US20050218073A1 - Method of cleaning membranes - Google Patents
Method of cleaning membranes Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20050218073A1 US20050218073A1 US11/073,137 US7313705A US2005218073A1 US 20050218073 A1 US20050218073 A1 US 20050218073A1 US 7313705 A US7313705 A US 7313705A US 2005218073 A1 US2005218073 A1 US 2005218073A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- reducing agent
- membrane
- sulfite
- sodium
- sulfite reducing
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D65/00—Accessories or auxiliary operations, in general, for separation processes or apparatus using semi-permeable membranes
- B01D65/02—Membrane cleaning or sterilisation ; Membrane regeneration
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D61/00—Processes of separation using semi-permeable membranes, e.g. dialysis, osmosis or ultrafiltration; Apparatus, accessories or auxiliary operations specially adapted therefor
- B01D61/14—Ultrafiltration; Microfiltration
- B01D61/145—Ultrafiltration
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D61/00—Processes of separation using semi-permeable membranes, e.g. dialysis, osmosis or ultrafiltration; Apparatus, accessories or auxiliary operations specially adapted therefor
- B01D61/14—Ultrafiltration; Microfiltration
- B01D61/147—Microfiltration
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D61/00—Processes of separation using semi-permeable membranes, e.g. dialysis, osmosis or ultrafiltration; Apparatus, accessories or auxiliary operations specially adapted therefor
- B01D61/14—Ultrafiltration; Microfiltration
- B01D61/16—Feed pretreatment
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D71/00—Semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus characterised by the material; Manufacturing processes specially adapted therefor
- B01D71/06—Organic material
- B01D71/30—Polyalkenyl halides
- B01D71/32—Polyalkenyl halides containing fluorine atoms
- B01D71/34—Polyvinylidene fluoride
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2311/00—Details relating to membrane separation process operations and control
- B01D2311/04—Specific process operations in the feed stream; Feed pretreatment
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2321/00—Details relating to membrane cleaning, regeneration, sterilization or to the prevention of fouling
- B01D2321/04—Backflushing
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2321/00—Details relating to membrane cleaning, regeneration, sterilization or to the prevention of fouling
- B01D2321/16—Use of chemical agents
- B01D2321/168—Use of other chemical agents
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F1/00—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
- C02F1/44—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by dialysis, osmosis or reverse osmosis
- C02F1/444—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by dialysis, osmosis or reverse osmosis by ultrafiltration or microfiltration
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02A—TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02A20/00—Water conservation; Efficient water supply; Efficient water use
- Y02A20/124—Water desalination
- Y02A20/131—Reverse-osmosis
Definitions
- the present invention relates a method for cleaning polymeric microfiltration membranes and membrane units, and to compositions useful in such methods.
- Synthetic membranes are used for a variety of applications including desalination, gas separation, filtration, and dialysis.
- the properties of the membranes vary depending on the morphology of the membrane, i.e. properties such as symmetry, pore shape, and pore size, and the polymeric material used to form the membrane.
- MF and UF processes are carried out under differential pressure and are distinguished by the size of the particle or molecule that the membrane is capable of retaining or passing.
- MF can remove very fine colloidal particles in the micrometer and sub micrometer range. As a general rule, it can filter particles down to 0.1 ⁇ m, whereas ultrafiltration can retain particles as small as 0.01 ⁇ m and smaller.
- Reverse osmosis operates on an even smaller scale.
- the pore size of the membrane decreases and the pressure required to carry out the separation accordingly increases.
- a large surface area is generally needed when a large filtrate flow is required.
- One known technique to make a filtration apparatus more compact is to form a membrane in the shape of a hollow porous fiber. Modules of such fibers can be made with an extremely large surface area per unit volume. Microporous synthetic membranes are particularly suitable for use in hollow fibers and are typically produced by phase inversion techniques.
- Microporous phase inversion membranes are particularly well suited to the application of removal of colloidal suspensions, viruses, and bacteria.
- the hollow fiber membrane contains the largest membrane area per unit volume.
- UF and MF membranes are used in separating particles and colloidal matter from liquids.
- water containing solutes and precipitates is passed through a bank of semipermeable tubular membranes housed in a module, often at elevated pressures.
- the filtered water is drawn off and collected, leaving a residue of solid material in the membrane pores or on the unfiltered side of the membrane.
- the pores of the membrane be kept relatively free of contaminants. As the amount of pore blockage increases, the filtration efficiency of the module decreases and the amount of pressure required to maintain a viable throughput of liquid increases. As pressure increases, the likelihood of membrane rupture becomes more significant.
- flocculating agents are to cause dispersed colloids to coagulate and form ‘flocs’.
- Flocs have the advantage of entrapping smaller colloidal particles, thereby making filtration more efficient. They may also aid in the removal of dissolved particles. Under the influence of a flocculating agent, dissolved and suspended particles coagulate and precipitate from the water, thereby removing color, and turbidity.
- the filtrate containing the flocculating agents, colloids, bacteria and other particulate matter is passed through the filtration unit under pressure, expelling filtered water and leaving the floc trapped within the unit, and more particularly on the waste side of the membrane and in the pores of the membrane. Flocs are particularly problematical in causing membrane blockage, and membrane performance gradually diminishes with use until it becomes necessary to clean the membranes.
- Residual material accumulating in and on the membrane is often removed by ‘backwashing’, that is, running the current of water counter to its normal direction of flow to dislodge the contaminants from the membrane. Gas backwashing of the membrane is also possible.
- Backwashing generally involves increasing the pressure on both sides of the hollow fibers within a module a relatively high value before suddenly releasing that pressure on the unfiltered side of the membrane walls to cause a sudden pressure differential across the walls, which causes a backwash action.
- the membranes may be de-fouled by more conventional cleaning regimes such as solution treatment with one or more of (and usually in a sequential manner) citric acid, oxidizing agents, in particular chlorine, and chelating agents such as EDTA.
- solution treatment with one or more of (and usually in a sequential manner) citric acid, oxidizing agents, in particular chlorine, and chelating agents such as EDTA.
- Citric acid is usually regarded as a satisfactory cleaning agent, however, even it does not provide ideal levels of cleaning, and the membrane performance diminishes even following regular use/cleaning cycles. Moreover, the cleaning process usually involves a number of steps, and one or more of the steps may need to be conducted for long periods of time. Temperature control is also usually required.
- Inorganic acids and bases are the mainstay of conventional cleaning agents. As well as suffering from the drawbacks mentioned above, these agents present their own problems because they may chemically attack the membranes and/or module components. Combinations of an aqueous inorganic acid, generally nitric acid, and a reducing agent, e.g., ascorbic acid, have also been used. However, none of the above regimes sufficiently de-foul membranes, particularly PVDF membranes, of the floc. Hence, there exists the need to improve the cleaning regime while at the same time avoiding the use of potentially severe cleaning agents.
- a method of cleaning a membrane contaminated with a contaminant including the step of contacting the contaminant with a composition including at least one soluble sulfite reducing agent and a compatible solvent.
- sulfite as used herein is used in its broadest general sense and includes, without limitation, sulfite, bisulfite, metabisulfite, hydrosulfite, and the like.
- the membrane is of a hollow fiber configuration, although alternatively it may be a flat sheet membrane or other membrane configuration.
- the membrane is formed from PVDF (polyvinylidene fluoride) polymer, although the methods of the preferred embodiments are applicable to polysulfone, polyethylene, polypropylene, polyacrylonitrile (PAN), fluorinated membranes, cellulose acetate membranes and the like and mixtures of the above, as well as all commonly used membrane polymers.
- PVDF polyvinylidene fluoride
- the soluble sulfite reducing agent is sodium metabisulfite, sodium hydrosulfite, sodium sulfite or mixtures thereof. Most preferably, a mixture of sodium metabisulfite and sodium hydrosulfite is used.
- the solvent is preferably water. However any suitable solvent that is compatible with the materials comprising the membrane and is a suitable solvent for the sulfite may also be employed.
- the sodium metabisulfite and sodium hydrosulfite are present in an amount of 20 wt. % to 65 wt. % each, when used alone or in combination. This combination may be used neat or further diluted when in use, for example, to around 0.5 wt. %. Dilutions of about 2 wt. % are particularly preferred. However, any suitable dilution may be employed.
- the contaminant is believed to be removed by solubilization resulting from a reduction to a lower valence state of at least a part of the contaminant.
- the method reduces the cleaning time relative to known cleaning methods and is carried out at low or ambient temperatures.
- a method of cleaning a membrane contaminated with a contaminant including the step of contacting the contaminant with a composition including a sulfite reducing agent and a solvent, wherein the sulfite reducing agent is soluble in the solvent, and wherein the solvent is compatible with the membrane.
- the contaminant includes a metal oxide or a metal hydroxide.
- the contaminant includes ferric floc.
- the contaminant includes an organic compound.
- the solvent includes water.
- the sulfite reducing agent includes sodium metabisulfite, sodium hydrosulfite, sodium sulfite, potassium metabisulfite, potassium hydrosulfite, potassium sulfite, or mixtures thereof.
- method further includes the step of reducing a valence state of an atom of the contaminant to a lower valence state, whereby the contaminant is solublized and removed from the membrane.
- the composition further includes an enhancing agent.
- the enhancing agent includes inorganic acids, organic acids, or mixtures thereof.
- the enhancing agent includes citric acid.
- the solvent includes water and the sulfite reducing agent includes sodium metabisulfite, sodium hydrosulfite, or mixtures thereof.
- the sulfite reducing agent includes from about 0.1 wt. % to about 5 wt. % of a component including sodium metabisulfite, sodium hydrosulfite, or mixtures thereof.
- the sulfite reducing agent includes from about 0.5 wt. % to about 2 wt. % of a component including sodium metabisulfite, sodium hydrosulfite, or mixtures thereof.
- the composition includes from about 0.5 wt. % to about 1.5 wt. % sodium metabisulfite and from about 0.5 wt. % to about 1.5 wt. % sodium hydrosulfite.
- the membrane includes a hollow fiber microfiltration membrane or a hollow fiber ultrafiltration membrane.
- the membrane includes a flat microfiltration membrane or a flat ultrafiltration membrane.
- the membrane includes a polyvinylidene fluoride polymer.
- a composition for cleaning a membrane contaminated with a contaminant including a sulfite reducing agent and a solvent, wherein the sulfite reducing agent is soluble in the solvent, and wherein the solvent is compatible with the membrane.
- the contaminant includes a metal oxide or a metal hydroxide.
- the contaminant is ferric floc.
- the sulfite reducing agent includes sodium metabisulfite, sodium hydrosulfite, sodium sulfite, potassium metabisulfite, potassium hydrosulfite, potassium sulfite, or mixtures thereof.
- the sulfite reducing agent includes sodium metabisulfite and sodium hydrosulfite.
- the composition further includes an enhancing agent.
- the enhancing agent includes an inorganic acid or an organic acid.
- the organic acid includes citric acid.
- the sulfite reducing agent includes from about 20 wt. % to about 60 wt. % sodium metabisulfite, wherein the sulfite reducing agent is capable of dilution to a working concentration of about 0.5 wt. % to about 2 wt. % of sulfite reducing agent in a solubilized form.
- the sulfite reducing agent includes from about 0.5 wt. % to about 2 wt. % sodium metabisulfite.
- the sulfite reducing agent includes from about 20 wt. % to about 65 wt. % sodium hydrosulfite, and wherein the sulfite reducing agent is capable of dilution to a working concentration of about 0.5 wt. % to about 2 wt. % soluble sulfite reducing agent present in solubilized form.
- the sulfite reducing agent includes from about 0.5 wt. % to about 2 wt. % sodium hydrosulfite.
- the composition includes from about 20 wt. % to about 65 wt. % sodium metabisulfite and from about 20 wt. % to about 65 wt. % sodium hydrosulfite, wherein the sodium metabisulfite and sodium hydrosulfite are capable of dilution to a working concentration of about 0.5 wt. % to about 2 wt. % sulfite reducing agent in solubilized form.
- the composition includes from about 0.5 wt. % to about 2 wt. % sodium metabisulfite and sodium hydrosulfite.
- a method for cleaning a membrane including the step of cleaning the membrane using a composition including a sulfite reducing agent and a solvent, wherein the sulfite reducing agent is soluble in the solvent, and wherein the solvent is compatible with the membrane.
- a membrane is provided wherein the membrane is capable of cleaning by a composition including a sulfite reducing agent and a solvent, wherein the sulfite reducing agent is soluble in the solvent, and wherein the solvent is compatible with the membrane.
- a membrane is provided, wherein the membrane is contaminated with a contaminant including a metal oxide or a metal hydroxide, and wherein the membrane is capable of cleaning by a composition including a sulfite reducing agent and a solvent, wherein the sulfite reducing agent is soluble in the solvent, and wherein the solvent is compatible with the membrane.
- the membrane includes a hollow fiber or a flat sheet.
- the membrane includes a polyvinylidene fluoride polymer.
- Ferric chloride is the preferred flocculating agent in water clean-up procedures.
- standard cleaning regimes have not been highly effective in cleaning PVDF membranes of the resultant Fe floc, leading to significant commercial costs associated with ultimate irreversible membrane fouling by metal oxides and/or hydroxides.
- the present inventors have found that the methods of the preferred embodiments are particularly suited for PVDF membranes.
- metabisulfite was used as a cleaning agent on PVDF membranes, there was successful removal of metal oxides and metal hydroxides.
- This material may be used neat, although it is possible to use it diluted in an amount such that the dilution is as low as 0.5 wt. %, although dilutions of around 2 wt. % have been found advantageous.
- standardized solutions may be prepared from the starting materials. While the exact concentration will be selected depending on the time limits set for the membrane cleaning and on cost considerations, it has been found particularly useful to use solutions of around 2 wt. %/volume total sulfite content based on the starting materials, i.e. 2 g sodium metabisulfite per 100 ml of water, or 1 g sodium bisulfite and 1 g of sodium hydrosulfite per 100 ml of water, and the like.
- ferric floc applications can be run at the higher flux and the fouled membranes can be quickly and efficiently cleaned.
- the ability to use such high fluxes can translate into a significant commercial advantage.
- CIP cleaning-in-place
- one form of CIP cleaning involves isolating the module to be cleaned by means of taps and pipes and the like from fluid communication with the remainder of the system.
- the water or liquid normally filtered is then replaced with a cleaning fluid.
- the cleaning fluid is then allowed to run through the membrane module to carry out the cleaning.
- the cleaning fluid may be recycled through the module, or allowed to pass through the module just once before being run off to waste, depending upon the particular requirements of the system and the amount of contaminants being removed.
- the CIP procedure can take place at ambient temperatures or at controlled temperatures outside the normal range of filtration temperatures, e.g. at higher temperatures to increase dissolution of solids, or at lower temperatures to allow for a greater concentration of dissolved gaseous agents e.g., especially chlorine gas, in the fluid.
- the CIP can be carried out for varying lengths of time and at pressures outside the normal range of those used for filtration.
- the filtration agent is flushed to remove traces of the cleaning agent before being returned to service by being reconnected to the normal fluid flow.
- CIP can be carried out manually or by means of fully automated systems which activate in response to pressure differentials or after predetermined module operating times.
- the examples given below relate to modules prepared from banks of hollow fiber PVDF membranes.
- the membrane modules are as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,159,373, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
- the module includes a shell within which is positioned a bundle containing from about 2800 to about 30,000 hollow fibers with a diameter of 500 ⁇ m to 650 ⁇ m and a lumen diameter of 250 ⁇ m to 310 ⁇ m, with a pore size of 0.2 ⁇ m, but these sizes may be varied as required.
- membrane and module configurations different from the one described above may also be employed with the methods of preferred embodiments, as will be appreciated by one skilled in the art.
- a potting compound holds the ends of the fibers in place without blocking the lumens and closes off each end of the module.
- the liquid feed is pumped into the module, between the shell and the outside of the hollow fibers. Some of the feed liquid passes into the lumen of the fibers, being filtered as it does so. The clean liquid then concentrates in the inside of the lumen, and flows, or is drawn off and taken outside the module, as a clarified liquid.
- the cleaning agent is introduced in place of the untreated liquid stream.
- the flow can be introduced counter to that normally used.
- Membranes in a raw water filtration module were cleaned using a 2 wt. % solution of citric acid in water at 35° C., which was recirculated for 60 minutes. Three repeats of a 300 second aeration followed by a 300 second soak were conducted. Then, a solution of 300 ppm Cl in water at 20° C. was recirculated for 60 minutes, followed by a 30 minute soak. The total duration of the CIP was 3 hours.
- Table 1 provides measurements of transmembrane pressure (TMP), resistance (R), and flow (in gallons per minute per module) both before and after the CIP.
- Membranes in a clarified water filtration module were cleaned 400 ppm solution of Cl in water at 20° C., which was recirculated for 60 minutes, followed by a 30 minute soak. Then the membranes were washed with a 2.7 wt. % citric acid solution in water at 35° C., which was recirculated for 60 minutes. Three repeats of a 300 second aeration followed by a 300 second soak were conducted. Then, an overnight soak was conducted. The total duration of the CIP was 13 hours. Table 2 provides measurements of transmembrane pressure, resistance, and flow both before and after the CIP.
- Membranes in a clarified water filtration module were cleaned using a 1000 ppm solution of Cl in water at 20° C., which was recirculated for 60 minutes, followed by a 30 minute soak. Then the membranes were washed with a 4 wt. % citric acid solution in water at 35° C., which was recirculated for 60 minutes. Three repeats of a 300 second aeration followed by a 300 second soak were conducted. Then, an overnight soak in a 1000 ppm Cl solution in water was conducted. The total duration of the CIP was 13 hours. Table 3 provides measurements of transmembrane pressure, resistance, and flow both before and after the CIP.
- Sulfite agents such as sodium metabisulfite and SUPER IRON OUT® can also be used in conjunction with other conventional methods, for example, in conjunction with sulfuric acid for cleaning membranes (including polypropylene membranes). In low concentrations, it is believed sodium metabisulfite may act as a sacrificial agent, protecting the membrane from degradation by other cleaning agents.
- the best post-clean fouling rates were also investigated.
- the poorest post-clean fouling rate was found using the conventional chlorine clean.
- the best post clean fouling was found using 2 wt. % citric acid and 2 wt. % SMBS, with the 1.5 wt. % SMBS/0.5 wt. % SHS and 0.5 wt. % SMBS/1.5 wt. % SHS mixtures also performing very well.
- the citric acid gave the lowest permeability recovery.
- Three cleans, 1.5% SMBS+0.5 wt. % SHS, 1 wt. % SMBS+1 wt. % SHS, and 2 wt. % SHS gave the best permeability recoveries.
- the permeability recoveries for the sulfite cleaning agents show that for two specific combinations, 1.5 wt. % SMBS/0.5 wt. % SHS and 1 wt. % SMBS/1 wt. % SHS, the permeability recovery (of 221% and 236%, respectively) was greater than the permeability recovery for either the SMBS or SHS alone, indicating a synergistic relationship between the two.
- the other cleaning combinations are likewise not simply additive, indicating that in combination, the two sulfite cleaning agents may act co-operatively.
- the sulfite cleaning method of the preferred embodiments provided in all cases a good TMP recovery, good permeability recovery and a low rate of post clean fouling.
- the all round performance was not matched by conventional cleaning methodologies.
- sulfite cleaning required less time to achieve CIP (cleaning in place) de-fouling of membranes than conventional (chlorine) membrane cleans.
Abstract
The present invention relates a method for cleaning polymeric microfiltration membranes and membrane units, and to compositions useful in such methods.
Description
- This application is a continuation of Application Ser. No. 10/298,471, filed Nov. 15, 2002, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/333,828, filed Nov. 16, 2001.
- The present invention relates a method for cleaning polymeric microfiltration membranes and membrane units, and to compositions useful in such methods.
- Synthetic membranes are used for a variety of applications including desalination, gas separation, filtration, and dialysis. The properties of the membranes vary depending on the morphology of the membrane, i.e. properties such as symmetry, pore shape, and pore size, and the polymeric material used to form the membrane.
- Different membranes can be used for specific separation processes, including microfiltration (MF), ultrafiltration (UF), and reverse osmosis. MF and UF processes are carried out under differential pressure and are distinguished by the size of the particle or molecule that the membrane is capable of retaining or passing. MF can remove very fine colloidal particles in the micrometer and sub micrometer range. As a general rule, it can filter particles down to 0.1 μm, whereas ultrafiltration can retain particles as small as 0.01 μm and smaller. Reverse osmosis operates on an even smaller scale.
- As the size of the particles to be separated decreases, the pore size of the membrane decreases and the pressure required to carry out the separation accordingly increases.
- A large surface area is generally needed when a large filtrate flow is required. One known technique to make a filtration apparatus more compact is to form a membrane in the shape of a hollow porous fiber. Modules of such fibers can be made with an extremely large surface area per unit volume. Microporous synthetic membranes are particularly suitable for use in hollow fibers and are typically produced by phase inversion techniques.
- Microporous phase inversion membranes are particularly well suited to the application of removal of colloidal suspensions, viruses, and bacteria. Of all types of membranes, the hollow fiber membrane contains the largest membrane area per unit volume.
- UF and MF membranes are used in separating particles and colloidal matter from liquids. In a typical scenario, water containing solutes and precipitates is passed through a bank of semipermeable tubular membranes housed in a module, often at elevated pressures. The filtered water is drawn off and collected, leaving a residue of solid material in the membrane pores or on the unfiltered side of the membrane.
- It is preferred that the pores of the membrane be kept relatively free of contaminants. As the amount of pore blockage increases, the filtration efficiency of the module decreases and the amount of pressure required to maintain a viable throughput of liquid increases. As pressure increases, the likelihood of membrane rupture becomes more significant.
- Under some circumstances, it may be desirable to treat water containing impurities with a flocculating agent prior to filtration. The purpose of flocculating agents is to cause dispersed colloids to coagulate and form ‘flocs’. Flocs have the advantage of entrapping smaller colloidal particles, thereby making filtration more efficient. They may also aid in the removal of dissolved particles. Under the influence of a flocculating agent, dissolved and suspended particles coagulate and precipitate from the water, thereby removing color, and turbidity.
- Thus, in practice, the filtrate containing the flocculating agents, colloids, bacteria and other particulate matter is passed through the filtration unit under pressure, expelling filtered water and leaving the floc trapped within the unit, and more particularly on the waste side of the membrane and in the pores of the membrane. Flocs are particularly problematical in causing membrane blockage, and membrane performance gradually diminishes with use until it becomes necessary to clean the membranes.
- One of the most commonly employed flocculating agents in the water purification field is ferric chloride, and the resultant floc is known as Fe floc. Build-up of Fe floc leads to iron fouling and eventually results in membrane performance degradation that diminishes the lifetime of these high cost membrane units. Two of the most widely used membrane compositions, polypropylene (PP) and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), foul irreversibly with Fe floc and can become useless.
- Residual material accumulating in and on the membrane is often removed by ‘backwashing’, that is, running the current of water counter to its normal direction of flow to dislodge the contaminants from the membrane. Gas backwashing of the membrane is also possible.
- Backwashing generally involves increasing the pressure on both sides of the hollow fibers within a module a relatively high value before suddenly releasing that pressure on the unfiltered side of the membrane walls to cause a sudden pressure differential across the walls, which causes a backwash action. However, it is difficult to achieve complete removal of particulate matter, especially when flocculants have been used.
- In addition to backwashing, the membranes may be de-fouled by more conventional cleaning regimes such as solution treatment with one or more of (and usually in a sequential manner) citric acid, oxidizing agents, in particular chlorine, and chelating agents such as EDTA.
- Citric acid is usually regarded as a satisfactory cleaning agent, however, even it does not provide ideal levels of cleaning, and the membrane performance diminishes even following regular use/cleaning cycles. Moreover, the cleaning process usually involves a number of steps, and one or more of the steps may need to be conducted for long periods of time. Temperature control is also usually required.
- Inorganic acids and bases are the mainstay of conventional cleaning agents. As well as suffering from the drawbacks mentioned above, these agents present their own problems because they may chemically attack the membranes and/or module components. Combinations of an aqueous inorganic acid, generally nitric acid, and a reducing agent, e.g., ascorbic acid, have also been used. However, none of the above regimes sufficiently de-foul membranes, particularly PVDF membranes, of the floc. Hence, there exists the need to improve the cleaning regime while at the same time avoiding the use of potentially severe cleaning agents.
- It is desirable to overcome or ameliorate at least one of the disadvantages of the prior art methods of de-fouling membranes, to provide a useful alternative to conventional methods of de-fouling membranes, or to provide suitable compositions for use in cleaning or de-fouling membranes.
- In a preferred embodiment, there is provided a method of cleaning a membrane contaminated with a contaminant including the step of contacting the contaminant with a composition including at least one soluble sulfite reducing agent and a compatible solvent. The term sulfite as used herein is used in its broadest general sense and includes, without limitation, sulfite, bisulfite, metabisulfite, hydrosulfite, and the like.
- Preferably the membrane is of a hollow fiber configuration, although alternatively it may be a flat sheet membrane or other membrane configuration. In highly preferred embodiments, the membrane is formed from PVDF (polyvinylidene fluoride) polymer, although the methods of the preferred embodiments are applicable to polysulfone, polyethylene, polypropylene, polyacrylonitrile (PAN), fluorinated membranes, cellulose acetate membranes and the like and mixtures of the above, as well as all commonly used membrane polymers.
- Preferably, the soluble sulfite reducing agent is sodium metabisulfite, sodium hydrosulfite, sodium sulfite or mixtures thereof. Most preferably, a mixture of sodium metabisulfite and sodium hydrosulfite is used. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that, for instance, besides sodium, other soluble salts such as potassium or other alkali metals or alkaline earth metals may be used. The solvent is preferably water. However any suitable solvent that is compatible with the materials comprising the membrane and is a suitable solvent for the sulfite may also be employed.
- It is also preferred that the sodium metabisulfite and sodium hydrosulfite are present in an amount of 20 wt. % to 65 wt. % each, when used alone or in combination. This combination may be used neat or further diluted when in use, for example, to around 0.5 wt. %. Dilutions of about 2 wt. % are particularly preferred. However, any suitable dilution may be employed.
- Preferably, and without wishing to be bound by any particular theory, the contaminant is believed to be removed by solubilization resulting from a reduction to a lower valence state of at least a part of the contaminant.
- Preferably, the method reduces the cleaning time relative to known cleaning methods and is carried out at low or ambient temperatures.
- Accordingly, in a first embodiment, a method of cleaning a membrane contaminated with a contaminant is provided, the method including the step of contacting the contaminant with a composition including a sulfite reducing agent and a solvent, wherein the sulfite reducing agent is soluble in the solvent, and wherein the solvent is compatible with the membrane.
- In an aspect of the first embodiment, the contaminant includes a metal oxide or a metal hydroxide.
- In an aspect of the first embodiment, the contaminant includes ferric floc.
- In an aspect of the first embodiment, the contaminant includes an organic compound.
- In an aspect of the first embodiment, the solvent includes water.
- In an aspect of the first embodiment, the sulfite reducing agent includes sodium metabisulfite, sodium hydrosulfite, sodium sulfite, potassium metabisulfite, potassium hydrosulfite, potassium sulfite, or mixtures thereof.
- In an aspect of the first embodiment, method further includes the step of reducing a valence state of an atom of the contaminant to a lower valence state, whereby the contaminant is solublized and removed from the membrane.
- In an aspect of the first embodiment, the composition further includes an enhancing agent.
- In an aspect of the first embodiment, the enhancing agent includes inorganic acids, organic acids, or mixtures thereof.
- In an aspect of the first embodiment, the enhancing agent includes citric acid.
- In an aspect of the first embodiment, the solvent includes water and the sulfite reducing agent includes sodium metabisulfite, sodium hydrosulfite, or mixtures thereof.
- In an aspect of the first embodiment, the sulfite reducing agent includes from about 0.1 wt. % to about 5 wt. % of a component including sodium metabisulfite, sodium hydrosulfite, or mixtures thereof.
- In an aspect of the first embodiment, the sulfite reducing agent includes from about 0.5 wt. % to about 2 wt. % of a component including sodium metabisulfite, sodium hydrosulfite, or mixtures thereof.
- In an aspect of the first embodiment, the composition includes from about 0.5 wt. % to about 1.5 wt. % sodium metabisulfite and from about 0.5 wt. % to about 1.5 wt. % sodium hydrosulfite.
- In an aspect of the first embodiment, the membrane includes a hollow fiber microfiltration membrane or a hollow fiber ultrafiltration membrane.
- In an aspect of the first embodiment, the membrane includes a flat microfiltration membrane or a flat ultrafiltration membrane.
- In an aspect of the first embodiment, the membrane includes a polyvinylidene fluoride polymer.
- In a second embodiment, a composition for cleaning a membrane contaminated with a contaminant is provided, the composition including a sulfite reducing agent and a solvent, wherein the sulfite reducing agent is soluble in the solvent, and wherein the solvent is compatible with the membrane.
- In an aspect of the second embodiment, the contaminant includes a metal oxide or a metal hydroxide.
- In an aspect of the second embodiment, the contaminant is ferric floc.
- In an aspect of the second embodiment, the sulfite reducing agent includes sodium metabisulfite, sodium hydrosulfite, sodium sulfite, potassium metabisulfite, potassium hydrosulfite, potassium sulfite, or mixtures thereof.
- In an aspect of the second embodiment, the sulfite reducing agent includes sodium metabisulfite and sodium hydrosulfite.
- In an aspect of the second embodiment, the composition further includes an enhancing agent.
- In an aspect of the second embodiment, the enhancing agent includes an inorganic acid or an organic acid.
- In an aspect of the second embodiment, the organic acid includes citric acid.
- In an aspect of the second embodiment, the sulfite reducing agent includes from about 20 wt. % to about 60 wt. % sodium metabisulfite, wherein the sulfite reducing agent is capable of dilution to a working concentration of about 0.5 wt. % to about 2 wt. % of sulfite reducing agent in a solubilized form.
- In an aspect of the second embodiment, the sulfite reducing agent includes from about 0.5 wt. % to about 2 wt. % sodium metabisulfite.
- In an aspect of the second embodiment, the sulfite reducing agent includes from about 20 wt. % to about 65 wt. % sodium hydrosulfite, and wherein the sulfite reducing agent is capable of dilution to a working concentration of about 0.5 wt. % to about 2 wt. % soluble sulfite reducing agent present in solubilized form.
- In an aspect of the second embodiment, the sulfite reducing agent includes from about 0.5 wt. % to about 2 wt. % sodium hydrosulfite.
- In an aspect of the second embodiment, the composition includes from about 20 wt. % to about 65 wt. % sodium metabisulfite and from about 20 wt. % to about 65 wt. % sodium hydrosulfite, wherein the sodium metabisulfite and sodium hydrosulfite are capable of dilution to a working concentration of about 0.5 wt. % to about 2 wt. % sulfite reducing agent in solubilized form.
- In an aspect of the second embodiment, the composition includes from about 0.5 wt. % to about 2 wt. % sodium metabisulfite and sodium hydrosulfite.
- In a third embodiment, a method for cleaning a membrane is provided, the method including the step of cleaning the membrane using a composition including a sulfite reducing agent and a solvent, wherein the sulfite reducing agent is soluble in the solvent, and wherein the solvent is compatible with the membrane.
- In a fourth embodiment, a membrane is provided wherein the membrane is capable of cleaning by a composition including a sulfite reducing agent and a solvent, wherein the sulfite reducing agent is soluble in the solvent, and wherein the solvent is compatible with the membrane.
- In a fifth embodiment, a membrane is provided, wherein the membrane is contaminated with a contaminant including a metal oxide or a metal hydroxide, and wherein the membrane is capable of cleaning by a composition including a sulfite reducing agent and a solvent, wherein the sulfite reducing agent is soluble in the solvent, and wherein the solvent is compatible with the membrane.
- In an aspect of the fifth embodiment, the membrane includes a hollow fiber or a flat sheet.
- In an aspect of the fifth embodiment, the membrane includes a polyvinylidene fluoride polymer.
- The following description and examples illustrate a preferred embodiment of the present invention in detail. Those of skill in the art will recognize that there are numerous variations and modifications of this invention that are encompassed by its scope. Accordingly, the description of a preferred embodiment should not be deemed to limit the scope of the present invention.
- Ferric chloride is the preferred flocculating agent in water clean-up procedures. However, standard cleaning regimes have not been highly effective in cleaning PVDF membranes of the resultant Fe floc, leading to significant commercial costs associated with ultimate irreversible membrane fouling by metal oxides and/or hydroxides.
- Surprisingly, the present inventors have found that the methods of the preferred embodiments are particularly suited for PVDF membranes. When metabisulfite was used as a cleaning agent on PVDF membranes, there was successful removal of metal oxides and metal hydroxides.
- More surprisingly, when sodium hydrosulfite and sodium metabisulfite were used in combination as cleaning agents for PVDF membranes, significant antifouling properties were observed.
- One commercial blend of sodium hydrosulfite (20-65 wt. %) and sodium metabisulfite (20-65 wt. %) was found to be particularly useful. This mixture, marketed as SUPER IRON OUT®, has been commercially available since the 1950's, although it has not been used for cleaning membranes. SUPER IRON OUT® has been marketed to household consumers as an all-purpose rust and stain remover, water softener, a cleaning agent for toilets, sinks tubs, dishwashers, white clothing, and fabrics as well as exterior surfaces, i.e. as a general household reductant.
- This material may be used neat, although it is possible to use it diluted in an amount such that the dilution is as low as 0.5 wt. %, although dilutions of around 2 wt. % have been found advantageous.
- Alternatively, standardized solutions may be prepared from the starting materials. While the exact concentration will be selected depending on the time limits set for the membrane cleaning and on cost considerations, it has been found particularly useful to use solutions of around 2 wt. %/volume total sulfite content based on the starting materials, i.e. 2 g sodium metabisulfite per 100 ml of water, or 1 g sodium bisulfite and 1 g of sodium hydrosulfite per 100 ml of water, and the like.
- The commercial importance of this new application is that it allows ferric floc applications to be run at 20 to 30 % higher water flux than has previously been thought possible. Using such high fluxes is normally to be avoided because of the extreme fouling that takes place under such conditions, and the resultant difficulty in cleaning badly fouled membranes, wherein the floc is forced hard into the pores and cannot be readily physically removed by backwashing, or by chemical cleaners.
- With the advent of the cleaning method of the preferred embodiments, the ferric floc applications can be run at the higher flux and the fouled membranes can be quickly and efficiently cleaned. The ability to use such high fluxes can translate into a significant commercial advantage.
- As more liquid is filtered, the amount of residue removed from that liquid increases in the pores and on the outside and needs to be cleaned.
- The methods of the preferred embodiments can be used in conjunction with backwashing methodology, or as a stand-alone cleaning method suitable for carrying out “cleaning-in-place” (CIP). CIP involves cleaning the membrane module without removal from its normal in situ place of operation.
- In general terms, one form of CIP cleaning involves isolating the module to be cleaned by means of taps and pipes and the like from fluid communication with the remainder of the system. The water or liquid normally filtered is then replaced with a cleaning fluid. The cleaning fluid is then allowed to run through the membrane module to carry out the cleaning. The cleaning fluid may be recycled through the module, or allowed to pass through the module just once before being run off to waste, depending upon the particular requirements of the system and the amount of contaminants being removed.
- The CIP procedure can take place at ambient temperatures or at controlled temperatures outside the normal range of filtration temperatures, e.g. at higher temperatures to increase dissolution of solids, or at lower temperatures to allow for a greater concentration of dissolved gaseous agents e.g., especially chlorine gas, in the fluid. The CIP can be carried out for varying lengths of time and at pressures outside the normal range of those used for filtration.
- Once the cleaning is completed, the filtration agent is flushed to remove traces of the cleaning agent before being returned to service by being reconnected to the normal fluid flow.
- CIP can be carried out manually or by means of fully automated systems which activate in response to pressure differentials or after predetermined module operating times.
- A preferred embodiment is described below, by way of example only.
- The examples given below relate to modules prepared from banks of hollow fiber PVDF membranes. The membrane modules are as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,159,373, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. The module includes a shell within which is positioned a bundle containing from about 2800 to about 30,000 hollow fibers with a diameter of 500 μm to 650 μm and a lumen diameter of 250 μm to 310 μm, with a pore size of 0.2 μm, but these sizes may be varied as required. Moreover, membrane and module configurations different from the one described above may also be employed with the methods of preferred embodiments, as will be appreciated by one skilled in the art.
- At each end of the fiber bundle, a potting compound holds the ends of the fibers in place without blocking the lumens and closes off each end of the module. The liquid feed is pumped into the module, between the shell and the outside of the hollow fibers. Some of the feed liquid passes into the lumen of the fibers, being filtered as it does so. The clean liquid then concentrates in the inside of the lumen, and flows, or is drawn off and taken outside the module, as a clarified liquid.
- In the CIP method exemplified, the cleaning agent is introduced in place of the untreated liquid stream. However, those skilled in the art will realize that the flow can be introduced counter to that normally used.
- CIP Comparative Method 1—Raw Water Filtration Module
- Membranes in a raw water filtration module were cleaned using a 2 wt. % solution of citric acid in water at 35° C., which was recirculated for 60 minutes. Three repeats of a 300 second aeration followed by a 300 second soak were conducted. Then, a solution of 300 ppm Cl in water at 20° C. was recirculated for 60 minutes, followed by a 30 minute soak. The total duration of the CIP was 3 hours. Table 1 provides measurements of transmembrane pressure (TMP), resistance (R), and flow (in gallons per minute per module) both before and after the CIP.
TABLE 1 BEFORE CIP AFTER CIP TMP Flow TMP Flow (psi) R (gpm/mod) (psi) R (gpm/mod) 8.1 4.27 4.4 3.5 2.21 4.9
CIP Comparative Method 2—Clarified Water Filtration Module - Membranes in a clarified water filtration module (containing flocculant) were cleaned 400 ppm solution of Cl in water at 20° C., which was recirculated for 60 minutes, followed by a 30 minute soak. Then the membranes were washed with a 2.7 wt. % citric acid solution in water at 35° C., which was recirculated for 60 minutes. Three repeats of a 300 second aeration followed by a 300 second soak were conducted. Then, an overnight soak was conducted. The total duration of the CIP was 13 hours. Table 2 provides measurements of transmembrane pressure, resistance, and flow both before and after the CIP.
TABLE 2 BEFORE CIP AFTER CIP TMP Flow TMP Flow (psi) R (gpm/mod) (psi) R (gpm/mod) 11 7.48 4.9 5.9 3.56 4.9
CIP Comparative Method 3—Clarified Water Filtration Module - Membranes in a clarified water filtration module (containing flocculant) were cleaned using a 1000 ppm solution of Cl in water at 20° C., which was recirculated for 60 minutes, followed by a 30 minute soak. Then the membranes were washed with a 4 wt. % citric acid solution in water at 35° C., which was recirculated for 60 minutes. Three repeats of a 300 second aeration followed by a 300 second soak were conducted. Then, an overnight soak in a 1000 ppm Cl solution in water was conducted. The total duration of the CIP was 13 hours. Table 3 provides measurements of transmembrane pressure, resistance, and flow both before and after the CIP.
TABLE 3 BEFORE CIP AFTER CIP TMP Flow TMP Flow (psi) R (gpm/mod) (psi) R (gpm/mod) 10.9 10.61 3.6 5.4 3.34 3.6
CIP Comparative Method 4—Raw Water Filtration Module - Membranes in a raw water filtration module were cleaned using a solution of 300 ppm Cl in water at 20° C., followed by an overnight soak. Then, the membranes were cleaned with a 2 wt. % citric acid solution in water at 40° C. for two hours. The total duration of the CIP was 13 hours. Table 4 provides measurements of transmembrane pressure (TMP), resistance (R), and flow (in gallons per minute per module) both before and after the CIP.
TABLE 4 BEFORE CIP AFTER CIP TMP Flow TMP Flow (psi) R (gpm/mod) (psi) R (gpm/mod) 5.58 4.08 3.85 3.5 2.63 3.75
CIP Method 1—Clarified Water Filtration Module - Membranes in a clarified water filtration module (containing flocculant) were cleaned using a 2 wt. % solution of SUPER IRON OUT® in water at 20° C. for 30 minutes. Then the membranes were washed with a solution of 1000 ppm Cl in water at 20° C., which was recirculated for 60 minutes, followed by a 30 minute soak. The total duration of the CIP was 2 hours. Table 5 provides measurements of transmembrane pressure, resistance, and flow both before and after the CIP. The data demonstrate a substantial reduction in transmembrane pressure and resistance, and an increase in flow following the cleaning method.
TABLE 5 BEFORE CIP AFTER CIP TMP Flow TMP Flow (psi) R (gpm/mod) (psi) R (gpm/mod) 10.6 7.19 4.8 5 2.8 5.7 - It can be seen from all the above examples that cleaning the membranes, by both conventional methods and by the methods of the preferred embodiments, results in a reduction in transmembrane pressure, a decrease in resistance, and an increase in flow, all indicators that the membrane has been cleaned.
- The results with SUPER IRON OUT® are significantly better than the comparative conventional methods. It enables the highest restoration of flow and the most significant decrease in resistance on cleaning.
- It has also achieved these results at ambient temperatures, and with fewer steps, meaning that the amount of external apparatus required to carry out the CIP of the module is considerably reduced.
- Possibly most significantly, however, it achieved this high level of cleaning in 2 hours for clarified (flocculant-containing) water. To achieve close to this result using the standard methods required overnight CIP times, typically around 13 hours. This dramatic reduction in CIP time translates into a reduction in downtime of modules, as well as allowing higher liquid throughput by permitting effective clean up after running at high flux rates.
- Sulfite agents such as sodium metabisulfite and SUPER IRON OUT® can also be used in conjunction with other conventional methods, for example, in conjunction with sulfuric acid for cleaning membranes (including polypropylene membranes). In low concentrations, it is believed sodium metabisulfite may act as a sacrificial agent, protecting the membrane from degradation by other cleaning agents.
- Further investigations were carried out to better standardize the active amount of sulfite agent present (rather than relying on the broader ranges which may be found in proprietary formulations and to investigate the optimal cleaning compositions, as established by the differing criteria to determine membrane de-fouling.
- Two sets of experiments were carried out to determine the efficiency of sulfite cleaning compositions of precisely defined composition relative to citric acid and chlorine, and measured with reference to different criteria. In both sets of experiments, the membranes were fouled with a mixture of 100 ppm humic acid and 100 ppm FeCl3.6H2O, by filtering this mixture through the membranes.
- In the transmembrane pressure recovery and refouling experiments, the same equipment was used to filter the cleaning solution through the membranes. The TMP change versus time was recorded while filtering this humic acid/iron solution through the membrane before and after the clean. The results are shown in Table 6.
TABLE 6 Fouling Final TMP Initial TMP TMP rate before clean after clean recovery post-clean Clean (kPa) (kPa) (kPa) (kPa/min) 2 wt. % Citric acid 38 18 20 0.07 200 ppm NaOCl 46 21 25 0.6 2 wt. % SHS 60 21 39 0.15 2 wt. % SMBS 36 20 16 0.08 1.5 wt. % SMBS + 31 17 14 0.1 0.5 wt. %SHS 0.5 wt. % SMBS + 39 20 19 0.1 1.5 wt. %SHS 1 wt. % SMBS + 36 20 16 0.3 1 wt. %SHS
SMBS = sodium metabisulfite
SHS = sodium hydrosulfite
- The results in the experiment show that the TMP recoveries were similar for all the cleaning methodologies used except for 2 wt. % sodium hydrosulfite which gave a significantly higher recovery than the other cleaning agents.
- The best post-clean fouling rates were also investigated. The poorest post-clean fouling rate was found using the conventional chlorine clean. The best post clean fouling was found using 2 wt. % citric acid and 2 wt. % SMBS, with the 1.5 wt. % SMBS/0.5 wt. % SHS and 0.5 wt. % SMBS/1.5 wt. % SHS mixtures also performing very well.
- In the second set of experiments, the dirty membranes were placed in jars of the cleaning solution and allowed to soak. The permeability of the fibers was measured before and after the clean. The results are shown in Table 7.
TABLE 7 Permeability Permeability Permeability % before clean after clean recovery Permeability Clean (L/m2 · hour) (L/m2 · hour) (L/m2 · hour) recovery 2 wt. % 589 795 206 135 Citric acid 200 ppm 277 576 299 207 NaOCl 2 wt. % SHS 383 795 412 208 2 wt. % SMBS 454 714 260 157 1.5 wt. % 350 774 424 221 SMBS + 0.5 wt. % SHS 0.5 wt. % 591 835 244 141 SMBS + 1.5 wt. % SHS 1 wt. % 378 824 446 236 SMBS + 1 wt. % SHS
SMBS = sodium metabisulfite
SHS = sodium hydrosulfite
- The citric acid gave the lowest permeability recovery. Three cleans, 1.5% SMBS+0.5 wt. % SHS, 1 wt. % SMBS+1 wt. % SHS, and 2 wt. % SHS gave the best permeability recoveries. The permeability recoveries for the sulfite cleaning agents show that for two specific combinations, 1.5 wt. % SMBS/0.5 wt. % SHS and 1 wt. % SMBS/1 wt. % SHS, the permeability recovery (of 221% and 236%, respectively) was greater than the permeability recovery for either the SMBS or SHS alone, indicating a synergistic relationship between the two. On the basis of the individual mixture components, a 1 wt. %:1 wt. % SMBS/SHS mixture would be expected to restore about 183% (based on 208%/2+157%/2) of the permeability, yet the actual value was 236%.
- The other cleaning combinations are likewise not simply additive, indicating that in combination, the two sulfite cleaning agents may act co-operatively.
- Thus, it can be seen that the sulfite cleaning method of the preferred embodiments provided in all cases a good TMP recovery, good permeability recovery and a low rate of post clean fouling. The all round performance was not matched by conventional cleaning methodologies. Further, sulfite cleaning required less time to achieve CIP (cleaning in place) de-fouling of membranes than conventional (chlorine) membrane cleans.
- The above description discloses several methods and materials of the present invention. This invention is susceptible to modifications in the methods and materials, as well as alterations in the fabrication methods and equipment. Such modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art from a consideration of this disclosure or practice of the invention disclosed herein. Consequently, it is not intended that this invention be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed herein, but that it cover all modifications and alternatives coming within the true scope and spirit of the invention as embodied in the attached claims. All patents, applications, and other references cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Claims (30)
1. A method of cleaning a porous polymeric membrane contaminated with a contaminant, the method comprising the step of:
contacting the contaminant with a composition comprising a sulfite reducing agent and a solvent, wherein the sulfite reducing agent is soluble in the solvent, and wherein the solvent is compatible with the porous polymeric membrane.
2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the contaminant comprises a metal oxide or a metal hydroxide.
3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the contaminant comprises an organic compound.
4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the solvent comprises water.
5. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the sulfite reducing agent is selected from the group consisting of sodium metabisulfite, sodium hydrosulfite, sodium sulfite, potassium metabisulfite, potassium hydrosulfite, potassium sulfite, and mixtures thereof.
6. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising the step of:
reducing a valence state of an atom of the contaminant to a lower valence state, whereby the contaminant is solublized and removed from the membrane.
7. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the composition further comprises an enhancing agent.
8. The method according to claim 7 , wherein the enhancing agent is selected from the group consisting of inorganic acids, organic acids, and mixtures thereof.
9. The method according to claim 7 , wherein the enhancing agent comprises citric acid.
10. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the solvent comprises water and the sulfite reducing agent is selected from the group consisting of sodium metabisulfite, sodium hydrosulfite, and mixtures thereof.
11. The method according to claim 10 , wherein the sulfite reducing agent comprises from about 0.1 wt. % to about 5 wt. % of a component selected from the group consisting of sodium metabisulfite, sodium hydrosulfite, and mixtures thereof.
12. The method according to claim 10 , wherein the sulfite reducing agent comprises from about 0.5 wt. % to about 2 wt. % of a component selected from the group consisting of sodium metabisulfite, sodium hydrosulfite, and mixtures thereof.
13. A method according to claim 10 , wherein the composition comprises from about 0.5 wt. % to about 1.5 wt. % sodium metabisulfite and from about 0.5 wt. % to about 1.5 wt. % sodium hydrosulfite.
14. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the membrane comprises a hollow fiber microfiltration membrane or a hollow fiber ultrafiltration membrane.
15. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the membrane comprises a flat microfiltration membrane or a flat ultrafiltration membrane.
16. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the membrane comprises a polyvinylidene fluoride polymer.
17. A composition for cleaning a porous polymeric membrane contaminated with a contaminant, the composition comprising a sulfite reducing agent, an enhancing agent and a solvent, wherein the sulfite reducing agent is soluble in the solvent, and wherein the solvent is compatible with the membrane.
18. The composition according to claim 17 , wherein the contaminant comprises a metal oxide or a metal hydroxide.
19. The composition according to claim 17 , wherein the contaminant is ferric floc.
20. The composition according to claim 17 , wherein the sulfite reducing agent is selected from the group consisting of sodium metabisulfite, sodium hydrosulfite, sodium sulfite, potassium metabisulfite, potassium hydrosulfite, potassium sulfite, and mixtures thereof.
21. The composition according to claim 17 , wherein the sulfite reducing agent comprises sodium metabisulfite and sodium hydrosulfite.
22. The composition according to claim 17 , further comprising an enhancing agent.
23. The composition according to claim 22 , wherein the enhancing agent comprises an inorganic acid or an organic acid.
24. The composition according to claim 23 , wherein the organic acid comprises citric acid.
25. The composition according to claim 17 , wherein the sulfite reducing agent comprises from about 20 wt. % to about 60 wt. % sodium metabisulfite, wherein the sulfite reducing agent is capable of dilution to a working concentration of from about 0.5 wt. % to about 2 wt. % of sulfite reducing agent in a solubilized form.
26. The composition according to claim 17 , wherein the sulfite reducing agent comprises from about 0.5 wt. % to about 2 wt. % sodium metabisulfite.
27. The composition according to claim 17 , wherein the sulfite reducing agent comprises from about 20 wt. % to about 65 wt. % sodium hydrosulfite, and wherein the sulfite reducing agent is capable of dilution to a working concentration of about 0.5 wt. % to about 2 wt. % soluble sulfite reducing agent present in solubilized form.
28. The composition according to claim 17 , wherein the sulfite reducing agent comprises from about 0.5 wt. % to about 2 wt. % sodium hydrosulfite.
29. The composition according to claim 17 , comprising from about 20 wt. % to about 65 wt. % sodium metabisulfite and from about 20 wt. % to about 65 wt. % sodium hydrosulfite, wherein the sodium metabisulfite and sodium hydrosulfite are capable of dilution to a working concentration of from about 0.5 wt. % to about 2 wt. % sulfite reducing agent in solubilized form.
30. The composition according to claim 17 , comprising from about 0.5 wt. % to about 2 wt. % sodium metabisulfite and sodium hydrosulfite.
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/073,137 US20050218073A1 (en) | 2001-11-16 | 2005-03-04 | Method of cleaning membranes |
US12/130,664 US20080237125A1 (en) | 2001-11-16 | 2008-05-30 | Method of cleaning membranes |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US33382801P | 2001-11-16 | 2001-11-16 | |
US10/298,471 US6955762B2 (en) | 2001-11-16 | 2002-11-15 | Method of cleaning membranes |
US11/073,137 US20050218073A1 (en) | 2001-11-16 | 2005-03-04 | Method of cleaning membranes |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/298,471 Continuation US6955762B2 (en) | 2001-11-16 | 2002-11-15 | Method of cleaning membranes |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/298,471 Continuation US6955762B2 (en) | 2001-11-16 | 2002-11-15 | Method of cleaning membranes |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20050218073A1 true US20050218073A1 (en) | 2005-10-06 |
Family
ID=23304416
Family Applications (4)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/298,471 Expired - Lifetime US6955762B2 (en) | 2001-11-16 | 2002-11-15 | Method of cleaning membranes |
US11/073,137 Abandoned US20050218073A1 (en) | 2001-11-16 | 2005-03-04 | Method of cleaning membranes |
US11/145,773 Abandoned US20050224411A1 (en) | 2001-11-16 | 2005-06-06 | Method of cleaning membranes |
US12/130,664 Abandoned US20080237125A1 (en) | 2001-11-16 | 2008-05-30 | Method of cleaning membranes |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/298,471 Expired - Lifetime US6955762B2 (en) | 2001-11-16 | 2002-11-15 | Method of cleaning membranes |
Family Applications After (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/145,773 Abandoned US20050224411A1 (en) | 2001-11-16 | 2005-06-06 | Method of cleaning membranes |
US12/130,664 Abandoned US20080237125A1 (en) | 2001-11-16 | 2008-05-30 | Method of cleaning membranes |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (4) | US6955762B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1312408B1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE333318T1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE60213184T2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (54)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CA2639642C (en) * | 1996-12-20 | 2013-01-15 | Siemens Water Technologies Corp. | Scouring method |
US20040232076A1 (en) * | 1996-12-20 | 2004-11-25 | Fufang Zha | Scouring method |
AUPQ680100A0 (en) * | 2000-04-10 | 2000-05-11 | Usf Filtration And Separations Group Inc. | Hollow fibre restraining system |
AUPR143400A0 (en) * | 2000-11-13 | 2000-12-07 | Usf Filtration And Separations Group Inc. | Modified membranes |
AUPR421501A0 (en) | 2001-04-04 | 2001-05-03 | U.S. Filter Wastewater Group, Inc. | Potting method |
AUPR584301A0 (en) * | 2001-06-20 | 2001-07-12 | U.S. Filter Wastewater Group, Inc. | Membrane polymer compositions |
AUPR692401A0 (en) | 2001-08-09 | 2001-08-30 | U.S. Filter Wastewater Group, Inc. | Method of cleaning membrane modules |
AUPR774201A0 (en) * | 2001-09-18 | 2001-10-11 | U.S. Filter Wastewater Group, Inc. | High solids module |
DE60213184T2 (en) * | 2001-11-16 | 2007-06-28 | U.S. Filter Wastewater Group, Inc. | Method for cleaning membranes |
US7247238B2 (en) * | 2002-02-12 | 2007-07-24 | Siemens Water Technologies Corp. | Poly(ethylene chlorotrifluoroethylene) membranes |
AUPS300602A0 (en) | 2002-06-18 | 2002-07-11 | U.S. Filter Wastewater Group, Inc. | Methods of minimising the effect of integrity loss in hollow fibre membrane modules |
JP4282598B2 (en) | 2002-10-10 | 2009-06-24 | シーメンス・ウォーター・テクノロジーズ・コーポレーション | Filtration device and method for cleaning the filtration device |
AU2002953111A0 (en) | 2002-12-05 | 2002-12-19 | U. S. Filter Wastewater Group, Inc. | Mixing chamber |
JP4611982B2 (en) | 2003-08-29 | 2011-01-12 | シーメンス・ウォーター・テクノロジーズ・コーポレーション | Backwash method |
KR20070003783A (en) | 2003-11-14 | 2007-01-05 | 유.에스. 필터 웨이스트워터 그룹, 인크. | Improved module cleaning method |
US8758621B2 (en) | 2004-03-26 | 2014-06-24 | Evoqua Water Technologies Llc | Process and apparatus for purifying impure water using microfiltration or ultrafiltration in combination with reverse osmosis |
JP2007535398A (en) | 2004-04-22 | 2007-12-06 | シーメンス ウォーター テクノロジース コーポレイション | Filtration device including membrane bioreactor and treatment tank for digesting organic substances, and waste liquid treatment method |
WO2006017911A1 (en) | 2004-08-20 | 2006-02-23 | Siemens Water Technologies Corp. | Square mbr manifolding system |
US8790515B2 (en) | 2004-09-07 | 2014-07-29 | Evoqua Water Technologies Llc | Reduction of backwash liquid waste |
NZ553742A (en) | 2004-09-14 | 2010-09-30 | Siemens Water Tech Corp | Methods and apparatus for removing solids from a membrane module |
CA2579894A1 (en) | 2004-09-15 | 2006-03-23 | Siemens Water Technologies Corp. | Continuously variable aeration |
NZ554811A (en) * | 2004-11-02 | 2010-09-30 | Siemens Water Tech Corp | A filtration system where a fluid containg the liquid to be filtered is kept close to the filter tubes to clean them |
US7591950B2 (en) * | 2004-11-02 | 2009-09-22 | Siemens Water Technologies Corp. | Submerged cross-flow filtration |
EP2394731A1 (en) | 2004-12-24 | 2011-12-14 | Siemens Industry, Inc. | Cleaning in membrane filtration systems |
WO2006066350A1 (en) | 2004-12-24 | 2006-06-29 | Siemens Water Technologies Corp. | Simple gas scouring method and apparatus |
CA2605757A1 (en) | 2005-04-29 | 2006-11-09 | Siemens Water Technologies Corp. | Chemical clean for membrane filter |
US20060273038A1 (en) * | 2005-06-02 | 2006-12-07 | Syed Murtuza A | Chemical cleaning for membranes |
CN101287538B (en) | 2005-08-22 | 2013-03-06 | 西门子工业公司 | An assembly for water filtration using a tube manifold to minimise backwash |
US20070138090A1 (en) | 2005-10-05 | 2007-06-21 | Jordan Edward J | Method and apparatus for treating wastewater |
WO2007044442A2 (en) * | 2005-10-05 | 2007-04-19 | Siemens Water Technologies Corp. | Method and system for treating wastewater |
US20070092464A1 (en) * | 2005-10-25 | 2007-04-26 | Duff Rocky J | Betadine neutralizer |
WO2008051546A2 (en) | 2006-10-24 | 2008-05-02 | Siemens Water Technologies Corp. | Infiltration/inflow control for membrane bioreactor |
EP2129629A1 (en) | 2007-04-02 | 2009-12-09 | Siemens Water Technologies Corp. | Improved infiltration/inflow control for membrane bioreactor |
US9764288B2 (en) | 2007-04-04 | 2017-09-19 | Evoqua Water Technologies Llc | Membrane module protection |
KR101239780B1 (en) | 2007-05-29 | 2013-03-06 | 지멘스 인더스트리 인코포레이티드 | Membrane cleaning with pulsed airlift pump |
US8236178B2 (en) * | 2007-08-20 | 2012-08-07 | Earth Renaissance Technologies, Llc | Reverse osmosis water recover method |
WO2010009518A1 (en) | 2008-07-24 | 2010-01-28 | Siemens Water Technologies Corp. | Frame system for membrane filtration modules |
KR20110044312A (en) | 2008-08-20 | 2011-04-28 | 지멘스 워터 테크놀로지스 코포레이션 | Improved membrane system backwash energy efficiency |
DE102008039676A1 (en) * | 2008-08-26 | 2010-03-04 | Inge Watertechnologies Ag | Device and method for backwashing filter membrane modules |
AU2010257526A1 (en) | 2009-06-11 | 2012-01-12 | Siemens Industry, Inc | Methods for cleaning a porous polymeric membrane and a kit for cleaning a porous polymeric membrane |
WO2011136888A1 (en) | 2010-04-30 | 2011-11-03 | Siemens Industry, Inc | Fluid flow distribution device |
EP2618916A4 (en) | 2010-09-24 | 2016-08-17 | Evoqua Water Technologies Llc | Fluid control manifold for membrane filtration system |
US9604166B2 (en) | 2011-09-30 | 2017-03-28 | Evoqua Water Technologies Llc | Manifold arrangement |
KR20140097140A (en) | 2011-09-30 | 2014-08-06 | 에보쿠아 워터 테크놀로지스 엘엘씨 | Isolation valve |
CN102407076B (en) * | 2011-10-11 | 2014-05-07 | 清远加多宝草本植物科技有限公司 | Membrane element cleaning agent in membrane separation industry |
EP2866922B1 (en) | 2012-06-28 | 2018-03-07 | Evoqua Water Technologies LLC | A potting method |
GB2520871B (en) | 2012-09-26 | 2020-08-19 | Evoqua Water Tech Llc | Membrane securement device |
US9962865B2 (en) | 2012-09-26 | 2018-05-08 | Evoqua Water Technologies Llc | Membrane potting methods |
AU2013323934A1 (en) | 2012-09-27 | 2015-02-26 | Evoqua Water Technologies Llc | Gas scouring apparatus for immersed membranes |
HUE061765T2 (en) | 2013-10-02 | 2023-08-28 | Rohm & Haas Electronic Mat Singapore Pte Ltd | Device for repairing a membrane filtration module |
US10322375B2 (en) | 2015-07-14 | 2019-06-18 | Evoqua Water Technologies Llc | Aeration device for filtration system |
US11117099B2 (en) | 2016-04-19 | 2021-09-14 | Gwinnett County Board of Commissioners | Method of cleaning microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes |
WO2018164720A1 (en) | 2017-03-06 | 2018-09-13 | Tangent Company Llc | Home sewage treatment system |
CN109201644B (en) * | 2018-08-29 | 2021-11-12 | 湖南军信环保股份有限公司 | Cleaning method for bacterial sludge breeding on inner wall of water inlet pipeline of NF/RO membrane unit |
Citations (96)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2105700A (en) * | 1936-07-13 | 1938-01-18 | William D Ramage | Process for purification of beverages |
US2926086A (en) * | 1957-07-30 | 1960-02-23 | Universal Oil Prod Co | Stabilization of non-distilled alcoholic beverages and the resulting product |
US3183191A (en) * | 1960-04-19 | 1965-05-11 | Hach Chemical Co | Stain and rust removing composition |
US3228876A (en) * | 1960-09-19 | 1966-01-11 | Dow Chemical Co | Permeability separatory apparatus, permeability separatory membrane element, method of making the same and process utilizing the same |
US3708071A (en) * | 1970-08-05 | 1973-01-02 | Abcor Inc | Hollow fiber membrane device and method of fabricating same |
US3955998A (en) * | 1973-06-21 | 1976-05-11 | Phillips Petroleum Company | Aqueous gels for plugging fractures in subterranean formation and production of said aqueous gels |
US3968192A (en) * | 1974-04-19 | 1976-07-06 | The Dow Chemical Company | Method of repairing leaky hollow fiber permeability separatory devices |
US4082683A (en) * | 1975-09-19 | 1978-04-04 | Lever Brothers Company | Cleaning of hard surfaces |
US4188817A (en) * | 1978-10-04 | 1980-02-19 | Standard Oil Company (Indiana) | Method for detecting membrane leakage |
US4192750A (en) * | 1976-08-09 | 1980-03-11 | Massey-Ferguson Inc. | Stackable filter head unit |
US4193780A (en) * | 1978-03-20 | 1980-03-18 | Industrial Air, Inc. | Air filter construction |
US4248648A (en) * | 1979-07-18 | 1981-02-03 | Baxter Travenol Laboratories, Inc. | Method of repairing leaks in a hollow capillary fiber diffusion device |
US4385150A (en) * | 1980-10-17 | 1983-05-24 | Asahi Glass Company, Ltd. | Organic solution of fluorinated copolymer having carboxylic acid groups |
US4384474A (en) * | 1980-10-30 | 1983-05-24 | Amf Incorporated | Method and apparatus for testing and using membrane filters in an on site of use housing |
US4451369A (en) * | 1980-12-18 | 1984-05-29 | Toyo Boseki Kabushiki Kaisha | Fluid separation apparatus |
US4496470A (en) * | 1981-01-12 | 1985-01-29 | The B. F. Goodrich Company | Cleaning composition |
US4511471A (en) * | 1982-06-03 | 1985-04-16 | Drm, Dr. Muller Ag | Filter apparatus for continuously thickening suspensions |
US4636296A (en) * | 1983-08-18 | 1987-01-13 | Gerhard Kunz | Process and apparatus for treatment of fluids, particularly desalinization of aqueous solutions |
US4642182A (en) * | 1985-03-07 | 1987-02-10 | Mordeki Drori | Multiple-disc type filter with extensible support |
US4647377A (en) * | 1984-07-24 | 1987-03-03 | Kabushiki Kaisha Ito Tekkousho | Filter apparatus |
US4650596A (en) * | 1983-05-13 | 1987-03-17 | Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien | Pour point depressants for paraffin solutions |
US4656865A (en) * | 1985-09-09 | 1987-04-14 | The Dow Chemical Company | System for analyzing permeation of a gas or vapor through a film or membrane |
US4660411A (en) * | 1985-05-31 | 1987-04-28 | Reid Philip L | Apparatus for measuring transmission of volatile substances through films |
US4670145A (en) * | 1986-07-08 | 1987-06-02 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Multiple bundle fluid separation apparatus |
US4673507A (en) * | 1985-05-06 | 1987-06-16 | Eco-Tec Limited | Fluid treatment process and apparatus |
US4718270A (en) * | 1983-05-17 | 1988-01-12 | Coulter Electronics, Ltd. | Porosimeter and methods of assessing porosity |
US4744240A (en) * | 1986-05-27 | 1988-05-17 | Akzo Nv | Method for determining the bubble point or the largest pore of membranes or of filter materials |
US4749487A (en) * | 1984-04-11 | 1988-06-07 | Syrinx Research Pty. Ltd. | High flux membrane |
US4756875A (en) * | 1983-09-29 | 1988-07-12 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Apparatus for filtering water containing radioactive substances in nuclear power plants |
US4797211A (en) * | 1985-12-24 | 1989-01-10 | Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe Gmbh | Cross flow microfilter |
US4810384A (en) * | 1986-06-20 | 1989-03-07 | Rhone-Poulenc Recherches | Hydrophilic PVDF semipermeable membrane |
US4812235A (en) * | 1982-03-29 | 1989-03-14 | Hr Textron, Inc. | Filter element assembly replaceable mesh pack |
US4816160A (en) * | 1985-03-28 | 1989-03-28 | Memtec Limited | Cooling hollow fibre cross-flow separators |
US4834998A (en) * | 1986-12-22 | 1989-05-30 | Heublein, Inc. | Ultrafiltration of red wines |
US4846970A (en) * | 1987-06-22 | 1989-07-11 | Osmonics, Inc. | Cross-flow filtration membrane test unit |
US4921610A (en) * | 1986-09-04 | 1990-05-01 | Memtec Limited | Cleaning of hollow fibre filters |
US4931186A (en) * | 1985-03-05 | 1990-06-05 | Memtec Limited | Concentration of solids in a suspension |
US4935143A (en) * | 1986-07-11 | 1990-06-19 | Memtec Limited | Cleaning of filters |
US4988444A (en) * | 1989-05-12 | 1991-01-29 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Prevention of biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes |
US4999038A (en) * | 1989-02-07 | 1991-03-12 | Lundberg Bo E H | Filter unit |
US5005430A (en) * | 1989-05-16 | 1991-04-09 | Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. | Automated membrane filter sampler |
US5024762A (en) * | 1985-03-05 | 1991-06-18 | Memtec Limited | Concentration of solids in a suspension |
US5079272A (en) * | 1989-11-30 | 1992-01-07 | Millipore Corporation | Porous membrane formed from interpenetrating polymer network having hydrophilic surface |
US5094750A (en) * | 1986-09-12 | 1992-03-10 | Memtec Limited | Hollow fibre filter cartridge and header |
US5094867A (en) * | 1990-01-16 | 1992-03-10 | Basf Aktiengesellschaft | Removal of heavy metal ions from wine and wine-like beverages |
US5104535A (en) * | 1990-08-17 | 1992-04-14 | Zenon Environmental, Inc. | Frameless array of hollow fiber membranes and module containing a stack of arrays |
US5104546A (en) * | 1990-07-03 | 1992-04-14 | Aluminum Company Of America | Pyrogens separations by ceramic ultrafiltration |
USH1045H (en) * | 1990-11-19 | 1992-05-05 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army | Air bubble leak detection test device |
US5182019A (en) * | 1990-08-17 | 1993-01-26 | Zenon Environmental Inc. | Cartridge of hybrid frameless arrays of hollow fiber membranes and module containing an assembly of cartridges |
US5192456A (en) * | 1991-03-07 | 1993-03-09 | Kubota Corporation | Apparatus for treating activated sludge and method of cleaning it |
US5192478A (en) * | 1984-10-22 | 1993-03-09 | The Dow Chemical Company | Method of forming tubesheet for hollow fibers |
US5194149A (en) * | 1989-09-29 | 1993-03-16 | Memtec Limited | Filter cartridge manifold |
US5198116A (en) * | 1992-02-10 | 1993-03-30 | D.W. Walker & Associates | Method and apparatus for measuring the fouling potential of membrane system feeds |
US5209852A (en) * | 1990-08-31 | 1993-05-11 | Japan Organo Co. Ltd. | Process for scrubbing porous hollow fiber membranes in hollow fiber membrane module |
US5211823A (en) * | 1991-06-19 | 1993-05-18 | Millipore Corporation | Process for purifying resins utilizing bipolar interface |
US5221478A (en) * | 1988-02-05 | 1993-06-22 | The Dow Chemical Company | Chromatographic separation using ion-exchange resins |
US5227063A (en) * | 1989-10-03 | 1993-07-13 | Zenon Environmental Inc. | Tubular membrane module |
US5297420A (en) * | 1993-05-19 | 1994-03-29 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Apparatus and method for measuring relative permeability and capillary pressure of porous rock |
US5320760A (en) * | 1992-12-07 | 1994-06-14 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Method of determining filter pluggage by measuring pressures |
US5389260A (en) * | 1993-04-02 | 1995-02-14 | Clack Corporation | Brine seal for tubular filter |
US5393433A (en) * | 1992-03-11 | 1995-02-28 | Aquasource, Societe En Nom Collectif | Method using separation membranes to treat a fluid containing matter in suspension and in solution |
US5401401A (en) * | 1993-01-13 | 1995-03-28 | Aquaria Inc. | Hang on tank canister filter |
US5403479A (en) * | 1993-12-20 | 1995-04-04 | Zenon Environmental Inc. | In situ cleaning system for fouled membranes |
US5405528A (en) * | 1990-04-20 | 1995-04-11 | Memtec Limited | Modular microporous filter assemblies |
US5417101A (en) * | 1991-06-10 | 1995-05-23 | Pall Corporation | Method and apparatus for testing the integrity of filter elements |
US5419816A (en) * | 1993-10-27 | 1995-05-30 | Halox Technologies Corporation | Electrolytic process and apparatus for the controlled oxidation of inorganic and organic species in aqueous solutions |
US5480553A (en) * | 1992-02-12 | 1996-01-02 | Mitsubishi Rayon Co., Ltd. | Hollow fiber membrane module |
US5531848A (en) * | 1992-05-18 | 1996-07-02 | Minntech Corporation | Method of manufacturing of hollow fiber cartridge with porous ring |
US5531900A (en) * | 1994-07-07 | 1996-07-02 | University Of Arizona | Modification of polyvinylidene fluoride membrane and method of filtering |
US5607593A (en) * | 1993-11-30 | 1997-03-04 | Otv Omnium De Trajtements Et De Valorisation S.A. | Installation for making water potable with submerged filtering membranes |
US5639373A (en) * | 1995-08-11 | 1997-06-17 | Zenon Environmental Inc. | Vertical skein of hollow fiber membranes and method of maintaining clean fiber surfaces while filtering a substrate to withdraw a permeate |
US5643455A (en) * | 1991-08-07 | 1997-07-01 | Memtel Limited | Concentration of solids in a suspension using hollow fibre membranes |
US5888401A (en) * | 1996-09-16 | 1999-03-30 | Union Camp Corporation | Method and apparatus for reducing membrane fouling |
US5906742A (en) * | 1995-07-05 | 1999-05-25 | Usf Filtration And Separations Group Inc. | Microfiltration membranes having high pore density and mixed isotropic and anisotropic structure |
US5910250A (en) * | 1995-08-11 | 1999-06-08 | Zenon Environmental Inc. | Baffle for conversion of fine bubbles to coarse while filtering with a vertical skein of hollow fibers |
US5914039A (en) * | 1997-07-01 | 1999-06-22 | Zenon Environmental Inc. | Filtration membrane with calcined α-alumina particles therein |
US5918264A (en) * | 1992-11-02 | 1999-06-29 | Usf Filtration And Separations Group Inc. | Fiber monitoring system |
US6039872A (en) * | 1997-10-27 | 2000-03-21 | Pall Corporation | Hydrophilic membrane |
US6048454A (en) * | 1997-03-18 | 2000-04-11 | Jenkins; Dan | Oil filter pack and assembly |
US6077435A (en) * | 1996-03-15 | 2000-06-20 | Usf Filtration And Separations Group Inc. | Filtration monitoring and control system |
US6193890B1 (en) * | 1995-08-11 | 2001-02-27 | Zenon Environmental Inc. | System for maintaining a clean skein of hollow fibers while filtering suspended solids |
US6202475B1 (en) * | 1997-05-30 | 2001-03-20 | Usf Filtration And Separations Group, Inc. | Predicting logarithmic reduction values |
US6221247B1 (en) * | 1999-06-03 | 2001-04-24 | Cms Technology Holdings, Inc. | Dioxole coated membrane module for ultrafiltration or microfiltration of aqueous suspensions |
US6245239B1 (en) * | 1998-10-09 | 2001-06-12 | Zenon Environmental Inc. | Cyclic aeration system for submerged membrane modules |
US6354444B1 (en) * | 1997-07-01 | 2002-03-12 | Zenon Environmental Inc. | Hollow fiber membrane and braided tubular support therefor |
US6387189B1 (en) * | 1997-01-09 | 2002-05-14 | Bayer Aktiengesellschaft | Surface-cleaning method |
US20020070157A1 (en) * | 2000-08-18 | 2002-06-13 | Yosuke Yamada | Filter device |
US6524481B2 (en) * | 1998-09-25 | 2003-02-25 | U.S. Filter Wastewater Group, Inc. | Apparatus and method for cleaning membrane filtration modules |
US20030057155A1 (en) * | 1999-09-29 | 2003-03-27 | Hidayat Husain | Ultrafiltration and microfiltration module and system |
US6550747B2 (en) * | 1998-10-09 | 2003-04-22 | Zenon Environmental Inc. | Cyclic aeration system for submerged membrane modules |
US20030075504A1 (en) * | 1998-09-25 | 2003-04-24 | Fufang Zha | Apparatus and method for cleaning membrane filtration modules |
US6555005B1 (en) * | 1996-12-20 | 2003-04-29 | Usf Filtration & Separations Group Inc. | Scouring method |
US20030089659A1 (en) * | 2000-04-10 | 2003-05-15 | Fufang Zha | Hollow fibre restraining system |
US20040000520A1 (en) * | 2001-11-16 | 2004-01-01 | Gallagher Paul Martin | Method of cleaning membranes |
US6685832B2 (en) * | 1995-08-11 | 2004-02-03 | Zenon Environmental Inc. | Method of potting hollow fiber membranes |
US20040035782A1 (en) * | 2000-11-13 | 2004-02-26 | Heinz-Joachim Muller | Modified membranes |
Family Cites Families (63)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US655505A (en) * | 1900-02-13 | 1900-08-07 | Lloyd Sherbondy Morrow | End-gate fastener for mining-cars. |
US3139401A (en) * | 1962-01-05 | 1964-06-30 | Hach Chemical Co | Method for removing rust from water softeners |
US3693406A (en) * | 1970-01-26 | 1972-09-26 | Air Intake Renu | Method for inspecting filters |
US3700591A (en) * | 1970-09-24 | 1972-10-24 | Us Interior | Cleaning of used membrane with oxalic acid |
US3992301A (en) | 1973-11-19 | 1976-11-16 | Raypak, Inc. | Automatic flushing system for membrane separation machines such as reverse osmosis machines |
JPS54162684A (en) * | 1978-06-14 | 1979-12-24 | Ebara Infilco Co Ltd | Preliminary treating method for contaminated membrane |
JPS55129107A (en) * | 1979-03-28 | 1980-10-06 | Nitto Electric Ind Co Ltd | Washing method of selective permeable membrane |
US4218324A (en) * | 1979-05-03 | 1980-08-19 | Textron, Inc. | Filter element having removable filter media member |
JPS5621604A (en) * | 1979-07-27 | 1981-02-28 | Toray Ind Inc | Separation of liquid by semipermeable composite membrane |
JPS56121685A (en) * | 1980-02-29 | 1981-09-24 | Ebara Infilco Co Ltd | Treatment of liquid containing iron ion and manganese ion |
US4540490A (en) * | 1982-04-23 | 1985-09-10 | Jgc Corporation | Apparatus for filtration of a suspension |
WO1983003984A1 (en) * | 1982-05-13 | 1983-11-24 | Gerhard Kunz | Method for the treatment of a liquid phase, particularly method for desalting aqueous solutions, as well as device for its implementation |
GB2132366B (en) * | 1982-12-27 | 1987-04-08 | Brunswick Corp | Method and device for testing the permeability of membrane filters |
CA1221645A (en) | 1983-02-28 | 1987-05-12 | Yoshihiro Okano | Filtration apparatus using hollow fiber-membrane |
CH673275A5 (en) * | 1983-05-20 | 1990-02-28 | Christ Ag | |
US4650586A (en) | 1983-09-26 | 1987-03-17 | Kinetico, Inc. | Fluid treatment system |
WO1985001449A1 (en) * | 1983-09-30 | 1985-04-11 | Memtec Limited | Cleaning of filters |
US4609465A (en) * | 1984-05-21 | 1986-09-02 | Pall Corporation | Filter cartridge with a connector seal |
EP0170895B1 (en) | 1984-07-09 | 1989-03-22 | Millipore Corporation | Improved electrodeionization apparatus and method |
DE3428307A1 (en) * | 1984-08-01 | 1986-02-13 | Filterwerk Mann & Hummel Gmbh, 7140 Ludwigsburg | DISPLAY DEVICE FOR THE POLLUTION LEVEL OF SUCTION AIR FILTERS |
ATE53510T1 (en) | 1985-04-10 | 1990-06-15 | Memtec Ltd | VARIABLE VOLUME FILTER OR CONCENTRATOR. |
JPS61249505A (en) * | 1985-04-27 | 1986-11-06 | Toyobo Co Ltd | Method for preserving fluid separator |
US4876006A (en) | 1985-10-08 | 1989-10-24 | Ebara Corporation | Hollow fiber filter device |
US4779448A (en) | 1986-01-28 | 1988-10-25 | Donaldson Company, Inc. | Photoelectric bubble detector apparatus and method |
JPH0742861B2 (en) | 1986-03-10 | 1995-05-15 | ヤマハ発動機株式会社 | Internal combustion engine intake system |
US4876012A (en) | 1986-09-12 | 1989-10-24 | Memtec Limited | Hollow fibre filter cartridge and header |
US4784771A (en) | 1987-08-03 | 1988-11-15 | Environmental Water Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus for purifying fluids |
DE3904544A1 (en) | 1989-02-15 | 1990-08-16 | Fraunhofer Ges Forschung | POLYMINE MEMBRANES BASED ON POLYVINYLIDENE FLUORIDE, METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION AND USE THEREOF |
NL8901090A (en) | 1989-04-28 | 1990-11-16 | X Flow Bv | METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A MICROPOROUS MEMBRANE AND SUCH MEMBRANE |
US5138870A (en) * | 1989-07-10 | 1992-08-18 | Lyssy Georges H | Apparatus for measuring water vapor permeability through sheet materials |
DE3923128A1 (en) | 1989-07-13 | 1991-01-24 | Akzo Gmbh | FLAX OR CAPILLARY MEMBRANE BASED ON A HOMOGENEOUS MIXTURE OF POLYVINYLIDE FLUORIDE AND OF A SECOND, BY CHEMICAL IMPROVEMENT, HYDROPHILIBLABLE POLYMERS |
US5158721A (en) | 1989-11-30 | 1992-10-27 | Millipore Corporation | Porous membrane formed from interpenetrating polymer network having hydrophilic surface |
US5066375A (en) | 1990-03-19 | 1991-11-19 | Ionics, Incorporated | Introducing and removing ion-exchange and other particulates from an assembled electrodeionization stack |
US5364527A (en) | 1990-06-20 | 1994-11-15 | Heinz Zimmermann | Apparatus and process for treating water |
US5248424A (en) | 1990-08-17 | 1993-09-28 | Zenon Environmental Inc. | Frameless array of hollow fiber membranes and method of maintaining clean fiber surfaces while filtering a substrate to withdraw a permeate |
FR2666245B1 (en) | 1990-08-31 | 1992-10-23 | Lyonnaise Eaux | METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE OPERATING MODES OF AN AUTOMATIC WATER FILTRATION APPARATUS ON TUBULAR MEMBRANES. |
JP2858913B2 (en) * | 1990-09-26 | 1999-02-17 | オルガノ株式会社 | Filtration method using hollow fiber membrane |
US5069065A (en) | 1991-01-16 | 1991-12-03 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Method for measuring wettability of porous rock |
US5135663A (en) * | 1991-10-18 | 1992-08-04 | Loctite Corporation | Method of treating (meth)acrylic monomer-containing wastewater |
US5137631A (en) * | 1991-10-22 | 1992-08-11 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Multiple bundle permeator |
EP0592066B1 (en) | 1992-05-01 | 1997-09-03 | Memtec Japan Limited | Apparatus for testing membrane filter integrity |
US5361625A (en) | 1993-04-29 | 1994-11-08 | Ylvisaker Jon A | Method and device for the measurement of barrier properties of films against gases |
FR2705734B1 (en) | 1993-05-25 | 1995-06-30 | Snecma | Method and device for improving the safety of fluid filters. |
JPH07313850A (en) * | 1994-05-30 | 1995-12-05 | Kubota Corp | Method for backward washing immersion-type ceramic membrane separator |
US5470469A (en) | 1994-09-16 | 1995-11-28 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Hollow fiber cartridge |
US5944997A (en) * | 1995-08-11 | 1999-08-31 | Zenon Environmental Inc. | System for maintaining a clean skein of hollow fibers while filtering suspended solids |
FR2741280B1 (en) * | 1995-11-22 | 1997-12-19 | Omnium Traitement Valorisa | METHOD FOR CLEANING A FILTER SYSTEM OF THE SUBMERSIBLE MEMBRANE TYPE |
JP3686918B2 (en) * | 1996-10-16 | 2005-08-24 | 森村興産株式会社 | Filtration device for solid-liquid separation of sewage, wastewater, etc. |
USD396046S (en) * | 1996-10-24 | 1998-07-14 | Allen Scheel | Steer device for an outboard motor |
AUPO412596A0 (en) * | 1996-12-10 | 1997-01-09 | Memtec America Corporation | Improved microporous membrane filtration assembly |
USD396726S (en) * | 1997-02-06 | 1998-08-04 | Abc Group | Combined air intake manifold and filter |
US6083393A (en) * | 1997-10-27 | 2000-07-04 | Pall Corporation | Hydrophilic membrane |
USD400890S (en) | 1997-12-03 | 1998-11-10 | Gambardella C Bruce | Automotive manifold |
CN1261194C (en) * | 1998-07-21 | 2006-06-28 | 东丽株式会社 | Method of bacteriostasis or disinfection for permselective membrane |
US6280626B1 (en) * | 1998-08-12 | 2001-08-28 | Mitsubishi Rayon Co., Ltd. | Membrane separator assembly and method of cleaning the assembly utilizing gas diffuser underneath the assembly |
ATE292511T1 (en) * | 1998-11-23 | 2005-04-15 | Zenon Environmental Inc | WATER FILTRATION USING UNDERWATER MEMBRANES |
CA2290053C (en) * | 1999-11-18 | 2009-10-20 | Zenon Environmental Inc. | Immersed membrane module and process |
JP2000157850A (en) * | 1998-11-27 | 2000-06-13 | Nitto Denko Corp | Separating membrane preservation liquid and separating membrane module |
US6214231B1 (en) * | 1999-08-27 | 2001-04-10 | Zenon Environmental Inc. | System for operation of multiple membrane filtration assemblies |
JP3603692B2 (en) * | 1999-09-14 | 2004-12-22 | 日立プラント建設株式会社 | Membrane separation method and apparatus |
US6440303B2 (en) * | 2000-03-02 | 2002-08-27 | Chapin Manufacturing, Inc. | Fluid filter |
AUPR421501A0 (en) * | 2001-04-04 | 2001-05-03 | U.S. Filter Wastewater Group, Inc. | Potting method |
US7247238B2 (en) * | 2002-02-12 | 2007-07-24 | Siemens Water Technologies Corp. | Poly(ethylene chlorotrifluoroethylene) membranes |
-
2002
- 2002-11-14 DE DE60213184T patent/DE60213184T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-11-14 EP EP02257855A patent/EP1312408B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-11-14 AT AT02257855T patent/ATE333318T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2002-11-15 US US10/298,471 patent/US6955762B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2005
- 2005-03-04 US US11/073,137 patent/US20050218073A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2005-06-06 US US11/145,773 patent/US20050224411A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2008
- 2008-05-30 US US12/130,664 patent/US20080237125A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (100)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2105700A (en) * | 1936-07-13 | 1938-01-18 | William D Ramage | Process for purification of beverages |
US2926086A (en) * | 1957-07-30 | 1960-02-23 | Universal Oil Prod Co | Stabilization of non-distilled alcoholic beverages and the resulting product |
US3183191A (en) * | 1960-04-19 | 1965-05-11 | Hach Chemical Co | Stain and rust removing composition |
US3228876A (en) * | 1960-09-19 | 1966-01-11 | Dow Chemical Co | Permeability separatory apparatus, permeability separatory membrane element, method of making the same and process utilizing the same |
US3708071A (en) * | 1970-08-05 | 1973-01-02 | Abcor Inc | Hollow fiber membrane device and method of fabricating same |
US3955998A (en) * | 1973-06-21 | 1976-05-11 | Phillips Petroleum Company | Aqueous gels for plugging fractures in subterranean formation and production of said aqueous gels |
US3968192A (en) * | 1974-04-19 | 1976-07-06 | The Dow Chemical Company | Method of repairing leaky hollow fiber permeability separatory devices |
US4082683A (en) * | 1975-09-19 | 1978-04-04 | Lever Brothers Company | Cleaning of hard surfaces |
US4192750A (en) * | 1976-08-09 | 1980-03-11 | Massey-Ferguson Inc. | Stackable filter head unit |
US4193780A (en) * | 1978-03-20 | 1980-03-18 | Industrial Air, Inc. | Air filter construction |
US4188817A (en) * | 1978-10-04 | 1980-02-19 | Standard Oil Company (Indiana) | Method for detecting membrane leakage |
US4248648A (en) * | 1979-07-18 | 1981-02-03 | Baxter Travenol Laboratories, Inc. | Method of repairing leaks in a hollow capillary fiber diffusion device |
US4385150A (en) * | 1980-10-17 | 1983-05-24 | Asahi Glass Company, Ltd. | Organic solution of fluorinated copolymer having carboxylic acid groups |
US4384474A (en) * | 1980-10-30 | 1983-05-24 | Amf Incorporated | Method and apparatus for testing and using membrane filters in an on site of use housing |
US4451369A (en) * | 1980-12-18 | 1984-05-29 | Toyo Boseki Kabushiki Kaisha | Fluid separation apparatus |
US4496470A (en) * | 1981-01-12 | 1985-01-29 | The B. F. Goodrich Company | Cleaning composition |
US4812235A (en) * | 1982-03-29 | 1989-03-14 | Hr Textron, Inc. | Filter element assembly replaceable mesh pack |
US4511471A (en) * | 1982-06-03 | 1985-04-16 | Drm, Dr. Muller Ag | Filter apparatus for continuously thickening suspensions |
US4650596A (en) * | 1983-05-13 | 1987-03-17 | Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien | Pour point depressants for paraffin solutions |
US4718270A (en) * | 1983-05-17 | 1988-01-12 | Coulter Electronics, Ltd. | Porosimeter and methods of assessing porosity |
US4636296A (en) * | 1983-08-18 | 1987-01-13 | Gerhard Kunz | Process and apparatus for treatment of fluids, particularly desalinization of aqueous solutions |
US4756875A (en) * | 1983-09-29 | 1988-07-12 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Apparatus for filtering water containing radioactive substances in nuclear power plants |
US4749487A (en) * | 1984-04-11 | 1988-06-07 | Syrinx Research Pty. Ltd. | High flux membrane |
US4647377A (en) * | 1984-07-24 | 1987-03-03 | Kabushiki Kaisha Ito Tekkousho | Filter apparatus |
US5192478A (en) * | 1984-10-22 | 1993-03-09 | The Dow Chemical Company | Method of forming tubesheet for hollow fibers |
US4931186A (en) * | 1985-03-05 | 1990-06-05 | Memtec Limited | Concentration of solids in a suspension |
US5024762A (en) * | 1985-03-05 | 1991-06-18 | Memtec Limited | Concentration of solids in a suspension |
US4642182A (en) * | 1985-03-07 | 1987-02-10 | Mordeki Drori | Multiple-disc type filter with extensible support |
US4816160A (en) * | 1985-03-28 | 1989-03-28 | Memtec Limited | Cooling hollow fibre cross-flow separators |
US4673507A (en) * | 1985-05-06 | 1987-06-16 | Eco-Tec Limited | Fluid treatment process and apparatus |
US4673507C1 (en) * | 1985-05-06 | 2001-10-16 | Eco Tec | Fluid treatment process and apparatus |
US4660411A (en) * | 1985-05-31 | 1987-04-28 | Reid Philip L | Apparatus for measuring transmission of volatile substances through films |
US4656865A (en) * | 1985-09-09 | 1987-04-14 | The Dow Chemical Company | System for analyzing permeation of a gas or vapor through a film or membrane |
US4797211A (en) * | 1985-12-24 | 1989-01-10 | Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe Gmbh | Cross flow microfilter |
US4744240A (en) * | 1986-05-27 | 1988-05-17 | Akzo Nv | Method for determining the bubble point or the largest pore of membranes or of filter materials |
US4810384A (en) * | 1986-06-20 | 1989-03-07 | Rhone-Poulenc Recherches | Hydrophilic PVDF semipermeable membrane |
US4670145A (en) * | 1986-07-08 | 1987-06-02 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Multiple bundle fluid separation apparatus |
US4935143A (en) * | 1986-07-11 | 1990-06-19 | Memtec Limited | Cleaning of filters |
US4921610A (en) * | 1986-09-04 | 1990-05-01 | Memtec Limited | Cleaning of hollow fibre filters |
US5094750A (en) * | 1986-09-12 | 1992-03-10 | Memtec Limited | Hollow fibre filter cartridge and header |
US4834998A (en) * | 1986-12-22 | 1989-05-30 | Heublein, Inc. | Ultrafiltration of red wines |
US4846970A (en) * | 1987-06-22 | 1989-07-11 | Osmonics, Inc. | Cross-flow filtration membrane test unit |
US5221478A (en) * | 1988-02-05 | 1993-06-22 | The Dow Chemical Company | Chromatographic separation using ion-exchange resins |
US4999038A (en) * | 1989-02-07 | 1991-03-12 | Lundberg Bo E H | Filter unit |
US4988444A (en) * | 1989-05-12 | 1991-01-29 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Prevention of biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes |
US5005430A (en) * | 1989-05-16 | 1991-04-09 | Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. | Automated membrane filter sampler |
US5194149A (en) * | 1989-09-29 | 1993-03-16 | Memtec Limited | Filter cartridge manifold |
US5227063A (en) * | 1989-10-03 | 1993-07-13 | Zenon Environmental Inc. | Tubular membrane module |
US5079272A (en) * | 1989-11-30 | 1992-01-07 | Millipore Corporation | Porous membrane formed from interpenetrating polymer network having hydrophilic surface |
US5094867A (en) * | 1990-01-16 | 1992-03-10 | Basf Aktiengesellschaft | Removal of heavy metal ions from wine and wine-like beverages |
US5405528A (en) * | 1990-04-20 | 1995-04-11 | Memtec Limited | Modular microporous filter assemblies |
US5104546A (en) * | 1990-07-03 | 1992-04-14 | Aluminum Company Of America | Pyrogens separations by ceramic ultrafiltration |
US5104535A (en) * | 1990-08-17 | 1992-04-14 | Zenon Environmental, Inc. | Frameless array of hollow fiber membranes and module containing a stack of arrays |
US5182019A (en) * | 1990-08-17 | 1993-01-26 | Zenon Environmental Inc. | Cartridge of hybrid frameless arrays of hollow fiber membranes and module containing an assembly of cartridges |
US5209852A (en) * | 1990-08-31 | 1993-05-11 | Japan Organo Co. Ltd. | Process for scrubbing porous hollow fiber membranes in hollow fiber membrane module |
USH1045H (en) * | 1990-11-19 | 1992-05-05 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army | Air bubble leak detection test device |
US5192456A (en) * | 1991-03-07 | 1993-03-09 | Kubota Corporation | Apparatus for treating activated sludge and method of cleaning it |
US5417101A (en) * | 1991-06-10 | 1995-05-23 | Pall Corporation | Method and apparatus for testing the integrity of filter elements |
US5211823A (en) * | 1991-06-19 | 1993-05-18 | Millipore Corporation | Process for purifying resins utilizing bipolar interface |
US5643455A (en) * | 1991-08-07 | 1997-07-01 | Memtel Limited | Concentration of solids in a suspension using hollow fibre membranes |
US5198116A (en) * | 1992-02-10 | 1993-03-30 | D.W. Walker & Associates | Method and apparatus for measuring the fouling potential of membrane system feeds |
US5480553A (en) * | 1992-02-12 | 1996-01-02 | Mitsubishi Rayon Co., Ltd. | Hollow fiber membrane module |
US5393433A (en) * | 1992-03-11 | 1995-02-28 | Aquasource, Societe En Nom Collectif | Method using separation membranes to treat a fluid containing matter in suspension and in solution |
US5531848A (en) * | 1992-05-18 | 1996-07-02 | Minntech Corporation | Method of manufacturing of hollow fiber cartridge with porous ring |
US5918264A (en) * | 1992-11-02 | 1999-06-29 | Usf Filtration And Separations Group Inc. | Fiber monitoring system |
US5320760A (en) * | 1992-12-07 | 1994-06-14 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Method of determining filter pluggage by measuring pressures |
US5401401A (en) * | 1993-01-13 | 1995-03-28 | Aquaria Inc. | Hang on tank canister filter |
US5389260A (en) * | 1993-04-02 | 1995-02-14 | Clack Corporation | Brine seal for tubular filter |
US5297420A (en) * | 1993-05-19 | 1994-03-29 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Apparatus and method for measuring relative permeability and capillary pressure of porous rock |
US5419816A (en) * | 1993-10-27 | 1995-05-30 | Halox Technologies Corporation | Electrolytic process and apparatus for the controlled oxidation of inorganic and organic species in aqueous solutions |
US5607593A (en) * | 1993-11-30 | 1997-03-04 | Otv Omnium De Trajtements Et De Valorisation S.A. | Installation for making water potable with submerged filtering membranes |
US5403479A (en) * | 1993-12-20 | 1995-04-04 | Zenon Environmental Inc. | In situ cleaning system for fouled membranes |
US5531900A (en) * | 1994-07-07 | 1996-07-02 | University Of Arizona | Modification of polyvinylidene fluoride membrane and method of filtering |
US5906742A (en) * | 1995-07-05 | 1999-05-25 | Usf Filtration And Separations Group Inc. | Microfiltration membranes having high pore density and mixed isotropic and anisotropic structure |
US5910250A (en) * | 1995-08-11 | 1999-06-08 | Zenon Environmental Inc. | Baffle for conversion of fine bubbles to coarse while filtering with a vertical skein of hollow fibers |
US6193890B1 (en) * | 1995-08-11 | 2001-02-27 | Zenon Environmental Inc. | System for maintaining a clean skein of hollow fibers while filtering suspended solids |
US6685832B2 (en) * | 1995-08-11 | 2004-02-03 | Zenon Environmental Inc. | Method of potting hollow fiber membranes |
USRE37549E1 (en) * | 1995-08-11 | 2002-02-19 | Zenon Environmental Inc. | Vertical skein of hollow fiber membranes and method of maintaining clean fiber surfaces while filtering a substrate to withdraw a permeate |
US5639373A (en) * | 1995-08-11 | 1997-06-17 | Zenon Environmental Inc. | Vertical skein of hollow fiber membranes and method of maintaining clean fiber surfaces while filtering a substrate to withdraw a permeate |
US6042677A (en) * | 1995-08-11 | 2000-03-28 | Zenon Environmental, Inc. | Potted header for hollow fiber membranes and method for making it |
US6077435A (en) * | 1996-03-15 | 2000-06-20 | Usf Filtration And Separations Group Inc. | Filtration monitoring and control system |
US5888401A (en) * | 1996-09-16 | 1999-03-30 | Union Camp Corporation | Method and apparatus for reducing membrane fouling |
US6555005B1 (en) * | 1996-12-20 | 2003-04-29 | Usf Filtration & Separations Group Inc. | Scouring method |
US6387189B1 (en) * | 1997-01-09 | 2002-05-14 | Bayer Aktiengesellschaft | Surface-cleaning method |
US6048454A (en) * | 1997-03-18 | 2000-04-11 | Jenkins; Dan | Oil filter pack and assembly |
US6202475B1 (en) * | 1997-05-30 | 2001-03-20 | Usf Filtration And Separations Group, Inc. | Predicting logarithmic reduction values |
US5914039A (en) * | 1997-07-01 | 1999-06-22 | Zenon Environmental Inc. | Filtration membrane with calcined α-alumina particles therein |
US6024872A (en) * | 1997-07-01 | 2000-02-15 | Zenon Evironmental Inc. | Method of making a dope comprising hydrophilized PVDF and α-alumina, and a membrane made therefrom |
US6354444B1 (en) * | 1997-07-01 | 2002-03-12 | Zenon Environmental Inc. | Hollow fiber membrane and braided tubular support therefor |
US6039872A (en) * | 1997-10-27 | 2000-03-21 | Pall Corporation | Hydrophilic membrane |
US20030075504A1 (en) * | 1998-09-25 | 2003-04-24 | Fufang Zha | Apparatus and method for cleaning membrane filtration modules |
US6524481B2 (en) * | 1998-09-25 | 2003-02-25 | U.S. Filter Wastewater Group, Inc. | Apparatus and method for cleaning membrane filtration modules |
US6245239B1 (en) * | 1998-10-09 | 2001-06-12 | Zenon Environmental Inc. | Cyclic aeration system for submerged membrane modules |
US6550747B2 (en) * | 1998-10-09 | 2003-04-22 | Zenon Environmental Inc. | Cyclic aeration system for submerged membrane modules |
US6221247B1 (en) * | 1999-06-03 | 2001-04-24 | Cms Technology Holdings, Inc. | Dioxole coated membrane module for ultrafiltration or microfiltration of aqueous suspensions |
US20030057155A1 (en) * | 1999-09-29 | 2003-03-27 | Hidayat Husain | Ultrafiltration and microfiltration module and system |
US20030089659A1 (en) * | 2000-04-10 | 2003-05-15 | Fufang Zha | Hollow fibre restraining system |
US20020070157A1 (en) * | 2000-08-18 | 2002-06-13 | Yosuke Yamada | Filter device |
US20040035782A1 (en) * | 2000-11-13 | 2004-02-26 | Heinz-Joachim Muller | Modified membranes |
US20040000520A1 (en) * | 2001-11-16 | 2004-01-01 | Gallagher Paul Martin | Method of cleaning membranes |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DE60213184D1 (en) | 2006-08-31 |
US20050224411A1 (en) | 2005-10-13 |
US20080237125A1 (en) | 2008-10-02 |
US20040000520A1 (en) | 2004-01-01 |
EP1312408A2 (en) | 2003-05-21 |
DE60213184T2 (en) | 2007-06-28 |
EP1312408A3 (en) | 2003-08-06 |
US6955762B2 (en) | 2005-10-18 |
EP1312408B1 (en) | 2006-07-19 |
ATE333318T1 (en) | 2006-08-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6955762B2 (en) | Method of cleaning membranes | |
Li et al. | Treatment of oily wastewater by organic–inorganic composite tubular ultrafiltration (UF) membranes | |
JP2007130523A (en) | Membrane washing method for water treatment system | |
JP2008229418A (en) | Method and apparatus for industrial water treatment | |
JP4135267B2 (en) | Method of operating a total filtration type membrane separation apparatus and total filtration type membrane separation apparatus | |
US11117099B2 (en) | Method of cleaning microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes | |
JPH10225682A (en) | Method of removing boron in reverse osmosis seawater desalination | |
JP2012200696A (en) | Desalting method and desalting apparatus | |
JP2003001073A (en) | Method for cleaning separation membrane | |
JPH09262444A (en) | Cleaning method of membrane module | |
PH12019000181A1 (en) | Hollow fiber membrane for filtration of liquids | |
AT516359B1 (en) | Device for the filtration of water with a filter arrangement | |
JP2002035748A (en) | Water cleaning treatment apparatus using large pore size filter membrane member | |
JP3838689B2 (en) | Water treatment system | |
KR102467729B1 (en) | Treatment method and water treatment method of nonionic surfactant-containing water | |
JP4454922B2 (en) | Control method of filtration apparatus using hollow fiber type separation membrane | |
JP2000015062A (en) | Membrane filter | |
JP2004130307A (en) | Method for filtration of hollow fiber membrane | |
JPH10118471A (en) | Cleaning of membrane module | |
JP2006218341A (en) | Method and apparatus for treating water | |
JP2005046801A (en) | Water treatment method and apparatus therefor | |
JP5996963B2 (en) | Filtration method of metal nanoparticles | |
JP3220216B2 (en) | Water treatment method | |
JP2006198531A (en) | Operating method of hollow fiber membrane module | |
JP2005103510A (en) | Method for cleaning liquid chemical |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: U.S. FILTER WASTEWATER GROUP, INC., PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:GALLAGHER, PAUL MARTIN;RAINIER, TOM;BALCZEWSKI, AARON J.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:016363/0357;SIGNING DATES FROM 20030423 TO 20030425 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- AFTER EXAMINER'S ANSWER OR BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION |