US20050282951A1

US20050282951A1 - Precipitated silica

Info

Publication number: US20050282951A1
Application number: US11/194,481
Authority: US
Inventors: Heinz Esch; Udo Gorl; Robert Kuhlmann; Ralf Rausch
Original assignee: Degussa GmbH
Current assignee: Evonik Operations GmbH
Priority date: 1993-10-07
Filing date: 2005-08-02
Publication date: 2005-12-22
Also published as: US20070208127A1; US6977065B1

Abstract

A precipitated silica with the following physicochemical properties: BET surface area 35 m²/g to 350 m²/g BET/CTAB surface area ratio 0.8 to 1.1 Pore volume, PV 1.6 ml/g to 3.4 ml/g Silanol group density 3 ml/(1.5 g) to 9.5 ml/(1.5 g) (V₂= NaOH consumption) Average aggregate size 250 nm to 1500 nm CTAB surface area 30 m²/g to 350 m²/g DBP value 150 ml/100 g to 300 ml/100 g V₂/V₁by Hg porosimetry 0.19 to 0.46 DBP/CTAB 1.2 to 3.5

is produced by reacting alkali silicate with mineral acids at temperatures of 60° C. to 95° C. while maintaining a pH of 7.5 to 10.5 and continuously stirring, continuing the reaction to a solids concentration in the precipitation suspension of 90 g/l to 120 g/l, adjusting the pH value to a value of less than or equal to 5, filtering out, washing, drying and optionally grinding or granulating the precipitated silica. The precipitated silica is used as a filler in vulcanizable rubber compounds and vulcanizates.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/870,591, filed Jun. 6, 1997, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/594,327, filed Jan. 30, 1996 (now abandoned), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/319,490, filed Oct. 7, 1994 (now abandoned), which in turn claims priority to German Patent Application No. P 44 27 137.9, filed Jul. 30, 1994 and German Patent Application No. P 43 34 201.9, filed Oct. 7, 1993. All applications are incorporated herewith in their entirety by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to precipitated silicas, to the process for the production thereof and to the use thereof in rubber compounds.
2. Background of the Invention:
Precipitated silicas may be incorporated into rubber compounds (Wolff, Kautschuk und Gummikunstst. 41(7), 674-698, 1988). Known silicas may be only very poorly dispersed in rubber compounds, particularly at high filling rates. This poor dispersibility is one of the reasons why elevated silica filling rates are used only rarely in tire compounds. One reason for poor dispersibility may lie in the process by which the precipitated silicas are produced. Drying, poor grinding or also excessively hard granulation may lead to silica particles which cannot readily be dispersed (filler flecks). These flecks may be seen with the naked eye.
Furthermore, silicas are highly polar and therefore have only poor phase compatibility with the non-polar polymers in the rubber compound. This form of dispersion occurs on the basis of the silica aggregates. It may only be evaluated using a light microscope and is known as microdispersion.
Precipitated silicas which may be used as a filler in rubber compounds for tires are known from EP-A 0 520 862.
A precipitated silica is known from published European Patent Application EP-A 0 157 703 which, according to EP-A 0 501 227, may be used as a filler in rubber compounds for tires.
Known precipitated silicas have the disadvantage that they exhibit poor microdispersion.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The object of the invention is to provide a precipitated silica with optimum phase compatibility with rubber, polymer, and good microdispersion.

The present invention provides a precipitated silica characterized by the following physicochemical properties:



	BET surface area	35 m²/g to 350 m²/g
	BET/CTAB surface area ratio	0.8 to 1.1
	Pore volume, PV	1.6 ml/g to 3.4 ml/g
	Silanol group density	3 ml/(1.5 g) to 9.5 ml/(1.5 g)
	(V₂= NaOH consumption)
	Average aggregate size	250 nm to 1500 nm
	CTAB surface area	30 m²/g to 350 m²/g
	DBP value
	150 ml/100 g to 300 ml/100 g
	V₂/V₁by Hg porosimetry	0.19 to 0.46
	preferably	0.20 to 0.23
	DBP/CTAB	1.2 to 3.5

The physicochemical properties are determined using the following measurement methods:



BET surface area	Areameter, Strohlein, to ISO 5794/Annex D
Pore volume	Mercury porosimetry to DIN 66 133 (7 bar to
	2000 bar)
Silanol group density	in Sears values, according to Sears,
	Anal. Chem. 28(12), 1981-1983, 1956.
Average aggregate size	Photon correlation spectroscopy, determined by
	Zeta Sizer 3 (manufacturer: Malvern Instruments)
CTAB surface area	at pH 9, according to Janzen et al., Rubber
	Chem. Technol. 44, 1287-1296, 1971.
DBP value	ASTM D 2414-88
Hg porosimetry	DIN 66 133

The precipitated silica according to the invention may in particular have the following physicochemical parameters:



BET surface	Hg porosimetry	Sears value V₂	Average aggregate
area [m²/g]	[ml/g]	NaOH [ml/(1.5 g)]	size [nm]

35 to 100	2.5 to 3.4	3 to 5.8	900 to 1500
100 to 150	2.4 to 3.2	4 to 7.2	400 to 850
150 to 200	1.6 to 2.4	5.3 to 9.1	300 to 550
200 to 350	1.6 to 2.3	5.8 to 9.5	250 to 520

In a preferred embodiment, the precipitated silica according to the invention has good grindability. This characteristic is represented by the average particle size determined using Malvern laser diffraction (D(4.3)) of ≦11 μm, in particular of ≦10 μm, measured after grinding on an Alpine Kolloplex pin impact mill (Z 160) at a throughput of 6 kg/h.

The present invention also provides a process for the production of the precipitated silica with the following physicochemical parameters

- which is characterized in that alkali silicate is reacted with mineral acids at temperatures of 60° C. to 95° C. while maintaining a pH of 7.5 to 10.5 and continuously stirring, the reaction is continued to a solids concentration in the precipitation suspension of 90 g/l to 120 g/l, the pH value is adjusted to a value of less than or equal to 5, the precipitated silica filtered out, washed, dried and optionally ground or granulated.

In a preferred embodiment, customary commercial sodium water glass may be diluted with water to a pH of 8 to 9 and concentrated sulfuric acid and the same water glass solution may simultaneously be added to this diluted water glass solution which has an SiO₂content of 4.9 g/l, while maintaining the pH value of 8 to 9.
Other preferred ranges of the pore volume ratio (V₂/V₁) are 0.19 to 0.43, 0.19 to 0.32, and 0.19 to 0.28.
Simultaneous addition of water glass solution and sulfuric acid may be performed over a period (duration of precipitation) of up to 160 minutes, preferably of greater than 90 minutes, in particular within 30 minutes to 90 minutes.
Depending upon the duration of precipitation, differing BET surface areas of the precipitated silica may be achieved. Thus, at a duration of precipitation of more than 90 minutes, surface areas of 35 m²/g to 150 m²/g are achieved and, at a duration of 30 minutes to 90 minutes, surface areas of 150 m²/g to 350 m²/g.
The precipitated silica according to the invention may be modified with organosilanes of the formulas I to III
[R¹ _n—(RO)_3-nSi—(Alk)_m—(Ar)_p]q[B] (I)
R¹ _n—(RO)_3-nSi—(Alkyl) (II)
or
R¹ _n—(RO)_3-nSi—(Alkenyl) (III)
in which:

- B: means —SCN, —SH, —Cl, —NH₂(if q=1) or —S_x— (if q=2)
- R and R¹: mean an alkyl group with 1 to 4 carbon atoms, the phenyl residue, wherein all residues R and R¹may each have the same or different meaning
- R: means a C₁-C₄alkyl, C₁-C₄alkoxy group
- n: means 0, 1 or 2
- Alk: means a divalent unbranched or branched hydrocarbon residue with 1 to 6 carbon atoms
- m: means 0 or 1
- Ar: means an arylene residue with 6 to 12 carbon atoms, preferably 6 carbon atoms
- p: means 0 or 1, providing that p and n do not simultaneously mean 0
- x: means a number from 2 to 8
- Alkyl: means a monovalent unbranched or branched unsaturated hydrocarbon residue with 1 to 20 carbon atoms, preferably 2 to 8 carbon atoms
- Alkenyl: means a monovalent unbranched or branched unsaturated hydrocarbon residue with 2 to 20 carbon atoms, preferably 2 to 8 carbon atoms

Modification with organosilanes may be performed in mixtures of 0.5 parts to 50 parts of organosilanes, related to 100 parts of precipitated silica, in particular of 2 parts to 15 parts, related to 100 parts of precipitated silica, wherein the reaction between the precipitated silica and silane may be performed during compounding (in situ) or outside the compounding process (premodified).
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, bis(triethoxy-silylpropyl) tetrasulphane may be used as the silane.
The precipitated silica according to the invention may be incorporated into vulcanizable rubber compounds as a reinforcing filler in quantities of 5 parts to 200 parts, related to 100 parts of rubber, as a powder, microbeads or granules both with and without silane modification.
One or more of the above-stated silanes may be added, together with the silica according to the invention, to the rubber compound, wherein the reaction between the filler and silane proceeds during the compounding process at elevated temperatures (in situ modification), or in already premodified form (see, for example, DE 40 04 781), i.e., the two reactants are reacted outside the actual compounding process.
In addition to compounds exclusively containing the silicas according to the invention with and without organosilanes according to formulae I to III, the rubber compounds may additionally be reinforced with one or more fillers having a greater or lesser reinforcing action. It would primarily be customary in this connection to use a blend of carbon blacks (for example furnace, gas, flame, acetylene blacks) and the silicas according to the invention, with or without silane, but also of natural fillers, such as for example clays, siliceous chalks, other commercial silicas and the silicas according to the invention.
The blending ratio, as with the quantity of organosilane added, depends in this connection on the range of properties to be achieved in the finished rubber compound. A ratio of 5% to 95% between the silicas according to the invention and the other above-stated fillers, i.e., the silica according to the invention is 5% to 95% by weight of the mixture of fillers, is conceivable and is also achieved in this context.
Apart from the silicas according to the invention, the organosilanes and other fillers, the elastomers comprise a further important constituent of the rubber blend. The silicas according to the invention may be used in any types of rubber which may be vulcanized with accelerators/sulphur or also peroxide curable rubbers. Rubbers which may be cited in this connection are natural or synthetic elastomers, oil-extended or not, as a single polymer or blend with other rubbers such as for example natural rubbers, butadiene rubbers, isoprene rubbers, butadiene/styrene rubbers, in particular SBR produced using the solution polymerization process, butadiene/acrylonitrile rubbers, butyl rubbers, terpolymers of ethylene, propylene and unconjugated dienes.
The following additional rubbers may moreover also be considered for use in rubber compounds with the stated rubbers: carboxyl rubbers, epoxy rubbers, transpolypentenamers, halogenated butyl rubbers, 2-chlorobutadiene rubbers, ethylene/vinyl acetate copolymers, ethylene/propylene copolymers, optionally together with chemical derivatives of natural rubber and modified natural rubbers.
Customary further constituents such as plasticizers, stabilizers, activators, pigments, antioxidants and processing auxiliaries in customary quantities are also known.
The silicas according to the invention, with and without silane, may be used in any rubber applications, such as for example tires, conveyor belts, seals, V-belts, tubes, shoe soles etc.
Dispersion, i.e. the distribution of a substance (filler) in a polymer compound, is of vital significance to the subsequent properties of the article containing this substance. Tear strength values in particular (tensile strength, elongation at break, tear propagation resistance), but also hysteresis and abrasion values are highly dependent upon dispersion (Schweitzer et al., Rubber World 138(6), 869-876, 1958; Schweitzer et al., Rubber World 139(1), 74-81, 1958; Hess et al., Rubber Chem. Tech. 36(5), 1175-1229, 1963).
The significance of this parameter to rubber properties is accompanied by a lack of options for exactly measuring it, or many of the most commonly used methods allow only a subjective examination and assessment of dispersion.
The most widely used methods for measuring dispersion are described in ASTM D 2663-88 and were all developed to measure the dispersion of carbon black in rubber, but may however also be used to measure the dispersion of silica-filled compounds, provided that the compound contains only this filler and not blends, for example carbon black and silica.
One of the three methods described in the above-mentioned standard involves visual examination with the naked eye or slight magnification under the microscope and photographic recording of the vulcanizate samples, wherein the result is assessed against 5 standard photographs using a numbered scale from 1 to 5.
Another method is to count filler agglomerates with a size of ≦5 μm. To this end, a microtome section of the vulcanizate is prepared and the percentage of the area occupied by these agglomerates is determined by transmission light microscopy. Here too, dispersion is divided into classes.
The third option described is scanning the surface roughness of the vulcanizate with a needle. In this manner, the number and average height of surface roughness is measured. As with method 2, the roughness factor is converted into a dispersion index from very good to very poor.
The microscopic method (for example 30 times magnification), in which dispersion in the vulcanizate is assessed against a numbered scale from 1 to 10 using 10 standard photographs is presently the most commonly used method, which, although subjective, is rapid, meaningful and most suited to laboratory operation.
Dispersion and its evaluation described above constitute a property of the silica in the polymer compound. In order to be able to predict the subsequent dispersion behavior of a silica in the polymer compound before it is compounded, for example with rubber, the person skilled in the art makes use of the grindability of the silica. In other words, the grindability of the silica and its subsequent dispersion, for example in rubber, largely correlate.
This grindability may inter alia be characterized by the energy required to achieve a particular particle fineness, or conversely by the particle fineness achieved when a grinder is operated at the same power and product throughput. The mill used is an Alpine-Kolloplex pin impact mill (Z 160) operated at a constant product throughput of 6 kg/h.
Particle fineness is characterized by the average, volume-weighted particle diameter MTG (D(4.3)) measured by laser diffraction (Malvern Instruments, model 2600c).
Values of ≦11 μm, in particular of ≦10 μm, are achieved for the silicas according to the invention, which are higher in customary silicas (≧12 μm). It has also been found that, due to the process by which the silicas are produced, the silicas according to the invention are already so fine that, in contrast with conventional products, they require no further grinding for many industrial applications and thus also offer economic advantages.
The present invention also provides vulcanizable rubber compounds which contain the precipitated silicas according to the invention in quantities of 5 parts to 200 parts, related to 100 parts of rubber. Incorporation of this silica and production of the compounds containing this silica proceed in the manner customary in the rubber industry in an internal mixer or roll mill. The silica may be presented or used as powder, microbeads or granules. In this respect too, the silicas according to the invention do not differ from known, light silicate fillers.
Due to the above-stated differences, the precipitated silicas according to the invention lead to improved dispersion properties at a constant surface area compared with standard silicas.
The silicas according to the invention also exhibit better properties in relation to some other technically important rubber parameters. The following properties may be mentioned, higher modulus, lower tan δ as a measure of tire rolling resistance, better abrasion resistance, lower T-center values, better wet skid resistance, better rebound resilience, better heat build-up performance and better viscosity.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

The drawings compare the essential physicochemical parameters of the precipitated silica according to the invention with those of known precipitated silica. The drawings show:
FIG. 1 the ratio of CTB to DBP
FIG. 2 the ratio of CTAB to DBP
FIG. 3 the ratio of CTAB to DBP
FIG. 4 the ratio of CTAB to DBP
FIG. 5 the ratio of CTAB to V₂/V₁
FIG. 6 the ratio of CTAB to DBP/CTAB.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The following examples illustrate the invention: The following substances are used in the examples:



First Latex Crepe	natural rubber
Ultrasil VN
2	precipitated silica (Degussa AG) with an N₂surface
	area of 125 m²/g
Ultrasil VN
3	precipitated silica (Degussa AG) with an N₂surface
	area of 175 m²/g
CBS	benzothiazyl-2-cyclohexylsulphenamide
TMTM	tetramethylthiuram monosulphide
Si 69	bis(3-triethoxysilylpropyl)tetrasilane (Degussa AG)
DEG	diethylene glycol
VSL 1955 S 25	solution polymerized styrene/butadiene rubber with a
	styrene content of 25% and a vinyl content of 55%
	(Bayer AG)
DPG	diphenylguanidine
Vulkanox 4020	N-(1,3-dimethylbutyl)-N-phenyl-p-phenylenediamine
	(Bayer AG)
Protector G 35	ozone protective wax
ZBED	zinc dibenzylthiocarbamate
Buna CB 24	butadiene rubber from Bunawerke Huls
Naftolene ZD	aromatic mineral oil plasticizer
Hisil 210	silica from PPG with an N₂surface area of approx.
	130 m²/g
Hisil 255	silica from PPG with an N₂surface area of approx.
	170 m²/g
KS
300	silica from Akzo with an N₂surface area of approx.
	125 m²/g
KS 404	silica from Akzo with an N₂surface area of approx.
	175 m²/g

The following test standards were used:



Test	Unit	Standard

Tensile stress	MPa	DIN 53 504
Compression set B	%	ASTM D 395
Loss angle tan δ	—	DIN 53 513
DIN abrasion	mm³	DIN 53 516
Firestone ball rebound	%	AD 20 405
Mooney viscosity	ME	DIN 53 523/524
Goodrich flexometer	° C.	ASTM D 623 A

EXAMPLE 1

Production of a silica according to the invention with an N₂surface area in the range 100 m²/g.
43.5 m³of hot water is introduced into a vat and customary commercial sodium waterglass (weight modulus 3.42, density 1.348) is stirred in a quantity such that a pH of 8.5 is achieved. While maintaining a precipitation temperature of 88° C. and pH 8.5, 16.8 m³of the same water glass and sulfuric acid (96%) are simultaneously added within 150 minutes from opposite positions. A solids content of 100 g/l is produced. Further sulfuric acid is then added until a pH of <5 is achieved. The solids are separated in presses, washed and the pressed paste dried by spray drying or in a rotary kiln and optionally ground.
The precipitated silica obtained has an N₂surface area of 80 m²/g, an aggregate size of 1320 nm and grindability of 10 μm. The Sears value (V₂) is 4.4 ml/(1.5 g) and Hg porosimetry 2.7 ml/g. The CTAB surface area is 75 m²/g. The DBP value is 236 ml/100 g. The V₂/V₁, ratio is 0.32. The DBP/CTAB ratio is 3.15.

EXAMPLE 2

Production of a silica according to the invention with an N₂surface area of the 100 m²/g to 150 m²/g range.
The same procedure is used as in Example 1, with the exception that a pH value of 9.0 is maintained in the initial precipitation batch and during precipitation. After 135 minutes, a solids content of 98 g/l is achieved in the precipitation suspension.
The precipitated silica obtained has an N₂surface area of 120 m²/g, grindability of 8.8 μm, a Sears value of 4.45 ml/(1.5 g) at an aggregate size of 490 nm and an Hg pore volume of 2.85 ml/g. The DBP value is 270 ml/100 g. The CTAB surface area is 115 m²/g. The V₂/V₁, ratio is 0.28. The DBP/CTAB ratio is 2.34.

EXAMPLE 3

Production of a silica according to the invention with an N₂surface area in the 150 m²/g to 200 m²/g range.
The same procedure is used as in Example 2, with the difference that the precipitation time is shortened to 76 minutes and the precipitation temperature reduced to 80° C. After this period, a solids content in the precipitation suspension of 100 g/l is achieved. The precipitated silica obtained has the following physicochemical parameters: BET surface area of 184 m²/g, grindability of 8.7 μm, Sears value of 7.5 ml/(1.5 g) at an aggregate size of 381 nm, Hg pore volume 2.26 ml/g. The CTAB surface area is 165 m²/g. The DBP value is 255 ml/100 g. The V₂/V₁ratio is 0.2080 to 0.2299. The DBP/CTAB ratio is 1.545.

EXAMPLE 4

Determination of pore volume by Hg porosimetry on silicas according to the invention compared with some presently known commercial standard silicas

Process: Hg-Porosimetry according to DIN 66 133 but using an injection process of from 7 bar to 500 bar

N₂surface area (m²/g): 100 to 150



Product Name	N₂surface area (m²/g)	Pore Volume (ml/g )

Hisil 210	130	1.54
KS 300	125	1.98
Ultrasil VN 2	125	1.82
Silica according to the	120	2.85
invention (Example 2)

N₂surface are (m²/g): 150 to 200



Product Name	N₂surface area (m²/g)	Pore Volume (ml/g)

Hisil 225	170	1.13
KS 404	175	1.66
Ultrasil VN 3	175	1.46
Silica according to the	184	2.26
invention (Example 3)

The silicas according to the invention have a distinctly higher pore volume.

EXAMPLE 5

Comparison of sears value (V₂) as a measure of the OH group density of the silicas according to the invention with standard commercial silicas
N₂surface area (m²/g): 100 to 150

V₂[ml] = NaOH

Product Name N₂surface area [m²/g] consumption [ml/(1.5 g)]

Hisil 210 130 8

KS 300 125 7.7

Ultrasil VN 2 125 7.2

Silica according to the 120 4.4

invention (Example 2)

N₂surface area (m²/g): 150 to 200



		V₂[ml] = NaOH
Product Name	N₂surface area [m²/g]	consumption [ml/(1.5 g)]

Hisil 255	170	8.1
KS 404	175	8.1
Ultrasil VN 3	175	9.9
Silica according to the	184	7.5
invention (Example 3)

The lower V₂=NaOH consumption, the lower is the —OH group density. The comparison shows that the silicas according to the invention may have a silanol group density of up to 40% lower than known precipitated silicas.

EXAMPLE 6

Determination of average aggregate size by photon correlation spectroscopy

Parameters:
Ultrasound time: 15 minutes
Ultrasonic Device used: RK 510 H (manufacturer: Bandelin)
Suspending agent: Isopropanol/pentanol 10:1
Weight: 30 mg silica per 10 ml suspending agent

N₂surface area (m²/g): 100 to 150



		Average aggregate
Product Name	N₂surface area (m²/g)	size (nm)

Hisil 210	130	254
KS 300	125	197
Ultrasil VN 2	125	191
Silica according to the	120	490
invention (Example 2)

N₂surface area (m²/g): 150 to 200



		Average aggregate
Product Name	N₂surface area (m²/g)	size (nm)

Hisil 255	170	152
KS 404	175	218
Ultrasil VN 3	175	167
Silica according to the	184	381
invention (Example 3)

The average aggregate size of the silicas according to the invention is distinctly greater than that of the known precipitated silicas.

EXAMPLE 7

Silica according to Example 2 of the invention in comparison with Ultrasil VN 2 in a natural rubber formulation with Si 69



	1	2

First Latex Crepe	100	100
Ultrasil VN 2	50	—
Silica according to the	—	50
invention (Example 2)
ZnO RS	4	4
Stearic acid	2	2
DEG	1	1
Si 69	3.2	3.2
CBS	1.6	1.6
TMTM	0.3	0.3
Sulfur	0.8	0.8
Mooney viscosity (MU)	77	69

Vulcanizate data: 150° C./t _95%

1 2

300% modulus (MPa) 8.1 9

Ball rebound (%) 56.8 58.6

DIN abrasion (mm³) 125 114

Goodrich flexometer (0.175″, 108 N, RT, 18 h)

T-center (° C.) 81.2 70.8

tan δ/60° C. 0.093 0.085
In comparison with Ultrasil VN 2, which is comparable in surface area, the silica according to Example 2 of the invention leads to lower viscosities, higher modulus and resilience values, improved abrasion, lower heat build-up and lower loss angle tan at 60° C. and thus lower rolling resistance.

EXAMPLE 8

Silica according to the invention (Example 3) in comparison with Ultrasil VN 3 in a solution-SBR/BR tire tread formulation with Si 69



	1	2

VSL 1955 S 25	96	96
Buna CB 24	30	30
Ultrasil VN 3	80	—
Silica according to the	—	80
invention (Example 3)
ZnO RS	3	3
Stearic acid	2	2
Naftolen ZD	10	10
Vulkanox 4020	1.5	1.5
Protektor G 35	1	1
Si 69	6.4	6.4
CBS	1.5	1.5
DPG	2	2
ZBED	0.2	0.2
Sulfur	1.5	1.5
Mooney viscosity (MU)	72	68

Vulcanizate data: 150° C./t _95%

1 2

300% modulus (MPa) 8.9 9.3

Ball rebound (%) 52.6 54.7

Loss tan δ according to DIN 53 513, device used: MTS

tan δ/0° C. 0.480 0.501

tan δ/60° C. 0.152 0.144
In comparison with VN 3, the silica according to the invention has lower viscosity, higher modulus, higher elasticity and, particularly importantly, higher wet skid resistance with low rolling resistance.

EXAMPLE 9

Comparison of dispersion of silica according to the invention (Example 2) compared with VN2 (identical N, surface area of approx. 120 m²/g) (Using the Philipps methods, described in technical information brochure 102 A).
A piece of rubber approximately 20 to 30 μm in thickness (area approx. 5×5 mm²) is cut using a Vibracut apparatus from FTB-Feinwerktechnik from a 6 mm sheet of vulcanizate of the formulation according to Example 8 filled with 80 parts of Ultrasil VN 2 or of the silica according to the invention from Example 2, related to 100 parts of rubber. This sample of rubber is transferred onto a glass slide and covered with a second glass slide. The sample prepared in this manner is examined under a light microscope with a reflected light attachment and reproduced as a negative image with 55-times magnification. A positive image with the desired final magnification is prepared from this negative.
Dispersion is assessed according to the Philipps method using 10 standard photographs as stated below:

Number Dispersion

1 to 2 very poor

3 to 4 poor

5 to 6 adequate

7 to 8 good

9 to 10 very good
The dispersion of Ultrasil VN2 is rated at 5 and is thus adequate, the dispersion of the silica according to the invention from Example 2 is rated at 9 and is thus very good.

EXAMPLE 10

Comparison of dispersion of silica according to the invention from Example 3 with Ultrasil VN 3 (identical N₂surface area of approx. 175 m²/g). Formulation, procedure and assessment are performed in a similar manner to Example 9.
The dispersion of Ultrasil VN 3 is rated at 2 and is thus very poor, the dispersion of the silica according to Example 3 of the invention is rated at 8 and is thus good.

EXAMPLE 11

Determination of dispersion by roughness measurement using a Federal Dispersion Analysis EM D4000-W7 unit. Comparison of Ultrasil VN2 with the silica according to the invention from Example 2.
A piece of rubber (20 mm×2 mm) is cut using a cutting device also supplied by the above-stated equipment manufacturer from a 2 mm sheet of vulcanizate of the formulation according to Example 8 filled with 80 parts of Ultrasil VN2 or with the silica according to the invention from Example 2, related to 100 parts of rubber, and is fixed into a holder provided by the equipment manufacturer. The surface of the vulcanizate is scanned using a diamond needle and the surface roughness caused by dispersion so determined. This process allows dispersion to be quantified as the device determines a value F²H. F means the number of peaks and H their average height. Thus, the lower the value of this parameter, the better is the dispersion of the filler in the vulcanizate sample.
For the above-stated fillers, the parameter F²H gave the following values:

Silica according to the

Ultrasil VN 2 invention (Example 2)

F²H 82366 32556
The silica according to the invention thus has distinctly better dispersion. This method thus confirms the results from Example 9.

EXAMPLE 12

Comparison of dispersion of Ultrasil VN 3 with the silica according to the invention from Example 3 using the roughness measurement from Example 11.
The filling rate and procedure are here similar to those in Example 11.

Silica according to the

Ultrasil VN 3 invention (Example 3)

F²H 55601 22602
The silica according to the invention has distinctly better dispersion characteristics than VN 3. This method confirms the results found in Example 10.

Claims

1-6. (canceled)

7. A rubber composition comprising a rubber compound and a precipitated silica having the following physico-chemical properties:

BET surface area: 35 m²/g to 350 m²/g; BET/CTAB surface area ratio: 0.8 to 1.1; pore volume, PV: 1.6 ml/g to 3.4 ml/g; silanol group density, ml of NaOH 3 ml/(1.5 g) to 9.5 ml/(1.5 g); consumed in raising pH to 9: average aggregate size: 250 nm to 1500 nm; CTAB surface area: 30 m²/g to 350 m²/g; DBP volume: 150 ml/100 g to 300 ml/100 g; V₂/V₁by Hg porosimetry: 0.19 to 0.46; and DBP/CTAB: 1.2 to 3.5.

8. The rubber composition of claim 7, wherein the DBP/CTAB ratio ranges from 1.2 to 2.4.

9. The rubber composition of claim 7, wherein said DBP/CTAB ratio is 1.545 to 3.5.

10. The rubber composition of claim 7, wherein said V₂/V₁by Hg porosimetry ranges from 0.19 to 0.43.

11. The rubber composition of claim 10, wherein said V₂/V₁by Hg porosimetry ranges from 0.19 to 0.32.

12. The rubber composition of claim 11, wherein said V₂/V₁by Hg porosimetry ranges from 0.19 to 0.28.

13. The rubber composition of claim 12, wherein said V₂/V₁by Hg porosimetry ranges from 0.19 to 0.20.

14. The rubber composition of claim 7, wherein the precipitated silica is modified with at least one organosilane.

15. The rubber composition of claim 7, further comprising at least one filler selected from the group consisting of carbon black, clay, siliceous chalk, commercial silica, and combinations thereof.

16. The rubber composition of claim 7, wherein the rubber compound is selected from the group consisting of a natural rubber, butadiene rubber, isoprene rubber, butadiene/styrene rubber, butadiene/acrylonitrile rubber, butyl rubber, terpolymer, and combinations thereof.

17. The rubber composition of claim 7, wherein the rubber composition is used in a tire, conveyor belt, seal, V-belt, tube, or shoe sole.

18. A tire comprising a rubber compound and a precipitated silica having the following physico-chemical properties:

19. The tire of claim 14, wherein the DBP/CTAB ratio ranges from 1.2 to 2.4.

20. The tire of claim 14, wherein said DBP/CTAB ratio is 1.545 to 3.5.

21. The tire of claim 18, wherein said V₂/V₁by Hg porosimetry ranges from 0.19 to 0.43.

22. The tire of claim 21, wherein said V₂/V₁by Hg porosimetry ranges from 0.19 to 0.32.

23. The tire of claim 22, wherein said V₂/V₁by Hg porosimetry ranges from 0.19 to 0.28.

24. The tire of claim 23, wherein said V₂/V₁by Hg porosimetry ranges from 0.19 to 0.20.

25. The tire of claim 18, wherein the precipitated silica is modified with at least one organosilane.

26. The tire of claim 18, wherein the tire further comprises at least one filler selected from the group consisting of carbon black, clay, siliceous chalk, commercial silica, and combinations thereof.

27. The tire of claim 18, wherein the rubber compound is selected from the group consisting of a natural rubber, butadiene rubber, isoprene rubber, butadiene/styrene rubber, butadiene/acrylonitrile rubber, butyl rubber, terpolymer, and combinations thereof.

28. A precipitated silica having the following physico-chemical properties:

BET surface area: 35 m²/g to 350 m²/g; BET/CTAB surface area ratio: 0.8 to 1.1; pore volume, PV: 1.6 ml/g to 3.4 ml/g; silanol group density, ml of NaOH 3 ml/(1.5 g) to 9.5 ml/(1.5 g); consumed in raising pH to 9: average aggregate size: 250 nm to 1500 nm; CTAB surface area: 30 m²/g to 350 m²/g; DBP volume: 150 ml/100 g to 300 ml/100 g; V₂/V₁by Hg porosimetry: 0.19 to 0.43; and DBP/CTAB: 1.2 to 3.5.

29. The precipitated silica of claim 28, wherein the DBP/CTAB ratio ranges from 1.2 to 2.4.

30. The precipitated silica of claim 28, wherein said DBP/CTAB ratio ranges from 1.545 to 3.5.

31. The precipitated silica of claim 28, wherein said V₂/V₁by Hg porosimetry ranges from 0.19 to 0.32.

32. The precipitated silica of claim 31, wherein said V₂/V₁by Hg porosimetry ranges from 0.19 to 0.28.

33. The precipitated silica of claim 32, wherein said V₂/V₁by Hg porosimetry ranges from 0.19 to 0.20.

34. The precipitated silica of claim 28, wherein said BET surface area ranges from 35 m²/g to 150 m²/g.

35. The precipitated silica of claim 34, wherein said BET surface area ranges from 100 m²/g to 150 m²/g.

36. The precipitated silica of claim 28, wherein said BET surface area ranges from 150 m 2/g to 350 m²/g.

37. The precipitated silica of claim 36, wherein said BET surface area ranges from 150 m²/g to 200 m²/g.