US20060184657A1 - Service broker for processing data from a data network - Google Patents
Service broker for processing data from a data network Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20060184657A1 US20060184657A1 US11/405,978 US40597806A US2006184657A1 US 20060184657 A1 US20060184657 A1 US 20060184657A1 US 40597806 A US40597806 A US 40597806A US 2006184657 A1 US2006184657 A1 US 2006184657A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- data
- server
- canceled
- service broker
- client
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/50—Network services
- H04L67/56—Provisioning of proxy services
- H04L67/59—Providing operational support to end devices by off-loading in the network or by emulation, e.g. when they are unavailable
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
- H04L67/02—Protocols based on web technology, e.g. hypertext transfer protocol [HTTP]
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
- H04L67/02—Protocols based on web technology, e.g. hypertext transfer protocol [HTTP]
- H04L67/025—Protocols based on web technology, e.g. hypertext transfer protocol [HTTP] for remote control or remote monitoring of applications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
- H04L67/10—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/14—Session management
- H04L67/142—Managing session states for stateless protocols; Signalling session states; State transitions; Keeping-state mechanisms
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/50—Network services
- H04L67/51—Discovery or management thereof, e.g. service location protocol [SLP] or web services
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/50—Network services
- H04L67/56—Provisioning of proxy services
- H04L67/568—Storing data temporarily at an intermediate stage, e.g. caching
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L9/00—Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols
- H04L9/40—Network security protocols
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/2866—Architectures; Arrangements
- H04L67/288—Distributed intermediate devices, i.e. intermediate devices for interaction with other intermediate devices on the same level
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L69/00—Network arrangements, protocols or services independent of the application payload and not provided for in the other groups of this subclass
- H04L69/30—Definitions, standards or architectural aspects of layered protocol stacks
- H04L69/32—Architecture of open systems interconnection [OSI] 7-layer type protocol stacks, e.g. the interfaces between the data link level and the physical level
- H04L69/322—Intralayer communication protocols among peer entities or protocol data unit [PDU] definitions
- H04L69/329—Intralayer communication protocols among peer entities or protocol data unit [PDU] definitions in the application layer [OSI layer 7]
Definitions
- the invention relates generally to computer networking and, more particularly, to a service broker for processing data from a data network.
- Transmission Control Protocol/Internet protocol A packet switching scheme the Internet uses to chop, route, and reconstruct the data it handles, from e-mail to video.
- a client is a computer which issues commands to the server which performs the task associated with the command.
- Any computer that performs a task at the command of another computer is a server.
- a Web server typically supports one or more clients.
- HTTP Hypertext Transfer Protocol
- HTTP is an example of a stateless protocol, which means that every request from a client to a server is treated independently. The server has no record of previous connections. At the beginning of a URL, “http:” indicates the file contains hyperlinks.
- a program running on a computer that acts as an Internet tour guide, complete with pictorial desktops, directories and search tools used when a user “surfs” the Internet.
- the Web browser is a client service which communicates with the World Wide Web.
- An entity or set of entities which produces data of varying types, such as video, email, heartbeat transmissions, commands, and the like.
- a device, program, or the like that receives, stores, and forwards data.
- the moderator may possess each of the three functionalities in one entity or each functionality may be contained in separate devices.
- the moderator includes a data receiving system, a data storage system, and a data transmission system.
- An entity that can at least temporarily store data A system in which data can be written to and retrieved.
- a method for transmitting an arbitrary number of name/value pairs within HTTP which encodes an arbitrary set of name/value pairs in other name/value pairs.
- a representation in which a control of a device can be mapped to a representative or virtual control.
- Any physical, virtual, electronic, or logical entity which either causes an effective change in the real world, in a virtual space, or in software or gives an indication of an effective change in the real world, in a virtual space, or in software.
- the World Wide Web is a way of using the Internet that provides the user with access via linked documents to a wealth of information distributed throughout the globe.
- the WWW also allows users to execute programs running on remote servers. This capability enables users to obtain the results from programs which the user cannot run locally due to hardware and/or software limitations. It is also possible to download and run programs stored remotely on the World Wide Web. This has the potential to greatly increase the amount of software which is available to a computer connected to the World Wide Web.
- Network protocols provide standard methods for machines to communicate with one another. The protocols indicate how data should be formatted for receipt and transmission across networks. Heterogeneous machines can communicate seamlessly over a network via standard protocols. Examples of standard Internet protocols include: HTTP, see, e.g., “Hypertext Transfer Protocol-HTTP/1.0”, http://www.ics.uci.edu/pub/ietf/http/draft-ietf-http-v 10-spec-03.html, by T. Berners-Lee, R. Fielding, and H. Frystyk, Sep. 4, 1995; SMTP, see, e.g, “Simple Mail Transfer Protocol”. RFC 821, J. B.
- FTP File Transfer Protocol
- RFC 959 Information Sciences Institute, USC, October 1985, http://ds.internic.net/std/std9.txt.
- Gopher see, e.g., F. Anklesaria, M. McCahill, P. Lindner, D. Johnson, D. Torrey, and B. Alberti.
- the Internet Gopher Protocol: A distributed document search and retrieval protocol RFC 1436, University of Minnesota, March 1993, http://ds.internic.net/rfc/rfc1436.txt.; and WAIS, see, e.g.,
- the client-server model constitutes one of the dominant paradigms in network programming, see, e.g., W. R Stevens, “Unix Network Programming”, Prentice Hall PTR, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1990; and D. E. Corner, “Internetworking with TCP/IP” vol 1., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1991 which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
- a server program offers a service which can be accessed by multiple users over the network.
- a program becomes a client when it sends a message to a server and waits for a response from the server.
- the client process which is typically optimized for user interaction, uses the requested service without having to know any of the detailed workings of the requested service or server.
- “browsers” constitute client programs while the programs sending back information to the browser constitute server programs.
- HTTP has become the defacto access protocol between web servers and client browsers. Due to HTTPs ubiquitous presence on the Internet most network administrators provide access methods for HTTP clients to gain access to Internet servers with HTTP services within their private net and gain access by users client browsers.
- HTTP is a stateless protocol; every request from the client to the server is treated independently. The server has no record of previous connections. The advantages of using stateless protocol are efficiency and simplicity.
- Clients can send and receive data from an Internet based system, but in order to protect private or enterprise data, in many instances access to a server services are hidden behind a private net firewall or other protection mechanism and can only be accessed within the same network subnet. In such cases the server is not visible by common Internet clients. Additionally, services provided by ad hoc network servers, which can be based on mobile or temporary Internet services, require complex system administration and can create a challenge for the average individual. Other system and network issues include such matters as scalability, resource management, security, and access control, each requiring technical depth, lengthy lead time to assemble, and ongoing maintenance that can become costly. In most cases the user has to invest a great deal of time and expense. The services are limited and devices which provide services are not user friendly. The system setup and service access can present problems.
- a client, sender, or data source must package data in a format which can be transported over the network using one of a variety of networking protocols.
- a receiver or service broker must then be able to unpack the data and make use of it in its original form. It is this latter side of the data transmission relationship that we are interested in.
- a server is often a program, either in hardware or software on the receiver, which listens for incoming data. When data arrives on the receiver, it is already tagged to be delivered to a particular port on the receiver. If no listener, i.e., a server, is registered with the port on the low level network driver on the receiver, the data cannot make it to the appropriate application that the data is intended for because no server is there to hand the data to the applications for high-level processing.
- the server is often responsible for unpacking the data and stripping off the envelopes which encapsulate the protocol information inside of which the client packaged the data. Such an unpackaging entity on the server is called the protocol stack. At each rung up the protocol stack, the server is responsible for keeping track of the information relevant to the protocols implemented at that layer as well as performing all necessary processing to carry out the functionality at that layer.
- the complexity, cost, and processing overhead of that server likewise increases.
- the code necessary to authenticate incoming connection requests and the connection setup can increase processing overhead because a separate connection handler thread or process may need be started to handle data for the new connection.
- additional memory must be allocated per connection to be used to queue packets for each incoming connection when the server is not processing the data fast enough for that connection.
- the code size and memory requirements for the server program itself running on the receiver all of these added complexities increase the cost of the receivers, more physical memory is needed to store programs and connection data and more powerful processors are needed to run these complex server programs.
- a method and system for communication between server-less computing devices or clients in computers communicating over networks such as the World Wide Web (WWW using stateless protocols, e.g., HTTP.
- WWW World Wide Web
- stateless protocols e.g., HTTP.
- clients that can operate independently or can be combined in computer communicating over the network: a) Clients that issue commands and request status or data, and b) clients that function as service brokers to provide services and process commands, update status, and provide specific data. Based on the description of the latter client device it would resemble a server device but without directly accessible TCP/IP ports.
- Each service provider device is authenticated, retains a unique identity and establishes a soft state with the globally accessible server or servers. All devices and clients can compile and process a globally common command language established between all communicating network clients.
- the central server includes a CGI processing program and a database to retain client specific information.
- the server database represents a collection of queues, with each having a client unique identifiable status, pending commands, and/or data components.
- commands and signaling transmitted between the servers and the clients utilize standard HTTP protocol semantics and HTML or standard markup language syntax.
- Clients encapsulate or embed information as parameters passed to HTTP CGI as a set of standard HTTP conversations.
- a CGI processing program converts, parses and processes each conversation and passes arguments with or without data to queues.
- Each conversation includes client identification key(s) and commands which are structured as attribute-value pair tuples.
- the service-handler client connects to the central server and accesses the client queue on the central server to check for any pending commands or update their status in either synchronous or asynchronous maner.
- the synchronous server access scheme is regulated temporally by either deterministic clocking on server response by a server based adaptive algorithm which can monitor network and client activities and optimize client access patterns.
- the invention comprises a service broker for processing data from a data network including at least one data source.
- the service broker includes a first communication module for initiating communication with a moderator and adapted to receive data from the moderator and a second communication module for sending data to at least one of the data source and the moderator.
- a service-action module is provided for processing the received data and for performing a task based on the processed data.
- An export module which is in communication with the service-action module is provided for publishing data based at least in part on the performed task to the data network.
- the published data may be published to at least one of the data source and the moderator.
- the moderator may includes a data store and the first communication module could receive data from the data store.
- the data store may store data received from the at least one data source.
- the data store could be a command queue and the data received from the data source could be a command which is intended to be processed by the service-action module, the first communication module receiving the command from the queue.
- the first communication module communicates with the moderator via the HTTP protocol.
- the data source could also communicate with the moderator via the HTTP protocol.
- the performed task comprises communicating a command based at least in part on the processed data to a device connected to the service broker.
- At least one of the moderator and the data source comprises a virtual representation of the service broker and wherein the published data updates the virtual representation.
- at least one of the moderator and the data source could comprise a virtual representation of the connected device and wherein the published data updates the virtual representation.
- the present invention also encompasses a method for transferring data from a data source to a service broker comprising the steps of: providing a data source and a service broker; providing a moderator for receiving the data transferred by the data source; providing a data store for storing data received by the moderator; providing a communications module for transferring data from the data store; providing a virtual representation of the service broker on the data source; transferring data from the data source to the moderator, the data sent being related to or associated with the virtual representation; storing the data received by the moderator in the data store; retrieving the data from the data store via the communications module and forwarding the data to the service broker; updating the virtual representation when the service broker receives the data sent by the data source, whereby data is transferred between the data source and to the service broker.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a first preferred embodiment of a system for transferring data via a service broker.
- FIG. 1 a is a schematic view of the service broker of the system shown in FIG. 1 .
- FIG. 2 is a schematic view of a second preferred embodiment of a data transfer system in accordance with the present invention.
- FIG. 3 is a schematic view of the client and server components of the system shown in FIG. 2 .
- FIG. 4 is a schematic view of the controlled devices and virtual representation of same in the server database of the system shown in FIG. 2 .
- FIG. 5 is a schematic view of a simplified data transfer system having a service broker in accordance with the present invention.
- FIG. 6 is a flow chart of the polling scheme for communicating with a service broker in accordance with the present invention.
- FIG. 1 there is shown a system 200 for transferring data or commands from a data source or command generator to a service broker via a moderator.
- the moderator allows the service broker to get commands and/or data from the data source without needing the functionality of a server or otherwise some mechanism for listening for the data transmission.
- the system 200 includes a data source or command generator 202 that initiates the transfer of commands and/or data intended for a particular service broker. Additional data sources/command generators 204 , 206 may also be provided.
- the system 200 includes a service broker 208 that receives the data/commands from the data sources/command generators. In addition to service broker 208 , the system may also include any number of additional service brokers 210 , 212 .
- Each service broker may include connected devices 214 , 216 , 218 , 220 , 222 .
- these connected devices are the ultimate receivers of at least some of the data commands transmitted from the data sources/command generators 202 , 204 , 206 .
- the connected devices are described in greater detail in connection with the second preferred embodiment, but for purposes of the current invention are defined as any appliance or electronic equipment that can be communicated with remotely and are capable of being connected to the network.
- Each data source/command generator may include a virtual representation of the service brokers and/or the connected devices.
- a virtual representation 224 for the service broker 208 along with virtual representations 226 , 228 , 230 for the connected devices 214 , 216 , 218 are present on the data source/command generator 202 .
- the data sources could contain a virtual representation for any or all of the connected devices and service brokers, but have been omitted from FIG. 1 for the sake of clarity.
- the additional data sources/command generators would also preferably include virtual representations of any of the service brokers and/or connected devices.
- the virtual representation is a control, group of controls, and/or user interface for a service broker or connected devices that is mapped to a representative control on the connected device and/or service broker.
- moderator 232 Between the data sources and the service brokers is a moderator 232 that listens for and accepts data/commands transmitted from the data source/command generators. It should be understood that any number of additional moderators, such as moderators 234 and 236 can also be provided in the present system as necessary or required.
- Each moderator includes a data store 238 for temporarily storing the data/commands received by the moderator.
- the preferred form of the data store is a queue of commands. Such a queue of commands can take any number of forms as known to those skilled in the art.
- Each moderator also includes a communications module that functions as a forwarding agent 240 for forwarding data/commands residing on the data store 238 to the service brokers.
- the forwarding agent 240 transmits its data synchronously or asynchronously pursuant to a request from the service broker.
- the forwarding agent may function in any suitable way to pass data as known to those skilled in the art.
- Data is transferred between the data sources, moderators and service brokers via any suitable data transfer protocol.
- data is transferred using the HTTP protocol between all the devices which are networked together via the global computer network, such as the Internet.
- the data is transferred using name value pairs, with each piece of data being transferred as the value part and identified by the name part.
- a command x intended for the service broker 208 can be encoded using the name value pair “service broker 208 : connected device 214 : command x.”
- name value pairs By transferring data using name value pairs, data can be easily transferred using the HTTP protocol.
- data is preferably transferred using a field value abstraction layer that allows an unlimited number of name value pairs to be transferred.
- the service broker 208 is capable of performing many different functions in order to effect the transfer of data.
- the different functionalities of the service broker 208 are described in terms of “modules.” It should be understood that the “modules” could be implemented in software, hardware, or a combination of the two.
- the service broker 208 includes a first communication module 250 for initiating communication with the moderator 232 and is adapted to receive data from the moderator 232 .
- the first communication module 250 is capable of handling a device identifier and/or class of device identifiers for each connected device and/or service broker. An example of which is given in connection with the command x as described above.
- the device identifier allows the first communication module to communicate with a particular device, whereas the class of identifiers allows the first communication with a class of similar or otherwise redacted devices.
- the service broker 208 includes a second communication module 252 for sending data to the moderator 232 and/or the data source 202 .
- the second communication module 252 is responsible for acknowledging the successful transmission of data to the service broker 208 and is also responsible for updating the virtual representations 224 of the service broker or the connected devices which may be present on the data source 202 and the moderator 232 .
- the service broker 208 also includes a service action module 254 for processing the data received from the moderator 232 and for performing a tasks based on the processed data.
- the data source 202 might transmit a command to the service broker 208 via the moderator 232 which is a command for changing the state of one of the connected devices 214 .
- the service broker 208 upon receiving the command, processes the command and passes a command to the connected device 214 in a form which it understands for changing the state of the device. Further examples of the functionality of the service action module 254 are described in connection with the second preferred embodiment which is described in greater detail below.
- the service broker 208 also includes an export module 256 which is in communication with the service action module 254 .
- the export module 256 is responsible for publishing data i.e., updates to the virtual representation to the data network and, in particular, to the data source 202 and the moderator 232 . It is the export module 256 that is responsible for updating the virtual representation of the service broker and the connected devices and for synchronizing the virtual representation for these devices with the devices themselves.
- the export module 256 may utilize the services of the second communication module 252 to effect the publication of data.
- data or commands intended for the service broker 208 are transmitted to the moderator 232 and stored a data queue 238 .
- the service broker 208 polls the data queue 238 for waiting data. If data is present in the data queue 238 , the forwarding agent 240 functions to transfer that data to the service broker 208 .
- the data is received by the first communication module 250 and processed by the service action module 254 and performs whatever task is associated with the received command. If necessary, the service broker 208 interfaces with the connected devices 214 if the transmitted command is intended for one of the connected devices.
- the export module 256 publishes an update based on this performed task back to the data source 202 so that the virtual representation 224 can be updated and synchronized. In this way, data is transferred between a data source 202 to another device, such as a service broker or connected devices, which is not otherwise directly accessible by the data source.
- FIGS. 2-6 there is illustrated a second preferred embodiment of the present invention.
- This second preferred embodiment is a specific implementation of the invention and concepts described in connection with the first embodiment.
- the second preferred embodiment is provided to illustrate how the invention can be implemented in a client/server environment over a global computer network having many distributed clients and a centralized server or moderator.
- FIG. 2 there is shown a client and server system 10 in accordance with the present invention.
- the client/server system 10 includes a client 12 and a server 14 which are connected via a global computer network 16 , such as the Internet.
- the client 12 is operated by a local user (not shown).
- the client 12 may comprise a plurality of nodes, such as first user node 18 and second user node 20 . It should be understood that the nodes 18 and 20 may be located at a single location, such as the user's house or at separate locations such as the user's main house and the user's vacation house.
- the present invention contemplates a plurality of local user locations and/or a plurality of remote user locations.
- the user node 18 includes a client computer 22 that is connected to the global computer network 16 via an Internet Service Provider (ISP) 23 by any conventional means, such as a dial-up connection, DSL line, cable modem, satellite connection, or T1 line.
- ISP Internet Service Provider
- the client computer 22 includes an Internet browser program 26 for accessing web pages via the global computer network 16 .
- a monitoring module 28 is also provided which serves as a gateway between the server 14 and at least one connected device 32 .
- the monitoring module can take various forms, such as a software program 29 running on the client computer (as shown at node 18 ). Alternately, the monitoring module 28 can take the form of a stand-alone appliance 30 (as shown at node 20 ) which is connected to the global computer network 16 and operates separately and independently from the client computer 22 .
- the monitoring module 28 is described in greater detail below.
- At least one, and preferably a plurality of, device or appliance 32 is connected to and controlled by each monitoring module 28 .
- the connection between the monitoring module 28 and the various devices 32 can be wired or wireless.
- the appliances 32 encompass a multitude of devices which are capable of being controlled or mediated by an external controller. Such appliances include camera 34 , radio 36 , smoke or fire detector 38 , contact sensor 40 , and light switch 41 . Although not illustrated, it should be understood that the present invention encompasses many other such devices such as various audio input and output devices, various visual displays, washers/driers, microwave ovens, cooking ranges, car alarms, plant watering devices, sprinkler, thermostats, carbon monoxide sensors, humidistats, rain gauges, video cassette recorders, radio tuners, and the like.
- notification devices such as pager 42
- the pager 42 is in wireless communication with a wireless or cellular transmitter 44 associated with the server component 14 .
- Other notification devices besides the pager 42 are also contemplated by the present invention including, e-mail clients, wireless hand-held computers, wireless wearable computer units, automatic web notification via dynamic web content, telephone clients, voice mail clients, cellular telephones, instant messaging clients, and the like.
- the server 14 of the present invention includes a web server 46 and a database server 48 .
- the web server 46 generates static web pages and dynamic web pages from data contained in the database server 48 .
- the web pages 50 can be viewed by the user on the Internet browser 26 running on the client computer 22 .
- the client 12 and the server 14 communicate over the global computer network 16 via the conventionally available TCP/IP environment using the HTTP protocol.
- HTTP protocol any request-response type of protocol and socket-based packet transport environment would also be suitable and within the scope of the contemplated invention.
- the server 14 of the present invention functions as the master controller of the system 10 .
- the client-server configuration of the system 10 and the connection of the system 10 to the global computer network 16 via an ISP 23 allow a user to access the system 10 via any computer, monitoring appliance or similar device connected to the global computer network 16 .
- a user is able to control and monitor a plurality of devices 32 connected to the monitoring module 29 at node 18 and a plurality of devices 32 connected to the networked monitoring module 30 at node 20 .
- the devices 32 can be accessed via any personal computer 22 by accessing the control server 14 via the global computer network 16 .
- a global computer network 16 it should be clear that a user, or anyone the user permits access to, can readily monitor and control the monitoring modules 28 at nodes 18 and 20 , from any location, using any suitable device that has access to the global computer network 16 .
- the monitoring module 28 serves as the connection hub for the controlled devices 32 and as the gateway for brokering communications between the devices 32 and the control server 14 via the global computer network 16 .
- the monitoring module 28 serves as a translation and brokering agent between the server 14 and the connected devices 32 .
- the monitoring module 28 comprises a plurality of dynamically loaded objects, or device descriptors 49 that allow the server 14 to interface with the connected devices 32 .
- the dynamically loaded device descriptors 49 act as the device drivers for the connected devices 32 , translating, in both directions, the monitoring, command, and control data that is sent and received between the monitoring module 28 and the server 14 via the global computer network 16 .
- Each device descriptor 49 also translates the signals received from the monitoring module 28 into the specific electrical signals that are required to communicate with, both input and output, and control its associated device 32 .
- a different device descriptor 49 must be provided for each specific model of each device 32 .
- the monitoring module 28 also controls the communication between the server 14 and the connected devices 32 via the global computer network 16 .
- the HTTP protocol employed by the existing global computer network is a stateless protocol. Since the knowledge of the current state of the connected devices is vital to the successful operation of the system 10 , it is necessary for the monitoring module 28 to store the persistent state of the connected devices 32 and to provide a system for periodically updating and obtaining the state of each connected device 32 for obtaining commands from the server 14 . The monitoring module 28 does this by polling 50 the server 14 and maintaining a system heartbeat 52 .
- the monitoring module 28 polls 50 by scheduling a transmission between the monitoring module 28 and the server 14 in which it checks for commands from the server 14 . If commands are waiting on the server 14 , the server will return commands in an algorithmic manner, that can take various forms, for processing and also informs the monitoring module that N commands are waiting in the queue. The monitoring module 14 will then poll the server 14 and retrieve data from the server 14 until there are no more commands in the queue. In this way, commands from the server 14 can be delivered to the monitoring module 28 to effect changes in the devices 32 over the stateless medium of the existing global computer network 16 .
- the client computer 22 issues a command for incurring a change in state of one of the control devices 32 .
- the change in state command is posted to a data store 51 , such as a command queue associated with the server 14 .
- a data store 51 such as a command queue associated with the server 14 .
- the server 14 desires to make an internal change to the monitor 28 , such as setting or modifying the polling 50 or heartbeat 52 time intervals, these commands are likewise posted to the storage device 51 .
- the monitoring module 28 Upon reaching the end of the current polling interval, the monitoring module 28 sends a transmission to the server 14 , requesting any queued commands.
- the monitoring module 28 continues to poll, using a preselected transmission scheme, until the queue of commands waiting for the monitor 28 is complete. Each command received from the queue is acted upon when it is received and any associated state changes are effected.
- the server 14 transmits an acknowledgment of receipt and successful processing of the data back to the monitoring module 28 .
- the monitoring module 28 is also responsible for maintaining a heartbeat 52 or a scheduled periodic update regime to refresh the current state of the devices 32 stored in the database server 48 .
- the primary function of the heartbeat 52 is to synchronize the states of the devices 32 and the virtual representation of those devices stored on the server 14 .
- the heartbeat 52 also functions to send device events and state changes between the devices 32 and the server 14 to effect this synchronization of the control server 14 and to assure that the monitoring module 28 and the server 14 are synchronized.
- the types of transmissions that cause the server 14 to send unsolicited transmissions back to the monitoring module 28 are to set or update the heartbeat or polling time and to issue a command to update a component of a device.
- a typical heartbeat operation 52 the monitoring module 28 sends a transmission to the server 14 in response to a change in state of a connected device 32 , a synchronization of a control device 32 with server 14 , a triggered alert event, or the like.
- all data intended to be transmitted to the server 14 is transmitted to the server 14 via the global computer network.
- the server 14 transmits an acknowledgment of receipt and successful processing of the data back to the monitoring module 28 .
- the monitoring module 28 Along with maintaining the polling and heartbeat operations and sending and receiving events, data, and commands 54 to and from the server 14 , the monitoring module 28 also takes care of many network level activities 56 such as verifying passwords, dialing up the ISP if necessary, periodically uploading accounting/billing information, and performing security measures.
- monitoring module 28 Another function of the monitoring module 28 is the storage of the persistent state of the devices 32 . In the event that the user's computer 22 crashes and the monitoring module 28 must be restarted, many of the parameters that were negotiated between the monitoring module 28 and the server 14 during the registration process are stored in the memory of the monitoring module.
- Each device is connected to a monitoring module 28 via a device descriptor or driver 49 (only one shown).
- Each device may include a customizable user interface 58 that is viewable on the client computer 22 over the global computer network 16 through a virtual representation of the user interface stored on the web server 46 , as explained below.
- the user interface 58 comprises at least one resource or sub-devices 60 , 62 , and 64 .
- a resource provides a specific functionality of the device.
- the device shown in FIG. 4 represents a VCR having a recording setting resource 60 , a channel selecting resource 62 , and a power selecting resource 64 .
- a typical VCR would have many other operational resources, but the resources illustrated are sufficient to describe the basic operation of the device.
- Each resource 60 , 62 , 64 is made up of components or the basic building blocks of the user interface 58 of the device.
- the recording setting resource 60 comprises a display component 70 and a series of pushbuttons 72 , 74 , 76 , 78 which activate the VCR's fast forward, reverse, play, and stop functions, respectively.
- the channel selecting resource 62 comprises the display component 70 and a pair of pushbuttons 82 which activate the up channel and down channel functions of the VCR.
- the power selecting resource 64 comprises a toggle switch 80 for activating the VCR's power on and power off commands and an LED indicator 81 which indicates the power condition of the VCR
- a virtual representation of each device 32 , 32 a , 32 b , 32 c , 32 d also exists as a record 94 , 94 a , 94 b , 94 c , 94 d in the database server 48 of the control server 14 .
- Each record contains an entry for each resource and its associated components which make up the device.
- the record 94 for the VCR device 32 contains an entry 90 , 91 , 92 for each resource 60 , 62 , 64 and an entry 90 a , 90 b , 90 c , 90 d , 91 a , 91 b , 92 a , 92 b for each component 70 , 72 , 72 , 74 , 80 , 81 , 82 , respectively.
- a web page 50 can be generated by the web server 46 by extracting the associated record for that device from the database server 48 and creating a graphical, textual, tactile, aural, or other similar modality user interface representation of that device which a user can access via the Internet browser 26 .
- the client 12 first registers with the server component 14 to begin using the services offered therein by accessing the web server 46 of the server component 14 via the client browser 26 .
- an account is opened for the client 12 and the user's information is stored in the database server 48 .
- the monitoring modules 29 and 30 would also be registered with the server component 14 and their information would also be stored in the database server 48 and associated with the node 18 .
- any device 32 that is attached to either of the monitoring devices 29 and 30 would also be registered in the system, stored in the database server 48 , and available to the user.
- Each device 32 communicates with the monitoring modules 29 , 30 and either exports its interface to the database server 48 or otherwise obtains a default interface configuration, as explained in greater detail below.
- These interfaces are adapted to be displayed, to be viewed, and to be interacted with by the user via the client browser 26 over the global computer network 16 by accessing the web server 46 .
- the contact sensor 40 could be associated with the front door (not shown) at the remote location 20 and set to trip whenever the front door is opened.
- the camera 34 is also positioned to view the front door location and can be programmed to take a digital photograph whenever the sensor contact 40 is tripped and transmit that photograph to be stored in the database server 48 .
- an event notification or alarm trigger is transmitted by the monitoring module 30 to the database server 48 which has been previously programmed to transmit a notification event to the user's pager via the cellular transmitter 44 .
- the camera 34 takes a picture of the front door and transmits that picture via the monitoring module 30 via the global computer network 16 to the database server 48 .
- the user having been notified via the pager 42 , can now access the web server 46 of the server component 14 via his Internet browser 26 to retrieve the photograph that has been stored on a database server 48 . In this way, the user can determine whether an intruder has entered via the front door of his vacation home or whether his family has just arrived for their vacation.
- Another use for the system 10 would be for the user located at the node 18 to be able to control his lamp 42 at his vacation home located at node 20 .
- the user would contact the web server 46 via his Internet browser 26 to access the database entry of the light switch 41 .
- a virtual representation of the light switch 41 would be available on the web server 46 and could be manipulated by the user to remotely change the state of the light switch 41 and the connected lamp 46 , say from being “off” to being “on.” To do this, the user would simply manipulate the on/off virtual representation of the light switch on the web server 46 and this command would be placed in a queue of waiting commands on the server component.
- the controlling module or monitor 30 polls the server component 14 looking for waiting commands, such as the change state command of the light switch 41 . Thereafter, the command would be transmitted to the monitoring device 30 which would instruct the light switch to change from the “off” state to “on” state, and, thus, turning on the lamp 46 .
- This change in state of the lamp 46 could be viewed by an appropriately positioned camera, such as camera 34 , which would be used to visually monitor the remote location 20 to determine whether the command had been completed successfully.
- the monitoring module 28 receives data and commands from the client 12 , it is considered to be a service broker for purposes of the present invention.
- the service broker 28 does not include a server which would otherwise receive data and commands sent to the service broker 28 .
- the present invention utilizes a polling scheme incorporated into the HTTP protocol so that the service broker 28 can receive data and/or commands initiating from the client 12 or server 14 .
- a service broker 28 may not have a permanent connection to the global computer network 16 , such as might be the case if there was a dial-up connection between the service broker 30 and the ISP 23 as shown in FIG. 2 .
- data and commands sent to the service broker 30 while it is not connected to the global computer networks 16 may never reach the service broker 30 .
- the present invention overcomes this problem by incorporating the polling scheme in which the service broker 30 connects to the global computer network as needed and polls for data waiting for it.
- FIG. 5 there is shown a simplified schematic of the data transfer system of the second preferred embodiment of the present invention.
- a client 12 is connected to a server 14 via the global computer network 16 via an ISP 23 .
- the client 12 comprises a computer 22 that is networked to the global computer network 16 via any suitable local network configuration, topography, and/or wired or wireless media.
- the client also includes a world wide web Internet browser 26 for accessing web pages on the global computer network 16 .
- the client 12 can be any source of data that is capable of transmitting that data and includes such devices as home appliances, cameras, home gateways, and the like.
- the server 14 includes a web server 46 for serving-up web pages and a database server 48 for storing data.
- a web server 46 for serving-up web pages
- a database server 48 for storing data.
- other suitable servers include gateways, firewall servers, ISP gateways, network enabled cameras, networked home appliances and the like.
- At least one service broker 28 is connected to the global computer network 16 .
- Suitable service brokers include home appliances, computers, cellular phones, personal digital assistants, and the like.
- a plurality of controlled devices 32 can be connected to each service broker 28 as described below.
- the device 32 illustrated in FIG. 5 is a light switch module 41 ; however, it should be understood that this device could be any similar device that receives data and is networked to the global computer network 16 such as a video camera, a thermostat, a sensor, a door opener, a door lock, a video cassette recorder, ovens, dish washers, and the like.
- the light switch module 41 includes a user interface 180 for controlling the light switch.
- the user interface 180 includes a on-off switch 182 for selectively providing an attached light or lamp with electricity.
- the virtual representation 180 a of the user interface 180 is stored in the database server 48 and can be viewed on a web page 184 generated by the web server 46 .
- the virtual interface 180 a has all the components normally associated with the real user interface 180 including a virtual on-off switch 182 a for controlling the power state of the switch.
- the client 12 is able to access the virtual user interface 180 a and its virtual control 182 by accessing the web page 184 on the web server 46 by use of the client's Internet browser 26 .
- commands and data are sent to the service broker 28 and relayed to the connected devices 32 by the user manipulating the virtual user interface on the web page 184 via the Internet browser 26 .
- the user may manipulate the virtual on-off switch 182 a which would send a command over the global computer network 16 to the database server 48 which contains an entry 90 for the light switch 41 and an entry 90 a for the on-off switch 182 a .
- the manipulation of the on-off switch 182 a would necessitate a change in state of the light switch 41 which must be communicated to the service broker 28 and to the light switch 41 via the global computer network by a command issuing from the client 12 via the server 14 for that command to actually take effect on the lamp 44 .
- the client 12 and the server 14 comprises the data source, albeit a distributed data source.
- the server 14 functions as the moderator.
- commands could issue from the server 14 that must be communicated with the service broker 28 such as heartbeats, polling commands, device or control specific commands, commands to manipulate the client's data rate, commands to update the service broker's components, and the like.
- the commands are in the form of a triple, i.e., the service broker name, device name, command.
- the service broker 28 lacks a server for listening for commands issued by the server 14 and/or since the service broker 28 does not have a permanent connection to the global computer network 16 , the server 14 is unable to communicate with the service broker 28 . Therefore, the present invention incorporates a polling scheme to communicate with the service broker 28 in which the service broker 28 periodically polls the server 14 to determine if any commands or data is waiting for it.
- commands are first generated 200 for the service brokers 28 . These commands can initiate from the client 12 , the server 14 , and from the ISP 23 . The commands are then sent 202 to the server 14 via the global computer network 16 using the HTTP protocol. The commands are assigned a unique ID and are stored in a queue or other temporary storage 204 on the server 14 such as the database server 48 . The stored commands are accessible by the service broker 28 when it polls the server 14 for the data waiting for it in the queue. Since the commands are stored in a queue, commands are stored in the order in which they are received.
- the service broker 28 On the service broker-side of the polling scheme, the service broker 28 first checks to see if a connection to the global computer network is available 206 .
- the service broker may be connected to the global computer network 16 via a dial-up connection to ISP 23 , in which case a connection to the global computer network 16 must be established 208 .
- the service broker 28 would poll the server 14 for data or commands waiting for it in the queue 208 .
- the poll contains a known string that signifies to the server 14 a request for data and contains the service broker's name.
- the server 14 parses the poll transmission and detects the polling token string and the name of the service broker. Thereafter, the service broker 28 relays the commands to the connected devices 32 as appropriate.
- the server 14 responds 212 to the service broker indicating that there is no data or commands waiting for it. Thereafter, at a pre-selected time interval, the service broker 28 initiates another poll to determine if any new data or commands are waiting for it in the queue. If commands are waiting in the queue 210 , the server responds 214 positively with a pre-selected packet of data containing the first queued command. However, if additional commands are waiting in the queue, the response includes a flag to indicate that additional data is waiting in the queue.
- the refresh flag is not set and this status is included in the server's response to the poll.
- the poll request is performed using the post method with data being transferred as name/value pairs in the HTTP header field, and the server's response is merely a response to the POST.
- the service broker 28 receives the queued command along with the refresh flag.
- the service broker 28 parses the response from the server to retrieve the command portion and device name and delivers the commands to the appropriate device 32 .
- the service broker 28 then parses the command to see if the refresh flag has been set 222 indicating that additional data is waiting in the server's queue for it. If additional data is waiting in the queue, the service broker again polls the server 14 to retrieve the remaining data as in step 208 and the process continues until there is no more data waiting in the queue and the refresh flag is no longer set.
- the user would call up the web page 184 on server 14 that contained the virtual user interface 180 a for the light switch 41 .
- the user would do this by using his Internet browser 26 to access the web page 184 via the global computer network 16 .
- the web server 46 generates web page 184 by retrieving the user interface 182 a for the light switch 41 stored in the database server 48 .
- the user would then manipulate the virtual on-off control 182 a for the light switch on the web page 184 using the browser 26 .
- This manipulations of the virtual on-off control 182 a issues a command for the light switch 41 which is placed in the server's queue.
- the service broker would periodically poll the server 14 to see if data was waiting for the devices connected to it, such as the light switch 41 .
- the change in state of the on-off switch would be waiting in the server queue.
- the server would retrieve this data waiting in the queue and, assuming that additional commands are waiting in the light switch queue, the server 14 would set the refresh flag to indicate that data was still waiting for the light switch control 41 in the queue.
- the server 14 would then respond to the poll request by transmitting the command data and the refresh flag to the service broker 28 that the light switch is connected to.
- the data is then passed off to the device descriptor for the light switch control 41 that is running as a software module on the monitoring appliance 28 .
- the data is processed by the device descriptor and the light switch control 41 changes its state to match the command.
- This change in state generates a change-in-state command which is transmitted to the entry 90 for the light switch 41 in the database server 48 .
- the entry for the on-off switch control 90 a would be changed according to the change effected in the virtual representation of the switch 182 a and stored therein. Since the refresh flag was set, the service broker would poll the server 14 again requesting the additional data waiting for it in the server queue.
- the server 14 would then return the remaining data in the queue and indicate via the refresh flag that no additional data was waiting in the queue.
- the change-in-state command is issued over the global computer network 16 to the monitoring appliance 28 where it is processed with the previous commands and issued to the lamp 44 connected to the light switch control 41 which would change the state of the light switch from off to on.
- a user is able to communicate with a service broker that does not contain a server via the global computer network 16 .
Abstract
A method and system for communication between server-less computing devices or clients in computers communicating over networks, such as the World Wide Web (WWW) using stateless protocols, e.g., HTTP. In this scheme there are two classes of clients which can operate independently or can be combined in computer communicating over the network: a) Clients that issue commands and request status or data, and b) clients which function as service brokers for provide services and processing commands, updating status and providing specific data. Based on the description of the latter client device it would resemble a server device but without accessible TCP/IP ports. Each service providing device is authenticated, retains a unique identity and establishes a soft state with the globally accessible server or servers. All devices and clients can compile and process a globally common command language established between all communicating network clients. The central server includes a CGI processing program and a database to retain client specific information. The server database represents a collection of queues, each having a client unique identifiable status, pending commands and/or data components. In this scheme commands and signaling transmitted between the servers and clients utilize standard HTTP protocol semantics and HTML or standard markup language syntax. Clients encapsulate or embed information as parameters passed to HTTP CGI as a set of standard HTTP conversations. A CGI processing program converts, parses or processes each conversation and passes arguments with or without data to queues. Each conversation is includes a client identification key(s) and commands which are structured as attribute-value pair tuples. The service-handler client connects to the central server and accesses the client queue on the central server to check for any pending commands or update their status in either synchronous or asynchronous manner. The synchronous server access scheme is regulated temporally by either deterministic clocking on server response or by a server based adaptive algorithm which can monitor network and client activities and optimize client access patterns.
Description
- The invention relates generally to computer networking and, more particularly, to a service broker for processing data from a data network.
- For purposes of the present invention, the following terms as used throughout the specification have the following defined meanings:
- Internet
- The network of networks and gateways that use the TCP/IP suite of protocols.
- TCP/IP
- Transmission Control Protocol/Internet protocol. A packet switching scheme the Internet uses to chop, route, and reconstruct the data it handles, from e-mail to video.
- Client
- A client is a computer which issues commands to the server which performs the task associated with the command.
- Server
- Any computer that performs a task at the command of another computer is a server. A Web server typically supports one or more clients.
- Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP)
- HTTP is an example of a stateless protocol, which means that every request from a client to a server is treated independently. The server has no record of previous connections. At the beginning of a URL, “http:” indicates the file contains hyperlinks.
- Web Browser
- A program running on a computer that acts as an Internet tour guide, complete with pictorial desktops, directories and search tools used when a user “surfs” the Internet. In this application the Web browser is a client service which communicates with the World Wide Web.
- Data Source
- An entity or set of entities which produces data of varying types, such as video, email, heartbeat transmissions, commands, and the like.
- Moderator
- A device, program, or the like that receives, stores, and forwards data. The moderator may possess each of the three functionalities in one entity or each functionality may be contained in separate devices. The moderator includes a data receiving system, a data storage system, and a data transmission system.
- Data Store
- An entity that can at least temporarily store data. A system in which data can be written to and retrieved.
- Name/Value Pairs
- An associative pair with two portions, the “name” part and the “value” part in which the “name” is related to the “value.” The value of the “name” is the “value.”
- Field/Value Abstraction Layer
- A method for transmitting an arbitrary number of name/value pairs within HTTP which encodes an arbitrary set of name/value pairs in other name/value pairs.
-
- 1. Base case: one name/value pair: “field 1”/“name 1” “field 2”/“value 1”
- 2. “field 3”/“name 2” “field 4”/“value 2” . . . “field (2n−1)”/“name n” “field (2n)”/“value n”
Virtual Representation
- A representation in which a control of a device can be mapped to a representative or virtual control.
- Control
- Any physical, virtual, electronic, or logical entity which either causes an effective change in the real world, in a virtual space, or in software or gives an indication of an effective change in the real world, in a virtual space, or in software.
- Data Transfer Protocol
- Any method by which data is organized and transmitted from a sender to a receiver.
- Networks have transformed the way people do computing. Someone with access to a personal computer or workstation can connect to the Internet and communicate with systems and people all over the world. The World Wide Web (WWW or Web) is a way of using the Internet that provides the user with access via linked documents to a wealth of information distributed throughout the globe. The WWW also allows users to execute programs running on remote servers. This capability enables users to obtain the results from programs which the user cannot run locally due to hardware and/or software limitations. It is also possible to download and run programs stored remotely on the World Wide Web. This has the potential to greatly increase the amount of software which is available to a computer connected to the World Wide Web. Network
- Network protocols provide standard methods for machines to communicate with one another. The protocols indicate how data should be formatted for receipt and transmission across networks. Heterogeneous machines can communicate seamlessly over a network via standard protocols. Examples of standard Internet protocols include: HTTP, see, e.g., “Hypertext Transfer Protocol-HTTP/1.0”, http://www.ics.uci.edu/pub/ietf/http/draft-ietf-http-v 10-spec-03.html, by T. Berners-Lee, R. Fielding, and H. Frystyk, Sep. 4, 1995; SMTP, see, e.g, “Simple Mail Transfer Protocol”. RFC 821, J. B. Postel, Information Sciences Institute, USC, August 1982, http://ds.internic.net/std/std10.txt.; NNTP, see, e.g., “Network News Transfer Protocol: A Proposed Standard for the Stream-Based Transmission of News”, RFC 977, B. Kantor and P. Lapsley, UC San Diego and UC Berkeley, February 1986, http://ds.internic.net/rfc/rfc977.txt.; FTP, see e.g., J. Postel and J. K. Reynolds. “File Transfer Protocol (FTP)”, RFC 959, Information Sciences Institute, USC, October 1985, http://ds.internic.net/std/std9.txt.; Gopher, see, e.g., F. Anklesaria, M. McCahill, P. Lindner, D. Johnson, D. Torrey, and B. Alberti. “The Internet Gopher Protocol: A distributed document search and retrieval protocol”, RFC 1436, University of Minnesota, March 1993, http://ds.internic.net/rfc/rfc1436.txt.; and WAIS, see, e.g.,
- F. Davis, B. Kahle, H. Morris, J. Salem, T. Shen, R. Wang, J. Sui and M. Grinbaum. “WAIS Interface Protocol Prototype Functional Specification” (v 1.5), Thinking Machines Corporation, April 1990.
- The client-server model constitutes one of the dominant paradigms in network programming, see, e.g., W. R Stevens, “Unix Network Programming”, Prentice Hall PTR, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1990; and D. E. Corner, “Internetworking with TCP/IP” vol 1., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1991 which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. A server program offers a service which can be accessed by multiple users over the network. A program becomes a client when it sends a message to a server and waits for a response from the server. The client process, which is typically optimized for user interaction, uses the requested service without having to know any of the detailed workings of the requested service or server. On the World Wide Web, “browsers” constitute client programs while the programs sending back information to the browser constitute server programs.
- Data transfer between client and server can be achieved by many different TCP protocols such as File Transfer Protocol. In the recent years HTTP has become the defacto access protocol between web servers and client browsers. Due to HTTPs ubiquitous presence on the Internet most network administrators provide access methods for HTTP clients to gain access to Internet servers with HTTP services within their private net and gain access by users client browsers. HTTP is a stateless protocol; every request from the client to the server is treated independently. The server has no record of previous connections. The advantages of using stateless protocol are efficiency and simplicity.
- Clients can send and receive data from an Internet based system, but in order to protect private or enterprise data, in many instances access to a server services are hidden behind a private net firewall or other protection mechanism and can only be accessed within the same network subnet. In such cases the server is not visible by common Internet clients. Additionally, services provided by ad hoc network servers, which can be based on mobile or temporary Internet services, require complex system administration and can create a challenge for the average individual. Other system and network issues include such matters as scalability, resource management, security, and access control, each requiring technical depth, lengthy lead time to assemble, and ongoing maintenance that can become costly. In most cases the user has to invest a great deal of time and expense. The services are limited and devices which provide services are not user friendly. The system setup and service access can present problems.
- In virtually all client/server systems today, there exist two main entities which each play a crucial role in the transmission of data. A client, sender, or data source must package data in a format which can be transported over the network using one of a variety of networking protocols. A receiver or service broker must then be able to unpack the data and make use of it in its original form. It is this latter side of the data transmission relationship that we are interested in.
- In order for applications running on the receivers today to obtain the transmitted data from the senders, those receivers must implement a server. A server is often a program, either in hardware or software on the receiver, which listens for incoming data. When data arrives on the receiver, it is already tagged to be delivered to a particular port on the receiver. If no listener, i.e., a server, is registered with the port on the low level network driver on the receiver, the data cannot make it to the appropriate application that the data is intended for because no server is there to hand the data to the applications for high-level processing. The server is often responsible for unpacking the data and stripping off the envelopes which encapsulate the protocol information inside of which the client packaged the data. Such an unpackaging entity on the server is called the protocol stack. At each rung up the protocol stack, the server is responsible for keeping track of the information relevant to the protocols implemented at that layer as well as performing all necessary processing to carry out the functionality at that layer.
- As the size of a server increases, i.e., as the number of possible incoming connections increases, the complexity, cost, and processing overhead of that server likewise increases. For example, the code necessary to authenticate incoming connection requests and the connection setup can increase processing overhead because a separate connection handler thread or process may need be started to handle data for the new connection. Further, additional memory must be allocated per connection to be used to queue packets for each incoming connection when the server is not processing the data fast enough for that connection. As the number of simultaneous connections increases, so does the code size and memory requirements for the server program itself running on the receiver. All of these added complexities increase the cost of the receivers, more physical memory is needed to store programs and connection data and more powerful processors are needed to run these complex server programs. With the advent of less expensive and smaller networked appliances, such as light switches and smoke sensors, there grows a need to reduce the cost of the servers that would be necessary in these devices to receive commands. Likewise, due to the increased network resources needed to continuously keep these devices on-line, a solution for delivering commands to these devices that does not require these devices to continuously be on-line becomes crucial. Finally, as the need for security on sensitive appliances such as cameras and motion sensors becomes ever greater, so does the danger of using embedded servers which have a notorious history of being prone to attack by malicious individuals. Thus, a scheme is needed to deliver data to receivers that is extremely light-weight, in terms of processing and hardware requirements, does not require an always-on connection, and protects against the faults found in traditional embedded server systems today.
- A method and system for communication between server-less computing devices or clients in computers communicating over networks, such as the World Wide Web (WWW using stateless protocols, e.g., HTTP. In this scheme there are two classes of clients which can operate independently or can be combined in computer communicating over the network: a) Clients that issue commands and request status or data, and b) clients that function as service brokers to provide services and process commands, update status, and provide specific data. Based on the description of the latter client device it would resemble a server device but without directly accessible TCP/IP ports.
- Each service provider device is authenticated, retains a unique identity and establishes a soft state with the globally accessible server or servers. All devices and clients can compile and process a globally common command language established between all communicating network clients. The central server includes a CGI processing program and a database to retain client specific information. The server database represents a collection of queues, with each having a client unique identifiable status, pending commands, and/or data components.
- In this scheme, commands and signaling transmitted between the servers and the clients utilize standard HTTP protocol semantics and HTML or standard markup language syntax. Clients encapsulate or embed information as parameters passed to HTTP CGI as a set of standard HTTP conversations. A CGI processing program converts, parses and processes each conversation and passes arguments with or without data to queues. Each conversation includes client identification key(s) and commands which are structured as attribute-value pair tuples. The service-handler client connects to the central server and accesses the client queue on the central server to check for any pending commands or update their status in either synchronous or asynchronous maner. The synchronous server access scheme is regulated temporally by either deterministic clocking on server response by a server based adaptive algorithm which can monitor network and client activities and optimize client access patterns.
- In one preferred embodiments the invention comprises a service broker for processing data from a data network including at least one data source. The service broker includes a first communication module for initiating communication with a moderator and adapted to receive data from the moderator and a second communication module for sending data to at least one of the data source and the moderator. A service-action module is provided for processing the received data and for performing a task based on the processed data. An export module which is in communication with the service-action module is provided for publishing data based at least in part on the performed task to the data network.
- The published data may be published to at least one of the data source and the moderator. The moderator may includes a data store and the first communication module could receive data from the data store. The data store may store data received from the at least one data source. In addition, the data store could be a command queue and the data received from the data source could be a command which is intended to be processed by the service-action module, the first communication module receiving the command from the queue.
- In one form of the invention, the first communication module communicates with the moderator via the HTTP protocol. In addition, the data source could also communicate with the moderator via the HTTP protocol.
- In another form of the invention, the performed task comprises communicating a command based at least in part on the processed data to a device connected to the service broker.
- In another form of the invention, at least one of the moderator and the data source comprises a virtual representation of the service broker and wherein the published data updates the virtual representation. Alternatively, at least one of the moderator and the data source could comprise a virtual representation of the connected device and wherein the published data updates the virtual representation.
- The present invention also encompasses a method for transferring data from a data source to a service broker comprising the steps of: providing a data source and a service broker; providing a moderator for receiving the data transferred by the data source; providing a data store for storing data received by the moderator; providing a communications module for transferring data from the data store; providing a virtual representation of the service broker on the data source; transferring data from the data source to the moderator, the data sent being related to or associated with the virtual representation; storing the data received by the moderator in the data store; retrieving the data from the data store via the communications module and forwarding the data to the service broker; updating the virtual representation when the service broker receives the data sent by the data source, whereby data is transferred between the data source and to the service broker.
- For a more complete understanding of this invention, reference should now be made to the embodiment illustrated in greater detail in the accompanying drawing and described below. In the drawings:
-
FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a first preferred embodiment of a system for transferring data via a service broker. -
FIG. 1 a is a schematic view of the service broker of the system shown inFIG. 1 . -
FIG. 2 is a schematic view of a second preferred embodiment of a data transfer system in accordance with the present invention. -
FIG. 3 is a schematic view of the client and server components of the system shown inFIG. 2 . -
FIG. 4 is a schematic view of the controlled devices and virtual representation of same in the server database of the system shown inFIG. 2 . -
FIG. 5 is a schematic view of a simplified data transfer system having a service broker in accordance with the present invention. -
FIG. 6 is a flow chart of the polling scheme for communicating with a service broker in accordance with the present invention. - In
FIG. 1 there is shown asystem 200 for transferring data or commands from a data source or command generator to a service broker via a moderator. The moderator allows the service broker to get commands and/or data from the data source without needing the functionality of a server or otherwise some mechanism for listening for the data transmission. - The
system 200 includes a data source orcommand generator 202 that initiates the transfer of commands and/or data intended for a particular service broker. Additional data sources/command generators system 200 includes aservice broker 208 that receives the data/commands from the data sources/command generators. In addition toservice broker 208, the system may also include any number ofadditional service brokers - Each service broker may include
connected devices command generators - Each data source/command generator may include a virtual representation of the service brokers and/or the connected devices. For example, as shown in
FIG. 1 , avirtual representation 224 for theservice broker 208, along withvirtual representations connected devices command generator 202. It should be understood that the data sources could contain a virtual representation for any or all of the connected devices and service brokers, but have been omitted fromFIG. 1 for the sake of clarity. - In addition, the additional data sources/command generators would also preferably include virtual representations of any of the service brokers and/or connected devices. For purposes of the present invention, the virtual representation is a control, group of controls, and/or user interface for a service broker or connected devices that is mapped to a representative control on the connected device and/or service broker.
- Between the data sources and the service brokers is a
moderator 232 that listens for and accepts data/commands transmitted from the data source/command generators. It should be understood that any number of additional moderators, such asmoderators - Each moderator includes a
data store 238 for temporarily storing the data/commands received by the moderator. The preferred form of the data store is a queue of commands. Such a queue of commands can take any number of forms as known to those skilled in the art. - Each moderator also includes a communications module that functions as a
forwarding agent 240 for forwarding data/commands residing on thedata store 238 to the service brokers. Preferably, theforwarding agent 240 transmits its data synchronously or asynchronously pursuant to a request from the service broker. Of course, the forwarding agent may function in any suitable way to pass data as known to those skilled in the art. - Data is transferred between the data sources, moderators and service brokers via any suitable data transfer protocol. Preferably, data is transferred using the HTTP protocol between all the devices which are networked together via the global computer network, such as the Internet.
- In addition, the data is transferred using name value pairs, with each piece of data being transferred as the value part and identified by the name part. For example, a command x intended for the
service broker 208 can be encoded using the name value pair “service broker 208: connected device 214: command x.” By transferring data using name value pairs, data can be easily transferred using the HTTP protocol. - In addition to transferring data using name/value pairs, data is preferably transferred using a field value abstraction layer that allows an unlimited number of name value pairs to be transferred.
- The
service broker 208 is capable of performing many different functions in order to effect the transfer of data. For purposes of the present invention, the different functionalities of theservice broker 208 are described in terms of “modules.” It should be understood that the “modules” could be implemented in software, hardware, or a combination of the two. - As best seen in
FIG. 1 a, theservice broker 208 includes afirst communication module 250 for initiating communication with themoderator 232 and is adapted to receive data from themoderator 232. In addition, thefirst communication module 250 is capable of handling a device identifier and/or class of device identifiers for each connected device and/or service broker. An example of which is given in connection with the command x as described above. The device identifier allows the first communication module to communicate with a particular device, whereas the class of identifiers allows the first communication with a class of similar or otherwise redacted devices. - The
service broker 208 includes asecond communication module 252 for sending data to themoderator 232 and/or thedata source 202. Thesecond communication module 252 is responsible for acknowledging the successful transmission of data to theservice broker 208 and is also responsible for updating thevirtual representations 224 of the service broker or the connected devices which may be present on thedata source 202 and themoderator 232. - The
service broker 208 also includes aservice action module 254 for processing the data received from themoderator 232 and for performing a tasks based on the processed data. For example, thedata source 202 might transmit a command to theservice broker 208 via themoderator 232 which is a command for changing the state of one of the connecteddevices 214. Theservice broker 208, upon receiving the command, processes the command and passes a command to theconnected device 214 in a form which it understands for changing the state of the device. Further examples of the functionality of theservice action module 254 are described in connection with the second preferred embodiment which is described in greater detail below. - The
service broker 208 also includes anexport module 256 which is in communication with theservice action module 254. Theexport module 256 is responsible for publishing data i.e., updates to the virtual representation to the data network and, in particular, to thedata source 202 and themoderator 232. It is theexport module 256 that is responsible for updating the virtual representation of the service broker and the connected devices and for synchronizing the virtual representation for these devices with the devices themselves. Theexport module 256 may utilize the services of thesecond communication module 252 to effect the publication of data. - In operation, data or commands intended for the
service broker 208 are transmitted to themoderator 232 and stored adata queue 238. Periodically, theservice broker 208 polls thedata queue 238 for waiting data. If data is present in thedata queue 238, theforwarding agent 240 functions to transfer that data to theservice broker 208. The data is received by thefirst communication module 250 and processed by theservice action module 254 and performs whatever task is associated with the received command. If necessary, theservice broker 208 interfaces with theconnected devices 214 if the transmitted command is intended for one of the connected devices. Once the command has been processed and the task performed, theexport module 256 publishes an update based on this performed task back to thedata source 202 so that thevirtual representation 224 can be updated and synchronized. In this way, data is transferred between adata source 202 to another device, such as a service broker or connected devices, which is not otherwise directly accessible by the data source. - In
FIGS. 2-6 there is illustrated a second preferred embodiment of the present invention. This second preferred embodiment is a specific implementation of the invention and concepts described in connection with the first embodiment. The second preferred embodiment is provided to illustrate how the invention can be implemented in a client/server environment over a global computer network having many distributed clients and a centralized server or moderator. - Client-Side
- In
FIG. 2 there is shown a client andserver system 10 in accordance with the present invention. The client/server system 10 includes aclient 12 and aserver 14 which are connected via aglobal computer network 16, such as the Internet. - The
client 12 is operated by a local user (not shown). Theclient 12 may comprise a plurality of nodes, such asfirst user node 18 andsecond user node 20. It should be understood that thenodes - In one form of the invention, the
user node 18 includes aclient computer 22 that is connected to theglobal computer network 16 via an Internet Service Provider (ISP) 23 by any conventional means, such as a dial-up connection, DSL line, cable modem, satellite connection, or T1 line. Theclient computer 22 includes anInternet browser program 26 for accessing web pages via theglobal computer network 16. - A
monitoring module 28 is also provided which serves as a gateway between theserver 14 and at least oneconnected device 32. The monitoring module can take various forms, such as asoftware program 29 running on the client computer (as shown at node 18). Alternately, themonitoring module 28 can take the form of a stand-alone appliance 30 (as shown at node 20) which is connected to theglobal computer network 16 and operates separately and independently from theclient computer 22. Themonitoring module 28 is described in greater detail below. - At least one, and preferably a plurality of, device or
appliance 32 is connected to and controlled by eachmonitoring module 28. The connection between themonitoring module 28 and thevarious devices 32 can be wired or wireless. - The
appliances 32 encompass a multitude of devices which are capable of being controlled or mediated by an external controller. Such appliances includecamera 34,radio 36, smoke orfire detector 38,contact sensor 40, andlight switch 41. Although not illustrated, it should be understood that the present invention encompasses many other such devices such as various audio input and output devices, various visual displays, washers/driers, microwave ovens, cooking ranges, car alarms, plant watering devices, sprinkler, thermostats, carbon monoxide sensors, humidistats, rain gauges, video cassette recorders, radio tuners, and the like. - In addition, a myriad of notification devices, such as
pager 42, can also be incorporated into the system. As best seen inFIG. 2 , thepager 42 is in wireless communication with a wireless orcellular transmitter 44 associated with theserver component 14. Other notification devices besides thepager 42 are also contemplated by the present invention including, e-mail clients, wireless hand-held computers, wireless wearable computer units, automatic web notification via dynamic web content, telephone clients, voice mail clients, cellular telephones, instant messaging clients, and the like. - Server-Side
- The
server 14 of the present invention includes aweb server 46 and adatabase server 48. Theweb server 46 generates static web pages and dynamic web pages from data contained in thedatabase server 48. Theweb pages 50 can be viewed by the user on theInternet browser 26 running on theclient computer 22. - It is contemplated that the
client 12 and theserver 14 communicate over theglobal computer network 16 via the conventionally available TCP/IP environment using the HTTP protocol. Of course, it should be understood that any request-response type of protocol and socket-based packet transport environment would also be suitable and within the scope of the contemplated invention. - It is also contemplated that the
server 14 of the present invention functions as the master controller of thesystem 10. In addition, the client-server configuration of thesystem 10 and the connection of thesystem 10 to theglobal computer network 16 via anISP 23 allow a user to access thesystem 10 via any computer, monitoring appliance or similar device connected to theglobal computer network 16. - In this way a user is able to control and monitor a plurality of
devices 32 connected to themonitoring module 29 atnode 18 and a plurality ofdevices 32 connected to thenetworked monitoring module 30 atnode 20. Thedevices 32 can be accessed via anypersonal computer 22 by accessing thecontrol server 14 via theglobal computer network 16. By using aglobal computer network 16 it should be clear that a user, or anyone the user permits access to, can readily monitor and control themonitoring modules 28 atnodes global computer network 16. - The Monitoring Module
- Referring now to
FIG. 3 , themonitoring module 28 serves as the connection hub for the controlleddevices 32 and as the gateway for brokering communications between thedevices 32 and thecontrol server 14 via theglobal computer network 16. - One of the functions of the
monitoring module 28 is to serve as a translation and brokering agent between theserver 14 and theconnected devices 32. In itssoftware form 29, themonitoring module 28 comprises a plurality of dynamically loaded objects, ordevice descriptors 49 that allow theserver 14 to interface with theconnected devices 32. The dynamically loadeddevice descriptors 49 act as the device drivers for theconnected devices 32, translating, in both directions, the monitoring, command, and control data that is sent and received between themonitoring module 28 and theserver 14 via theglobal computer network 16. Eachdevice descriptor 49 also translates the signals received from themonitoring module 28 into the specific electrical signals that are required to communicate with, both input and output, and control its associateddevice 32. In addition, because eachdevice 32 has its own specific interface and requires a specific set of electrical signals to monitor and control it, adifferent device descriptor 49 must be provided for each specific model of eachdevice 32. - The
monitoring module 28 also controls the communication between theserver 14 and theconnected devices 32 via theglobal computer network 16. The HTTP protocol employed by the existing global computer network is a stateless protocol. Since the knowledge of the current state of the connected devices is vital to the successful operation of thesystem 10, it is necessary for themonitoring module 28 to store the persistent state of the connecteddevices 32 and to provide a system for periodically updating and obtaining the state of eachconnected device 32 for obtaining commands from theserver 14. Themonitoring module 28 does this by polling 50 theserver 14 and maintaining asystem heartbeat 52. - The
monitoring module 28polls 50 by scheduling a transmission between themonitoring module 28 and theserver 14 in which it checks for commands from theserver 14. If commands are waiting on theserver 14, the server will return commands in an algorithmic manner, that can take various forms, for processing and also informs the monitoring module that N commands are waiting in the queue. Themonitoring module 14 will then poll theserver 14 and retrieve data from theserver 14 until there are no more commands in the queue. In this way, commands from theserver 14 can be delivered to themonitoring module 28 to effect changes in thedevices 32 over the stateless medium of the existingglobal computer network 16. - In a
typical polling operation 50, theclient computer 22 issues a command for incurring a change in state of one of thecontrol devices 32. The change in state command is posted to adata store 51, such as a command queue associated with theserver 14. Similarly, if theserver 14 desires to make an internal change to themonitor 28, such as setting or modifying thepolling 50 orheartbeat 52 time intervals, these commands are likewise posted to thestorage device 51. Upon reaching the end of the current polling interval, themonitoring module 28 sends a transmission to theserver 14, requesting any queued commands. Themonitoring module 28 continues to poll, using a preselected transmission scheme, until the queue of commands waiting for themonitor 28 is complete. Each command received from the queue is acted upon when it is received and any associated state changes are effected. Theserver 14 transmits an acknowledgment of receipt and successful processing of the data back to themonitoring module 28. - The
monitoring module 28 is also responsible for maintaining aheartbeat 52 or a scheduled periodic update regime to refresh the current state of thedevices 32 stored in thedatabase server 48. The primary function of theheartbeat 52 is to synchronize the states of thedevices 32 and the virtual representation of those devices stored on theserver 14. Theheartbeat 52 also functions to send device events and state changes between thedevices 32 and theserver 14 to effect this synchronization of thecontrol server 14 and to assure that themonitoring module 28 and theserver 14 are synchronized. - Not only is the monitoring module able to send commands to the
server 14, but theserver 14 is able to send commands back to themonitoring module 28. The types of transmissions that cause theserver 14 to send unsolicited transmissions back to themonitoring module 28 are to set or update the heartbeat or polling time and to issue a command to update a component of a device. - In a
typical heartbeat operation 52, themonitoring module 28 sends a transmission to theserver 14 in response to a change in state of aconnected device 32, a synchronization of acontrol device 32 withserver 14, a triggered alert event, or the like. In such aheartbeat operation 52, all data intended to be transmitted to theserver 14 is transmitted to theserver 14 via the global computer network. Theserver 14 transmits an acknowledgment of receipt and successful processing of the data back to themonitoring module 28. - Along with maintaining the polling and heartbeat operations and sending and receiving events, data, and commands 54 to and from the
server 14, themonitoring module 28 also takes care of manynetwork level activities 56 such as verifying passwords, dialing up the ISP if necessary, periodically uploading accounting/billing information, and performing security measures. - Another function of the
monitoring module 28 is the storage of the persistent state of thedevices 32. In the event that the user'scomputer 22 crashes and themonitoring module 28 must be restarted, many of the parameters that were negotiated between themonitoring module 28 and theserver 14 during the registration process are stored in the memory of the monitoring module. - Device Interface and Descriptors
- Referring now to
FIG. 4 , a series ofdevices monitoring module 28 via a device descriptor or driver 49 (only one shown). Each device may include acustomizable user interface 58 that is viewable on theclient computer 22 over theglobal computer network 16 through a virtual representation of the user interface stored on theweb server 46, as explained below. Theuser interface 58 comprises at least one resource or sub-devices 60, 62, and 64. Typically, a resource provides a specific functionality of the device. For example, the device shown inFIG. 4 represents a VCR having arecording setting resource 60, achannel selecting resource 62, and apower selecting resource 64. Of course, a typical VCR would have many other operational resources, but the resources illustrated are sufficient to describe the basic operation of the device. - Each
resource user interface 58 of the device. For example, therecording setting resource 60 comprises adisplay component 70 and a series ofpushbuttons 72, 74, 76, 78 which activate the VCR's fast forward, reverse, play, and stop functions, respectively. Thechannel selecting resource 62 comprises thedisplay component 70 and a pair ofpushbuttons 82 which activate the up channel and down channel functions of the VCR. Thepower selecting resource 64 comprises atoggle switch 80 for activating the VCR's power on and power off commands and anLED indicator 81 which indicates the power condition of the VCR A virtual representation of eachdevice record database server 48 of thecontrol server 14. Each record contains an entry for each resource and its associated components which make up the device. For example, Therecord 94 for theVCR device 32 contains anentry resource entry component web page 50 can be generated by theweb server 46 by extracting the associated record for that device from thedatabase server 48 and creating a graphical, textual, tactile, aural, or other similar modality user interface representation of that device which a user can access via theInternet browser 26. - Basic Operation of the System
- In operation, the
client 12 first registers with theserver component 14 to begin using the services offered therein by accessing theweb server 46 of theserver component 14 via theclient browser 26. At this point, an account is opened for theclient 12 and the user's information is stored in thedatabase server 48. If it has not been previously registered, themonitoring modules server component 14 and their information would also be stored in thedatabase server 48 and associated with thenode 18. Once themonitoring modules device 32 that is attached to either of themonitoring devices database server 48, and available to the user. Eachdevice 32 communicates with themonitoring modules database server 48 or otherwise obtains a default interface configuration, as explained in greater detail below. These interfaces, as described in greater detail below, are adapted to be displayed, to be viewed, and to be interacted with by the user via theclient browser 26 over theglobal computer network 16 by accessing theweb server 46. - A few uses of the
present system 10 will now be explained to aid in the understanding of the operation. For example, thecontact sensor 40 could be associated with the front door (not shown) at theremote location 20 and set to trip whenever the front door is opened. Thecamera 34 is also positioned to view the front door location and can be programmed to take a digital photograph whenever thesensor contact 40 is tripped and transmit that photograph to be stored in thedatabase server 48. When, in fact, thecontact sensor 40 detects that the front door has been opened, an event notification or alarm trigger is transmitted by themonitoring module 30 to thedatabase server 48 which has been previously programmed to transmit a notification event to the user's pager via thecellular transmitter 44. As the contact sensor is tripped, thecamera 34 takes a picture of the front door and transmits that picture via themonitoring module 30 via theglobal computer network 16 to thedatabase server 48. The user, having been notified via thepager 42, can now access theweb server 46 of theserver component 14 via hisInternet browser 26 to retrieve the photograph that has been stored on adatabase server 48. In this way, the user can determine whether an intruder has entered via the front door of his vacation home or whether his family has just arrived for their vacation. - Another use for the
system 10 would be for the user located at thenode 18 to be able to control hislamp 42 at his vacation home located atnode 20. The user would contact theweb server 46 via hisInternet browser 26 to access the database entry of thelight switch 41. A virtual representation of thelight switch 41 would be available on theweb server 46 and could be manipulated by the user to remotely change the state of thelight switch 41 and theconnected lamp 46, say from being “off” to being “on.” To do this, the user would simply manipulate the on/off virtual representation of the light switch on theweb server 46 and this command would be placed in a queue of waiting commands on the server component. - Periodically, the controlling module or monitor 30 polls the
server component 14 looking for waiting commands, such as the change state command of thelight switch 41. Thereafter, the command would be transmitted to themonitoring device 30 which would instruct the light switch to change from the “off” state to “on” state, and, thus, turning on thelamp 46. This change in state of thelamp 46 could be viewed by an appropriately positioned camera, such ascamera 34, which would be used to visually monitor theremote location 20 to determine whether the command had been completed successfully. - Since the
monitoring module 28 receives data and commands from theclient 12, it is considered to be a service broker for purposes of the present invention. Theservice broker 28 does not include a server which would otherwise receive data and commands sent to theservice broker 28. Since theservice broker 28 lacks a server functionality, the present invention utilizes a polling scheme incorporated into the HTTP protocol so that theservice broker 28 can receive data and/or commands initiating from theclient 12 orserver 14. - In addition, it is also a common situation that a
service broker 28 may not have a permanent connection to theglobal computer network 16, such as might be the case if there was a dial-up connection between theservice broker 30 and theISP 23 as shown inFIG. 2 . As such, data and commands sent to theservice broker 30 while it is not connected to theglobal computer networks 16 may never reach theservice broker 30. The present invention overcomes this problem by incorporating the polling scheme in which theservice broker 30 connects to the global computer network as needed and polls for data waiting for it. - In
FIG. 5 , there is shown a simplified schematic of the data transfer system of the second preferred embodiment of the present invention. Aclient 12 is connected to aserver 14 via theglobal computer network 16 via anISP 23. Theclient 12 comprises acomputer 22 that is networked to theglobal computer network 16 via any suitable local network configuration, topography, and/or wired or wireless media. The client also includes a world wideweb Internet browser 26 for accessing web pages on theglobal computer network 16. It should be understood that theclient 12 can be any source of data that is capable of transmitting that data and includes such devices as home appliances, cameras, home gateways, and the like. - The
server 14 includes aweb server 46 for serving-up web pages and adatabase server 48 for storing data. For purposes of the present invention, other suitable servers include gateways, firewall servers, ISP gateways, network enabled cameras, networked home appliances and the like. - At least one
service broker 28 is connected to theglobal computer network 16. Suitable service brokers include home appliances, computers, cellular phones, personal digital assistants, and the like. A plurality of controlleddevices 32 can be connected to eachservice broker 28 as described below. - The
device 32 illustrated inFIG. 5 is alight switch module 41; however, it should be understood that this device could be any similar device that receives data and is networked to theglobal computer network 16 such as a video camera, a thermostat, a sensor, a door opener, a door lock, a video cassette recorder, ovens, dish washers, and the like. Thelight switch module 41 includes auser interface 180 for controlling the light switch. In this case, theuser interface 180 includes a on-off switch 182 for selectively providing an attached light or lamp with electricity. - The
virtual representation 180 a of theuser interface 180 is stored in thedatabase server 48 and can be viewed on aweb page 184 generated by theweb server 46. Thevirtual interface 180 a has all the components normally associated with thereal user interface 180 including a virtual on-off switch 182 a for controlling the power state of the switch. Theclient 12 is able to access thevirtual user interface 180 a and itsvirtual control 182 by accessing theweb page 184 on theweb server 46 by use of the client'sInternet browser 26. - Typically, commands and data are sent to the
service broker 28 and relayed to theconnected devices 32 by the user manipulating the virtual user interface on theweb page 184 via theInternet browser 26. For example, the user may manipulate the virtual on-off switch 182 a which would send a command over theglobal computer network 16 to thedatabase server 48 which contains anentry 90 for thelight switch 41 and anentry 90 a for the on-off switch 182 a. The manipulation of the on-off switch 182 a would necessitate a change in state of thelight switch 41 which must be communicated to theservice broker 28 and to thelight switch 41 via the global computer network by a command issuing from theclient 12 via theserver 14 for that command to actually take effect on thelamp 44. As such, theclient 12 and theserver 14 comprises the data source, albeit a distributed data source. In addition, theserver 14 functions as the moderator. - It should also be understood that other commands could issue from the
server 14 that must be communicated with theservice broker 28 such as heartbeats, polling commands, device or control specific commands, commands to manipulate the client's data rate, commands to update the service broker's components, and the like. The commands are in the form of a triple, i.e., the service broker name, device name, command. - Since in this embodiment the
service broker 28 lacks a server for listening for commands issued by theserver 14 and/or since theservice broker 28 does not have a permanent connection to theglobal computer network 16, theserver 14 is unable to communicate with theservice broker 28. Therefore, the present invention incorporates a polling scheme to communicate with theservice broker 28 in which theservice broker 28 periodically polls theserver 14 to determine if any commands or data is waiting for it. - Referring now to
FIG. 6 , a flow diagram of the polling scheme of the present invention is depicted. As described above, commands are first generated 200 for the service brokers 28. These commands can initiate from theclient 12, theserver 14, and from theISP 23. The commands are then sent 202 to theserver 14 via theglobal computer network 16 using the HTTP protocol. The commands are assigned a unique ID and are stored in a queue or othertemporary storage 204 on theserver 14 such as thedatabase server 48. The stored commands are accessible by theservice broker 28 when it polls theserver 14 for the data waiting for it in the queue. Since the commands are stored in a queue, commands are stored in the order in which they are received. - On the service broker-side of the polling scheme, the
service broker 28 first checks to see if a connection to the global computer network is available 206. For example, the service broker may be connected to theglobal computer network 16 via a dial-up connection toISP 23, in which case a connection to theglobal computer network 16 must be established 208. Once a connection to theglobal computer network 16 is available, theservice broker 28 would poll theserver 14 for data or commands waiting for it in thequeue 208. The poll contains a known string that signifies to the server 14 a request for data and contains the service broker's name. Upon receiving the poll, theserver 14 parses the poll transmission and detects the polling token string and the name of the service broker. Thereafter, theservice broker 28 relays the commands to theconnected devices 32 as appropriate. - If the
queue 210 is empty, theserver 14 responds 212 to the service broker indicating that there is no data or commands waiting for it. Thereafter, at a pre-selected time interval, theservice broker 28 initiates another poll to determine if any new data or commands are waiting for it in the queue. If commands are waiting in thequeue 210, the server responds 214 positively with a pre-selected packet of data containing the first queued command. However, if additional commands are waiting in the queue, the response includes a flag to indicate that additional data is waiting in the queue. - If there is no additional data waiting in the
queue 216, the refresh flag is not set and this status is included in the server's response to the poll. In the preferred embodiment, the poll request is performed using the post method with data being transferred as name/value pairs in the HTTP header field, and the server's response is merely a response to the POST. - In
step 220, theservice broker 28 receives the queued command along with the refresh flag. Theservice broker 28 parses the response from the server to retrieve the command portion and device name and delivers the commands to theappropriate device 32. Theservice broker 28 then parses the command to see if the refresh flag has been set 222 indicating that additional data is waiting in the server's queue for it. If additional data is waiting in the queue, the service broker again polls theserver 14 to retrieve the remaining data as instep 208 and the process continues until there is no more data waiting in the queue and the refresh flag is no longer set. - In this way, data and commands get from the
client 12 orserver 14 to theservice broker 28 via the global computer network using the HTTP protocol by first being held in a queue on the server and forwarded as a response to a poll request from theservice broker 28. This continues until the entire queue on the server is flushed. In this way, all pending commands and data are eventually delivered to theservice broker 28 when requested by theservice broker 28. - The operation of the polling scheme of the present invention will now be described in connection with the embodiment illustrated in
FIG. 5 . If the user wanted to change the state of alamp 44 connected tolight switch 41 from off to on using the system of the present invention, the user would call up theweb page 184 onserver 14 that contained thevirtual user interface 180 a for thelight switch 41. The user would do this by using hisInternet browser 26 to access theweb page 184 via theglobal computer network 16. Theweb server 46 generatesweb page 184 by retrieving theuser interface 182 a for thelight switch 41 stored in thedatabase server 48. The user would then manipulate the virtual on-offcontrol 182 a for the light switch on theweb page 184 using thebrowser 26. This manipulations of the virtual on-offcontrol 182 a issues a command for thelight switch 41 which is placed in the server's queue. - Using the algorithm described in connection with
FIG. 6 , the service broker would periodically poll theserver 14 to see if data was waiting for the devices connected to it, such as thelight switch 41. In the instant case, the change in state of the on-off switch would be waiting in the server queue. The server would retrieve this data waiting in the queue and, assuming that additional commands are waiting in the light switch queue, theserver 14 would set the refresh flag to indicate that data was still waiting for thelight switch control 41 in the queue. Theserver 14 would then respond to the poll request by transmitting the command data and the refresh flag to theservice broker 28 that the light switch is connected to. - As described in connection with the
monitoring appliance 28, the data is then passed off to the device descriptor for thelight switch control 41 that is running as a software module on themonitoring appliance 28. The data is processed by the device descriptor and thelight switch control 41 changes its state to match the command. This change in state generates a change-in-state command which is transmitted to theentry 90 for thelight switch 41 in thedatabase server 48. The entry for the on-off switch control 90 a would be changed according to the change effected in the virtual representation of theswitch 182 a and stored therein. Since the refresh flag was set, the service broker would poll theserver 14 again requesting the additional data waiting for it in the server queue. Theserver 14 would then return the remaining data in the queue and indicate via the refresh flag that no additional data was waiting in the queue. In this way, the change-in-state command is issued over theglobal computer network 16 to themonitoring appliance 28 where it is processed with the previous commands and issued to thelamp 44 connected to thelight switch control 41 which would change the state of the light switch from off to on. In this way, a user is able to communicate with a service broker that does not contain a server via theglobal computer network 16. - While certain preferred embodiments in various modifications thereto have been described or suggested, other changes in these preferred embodiments will occur to those of ordinary skilled in the art which do not depart from the broad inventive concepts of the present invention. Accordingly, reference should be made to the appended claims rather than the specific embodiment of the foregoing specification to ascertain the full scope of the present invention.
Claims (33)
1. A service broker system for interactive monitoring and control of data over the Internet, for processing data from a data network including at least one data source, the system comprising:
a first communication module for initiating communication with a moderator and adapted to receive data from the moderator;
a second communication module for sending data to at least one of the data source and the moderator;
a service-action module for processing the received data and for performing a task based on the processed data; and
an export module in communication with the service-action module and for publishing data based at east in part on the performed task to the data network.
2. (canceled)
3. (canceled)
4. (canceled)
5. (canceled)
6. (canceled)
7. (canceled)
8. (canceled)
9. (canceled)
10. (canceled)
11. A method for transferring data from a data source to a service broker system for interactive monitoring and control of data over the Internet, the method comprising the steps of:
providing a data source and a service broker;
providing a moderator for receiving the data transferred by the data source;
providing a data store for storing data received by the moderator;
providing a communications module for transferring data from the data store;
providing a virtual representation of the service broker on the data source;
transferring data from the date source to the moderator, the data sent being related to or associated with the virtual representation;
storing the data received by the moderator in the data store;
retrieving the data from the data store via the communications module and forwarding the data to the service broker; and
updating the virtual representation when the service broker receives the data sent by the data source, whereby data is transferred between the data source and to the service broker.
12. (canceled)
13. (canceled)
14. (canceled)
15. (canceled)
16. (canceled)
17. (canceled)
18. (canceled)
19. (canceled)
20. (canceled)
21. (canceled)
22. (canceled)
23. (canceled)
24. (canceled)
25. (canceled)
26. (canceled)
27. (canceled)
28. (canceled)
29. (canceled)
30. (canceled)
31. (canceled)
32. (canceled)
33. A service broker system for interactive monitoring and control of data over the Internet, for processing data from a data network including at least one data source, the service broker system comprising:
a first communication module for initiating communication with a moderator and adapted to receive data from the moderator;
a second communication module for sending data to at least one of the data source and the moderator;
a service-action module for processing the received data and for performing a task based on the processed data; and
an export module in communication with the service-action module and for publishing data based at least in part on the performed task to the data network;
wherein at least one of the moderator and the data source comprises a virtual representation of the service broker system and wherein the published data updates the virtual representation, and wherein the virtual representation comprises a mapped control, group of controls, or user interface.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/405,978 US20060184657A1 (en) | 2000-09-06 | 2006-04-17 | Service broker for processing data from a data network |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US23031000P | 2000-09-06 | 2000-09-06 | |
US09/698,981 US7032002B1 (en) | 2000-09-06 | 2000-10-27 | Service broker for processing data from a data network |
US11/405,978 US20060184657A1 (en) | 2000-09-06 | 2006-04-17 | Service broker for processing data from a data network |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/698,981 Continuation US7032002B1 (en) | 2000-09-06 | 2000-10-27 | Service broker for processing data from a data network |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20060184657A1 true US20060184657A1 (en) | 2006-08-17 |
Family
ID=26924109
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/698,981 Expired - Lifetime US7032002B1 (en) | 2000-09-06 | 2000-10-27 | Service broker for processing data from a data network |
US11/405,978 Abandoned US20060184657A1 (en) | 2000-09-06 | 2006-04-17 | Service broker for processing data from a data network |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/698,981 Expired - Lifetime US7032002B1 (en) | 2000-09-06 | 2000-10-27 | Service broker for processing data from a data network |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US7032002B1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1323056A4 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2001288895A1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2421533A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2002021299A1 (en) |
Cited By (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20080040507A1 (en) * | 2005-03-01 | 2008-02-14 | Yuan-Ying Hsu | Methods and systems for a routing protocol |
US20080082661A1 (en) * | 2006-10-02 | 2008-04-03 | Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. | Method and Apparatus for Network Monitoring of Communications Networks |
US20100281149A1 (en) * | 2009-04-30 | 2010-11-04 | Alcatel Lucent | Buffer system for managing service measurement requests |
US20130151743A1 (en) * | 2008-12-02 | 2013-06-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Network adaptor optimization and interrupt reduction |
US20160142399A1 (en) * | 2014-11-18 | 2016-05-19 | Auth0, Inc. | Identity infrastructure as a service |
US9369331B1 (en) * | 2012-03-27 | 2016-06-14 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Application message management |
CN110019671A (en) * | 2017-11-07 | 2019-07-16 | 北京京东尚科信息技术有限公司 | A kind of method and system handling real-time messages |
US10650621B1 (en) | 2016-09-13 | 2020-05-12 | Iocurrents, Inc. | Interfacing with a vehicular controller area network |
WO2020101223A1 (en) * | 2018-11-15 | 2020-05-22 | 전자부품연구원 | Method for providing api in serverless cloud computing |
KR20200063360A (en) * | 2018-11-23 | 2020-06-05 | 전자부품연구원 | Combination Method for Services of Serverless Container |
CN116506434A (en) * | 2023-04-27 | 2023-07-28 | 湖北清江水电开发有限责任公司 | Multi-terminal offline-operation intelligent warehouse management method |
Families Citing this family (127)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6970913B1 (en) * | 1999-07-02 | 2005-11-29 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Load balancing using distributed forwarding agents with application based feedback for different virtual machines |
US7117239B1 (en) | 2000-07-28 | 2006-10-03 | Axeda Corporation | Reporting the state of an apparatus to a remote computer |
US7032002B1 (en) * | 2000-09-06 | 2006-04-18 | Xanboo, Inc. | Service broker for processing data from a data network |
US8108543B2 (en) | 2000-09-22 | 2012-01-31 | Axeda Corporation | Retrieving data from a server |
US7237257B1 (en) * | 2001-04-11 | 2007-06-26 | Aol Llc | Leveraging a persistent connection to access a secured service |
US7379977B2 (en) * | 2001-07-24 | 2008-05-27 | Steve Walrath | System and method for display of multiple electronic pages |
US7254601B2 (en) | 2001-12-20 | 2007-08-07 | Questra Corporation | Method and apparatus for managing intelligent assets in a distributed environment |
US6658091B1 (en) | 2002-02-01 | 2003-12-02 | @Security Broadband Corp. | LIfestyle multimedia security system |
US7178149B2 (en) | 2002-04-17 | 2007-02-13 | Axeda Corporation | XML scripting of soap commands |
US7899900B1 (en) * | 2002-08-22 | 2011-03-01 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Method and system for monitoring network connected devices with multiple protocols |
US7263078B2 (en) * | 2002-12-18 | 2007-08-28 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and apparatus for scanning in wireless computing devices |
US7966418B2 (en) | 2003-02-21 | 2011-06-21 | Axeda Corporation | Establishing a virtual tunnel between two computer programs |
US7958496B2 (en) * | 2003-12-22 | 2011-06-07 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Method of and system for application service exchange across different execution environments |
US20050138238A1 (en) * | 2003-12-22 | 2005-06-23 | James Tierney | Flow control interface |
US11677577B2 (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2023-06-13 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Premises system management using status signal |
US11582065B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2023-02-14 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Systems and methods for device communication |
US10313303B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2019-06-04 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Forming a security network including integrated security system components and network devices |
US9141276B2 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2015-09-22 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Integrated interface for mobile device |
US11113950B2 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2021-09-07 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Gateway integrated with premises security system |
US8988221B2 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2015-03-24 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Integrated security system with parallel processing architecture |
US8612591B2 (en) * | 2005-03-16 | 2013-12-17 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Security system with networked touchscreen |
US10444964B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2019-10-15 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Control system user interface |
US8635350B2 (en) | 2006-06-12 | 2014-01-21 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | IP device discovery systems and methods |
US20090077623A1 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2009-03-19 | Marc Baum | Security Network Integrating Security System and Network Devices |
US11489812B2 (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2022-11-01 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Forming a security network including integrated security system components and network devices |
US20170118037A1 (en) | 2008-08-11 | 2017-04-27 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Integrated cloud system for premises automation |
US11916870B2 (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2024-02-27 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Gateway registry methods and systems |
US8086702B2 (en) * | 2005-03-16 | 2011-12-27 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Takeover processes in security network integrated with premise security system |
US10375253B2 (en) | 2008-08-25 | 2019-08-06 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Security system with networked touchscreen and gateway |
US8073931B2 (en) * | 2005-03-16 | 2011-12-06 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Networked touchscreen with integrated interfaces |
US11316958B2 (en) | 2008-08-11 | 2022-04-26 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Virtual device systems and methods |
US11159484B2 (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2021-10-26 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Forming a security network including integrated security system components and network devices |
US7711796B2 (en) | 2006-06-12 | 2010-05-04 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Gateway registry methods and systems |
US9531593B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2016-12-27 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Takeover processes in security network integrated with premise security system |
US10142392B2 (en) | 2007-01-24 | 2018-11-27 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Methods and systems for improved system performance |
US8963713B2 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2015-02-24 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Integrated security network with security alarm signaling system |
US20120066608A1 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2012-03-15 | Ken Sundermeyer | Control system user interface |
US11277465B2 (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2022-03-15 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Generating risk profile using data of home monitoring and security system |
US11368429B2 (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2022-06-21 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Premises management configuration and control |
US8473619B2 (en) * | 2005-03-16 | 2013-06-25 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Security network integrated with premise security system |
US10721087B2 (en) * | 2005-03-16 | 2020-07-21 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Method for networked touchscreen with integrated interfaces |
US11244545B2 (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2022-02-08 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Cross-client sensor user interface in an integrated security network |
US11811845B2 (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2023-11-07 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols over internet protocol (IP) networks |
US11201755B2 (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2021-12-14 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Premises system management using status signal |
US9191228B2 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2015-11-17 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Cross-client sensor user interface in an integrated security network |
US10237237B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2019-03-19 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols in integrated systems |
US11343380B2 (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2022-05-24 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Premises system automation |
US10348575B2 (en) | 2013-06-27 | 2019-07-09 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Control system user interface |
US10382452B1 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2019-08-13 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols in integrated systems |
US10339791B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2019-07-02 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Security network integrated with premise security system |
US9729342B2 (en) | 2010-12-20 | 2017-08-08 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Defining and implementing sensor triggered response rules |
US8996665B2 (en) * | 2005-03-16 | 2015-03-31 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Takeover processes in security network integrated with premise security system |
US8209400B2 (en) * | 2005-03-16 | 2012-06-26 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | System for data routing in networks |
US9609003B1 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2017-03-28 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Generating risk profile using data of home monitoring and security system |
US9172553B2 (en) * | 2005-03-16 | 2015-10-27 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Security system with networked touchscreen and gateway |
US8086703B2 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2011-12-27 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Takeover processes in security network integrated with premise security system |
US10200504B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2019-02-05 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols over internet protocol (IP) networks |
US10522026B2 (en) | 2008-08-11 | 2019-12-31 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Automation system user interface with three-dimensional display |
US11190578B2 (en) | 2008-08-11 | 2021-11-30 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Integrated cloud system with lightweight gateway for premises automation |
US20050216302A1 (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2005-09-29 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Business method for premises management |
US10156959B2 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2018-12-18 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Cross-client sensor user interface in an integrated security network |
US7660873B2 (en) | 2004-08-16 | 2010-02-09 | General Electric Company | Systems and methods for communicating messages |
US10645347B2 (en) | 2013-08-09 | 2020-05-05 | Icn Acquisition, Llc | System, method and apparatus for remote monitoring |
US11615697B2 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2023-03-28 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Premise management systems and methods |
US20120324566A1 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2012-12-20 | Marc Baum | Takeover Processes In Security Network Integrated With Premise Security System |
US9450776B2 (en) * | 2005-03-16 | 2016-09-20 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Forming a security network including integrated security system components |
US8122131B2 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2012-02-21 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Takeover processes in security network integrated with premise security system |
US8825871B2 (en) * | 2005-03-16 | 2014-09-02 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Controlling data routing among networks |
US9306809B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2016-04-05 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Security system with networked touchscreen |
US20170180198A1 (en) | 2008-08-11 | 2017-06-22 | Marc Baum | Forming a security network including integrated security system components |
US8713132B2 (en) * | 2005-03-16 | 2014-04-29 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Device for data routing in networks |
US11496568B2 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2022-11-08 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Security system with networked touchscreen |
US11700142B2 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2023-07-11 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Security network integrating security system and network devices |
US20110128378A1 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2011-06-02 | Reza Raji | Modular Electronic Display Platform |
US10999254B2 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2021-05-04 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | System for data routing in networks |
US8819178B2 (en) * | 2005-03-16 | 2014-08-26 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Controlling data routing in integrated security systems |
US9059863B2 (en) * | 2005-03-16 | 2015-06-16 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Method for data routing in networks |
US10079839B1 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2018-09-18 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Activation of gateway device |
US8370479B2 (en) | 2006-10-03 | 2013-02-05 | Axeda Acquisition Corporation | System and method for dynamically grouping devices based on present device conditions |
US8065397B2 (en) | 2006-12-26 | 2011-11-22 | Axeda Acquisition Corporation | Managing configurations of distributed devices |
US11706279B2 (en) | 2007-01-24 | 2023-07-18 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Methods and systems for data communication |
US7633385B2 (en) | 2007-02-28 | 2009-12-15 | Ucontrol, Inc. | Method and system for communicating with and controlling an alarm system from a remote server |
US8451986B2 (en) | 2007-04-23 | 2013-05-28 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Method and system for automatically providing alternate network access for telecommunications |
US11218878B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2022-01-04 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols in integrated systems |
US10389736B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2019-08-20 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols in integrated systems |
US10666523B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2020-05-26 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols in integrated systems |
US11646907B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2023-05-09 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols in integrated systems |
US11316753B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2022-04-26 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols in integrated systems |
US11423756B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2022-08-23 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols in integrated systems |
US10498830B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2019-12-03 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Wi-Fi-to-serial encapsulation in systems |
US11089122B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2021-08-10 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Controlling data routing among networks |
US11212192B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2021-12-28 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols in integrated systems |
US10616075B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2020-04-07 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols in integrated systems |
US10523689B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2019-12-31 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols over internet protocol (IP) networks |
US10423309B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2019-09-24 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Device integration framework |
US11237714B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2022-02-01 | Control Networks, Inc. | Control system user interface |
US10051078B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2018-08-14 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | WiFi-to-serial encapsulation in systems |
US11601810B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2023-03-07 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols in integrated systems |
US10223903B2 (en) | 2010-09-28 | 2019-03-05 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Integrated security system with parallel processing architecture |
US11831462B2 (en) | 2007-08-24 | 2023-11-28 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Controlling data routing in premises management systems |
US11916928B2 (en) | 2008-01-24 | 2024-02-27 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols over internet protocol (IP) networks |
US20170185278A1 (en) | 2008-08-11 | 2017-06-29 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Automation system user interface |
US11729255B2 (en) | 2008-08-11 | 2023-08-15 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Integrated cloud system with lightweight gateway for premises automation |
US11258625B2 (en) | 2008-08-11 | 2022-02-22 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Mobile premises automation platform |
US11758026B2 (en) | 2008-08-11 | 2023-09-12 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Virtual device systems and methods |
US11792036B2 (en) | 2008-08-11 | 2023-10-17 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Mobile premises automation platform |
WO2010025468A1 (en) * | 2008-08-29 | 2010-03-04 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Battery-backed power interface transformer for low-power devices |
US9628440B2 (en) | 2008-11-12 | 2017-04-18 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Takeover processes in security network integrated with premise security system |
US8638211B2 (en) | 2009-04-30 | 2014-01-28 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Configurable controller and interface for home SMA, phone and multimedia |
US10721269B1 (en) | 2009-11-06 | 2020-07-21 | F5 Networks, Inc. | Methods and system for returning requests with javascript for clients before passing a request to a server |
WO2011137458A1 (en) | 2010-04-30 | 2011-11-03 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Power and data solution for remote low-power devices |
US8836467B1 (en) | 2010-09-28 | 2014-09-16 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Method, system and apparatus for automated reporting of account and sensor zone information to a central station |
US11750414B2 (en) | 2010-12-16 | 2023-09-05 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Bidirectional security sensor communication for a premises security system |
US9147337B2 (en) | 2010-12-17 | 2015-09-29 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Method and system for logging security event data |
US8683567B2 (en) | 2011-03-31 | 2014-03-25 | Belkin International, Inc. | Method of distributing information regarding one or more electrical devices and system for the same |
US20120290707A1 (en) * | 2011-05-10 | 2012-11-15 | Monolith Technology Services, Inc. | System and method for unified polling of networked devices and services |
US9432410B2 (en) * | 2012-08-13 | 2016-08-30 | Oracle International Corporation | System and method for extending SCIM / service broker processing IMS initial filter criteria (IFC) for pipeline processing |
SG11201504581TA (en) * | 2012-12-10 | 2015-07-30 | Fintech Pte Ltd | Computerized method and system for secure communication, and method and system for matching customers with options for investment |
US20140237482A1 (en) * | 2013-02-21 | 2014-08-21 | cpuMash LLC | Computational resource management |
US9928975B1 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2018-03-27 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Three-way switch |
US9287727B1 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2016-03-15 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Temporal voltage adaptive lithium battery charger |
US9867143B1 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2018-01-09 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Adaptive Power Modulation |
US11146637B2 (en) | 2014-03-03 | 2021-10-12 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Media content management |
US11405463B2 (en) | 2014-03-03 | 2022-08-02 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Media content management |
CN111427533B (en) * | 2014-12-11 | 2023-07-25 | 微软技术许可有限责任公司 | Virtual assistant system capable of actionable messaging |
US11204965B2 (en) | 2017-01-09 | 2021-12-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Data analytics and insights brokerage service |
CN114615249B (en) * | 2022-03-10 | 2022-11-22 | 南方科技大学 | Control method and system for air-insulated switching lamp and computer readable storage medium |
Citations (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5329619A (en) * | 1992-10-30 | 1994-07-12 | Software Ag | Cooperative processing interface and communication broker for heterogeneous computing environments |
US5815665A (en) * | 1996-04-03 | 1998-09-29 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for providing trusted brokering services over a distributed network |
US5862328A (en) * | 1995-09-15 | 1999-01-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Bridge for a client-server environment |
US6141759A (en) * | 1997-12-10 | 2000-10-31 | Bmc Software, Inc. | System and architecture for distributing, monitoring, and managing information requests on a computer network |
US6330602B1 (en) * | 1997-04-14 | 2001-12-11 | Nortel Networks Limited | Scaleable web server and method of efficiently managing multiple servers |
US6393412B1 (en) * | 1999-09-23 | 2002-05-21 | Peter Deep | Method for allowing users to purchase professional services in a private chat room through a service brokerage via the internet |
US6446108B1 (en) * | 1997-07-18 | 2002-09-03 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method for wide area network service location |
US6519632B1 (en) * | 1999-04-28 | 2003-02-11 | General Electric Company | Method and apparatus for configuring imaging system to communicate with multiple remote devices |
US6633899B1 (en) * | 1999-05-06 | 2003-10-14 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Dynamic installation and configuration broker |
US6681327B1 (en) * | 1998-04-02 | 2004-01-20 | Intel Corporation | Method and system for managing secure client-server transactions |
US7032002B1 (en) * | 2000-09-06 | 2006-04-18 | Xanboo, Inc. | Service broker for processing data from a data network |
Family Cites Families (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5917405A (en) | 1993-06-08 | 1999-06-29 | Joao; Raymond Anthony | Control apparatus and methods for vehicles |
US6542077B2 (en) | 1993-06-08 | 2003-04-01 | Raymond Anthony Joao | Monitoring apparatus for a vehicle and/or a premises |
US6542076B1 (en) | 1993-06-08 | 2003-04-01 | Raymond Anthony Joao | Control, monitoring and/or security apparatus and method |
WO1997018636A2 (en) * | 1995-11-13 | 1997-05-22 | Webtronics, Inc. | Control of remote devices using http protocol |
US6587046B2 (en) | 1996-03-27 | 2003-07-01 | Raymond Anthony Joao | Monitoring apparatus and method |
US6275490B1 (en) | 1996-08-21 | 2001-08-14 | Netspeak Corporation | Method and apparatus for establishing communications from browser application |
US6247056B1 (en) * | 1997-02-03 | 2001-06-12 | Oracle Corporation | Method and apparatus for handling client request with a distributed web application server |
JP3610193B2 (en) | 1997-06-26 | 2005-01-12 | 株式会社日立製作所 | ATM controller and ATM communication control apparatus using the same |
US5974443A (en) * | 1997-09-26 | 1999-10-26 | Intervoice Limited Partnership | Combined internet and data access system |
TW436709B (en) * | 1997-11-17 | 2001-05-28 | Ibm | Method and apparatus for interacting with hardware devices remotely |
US6487590B1 (en) * | 1998-10-30 | 2002-11-26 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method for controlling a network element from a remote workstation |
US6463459B1 (en) * | 1999-01-22 | 2002-10-08 | Wall Data Incorporated | System and method for executing commands associated with specific virtual desktop |
US6621827B1 (en) * | 2000-09-06 | 2003-09-16 | Xanboo, Inc. | Adaptive method for polling |
-
2000
- 2000-10-27 US US09/698,981 patent/US7032002B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2001
- 2001-09-06 CA CA002421533A patent/CA2421533A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2001-09-06 WO PCT/US2001/028092 patent/WO2002021299A1/en active Application Filing
- 2001-09-06 EP EP01968661A patent/EP1323056A4/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2001-09-06 AU AU2001288895A patent/AU2001288895A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2006
- 2006-04-17 US US11/405,978 patent/US20060184657A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5329619A (en) * | 1992-10-30 | 1994-07-12 | Software Ag | Cooperative processing interface and communication broker for heterogeneous computing environments |
US5862328A (en) * | 1995-09-15 | 1999-01-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Bridge for a client-server environment |
US5815665A (en) * | 1996-04-03 | 1998-09-29 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for providing trusted brokering services over a distributed network |
US6330602B1 (en) * | 1997-04-14 | 2001-12-11 | Nortel Networks Limited | Scaleable web server and method of efficiently managing multiple servers |
US6446108B1 (en) * | 1997-07-18 | 2002-09-03 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method for wide area network service location |
US6141759A (en) * | 1997-12-10 | 2000-10-31 | Bmc Software, Inc. | System and architecture for distributing, monitoring, and managing information requests on a computer network |
US6681327B1 (en) * | 1998-04-02 | 2004-01-20 | Intel Corporation | Method and system for managing secure client-server transactions |
US6519632B1 (en) * | 1999-04-28 | 2003-02-11 | General Electric Company | Method and apparatus for configuring imaging system to communicate with multiple remote devices |
US6633899B1 (en) * | 1999-05-06 | 2003-10-14 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Dynamic installation and configuration broker |
US6393412B1 (en) * | 1999-09-23 | 2002-05-21 | Peter Deep | Method for allowing users to purchase professional services in a private chat room through a service brokerage via the internet |
US7032002B1 (en) * | 2000-09-06 | 2006-04-18 | Xanboo, Inc. | Service broker for processing data from a data network |
Cited By (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20080040507A1 (en) * | 2005-03-01 | 2008-02-14 | Yuan-Ying Hsu | Methods and systems for a routing protocol |
US7996558B2 (en) * | 2005-03-01 | 2011-08-09 | Industrial Technology Research Institute | Methods and systems for a routing protocol |
US20080082661A1 (en) * | 2006-10-02 | 2008-04-03 | Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. | Method and Apparatus for Network Monitoring of Communications Networks |
US20130151743A1 (en) * | 2008-12-02 | 2013-06-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Network adaptor optimization and interrupt reduction |
US8719479B2 (en) * | 2008-12-02 | 2014-05-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Network adaptor optimization and interrupt reduction |
US20100281149A1 (en) * | 2009-04-30 | 2010-11-04 | Alcatel Lucent | Buffer system for managing service measurement requests |
US8271634B2 (en) * | 2009-04-30 | 2012-09-18 | Alcatel Lucent | Buffer system for managing service measurement requests |
US9369331B1 (en) * | 2012-03-27 | 2016-06-14 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Application message management |
US20160142399A1 (en) * | 2014-11-18 | 2016-05-19 | Auth0, Inc. | Identity infrastructure as a service |
US10225245B2 (en) * | 2014-11-18 | 2019-03-05 | Auth0, Inc. | Identity infrastructure as a service |
US10650621B1 (en) | 2016-09-13 | 2020-05-12 | Iocurrents, Inc. | Interfacing with a vehicular controller area network |
US11232655B2 (en) | 2016-09-13 | 2022-01-25 | Iocurrents, Inc. | System and method for interfacing with a vehicular controller area network |
CN110019671A (en) * | 2017-11-07 | 2019-07-16 | 北京京东尚科信息技术有限公司 | A kind of method and system handling real-time messages |
WO2020101223A1 (en) * | 2018-11-15 | 2020-05-22 | 전자부품연구원 | Method for providing api in serverless cloud computing |
KR20200063360A (en) * | 2018-11-23 | 2020-06-05 | 전자부품연구원 | Combination Method for Services of Serverless Container |
KR102310523B1 (en) * | 2018-11-23 | 2021-10-08 | 한국전자기술연구원 | Combination Method for Services of Serverless Container |
CN116506434A (en) * | 2023-04-27 | 2023-07-28 | 湖北清江水电开发有限责任公司 | Multi-terminal offline-operation intelligent warehouse management method |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2002021299A1 (en) | 2002-03-14 |
US7032002B1 (en) | 2006-04-18 |
CA2421533A1 (en) | 2002-03-14 |
AU2001288895A1 (en) | 2002-03-22 |
EP1323056A1 (en) | 2003-07-02 |
EP1323056A4 (en) | 2007-05-23 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7032002B1 (en) | Service broker for processing data from a data network | |
US6621827B1 (en) | Adaptive method for polling | |
US20040153537A1 (en) | Adaptive method for polling | |
US6708217B1 (en) | Method and system for receiving and demultiplexing multi-modal document content | |
US20020103897A1 (en) | Method and system for adaptively setting a data refresh interval | |
US7085937B1 (en) | Adaptive method for amortizing authentication overhead | |
EP1808789B1 (en) | Improvements in and relating to remote user interfaces | |
US8200764B2 (en) | System and method for achieving highly scalable real-time collaboration applications using HTTP | |
KR100318781B1 (en) | Server-side asynchronous form management | |
EP1811747B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for storing and restoring state information of remote user interface | |
US20030195964A1 (en) | Managing multicast sessions | |
US20070100772A1 (en) | Method for amortizing authentication overhead | |
EP1207655A2 (en) | Mobile device server | |
US20010027474A1 (en) | Method for clientless real time messaging between internet users, receipt of pushed content and transacting of secure e-commerce on the same web page | |
US20080140860A1 (en) | Media routing | |
EP1277118A1 (en) | A system and method to accelerate client/server interactions using predictive requests | |
US20030037102A1 (en) | Message broker | |
CN1631018B (en) | Method and apparatus to retrieve information in a network | |
EP1286513B1 (en) | Message broker | |
EP1296490A2 (en) | Message broker | |
US20030135585A1 (en) | Network communication | |
US20040015484A1 (en) | Client context-aware proxy server system | |
Chen et al. | A mobile service platform using proxy technology | |
Nikora | Maintenance issues for very long-lived robotic space systems | |
WO2001024024A1 (en) | System for providing services based on a connection-oriented protocol in a web service based on a connectionless protocol |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |