US20060184387A1 - Insurance policy renewal chain - Google Patents

Insurance policy renewal chain Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20060184387A1
US20060184387A1 US10/906,271 US90627105A US2006184387A1 US 20060184387 A1 US20060184387 A1 US 20060184387A1 US 90627105 A US90627105 A US 90627105A US 2006184387 A1 US2006184387 A1 US 2006184387A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
policy
current
insurance
calendar year
insurance policy
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/906,271
Inventor
John Richardson
Carl Witkowski
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Westguard Insurance Co
Original Assignee
Guard Insurance Group Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Guard Insurance Group Inc filed Critical Guard Insurance Group Inc
Priority to US10/906,271 priority Critical patent/US20060184387A1/en
Assigned to GUARD INSURANCE GROUP reassignment GUARD INSURANCE GROUP ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: RICHARDSON, JOHN H, WITKOWSKI, CARL J
Publication of US20060184387A1 publication Critical patent/US20060184387A1/en
Priority to US12/693,060 priority patent/US9852473B2/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q40/00Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
    • G06Q40/08Insurance
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10Office automation; Time management
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/20Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
    • G06F16/22Indexing; Data structures therefor; Storage structures
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/30Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of unstructured textual data
    • G06F16/31Indexing; Data structures therefor; Storage structures
    • G06F16/316Indexing structures
    • G06F16/319Inverted lists
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • G06F16/93Document management systems

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to the field of insurance policy issuance and management. More specifically, the present invention is related to the automated search for and linking of expired and current insurance policy terms to aid in the calculation of future policy terms.
  • policies that may have been incorrectly issued, either because of incomplete or inaccurate policy conditions, must be put through a process known as “cancel-flat re-issue”. This process is very similar to the renewal process in that the policy terms and conditions must be carried forward to a new iteration of the policy's existence.
  • a “pull forward” subfolder is created in which to “pull” and keep information from prior paper-based policies. In this manner, information from a prior policy's folder is copied and stored in the new policy's folder without having to have the entire prior policy folder pulled from the paper system.
  • recalculating a workers compensation premium would require collecting from the policyholder, information such as number of accidents in the previous year, number of employees on payroll, the amount of payroll per employee, the job classification of the employees, experience modifications, merit modifications, etc.
  • This process is not only duplicative and redundant; it is wasteful of resources that could be better allocated, i.e., to claims adjustment and new policyholder application issuance.
  • Prior art methods relating to archival and version management include a method for storing related information in a single container data structure.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 5,857,207 to Lo et al. discloses a method of pooling containers having multiple versions of a distinct document. Pooling containers are divided into layers wherein at most one unique version of a document is stored. Also disclosed is a mechanism for manipulating the distinct document to be used at a given time.
  • Lo et al. fail to mention linking of or referencing between the distinct versions; the reference merely discusses distinct versions of a single document collocated within the same container.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 6,499,206 to Rivette et al. discloses a method for grouping documents automatically by utilizing system and user grouping constraints. Documents associated with the group may be mapped, linked to forwards and backwards citations, as well as bracketed and clustered.
  • Rivette et al. limit their discussion to the location and grouping of keywords manually selected and input by the user; the system only searches for different grammatical variants of the user-input keyword. No mention is made of an automated search predicated solely on system-generated terms nor is any made of an allowance for terms having either constant or variable values.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 6,539,396 to Bowman-Amuah discloses a system and method for associating multiple versions of business objects with one another.
  • a legacy system interconnected with a client via an integration architecture uses a legacy wrapper to communicate with a client.
  • the calculation of insurance rates are mentioned, the calculation referred to pertains to communication regarding a single customer component of an insurance rate quote between a newer system of an independent agency and a legacy system of an insurance company.
  • Bowman-Amuah fails to discuss or even mention accessing legacy information in the calculation of insurance rates. Rather, facilitating communication between legacy and newer protocols is discussed.
  • U.S. patent application publication 2003/01355520 A1 to Mitchell et al. discloses a method for storing different versions of a body of statutory law and judicial precedent. Different versions of bodies of law are linked and associated via pointers. A version of interest is accessed by navigating through a display along a hierarchical path. Also disclosed is a method of hyper-linking information included in the same file, record, or structured document.
  • Mitchell et al. simply provide for a display of dates in association with selected versions of a particular portion of a body of law.
  • particular portions of a body of law are simply linked based on their physical locations within a statute or code; no mention is made of a linking based on content or meaning of a particular portion or section of a selected body of law.
  • the system and method of the present invention provide for the automatic linking of expired, current, and future insurance policies.
  • each insurance policy is a plurality of terms frequently used in the determination of an insurance policy premium or rate quote. Such terms are calculated based on information either associated with or obtained from a particular policyholder.
  • the present invention allows policy information previously submitted by a policyholder or calculated in regards to activity on a particular policy to be used in automatic calculation and generation of a future policy term.
  • member identification (ID) information Also associated with a particular insurance policy for each insured member under the same policy are member identification (ID) information, effective coverage date range, policy premium information, and policy status. Policy status includes a designation of whether the policy was cancelled flat and reissued, expired and renewed, or cancelled and reinstated.
  • Utilizing a logical linked list to all of an insured's policies maintained by the system of the present invention ensures that policies are presented in chronological order regardless of changes in either a policyholder's name or tax identification number. In this manner, it is possible to collocate historical information and documents for all policies associated with a particular policyholder and to obtain immediate access to desired policy information. Thus, the need to sort policy information is obviated as is the need to perform an exhaustive manual search or even an electronic keyword search is obviated.
  • the present invention achieves straight-thru processing in organizing prior policies for assistance in renewals, loss ratio calculations, shifts in payroll numbers (i.e., the number of employees insured under a single policy), and previous claims activity under the same type of policy.
  • loss representatives are able to analyze new, system-generated calculations that are determined via triggers pulled from prior policies, as opposed to manually searching for prior policy terms and manually generating new policy terms.
  • FIG. 1 is a screenshot of a Graphical User Interface (GUI) of the system of the present invention.
  • GUI Graphical User Interface
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a folder view of an insurance policy under review.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates items pulled forward and linked to an insurance policy under review and the propagation of a policy term to previous policy years.
  • FIG. 4 is a process flow diagram for the method of the present invention.
  • GUI graphical user interface
  • Policy terms calculated for previous years and for the current year are collocated in a single insurance policy folder.
  • Each policy is also collocated with a root underwriting file, which functions as a placeholder for policy subfolders located at lower levels of hierarchy.
  • a root folder is also used to store items that a user (i.e., an underwriter, adjustor, loss control representative, litigator, or subrogation specialist) needs to be immediately aware of.
  • items stored in a root folder are “red-flagged.” For example, a policy that is currently the subject of litigation is noted such that a user is given ample notice to proceed with caution when working on the noted policy.
  • the correspondence When a user receives correspondence pertaining to a particular policy or a particular insured member's policy information, the correspondence becomes a part of the underwriting folder of the noted policy. Once the correspondence item is placed into the underwriting root folder of the noted policy, it becomes possible to “pull forward” certain application items to aid in the renewal process.
  • Suggested items to be “pulled forward” include an insurance policy application, supplemental application, and account analysis; if the item is over three years old, a diary note is attached as a reminder to obtain a new or updated application prior to renewal.
  • Other items to be pulled forward include, but are not limited to, the latest: underwriter activity sheets, E-mod (Q-mod) worksheets, schedule mod worksheets, Dun and BradstreetTM reports, Drug-free workplace (DFWP) forms, managed care forms, loss runs, and loss control surveys.
  • Other items of interest that may influence a future underwriter decision include officer election information. Once these items are pulled forward and placed in the underwriting folder of the noted policy, and underwriter is provided access necessary to determine new policy terms, without having to obtain or collect redundant data.
  • FIG. 2 Shown in FIG. 2 is a policy folder 200 corresponding to an insurance policy currently under review by an underwriter.
  • a root underwriting folder 202 is maintained within policy folder 200 and links to items either manually or automatically pulled forward 204 a - d.
  • step 400 items of interest in calculating renewal policy terms are marked as “pulled forward”.
  • items of interest in calculating renewal policy terms are comprised of the latest: insurance applications filled out by the insured, supplemental applications, underwriter activity sheets, E-mod worksheets, schedule mod worksheets, Dun and BradstreetTM reports, officer election information, Drug-free workplace (DFWP) forms, managed care forms, loss runs, and loss control surveys.
  • Items marked as “pulled forward” are then linked to a root underwriting folder collocated with the insurance policy of interest in step 402 .
  • step 404 links are traversed to obtain specific information from any one of the items marked as pulled forward. If the location of the specific information is known, it is possible to access the information directly.
  • claims are adjusted, renewal policy terms are calculated, new insurance policy terms are underwritten, or a current policy is cancelled based on the insurance policy of interest. If it is determined in step 406 that a renewal policy is created, policy terms determined for the renewal policy are propagated to policies previously issued in step 408 .
  • step 410 the policy of interest for which policy terms were calculated is designated as a current policy and a current policy is designated as expired. If it is determined in step 406 that the policy of interest was cancelled, the policy of interest is designated as expired in step 412 .
  • the method of the present invention does not require navigation along a path; if the identity of a prior or previous insurance policy term is known, direct access is possible. This obviates the need for a manual search, terms such as payroll numbers are located instantaneously; relevant terms in previously issued policies are flagged for review in underwriting a current policy.
  • the present invention provides for an article of manufacture comprising computer readable program code contained within implementing one or more modules to link previous insurance policy information to a current insurance policy under review.
  • the present invention includes a computer program code-based product, which is a storage medium having program code stored therein which can be used to instruct a computer to perform any of the methods associated with the present invention.
  • the computer storage medium includes any of, but is not limited to, the following: CD-ROM, DVD, magnetic tape, optical disc, hard drive, floppy disk, ferroelectric memory, flash memory, ferromagnetic memory, optical storage, charge coupled devices, magnetic or optical cards, smart cards, EEPROM, EPROM, RAM, ROM, DRAM, SRAM, SDRAM, or any other appropriate static or dynamic memory or data storage devices.
  • Implemented in computer program code based products are software modules for: (a) linking policy terms and information used in underwriting a prior policy term; (b) calculating policy terms for a current policy under review; (c) propagating calculated policy terms to prior policies; and (d) providing instantaneous access to policy terms from prior years.
  • traversing said links to perform any of: adjusting claims for a prior calendar year, underwriting an insurance policy, creating a renewal policy, and canceling an insurance policy operations.
  • the present invention may be implemented on a multi-nodal system (e.g., LAN) or networking system (e.g., Internet, WWW, wireless web). All programming and data related thereto are stored in computer memory, static or dynamic, and may be retrieved by the user in any of: conventional computer storage, display (i.e., CRT) and/or hardcopy (i.e., printed) formats.
  • the programming of the present invention may be implemented by one of skill in the art of insurance policy issuance/management and database programming.

Abstract

A system and method for the automatic linking of expired, current, and future insurance policies is provided. Within each insurance policy is a plurality of conditions frequently used in the determination of an insurance policy premium or rate quote. Such terms are calculated based upon information either associated with or obtained from a particular policyholder. By automatically linking policy information and policy terms from prior insurance policies, information previously submitted by a policyholder or calculated in regards to activity on a particular policy is used in automatic calculation and generation of a future policy term. Thus, straight-thru processing is achieved via organizing of prior policies for assistance in renewals, loss ratio calculations, shifts in payroll numbers (i.e., the number of employees insured under a single policy), and previous claim activity under the same type of policy.

Description

    BACKGROUND OF INVENTION
  • The present invention relates generally to the field of insurance policy issuance and management. More specifically, the present invention is related to the automated search for and linking of expired and current insurance policy terms to aid in the calculation of future policy terms.
  • DISCUSSION OF PRIOR ART
  • In the determination of insurance policy premiums and the calculation of future policy terms, and even when adjusting claims and calculating loss runs for policyholders insured under prior insurance policies, it becomes beneficial to maintain archives of and provide efficient access to the characteristics and data of previously issued policies. Currently, industry-wide standards typically call for existing policies, that are about to expire, to be renewed. The process of recalculating policy terms, in order to renew an insurance policy for a subsequent calendar year; is known as the “renewal” process. Because most companies do not retain expired insurance policies, the “renewal” process requires the manual re-computation of policy terms from information that must once again be gathered from the policyholder. In addition, policies that may have been incorrectly issued, either because of incomplete or inaccurate policy conditions, must be put through a process known as “cancel-flat re-issue”. This process is very similar to the renewal process in that the policy terms and conditions must be carried forward to a new iteration of the policy's existence.
  • Often times, to assist in a re-computation of terms, a “pull forward” subfolder is created in which to “pull” and keep information from prior paper-based policies. In this manner, information from a prior policy's folder is copied and stored in the new policy's folder without having to have the entire prior policy folder pulled from the paper system.
  • For example, recalculating a workers compensation premium would require collecting from the policyholder, information such as number of accidents in the previous year, number of employees on payroll, the amount of payroll per employee, the job classification of the employees, experience modifications, merit modifications, etc. This process is not only duplicative and redundant; it is wasteful of resources that could be better allocated, i.e., to claims adjustment and new policyholder application issuance. Thus, there is a need in the industry for a resource conscious method of storing prior insurance policies.
  • Prior art methods relating to archival and version management include a method for storing related information in a single container data structure. U.S. Pat. No. 5,857,207 to Lo et al. discloses a method of pooling containers having multiple versions of a distinct document. Pooling containers are divided into layers wherein at most one unique version of a document is stored. Also disclosed is a mechanism for manipulating the distinct document to be used at a given time. However, Lo et al. fail to mention linking of or referencing between the distinct versions; the reference merely discusses distinct versions of a single document collocated within the same container.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 6,499,206 to Rivette et al. discloses a method for grouping documents automatically by utilizing system and user grouping constraints. Documents associated with the group may be mapped, linked to forwards and backwards citations, as well as bracketed and clustered. However, Rivette et al. limit their discussion to the location and grouping of keywords manually selected and input by the user; the system only searches for different grammatical variants of the user-input keyword. No mention is made of an automated search predicated solely on system-generated terms nor is any made of an allowance for terms having either constant or variable values.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 6,539,396 to Bowman-Amuah discloses a system and method for associating multiple versions of business objects with one another. A legacy system interconnected with a client via an integration architecture uses a legacy wrapper to communicate with a client. Although the calculation of insurance rates are mentioned, the calculation referred to pertains to communication regarding a single customer component of an insurance rate quote between a newer system of an independent agency and a legacy system of an insurance company. Bowman-Amuah fails to discuss or even mention accessing legacy information in the calculation of insurance rates. Rather, facilitating communication between legacy and newer protocols is discussed.
  • U.S. patent application publication 2003/01355520 A1 to Mitchell et al. discloses a method for storing different versions of a body of statutory law and judicial precedent. Different versions of bodies of law are linked and associated via pointers. A version of interest is accessed by navigating through a display along a hierarchical path. Also disclosed is a method of hyper-linking information included in the same file, record, or structured document. However, Mitchell et al. simply provide for a display of dates in association with selected versions of a particular portion of a body of law. Furthermore, particular portions of a body of law are simply linked based on their physical locations within a statute or code; no mention is made of a linking based on content or meaning of a particular portion or section of a selected body of law.
  • Although it is common practice to sort and search by either an insured business name or a tax identification number to find prior policies issued to a particular business, name searches are limited in their ability to provide prior policy information when an insured changes their business name, or, in the event that a search keyed on a tax identification number was performed, a business would appear to have duplicative insurance policy coverage, one policy for each tax identification number. Thus, the ability to accurately find, evaluate, and present all prior policy information corresponding to a particular insured business in a concise, chronological order is hindered.
  • Whatever the precise merits, features, and advantages of the above cited references, none of them achieves or fulfills the purposes of the present invention.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The system and method of the present invention provide for the automatic linking of expired, current, and future insurance policies. Within each insurance policy is a plurality of terms frequently used in the determination of an insurance policy premium or rate quote. Such terms are calculated based on information either associated with or obtained from a particular policyholder. By automatically linking policy information and policy terms from prior insurance policies, the present invention allows policy information previously submitted by a policyholder or calculated in regards to activity on a particular policy to be used in automatic calculation and generation of a future policy term. Also associated with a particular insurance policy for each insured member under the same policy are member identification (ID) information, effective coverage date range, policy premium information, and policy status. Policy status includes a designation of whether the policy was cancelled flat and reissued, expired and renewed, or cancelled and reinstated.
  • Utilizing a logical linked list to all of an insured's policies maintained by the system of the present invention ensures that policies are presented in chronological order regardless of changes in either a policyholder's name or tax identification number. In this manner, it is possible to collocate historical information and documents for all policies associated with a particular policyholder and to obtain immediate access to desired policy information. Thus, the need to sort policy information is obviated as is the need to perform an exhaustive manual search or even an electronic keyword search is obviated.
  • Thus, the present invention achieves straight-thru processing in organizing prior policies for assistance in renewals, loss ratio calculations, shifts in payroll numbers (i.e., the number of employees insured under a single policy), and previous claims activity under the same type of policy. Using the present invention, loss representatives are able to analyze new, system-generated calculations that are determined via triggers pulled from prior policies, as opposed to manually searching for prior policy terms and manually generating new policy terms.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a screenshot of a Graphical User Interface (GUI) of the system of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a folder view of an insurance policy under review.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates items pulled forward and linked to an insurance policy under review and the propagation of a policy term to previous policy years.
  • FIG. 4 is a process flow diagram for the method of the present invention.
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • While this invention is illustrated and described in a preferred embodiment, the invention may be produced in many different configurations. There is depicted in the drawings, and will herein be described in detail, a preferred embodiment of the invention, with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered as an exemplification of the principles of the invention and the associated functional specifications for its construction and is not intended to limit the invention to the embodiment illustrated. Those skilled in the art will envision many other possible variations within the scope of the present invention.
  • Because the volume of the base of insured policy members increases on a day-to-day basis, it is unlikely that simply archiving insurance policies would allow for efficient access on a need-to-know basis. For this reason, it is necessary to have some sort of consistent and efficient method of accessing the information contained within insurance policies previously issued for current policyholders.
  • Referring now to FIG. 1, a screenshot depicting a graphical user interface (GUI) of the present invention is shown. Policy terms calculated for previous years and for the current year are collocated in a single insurance policy folder. Each policy is also collocated with a root underwriting file, which functions as a placeholder for policy subfolders located at lower levels of hierarchy. A root folder is also used to store items that a user (i.e., an underwriter, adjustor, loss control representative, litigator, or subrogation specialist) needs to be immediately aware of. Essentially, items stored in a root folder are “red-flagged.” For example, a policy that is currently the subject of litigation is noted such that a user is given ample notice to proceed with caution when working on the noted policy. When a user receives correspondence pertaining to a particular policy or a particular insured member's policy information, the correspondence becomes a part of the underwriting folder of the noted policy. Once the correspondence item is placed into the underwriting root folder of the noted policy, it becomes possible to “pull forward” certain application items to aid in the renewal process.
  • Items “pulled forward” are not physically removed from original policy folder locations, rather, a logical linked list is placed in the folder that “point” back to documents held in either expired or expiring policy folders. Thus, no manual process is required to actually “pull forward” or move or copy documents from one folder to another folder. The system of the present invention automatically creates a linked list linking documents from prior policies; these documents are chosen for linking based on business logic that changes from month to month, year to year.
  • Suggested items to be “pulled forward” include an insurance policy application, supplemental application, and account analysis; if the item is over three years old, a diary note is attached as a reminder to obtain a new or updated application prior to renewal. Other items to be pulled forward include, but are not limited to, the latest: underwriter activity sheets, E-mod (Q-mod) worksheets, schedule mod worksheets, Dun and Bradstreet™ reports, Drug-free workplace (DFWP) forms, managed care forms, loss runs, and loss control surveys. Other items of interest that may influence a future underwriter decision include officer election information. Once these items are pulled forward and placed in the underwriting folder of the noted policy, and underwriter is provided access necessary to determine new policy terms, without having to obtain or collect redundant data.
  • Shown in FIG. 2 is a policy folder 200 corresponding to an insurance policy currently under review by an underwriter. A root underwriting folder 202 is maintained within policy folder 200 and links to items either manually or automatically pulled forward 204 a-d.
  • Referring now to FIG. 3, items pulled forward from root underwriting folders 302 a, b of policies issued in prior years 300 a, b are linked to root underwriting folder 302 c, for a policy currently under review 300 c. Pulled forward items are evaluated to calculate a term or terms for policy under review 300 c and used to adjust the renewal process. Changes made to policy under review 300 c propagate all the way through prior policies 300 a, b.
  • Referring now to FIG. 4, a process flow diagram for calculating policy terms for an insurance policy of interest is shown. In step 400, items of interest in calculating renewal policy terms are marked as “pulled forward”. In one embodiment, such items are comprised of the latest: insurance applications filled out by the insured, supplemental applications, underwriter activity sheets, E-mod worksheets, schedule mod worksheets, Dun and Bradstreet™ reports, officer election information, Drug-free workplace (DFWP) forms, managed care forms, loss runs, and loss control surveys. Items marked as “pulled forward” are then linked to a root underwriting folder collocated with the insurance policy of interest in step 402.
  • Subsequently in step 404, links are traversed to obtain specific information from any one of the items marked as pulled forward. If the location of the specific information is known, it is possible to access the information directly. Following in step 406, claims are adjusted, renewal policy terms are calculated, new insurance policy terms are underwritten, or a current policy is cancelled based on the insurance policy of interest. If it is determined in step 406 that a renewal policy is created, policy terms determined for the renewal policy are propagated to policies previously issued in step 408. In step 410, the policy of interest for which policy terms were calculated is designated as a current policy and a current policy is designated as expired. If it is determined in step 406 that the policy of interest was cancelled, the policy of interest is designated as expired in step 412.
  • Furthermore, the method of the present invention does not require navigation along a path; if the identity of a prior or previous insurance policy term is known, direct access is possible. This obviates the need for a manual search, terms such as payroll numbers are located instantaneously; relevant terms in previously issued policies are flagged for review in underwriting a current policy.
  • Additionally, the present invention provides for an article of manufacture comprising computer readable program code contained within implementing one or more modules to link previous insurance policy information to a current insurance policy under review. Furthermore, the present invention includes a computer program code-based product, which is a storage medium having program code stored therein which can be used to instruct a computer to perform any of the methods associated with the present invention. The computer storage medium includes any of, but is not limited to, the following: CD-ROM, DVD, magnetic tape, optical disc, hard drive, floppy disk, ferroelectric memory, flash memory, ferromagnetic memory, optical storage, charge coupled devices, magnetic or optical cards, smart cards, EEPROM, EPROM, RAM, ROM, DRAM, SRAM, SDRAM, or any other appropriate static or dynamic memory or data storage devices.
  • Implemented in computer program code based products are software modules for: (a) linking policy terms and information used in underwriting a prior policy term; (b) calculating policy terms for a current policy under review; (c) propagating calculated policy terms to prior policies; and (d) providing instantaneous access to policy terms from prior years.
  • Also, implemented in computer program based products are software modules for:
  • creating an object representing an insured, effective range date of an insurance policy premium and policy status;
  • linking a current policy for a current calendar year to at least one of: an expired policy for a calendar year prior to said current calendar year and a renewal policy issued for a following calendar year; and
  • traversing said links to perform any of: adjusting claims for a prior calendar year, underwriting an insurance policy, creating a renewal policy, and canceling an insurance policy operations.
  • CONCLUSION
  • A system and method has been shown in the above embodiments for the effective implementation of an insurance policy renewal chain in a digital paperless environment. While various preferred embodiments have been shown and described, it will be understood that there is no intent to limit the invention by such disclosure, but rather, it is intended to cover all modifications falling within the spirit and scope of the invention, as defined in the appended claims. For example, the present invention should not be limited by software/program, computing environment, or specific computing hardware, subject matter of term calculation.
  • The above enhancements are implemented in various computing environments. For example, the present invention may be implemented on a multi-nodal system (e.g., LAN) or networking system (e.g., Internet, WWW, wireless web). All programming and data related thereto are stored in computer memory, static or dynamic, and may be retrieved by the user in any of: conventional computer storage, display (i.e., CRT) and/or hardcopy (i.e., printed) formats. The programming of the present invention may be implemented by one of skill in the art of insurance policy issuance/management and database programming.

Claims (13)

1. A method to link, access, and search current and expired insurance policy terms in the renewal of insurance policies; said method comprising:
a. linking a root underwriting folder for a renewal policy for a current calendar year to at least one expired policy for a calendar year prior to said calendar year;
b. traversing links to perform any of the following operations: adjusting claims for a prior calendar year, underwriting a new insurance policy, calculating policy terms for said renewal policy, and canceling a current insurance policy;
c. linking said renewal policy to said current policy and propagating said calculated policy terms if said renewal policy was created; and
d. modifying designations of said current and expired policies if either a renewal policy was created or an insurance policy was canceled in said traversing step.
2. A method to link, access, and search current and expired insurance policy terms, as per claim 1, wherein said modifying further comprises:
a. designating a current insurance policy as an expired policy, in a calendar year subsequent to said current calendar year; and
b. designating a renewed insurance policy as a current policy, in a calendar year subsequent to said current calendar year.
3. A method to link, access, and search current and expired insurance policy terms, as per claim 1, wherein said renewal insurance policy terms are determined by any of: insurance application, supplemental application, underwriter activity sheet, E-mod worksheet, schedule mod worksheet, Dun and Bradstreet™ report, officer election, drug-free workplace (DFWP) form, managed care form, loss run, and loss control survey information.
4. A method to link, access, and search current and expired insurance policy terms, as per claim 1, wherein any of said: adjusting of claims;
underwriting of a new insurance policy; and calculation of renewal policy terms results in an automated search of policy terms on expired policies from calendar years prior to said current calendar year.
5. A method to link, access, and search current and expired insurance policy terms, as per claim 4, wherein said policy terms from said expired insurance policy are linked to said current insurance policy.
6. A method to link, access, and search current and expired insurance policy terms, as per claim 4, wherein said policy terms from said current insurance policy are linked to said renewed insurance policy.
7. A method to reference and modify current, expired, and renewed policies in an insurance policy renewal chain; said method comprising:
a. creating an object representing an insured, effective range date of an insurance policy premium and policy status;
b. linking a current policy for a current calendar year to at least one of: an expired policy for a calendar year prior to said current calendar year and a renewal policy issued for a following calendar year; and
c. traversing said links to perform any of: adjusting claims for a prior calendar year, underwriting an insurance policy, creating a renewal policy, and canceling an insurance policy operations.
8. An article of manufacture comprising a computer usable medium having computer readable program code embodied therein which implements a method for referencing and modifying current, expired, and renewed policies in an insurance policy renewal chain; said medium comprising:
a. computer readable program code creating an object representing an insured, effective range date of an insurance policy premium and policy status;
b. computer readable program code linking a current policy for a current calendar year to at least one of: an expired policy for a calendar year prior to said current calendar year and a renewal policy issued for a following calendar year; and
c. computer readable program code traversing said links to perform any of: adjusting claims for a prior calendar year, underwriting an insurance policy, creating a renewal policy, and canceling an insurance policy operations.
9. An article of manufacture comprising a computer usable medium having computer readable program code, as per claim 8, wherein said medium further comprises:
a. computer readable program code designating a current insurance policy as an expired policy, in a calendar year subsequent to said current calendar year; and
b. computer readable program code designating a renewed insurance policy as a current policy, in a calendar year subsequent to said current calendar year.
10. An article of manufacture comprising a computer usable medium having computer readable program code, as per claim 8, wherein said renewed insurance policies are determined by any of: insurance application, supplemental application, underwriter activity sheet, E-mod worksheet, schedule mod worksheet, Dun and Bradstreet™ report, officer election, DFWP form, managed care form, loss run, and loss control survey information.
11. An article of manufacture comprising a computer usable medium having computer readable program code, as per claim 8, wherein any of said:
adjusting of claims; underwriting of an insurance policy; and creation of a renewal policy invokes computer readable program code to perform an automated search of policy terms on expired policies from calendar years prior to said current calendar year.
12. An article of manufacture comprising a computer usable medium having computer readable program code, as per claim 11, wherein said policy terms from said expired insurance policy are linked to said current insurance policy.
13. An article of manufacture comprising a computer usable medium having computer readable program code, as per claim 11, wherein said policy terms from said current insurance policy are linked to said renewed insurance policy.
US10/906,271 2005-02-11 2005-02-11 Insurance policy renewal chain Abandoned US20060184387A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/906,271 US20060184387A1 (en) 2005-02-11 2005-02-11 Insurance policy renewal chain
US12/693,060 US9852473B2 (en) 2005-02-11 2010-01-25 Insurance policy renewal chain

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/906,271 US20060184387A1 (en) 2005-02-11 2005-02-11 Insurance policy renewal chain

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/693,060 Division US9852473B2 (en) 2005-02-11 2010-01-25 Insurance policy renewal chain

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20060184387A1 true US20060184387A1 (en) 2006-08-17

Family

ID=36816750

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/906,271 Abandoned US20060184387A1 (en) 2005-02-11 2005-02-11 Insurance policy renewal chain
US12/693,060 Active 2025-04-23 US9852473B2 (en) 2005-02-11 2010-01-25 Insurance policy renewal chain

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/693,060 Active 2025-04-23 US9852473B2 (en) 2005-02-11 2010-01-25 Insurance policy renewal chain

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US20060184387A1 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080120143A1 (en) * 2006-11-17 2008-05-22 Uniprise, Inc. Method for Providing Discounted Insurance
US20100312584A1 (en) * 2009-05-29 2010-12-09 Quanis, Inc. Dynamic adjustment of insurance coverage
TWI490810B (en) * 2008-12-04 2015-07-01 Shacom Com Inc Investment property insurance method
US20170293645A1 (en) * 2016-04-08 2017-10-12 International Business Machines Corporation Organizing multiple versions of content
US11861719B1 (en) * 2009-07-09 2024-01-02 United Services Automobile Association (Usaa) Systems and methods for alternate location of a vehicle

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107038647A (en) * 2017-03-15 2017-08-11 平安科技(深圳)有限公司 Insurance application cancelling method and device
US11488027B2 (en) 2020-02-21 2022-11-01 Optum, Inc. Targeted data retrieval and decision-tree-guided data evaluation

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5235507A (en) * 1990-01-16 1993-08-10 P. B. Toau And Company, Ltd. Health insurance management system
US5586313A (en) * 1993-02-12 1996-12-17 L.I.D.P. Consulting Services, Inc. Method for updating a file
US5857207A (en) * 1993-05-12 1999-01-05 Apple Computer, Inc. Storage manager for computer system
US5950214A (en) * 1993-11-19 1999-09-07 Aurigin Systems, Inc. System, method, and computer program product for accessing a note database having subnote information for the purpose of manipulating subnotes linked to portions of documents
US20020022976A1 (en) * 2000-05-19 2002-02-21 Hartigan William R. Method and system for providing online insurance information
US6366930B1 (en) * 1996-04-12 2002-04-02 Computer Associates Think, Inc. Intelligent data inventory & asset management systems method and apparatus
US20020069090A1 (en) * 2000-12-05 2002-06-06 De Grosz Kurt M. Insurance business system
US20030135520A1 (en) * 2002-01-11 2003-07-17 Mitchell Fred C. Dynamic legal database providing historical and current versions of bodies of law

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7406656B2 (en) * 2001-04-05 2008-07-29 International Business Machines Corporation Method, apparatus, and program for creating bookmark symlinks
US20030167191A1 (en) * 2002-02-25 2003-09-04 Slabonik Elizabeth Ann System and method for underwriting review in an insurance system
US20040186750A1 (en) * 2003-03-18 2004-09-23 Gordon Surbey Method and system for automating insurance processes

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5235507A (en) * 1990-01-16 1993-08-10 P. B. Toau And Company, Ltd. Health insurance management system
US5586313A (en) * 1993-02-12 1996-12-17 L.I.D.P. Consulting Services, Inc. Method for updating a file
US5857207A (en) * 1993-05-12 1999-01-05 Apple Computer, Inc. Storage manager for computer system
US5950214A (en) * 1993-11-19 1999-09-07 Aurigin Systems, Inc. System, method, and computer program product for accessing a note database having subnote information for the purpose of manipulating subnotes linked to portions of documents
US6366930B1 (en) * 1996-04-12 2002-04-02 Computer Associates Think, Inc. Intelligent data inventory & asset management systems method and apparatus
US20020022976A1 (en) * 2000-05-19 2002-02-21 Hartigan William R. Method and system for providing online insurance information
US20020069090A1 (en) * 2000-12-05 2002-06-06 De Grosz Kurt M. Insurance business system
US20030135520A1 (en) * 2002-01-11 2003-07-17 Mitchell Fred C. Dynamic legal database providing historical and current versions of bodies of law

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080120143A1 (en) * 2006-11-17 2008-05-22 Uniprise, Inc. Method for Providing Discounted Insurance
TWI490810B (en) * 2008-12-04 2015-07-01 Shacom Com Inc Investment property insurance method
US20100312584A1 (en) * 2009-05-29 2010-12-09 Quanis, Inc. Dynamic adjustment of insurance coverage
US10049407B2 (en) 2009-05-29 2018-08-14 Quanis Licensing Ltd. Dynamic aggregation of insurance premiums
US11861719B1 (en) * 2009-07-09 2024-01-02 United Services Automobile Association (Usaa) Systems and methods for alternate location of a vehicle
US20170293645A1 (en) * 2016-04-08 2017-10-12 International Business Machines Corporation Organizing multiple versions of content
US10824671B2 (en) * 2016-04-08 2020-11-03 International Business Machines Corporation Organizing multiple versions of content

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US9852473B2 (en) 2017-12-26
US20100185469A1 (en) 2010-07-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9852473B2 (en) Insurance policy renewal chain
Iswajuni et al. The effect of enterprise risk management (ERM) on firm value in manufacturing companies listed on Indonesian Stock Exchange year 2010-2013
US7873557B2 (en) Information, document, and compliance management for financial professionals, clients, and supervisors
US7720698B1 (en) Method and apparatus for performing assessments
US8719063B1 (en) System and method for comparing information in a process for issuing insurance policies
US7313540B1 (en) Electronic communication system and method for facilitating financial transaction bidding and reporting processes
US20080114628A1 (en) Enterprise proposal management system
Back et al. Information management strategies for project management
WO2005070161A2 (en) Automated management of business performance information
EP1451744A2 (en) Rules based method and system for project performance monitoring
US7849012B2 (en) Web-based methods and systems for exchanging information among partners
McKeen et al. Developments in Practice XXXIV: Application portfolio management
Gerald et al. Projections of Education Statistics to 2012.
US20060224617A1 (en) Unstructured business metadata manager
US20060069685A1 (en) Method and a process, provided through internet based software, for the development, management, and reporting of information regarding contingent liabilities
US20130097092A1 (en) Unclaimed property method and system
Massardi et al. Business intelligence design of rural bank performance assessment using financial ratio analysis
Barth et al. Does voluntary non-earnings disclosure substitute for redacted proprietary contract information?
RU2306606C1 (en) Method for performing periodic calculations (variants) and automated computing system for realization thereof
Bearman Managing electronic mail
Benfell An integrated approach to managing electronic records
Nurminen Master data management in industry
Howlett et al. Policy consulting in the USA: New evidence from the federal procurement data system-next generation
Chiantera Data quality and data governance in insurance corporations
Fang et al. Pension Estimation Program Users Guide

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: GUARD INSURANCE GROUP, PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:RICHARDSON, JOHN H;WITKOWSKI, CARL J;REEL/FRAME:015675/0072

Effective date: 20050207

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: EXPRESSLY ABANDONED -- DURING EXAMINATION