US20060136432A1 - Method and system for controlling software to facilitate cross-version collaboration of files - Google Patents
Method and system for controlling software to facilitate cross-version collaboration of files Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20060136432A1 US20060136432A1 US11/018,571 US1857104A US2006136432A1 US 20060136432 A1 US20060136432 A1 US 20060136432A1 US 1857104 A US1857104 A US 1857104A US 2006136432 A1 US2006136432 A1 US 2006136432A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- application
- document
- software application
- features
- functionalities
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
- G06F9/44—Arrangements for executing specific programs
- G06F9/445—Program loading or initiating
- G06F9/44505—Configuring for program initiating, e.g. using registry, configuration files
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
- G06F9/44—Arrangements for executing specific programs
- G06F9/445—Program loading or initiating
- G06F9/44552—Conflict resolution, i.e. enabling coexistence of conflicting executables
Definitions
- the present invention generally relates to collaborative use of disparate computing and software systems. More particularly, the present invention relates to methods and systems for controlling software to facilitate cross-application and cross-version collaboration of files.
- features or functionalities available on the later version of the software application may apply properties to the document that may not be compatible with available functionalities or features available to the earlier version of the software application.
- Typical problems the average user encounters include a failure to open a file received from a different computing system, a failure to save a file intended for use in a different computing system without file degradation, visual and content changes or loss when consuming a file on a different computing system from the computing system on which the file was created or edited, and programmatic errors when trying to consume a file on a different computing system from the computing system on which the file was created or edited.
- Prior solutions to these problems fail to mitigate most of the potential problems users can expect. Further, prior solutions often are deployed when a user is no longer in a position to easily identify or fix the offending component of a file. Examples of such solutions include compatibility checkers, translators, and converters.
- Embodiments of the present invention solve the above and other problems by providing methods and systems for controlling elements of computing systems including operating systems, software applications, and different versions of software applications to better facilitate cross-application and cross-version collaboration of files.
- elements within a computing system for example operating systems, applications, or particular versions of an application, are reconfigured so that individual elements may interact with existing files of an otherwise different computing system or such that individual elements may generate files targeted at otherwise different computing systems.
- a given element of a computing system is constrained such that as the element is used, functionality available to the element that may cause cross-application or cross-version collaboration problems is disabled or otherwise is made unavailable for use in creating or editing a file that is intended for a different type or different version of the computing system element.
- an element of the computing system may be constrained according to a spectrum of constraints where on one end of the spectrum the application or element is completely disallowed from performing editing functions on a given file.
- the application or element may be configured or constrained so that a particular set of features of functionalities of the application are disabled according to a profile applied to the application or element for enabling or disabling certain features or functionalities of the application or element so as to prevent cross-application or cross-version problems between the application or element and a different application or element of the same type or from a different version of the same application or element.
- a computing system or elements of a computing system may be configured in a particular way that is optimized for general needs of a given user or group of users, but when a file is encountered by the computing system from a different computing system, the first computing system may automatically offer to reconfigure itself for consuming the file so as to avoid cross-application or cross-version collaboration problems.
- one or more compatibility configurations may be loaded by the application or element being used to create or edit a file for configuring the application or element to prevent cross-application or cross-version problems.
- the computing system element may nonetheless be returned to full utility by removing the cross-application or cross-version configurations applied to the computing system element.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing the architecture of a personal computer that provides an illustrative operating environment for embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating steps performed by a method and system of the present invention for loading compatibility configurations onto a computing system element for preventing cross-application or cross-version problems according to embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a spectrum of configuration changes applicable to a computing system element for preventing cross-application or cross-version problems according to embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating steps performed by a method and system of the present invention for applying a cross-application or cross-version configuration to a computing system element when a file is loaded by the computing system element for creation or editing according to embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating steps performed by a method and system of the present invention for upgrading cross-application or cross-version configurations applied to an element of a computing system according to embodiments of the present invention.
- embodiments of the present invention are directed to methods and systems for controlling elements of a computing system, for example operating systems, software applications, or different versions of software applications to facilitate improved cross-application and cross-version collaboration of files.
- features and/or functionalities or other configurations of an element of a computing system may be modified to allow a given element of the computing system to create, edit or otherwise operate on a file or document in a manner that allows a different computing system element, different software application, or a different version of the same software application to receive and use the file or document without the problems normally associated with incompatible computing systems or incompatible computer system elements, or associated with different versions of a same software application as set out above in the background section.
- FIG. 1 and the following discussion are intended to provide a brief, general description of a suitable computing environment in which the invention may be implemented. While the invention will be described in the general context of program modules that execute in conjunction with an application program that runs on an operating system on a personal computer, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention may also be implemented in combination with other program modules.
- program modules include routines, programs, components, data structures, and other types of structures that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types.
- program modules may be located in both local and remote memory storage devices.
- FIG. 1 an illustrative computer architecture for a personal computer 2 for practicing the various embodiments of the invention will be described.
- the computer architecture shown in FIG. 1 illustrates a conventional personal computer, including a central processing unit 4 (“CPU”), a system memory 6 , including a random access memory 8 (“RAM”) and a read-only memory (“ROM”) 10 , and a system bus 12 that couples the memory to the CPU 4 .
- the personal computer 2 further includes a mass storage device 14 for storing an operating system 16 , application programs, such as the application program 105 , and data.
- the mass storage device 14 is connected to the CPU 4 through a mass storage controller (not shown) connected to the bus 12 .
- the mass storage device 14 and its associated computer-readable media provide non-volatile storage for the personal computer 2 .
- computer-readable media can be any available media that can be accessed by the personal computer 2 .
- Computer-readable media may comprise computer storage media and communication media.
- Computer storage media includes volatile and non-volatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data.
- Computer storage media includes, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, EPROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other solid state memory technology, CD-ROM, DVD, or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by the computer.
- the personal computer 2 may operate in a networked environment using logical connections to remote computers through a TCP/IP network 18 , such as the Internet.
- the personal computer 2 may connect to the TCP/IP network 18 through a network interface unit 20 connected to the bus 12 .
- the network interface unit 20 may also be utilized to connect to other types of networks and remote computer systems.
- the personal computer 2 may also include an input/output controller 22 for receiving and processing input from a number of devices, including a keyboard or mouse (not shown). Similarly, an input/output controller 22 may provide output to a display screen, a printer, or other type of output device.
- a number of program modules and data files may be stored in the mass storage device 14 and RAM 8 of the personal computer 2 , including an operating system 16 suitable for controlling the operation of a networked personal computer, such as the WINDOWS operating systems from Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash.
- the mass storage device 14 and RAM 8 may also store one or more application programs.
- the mass storage device 14 and RAM 8 may store an application program 105 for providing a variety of functionalities to a user.
- the application program 105 may comprise many types of programs such as a word processing application, a spreadsheet application, a desktop publishing application, and the like.
- the application program 105 comprises a multiple functionality software application suite for providing functionality from a number of different software applications.
- Some of the individual program modules that may comprise the multiple functionality application suite 105 include a word processing application 125 , a slide presentation application 135 , a spreadsheet application 140 and a database application 145 .
- An example of such a multiple functionality application suite 105 is OFFICE manufactured by Microsoft Corporation.
- Other software applications illustrated in FIG. 1 include an electronic mail application 130 .
- elements of a given computing system configure themselves so that they can interact with existing files of an otherwise different system or such that they can generate files targeted at the otherwise different computing system.
- Configuration modifications utilized by elements of a computing system include configuration modifications at a variety of levels including user interfaces, features/functionalities, application program interface (API) sets and file format support.
- API application program interface
- configuration of an application for improved cross-application or cross-version collaboration may be performed at application load time.
- cross-application collaboration may include collaboration on documents or files on two different applications of the same type, for example, two word processing applications manufactured by different companies.
- Cross-version collaboration may include collaboration on documents or files on two versions (e.g., 2003 version versus 2004 version) of the same software application.
- the application may pick up appropriate configurations and apply those configurations relative to a different application or different version of the same application to which documents or files created or edited by the first application are intended. For example, if a first application includes a word processing application provided by a first software company is to be used for generating documents directed to an organization that operates a second word processing application provided by a second software company, compatibility configurations may be necessary for the first software application in order to generate documents or files that may be utilized by the organization operating the second software application without file or document degradation associated with incompatibility problems between the two software applications. For example, the first software application may allow formatting functionalities that are not allowed or available by the second software application.
- a set of compatibility configurations may be constructed and applied to the first application that will disable functionality provided by the first software application while the first application is being used to generate or edit files intended for use on the second software.
- a given compatibility configuration setting operates as a profile of the computing system element to which a document or file is intended for allowing a creating or editing application to create or edit documents for use on an otherwise different or incompatible computing system or computing system element.
- FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating steps performed by a method and system of the present invention for loading compatibility configurations at application load time onto a computing system element for preventing cross-application or cross-version collaboration problems.
- a first application is started.
- compatibility configurations for reconfiguring the first application for creating or editing a document or file intended for the second application are loaded onto the first application.
- a functionality button or control may be provided in a user interface associated with the first application to allow the user to select compatibility configurations for configuring the first application for use in association with a variety of different applications including the example second software application described above.
- a list of compatibility configurations may be provided to a user at application load time, and a prompt may be provided to alert the user of available compatibility configurations.
- compatibility configurations associated with the second application are loaded onto the first application.
- a global compatibility configuration may be set onto the first application for applying a standard set of compatibility configurations to the first application.
- the global compatibility configuration may be a configuration determined by an organization's computing system administrator for configuring all computing systems for generating or editing documents or files according to a set compatibility configuration if those documents or files created by all computing systems in the organization are directed to persons or organizations operating a different computing system or computing system element for which the compatibility configurations are required.
- local compatibility configurations may be applied to the first application whereby the compatibility configurations may be customizable by the end user of the first application. For example, if a particular user in an organization knows that a document created or edited on his/her local computing system is to be utilized by another user having a different software application of the same type as the first software application (e.g., word processing application), or operating a different version of the same software application, then a local compatibility configuration may be applied to the first application whereby the end user of the first application sets customized compatibility configurations on the first application.
- a user interface button may be provided for displaying a menu of compatibility configurations that may be set by the end user.
- the end user may be allowed to disable particular functionalities or features such as formatting options and the like.
- a compatibility configuration or profile applied to a computing system element may range from simple modifications to the features/functionalities of the computing system element to very complex configuration modifications.
- simple configuration settings may be applied, for example disallowing all editing by a given computing system element.
- an example configuration is shown of disallowing only non-text editing.
- a configuration is shown for disabling user interface controls A, B and F for feature A, but enabling a feature A object model.
- a configuration setting is shown for disabling user interface controls A, B and F of feature A, enabling feature A object model and obtaining a control G plug-in at a particular online location.
- the configuration settings illustrated at FIG. 3 are for purposes of example only and are not limiting of the variety of different configuration settings that may be applied to a computing system element.
- compatibility configurations may be applied to a computing system element, for example a software application, a particular version of the software application, operating system, and the like, upon the loading of a particular file or document for editing or other processing.
- a computing system element for example a software application, a particular version of the software application, operating system, and the like
- a compatibility configuration should be applied to the application so that edits or other processing performed on the document or file will be compatible with other applications or versions of the same application for which the document or file is intended.
- a compatibility configuration to the later version of the software application such that edits made to the document or file will not create compatibility problems when the document or file is subsequently opened using the older version of the software application.
- the application is use (e.g., later version) is loaded.
- the user performs some action such as opening an existing file or document, or opening a new file or document. If the user opens a new file or document, the routine proceeds to block 445 , and no compatibility configurations are applied to the software application in use because no existing document or file is being edited that may have been generated or previously edited by a different software application or by a different version of the same software application. As should be understood, if the user knows that the new file or new document is to be generated for use by a different application or different application version, the user may apply a compatibility configuration to the application at application load time as described above with reference to FIGS. 2 and 3 .
- the routine proceeds to block 415 , and a determination is made as to whether the file or document has an associated compatibility configuration. For example, a determination is made as to whether the document or file was generated by another application to which a compatibility configuration was applied at the time the document or file was generated as described above with reference to FIGS. 2 and 3 .
- properties may be associated with a document or file which identify attributes (e.g., application type, name, version, compatibility configuration, etc.) of an application used for generating or editing the document or file.
- the routine proceeds to block 420 , and the user is prompted to use the same compatibility configuration on the computing system element or application currently in use. If the user does not wish to utilize the proposed compatibility configuration, the routine proceeds to block 445 , and the user may edit the document or file according to the functionality/feature configurations associated with the in-use application. If the user does desire to apply the proposed compatibility configuration, the routine proceeds to block 425 , and the proposed compatibility configuration is applied to the computing system element or application. As should be understood, the proposed compatibility configuration may be provided to the user in a user interface element such as a pop-up dialog, drop-down menu, and the like. Alternatively, when a particular document or file is launched on a given application, a list of compatibility configurations may be provided for configuring the application relative to configurations applied to a previous or other application used for generating or editing the document or file.
- the routine proceeds to block 430 , and a determination is made as to whether the document or file was generated by a different version of the same software application in use. If not, the routine proceeds to block 445 , and the software application or other computing system element may be utilized without the application of a given or customized compatibility configuration. If a determination is made that the document or file was generated or edited using a software application of a different version, the routine proceeds to block 435 , and a determination is made as to whether a compatibility configuration is available for configuring the software application is use for generating or editing a document or file for use by a different version of the software application.
- the routine proceeds to block 445 , and the user may decide to continue with edits to the document or file without regard to potential compatibility problems that may be caused by generating or editing the document with the application version in use. If a configuration is available, the routine proceeds to block 440 , and the user may be prompted to load the available compatibility configuration. If the user accepts the proposed compatibility configuration, the routine proceeds to block 425 , and the proposed compatibility configuration is applied to the application in use. The routine then proceeds to block 445 , and the reconfigured application may be utilized for editing the document or file.
- a user may desire to upgrade the configurations of a given computing system element to remove or modify constraints placed on features or functionalities of a given element. Or, a user may desire to remove altogether a configuration applied to an application at application load time or in association with a loaded file or document.
- FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating steps performed by a method and system of the present invention for upgrading cross-application or cross-version configurations applied to an element of a computing system. Referring to FIG. 5 , a user may upgrade or remove configurations at document start time or at application load time.
- a user input is received, for example selection of a feature or functionality for application to a document or file. If the feature or functionality selected by the user is not constrained by an applied compatibility configuration, the routine loops back around to block 510 , and subsequent user inputs are received. If the feature selected by the user is constrained by an applied compatibility configuration, the routine proceeds to block 515 , and a prompt may be provided to the user to allow the user to upgrade the compatibility configurations applied to the application so that the user may indeed utilize the desired feature of functionality. That is, the previously applied compatibility configuration which disallows use of the selected feature or functionality may be changed so that the compatibility configuration is upgraded to allow selection and use of the otherwise constrained feature.
- the routine proceeds back to block 510 for the next user input.
- the routine proceeds to block 520 , and a new compatibility configuration is applied to the software application in use to allow for selection and use of the desired feature or functionality.
- the routine ends at block 530 .
Abstract
Description
- The present invention generally relates to collaborative use of disparate computing and software systems. More particularly, the present invention relates to methods and systems for controlling software to facilitate cross-application and cross-version collaboration of files.
- With the advent of the computer age, computer and software users have grown accustomed to user-friendly software applications that help then write, calculate, organize, prepare presentations, send and receive electronic mail, make music, and the like. For example, modern electronic word processing applications allow users to prepare a variety of useful documents. Modem spreadsheet applications allow users to enter, manipulate, and organize data. Modem electronic slide presentation applications allow users to create a variety of slide presentations containing text, pictures, data and other useful objects.
- As society continues to embrace computers and computer software at an ever-increasing rate, the computing world has become a fragmented heterogeneous system made up of computers running a multitude of different operating systems, applications and versions of applications. Each element within a single computing system (for example, operating system, applications and different versions of applications) has differences in user interface, features/functionality, application program interfaces and file formats. The differences between these elements cause problems when two or more users from different computing systems attempt to collaborate. For example, when one user from one computing system using a second generation or second version of a given software application creates or edits a document intended for a first or former version of the same software application, features or functionalities available on the later version of the software application may apply properties to the document that may not be compatible with available functionalities or features available to the earlier version of the software application.
- Typical problems the average user encounters include a failure to open a file received from a different computing system, a failure to save a file intended for use in a different computing system without file degradation, visual and content changes or loss when consuming a file on a different computing system from the computing system on which the file was created or edited, and programmatic errors when trying to consume a file on a different computing system from the computing system on which the file was created or edited. Prior solutions to these problems fail to mitigate most of the potential problems users can expect. Further, prior solutions often are deployed when a user is no longer in a position to easily identify or fix the offending component of a file. Examples of such solutions include compatibility checkers, translators, and converters.
- Accordingly, there is a need for a method and system for improving the control of software applications and components of computing systems to facilitate better cross-application and cross-version collaboration of files. It is with respect to these and other considerations that the present invention has been made.
- Embodiments of the present invention solve the above and other problems by providing methods and systems for controlling elements of computing systems including operating systems, software applications, and different versions of software applications to better facilitate cross-application and cross-version collaboration of files. Generally described, according to embodiments of the present invention, elements within a computing system, for example operating systems, applications, or particular versions of an application, are reconfigured so that individual elements may interact with existing files of an otherwise different computing system or such that individual elements may generate files targeted at otherwise different computing systems.
- According to one embodiment of the present invention, a given element of a computing system is constrained such that as the element is used, functionality available to the element that may cause cross-application or cross-version collaboration problems is disabled or otherwise is made unavailable for use in creating or editing a file that is intended for a different type or different version of the computing system element. According to this embodiment, an element of the computing system may be constrained according to a spectrum of constraints where on one end of the spectrum the application or element is completely disallowed from performing editing functions on a given file. At the other end of the spectrum, the application or element may be configured or constrained so that a particular set of features of functionalities of the application are disabled according to a profile applied to the application or element for enabling or disabling certain features or functionalities of the application or element so as to prevent cross-application or cross-version problems between the application or element and a different application or element of the same type or from a different version of the same application or element.
- According to another embodiment, a computing system or elements of a computing system may be configured in a particular way that is optimized for general needs of a given user or group of users, but when a file is encountered by the computing system from a different computing system, the first computing system may automatically offer to reconfigure itself for consuming the file so as to avoid cross-application or cross-version collaboration problems. According to this embodiment, one or more compatibility configurations may be loaded by the application or element being used to create or edit a file for configuring the application or element to prevent cross-application or cross-version problems.
- According to another embodiment, once a computing system element has been configured with a set of feature and/or functionality limitations for preventing cross-application or cross-version problems, the computing system element may nonetheless be returned to full utility by removing the cross-application or cross-version configurations applied to the computing system element.
- These and other features and advantages, which characterize the present invention, will be apparent from a reading of the following detailed description and a review of the associated drawings. It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the invention as claimed.
-
FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing the architecture of a personal computer that provides an illustrative operating environment for embodiments of the present invention. -
FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating steps performed by a method and system of the present invention for loading compatibility configurations onto a computing system element for preventing cross-application or cross-version problems according to embodiments of the present invention. -
FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a spectrum of configuration changes applicable to a computing system element for preventing cross-application or cross-version problems according to embodiments of the present invention. -
FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating steps performed by a method and system of the present invention for applying a cross-application or cross-version configuration to a computing system element when a file is loaded by the computing system element for creation or editing according to embodiments of the present invention. -
FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating steps performed by a method and system of the present invention for upgrading cross-application or cross-version configurations applied to an element of a computing system according to embodiments of the present invention. - As briefly described above, embodiments of the present invention are directed to methods and systems for controlling elements of a computing system, for example operating systems, software applications, or different versions of software applications to facilitate improved cross-application and cross-version collaboration of files. According to embodiments of the present invention, features and/or functionalities or other configurations of an element of a computing system may be modified to allow a given element of the computing system to create, edit or otherwise operate on a file or document in a manner that allows a different computing system element, different software application, or a different version of the same software application to receive and use the file or document without the problems normally associated with incompatible computing systems or incompatible computer system elements, or associated with different versions of a same software application as set out above in the background section. These embodiments may be combined, other embodiments may be utilized, and structural changes may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the present invention. The following detailed description is therefore not to be taken in a limiting sense and the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.
- Referring now to the drawings, in which like numerals refer to like elements through the several figures, aspects of the present invention and an exemplary operating environment will be described.
FIG. 1 and the following discussion are intended to provide a brief, general description of a suitable computing environment in which the invention may be implemented. While the invention will be described in the general context of program modules that execute in conjunction with an application program that runs on an operating system on a personal computer, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention may also be implemented in combination with other program modules. - Generally, program modules include routines, programs, components, data structures, and other types of structures that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Moreover, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the invention may be practiced with other computer system configurations, including hand-held devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, minicomputers, mainframe computers, and the like. The invention may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote memory storage devices.
- Turning now to
FIG. 1 , an illustrative computer architecture for apersonal computer 2 for practicing the various embodiments of the invention will be described. The computer architecture shown inFIG. 1 illustrates a conventional personal computer, including a central processing unit 4 (“CPU”), asystem memory 6, including a random access memory 8 (“RAM”) and a read-only memory (“ROM”) 10, and asystem bus 12 that couples the memory to theCPU 4. A basic input/output system containing the basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within the computer, such as during startup, is stored in theROM 10. Thepersonal computer 2 further includes amass storage device 14 for storing anoperating system 16, application programs, such as theapplication program 105, and data. - The
mass storage device 14 is connected to theCPU 4 through a mass storage controller (not shown) connected to thebus 12. Themass storage device 14 and its associated computer-readable media, provide non-volatile storage for thepersonal computer 2. Although the description of computer-readable media contained herein refers to a mass storage device, such as a hard disk or CD-ROM drive, it should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that computer-readable media can be any available media that can be accessed by thepersonal computer 2. - By way of example, and not limitation, computer-readable media may comprise computer storage media and communication media. Computer storage media includes volatile and non-volatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data. Computer storage media includes, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, EPROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other solid state memory technology, CD-ROM, DVD, or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by the computer.
- According to various embodiments of the invention, the
personal computer 2 may operate in a networked environment using logical connections to remote computers through a TCP/IP network 18, such as the Internet. Thepersonal computer 2 may connect to the TCP/IP network 18 through anetwork interface unit 20 connected to thebus 12. It should be appreciated that thenetwork interface unit 20 may also be utilized to connect to other types of networks and remote computer systems. Thepersonal computer 2 may also include an input/output controller 22 for receiving and processing input from a number of devices, including a keyboard or mouse (not shown). Similarly, an input/output controller 22 may provide output to a display screen, a printer, or other type of output device. - As mentioned briefly above, a number of program modules and data files may be stored in the
mass storage device 14 andRAM 8 of thepersonal computer 2, including anoperating system 16 suitable for controlling the operation of a networked personal computer, such as the WINDOWS operating systems from Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash. Themass storage device 14 andRAM 8 may also store one or more application programs. In particular, themass storage device 14 andRAM 8 may store anapplication program 105 for providing a variety of functionalities to a user. For instance, theapplication program 105 may comprise many types of programs such as a word processing application, a spreadsheet application, a desktop publishing application, and the like. According to an embodiment of the present invention, theapplication program 105 comprises a multiple functionality software application suite for providing functionality from a number of different software applications. Some of the individual program modules that may comprise the multiplefunctionality application suite 105 include aword processing application 125, aslide presentation application 135, aspreadsheet application 140 and adatabase application 145. An example of such a multiplefunctionality application suite 105 is OFFICE manufactured by Microsoft Corporation. Other software applications illustrated inFIG. 1 include anelectronic mail application 130. - According to embodiments of the present invention, elements of a given computing system, for example an operating system, a given software application, or a particular version of a given software application, configure themselves so that they can interact with existing files of an otherwise different system or such that they can generate files targeted at the otherwise different computing system. Configuration modifications utilized by elements of a computing system according to embodiments of the present invention include configuration modifications at a variety of levels including user interfaces, features/functionalities, application program interface (API) sets and file format support.
- According to one embodiment of the invention, configuration of an application for improved cross-application or cross-version collaboration may be performed at application load time. As should be understood, cross-application collaboration may include collaboration on documents or files on two different applications of the same type, for example, two word processing applications manufactured by different companies. Cross-version collaboration may include collaboration on documents or files on two versions (e.g., 2003 version versus 2004 version) of the same software application.
- When a given application loads, the application may pick up appropriate configurations and apply those configurations relative to a different application or different version of the same application to which documents or files created or edited by the first application are intended. For example, if a first application includes a word processing application provided by a first software company is to be used for generating documents directed to an organization that operates a second word processing application provided by a second software company, compatibility configurations may be necessary for the first software application in order to generate documents or files that may be utilized by the organization operating the second software application without file or document degradation associated with incompatibility problems between the two software applications. For example, the first software application may allow formatting functionalities that are not allowed or available by the second software application. Accordingly, a set of compatibility configurations may be constructed and applied to the first application that will disable functionality provided by the first software application while the first application is being used to generate or edit files intended for use on the second software. In effect, a given compatibility configuration setting operates as a profile of the computing system element to which a document or file is intended for allowing a creating or editing application to create or edit documents for use on an otherwise different or incompatible computing system or computing system element.
-
FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating steps performed by a method and system of the present invention for loading compatibility configurations at application load time onto a computing system element for preventing cross-application or cross-version collaboration problems. At block 210 a first application is started. Atblock 215, compatibility configurations for reconfiguring the first application for creating or editing a document or file intended for the second application are loaded onto the first application. For example, when the first application is started, a functionality button or control may be provided in a user interface associated with the first application to allow the user to select compatibility configurations for configuring the first application for use in association with a variety of different applications including the example second software application described above. According to one embodiment of the present invention, a list of compatibility configurations may be provided to a user at application load time, and a prompt may be provided to alert the user of available compatibility configurations. Upon selection of the desired application for which the first application is to be configured, compatibility configurations associated with the second application are loaded onto the first application. - When the application loads, and when a particular compatibility configuration is selected, the configuration may be taken from a variety of sources. As illustrated at
block 220, a global compatibility configuration may be set onto the first application for applying a standard set of compatibility configurations to the first application. For example, the global compatibility configuration may be a configuration determined by an organization's computing system administrator for configuring all computing systems for generating or editing documents or files according to a set compatibility configuration if those documents or files created by all computing systems in the organization are directed to persons or organizations operating a different computing system or computing system element for which the compatibility configurations are required. - Alternatively, as illustrated at
block 225, local compatibility configurations may be applied to the first application whereby the compatibility configurations may be customizable by the end user of the first application. For example, if a particular user in an organization knows that a document created or edited on his/her local computing system is to be utilized by another user having a different software application of the same type as the first software application (e.g., word processing application), or operating a different version of the same software application, then a local compatibility configuration may be applied to the first application whereby the end user of the first application sets customized compatibility configurations on the first application. A user interface button may be provided for displaying a menu of compatibility configurations that may be set by the end user. For example, the end user may be allowed to disable particular functionalities or features such as formatting options and the like. Once the global or local compatibility configurations are loaded atblock 215, atblock 230 the configurations are applied to the application, and the routine ends atblock 235. - Referring now to
FIG. 3 , a compatibility configuration or profile applied to a computing system element may range from simple modifications to the features/functionalities of the computing system element to very complex configuration modifications. As shown inFIG. 3 , on thesimple end 300 of the configuration spectrum, simple configuration settings may be applied, for example disallowing all editing by a given computing system element. Atposition 310 on the spectrum, an example configuration is shown of disallowing only non-text editing. Atposition 330 on the spectrum, a configuration is shown for disabling user interface controls A, B and F for feature A, but enabling a feature A object model. Atposition 335 on the spectrum, a configuration setting is shown for disabling user interface controls A, B and F of feature A, enabling feature A object model and obtaining a control G plug-in at a particular online location. As should be understood, the configuration settings illustrated atFIG. 3 are for purposes of example only and are not limiting of the variety of different configuration settings that may be applied to a computing system element. - According to another embodiment of the present invention, compatibility configurations may be applied to a computing system element, for example a software application, a particular version of the software application, operating system, and the like, upon the loading of a particular file or document for editing or other processing. According to this embodiment, when a particular document or file is launched using a given application, a determination may be made that a compatibility configuration should be applied to the application so that edits or other processing performed on the document or file will be compatible with other applications or versions of the same application for which the document or file is intended. For example, if a user attempts to open a file generated on an older version of a software application using a later version of the same software application, the user may desire to apply a compatibility configuration to the later version of the software application such that edits made to the document or file will not create compatibility problems when the document or file is subsequently opened using the older version of the software application.
- Referring to
FIG. 4 , atblock 405, the application is use (e.g., later version) is loaded. Atblock 410, the user performs some action such as opening an existing file or document, or opening a new file or document. If the user opens a new file or document, the routine proceeds to block 445, and no compatibility configurations are applied to the software application in use because no existing document or file is being edited that may have been generated or previously edited by a different software application or by a different version of the same software application. As should be understood, if the user knows that the new file or new document is to be generated for use by a different application or different application version, the user may apply a compatibility configuration to the application at application load time as described above with reference toFIGS. 2 and 3 . - Referring still to
FIG. 4 , if an existing file or document is being opened, the routine proceeds to block 415, and a determination is made as to whether the file or document has an associated compatibility configuration. For example, a determination is made as to whether the document or file was generated by another application to which a compatibility configuration was applied at the time the document or file was generated as described above with reference toFIGS. 2 and 3 . As should be understood, properties may be associated with a document or file which identify attributes (e.g., application type, name, version, compatibility configuration, etc.) of an application used for generating or editing the document or file. - If the document is associated with a particular compatibility configuration, the routine proceeds to block 420, and the user is prompted to use the same compatibility configuration on the computing system element or application currently in use. If the user does not wish to utilize the proposed compatibility configuration, the routine proceeds to block 445, and the user may edit the document or file according to the functionality/feature configurations associated with the in-use application. If the user does desire to apply the proposed compatibility configuration, the routine proceeds to block 425, and the proposed compatibility configuration is applied to the computing system element or application. As should be understood, the proposed compatibility configuration may be provided to the user in a user interface element such as a pop-up dialog, drop-down menu, and the like. Alternatively, when a particular document or file is launched on a given application, a list of compatibility configurations may be provided for configuring the application relative to configurations applied to a previous or other application used for generating or editing the document or file.
- Referring back to block 415, if the document or file is not associated with a given compatibility configuration, the routine proceeds to block 430, and a determination is made as to whether the document or file was generated by a different version of the same software application in use. If not, the routine proceeds to block 445, and the software application or other computing system element may be utilized without the application of a given or customized compatibility configuration. If a determination is made that the document or file was generated or edited using a software application of a different version, the routine proceeds to block 435, and a determination is made as to whether a compatibility configuration is available for configuring the software application is use for generating or editing a document or file for use by a different version of the software application.
- If no compatibility configuration is available, the routine proceeds to block 445, and the user may decide to continue with edits to the document or file without regard to potential compatibility problems that may be caused by generating or editing the document with the application version in use. If a configuration is available, the routine proceeds to block 440, and the user may be prompted to load the available compatibility configuration. If the user accepts the proposed compatibility configuration, the routine proceeds to block 425, and the proposed compatibility configuration is applied to the application in use. The routine then proceeds to block 445, and the reconfigured application may be utilized for editing the document or file.
- In some cases, a user may desire to upgrade the configurations of a given computing system element to remove or modify constraints placed on features or functionalities of a given element. Or, a user may desire to remove altogether a configuration applied to an application at application load time or in association with a loaded file or document.
FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating steps performed by a method and system of the present invention for upgrading cross-application or cross-version configurations applied to an element of a computing system. Referring toFIG. 5 , a user may upgrade or remove configurations at document start time or at application load time. - At
block 505, when a particular document or file is loaded, or when an application is loaded or started, the routine proceeds to block 510. Atblock 510, a user input is received, for example selection of a feature or functionality for application to a document or file. If the feature or functionality selected by the user is not constrained by an applied compatibility configuration, the routine loops back around to block 510, and subsequent user inputs are received. If the feature selected by the user is constrained by an applied compatibility configuration, the routine proceeds to block 515, and a prompt may be provided to the user to allow the user to upgrade the compatibility configurations applied to the application so that the user may indeed utilize the desired feature of functionality. That is, the previously applied compatibility configuration which disallows use of the selected feature or functionality may be changed so that the compatibility configuration is upgraded to allow selection and use of the otherwise constrained feature. - If the user decides not to upgrade the compatibility configurations to allow use of the selected feature or functionality, the routine proceeds back to block 510 for the next user input. On the other hand, if the user decides to upgrade the compatibility configuration to allow use of the selected feature or functionality, the routine proceeds to block 520, and a new compatibility configuration is applied to the software application in use to allow for selection and use of the desired feature or functionality. The routine ends at
block 530. - As described herein, methods and systems are provided for controlling computing system elements for facilitating improved cross-application or cross-version collaboration of files and documents. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications or variations may be made in the present invention without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. Other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed herein.
Claims (20)
Priority Applications (10)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/018,571 US7568182B2 (en) | 2004-12-20 | 2004-12-20 | Method and system for controlling software to facilitate cross-version collaboration of files |
AU2005225111A AU2005225111A1 (en) | 2004-12-20 | 2005-10-21 | Method and system for controlling software to facilitate cross-version collaboration of files |
CA002527405A CA2527405A1 (en) | 2004-12-20 | 2005-11-16 | Method and system for controlling software to facilitate cross-version collaboration of files |
BRPI0505076-6A BRPI0505076A (en) | 2004-12-20 | 2005-11-17 | method and system for controlling software to facilitate cross application collaboration and cross file versioning |
CNA2005101267877A CN1794172A (en) | 2004-12-20 | 2005-11-18 | Promote trnas-application and trans-edition file protocol |
KR1020050111274A KR20060070424A (en) | 2004-12-20 | 2005-11-21 | Method and system for controlling software to facilitate cross-application and cross-version collaboration of files |
MXPA05012554A MXPA05012554A (en) | 2004-12-20 | 2005-11-21 | Method and system for controlling software to facilitate cross-version collaboration of files. |
EP05111553A EP1672497A3 (en) | 2004-12-20 | 2005-12-01 | Method and system for controlling software to facilitate cross-application and cross-version collaboration of files |
JP2005355255A JP2006178953A (en) | 2004-12-20 | 2005-12-08 | Method and system for controlling software to facilitate cross-application collaboration and cross-version collaboration of files |
RU2005139790/09A RU2005139790A (en) | 2004-12-20 | 2005-12-19 | METHOD AND SYSTEM OF MANAGING SOFTWARE FOR PROVIDING JOINT WORK WITH FILES OF VARIOUS APPLICATIONS AND VARIOUS VERSIONS |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/018,571 US7568182B2 (en) | 2004-12-20 | 2004-12-20 | Method and system for controlling software to facilitate cross-version collaboration of files |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20060136432A1 true US20060136432A1 (en) | 2006-06-22 |
US7568182B2 US7568182B2 (en) | 2009-07-28 |
Family
ID=36353981
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/018,571 Expired - Fee Related US7568182B2 (en) | 2004-12-20 | 2004-12-20 | Method and system for controlling software to facilitate cross-version collaboration of files |
Country Status (10)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7568182B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1672497A3 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2006178953A (en) |
KR (1) | KR20060070424A (en) |
CN (1) | CN1794172A (en) |
AU (1) | AU2005225111A1 (en) |
BR (1) | BRPI0505076A (en) |
CA (1) | CA2527405A1 (en) |
MX (1) | MXPA05012554A (en) |
RU (1) | RU2005139790A (en) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101251808B (en) * | 2006-12-13 | 2010-06-02 | 国际商业机器公司 | Computer method and apparatus for referencing files in a software configuration management system |
US20140236984A1 (en) * | 2013-02-20 | 2014-08-21 | Sap Ag | Cross-report collaboration |
US10909314B2 (en) | 2016-08-03 | 2021-02-02 | Advanced New Technologies Co., Ltd. | Card-based information displaying method and apparatus, and information displaying service processing method and apparatus |
US11443107B2 (en) * | 2020-09-29 | 2022-09-13 | Fujifilm Business Innovation Corp. | Information processing apparatus and non-transitory computer readable medium storing program for causing applications to collaborate |
Families Citing this family (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7526737B2 (en) * | 2005-11-14 | 2009-04-28 | Microsoft Corporation | Free form wiper |
US8925052B2 (en) * | 2006-07-26 | 2014-12-30 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Application integration |
US7954048B2 (en) * | 2006-09-21 | 2011-05-31 | International Business Machines Corporation | Content management via configuration set relationships in a content management system |
CN101685394A (en) * | 2008-09-26 | 2010-03-31 | 国际商业机器公司 | Method and device for providing inter-version document compatibility |
JP5257311B2 (en) * | 2008-12-05 | 2013-08-07 | ソニー株式会社 | Information processing apparatus and information processing method |
CN102750185B (en) * | 2011-04-18 | 2018-05-22 | 腾讯科技(深圳)有限公司 | A kind of data adaptive output method and system |
US8914790B2 (en) * | 2012-01-11 | 2014-12-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Contextual solicitation in a starter application |
WO2014014879A2 (en) * | 2012-07-17 | 2014-01-23 | Good Technology Corporation | Systems and methods for facilitating service provision between applications |
US9509566B2 (en) * | 2013-06-27 | 2016-11-29 | Yokogawa Electric Corporation | System and method for generating output data |
US10521590B2 (en) * | 2016-09-01 | 2019-12-31 | Microsoft Technology Licensing Llc | Detection dictionary system supporting anomaly detection across multiple operating environments |
CN111176720A (en) * | 2019-12-27 | 2020-05-19 | 珠海奔图电子有限公司 | Control method and control device for running application programs in multiple systems |
KR102356010B1 (en) | 2021-08-13 | 2022-02-08 | 주식회사 쓰리데이즈 | Method and system for transferring data between devices |
Citations (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5339435A (en) * | 1991-02-28 | 1994-08-16 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Heterogenous software configuration management apparatus |
US5652876A (en) * | 1992-12-28 | 1997-07-29 | Apple Computer, Inc. | Method and apparatus for launching files created by non-resident application programs |
US20020100017A1 (en) * | 2000-04-24 | 2002-07-25 | Microsoft Corporation | Configurations for binding software assemblies to application programs |
US20020143794A1 (en) * | 2001-03-30 | 2002-10-03 | Helt David J. | Method and system for converting data files from a first format to second format |
US20030011986A1 (en) * | 2001-06-28 | 2003-01-16 | Koji Ariga | Electronic apparatus having a detachable circuit component and method of assembling the electronic apparatus |
US20030119386A1 (en) * | 2001-11-21 | 2003-06-26 | Laux Thorsten O. | Method and system for installing server-specific plug-ins |
US20030159035A1 (en) * | 2002-02-21 | 2003-08-21 | Orthlieb Carl W. | Application rights enabling |
US20030195899A1 (en) * | 2001-11-09 | 2003-10-16 | Tsao Sheng A. | Data processing system with data recovery |
US20040103393A1 (en) * | 2001-07-17 | 2004-05-27 | Reddy Sreedhar Sannareddy | Method and apparatus for versioning and configuration management of object models |
US20040133846A1 (en) * | 2003-01-03 | 2004-07-08 | Ramin Khoshatefeh | Interactive system and method for graphical document generation |
US6775829B1 (en) * | 1998-06-04 | 2004-08-10 | Gateway, Inc. | Method for configuring software for a build to order system |
US6947162B2 (en) * | 2001-08-30 | 2005-09-20 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Systems and methods for converting the format of information |
US7278134B2 (en) * | 2001-04-27 | 2007-10-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Three dimensional framework for information technology solutions |
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH04347733A (en) * | 1991-05-24 | 1992-12-02 | Hitachi Ltd | Computer program maintenance system |
JP3695777B2 (en) * | 1994-08-30 | 2005-09-14 | 株式会社東芝 | Information transfer method |
US5630066A (en) * | 1994-12-20 | 1997-05-13 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | System and method for locating object view and platform independent object |
JPH1049354A (en) * | 1996-08-05 | 1998-02-20 | Fuji Xerox Co Ltd | Information processing system |
US20030154321A1 (en) * | 2001-12-21 | 2003-08-14 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Method and system for registering a control within an operating environment using a control manager |
JP2004110763A (en) * | 2002-07-25 | 2004-04-08 | Fuji Photo Film Co Ltd | Content reproduction program and content reproduction method |
-
2004
- 2004-12-20 US US11/018,571 patent/US7568182B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2005
- 2005-10-21 AU AU2005225111A patent/AU2005225111A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2005-11-16 CA CA002527405A patent/CA2527405A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2005-11-17 BR BRPI0505076-6A patent/BRPI0505076A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2005-11-18 CN CNA2005101267877A patent/CN1794172A/en active Pending
- 2005-11-21 KR KR1020050111274A patent/KR20060070424A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2005-11-21 MX MXPA05012554A patent/MXPA05012554A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2005-12-01 EP EP05111553A patent/EP1672497A3/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2005-12-08 JP JP2005355255A patent/JP2006178953A/en active Pending
- 2005-12-19 RU RU2005139790/09A patent/RU2005139790A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
Patent Citations (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5339435A (en) * | 1991-02-28 | 1994-08-16 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Heterogenous software configuration management apparatus |
US5652876A (en) * | 1992-12-28 | 1997-07-29 | Apple Computer, Inc. | Method and apparatus for launching files created by non-resident application programs |
US6775829B1 (en) * | 1998-06-04 | 2004-08-10 | Gateway, Inc. | Method for configuring software for a build to order system |
US20020100017A1 (en) * | 2000-04-24 | 2002-07-25 | Microsoft Corporation | Configurations for binding software assemblies to application programs |
US20020143794A1 (en) * | 2001-03-30 | 2002-10-03 | Helt David J. | Method and system for converting data files from a first format to second format |
US7278134B2 (en) * | 2001-04-27 | 2007-10-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Three dimensional framework for information technology solutions |
US20030011986A1 (en) * | 2001-06-28 | 2003-01-16 | Koji Ariga | Electronic apparatus having a detachable circuit component and method of assembling the electronic apparatus |
US20040103393A1 (en) * | 2001-07-17 | 2004-05-27 | Reddy Sreedhar Sannareddy | Method and apparatus for versioning and configuration management of object models |
US6947162B2 (en) * | 2001-08-30 | 2005-09-20 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Systems and methods for converting the format of information |
US20030195899A1 (en) * | 2001-11-09 | 2003-10-16 | Tsao Sheng A. | Data processing system with data recovery |
US20030119386A1 (en) * | 2001-11-21 | 2003-06-26 | Laux Thorsten O. | Method and system for installing server-specific plug-ins |
US20030159035A1 (en) * | 2002-02-21 | 2003-08-21 | Orthlieb Carl W. | Application rights enabling |
US20040133846A1 (en) * | 2003-01-03 | 2004-07-08 | Ramin Khoshatefeh | Interactive system and method for graphical document generation |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101251808B (en) * | 2006-12-13 | 2010-06-02 | 国际商业机器公司 | Computer method and apparatus for referencing files in a software configuration management system |
US20140236984A1 (en) * | 2013-02-20 | 2014-08-21 | Sap Ag | Cross-report collaboration |
US10078817B2 (en) * | 2013-02-20 | 2018-09-18 | Sap Se | Cross-report collaboration |
US10909314B2 (en) | 2016-08-03 | 2021-02-02 | Advanced New Technologies Co., Ltd. | Card-based information displaying method and apparatus, and information displaying service processing method and apparatus |
US11443107B2 (en) * | 2020-09-29 | 2022-09-13 | Fujifilm Business Innovation Corp. | Information processing apparatus and non-transitory computer readable medium storing program for causing applications to collaborate |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
KR20060070424A (en) | 2006-06-23 |
BRPI0505076A (en) | 2006-09-12 |
JP2006178953A (en) | 2006-07-06 |
EP1672497A3 (en) | 2008-01-23 |
EP1672497A2 (en) | 2006-06-21 |
CA2527405A1 (en) | 2006-06-20 |
CN1794172A (en) | 2006-06-28 |
MXPA05012554A (en) | 2006-06-19 |
RU2005139790A (en) | 2007-06-27 |
AU2005225111A1 (en) | 2006-07-06 |
US7568182B2 (en) | 2009-07-28 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1672497A2 (en) | Method and system for controlling software to facilitate cross-application and cross-version collaboration of files | |
US6910208B1 (en) | System and method of providing replaceable and extensible user interface for the installation of a suite of applications | |
US7398480B2 (en) | System and method of providing multiple installation actions | |
US6449617B1 (en) | Edit command delegation program for editing electronic files | |
KR101099297B1 (en) | Method for managing file replication in applications | |
US6449642B2 (en) | Method and system for integrating a client computer into a computer network | |
EP1173809B1 (en) | Method and system for automatically transitioning of configuration settings among computer systems | |
US6948166B2 (en) | System and method for automatically de-installing previously installed software based on user defined preferences | |
US7523122B2 (en) | Automatic discovery of application settings' storage locations | |
US7406664B1 (en) | System for integrating HTML Web site views into application file dialogs | |
US10198416B2 (en) | Customizing a form in a model-based system | |
US20080263442A1 (en) | Move tracking with conflict resolution | |
US20070100903A1 (en) | Systems and methods for compiling applications on a test server | |
EP0676069A1 (en) | File translation system | |
EP2223209A1 (en) | Improved user interface | |
US7406510B1 (en) | Techniques for accessing portal components | |
US20090132937A1 (en) | Modifying Hover Help for a User Interface | |
US5542086A (en) | Document type metamorphosis in an object-oriented operating system having a graphical user interface | |
US6473771B1 (en) | Method of integrating application programs to form or modify suite, and a suite integration toolkit to perform same | |
WO2004111846A1 (en) | A method and system for sharing information in a network of computers | |
US20060136906A1 (en) | Software product installation facilitation | |
US8095569B2 (en) | Customized context menu for files based on their content | |
Torres | Windows Admin Scripting Little Black Book | |
Lavigne | Push Button Installer System | |
Barkakati | Red Hat Fedora Linux 2 All-in-one Desk Reference for Dummies |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MICROSOFT CORPORATION, WASHINGTON Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:VILLARON, SHAWN ALAN;JONES, BRIAN;ROTHSCHILLER, CHAD;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:015924/0722 Effective date: 20050127 Owner name: MICROSOFT CORPORATION, WASHINGTON Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:VILLARON, SHAWN ALAN;JONES, BRIAN;ROTHSCHILLER, CHAD;REEL/FRAME:015924/0676 Effective date: 20050127 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC, WASHINGTON Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MICROSOFT CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:034543/0001 Effective date: 20141014 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20210728 |