US20060009011A1 - Method for recycling/reclaiming a monitor wafer - Google Patents

Method for recycling/reclaiming a monitor wafer Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20060009011A1
US20060009011A1 US10/885,270 US88527004A US2006009011A1 US 20060009011 A1 US20060009011 A1 US 20060009011A1 US 88527004 A US88527004 A US 88527004A US 2006009011 A1 US2006009011 A1 US 2006009011A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
monitor wafer
recited
wafer
annealing
front surface
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/885,270
Inventor
Gary Barrett
Bradley Sucher
Colin Carr
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Texas Instruments Inc
Original Assignee
Texas Instruments Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Texas Instruments Inc filed Critical Texas Instruments Inc
Priority to US10/885,270 priority Critical patent/US20060009011A1/en
Assigned to TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED reassignment TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CARR, COLIN L., SUCHER, BRADLEY D.
Publication of US20060009011A1 publication Critical patent/US20060009011A1/en
Priority to US12/621,393 priority patent/US7955956B2/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01LSEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
    • H01L21/00Processes or apparatus adapted for the manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or solid state devices or of parts thereof
    • H01L21/02Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof
    • H01L21/02041Cleaning
    • H01L21/02079Cleaning for reclaiming
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01LSEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
    • H01L21/00Processes or apparatus adapted for the manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or solid state devices or of parts thereof
    • H01L21/02Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof
    • H01L21/02002Preparing wafers
    • H01L21/02005Preparing bulk and homogeneous wafers
    • H01L21/02032Preparing bulk and homogeneous wafers by reclaiming or re-processing
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01LSEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
    • H01L22/00Testing or measuring during manufacture or treatment; Reliability measurements, i.e. testing of parts without further processing to modify the parts as such; Structural arrangements therefor
    • H01L22/30Structural arrangements specially adapted for testing or measuring during manufacture or treatment, or specially adapted for reliability measurements
    • H01L22/34Circuits for electrically characterising or monitoring manufacturing processes, e. g. whole test die, wafers filled with test structures, on-board-devices incorporated on each die, process control monitors or pad structures thereof, devices in scribe line
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01LSEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
    • H01L21/00Processes or apparatus adapted for the manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or solid state devices or of parts thereof
    • H01L21/02Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof
    • H01L21/04Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof the devices having at least one potential-jump barrier or surface barrier, e.g. PN junction, depletion layer or carrier concentration layer
    • H01L21/18Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof the devices having at least one potential-jump barrier or surface barrier, e.g. PN junction, depletion layer or carrier concentration layer the devices having semiconductor bodies comprising elements of Group IV of the Periodic System or AIIIBV compounds with or without impurities, e.g. doping materials
    • H01L21/30Treatment of semiconductor bodies using processes or apparatus not provided for in groups H01L21/20 - H01L21/26
    • H01L21/322Treatment of semiconductor bodies using processes or apparatus not provided for in groups H01L21/20 - H01L21/26 to modify their internal properties, e.g. to produce internal imperfections
    • H01L21/3221Treatment of semiconductor bodies using processes or apparatus not provided for in groups H01L21/20 - H01L21/26 to modify their internal properties, e.g. to produce internal imperfections of silicon bodies, e.g. for gettering
    • H01L21/3225Thermally inducing defects using oxygen present in the silicon body for intrinsic gettering

Definitions

  • the present invention is directed, in general, to a method for manufacturing an integrated circuit and, more specifically, to a method for recycling/reclaiming a monitor wafer used in the manufacture of an integrated circuit.
  • the industry as a result of the extreme number and cost of the monitor wafers being used, currently attempts to recycle or reclaim these used monitor wafers.
  • the recycling or reclaiming of the used monitor wafers typically begins by determining what type of used monitor wafer is being recycled or reclaimed. Knowing that information, the specific type of chemical etch, chemical strip, and/or polish that is required to return the monitor wafer to a suitable state, may be determined.
  • conventional technologies do not always thoroughly restore the original condition of a monitor wafer.
  • conventional technologies are not capable of removing or reducing the number of crystal oriented pits (COPs) or oxygen induced stacking faults (OISFs), thereby making it more atomically flat, that show up on the surface of the monitor wafer.
  • OISFs typically result when oxygen precipitates out of the wafer during one or more of the multiple thermal cycles the monitor wafer experiences during its testing.
  • the COPs and OISFs show up as light point defects, similar to airborne particles, the industry generally finds them undesirable. This is particularly evident, as the specification requirements of the industry continue to tighten.
  • the present invention provides a method for recycling/reclaiming a monitor wafer and a method for testing a manufacturing process.
  • the method for recycling/reclaiming the monitor wafer includes providing a monitor wafer having a number of front surface defects thereon, and annealing the monitor wafer in a presence of an inert gas to correct one or more of the number of front surface defects.
  • the method for testing a manufacturing process includes (1) providing a monitor wafer, (2) forming one or more integrated circuit films on the monitor wafer and testing the one or more integrated circuit films, the process of forming or testing the one or more integrated circuit films on the monitor wafer causing the monitor wafer to have a number of front surface defects thereon, (3) annealing the monitor wafer in a presence of an inert gas to correct one or more of the number of front surface defects, and thereby recycling/reclaiming the monitor wafer.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a flow chart depicting one process flow that could be used to test a manufacturing process, which takes advantage of the unique recycling/reclamation method of the present invention.
  • the present invention in contrast to the prior art, begins with the unique recognition that if front surface defects on a monitor wafer caused during either the formation of the integrated circuit (IC) films on the monitor wafers or the testing of those films can be corrected, the effective useful life of the monitor wafer can be greatly increased. Namely, the present invention has recognized that if the front surface effects can be corrected, less lapping and polishing of the monitor wafer is required to sufficiently correct those front surface defects during the recycling/reclamation process. Therefore, the monitor wafer, and more specifically the thickness of the monitor wafer, withstands many more recycling/reclamation processes before being unsuitable for additional testing purposes.
  • the present invention observed that by annealing the monitor wafer in a presence of an inert gas, one or more of the front surface defects created during either the formation of the IC films on the monitor wafers or the testing of those films, may be corrected. Accordingly, depending on the specifications of the IC manufacturer purchasing the recycled/reclaimed monitor wafer, less of the monitor wafer need be lapped or polished. Thus, the effective lifespan of any given monitor wafer can be increased over what it once was using the prior art etching and polishing process. As new monitor wafers can cost upwards of $50 each, this saving represents a significant savings to the industry.
  • FIG. 1 illustrated is a flow chart 100 depicting one process flow that could be used to test a manufacturing process, that takes advantage of the unique recycling/reclamation method of the present invention. While the flow chart 100 depicted in FIG. 1 includes about 10 specific steps, those skilled in the art understand that fewer or more steps could be used and remain within the scope of the present invention. While many of the additional steps will not be discussed, certain ones of those additional steps will be discussed.
  • the method for testing the manufacturing process using the unique method for recycling/reclaiming the wafer begins in a start step 105 . Thereafter, in a step 110 , a wafer is provided.
  • the wafer which may comprise a number of different types and qualities, in the embodiment of the present invention is a virgin monitor wafer.
  • the virgin monitor wafer is a wafer that was formed using the well known Czochralski method, or a slight variation thereof.
  • Other known or hereafter discovered manufacturing techniques could, however, also be used to form the virgin monitor wafer and stay within the scope of the present invention.
  • the wafer depending on its intended use and the IC manufacturer using it, will include a given set of parameters. For instance, the wafer will most likely be designed to have a certain amount of resistance, a certain dopant type and amount, certain thickness, certain surface roughness, etc. In addition to those parameters, the initial wafer will most likely also contain only a certain number of surface defects of a prescribed size. For instance, certain manufacturers require that the initial wafer contains less than about 25 defects of 0.2 microns or larger, or less than about 100 defects of 0.12 microns or larger or larger when used for testing purposes.
  • one or more IC films may be formed on the wafer.
  • the one or more IC films may comprise any material layer formed on the wafer that might be used in the typical manufacture of an IC.
  • the IC films could be a collection of dielectric and conductive layers, or in alternative embodiments just dielectric or conductive layers. The number and type of films generally depends on the specific parameter of the manufacturing process, or in this case IC, that needs testing.
  • the IC film could also include a doped region in the wafer itself or one of the other IC films located thereon.
  • the properties of the one or more IC films may be tested in a step 130 .
  • the testing of the IC films may consist of a collection of one or more electrical, thermal, mechanical, or other known tests. Those skilled in the art understand the numerous different tests that might be applied to test the IC films. For this reason, no discussion is warranted.
  • the front surface defects in one embodiment of the invention, comprise crystal originate pits (COPs).
  • the front surface defects may, however, comprise in addition to or in place of the COPs, oxygen induced stacking faults (OISFs) caused by the oxygen precipitating in the wafer during thermal cycles that occurred during the formation of the IC films and/or the testing of the IC films.
  • OISFs oxygen induced stacking faults
  • these COPs or OISFs are detrimental to the testing of the IC films, during the visual inspection of the recycled/reclaimed wafer they show up as defects just the same. For instance, both show up as light point defects just the same as particle imperfections.
  • these COPs and OISFs often cause a wafer to be rejected.
  • the wafer that has been subjected to the formation and testing of the one or more films contains at least about 500 front surface defects, such as crystal oriented front surface defects, of 0.09 microns or larger.
  • 500 front surface defects such as crystal oriented front surface defects
  • a significant portion of those 500 front surface defects of 0.09 microns or larger are COPs or OISFs. In most instances too many front surface defects exist to meet the manufactures defect specifications.
  • steps 140 through 170 the wafers are recycled/reclaimed using a unique method that corrects one or more of the front surface defects caused by the formation of the IC films and/or the testing of the IC films. Therefore, steps 140 through 170 , as well as the intermediate steps, allow the recycled/reclaimed wafer to meet the predetermined specifications of the IC manufacturers more often and easier. Additionally, these steps allow the effective lifespan of the wafer to significantly increase, as less severe etching and polishing procedures are required to remove the front surface defects. In an exemplary embodiment, the unique process of the present invention forgoes the need for etching or polishing the wafer to remove the front surface defects.
  • the one or more IC films located on the wafer may be removed.
  • the removal of the IC films may be accomplished using a number of different processes, as well as combination of processes.
  • the wafer may be subjected to a one or more step polishing process.
  • a two-step polishing process is used, wherein the first step of the polishing process is a rough polish and the second step of the polishing process is a mirror polish. It should be noted, however, that the removal of the IC films could be accomplished using any combination of one or more of a chemical etch or polishing process.
  • the wafer is subjected to a modified RCA chemistry.
  • the modified RCA chemistry used in the exemplary embodiment of the invention includes a first SC1 solution (e.g., hydrogen peroxide, ammonia hydroxide and DI water) followed by a second SC2 solution (e.g., hydrochloric acid, hydrogen peroxide and DI water).
  • the wafer is subjected to a unique anneal to correct one or more of the front surface defects on the wafer.
  • the anneal is accomplished in the presence of an inert gas.
  • this inert gas includes hydrogen, argon, another similar inert gas or any combinations thereof.
  • deuterium which is an isotope of hydrogen, works significantly well.
  • the gas flow of the specific gases used may vary greatly. It is believed that a flow rate of 2000 sccm to about 50000 sccm would provide excellent results.
  • the anneal which may be accomplished using a rapid thermal anneal, furnace anneal, or another similar process, optimally occurs at a temperature of greater than about 1000° C. for a time period of greater than about 10 minutes for the standard furnace process or a time period ranging from about 5 seconds to about 240 seconds for the rapid thermal anneal process.
  • the anneal occurs at a temperature ranging from about 1100° C. to about 1300° C. for a time period ranging from about 10 minutes to about 120 minutes for the standard furnace process or a time period ranging from about 15 seconds to about 120 seconds for the rapid thermal anneal process.
  • the resulting annealed wafer may have less than about 100 front surface defects, such as crystal oriented front surface defects, of 0.09 microns or larger, many of those defects being particle defects rather than front surface defects. In an exemplary embodiment, the annealed wafer has less than about 25 front surface defects of 0.09 microns or larger.
  • the wafer may be polished, whether it be rough polished or mirror polished after it has been annealed. In another embodiment the wafer is rough polished or mirror polished before it has been annealed. It is believed that after the wafer has been annealed that the wafer surface will approach its original atomically flat state.
  • the annealed wafer may be inspected to determine whether it is suitable for another testing procedure, in a step 160 . This inspection, as is appreciated, might be based upon the number of defects remaining on the wafer of a certain size, the thickness of the wafer, as well as other criteria. If it is determined that the anneal adequately recycled/reclaimed the wafer and that the wafer is suitable for another testing procedure, in a step 170 the process flow would return to step 120 .
  • the process flow would return to step 140 assuming the wafer thickness was sufficient or move to step 180 if the wafer thickness were not sufficient, where the wafer would be discontinued for testing purposes. For example, depending on the number of testing procedures the wafer has already undergone, its thickness might be reduced to such a level that it is impractical to be reused. After the wafer is discontinued in step 180 , the process would finish in step 185 .

Abstract

The present invention provides a method for recycling/reclaiming a monitor wafer and a method for testing a manufacturing process. The method for recycling/reclaiming the monitor wafer, among other steps, includes providing a monitor wafer having a number of front surface defects thereon (110), and annealing the monitor wafer in a presence of an inert gas to correct one or more of the number of front surface defects (150).

Description

    TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention is directed, in general, to a method for manufacturing an integrated circuit and, more specifically, to a method for recycling/reclaiming a monitor wafer used in the manufacture of an integrated circuit.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • In practical semiconductor fabrication, hundreds and hundreds of individual manufacturing steps are required to convert a bare silicon wafer into one or more operational integrated circuits (ICs). In an effort to save time and money, after each individual manufacturing step is set up a monitor or test wafer is processed through the given manufacturing step to examine whether the manufacturing step achieves its intended purpose. If the specific manufacturing step being tested achieves its intended purpose, then the manufacturer is confident that actual device wafers may be subjected to the manufacturing step. However, if the specific manufacturing step being tested does not achieve its intended purpose, the manufacturing step may be tweaked and tested again, without subjecting actual device wafers to the unsatisfactory manufacturing step.
  • The industry, as a result of the extreme number and cost of the monitor wafers being used, currently attempts to recycle or reclaim these used monitor wafers. The recycling or reclaiming of the used monitor wafers typically begins by determining what type of used monitor wafer is being recycled or reclaimed. Knowing that information, the specific type of chemical etch, chemical strip, and/or polish that is required to return the monitor wafer to a suitable state, may be determined.
  • However, conventional technologies do not always thoroughly restore the original condition of a monitor wafer. For example, conventional technologies are not capable of removing or reducing the number of crystal oriented pits (COPs) or oxygen induced stacking faults (OISFs), thereby making it more atomically flat, that show up on the surface of the monitor wafer. OISFs typically result when oxygen precipitates out of the wafer during one or more of the multiple thermal cycles the monitor wafer experiences during its testing. As the COPs and OISFs show up as light point defects, similar to airborne particles, the industry generally finds them undesirable. This is particularly evident, as the specification requirements of the industry continue to tighten. For example, where the industry was previously in agreement with up to about 25 particles of 0.2 microns or less per wafer, the industry in certain instances now requires less than about 25 particles of 0.16 microns or less. With the current two or three step polish processes for recycled/reclaimed wafers, COPs and other crystal oriented front surface defects are quite abundant at the sub 0.17 micron level. If the COPs or OISFs may be removed from this count, the manufacturers defect specifications are easier to attain.
  • Therefore, what is needed in the art is a method for recycling/reclaiming silicon wafers that does not experience the drawbacks of the prior art processes.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • To address the above-discussed deficiencies of the prior art, the present invention provides a method for recycling/reclaiming a monitor wafer and a method for testing a manufacturing process. The method for recycling/reclaiming the monitor wafer, among other steps, includes providing a monitor wafer having a number of front surface defects thereon, and annealing the monitor wafer in a presence of an inert gas to correct one or more of the number of front surface defects.
  • The method for testing a manufacturing process, on the other hand, includes (1) providing a monitor wafer, (2) forming one or more integrated circuit films on the monitor wafer and testing the one or more integrated circuit films, the process of forming or testing the one or more integrated circuit films on the monitor wafer causing the monitor wafer to have a number of front surface defects thereon, (3) annealing the monitor wafer in a presence of an inert gas to correct one or more of the number of front surface defects, and thereby recycling/reclaiming the monitor wafer.
  • The foregoing has outlined preferred and alternative features of the present invention so that those skilled in the art may better understand the detailed description of the invention that follows. Additional features of the invention will be described hereinafter that form the subject of the claims of the invention. Those skilled in the art should appreciate that they can readily use the disclosed conception and specific embodiment as a basis for designing or modifying other structures for carrying out the same purposes of the present invention. Those skilled in the art should also realize that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • For a more complete understanding of the present invention, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a flow chart depicting one process flow that could be used to test a manufacturing process, which takes advantage of the unique recycling/reclamation method of the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • The present invention, in contrast to the prior art, begins with the unique recognition that if front surface defects on a monitor wafer caused during either the formation of the integrated circuit (IC) films on the monitor wafers or the testing of those films can be corrected, the effective useful life of the monitor wafer can be greatly increased. Namely, the present invention has recognized that if the front surface effects can be corrected, less lapping and polishing of the monitor wafer is required to sufficiently correct those front surface defects during the recycling/reclamation process. Therefore, the monitor wafer, and more specifically the thickness of the monitor wafer, withstands many more recycling/reclamation processes before being unsuitable for additional testing purposes.
  • Given the aforementioned recognition, the present invention observed that by annealing the monitor wafer in a presence of an inert gas, one or more of the front surface defects created during either the formation of the IC films on the monitor wafers or the testing of those films, may be corrected. Accordingly, depending on the specifications of the IC manufacturer purchasing the recycled/reclaimed monitor wafer, less of the monitor wafer need be lapped or polished. Thus, the effective lifespan of any given monitor wafer can be increased over what it once was using the prior art etching and polishing process. As new monitor wafers can cost upwards of $50 each, this saving represents a significant savings to the industry.
  • Turning now to FIG. 1, illustrated is a flow chart 100 depicting one process flow that could be used to test a manufacturing process, that takes advantage of the unique recycling/reclamation method of the present invention. While the flow chart 100 depicted in FIG. 1 includes about 10 specific steps, those skilled in the art understand that fewer or more steps could be used and remain within the scope of the present invention. While many of the additional steps will not be discussed, certain ones of those additional steps will be discussed.
  • The method for testing the manufacturing process using the unique method for recycling/reclaiming the wafer begins in a start step 105. Thereafter, in a step 110, a wafer is provided. The wafer, which may comprise a number of different types and qualities, in the embodiment of the present invention is a virgin monitor wafer. In an exemplary embodiment, the virgin monitor wafer is a wafer that was formed using the well known Czochralski method, or a slight variation thereof. Other known or hereafter discovered manufacturing techniques could, however, also be used to form the virgin monitor wafer and stay within the scope of the present invention.
  • The wafer, depending on its intended use and the IC manufacturer using it, will include a given set of parameters. For instance, the wafer will most likely be designed to have a certain amount of resistance, a certain dopant type and amount, certain thickness, certain surface roughness, etc. In addition to those parameters, the initial wafer will most likely also contain only a certain number of surface defects of a prescribed size. For instance, certain manufacturers require that the initial wafer contains less than about 25 defects of 0.2 microns or larger, or less than about 100 defects of 0.12 microns or larger or larger when used for testing purposes.
  • After providing the wafer, in a step 120, one or more IC films may be formed on the wafer. As is appreciated by those skilled in the art, the one or more IC films may comprise any material layer formed on the wafer that might be used in the typical manufacture of an IC. For example, the IC films could be a collection of dielectric and conductive layers, or in alternative embodiments just dielectric or conductive layers. The number and type of films generally depends on the specific parameter of the manufacturing process, or in this case IC, that needs testing. As used herein, however, the IC film could also include a doped region in the wafer itself or one of the other IC films located thereon.
  • After forming the IC films in a desired manner, the properties of the one or more IC films may be tested in a step 130. The testing of the IC films may consist of a collection of one or more electrical, thermal, mechanical, or other known tests. Those skilled in the art understand the numerous different tests that might be applied to test the IC films. For this reason, no discussion is warranted.
  • It is believed that the formation of the IC films and/or the testing of the IC films causes one or more front surface defects to occur in the wafer. The front surface defects, in one embodiment of the invention, comprise crystal originate pits (COPs). The front surface defects may, however, comprise in addition to or in place of the COPs, oxygen induced stacking faults (OISFs) caused by the oxygen precipitating in the wafer during thermal cycles that occurred during the formation of the IC films and/or the testing of the IC films. While it is not currently believed that these COPs or OISFs are detrimental to the testing of the IC films, during the visual inspection of the recycled/reclaimed wafer they show up as defects just the same. For instance, both show up as light point defects just the same as particle imperfections. As each specific IC manufacturer has a predetermined size and amount of defects per wafer, these COPs and OISFs often cause a wafer to be rejected.
  • In a common scenario, the wafer that has been subjected to the formation and testing of the one or more films contains at least about 500 front surface defects, such as crystal oriented front surface defects, of 0.09 microns or larger. A significant portion of those 500 front surface defects of 0.09 microns or larger are COPs or OISFs. In most instances too many front surface defects exist to meet the manufactures defect specifications.
  • Therefore, in steps 140 through 170, as well as any steps in-between, the wafers are recycled/reclaimed using a unique method that corrects one or more of the front surface defects caused by the formation of the IC films and/or the testing of the IC films. Therefore, steps 140 through 170, as well as the intermediate steps, allow the recycled/reclaimed wafer to meet the predetermined specifications of the IC manufacturers more often and easier. Additionally, these steps allow the effective lifespan of the wafer to significantly increase, as less severe etching and polishing procedures are required to remove the front surface defects. In an exemplary embodiment, the unique process of the present invention forgoes the need for etching or polishing the wafer to remove the front surface defects.
  • Consequently, in a step 140, the one or more IC films located on the wafer may be removed. As those skilled in the art are aware, without the removal of these IC films the wafer may not easily be reused. The removal of the IC films may be accomplished using a number of different processes, as well as combination of processes. After chemically etching the one or more IC films from the wafer, the wafer may be subjected to a one or more step polishing process. For example, in an exemplary embodiment a two-step polishing process is used, wherein the first step of the polishing process is a rough polish and the second step of the polishing process is a mirror polish. It should be noted, however, that the removal of the IC films could be accomplished using any combination of one or more of a chemical etch or polishing process.
  • Following the IC film removal process, in one embodiment of the invention the wafer is subjected to a modified RCA chemistry. The modified RCA chemistry used in the exemplary embodiment of the invention includes a first SC1 solution (e.g., hydrogen peroxide, ammonia hydroxide and DI water) followed by a second SC2 solution (e.g., hydrochloric acid, hydrogen peroxide and DI water).
  • After removing the IC films, in a step 150, the wafer is subjected to a unique anneal to correct one or more of the front surface defects on the wafer. The anneal is accomplished in the presence of an inert gas. In an exemplary embodiment this inert gas includes hydrogen, argon, another similar inert gas or any combinations thereof. In an alternative embodiment, however, it has been observed that deuterium, which is an isotope of hydrogen, works significantly well. The gas flow of the specific gases used may vary greatly. It is believed that a flow rate of 2000 sccm to about 50000 sccm would provide excellent results.
  • The anneal, which may be accomplished using a rapid thermal anneal, furnace anneal, or another similar process, optimally occurs at a temperature of greater than about 1000° C. for a time period of greater than about 10 minutes for the standard furnace process or a time period ranging from about 5 seconds to about 240 seconds for the rapid thermal anneal process. In an exemplary embodiment, the anneal occurs at a temperature ranging from about 1100° C. to about 1300° C. for a time period ranging from about 10 minutes to about 120 minutes for the standard furnace process or a time period ranging from about 15 seconds to about 120 seconds for the rapid thermal anneal process.
  • It is believed that the resulting annealed wafer may have less than about 100 front surface defects, such as crystal oriented front surface defects, of 0.09 microns or larger, many of those defects being particle defects rather than front surface defects. In an exemplary embodiment, the annealed wafer has less than about 25 front surface defects of 0.09 microns or larger.
  • In an optional embodiment of the present invention the wafer may be polished, whether it be rough polished or mirror polished after it has been annealed. In another embodiment the wafer is rough polished or mirror polished before it has been annealed. It is believed that after the wafer has been annealed that the wafer surface will approach its original atomically flat state.
  • After annealing the wafer in step 150, the annealed wafer may be inspected to determine whether it is suitable for another testing procedure, in a step 160. This inspection, as is appreciated, might be based upon the number of defects remaining on the wafer of a certain size, the thickness of the wafer, as well as other criteria. If it is determined that the anneal adequately recycled/reclaimed the wafer and that the wafer is suitable for another testing procedure, in a step 170 the process flow would return to step 120. Alternatively, if it is determined that the anneal did not adequately recycle/reclaim the wafer and that the wafer is not suitable for another testing procedure, or that the wafer is not suitable for another testing procedure for another reason, the process flow would return to step 140 assuming the wafer thickness was sufficient or move to step 180 if the wafer thickness were not sufficient, where the wafer would be discontinued for testing purposes. For example, depending on the number of testing procedures the wafer has already undergone, its thickness might be reduced to such a level that it is impractical to be reused. After the wafer is discontinued in step 180, the process would finish in step 185.
  • It is quite conceivable that the manufacturing process might return to steps 120 or 140 up to about 50 times before the wafer would be unsuitable for further testing procedures. As the prior art methods were generally only capable of reusing their wafers up to about 4 times, the unique method of the present invention provides tremendous cost savings to the industry.
  • Although the present invention has been described in detail, those skilled in the art should understand that they can make various changes, substitutions and alterations herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention in its broadest form.

Claims (20)

1. A method for recycling/reclaiming a monitor wafer, comprising:
providing a monitor wafer having a number of front surface defects thereon;
annealing the monitor wafer in a presence of an inert gas to correct one or more of the number of front surface defects.
2. The method as recited in claim 1 further including removing any integrated circuit films located on the monitor wafer prior to annealing the monitor wafer.
3. The method as recited in claim 2 wherein removing any integrated circuit films includes chemically etching the monitor wafer.
4. The method as recited in claim 2 wherein removing any integrated circuit films includes polishing the monitor wafer.
5. The method as recited in claim 2 wherein removing any integrated circuit films includes chemically etching and polishing the monitor wafer.
6. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein providing a monitor wafer includes providing a monitor wafer produced by a Czochralski method.
7. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the monitor wafer provided has more than about 500 crystal oriented front surface defects of about 0.09 microns or larger, and wherein the annealed monitor wafer has less than about 100 crystal oriented front surface defects of 0.09 microns or larger.
8. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein annealing the monitor wafer includes annealing the monitor wafer using a rapid thermal anneal or furnace anneal process.
9. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein annealing the monitor wafer includes annealing the monitor wafer using a temperature of greater than about 1000° C. for a time ranging from about 10 minutes to about 120 minutes for a standard thermal process or a time ranging from about 15 seconds to about 240 seconds for a rapid thermal anneal process.
10. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the inert gas comprises deuterium.
11. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the inert gas comprises a gas selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, argon, or any combination thereof.
12. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the front surface defects are crystal originated pits caused by the formation or testing of one or more integrated circuit films on the monitor wafer.
13. The method as recited in claim 1 further including polishing the monitor wafer after annealing it.
14. A method for testing a manufacturing process, comprising:
providing a monitor wafer;
forming one or more integrated circuit films on the monitor wafer and testing the one or more integrated circuit films, the process of forming or testing the one or more integrated circuit films on the monitor wafer causing the monitor wafer to have a number of front surface defects thereon;
annealing the monitor wafer in a presence of an inert gas to correct one or more of the number of front surface defects, and thereby recycling/reclaiming the monitor wafer.
15. The method as recited in claim 14 further including removing the one or more integrated circuit films located on the monitor wafer prior to annealing the monitor wafer.
16. The method as recited in claim 14 wherein providing a monitor wafer includes providing a monitor wafer produced by a Czochralski method.
17. The method as recited in claim 14 wherein the monitor wafer provided has more than about 500 crystal oriented front surface defects of about 0.09 microns or larger, and wherein the annealed monitor wafer has less than about 100 crystal oriented front surface defects of 0.09 microns or larger.
18. The method as recited in claim 14 wherein annealing the monitor wafer includes annealing the monitor wafer using a temperature of greater than about 1000° C. for a time ranging from about 10 minutes to about 120 minutes for a standard thermal process or a time ranging from about 15 seconds to about 240 seconds for a rapid thermal anneal process.
19. The method as recited in claim 14 wherein the inert gas comprises deuterium.
20. The method as recited in claim 14 further including forming one or more integrated circuit films on the monitor wafer and then annealing the monitor wafer, up to about 50 times before discarding the monitor wafer.
US10/885,270 2004-07-06 2004-07-06 Method for recycling/reclaiming a monitor wafer Abandoned US20060009011A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/885,270 US20060009011A1 (en) 2004-07-06 2004-07-06 Method for recycling/reclaiming a monitor wafer
US12/621,393 US7955956B2 (en) 2004-07-06 2009-11-18 Method for recycling/reclaiming a monitor wafer

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/885,270 US20060009011A1 (en) 2004-07-06 2004-07-06 Method for recycling/reclaiming a monitor wafer

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/621,393 Continuation US7955956B2 (en) 2004-07-06 2009-11-18 Method for recycling/reclaiming a monitor wafer

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20060009011A1 true US20060009011A1 (en) 2006-01-12

Family

ID=35541916

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/885,270 Abandoned US20060009011A1 (en) 2004-07-06 2004-07-06 Method for recycling/reclaiming a monitor wafer
US12/621,393 Active US7955956B2 (en) 2004-07-06 2009-11-18 Method for recycling/reclaiming a monitor wafer

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/621,393 Active US7955956B2 (en) 2004-07-06 2009-11-18 Method for recycling/reclaiming a monitor wafer

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US20060009011A1 (en)

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080073570A1 (en) * 2006-07-10 2008-03-27 Yu-Hsien Chen Method of repeatedly using a control wafer to monitor treatments
CN101383269A (en) * 2008-08-28 2009-03-11 北大方正集团有限公司 Recycling method of monitoring tablet
US20090233447A1 (en) * 2008-03-11 2009-09-17 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Control wafer reclamation process
US20100056410A1 (en) * 2006-09-25 2010-03-04 Advanced Technology Materials, Inc. Compositions and methods for the removal of photoresist for a wafer rework application
US7851374B2 (en) 2007-10-31 2010-12-14 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Silicon wafer reclamation process
US7960328B2 (en) 2005-11-09 2011-06-14 Advanced Technology Materials, Inc. Composition and method for recycling semiconductor wafers having low-k dielectric materials thereon
US20150022654A1 (en) * 2013-07-22 2015-01-22 Applied Materials Israel Ltd. Closed-loop automatic defect inspection and classification
US9607233B2 (en) 2012-04-20 2017-03-28 Applied Materials Israel Ltd. Classifier readiness and maintenance in automatic defect classification
US20170107638A1 (en) * 2015-10-15 2017-04-20 Zing Semiconductor Corporation Method for forming monocrystalline silicon ingot and wafer
US9715723B2 (en) 2012-04-19 2017-07-25 Applied Materials Israel Ltd Optimization of unknown defect rejection for automatic defect classification
US9831088B2 (en) 2010-10-06 2017-11-28 Entegris, Inc. Composition and process for selectively etching metal nitrides
US10043264B2 (en) 2012-04-19 2018-08-07 Applied Materials Israel Ltd. Integration of automatic and manual defect classification
CN109559972A (en) * 2017-09-27 2019-04-02 苏州能讯高能半导体有限公司 Silicon carbide substrates recovery method, silicon carbide substrates and recovery system
CN112404100A (en) * 2020-11-03 2021-02-26 福建晶安光电有限公司 Recovery process of filter substrate

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104157587A (en) * 2014-08-08 2014-11-19 上海华力微电子有限公司 Shape testing piece and forming method thereof

Citations (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5502331A (en) * 1993-02-23 1996-03-26 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Semiconductor substrate containing bulk micro-defect
US5744401A (en) * 1995-03-24 1998-04-28 Toshiba Ceramics Co., Ltd. Silicon wafer manufacturing method eliminating final mirror-polishing step
US5817174A (en) * 1995-12-15 1998-10-06 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Semiconductor substrate and method of treating semiconductor substrate
US5931662A (en) * 1996-06-28 1999-08-03 Sumitomo Sitix Corporation Silicon single crystal wafer annealing method and equipment and silicon single crystal wafer and manufacturing method related thereto
US6146911A (en) * 1998-03-19 2000-11-14 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Semiconductor wafer and method of manufacturing the same
US6376395B2 (en) * 2000-01-11 2002-04-23 Memc Electronic Materials, Inc. Semiconductor wafer manufacturing process
US6517632B2 (en) * 2000-01-17 2003-02-11 Toshiba Ceramics Co., Ltd. Method of fabricating a single crystal ingot and method of fabricating a silicon wafer
US6531416B1 (en) * 1997-10-30 2003-03-11 Shin-Etsu Handotai Co., Ltd. Method for heat treatment of silicon wafer and silicon wafer heat-treated by the method
US6547647B2 (en) * 2001-04-03 2003-04-15 Macronix International Co., Ltd. Method of wafer reclaim
US6551398B2 (en) * 1997-12-17 2003-04-22 Shin-Etsu Handotai Co., Ltd. Heat treatment method for a silicon monocrystal wafer and a silicon monocrystal wafer
US6645834B2 (en) * 2000-11-09 2003-11-11 Shin-Etsu Handotai Co., Ltd. Method for manufacturing annealed wafer and annealed wafer
US6878645B2 (en) * 2000-07-13 2005-04-12 Shin-Etsu Handotai Co., Ltd. Method for manufacturing silicon wafer
US6902618B2 (en) * 2001-06-15 2005-06-07 Shin-Etsu Handotai Co., Ltd. Silicon single crystal wafer having void denuded zone on the surface and diameter of above 300 mm and its production method
US7008874B2 (en) * 2000-12-19 2006-03-07 Memc Electronics Materials, Inc. Process for reclaiming semiconductor wafers and reclaimed wafers

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
TW248612B (en) * 1993-03-31 1995-06-01 Siemens Ag

Patent Citations (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5502331A (en) * 1993-02-23 1996-03-26 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Semiconductor substrate containing bulk micro-defect
US5744401A (en) * 1995-03-24 1998-04-28 Toshiba Ceramics Co., Ltd. Silicon wafer manufacturing method eliminating final mirror-polishing step
US5817174A (en) * 1995-12-15 1998-10-06 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Semiconductor substrate and method of treating semiconductor substrate
US6010797A (en) * 1995-12-15 2000-01-04 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Semiconductor substrate and method of treating semiconductor substrate
US5931662A (en) * 1996-06-28 1999-08-03 Sumitomo Sitix Corporation Silicon single crystal wafer annealing method and equipment and silicon single crystal wafer and manufacturing method related thereto
US6074479A (en) * 1996-06-28 2000-06-13 Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd. Silicon single crystal wafer annealing method and equipment, and silicon single crystal wafer and manufacturing method related thereto
US6531416B1 (en) * 1997-10-30 2003-03-11 Shin-Etsu Handotai Co., Ltd. Method for heat treatment of silicon wafer and silicon wafer heat-treated by the method
US6551398B2 (en) * 1997-12-17 2003-04-22 Shin-Etsu Handotai Co., Ltd. Heat treatment method for a silicon monocrystal wafer and a silicon monocrystal wafer
US6146911A (en) * 1998-03-19 2000-11-14 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Semiconductor wafer and method of manufacturing the same
US6376395B2 (en) * 2000-01-11 2002-04-23 Memc Electronic Materials, Inc. Semiconductor wafer manufacturing process
US6517632B2 (en) * 2000-01-17 2003-02-11 Toshiba Ceramics Co., Ltd. Method of fabricating a single crystal ingot and method of fabricating a silicon wafer
US6878645B2 (en) * 2000-07-13 2005-04-12 Shin-Etsu Handotai Co., Ltd. Method for manufacturing silicon wafer
US6645834B2 (en) * 2000-11-09 2003-11-11 Shin-Etsu Handotai Co., Ltd. Method for manufacturing annealed wafer and annealed wafer
US7008874B2 (en) * 2000-12-19 2006-03-07 Memc Electronics Materials, Inc. Process for reclaiming semiconductor wafers and reclaimed wafers
US6547647B2 (en) * 2001-04-03 2003-04-15 Macronix International Co., Ltd. Method of wafer reclaim
US6902618B2 (en) * 2001-06-15 2005-06-07 Shin-Etsu Handotai Co., Ltd. Silicon single crystal wafer having void denuded zone on the surface and diameter of above 300 mm and its production method

Cited By (26)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7960328B2 (en) 2005-11-09 2011-06-14 Advanced Technology Materials, Inc. Composition and method for recycling semiconductor wafers having low-k dielectric materials thereon
US8642526B2 (en) 2005-11-09 2014-02-04 Advanced Technology Materials, Inc. Composition and method for recycling semiconductor wafers having low-k dielectric materials thereon
US20080073570A1 (en) * 2006-07-10 2008-03-27 Yu-Hsien Chen Method of repeatedly using a control wafer to monitor treatments
US20100056410A1 (en) * 2006-09-25 2010-03-04 Advanced Technology Materials, Inc. Compositions and methods for the removal of photoresist for a wafer rework application
US7851374B2 (en) 2007-10-31 2010-12-14 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Silicon wafer reclamation process
US8696930B2 (en) 2007-10-31 2014-04-15 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Silicon wafer reclamation process
US20090233447A1 (en) * 2008-03-11 2009-09-17 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Control wafer reclamation process
US20110223767A1 (en) * 2008-03-11 2011-09-15 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Control wafer reclamation process
CN101383269A (en) * 2008-08-28 2009-03-11 北大方正集团有限公司 Recycling method of monitoring tablet
US9831088B2 (en) 2010-10-06 2017-11-28 Entegris, Inc. Composition and process for selectively etching metal nitrides
US9715723B2 (en) 2012-04-19 2017-07-25 Applied Materials Israel Ltd Optimization of unknown defect rejection for automatic defect classification
US10043264B2 (en) 2012-04-19 2018-08-07 Applied Materials Israel Ltd. Integration of automatic and manual defect classification
US9607233B2 (en) 2012-04-20 2017-03-28 Applied Materials Israel Ltd. Classifier readiness and maintenance in automatic defect classification
KR20150011329A (en) * 2013-07-22 2015-01-30 어플라이드 머티리얼즈 이스라엘 리미티드 Closed-loop automatic defect inspection and classification
KR102340791B1 (en) 2013-07-22 2021-12-17 어플라이드 머티리얼즈 이스라엘 리미티드 Closed-loop automatic defect inspection and classification
US10901402B2 (en) 2013-07-22 2021-01-26 Applied Materials Israel, Ltd. Closed-loop automatic defect inspection and classification
US10114368B2 (en) * 2013-07-22 2018-10-30 Applied Materials Israel Ltd. Closed-loop automatic defect inspection and classification
US20150022654A1 (en) * 2013-07-22 2015-01-22 Applied Materials Israel Ltd. Closed-loop automatic defect inspection and classification
TWI618162B (en) * 2013-07-22 2018-03-11 應用材料以色列公司 Closed-loop automatic defect inspection and classification
US20190121331A1 (en) * 2013-07-22 2019-04-25 Applied Materials Israel Ltd. Closed-loop automatic defect inspection and classification
US20170107638A1 (en) * 2015-10-15 2017-04-20 Zing Semiconductor Corporation Method for forming monocrystalline silicon ingot and wafer
KR101865467B1 (en) * 2015-10-15 2018-06-07 징 세미콘덕터 코포레이션 Method for forming monocrystalline silicon ingot and wafer
CN106591939A (en) * 2015-10-15 2017-04-26 上海新昇半导体科技有限公司 Monocrystalline silicon ingot and wafer forming method
KR20170044576A (en) * 2015-10-15 2017-04-25 징 세미콘덕터 코포레이션 Method for forming monocrystalline silicon ingot and wafer
CN109559972A (en) * 2017-09-27 2019-04-02 苏州能讯高能半导体有限公司 Silicon carbide substrates recovery method, silicon carbide substrates and recovery system
CN112404100A (en) * 2020-11-03 2021-02-26 福建晶安光电有限公司 Recovery process of filter substrate

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7955956B2 (en) 2011-06-07
US20100144065A1 (en) 2010-06-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7955956B2 (en) Method for recycling/reclaiming a monitor wafer
US5478408A (en) SOI substrate and manufacturing method therefor
US6376335B1 (en) Semiconductor wafer manufacturing process
JP2014508405A5 (en)
US7276427B2 (en) Method for manufacturing SOI wafer
US5705423A (en) Epitaxial wafer
US5946543A (en) Semiconductor wafer evaluating method and semiconductor device manufacturing method
US7517706B2 (en) Method for evaluating quality of semiconductor substrate and method for manufacturing semiconductor substrate
US7699997B2 (en) Method of reclaiming silicon wafers
US6384415B1 (en) Method of evaluating quality of silicon wafer and method of reclaiming the water
US20190170661A1 (en) Method of identifying defect regions in wafer
US5943549A (en) Method of evaluating silicon wafers
JPH07235534A (en) Manufacture of silicon wafer
US5990022A (en) Method of evaluating a silicon wafer
JP3896919B2 (en) Method for evaluating Ni contamination of silicon wafer
JP4257080B2 (en) Defect detection method for silicon wafer
EP1970949B1 (en) Method of manufacturing bonded wafer
Moriceau et al. A new characterization process used to qualify SOI films
JP5584959B2 (en) Silicon wafer manufacturing method
KR100211648B1 (en) Method for generating semiconductor wafer
Xu et al. 40nm Backside Optimization and Improvement
US20120037191A1 (en) Cleaning sequence for oxide quality monitoring short-loop semiconductor wafer
JP2002134520A (en) Method for using mirror-surface silicon wafer
JP2005159013A (en) Inspecting method of silicon single crystal, manufacturing method of silicon wafer and manufacturing method of epitaxial wafer
JPH10112486A (en) Method of measuring oxide film dielectric strength of semiconductor wafer

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED, TEXAS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SUCHER, BRADLEY D.;CARR, COLIN L.;REEL/FRAME:015993/0289;SIGNING DATES FROM 20040928 TO 20041108

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION