US20060162886A1 - Process for improving dry strength and drainage of paper and paperboard - Google Patents

Process for improving dry strength and drainage of paper and paperboard Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20060162886A1
US20060162886A1 US11/338,049 US33804906A US2006162886A1 US 20060162886 A1 US20060162886 A1 US 20060162886A1 US 33804906 A US33804906 A US 33804906A US 2006162886 A1 US2006162886 A1 US 2006162886A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
glyoxal
glyoxylated
paper
polymer
working solution
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/338,049
Inventor
William Smith
Jeffrey Meier
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Paradigm Chemical and Consulting LLC
Original Assignee
Paradigm Chemical and Consulting LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Paradigm Chemical and Consulting LLC filed Critical Paradigm Chemical and Consulting LLC
Priority to US11/338,049 priority Critical patent/US20060162886A1/en
Assigned to PARADIGM CHEMICAL & CONSULTING, LLC reassignment PARADIGM CHEMICAL & CONSULTING, LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: MEIER, JEFFREY J., SMITH, WILLIAM E.
Publication of US20060162886A1 publication Critical patent/US20060162886A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21HPULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D21H21/00Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its function, form or properties; Paper-impregnating or coating material, characterised by its function, form or properties
    • D21H21/06Paper forming aids
    • D21H21/10Retention agents or drainage improvers
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08FMACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING CARBON-TO-CARBON UNSATURATED BONDS
    • C08F265/00Macromolecular compounds obtained by polymerising monomers on to polymers of unsaturated monocarboxylic acids or derivatives thereof as defined in group C08F20/00
    • C08F265/10Macromolecular compounds obtained by polymerising monomers on to polymers of unsaturated monocarboxylic acids or derivatives thereof as defined in group C08F20/00 on to polymers of amides or imides
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08LCOMPOSITIONS OF MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS
    • C08L51/00Compositions of graft polymers in which the grafted component is obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds; Compositions of derivatives of such polymers
    • C08L51/003Compositions of graft polymers in which the grafted component is obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds; Compositions of derivatives of such polymers grafted on to macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving unsaturated carbon-to-carbon bonds
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21HPULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D21H21/00Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its function, form or properties; Paper-impregnating or coating material, characterised by its function, form or properties
    • D21H21/14Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its function, form or properties; Paper-impregnating or coating material, characterised by its function, form or properties characterised by function or properties in or on the paper
    • D21H21/18Reinforcing agents
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21HPULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D21H17/00Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its constitution; Paper-impregnating material characterised by its constitution
    • D21H17/03Non-macromolecular organic compounds
    • D21H17/05Non-macromolecular organic compounds containing elements other than carbon and hydrogen only
    • D21H17/06Alcohols; Phenols; Ethers; Aldehydes; Ketones; Acetals; Ketals
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21HPULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D21H17/00Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its constitution; Paper-impregnating material characterised by its constitution
    • D21H17/20Macromolecular organic compounds
    • D21H17/21Macromolecular organic compounds of natural origin; Derivatives thereof
    • D21H17/24Polysaccharides
    • D21H17/28Starch
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21HPULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D21H17/00Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its constitution; Paper-impregnating material characterised by its constitution
    • D21H17/20Macromolecular organic compounds
    • D21H17/21Macromolecular organic compounds of natural origin; Derivatives thereof
    • D21H17/24Polysaccharides
    • D21H17/28Starch
    • D21H17/29Starch cationic
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21HPULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D21H17/00Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its constitution; Paper-impregnating material characterised by its constitution
    • D21H17/20Macromolecular organic compounds
    • D21H17/33Synthetic macromolecular compounds
    • D21H17/34Synthetic macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds
    • D21H17/37Polymers of unsaturated acids or derivatives thereof, e.g. polyacrylates
    • D21H17/375Poly(meth)acrylamide

Definitions

  • This invention is directed towards the manufacturing process of paper, paperboard, corrugated products, and other fiber-containing products such as gypsum board/drywall and fiber-based backing for vinyl flooring.
  • This invention further relates to additives used in the wet end of a papermaking process to confer dry strength to the resulting product.
  • An additional aspect of one aspect of the invention is a process which improves manufacturing efficiency by promoting increased drainage during fiber processing.
  • Glyoxal is another additive which is frequently combined with a polyacrylamide polymer for incorporation into the wet end of a papermaking process.
  • a glyoxylated resin additive is frequently used to obtain increased internal bond strength, greater dry tensile strength, improved modulus of elasticity, and improvements in sizing effectiveness.
  • the glyoxylated polymer additives may have cationic charges
  • the amount of cationic charge can be controlled so as to provide desired drainage and retention properties to the paper. Proper pH regulation avoids problems associated with excessive cationic charges such as flocculation of the fibers.
  • a glyoxylated product may be added to an aqueous suspension of paper stock while the paper stock is in the head box recirculation loop, in the thick stock chest, the hydropulper, or at other points in the process prior to or after formation of a sheet.
  • An example of the latter would be the spraying of a gloxylated polymer solution between the plies of a multi-ply sheet.
  • the 4% to 6% solids solution is thereafter metered into a papermaking process as a glyoxylated polyacrylamide polymer solution, for example.
  • the working solution is useful for incorporation into a thick paper stock solution having between about 2% to about 5% solids and thereby achieve an increase in dry strength of the resulting paper product.
  • the working solution can also be used to improve drainage properties in a thin paper stock having solids of less than about 1%.
  • a glyoxylated additive the proportion of glyoxal to polymer of which is varied, depending upon monitored production goals, such as sheet strength, stock drainage and drying rates, white water quality, and process variables which may include water properties, stock pH, fiber quality, fines content, and the type and amount of additional additives used in the paper making process.
  • the FIGURE is a schematic view of a process of incorporating a high solid content glyoxylated polymer into the wet end of a papermaking process.
  • glyoxal will react with macromolecules such as polyacrylamide polymers and other polymeric agents in a cross-linking reaction.
  • Glyoxal reacts with the polymeric agent to improve the paper properties, such as strength, upon drying of the paper.
  • the amount of glyoxal resin is within the ratio of about 15 percent to about 25 percent by dry weight of the glyoxal to dry weight of a cationic polymer such as polyacrylamide.
  • glyoxal can promote improved drainage properties of a paper furnish.
  • the glyoxal resin is added within a ratio of about 5 percent to about 15 percent by dry weight of the glyoxal to cationic polymer such as polyacrylamide.
  • PCV 005 and PCV 015 are nonionic polymers while the PCV 105 polymer has a 10% cationic charge.
  • the polymers used were prepared using dry powders which were dispersed in deionized water at a 1.7% solids concentration. Thereafter, glyoxal supplied by Noveon, Charlotte, N.C., at a 40% solids concentration was slowly added to the polymer solution while stirring to produce a 25:75 glyoxal to polymer ratio, on a solids basis, for each reactant.
  • Lignin sulfonate solids were added to the suspension of fibers at a concentration of 200 ppm, based upon the lignin sulfonate solids to the wet paper stock weight. The addition of lignin sulfonate solids was used to provide a water/fiber suspension having properties of a closed mill water system. The lignin sulfonate retards drainage and duplicates conditions of a typical fiber furnish.
  • Furnish samples of the 0.8% to 1.0% consistency solution described above were prepared using 500 ml aliquots which were mixed in a Britt jar for 10 seconds. Following mixing, a corresponding amount of a freshly prepared glyoxylated polymer was added at levels equivalent to 5 pounds of polymer solids per ton of fiber solids. Following addition of this polymer, the material within the Britt jar was stirred for an additional 20 seconds and the furnish transferred to a Buchner funnel having a coarse filter (Whatman grade 202,15 cm diameter). Prior to transferring the furnish to the funnel, a vacuum was applied to the supporting filter flask. A 10 second vacuum interval was applied to the furnish at which time the vacuum was removed and the amount of water drained during the 10 second time interval was measured.
  • low molecular weight gyloxylated polymers have a more significant impact upon furnish drainage than higher molecular weight polymers. This is true even when the higher molecular weight polymers have a cationic charge.
  • the use of lower molecular weight polymers provide for an increased number of polymer molecules which are available for interaction. In other words, the lower molecular weight polymers result in enhanced uniformity of coverage of the polymeric species on the fiber and fines surfaces, resulting in a better distribution of chemical bonding between the additive and the cellulose.
  • the free glyoxal serves as a scavenger for sulfide and other materials and which can bring about further improvements in drainage properties by scavenging materials that may otherwise contribute to reduced drainage.
  • the ability of freshly glyoxylated polymers to improve drainage properties of a commercial paper furnish having a clean, open water system was also evaluated.
  • the polymer used to evaluate drainage improvements was a copolymer consisting of a 93 mol percent of dimethyldiallyl ammonium chloride (DADMAC) and a 7 mol percent of polyacrylamide. This copolymer was obtained in an aqueous solution, therefore, it did not require dispersion in water.
  • DMDMAC dimethyldiallyl ammonium chloride
  • the glyoxylation process used was otherwise identical to that described in Example 1.
  • the paper furnish used was obtained from the headbox of a commercial paper machine making kraft multi-wall bag paper material.
  • the furnish composition was a mixture of 80% unbleached, refined virgin kraft Southern Pine pulp blended with 20% old corrugated containers.
  • the furnish was separated into four samples as set forth in Table 3.
  • a portion of the furnish was introduced into a Britt jar at a propeller rotation of 800 rpm, and using a screen made from the paper machine's forming fabric.
  • additional furnish was added to maintain a volume of between about 400 to about 600 ml.
  • the effluent from the jar was collected and consisted of process water and fines, i.e., fibrous material capable of passing through the screen.
  • Sample 3 was obtained by simply filtering a portion of the furnish.
  • Sample 4 preparation began by collecting long fibers trapped by the screen which were subsequently thoroughly washed with tap water. The washed long fibers were then re-dispersed in filtrate from the headbox sample.
  • the drainage test procedure was set up as described in reference to Example 1 above. However, because of the much higher drainage rate of the filtrate (Sample 3) and the long fiber sample (Sample 4) a different evaluation measurement was obtained. As seen in reference to Table 3, the time required to completely evacuate free water was measured. All measurements set forth in Table 3 are set forth at a drainage rate of milliliters per second. The amount of glyoxylated polymer used to treat the samples was identical to that in Example 1. All samples were adjusted to have the same solids-to-water ratio as occurred in the original headbox sample, except for the filtrate, Sample 3, which had no suspended solids. The headbox sample consisted of a 63% long fiber and a 37% fines composition.
  • the glyoxylated polymer significantly enhances the drainage rate of all the samples with the exception of long fibers in the process water.
  • the process water has been depleted of the primary material responsible for slow drainage, i.e., fines.
  • the freshly glyoxylated polymer brings about significant improvement in drainage rate.
  • the paper furnish was prepared in a laboratory using defiberized paper stocks of 98% old corrugated container and 2% old newsprint.
  • the drainage test procedures set forth in Example 1 were used and the results set forth below in Table 5.
  • the liquid reactants are generally stable for periods ranging between 6 months to 1 year and may be stored in bulk tanks equipped with metering pumps.
  • pumps may supply the required ingredients at a programmed flow rate to a header.
  • the required ingredients must be dispensed simultaneously, followed by static mixing.
  • Reactant A may be a polyacrylamide polymer, a copolymer of, for example, polyacrylamide and dimethlydiallyl ammonium chloride, or any number of linear or branched polymers modified by appendaged anionically or cationically charged groups.
  • Reactant B may be a liquid cationic starch solution, chitin, guar gum, or a hybrid product, such as a starch-cationic polymer complex with a high percentage (approximately 50 percent) of synthetic polymer
  • Reactant C may be a glyoxal at 40% solids or another suitable cross-linking agent.
  • Non-limiting examples include other dialdehydes, anhydrides, dianhydrides, polyfunctional amines, and polyamines.
  • sodium carbonate may be added in small amounts to increase the pH of the mixed reactants to a desired range of between about 7.8 to about 8.0.
  • a typical reaction time of 15 to 30 minutes may be used in which the reactants are continually mixed by an agitator in the reactor or some other form of agitation.
  • the pH of the resulting reactant is monitored and adjusted with either sodium carbonate or sulfuric acid to maintain a desired pH.
  • the product concentration in the reactor will typically be in a range of about 15% to about 35% solids.
  • the reactant is diluted with water using a static mixer.
  • the resulting working solution of freshly prepared glyoxylated polymer should be at a concentration of between about 4% to about 6% solids and which is then pumped to an accompanying storage tank.
  • two storage tanks may be employed to provide a continuous tank for operation.
  • the reaction product necessary for the desired papermaking process may be metered via a metering pump.
  • the metering pump is controlled by a distributed control system (DCS).
  • DCS distributed control system
  • Samples of glyoxylated polyacrylamide were prepared under laboratory conditions similar to conditions for use within a pulp or paper mill environment. Specifically, a base polymer of a low molecular weight, 3 mol percent charge polyacrylamide, designated PAM and a 40% aqueous solution of glyoxal was used to obtain various degrees of glyoxylation as measured relative to active PAM. The degrees of glyoxylation are set forth in Table 6.
  • the samples were prepared at ambient laboratory conditions with the pH adjusted to 7.8 using a dilute caustic followed by 15 minutes of vigorous stirring. During the stirring process, the pH typically drifts to the value of between 7.5 to 7.7, but no further pH changes were made.
  • the samples described above were evaluated for their drainage efficiency in a recycled paper furnish product.
  • the furnish was prepared in the laboratory by re-pulping a mixture consisting of 80% corrugated container and 20% newsprint.
  • the consistency of the furnish was 0.70% with a pH of 7.5.
  • the evaluation consisted of mixing 500 ml samples of furnish in a Britt jar using a stir rotation of 800 rpm in 15 seconds followed by the introduction of the respective sample or control by a syringe injection.
  • a polymer product application amount corresponding to 3 lbs./ton was selected with the pounds of polymer product being on the solids basis and the tons being on an oven-dry fiber basis.
  • Samples 7 and 8 were polymers made 21 and 26 days, respectively, and stored under ambient laboratory conditions prior to use in the drainage test reported above. Samples 3 through 6 were prepared 24 hours prior to use.
  • samples 5, 7, and 8 which have aged for 21 days as in sample 7 and 26 days as in sample 8, have a negative impact on desired properties.
  • the use of freshly glyoxylated polymers improves drainage properties resulting in a more efficient paper manufacturing process.
  • the freshly glyoxylated polymers can both increase the filtration efficiency of the furnish as well as prevent the formation of gels within storage and dispensing equipment used within the mill.
  • the three samples set forth in Table 7 were made using dosages equivalent to 5 lbs/ton on a solids basis in the treated samples.
  • the base for the starch treatment, sample 2 is a commercial liquid cationic starch.
  • the base for the polymer, sample 3 is a cationic low molecular weight solution polymer.
  • the base samples were used to prepare a 30% glyoxal and 70% base reaction product. Glyoxyalation was carried out at a pH of about 7.9 at 80° F. for a 15 minute period. This reaction process and timing simulates on-site production conditions within a paper or pulp mill.
  • the glyoxylated starch and the glyoxylated polymer as set forth in Table 7 can also be used at a similar dosage level of about 3 to about 5 lb/ton on a solids basis to be applied as a spray between ply layers on forming webs in a papermaking process. It is also envisioned that the strength additives can be sprayed onto forming webs prior to the drying of the webs to bring about improvements in dry strength.
  • the enhancements in the quality of the glyoxylated polymer strength and drainage additives are best achieved using the preparation methods described above in which the appropriate material quantities are combined and through control of the solution pH, mixing time, and post-reaction dilution control, allows for a high level of control over the quality and reactivity of the glyoxylated polymer additives.
  • the automation overcomes problems in the prior art dealing with gelation, loss of efficiency through storage and shipping, sensitivity to temperatures, along with age-dependent variability in the reactivity of the glyoxylated polymer additives.

Abstract

A process is provided of providing glyoxylated polymer additives to a paper making process which brings about improvements in drainage properties of a cellulosic pulp material along with the ability to increase the dry strength of a resulting paper product. The process uses concentrated glyoxal to generate a working solution of a glyoxylated polymer additive which can be generated on site in a paper mill and used within a 24 to 48 hour interval. The ability to glyoxylate polymers in a working solution concentration provides for a more active additive and which can be supplied in a more economical fashion than conventional glyoxylated polymers.

Description

    RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/646,341, filed on Jan. 24, 2005, and which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • This invention is directed towards the manufacturing process of paper, paperboard, corrugated products, and other fiber-containing products such as gypsum board/drywall and fiber-based backing for vinyl flooring. This invention further relates to additives used in the wet end of a papermaking process to confer dry strength to the resulting product. An additional aspect of one aspect of the invention is a process which improves manufacturing efficiency by promoting increased drainage during fiber processing.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Within the papermaking art, it is known to add cationic starches during fiber processing/manipulation so as to achieve an improved retention of cellulosic fines, filler, and/or pigment within the fiber product and to also bring about an improved dry strength in the resulting paper.
  • Glyoxal is another additive which is frequently combined with a polyacrylamide polymer for incorporation into the wet end of a papermaking process. A glyoxylated resin additive is frequently used to obtain increased internal bond strength, greater dry tensile strength, improved modulus of elasticity, and improvements in sizing effectiveness.
  • Further, since the glyoxylated polymer additives may have cationic charges, the amount of cationic charge can be controlled so as to provide desired drainage and retention properties to the paper. Proper pH regulation avoids problems associated with excessive cationic charges such as flocculation of the fibers.
  • Heretofore, it has been the custom and practice within the papermaking industry to use bulk supplies of a low solids content of glyoxylated polymers having about 6% to about 11% solids. However, glyoxylated polymer solutions, even at the commonly used concentration levels, suffer a noticeable loss of efficiency following three to four weeks of storage. Further, if not used within a narrow time interval, the glyoxylated polymer will gel. Once gelling occurs, the glyoxylated polymer is no longer usable, and the equipment affected by the gelled glyoxylated polymer must be cleaned and reconditioned. In addition, the gel time of glyoxylated compositions is dependent upon ambient temperature. Accordingly, glyoxylated polymer degradation and gelling occurs more rapidly in warmer climates.
  • Since the traditional glyoxylated polymers employed within the papermaking industry have a limited storage life, it is common for the stored glyoxylated additives to be used for paper and paperboard products which do not require the higher strength parameters normally associated with the use of the strength additives. In other words, glyoxylated additives are frequently incorporated into products merely as a way of using up stored additive inventory before unacceptable gelling occurs.
  • Accordingly, there remains room for improvement and variation within the art.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • It is one aspect of at least one of the present embodiments to provide for a paper manufacturing process in which a high solids content glyoxylated additive can be mixed into a cellulosic pulp material by the incorporation of glyoxal and glyoxal-polymer reaction products into the cellulose pulp prior to formation of the paper product. Accordingly, a glyoxylated product may be added to an aqueous suspension of paper stock while the paper stock is in the head box recirculation loop, in the thick stock chest, the hydropulper, or at other points in the process prior to or after formation of a sheet. An example of the latter would be the spraying of a gloxylated polymer solution between the plies of a multi-ply sheet.
  • It is yet another aspect of at least one embodiment of the present invention to provide for a process of using stock solutions of glyoxal and polymer at about a 25% to about a 40% solids range which can be used on site to produce a diluted working solution of glyoxylated polymer at about a 4% to about a 6% solids concentration. The 4% to 6% solids solution is thereafter metered into a papermaking process as a glyoxylated polyacrylamide polymer solution, for example.
  • It is a further aspect of at least one embodiment of the present invention to provide for a process for introducing glyoxal to various reactive polymers, starches, gums, etc., to produce a cross-linked dry strength resin having excellent drainage properties and which can be applied in situ in a paper mill operation.
  • It is a further aspect of at least one embodiment of the present invention to employ a metering system for a glyoxal stock solution and a base polymer to produce a freshly prepared glyoxylated polymer working solution of between about 4% to about 6% solids concentration. The working solution is useful for incorporation into a thick paper stock solution having between about 2% to about 5% solids and thereby achieve an increase in dry strength of the resulting paper product. The working solution can also be used to improve drainage properties in a thin paper stock having solids of less than about 1%.
  • It is a further aspect of at least one embodiment of the present invention to provide for a working solution of a glyoxylated additive in a papermaking process which reduces the tendency of the reaction product to form undesired gels.
  • It is yet another aspect of at least one embodiment of the present invention to provide for a process of introducing a glyoxylated additive, the proportion of glyoxal to polymer of which is varied, depending upon monitored production goals, such as sheet strength, stock drainage and drying rates, white water quality, and process variables which may include water properties, stock pH, fiber quality, fines content, and the type and amount of additional additives used in the paper making process.
  • It is yet a further aspect of at least one embodiment of the present invention to provide for an effective sulfide, or other sulfur compound, scavenging amount of free glyoxal in a working solution of a glyoxal additive which serves as a sulfide scavenger within a fiber furnish.
  • These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with reference to the following description and appended claims.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • A fully enabling disclosure of the present invention, including the best mode thereof to one of ordinary skill in the art, is set forth more particularly in the remainder of the specification, including reference to the accompanying drawings.
  • The FIGURE is a schematic view of a process of incorporating a high solid content glyoxylated polymer into the wet end of a papermaking process.
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
  • Reference will now be made in detail to the embodiments of the invention, one or more examples of which are set forth below. Each example is provided by way of explanation of the invention, not limitation of the invention. In fact, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the present invention without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. For instance, features illustrated or described as part of one embodiment can be used on another embodiment to yield a still further embodiment. Thus, it is intended that the present invention cover such modifications and variations as come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents. Other objects, features, and aspects of the present invention are disclosed in the following detailed description. It is to be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that the present discussion is a description of exemplary embodiments only and is not intended as limiting the broader aspects of the present invention, which broader aspects are embodied in the exemplary constructions.
  • In describing the various FIGURES herein, the same reference numbers are used throughout to describe the same material, apparatus, or process pathway. To avoid redundancy, detailed descriptions of much of the apparatus once described in relation to a FIGURE is not repeated in the descriptions of subsequent FIGURES, although such apparatus or process is labeled with the same reference numbers.
  • In accordance with the present invention, it has been demonstrated that a high solids glyoxal will react with macromolecules such as polyacrylamide polymers and other polymeric agents in a cross-linking reaction. Glyoxal reacts with the polymeric agent to improve the paper properties, such as strength, upon drying of the paper. Generally, the amount of glyoxal resin is within the ratio of about 15 percent to about 25 percent by dry weight of the glyoxal to dry weight of a cationic polymer such as polyacrylamide.
  • In addition, glyoxal can promote improved drainage properties of a paper furnish. For purposes of improving drainage, the glyoxal resin is added within a ratio of about 5 percent to about 15 percent by dry weight of the glyoxal to cationic polymer such as polyacrylamide.
  • EXAMPLE 1
  • The effect of gyloxylation on polyacrylamides with varying chain lengths was determined with respect to drainage properties of a paper furnish. The laboratory conditions utilized are representative of a glyoxylation process that may be used on site in a paper mill. The following procedures were used and the results are set forth below.
  • Three types of polyacrylamide polymers supplied by Aquaserv, Memphis, Tenn., were selected as referenced in Table 1 below. As noted, samples PCV 005 and PCV 015 are nonionic polymers while the PCV 105 polymer has a 10% cationic charge. The polymers used were prepared using dry powders which were dispersed in deionized water at a 1.7% solids concentration. Thereafter, glyoxal supplied by Noveon, Charlotte, N.C., at a 40% solids concentration was slowly added to the polymer solution while stirring to produce a 25:75 glyoxal to polymer ratio, on a solids basis, for each reactant. The resulting solution was adjusted to a pH of between 7.8 to 8.0 using a dilute sodium hydroxide solution. The samples were continually mixed by stirring for 15 minutes and stored at room temperature.
    TABLE 1
    Approx. Molecular
    Polymer Weight Range Polymer Charge
    PCV 005 200,000 to 500,000 nonionic
    PCV 015 1,000,000 to 1,250,000 nonionic
    PCV 105 2,000,000 to 2,500,000 10% cationic
  • An appropriate paper furnish having a consistency of between about 0.8% to about 1.0% was provided by defiberization of a blend of paper stocks which included:
      • 98% old corrugated containers;
      • 1% office copy paper; and
      • 1% old newsprint.
  • Lignin sulfonate solids were added to the suspension of fibers at a concentration of 200 ppm, based upon the lignin sulfonate solids to the wet paper stock weight. The addition of lignin sulfonate solids was used to provide a water/fiber suspension having properties of a closed mill water system. The lignin sulfonate retards drainage and duplicates conditions of a typical fiber furnish.
  • Furnish samples of the 0.8% to 1.0% consistency solution described above were prepared using 500 ml aliquots which were mixed in a Britt jar for 10 seconds. Following mixing, a corresponding amount of a freshly prepared glyoxylated polymer was added at levels equivalent to 5 pounds of polymer solids per ton of fiber solids. Following addition of this polymer, the material within the Britt jar was stirred for an additional 20 seconds and the furnish transferred to a Buchner funnel having a coarse filter (Whatman grade 202,15 cm diameter). Prior to transferring the furnish to the funnel, a vacuum was applied to the supporting filter flask. A 10 second vacuum interval was applied to the furnish at which time the vacuum was removed and the amount of water drained during the 10 second time interval was measured. Results are listed in Table 2. The measurement of percent drainage improvement was calculated by the following equation:
    TABLE 2
    drainage improvement = treated volume - blank volume blank volume × 100
    Drainage Improvement,
    Sample Vol. Drained, ml %
    Blank 68 0
    Gly. PCV 005 155 128
    Gly. PCV 015 125 84
    Gly. PCV 105 80 18
  • As seen from the results, low molecular weight gyloxylated polymers have a more significant impact upon furnish drainage than higher molecular weight polymers. This is true even when the higher molecular weight polymers have a cationic charge. Without wishing to be limited by theory, it is believed that the use of lower molecular weight polymers provide for an increased number of polymer molecules which are available for interaction. In other words, the lower molecular weight polymers result in enhanced uniformity of coverage of the polymeric species on the fiber and fines surfaces, resulting in a better distribution of chemical bonding between the additive and the cellulose.
  • In addition, when a glyoxylated solution is freshly prepared, there is a greater amount of free glyoxal present within the solution. It is believed that the free glyoxal serves as a scavenger for sulfide and other materials and which can bring about further improvements in drainage properties by scavenging materials that may otherwise contribute to reduced drainage.
  • EXAMPLE 2
  • The ability of freshly glyoxylated polymers to improve drainage properties of a commercial paper furnish having a clean, open water system was also evaluated. The polymer used to evaluate drainage improvements was a copolymer consisting of a 93 mol percent of dimethyldiallyl ammonium chloride (DADMAC) and a 7 mol percent of polyacrylamide. This copolymer was obtained in an aqueous solution, therefore, it did not require dispersion in water. The glyoxylation process used was otherwise identical to that described in Example 1.
  • The paper furnish used was obtained from the headbox of a commercial paper machine making kraft multi-wall bag paper material. The furnish composition was a mixture of 80% unbleached, refined virgin kraft Southern Pine pulp blended with 20% old corrugated containers.
  • The furnish was separated into four samples as set forth in Table 3. A portion of the furnish was introduced into a Britt jar at a propeller rotation of 800 rpm, and using a screen made from the paper machine's forming fabric. As the level in the Britt jar dropped, additional furnish was added to maintain a volume of between about 400 to about 600 ml. The effluent from the jar was collected and consisted of process water and fines, i.e., fibrous material capable of passing through the screen. Sample 3 was obtained by simply filtering a portion of the furnish. Sample 4 preparation began by collecting long fibers trapped by the screen which were subsequently thoroughly washed with tap water. The washed long fibers were then re-dispersed in filtrate from the headbox sample.
  • The drainage test procedure was set up as described in reference to Example 1 above. However, because of the much higher drainage rate of the filtrate (Sample 3) and the long fiber sample (Sample 4) a different evaluation measurement was obtained. As seen in reference to Table 3, the time required to completely evacuate free water was measured. All measurements set forth in Table 3 are set forth at a drainage rate of milliliters per second. The amount of glyoxylated polymer used to treat the samples was identical to that in Example 1. All samples were adjusted to have the same solids-to-water ratio as occurred in the original headbox sample, except for the filtrate, Sample 3, which had no suspended solids. The headbox sample consisted of a 63% long fiber and a 37% fines composition.
    TABLE 3
    Drainage Rate Drainage Rate Drainage
    Sample Without Polymer With Polymer Improvement, %
    Complete Sample 2.2 ml/sec 7.43 ml/sec 238
    Fines in Process 2.3 ml/sec 6.90 ml/sec 200
    Water
    Filtrate Only 15.0 ml/sec 63.10 ml/sec 321
    Long Fiber in 88.2 ml/sec 90.10 ml/sec 2
    Process Water
  • As seen in the data set forth in Table 3, the glyoxylated polymer significantly enhances the drainage rate of all the samples with the exception of long fibers in the process water. In this latter example, the process water has been depleted of the primary material responsible for slow drainage, i.e., fines. In Examples 1 through 3, where fines, dissolved solids, and colloids are present, the freshly glyoxylated polymer brings about significant improvement in drainage rate.
  • EXAMPLE 3
  • The effect of the copolymer charge on drainage and floc formation was also evaluated using glyoxylated copolymers. As set forth in Table 4, the identified copolymers were used as the starting material and obtained in a liquid form. Glyoxal was added to the copolymer to achieve a 15:85 glyoxal to polymer ratio. The solution was adjusted to a pH of between 7.8 to 8.0 using dilute sodium hydroxide as described in Example 1 above. The glyoxylated copolymers were used at a level equivalent to 5 pounds of glyoxylated polymer per ton of fiber, though it is believed that a useful concentration of 3 to 5 pounds of glyoxylated polymer per ton of fiber is a useful range.
    TABLE 4
    Polymer Identification % Polyacrylamide % DADMACC
    PC 1070 7 93
    PC 6050 50 50
    PC 6010 90 10
  • The paper furnish was prepared in a laboratory using defiberized paper stocks of 98% old corrugated container and 2% old newsprint. The drainage test procedures set forth in Example 1 were used and the results set forth below in Table 5.
  • A determination of flocculation was made using qualitative assessments of furnish samples stirred in a Britt jar during the final 20 seconds of mixing. As observed from the data set forth in Table 5, the copolymer having a lower percentage of DADMAC, and hence less of a positive charge, produces very little floccing. In comparison, polymers having a higher percentage of DADMAC exhibited no additional improvement in drainage but produced moderate to severe floccing. Accordingly, with respect to freshly glyoxylated copolymers, it is believed that lower charged products which exhibit good drainage properties are preferable to higher charged products.
    TABLE 5
    Volume Drainage
    Observation of Drained, Improvement,
    Sample Floc Formation ml %
    Blank Very little floccing 210 0
    Gly. PC 1070 Moderate floccing 490 133
    Gly. PC 6050 Severe floccing 505 140
    Gly. PC 6010 Very little visible 505 140
    floccing
  • As seen in reference to the accompanying sole FIGURE, an overview of a representative process is set forth in which reacting polymers, starches, gums, etc., may be cross-linked to produce dry strength resins, serve as drainage aids, and enhance production efficiency within a paper mill.
  • The liquid reactants are generally stable for periods ranging between 6 months to 1 year and may be stored in bulk tanks equipped with metering pumps. For production of a batch product, pumps may supply the required ingredients at a programmed flow rate to a header. The required ingredients must be dispensed simultaneously, followed by static mixing.
  • As seen in reference to the sole FIGURE, Reactant A may be a polyacrylamide polymer, a copolymer of, for example, polyacrylamide and dimethlydiallyl ammonium chloride, or any number of linear or branched polymers modified by appendaged anionically or cationically charged groups. Reactant B may be a liquid cationic starch solution, chitin, guar gum, or a hybrid product, such as a starch-cationic polymer complex with a high percentage (approximately 50 percent) of synthetic polymer Reactant C may be a glyoxal at 40% solids or another suitable cross-linking agent. Non-limiting examples include other dialdehydes, anhydrides, dianhydrides, polyfunctional amines, and polyamines. As the various reactants are mixed within a reactor, sodium carbonate may be added in small amounts to increase the pH of the mixed reactants to a desired range of between about 7.8 to about 8.0.
  • A typical reaction time of 15 to 30 minutes may be used in which the reactants are continually mixed by an agitator in the reactor or some other form of agitation.
  • The pH of the resulting reactant is monitored and adjusted with either sodium carbonate or sulfuric acid to maintain a desired pH. The product concentration in the reactor will typically be in a range of about 15% to about 35% solids. At this point, termination of the reaction and cross linking of product having proceeded, the reactant is diluted with water using a static mixer. The resulting working solution of freshly prepared glyoxylated polymer should be at a concentration of between about 4% to about 6% solids and which is then pumped to an accompanying storage tank. As seen in the exemplary FIGURE, two storage tanks may be employed to provide a continuous tank for operation.
  • From the storage tank, the reaction product necessary for the desired papermaking process may be metered via a metering pump. The metering pump is controlled by a distributed control system (DCS).
  • EXAMPLE 4
  • The effect of degree of glyoxalation and age of glyoxylated polyacrylamide on drainage enhancement was evaluated.
  • Samples of glyoxylated polyacrylamide (PAM) were prepared under laboratory conditions similar to conditions for use within a pulp or paper mill environment. Specifically, a base polymer of a low molecular weight, 3 mol percent charge polyacrylamide, designated PAM and a 40% aqueous solution of glyoxal was used to obtain various degrees of glyoxylation as measured relative to active PAM. The degrees of glyoxylation are set forth in Table 6. The samples were prepared at ambient laboratory conditions with the pH adjusted to 7.8 using a dilute caustic followed by 15 minutes of vigorous stirring. During the stirring process, the pH typically drifts to the value of between 7.5 to 7.7, but no further pH changes were made.
  • Following the 15 minute stirring/reaction period, the viscosity of the sample was measured and an aliquot from each sample was used to prepare a 3% solids solution. From previous studies, it has been observed that solutions of 15% or higher glyoxal content result in the formation of gels in 24 hours or less unless the pH is reduced to 4.4 or lower. Similarly, it has been observed that 3% solutions will remain a pourable liquid at higher pH levels.
    TABLE 6
    VOL. %
    DRAINED, DRAINAGE
    SAMPLE SAMPLE DESCRIPTION ml IMPROVE.
    1 CONTROL 228  -0-
    2 UNMODIFIED 302 205 (10)
    3 PAM-12/06-5% glyoxal 280 23
    4 PAM-12/06-15% glyoxal 343 50
    5 PAM-12/06-25% glyoxal 368 61
    6 PAM-12/06-30% glyoxal 374 64
    7 PAM-11/16-25% glyoxal 225  (1)
    8 PAM-11/11-25% glyoxal 212  (7)
  • As set forth in Table 6, as discussed below, storage periods of 3 to 4 weeks for a 3% solution adversely affects the efficacy of the product. Such findings are consistent with observations from various pulp and paper mills that glyoxylated polymers experience various adverse effects upon storage which are dependent in part upon polymer concentration, temperature, and pH.
  • The samples described above were evaluated for their drainage efficiency in a recycled paper furnish product. The furnish was prepared in the laboratory by re-pulping a mixture consisting of 80% corrugated container and 20% newsprint. The consistency of the furnish was 0.70% with a pH of 7.5.
  • The evaluation consisted of mixing 500 ml samples of furnish in a Britt jar using a stir rotation of 800 rpm in 15 seconds followed by the introduction of the respective sample or control by a syringe injection. A polymer product application amount corresponding to 3 lbs./ton was selected with the pounds of polymer product being on the solids basis and the tons being on an oven-dry fiber basis.
  • Following the polymer introduction, the samples were stirred for an additional 15 seconds at which time the furnish sample was poured into a Buchner funnel fitted with a fast, qualitative Whatman filter paper. Drainage occurred under vacuum for a period of 35 seconds at which time the vacuum was removed and the Buchner funnel was removed from the flask. The volume of water drained during the 35 second time interval was then measured, the results of which are set forth in Table 6. Samples 7 and 8 were polymers made 21 and 26 days, respectively, and stored under ambient laboratory conditions prior to use in the drainage test reported above. Samples 3 through 6 were prepared 24 hours prior to use.
  • As noted by the drainage improvement set forth in Table 6, as the percent increase of glyoxylation increases there is a significant increase in the drainage improvement properties. However, the rate of increase is not linear and less of a degree of improvement is noted as the percent glyoxal content increases.
  • Several factors were identified which influence the decrease in relative drainage improvement. First, the number of long chain polymer molecules within the samples decreases as the degree of glyoxylation increases. In other words, a larger percentage of the sample of polymer is now displaced with glyoxal. However, the polymers which are present are interacting through cross-linking activity which produces larger and more effective molecular structures.
  • Additionally, the storage of glyoxylated products results in a decrease of effectiveness as represented by the data set forth for samples 5, 7, and 8. As noted in Table 6, sample 5 of a 3% active solution with a 25% glyoxal content brings about a 61% drainage improvement. In comparison, samples 7 and 8, which have aged for 21 days as in sample 7 and 26 days as in sample 8, have a negative impact on desired properties. The use of freshly glyoxylated polymers improves drainage properties resulting in a more efficient paper manufacturing process. In addition, the freshly glyoxylated polymers can both increase the filtration efficiency of the furnish as well as prevent the formation of gels within storage and dispensing equipment used within the mill.
  • EXAMPLE 5 Improvement in Paper Dry Strength
  • In addition to the improvements in furnish drainage previously mentioned, it has been found that the dry strength of paper as measured by tensile strength, elongation at break, and tensile energy absorption of paper sheets are improved by incorporation of high solids glyoxylated cationic starch and high solids glyoxylated cationic polymer in the furnish. In addition, it is possible to improve the strength of the resulting paper product while simultaneously increasing the efficiency of drainage. In this manner, it is possible to achieve greater manufacturing efficiency using the gyloxylated products while also increasing the quality of the resulting paper product.
    TABLE 7
    Basis Tensile Elongation
    Weight Drainage Force At Failure TEA
    Sample (lbs/MSF) (ml/sec.) (lb force) (%) (Gpa)
    Control 35.1 2.84 10.4 1.20 1.09
    Glyoxylated 36.7 8.20 12.6 1.71 1.94
    Starch
    Glyoxylated 37.1 8.93 12.8 2.64 3.18
    Polymer
  • The data set forth in Table 7 above is obtained from a commercial gypsum liner furnish which was treated with two types of glyoxylated product. Under laboratory conditions, furnish samples consisting of 500 m is of furnish were mixed in a Britt jar for 20 seconds followed by the injection of a polymer sample as noted in Table 7. Mixing continued for 20 seconds upon which time the contents were transferred to a Buchner funnel attached to a vacuum flask. The time required to drain the water was measured. The fibrous furnish which was formed into a wet sheet was then air dried under restraint and without pressing, and the filter paper was peeled from the liner furnish sheet. The respective sheets were conditioned at TAPPI standards of 50% relative humidity and 73° F. and tested using an L&W tensile tester.
  • The three samples set forth in Table 7 were made using dosages equivalent to 5 lbs/ton on a solids basis in the treated samples. The base for the starch treatment, sample 2, is a commercial liquid cationic starch. The base for the polymer, sample 3, is a cationic low molecular weight solution polymer. The base samples were used to prepare a 30% glyoxal and 70% base reaction product. Glyoxyalation was carried out at a pH of about 7.9 at 80° F. for a 15 minute period. This reaction process and timing simulates on-site production conditions within a paper or pulp mill.
  • The results are set forth in Table 7, and sets forth that tensile strength increases of about 23% may be obtained by using the glyoxylated polymers. Along with the improvements to tensile strength, the elongation break point also increases significantly as well as the tensile energy absorption. The tensile energy absorption data correlates with sheet toughness. As further noted, the drainage of the furnish also improved with the use of the glyoxylated products.
  • Further, the glyoxylated starch and the glyoxylated polymer as set forth in Table 7 can also be used at a similar dosage level of about 3 to about 5 lb/ton on a solids basis to be applied as a spray between ply layers on forming webs in a papermaking process. It is also envisioned that the strength additives can be sprayed onto forming webs prior to the drying of the webs to bring about improvements in dry strength.
  • Without wishing to be limited by theory, it is Applicant's belief that use of freshly glyoxylated compounds results in greater efficiencies in paper drainage and paper strength as opposed to comparable strength solutions which have been stored long term. Further, the ability to provide, on-site, freshly prepared working solutions of glyoxylated polymers provides substantial cost savings. For instance, at the diluted working solutions used, it is not economical to ship large volumes of the glyoxylated polymers. Further, such shipments, while prohibitively expensive, would also suffer from disadvantages Applicant believes exists with using the working solutions of glyoxylated polymers that are not freshly prepared and used within about a 24 to 48 hour interval.
  • Likewise, there are disadvantages of the conventional techniques used within the papermaking industry of shipping large quantities of more concentrated glyoxylated polymers. At conventional shipping concentrations used within the paper industry, the solutions have a very short shelf life. As a result, gel formations within the product can lead to costly equipment cleaning and downtime. Further, the use of aged glyoxylated polymer solutions makes it difficult to standardize production techniques, in that age induced loss of efficiency introduces undesired variability into the manufacturing process. Such variability can be eliminated by using glyoxal stock solutions to prepare fresh glyoxylated polymers which are used within a time interval not exceeding 48 hours. In this manner, a consistent level of reactivity can be assured from one process to another, reducing one source of variability that can result in uneven paper quality.
  • The enhancements in the quality of the glyoxylated polymer strength and drainage additives are best achieved using the preparation methods described above in which the appropriate material quantities are combined and through control of the solution pH, mixing time, and post-reaction dilution control, allows for a high level of control over the quality and reactivity of the glyoxylated polymer additives. The automation overcomes problems in the prior art dealing with gelation, loss of efficiency through storage and shipping, sensitivity to temperatures, along with age-dependent variability in the reactivity of the glyoxylated polymer additives.
  • Although preferred embodiments of the invention have been described using specific terms, devices, and methods, such description is for illustrative purposes only. The words used are words of description rather than of limitation. It is to be understood that changes and variations may be made by those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit or the scope of the present invention which is set forth in the following claims. In addition, it should be understood that aspects of the various embodiments may be interchanged, both in whole, or in part. Therefore, the spirit and scope of the appended claims should not be limited to the description of the preferred versions contained therein.

Claims (3)

1. A method of improving drainage properties of fibers in a papermaking process comprising:
providing a stock solution of glyoxal at a concentration of between about 25% to about 40%;
adding a quantity of said stock solution of glyoxal to a polyacrylamide polymer to produce a solids working solution of a glyoxylated polyacrylamide polymer, said glyoxal being present at about 15% to about 25% by dry weight relative to the dry weight of said polymer;
adjusting said pH of said working solution to between about 7.8 to about 8.0;
metering said pH adjusted working solution into an aqueous suspension of a cellulosic pulp at a loading level of at least about 3 lbs of glyoxylated polyacrylamide per ton of fiber solids; and,
mixing said cellulosic pulp and said metered pH adjusted solution, thereby increasing the drainage properties of said cellulosic pulp.
2. A method of improving the dry strength of a paper product comprising:
providing a stock solution of glyoxal at a concentration of between about 25% to about 40%;
adding a quantity of said stock solution of glyoxal to a strength additive selected from the group consisting of cationic starch, PAM, and combinations thereof, to produce an about 4% to about 6% solids working solution of a glyoxylated polyacrylamide polymer, said glyoxal being present at about 30% by dry weight relative to the dry weight of said strength additive;
adjusting said pH of said working solution to between about 7.8 to about 8.0;
metering said pH adjusted working solution into an aqueous suspension of a cellulosic pulp at a loading level of at least about 3 lbs of glyoxylated polyacrylamide per ton of fiber solids; and,
mixing said cellulosic pulp and said metered pH adjusted solution, thereby increasing the strength properties of cellulosic sheets made from said cellulosic pulp.
3. A method of improving the dry strength of a paper product comprising:
providing a stock solution of glyoxal at a concentration of between about 25% to about 40%;
adding a quantity of said stock solution of glyoxal to a strength additive selected from the group consisting of cationic starch, PAM, and combinations thereof, to produce an about 4% to about 6% solids working solution of a glyoxylated polyacrylamide polymer, said glyoxal being present at about 30% by dry weight relative to the dry weight of said strength additive;
adjusting said pH of said working solution to between about 7.8 to about 8.0;
spraying said working solution onto a surface of a paper web at a dosage of about 3 to about 5 pounds of glyoxylated polyacrylamide on a solids basis to a ton of dry paper; and,
drying said paper web and said working solution, thereby increasing the strength properties of the resulting dried cellulosic product.
US11/338,049 2005-01-24 2006-01-24 Process for improving dry strength and drainage of paper and paperboard Abandoned US20060162886A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/338,049 US20060162886A1 (en) 2005-01-24 2006-01-24 Process for improving dry strength and drainage of paper and paperboard

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US64634105P 2005-01-24 2005-01-24
US11/338,049 US20060162886A1 (en) 2005-01-24 2006-01-24 Process for improving dry strength and drainage of paper and paperboard

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20060162886A1 true US20060162886A1 (en) 2006-07-27

Family

ID=36740980

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/338,049 Abandoned US20060162886A1 (en) 2005-01-24 2006-01-24 Process for improving dry strength and drainage of paper and paperboard

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US20060162886A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2006081183A2 (en)

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20060270801A1 (en) * 2005-05-25 2006-11-30 Georgia-Pacific Resins, Inc. Glyoxalated inter-copolymers with high and adjustable charge density
US20080064819A1 (en) * 2006-09-07 2008-03-13 Wright Matthew D Glyoxalation of vinylamide polymer
US20080216979A1 (en) * 2006-07-21 2008-09-11 Bercen Incorporated Paper making process using cationic polyacrylamides and crosslinking compositions for use in same
US20110224374A1 (en) * 2007-11-05 2011-09-15 Basf Se Glyoxalated n-vinylamine
US8920606B2 (en) 2011-12-06 2014-12-30 Basf Se Preparation of polyvinylamide cellulose reactive adducts
AU2013204365B2 (en) * 2006-09-07 2015-03-12 Basf Se Glyoxalation of vinylamide polymer
US9644320B2 (en) 2013-09-09 2017-05-09 Basf Se High molecular weight and high cationic charge glyoxalated polyacrylamide copolymers and their methods of manufacture and use
US9951475B2 (en) * 2014-01-16 2018-04-24 Ecolab Usa Inc. Wet end chemicals for dry end strength in paper
US10145067B2 (en) 2007-09-12 2018-12-04 Ecolab Usa Inc. Method of improving dewatering efficiency, increasing sheet wet web strength, increasing sheet wet strength and enhancing filler retention in papermaking

Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3549568A (en) * 1968-05-21 1970-12-22 American Cyanamid Co Aqueous starch-pigment paper coating compositions containing polyacrylamide-glyoxal latent insolubilizer
US3556932A (en) * 1965-07-12 1971-01-19 American Cyanamid Co Water-soluble,ionic,glyoxylated,vinylamide,wet-strength resin and paper made therewith
US4217425A (en) * 1978-11-06 1980-08-12 Nalco Chemical Company Paper fiber additive containing polyacrylamide blended with glyoxal and polymeric diallyldimethyl ammonium chloride as a cationic regulator
US4544609A (en) * 1984-09-12 1985-10-01 Sun Chemical Corporation Compounds and their use as insolubilizers for binders for paper coating compositions
US5118474A (en) * 1988-09-19 1992-06-02 Vitaly Rogalsky Laboratory pipet
US5232553A (en) * 1992-01-24 1993-08-03 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Fines retention in papermaking with amine functional polymers
US5638284A (en) * 1994-05-18 1997-06-10 Eka Nobel Ab Method of quantifying the wet strength of paper
US6176972B1 (en) * 1996-12-23 2001-01-23 Fort James Corporation Hydrophilic, humectant, soft, pliable, absorbent paper having wet strength agents and method for its manufacture
US20040040683A1 (en) * 1998-06-04 2004-03-04 Snf Sa Paper and paperboard production process and corresponding novel retention and drainage aids, and papers and paperboards thus obtained
US6824648B2 (en) * 1998-06-12 2004-11-30 Fort James Corporation Method of making a paper web having a high internal void volume of secondary fibers and a product made by the process

Patent Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3556932A (en) * 1965-07-12 1971-01-19 American Cyanamid Co Water-soluble,ionic,glyoxylated,vinylamide,wet-strength resin and paper made therewith
US3549568A (en) * 1968-05-21 1970-12-22 American Cyanamid Co Aqueous starch-pigment paper coating compositions containing polyacrylamide-glyoxal latent insolubilizer
US4217425A (en) * 1978-11-06 1980-08-12 Nalco Chemical Company Paper fiber additive containing polyacrylamide blended with glyoxal and polymeric diallyldimethyl ammonium chloride as a cationic regulator
US4544609A (en) * 1984-09-12 1985-10-01 Sun Chemical Corporation Compounds and their use as insolubilizers for binders for paper coating compositions
US5118474A (en) * 1988-09-19 1992-06-02 Vitaly Rogalsky Laboratory pipet
US5232553A (en) * 1992-01-24 1993-08-03 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Fines retention in papermaking with amine functional polymers
US5638284A (en) * 1994-05-18 1997-06-10 Eka Nobel Ab Method of quantifying the wet strength of paper
US6176972B1 (en) * 1996-12-23 2001-01-23 Fort James Corporation Hydrophilic, humectant, soft, pliable, absorbent paper having wet strength agents and method for its manufacture
US20040040683A1 (en) * 1998-06-04 2004-03-04 Snf Sa Paper and paperboard production process and corresponding novel retention and drainage aids, and papers and paperboards thus obtained
US6824648B2 (en) * 1998-06-12 2004-11-30 Fort James Corporation Method of making a paper web having a high internal void volume of secondary fibers and a product made by the process

Cited By (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7589153B2 (en) * 2005-05-25 2009-09-15 Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc Glyoxalated inter-copolymers with high and adjustable charge density
US20060270801A1 (en) * 2005-05-25 2006-11-30 Georgia-Pacific Resins, Inc. Glyoxalated inter-copolymers with high and adjustable charge density
US8197640B2 (en) * 2006-07-21 2012-06-12 Bercen, Inc. Paper making process using cationic polyacrylamides and crosslinking compositions for use in same
US20080216979A1 (en) * 2006-07-21 2008-09-11 Bercen Incorporated Paper making process using cationic polyacrylamides and crosslinking compositions for use in same
KR101598388B1 (en) * 2006-09-07 2016-03-02 바스프 에스이 Glyoxalation of vinylamide polymer
KR20140034325A (en) * 2006-09-07 2014-03-19 바스프 에스이 Glyoxalation of vinylamide polymer
US20110083821A1 (en) * 2006-09-07 2011-04-14 Wright Matthew D Glyoxalation of vinylamide polymer
EP3130615A1 (en) * 2006-09-07 2017-02-15 Basf Se Glyoxalation of vinylamide polymer
CN102408519A (en) * 2006-09-07 2012-04-11 西巴控股有限公司 Glyoxalation of vinylamide polymer
WO2008028865A3 (en) * 2006-09-07 2008-08-28 Ciba Holding Inc Glyoxalation of vinylamide polymer
EP2386579A3 (en) * 2006-09-07 2012-06-13 Basf Se Glyoxalation of vinylamide polymer
US8222343B2 (en) 2006-09-07 2012-07-17 Basf Se Glyoxalation of vinylamide polymer
US20080064819A1 (en) * 2006-09-07 2008-03-13 Wright Matthew D Glyoxalation of vinylamide polymer
US7875676B2 (en) 2006-09-07 2011-01-25 Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corporation Glyoxalation of vinylamide polymer
US8703847B2 (en) 2006-09-07 2014-04-22 Basf Se Glyoxalation of vinylamide polymer
AU2013204365C1 (en) * 2006-09-07 2015-07-23 Basf Se Glyoxalation of vinylamide polymer
AU2013204365B2 (en) * 2006-09-07 2015-03-12 Basf Se Glyoxalation of vinylamide polymer
US10145067B2 (en) 2007-09-12 2018-12-04 Ecolab Usa Inc. Method of improving dewatering efficiency, increasing sheet wet web strength, increasing sheet wet strength and enhancing filler retention in papermaking
US8299180B2 (en) 2007-11-05 2012-10-30 Basf Se Glyoxalated N-vinylamine
US20110224374A1 (en) * 2007-11-05 2011-09-15 Basf Se Glyoxalated n-vinylamine
US8920606B2 (en) 2011-12-06 2014-12-30 Basf Se Preparation of polyvinylamide cellulose reactive adducts
US9879381B2 (en) 2011-12-06 2018-01-30 Basf Se Preparation of polyvinylamide cellulose reactive adducts
US9644320B2 (en) 2013-09-09 2017-05-09 Basf Se High molecular weight and high cationic charge glyoxalated polyacrylamide copolymers and their methods of manufacture and use
US9951475B2 (en) * 2014-01-16 2018-04-24 Ecolab Usa Inc. Wet end chemicals for dry end strength in paper

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2006081183A3 (en) 2007-10-11
WO2006081183A2 (en) 2006-08-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20060162886A1 (en) Process for improving dry strength and drainage of paper and paperboard
RU2669629C2 (en) Sizing composition, its application and a method for manufacturing paper, cardboard or a similar material
DE69829410T2 (en) PROCESS FOR PREPARING WET-RESISTANT PAPER
US4210490A (en) Method of manufacturing paper or cardboard products
CN101778873B (en) High solids glyoxalated polyacrylamide
CN105324530B (en) The preparation method of the cellulose composition of micro fibrillation
EP0960236B1 (en) Lumen loading of mineral filler into cellulose fibers for papermaking
AU645074B2 (en) Pre-treatment of filler with cationic ketene dimer
NO174724B (en) Procedure for making paper and cardboard
MXPA03000790A (en) A process for the production of paper.
EP0986672B1 (en) Use of dendrimeric polymers for the production of paper and board
CN113195827B (en) Method for producing paper or board and product thereof
EP2334871B1 (en) Method for manufacturing paper, cardboard and paperboard using endo-beta-1,4 glucanases as dewatering means
US6200416B1 (en) Recycled paper production process which incorporates carbon dioxide
US2969302A (en) Method of making paper
US5837100A (en) Use of blends of dispersion polymers and coagulants for coated broke treatment
PL215499B1 (en) Aqueous silica-containing composition and process for production of paper
CN111472198B (en) Method for manufacturing straw base paper, straw base paper and paper straw
US11453979B2 (en) Paper strength improving composition, manufacture thereof and use in paper making
US7094319B2 (en) Additive for paper making
Kumar et al. PRODUCTION OF ADVANCED FIBRILLATED CELLULOSIC MATERIAL FROM WHEAT STRAW BY REFINING PROCESS TO IMPROVE PAPER QUALITY
AU744781B2 (en) Use of blends of dispersion polymers and coagulants for coated broke treatment
PT1931826E (en) Paper system for reducing deposits and clogging on a machine during paper and cardboard manufacture
GB1581548A (en) Manufacture of paper or cardboard
EP0893538A1 (en) Use of blends of dispersion polymers and coagulants for papermaking

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: PARADIGM CHEMICAL & CONSULTING, LLC, GEORGIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SMITH, WILLIAM E.;MEIER, JEFFREY J.;REEL/FRAME:017506/0018

Effective date: 20050627

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION