US20050139292A1 - Method and apparatus for minimizing thickness-to-planarity and dishing in CMP - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for minimizing thickness-to-planarity and dishing in CMP Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20050139292A1
US20050139292A1 US10/750,734 US75073403A US2005139292A1 US 20050139292 A1 US20050139292 A1 US 20050139292A1 US 75073403 A US75073403 A US 75073403A US 2005139292 A1 US2005139292 A1 US 2005139292A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
metal layer
cmp
set forth
metal
wafer
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/750,734
Inventor
Suresh Ramarajan
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Amazonen Werke H Dreyer SE and Co KG
Micron Technology Inc
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US10/750,734 priority Critical patent/US20050139292A1/en
Assigned to MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. reassignment MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: RAMARAJAN, SURESH
Publication of US20050139292A1 publication Critical patent/US20050139292A1/en
Priority to US11/475,585 priority patent/US7453152B2/en
Assigned to Amazonen-Werke H. Dreyer SE & Co. KG reassignment Amazonen-Werke H. Dreyer SE & Co. KG CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: AMAZONEN-WERKE H. DREYER GMBH & CO. KG, Amazonen-Werke H. Dreyer SE & Co. KG
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C8/00Solid state diffusion of only non-metal elements into metallic material surfaces; Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive gas, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals
    • C23C8/80After-treatment
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C8/00Solid state diffusion of only non-metal elements into metallic material surfaces; Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive gas, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals
    • C23C8/02Pretreatment of the material to be coated
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/24Structurally defined web or sheet [e.g., overall dimension, etc.]
    • Y10T428/24273Structurally defined web or sheet [e.g., overall dimension, etc.] including aperture
    • Y10T428/24322Composite web or sheet
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/31504Composite [nonstructural laminate]
    • Y10T428/31678Of metal

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to improving the fabrication of integrated circuits and, more particularly, to reducing thickness-to-planarity and dishing during chemical mechanical planarization of layers on a substrate.
  • Microprocessors and memory devices such as dynamic and static random access memories (DRAM and SRAM), are complex integrated circuits that are used in a wide variety of applications throughout the world. Such applications include personal computers, control systems, telephone networks, and a host of other consumer products. Despite their complexity, price competition requires that microprocessor and memory designs be inexpensive to manufacture. In the fabrication of integrated circuits, it can be a significant cost advantage to reduce the amount of material used and the waste generated.
  • DRAM and SRAM dynamic and static random access memories
  • Integrated circuits such as random access memories, are fabricated on semiconductor wafers. They may be mass produced by fabricating thousands of identical circuit patterns on a single semiconductor wafer and subsequently dividing them into identical dies or chips. Integrated circuits are commonly referred to as “semiconductor devices” because the wafer substrates are typically a semiconductor, such as silicon. Integrated circuits are fabricated, however, by depositing numerous materials of varying electrical properties on the semiconductor wafer. These materials include insulators or dielectrics (such as silicon dioxide), conductors (such as polysilicon, copper, aluminum and tungsten), and semiconductors (such as silicon and germanium).
  • insulators or dielectrics such as silicon dioxide
  • conductors such as polysilicon, copper, aluminum and tungsten
  • semiconductors such as silicon and germanium
  • CMP chemical mechanical planarization
  • planarization is a process of removing material to render a surface relatively smooth.
  • CMP in particular, is the process of smoothing and planarizing aided by chemical and mechanical forces.
  • the CMP process helps to minimize barriers to multilayer formation and metallization, as well as to smooth, flatten, and clean the surface.
  • This process involves chemically modifying the surface while also mechanically polishing it.
  • the combined action of surface chemical reaction and mechanical polishing allows for controlled layer-by-layer removal of the desired material from the wafer surface, resulting in the preferential removal of protruding surface topography and producing a planarized wafer surface.
  • the degree of planarization may be measured, for example, with an optical reflectivity sensor.
  • CMP has become one of the most effective techniques for planarizing a semiconductor wafer.
  • the CMP process involves holding a semiconductor substrate, such as a wafer, against a rotating wetted polishing pad under controlled downward pressure.
  • the CMP process may involve holding a wetted polishing pad while rotating a semiconductor substrate, such as a wafer, under controlled downward pressure.
  • a polishing slurry delivered onto the polishing pad contains etchants and an abrasive material such as alumina or silica.
  • a wafer carrier is typically utilized to hold the wafer under controlled pressure against the polishing pad.
  • the polishing pad may be constructed, for example, of a felt fabric material impregnated with blown polyurethane.
  • the three key elements in the CMP process include the surface to be polished, the pad which enables the transfer of mechanical forces to the surface being polished, and the slurry which provides both chemical and mechanical effects.
  • Abrasive particles in the slurry cause mechanical alteration at the sample surface, loosening the material for enhanced chemical attack or fracturing off the pieces of surface into a slurry where they dissolve or are swept away.
  • chemistry alone typically will not achieve planarization because most chemical actions are isotropic.
  • Mechanical grinding alone theoretically may achieve the desired planarization but is generally not desirable because of the extensive associated damage of the material surfaces.
  • CMP CMP to remove material only from elevated regions on the sample surface.
  • the amount of material removed, the related thickness-to-planarity, and the associated dishing phenomenon may be reduced.
  • a problem in CMP is that material is undesirably removed from recessed regions, increasing thickness-to-planarity and dishing. For example, during CMP the pad may deform and grind the recessed regions.
  • the recessed surface of the filled contact opening (“contact plug”) may be attacked by the slurry. Material is dissolved below the CMP stopping layer, forming a dish-shaped cavity on the wafer surface. Dishing may be characterized as the distance between the CMP stopping layer on the field and the contact plug surface. Significant material removal may occur in the recessed contact plug.
  • CMP slurries that not only dissolve the metal layer but also oxidize the metal surface or coat the metal surface with a polymer during CMP. Mechanical action removes the oxide or the polymer layer from the elevated regions (due to the higher pressure experienced), exposing the underlying metal to the slurry that can dissolve the metal, while the oxide or the polymer coating in the recessed areas may stay intact protecting the metal from the slurry.
  • the oxide layer formed on the metal surface is thin and relatively sparse, and hence, easily removed in the recessed regions due to CMP pad deformation. As a result, dishing and the thickness-to-planarity remain relatively high.
  • the polymeric coating may protect the recessed areas better than a thin oxide layer but the coating is difficult to remove. Removal of a polymeric coating typically requires, for example, that the wafer be heated to a high temperature such as 100° C.
  • the slurry oxidizes the metal surface or coats the metal surface with polymer, these slurries are relatively expensive and do not significantly reduce thickness-to-planarity or dishing.
  • the present invention may be directed to one or more of the problems set forth above.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a cross-sectional view of an exemplary semiconductor wafer having a contact opening etched in an ILD layer
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a cross-sectional view of the semiconductor wafer in FIG. 1 , having an exemplary metal layer surface
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a cross-sectional view of the semiconductor wafer in FIG. 2 after CMP of the metal layer
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a cross-sectional view of the semiconductor wafer in FIG. 2 before CMP and having a metal oxide layer of desired thickness and density in accordance with embodiments of the presently claimed techniques
  • FIG. 5 illustrates a cross-sectional view of the semiconductor wafer in FIG. 4 after CMP of the metal layer in accordance with aspects of the presently claimed techniques
  • FIG. 6 illustrates a block diagram of an exemplary oxidizing technique in accordance with the presently claimed techniques used to minimize thickness-to-planarity and dishing in CMP;
  • FIG. 7 illustrates two representative curves of dishing versus thickness-to-planarity after CMP of a wafer metal layer without an oxidized surface and of a wafer metal layer with an oxidized surface in accordance with aspects of the presently claimed techniques.
  • embodiments of the present technique hardens (modifies) the surface of the metal layers prior to CMP.
  • Such hardening before CMP may be accomplished, for example, by oxidizing the metal surface or by coating the metal surface with a polymer.
  • the surface of the metal layer is hardened to increase its resistance to abrasion and/or chemical attack. Accordingly, less material is removed from recessed regions during CMP because the hardened surface makes the recessed regions less susceptible to abrasion caused by undesirable CMP pad deformation and/or less susceptible to etching caused by undesirable chemical attack by the CMP slurry.
  • a “hardened” surface may be defined broadly to include both resistance to abrasion and resistance to chemical attack. In other words, even if the surface metal layer surface is softened in the traditional sense, for example, by coating with a soft polymer to increase chemical resistance, the surface is “hardened” as defined here.
  • the surface of the wafer metal layer is oxidized prior to CMP, such as during an annealing process.
  • CMP chemical vapor deposition
  • the oxidation forms a copper oxide film on the surface.
  • the amount of copper removed during the subsequent CMP is reduced.
  • the present technique encompasses approaches other than oxidation, such as application of a polymeric coating to the metal layer surface prior to CMP.
  • the present techniques apply to treatment of the metal surface, such as by hardening of the metal surface, to increase abrasion resistance and/or chemical resistance. Treatment occurs before CMP, and as a result, the amount of material removed during the subsequent CMP, the related thickness-to-planarity, and dishing may be reduced.
  • FIG. 1 a cross-sectional view of a portion of a semiconductor wafer 10 having a substrate 12 , interlayer dielectric (ILD) layer 14 , and contact 16 , is illustrated.
  • the substrate 12 is typically a semiconductor substrate or wafer, such as silicon or gallium arsenide, upon which conductive interfaces or structures may be formed.
  • a metal layer (not shown), such as aluminum, copper, tungsten, and/or titanium, or some other conductive layer, such as polysilicon, may be deposited on the substrate 12 underneath the ILD layer 14 .
  • additional ILD material may be deposited between the substrate 12 and ILD layer 14 .
  • interlayer dielectrics, such as ILD layer 14 may be used to separate and insulate wafer conductive layers, and can be, for example, a deposited silicon oxide, silicon nitride, or a polyimide film.
  • Contact 16 represents conductive material and is, for example, an active structure of a lower conductive layer or an interconnecting metal line from a lower conductive layer.
  • a “contact opening” 18 is formed in the ILD layer 14 , exposing an underlying conductive surface 19 , of an active region or conductive layer.
  • the exposed conductive region 19 is generically shown as a surface of the contact 16 , those of ordinary skill in the art recognize that many different types of conductive regions 19 may exist at various locations along the interface between layers 12 and 14 .
  • FIG. 2 a cross-sectional view of the semiconductor wafer 10 illustrated in FIG. 1 , having a conductive layer, such as metal layer 20 , with a recessed region 22 that forms as the metal is deposited.
  • the metal layer 20 may be, for example, aluminum, copper, tungsten, titanium, a combination thereof, and so forth.
  • CMP chemical mechanical planarization
  • planarization results from the difference in the material removal rate between the elevated region 23 and the recessed region 22 due to the difference in the pressure experienced by the two regions.
  • a problem in CMP is that significant material is removed in the recessed regions, such as in the recessed region 22 , because the CMP slurry etches the recessed region 22 even though the CMP pad may not touch the recessed region 22 .
  • more material of the metal layer 20 must be removed to achieve planarity. More waste is generated because more metal must be deposited initially to accommodate the significant amount of metal removed during CMP.
  • the thickness 24 is the height of the metal layer 20 before CMP.
  • Thickness-to-planarity 26 is the amount of material removed during CMP from the elevated region 23 in order for the surface to become planar.
  • the height or level on the metal layer 20 at which the surface becomes generally planar is denoted by reference numeral 27 .
  • the level 27 at which the surface becomes planar may be different than the ultimate stopping layer on the field.
  • the wafer 10 may then be subjected to additional processing, such as a CMP overpolish step which removes additional material from metal layer 20 .
  • the stopping layer on the field is denoted by reference numeral 28 and is the top of the ILD layer 14 .
  • an overpolish step with partial or complete copper removal across the wafer may be required. Copper dishing may occur both during the planarization CMP and during the overpolish CMP.
  • the CMP slurry may undesirably attack the material in the recessed region 22 which may descend to below the CMP stopping layer 28 on the field. Significant material removal may occur in the metal contact plug 30 down in the trench (contact hole 18 ).
  • the amount of “dishing” is the distance between the CMP stopping layer 28 and the etched material down in the contact plug 30 . It should be noted that the representations in FIGS. 2 and 3 do not use the present techniques but are illustrated to demonstrate the merits of present techniques.
  • FIG. 3 depicts the cross-sectional view of the semiconductor wafer 10 after subjecting the metal layer 20 to CMP for both planarization and subsequent overpolish.
  • the contact plug 30 is shown with a dishing dimension 32 .
  • the metal layer 20 has been removed from the surface of the ILD layer 14 .
  • the dishing dimension 32 is the distance between the stopping layer 28 and the surface 37 of the contact plug 30 .
  • the contact plug 30 is copper, the width 34 of the contact plug is approximately 100 microns, the height 36 is about 5,500 angstroms, and the dishing dimension 32 is about 1000 angstroms.
  • Embodiments of the presently claimed techniques reduce dishing.
  • oxidation of the metal layer 20 surface before CMP reduces the dishing dimension 32 from approximately 1000 angstroms to within 400-500 angstroms.
  • the dishing dimension 32 may be reduced to as low as 250 angstroms.
  • the dishing dimension 32 is reduced from about 780 angstroms to about 280 angstroms.
  • the dishing dimension 32 with the present techniques may be reduced by 50-75%.
  • slurries that oxidize the metal surface during CMP deposit only a thin oxide layer and do not significantly reduce dishing or thickness-to-planarity 26 ( FIG. 2 ).
  • Dishing and thickness-to-planarity are reduced by forming an oxide layer of desired thickness and density on the metal surface before CMP. Due to the presence of the oxide layer, the metal surface becomes hardened and thus more resistant to abrasion by the CMP pad and/or more resistant to attack by the CMP slurry. It should be noted that the present techniques apply to any oxidizable metal subjected to CMP. Furthermore, existing portions of the wafer fabrication system may be used to create the oxide layer. For example, the oxide layer may be formed during an annealing process that precedes CMP of the metal layer.
  • a copper oxide layer is formed before copper CMP is performed.
  • an oxidant such as O 2 or O 3 gas (diatomic or triatomic oxygen)
  • other metals such as aluminum, may normally possess adequate conductivity without annealing.
  • metal layers may be dry etched instead of subjected to CMP. Nevertheless, the presently claimed techniques may be applicable to any oxidizable metal that is removed from the wafer.
  • FIG. 4 a cross-sectional view of the semiconductor wafer 10 ′ after annealing but before CMP and having a metal oxide layer 38 of desired thickness and density, is illustrated.
  • the metal layer 20 is copper and the oxide layer 38 is copper oxide.
  • Annealing may be performed at high temperature, such as in the range of 150-250° C., and thus, the resulting oxide layer is especially dense.
  • a relatively thick (e.g., 300 to 600 angstroms) and dense oxide layer it is possible, during the subsequent CMP, to decrease the material removal rate in the recessed regions and thus minimize dishing and thickness-to-planarity.
  • the required thickness 24 ′ of copper layer 20 ′ may, for example, be reduced from 11,000 to 7,000 angstroms because the presence of the relatively thick and dense copper oxide layer 38 results in a reduction of the thickness-to-planarity 26 ′, for example, from 10,000 to 6,000 angstroms.
  • the thickness-to-planarity 26 ′ is the height of the metal layer 20 ′ removed during CMP to achieve planarity. Techniques that reduce dishing and thickness-to-planarity require less thickness 24 ′ of metal layer 20 ′. Less material is deposited and less material is removed.
  • FIG. 5 a cross-sectional view of the semiconductor wafer 10 ′ in FIG. 4 after CMP of the metal layer 20 ′ in accordance with aspects of the presently claimed techniques is depicted.
  • the wafer metal surface layer 20 ′ in FIG. 4
  • this oxidized wafer 10 ′ is subjected to CMP for both planarization and a subsequent overpolish.
  • the metal (copper) layer 20 is ultimately removed from surface of the ILD layer 14 ′, and the surface of the ILD layer 14 ′ is the stopping layer 28 ′.
  • contact plug 30 ′ is shown with a reduced dishing dimension 32 ′, in this example, reduced from 1000 angstroms to 450 angstroms.
  • Contact plug 30 ′ has the same width 34 (100 microns) and height 36 (angstroms) as that depicted in FIG. 3 .
  • Embodiments of the presently claimed technique apply to CMP of oxidizable metal layers in a variety of wafer configurations. Implementations apply to contact plugs, and to a variety of filled or plated volumes on a semiconductor wafer. Additionally, exposed regions may be active or not active, and if active, may be, for example, a doped region, interconnecting metal line, or the like. In general, embodiments of the presently claimed approach apply to removal or modification, such as via CMP, of oxidizable metals.
  • One of the advantages of the presently claimed techniques is that the lower thickness-to-planarity translates into lower metal plating thickness, thus saving manufacturing costs. Additionally, metals, such as copper, removed during CMP, normally cannot be reclaimed. As a result, the metal removed may be waste and may require treatment to become inert. Accordingly, embodiments of the present techniques reduce waste generation, the associated waste treatment and disposal costs, and facilitate compliance with EPA requirements and other waste disposal regulations. In general, as previously indicated, the amount of metal deposited and removed is reduced by about 50-75%.
  • a block diagram of an oxidizing technique 40 used to minimize thickness-to-planarity and dishing in CMP is illustrated.
  • a metal layer such as copper
  • the wafer is annealed (baked), for example, in a temperature chamber or other thermal unit in the range of 150-250° C. (e.g., 200° C.) for 15-60 minutes (e.g., 30 minutes), as represented by block 44 .
  • An oxide layer is formed by introducing an oxidant into the temperature chamber (block 46 ). In one embodiment, the oxidant is introduced near the end of the annealing cycle (bake).
  • the oxidant such as oxygen or ozone
  • the oxidant may be introduced into the temperature chamber during the last 1-2 minutes of a 30 minute annealing cycle.
  • a copper oxide layer is formed with a thickness in the range of 300 to 600 angstroms (block 48 ).
  • CMP is applied to the semiconductor wafer. The presence of the relatively thick and dense oxide layer on the semiconductor wafer results in improved thickness-to-planarity and dishing characteristics.
  • the metal layer surface may be oxidized prior to CMP in a process other than an annealing process.
  • the metal layer may be oxidized after the semiconductor wafer has been annealed.
  • Metal oxidation can be carried out using oxygen plasma or the residual heat in the wafer from the annealing process may be used in the oxidation.
  • the wafer may be allowed to cool and then reheated before oxidation of the metal surface.
  • the techniques encompass a variety of approaches and devices to oxidize the semiconductor metal layer prior to CMP under heat, including the use of residual heat, with an oxidizing agent, such as oxygen.
  • oxidation is given only as an example. Techniques other than oxidation, such as the use of a polymeric coating, may be employed to harden the metal surface before CMP, and thus to make the metal surface more resistant to abrasion and/or chemical attack.
  • the depths of the recessed regions (i.e., dishing 56 ) decrease in both cases during the initial portion of the CMP as material is preferentially removed from the elevated regions. Though both cases show a decrease in dishing 56 as the surface is planarized, the planarization is more effective with the oxidized metal layer 20 ′ than with the non-oxidized metal layer 20 .
  • the points at which the metal layers 20 and 20 ′ become planarized are denoted by reference numeral 60 for the non-oxidized case and reference numeral 60 ′ for the oxidized case.
  • the thickness-to-planarity may be defined as the value of the material removed 58 at these planarization points.
  • the material removed 58 (thickness-to-planarity) from the metal layer to achieve the specified degree of planarity is reduced from 7800 angstroms to 4800 angstroms.
  • the end points at the conclusion of the CMP overpolish are denoted by reference numerals 62 and 62 ′, respectively.
  • the dishing 56 in the contact plug is reduced from 1000 angstroms for a non-modified metal surface layer to 250 angstroms for a modified metal surface layer.

Abstract

The present technique is directed toward the fabrication of integrated circuits and provides for the hardening (modification) of a metal layer surface of a semiconductor wafer to reduce the amount of material removed during chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) of the metal layer. This hardening may be accomplished, for example, by oxidizing the metal surface and/or coating the metal surface with a polymer. In one implementation, a relatively thick and dense oxide layer is formed on the wafer metal surface prior to CMP, by injecting, for example, an oxidant, such as oxygen or ozone, near the end of an annealing cycle. Such hardening of the surface beneficially protects recessed regions from CMP chemical attack and CMP pad deformation, and thus reduces the thickness-to-planarity, dishing, and waste generation realized during CMP.

Description

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Field of the Invention
  • The present invention relates generally to improving the fabrication of integrated circuits and, more particularly, to reducing thickness-to-planarity and dishing during chemical mechanical planarization of layers on a substrate.
  • 2. Description of the Related Art
  • This section is intended to introduce the reader to various aspects of art that may be related to various aspects of the present invention, which are described and/or claimed below. This discussion is believed to be helpful in providing the reader with background information to facilitate a better understanding of the various aspects of the present invention. Accordingly, it should be understood that these statements are to be read in this light, and not as admissions of prior art.
  • Microprocessors and memory devices, such as dynamic and static random access memories (DRAM and SRAM), are complex integrated circuits that are used in a wide variety of applications throughout the world. Such applications include personal computers, control systems, telephone networks, and a host of other consumer products. Despite their complexity, price competition requires that microprocessor and memory designs be inexpensive to manufacture. In the fabrication of integrated circuits, it can be a significant cost advantage to reduce the amount of material used and the waste generated.
  • Integrated circuits, such as random access memories, are fabricated on semiconductor wafers. They may be mass produced by fabricating thousands of identical circuit patterns on a single semiconductor wafer and subsequently dividing them into identical dies or chips. Integrated circuits are commonly referred to as “semiconductor devices” because the wafer substrates are typically a semiconductor, such as silicon. Integrated circuits are fabricated, however, by depositing numerous materials of varying electrical properties on the semiconductor wafer. These materials include insulators or dielectrics (such as silicon dioxide), conductors (such as polysilicon, copper, aluminum and tungsten), and semiconductors (such as silicon and germanium).
  • To produce the integrated circuit, many commonly known processes are used to modify, remove, and deposit the materials onto the semiconductor wafer. Processes such as ion implantation, sputtering, etching, chemical vapor deposition and variations thereof, such as plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition, are among those commonly used. These steps of material deposition or removal on a semiconductor wafer are frequently followed by a planarization step such as chemical mechanical planarization (CMP).
  • Generally speaking, planarization is a process of removing material to render a surface relatively smooth. CMP, in particular, is the process of smoothing and planarizing aided by chemical and mechanical forces. The CMP process helps to minimize barriers to multilayer formation and metallization, as well as to smooth, flatten, and clean the surface. This process involves chemically modifying the surface while also mechanically polishing it. The combined action of surface chemical reaction and mechanical polishing allows for controlled layer-by-layer removal of the desired material from the wafer surface, resulting in the preferential removal of protruding surface topography and producing a planarized wafer surface. The degree of planarization may be measured, for example, with an optical reflectivity sensor. In the past few years, CMP has become one of the most effective techniques for planarizing a semiconductor wafer.
  • In general, the CMP process involves holding a semiconductor substrate, such as a wafer, against a rotating wetted polishing pad under controlled downward pressure. Alternately, the CMP process may involve holding a wetted polishing pad while rotating a semiconductor substrate, such as a wafer, under controlled downward pressure. A polishing slurry delivered onto the polishing pad contains etchants and an abrasive material such as alumina or silica. A wafer carrier is typically utilized to hold the wafer under controlled pressure against the polishing pad. The polishing pad may be constructed, for example, of a felt fabric material impregnated with blown polyurethane. To summarize, the three key elements in the CMP process include the surface to be polished, the pad which enables the transfer of mechanical forces to the surface being polished, and the slurry which provides both chemical and mechanical effects.
  • Abrasive particles in the slurry cause mechanical alteration at the sample surface, loosening the material for enhanced chemical attack or fracturing off the pieces of surface into a slurry where they dissolve or are swept away. For efficient planarization, it is typically desirable to enhance material removal rate from elevated regions or high points on the surface and to reduce material removal in recessed regions. Moreover, it is the combination of chemical and mechanical effects, and not these forces alone, that is typically advantageous. For example, chemistry alone typically will not achieve planarization because most chemical actions are isotropic. Mechanical grinding alone theoretically may achieve the desired planarization but is generally not desirable because of the extensive associated damage of the material surfaces.
  • To reduce the amount of material removed during CMP and thus the amount of material that must be deposited prior to CMP, it is typically preferred in CMP to remove material only from elevated regions on the sample surface. By removing material primarily from high points on the surface to achieve the specified degree of planarization, the amount of material removed, the related thickness-to-planarity, and the associated dishing phenomenon (discussed below) may be reduced. A problem in CMP, however, is that material is undesirably removed from recessed regions, increasing thickness-to-planarity and dishing. For example, during CMP the pad may deform and grind the recessed regions. As a result, in order to reach planarization, more material must be added initially to the wafer to account for the more material that is being removed from the recessed regions during CMP. Furthermore, even where the pad does not touch the recessed regions, the CMP slurry may etch material in the recessed regions. Again, more material must be removed to achieve planarity. More waste is generated and more material must be deposited initially to accommodate the significant amount of material removed during CMP.
  • Additionally, dishing, an undesirable effect occurs in filled contact openings. The recessed surface of the filled contact opening (“contact plug”) may be attacked by the slurry. Material is dissolved below the CMP stopping layer, forming a dish-shaped cavity on the wafer surface. Dishing may be characterized as the distance between the CMP stopping layer on the field and the contact plug surface. Significant material removal may occur in the recessed contact plug.
  • For metals, efforts to reduce dishing and thickness-to-planarity include the use of CMP slurries that not only dissolve the metal layer but also oxidize the metal surface or coat the metal surface with a polymer during CMP. Mechanical action removes the oxide or the polymer layer from the elevated regions (due to the higher pressure experienced), exposing the underlying metal to the slurry that can dissolve the metal, while the oxide or the polymer coating in the recessed areas may stay intact protecting the metal from the slurry.
  • For slurries that oxidize, a drawback is that the oxide layer formed on the metal surface is thin and relatively sparse, and hence, easily removed in the recessed regions due to CMP pad deformation. As a result, dishing and the thickness-to-planarity remain relatively high. For slurries that form polymers on the metal surface, the polymeric coating may protect the recessed areas better than a thin oxide layer but the coating is difficult to remove. Removal of a polymeric coating typically requires, for example, that the wafer be heated to a high temperature such as 100° C. Moreover, whether the slurry oxidizes the metal surface or coats the metal surface with polymer, these slurries are relatively expensive and do not significantly reduce thickness-to-planarity or dishing.
  • Other efforts to improve dishing characteristics involve the use of a harder CMP pad that deforms less than the typical CMP softer pads. Harder pads, however, can scratch wafers. Also, as will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, it is difficult to condition harder pads. For example, the use of a typical diamond-based conditioner may not effectively remove damaged portions of harder pads.
  • The present invention may be directed to one or more of the problems set forth above.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • Advantages of the invention may become apparent upon reading the following detailed description and upon reference to the drawings in which:
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a cross-sectional view of an exemplary semiconductor wafer having a contact opening etched in an ILD layer;
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a cross-sectional view of the semiconductor wafer in FIG. 1, having an exemplary metal layer surface;
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a cross-sectional view of the semiconductor wafer in FIG. 2 after CMP of the metal layer;
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a cross-sectional view of the semiconductor wafer in FIG. 2 before CMP and having a metal oxide layer of desired thickness and density in accordance with embodiments of the presently claimed techniques;
  • FIG. 5 illustrates a cross-sectional view of the semiconductor wafer in FIG. 4 after CMP of the metal layer in accordance with aspects of the presently claimed techniques;
  • FIG. 6 illustrates a block diagram of an exemplary oxidizing technique in accordance with the presently claimed techniques used to minimize thickness-to-planarity and dishing in CMP; and
  • FIG. 7 illustrates two representative curves of dishing versus thickness-to-planarity after CMP of a wafer metal layer without an oxidized surface and of a wafer metal layer with an oxidized surface in accordance with aspects of the presently claimed techniques.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS
  • One or more specific embodiments of the present invention will be described below. In an effort to provide a concise description of these embodiments, not all features of an actual implementation are described in the specification. It should be appreciated that in the development of any such actual implementation, as in any engineering or design project, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developers' specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which may vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it should be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking of design, fabrication, and manufacture for those of ordinary skill having the benefit of this disclosure.
  • To reduce the amount of material removed during chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) of metal layers on semiconductor wafers, embodiments of the present technique hardens (modifies) the surface of the metal layers prior to CMP. Such hardening before CMP may be accomplished, for example, by oxidizing the metal surface or by coating the metal surface with a polymer. In general, the surface of the metal layer is hardened to increase its resistance to abrasion and/or chemical attack. Accordingly, less material is removed from recessed regions during CMP because the hardened surface makes the recessed regions less susceptible to abrasion caused by undesirable CMP pad deformation and/or less susceptible to etching caused by undesirable chemical attack by the CMP slurry. As discussed more below, hardening of the metal layer before CMP reduces dishing and thickness-to-planarity realized during the subsequent CMP of the wafer and metal layer. It should be noted that a “hardened” surface may be defined broadly to include both resistance to abrasion and resistance to chemical attack. In other words, even if the surface metal layer surface is softened in the traditional sense, for example, by coating with a soft polymer to increase chemical resistance, the surface is “hardened” as defined here.
  • Nevertheless, in one embodiment, the surface of the wafer metal layer is oxidized prior to CMP, such as during an annealing process. For a metal layer comprising copper, the oxidation forms a copper oxide film on the surface. As a result, the amount of copper removed during the subsequent CMP is reduced. It should be restated, however, that though oxidation is extensively discussed, the present technique encompasses approaches other than oxidation, such as application of a polymeric coating to the metal layer surface prior to CMP. In general, the present techniques apply to treatment of the metal surface, such as by hardening of the metal surface, to increase abrasion resistance and/or chemical resistance. Treatment occurs before CMP, and as a result, the amount of material removed during the subsequent CMP, the related thickness-to-planarity, and dishing may be reduced.
  • With a lower thickness-to-planarity and less metal removed, less metal may be deposited initially before CMP and less waste is generated during CMP. Additionally, the dishing phenomenon that unfortunately causes, for example, cavities on the wafer surface may be reduced. Dishing is to be avoided because the resulting topology, for example, may cause damage to the underlying topology during subsequent processing of the semiconductor wafer. It should be noted that in contrast with the present techniques, CMP slurries that oxidize the metal surface during CMP, deposit only a thin oxide layer and do not significantly reduce dishing or thickness-to-planarity.
  • Turning now to the drawings, and referring initially to FIG. 1, a cross-sectional view of a portion of a semiconductor wafer 10 having a substrate 12, interlayer dielectric (ILD) layer 14, and contact 16, is illustrated. The substrate 12 is typically a semiconductor substrate or wafer, such as silicon or gallium arsenide, upon which conductive interfaces or structures may be formed. A metal layer (not shown), such as aluminum, copper, tungsten, and/or titanium, or some other conductive layer, such as polysilicon, may be deposited on the substrate 12 underneath the ILD layer 14. Furthermore, additional ILD material (not shown) may be deposited between the substrate 12 and ILD layer 14. In general, interlayer dielectrics, such as ILD layer 14, may be used to separate and insulate wafer conductive layers, and can be, for example, a deposited silicon oxide, silicon nitride, or a polyimide film.
  • Contact 16 represents conductive material and is, for example, an active structure of a lower conductive layer or an interconnecting metal line from a lower conductive layer. A “contact opening” 18 (or “via”) is formed in the ILD layer 14, exposing an underlying conductive surface 19, of an active region or conductive layer. Although in this illustrative embodiment, the exposed conductive region 19 is generically shown as a surface of the contact 16, those of ordinary skill in the art recognize that many different types of conductive regions 19 may exist at various locations along the interface between layers 12 and 14.
  • After the contact opening 18 is formed, another conductive layer may then be deposited onto the wafer 10, forming a metal “contact plug” in the contact opening 18 so that the new metal layer is connected to the underlying contact 16. For example, referring now to FIG. 2, a cross-sectional view of the semiconductor wafer 10 illustrated in FIG. 1, having a conductive layer, such as metal layer 20, with a recessed region 22 that forms as the metal is deposited. The metal layer 20 may be, for example, aluminum, copper, tungsten, titanium, a combination thereof, and so forth. After deposition, the metal layer 20 may be subjected to chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) to remove excess material and to smooth (planarize) the surface. For CMP, planarization results from the difference in the material removal rate between the elevated region 23 and the recessed region 22 due to the difference in the pressure experienced by the two regions.
  • A problem in CMP is that significant material is removed in the recessed regions, such as in the recessed region 22, because the CMP slurry etches the recessed region 22 even though the CMP pad may not touch the recessed region 22. Thus, more material of the metal layer 20 must be removed to achieve planarity. More waste is generated because more metal must be deposited initially to accommodate the significant amount of metal removed during CMP. The thickness 24 is the height of the metal layer 20 before CMP. Thickness-to-planarity 26 is the amount of material removed during CMP from the elevated region 23 in order for the surface to become planar. The height or level on the metal layer 20 at which the surface becomes generally planar is denoted by reference numeral 27. As will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, the level 27 at which the surface becomes planar may be different than the ultimate stopping layer on the field. For example, after the surface becomes planar (i.e., at level 27), the wafer 10 may then be subjected to additional processing, such as a CMP overpolish step which removes additional material from metal layer 20. In this illustrative example, the stopping layer on the field is denoted by reference numeral 28 and is the top of the ILD layer 14. In certain applications for copper CMP, an overpolish step with partial or complete copper removal across the wafer may be required. Copper dishing may occur both during the planarization CMP and during the overpolish CMP.
  • As previously mentioned, the CMP slurry may undesirably attack the material in the recessed region 22 which may descend to below the CMP stopping layer 28 on the field. Significant material removal may occur in the metal contact plug 30 down in the trench (contact hole 18). The amount of “dishing” (see FIGS. 3 and 5) is the distance between the CMP stopping layer 28 and the etched material down in the contact plug 30. It should be noted that the representations in FIGS. 2 and 3 do not use the present techniques but are illustrated to demonstrate the merits of present techniques.
  • FIG. 3 depicts the cross-sectional view of the semiconductor wafer 10 after subjecting the metal layer 20 to CMP for both planarization and subsequent overpolish. The contact plug 30 is shown with a dishing dimension 32. In this illustrative example, the metal layer 20 has been removed from the surface of the ILD layer 14. The dishing dimension 32 is the distance between the stopping layer 28 and the surface 37 of the contact plug 30. In one example, the contact plug 30 is copper, the width 34 of the contact plug is approximately 100 microns, the height 36 is about 5,500 angstroms, and the dishing dimension 32 is about 1000 angstroms.
  • Embodiments of the presently claimed techniques reduce dishing. In the above example, oxidation of the metal layer 20 surface before CMP reduces the dishing dimension 32 from approximately 1000 angstroms to within 400-500 angstroms. In certain circumstances, the dishing dimension 32 may be reduced to as low as 250 angstroms. In yet another example of oxidation of a copper layer, the dishing dimension 32 is reduced from about 780 angstroms to about 280 angstroms. In general, the dishing dimension 32 with the present techniques may be reduced by 50-75%. In contrast, slurries that oxidize the metal surface during CMP deposit only a thin oxide layer and do not significantly reduce dishing or thickness-to-planarity 26 (FIG. 2).
  • Dishing and thickness-to-planarity are reduced by forming an oxide layer of desired thickness and density on the metal surface before CMP. Due to the presence of the oxide layer, the metal surface becomes hardened and thus more resistant to abrasion by the CMP pad and/or more resistant to attack by the CMP slurry. It should be noted that the present techniques apply to any oxidizable metal subjected to CMP. Furthermore, existing portions of the wafer fabrication system may be used to create the oxide layer. For example, the oxide layer may be formed during an annealing process that precedes CMP of the metal layer.
  • In an example of a copper metal layer 20′, a copper oxide layer is formed before copper CMP is performed. By introducing an oxidant, such as O2 or O3 gas (diatomic or triatomic oxygen), towards the end of an annealing cycle, it is possible to oxidize the copper surface to the desired thickness before CMP. As will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, it is typical to anneal copper after plating or deposition to increase the conductivity of copper. In contrast, other metals, such as aluminum, may normally possess adequate conductivity without annealing. Moreover, metal layers may be dry etched instead of subjected to CMP. Nevertheless, the presently claimed techniques may be applicable to any oxidizable metal that is removed from the wafer.
  • Referring now to FIG. 4, a cross-sectional view of the semiconductor wafer 10′ after annealing but before CMP and having a metal oxide layer 38 of desired thickness and density, is illustrated. In this illustrative embodiment, the metal layer 20 is copper and the oxide layer 38 is copper oxide. Annealing may be performed at high temperature, such as in the range of 150-250° C., and thus, the resulting oxide layer is especially dense. By forming a relatively thick (e.g., 300 to 600 angstroms) and dense oxide layer, it is possible, during the subsequent CMP, to decrease the material removal rate in the recessed regions and thus minimize dishing and thickness-to-planarity.
  • For a metal layer 20 that is that is a conformal copper coating (i.e., plating), the required thickness 24′ of copper layer 20′ may, for example, be reduced from 11,000 to 7,000 angstroms because the presence of the relatively thick and dense copper oxide layer 38 results in a reduction of the thickness-to-planarity 26′, for example, from 10,000 to 6,000 angstroms. The thickness-to-planarity 26′ is the height of the metal layer 20′ removed during CMP to achieve planarity. Techniques that reduce dishing and thickness-to-planarity require less thickness 24′ of metal layer 20′. Less material is deposited and less material is removed.
  • Referring to FIG. 5, a cross-sectional view of the semiconductor wafer 10′ in FIG. 4 after CMP of the metal layer 20′ in accordance with aspects of the presently claimed techniques is depicted. As mentioned in the discussion of FIG. 4, the wafer metal surface (layer 20′ in FIG. 4) is oxidized in an annealing process prior to CMP. And as with the wafer 10 of FIG. 3, this oxidized wafer 10′ is subjected to CMP for both planarization and a subsequent overpolish. In this example, the metal (copper) layer 20 is ultimately removed from surface of the ILD layer 14′, and the surface of the ILD layer 14′ is the stopping layer 28′. Furthermore, the contact plug 30′ is shown with a reduced dishing dimension 32′, in this example, reduced from 1000 angstroms to 450 angstroms. Contact plug 30′ has the same width 34 (100 microns) and height 36 (angstroms) as that depicted in FIG. 3.
  • Embodiments of the presently claimed technique apply to CMP of oxidizable metal layers in a variety of wafer configurations. Implementations apply to contact plugs, and to a variety of filled or plated volumes on a semiconductor wafer. Additionally, exposed regions may be active or not active, and if active, may be, for example, a doped region, interconnecting metal line, or the like. In general, embodiments of the presently claimed approach apply to removal or modification, such as via CMP, of oxidizable metals.
  • One of the advantages of the presently claimed techniques is that the lower thickness-to-planarity translates into lower metal plating thickness, thus saving manufacturing costs. Additionally, metals, such as copper, removed during CMP, normally cannot be reclaimed. As a result, the metal removed may be waste and may require treatment to become inert. Accordingly, embodiments of the present techniques reduce waste generation, the associated waste treatment and disposal costs, and facilitate compliance with EPA requirements and other waste disposal regulations. In general, as previously indicated, the amount of metal deposited and removed is reduced by about 50-75%.
  • Referring now to FIG. 6, a block diagram of an oxidizing technique 40 used to minimize thickness-to-planarity and dishing in CMP, is illustrated. A metal layer, such as copper, is deposited on a semiconductor wafer (block 42). The wafer is annealed (baked), for example, in a temperature chamber or other thermal unit in the range of 150-250° C. (e.g., 200° C.) for 15-60 minutes (e.g., 30 minutes), as represented by block 44. An oxide layer is formed by introducing an oxidant into the temperature chamber (block 46). In one embodiment, the oxidant is introduced near the end of the annealing cycle (bake). For example, the oxidant, such as oxygen or ozone, may be introduced into the temperature chamber during the last 1-2 minutes of a 30 minute annealing cycle. In the case of a copper metal layer, a copper oxide layer is formed with a thickness in the range of 300 to 600 angstroms (block 48). In block 50, CMP is applied to the semiconductor wafer. The presence of the relatively thick and dense oxide layer on the semiconductor wafer results in improved thickness-to-planarity and dishing characteristics.
  • It should be apparent that with the presently claimed techniques, the metal layer surface may be oxidized prior to CMP in a process other than an annealing process. For example, the metal layer may be oxidized after the semiconductor wafer has been annealed. Metal oxidation can be carried out using oxygen plasma or the residual heat in the wafer from the annealing process may be used in the oxidation. Or the wafer may be allowed to cool and then reheated before oxidation of the metal surface. In general, the techniques encompass a variety of approaches and devices to oxidize the semiconductor metal layer prior to CMP under heat, including the use of residual heat, with an oxidizing agent, such as oxygen.
  • It should also be noted that in this illustrative embodiment, oxidation is given only as an example. Techniques other than oxidation, such as the use of a polymeric coating, may be employed to harden the metal surface before CMP, and thus to make the metal surface more resistant to abrasion and/or chemical attack.
  • Referring now to FIG. 7, a plot 52 of two representative curves 54 and 54′ of dishing 56 in angstroms versus material removed 58 in angstroms for a non-hardened (e.g., non-oxidized) wafer metal layer 20 and for an hardened (e.g., oxidized) metal layer 20′, is depicted. The depths of the recessed regions (i.e., dishing 56) decrease in both cases during the initial portion of the CMP as material is preferentially removed from the elevated regions. Though both cases show a decrease in dishing 56 as the surface is planarized, the planarization is more effective with the oxidized metal layer 20′ than with the non-oxidized metal layer 20.
  • The points at which the metal layers 20 and 20′ become planarized are denoted by reference numeral 60 for the non-oxidized case and reference numeral 60′ for the oxidized case. The thickness-to-planarity may be defined as the value of the material removed 58 at these planarization points. As indicated by these points 60 and 60′, the material removed 58 (thickness-to-planarity) from the metal layer to achieve the specified degree of planarity (e.g., measured with optical sensors) is reduced from 7800 angstroms to 4800 angstroms. Furthermore, the end points at the conclusion of the CMP overpolish are denoted by reference numerals 62 and 62′, respectively. In this exemplary representation, the dishing 56 in the contact plug is reduced from 1000 angstroms for a non-modified metal surface layer to 250 angstroms for a modified metal surface layer.
  • While the invention may be susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and have been described in detail herein. However, it should be understood that the invention is not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the following appended claims.

Claims (23)

1. A process comprising the acts of:
hardening a metal layer of a semiconductor wafer prior to chemical mechanical planarization (CMP); and
performing CMP on the semiconductor wafer.
2. The process, as set forth in claim 1, wherein hardening of the metal layer comprises making the metal layer more resistant to abrasion.
3. The process, as set forth in claim 1, wherein hardening of the metal layer comprises making the metal layer more resistant to chemical attack.
4. The process, as set forth in claim 1, wherein hardening of the metal layer comprises oxidizing the metal layer.
5. The process, as set forth in claim 4, wherein a thickness of an oxide layer formed on a surface of the metal layer is in the range of 300-600 angstroms.
6. The process, as set forth in claim 4, wherein the metal layer comprises copper.
7. The process, as set forth in claim 4, wherein copper oxide is formed on the metal layer.
8. The process, as set forth in claim 4, wherein the metal layer comprises tungsten.
9. The process, as set forth in claim 8, wherein tungsten oxide is formed on the metal layer.
10. The process, as set forth in claim 1, wherein hardening of the metal layer comprises coating a surface of the metal layer with polymer.
11. A process comprising the acts of:
oxidizing a metal layer of a semiconductor wafer prior to chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) of the metal layer; and
performing CMP on the metal layer.
12. The process, as set forth in claim 11, wherein the semiconductor wafer has one or more metal contact plugs.
13. The process, as set forth in claim 11, wherein during oxidation of the metal layer, the temperature surrounding the semiconductor wafer is elevated to a predetermined temperature for a predetermined period of time.
14. The process, as set forth in claim 13, wherein the predetermined temperature is in the range of 150-250° C.
15. The process, as set forth in claim 13, wherein the predetermined period of time is in the range of 1-2 minutes.
16. The process, as set forth in claim 11, wherein the metal layer is oxidized in an annealing process.
17. The process, as set forth in claim 16, wherein the metal layer is oxidized with oxygen.
18. The process, as set forth in claim 16, wherein the metal layer is oxidized with ozone.
19. A method comprising the acts of:
plating a semiconductor wafer with a metal layer;
annealing the wafer;
introducing an oxidant near the end of an annealing cycle;
oxidizing a surface of the metal layer prior to chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) of the wafer; and
applying CMP to the wafer.
20. The method, as set forth in claim 19, wherein the oxidant comprises oxygen (O2).
21. The method, as set forth in claim 19, wherein the oxidant comprises ozone (O3).
22. The method, as set forth in claim 19, wherein the metal layer comprises copper and the CMP comprises copper CMP.
23. The method, as set forth in claim 19, wherein the metal layer comprises tungsten and the CMP comprises tungsten CMP.
US10/750,734 2003-12-31 2003-12-31 Method and apparatus for minimizing thickness-to-planarity and dishing in CMP Abandoned US20050139292A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/750,734 US20050139292A1 (en) 2003-12-31 2003-12-31 Method and apparatus for minimizing thickness-to-planarity and dishing in CMP
US11/475,585 US7453152B2 (en) 2003-12-31 2006-06-27 Device having reduced chemical mechanical planarization

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/750,734 US20050139292A1 (en) 2003-12-31 2003-12-31 Method and apparatus for minimizing thickness-to-planarity and dishing in CMP

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/475,585 Continuation US7453152B2 (en) 2003-12-31 2006-06-27 Device having reduced chemical mechanical planarization

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20050139292A1 true US20050139292A1 (en) 2005-06-30

Family

ID=34701242

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/750,734 Abandoned US20050139292A1 (en) 2003-12-31 2003-12-31 Method and apparatus for minimizing thickness-to-planarity and dishing in CMP
US11/475,585 Active 2024-04-30 US7453152B2 (en) 2003-12-31 2006-06-27 Device having reduced chemical mechanical planarization

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/475,585 Active 2024-04-30 US7453152B2 (en) 2003-12-31 2006-06-27 Device having reduced chemical mechanical planarization

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US20050139292A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109659229A (en) * 2017-10-10 2019-04-19 应用材料公司 The method for being chemically-mechanicapolish polished (CMP) processing with ozone

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7799491B2 (en) * 2006-04-07 2010-09-21 Aptina Imaging Corp. Color filter array and imaging device containing such color filter array and method of fabrication
US20080204580A1 (en) * 2007-02-28 2008-08-28 Micron Technology, Inc. Method, apparatus and system providing imaging device with color filter array
US9425206B2 (en) 2014-12-23 2016-08-23 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Boundary scheme for embedded poly-SiON CMOS or NVM in HKMG CMOS technology

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5618381A (en) * 1992-01-24 1997-04-08 Micron Technology, Inc. Multiple step method of chemical-mechanical polishing which minimizes dishing
US6251786B1 (en) * 1999-09-07 2001-06-26 Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Ltd. Method to create a copper dual damascene structure with less dishing and erosion
US6342444B1 (en) * 1999-03-11 2002-01-29 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Method of forming diffusion barrier for copper interconnects
US20030020141A1 (en) * 2001-07-26 2003-01-30 Thomas Terence M. Adapting a semiconductor wafer for planarization
US6702954B1 (en) * 2000-10-19 2004-03-09 Ferro Corporation Chemical-mechanical polishing slurry and method
US20040092102A1 (en) * 2002-11-12 2004-05-13 Sachem, Inc. Chemical mechanical polishing composition and method
US20050085066A1 (en) * 2003-10-16 2005-04-21 Taiwan Semicondutor Manufacturing Co. Novel method to reduce Rs pattern dependence effect
US20060160475A1 (en) * 2001-08-14 2006-07-20 Ying Ma Chemical mechanical polishing compositions for metal and associated materials and method of using same

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5397741A (en) * 1993-03-29 1995-03-14 International Business Machines Corporation Process for metallized vias in polyimide
US6001730A (en) * 1997-10-20 1999-12-14 Motorola, Inc. Chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) slurry for polishing copper interconnects which use tantalum-based barrier layers
JP3371775B2 (en) * 1997-10-31 2003-01-27 株式会社日立製作所 Polishing method
US6649523B2 (en) * 2000-09-29 2003-11-18 Nutool, Inc. Method and system to provide material removal and planarization employing a reactive pad

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5618381A (en) * 1992-01-24 1997-04-08 Micron Technology, Inc. Multiple step method of chemical-mechanical polishing which minimizes dishing
US6342444B1 (en) * 1999-03-11 2002-01-29 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Method of forming diffusion barrier for copper interconnects
US6251786B1 (en) * 1999-09-07 2001-06-26 Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Ltd. Method to create a copper dual damascene structure with less dishing and erosion
US6702954B1 (en) * 2000-10-19 2004-03-09 Ferro Corporation Chemical-mechanical polishing slurry and method
US20030020141A1 (en) * 2001-07-26 2003-01-30 Thomas Terence M. Adapting a semiconductor wafer for planarization
US20060160475A1 (en) * 2001-08-14 2006-07-20 Ying Ma Chemical mechanical polishing compositions for metal and associated materials and method of using same
US20040092102A1 (en) * 2002-11-12 2004-05-13 Sachem, Inc. Chemical mechanical polishing composition and method
US20050085066A1 (en) * 2003-10-16 2005-04-21 Taiwan Semicondutor Manufacturing Co. Novel method to reduce Rs pattern dependence effect

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109659229A (en) * 2017-10-10 2019-04-19 应用材料公司 The method for being chemically-mechanicapolish polished (CMP) processing with ozone

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7453152B2 (en) 2008-11-18
US20060240221A1 (en) 2006-10-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA1247259A (en) Method of improving silicon-on-insulator uniformity
JP3297359B2 (en) Method for planarizing semiconductor wafer
US20010000115A1 (en) Dual damascene flowable oxide insulation structure and metallic barrier
US7453152B2 (en) Device having reduced chemical mechanical planarization
US6251788B1 (en) Method of integrated circuit polishing without dishing effects
US5930677A (en) Method for reducing microloading in an etchback of spin-on-glass or polymer
KR100974839B1 (en) Methods for fabricating interconnect structures having low k dielectric properties
JP2000208516A (en) Semiconductor device having multilayer wiring structure and manufacture thereof
JP3047343B2 (en) Method for manufacturing semiconductor device
US6280644B1 (en) Method of planarizing a surface on an integrated circuit
US6150274A (en) Method of enhancing CMP removal rate of polymer-like material and improving planarization in integrated circuit structure
US6348736B1 (en) In situ formation of protective layer on silsesquioxane dielectric for dual damascene process
US5767582A (en) Surface conditioning insulating layer for fine line conductive pattern
US6294471B1 (en) Method of eliminating dishing effect in polishing of dielectric film
KR100468688B1 (en) Manufacturing method of inter dielectric layer by using spin on glass layer for semiconductor device
KR20070054932A (en) Method of manufacturing semiconductor device
KR0176195B1 (en) Method for forming wiring of semiconductor device
JP2003092300A (en) Manufacturing method for semiconductor device, and semiconductor device
US7208416B2 (en) Method of treating a structured surface
US20020144972A1 (en) Method for forming rough surface
KR100891535B1 (en) Method for manufacturing isolation layer of semiconductor device
KR20010063907A (en) A new cmp method for polymer base low dielectric constant inter-layer dielectrics
KR20030052811A (en) Method For Manufacturing Semiconductor Devices
KR100693785B1 (en) Method for forming interlayer dielectric in semiconductor memory device
KR100493428B1 (en) Method for Polishing Electrode lines of a Semiconductor Device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., IDAHO

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:RAMARAJAN, SURESH;REEL/FRAME:014873/0004

Effective date: 20031231

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION

AS Assignment

Owner name: AMAZONEN-WERKE H. DREYER SE & CO. KG, GERMANY

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNORS:AMAZONEN-WERKE H. DREYER SE & CO. KG;AMAZONEN-WERKE H. DREYER GMBH & CO. KG;REEL/FRAME:057539/0001

Effective date: 20210317