US20060084575A1 - Composition and method for selective herbicide

Info

Abstract

Description

Claims

US20060084575A1

Publication number: US20060084575A1
Application number: US11/252,192
Authority: US
Inventors: Frederick Sedun; Kim Taylor; Cameron Wilson; Diana Parker; David Almond
Original assignee: Eco-Care Technologies Inc
Current assignee: Eco-Care Technologies Inc; W Neudorff GmbH KG
Priority date: 2002-03-01
Filing date: 2005-10-17
Publication date: 2006-04-20
Also published as: DK1489909T3; US6972273B2; US20030181332A1; EP1489909B1; WO2003073856A1; ES2611252T3; EP1489909A1; AU2003211724A1; CA2477493A1; CA2477493C

An environmentally safe selective herbicide is provided that includes at least one metal component and at least one chelating agent. The metal component can have a variety of forms, but is preferably in the form of a metal salt, a metal chelate, or combinations thereof. The chelating agent can also have a variety of forms, but is preferably in the form of a metal chelate, a salt, an acid, or combinations thereof. Methods of use are also provided.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/374,643, filed on Feb. 26, 2003, and currently pending, entitled, “Composition and Method for Selective Herbicide,” which claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/361,217, filed on Mar. 1, 2002, entitled “Composition and Method for Selective Herbicide,” the disclosure of each of which is incorporated by reference herein.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to selective herbicide compositions and methods for controlling unwanted vegetation.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The selective control of unwanted vegetation, such as, for example, weeds, is a major industry. Vegetation can be controlled using herbicides that are non-selective or selective, and systemic or contact. Non-selective herbicides kill or damage all plants to which they are applied, i.e., both desired and undesired vegetation. In contrast, selective herbicides eliminate or inhibit the growth of unwanted vegetation, while leaving the desired vegetation relatively unharmed. Contact herbicides are applied to the top growth, or portion(s) of the plant located above the soil surface. These herbicides, which kill or damage the top-growth only, are typically effective on annual weeds or vegetation. In contrast, systemic herbicides are initially taken up by the roots and/or the foliage of the plant and subsequently translocated to tissues that are remotely located from the point of application.
At present, there are several common types of selective herbicides on the market. The Phenoxy Acid-Type selective herbicides include 2,4-D (2,4-Dicholorophenoxyacetic acid), 2,4-DP (2,4-Dicholorophenoxypropionic acid, or Dichlorprop), and mecoprop (2-(2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxy) propionic acid). These systemic selective herbicides are initially taken up by the leaves, stem or roots of a plant, and subsequently moved throughout the plant. 2,4-D and 2,4-DP stimulate nucleic acid and protein synthesis and affect enzyme activity, respiration, and cell division, while mecoprop affects enzyme activity and plant growth. The Benzoic Acid-Type selective herbicides include dicamba, another systemic selective herbicide that is initially taken up by the leaves and roots of a plant and subsequently moved throughout the plant. Benzoic Acid-Type selective herbicides are similar to the Phenoxy Acid-Type selective herbicides described above.
Currently, these selective herbicides present major toxicological and environmental concerns. Attempts have been made to create selective herbicides that are effective, yet environmentally safe. Smiley (U.S. Pat. No. 6,323,153) teaches using various salts of chelating agents that are capable of forming stable coordination complexes with calcium and magnesium salts to control the growth of various weeds in lawns. In another patent (U.S. Pat. No. 6,117,823), Smiley discloses the use of aliphatic carboxylic acid diesters, such as dimethyl succinate and dimethyl glutarate, as non-selective herbicides. Simpson (U.S. Pat. No. 6,258,750) teaches an algaecide, herbicidal and/or fungicidal composition including a metal, the chelating agent, ethylene diamine disuccinic acid (EDDS) or a salt thereof, and a source of calcium and chloride ions. Hudetz (U.S. Pat. No. 6,271,177) teaches a herbicide that combines a sulfonyl urea compound and a water-soluble iron compound, while Sedun (WO 01/50862) discloses a herbicidal composition containing a combination of maleic hydrazide (MH) and carboxylic acids. Sedun also discloses that MH may be combined with an amine salt of a carboxylic acid (e.g., triethanolamine salts), which is chemically distinct from compounds that include amine and carboxylic function groups on the same molecule (e.g., EDTA).
Thus, there is presently a need for safer alternatives to currently used selective herbicides. There also exists a need for an environmentally safe selective herbicide that can selectively control unwanted plants, grasses and weeds, while leaving other plants and crops relatively unharmed.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to an environmentally safe selective herbicide that includes at least one metal component and at least one chelating agent. The metal component can have a variety of forms, but is preferably in the form of a metal salt, a metal chelate, or combinations thereof. The chelating agent can also have a variety of forms, but is preferably in the form of a metal chelate, a salt, an acid, or combinations thereof. Methods of use are also provided.
The disclosed herbicidal compositions can be made as a ready-to-use composition, a liquid concentrate, or a dry concentrate. The present composition is also particularly advantageous in that plants such as lawn grasses remain relatively undamaged, whereas unwanted plants such as dandelions (Taraxacum officinale), daisies (Bellis perennis), chickweed (Stellaria media), mosses, liverworts, and algae are severely damaged or killed.
Unless otherwise noted, all percentages referred to herein are percent by weight.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides an environmentally compatible, selective herbicidal composition comprising a combination of a metal component and a chelating agent. The metal component of the formulation can be in the form of a metal salt, a metal chelate, or combinations thereof, and the chelating agent can be in the form of a metal chelate, a salt, an acid, or combinations thereof.
The metal component of the present invention can include a variety of metals, but preferably includes a transition metal ion. Suitable transition metal ions include, for example, copper ions, iron ions, manganese ions, nickel ions, zinc ions, and combinations thereof. In an exemplary embodiment, the metal component includes an iron ion. The metal ions can be added in a variety of ionic states. By way of non-limiting example, iron ions used in the present invention can be added as either Fe²⁺ ions, Fe³⁺ ions, and mixtures thereof.
The metal component of the present invention can also be added in a variety of forms. In one embodiment, the metal ions can be added as a metal salt. Preferably, when the metal ions are added as a salt, they are added as metal chlorides, metal sulfates, metal nitrates, metal citrates, metal phosphates, metal chelates, metal sulfides, metal sulfites, metal succinates, metal gluconates, metal lactates, metal formates, metal nitrites, metal salicylates, metal carboxylic acids, and in combinations of these salts.
In another embodiment, the metal ions can be added to the herbicidal composition as a metal chelate. A variety of chelating agents can be used in the selective herbicide compositions of the present invention to form a metal chelate. By way of non-limiting example, suitable chelating agents include aconitic acid, alanine diacetic acid (ADA), alkoyl ethylene diamine triacetic acids (e.g., lauroyl ethylene diamine triacetic acids (LED3A)), aminotri (methylenephosphonic acid) (ATMP), asparticaciddiacetic acid (ASDA), asparticacidmonoacetic acid, diamino cyclohexane tetraacetic acid (CDTA), citraconic acid, citric acid, 1,2-diaminopropanetetraacetic acid (DPTA-OH), 1,3-diamino-2-propanoltetraacetic acid (DTPA), diethanolamine, diethanol glycine (DEG), diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA), diethylene triamine pentamethylene phosphonic acid (DTPMP), diglycolic acid, dipicolinic acid (DPA), ethanolaminediacetic acid, ethanoldiglycine (EDG), ethionine, ethylenediamine (EDA), ethylenediaminediglutaric acid (EDDG), ethylenediaminedi(hydroxyphenylacetic acid (EDDHA), ethylenediaminedipropionic acid (EDDP), ethylenediaminedisuccinate (EDDS), ethylenediaminemonosuccinic acid (EDMS), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), ethylenediaminetetrapropionic acid (EDTP), ethyleneglycolaminoethylestertetraacetic acid (EGTA), gallic acid, glucoheptonic acid, gluconic acid, glutamicaciddiacetic acid (GLDA), glutaric acid, glyceryliminodiacetic acid, glycinamidedisuccinic acid (GADS), glycoletherdiaminetetraacetic acid (GEDTA), 2-hydroxyethyldiacetic acid, hydroxyethylenediaminetriacetic acid (HEDTA), hydroxyethyldiphosphonic acid (HEDP), 2-hydroxyethyl imino diacetic acid (HIMDA), hydroxyiminodiacetic acid (HIDA), 2-hydroxy propylene diamine disuccinic acid (HPDDS), iminodiacetic acid (IDA), iminodisuccinic acid (IDS), itaconic acid, lauroyl ethylene diamine triacetic acids (LED3A), malic acid, malonic acid, methylglycinediacetate (MGDA), methyliminodiacetic acid (MIDA), monoethanolamine, nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA), nitrilotripropionic acid (NPA), N-phosphonomethyl glycine (glyphosate), propyldiamine tetraacetic acid (PDTA), salicylic acid, serinediacetic acid (SDA), sorbic acid, succinic acid, sugars, tartaric acid, tartronic acid, triethanolamine, triethylenetetraamine, triethylene tetraamine hexaacetic acid (TTHA), and combinations thereof. In an exemplary embodiment, the chelating agent is EDTA, HEDTA, EDG, EDDS, GLDA MGDA, isomers thereof, and combinations thereof.
Other suitable chelating agents include aminopolycarboxylic acid, amines, amides, phosphonic acid, and combinations thereof. Amino acids can also be used as chelating agents in the present invention. Suitable amino acids include alanine, arginine, asparagine, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, glutamine, glycine, histidine, isoleucine, leucine, lysine, methionine, proline, serine, threonine, tyrosine, valine, and combinations thereof.
Other suitable chelating agents that can be used in the herbicidal compositions of the present invention include beet molasses, carboxylic acids and the salts thereof, salicylic acid and the salts thereof (such as ammonium salicylate), citric acid, and combinations thereof.
The chelating agent of the present invention can also be added to the herbicidal composition in a variety of forms, alone, or in combination. In one embodiment, it can be a free acid. In another embodiment the chelating agent can be a salt. Preferably, in this embodiment, the chelating agent is added as a sodium salt, potassium salt, calcium salt, ammonium salt, amine salt, amide salt, and combinations thereof. In another embodiment, the chelating agent can be added as an alkali metal chelate, including calcium and magnesium. Other suitable metal chelates are described above with respect to the metal component.
The end-use concentration of the ingredients of the herbicidal compositions of the present invention can vary depending on the form of the metal component and the chelating agent. When referring to the amount, e.g., concentration and molar ratio, of the metal component in the composition, the amount is based on the amount of metal ions present within the metal component.
Where the selective herbicide composition includes a metal ion and a chelating agent, the concentration of the metal ion and the chelating agent can vary significantly. By way of non-limiting example, the concentration of metal applied to the plant can be in the range of about 0.01 and 5% by weight, and more preferably about 0.05 to 2% by weight, while the concentration of the chelating agent applied to the plant can be in the range of about 0.1 to 10% by weight, and more preferably about 0.2 to 5% by weight. The molar concentration of each ingredient can also vary. Thus, the molar ratio of metal to chelating agent can be substantially equal to one, greater than one, substantially greater than one, less than one, or substantially less than one. More preferably, the molar ratio of metal to chelating agent is in the range of about 0.05:1 to 20:1, and more preferably is about 0.2:1 to 5:1.
Where the composition includes a metal salt and a metal chelate, on the other hand, the metal is preferably present at a molar amount greater than the amount of chelating agent. In an exemplary embodiment, the concentration of metal ions applied to the plant is preferably in the range of about 0.01 to 5.0% by weight, and more preferably about 0.05 to 2.0% by weight, while the concentration of chelating agent(s) applied to the plant is about 0.1 to 10.0% by weight, and more preferably between 0.2 to 5.0% by weight. The molar concentration of each ingredient can also vary. Preferably, the molar ratio of metal to chelating agent is in the range of about 1.0:0.05 to 1.0:1.0, and more preferably is about 1.0:0.1 to 1.0:1.0.
In another embodiment, the composition can include a metal chelate and a chelating agent. While the amount can vary, in this embodiment the chelating agent is present at an amount greater than an amount of metal. In an exemplary embodiment, the concentration of metal applied to the plant is preferably in the range of about 0.01 to 5.0% by weight, and more preferably about 0.05 to 2.0% by weight, while the concentration of the chelating agent applied to the plant is about 0.1 to 10.0% by weight, and more preferably between 0.2 to 5.0% by weight. In yet another embodiment, the composition can include one or more metal chelates. While the amount can vary, the concentration of metal applied to the plant is preferably in the range of about 0.1 to 5.0% by weight, and more preferably about 0.1 to 2.0% by weight.
Besides the above ingredients, a variety of other components can be added to the selective herbicide compositions. By way of non-limiting example, these additives can include fertilizers, growth regulators, amino acids, additional herbicides, thickening agents, dyes, and combinations thereof.
A variety of fertilizers can be added to the herbicidal composition of the present invention. Preferably, the fertilizer is a nitrogen-containing fertilizer that is effective to promote the rapid growth of grass, thereby allowing the grass to shade and out-compete the damaged weeds. The end-use concentration of added fertilizer(s) can vary, but preferably, the concentration of fertilizer is in the range of about 0.1 to 5% by weight.
A variety of growth regulators may also be added to the herbicidal composition of the present invention. By way of non-limiting example, the growth regulators added to the herbicidal compositions can include maleic hydrazide (MH), cycocel (2-chloroethyl-trimethyl ammonium chloride), auxins, and combinations thereof. The end-use concentration of the additional growth regulators can vary, but preferably, the concentration is between about 100 ppm and 2% by weight.
The herbicidal compositions of the present invention can also include natural growth regulators, such as for example, salicylic acid, salts of salicylic acid including ammonium salicylate, jasmonates, ethylene, auxins, gibberellins, cytokinins, abscisic acid, and combinations thereof. The end-use concentration of these natural growth regulators can vary, but preferably, the concentration is between about 10 ppm and 5% by weight.
In addition to the selective herbicides disclosed herein, the herbicidal compositions of the present invention can include other herbicides as a co-active ingredient. The co-active ingredients that can be added as additional herbicides include glyphosate, glufosinate, fatty acids and salts thereof, urea, sodium, borax, copper sulfate, carboxylic acids and the salts thereof, ammonium salts, and combinations thereof. The end-use concentration of the additional herbicide(s) can vary, but preferably, the concentration is in the range of about 100 ppm to 5% by weight.
Furthermore, a variety of thickening agents may be added to the herbicidal compositions disclosed herein. Preferably, these thickening agents include Rhodopol 23 (Rhone Poulenc), VanGel B (R. T. Vanderbilt), Kelzan S (Merck & Co.), guar gum, propylene glycol, glycerol, and combinations thereof. The end-use concentration of added thickening agent(s) can vary, but preferably, the concentration is in the range of about 0.01 to 1% by weight.
Other additives may be included in the herbicidal compositions disclosed herein. By way of non-limiting example, a herbicidal composition according to the present invention can include humectants, antioxidants, stabilizing agents, wetting agents, herbicide synergists, sequestrants, and combinations thereof. Suitable humectants include, for example, propylene glycol, glycerin, beet molasses, and combinations thereof. Suitable antioxidants include, for example, citric acid, while suitable stabilizing agents include citric acid, ammonium salts, and combinations thereof. Suitable wetting agents include, for example, carboxylic acids and the salts thereof and silicone polymers such as Silwet 77 (Witco Corp, CT, USA). Suitable herbicide synergists and suitable sequestrant additives include, for example, ammonium salts. The end-use concentration of these additives may vary, but preferably, the concentration is between about 0.1 and 5% by weight.
In use, the formulation of the selective herbicide of the present invention can vary. Preferably, the herbicidal compositions are formed as a ready-to-use composition, a liquid concentrate, or a dry concentrate. The solvents used in the ready-to-use liquid composition and liquid concentrate forms can vary. Preferably, the solvent is a poor wetting agent on plant leaves, essentially equal to that of water. Grass leaves are often vertical and hard to wet, whereas many weeds, such as the dandelion, are horizontal and easy to wet. Solutions that are poor wetting agents are advantageous because they tend to bead up and run off of grass leaves, while spreading onto leaves of the horizontal weeds, such as the dandelion. More preferably, the solvent(s) used in the formulation of the disclosed herbicidal compositions are propylene glycol, glycerin, alcohols such as tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol (THFA) and combinations thereof.
The pH of the herbicidal solution can vary, but preferably, the herbicidal compositions of the present invention are effective over a wide range of pH values. More preferably, the pH of the herbicidal compositions of the present invention is between about 1.5 and 10. After the formulation has been prepared, the pH of the solution can be measured and adjusted as necessary. The pH values can be measured using standard pH meters, with glass bulb electrodes.
A typical ready-to-use (RTU) formulation according to one embodiment of the present invention is FeEDTA RTU with 0.2% iron. The ingredients are as follows:

Ingredient Concentration by weight (%)

Water 96.75%

Na₄EDTA 1.80%

Fe(NO₃)₃.9H₂O 1.45%
The RTU formulation is prepared by adding water to a vessel, and adding Na₄EDTA the water while stirring. Once dissolved, the ferric nitrate is added, followed by additional stirring to dissolve the ferric nitrate. This solution can then be sprayed onto areas of lawn and dandelion using a hand sprayer, at a rate of 100 ml/m².
The composition of the present invention can be applied to a variety of undesired vegetation in both residential and commercial plant or crop areas. Preferably, the herbicidal compositions are effective to control weeds and unwanted plants, including dicotyledonous plants, monocotyledonous plants, conifers, cycads, ferns, horsetails, mosses, liverworts, and algae. It is very effective against common weeds such as dandelions (Taraxacum officinale), daisies (Bellis perennis), and chickweed (Stellaria media).
The following non-limiting examples serve to further describe the invention. Unless otherwise specified, all of the iron solutions were made using the same molar concentration of iron ion as chelating agent. All of the outside tests were done on areas of mixed grass and dandelions that were at least 2 months old. For the greenhouse tests, dandelions were grown in a commercial greenhouse mix, using supplemental lighting and heating. Each plant was grown in a 2¼ inch pot to a minimum diameter of 20 cm. All of the solutions were sprayed onto the plants at a rate of 100 ml/m². The ferrous sulfate formulations that were used in examples 1, 2, 8, and 9 contained 1% iron (180 mM), 18 mM EDTA, 1% citric acid, and 0.5% urea. In all of the examples, the amount of iron is identified in brackets as the percent iron on a weight basis.
Killex® (Green Cross, Ontario, Canada) is a commonly used selective lawn herbicide and was included in several field tests as a standard. Killex contains 2,4-D (9.5%), mecoprop (5%) and dicamba (0.9%). The product was diluted 6 ml into 1 L of water solution and applied 2 at rate of 200 ml/m², as per label instructions.

All plant damage was assessed using a qualitative rating scale from 0 to 9.



0	No damage
1	Trace of damage
2	Trace to slight damage
3	Slight damage
4	Slight to moderate damage
5	Moderate damage
6	Moderate to severe damage
7	Severe damage
8	Very severe damage
9	Plant dead

A damage rating of “4” or higher may be high enough to control undesired plants.

EXAMPLE 1

Field Dandelion and Turf Test of Iron Chelates

All of the iron chelates were sprayed once at 0.2% Fe³⁺ (35.8 mM), at a volume of 100 ml/m²onto 0.5 m areas of mixed grass and dandelions. The spraying of the test was followed by 2 days of rain-free weather. Observations were made 5 days after spraying.

Grass Damage Dandelion Damage

pH (0 to 9) (0 to 9)

FeEDDS (0.2% Fe³⁺) 7.5 3 4.5

FeEDTA (0.2% Fe³⁺) 7.5 1 8.3

FeHEDTA (0.2% Fe³⁺) 7.5 0 8.9

FeSO₄(1% Fe²⁺) 2.5 7 6.3

Untreated 0 0.0

EXAMPLE 2

Field Grass and Dandelion Test of FeEDDS and FeHEDTA at pH 3 and 7

The FeEDDS and FeHEDTA solutions contained 0.2% Fe³⁺ (35.8 mM). The ferrous sulfate contained 1% Fe²⁺ (179.1 mM). The solutions were sprayed at a rate of 0.1 L/m²onto 2 plots of 0.5 m²of mixed grass and dandelions. Observations were made 4 days after spraying.

Grass Damage Dandelion Damage

pH (0 to 9) (0 to 9)

FeEDDS (0.2% Fe³⁺) 3.0 2.0 5.5

FeEDDS (0.2% Fe³⁺) 7.0 1.0 4.0

FeHEDTA (0.2% Fe³⁺) 3.0 0.0 7.0

FeHEDTA (0.2% Fe³⁺) 7.1 1.0 7.5

FeSO₄(1% Fe²⁺) 2.6 7.0 7.0

Untreated 0.0 0.0

EXAMPLE 3

Combinations of FeSO4, EDTA, EDDS and MH, at pH 6 and 3, on Dandelions and Grass

This test investigated the effect of 10% chelation and pH on potted grass and dandelions. All of the solutions contained 10% ferrous sulfate heptahydrate, resulting in a Fe²⁺ concentration of 2% (358.1 mM). EDTA and EDDS were added at 1/10^THof the iron molar concentration (35.8 mM). MH was added 1%. The dandelions and turf grasses were sow in separate pots 3 weeks prior to the start of the test.

The plants were re-sprayed after 9 days.



	Plant
	Damage (0 to 9)	Plant Death (%)

3 Days After Second Spray	pH	Grass	Dandelion	Grass	Dandelion

FeSO₄(2% Fe²⁺)	6	0	6.0	0	17
FeSO₄+ MH (0.2% Fe)	6	0	7.0	0	30
FeSO₄+ EDTA (0.2% Fe)	6	0	8.3	0	87
FeSO₄+ EDDS (0.2% Fe)	6	0	7.3	0	69
FeSO₄+ MH + EDTA	6	0	8.5	0	89
(0.2% Fe)
FeSO₄+ MH + EDDS	6	4	7.0	0	56
(0.2% Fe)
FeSO₄(0.2% Fe)	3	4	8.2	0	76
FeSO₄+ EDTA (0.2% Fe)	3	1	9.0	0	100
FeSO₄+ EDDS (0.2% Fe)	3	0	8.7	0	90
Untreated	n/a	0.0	0	0	0

EXAMPLE 4

Effect of pH on FeHEDTA Applied to Greenhouse Dandelions

This test compared the effects of FeHEDTA at a range of pH values to potted, greenhouse-grown dandelions. All of the solutions were applied at 0.2% Fe³⁺ (35.8 mM). Ammonium sulfate was added at 2%. The plants were re-sprayed after 8 days.



	Plant Damage	Dead
	(0 to 9)	(#/10)

	Days After Spraying	7	8 + 5	8 + 5

FeHEDTA pH 3 (0.2% Fe)	3.2	6.8	5
FeHEDTA pH 5 (0.2% Fe)	2.6	5.4	3
FeHEDTA pH 7 (0.2% Fe)	1.9	5.1	2
FeHEDTA pH 9 (0.2% Fe)	2.0	3.6	1
FeHEDTA pH 11 (0.2% Fe)	3.8	6.6	5
FeHEDTA pH 3 + NH₄SO₄	3.8	7.9	6
(0.2% Fe)
Untreated	0.0	0.0	0

EXAMPLE 5

Effect of Additives on FeEDDS (0.4% Fe³⁺) on Dandelions

The literature identifies many compounds that can chelate iron. This test evaluated combinations of these compounds with EDDS sprayed onto greenhouse grown dandelions. Maleic hydrazide (MH) was included to investigate the effect of a growth inhibitor on the response of the plant to iron.

All of the additives, except MH and beet molasses, were applied at the same molar concentration as the iron (71.6 mM). NaEDDS was used at twice the molar concentration of iron (143.3 mM). All of the solutions were adjusted to pH 5.1, except as noted, using sodium carbonate. The plants were re-sprayed 7 days after the first spray.



			Dead or
		Plant Damage	Dying
		(0 to 9)	(#/10)

Days After Spraying	pH	7	7 + 7	7 + 7

FeEDDS (0.4% Fe³⁺) (A)	5.2	5.8	3.8	3
(A) “pH 9” (0.4% Fe³⁺)	8.7	5.9	5.6	3
(A) + ascorbic acid (0.4% Fe³⁺)	5.1	5.7	4.5	3
(A) + citrate acid (0.4% Fe³⁺)	5.5	7.7	5.6	4
(A) + malic acid (0.4% Fe³⁺)	5.1	7.0	4.1	2
(A) + salicylic acid (0.4% Fe³⁺)	5.1	7.4	7.7	8
(A) + succinic acid (0.4% Fe³⁺)	5.3	6.5	5.3	1
(A) + tartaric acid (0.4% Fe³⁺)	5.1	7.3	5.2	4
(A) + NH₄SO₄(0.4% Fe³⁺)	5.2	4.9	5.2	4
(A) + beet molasses 4% (0.4% Fe³⁺)	5.2	7.1	7.5	6
(A) + MH 0.2% (0.4% Fe³⁺)	5.2	7.1	7.0	6
(A) + MH 0.5% (0.4% Fe³⁺)	5.2	7.2	8.3	8

EXAMPLE 6

Effect of Various Fe Chelates on Dandelion Phytotoxicity

This test compared EDG (ethanol diglycine) and EDDS at 0.4% Fe³⁺ (71.6 mM), with HEDTA 0.2% Fe³⁺ (35.8 mM). FeEDDS and FeEDG were made with 100% excess chelating agent. FeHEDTA was made with 10% excess chelating agent. The solutions were sprayed onto greenhouse grown dandelions. The plants were re-sprayed after 7 days.

Plant Damage Dead Plants

(0 to 9) (#/10)

Days After Spraying pH 7 7 + 5 7 + 5

FeEDG (0.4% Fe³⁺) 8.3 1.4 6.4 1

FeEDDS (0.4% Fe³⁺) 5.5 5.0 8.6 8

FeHEDTA (0.2% Fe³⁺) 5.5 1.3 8.1 3

Untreated 0.0 0.0 0

EXAMPLE 7

Potassium Nonanoate (KC9) with FeHEDTA on Greenhouse Dandelions

This test compared the damaged caused by combinations of fatty acid and FeHEDTA. FeHEDTA was used at a concentration to 35.8 mM. The treatment with 0.1% Fe contained twice the molar amount of chelating agent as iron. The treatment with 0.2% iron contained the same molar amount of chelating agent as iron Potassium nonanoate (KC9) was used at 0.84%. The plants were re-sprayed 8 days after the first spray.

Days After Spraying	(mM)	(mM)	pH	7	8 + 5	8 + 5

KC9	0.0	0.0	7.7	0.0	0.6	0
KC9 + FeHEDTA	18.0	35.8	7.8	8.1	9.0	10
(0.1% Fe³⁺)
KC9 + FeHEDTA	35.8	35.8	7.8	5.9	7.6	7
(0.2% Fe³⁺)
FeSO₄(0.2% Fe²⁺)	35.8	0.0	2.4	0.8	0.2	0
FeSO₄(1% Fe²⁺)	179.1	0.0	2.1	4.4	7.2	5
FeSO₄(2% Fe²⁺)	358.1	0.0	1.9	6.2	8.4	8
Untreated				0.0	0.0	0

EXAMPLE 8

Field Daisy Test of Iron Solutions with Added EDTA and Propylene Glycol

Field areas with 10 cm to 20 cm areas of daisy plants (Bellis perennis BELPE) were sprayed with various 2% Fe²⁺ iron (358 mM) solutions at a rate of 0.5 L/m². The areas were assessed 6 days after spraying.

pH Daisy Mortality (%)

FeSO₄(2% Fe²⁺) 2.2 6

FeSO₄+ NaEDTA (2% Fe²⁺) 2.6 35

FeSO₄+ PG (2% Fe²⁺) 2.2 6

FeSO₄+ PG + NaEDTA (2% Fe²⁺) 2.6 60

Untreated 0

EXAMPLE 9

Restoring Dandelion and Dock Infested Lawns with Iron Solutions

This test compared the activity of ferrous sulfate and a solution of ferrous sulfate, citric acid (2%), urea (1%), and EDTA (1.5%). 0.5 m²areas of turf were sprayed on June 25^thand July 7^th, with observations made on July 13^th. At the time of the first spraying, grass covered less than 1% of the areas, with dandelions (Taraxacum officinale) and dock (Rumex crispus) covering the remaining plot areas. The dandelions had leaves 8 to 10 cm long. Iron solutions were applied at 1% Fe³⁺ (179 mM). Na₄EDTA was added to the ferrous sulfate solution at 1.5% (36 mM). The molar level of EDTA is 1/10 that of the iron ions. Citric acid was used at 2% and urea at 1%. The urea is added as a nitrogen fertilizer source to encourage the growth of the grasses.
The plot coverage by various plant species remained unchanged in the untreated areas. The “ferrous sulfate only” treatment reduced the area covered by dock and increased the area covered by turf grasses. However, it did not appear to reduce the area covered by dandelions. The area treated with the ferrous sulfate with added EDTA, citrate, and urea showed a dramatic increase in grass coverage, and a reduction in the dandelion and dock coverage. In the area treated with ferrous sulfate with added EDTA, citrate and urea, the dock and dandelions died, leaving bare soil exposed. One skilled in the art will appreciate that grass seed can be re-sown in the treated areas 7 days after treatment with no ill effects.

Grass

Observations Plot Area Covered (%) By: Damage

After 18 days Grass Dandelion Dock Bare Soil (0 to 9)

Untreated 1 70 29 0 0

FeSO₄(pH 2.4) (1% 20 65 14 1 1

Fe²⁺)

FeSO₄(1%) + EDTA, 45 15 10 30 1

citrate & urea (pH 2.5)

(1% Fe)

EXAMPLE 10

Evaluation of FeHEDTA with 0.1% and 0.2% Fe³⁺ on Dandelions

This test investigated using 0.1% (17.9 mM) and 0.2% (35.8 mM) iron, as FeHEDTA, to kill potted dandelions. The solutions contained 10% excess chelating agent.
Small (12 cm diameter) to medium (20 cm diameter) sized, greenhouse-grown dandelions were used. These sizes of dandelions are typically found in lawns. The plants were re-sprayed 7 days after the first spray.
These sizes of dandelions are very susceptible to the FeHEDTA.

Dead Dandelions

FeHEDTA Conc. As % iron Dandelion (#/10)

Days After Spraying Diameter 6 7 + 6

FeHEDTA (0.1% Fe) 12 cm 2 10

FeHEDTA (0.2% Fe) 12 cm 8 10

FeHEDTA (0.1% Fe) 16 cm 1 3

FeHEDTA (0.2% Fe) 16 cm 3 10

FeHEDTA (0.1% Fe) 20 cm 0 3

FeHEDTA (0.2% Fe) 20 cm 1 8

EXAMPLE 11

Field Test of FeHEDTA, (FeEDDS+Fe MGDA), and Killex to Control Dandelion and Daisy Plants in Lawns.

This test investigated the effect of FeHEDTA and a mixture of FeEDDS and FeMGDA on daisy (Bellis perennis), dandelion (Taraxacum officinale), and a turf bentgrass (Agrostis sp.). The chelating agents were used at one and a half times the molar amount of iron. The FeHEDTA solutions contained 0.2% iron (35.8 mM). The commercially prepared FeHEDTA product from the Monterey Chemical Company (CA, USA) was used as a standard. The (FeEDDS+FeMGDA) solutions contained 0.4% iron (71.6 mM) and the same molar amount of EDDS and MGDA. The solutions were made from NaEDDS (Octaquest E30, Octel) and NaMGDA (Trilon M liquid, BASF, Germany). Ammonium sulfate was added at a concentration of 1%. Killex (Solaris ON, Canada) was diluted and applied as per label instructions of 6 ml/L applied at 200 ml/m².
The daisy (0.25 m²) and dandelion (0.5 m²) test plots were in different areas of the bentgrass field. The dandelions were large, averaging 30 cm in diameter. The daisy patches were between 10 and 20 cm in diameter. The plants were sprayed weekly 4 times.

The iron treatments were effective at killing the daisy and dandelion plants and did not cause significant grass damage. The only grass damage that was observed was a minor blackening of some of the leaf tips.



	Plot Area
	Covered by
	Dandelion	Dandelion
Dandelion Data	Plants (%)	Necrosis (%)

Days After Start of Test	0	13	21	26	2	9	16	23

FeHEDTA (0.2% Fe)	80	5	10	8	95	98	97	97
FeHEDTA + NH₄SO₄(0.2%	80	5	8	6	90	95	95	95
Fe)
FeHEDTA (Monterey) (0.2%	80	15	12	8	85	96	90	92
Fe)
FeEDDS + FeMGDA (0.4%	80	10	10	10	80	98	80	95
Fe)
FeEDDS + FeMGDA + NH₄SO₄	75	10	12	10	85	99	85	95
(0.4% Fe)
Killex	85	85	60	25	0	0	35	65
Water	85	80	80	90	0	0	0

	Plot Area
	Covered by	Daisy Necrosis
Daisy Data	Daisy Plants (%)	(%)

Days After Start of Test	0	13	21	30	2	10	16	23

FeHEDTA (0.2% Fe)	60	1	2	0.5	20	95	98	98
FeHEDTA + NH₄SO₄(0.2% Fe)	35	1	1	1	35	97	98	99
FeHEDTA (Monterey)	40	10	5	0.5	35	70	92	90
(0.2% Fe)
FeEDDS + FeMGDA (0.4% Fe)	55	5	3	4	35	70	90	80
FeEDDS + FeMGDA +	45	7	7	2	30	90	92	90
NH₄SO_{4 (0.4% Fe)}
Killex	60	25	15	1	0	5	25	45
Water	50	40	45	45	0	0	0	0

	Blackening of Bentgrass (Agrostis)
Turfgrass Data	Leaf Tips (0 to 9)

Days After Start of Test	1	6	9	16	21	23	30
FeHEDTA (0.2% Fe)	0	0	0	2	0.5	0	0
FeHEDTA + NH₄SO₄(0.2% Fe)	0	0	0	0.5	0	0	0
FeHEDTA (Monterey)	0	0	0	0.5	0	0.5	0
(0.2% Fe)
FeEDDS + FeMGDA (0.4% Fe)	0.5	0.5	2	3	0.5	1	0
FeEDDS + FeMGDA +	0	1	2	2	0.5	1	0
NH₄SO_{4 (0.4% Fe)}
Killex	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Water	0	0	0	0	0	0	0

EXAMPLE 12

Effect of FeHEDTA on the Chickweed Scarlet Pimpernel and Dandelion

This test evaluated FeHEDTA with 0.15% and 0.2% Fe for controlling the chickweed scarlet pimpernel (Anagallis arvensis) and dandelion (Taraxacum officinale). The solution contained 1.3 times the molar amount of chelating agent as iron. Field areas of well established chickweed and dandelion (0.5 m²) were sprayed at a rate of 100 ml/m².
FeHEDTA significantly reduced the numbers of dandelions and chickweed plants.

Dandelion Plants Survival of Dandelion Plants

DANDELION (#/0.5 m²) (%)

Days After Spraying 0 7 day 7/day 0

Untreated 69 69 100%

FeHEDTA (0.15% Fe) 57 19 33

FeHEDTA (0.20% Fe) 84 24 29

Chickweed Plants Survival of Chickweed

CHICKWEED (#/0.5 m²) Plants (%)

Days After Spraying 0 7 day 7/day 0

Untreated 23 23 100%

FeHEDTA (0.15% Fe) 15 8 53

FeHEDTA (0.20% Fe) 25 4 16

EXAMPLE 13

Field Test of FeHEDTA at 0.2% Fe and FeEDDS at 0.4% Fe

This test evaluated FeEDDS (0.4% Fe³⁺) and FeHEDTA (0.2% Fe³+) for controlling the weed hairy cat's ear (Hypochoeris radicata), also known as “false dandelion,” grown in areas of mixed grass and Hypochoeris. The iron solutions were sprayed at a rate of 100 ml/m²to 1.0 m²plots. The iron treatments were resprayed after 7 and 14 days. Killex (Solaris ON, Canada) was diluted and applied once as per label instructions of 6 ml/L applied at 200 ml/m².
The Killex treatment did not result in a reduction in the plot area covered by cat's ear, although the plants exhibited severe epinasty symptoms. The grass covered between 15 and 30% of the area over the course of the experiment.

In contrast, the iron treatments eliminated cat's ear from the plots after 3 sprays, even though cat's ear was the predominate weed at the start of the test. The area covered by grass increased 2.5 to 3 fold during the test. None of the treatments caused significant grass phytotoxicity.



	Area	Relative
Cat's Ear	Covered by Hairy	Cat's Ear Area
Days After	Cat's Ear (%)	(Start = 100%)

Start of Test	0	6	8	14	18	0	6	8	15	18

FeHEDTA	65	20	20	5	0	100	31	31	8	0
(0.2% Fe)
FeEDDS	55	20	25	10	0	100	36	45	19	0
(0.4% Fe)
Killex	55	60	70	70	53	100	109	127	127	96
Untreated	64	55	60	57	70	100	86	94	89	109

Grass	Area Covered	Relative Grass Area
Days After	by Hairy Grass (%)	(Start = 100%)

Start of Test	0	6	8	15	18	0	6	8	15	18

FeHEDTA	15	47	40	50	46	100	313	267	333	307
(0.2% Fe)
FeEDDS	20	49	55	50	50	100	245	275	250	250
(0.4% Fe)
Killex	23	20	15	15	30	100	87	65	65	130
Untreated	15	15	15	10	5	100	100	100	67	33

EXAMPLE 14

Field Dandelion Test of FeHEDTA, FeEDTA, FeEDDS, FeMGDA, and 50:50 Mixtures of Chelate Combinations

Solutions were made of FeHEDTA (0.2% Fe), FeEDTA (0.2% Fe), FeEDDS (0.4% Fe), and FeMGDA (0.4% Fe). For the combinations, these 4 solutions were mixed together in a 1:1 ratio. The plots (0.25 m²) were sprayed 3 times at weekly intervals at a rate of 0.1 L/m². The plots contained a mixture of dandelion and hard fescue turfgrass.

All of the iron chelate solutions provided dandelion control that was equal to or better than that provided by Killex. No phytotoxicity was observed on the turfgrass.



	Area Covered by	Dandelion
Dandelion	Dandelion (%)	Necrosis (%)

Days After Start of Test	0	6	15	21	33	11	18

FeHEDTA (0.2% Fe)	40	20	8	2	97	95	97
FeEDTA (0.2% Fe)	30	10	7	1	90	90	98
FeEDDS (0.4% Fe)	25	20	5	1	45	90	70
FeMGDA (0.4% Fe)	30	17	12	2	80	85	99
FeHEDTA + FeEDTA (0.2% Fe)	30	9	5	2	98	90	95
FeHEDTA + FeEDDS (0.3% Fe)	35	15	12	3	97	80	97
FeHEDTA + FeMGDA (0.3% Fe)	25	10	5	1	95	98	99
FeEDDS + FeMGDA (0.4% Fe)	30	9	10	3	95	90	98
FeEDDS + FeEDTA (0.3% Fe)	30	20	13	3	80	70	96
FeEDTA + FeMGDA (0.3% Fe)	30	13	6	2	85	85	98
Killex	40	30	25	10	15	25	50
Untreated	25	20	60	70	0	0	0

	Dandelion
	Count	Surviving
Dandelion	(#/0.25 m²)	Dandelions (%)

Days After Start of Test	0	6	13	21	6	13	21

FeHEDTA (0.2% Fe)	63	60	40	26	95	63	41
FeEDTA 0.2% Fe	56	33	20	19	59	36	34
FeEDDS 0.4% Fe	53	40	19	16	75	36	30
FeMGDA 0.4% Fe	72	71	43	19	99	60	26
FeHEDTA + FeEDTA	58	37	27	18	64	47	31
(0.2% Fe)
FeHEDTA + FeEDDS	67	57	53	21	85	79	31
(0.3% Fe)
FeHEDTA + FeMGDA	45	28	19	13	62	42	29
(0.3% Fe)
FeEDDS + FeMGDA (0.4% Fe)	59	51	42	20	86	71	34
FeEDDS + FeEDTA (0.3% Fe)	55	55	47	23	100	85	42
FeEDTA + FeMGDA (0.3% Fe)	62	41	32	17	66	52	27
Killex	55	50	38	33	91	69	60
Untreated	49	51	49	53	100	100	100

EXAMPLE 15

Greenhouse Dandelion Damage of FeEDDS with Various Additives

This test investigated combinations of various chelating agents with FeEDDS. All of the solutions contained 0.4% iron (71.6 mM). The chelating agents were made as sodium salts and added to a solution of FeEDDS. The solutions were sprayed onto greenhouse-grown dandelions at a rate of 100 ml/m². The test was resprayed after 7 days.

All of the solutions were effective at controlling dandelions.



	Dandelion

		Dead Dandelion
	Dandelion Necrosis (%)	(#/20)

Days After Start of Test	1	10	7	10

FeEDDS 0.4% Fe (A)	67	96	6	10
(A) + citric 2% (0.4% Fe)	89	98	5	14
(A) + gluconic 2%	87	98	7	11
(0.4% Fe)
(A) + lactic 2% (0.4% Fe)	84	98	3	12
(A) + malonic 2%	90	99	10	18
(0.4% Fe)
(A) + malic 2% (0.4% Fe)	93	98	11	17
(A) + glycine 2%	84	97	7	18
(0.4% Fe)
Untreated	0	0	0	0

EXAMPLE 16

Comparison of Different Salts of EDTA on Greenhouse Dandelion Mortality

This test investigated various metal chelates. All chelate solutions contained 0.4% metal ions with 10% excess chelator, and were adjusted to pH 7. For the combinations, these 4 solutions were mixed together in a 1:1 ratio. The solutions were sprayed onto greenhouse grown dandelions at a rate of 100 ml/m². The test was re-sprayed after 7 days.

FeEDTA is a better herbicide than AlEDTA, CuEDTA, and ZnEDTA. Also 1 to 1 mixtures of FeEDTA with other metal chelates caused the same damage as FeEDTA.



	Dandelion	Dead Dandelion (#/20)

	Days After Start of Test	7	10

FeEDTA (0.4% Fe)	10	17
AlEDTA (0.4% Al)	0	0
CuEDTA (0.4% Cu)	0	4
ZnEDTA (0.4% Zn)	0	0
(Fe + Al) EDTA (0.2% Fe + 0.2% Al)	8	17
(Fe + Cu) EDTA (0.2% Fe + 0.2% Cu)	3	16
(Fe + Zn) EDTA (0.2% Fe + 0.2% Zn)	0	14
FeCl₃(0.4% Fe)	0	0
Untreated	0	0

One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate further features and advantages of the invention based on the above-described embodiments. Accordingly, the invention is not to be limited by what has been particularly shown and described, except as indicated by the appended claims. All publications and references cited herein are expressly incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

Dead Plants

1. A method for selectively treating undesired vegetation, comprising the steps of:

providing a herbicidal composition having an active ingredient selected from the group consisting of the sodium salt of ethylenediaminedisuccinic acid, the potassium salt of ethylenediaminedisuccinic acid, the ammonium salt of ethylenediaminedisuccinic acid, and mixtures thereof; and

contacting vegetation with a herbicidally effective amount of the composition, such that the vegetation is selectively controlled.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the active ingredient is present at a concentration in the range of about 0.1 to 10% by weight.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the active ingredient is present at a concentration in the range of about 0.2 to 5% by weight.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising an additional component selected from the group consisting of growth regulators, fertilizers, herbicides, thickening agents, humectants, antioxidants, surfactants, stabilizing agents, wetting agents, herbicide synergists, sequestrants, solvents, dyes, and combinations thereof.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the fertilizer is a nitrogen-containing fertilizer that is present at a concentration in the range of about 0.1 to 5% by weight.

6. The method of claim 4, wherein the growth regulators are selected from the group consisting of maleic hydrazide (MH), cycocel (2-chloroethyl-trimethyl ammonium chloride), auxins, and combinations thereof.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the growth regulators are present at a concentration in the range of about 100 ppm and 2% by weight.

8. The method of claim 4, wherein the growth regulators are natural growth regulators selected from the group consisting of salicylic acid, salts of salicylic acid including ammonium salicylate, jasmonates, ethylene, auxins, gibberellins, cytokinins, abscisic acid, and combinations thereof.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the natural growth regulators are present at a concentration in range of about 10 ppm and 5% by weight.

10. The method of claim 4, wherein the thickening agents are selected from the group consisting of Rhodopol 23, VanGel B, Kelzan S, guar gum, propylene glycol, glycerol, and combinations thereof.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the thickening agents are present at a concentration in the range of about 0.01 to 1% by weight.

12. The method of claim 4, wherein the humectants are selected from the group consisting of propylene glycol, glycerin, beet molasses, and combinations thereof.

13. The method of claim 4, wherein the antioxidants are selected from the group consisting of citric acid, while suitable stabilizing agents include citric acid, ammonium salts, and combinations thereof.

14. The method of claim 4, wherein the wetting agents are selected from the group consisting of carboxylic acids and the salts thereof and silicone polymers.

15. The method of claim 1, wherein the composition is a ready-to-use composition.

16. The method of claim 1, wherein the composition is a dry concentrate.

17. The method of claim 1, wherein the composition is a liquid concentrate.

18. The method of claim 1, wherein the composition further includes a solvent.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein the solvent is selected from the group consisting of propylene glycol, glycerin, alcohols such as tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol (THFA), and combinations thereof.

20. The method of claim 1, wherein the pH of the concentration is in the range of about 1.5 and 10.