US20060018782A1 - Media mixture for improved residual compressive stress in a product - Google Patents

Media mixture for improved residual compressive stress in a product Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20060018782A1
US20060018782A1 US11/209,461 US20946105A US2006018782A1 US 20060018782 A1 US20060018782 A1 US 20060018782A1 US 20946105 A US20946105 A US 20946105A US 2006018782 A1 US2006018782 A1 US 2006018782A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
media
carrier
carrier medium
abrasive
size
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/209,461
Inventor
Steve Hoffman
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
MIKRONITE TECHNOLOGIES GROUP Inc
Mikronite Tech Group Inc
Original Assignee
Mikronite Tech Group Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US09/965,162 external-priority patent/US20020078813A1/en
Application filed by Mikronite Tech Group Inc filed Critical Mikronite Tech Group Inc
Priority to US11/209,461 priority Critical patent/US20060018782A1/en
Assigned to MIKRONITE TECHNOLOGIES GROUP INC. reassignment MIKRONITE TECHNOLOGIES GROUP INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: HOFFMAN, STEVE E.
Publication of US20060018782A1 publication Critical patent/US20060018782A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D7/00Modifying the physical properties of iron or steel by deformation
    • C21D7/02Modifying the physical properties of iron or steel by deformation by cold working
    • C21D7/04Modifying the physical properties of iron or steel by deformation by cold working of the surface
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B24GRINDING; POLISHING
    • B24CABRASIVE OR RELATED BLASTING WITH PARTICULATE MATERIAL
    • B24C1/00Methods for use of abrasive blasting for producing particular effects; Use of auxiliary equipment in connection with such methods
    • B24C1/10Methods for use of abrasive blasting for producing particular effects; Use of auxiliary equipment in connection with such methods for compacting surfaces, e.g. shot-peening
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B24GRINDING; POLISHING
    • B24CABRASIVE OR RELATED BLASTING WITH PARTICULATE MATERIAL
    • B24C11/00Selection of abrasive materials or additives for abrasive blasts

Abstract

A media mixtures is disclosed for imparting compressive residual stress on a work piece in a high energy centrifugal processor. The media mixture includes carrier media, preferably made from a fractured grain product. The carrier medium having an average size of at least about 0.05 inches and a hardness. A plurality of abrasive particles are mixed with the carrier media, Each particle has a size that is smaller than the carrier medium and has a hardness that is greater than the hardness of the carrier medium.

Description

    RELATED APPLICATION
  • The present application is a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/965,162, filed Sep. 27, 2001 which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/236,001, filed Sep. 28, 2000. Both applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. The present application is also related to and claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application 60/604,555, filed Aug. 26, 2004, entitled “Process for Forming Spherical Components”, which is also incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to a media mixture for forming a product with a surface layer having increased residual compressive stress.
  • BACKGROUND
  • Residual stress is a stress that exists within a part without any external load, such as an applied force or thermal gradient. These stresses are induced during the manufacturing process, for example, due to working of the part, surface treatment of the part or temperature changes during part formation. Residual stresses within a part can be tensile or compressive. Most conventional manufacturing processes tend to induce residual tensile stresses into the component being fabricated.
  • It is well known that tensile stress tends to reduce the mechanical performance of materials. For example, cracks that form within a part tend to propagate more readily under the influence of tensile residual stresses in the part. These stresses act upon the crack causing the crack tip to extend through the part. Fatigue or cyclic loading in the vicinity of the crack can accelerate the crack propagation, which could lead to catastrophic failure of the component. It is also known that residual tensile stresses can cause corrosion in a part to propagate into cracking. Thus, residual tensile stresses in a component are generally not favorable.
  • One known way of reducing crack propagation in component is by inducing a compressive residual stress in the vicinity of a crack tip. The compressive stress tends to inhibit crack growth, thus improving the fatigue life of the component. However, to date, the processes for introducing compressive residual stress in a part have been limited to shot and hammer peening. The drawback with both these processes is that they produce relatively large, inconsistent compressive stress spots in the component. FIGS. 1A-1D illustrate the effect of conventional peening on a metallic surface. FIG. 1A schematically illustrates the granular arrangement in a manufactured part. The grains are generally under a tensile residual stress. As a shot hits the surface, it deforms it locally, inducing compression into the material. See FIG. 1B. The force of the shot causes localized plastic deformation, resulting in a small area of subsurface residual compression.
  • Due to the size of the shots used in conventional shot peening, the localized areas of compression are not consistent. As such, the resulting product will generally include mixtures of tensile and compressive residual stresses at the surface. See FIG. 1C As such, in the event that a crack develops in between shot peened zones, those cracks can propagate.
  • In products that have tight internal radii, for example at the root of gear teeth and in notched materials (which is generically shown in FIG. 1D), it is generally not possible for the surface to be completely peened. As such, the very points where there are high stress concentrations (e.g., notches and radiused corners) are the same places where shot peening cannot reach and, thus, cannot assist in reducing crack propagation.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • A media mixtures is disclosed for imparting compressive residual stress on a work piece in a high energy centrifugal processor. The media mixture includes carrier media, preferably made from a fractured grain product. The carrier medium having an average size of at least about 0.05 inches and a hardness. A plurality of abrasive particles are mixed with the carrier media, Each particle has a size that is smaller than the carrier medium and has a hardness that is greater than the hardness of the carrier medium.
  • The abrasive particles preferably covering on average at least about 50% of the carrier medium. The abrasive particles preferably having a size of at least approximately 1000 grit. The abrasive particles being attached to the carrier medium preferably with a lubricant.
  • The abrasive particles are preferably selected from a group consisting of aluminum oxide, silicon carbide, tungsten carbide and diamond.
  • In one embodiment of the invention, a plurality of solid additives are added to the media. The solid additives each have a size that is larger than the abrasive and a density that is greater than the carrier medium. The solid additives are preferably substantially spherical in shape.
  • The foregoing and other features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent in light of the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments thereof, as illustrated in the accompanying figures. As will be realized, the invention is capable of modifications in various respects, all without departing from the invention. Accordingly, the drawings and the description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature, and not as restrictive.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • For the purpose of illustrating the invention, the drawings show a form of the invention which is presently preferred. However, it should be understood that this invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown in the drawings.
  • FIGS. 1A-1D schematically illustrate the application of conventional peening on a material surface.
  • FIG. 2A schematically illustrates the path of a media particle as it interacts with the surface of a work piece in a centrifugal processor.
  • FIGS. 2B and 2C schematically illustrate the resulting residual compressive stress profile produced in a work piece using a media mixture according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 schematically illustrates a carrier medium coated with hard abrasive particles in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a graph comparing the surface roughness between an unprocessed bearing race and a processed bearing race.
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • It has been determined that centrifugal processors, such as those available from Mikronite Technologies, Inc., and disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,355,638, 5,848,929, 6,599,176, 6,733,375 and PCT/US03/21218, afford an almost perfect slide relationship between the part being processed and the media in the processing vessel that is used to modify the surface of the part. The forces imposed on the media within a centrifugal processor are such that the media contacts the work piece at an angle of incidence that is typically not perpendicular to the work piece surface. This produces a desirable slide relationship since it tends to reduce or eliminate cumulative and inconsistent impact forces that plague the uniformity of surface and sub-surface treatment in other high compression processes such as hammering or peening. The sliding signature of the media along the part surface produces a short (as compared to the total length of the piece) substantially linear scratch on the surface. The angle of incidence of the media results in applied forces that are not only normal to the surface of the part, but also parallel to the surface. In contract, shot peening and hammering are designed to apply a perpendicular or normal force onto the material. Accordingly these methods produces only impact forces with a localized, essentially point compression induced in the part.
  • The scratching of the surface of a material in a centrifugal processor results in substantially entire surface contact. Furthermore, the lateral of side motion of the media on the surface produces molecular movement of the work piece material, as opposed to simple crushing that is produced by peening. It has been determined that when the movement of the media is highly accelerated, the result is that the scratching produces substantially uniform and contiguous surface and subsurface (i.e., layer) of residual compression in the work piece. FIG. 2A schematically illustrates the resulting surface layer compression that results in a part subjected to centrifugal processing. An exemplary trajectory T of a media M is shown. The media skips off the surface at high speed, thus producing the highly desirable scratching and subsurface compression. The fluidized media environment created by the centrifugal processors described in the above referenced patents produces multidirectional scratches across the entire surface of the work piece, which produces a substantially uniform surface finish and subsurface compression, see FIG. 2B, and permits the application of compressive stress in many remote regions, see FIG. 2C.
  • Experimentation has yielded several media blends that control depth and intensity of compression, resulting in optimal compressive residual stress profiles, and no substantial undesirable direct impacts.
  • In one embodiment, the media 10 is composed of a small grain product 12. Various grain or similar products can be used in the media, such as organic grain products that can be fractured. The fracturing permits further reach of the grain surfaces into tight corners. Some preferred forms of grain are walnut shells and corn. The weight of the grain product will vary depending on the degree and length of time of processing desired, the material being processed, and size of the product being processed relative to the vessel size, etc. In one exemplary embodiment, the grain has a weight of between about 15 and 35 pounds per cubic foot of weight per volume. More preferably the weight is about 26 pounds per cubic foot of weight per volume. The media at this weight will typically have a size (cross-sectional dimension) of about 0.05 inches or larger, usually graded through screen separation. The maximum preferred media size is 0.50 inches. The preferred media will range in size from about 0.05 inches to about 0.25 inches. The preferred minimum size used in the media mixture is about 0.05 inches. While smaller particles can be used, the result is that the processing time becomes excessively long. However, as will be apparent the size of the part being processed will, to some extent, impact the size of the media selected
  • In order to enhance the surface finishing, the surface of the media 10 is preferably coated with a hard particle (abrasive) 14 of a smaller size, for example about 1000 grit or larger. FIG. 3 schematically illustrates a carrier medium 12 with abrasive particles 14 on the surface of the grain 12. Since abrasive is being carried by the grain (i.e., the grain is the carrier) 12, there is less volume needed of abrasive. Preferably, the abrasive 14 covers, on average, more than 50% of the carrier medium 12 (e.g., grain). More preferably, the abrasive 14 covers 50%-100% of the surface of the carrier medium 12. In one embodiment, the abrasive covers between about 80% to about 90% of the surface of the carrier medium. The hard particles may be, for example, aluminum oxide, silicon carbide, tungsten carbide, or diamond. The present invention is not, however, limited to this selection of hard materials. On the contrary, any material can be used depending on the processing desired, and more preferably any material that is harder than the carrier can be used. Also, more than one type of abrasive particle and carrier medium can be used in a media mixture.
  • In one embodiment, the abrasive 14 is attached to the carrier 12. The attachment can be through various means. For example, in an exemplary arrangement, a lubricant, such as thin viscosity oil is added to the carrier medium 12. The lubricant is preferably selected so that it soaks into the carrier and/or abrasive, without muting the facets of the hard abrasive particle. The lubricant coats the carrier medium and creates a small degree of surface adhesion which holds the abrasive onto the carrier medium. While the exemplary embodiment discussed above coats the abrasive onto the carrier medium (e.g., grain) it is also contemplated that the abrasive may simply be mixed with the carrier medium.
  • The carrier medium preferably has a jagged shape which forms traction against adjacent carrier media, causing the carrier media to cascade around inside the vessel. The carrier medium provides the support structure for carrying the hard (but typically lighter) abrasive particles into the work piece. As a consequence, the weight of an individual abrasive particle is not germane to calculating the contacting force. Rather the entire multiplier of g forces are the determinant in the ultimate benefit achieved. It should be readily apparent that the carrier media need not be jagged. The hard particles themselves can provide the frictional interface with adjacent pieces of media. Sharper edges are preferred for the hard particles since such edges provide more of an effect on the surface of the work piece.
  • It is preferred that the carrier medium has a lower hardness than the abrasive particles. As such, the carrier medium will bend or flex when it contacts the work piece, thereby limiting damage to the work piece.
  • In testing, this blend of media was used in one of the centrifugal processors described above and processed at speeds that generated accelerations of approximately 16 g's or more. In one exemplary embodiment, the processor was operated at about 30 g's on a work piece of steel for at least approximately 20 minutes, and achieved a compressive residual stress of at least approximately 175 ksi substantially across the surface of the work piece and to a subsurface depth of approximately 0.012 inches with a reduction in stress levels as depth increased.
  • Variations in media composition have also been tested. In one embodiment, the media composition was modified to include larger solids and defined non-antagonistic shapes, such as spheres. The solids (or additives) are dense compositions and usually larger then the carrier media. The solids generally do not have any sharp edges so as to minimize damage to the work piece. The solids and/or non-antagonistic shapes do not need to have any particular density, only that they are preferably heavier than the carrier media. The large size of the dense solids has been found to enhance the surface compressive residual stress to over 200 ksi, but the larger size also typically results in a reduction in the depth of the compressive stress that is imposed on the material. This is likely due to a reduced angle of incidence caused by the heavier material, moving closer to 180 degrees or a path that is parallel to the surface of the material.
  • The harder surface benefit helps to create a differentiation in parts operating in an articulating (e.g., intermeshing) manner with parts of similar materials untreated. For example, in untreated gears made from identical materials, as the gears rotate and mesh, there is a chance that, if there is no oxide layer on the surface of the materials, the mating surfaces will weld (cold fuse) to one another. This is sometimes referred to as a “metallic bond”. As the gears continue to rotate, the weld results in a portion of one or both of the gears to break off. To prevent this, some gear trains use gears that are made from different materials. The present invention eliminates this problem by processing one gear so as to produce a density and stress level in the gear surface that is sufficiently distinct from the surface of the mating gear so as to preclude or reduce chemical failure modes (such as galling, cold welding, and tearing) that occurs when identical metals contact one under high pressure and/or temperature conditions.
  • Another problem that the present invention solves is corrosion that can develop from anodic potential in intermeshing or contacting metallic parts. As electrodes transfer from anodes to cathodes, they bring with them oxides. This produces corrosive oxidation. As noted above, the processing of the surface using the present invention to create a substantially uniform electrical surface which reduces or minimizes the occurrence of anodic potential.
  • The larger dense media additives can, if too large, create a relationship of equal inertial tendency to resist movement, resulting in intensified collisions with damaging results. Thus, in order to control the compressive stress being imparted without work piece damage, it is desirable to have the overall weight of the individual pieces of media additive not exceed 10% of the work piece. The total of all additives are not cumulative and tends to have no relationship to destructive effects.
  • In one preferred embodiment, spherical ductile media additives such as metallic balls, can prove most effective when factoring damage aversion as a primary criteria. Small metal balls, having a maximum size which permits contact with the tightest regions of the work piece being processed, have been tested in total media concentrations of 20%, 40%, and 50% (i.e., media concentrations=amount of additives/(amount of carrier+abrasive+additives) All concentrations provided beneficial results. It should be noted that the inclusion of metallic balls in the media mixture increases the temperature during processing due to the agitation. As such, the smallest concentration of the metallic ball additive is desirable to avoid rapid temperature rise within the processing vessel.
  • In cases where heat elevation is desirable, such as for annealing or hardening requirements, larger concentrations of metallic balls can induce those effects without any risk of damage. Conduction of heat in large concentration ball-on-ball contact, and forced convection during agitation of the fluidized media maintain extremely uniform controlled temperatures (albeit elevated). External devices for controlling the internal atmosphere within the processing vessel can also be used to control the process parameters.
  • In one embodiment, grain media was mixed with metallic balls to create the media mixture. The grain is preferably smaller than the metallic balls. In this embodiment, there is preferably no abrasive on the grain, although it can be added if desired. The grain media provides a support geometry for the metallic sphere not possible with the void spaces that would otherwise exist in a sphere-on-sphere media. Spheres, by design, have less surface interlocking then more cubic, random, or polygonal shapes. Although this aids in part slide and roll off of touching pieces, it has a greater likelihood of collapse in a solely ball-stacked-on-ball structure. As such, to use metallic balls without a support media results in reduced stability, inertia, and time of contact, regardless of density or size.
  • Testing has established that use of the high energy centrifugal processors described above in combination with the media can enhance even conventionally processed gears. For example, it has been determined that the present invention can be used to significantly increase the compressive residual stress in conventionally carburized products, including pinion gears. The process is described in detail in co-pending application Ser. No. ______ , entitled “Sub-Surface Enhanced Gear” (Attorney Docket No. 9436-40US (209417)), which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
  • Referring to Test Protocol 1 shown below, a carburized pinion gear was measured before and after application of the high energy finishing process. Prior to application, the pinion had a compressive residual stress at its surface of 122.7 ksi as measured using X-ray diffraction. After application of the process according to the present invention, the compressive residual stress was up to 204.3 ksi. That is a 66% increase. As shown in the chart, the increase in compressive residual stress was consistently measured down to a depth of 0.015 inches. On average, there was a 50% increase in compressive residual stress through the depth.
  • Table 1A shows that the present invention can be used to produce a 67% decrease in the surface roughness of the carburized pinion gear as measured in terms of Ra. Ra is the Arithmetic Mean Deviation of the roughness profile. This is a tremendous improvement in the surface roughness of a conventional pinion gear. As shown the peaks on the surface of a conventional carburized pinion gear were on average 34 μin. When these high peaks break off during use of the pinion, they tend to cause damage within the gearbox. The present invention addresses this problem by significantly reducing the height of the peaks, essentially evening out the surface. This minimizes damage to the pinion gear and the gearbox.
  • Test Protocols 2-5 (shown below) were conducted on cutting flutes made from different materials. These tests show similar beneficial results as Test Protocol 1 discussed above.
  • Test Protocol 6 was performed on a bearing race made from E52100 steel. Again there was an increase in the compressive residual stress from 4% to 72.2%. Also shown in FIG. 4 is a chart of the Ra on the surface of the bearing race. As can be readily seen, the unprocessed part had significant variations over the surface resulting in an Ra of 10.5 μin. These variations result in potential hot spots where faults (e.g. cracks) can start. Furthermore, the variations in the surface contour generate vibrations that result in vibratory loading on the race and increased acoustic noise. The processed bearing race according to the present invention had a significant decrease in the surface roughness producing an Ra of 0.91 μin.
  • Test Results
  • The present invention has been applied to several specimens. The following summarizes the test results.
  • Test Protocol—1
    • Material—4140 Steel—Carburized Pinion Gear
    • Processing time—approximately 45 minutes at about 30 g's
    • Depth reading—surface to 0.015 inches
  • Location—measurement at same point but at different depths
    TABLE 1
    Compressive Residual Stress v. Depth - Pinion Gear
    Stress (ksi)
    Depth Gear U Gear M Percentage
    (inches) (Unprocessed) (Processed) Delta Increase
    0 −122.7 −204.3 −81.6 66.5%
    0.0005 −86.2 −124.6 −38.4 44.5%
    0.001 −59.8 −95.7 −35.9 60.0%
    0.002 −32.3 −59.8 −27.5 85.1%
    0.004 −25.3 −37.6 −12.3 48.6%
    0.007 −32.1 −42.7 −10.6 33.0%
    0.01 −27 −43.3 −16.3 60.4%
    0.015 −49.1 −51.4 −2.3 4.7%
  • TABLE 1A
    Ra on Surface - Pinion Gear
    Gear U Gear M Percentage
    (Unprocessed) (Processed) Decrease
    34 μin 11 μin 67.6%
  • Test Protocol—2
    • Material—imported High Strength Steel ½ End Mill 2 Flutes—Solid carbide
    • Processing time—6 minutes at 30 g's
    • Depth reading—surface
  • Location inside flute, 3 measurements at same point, but at different angles
    TABLE 2
    Unprocessed Processed Percentage
    Location (ksi) (ksi) Increase
    90° −20 −40.48 39%
    45° −11.2 −32.66 190% 
    315°  −27.27 −39.36 44%
  • Test Protocol—3
    • Material—American High Strength Cobalt Steel ½ End Mill 2 Flutes—Square end
    • Processing time—6 minutes at 30 g's
    • Depth reading—surface
  • Location inside flute, 3 measurements at same point, but at different angles
    TABLE 3
    Unprocessed Processed Percentage
    Location (ksi) (ksi) Increase
    90° −95.11 −115.01 20%
    45° −46.6 −94.71 104% 
    315°  −125.03 −130.41  4%
  • Test Protocol—4
    • Material—American Solid Carbide 7/16 End Mill 2 Flutes—Solid carbide
    • Processing time—6 minutes at 30 g's
    • Depth reading—surface
  • Location inside flute, 3 measurements at same point, but at different angles
    TABLE 4
    Unprocessed Processed Percentage
    Location (ksi) (ksi) Increase
    90° −79.89 −114.58 44%
    45° −114.48 −129.82 13%
    315°  −16.25 −68.53 325% 
  • Test Protocol—5
    • Material—American Hob Steel 2 Piece Test/(DP40PAZOWD, 057-1°21′), M42 Tin Coated
    • Processing time—8 minutes at 30 g's
    • Depth reading—surface
  • Location—1 measurement
    TABLE 5
    Unprocessed Processed Percentage
    Location (ksi) (ksi) Increase
    90° −8.2 −17.7 115%
  • Test Protocol—6
    • Material—E52100 Steel—Bearing Race
    • Processing time—6 minutes at 30 g's
    • Depth reading—surface to 0.02 inches
  • Location—measurement at same point, but at different depths
    TABLE 6
    E52100 Steel - Bearing Race
    Unprocessed Processed
    Depth Stress Depth Stress Percentage
    (inches) (ksi) (inches) (ksi) Increase
    0 −37.18 0 −57.95 55.8%
    0.0005 −40.08 0.0006 −46.2 15.2%
    0.001 −37.79 0.001 −39.3   4%
    0.0019 −35.55 0.0021 −41.11 15.6%
    0.0042 −32.08 0.004 −40.62 26.6%
    0.0068 −29.4 0.0069 −30.81  4.8%
    0.0104 −16.85 0.0098 −29.02 72.2%
    0.0151 −14.79 0.015 −20.53 38.8%
    0.02 −9.27 0.021 −12.93 39.5%
  • Accordingly, the present invention results in improved compressive residual stress in parts. This increased compressive residual stress helps to prevent and/or reduce the propagation of cracking in the products. Also, as discussed above, the media produces a product with a very low surface roughness. This results in reduced loading on the part, including thermal loads, as well as reduced vibrations.
  • Although the invention has been described and illustrated with respect to the exemplary embodiments thereof, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that the foregoing and various other changes, omissions and additions may be made therein and thereto, without parting from the spirit and scope of the present invention.

Claims (18)

1. A media for imparting compressive residual stress on a work piece in a high energy centrifugal processor, the media comprising:
a plurality of carrier medium, each having an average size of at least about 0.05 inches, and a hardness; and
a plurality of abrasive particles, each particle having a size that is smaller than the average size of the carrier media and having a hardness that is greater than the hardness of the carrier media.
2. A media according to claim 1 wherein the size of the particles is approximately 1000 grit.
3. A media according to claim 1 wherein the carrier medium has a size of between about 0.05 inches and about 0.50 inches.
4. A media according to claim 4 wherein the carrier medium is made from a grain product.
5. A media according to claim 1 wherein a plurality of the abrasive particles are attached to each carrier medium.
6. A media according to claim 5 wherein on average at least 50% of the surface area of each carrier is coated with abrasive particles.
7. A media according to claim 5 wherein the abrasive particles are attached to the carrier medium with a lubricant.
8. A media according to claim 1 wherein at least some of the abrasive particles are selected from a group consisting of aluminum oxide, silicon carbide, tungsten carbide and diamond.
9. A media according to claim 1 further comprising a plurality of solid additives in the media, the solid additives each having a size that is larger than the abrasive and a density greater than the carrier medium.
10. A media according to claim 9 wherein the solid additives are substantially spherical in shape.
11. A media according to claim 1 wherein the grain has a weight of between about 15 and 35 pounds per cubic foot of weight per volume.
12. A process for preparing a media mixture for use in a centrifugal processing machine for processing a part, the process comprising the steps of:
providing carrier media made from fractured grain product, the fractured grain having an average size of greater than about 0.05 inches;
providing abrasive media having a size of at least 1000 grit; the amount of abrasive media being selected to coat on average at least about 50% of the carrier media; and
mixing the media together to form a mixture.
13. A process for preparing a media mixture according to claim 12 further comprising the step of adding an adherent into the mixture to cause a plurality of the abrasive media to adhere to the carrier media.
14. A process for preparing a media mixture according to claim 13 wherein the adherent is a lubricant.
15. A process for preparing a media mixture according to claim 12 further comprising the steps of:
providing a plurality of metallic additives, each additive having a density greater than the density of an average carrier medium; and
adding the metallic additives to the mixture of the abrasive media and the carrier media.
16. A process for preparing a media mixture according to claim 15 wherein the additives are metallic balls.
17. A process for preparing a media mixture according to claim 12 wherein the abrasive particles are selected from a group consisting of aluminum oxide, silicon carbide, tungsten carbide and diamond.
18. A process for preparing a media mixture according to claim 12 wherein the carrier medium has an average weight of between about 15 and 35 pounds per cubic foot of weight per volume.
US11/209,461 2000-09-28 2005-08-23 Media mixture for improved residual compressive stress in a product Abandoned US20060018782A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/209,461 US20060018782A1 (en) 2000-09-28 2005-08-23 Media mixture for improved residual compressive stress in a product

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US23600100P 2000-09-28 2000-09-28
US09/965,162 US20020078813A1 (en) 2000-09-28 2001-09-27 Saw blade
US60455504P 2004-08-26 2004-08-26
US11/209,461 US20060018782A1 (en) 2000-09-28 2005-08-23 Media mixture for improved residual compressive stress in a product

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/965,162 Continuation-In-Part US20020078813A1 (en) 2000-09-28 2001-09-27 Saw blade

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20060018782A1 true US20060018782A1 (en) 2006-01-26

Family

ID=35657354

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/209,461 Abandoned US20060018782A1 (en) 2000-09-28 2005-08-23 Media mixture for improved residual compressive stress in a product

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US20060018782A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105899331A (en) * 2012-12-31 2016-08-24 圣戈本陶瓷及塑料股份有限公司 Abrasive blasting media and methods of forming and using same
US20180109672A1 (en) * 2015-01-06 2018-04-19 United Services Automobile Association (Usaa) Application triggered media control in call centers

Citations (45)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1512350A (en) * 1922-07-24 1924-10-21 William M Mccorkle Disk scouring and polishing apparatus
US2550630A (en) * 1946-04-15 1951-04-24 Wolverhampton Die Casting Comp Device for use in polishing articles
US3023973A (en) * 1959-03-17 1962-03-06 Entoleter Centrifugal impacting apparatus
US3034378A (en) * 1961-05-18 1962-05-15 Do All Company Method of making carbide tipped saw blade and other tools
US3107706A (en) * 1960-08-12 1963-10-22 Heinemann Saw Corp Saw blade
US3233372A (en) * 1962-05-19 1966-02-08 Kobayashi Hisaminc Surface finishing in high speed gyrating barrels
US3513604A (en) * 1966-11-26 1970-05-26 Tipton Mfg Co High speed surface finishing method
US4073095A (en) * 1976-01-21 1978-02-14 Manfrid Dreher Centrifugal drum polishing machine
US4117748A (en) * 1976-07-28 1978-10-03 Wiltshire Cutlery Company Proprietary Limited Knife scabbard and sharpening device
US4280302A (en) * 1978-11-06 1981-07-28 Ietatsu Ohno Grinding method and apparatus
US4459781A (en) * 1981-03-30 1984-07-17 Li Chou H Grinding and polishing apparatus
US4580371A (en) * 1983-10-17 1986-04-08 Iolab Corporation Method for tumble grinding optical lens edge
US4586292A (en) * 1985-01-30 1986-05-06 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy Machine imparting complex rotary motion for lapping a spherical inner diameter
US4850157A (en) * 1987-11-23 1989-07-25 Magnetic Peripherals Inc. Apparatus for guiding the flow of abrasive slurry over a lapping surface
US4967514A (en) * 1988-07-08 1990-11-06 Metallgesellschaft Aktiengesellschaft Tumbling apparatus with double rotation
US5140783A (en) * 1990-06-26 1992-08-25 Hoffman Steve E Method for surface finishing of articles
US5355638A (en) * 1992-09-08 1994-10-18 Hoffman Steve E Traction drive centrifugal finisher
US5454749A (en) * 1990-09-21 1995-10-03 Ohno; Ietatsu Grinding method and apparatus
US5458210A (en) * 1993-10-15 1995-10-17 The Sollami Company Drill bits and blades therefor
US5471751A (en) * 1993-12-15 1995-12-05 Sandvik Windsor Corporation Low friction guide bar for a chain saw
US5477616A (en) * 1992-04-24 1995-12-26 Mcpherson's Limited Coated knife blades
US5492188A (en) * 1994-06-17 1996-02-20 Baker Hughes Incorporated Stress-reduced superhard cutting element
US5555788A (en) * 1995-03-29 1996-09-17 Credo Tool Company Saw blade
US5802932A (en) * 1994-04-18 1998-09-08 Braun Aktiengesellschaft Cutter for a cutting device of an electric shaving apparatus or beard trimmer
US5848929A (en) * 1997-03-24 1998-12-15 H Technology Centrifugal finisher with fixed outer vessel and rotatable inner vessel
US5873770A (en) * 1996-07-22 1999-02-23 The Timken Company Vibratory finishing process
US5896800A (en) * 1995-09-26 1999-04-27 Black & Decker Inc. Circular saw blade
US5932356A (en) * 1996-03-21 1999-08-03 United Technologies Corporation Abrasive/abradable gas path seal system
US5971087A (en) * 1998-05-20 1999-10-26 Baker Hughes Incorporated Reduced residual tensile stress superabrasive cutters for earth boring and drill bits so equipped
US6035844A (en) * 1996-09-25 2000-03-14 Matsushita Electric Works, Ltd. Cutting tool and method for making the same
US6067888A (en) * 1997-08-01 2000-05-30 Black & Decker Inc. Surface treatment of circular saw blades
US6161634A (en) * 1997-09-04 2000-12-19 Minikus; James C. Cutter element with non-rectilinear crest
US6220375B1 (en) * 1999-01-13 2001-04-24 Baker Hughes Incorporated Polycrystalline diamond cutters having modified residual stresses
US6293020B1 (en) * 1997-02-14 2001-09-25 Nitinol Technologies, Inc. Cutting instruments
US20020078813A1 (en) * 2000-09-28 2002-06-27 Hoffman Steve E. Saw blade
US6511559B2 (en) * 1999-06-23 2003-01-28 Fraunhofer-Geselleschaft Zur Foerderung Der Angewandten Forschung E.V. Process for producing wear-resistant edge layers in precipitation-hardenable materials
US6599176B2 (en) * 2001-09-27 2003-07-29 Mikronite Technologies Group Inc. High speed centrifugal processor
US6708594B1 (en) * 1999-01-29 2004-03-23 Kanefusa Kabushiki Kaisha Circular saw
US6730392B2 (en) * 2000-03-09 2004-05-04 Metaplas Ionon Oberflächenveredelungstechnik GmbH Hard layer coated parts
US6733375B2 (en) * 2001-09-27 2004-05-11 Mikronite Technologies Group Inc. Horizontal finishing machine
US6749653B2 (en) * 2002-02-21 2004-06-15 3M Innovative Properties Company Abrasive particles containing sintered, polycrystalline zirconia
US6780458B2 (en) * 2001-08-01 2004-08-24 Siemens Westinghouse Power Corporation Wear and erosion resistant alloys applied by cold spray technique
US6863207B2 (en) * 2001-09-27 2005-03-08 Mikronite Technologies Group Inc. System for high speed centrifugal welding
US6863600B2 (en) * 2002-12-17 2005-03-08 Edgecraft Corporation Apparatus for precision edge refinement of metallic cutting blades
US6875081B2 (en) * 2001-09-27 2005-04-05 Mikronite Technologies Group Inc. Method of manufacturing a tool using a rotational processing apparatus

Patent Citations (46)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1512350A (en) * 1922-07-24 1924-10-21 William M Mccorkle Disk scouring and polishing apparatus
US2550630A (en) * 1946-04-15 1951-04-24 Wolverhampton Die Casting Comp Device for use in polishing articles
US3023973A (en) * 1959-03-17 1962-03-06 Entoleter Centrifugal impacting apparatus
US3107706A (en) * 1960-08-12 1963-10-22 Heinemann Saw Corp Saw blade
US3034378A (en) * 1961-05-18 1962-05-15 Do All Company Method of making carbide tipped saw blade and other tools
US3233372A (en) * 1962-05-19 1966-02-08 Kobayashi Hisaminc Surface finishing in high speed gyrating barrels
US3513604A (en) * 1966-11-26 1970-05-26 Tipton Mfg Co High speed surface finishing method
US4073095A (en) * 1976-01-21 1978-02-14 Manfrid Dreher Centrifugal drum polishing machine
US4117748A (en) * 1976-07-28 1978-10-03 Wiltshire Cutlery Company Proprietary Limited Knife scabbard and sharpening device
US4280302A (en) * 1978-11-06 1981-07-28 Ietatsu Ohno Grinding method and apparatus
US4459781A (en) * 1981-03-30 1984-07-17 Li Chou H Grinding and polishing apparatus
US4580371A (en) * 1983-10-17 1986-04-08 Iolab Corporation Method for tumble grinding optical lens edge
US4586292A (en) * 1985-01-30 1986-05-06 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy Machine imparting complex rotary motion for lapping a spherical inner diameter
US4850157A (en) * 1987-11-23 1989-07-25 Magnetic Peripherals Inc. Apparatus for guiding the flow of abrasive slurry over a lapping surface
US4967514A (en) * 1988-07-08 1990-11-06 Metallgesellschaft Aktiengesellschaft Tumbling apparatus with double rotation
US5140783A (en) * 1990-06-26 1992-08-25 Hoffman Steve E Method for surface finishing of articles
US5454749A (en) * 1990-09-21 1995-10-03 Ohno; Ietatsu Grinding method and apparatus
US5477616A (en) * 1992-04-24 1995-12-26 Mcpherson's Limited Coated knife blades
US5355638A (en) * 1992-09-08 1994-10-18 Hoffman Steve E Traction drive centrifugal finisher
US5458210A (en) * 1993-10-15 1995-10-17 The Sollami Company Drill bits and blades therefor
US5471751A (en) * 1993-12-15 1995-12-05 Sandvik Windsor Corporation Low friction guide bar for a chain saw
US5802932A (en) * 1994-04-18 1998-09-08 Braun Aktiengesellschaft Cutter for a cutting device of an electric shaving apparatus or beard trimmer
US5492188A (en) * 1994-06-17 1996-02-20 Baker Hughes Incorporated Stress-reduced superhard cutting element
US5555788A (en) * 1995-03-29 1996-09-17 Credo Tool Company Saw blade
US5896800A (en) * 1995-09-26 1999-04-27 Black & Decker Inc. Circular saw blade
US5932356A (en) * 1996-03-21 1999-08-03 United Technologies Corporation Abrasive/abradable gas path seal system
US5873770A (en) * 1996-07-22 1999-02-23 The Timken Company Vibratory finishing process
US6035844A (en) * 1996-09-25 2000-03-14 Matsushita Electric Works, Ltd. Cutting tool and method for making the same
US6293020B1 (en) * 1997-02-14 2001-09-25 Nitinol Technologies, Inc. Cutting instruments
US5848929A (en) * 1997-03-24 1998-12-15 H Technology Centrifugal finisher with fixed outer vessel and rotatable inner vessel
US6067888A (en) * 1997-08-01 2000-05-30 Black & Decker Inc. Surface treatment of circular saw blades
US6161634A (en) * 1997-09-04 2000-12-19 Minikus; James C. Cutter element with non-rectilinear crest
US6196341B1 (en) * 1998-05-20 2001-03-06 Baker Hughes Incorporated Reduced residual tensile stress superabrasive cutters for earth boring and drill bits so equipped
US5971087A (en) * 1998-05-20 1999-10-26 Baker Hughes Incorporated Reduced residual tensile stress superabrasive cutters for earth boring and drill bits so equipped
US6220375B1 (en) * 1999-01-13 2001-04-24 Baker Hughes Incorporated Polycrystalline diamond cutters having modified residual stresses
US6708594B1 (en) * 1999-01-29 2004-03-23 Kanefusa Kabushiki Kaisha Circular saw
US6511559B2 (en) * 1999-06-23 2003-01-28 Fraunhofer-Geselleschaft Zur Foerderung Der Angewandten Forschung E.V. Process for producing wear-resistant edge layers in precipitation-hardenable materials
US6730392B2 (en) * 2000-03-09 2004-05-04 Metaplas Ionon Oberflächenveredelungstechnik GmbH Hard layer coated parts
US20020078813A1 (en) * 2000-09-28 2002-06-27 Hoffman Steve E. Saw blade
US6780458B2 (en) * 2001-08-01 2004-08-24 Siemens Westinghouse Power Corporation Wear and erosion resistant alloys applied by cold spray technique
US6599176B2 (en) * 2001-09-27 2003-07-29 Mikronite Technologies Group Inc. High speed centrifugal processor
US6733375B2 (en) * 2001-09-27 2004-05-11 Mikronite Technologies Group Inc. Horizontal finishing machine
US6863207B2 (en) * 2001-09-27 2005-03-08 Mikronite Technologies Group Inc. System for high speed centrifugal welding
US6875081B2 (en) * 2001-09-27 2005-04-05 Mikronite Technologies Group Inc. Method of manufacturing a tool using a rotational processing apparatus
US6749653B2 (en) * 2002-02-21 2004-06-15 3M Innovative Properties Company Abrasive particles containing sintered, polycrystalline zirconia
US6863600B2 (en) * 2002-12-17 2005-03-08 Edgecraft Corporation Apparatus for precision edge refinement of metallic cutting blades

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105899331A (en) * 2012-12-31 2016-08-24 圣戈本陶瓷及塑料股份有限公司 Abrasive blasting media and methods of forming and using same
EP2938458A4 (en) * 2012-12-31 2016-09-28 Saint Gobain Ceramics & Plastics Inc Abrasive blasting media and methods of forming and using same
US20180109672A1 (en) * 2015-01-06 2018-04-19 United Services Automobile Association (Usaa) Application triggered media control in call centers

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8782902B2 (en) Method of making bearing using ultrasonic nano crystal surface modification technology
US7677070B2 (en) Shot-peening process
Unal et al. Effects of conventional shot peening, severe shot peening, re-shot peening and precised grinding operations on fatigue performance of AISI 1050 railway axle steel
US20050279430A1 (en) Sub-surface enhanced gear
RU2354715C1 (en) Strengthening method of details made of constructional material
Canals et al. Effect of vibratory peening on the sub-surface layer of aerospace materials Ti-6Al-4V and E-16NiCrMo13
Tan et al. Effects of different mechanical surface treatments on surface integrity of TC17 alloys
Fernandez et al. Increase wind gearbox power density by means of IGS (Improved Gear Surface)
JP4441371B2 (en) Gear with excellent fatigue characteristics and method for improving the fatigue characteristics thereof
Kumar et al. Influence of residual stress distribution and microstructural characteristics on fatigue failure mechanism in Ni‐based Superalloy
EP1944124A1 (en) Shot- peening process
US20060018782A1 (en) Media mixture for improved residual compressive stress in a product
Semenova et al. Advanced Materials for Mechanical Engineering: Ultrafine‐Grained Alloys with Multilayer Coatings
KR20190007052A (en) Surface treatment of metal products and metal products
Qandil et al. Effect of shot peening and grain refinement on the fatigue life and strength of commercially pure Al and two of its alloys: Al-2024-T3 and Al-7075-T6
Ahn et al. Application of crosswise repetitive ultrasonic nanocrystal surface modification treatment to Inconel 690 alloy: Efficiency of single-path and multi-paths
Zammit Shot peening of austempered ductile iron
Moriyama et al. Effect of shot peening on fatigue strength of 18% Ni maraging steel
JP2001079766A (en) Projection material for shot peening
Bohmer et al. Microstructural optimisation of bearing steels for operation under contaminated lubrication by using the experimental method of dented surfaces
JP3028624B2 (en) How to strengthen carburized parts
JP4559933B2 (en) Machining tool and its manufacturing method
US20020079602A1 (en) Method of increasing the boundary layer strength on surfaces of workpieces made of brittle hard materials
JP5664950B2 (en) Rolled titanium alloy screw
JP4131384B2 (en) Shot peening method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: MIKRONITE TECHNOLOGIES GROUP INC., NEW JERSEY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HOFFMAN, STEVE E.;REEL/FRAME:017063/0562

Effective date: 20050929

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO PAY ISSUE FEE