (QIAquick PCR Purification Kit) and then linearized using BamHI.
  • the molecular weight of c-fos RNA is 401280 g/Mol.
  • HepG2 cells were seeded on a 10 cm tissue culture plate (Greiner bio-one, catalogue no. 664160) in 10 ml DMEM-F12 (Gibco, catalogue no. 31331-028) supplemented with 10% FCS (Gibco, catalogue no. 10500-064) and incubated at 37° C. and 5% CO 2 . After 48 hours the medium was changed to DMEM (Sigma, catalogue no. D 5921) supplemented with 0.1% sterile filtered HSA (Sigma, catalogue no. A 1653). After incubation for 24 h the medium was changed to DMEM supplemented with 0.1% HSA and 0.02% DMSO.
  • RNA was diluted with control lysate to yield the 8 different copy numbers/24 ⁇ l indicated in Table 2 below.
  • a hybridization solution was prepared using the CO, DO and UO mixture solutions described above. Appropriate volumes were added to lysis buffer to yield a final concentration of 7 nM of each CO, DO and UO. Furthermore, the hybridization solution contained 3.7*10 3 SA beads/ml.
  • RNA copy number/well copy number/24 ⁇ l concentration 1 * 10 8 6.9 pM 1 * 10 7 692 fM 5 * 10 6 346 fM 2.5 * 10 6 173 fM 1 * 10 6 69 fM 5 * 10 5 34.6 fM 2.5 * 10 5 17.3 fM 1 * 10 5 6.9 fM
  • RNA dilution Four 24 ⁇ l aliquots of each RNA dilution were transferred to the wells of a glass bottom, heat resistant measurement plate (NanoCarrierTM96/30, Evotec Technologies), respectively. 4 additional wells were filled with 24 ⁇ l of control lysate. To each well, 1 ⁇ l of hybridization solution was added resulting in a final concentration of 0.28 nM of each DO, CO and UO. The final SA bead number per well was 3700. The measurement plate was placed into a humid incubator (Kendro, HERACELL 150/70 CO2 INKUBATOR VA 230V) and incubated over night (for approximately 17 h) at 53° C. After this first hybridization, a DO-analyte-CO-bead-complex was formed (see also the schematic drawing of FIG. 1 ).
  • a quencher solution was prepared using the FQO mixture solution and the stock solution of biotinylated red oxazine dye described above. Appropriate volumes were added to lysis buffer to yield a final concentration of 72.8 nM of each FQO and a final concentration of 1.3 ⁇ M of the biotinylated red oxazine dye. 1 ⁇ l of the quencher solution was added to each well of the measurement plate, resulting in a final concentration of 2.8 nM for each FQO and 50 nM of the biotinylated red oxazine dye. The measurement plate was again placed into a humid incubator and incubated for 1 h at 35° C.
  • the results are listed in Table 3 and depicted in FIG. 7 .
  • the RNA copy number is linearly related to the fluorescence signal intensity of the detection oligonucleotides bound via analyte/capture oligonucleotides to the beads over a range of three orders of magnitude, namely between 10 5 -10 8 copies of RNA/well.
  • the upper limit of the linear range is 10 9 copies RNA/well, data not shown in FIG. 7 ; see FIG. 12 ).
  • the lower detection limit is more relevant for typical applications and is in the range of 5*10 5 copies of c-fos RNA or even below that can be distinguished reliably from the control.
  • HepG2 cells were seeded at a density of 2*10 6 cells in 10 ml medium/plate (corresponding to 2*10 5 cells/ml) in nine 10 cm tissue culture plates (Greiner bio-one, catalogue no. 664160) in DMEM-F12 (Gibco, catalogue no. 31331-028) supplemented with 10% FCS (Gibco, catalogue no. 10500-064).
  • the cells were incubated for 48 h at 37° C. with 5% CO 2 .
  • medium was changed to DMEM (Sigma, catalogue no. D 5921) supplemented with 0.1% sterile filtered HSA (Sigma, catalogue no. A 1653) and incubation was continued for 24 h at 37° C. with 5% CO 2 .
  • One control plate was used for cell counting, the final cell number was 1.5*10 7 cells/plate. After 1 h the stimulation mixture was removed and the cells were lysed by addition of 5 ml lysis buffer/plate, resulting in a cell number of 3*10 6 cells/ml. Immediately after the addition of the lysis buffer the plates were put on ice and after 15 mm stored at ⁇ 20° C. for 24 h.
  • a quencher solution was prepared using the FQO mixture solution and the stock solution of biotinylated red oxazine dye described above. Appropriate volumes were added to lysis buffer to yield a final concentration of 72.8 nM of each FQO and a final concentration of 1.3 ⁇ M of the biotinylated red oxazine dye. 1 ⁇ l of the quencher solution was added to each well of the measurement plate, resulting in a final concentration of 2.8 nM for each FQO and 50 nM of the biotinylated red oxazine dye. The measurement plate was again placed into a humid incubator and incubated for 1 h at 35° C. Then the plate was measured as described above.
  • the measured fluorescence intensity at 100 nM PMA equals a copy number of 3.03*10 6 copies mRNA/well (corresponding to 24 ⁇ l of lysate). Taking into account that 24 ⁇ l of lysate contained 7.2*10 4 lysed cells (see above), an average expression rate of 42 copies mRNA/cell was concluded.
  • a set of 20 detection oligonucleotides (DO) and 8 capture oligonucleotides (CO) was chosen.
  • DO detection oligonucleotides
  • CO capture oligonucleotides
  • the DO were labeled with rhodamine-6G at the 5′ terminus.
  • the CO comprised a nucleotide sequence complementary to a sequence of the analyte, a T15-linker at the 5′ terminus and biotin.
  • the oligonucleotides were complementary to parts of the nucleotide sequence of the cyp1A1 mRNA, had a minimal melting temperature Tm of 63° C.
  • oligonucleotides with a length varying between 18-25 nt (with the exception of an UO with less than 18 nt), depending on GC-content. They covered a 686 nt long part of the cyp1A1 mRNA (total length 1539 nt) between nucleotides 405 and 1091 without intervening gaps. This region was chosen to avoid regions with high homology to cyp3A4 (e.g. nt 325-363). One short homologous region could not be avoided and was therefore covered by an unlabelled oligonucleotide (see below).
  • DO and CO were chosen so as not to be complementary to each other (DO and CO being complementary to each other would result in unspecific binding of DO to the beads via their direct binding to CO).
  • 3 oligonucleotides had a too high degree of complementarity to others and were not labeled.
  • UO unlabeled oligonucleotides
  • a fourth unlabelled oligonucleotide was prepared to cover a region with a high degree of homology to cyp3A4 (31 Cy1-UO).
  • the CO were chosen in a way that they were spaced relatively evenly between the DO. Furthermore, every DO was chosen to have the nucleotide A, C or T at the 5′ terminus, because G is a known quencher of rhodamine-6G fluorescence.
  • FRET quencher oligonucleotides (FQO) were prepared. These were complementary to the 5′ terminal part of the DO, however, they were only 15 nt long, resulting in a lower minimal melting temperature Tm of 38° C. They were labeled with a red oxazine dye at the 3′ terminus. All oligonucleotides were synthesized according to standard procedures.
  • oligonucleotides were prepared in TE-buffer (DEPC-treated water with 10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA pH 8.0) at a concentration of 100 ⁇ M and frozen at ⁇ 80° C.
  • DO-, CO-, UO- and FQO-mixtures were prepared (by adding equal amounts of each oligonucleotide solution) at a concentration of 100 ⁇ M.
  • the concentration of each individual oligonucleotide in these mixtures was 5 ⁇ M for DO-mixture and FQO-mixture, 12.5 ⁇ M for CO-mixture and 25 ⁇ M for UO-mixture.
  • the following table 6 shows a complete list of all oligonucleotides used for the detection of cyp1A1 mRNA analyte.
  • the position given below for the CO, DO and UO refers to the position on a strand complementary to the mRNA analyte.
  • the cells were seeded at 1*10 4 cells/50 ⁇ l per well in three 384 titerplates (Greiner; catalogue number 781091) in DMEM-F12 supplemented with 10% FCS. After 24 h of incubation at 37° C. and 5% CO 2 , 10 ⁇ l of 3-methylcholanthrene (3-MC) in different concentrations was added for stimulation of cyp1A1 expression for 24 h at 37° C. and 5% CO 2 .
  • 3-methylcholanthrene (3-MC) 3-methylcholanthrene
  • the final 3-MC concentrations were 0 ⁇ M (control), 0 ⁇ M+0.02% DMSO (DMSO-control), 0.1 ⁇ M, 0.3 ⁇ M, 0.7 ⁇ M, 1 ⁇ M, 1.3 ⁇ M, 1.7 ⁇ M, 2 ⁇ M, 2.5 ⁇ M, 3 ⁇ M and 3.5 ⁇ M. On each plate each concentration was present 32 times.
  • 3-MC stock solution was prepared with DMSO and diluted with DMEM-F12+10% FCS, the final DMSO concentration in the wells never exceeded 0.02%. After 24 h the stimulation mix was removed, 50 ⁇ l of lysis buffer were added to each well and incubation took place for 15 min at 37° C., 5% CO 2 . Then the plate was frozen at ⁇ 20° C. for three days until the assay procedure was performed.
  • a quencher solution was prepared using the FQO mixture solution and the stock solution of biotinylated red oxazine dye described above. Appropriate volumes were added to lysis buffer to yield a final concentration of 72.8 nM of each FQO and a final concentration of 1.3 ⁇ M of the biotinylated red oxazine dye. 1 ⁇ l of the quencher solution was added to each well of the measurement plate, resulting in a final concentration of 2.8 nM for each FQO and 50 nM of the biotinylated red oxazine dye. The measurement plate was again placed into a humid incubator and incubated for 1 h at 35° C. Then the plate was measured as described above.
  • FIG. 9 The result is depicted in FIG. 9 .
  • 3-MC concentration used to stimulate expression of cyp1A1 mRNA
  • an increase in the average fluorescence intensity/bead pixel stemming from the detection oligonucleotide—mRNA analyte—capture oligonucleotide complex bound to beads can be observed.
  • the EC 50 determined for each plate was 0.8 ⁇ M with a standard deviation of 0.05 ⁇ M between the three plates. Thus, the results show an excellent reproducibility although the absolute values of the three plates differ.
  • This example is based on the images obtained according to example 1a and relates to FIGS. 10 and 11 .
  • image analysis was conducted utilizing the emission of the reporter labeling the beads (see reference images).
  • image analysis was performed without making use of such reference images and relied solely on the emission of the reporter labeling the detection oligonucleotides bound to the beads via the analyte-CO-complex.
  • the sensitivity of the assay is significantly reduced by at least one order of magnitude if one relies only on the emission of the reporter labeling the detection oligonucleotides bound to the beads via the analyte-CO-complex (see FIG. 10 ).
  • Bead recognition utilizing a reporter labeling the bead (second reporter) is advantageous because otherwise contaminations of the sample or sufficiently large aggregates of DO would be recognized erroneously as signal stemming from the first reporter of the detection oligonucleotide-analyte-complex.
  • the assay was in essence conducted as described in example 1a above. However, nine (instead of eight) c-fos RNA dilutions were prepared, see table 7 below. Furthermore eight (instead of four) 24 ⁇ l samples of each concentration were added to the wells of the measurement plate (NanocarrierTM96/30, Evotec Technologies). In contrast to example 1a only to four wells of each concentration the usual quencher solution (containing FQO and biotinlyated red oxazine dye) was added. To the other four wells, a modified solution without FQO was added, containing only the biotinlyated red oxazine dye.
  • RNA copy number/well c-fos copy number/24 ⁇ l concentration 1 * 10 9 69 pM 1 * 10 8 6.9 pM 1 * 10 7 692 fM 5 * 10 6 346 fM 2.5 * 10 6 173 fM 1 * 10 6 69 fM 5 * 10 5 34.6 fM 2.5 * 10 5 17.3 fM 1 * 10 5 6.9 fM Result
  • the specific quenching of free DO via the hybridization of FQO to these DO significantly reduces the fluorescence intensity of the background to ⁇ 25% of the values without FQO: 116 intensity counts/background pixel as opposed to 444 intensity counts/background pixel without FQO.
  • the strategy proposed by the present invention therefore improves significantly the sensitivity of the assay (in the present example by approximately one order of magnitude). This becomes visible in FIG. 12 .
  • no background signal intensity was determined in the is vicinity of the beads and subtracted from the signal intensity detected per bead pixel. This procedure was chosen to demonstrate the influence of utilizing FQOs according to the present invention.

Abstract

The present invention relates to a method for detecting an analyte in a sample comprising the steps of providing detection probes being labeled with a first reporter, which detection probes are capable of binding to the analyte, providing a solid support, providing capture probes being bound or capable of binding to the solid support, which capture probes are capable of binding to the analyte, thus concentrating the analyte on the solid support, contacting the sample with the detection probes, the solid support and the capture probes, and detecting the detection probes, wherein the detection of detection probes is conducted in the presence of quenching probes binding to surplus detection probes not being bound to the analyte and thereby quenching at least partially an emission of the first reporter of said surplus detection probes and/or the solid support is labeled with a second reporter different from the first reporter, imaging the sample at an emission wavelength of the second reporter, generating a mask obtained from imaging the sample at the emission wavelength of the second reporter and applying this mask to an image of the sample used for detecting the detection probes.

Description

  • The present invention pertains to a method for detecting an analyte in a sample utilizing probes interacting with the analytes.
  • The detection and preferably quantitative analysis of nucleic acids is an important tool in the molecular biology laboratory. Examples are genetic tests, virus diagnostics, and analysis of polymorphisms. To date a number of DNA/RNA quantification systems have been developed. Typically, such quantification systems rely on an amplification step being performed exponentially (realized by Polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which is based on a specific, multiple turnover replication of the nucleic acid section to be identified) or linearly (realized by enzymatic turnover). Many detection and quantification systems rely on detecting analytes by labeled probes added to the sample in surplus. A part of the labeled probes binds to the analytes. When the binding reaction is complete, the unbound labeled probed is washed away, and the amount of analyte is quantified by the amount of bound labeled probe. Typically such washing steps are indispensable to reduce the background signals stemming from unbound probes. However, washing steps are difficult to manage, if manageable at all, in an automated way. Automation, on the other hand, is a prerequisite for high throughput applications typical in mass diagnostics, drug testing and development and alike situations.
  • An object of the present invention is to provide a sensitive method for the detection of low concentrations of analytes, such as nucleic acids. The method should in particular be feasible (i) without additional amplification steps thereby allowing a direct detection of the analyte and (ii) in a homogeneous format without relying on washing or other separation steps.
  • In a first aspect, the object of the present invention is accomplished by a method for detecting an analyte in a sample comprising the steps of
      • providing detection probes being labeled with a first reporter, which detection probes are capable of binding to the analyte,
      • providing a solid support,
      • providing capture probes being bound or capable of binding to the solid support, which capture probes are capable of binding to the analyte, thus concentrating the analyte on the solid support,
      • contacting the sample with the detection probes, the solid support and the capture probes, and
      • detecting the detection probes, wherein
        • the detection of detection probes is conducted in the presence of quenching probes binding to surplus detection probes not being bound to the analyte and thereby quenching at least partially an emission of the first reporter of said surplus detection probes and/or
        • the solid support is labeled with a second reporter different from the first reporter, imaging the sample at an emission wavelength of the second reporter, generating a mask obtained from imaging the sample at the emission wavelength of the second reporter and applying this mask to an image of the sample used for detecting the detection probes.
  • In a second aspect, which is particularly suited for detecting nucleic acid analytes, the object of the present invention is accomplished by a method comprising the steps of
      • providing detection oligonucleotides being labeled with a first reporter, which detection oligonucleotides are capable of binding to the analyte,
      • providing a solid support,
      • providing capture oligonucleotides being bound or capable of binding to the solid support, which capture oligonucleotides are capable of binding to the analyte, thus concentrating the analyte on the solid support,
      • contacting the sample with the detection oligonucleotides, the solid support and the capture oligonucleotides, and
      • detecting the detection oligonucleotides, wherein
        • the detection of detection oligonucleotides is conducted in the presence of quenching oligonucleotides hybridizing to surplus detection oligonucleotides not being bound to the analyte and thereby quenching at least partially an emission of the first reporter of said surplus detection oligonucleotides and/or
        • the solid support is labeled with a second reporter different from the first reporter, imaging the sample at an emission wavelength of the second reporter, generating a mask obtained from imaging the sample at the emission wavelength of the second reporter and applying this mask to an image of the sample used for detecting the detection oligonucleotides.
  • It is understood that the above mentioned method steps of providing the detection probes/detection oligonucleotides, solid support and capture probes/capture oligonucleotides do not represent necessarily the sequential order.
  • The method of the invention is advantageous since no washing steps and no amplification of the signal is necessary. Consequently, in a preferred embodiment the method is indeed conducted in a homogeneous format. In the case of detecting nucleic acid analytes, a direct detection of the analytes by the use of detection oligonucleotides becomes possible. Furthermore, well established confocal detection systems and devices become applicable. The signal intensity of the first reporter labeling the detection probe bound to the analyte, which is e.g. fluorescent light, is directly linked to the amount of analytes, omitting any amplifying turnover step. Consequently, the present invention allows for a quantification of the analyte. This makes the method according to the present invention easy to handle, extremely robust and amenable to high throughput applications. Additional features are a dynamic range of 3 orders of magnitude, variability smaller than 15% and the feasibility to miniaturize the reaction volumes to about 25 μL, while reading and evaluating a 384 sample plate within about 10 minutes.
  • According to the invention it becomes possible to determine analytes such as proteins and nucleic acids. In particular, the analyte comprises at least two binding sites, one for the capture probe and another one for the detection probe.
  • It is preferred that the first and/or second reporter is luminescent, in particular fluorescent. In an additional embodiment, the first and/or second reporter is a dye. The detection probes, in particular the detection oligonucleotides, are labeled with a first fluorescent dye and/or the solid support is labeled with a second fluorescent dye. Typical dyes include rhodamine dyes such as rhodamine-6-G, tetramethylrhodamine or rhodamine green, oxazine dyes, fluorescein, and the like.
  • When detecting nucleic acid analytes, it is preferred that in a first step a hybrid between detection oligonucleotides and analytes is formed. This complex is bound to the solid support via the hybridization of the analyte to capture oligonucleotides. The concentration of the detection oligonucleotides should not be the limiting factor in this first hybridization reaction. Therefore, the detection oligonucleotides are typically added to the sample in high amounts because the actual amount of analyte is usually unknown. After the hybridization reaction between detection oligonucleotides and analytes is completed, usually surplus detection oligonucleotides not being bound to the analyte are present. The emission of the first reporter of these unbound detection oligonucleotides is the main cause of background signal, deteriorating the reliability of analysis. According to the present invention, the detection of detection oligonucleotides is conducted in the presence of quenching oligonucleotides hybridizing to surplus detection oligonucleotides not being bound to the analyte and thereby quenching at least partially an emission of the first reporter of said surplus detection oligonucleotides. It is preferred that the hybrid between detection oligonucleotides and analyte has a higher melting temperature than a hybrid between detection oligonucleotides and quenching oligonucleotides. Therefore, the complete method can be conducted at two different temperatures so that competition of quenching oligonucleotides with analyte can be avoided. The melting temperature of the hybrid between detection oligonucleotides and analyte is at least 1° C., more preferably at least 2° C., even more preferably at least 5° C. and most preferably at least 10° C. higher than the melting temperature of the hybrid between detection oligonucleotides and quenching oligonucleotides under test conditions. Generally speaking, contacting the sample with the detection oligonucleotides is performed under first hybridization conditions allowing the generation of a stable hybrid between detection oligonucleotides and analyte. Contacting the sample with the quenching oligonucleotides is performed under second hybridization conditions allowing the generation of a stable hybrid is between surplus detection oligonucleotides not being bound to the analyte and quenching oligonucleotides. Said second hybridization conditions do not destabilize the hybrid between detection oligonucleotides and analyte formed under said first hybridization conditions.
  • In a preferred embodiment, the capture probes, in particular the capture oligonucleotides, are covalently bound to the solid support. It is however alternatively also possible to utilize capture probes, in particular capture oligonucleotides, which are capable of binding to the solid support via affinity interaction. In this instance, the capture probes/capture oligonucleotides comprise a first affinity unit capable of binding to a second affinity unit attached to the solid support. As a typical example, the first affinity unit might be biotin and the second affinity unit might be streptavidin or avidin.
  • A typical solid support may be a bead, a cell, a pollen, or a plurality thereof. In a convenient embodiment of the invention, streptavidin coated polystyrene beads (from Spherotech, Libertyville, Ill. 60048) are used having a diameter of about 6 μm. According to the invention, the analyte is bound to the support by a capture probe. The capture probe of the invention may comprise a first portion bound to the support and a second portion capable of binding the analyte. Each support may comprise a multitude of capture probes.
  • However, it is also possible to utilize as a solid support the bottom of a sample carrier such as a slide or a titerplate. In this case, it is preferable to attach the capture probes covalently to discrete spots on such carrier or to attach the above mentioned second affinity unit thereto.
  • Typically, the first reporter labeling the detection probes/detection oligonucleotides differs from the second reporter labeling the solid support in its excitation wavelength and/or its emission wavelength. When choosing the reporters in such a way as to have different emission wavelengths (e.g. dyes emitting light at a wavelength of 565 nm for the first reporter and 690 nm for the second reporter; see examples below), these can be easily distinguished during detection. However, it is also possible to utilize reporters with different excitation wavelengths but the same emission wavelength. In this case, the first reporter and the second reporter are excited at different points in time and their emission is recorded correspondingly. Due to the time difference, the detected signal can be correlated to the different reporters. The difference in the excitation wavelength and/or emission wavelength between first and second reporter is typically at least 10 nm, preferably at least 20 nm, even more preferably at least 50 nm and most preferably at least 100 nm.
  • It is also preferred that the detection oligonucleotides comprise a linker sequence. This linker sequence links the sequence of the detection oligonucleotide complementary to the analyte with the first reporter. The capture oligonucleotides may also comprise a linker sequence, linking the sequence of the capture oligonucleotide complementary to analyte with the affinity unit or the solid support (see e.g. the T15 linker mentioned in the examples below). The use of the linker sequences serves to spatially separate the first and second reporter from each other (in the complex of detection oligonucleotides/analyte/capture oligonucleotides/solid support labeled with second reporter). Otherwise unfavorable interactions between these reporters may occur (e.g. FRET) which may reduce the signal emitted by the first reporter used to detect and quantify the analyte.
  • In an additional embodiment, the present invention is utilized in a multiplex format. At least two different analytes may be detected by providing at least two different sets of detection probes/detection oligonucleotides and at least two different sets of capture probes/capture oligonucleotides. The first set of detection oligonucleotides is complementary to the first analyte and the second set of detection oligonucleotides is complementary to the second analyte. The same applies to the capture oligonucleotides, accordingly. The different sets of detection probes/detection oligonucleotides are preferably labeled with different reporters. The reporters of one set are identical, have the same excitation wavelength and/or the same emission wavelength. Alternatively, the reporters of the detection probes/detection oligonucleotides are identical in the different sets. In this instance, it is preferred to utilize two different types of solid supports. The first analyte may be captured on the first solid support (such as a small bead) by a first affinity interaction. The second analyte may be captured on the second solid support (such as a large bead) by a second affinity interaction. The solid supports may be differentiated from each other by applying image analysis tools. Detecting the detection oligonucleotides bound to the first analyte can be conducted by utilizing a mask of the small beads whereas detecting the detection oligonucleotides bound to the second analyte can be conducted by utilizing a mask of the large beads.
  • According to the present invention, the detection of the detection probes/detection oligonucleotides can be performed applying imaging in combination with the generation of a mask. The solid support is labeled with a second reporter different from the one utilized to label the detection probes/detection oligonucleotides. An image is recorded at the emission wavelength of said second reporter. Thereafter, a mask is generated and applied to an image of the sample used for the above mentioned detection. It is preferred that the image recorded at the emission wavelength of the second reporter is recorded simultaneously with the image used for detecting the detection probes/detection oligonucleotides utilizing two detectors. This latter image is typically recorded at a wavelength different from the emission wavelength of the second reporter (see FIG. 5 below). The image of the sample used for detecting the detection probes/detection oligonucleotides typically is acquired at the emission wavelength of the first reporter. It is preferred to correct the image recorded at the emission wavelength of the second reporter in such a way that it spatially matches with the image used for detecting the detection probes/detection oligonucleotides. Alternatively, the latter image may be corrected to match the first image.
  • In another preferred embodiment, the quenching probes/quenching oligonucleotides comprise a quenching unit, said quenching unit preferably being a dye. In particular, the first reporter is a donor of a Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) donor-acceptor-pair and the quenching unit is an acceptor of said donor-acceptor-pair. Alternatively, the quenching unit is a dark quencher which quenches at least partially the emission of the first reporter by dissipating the energy of the excited state of the first reporter into the environment.
  • When quantifying the analyte, such quantification may be performed by determining an amount of detection probes/detection oligonucleotides bound to the analyte. The signal stemming from the first reporter labeling such bound probes (in the complex of detection probe/analyte/capture probe/solid support) is related to the amount of the analyte. The amount of detection probes/detection oligonucleotides bound to the analyte may be expressed as the emission intensity emitted by the first reporter.
  • The method according to the present invention preferably comprises the additional step of determining an intensity of a background emission in the vicinity of the solid support and considering such intensity when determining the amount of detection probes/detection oligonucleotides.
  • In general, the detection probes may be aptameres, oligonucleotides, or antibodies. Analytes may be proteins or nucleic acids, in particular mRNA. The sample potentially comprising the analyte may be a cell lysate, in particular a crude cell lysate, or an in vitro prepared sample. The method according to the present invention is particularly useful in screening for potentially pharmaceutically active substances, in diagnostics, or in determining any potential side effects of drugs.
  • As already outlined above, in the case that the probe having the first reporter is a fluorescent probe and there are only a few analytes present it normally happens that the probe is present in an excess. Non-bound probe then emits fluorescent light which may cause a lowering of the sensitivity of the measurement. Imaging can preferably be performed utilizing confocal optics. Confocal optics spatially limit the measurement volume to a very narrow well-defined focal plane thus reducing background signals. In addition, it is advantageous to add a quencher of a fluorescence of the first reporter unit and to reduce the background thereby. Due to utilizing quenching oligonucleotides complementary to the detection oligonucleotides and applying the above described specific hybridization conditions, it is possible to specifically quench the background fluorescence of the unbound detection oligonucleotides. This is done without quenching the signal fluorescence of the detection oligonucleotides bound to the analyte.
  • Additionally, the background signal can be eliminated by mathematical methods. For example, the background signal is quantified in the vicinity of the solid support (though having sufficient distance to it) and subtracted from the signal of first reporter.
  • The probe having the first reporter is used for detecting the actual analyte, whereas the second reporter serves as marker for the solid support itself to which the analyte is bound, if present. Thus, the second reporter allows the localization of the solid support and the subsequent generation of a mask which improves the accuracy of the measurement. In a preferred embodiment, the reporter are dyes having different absorption maxima and/or, if they are fluorescent dyes, different emission spectra. The skilled person readily understands how to choose the dyes according to the fluorescent filters in the measuring device which filters separate the excitation and/or emission bands of the two dyes.
  • In the following a brief description of the figures is given.
  • FIG. 1 depicts the result of a hybridization reaction utilizing detection oligonucleotides (DO), capture oligonucleotides (CO) and beads to detect a nucleic acid.
  • FIG. 2 depicts the measures taught by the present invention to improve the sensitivity of the assay principle shown in FIG. 1.
  • FIG. 3 shows an embodiment of the improved assay principle applying detection oligonucleotides labeled with rhodamine-6G, FRET quencher oligonucleotides and beads labeled with a red oxazine dye.
  • FIG. 4 depicts details of the assay principle taught by the present invention for the detection of c-fos mRNA.
  • FIG. 5 shows signal images and reference images of beads at different concentrations of the target RNA analyte. The signal image was recorded at the emission wavelength of the first reporter labeling the detection oligonucleotides (565 nm), whereas the reference image was recorded at the emission wavelength of the second reporter labeling the beads (690 nm).
  • FIG. 6 shows a strategy for image analysis according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 7 depicts the results of c-fos RNA titration. Due to the logarithmic scale, the control is represented as 1*103 copies (though in fact it does not contain any in vitro prepared c-fos RNA). The average fluorescence intensity per bead pixel relates to the amount of c-fos RNA analyte labeled with detection oligonucleotides and bound to the beads via the capture oligonucleotides.
  • FIG. 8 shows the average fluorescence intensity per bead pixel at various PMA concentrations (c-fos experiments). The fluorescence intensity depicted in this FIG. 8 stems from emission of the detection oligonucleotides bound indirectly to the bead (via the analyte/capture oligonucleotide; see also FIGS. 1 and 2).
  • FIG. 9 shows the average fluorescence intensity per bead pixel at various 3-methylcholanthrene concentrations (cyp1A1 experiments). The fluorescence intensity depicted in this FIG. 9 stems from emission of the detection oligonucleotides bound indirectly to the bead (via the analyte/capture oligonucleotide; see also FIGS. 1 and 2). The results of measuring three sample plates are depicted (see also example 2).
  • FIG. 10 relates to example 1a. It shows the average fluorescence intensity of the emission of the reporter labeling the detection oligonucleotides per bead pixel as a function of RNA copies per well (average of 4 wells per concentration). Due to the logarithmic scale, the control is represented as 1E+03 RNA copies/well. Two different kinds of image analysis have been performed. In the first analysis, the bead recognition was performed on the signal image obtained at the emission wavelength of the dye labeling the detection oligonucleotides. In the second analysis, the bead recognition was performed on the respective reference image obtained at the emission wavelength of the dye labeling the beads. The signal emission is related to the mRNA analyte concentration and thus decreases with decreasing mRNA concentration. This results in deteriorated bead recognition starting at a concentration of 5*106 copies/RNA (note the high standard deviation) and no bead recognition at all at concentrations below. This significantly deteriorates the lower detection limit and sensitivity of the assay. The corresponding images underlying this figure are shown in FIG. 11.
  • FIG. 11 relates to example 1a. Representative images from the image analysis of experiments depicted in FIGS. 7 and 10 are shown. FIG. 11 shows the results of bead recognition performed on (i) signal images obtained at the emission wavelength of the dye labeling the detection oligonucleotides and (ii) reference images obtained at the emission wavelength of the dye labeling the beads, at different concentrations of the target c-fos RNA analyte. The left column demonstrates that a reliable bead recognition performed on signal images is possible only in case of high analyte concentrations. At lower concentrations in the order of 2.5*106 RNA copies/well, beads are not recognizable anymore. This kind of bead recognition corresponds to an experimental set-up conducted without the use of the second dye for labeling the beads (independently of the analyte concentration). The right column demonstrates that the bead recognition performed on reference images functions independently of analyte concentration.
  • FIG. 12 shows the results of c-fos RNA titration with and without FQO (see also example 4). Due to the logarithmic scale, the control is represented as 1*103 copies (though in fact it does not contain any in vitro prepared c-fos RNA). The average fluorescence intensity at the emission wavelength of the first reporter per bead pixel relates to the amount of c-fos RNA analyte labeled with detection oligonucleotides and bound to the beads via the capture oligonucleotides. The figure demonstrates that the dynamic range of the signal fluorescence intensity is significantly broader in the presence of FQO than in its absence. Consequently, the lower detection limit for the analyte is improved in the presence of FQO.
  • The figures and various experiments conducted according to the present invention are explained in more detail in the following.
  • FIG. 1 depicts schematically that detection oligonucleotides (DO) labeled with a first dye are used to label the analyte nucleic acid. The resulting labeled complex is captured to streptavidin coated beads via hybridization of biotinylated capture oligonucleotides (CO). The use of a bead or other solid support is advantageous because the analyte is concentrated thereon.
  • FIG. 2 depicts measures according to the present invention that are taken alone or in combination to reach an improved sensitivity of the assay. The streptavidin coated beads may be labeled by biotinylated second dyes to allow their reliable detection independent of the analyte concentration. So called 2-channel measurements can be conducted by detecting both the signal of the labeled detection oligonucleotides bound to the analyte-CO-bead complex and the reference emission of the biotinylated second dye. In addition or alternatively, the background signal caused by unbound fluorescent detection oligonucleotides may be minimized using quencher oligonucleotides hybridizing to the free surplus detection oligonucleotides.
  • A specific embodiment of the assay principle according to the present invention is depicted in more detail in FIG. 3. A number of about 20 detection oligonucleotides (DO) marked with the fluorescent dye rhodamine-6G is used to label the target mRNA, i.e. the analyte, specifically. The resulting fluorescent complex is captured to streptavidin coated beads via hybridization of biotinylated so-called capture oligonucleotides (CO). The fluorescence intensity on the beads may be recorded using high speed dual channel confocal imaging. The fluorescence intensity of the detection oligonucleotides bound indirectly to the beads (via analyte/CO-complex) is linearly related to the mRNA concentration. To reach an improved sensitivity of the assay, additional steps can be taken according to the present invention, namely the unspecific labeling of the beads with a second color (such as biotinylated red oxazine dye) to allow their reliable detection independently of the RNA concentration. Furthermore, the background fluorescence caused by free surplus detection oligonucleotides can be minimized using FRET quencher oligonucleotides (FQO).
  • An even more detailed example is given in FIG. 4: The c-fos mRNA is labeled with two detection oligonucleotides (19 cF-DO and 20 cF-DO; for numbering of c-Fos oligonucleotides see Table 1). A biotinylated capture oligonucleotide (6 cf-CO) serves for binding to the bead (bead not depicted). In addition (lower right corner), the quenching of surplus DO (19 cF-DO) by its specific FQO (19 cF-FQO) is demonstrated.
  • In the following, the present invention is explained in more detail by the following examples. The general procedures described in the following section “Material and methods” are applicable to all examples.
  • Material and Methods
  • Cell Culture
  • HepG2 hepatoma cells were maintained in DMEM-F12 (Gibco, catalogue no. 31331-028), supplemented with 10% FCS (Gibco, catalogue no. 10500-064) at 37° C. and 5% CO2. A549 cells were maintained in DMEM-F12 (Gibco, catalogue no. 31331-028), supplemented with 5% FCS (Gibco, catalogue no. 10500-064) at 37° C. and 5% CO2.
  • Preparation of Lysis Buffer
  • The lysis buffer contained DEPC-treated water (RNase free) with 100 mM Tris/HCl pH 8.0, 10 mM EDTA pH 8.0, 0.5 M LiCl, 5 mM DTT, 1% (w/v) LiDS and 1 mg/ml Proteinase K (Roche Diagnostics, catalogue no. 1000144). A stock solution of the lysis buffer without Proteinase K was prepared and stored at −20° C., freshly prepared Proteinase K was added before each experiment. All chemicals were purchased in highest quality (“for molecular biology”) from Sigma-Aldrich.
  • Streptavidin Coated Beads
  • Streptavidin coated polystyrene beads (SA beads) with a diameter of 6.7 μm and a concentration of 3.8*104 beads/μl were purchased from Spherotech (Cat. No. SVP-60-5).
  • Preparation of Biotinylated Red Oxazine Dye
  • A red oxazine dye was biotinylated using standard procedures. A 50 μM stock solution of the biotinylated red oxazine dye in DMSO was prepared.
  • Detection
  • Fully automated dual-channel confocal imaging was performed with two independent cooled CCD detectors. Excitation wavelengths were 532 nm and 633 nm, a dichroic beam splitter with 630 nm was used and emission filters were 565/50 nm and 690/40 nm. Laser power was ˜500 μW for both wavelengths, measured at the entrance of the objective. Exposure times were usually in the range of 500-1000 ms. 1-5 image pairs/well of a standard titerplate housing the sample were recorded, each image had a size of 445×336 μm.
  • In addition, correction images with appropriate dye solutions, pre-stained beads and dark images (detector noise) were recorded. In combination with appropriate algorithms these images were used for correction of assay images with regard to camera noise and irregularities of illumination. Furthermore, the image pairs from detectors 1 and 2 were spatially adjusted to achieve optimal overlap.
  • Evaluation
  • An image of the sample was acquired at 565 nm by the first CCD detector. This image is called the signal image. At this wavelength, the emission of the detection oligonucleotides is seen. Therefore, in principle one can see the fluorescence emission of both the unbound detection oligonucleotides as well as the detection oligonucleotides bound specifically to the analyte (and consequently via the capture oligonucleotides to the beads). To distinguish these signals from each other, the present invention teaches to minimize the emission of the unbound detection oligonucleotides by the use of complementary quencher oligonucleotides. The signal intensity on the beads is linear dependent on the analyte concentration, i.e. in the present example the mRNA concentration.
  • In addition, an image of the sample was acquired at 690 nm by the second CCD detector. This image is called the reference image. At this wavelength, the emission of the biotinylated red oxazine dye is seen. The fluorescence of the biotinylated red oxazine dye bound to the beads can be seen as a red ring in the reference image (see FIG. 6, left picture). This emission of the dyes bound to the beads can be distinguished from the background emission of the unbound biotinylated red oxazine dye through threshold techniques. This fluorescence intensity is constant and not dependent on the mRNA analyte concentration, see FIG. 5 for illustration. At extremely high mRNA is concentrations it may become inversely related to the mRNA concentrations due to limited streptavidin binding sites, however, under physiological conditions and in the experiments presented here this was not the case.
  • The analysis of the images was performed with image analysis software as follows. Segmentation of the beads from the background was performed on a pixel-basis in the reference image. As can be seen in FIG. 6 (left picture), detected beads are marked by a ring. A mask of these rings corresponding to detected beads was generated from the reference image. This mask was applied to the signal image (see FIG. 6, right picture). Areas within the outer boundary of the ring were evaluated for fluorescence intensity stemming from the DO-analyte-CO complex bound to the bead. It was particularly advantageous to further reduce distorting background signals of free DO not completely quenched by determining the local background intensity in a circular region near every single bead in the signal image. Such local background intensity was then subtracted from the signal intensity.
  • The final result was the mean fluorescence intensity/bead pixel of the signal image. In general, the intensity was averaged over all correctly detected beads of the image. The beads were usually comprised in wells of micro- or nanotiter plates and in some cases, several images were taken of each well. In this instance, the intensity was averaged over all images of one well.
  • EXAMPLE 1 Detection of c-fos mRNA
  • Preparation of Oligonucleotides (DO, CO, UO and FQO)
  • A set of 19 detection oligonucleotides (DO) and 8 capture oligonucleotides (CO) was chosen. The DO were labeled with rhodamine-6G at the 5′ terminus. The CO comprised a nucleotide sequence complementary to a sequence of the analyte, a T15-linker at the 5′ terminus and biotin. The oligonucleotides were complementary to parts of the nucleotide sequence of the c-fos mRNA, had a minimal melting temperature Tm of 63° C. with a length varying between 17-26 nucleotides (nt), depending on GC-content. They covered a 676 nt long part of the c-fos mRNA (total length 1143 nt) between nucleotides 161 and 837 without intervening gaps. The DO and CO were chosen in such a way that they were not complementary to each other (DO and CO being complementary to each other would result in unspecific binding of DO to the beads via their direct binding to CO). 6 additional oligonucleotides had a too high degree of complementarity to others and were not labeled. These unlabeled oligonucleotides (UO) were nevertheless prepared and added to the hybridization solution to ensure that the respective part of the c-fos mRNA was completely covered and thus in a double-stranded, more stable conformation. The CO were chosen in a way that they were spaced relatively evenly between the DO. Furthermore, every DO was chosen to have the nucleotide A, C or T at the 5′ terminus, because G is a known quencher of rhodamine-6G fluorescence.
  • In addition, a set of 19 FRET (Förster resonance energy transfer) quencher oligonucleotides (FQO) was prepared. These were complementary to the 5′ terminal part of the respective DO, however, they were only 15 nt long, resulting in a lower minimal melting temperature Tm of ˜42° C. They were labeled with a red oxazine dye at the 3′ terminus. All oligonucleotides were synthesized according to standard procedures.
  • Stock solutions of oligonucleotides were prepared in TE-buffer (DEPC-treated water with 10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA pH 8.0) at a concentration of 100 μM and frozen at −80° C. DO-, CO-, UO- and FQO-mixtures were prepared (by adding equal amounts of each oligonucleotide solution) at a concentration of 100 μM. The DO-mixture comprised 19 different detection oligonucleotides, each individual oligonucleotide in this mixture was present at a concentration of 5.26 μM. For the FQO-mixture, the concentration of each individual oligonucleotide (FQO) was also 5.26 μM, whereas the individual concentration of each CO was 12.5 μM for CO-mixture and the individual concentration of each UO was 16.66 μM for UO-mixture.
  • The following table 1 shows a complete list of all oligonucleotides used for the detection of c-fos mRNA analyte. The position given below for the CO, DO and UO refers to the position on a DNA strand complementary to the mRNA analyte.
    TABLE 1
    List of oligonucleotides used for the detection
    of c-fos mRNA
    position name sequence
    8 CO (capture oligonucleotides) comprising a
    linker of 15 T-nucleotides (T15) and biotin at-
    tached to 5′ terminus
    258-276  1 cF-CO Biotin - 5′ -T15 -
    ggctctggtctgcgatggg - 3′
    277-296  2 cF-CO Biotin - 5′ -T15 -
    gggactccgaaagggtgagg - 3′
    394-420  3 cF-CO Biotin - 5′ -T15 -
    ccttttctcttcttcttctggagataa - 3′
    421-441  4 cF-CO Biotin - 5′ -T15 -
    attcctttcccttcggattct - 3′
    528-548  5 cF-CO Biotin - 5′ -T15 -
    atctcggtctgcaaagcagac - 3′
    549-568  6 cF-CO Biotin - 5′ -T15 -
    tctccttcagcaggttggca - 3′
    633-655  7 cF-CO Biotin - 5′ -T15 -
    ccacagacatctcttctgggaag - 3′
    656-676  8 cF-CO Biotin - 5′ -T15 -
    ccccagtcagatcaagggaag - 3′
    19 DO (detection oligos) 5′ labeled with
    rhodamine-6G (Rh6G)
    161-182  9 cF-DO Rh6G - 5′ -
    atgaagttggcactggagacgg - 3′
    183-200 10 cF-DO Rh6G - 5′ - atggcagtgaccgtggga -
    3′
    201-219 11 cF-DO Rh6G - 5′ -
    caggtccggactggtcgag - 3′
    220-238 12 cF-DO Rh6G - 5′ -
    cgggctgcaccagccactg - 3′
    312-329 13 cF-DO Rh6G - 5′ - ccagccctggagtaagcc -
    3′
    330-352 14 cF-DO Rh6G - 5′ -
    ctcctgtcatggtcttcacaacg - 3′
    353-371 15 cF-DO Rh6G - 5′ -
    ccaatgctctgcgctcggc - 3′
    372-393 16 cF-DO Rh6G - 5′ -
    ctgttccaccttgcccctcctg - 3′
    462-478 17 cF-DO Rh6G - 5′ - ccctcctccggttgcgg -
    3′
    479-501 18 cF-DO Rh6G - 5′ -
    cgcttggagtgtatcagtcagct - 3′
    569-592 19 cF-DO Rh6G - 5′ -
    ccaggatgaactctagtttttcct - 3′
    593-611 20 cF-DO Rh6G - 5′ -
    caggcaggtcggtgagctg - 3′
    612-632 21 cF-DO Rh6G - 5′ -
    cccaggtcatcagggatcttg - 3′
    696-715 22 cF-DO Rh6G - 5′ -
    aggcctcctcagactccggg - 3′
    716-733 23 cF-DO Rh6G - 5′ - tgaggagaggcagggtga -
    3′
    734-754 24 cF-DO Rh6G - 5′ -
    agggcttgggctcagggtcat - 3′
    755-775 25 cF-DO Rh6G - 5′ -
    tgctcttgacaggttccactg - 3′
    796-815 26 cF-DO Rh6G - 5′ -
    aagtcatcaaagggctcggt - 3′
    816-837 27 cF-DO Rh6G - 5′ -
    cctggatgatgctgggaacagg - 3′
    6 UO (unlabeled oligonucleotides)
    239-257 28 cF-UO 5′ - gccacagaggagacgaggg - 3′
    297-311 29 cF-UO 5′ - ccagcggagggggcg - 3′
    442-461 30 cF-UO 5′ - catttggctgcagccatctt - 3′
    502-527 31 cF-UO 5′ -
    ttctcatcttctagttggtctgtctc - 3′
    677-695 32 cF-UO 5′ - gtggcaacctctggcaggc - 3′
    776-795 33 cF-UO 5′ - cttcagctccatgctgctga - 3′
    19 FQO (FRET quencher oligos) 3′ labeled with red
    oxazine dye (RO)
     9 cF-DO  9 cF-FQO 5′ - cag tgc caa ctt cat - 3′ -
    RO
    10 cF-DO 10 cF-FQO 5′ - cac ggt cac tgc cat - 3′ -
    RO
    11 cF-DO 11 cF-FQO 5′ - acc agt ccg gac ctg - 3′ -
    RO
    12 cF-DO 12 cF-FQO 5′ - ggc tgg tgc agc ccg - 3′ -
    RO
    13 cF-DO 13 cF-FQO 5′ - tta ctc cag ggc tgg - 3′ -
    RO
    14 cF-DO 14 cF-FQO 5′ - aga cca tga cag gag - 3′ -
    RO
    15 cF-DO 15 cF-FQO 5′ - agc gca gag cat tgg - 3′ -
    RO
    16 cF-DO 16 cF-FQO 5′ - ggc aag gtg gaa cag - 3′ -
    RO
    17 cF-DO 17 cF-FQO 5′ - gca acc gga gga ggg - 3′ -
    RO
    18 cF-DO 18 cF-FQO 5′ - gat aca ctc caa gcg - 3′ -
    RO
    19 cF-DO 19 cF-FQO 5′ - tag agt tca tcc tgg - 3′ -
    RO
    20 cF-DO 20 cF-FQO 5′ - tca ccg acc tgc ctg - 3′ -
    RO
    21 cF-DO 21 cF-FQO 5′ - ccc tga tga cct ggg - 3′ -
    RO
    22 cF-DO 22 cF-FQO 5′ - agt ctg agg agg cct - 3′ -
    RO
    23 cF-DO 23 cF-FQO 5′ - ccc tgc ctc tcc tca - 3′ -
    RO
    24 cF-DO 24 cF-FQO 5′ - ctg agc cca agc cct - 3′ -
    RO
    25 cF-DO 25 cF-FQO 5′ - aac ctg tca aga gca - 3′ -
    RO
    26 cF-DO 26 cE-FQO 5′ - gcc ctt tga tga ctt - 3′ -
    RO
    27 cF-DO 27 cF-FQO 5′ - cca gca tca tcc agg - 3′ -
    RO
  • Example 1a) c-fos RNA Titration
  • In Vitro Preparation of c-fos RNA
  • A549 cells were stimulated with a cytokine mixture (16.5 ng/ml IFN-γ, 41.7 ng/ml IL-1β and 25 ng/ml TNF-α) to induce c-fos mRNA expression. After 1 h the total RNA was isolated (QIAGEN, RNeasy Mini Protocol for RNA Cleanup). Then the 1143 nucleotides long coding sequence of c-fos (Genbank Accession-number K00650) was prepared by RT-PCR with two specific primers (forward primer: 5′ GCG MT TCC TCG GGC TTC AAC GCA GA 3′, reverse primer: 5′ ATG GAT CCC AGC GTG GGT GAG CTG A 3′). These primers contained an additional BamHI and EcoRI restriction site, respectively. The success of the PCR was verified via Agarose gelelectrophoresis and the PCR product was purified (QIAquick PCR Purification Kit). The PCR product was cloned into the vector pBluescript II KS(+/−) using the EcoRI and BamHI restriction sites. The resulting product was used for transformation of E. coli Top10 F′ cells, several clones were picked and amplified. The constructs were verified by complete sequencing and amplified in E. coli—TOP 10 F′ cells, purified (QIAquick PCR Purification Kit) and then linearized using BamHI. The linearized probe was used for in vitro transcription of RNA (Promega, Riboprobe System—T3/T7 Kit) using T3 RNA Polymerase. The resulting product was subjected to DNAse digestion and afterwards purified (QIAGEN, RNeasy Mini Protocol for RNA Cleanup). The RNA amount was determined (Agilent 2001 Bioanalyzer) to be 901 ng/μl=2.2 μM=1.35*1012 copies RNA/μl (mean value of five independent measurements). The molecular weight of c-fos RNA is 401280 g/Mol.
  • Preparation of c-fos Control Lysate
  • 3*106 HepG2 cells were seeded on a 10 cm tissue culture plate (Greiner bio-one, catalogue no. 664160) in 10 ml DMEM-F12 (Gibco, catalogue no. 31331-028) supplemented with 10% FCS (Gibco, catalogue no. 10500-064) and incubated at 37° C. and 5% CO2. After 48 hours the medium was changed to DMEM (Sigma, catalogue no. D 5921) supplemented with 0.1% sterile filtered HSA (Sigma, catalogue no. A 1653). After incubation for 24 h the medium was changed to DMEM supplemented with 0.1% HSA and 0.02% DMSO. No PMA (Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate) was added so that no c-fos expression was induced. The cells were incubated for 1 h at 37° C. and 5% CO2. Then the medium was removed and 5 ml lysis buffer was added, incubated for 15 min at 37° C. and 5% CO2 and then mixed by repeated pipetting. This control lysate was stored at −20° C.
  • Assay Procedure
  • The in vitro prepared RNA was diluted with control lysate to yield the 8 different copy numbers/24 μl indicated in Table 2 below. A hybridization solution was prepared using the CO, DO and UO mixture solutions described above. Appropriate volumes were added to lysis buffer to yield a final concentration of 7 nM of each CO, DO and UO. Furthermore, the hybridization solution contained 3.7*103 SA beads/ml.
    TABLE 2
    c-fos RNA copy number/well
    copy number/24 μl (=copy final RNA
    number/well) concentration
    1 * 108 6.9 pM
    1 * 107 692 fM
    5 * 106 346 fM
    2.5 * 106   173 fM
    1 * 106 69 fM
    5 * 105 34.6 fM
    2.5 * 105   17.3 fM
    1 * 105 6.9 fM
  • Four 24 μl aliquots of each RNA dilution were transferred to the wells of a glass bottom, heat resistant measurement plate (NanoCarrier™96/30, Evotec Technologies), respectively. 4 additional wells were filled with 24 μl of control lysate. To each well, 1 μl of hybridization solution was added resulting in a final concentration of 0.28 nM of each DO, CO and UO. The final SA bead number per well was 3700. The measurement plate was placed into a humid incubator (Kendro, HERACELL 150/70 CO2 INKUBATOR VA 230V) and incubated over night (for approximately 17 h) at 53° C. After this first hybridization, a DO-analyte-CO-bead-complex was formed (see also the schematic drawing of FIG. 1).
  • The next day a quencher solution was prepared using the FQO mixture solution and the stock solution of biotinylated red oxazine dye described above. Appropriate volumes were added to lysis buffer to yield a final concentration of 72.8 nM of each FQO and a final concentration of 1.3 μM of the biotinylated red oxazine dye. 1 μl of the quencher solution was added to each well of the measurement plate, resulting in a final concentration of 2.8 nM for each FQO and 50 nM of the biotinylated red oxazine dye. The measurement plate was again placed into a humid incubator and incubated for 1 h at 35° C. After this second hybridization, a situation was achieved as depicted in FIG. 3. The emission of the free (unbound) detection oligonucleotides was quenched upon hybridization to the FRET quencher oligonucleotides. The biotinylated red oxazine dye served to generate a reference emission for the reliable detection of the beads. Then the plate was measured as described above.
  • Results
  • The results are listed in Table 3 and depicted in FIG. 7. The RNA copy number is linearly related to the fluorescence signal intensity of the detection oligonucleotides bound via analyte/capture oligonucleotides to the beads over a range of three orders of magnitude, namely between 105-108 copies of RNA/well. (In fact the upper limit of the linear range is 109 copies RNA/well, data not shown in FIG. 7; see FIG. 12). However, the lower detection limit is more relevant for typical applications and is in the range of 5*105 copies of c-fos RNA or even below that can be distinguished reliably from the control. A linear fit of the data shown in FIG. 7 resulted in the equation y=1.06*106×−3.444. This calibration was used in example 1b for the calculation of mRNA copy number/cell.
    TABLE 3
    Results of c-fos RNA titration
    RNA average fluorescence signal intensity/bead pixel
    copies/ standard
    well well 1 well 2 well 3 well 4 mean deviation
    1.0 * 108 912.8 1271.2 1010.1 943.9 1034.5 162.9
    1.0 * 107 95.3 86.3 84.0 81.1 86.7 6.1
    5.0 * 106 36.2 47.0 35.5 47.1 41.5 6.5
    2.5 * 106 24.5 24.2 22.1 20.6 22.8 1.8
    1.0 * 106 8.6 10.2 7.5 11.8 9.5 1.9
    5.0 * 105 5.1 4.5 6.4 6.9 5.7 1.1
    2.5 * 105 3.4 3.1 2.7 3.0 3.1 0.3
    1.25 * 105  2.3 1.4 1.5 1.8 1.7 0.4
    control 2.1 1.7 0.5 0.5 1.2 0.8
      (“1 * 103”)
  • Example 1b) Expression of c-fos mRNA in HepG2 Cells
  • HepG2 cells were seeded at a density of 2*106 cells in 10 ml medium/plate (corresponding to 2*105 cells/ml) in nine 10 cm tissue culture plates (Greiner bio-one, catalogue no. 664160) in DMEM-F12 (Gibco, catalogue no. 31331-028) supplemented with 10% FCS (Gibco, catalogue no. 10500-064). The cells were incubated for 48 h at 37° C. with 5% CO2. Then medium was changed to DMEM (Sigma, catalogue no. D 5921) supplemented with 0.1% sterile filtered HSA (Sigma, catalogue no. A 1653) and incubation was continued for 24 h at 37° C. with 5% CO2. Then the cells were incubated with PMA (Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate, Sigma, catalogue no. P1585) for 1 h at 37° C. and 5% CO2 to induce expression of c-fos. 500 μl of appropriate PMA dilutions in DMEM with 0.1% HSA were added, for final concentrations refer to table 4 below.
    TABLE 4
    PMA concentrations
    plate
    number PMA concentration
    1 0 nM (control)
    2 0 nM, 0.1% DMSO (DMSO-
    control)
    3 0.5 nM
    4 1 nM
    5 10 nM
    6 100 nM
    7 500 nM
    8 1 μM
  • One control plate was used for cell counting, the final cell number was 1.5*107 cells/plate. After 1 h the stimulation mixture was removed and the cells were lysed by addition of 5 ml lysis buffer/plate, resulting in a cell number of 3*106 cells/ml. Immediately after the addition of the lysis buffer the plates were put on ice and after 15 mm stored at −20° C. for 24 h.
  • Assay Procedure
  • Eight 24 μl aliquots (each corresponding to 7.2*104 lysed cells) of the cell lysate of each PMA concentration were added to the wells of a heat-resistant glass bottom plate (Nanocarrier™ 384/30, Evotec Technologies), respectively. A hybridization solution was prepared using the CO, DO and UO mixture solutions described above. Appropriate volumes were added to lysis buffer to yield a final concentration of 7 nM of each CO, DO and UO. Furthermore, the hybridization solution contained 3.7*103 SA beads/ml.
  • To each well, 1 μl of hybridization solution was added resulting in a final concentration of 0.28 nM of each DO, CO and UO. The final SA bead number per well was 3700. The measurement plate was placed into a humid incubator (Kendro, HERACELL 150/70 CO2 INKUBATOR VA 230V) and incubated over night (for approximately 17 h) at 53° C.
  • The next day a quencher solution was prepared using the FQO mixture solution and the stock solution of biotinylated red oxazine dye described above. Appropriate volumes were added to lysis buffer to yield a final concentration of 72.8 nM of each FQO and a final concentration of 1.3 μM of the biotinylated red oxazine dye. 1 μl of the quencher solution was added to each well of the measurement plate, resulting in a final concentration of 2.8 nM for each FQO and 50 nM of the biotinylated red oxazine dye. The measurement plate was again placed into a humid incubator and incubated for 1 h at 35° C. Then the plate was measured as described above.
  • Results
  • The results are listed in Table 5 and depicted in FIG. 8.
  • With increasing PMA concentration (used to stimulate expression of c-fos mRNA) an increase in the average fluorescence intensity/bead pixel stemming from the detection oligonucleotide—mRNA analyte—capture oligonucleotide complex bound to beads can be observed. Thus, PMA induced a strong increase in c-fos expression with an EC50 of 484 nM. This is in the same order of magnitude as the EC50 that can be estimated from published results (Northern Blot) (Arts, J., Grimbergen, J., Bosma, P. J., Rahmsdorf, H. J., and Kooistra, T. (1996). Role of c-Jun and proximal phorbol 12-myristate-13acetate-(PMA)-responsive elements in the regulation of basal and PMA-stimulated plasminogen-activator inhibitor-1 gene expression in HepG2. Eur. J. Biochem. 241, 393-402). The z′ values (Zhang J H, Chung T D, Oldenburg K R: A Simple Statistical Parameter for Use in Evaluation and Validation of High Throughput Screening Assays. J Biomol Screen 1999;4:67-73) are positive down to 100 nM PMA, thus the reliable differentiation between control and stimulated sample down to a concentration of 100 nM PMA in high throughput screening (HTS) is possible.
  • Using the calibration of example 1a, the measured fluorescence intensity at 100 nM PMA equals a copy number of 3.03*106 copies mRNA/well (corresponding to 24 μl of lysate). Taking into account that 24 μl of lysate contained 7.2*104 lysed cells (see above), an average expression rate of 42 copies mRNA/cell was concluded.
    TABLE 5
    Results of c-fos mRNA expression in HepG2 cells
    PMA average fluorescence signal
    concentration intensity/bead pixel
    [nM] Mean std CV % z′
    0 (control) 2.15 1.31 60.68
    0 (control 1.09 0.51 47.17
    DMSO)
    0.5 1.51 0.97 64.14 −9.58
    1 1.53 0.63 41.05 −6.75
    10 4.84 1.74 35.97 −0.80
    100 14.29 2.46 17.24 0.32
    500 24.44 6.48 26.52 0.10
    1000 30.03 5.97 19.89 0.33
  • EXAMPLE 2 Expression of cyp1A1 mRNA in HepG2 Cells
  • Preparation of Oligonucleotides (DO, CO and FQO)
  • A set of 20 detection oligonucleotides (DO) and 8 capture oligonucleotides (CO) was chosen. The DO were labeled with rhodamine-6G at the 5′ terminus. The CO comprised a nucleotide sequence complementary to a sequence of the analyte, a T15-linker at the 5′ terminus and biotin. The oligonucleotides were complementary to parts of the nucleotide sequence of the cyp1A1 mRNA, had a minimal melting temperature Tm of 63° C. (with the exception of two unlabelled oligonucleotides with a Tm of 55° C.) with a length varying between 18-25 nt (with the exception of an UO with less than 18 nt), depending on GC-content. They covered a 686 nt long part of the cyp1A1 mRNA (total length 1539 nt) between nucleotides 405 and 1091 without intervening gaps. This region was chosen to avoid regions with high homology to cyp3A4 (e.g. nt 325-363). One short homologous region could not be avoided and was therefore covered by an unlabelled oligonucleotide (see below).
  • The DO and CO were chosen so as not to be complementary to each other (DO and CO being complementary to each other would result in unspecific binding of DO to the beads via their direct binding to CO). 3 oligonucleotides had a too high degree of complementarity to others and were not labeled. These unlabeled oligonucleotides (UO) were nevertheless prepared and added to the hybridization solution to ensure that the respective part of the cyp1A1 mRNA was completely covered and thus in a double-stranded, more stable conformation. A fourth unlabelled oligonucleotide was prepared to cover a region with a high degree of homology to cyp3A4 (31 Cy1-UO).
  • The CO were chosen in a way that they were spaced relatively evenly between the DO. Furthermore, every DO was chosen to have the nucleotide A, C or T at the 5′ terminus, because G is a known quencher of rhodamine-6G fluorescence.
  • In addition, a set of 20 FRET quencher oligonucleotides (FQO) was prepared. These were complementary to the 5′ terminal part of the DO, however, they were only 15 nt long, resulting in a lower minimal melting temperature Tm of 38° C. They were labeled with a red oxazine dye at the 3′ terminus. All oligonucleotides were synthesized according to standard procedures.
  • Stock solutions of oligonucleotides were prepared in TE-buffer (DEPC-treated water with 10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA pH 8.0) at a concentration of 100 μM and frozen at −80° C. DO-, CO-, UO- and FQO-mixtures were prepared (by adding equal amounts of each oligonucleotide solution) at a concentration of 100 μM. The concentration of each individual oligonucleotide in these mixtures was 5 μM for DO-mixture and FQO-mixture, 12.5 μM for CO-mixture and 25 μM for UO-mixture.
  • The following table 6 shows a complete list of all oligonucleotides used for the detection of cyp1A1 mRNA analyte. The position given below for the CO, DO and UO refers to the position on a strand complementary to the mRNA analyte.
    TABLE 6
    List of oligonucleotides used for the detection
    of cyp1A1 mRNA
    position Name sequence
    8 CO (capture oligonucleotides) comprising a
    linker of 15 T-nucleotides (T15) and biotin
    attached to 5′ terminus
     505-525  1 Cy1-CO Biotin - 5′ - T15 -
    ctgcaacgtgcttatcaggac - 3′
     526-544  2 Cy1-CO Biotin - 5′ - T15 -
    caggccctgccatcagctc - 3′
     633-656  3 Cy1-CO Biotin - 5′ -T15 -
    ttgactaggctaagcagttcttgg - 3′
     657-679  4 Cy1-CO Biotin - 5′ -T15 -
    cctccccgaaattattattcagg - 3′
     745-766  5 Cy1-CO Biotin - 5′ -T15-
    cattcaggtccttgaaggcatt - 3′
     767-791  6 Cy1-CO Biotin - 5′ -T15-
    ttctgcatgaagctgtagaacttct -
    3′
     987-1008  7 Cy1-CO Biotin - 5′ -T15-
    gttcatcaccaaatacatgagg - 3′
    1033-1055  8 Cy1-CO Biotin - 5′ -T15-
    ccaatcactgtgtctagctcctc - 3′
    +TL,1, 20 DO (detection oligos) 5′ labelled with
    rhodamine-6G (Rh6G)
     405-422  9 Cy1-DO Rh6G - 5′ -
    ccattctgggccaggcgc - 3′
     423-445 10 Cy1-DO Rh6G - 5′ -
    aggcaatggagaaacttttcagg - 3′
     446-463 11 Cy1-DO Rh6G - 5′ -
    ttgaggaggctgggtcag - 3′
     464-485 12 Cy1-DO Rh6G - 5′ -
    tgctcttccaggtagcaggagg - 3′
     570-592 13 Cy1-DO Rh6G - 5′ -
    tgacattggtcactgataccacc - 3′
     593-611 14 Cy1-DO Rh6G - 5′ -
    ccaaagcaaatggcacaga - 3′
     612-632 15 Cy1-DO Rh6G - 5′ -
    tggttgtggtcatagcgccgg - 3′
     680-699 16 Cy1-DO Rh6G-5′ -
    tgggtttccagagccaacca - 3′
     700-722 17 Cy1-DO Rh6G - 5′ -
    cgaagaatagggatgaactcagc - 3′
     723-744 18 Cy1-DO Rh6G - 5′ -
    cagggaagggttgggtaggtag - 3′
     792-814 19 Cy1-DO Rh6G - 5′ -
    ttttgtagtgctccttgaccatc - 3′
     815-833 20 Cy1-DO Rh6G - 5′ -
    atgtggcccttctcaaagg - 3′
     834-856 21 Cy1-DO Rh6G - 5′ -
    tcaggctgtctgtgatgtcccgg - 3′
     857-878 22 Cy1-DO Rh6G - 5′ -
    tgcttctcctgacagtgctcaa - 3′
     879-898 23 Cy1-DO Rh6G - 5′ -
    cattggcgttctcatccagc - 3′
     899-922 24 Cy1-DO Rh6G - 5′ -
    tgatcttctcatctgacagctgga - 3′
     923-946 25 Cy1-DO Rh6G - 5′ -
    caaagaggtccaagacgatgaaa - 3′
     947-967 26 Cy1-DO Rh6G - 5′ -
    tgactgtgtcaaacccagctc - 3′
    1009-1032 27 Cy1-DO Rh6G - 5′ -
    ttggatctttctctgtaccctggg - 3′
    1070-1091 28 Cy1-DO Rh6G - 5′ -
    tgggatctgtcagagagccggg - 3′
    4 UO (unlabelled oligonucleotides)
     486-504 29 Cy1-UO 5′ - ctcagcctccttgctcaca - 3′
     545-569 30 Cy1-UO 5′ -
    acatacctgtaggggttaaagtgcc -
    3′
     968-986 31 Cy1-UO 5′ - ctccaggagatagcagttg - 3′
    1056-1069 32 Cy1-UO 5′ - gccgccgtgacctg - 3′
    20 FQO (FRET quencher oligos) 3′ labeled with red
    oxazine dye (RO)
     9 Cy1-DO  9 Cy1-FQO 5′ - cct ggc cca gaa tgg -
    3′ - RO
    10 Cy1-DO 10 Cy1-FQO 5′ - gtt tct cca ttg cct -
    3′ - RO
    11 Cy1-DO 11 Cy1-FQO 5′ - acc cag cct cct caa -
    3′ - RO
    12 Cy1-DO 12 Cy1-FQO 5′ - cta cct gga aga gca -
    3′ - RO
    13 Cy1-DO 13 Cy1-FQO 5′ - cag tga cca atg tca -
    3′ - RO
    14 Cy1-DO 14 Cy1-FQO 5′ - tgc cat ttg ctt tgg -
    3′ - RO
    15 Cy1-DO 15 Cy1-FQO 5′ - cta tga cca caa cca -
    3′ - RO
    16 Cy1-DO 16 Cy1-FQO 5′0 - ggc tct gga aac cca -
    3′ - RO
    17 Cy1-DO 17 Cy1-FQO 5′ - cat ccc tat tct tcg -
    3′ - RO
    18 Cy1-DO 18 Cy1-FQO 5′ - ccc aac cct tcc ctg -
    3′ - RO
    19 Cy1-DO 19 Cy1-FQO 5′ - agg agc act aca aaa -
    3′ - RO
    20 Cy1-DO 20 Cy1-FQO 5′ - tga gaa ggg cca cat -
    3′ - RO
    21 Cy1-DO 21 Cy1-FQO 5′ - tca cag aca gcc tga -
    3′ - RO
    22 Cy1-DO 22 Cy1-FQO 5′ - ctg tca gga gaa gca -
    3′ - RO
    23 Cy1-DO 23 Cy1-FQO 5′ - atg aga acg cca atg -
    3′ - RO
    24 Cy1-DO 24 Cy1-FQO 5′ - cag atg aga aga tca -
    3′ - RO
    25 Cy1-DO 25 Cy1-FQO 5′ - tct tgg acc tct ttg -
    3′ - RO
    26 Cy1-DO 26 Cy1-FQO 5′ - ggt ttg aca cag tca -
    3′ - RO
    27 Cy1-DO 27 Cy1-FQO 5′ - cag aga aag atc caa -
    3′ - RO
    28 Cy1-DO 28 Cy1-FQO 5′ - ctc tga cag atc cca -
    3′ - RO

    Expression of cyp1A1 mRNA in HepG2 Cells
  • For experiment the cells were seeded at 1*104 cells/50 μl per well in three 384 titerplates (Greiner; catalogue number 781091) in DMEM-F12 supplemented with 10% FCS. After 24 h of incubation at 37° C. and 5% CO2, 10 μl of 3-methylcholanthrene (3-MC) in different concentrations was added for stimulation of cyp1A1 expression for 24 h at 37° C. and 5% CO2. The final 3-MC concentrations were 0 μM (control), 0 μM+0.02% DMSO (DMSO-control), 0.1 μM, 0.3 μM, 0.7 μM, 1 μM, 1.3 μM, 1.7 μM, 2 μM, 2.5 μM, 3 μM and 3.5 μM. On each plate each concentration was present 32 times.
  • 3-MC stock solution was prepared with DMSO and diluted with DMEM-F12+10% FCS, the final DMSO concentration in the wells never exceeded 0.02%. After 24 h the stimulation mix was removed, 50 μl of lysis buffer were added to each well and incubation took place for 15 min at 37° C., 5% CO2. Then the plate was frozen at −20° C. for three days until the assay procedure was performed.
  • Assay Procedure
  • 24 μl of the cell lysate from each well of the cell culture plates was transferred to a well of one of the three glass bottom measurement plates (Nanocarrier™ 384/30, Evotec Technologies). A hybridization solution was prepared using the CO, DO and UO mixture solutions described above. Appropriate volumes were added to lysis buffer to yield a final concentration of 7 nM of each CO, DO and UO. Furthermore, the hybridization solution contained 3.7*103 SA beads/ml.
  • To each well, 1 μl of hybridization solution was added resulting in a final concentration of 0.28 nM of each DO, CO and UO. The final SA bead number per well was 3700. The measurement plate was placed into a humid incubator and incubated over night (for approximately 17 h) at 53° C.
  • The next day a quencher solution was prepared using the FQO mixture solution and the stock solution of biotinylated red oxazine dye described above. Appropriate volumes were added to lysis buffer to yield a final concentration of 72.8 nM of each FQO and a final concentration of 1.3 μM of the biotinylated red oxazine dye. 1 μl of the quencher solution was added to each well of the measurement plate, resulting in a final concentration of 2.8 nM for each FQO and 50 nM of the biotinylated red oxazine dye. The measurement plate was again placed into a humid incubator and incubated for 1 h at 35° C. Then the plate was measured as described above.
  • Result
  • The result is depicted in FIG. 9. With increasing 3-MC concentration (used to stimulate expression of cyp1A1 mRNA) an increase in the average fluorescence intensity/bead pixel stemming from the detection oligonucleotide—mRNA analyte—capture oligonucleotide complex bound to beads can be observed. The EC50 determined for each plate was 0.8 μM with a standard deviation of 0.05 μM between the three plates. Thus, the results show an excellent reproducibility although the absolute values of the three plates differ. This result is siminlar to published results, (see e.g Delescluse, C., Ledirac, N., de Sousa, G., Pralavorio, M., Botta-Fridlund, D., Letreut, Y., and Rahmani, R. (1997), Comparative study of Cyp1A1 induction by 3-methylcholanthrene in various human hepatic and epidermal cell types. Toxicology in Vitro 11, 443-450). From a Northern Blot in this publication an EC50 of ˜0.5 μM can be roughly estimated, this is in excellent agreement with the present results.
  • EXAMPLE 3 Influence of the Use of the Reference Emission of the Biotinylated Second Dye on Assay Sensitivity
  • This example is based on the images obtained according to example 1a and relates to FIGS. 10 and 11. In a first instance, image analysis was conducted utilizing the emission of the reporter labeling the beads (see reference images). In a second instance, image analysis was performed without making use of such reference images and relied solely on the emission of the reporter labeling the detection oligonucleotides bound to the beads via the analyte-CO-complex. The sensitivity of the assay is significantly reduced by at least one order of magnitude if one relies only on the emission of the reporter labeling the detection oligonucleotides bound to the beads via the analyte-CO-complex (see FIG. 10). Bead recognition utilizing a reporter labeling the bead (second reporter) is advantageous because otherwise contaminations of the sample or sufficiently large aggregates of DO would be recognized erroneously as signal stemming from the first reporter of the detection oligonucleotide-analyte-complex.
  • EXAMPLE 4 Influence of the Addition of FQO on Assay Sensitivity
  • Assay Procedure
  • The assay was in essence conducted as described in example 1a above. However, nine (instead of eight) c-fos RNA dilutions were prepared, see table 7 below. Furthermore eight (instead of four) 24 μl samples of each concentration were added to the wells of the measurement plate (Nanocarrier™96/30, Evotec Technologies). In contrast to example 1a only to four wells of each concentration the usual quencher solution (containing FQO and biotinlyated red oxazine dye) was added. To the other four wells, a modified solution without FQO was added, containing only the biotinlyated red oxazine dye.
    TABLE 7
    RNA copy number/well c-fos
    copy number/24 μl (=copy final RNA
    number/well) concentration
    1 * 109 69 pM
    1 * 108 6.9 pM
    1 * 107 692 fM
    5 * 106 346 fM
    2.5 * 106   173 fM
    1 * 106 69 fM
    5 * 105 34.6 fM
    2.5 * 105   17.3 fM
    1 * 105 6.9 fM

    Result
  • The specific quenching of free DO via the hybridization of FQO to these DO significantly reduces the fluorescence intensity of the background to ˜25% of the values without FQO: 116 intensity counts/background pixel as opposed to 444 intensity counts/background pixel without FQO. The strategy proposed by the present invention therefore improves significantly the sensitivity of the assay (in the present example by approximately one order of magnitude). This becomes visible in FIG. 12. In contrast to the image analysis described in general above, no background signal intensity was determined in the is vicinity of the beads and subtracted from the signal intensity detected per bead pixel. This procedure was chosen to demonstrate the influence of utilizing FQOs according to the present invention.

Claims (40)

1. A method for detecting an analyte in a sample comprising the steps of
providing detection probes being labeled with a first reporter, which detection probes are capable of binding to the analyte,
providing a solid support,
providing capture probes being bound or capable of binding to the solid support, which capture probes are capable of binding to the analyte, thus concentrating the analyte on the solid support,
contacting the sample with the detection probes, the solid support and the capture probes, and
detecting the detection probes, wherein
the detection of detection probes is conducted in the presence of quenching probes binding to surplus detection probes not being bound to the analyte and thereby quenching at least partially an emission of the first reporter of said surplus detection probes and/or
the solid support is labeled with a second reporter different from the first reporter, imaging the sample at an emission wavelength of the second reporter, generating a mask obtained from imaging the sample at the emission wavelength of the second reporter and applying this mask to an image of the sample used for detecting the detection probes.
2. A method for detecting an analyte in a sample comprising the steps of
providing detection oligonucleotides being labeled with a first reporter, which detection oligonucleotides are capable of binding to the analyte,
providing a solid support,
providing capture oligonucleotides being bound or capable of binding to the solid support, which capture oligonucleotides are capable of binding to the analyte, thus concentrating the analyte on the solid support,
contacting the sample with the detection oligonucleotides, the solid support and the capture oligonucleotides, and
detecting the detection oligonucleotides, wherein
the detection of detection oligonucleotides is conducted in the presence of quenching oligonucleotides hybridizing to surplus detection oligonucleotides not being bound to the analyte and thereby quenching at least partially an emission of the first reporter of said surplus detection oligonucleotides and/or
the solid support is labeled with a second reporter different from the first reporter, imaging the sample at an emission wavelength of the second reporter, generating a mask obtained from imaging the sample at the emission wavelength of the second reporter and applying this mask to an image of the sample used for detecting the detection oligonucleotides.
3. The method according to claim 1 being conducted in a homogeneous format.
4. The method according to claim 1 wherein the first and/or second reporter is luminescent, in particular fluorescent.
5. The method according to claim 1 wherein the first and/or second reporter is a dye.
6. The method according to claim 1 wherein the detection probes, in particular the detection oligonucleotides, are labeled with a first fluorescent dye and/or the solid support is labeled with a second fluorescent dye.
7. The method according to claim 2 wherein a hybrid between detection oligonucleotides and analyte has a higher melting temperature than a hybrid between detection oligonucleotides and quenching oligonucleotides.
8. The method according to claim 7 wherein a melting temperature of a hybrid between detection oligonucleotides and analyte is at least 1° C., more preferably at least 2° C., even more preferably at least 5° C. and most preferably at least 10° C. higher than a melting temperature of a hybrid between detection oligonucleotides and quenching oligonucleotides under test conditions.
9. The method according to claim 2 wherein contacting the sample with the detection oligonucleotides is performed under first hybridization conditions allowing the generation of a stable hybrid between detection oligonucleotides and analyte.
10. The method according to claim 2 wherein contacting the sample with the quenching oligonucleotides is performed under second hybridization conditions allowing the generation of a stable hybrid between surplus detection oligonucleotides not being bound to the analyte and quenching oligonucleotides.
11. The method according to claim 10 wherein said second hybridization conditions do not destabilize a hybrid between detection oligonucleotides and analyte formed under said first hybridization conditions.
12. The method according to claim 1 wherein the capture probes, in particular the capture oligonucleotides, are covalently bound to the solid support.
13. The method according to claim 1 wherein the capture probes, in particular the capture oligonucleotides, are capable of binding to the solid support via affinity interaction.
14. The method according to claim 13 wherein the capture probes/capture oligonucleotides comprise a first affinity unit capable of binding to a second affinity unit attached to the solid support.
15. The method according to claim 14 wherein the first affinity unit is biotin and the second affinity unit is streptavidin or avidin.
16. The method according to claim 1 wherein the solid support is a bead, a cell, a pollen, or a plurality thereof.
17. The method according to claim 1 wherein the first reporter labeling the detection probes/detection oligonucleotides differs in its excitation wavelength and/or its emission wavelength from the second reporter labeling the solid support.
18. The method according to claim 17 wherein the difference in the excitation wavelength and/or emission wavelength between first and second reporter is at least 10 nm, preferably at least 20 nm, even more preferably at least 50 nm and most preferably at least 100 nm.
19. The method according to claim 2 wherein the detection oligonucleotides comprise a linker sequence, linking the sequence of detection oligonucleotide complementary to the analyte with the first reporter.
20. The method according to claim 2 wherein the capture oligonucleotides comprise a linker sequence, linking the sequence of the capture oligonucleotide complementary to the analyte with the affinity unit or the solid support.
21. The method according to claim 1 wherein at least two different analytes are being detected by providing at least two different sets of detection probes/detection oligonucleotides and at least two different sets of capture probes/capture oligonucleotides.
22. The method according to claim 21 wherein the different sets of detection probes/detection oligonucleotides are being labeled with different reporters.
23. The method according to claim 22 wherein the reporters of one set are identical, have the same excitation wavelength and/or the same emission wavelength.
24. The method according to claim 1 wherein the image recorded at the emission wavelength of the second reporter is recorded simultaneously with the image used for detecting the detection probes/detection oligonucleotides.
25. The method according to claim 24 wherein the image recorded at the emission wavelength of the second reporter is corrected such that it spatially matches with the image used for detecting the detection probes/detection oligonucleotides, or vice versa.
26. The method according to claim 1 wherein the quenching probes/quenching oligonucleotides have a quenching unit, said quenching unit preferably being a dye.
27. The method according to claim 1 wherein the first reporter is a donor of a Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) donor-acceptor-pair and the quenching unit is an acceptor of said donor-acceptor-pair.
28. The method according to claim 26 wherein the quenching unit is a dark quencher which quenches at least partially the emission of the first reporter by dissipating an energy of an excited state of the first reporter into the environment.
29. The method according to claim 1 comprising the step of quantifying the analyte.
30. The method according to claim 29 wherein the quantification is performed by determining an amount of detection probes/detection oligonucleotides bound to the analyte.
31. The method according to claim 30 wherein the amount of detection probes/detection oligonucleotides bound to the analyte is expressed as the emission intensity emitted by the first reporter.
32. The method according to claim 30 comprising the step of determining an intensity of a background emission in the vicinity of the solid support and considering such intensity when determining the amount of detection probes/detection oligonucleotides.
33. The method according to claim 1 wherein the image of the sample used for detecting the detection probes/detection oligonucleotides is acquired at the emission wavelength of the first reporter.
34. The method according to claim 1 wherein the detection probes are aptameres, oligonucleotides, or antibodies.
35. The method according to claim 1 wherein the analyte is a protein or a nucleic acid.
36. The method according to claim 1 wherein the sample is a cell lysate, in particular a crude cell lysate, or an in vitro prepared sample.
37. The method according to claim 21 wherein the capture probes/capture oligonucleotides of different sets are attached or capable of binding to different solid supports.
38. The method according to claim 37 wherein the solid supports differ in the affinity units attached thereto, which affinity units interact with affinity units of the capture probes/capture oligonucleotides.
39. The method according to claim 1 comprising adding a potentially pharmaceutically active substance or a known drug to a cellular sample and analyzing whether such substance induces, inhibits or otherwise modulates the generation of the analyte.
40. Use of the method according claim 1 in screening for potentially pharmaceutically active substances, in diagnostics, or in determining any potential side effects of drugs.
US10/539,628 2002-12-20 2003-12-19 Method for detecting an analyte in a sample Abandoned US20060188880A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/539,628 US20060188880A1 (en) 2002-12-20 2003-12-19 Method for detecting an analyte in a sample
US12/662,896 US8580577B2 (en) 2002-12-20 2010-05-10 Method for detecting an analyte in a sample

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP02028582A EP1431398A1 (en) 2002-12-20 2002-12-20 A method for detecting in a mixture an amount of analytes
EP02028582.1 2002-12-20
US43943903P 2003-01-13 2003-01-13
PCT/EP2003/014661 WO2004057023A1 (en) 2002-12-20 2003-12-19 A method for detecting an analyte in a sample
US10/539,628 US20060188880A1 (en) 2002-12-20 2003-12-19 Method for detecting an analyte in a sample

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2003/014661 A-371-Of-International WO2004057023A1 (en) 2002-12-20 2003-12-19 A method for detecting an analyte in a sample

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/662,896 Continuation US8580577B2 (en) 2002-12-20 2010-05-10 Method for detecting an analyte in a sample

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20060188880A1 true US20060188880A1 (en) 2006-08-24

Family

ID=32338069

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/539,628 Abandoned US20060188880A1 (en) 2002-12-20 2003-12-19 Method for detecting an analyte in a sample
US12/662,896 Active 2025-04-22 US8580577B2 (en) 2002-12-20 2010-05-10 Method for detecting an analyte in a sample

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/662,896 Active 2025-04-22 US8580577B2 (en) 2002-12-20 2010-05-10 Method for detecting an analyte in a sample

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (2) US20060188880A1 (en)
EP (2) EP1431398A1 (en)
AT (1) ATE362549T1 (en)
AU (1) AU2003290106A1 (en)
DE (1) DE60313894T2 (en)
WO (1) WO2004057023A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2011090445A1 (en) * 2010-01-22 2011-07-28 Huseyin Avni Oktem Method for detection of non-labeled pcr products on sandwich hybridization based array platforms
JP2019148590A (en) * 2011-06-06 2019-09-05 アボット・ラボラトリーズAbbott Laboratories Spatially resolved ligand-receptor binding assays

Families Citing this family (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7223544B2 (en) 2003-06-27 2007-05-29 Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. Nucleic acid-engineered materials
US20050255044A1 (en) * 2004-05-14 2005-11-17 Lomnes Stephen J Contrast agent for combined modality imaging and methods and systems thereof
US7867707B2 (en) 2004-06-11 2011-01-11 Evotec Ag Method for detecting analytes in a sample
US20070072211A1 (en) 2005-06-30 2007-03-29 Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. Asymmetric PCR coupled with post-PCR characterization for the identification of nucleic acids
US8486621B2 (en) 2005-08-11 2013-07-16 Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. Nucleic acid-based matrixes
DE102006009516B4 (en) * 2006-02-28 2007-12-06 Analyticon Biotechnologies Ag Test device, manufacturing method therefor and test method
DE102008062372B3 (en) 2008-12-17 2010-06-17 Medizinische Hochschule Hannover Detecting conjugate and method of analysis
CN104136611B (en) * 2012-02-27 2018-03-27 东丽株式会社 The detection method of nucleic acid
WO2014083474A1 (en) * 2012-11-30 2014-06-05 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Capture particle for selectively binding a target molecule
US9932626B2 (en) * 2013-01-15 2018-04-03 Quanterix Corporation Detection of DNA or RNA using single molecule arrays and other techniques
US20190376963A1 (en) * 2018-05-04 2019-12-12 Abbott Laboratories Sequential sampling method for improving immunoassay sensitivity and kinetics of small volume samples
CN111394432B (en) * 2020-03-27 2023-03-24 深圳闪量科技有限公司 Multiple quantitative PCR detection system based on universal probe chip
CA3186950A1 (en) * 2020-07-23 2022-01-27 Scott Benson Compositions, systems and methods for biological analysis involving energy transfer dye conjugates and analytes comprising the same
EP4341671A1 (en) * 2021-05-19 2024-03-27 Leica Microsystems CMS GmbH Method for analyzing a biological sample or a chemical compound or a chemical element

Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5784162A (en) * 1993-08-18 1998-07-21 Applied Spectral Imaging Ltd. Spectral bio-imaging methods for biological research, medical diagnostics and therapy
US6218132B1 (en) * 1996-05-31 2001-04-17 Anergen, Inc. Method for monitoring T cell reactivity
US6251615B1 (en) * 1998-02-20 2001-06-26 Cell Analytics, Inc. Cell analysis methods
US20020177235A1 (en) * 1992-01-27 2002-11-28 Michel Mabile Method of measuring the luminescence emitted in a luminescent assay
US6544730B1 (en) * 1997-10-27 2003-04-08 Prescott Deininger High density polymorphic genetic locus
US20030082571A1 (en) * 2001-04-10 2003-05-01 Kachab Edward Hanna Linear nucleic acid and sequence therefor
US6589742B2 (en) * 1999-04-12 2003-07-08 Nanogen, Inc. Multiplex amplification and separation of nucleic acid sequences on a bioelectronic microchip using asymmetric structures
US20030129296A1 (en) * 2001-07-17 2003-07-10 David Kelso Film-immobilized capture particles
US20030219151A1 (en) * 2002-05-21 2003-11-27 Curry Bo U. Method and system for measuring a molecular array background signal from a continuous background region of specified size
US20040022777A1 (en) * 1999-12-15 2004-02-05 Hubert Kolb Fragments and antagonists of heat shock protein 60
US7202036B2 (en) * 2003-06-12 2007-04-10 Los Alamos National Security, Llc Quenching methods for background reduction in luminescence-based probe-target binding assays
US20080213762A1 (en) * 2004-12-08 2008-09-04 Takeshi Yamamoto Method of Gene Sequence Examination

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1990001564A1 (en) * 1988-08-09 1990-02-22 Microprobe Corporation Methods for multiple target analyses through nucleic acid hybridization
DE69435060T2 (en) 1993-11-12 2009-01-02 Phri Properties, Inc. HYBRIDIZATION TEST FOR NUCLEIC ACID DETERRECTION, UNIVERSAL STRAIN STRUCTURES, METHODS AND REAGENT SETS
US6361944B1 (en) * 1996-07-29 2002-03-26 Nanosphere, Inc. Nanoparticles having oligonucleotides attached thereto and uses therefor

Patent Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20020177235A1 (en) * 1992-01-27 2002-11-28 Michel Mabile Method of measuring the luminescence emitted in a luminescent assay
US5784162A (en) * 1993-08-18 1998-07-21 Applied Spectral Imaging Ltd. Spectral bio-imaging methods for biological research, medical diagnostics and therapy
US6218132B1 (en) * 1996-05-31 2001-04-17 Anergen, Inc. Method for monitoring T cell reactivity
US6544730B1 (en) * 1997-10-27 2003-04-08 Prescott Deininger High density polymorphic genetic locus
US6251615B1 (en) * 1998-02-20 2001-06-26 Cell Analytics, Inc. Cell analysis methods
US6589742B2 (en) * 1999-04-12 2003-07-08 Nanogen, Inc. Multiplex amplification and separation of nucleic acid sequences on a bioelectronic microchip using asymmetric structures
US20040022777A1 (en) * 1999-12-15 2004-02-05 Hubert Kolb Fragments and antagonists of heat shock protein 60
US20030082571A1 (en) * 2001-04-10 2003-05-01 Kachab Edward Hanna Linear nucleic acid and sequence therefor
US20030129296A1 (en) * 2001-07-17 2003-07-10 David Kelso Film-immobilized capture particles
US20030219151A1 (en) * 2002-05-21 2003-11-27 Curry Bo U. Method and system for measuring a molecular array background signal from a continuous background region of specified size
US7202036B2 (en) * 2003-06-12 2007-04-10 Los Alamos National Security, Llc Quenching methods for background reduction in luminescence-based probe-target binding assays
US20080213762A1 (en) * 2004-12-08 2008-09-04 Takeshi Yamamoto Method of Gene Sequence Examination

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2011090445A1 (en) * 2010-01-22 2011-07-28 Huseyin Avni Oktem Method for detection of non-labeled pcr products on sandwich hybridization based array platforms
JP2019148590A (en) * 2011-06-06 2019-09-05 アボット・ラボラトリーズAbbott Laboratories Spatially resolved ligand-receptor binding assays

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US8580577B2 (en) 2013-11-12
EP1585829B1 (en) 2007-05-16
AU2003290106A1 (en) 2004-07-14
WO2004057023A1 (en) 2004-07-08
US20110105348A1 (en) 2011-05-05
EP1585829A1 (en) 2005-10-19
ATE362549T1 (en) 2007-06-15
EP1431398A1 (en) 2004-06-23
DE60313894D1 (en) 2007-06-28
DE60313894T2 (en) 2008-01-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8580577B2 (en) Method for detecting an analyte in a sample
US7867707B2 (en) Method for detecting analytes in a sample
US10266879B2 (en) Detection of nucleic acids
Jin et al. A Rapid, Amplification‐Free, and Sensitive Diagnostic Assay for Single‐Step Multiplexed Fluorescence Detection of MicroRNA
JP4653366B2 (en) Digital amplification
Tan et al. Molecular beacons: a novel DNA probe for nucleic acid and protein studies
US9896720B2 (en) Imaging individual mRNA molecules using multiple singly labeled probes
US10883137B2 (en) Method to detect activity of a polymerase
Yamanaka et al. Polymorphism genotyping based on loop-mediated isothermal amplification and smartphone detection
US9745633B2 (en) Detection of PNA clamping
US7141370B2 (en) Bioluminescence regenerative cycle (BRC) for nucleic acid quantification
US9777313B2 (en) Silver nanocluster probe and target polynucleotide detection method using same, and silver nanocluster probe design method
JP2006333739A (en) Method for analyzing nucleic acid by monomolecular measurement
Miotke et al. Enzyme-free detection of mutations in cancer DNA using synthetic oligonucleotide probes and fluorescence microscopy
JP2004531233A (en) Method for detecting DNA polymerization
US20230068047A1 (en) Digital amplification assay analysis method
Mojumdar et al. Assaying the activity of helicases: an overview
McCarthy et al. Detection and identification of IHN and ISA viruses by isothermal DNA amplification in microcapillary tubes
JP2018526009A (en) Multivalent probe with single nucleotide resolution
Ahmed et al. Biochemical assays used for in vitro and in vivo gene expression
JPH0484751A (en) Gene detecting method
JP2004535803A (en) Quantitative hybridization assays for nucleic acid analysis
US6589744B2 (en) Method and kit for identification for nucleic acid modification enzymes and inhibitors thereof
JP2008206443A (en) METHOD FOR ASSAYING mRNA OF TRANSPORTER IN RAT, AND PROBE AND KIT THEREFOR
WO2018149929A1 (en) Combination of reporter gene assays and transcriptional analysis

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: EVOTEC AG, GERMANY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HINNAH, SILKE;LAMBRU, DAGMAR;DROGE, SONJA;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:017349/0670;SIGNING DATES FROM 20050505 TO 20050919

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION