US20060072120A1 - Measuring elastic moduli of dielectric thin films using an optical metrology system - Google Patents
Measuring elastic moduli of dielectric thin films using an optical metrology system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20060072120A1 US20060072120A1 US10/960,351 US96035104A US2006072120A1 US 20060072120 A1 US20060072120 A1 US 20060072120A1 US 96035104 A US96035104 A US 96035104A US 2006072120 A1 US2006072120 A1 US 2006072120A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- angle
- sample
- refraction
- incidence
- coordinates
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
- G01N21/17—Systems in which incident light is modified in accordance with the properties of the material investigated
- G01N21/21—Polarisation-affecting properties
- G01N21/211—Ellipsometry
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
- G01N21/84—Systems specially adapted for particular applications
- G01N21/8422—Investigating thin films, e.g. matrix isolation method
Definitions
- This invention relates generally to optical metrology methods and apparatus and, more specifically, relates to measuring elastic moduli of dielectric thin films.
- Nano-indentation and bending tests have been the commonly used methods to determine the elastic moduli of both opaque and transparent materials.
- a load is applied to an indenter to force it into a material.
- the amount that the indenter is displaced into the material is measured.
- the load applied to the indenter is measured.
- Bending tests apply strain to measure failure characteristics of a material.
- a non-destructive, non-contact, small spot, high throughput and high accuracy method is needed that is compatible with semiconductor production throughput requirements, and for accurate measurement and control of the elastic moduli of the dielectric films used in the semiconductor industry.
- a method uses an optical metrology system to determine the elastic moduli of optically transparent dielectric films such as silicon dioxide, Black DiamondTM, CoralTM, other carbon doped oxides over metal or semiconductor substrates.
- a light pulse (pump) focused onto the wafer surface generates a sound wave traveling through the dielectric film.
- a second light pulse (probe) from the same or a different laser focused onto the same spot measures the changes in the optical reflectivity of the wafer.
- the reflected probe beam includes two components, one from the dielectric/substrate interface and one from the propagating sound wave in the dielectric film. The period of the interference of these two components of the reflected probe beam is used to determine the elastic moduli of the dielectric layer.
- the same result is obtained by directing the second light pulse onto a different spot along the surface, where there the optical reflectance at the first and second spots differ, such as where there is a different dielectric film at the two spots in a reference sample.
- the data analysis method enables the determination of the period from the measured signal with, for example, ⁇ 0.5% accuracy.
- the invention further provides hardware calibration and adjustments to the optical metrology system in order to minimize the variation of the results from tool to tool down to about 0.5% or below.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an optical metrology system
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a photoacoustic film thickness measurement system wherein the optical paths are illustrated;
- FIG. 3 illustrates a pump pulse as it passes through the transparent interlayer dielectric according to the present invention.
- FIG. 4 is a flow chart that illustrates the method of calibrating the metrology system according to the present invention.
- This invention provides a method to measure the elastic moduli of optically transparent dielectric films on opaque substrates using an optical metrology system.
- One suitable and non-limiting type of optical metrology system is known as the MetaPULSETM system, which is available from the assignee of this patent application.
- a metrology system 50 that includes measurement stage 60 , robotics and wafer handling system 65 , measurement system 75 , cassette station 70 , computer controller 55 , and communication lines 80 .
- Computer controller (controller) 55 may be a commonly available personal computer system and is electrically connected to measurement system 75 , measurement stage 60 , robotics and wafer handling system 65 , and cassette station 70 via communication lines 80 .
- Controller 55 further includes software embodied in a computer-readable medium (not shown) capable of carrying out the steps of the present invention.
- controller 55 sends an instruction to the robotics and wafer handling system 65 to extract a wafer from cassette station 70 , and to position the wafer on the measurement stage 60 .
- the controller 55 then issues commands to the measurement stage 60 to position the wafer relative to the measurement system so that measurements can be made at a predetermined location.
- the controller 55 then issues commands to the measurement system 75 to make a measurement and display the results of the measurement.
- the controller 55 issues instructions to the robotics and wafer handling system 65 to return the wafer to the cassette station 70 .
- the measurement stage 60 includes a test surface upon which the wafer is placed for measurements, and translation stages to provide wafer manipulation in three degrees of freedom.
- FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a photoacoustic measurement system 75 that includes, as arranged in FIG. 2 , a pulsed light source 100 , a sample stage 220 , a stage/vacuum chuck 230 , a first probe steering mirror 180 , a pump beam steering mirror 150 , a first steering mirror 110 , a pump-probe beamsplitter 120 , a polarizer 135 , and an electro-optic modulator (EOM) 130 .
- photoacoustic system 75 includes a probe retroreflector 160 , a delay scanning stage 170 , a dither EOM 205 , a beam dump 242 , and a detector 250 .
- photoacoustic measurement system 75 includes a linear pump-discriminating polarizer 245 , a harmonic generator wavelength selector (wavelength selector) 102 , a projecting lens 210 , a collimating lens 240 , a pump retroreflector 140 , and a second probe steering mirror 190 .
- Pulsed light source 100 may be a titanium-sapphire laser operating at 80 MHz and emitting light at 800 nm.
- the laser can also be alternatively configured with a frequency doubling birefringent crystal to emit laser beam 105 at 400 nm.
- Other types of lasers operating with different wavelengths and different frequencies can be used as well.
- pulsed light source 100 emits laser beam 105 that is re-directed by first steering mirror 110 .
- Pump probe beamsplitter 120 splits incident laser-beam pulse (preferably of picosecond or shorter duration) into pump beam 125 A and probe beam 125 B.
- Electro-optic modulator (EOM) 130 rotates pump beam 125 A polarization between horizontal and vertical at a frequency of, for example, 10 kHz to 10 MHz.
- Polarizer 135 converts pump beam 125 A polarization rotation into an amplitude-modulated pump beam 200 .
- Pump retroreflector 140 and pump beam steering mirror 150 deflect modulated pump beam 200 onto dither EOM 205 .
- a probe beam 125 B is transmitted to probe retroreflector 160 where delay scanning stage 170 is used to modify the length of the beam path of probe beam 125 B relative to the length of modulated pump beam 200 , thus forming time delayed probe beam 195 .
- Delayed probe beam 195 and modulated pump beam 200 propagate through dither EOM 205 and then through projecting lens 210 and finally onto sample 220 .
- Stage/vacuum chuck 230 acts as a positioning unit for the sample wafer and is preferably a multiple-degree of freedom stage that is adjustable in height (z-axis), position (x and y-axes), and tilt (T), and allows motor controlled positioning of a portion of the sample relative to the modulated pump beam 200 and delayed probe beam 195 .
- the stage may have rotational freedom of movement.
- the z-axis is used to translate the sample vertically into the focus region of the pump and probe beams, the x and y-axes translate the sample parallel to the focal plane, and the tilt axes adjust the orientation of the sample 220 to establish a desired angle of incidence for the probe beam.
- Modulated pump beam 200 and delayed probe beam 195 propagate through collimating lens 240 where the modulated pump beam 200 is gathered by beam dump 242 .
- Pump-discriminating polarizer 245 isolates reflected probe beam 225 from the modulated pump beam 200 .
- Detector 250 converts reflected probe beam 225 into a signal versus delay stage 170 position. This signal is demodulated and sent to controller 55 (shown in FIG. 1 ) for analysis (e.g. to determine film thickness).
- the optical metrology system 50 is configured to measure the elastic moduli of the optically transparent dielectric films on opaque substrates.
- a light pulse (pump) passing through a dielectric film 310 and focused onto a 5 ⁇ 7 micron 2 spot on the substrate surface generates a sound wave 320 , illustrated as a dashed line, traveling through the dielectric film 310 .
- the reflected probe beam 325 A has two components, one from the dielectric/substrate interface and one from the sound wave 320 as it travels in the dielectric layer 310 . As the sound travels in the dielectric layer 310 , it causes small local changes in the optical properties which reflect the probe beam 325 . These two components of the probe beam interfere at a detector 330 resulting in a signal oscillating with a fixed period. The period of the oscillations depends on the wavelength of the probe beam 325 , the incident angle of the probe beam 325 , the sound velocity in the dielectric film 310 , and the index of refraction of the dielectric film 310 .
- FIG. 3A shows the case where the reflected probe beam 325 destructively interferes with itself
- FIG. 3B shows the case where the reflected probe beam 325 A constructively interferes.
- a method as illustrated in FIG. 4 , is provided with several hardware adjustments for determining the value of each parameter in Eq. 1.
- the index of refraction may be measured by an ellipsometer, and the wavelength of the laser beam may be measured using a laser spectrometer 420 that is integrated inside the metrology system.
- Wavelength measurement accuracy of better than 0.1% is attainable with commercially available compact spectrometers (e.g. Ocean Optics model S2000), and it can be seen by Eq. 1 that this accuracy is sufficient to achieve 0.5% accuracy in the modulus measurement.
- the angle of refraction is determined by the following method.
- the probe beam scans across the edges in both the x and y direction of a measurement area with the 1000 Angstrom SiO 2 residing in an area with native oxide (or vice versa). Since the reflectivity of the laser is different between these two films, two curves are generated from the scans, one for the scan in the x direction and one for the scan in the y direction.
- AOI Arc Tan([( x 2 ⁇ x 1 ) 2 +( y 2 ⁇ y 1 ) 2 )] 1/2 /( z 2 ⁇ z 1 )).
- a near normal incidence angle may be used.
- the presently preferred optical metrology system shown at block 50 operates at a probe angle of incidence of about 40 degrees with respect to normal. As the probe incidence angle becomes smaller (more normal to the film), the angle-dependent term in Eq. 1 becomes less sensitive to uncertainty in the angle, and measurement matching between systems improves.
- a discrete Fourier transform (DFT) 460 preferably is used to analyze the frequency content of the signal to obtain the period.
- the DFT 460 is well suited to find the frequency of sine waves in high frequency noise.
- the DFT 460 is circular in nature and if the beginning and ends do not match, an artifact called ‘spectral leakage’ (smearing of the spectrum) will occur.
- Another artifact is known as scalloping or ‘picket fence’ effect. This results when the actual frequency of the wave does not correspond with the frequency resolution of the DFT 460 .
- the frequency resolution of a DFT 460 is the ratio of the sampling frequency f s to the number of digitized samples N. Because the signal from the interlayer dielectric is not stationary (i.e.
- the following algorithm is preferred for use.
- Recorded data is windowed 465 using a rectangular or ‘boxcar’ function to ensure an integral number of wavelengths present.
- the DFT 460 is performed.
- An ideal filter is applied that has a center frequency equal to the frequency at which the maximum amplitude occurs and narrow bandwidth that is a function of the center frequency.
- Sinc-interpolation in the frequency domain is performed on the resulting spectrum and a peak refinement algorithm is used to find a high precision value of the frequency of oscillation.
- the signal, measured by the optical metrology system contains “background” contribution due to the dissipation of the heat energy delivered by the pump pulse.
- This component is slowly decaying with time.
- This component additionally contributes to the signal being non-stationary, and decreases the accuracy obtained using the DFT 460 method.
- this background component depends on the fine details of the optical alignment and contributes to the tool-to-tool variability. Thermal background can be subtracted by fitting an exponential or a polynomial function to the signal, and subtracting it.
- the sinc-interpolation is done on the padded dataset, which may contain several times more data points.
- the sinc-interpolation may become time-consuming due to the increased dataset.
- a faster algorithm comprising the following can be used.
- the thermal background is subtracted by fitting a low order polynomial function to the raw data.
- the resulting signal is de-noised by using Ideal frequency filtering.
- Ideal frequency filtering involves applying the DFT transform 460 , finding the maximal intensity frequency within the pre-specified range, removing any component outside the narrow band surrounding the maximal intensity component, and calculating the inverse DFT to obtain the de-noised data in the time domain.
- the signals' period can be determined by locating the times of its maxima and minima using a peak refinement algorithm. These times can be obtained with improved resolution over the resolution obtained by time sampling of the signal.
- the slope and the intercept may be obtained.
- the slope equals one half of the oscillation period.
- MUSIC or DMUSIC algorithms can be used, or alternatively some non-linear fitting of the signal with the single frequency sinusoid, optimizing its amplitude, phase and frequency to obtain the best fit to the data.
- the goal function of such optimization can be either the usual Fit Error defined as a sum of the squares of the differences between the measured and fitted signal, or the cross-correlation of the fitted and measured signals.
- Another technique to address the problem solved by the teachings of this invention includes a narrow-bandwidth/long pulse system.
- the 100 fsec laser pulses generated by titanium sapphire lasers typically have bandwidths on the order of 10 nm at 800 nm and doubled pulses have bandwidths around 3 nm.
- Longer pulse widths, around 1 psec, may be used to practice this technique and these pulses have significantly smaller bandwidths ( ⁇ 1 nm). The smaller bandwidth improves the accuracy of the technique via Eq. 1 by limiting the range of wavelengths.
- Another alternative includes the use of a derivative mode modulus measurement system, as the oscillatory nature of the measurement signals lends these measurements to a derivative type of measurement (see, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,748,318).
- the result is an improved signal to noise ratio, leading to improved repeatability and shorter measurement time (higher throughput).
- a further alternative includes the use of tilt correction.
- the wafer tilt relative to the optics head contributes to uncertainty in the angle as calculated in Eq. 1.
- Such tilts can be different depending on measurement location across the sample due to sample, chuck, or stage non-uniformities.
- a tilt measurement may be performed at each site to correct for these effects, for example using a standard laser diode and position sensitive detector.
- one or more optimized “check samples” may be used to calibrate and/or monitor multiple optical metrology systems for improved repeatability and/or matching between systems. Such samples may be periodically loaded into the tool or included inside the tool and periodically monitored.
- Another alternative includes the use of a multiple angle probe beam system. Measuring the sample at multiple known probe angles allows for an independent calculation of refractive index n in Eq. 1. This allows the system to uniquely discriminate between process variations that may impact sound velocity from those that may impact refractive index.
- a further alternative includes matched spot size and pump/probe beam intensities. Previous work suggests that most film measurement results have a small empirical dependence on pump and probe spot sizes and powers. Likewise, some degree of control of these system parameters may be preferred for modulus measurement matching. Additionally, reducing uncertainty in the incident probe angle with an extremely flat chuck ( ⁇ 0.01 deg) leads to improved tool matching through Eqs. 1 and 2.
- Film temperature compensation is another alternative. According to the experimental literature on temperature dependence of sound velocity, many films have temperature coefficients on the order of 10 ⁇ 4 1/C. Therefore, to the extent that the film temperature is not similar between tools a difference in the measured sound velocity is expected. Temperature differences may be due to ambient temperature or temperature rise in the film as a result of the absorption of the laser pulses.
- a calibration table may be created to match tools for each material based upon the film's velocity and refractive index temperature coefficients, an accurate measurement of ambient temperature, and a calculation of film temperature rise on the basis of the measured quantities: pump and probe laser powers, spot sizes, and film reflectance.
- the method is not limited to dielectric blanket films; it can also be applied to measure an effective value for the elastic moduli of metal/dielectric pattern structures such as in Cu/ILD damascene interconnects.
Abstract
Description
- This invention relates generally to optical metrology methods and apparatus and, more specifically, relates to measuring elastic moduli of dielectric thin films.
- The increasing sophistication of semiconductor technology has resulted in a significant shift away from aluminum as the dominant metal in multi-level metallization processes. As semiconductor chip manufacturing has moved from AlCu/SiO2 based interconnect technology to Cu/Low k ILD (low dielectric constant interlayer dielectrics) technology, several integration issues such as delamination, peeling, and cracking have become apparent. Accordingly, these issues have evidenced a need for accurate measurement and control of the mechanical strength of the dielectric layers.
- Nano-indentation and bending tests have been the commonly used methods to determine the elastic moduli of both opaque and transparent materials. With nano-indentation, a load is applied to an indenter to force it into a material. As the indenter is forced into the material, the amount that the indenter is displaced into the material is measured. Concurrently with the measurement of the indenter displacement, the load applied to the indenter is measured. However, when forcing an indenter into a thin film, not only will the thin film deform, but the substrate will deform as well. Bending tests apply strain to measure failure characteristics of a material.
- When applied to thin films, these methods fail to accurately describe behavior as the scale of thin films is reduced to micron and sub-micron dimensions. Because both nano-indentation and bending tests are destructive, are contact based in nature, and have large errors and very low throughput, they are not suitable for semiconductor process control. Another disadvantage of these methods is that they require larger test areas than the area that the typical process design rules allow.
- As can be appreciated, a non-destructive, non-contact, small spot, high throughput and high accuracy method is needed that is compatible with semiconductor production throughput requirements, and for accurate measurement and control of the elastic moduli of the dielectric films used in the semiconductor industry.
- The foregoing and other problems are overcome, and other advantages are realized, in accordance with the presently preferred embodiments of these teachings.
- A method is provided which uses an optical metrology system to determine the elastic moduli of optically transparent dielectric films such as silicon dioxide, Black Diamond™, Coral™, other carbon doped oxides over metal or semiconductor substrates. A light pulse (pump) focused onto the wafer surface generates a sound wave traveling through the dielectric film. In one aspect, a second light pulse (probe) from the same or a different laser focused onto the same spot measures the changes in the optical reflectivity of the wafer. The reflected probe beam includes two components, one from the dielectric/substrate interface and one from the propagating sound wave in the dielectric film. The period of the interference of these two components of the reflected probe beam is used to determine the elastic moduli of the dielectric layer. In another aspect, the same result is obtained by directing the second light pulse onto a different spot along the surface, where there the optical reflectance at the first and second spots differ, such as where there is a different dielectric film at the two spots in a reference sample.
- The data analysis method enables the determination of the period from the measured signal with, for example, ±0.5% accuracy. The invention further provides hardware calibration and adjustments to the optical metrology system in order to minimize the variation of the results from tool to tool down to about 0.5% or below.
- The foregoing and other aspects of these teachings are made more evident in the following Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments, when read in conjunction with the attached Drawing Figures, wherein:
-
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an optical metrology system; -
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a photoacoustic film thickness measurement system wherein the optical paths are illustrated; -
FIG. 3 illustrates a pump pulse as it passes through the transparent interlayer dielectric according to the present invention; and -
FIG. 4 is a flow chart that illustrates the method of calibrating the metrology system according to the present invention. - This invention provides a method to measure the elastic moduli of optically transparent dielectric films on opaque substrates using an optical metrology system. One suitable and non-limiting type of optical metrology system is known as the MetaPULSE™ system, which is available from the assignee of this patent application. Reference can also be made to, as example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,621,582, “Optical metrology system and method employing laser-server supplying laser energy to distributed slave metrology heads,” and U.S. Pat. No. 5,748,318, “Optical stress generator and detector.”
- By way of introduction, and referring to
FIG. 1 , there is shown ametrology system 50 that includesmeasurement stage 60, robotics andwafer handling system 65,measurement system 75,cassette station 70,computer controller 55, andcommunication lines 80. Computer controller (controller) 55 may be a commonly available personal computer system and is electrically connected tomeasurement system 75,measurement stage 60, robotics andwafer handling system 65, andcassette station 70 viacommunication lines 80.Controller 55 further includes software embodied in a computer-readable medium (not shown) capable of carrying out the steps of the present invention. - In operation,
controller 55 sends an instruction to the robotics and wafer handlingsystem 65 to extract a wafer fromcassette station 70, and to position the wafer on themeasurement stage 60. Thecontroller 55 then issues commands to themeasurement stage 60 to position the wafer relative to the measurement system so that measurements can be made at a predetermined location. Thecontroller 55 then issues commands to themeasurement system 75 to make a measurement and display the results of the measurement. Once the measurement is complete, thecontroller 55 issues instructions to the robotics and waferhandling system 65 to return the wafer to thecassette station 70. - The
measurement stage 60 includes a test surface upon which the wafer is placed for measurements, and translation stages to provide wafer manipulation in three degrees of freedom. -
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of aphotoacoustic measurement system 75 that includes, as arranged inFIG. 2 , apulsed light source 100, asample stage 220, a stage/vacuum chuck 230, a firstprobe steering mirror 180, a pumpbeam steering mirror 150, afirst steering mirror 110, a pump-probe beamsplitter 120, apolarizer 135, and an electro-optic modulator (EOM) 130. Additionally,photoacoustic system 75 includes aprobe retroreflector 160, adelay scanning stage 170, a dither EOM 205, abeam dump 242, and adetector 250. Furthermore,photoacoustic measurement system 75 includes a linear pump-discriminating polarizer 245, a harmonic generator wavelength selector (wavelength selector) 102, aprojecting lens 210, acollimating lens 240, apump retroreflector 140, and a secondprobe steering mirror 190. - Pulsed
light source 100 may be a titanium-sapphire laser operating at 80 MHz and emitting light at 800 nm. The laser can also be alternatively configured with a frequency doubling birefringent crystal to emitlaser beam 105 at 400 nm. Other types of lasers operating with different wavelengths and different frequencies can be used as well. - In operation, pulsed
light source 100emits laser beam 105 that is re-directed byfirst steering mirror 110.Pump probe beamsplitter 120 splits incident laser-beam pulse (preferably of picosecond or shorter duration) intopump beam 125A andprobe beam 125B. Electro-optic modulator (EOM) 130 rotatespump beam 125A polarization between horizontal and vertical at a frequency of, for example, 10 kHz to 10 MHz. Polarizer 135converts pump beam 125A polarization rotation into an amplitude-modulatedpump beam 200.Pump retroreflector 140 and pumpbeam steering mirror 150 deflect modulatedpump beam 200 onto dither EOM 205. - A
probe beam 125B is transmitted toprobe retroreflector 160 wheredelay scanning stage 170 is used to modify the length of the beam path ofprobe beam 125B relative to the length of modulatedpump beam 200, thus forming timedelayed probe beam 195. Delayedprobe beam 195 and modulatedpump beam 200 propagate through dither EOM 205 and then through projectinglens 210 and finally ontosample 220. Stage/vacuum chuck 230 acts as a positioning unit for the sample wafer and is preferably a multiple-degree of freedom stage that is adjustable in height (z-axis), position (x and y-axes), and tilt (T), and allows motor controlled positioning of a portion of the sample relative to the modulatedpump beam 200 anddelayed probe beam 195. Alternatively or additionally, the stage may have rotational freedom of movement. The z-axis is used to translate the sample vertically into the focus region of the pump and probe beams, the x and y-axes translate the sample parallel to the focal plane, and the tilt axes adjust the orientation of thesample 220 to establish a desired angle of incidence for the probe beam. - Modulated
pump beam 200 anddelayed probe beam 195 propagate through collimatinglens 240 where the modulatedpump beam 200 is gathered bybeam dump 242. Pump-discriminating polarizer 245 isolates reflectedprobe beam 225 from the modulatedpump beam 200.Detector 250 converts reflectedprobe beam 225 into a signal versusdelay stage 170 position. This signal is demodulated and sent to controller 55 (shown inFIG. 1 ) for analysis (e.g. to determine film thickness). - Presently preferred techniques for performing the analysis to determine film thickness, as well as to determine other film characteristics, can be found in the following U.S. Pat. No. 4,710,030, “Optical Generator and Detector of Stress Pulses”; U.S. Pat. No. 5,706,094, “Ultrafast Optical Technique for the Characterization of Altered Materials”; U.S. Pat. No. 5,748,318, “Optical Stress Generator and Detector”; U.S. Pat. No. 5,844,684, “Optical Method for Determining the Mechanical Properties of a Material”; U.S. Pat. No. 5,864,393, “Optical Method for the Determination of Stress in Thin Films”; U.S. Pat. No. 6,008,906, “Optical Method for the Characterization of the Electrical Properties of Semiconductors and Insulating Films”; U.S. Pat. No. 6,025,918, “Apparatus and Method for Measurement of the Mechanical Properties and Electromigration of Thin Films” and U.S. Pat. No. 6,038,026, “Apparatus and Method for the Determination of Grain Size in Thin Films”, all of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
- Referring now to
FIG. 3A and 3B collectively referred to asFIG. 3 , theoptical metrology system 50 is configured to measure the elastic moduli of the optically transparent dielectric films on opaque substrates. A light pulse (pump) passing through adielectric film 310 and focused onto a 5×7 micron2 spot on the substrate surface generates asound wave 320, illustrated as a dashed line, traveling through thedielectric film 310. A second light pulse (probe) 325 from the same or a different laser focused onto the same spot, measures the optical reflectivity of thedielectric film 310 modified by thesound wave 320. The reflectedprobe beam 325A has two components, one from the dielectric/substrate interface and one from thesound wave 320 as it travels in thedielectric layer 310. As the sound travels in thedielectric layer 310, it causes small local changes in the optical properties which reflect theprobe beam 325. These two components of the probe beam interfere at adetector 330 resulting in a signal oscillating with a fixed period. The period of the oscillations depends on the wavelength of theprobe beam 325, the incident angle of theprobe beam 325, the sound velocity in thedielectric film 310, and the index of refraction of thedielectric film 310.FIG. 3A shows the case where the reflectedprobe beam 325 destructively interferes with itself, andFIG. 3B shows the case where the reflectedprobe beam 325A constructively interferes. - The period of the oscillations can be used to determine the sound velocity v, in the
dielectric layer 310 using
v=λ/2nτ Cos θ (Eq. 1)
where n is the index of refraction of thedielectric layer 310; τ is the period of the interference oscillations; λ is the wavelength of theprobe beam 325; and θ is the angle of refraction. - The elastic stiffness of the
dielectric film 310 is described by c1111=ρv2. Young's modulus (Y) of the dielectric film can then be calculated by:
Y=1/s 1111 =ρv 2(1−2v)(1+v)/(1−v). (Eq. 2)
Similarly the Bulk Modulus of thedielectric film 310 can be calculated using:
B=ρv 2(1+v)/3(1−v), (Eq. 3)
where ρ and v are the density and Poisson's ratio of thedielectric film 310. - Additionally, in order to determine the elastic moduli with the accuracy and repeatability required for semiconductor process monitoring, while minimizing the variation of the results from tool to tool, a method, as illustrated in
FIG. 4 , is provided with several hardware adjustments for determining the value of each parameter in Eq. 1. - The index of refraction, if not known a priori, may be measured by an ellipsometer, and the wavelength of the laser beam may be measured using a
laser spectrometer 420 that is integrated inside the metrology system. Wavelength measurement accuracy of better than 0.1% is attainable with commercially available compact spectrometers (e.g. Ocean Optics model S2000), and it can be seen by Eq. 1 that this accuracy is sufficient to achieve 0.5% accuracy in the modulus measurement. The angle of refraction is determined by the following method. - A SiO2 pattern wafer or a reference chip (cut from a SiO2 pattern wafer) with areas of two different films with contrasting optical reflectance, for example native and 1000 Angstrom SiO2, can be also be used for the measurement. The probe beam scans across the edges in both the x and y direction of a measurement area with the 1000 Angstrom SiO2 residing in an area with native oxide (or vice versa). Since the reflectivity of the laser is different between these two films, two curves are generated from the scans, one for the scan in the x direction and one for the scan in the y direction. By fitting each curve to a complementary error function (based on the assumption that the intensity of the laser beam has a Gaussian distribution), the spot location and size in both the x and y directions can be obtained. The spot locations (x, y) are detected by this method at different positions in the z direction. The angle of incidence (AOI) at
block 445 is calculated by:
AOI=Arc Tan([(x 2 −x 1)2+(y 2 −y 1)2)]1/2/(z 2 −z 1)). - To increase the accuracy in the AOI measurements, one can measure the laser beam location (x, y) for successive six or seven positions in the z direction, and use linear data modeling to reduce noise. With one time setup, these measurements of angle and wavelength can be performed automatically without any user intervention.
- In a presently preferred embodiment a near normal incidence angle may be used. The presently preferred optical metrology system shown at
block 50 operates at a probe angle of incidence of about 40 degrees with respect to normal. As the probe incidence angle becomes smaller (more normal to the film), the angle-dependent term in Eq. 1 becomes less sensitive to uncertainty in the angle, and measurement matching between systems improves. - A discrete Fourier transform (DFT) 460 preferably is used to analyze the frequency content of the signal to obtain the period. The
DFT 460 is well suited to find the frequency of sine waves in high frequency noise. However theDFT 460 is circular in nature and if the beginning and ends do not match, an artifact called ‘spectral leakage’ (smearing of the spectrum) will occur. Another artifact is known as scalloping or ‘picket fence’ effect. This results when the actual frequency of the wave does not correspond with the frequency resolution of theDFT 460. The frequency resolution of aDFT 460 is the ratio of the sampling frequency fs to the number of digitized samples N. Because the signal from the interlayer dielectric is not stationary (i.e. it changes with time), due to sound reflections at interfaces and acoustic damping, it is difficult to arbitrarily increase N by taking longer measurements. However, sinc or frequency preserving interpolation in the frequency domain can be accomplished in the frequency domain by simply zero-padding in the time domain. - To combat the artifacts associated with the
DFT 460, the following algorithm is preferred for use. Recorded data is windowed 465 using a rectangular or ‘boxcar’ function to ensure an integral number of wavelengths present. TheDFT 460 is performed. An ideal filter is applied that has a center frequency equal to the frequency at which the maximum amplitude occurs and narrow bandwidth that is a function of the center frequency. Sinc-interpolation in the frequency domain is performed on the resulting spectrum and a peak refinement algorithm is used to find a high precision value of the frequency of oscillation. - In addition to the oscillatory component coming from the interference of the reflected probe beam components that carry information about the sound velocity, the signal, measured by the optical metrology system contains “background” contribution due to the dissipation of the heat energy delivered by the pump pulse. This component is slowly decaying with time. This component additionally contributes to the signal being non-stationary, and decreases the accuracy obtained using the
DFT 460 method. In addition, this background component depends on the fine details of the optical alignment and contributes to the tool-to-tool variability. Thermal background can be subtracted by fitting an exponential or a polynomial function to the signal, and subtracting it. - To obtain fine frequency resolution and sensitivity of the measurement, the sinc-interpolation is done on the padded dataset, which may contain several times more data points. The sinc-interpolation may become time-consuming due to the increased dataset.
- A faster algorithm comprising the following can be used. The thermal background is subtracted by fitting a low order polynomial function to the raw data. The resulting signal is de-noised by using Ideal frequency filtering. Ideal frequency filtering involves applying the DFT transform 460, finding the maximal intensity frequency within the pre-specified range, removing any component outside the narrow band surrounding the maximal intensity component, and calculating the inverse DFT to obtain the de-noised data in the time domain.
- As this signal consists of a single frequency oscillation, the signals' period can be determined by locating the times of its maxima and minima using a peak refinement algorithm. These times can be obtained with improved resolution over the resolution obtained by time sampling of the signal.
- Separations between the peaks can be averaged over the pairs of peaks, separated by at least kmin counts, to obtain the oscillation period T by using the following formula for a set of M extrema times {ei}, sorted by the peak time in ascending order:
It is important to exclude the close peaks as much as possible, as they contribute more variability to the answer. - Alternatively, by linear fitting peak times vs. peak number, the slope and the intercept may be obtained. The slope equals one half of the oscillation period.
- In the situation where the ILD film is thinner, and only a few, or no oscillation periods can be observed before the first sound reflection from the bottom of the film, the above methodology may not be adequate. In this situation MUSIC or DMUSIC algorithms can be used, or alternatively some non-linear fitting of the signal with the single frequency sinusoid, optimizing its amplitude, phase and frequency to obtain the best fit to the data. The goal function of such optimization can be either the usual Fit Error defined as a sum of the squares of the differences between the measured and fitted signal, or the cross-correlation of the fitted and measured signals.
- Density can be determined 470 by measuring the amplitude change between the oscillations incident and reflected at the dielectric/Si interface by the following:
R=B/A=(Z substrate −Z dielectric)/(Z substrate +Z dielectric) (Eq. 4)
ρ=Z/v, (Eq. 5)
where R is the reflection coefficient, A is the incident wave amplitude, B is the reflected wave amplitude, and Z is the characteristic acoustic impedance. It is assumed that the characteristic acoustic impedance is known for the Si substrate. For the Young's modulus or the Bulk modulus calculations, the published value of the Poisson's ratio can be used. - It is noted that another technique to address the problem solved by the teachings of this invention includes a narrow-bandwidth/long pulse system. The 100 fsec laser pulses generated by titanium sapphire lasers typically have bandwidths on the order of 10 nm at 800 nm and doubled pulses have bandwidths around 3 nm. Longer pulse widths, around 1 psec, may be used to practice this technique and these pulses have significantly smaller bandwidths (<1 nm). The smaller bandwidth improves the accuracy of the technique via Eq. 1 by limiting the range of wavelengths.
- Another alternative includes the use of a derivative mode modulus measurement system, as the oscillatory nature of the measurement signals lends these measurements to a derivative type of measurement (see, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,748,318). The result is an improved signal to noise ratio, leading to improved repeatability and shorter measurement time (higher throughput).
- A further alternative includes the use of tilt correction. The wafer tilt relative to the optics head contributes to uncertainty in the angle as calculated in Eq. 1. Such tilts can be different depending on measurement location across the sample due to sample, chuck, or stage non-uniformities. A tilt measurement may be performed at each site to correct for these effects, for example using a standard laser diode and position sensitive detector.
- Additionally, one or more optimized “check samples” (for example SiO2/Si, bare Si, and SiN/Si) with known acoustic and optical properties may be used to calibrate and/or monitor multiple optical metrology systems for improved repeatability and/or matching between systems. Such samples may be periodically loaded into the tool or included inside the tool and periodically monitored.
- Another alternative includes the use of a multiple angle probe beam system. Measuring the sample at multiple known probe angles allows for an independent calculation of refractive index n in Eq. 1. This allows the system to uniquely discriminate between process variations that may impact sound velocity from those that may impact refractive index.
- A further alternative includes matched spot size and pump/probe beam intensities. Previous work suggests that most film measurement results have a small empirical dependence on pump and probe spot sizes and powers. Likewise, some degree of control of these system parameters may be preferred for modulus measurement matching. Additionally, reducing uncertainty in the incident probe angle with an extremely flat chuck (<0.01 deg) leads to improved tool matching through Eqs. 1 and 2.
- Film temperature compensation is another alternative. According to the experimental literature on temperature dependence of sound velocity, many films have temperature coefficients on the order of 10−4 1/C. Therefore, to the extent that the film temperature is not similar between tools a difference in the measured sound velocity is expected. Temperature differences may be due to ambient temperature or temperature rise in the film as a result of the absorption of the laser pulses. A calibration table may be created to match tools for each material based upon the film's velocity and refractive index temperature coefficients, an accurate measurement of ambient temperature, and a calculation of film temperature rise on the basis of the measured quantities: pump and probe laser powers, spot sizes, and film reflectance.
- Further, although described in terms of preferred embodiments, it should be realized that a number of modifications of the teachings of this invention may occur to one skilled in the art and will still fall within the scope of this invention. By example, the method is not limited to dielectric blanket films; it can also be applied to measure an effective value for the elastic moduli of metal/dielectric pattern structures such as in Cu/ILD damascene interconnects.
- Thus, while described above in the context of presently preferred embodiments, it should be appreciated that these embodiments are not to be construed in a limiting sense upon the practice of this invention.
Claims (36)
AOI=Arc Tan([(x 2 −x 1)2+(y 2 −y 1)2)]1/2/(z 2 −z 1)).
AOI=Arc Tan([(x 2 −x 1)2+(y 2 −y 1)2)]1/2/(z 2 −z 1)).
Priority Applications (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/960,351 US7019845B1 (en) | 2004-10-06 | 2004-10-06 | Measuring elastic moduli of dielectric thin films using an optical metrology system |
JP2007535661A JP4918634B2 (en) | 2004-10-06 | 2004-10-07 | Measurement of elastic modulus of dielectric thin film using optical measurement system |
PCT/US2004/033405 WO2006041493A1 (en) | 2004-10-06 | 2004-10-07 | Measuring elastic moduli of dielectric thin films using an optical metrology system |
EP04794682.7A EP1817542B9 (en) | 2004-10-06 | 2004-10-07 | Measuring elastic modulus of dielectric thin films using an optical metrology system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/960,351 US7019845B1 (en) | 2004-10-06 | 2004-10-06 | Measuring elastic moduli of dielectric thin films using an optical metrology system |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US7019845B1 US7019845B1 (en) | 2006-03-28 |
US20060072120A1 true US20060072120A1 (en) | 2006-04-06 |
Family
ID=36084661
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/960,351 Active 2024-11-10 US7019845B1 (en) | 2004-10-06 | 2004-10-06 | Measuring elastic moduli of dielectric thin films using an optical metrology system |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7019845B1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1817542B9 (en) |
JP (1) | JP4918634B2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2006041493A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2012103440A1 (en) * | 2011-01-28 | 2012-08-02 | Rudolph Technologies, Inc. | Position sensitive detection optimization |
Families Citing this family (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR2887334B1 (en) * | 2005-06-20 | 2007-08-24 | Centre Nat Rech Scient | DEVICE AND METHOD FOR WAVELENGTH EFFECT CHARACTERIZATION CHARACTERIZATION IN A PHOTOACOUSTIC SYSTEM |
DE102005047200B4 (en) * | 2005-10-01 | 2021-05-06 | Carl Zeiss Microscopy Gmbh | Method for correcting a control of an optical scanner in a device for scanning imaging of a sample and device for generating an image of a sample by scanning the sample |
AU2007292295B2 (en) * | 2006-09-06 | 2013-06-06 | Immunoforge Co., Ltd. | Fusion peptide therapeutic compositions |
JP2013217909A (en) * | 2012-03-11 | 2013-10-24 | Canon Inc | Method and apparatus for calculating refractive index, material for calculating refractive index, and tomography apparatus |
US9165579B1 (en) | 2014-09-26 | 2015-10-20 | Western Digital (Fremont), Llc | Air bearing area configuration for reducing flying height hump across a stroke |
DE102016113068A1 (en) * | 2016-07-15 | 2018-01-18 | Carl Zeiss Microscopy Gmbh | A method and apparatus for determining the location of an optical interface along a first direction |
CN108872153B (en) * | 2018-08-20 | 2020-12-11 | 南京理工大学 | Method for measuring optical uniformity of parallel flat plate based on non-uniform Fourier transform |
CN111551503B (en) * | 2020-04-29 | 2023-04-07 | 南京理工大学 | Laser ultrasonic system and method for detecting elastic modulus of material in non-contact manner |
US11668644B2 (en) | 2021-03-30 | 2023-06-06 | Onto Innovation Inc. | Opto-acoustic measurement of a transparent film stack |
Citations (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4710030A (en) * | 1985-05-17 | 1987-12-01 | Bw Brown University Research Foundation | Optical generator and detector of stress pulses |
US5706094A (en) * | 1995-08-25 | 1998-01-06 | Brown University Research Foundation | Ultrafast optical technique for the characterization of altered materials |
US5748318A (en) * | 1996-01-23 | 1998-05-05 | Brown University Research Foundation | Optical stress generator and detector |
US5844684A (en) * | 1997-02-28 | 1998-12-01 | Brown University Research Foundation | Optical method for determining the mechanical properties of a material |
US5864393A (en) * | 1997-07-30 | 1999-01-26 | Brown University Research Foundation | Optical method for the determination of stress in thin films |
US6008906A (en) * | 1995-08-25 | 1999-12-28 | Brown University Research Foundation | Optical method for the characterization of the electrical properties of semiconductors and insulating films |
US6016202A (en) * | 1997-06-30 | 2000-01-18 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Method and apparatus for measuring material properties using transient-grating spectroscopy |
US6025918A (en) * | 1998-07-07 | 2000-02-15 | Brown University Research Foundation | Apparatus and method for measurement of the mechanical properties and electromigration of thin films |
US6038026A (en) * | 1998-07-07 | 2000-03-14 | Brown University Research Foundation | Apparatus and method for the determination of grain size in thin films |
US6504618B2 (en) * | 2001-03-21 | 2003-01-07 | Rudolph Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for decreasing thermal loading and roughness sensitivity in a photoacoustic film thickness measurement system |
US6621582B2 (en) * | 2000-09-11 | 2003-09-16 | Rudolph Technologies, Inc. | Optical metrology system and method employing laser-server supplying laser energy to distributed slave metrology heads |
Family Cites Families (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US620841A (en) | 1899-03-07 | Paper-feeding machine | ||
JPH04332990A (en) * | 1991-05-02 | 1992-11-19 | Fujitsu Ten Ltd | Method for adding partition to dat for data storage |
JPH0726816B2 (en) * | 1991-05-23 | 1995-03-29 | 新日本製鐵株式会社 | Simultaneous measurement of transparent thin film thickness and sound velocity |
US6175416B1 (en) | 1996-08-06 | 2001-01-16 | Brown University Research Foundation | Optical stress generator and detector |
JP4442843B2 (en) * | 2000-08-11 | 2010-03-31 | 株式会社トプコン | Refractive index measuring device for test lens |
US6694284B1 (en) | 2000-09-20 | 2004-02-17 | Kla-Tencor Technologies Corp. | Methods and systems for determining at least four properties of a specimen |
JP2003232610A (en) * | 2002-02-06 | 2003-08-22 | Meiyuu Giken Kk | Method of measuring micro displacement |
JP2004163366A (en) * | 2002-11-15 | 2004-06-10 | Nikon Corp | Measuring method, method and apparatus for holding substrate, and aligner |
JP2004198627A (en) * | 2002-12-17 | 2004-07-15 | Sumitomo Electric Ind Ltd | Optical axis measuring method, optical axis adjusting method, optical device assembling method, optical axis measuring system, optical axis adjusting system, and optical device assembly system |
-
2004
- 2004-10-06 US US10/960,351 patent/US7019845B1/en active Active
- 2004-10-07 EP EP04794682.7A patent/EP1817542B9/en active Active
- 2004-10-07 WO PCT/US2004/033405 patent/WO2006041493A1/en active Application Filing
- 2004-10-07 JP JP2007535661A patent/JP4918634B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4710030A (en) * | 1985-05-17 | 1987-12-01 | Bw Brown University Research Foundation | Optical generator and detector of stress pulses |
US5706094A (en) * | 1995-08-25 | 1998-01-06 | Brown University Research Foundation | Ultrafast optical technique for the characterization of altered materials |
US6008906A (en) * | 1995-08-25 | 1999-12-28 | Brown University Research Foundation | Optical method for the characterization of the electrical properties of semiconductors and insulating films |
US5748318A (en) * | 1996-01-23 | 1998-05-05 | Brown University Research Foundation | Optical stress generator and detector |
US5844684A (en) * | 1997-02-28 | 1998-12-01 | Brown University Research Foundation | Optical method for determining the mechanical properties of a material |
US6016202A (en) * | 1997-06-30 | 2000-01-18 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Method and apparatus for measuring material properties using transient-grating spectroscopy |
US5864393A (en) * | 1997-07-30 | 1999-01-26 | Brown University Research Foundation | Optical method for the determination of stress in thin films |
US6025918A (en) * | 1998-07-07 | 2000-02-15 | Brown University Research Foundation | Apparatus and method for measurement of the mechanical properties and electromigration of thin films |
US6038026A (en) * | 1998-07-07 | 2000-03-14 | Brown University Research Foundation | Apparatus and method for the determination of grain size in thin films |
US6621582B2 (en) * | 2000-09-11 | 2003-09-16 | Rudolph Technologies, Inc. | Optical metrology system and method employing laser-server supplying laser energy to distributed slave metrology heads |
US6504618B2 (en) * | 2001-03-21 | 2003-01-07 | Rudolph Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for decreasing thermal loading and roughness sensitivity in a photoacoustic film thickness measurement system |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2012103440A1 (en) * | 2011-01-28 | 2012-08-02 | Rudolph Technologies, Inc. | Position sensitive detection optimization |
US20140103188A1 (en) * | 2011-01-28 | 2014-04-17 | Manjusha Mehendale | Position sensitive detection optimization |
US9140601B2 (en) * | 2011-01-28 | 2015-09-22 | Rudolph Technologies, Inc. | Position sensitive detection optimization |
TWI548869B (en) * | 2011-01-28 | 2016-09-11 | 魯道夫科技股份有限公司 | Method and apparatus for optimizing signal to noise ratio in an optical sensor, and sensor adjustment mechanism |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP1817542A1 (en) | 2007-08-15 |
JP2008516229A (en) | 2008-05-15 |
EP1817542A4 (en) | 2009-11-18 |
EP1817542B9 (en) | 2016-09-21 |
WO2006041493A1 (en) | 2006-04-20 |
US7019845B1 (en) | 2006-03-28 |
JP4918634B2 (en) | 2012-04-18 |
EP1817542B1 (en) | 2016-04-13 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7253887B2 (en) | Metrology system with spectroscopic ellipsometer and photoacoustic measurements | |
US6348967B1 (en) | Method and device for measuring the thickness of opaque and transparent films | |
US7782471B2 (en) | Optical method for the characterization of laterally-patterned samples in integrated circuits | |
US6175416B1 (en) | Optical stress generator and detector | |
US7050178B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for increasing signal to noise ratio in a photoacoustic film thickness measurement system | |
US10113861B2 (en) | Optical system and methods for the determination of stress in a substrate | |
US7019845B1 (en) | Measuring elastic moduli of dielectric thin films using an optical metrology system | |
US6393915B1 (en) | Method and device for simultaneously measuring multiple properties of multilayer films | |
JP2006513418A (en) | Film thickness measuring apparatus and method using improved high-speed Fourier transform | |
JP7413429B2 (en) | OPTO acousto-optic measurement of transparent film laminate |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: RUDOLPH TECHNOLGIES, INC., NEW JERSEY Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:LEARY, SEAN P.;TAS, GURAY;MORATH, CHRISTOPHER J.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:015881/0815;SIGNING DATES FROM 20040924 TO 20041004 Owner name: INTEL CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MILLER, ANDRE D.;ANTONELLI, GEORGE A.;LUDKE, JAMIE I.;REEL/FRAME:015881/0841;SIGNING DATES FROM 20040927 TO 20040928 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES, INC., NEW JERSEY Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:INTEL CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:017790/0171 Effective date: 20050204 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES, INC., NEW JERSEY Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:INTEL CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:017765/0565 Effective date: 20050125 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1553) Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ONTO INNOVATION INC., MASSACHUSETTS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:053117/0623 Effective date: 20200430 |