US20050071135A1 - Knowledge management system for computer-aided design modeling - Google Patents
Knowledge management system for computer-aided design modeling Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20050071135A1 US20050071135A1 US10/675,809 US67580903A US2005071135A1 US 20050071135 A1 US20050071135 A1 US 20050071135A1 US 67580903 A US67580903 A US 67580903A US 2005071135 A1 US2005071135 A1 US 2005071135A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- computer
- aided design
- modeling
- design system
- rules
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N5/00—Computing arrangements using knowledge-based models
- G06N5/02—Knowledge representation; Symbolic representation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/10—Geometric CAD
- G06F30/13—Architectural design, e.g. computer-aided architectural design [CAAD] related to design of buildings, bridges, landscapes, production plants or roads
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T19/00—Manipulating 3D models or images for computer graphics
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2111/00—Details relating to CAD techniques
- G06F2111/04—Constraint-based CAD
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to computer-aided design, and, more particularly, to a knowledge management system for computer-aided design modeling.
- CAD systems can be used to produce and manipulate geometric models.
- CAD systems often include very sophisticated algorithms for producing complex geometric models, manipulating those models, and analyzing the components of those models.
- a CAD system may be used to model a complex structure having a curved surface, view the structure at various angles, and calculate the surface area of the curved surface and the volume of the structure as a whole. It might be useful to know the surface area of the curved surface, for example, to determine how much paint would be needed to cover the surface. It might be useful to know the volume of the structure, for example, to determine how much material would be needed to produce the structure.
- CAD systems can be very powerful modeling tools, they are generally limited to geometric modeling. Thus, CAD systems generally require the user to apply product design rules and practices necessary to produce the model. For example, if the user is required by an employer to use certain practices (such as, for example, always using a certain size bolt to connect two components), then the user must apply those practices to the model. The user is typically also required to make successive changes to a model when changing a component of the model. For example, each time the user changes an attribute of a component (such as, for example, the outside diameter of a component), the user may have to change attributes of one or more other components that connect or otherwise interact with that component, and the effects of these changes may cascade through many components of the model.
- a component such as, for example, the outside diameter of a component
- CAD systems can be difficult to use, particularly for casual CAD users (such as engineers, architects, or managerial staff) who may not be proficient with the CAD system but often need to make modifications to drawings or models on an as-needed basis.
- KBE Knowledge-based engineering attempts to combine some level of knowledge management with design automation.
- Knowledge management typically includes such things as best practices, lessons learned (e.g., from earlier models), common practices (e.g., industry standards, company policies), product design rules, and quality metrics.
- Knowledge management might be applied to design automation, for example, to reduce the number of parts a company needs to order (e.g., by reusing parts from one model in another model), reduce design time, reduce product cost, and produce higher quality and reliability.
- KBE functionality is typically implemented within a CAD system or as an add-on to a CAD system (e.g., as a plug-in) so as to provide the CAD system with additional knowledge management capabilities.
- CAD systems are often used in conjunction with computer-aided engineering (CAE) analysis tools for performing advanced model analysis.
- CAD systems are also often used in conjunction with product document management (PDM) tools for generating and maintaining product documentation.
- CAE and PDM tools can be implemented as stand-alone applications or as add-ons to a CAD system.
- the KBE functionality may interact with the CAE and PDM tools to gather or provide information.
- a knowledge management system captures, stores, manages, and applies rules for modeling geometric objects and related non-geometric attributes.
- the knowledge management system controls a computer-aided design system for modeling a geometric structure, typically through an application program interface of the computer-aided design system.
- the knowledge management system typically includes a knowledge management application in communication with the computer-aided design system through an application program interface.
- the knowledge management system typically also includes a central database managed by a knowledge storage application for maintaining rules and other related information.
- the knowledge management system typically also includes a knowledge acquisition application for generating rule programs for storage in the central database.
- Rule programs are generated by the knowledge management system based on information that can be provided by a user, imported from the computer-aided design system, or extracted from a product document management application.
- the rules can relate to both geometric and non-geometric attributes of the model. Non-geometric attributes can be dependent on geometric attributes. Geometric structures can be modeled based on rules relating to non-geometric attributes.
- a computer-aided modeling system includes a knowledge management system for managing a set of modeling rules and a computer-aided design system controlled by the knowledge management system.
- the knowledge management system generates instructions for modeling a geometric structure based on the set of modeling rules and communicates the instructions to the computer-aided design system for generating a model of the geometric structure.
- the knowledge management system can include a knowledge management application in communication with the computer-aided design system through an application program interface of the computer-aided design system.
- the knowledge management system can also include a knowledge storage application in communication with the knowledge management application for storing the set of rules in a central database and communicating the set of rules to the knowledge management application.
- the knowledge management system can also include a knowledge acquisition application in communication with the knowledge storage application for generating the set of rules and communication the set of rules to the knowledge storage application for storage in the central database.
- the knowledge management system can produce a graphical display on a graphical user interface, including a first portion including information from the knowledge management system and a second portion including information from the computer-aided design system (such as a display window including a graphical representation of the geometric structure, with or without controls for manipulating the graphical representation).
- a graphical user interface including a first portion including information from the knowledge management system and a second portion including information from the computer-aided design system (such as a display window including a graphical representation of the geometric structure, with or without controls for manipulating the graphical representation).
- a method for computer-aided design modeling involves generating instructions for modeling a geometric structure based on a set of modeling rules and communicating the instructions to a computer-aided design system for generating a model of the geometric structure.
- the set of rules are obtained from a central database over a communication network.
- the computer-aided design system typically includes an application program interface, and the instructions are typically communicated to the computer-aided design system through the application program interface.
- the method can also involve producing a graphical display on a graphical user interface, including a first portion including information relating to the set of modeling rules and a second portion including information from the computer-aided design system. This may involve directing a window display generated by the computer-aided design system to be displayed on the graphical user interface.
- the display window can include a graphical representation of the geometric structure, and may also include controls for manipulating the graphical representation of the geometric structure.
- the apparatus includes a design modeler for generating instructions for modeling a geometric structure based on a set of modeling rules and an interface from the design modeler to a computer-aided design system for communicating the instructions to the computer-aided design system for generating a model of the geometric structure.
- the apparatus typically also includes an interface from the design modeler to a central database over a communication network for obtaining the set of modeling rules from the central database.
- the computer-aided design system typically includes an application program interface, and the interface from the design modeler to a computer-aided design system typically complies with the application program interface.
- the apparatus includes a graphical user interface.
- the design modeler can produce a graphical display on the graphical user interface, including a first portion including information from the design modeler and a second portion including information from the computer-aided design system. This may involve the design modeler directing a window display generated by the computer-aided design system to be displayed on the graphical user interface.
- the display window can include a graphical representation of the geometric structure, and may also include controls for manipulating the graphical representation of the geometric structure.
- a computer program for computer-aided design modeling can be embodied in a computer readable medium.
- the computer program includes means for generating instructions for modeling a geometric structure based on a set of modeling rules and means for communicating the instructions to a computer-aided design system for generating a model of the geometric structure.
- the set of rules are obtained from a central database over a communication network.
- the computer-aided design system typically includes an application program interface, and the instructions are typically communicated to the computer-aided design system through the application program interface.
- the computer program typically includes means for producing a graphical display on a graphical user interface, including a first portion including information relating to the set of modeling rules and a second portion including information from the computer-aided design system. This may involve directing a window display generated by the computer-aided design system to be displayed on the graphical user interface.
- the display window can include a graphical representation of the geometric structure, and may also include controls for manipulating the graphical representation of the geometric structure.
- apparatus for computer-aided design modeling including means for generating instructions for modeling a geometric structure based on a set of modeling rules and means for communicating the instructions to a computer-aided design system for generating a model of the geometric structure.
- the set of rules can include rules relating to both geometric and non-geometric attributes.
- Rules relating to non-geometric attributes can include, for example, a rule for determine a cost of the geometric structure or a rule for defining a process.
- the set of rules can include rules relating to a class having a plurality of geometric structures.
- the set of rules can include rules relating to geometric structures defined in the computer-aided design system.
- Typical embodiments include a three-dimensional computer-aided design system controlled by a knowledge management system, such as the SOLIDWORKSTM three-dimensional computer-aided design system, and may additionally include a two-dimensional computer-aided design system, such as the VISIOTM two-dimensional computer-aided design system.
- a knowledge management system such as the SOLIDWORKSTM three-dimensional computer-aided design system
- a two-dimensional computer-aided design system such as the VISIOTM two-dimensional computer-aided design system.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing an exemplary modeling system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing the relevant components of the knowledge management system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 3A is a block diagram showing relevant components of the CAD system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 3B is a block diagram showing the relevant components of a CAD program in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing an exemplary computer-aided modeling system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 5 shows an exemplary user interface screenshot for importing information from the CAD system relating to a mounting assembly, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 6 shows an exemplary user interface screenshot for defining a new geometric specification relating to the Mounting part family, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 7 shows an exemplary user interface screenshot displaying information upon entry of the name of a new CAD part file, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 8 shows an exemplary user interface screenshot for defining a geometry feature, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 9 shows an exemplary user interface screenshot showing geometry features (properties) defined for the CAD part file, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 10 shows an exemplary user interface screenshot for defining a mating, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 11 shows an exemplary user interface screenshot showing mating definitions, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 12 shows an exemplary user interface screenshot showing a rule for determining a fan area for the fan, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 13 shows an exemplary user interface screenshot including an embedded graphical representation of a model generated by the CAD system, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 14 shows a first exemplary user interface screenshot including a sub-window generated by the CAD system, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 15 shows a second exemplary user interface screenshot including a sub-window generated by the CAD system, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 16 shows a third exemplary user interface screenshot including a full view window generated by the CAD system, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 17 shows an exemplary user interface screenshot including a window generated by a two-dimensional CAD system, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 18 shows an exemplary user interface screenshot including an analysis window, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 19 shows the relationship between the user (engineer), knowledge management application, knowledge database, and the integrated systems controlled by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 20 shows the relationship between the knowledge management application and the integrated systems in greater detail
- FIG. 21 is a logic flow diagram showing exemplary logic for class-based rules in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 22 is a logic flow diagram showing exemplary logic for the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- ActiveX Control A reusable control written in Visual Basic used to create custom user interfaces in nAct.
- top-level part families can reference components in other applications.
- Assembly A grouping of parts and their subparts.
- An assembly is the hierarchy of parts that make up something meaningful to the engineers, such as a top-level part or a finished good.
- Calculated Value The value that was calculated by the formula that was entered into the rules database.
- the formula may return a constant, a calculation based on other properties or a value obtained from a customer database.
- Child Part Family A family that inherits properties, subparts and connections from another part family (template part family).
- Code Generation The creation of rules into executable source code for use in nAct during run-time.
- the generated code can also be compiled into a dynamic link library (.DLL) using Visual Basic.
- Compiled Mode Editing models in nAct with rules that are compiled into a DLL file using Microsoft Visual Basic 6.0.
- compiled rules cannot be seen by the user and cannot be debugged at runtime. (See also Developer Mode)
- Component is any part or sub-assembly within an assembly.
- Connection Collection A conceptual or physical relationship between two or more parts. This differs from a subpart collection in that the two connected parts do not have a parent-child relationship (such as a nut and a bolt).
- Connection Constraint The formula used to determine the correct part or parts to be connected at run-time. There is preferably never a connection constraint associated with a connection specification where the same part family owns both.
- Connection Point A point in which two schematic shapes can be connected directly or via wire.
- Connection Spec The definition of a relationship between two parts at run-time (e.g. a hose and a valve).
- a connection exists when one part in an assembly needs to reference the properties of another part in an assembly and the user cannot or prefers not to walk up and down the part/subpart hierarchy.
- Constraint A formula that indicates how a specification should be computed in the design model.
- Context The current location of the part in the tree defined by its parents, grandparents, etc. A part may be used in more than one location in the tree, and each location is considered a different context.
- Custom Control A customer-developed ActiveX Control written in Microsoft Visual Basic 6.0 and compiled to an .OCX file. Custom controls are used to create custom interfaces for process steps.
- Database A collection of data arranged for ease and speed of search and retrieval.
- a database also includes an engine which accepts commands from the user to insert, update, delete and select the data.
- Exemplary embodiments of the invention use Microsoft SQL Server 2000 database to store its data.
- Decache Resetting values based on a dependency.
- Design Time Using nAct Expert to create part families and specifications (properties, subparts, connections, database constraints, geometry and schematics) and to write formulas for rules. (See also Run Time)
- Display Name This is a property that is used to create a formula-driven name that appears in the run-time application instead of the part family pretty name. (Display Name can be placed on any part family.)
- Feature A geometric attribute of a part (i.e. plane, extrusion, sketch, cut, etc.) whose dimensions can be driven by nAct properties within the model.
- Frame A component of a process step layout. Each layout contains 1 to 4 frames. Each frame contains 1 of the following user interface elements: dynamically generated form, CAD system, 2D modeler, drawing, report or custom control.
- Hierarchy A logical tree structure that organizes the members of a dimension such that each member has one parent member and zero or more child members.
- IIS Microsoft Internet Information Services.
- IIS includes a web server, SMTP (mail) services and FTP (file transfer protocol) services.
- SMTP mail
- FTP file transfer protocol
- the RuleStream Enterprise Web tools must be installed on an IIS server.
- IIS is a component of Microsoft Windows 2000 Server and Microsoft Windows 2003 Server and can be installed from the Windows CD.
- Index In a relational database, a database object that provides fast access to data in the rows of a table, based on key values. Indexes can also enforce uniqueness on the rows in a table. SQL Server supports clustered and nonclustered indexes. The primary key of a table is automatically indexed. In full-text search, a full-text index stores information about significant words and their location within a given column.
- Input Value A value that is entered by the user in nact during run-time. This takes precedence over any calculated values.
- Kernel The knowledge engine that executes rules. It provides the base system functionality for managing the run-time model.
- Layout The configuration of the user interface of the model designer window in nAct. Each step in the selected process can have its own unique layout.
- a layout consists of 1 to 4 frames, and each frame can contain 1 of the following user interface elements: dynamically generated form, CAD system, 2D modeler, drawing, report or custom control.
- Line Item A top-level part that is associated with a project.
- the line item has an associated top-level part family.
- Model An actual design created using nact (the graphical representation of a line item).
- nAct The client server tool used to create projects, line items and models.
- nAnswer The web-based tool which allows users to query the databases using English like query statements.
- nExplore The web-based tool used to view rules and documentation.
- nPlatform The project and rules repository.
- nQuality The web-based tool for entering and reporting quality data, scoring and risks.
- Override The action of a higher-level part within an assembly determining the value for a subordinate part.
- Owner Part Family The part family that contains the specification or constraint.
- Parent Part Family The part family that owns the subpart collection of which the part is a member.
- Part An instance of a part family.
- Part Family The definition of a fundamental object in an assembly. This may be a component or a finished good.
- Process A defined set of steps. Each top-level part family can have 1 or more processes. The processes that will be used during run time are determined by the line item definition.
- Process Step A defined workflow for editing a model during run time. Each process step has a layout that defines its user interface. Process steps are grouped in categories and have a defined order within the process. Each process must have 1 or more process steps.
- Property Constraint The formula used to determine the value of a property.
- Row In an SQL table, the collection of elements that form a horizontal line in the table. Each row in the table represents a single occurrence of the object modeled by the table and stores the values for all the attributes of that object.
- Run Time Using the nAct Model Designer to edit a model using defined part families, specs and rules. Users design models in run time in Compiled Mode or Developer Mode. (See also Design Time)
- Score A value assigned to rate the effectiveness of the design.
- Shape A 2D object within a schematic diagram.
- Stored Procedure A precompiled collection of Transact-SQL statements stored under a name and processed as a unit.
- Subpart Collection A collection of component parts.
- Subpart Link Constraint The formulas used to determine existence, type, quantity and/or names of parts within the collection.
- Subpart Link Spec Provides the valid part families that can become components at run-time.
- Table A two-dimensional object, consisting of rows and columns, used to store data in a relational database. Each table stores information about one of the types of objects modeled by the database.
- Template Part Family The part family from which a child part family inherits its characteristics.
- UDF User Defined Fields
- Unit A unit of measure for a numeric property value. Like units are grouped in unit categories.
- the unit category “Length” may include units such as “feet”, “meters”, “inches” or “millimeters”.
- Visual Basic is the language used to create custom controls for use in process steps and to create compiled versions of rules (application DLLs).
- VBA Microsoft Visual Basic for Applications.
- View A database object that can be referenced the same way as a table in SQL statements. Views are defined using a SELECT statement and are analogous to an object that contains the result set of this statement.
- Wire A line or connector used when two connected objects are not coincidental.
- a knowledge management system captures, stores, manages, and applies rules for modeling geometric objects and related non-geometric attributes.
- the knowledge management system preferably supports rules relating to geometric attributes that can be represented and manipulated by a CAD system as well as rules relating to various other attributes that generally cannot be represented and manipulated by the CAD system, such as certain “negative” geometric attributes (e.g., a specification for producing a hole in a component or for removing material from a component so as to form a feature of that component), certain geometry-based attributes that are not modeled as physical features of a structure or assembly, and non-geometric attributes (e.g., pricing, processes, component relationships, component classes, user intentions, and abstractions).
- rules relating to geometric attributes that can be represented and manipulated by a CAD system as well as rules relating to various other attributes that generally cannot be represented and manipulated by the CAD system, such as certain “negative” geometric attributes (e.g., a specification for producing a hole in a component or for removing material from
- the rules are typically stored in a central database so that the rules can be manipulated independently of any modeling.
- the rules can be derived from various sources, including general engineering principles, user-provided information, and information obtained from a PDM system.
- the knowledge management system can tracks rule changes over time, and can apply a particular version of the rules to a model.
- the knowledge management system defines the components and parameters for a particular model based on the rules being applied.
- the knowledge management system can incorporate predefined components (such as components created in a CAD system) or dynamically defined components into the model.
- the knowledge management system is generally independent of the CAD system, although the knowledge management system can interface with a CAD system for, among other things, importing/integrating component specifications from the CAD system for use in modeling, instructing the CAD system to produce a geometric model incorporating the components and parameters defined by the knowledge management system, and obtaining geometric information relating to a model (e.g., sizes, surface areas, volumes) for use by the knowledge management system (e.g., for computing the cost of a component based on its volume according to pricing rules provided by a user).
- a geometric model produced by the CAD system can be viewed and manipulated as usual using the CAD system, although it is preferable for any and all changes to the model to be coordinated through the knowledge management system so that the appropriate rules can be applied to the changes.
- the knowledge management system interfaces with the CAD system through an application program interface (API) of the CAD system.
- the CAD system includes an API through which certain functions of the CAD system can be performed.
- the CAD system API is typically used for such things as macros (i.e., programs that perform a series of function steps for the user) and add-ons (i.e., programs that add functionality to the CAD system).
- the knowledge management system uses the API to control the CAD system such that the CAD system runs only when activated by the knowledge management system.
- the knowledge management system typically activates the CAD system for such things as displaying a model to the user and obtaining geometric information relating to model components.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing an exemplary modeling system 100 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- the modeling system 100 includes a knowledge management system 110 in communication with a CAD system 120 .
- the knowledge management system 110 controls the CAD system 120 , specifically by generating instructions for modeling a geometric structure based on a set of modeling rules and communicating the instructions to the computer-aided design system 120 for generating a model of the geometric structure.
- the knowledge management system 110 can also interface with a CAE application 130 for analysis and with a PDM application 140 for product document management.
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing the relevant components of the knowledge management system 110 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- the knowledge management system 110 includes a knowledge acquisition application 210 for capturing and generating rules, a knowledge storage application 220 for storing rules and models in a central database 240 , and a knowledge management application 230 for generating models based on the rules.
- the knowledge acquisition application 210 generates rule programs based on information obtained from a user and communicates the rule programs to the knowledge storage application 220 for storage in the central database 240 .
- the knowledge management application 230 obtains rule programs from the knowledge storage application 220 and applies the rule programs for building a model.
- the knowledge management application 230 may communicate model information to the knowledge storage application 220 for storage in the central database 240 .
- the knowledge acquisition application 210 captures modeling rules and generates rule programs for storage by the knowledge storage application 220 .
- the knowledge acquisition application 210 interacts with a user through a user interface through which the user enters information regarding components, design processes, engineering and manufacturing rules, and customer and marketing requirements.
- the knowledge acquisition application 210 generates rule programs from the user information, and sends the rule programs to the knowledge storage application 220 for storage.
- the knowledge acquisition application 210 allows rules to be modified quickly and easily.
- the knowledge storage application 220 stores modeling information in a relational database, including, among other things, rule programs generated by the knowledge acquisition application 210 and models generated by the knowledge management application 230 .
- the knowledge storage application 220 also tracks revision histories, design status, and user group security. Multiple revisions of a rule can be stored so that a particular version of a rule can be applied to a model while another version of the rule is being created or modified. A design can be modeled using an earlier version of a rule if desired.
- the knowledge management application 230 applies rules to create detailed computer models.
- the knowledge management application 230 can model two-dimensional schematics or three-dimensional geometries.
- the knowledge management application 230 can also model a bill of materials for the components of an assembly.
- the knowledge management application 230 can automatically update a previously completed model under revised or new rules. In this way, models can be generated by manipulating the rules through the knowledge management system rather than manipulating the model itself through the computer-aided design system.
- FIG. 3A is a block diagram showing relevant components of the CAD system 120 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- the CAD system 120 includes a 3D CAD program 301 , such as such as SOLIDWORKSTMfrom SolidWorks Corporation, 300 Baker Avenue, Concord, Mass. 01742, and may also include a 2D CAD program 302 , such as VISIOTM from Microsoft Corporation.
- Each of the CAD programs has its own API through which it interacts with the knowledge management application.
- FIG. 3B is a block diagram showing the relevant components of a CAD program, such as the 3D CAD program 301 or the 2D CAD program 302 , in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- the CAD program includes a CAD application 320 having an API 310 through which certain functions of the CAD application 320 can be controlled.
- the interactions between the knowledge management application and different CAD systems depend to a large degree on the CAD system API.
- the SOLIDWORKSTM three-dimensional CAD program has an internal macro/recording language and also supports an application programming interface language that is accessible through an OLE (Object Linking and Embedding) interface with support for VISUAL BASICTM and VISUAL C++TM.
- OLE Object Linking and Embedding
- the knowledge management application is substantially reactive to the VISIOTM two-dimensional CAD system, while the knowledge management application actively controls the SOLIDWORKSTM three-dimensional CAD system.
- support for each particular CAD system generally requires some level of integration by the knowledge management application to work with the specific functions and API of the CAD program.
- the various functions of the knowledge management system 110 are divided among different devices that communicate over a communication network, such as the public Internet or public or private intranets.
- knowledge storage functions reside in one or more storage servers that incorporate the knowledge storage application 220 and central database 240
- knowledge acquisition and management functions reside in user workstations (such as personal computers) or terminals that incorporate the knowledge acquisition application 210 , the knowledge management application 230 , and the CAD system 120 .
- the user workstations or terminals typically include a user interface for interacting with a user and a network interface for communicating with the storage server over a communication network.
- FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing an exemplary computer-aided modeling system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- the system 400 includes one or more user workstations 410 in communication with one or more storage servers 430 over a communication network 420 .
- the workstation 410 incorporates the knowledge acquisition application 210 , the knowledge management application 230 , and the CAD system 120 , and also includes a user interface for interacting with the user and a network interface for communicating over the communication network 420 with the storage server(s) 430 .
- the user interface 411 is typically a graphical user interface that provides for both displaying information to the user and receiving inputs from the user.
- the storage server 430 incorporates the knowledge storage application 220 and the central database 240 , and also includes a network interface 431 for communicating over the communication network 420 with the user workstation(s) 410 .
- the knowledge acquisition application 210 and the knowledge management application 230 interact with the user through the user interface 411 , and also interact with the knowledge storage application 220 in the storage server 430 through the network interface 412 using a client-server paradigm.
- the knowledge management application 230 also controls the CAD system 120 through an API of the CAD system 120 .
- the user workstation 410 is typically a general-purpose computer, and the knowledge acquisition application 210 , the knowledge management application 230 , and the CAD system 120 are typically software programs that run on the general-purpose computer.
- the knowledge storage application 220 interacts with the central database 240 through a database interface (not shown), and interacts with the knowledge acquisition application 210 and the knowledge management application 230 in the user workstation 410 through the network interface 431 .
- the storage server 430 is typically a general-purpose computer, and the knowledge storage application 220 is typically a software program that runs on the general-purpose computer.
- the central database 240 is typically a relational database.
- FIG. 19 shows the relationship between the user (engineer) 1910 , knowledge management application 1920 , knowledge database 1930 , and the integrated systems 1940 controlled by the knowledge management application 1920 , including CAD system(s) and possibly also a CAE application, a PDM application, and a component databases.
- the knowledge management application 1920 extracts rules for design automation from the knowledge database 1930 .
- the knowledge management application 1920 may also receive specifications, rules, and other information relating to modeling.
- a product control modeler element of the knowledge management application 1920 interacts with the integrated applications as necessary for modeling, analysis, product document management, and component selection.
- Information generated by the knowledge management application 1920 such as runtime rule authoring and trend analysis, may be stored in the knowledge database 1930 .
- FIG. 20 shows the relationship between the knowledge management application and the integrated systems in greater detail.
- the knowledge management application 1920 interacts with the CAD system 2010 for modeling such things as features, mating conditions, surface area, volume, and mass properties.
- the knowledge management application 1920 interacts with the CAE analysis application 2020 for such things as stress, thermal, kinematics, and loads analysis.
- the knowledge management application 1920 interacts with the PDM application 2030 to generate and utilize such things as files, structure, workflow, and bill of materials (BOM).
- BOM bill of materials
- the knowledge management application 1920 interacts with component databases 2040 for such things as part numbers, standards, inventory, and pricing.
- a model may include multiple geometric components. Each component can be associated with both geometric attributes and non-geometric attributes. Rules can be established for defining relationships between components without necessarily defining that actual parameters of the relationship (such as, for example, a rule that a fan blade assembly must mate with a motor shaft, without necessarily defining the shape or size of the shaft which might affect the type of mating).
- Components can be organized into classes (such as, for example, three possible motors for a fan assembly can be organized into a “motors” class), and rules can be established for the class as a whole such that the rules are applied to whatever class member is selected for inclusion in a particular model (such as, for example, a generic rule that any of the class of motors must mate with a fan blade component).
- classes such as, for example, three possible motors for a fan assembly can be organized into a “motors” class
- rules can be established for the class as a whole such that the rules are applied to whatever class member is selected for inclusion in a particular model (such as, for example, a generic rule that any of the class of motors must mate with a fan blade component).
- Rules can be established for selecting a particular member of a class for a particular model (such as, for example, a rule for selecting a particular motor based on the amount of power or the rotational speed required for a model, or a rule for selecting the number of fan blades for the fan blade component based on the volume of air to be moved and other parameters such as the motor selected and the diameter of the fan blade component).
- Rules relating to “negative” attributes can be defined (such as, for example, a rule that a motor frame must include a hole in a particular location for bolting the motor frame to a chassis) and applied to a model component as a library feature.
- Rules relating to various non-geometric attributes can be established (such as, for example, rules for deriving manufacturing processes based on the components incorporated into a selected model, or rules for estimating component, sub-assembly, product, and manufacturing costs).
- Attachment I Consisting of numbered pages 1-91
- Attachment II Consisting of numbered pages 1-113
- the knowledge management system may be referred to generally as “Rulestream” or “Navion,” the knowledge management application may be referred to as “nAct” or “nAct Engineer,” the knowledge acquisition application may be referred to as “nAct Expert,” and the knowledge storage application may be referred to as “nPlatform.”
- Attachment II edit rules relating to “Geometry Specification” and “Geometry Constraint” generally relate to the SOLIDWORKSTM three-dimensional CAD system, while edit rules relating to “2DSchematic Specification” generally relate to the VISIOTM two-dimensional CAD system.
- the knowledge management application controls the CAD system through a CAD system API. While the actual CAD functions that can be performed through the API are substantially limited by the API (and are subject to change by the CAD system provider), the specific API functions used and the manner in which the API functions are used are determined by the knowledge management application for performing specific knowledge management operations. In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the knowledge management application controls the SOLIDWORKSTM three-dimensional CAD system through its API.
- the knowledge management application In order to control the CAD system, the knowledge management application typically performs such operations as starting SOLIDWORKSTM, opening a part file, opening an assembly file, mating a component, deleting a mate, fixing a component, removing a part or assembly, suppressing a component, hiding/showing a component, suppressing a feature, inserting a library feature, removing a library feature, setting a part dimension, setting an assembly dimension, creating a component pattern, removing a component pattern, creating a feature pattern, removing a point in a sketch, removing a feature pattern, setting a custom property, setting component color, and closing SOLIDWORKSTM.
- This is not meant as an exhaustive list, and the knowledge management application can perform other operations as needed. Exemplary API calls and settings for performing the above operations in an exemplary embodiment of the invention are described below.
- Opening a part file typically involves opening the part file, adding the part file as a component to a parent assembly, closing the part file, and rebuilding the top level assembly.
- the following API functions may be used:
- Opening an assembly file typically involves opening the part file, adding the part file as a component to a parent assembly, closing the part file, and rebuilding the top level assembly. If assembly dimensions are driven by the knowledge management application, then all components are typically renamed to ensure uniqueness.
- the following API functions may be used:
- Mating a component typically involves putting the parent assembly in “edit” mode, selecting the features to mate, adding the mate, and rebuilding the assembly. The mate name is then found and noted by the knowledge management application in the case where a dependent property is changed and the mating is effected.
- the following API functions may be used:
- Deleting a mate typically involves selecting the mate using the parent assembly's model document and deleting the selection.
- the following API functions may be used:
- Fixing a component typically involves setting the component transform, selecting the component, and fixing the component.
- the following API functions may be used:
- Removing a part or assembly typically involves selecting the parent assembly, putting the parent assembly in “edit” mode, selecting the component, and deleting the selection.
- the following API functions may be used:
- Suppressing a component typically involves checking the suppression state of the component and setting the suppression state, if suppressing the document is saved.
- the following API functions may be used:
- Suppressing a feature typically involves traversing the model documents to find the named feature and setting its suppression state accordingly.
- the following API functions may be used:
- Inserting a library feature typically involves selecting the component to receive the feature, putting the component in “edit” mode, selecting the references required for insertion, and inserting the library feature.
- the new feature and its sub-features are typically renamed.
- the following API functions may be used:
- Removing a library feature typically involves selecting component owning the feature, putting the component in “edit” mode, selecting the feature, and deleting the feature using the context of the top level assembly.
- the following API functions may be used:
- a dimension typically involves setting the read-only status of the dimension to false, setting the system value for the dimension, and resetting the read-only status of the dimension to true (this is because all dimensions controlled by the knowledge management application are preferably maintained as read-only to prevent modification through the CAD system).
- a dimension is typically references by a string (e.g. D1@Sketch1).
- the following API functions may be used:
- Setting an assembly dimension typically involves all of the steps for setting an assembly dimension, except Parameter is additionally checked for existence on the components.
- API functions may be used:
- Creating a component pattern typically involves selecting the parent assembly, putting the parent assembly in “edit” mode, selecting the component and the feature pattern, and inserting the feature pattern.
- the Derived Pattern is typically renamed by traversing the parent assembly and finding the Derived Pattern using the seed component.
- the following API functions may be used:
- Removing a component pattern typically involves selecting the Derived Pattern from the parent model document and deleting the selection.
- the referenced configuration may need to be reset to prevent future selections from failing on this part.
- the following API functions may be used:
- the knowledge management application typically requires a part for each feature in the pattern, and maintains a property containing the X and Y coordinates for each feature.
- the is activated and is used to select the Sketch Pattern.
- a point for each component required is created, it's identifier is stored, the Sketch is inserted, and the document rebuilt.
- the Sketch and Feature are selected and a Pattern is created.
- the Sketch Pattern is then found and renamed by traversing the Document and finding the Pattern using the seed feature.
- the following API functions may be used:
- Removing a point in a sketch typically involves opening the document containing the sketch, putting the sketch in “edit” mode, traversing the sketch points to find the point with the corresponding identifier, selecting the point, and deleting the selected point.
- the following API functions may be used:
- Removing a feature pattern typically involves selecting the derived pattern from the parent model document and deleting the selected derived pattern.
- the following API functions may be used:
- Setting a custom property typically involves verifying the value and setting the value if necessary.
- the following API functions may be used:
- Setting a component color typically involves retrieving the MaterialPropertyValues for the component from the component or the model document, changing the first three elements in the array to reflect the new color, and setting the new MaterialPropertyValues on the component. If the color is being removed, the RemoveMaterialProperty is called.
- the following API functions may be used:
- Closing SOLIDWORKSTM typically involves closing the top level assembly (which is typically the only one open at this point) and calling the Exit App API function.
- a fan includes various sub-parts, including a fan assembly, a housing assembly, a motor assembly, and a mounting assembly.
- Certain components of the fan might have fixed characteristics. For example, a company might purchase three different motors that can be used in a fan, and these motors have fixed dimensions that cannot be changed in the model.
- CAD models of the motors may be created in the CAD system and imported into the knowledge management application for storage by the knowledge storage application.
- Other components of the fan might have characteristics that can be determined dynamically during modeling. For example, the dimensions of a fan hub might depend on the motor selected for the model. Models of these components might be created in the CAD system and imported into the knowledge management application, or rules for defining these components might be established.
- the CAD system is presumed to be the SOLIDWORKSTM three-dimensional CAD system.
- FIG. 5 shows an exemplary user interface screenshot 500 for importing information from the CAD system relating to a mounting assembly, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- the screenshot 500 displays, among other things, a hierarchical part family tree 510 showing that a BuildingServicesFan part family includes sub-parts entitled FanAssembly, HousingAssembly, MotorAssembly, and MountingAssembly, with the sub-parts having their own part families entitled Rotor, Housing, Motor, and Mounting, respectively.
- the screenshot 500 shows information relating to the MountingAssembly sub-part (as indicated by the MountingAssembly sub-part being highlighted in the part family tree 510 ), including a list of all specifications 520 relating to the MountingAssembly sub-part and a window 530 for entering information about the MountingAssembly sub-part.
- the screenshot 500 also includes a toolbar 540 from which various functions of the knowledge management application (such as creating a new part family, sub-part, property, connection, or CAD specification) can be accessed using either pull-down menus or icons.
- the window 530 includes a portion 531 showing that there is a single valid part family entitled Mounting associated with the MountingAssembly sub-part.
- the window 530 also includes a portion 532 for defining a rule to determine the optimal part family for a particular model (in this case, the optimal part family is the Mounting part family by default).
- FIG. 6 shows an exemplary user interface screenshot 600 for defining a new geometric specification relating to the Mounting part family, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- the screenshot 600 shows information relating to the Mounting part family of the MountingAssembly sub-part (as indicated by the Mounting part family being highlighted in the part family tree 610 ), including a list of all specifications 620 relating to the Mounting part family and a window 630 for entering the new geometric specification for the Mounting part family.
- the window 630 shows the geometry type 631 (in this case, “SolidWorks”) and a list of valid CAD part files 632 associated with the Mounting part family (in this case, none have yet been specified).
- FIG. 7 shows an exemplary user interface screenshot 700 displaying information upon entry of the name of a new CAD part file, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- the screenshot 700 shows the part family tree 710 , a list of all specifications 720 relating to the Mounting part family, a window 730 showing the new valid part file (Mounting-Aero.SLDPR), and a window 740 displaying a list of parameters defined for the part in the CAD part file.
- a window 730 showing the new valid part file (Mounting-Aero.SLDPR)
- a window 740 displaying a list of parameters defined for the part in the CAD part file.
- FIG. 8 shows an exemplary user interface screenshot 800 for defining a geometry feature, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- the screenshot 800 includes a window 840 for defining a geometry feature and associating the geometry feature with one or more specific CAD parts.
- a geometry feature having a display name 842 HubDiameter and a system name HubDiameter 843 is associated with a corresponding CAD part entitled HubDiameter by specifying a formula in portion 844 .
- FIG. 9 shows an exemplary user interface screenshot 900 showing geometry features (properties) defined for the CAD part file, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- the screenshot 900 shows the part family tree 910 , a list of all specifications 920 relating to the Mounting part family, and a window 930 including a properties portion 931 showing the geometry features associated with specific CAD parts (in this case, a HubDiameter geometry feature and a MountingDiameter geometry feature).
- FIG. 10 shows an exemplary user interface screenshot 1000 for defining a mating, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- the screenshot 1000 shows the part family tree 1010 , a list of all specifications 1020 relating to the Mounting part family, a part file window 1030 , and a window 1040 for entering mating information.
- FIG. 11 shows an exemplary user interface screenshot 1100 showing mating definitions, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- the screenshot 1100 shows the part family tree 1110 , a list of all specifications 1120 relating to the Mounting part family, and a window 1130 displaying various mating (orientation) definitions 1131 for the CAD part.
- the user can establish rules for attributes that may be difficult or impossible to model in the CAD system, including certain geometric attributes (such as “negative” attributes), certain geometry-based attributes that are not modeled as physical features of a structure or assembly, and non-geometric attributes (such as pricing and processes).
- certain geometric attributes such as “negative” attributes
- certain geometry-based attributes that are not modeled as physical features of a structure or assembly
- non-geometric attributes such as pricing and processes.
- a rule for computing a non-modeled geometry-based attribute such as area covered by the sweep of the fan blade component when rotating. While this fan area might be useful, for example, for computing the volume of air moved by a fan blade component having a specified number of blades rotating at a specified rate, the fan area is typically not modeled as a physical feature of the fan.
- FIG. 12 shows an exemplary user interface screenshot 1200 showing a rule for determining a fan area for the fan, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- the screenshot 1200 shows the part family tree 1210 (with the part family BuildingServicesFan highlighted), a list of all specifications 1220 relating to the BuildingServicesFan part family (with the FanArea specification highlighted), and a window 1230 displaying the rule 1240 for determining the fan area based on the diameter of the fan blade component.
- the user can establish other rules that utilize this FanArea value.
- the knowledge management application controls the CAD system through its API to produce a geometric model according to predetermined specifications.
- the specifications can be incorporated into the rules and/or provided by a user at run time.
- the CAD model may be produced for display to the user via the graphical user interface, or may be produced solely for the knowledge management application to obtain model-related information from the CAD system.
- the knowledge management application can control the CAD system to generate a model and then produce a graphical display through the graphical user interface including a graphical representation of the model as generated by the CAD system (e.g., by displaying a display window generated by the computer-aided design system), with or without related information from the knowledge management system.
- the knowledge management application can control the CAD system to generate a model and then control the CAD system to compute the surface area of a component for a cost estimate to be produced by the knowledge management application.
- FIG. 13 shows an exemplary user interface screenshot 1300 including an embedded graphical representation of a model generated by the CAD system, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- the screenshot 1300 shows the part family tree 1310 (with the part family BuildingServicesFan highlighted), a list of all specifications 1320 relating to the BuildingServicesFan part family, and a window 1330 including a portion 1340 including a graphical representation of the model generated by the CAD system.
- the user can specify how information is to be displayed by the knowledge management application. For example, the user can specify that the CAD system window be displayed under some conditions but not others, and can also specify what knowledge management system information to display along with the CAD system window.
- FIG. 14 shows a first exemplary user interface screenshot 1400 including a sub-window generated by the CAD system, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- the screenshot 1400 displays a function list 1410 , information from the knowledge management system 1430 , and a sub-window 1440 generated by the CAD system including a graphical representation of the model generated by the CAD system and controls for manipulating the model.
- FIG. 15 shows a second exemplary user interface screenshot 1500 including a sub-window generated by the CAD system, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- the screenshot 1500 displays a function list 1510 , a part family tree 1520 , information from the knowledge management system 1530 , a sub-window 1540 generated by the CAD system including a graphical representation of the model generated by the CAD system and controls for manipulating the model, and properties information 1550 .
- FIG. 16 shows a third exemplary user interface screenshot 1600 including a full view window generated by the CAD system, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- the screenshot 1600 displays a function list 1610 and a full view window 1630 generated by the CAD system.
- the user can make rule changes on the fly, and the knowledge management application will control the CAD system to update the model accordingly and will display the updated graphical representation of the model to the user substantially in real time. In this way, the user essentially gets immediate feedback regarding the rule change.
- changes to a model can be made in the CAD system, and the knowledge management application will identify those changes through interactions with the CAD system and will modify and apply rules accordingly. For example, if the user makes a change in the CAD system that overrides a particular rule, the knowledge management application might cause appropriate tracking information to be stored by the knowledge storage application, create one or more revised rules that reflect the change, and apply other rules to update other components of the model according to the rules.
- the manner in which the knowledge management application can identify CAD system changes depends to a large degree on the CAD system API. For example, the CAD system might communicate the changes to the knowledge management application, or the knowledge management application might monitor or poll the CAD system for changes.
- the knowledge management application can cause a particular model part displayed in the CAD system window to be displayed or highlighted when the user is working on rules relating to that part. For example, with reference again to FIG. 13 , if the user selects the Motor part family in the part family tree 1310 , the knowledge management application might cause the motor to be highlighted in the window 1340 , for example, by changing the color of the motor.
- the knowledge management application can cause information relating to a particular model part to be displayed when the user highlights that part in the CAD system window. For example, with reference again to FIG. 13 , if the user highlights the fan blade component in the CAD window 1340 , the knowledge management application might cause information relating to the fan blade component to be displayed in the window 1330 , with appropriate highlighting in the part family tree 1310 and the list of specifications 1320 .
- the knowledge management application can interoperate with two-dimensional CAD systems as well as three-dimensional CAD systems.
- the knowledge management application supports both the two-dimensional CAD system VISIOTM and the three-dimensional CAD system SOLIDWORKSTM.
- FIG. 17 shows an exemplary user interface screenshot 1700 including a window generated by a two-dimensional CAD system, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- the screenshot 1700 displays a function list 1710 , a part family tree 1720 , a CAD system window 1740 , and properties information 1750 .
- the knowledge management application can also interoperate with various analysis applications. Typically, the knowledge management application exports information to the analysis application for analysis. The knowledge management application can display analysis information to the user.
- FIG. 18 shows an exemplary user interface screenshot 1800 including an analysis window, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- the screenshot 1800 displays a function list 1810 , a part family tree 1820 , a CAD system window 1840 , properties information 1850 , and an analysis window 1860 generated by the analysis application.
- structures are defined in a CAD system and are associated with a structure class.
- Rules are defined for the structure class. When one of the structures is selected by the knowledge management system for a computer-aided design model, the rules are applied to the selected structure.
- These class-based rules make it easier for the user to define rules, since a single rule defined by the user gets applied to an entire class of structures, and therefore the user does not have to define the rule individually for each structure of the structure class.
- FIG. 21 is a logic flow diagram showing exemplary logic 2100 for class-based rules in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- structures such as parts for an assembly
- the structures are associated with a structure class (such as a part family) in a knowledge management system, in block 2106 .
- At least one rule is defined that applies to the structure class, in block 2108 .
- the knowledge management system applies the rule(s) to the selected structure, in block 2112 .
- the logic 2100 ends in block 2199 .
- the knowledge management application obtains a set of rules from a central database.
- the set of rules may include rules relating to geometric and non-geometric attributes.
- the non-geometric attributes may be dependent on geometric attributes.
- the knowledge management application generates instructions for modeling a geometric structure based on the set of rules.
- the knowledge management application communicates the instructions to a computer-aided design system, typically through an API of the computer-aided design system.
- the knowledge management application may produce a graphical display on a graphical user interface including information from the knowledge management system as well as information from the computer-aided design system (such as a graphical representation of a geometric model).
- FIG. 22 is a logic flow diagram showing exemplary logic 2200 for the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- the logic obtains a set of rules from a central database, in block 2204 .
- the logic generates instructions for modeling a geometric structure based on the set of rules, in block 2206 .
- the logic communicates the instructions to a computer-aided design system, in block 2208 , typically through an application program interface of the computer-aided design system.
- the logic may produce a graphical display on a graphical user interface including a first portion including information from the knowledge management application and a second portion including information from the computer-aided design system, in block 2210 .
- the logic ends in block 2299 .
- logic flow diagrams are used herein to demonstrate various aspects of the invention, and should not be construed to limit the present invention to any particular logic flow or logic implementation.
- the described logic may be partitioned into different logic blocks (e.g., programs, modules, functions, or subroutines) without changing the overall results or otherwise departing from the true scope of the invention.
- logic elements may be added, modified, omitted, performed in a different order, or implemented using different logic constructs (e.g., logic gates, looping primitives, conditional logic, and other logic constructs) without changing the overall results or otherwise departing from the true scope of the invention.
- the present invention may be embodied in many different forms, including, but in no way limited to, computer program logic for use with a processor (e.g., a microprocessor, microcontroller, digital signal processor, or general purpose computer), programmable logic for use with a programmable logic device (e.g., a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) or other PLD), discrete components, integrated circuitry (e.g., an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC)), or any other means including any combination thereof.
- a processor e.g., a microprocessor, microcontroller, digital signal processor, or general purpose computer
- programmable logic for use with a programmable logic device
- FPGA Field Programmable Gate Array
- ASIC Application Specific Integrated Circuit
- predominantly all of the knowledge management system applications are implemented as a set of computer program instructions that are executed by a computer under the control of an operating system.
- Source code may include a series of computer program instructions implemented in any of various programming languages (e.g., an object code, an assembly language, or a high-level language such as Fortran, C, C++, JAVA, or HTML) for use with various operating systems or operating environments.
- the source code may define and use various data structures and communication messages.
- the source code may be in a computer executable form (e.g., via an interpreter), or the source code may be converted (e.g., via a translator, assembler, or compiler) into a computer executable form.
- the computer program may be fixed in any form (e.g., source code form, computer executable form, or an intermediate form) either permanently or transitorily in a tangible storage medium, such as a semiconductor memory device (e.g., a RAM, ROM, PROM, EEPROM, or Flash-Programmable RAM), a magnetic memory device (e.g., a diskette or fixed disk), an optical memory device (e.g., a CD-ROM), a PC card (e.g., PCMCIA card), or other memory device.
- a semiconductor memory device e.g., a RAM, ROM, PROM, EEPROM, or Flash-Programmable RAM
- a magnetic memory device e.g., a diskette or fixed disk
- an optical memory device e.g., a CD-ROM
- PC card e.g., PCMCIA card
- the computer program may be fixed in any form in a signal that is transmittable to a computer using any of various communication technologies, including, but in no way limited to, analog technologies, digital technologies, optical technologies, wireless technologies (e.g., Bluetooth), networking technologies, and internetworking technologies.
- the computer program may be distributed in any form as a removable storage medium with accompanying printed or electronic documentation (e.g., shrink wrapped software), preloaded with a computer system (e.g., on system ROM or fixed disk), or distributed from a server or electronic bulletin board over the communication system (e.g., the Internet or World Wide Web).
- Hardware logic including programmable logic for use with a programmable logic device
- implementing all or part of the functionality previously described herein may be designed using traditional manual methods, or may be designed, captured, simulated, or documented electronically using various tools, such as Computer Aided Design (CAD), a hardware description language (e.g., VHDL or AHDL), or a PLD programming language (e.g., PALASM, ABEL, or CUPL).
- CAD Computer Aided Design
- a hardware description language e.g., VHDL or AHDL
- PLD programming language e.g., PALASM, ABEL, or CUPL
- Programmable logic may be fixed either permanently or transitorily in a tangible storage medium, such as a semiconductor memory device (e.g., a RAM, ROM, PROM, EEPROM, or Flash-Programmable RAM), a magnetic memory device (e.g., a diskette or fixed disk), an optical memory device (e.g., a CD-ROM), or other memory device.
- a semiconductor memory device e.g., a RAM, ROM, PROM, EEPROM, or Flash-Programmable RAM
- a magnetic memory device e.g., a diskette or fixed disk
- an optical memory device e.g., a CD-ROM
- the programmable logic may be fixed in a signal that is transmittable to a computer using any of various communication technologies, including, but in no way limited to, analog technologies, digital technologies, optical technologies, wireless technologies (e.g., Bluetooth), networking technologies, and internetworking technologies.
- the programmable logic may be distributed as a removable storage medium with accompanying printed or electronic documentation (e.g., shrink wrapped software), preloaded with a computer system (e.g., on system ROM or fixed disk), or distributed from a server or electronic bulletin board over the communication system (e.g., the Internet or World Wide Web).
- printed or electronic documentation e.g., shrink wrapped software
- a computer system e.g., on system ROM or fixed disk
- server or electronic bulletin board e.g., the Internet or World Wide Web
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates generally to computer-aided design, and, more particularly, to a knowledge management system for computer-aided design modeling.
- Computer-aided design (CAD) systems can be used to produce and manipulate geometric models. CAD systems often include very sophisticated algorithms for producing complex geometric models, manipulating those models, and analyzing the components of those models. For example, a CAD system may be used to model a complex structure having a curved surface, view the structure at various angles, and calculate the surface area of the curved surface and the volume of the structure as a whole. It might be useful to know the surface area of the curved surface, for example, to determine how much paint would be needed to cover the surface. It might be useful to know the volume of the structure, for example, to determine how much material would be needed to produce the structure.
- While CAD systems can be very powerful modeling tools, they are generally limited to geometric modeling. Thus, CAD systems generally require the user to apply product design rules and practices necessary to produce the model. For example, if the user is required by an employer to use certain practices (such as, for example, always using a certain size bolt to connect two components), then the user must apply those practices to the model. The user is typically also required to make successive changes to a model when changing a component of the model. For example, each time the user changes an attribute of a component (such as, for example, the outside diameter of a component), the user may have to change attributes of one or more other components that connect or otherwise interact with that component, and the effects of these changes may cascade through many components of the model. The user is typically also required to handle non-geometric attributes of the model (such as, for example, component pricing and manufacturing processes). As a result of these limitations, CAD systems can be difficult to use, particularly for casual CAD users (such as engineers, architects, or managerial staff) who may not be proficient with the CAD system but often need to make modifications to drawings or models on an as-needed basis.
- Knowledge-based engineering (KBE) attempts to combine some level of knowledge management with design automation. Knowledge management typically includes such things as best practices, lessons learned (e.g., from earlier models), common practices (e.g., industry standards, company policies), product design rules, and quality metrics. Knowledge management might be applied to design automation, for example, to reduce the number of parts a company needs to order (e.g., by reusing parts from one model in another model), reduce design time, reduce product cost, and produce higher quality and reliability. KBE functionality is typically implemented within a CAD system or as an add-on to a CAD system (e.g., as a plug-in) so as to provide the CAD system with additional knowledge management capabilities.
- CAD systems are often used in conjunction with computer-aided engineering (CAE) analysis tools for performing advanced model analysis. CAD systems are also often used in conjunction with product document management (PDM) tools for generating and maintaining product documentation. These CAE and PDM tools can be implemented as stand-alone applications or as add-ons to a CAD system. The KBE functionality may interact with the CAE and PDM tools to gather or provide information.
- In various embodiments of the present invention, a knowledge management system captures, stores, manages, and applies rules for modeling geometric objects and related non-geometric attributes. The knowledge management system controls a computer-aided design system for modeling a geometric structure, typically through an application program interface of the computer-aided design system. The knowledge management system typically includes a knowledge management application in communication with the computer-aided design system through an application program interface. The knowledge management system typically also includes a central database managed by a knowledge storage application for maintaining rules and other related information. The knowledge management system typically also includes a knowledge acquisition application for generating rule programs for storage in the central database.
- Rule programs are generated by the knowledge management system based on information that can be provided by a user, imported from the computer-aided design system, or extracted from a product document management application. The rules can relate to both geometric and non-geometric attributes of the model. Non-geometric attributes can be dependent on geometric attributes. Geometric structures can be modeled based on rules relating to non-geometric attributes.
- In certain embodiments of the present invention there is provided a computer-aided modeling system includes a knowledge management system for managing a set of modeling rules and a computer-aided design system controlled by the knowledge management system. The knowledge management system generates instructions for modeling a geometric structure based on the set of modeling rules and communicates the instructions to the computer-aided design system for generating a model of the geometric structure.
- The knowledge management system can include a knowledge management application in communication with the computer-aided design system through an application program interface of the computer-aided design system. The knowledge management system can also include a knowledge storage application in communication with the knowledge management application for storing the set of rules in a central database and communicating the set of rules to the knowledge management application. The knowledge management system can also include a knowledge acquisition application in communication with the knowledge storage application for generating the set of rules and communication the set of rules to the knowledge storage application for storage in the central database. The knowledge management system can produce a graphical display on a graphical user interface, including a first portion including information from the knowledge management system and a second portion including information from the computer-aided design system (such as a display window including a graphical representation of the geometric structure, with or without controls for manipulating the graphical representation).
- In other embodiments of the present invention there is provided a method for computer-aided design modeling involves generating instructions for modeling a geometric structure based on a set of modeling rules and communicating the instructions to a computer-aided design system for generating a model of the geometric structure. In certain embodiments of the present invention, the set of rules are obtained from a central database over a communication network. The computer-aided design system typically includes an application program interface, and the instructions are typically communicated to the computer-aided design system through the application program interface.
- The method can also involve producing a graphical display on a graphical user interface, including a first portion including information relating to the set of modeling rules and a second portion including information from the computer-aided design system. This may involve directing a window display generated by the computer-aided design system to be displayed on the graphical user interface. The display window can include a graphical representation of the geometric structure, and may also include controls for manipulating the graphical representation of the geometric structure.
- In other embodiments of the present invention there is provided apparatus for computer-aided design modeling, the apparatus includes a design modeler for generating instructions for modeling a geometric structure based on a set of modeling rules and an interface from the design modeler to a computer-aided design system for communicating the instructions to the computer-aided design system for generating a model of the geometric structure. The apparatus typically also includes an interface from the design modeler to a central database over a communication network for obtaining the set of modeling rules from the central database. The computer-aided design system typically includes an application program interface, and the interface from the design modeler to a computer-aided design system typically complies with the application program interface.
- In certain embodiments of the present invention, the apparatus includes a graphical user interface. The design modeler can produce a graphical display on the graphical user interface, including a first portion including information from the design modeler and a second portion including information from the computer-aided design system. This may involve the design modeler directing a window display generated by the computer-aided design system to be displayed on the graphical user interface. The display window can include a graphical representation of the geometric structure, and may also include controls for manipulating the graphical representation of the geometric structure.
- In still other embodiments of the present invention there is provided a computer program for computer-aided design modeling can be embodied in a computer readable medium. The computer program includes means for generating instructions for modeling a geometric structure based on a set of modeling rules and means for communicating the instructions to a computer-aided design system for generating a model of the geometric structure. In certain embodiments of the present invention, the set of rules are obtained from a central database over a communication network. The computer-aided design system typically includes an application program interface, and the instructions are typically communicated to the computer-aided design system through the application program interface.
- The computer program typically includes means for producing a graphical display on a graphical user interface, including a first portion including information relating to the set of modeling rules and a second portion including information from the computer-aided design system. This may involve directing a window display generated by the computer-aided design system to be displayed on the graphical user interface. The display window can include a graphical representation of the geometric structure, and may also include controls for manipulating the graphical representation of the geometric structure.
- In other embodiments of the present invention there is provided apparatus for computer-aided design modeling including means for generating instructions for modeling a geometric structure based on a set of modeling rules and means for communicating the instructions to a computer-aided design system for generating a model of the geometric structure.
- In the various embodiments of the present invention, the set of rules can include rules relating to both geometric and non-geometric attributes. Rules relating to non-geometric attributes can include, for example, a rule for determine a cost of the geometric structure or a rule for defining a process. The set of rules can include rules relating to a class having a plurality of geometric structures. The set of rules can include rules relating to geometric structures defined in the computer-aided design system.
- Typical embodiments include a three-dimensional computer-aided design system controlled by a knowledge management system, such as the SOLIDWORKS™ three-dimensional computer-aided design system, and may additionally include a two-dimensional computer-aided design system, such as the VISIO™ two-dimensional computer-aided design system.
- In the accompanying drawings:
-
FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing an exemplary modeling system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing the relevant components of the knowledge management system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 3A is a block diagram showing relevant components of the CAD system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 3B is a block diagram showing the relevant components of a CAD program in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing an exemplary computer-aided modeling system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 5 shows an exemplary user interface screenshot for importing information from the CAD system relating to a mounting assembly, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 6 shows an exemplary user interface screenshot for defining a new geometric specification relating to the Mounting part family, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 7 shows an exemplary user interface screenshot displaying information upon entry of the name of a new CAD part file, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 8 shows an exemplary user interface screenshot for defining a geometry feature, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 9 shows an exemplary user interface screenshot showing geometry features (properties) defined for the CAD part file, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 10 shows an exemplary user interface screenshot for defining a mating, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 11 shows an exemplary user interface screenshot showing mating definitions, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 12 shows an exemplary user interface screenshot showing a rule for determining a fan area for the fan, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 13 shows an exemplary user interface screenshot including an embedded graphical representation of a model generated by the CAD system, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 14 shows a first exemplary user interface screenshot including a sub-window generated by the CAD system, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 15 shows a second exemplary user interface screenshot including a sub-window generated by the CAD system, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 16 shows a third exemplary user interface screenshot including a full view window generated by the CAD system, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 17 shows an exemplary user interface screenshot including a window generated by a two-dimensional CAD system, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 18 shows an exemplary user interface screenshot including an analysis window, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 19 shows the relationship between the user (engineer), knowledge management application, knowledge database, and the integrated systems controlled by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; and -
FIG. 20 shows the relationship between the knowledge management application and the integrated systems in greater detail; -
FIG. 21 is a logic flow diagram showing exemplary logic for class-based rules in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; and -
FIG. 22 is a logic flow diagram showing exemplary logic for the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. - For the purpose of the present description, the attachments thereto, and the accompanying claims, the following terms shall have the indicated meanings unless the context otherwise requires:
- ActiveX Control—A reusable control written in Visual Basic used to create custom user interfaces in nAct.
- Application—In the context of a model, a unit of deployment that contains one or more top-level parts and its components. In some cases, top-level part families can reference components in other applications.
- Assembly—A grouping of parts and their subparts. An assembly is the hierarchy of parts that make up something meaningful to the engineers, such as a top-level part or a finished good.
- Calculated Value—The value that was calculated by the formula that was entered into the rules database. The formula may return a constant, a calculation based on other properties or a value obtained from a customer database.
- Check In/Check Out —
-
- A project cannot be deleted if it contains line items that are checked out to another user.
- A line item cannot be deleted or edited if it is checked out to another user.
- A model cannot be edited if the line item is checked out to another user.
- When a user edits a model that is not checked out to anyone, the corresponding line item automatically becomes checked out to them.
- Line items can be manually checked in or out by clicking the Check In and Check Out buttons beneath the line item grid or by clicking the corresponding options under the Line Item menu. While editing a model automatically checks out a line item, the check in process must always be done manually.
- When a line item is checked out, Checked_Out_By column in the LineItem table in the Project database is updated with the user's username. When the line item is checked back in, the column is set to null.
- Anyone can edit a line item (or its model) if the line item is not checked out to anyone.
- Child Part Family—A family that inherits properties, subparts and connections from another part family (template part family).
- Code Generation—The creation of rules into executable source code for use in nAct during run-time. The generated code can also be compiled into a dynamic link library (.DLL) using Visual Basic.
- Column—In an SQL table, the area in each row that stores the data value for some attribute of the object modeled by the table.
- Compiled Mode—Editing models in nAct with rules that are compiled into a DLL file using Microsoft Visual Basic 6.0. In a typical embodiment of the invention, compiled rules cannot be seen by the user and cannot be debugged at runtime. (See also Developer Mode)
- Component—A component is any part or sub-assembly within an assembly.
- Connection Collection—A conceptual or physical relationship between two or more parts. This differs from a subpart collection in that the two connected parts do not have a parent-child relationship (such as a nut and a bolt).
- Connection Constraint—The formula used to determine the correct part or parts to be connected at run-time. There is preferably never a connection constraint associated with a connection specification where the same part family owns both.
- Connection Point—A point in which two schematic shapes can be connected directly or via wire.
- Connection Spec—The definition of a relationship between two parts at run-time (e.g. a hose and a valve). A connection exists when one part in an assembly needs to reference the properties of another part in an assembly and the user cannot or prefers not to walk up and down the part/subpart hierarchy.
- Constraint—A formula that indicates how a specification should be computed in the design model.
- Context—The current location of the part in the tree defined by its parents, grandparents, etc. A part may be used in more than one location in the tree, and each location is considered a different context.
- Custom Control—A customer-developed ActiveX Control written in Microsoft Visual Basic 6.0 and compiled to an .OCX file. Custom controls are used to create custom interfaces for process steps.
- Database—A collection of data arranged for ease and speed of search and retrieval. A database also includes an engine which accepts commands from the user to insert, update, delete and select the data. Exemplary embodiments of the invention use Microsoft SQL Server 2000 database to store its data.
- Decache—Resetting values based on a dependency.
- Dependency—A property or attribute that is used in the calculation of another formula.
- Design Time—Using nAct Expert to create part families and specifications (properties, subparts, connections, database constraints, geometry and schematics) and to write formulas for rules. (See also Run Time)
- Developer Mode—Editing models in nAct with rules running in source code using Microsoft Visual Basic for Applications. The user can see the actual formulas for the rules and can step through and debug them at run time. (See also Compiled Mode)
- Display Name—This is a property that is used to create a formula-driven name that appears in the run-time application instead of the part family pretty name. (Display Name can be placed on any part family.)
- Drawing—A Drawing is a 2D representation of a 3D part or assembly.
- Feature—A geometric attribute of a part (i.e. plane, extrusion, sketch, cut, etc.) whose dimensions can be driven by nAct properties within the model.
- Follow Part Number—When this flag is set, all parts with the same part number will share the user input value of its properties, subparts or connections.
- Frame—A component of a process step layout. Each layout contains 1 to 4 frames. Each frame contains 1 of the following user interface elements: dynamically generated form, CAD system, 2D modeler, drawing, report or custom control.
- Hierarchy—A logical tree structure that organizes the members of a dimension such that each member has one parent member and zero or more child members.
- IIS—Microsoft Internet Information Services. IIS includes a web server, SMTP (mail) services and FTP (file transfer protocol) services. The RuleStream Enterprise Web tools must be installed on an IIS server. IIS is a component of Microsoft Windows 2000 Server and Microsoft Windows 2003 Server and can be installed from the Windows CD.
- Index—In a relational database, a database object that provides fast access to data in the rows of a table, based on key values. Indexes can also enforce uniqueness on the rows in a table. SQL Server supports clustered and nonclustered indexes. The primary key of a table is automatically indexed. In full-text search, a full-text index stores information about significant words and their location within a given column.
- Input Value—A value that is entered by the user in nact during run-time. This takes precedence over any calculated values.
- Kernel—The knowledge engine that executes rules. It provides the base system functionality for managing the run-time model.
- Layout—The configuration of the user interface of the model designer window in nAct. Each step in the selected process can have its own unique layout. A layout consists of 1 to 4 frames, and each frame can contain 1 of the following user interface elements: dynamically generated form, CAD system, 2D modeler, drawing, report or custom control.
- Line Item—A top-level part that is associated with a project. The line item has an associated top-level part family.
- Local Constraint—A constraint owned the same part family as the associated spec. This is the default formula.
- Model—An actual design created using nact (the graphical representation of a line item).
- nAct—The client server tool used to create projects, line items and models.
- nAnswer—The web-based tool which allows users to query the databases using English like query statements.
- nExplore—The web-based tool used to view rules and documentation.
- nPlatform—The project and rules repository.
- nQuality—The web-based tool for entering and reporting quality data, scoring and risks.
- Override—The action of a higher-level part within an assembly determining the value for a subordinate part.
- Owner Part Family—The part family that contains the specification or constraint.
- Parent Part Family—The part family that owns the subpart collection of which the part is a member.
- Part—An instance of a part family.
- Part Family—The definition of a fundamental object in an assembly. This may be a component or a finished good.
- Process—A defined set of steps. Each top-level part family can have 1 or more processes. The processes that will be used during run time are determined by the line item definition.
- Process Step—A defined workflow for editing a model during run time. Each process step has a layout that defines its user interface. Process steps are grouped in categories and have a defined order within the process. Each process must have 1 or more process steps.
- Property Constraint—The formula used to determine the value of a property.
- Property Specification—The definition of the characteristics of a part family (e.g. height, weight, length).
- Release—A snapshot of a model and its values.
- Row—In an SQL table, the collection of elements that form a horizontal line in the table. Each row in the table represents a single occurrence of the object modeled by the table and stores the values for all the attributes of that object.
- Run Time—Using the nAct Model Designer to edit a model using defined part families, specs and rules. Users design models in run time in Compiled Mode or Developer Mode. (See also Design Time)
- Schematic—A 2D representation, usually associated with electrical components.
- Score—A value assigned to rate the effectiveness of the design.
- Shape—A 2D object within a schematic diagram.
- Specification—The constituent elements of a part family. Specifications indicate that parts of that type always have certain properties, subpart collections, or connection collections.
- Step—(see Process Step)
- Stored Procedure—A precompiled collection of Transact-SQL statements stored under a name and processed as a unit.
- Subpart Collection—A collection of component parts.
- Subpart Link Constraint—The formulas used to determine existence, type, quantity and/or names of parts within the collection.
- Subpart Link Spec—Provides the valid part families that can become components at run-time.
- Subscription—The ability of one part family to assume the property, subpart or connection definitions and formulas of another part family.
- Table—A two-dimensional object, consisting of rows and columns, used to store data in a relational database. Each table stores information about one of the types of objects modeled by the database.
- Template Part Family—The part family from which a child part family inherits its characteristics.
- UDF (User Defined Fields)—Customizable columns on the project table. There are four UDF columns available.
- Unit—A unit of measure for a numeric property value. Like units are grouped in unit categories. The unit category “Length” may include units such as “feet”, “meters”, “inches” or “millimeters”.
- VB—Microsoft Visual Basic 6.0. In exemplary embodiments of the invention, Visual Basic is the language used to create custom controls for use in process steps and to create compiled versions of rules (application DLLs).
- VBA—Microsoft Visual Basic for Applications.
- View—A database object that can be referenced the same way as a table in SQL statements. Views are defined using a SELECT statement and are analogous to an object that contains the result set of this statement.
- Wire—A line or connector used when two connected objects are not coincidental.
- In embodiments of the present invention, a knowledge management system captures, stores, manages, and applies rules for modeling geometric objects and related non-geometric attributes. The knowledge management system preferably supports rules relating to geometric attributes that can be represented and manipulated by a CAD system as well as rules relating to various other attributes that generally cannot be represented and manipulated by the CAD system, such as certain “negative” geometric attributes (e.g., a specification for producing a hole in a component or for removing material from a component so as to form a feature of that component), certain geometry-based attributes that are not modeled as physical features of a structure or assembly, and non-geometric attributes (e.g., pricing, processes, component relationships, component classes, user intentions, and abstractions). The rules are typically stored in a central database so that the rules can be manipulated independently of any modeling. The rules can be derived from various sources, including general engineering principles, user-provided information, and information obtained from a PDM system. The knowledge management system can tracks rule changes over time, and can apply a particular version of the rules to a model. The knowledge management system defines the components and parameters for a particular model based on the rules being applied. The knowledge management system can incorporate predefined components (such as components created in a CAD system) or dynamically defined components into the model.
- The knowledge management system is generally independent of the CAD system, although the knowledge management system can interface with a CAD system for, among other things, importing/integrating component specifications from the CAD system for use in modeling, instructing the CAD system to produce a geometric model incorporating the components and parameters defined by the knowledge management system, and obtaining geometric information relating to a model (e.g., sizes, surface areas, volumes) for use by the knowledge management system (e.g., for computing the cost of a component based on its volume according to pricing rules provided by a user). A geometric model produced by the CAD system can be viewed and manipulated as usual using the CAD system, although it is preferable for any and all changes to the model to be coordinated through the knowledge management system so that the appropriate rules can be applied to the changes.
- In certain embodiments of the present invention, the knowledge management system interfaces with the CAD system through an application program interface (API) of the CAD system. Specifically, the CAD system includes an API through which certain functions of the CAD system can be performed. The CAD system API is typically used for such things as macros (i.e., programs that perform a series of function steps for the user) and add-ons (i.e., programs that add functionality to the CAD system). In embodiments of the present invention, however, the knowledge management system uses the API to control the CAD system such that the CAD system runs only when activated by the knowledge management system. The knowledge management system typically activates the CAD system for such things as displaying a model to the user and obtaining geometric information relating to model components.
-
FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing anexemplary modeling system 100 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Among other things, themodeling system 100 includes aknowledge management system 110 in communication with aCAD system 120. Theknowledge management system 110 controls theCAD system 120, specifically by generating instructions for modeling a geometric structure based on a set of modeling rules and communicating the instructions to the computer-aideddesign system 120 for generating a model of the geometric structure. Theknowledge management system 110 can also interface with aCAE application 130 for analysis and with aPDM application 140 for product document management. -
FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing the relevant components of theknowledge management system 110 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Among other things, theknowledge management system 110 includes aknowledge acquisition application 210 for capturing and generating rules, aknowledge storage application 220 for storing rules and models in acentral database 240, and aknowledge management application 230 for generating models based on the rules. Among other things, theknowledge acquisition application 210 generates rule programs based on information obtained from a user and communicates the rule programs to theknowledge storage application 220 for storage in thecentral database 240. Theknowledge management application 230 obtains rule programs from theknowledge storage application 220 and applies the rule programs for building a model. Theknowledge management application 230 may communicate model information to theknowledge storage application 220 for storage in thecentral database 240. - More specifically, the
knowledge acquisition application 210 captures modeling rules and generates rule programs for storage by theknowledge storage application 220. Theknowledge acquisition application 210 interacts with a user through a user interface through which the user enters information regarding components, design processes, engineering and manufacturing rules, and customer and marketing requirements. Theknowledge acquisition application 210 generates rule programs from the user information, and sends the rule programs to theknowledge storage application 220 for storage. Theknowledge acquisition application 210 allows rules to be modified quickly and easily. - The
knowledge storage application 220 stores modeling information in a relational database, including, among other things, rule programs generated by theknowledge acquisition application 210 and models generated by theknowledge management application 230. Theknowledge storage application 220 also tracks revision histories, design status, and user group security. Multiple revisions of a rule can be stored so that a particular version of a rule can be applied to a model while another version of the rule is being created or modified. A design can be modeled using an earlier version of a rule if desired. - The
knowledge management application 230 applies rules to create detailed computer models. Theknowledge management application 230 can model two-dimensional schematics or three-dimensional geometries. Theknowledge management application 230 can also model a bill of materials for the components of an assembly. Theknowledge management application 230 can automatically update a previously completed model under revised or new rules. In this way, models can be generated by manipulating the rules through the knowledge management system rather than manipulating the model itself through the computer-aided design system. -
FIG. 3A is a block diagram showing relevant components of theCAD system 120 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Among other things, theCAD system 120 includes a3D CAD program 301, such as such as SOLIDWORKS™from SolidWorks Corporation, 300 Baker Avenue, Concord, Mass. 01742, and may also include a2D CAD program 302, such as VISIO™ from Microsoft Corporation. Each of the CAD programs has its own API through which it interacts with the knowledge management application.FIG. 3B is a block diagram showing the relevant components of a CAD program, such as the3D CAD program 301 or the2D CAD program 302, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Among other things, the CAD program includes aCAD application 320 having anAPI 310 through which certain functions of theCAD application 320 can be controlled. The interactions between the knowledge management application and different CAD systems depend to a large degree on the CAD system API. The SOLIDWORKS™ three-dimensional CAD program has an internal macro/recording language and also supports an application programming interface language that is accessible through an OLE (Object Linking and Embedding) interface with support for VISUAL BASIC™ and VISUAL C++™. In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the knowledge management application is substantially reactive to the VISIO™ two-dimensional CAD system, while the knowledge management application actively controls the SOLIDWORKS™ three-dimensional CAD system. Thus, support for each particular CAD system generally requires some level of integration by the knowledge management application to work with the specific functions and API of the CAD program. - In certain embodiments of the present invention, the various functions of the
knowledge management system 110 are divided among different devices that communicate over a communication network, such as the public Internet or public or private intranets. In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, knowledge storage functions reside in one or more storage servers that incorporate theknowledge storage application 220 andcentral database 240, while knowledge acquisition and management functions reside in user workstations (such as personal computers) or terminals that incorporate theknowledge acquisition application 210, theknowledge management application 230, and theCAD system 120. The user workstations or terminals typically include a user interface for interacting with a user and a network interface for communicating with the storage server over a communication network. -
FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing an exemplary computer-aided modeling system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Among other things, thesystem 400 includes one ormore user workstations 410 in communication with one ormore storage servers 430 over acommunication network 420. Theworkstation 410 incorporates theknowledge acquisition application 210, theknowledge management application 230, and theCAD system 120, and also includes a user interface for interacting with the user and a network interface for communicating over thecommunication network 420 with the storage server(s) 430. Theuser interface 411 is typically a graphical user interface that provides for both displaying information to the user and receiving inputs from the user. Thestorage server 430 incorporates theknowledge storage application 220 and thecentral database 240, and also includes anetwork interface 431 for communicating over thecommunication network 420 with the user workstation(s) 410. - Within the
user workstation 410, theknowledge acquisition application 210 and theknowledge management application 230 interact with the user through theuser interface 411, and also interact with theknowledge storage application 220 in thestorage server 430 through thenetwork interface 412 using a client-server paradigm. Theknowledge management application 230 also controls theCAD system 120 through an API of theCAD system 120. Theuser workstation 410 is typically a general-purpose computer, and theknowledge acquisition application 210, theknowledge management application 230, and theCAD system 120 are typically software programs that run on the general-purpose computer. - Within the
storage server 430, theknowledge storage application 220 interacts with thecentral database 240 through a database interface (not shown), and interacts with theknowledge acquisition application 210 and theknowledge management application 230 in theuser workstation 410 through thenetwork interface 431. Thestorage server 430 is typically a general-purpose computer, and theknowledge storage application 220 is typically a software program that runs on the general-purpose computer. Thecentral database 240 is typically a relational database. -
FIG. 19 shows the relationship between the user (engineer) 1910,knowledge management application 1920,knowledge database 1930, and theintegrated systems 1940 controlled by theknowledge management application 1920, including CAD system(s) and possibly also a CAE application, a PDM application, and a component databases. Theknowledge management application 1920 extracts rules for design automation from theknowledge database 1930. Theknowledge management application 1920 may also receive specifications, rules, and other information relating to modeling. A product control modeler element of theknowledge management application 1920 interacts with the integrated applications as necessary for modeling, analysis, product document management, and component selection. Information generated by theknowledge management application 1920, such as runtime rule authoring and trend analysis, may be stored in theknowledge database 1930. -
FIG. 20 shows the relationship between the knowledge management application and the integrated systems in greater detail. Theknowledge management application 1920 interacts with theCAD system 2010 for modeling such things as features, mating conditions, surface area, volume, and mass properties. Theknowledge management application 1920 interacts with theCAE analysis application 2020 for such things as stress, thermal, kinematics, and loads analysis. Theknowledge management application 1920 interacts with thePDM application 2030 to generate and utilize such things as files, structure, workflow, and bill of materials (BOM). Theknowledge management application 1920 interacts withcomponent databases 2040 for such things as part numbers, standards, inventory, and pricing. - In typical embodiments of the present invention, a model may include multiple geometric components. Each component can be associated with both geometric attributes and non-geometric attributes. Rules can be established for defining relationships between components without necessarily defining that actual parameters of the relationship (such as, for example, a rule that a fan blade assembly must mate with a motor shaft, without necessarily defining the shape or size of the shaft which might affect the type of mating). Components can be organized into classes (such as, for example, three possible motors for a fan assembly can be organized into a “motors” class), and rules can be established for the class as a whole such that the rules are applied to whatever class member is selected for inclusion in a particular model (such as, for example, a generic rule that any of the class of motors must mate with a fan blade component). Rules can be established for selecting a particular member of a class for a particular model (such as, for example, a rule for selecting a particular motor based on the amount of power or the rotational speed required for a model, or a rule for selecting the number of fan blades for the fan blade component based on the volume of air to be moved and other parameters such as the motor selected and the diameter of the fan blade component). Rules relating to “negative” attributes can be defined (such as, for example, a rule that a motor frame must include a hole in a particular location for bolting the motor frame to a chassis) and applied to a model component as a library feature. Rules relating to various non-geometric attributes can be established (such as, for example, rules for deriving manufacturing processes based on the components incorporated into a selected model, or rules for estimating component, sub-assembly, product, and manufacturing costs).
- One particular implementation of a knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention is described in Attachment I (consisting of numbered pages 1-91) and in Attachment II (consisting of numbered pages 1-113), each of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Within these attachments, the knowledge management system may be referred to generally as “Rulestream” or “Navion,” the knowledge management application may be referred to as “nAct” or “nAct Engineer,” the knowledge acquisition application may be referred to as “nAct Expert,” and the knowledge storage application may be referred to as “nPlatform.” In Attachment II, edit rules relating to “Geometry Specification” and “Geometry Constraint” generally relate to the SOLIDWORKS™ three-dimensional CAD system, while edit rules relating to “2DSchematic Specification” generally relate to the VISIO™ two-dimensional CAD system.
- As discussed above, the knowledge management application controls the CAD system through a CAD system API. While the actual CAD functions that can be performed through the API are substantially limited by the API (and are subject to change by the CAD system provider), the specific API functions used and the manner in which the API functions are used are determined by the knowledge management application for performing specific knowledge management operations. In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the knowledge management application controls the SOLIDWORKS™ three-dimensional CAD system through its API. In order to control the CAD system, the knowledge management application typically performs such operations as starting SOLIDWORKS™, opening a part file, opening an assembly file, mating a component, deleting a mate, fixing a component, removing a part or assembly, suppressing a component, hiding/showing a component, suppressing a feature, inserting a library feature, removing a library feature, setting a part dimension, setting an assembly dimension, creating a component pattern, removing a component pattern, creating a feature pattern, removing a point in a sketch, removing a feature pattern, setting a custom property, setting component color, and closing SOLIDWORKS™. This is not meant as an exhaustive list, and the knowledge management application can perform other operations as needed. Exemplary API calls and settings for performing the above operations in an exemplary embodiment of the invention are described below.
- Starting SOLIDWORKS™ may involve use of the following API functions:
-
- Set SW=New SldWorks.SldWorks
- SW.UserControl=False
- Set Assembly=SW.OpenDoc6(strFilename, swDocPART,
- swOpenDocOptions_Silent, “ ”, lngErr, lngMess)
- The following SOLIDWORKS™ settings may be used:
-
- swMateAnimationSpeed=0
- swLargeAsmModeAutoActivate=swResponseNever
- swPerformanceAssemRebuildOnLoad=swResponseAlways
- swLoadExternalReferences=swResponseNever
- swAutoSaveInterval=0
- swBackupCopiesPerDocument=0
- swShowErrorsEveryRebuild=False
- swMaximizeDocumentOnOpen=True
- swSnapToPoints=False
- swLargeAsmModeAutoLoadLightweight=False
- swLargeAsmModeUpdateMassPropsOnSave=False
- swLargeAsmModeAutoRecover=False
- swAutoLoadPartsLightweight=False
- swPerformanceVerifyOnRebuild=False
- swEnablePerformanceEmail=False
- swUseFolderSearchRules=False
- swExtRefUpdateCompNames=True
- swFeatureManagerEnsureVisible=False
- Opening a part file typically involves opening the part file, adding the part file as a component to a parent assembly, closing the part file, and rebuilding the top level assembly. The following API functions may be used:
-
- Set objDoc=SW.OpenDoc6(strFilename, swDocPART, swOpenDocOptions_Silent, “ ”, lngErr, lngMess)
- Assembly.AddComponent2(strFilename, 0, 0, 0)
- SW.CloseDoc objDoc.GetTitle
- Assembly.EditRebuild3
- Opening an assembly file typically involves opening the part file, adding the part file as a component to a parent assembly, closing the part file, and rebuilding the top level assembly. If assembly dimensions are driven by the knowledge management application, then all components are typically renamed to ensure uniqueness. The following API functions may be used:
-
- Set objDoc=SW.OpenDoc6(strFilename, swDocPART, swOpenDocOptions_Silent, “ ”, lngErr, lngMess)
- Set objconfiguration=objDoc.GetActiveConfigurationO
- Set obj Component=objConfiguration.GetRootComponent( )
- objComponent.GetChildren
- Set objChildDoc=objChild.GetModelDoc objChildDoc.SaveAs4 strNewFileName swSaveAsCurrentVersion, swSaveAsOptions_Silent, lngErr, lngWarnings
- SWAssembly.AddComponent2(strFilename, 0, 0, 0)
- SW.CloseDoc objDoc.GetTitle
- SWAssembly.EditRebuild3
- Mating a component typically involves putting the parent assembly in “edit” mode, selecting the features to mate, adding the mate, and rebuilding the assembly. The mate name is then found and noted by the knowledge management application in the case where a dependent property is changed and the mating is effected. The following API functions may be used:
-
- ObjParentComponent.Select False
- Assembly.EditAssembly
- Selecting Plane, Axis, or Point
-
- Assembly.SelectByID strFeatureName, strFeatureType, 0, 0, 0 (also used, strFeatureName & “@,” & strComponentPath, and “Point1@” & strFeatureName) Selecting Face or Edge (loop through Faces, or Faces and Edges to find name match)
- objComponent.GetBody( ), objBody.GetFirstFaceo,
- objBody.GetNextFace( ), objFace.GetEdges,
- Assembly.GetEntityName(obj)
- Assembly.AddMate lngMateType, lngAlignType, boolFlip, dblDist, dblAngle
- Assembly.EditRebuild3
- Finding the Mate created (find the MateGroup, move to the last SubFeature)
-
- Assembly.FeatureByPositionReverse(i)
- objFeature.GetTypeName=“MateGroup”
- objMateGroup.GetFirstSubFeature
- objMate.GetNextSubFeatureO
- Deleting a mate typically involves selecting the mate using the parent assembly's model document and deleting the selection. The following API functions may be used:
-
- Assembly.SelectByID strMateName, “MATE”, 0, 0, 0
- Assembly.DeleteSelection False
- Assembly.EditRebuild3
- Fixing a component typically involves setting the component transform, selecting the component, and fixing the component. The following API functions may be used:
-
- objComponent.GetXform
- objComponent.SetXform (varXForm)
- objComponent.Select False
- Assembly.FixComponent
- Assembly.EditRebuild3
- Removing a part or assembly typically involves selecting the parent assembly, putting the parent assembly in “edit” mode, selecting the component, and deleting the selection. The following API functions may be used:
-
- objParentComp.Select False
- Assembly.EditAssembly
- objComponent.Select False
- Assembly.DeleteSelection False
- Assembly.ClearSelection
- Assembly.EditAssembly
- Assembly.EditRebuild3
- Suppressing a component typically involves checking the suppression state of the component and setting the suppression state, if suppressing the document is saved. The following API functions may be used:
-
- objComponent.IsSuppressed
- Set oModelDoc=objComponent.GetModelDoc
- oModelDoc.Save3 swSaveAsOptions_Silent, lngErr, lngwarnings
- objComponent.Select False
- Assembly.EditSuppress2 or Assembly.EditUnSuppress2
- Assembly.EditRebuild3
- Hiding or showing a component typically involves setting the hidden state appropriately. The following API functions may be used:
-
- objComponent.IsHidden(False)
- objComponent.Select False
- Assembly.ShowComponent2, Assembly.HideComponent2
- Assembly.EditRebuild3
- Suppressing a feature typically involves traversing the model documents to find the named feature and setting its suppression state accordingly. The following API functions may be used:
-
- objModelDoc.FirstFeature
- objFeature.Name( )
- objFeature.GetNextFeature( )
- objFeature.IsSuppressed
-
objFeature.SetSuppression 0 -
objFeature.SetSuppression 2
- Inserting a library feature typically involves selecting the component to receive the feature, putting the component in “edit” mode, selecting the references required for insertion, and inserting the library feature. The new feature and its sub-features are typically renamed. The following API functions may be used:
-
- objParentComponent.Select2 False, 0
- Assembly.EditPart2 True, True, lngErr
- obj.Select2 True, intMark (Traverse features and select for Edges and Faces)
- Assembly.AndSelectByMark(strFeatureName & “@” & strComponentPath, strFeatureType, 0, 0, 0, intMark) (Plane, Point, or Axis)
- Assembly.InsertLibraryFeature(strFileName)
-
Assembly.SelectedFeatureProperties - objFeature.GetFirstSubFeature, subFeature.Name( ),
- subFeature.GetNextFeature( )
- Assembly.EditAssembly
- Assembly.EditRebuild3
- Removing a library feature typically involves selecting component owning the feature, putting the component in “edit” mode, selecting the feature, and deleting the feature using the context of the top level assembly. The following API functions may be used:
-
- objComponent.Select2 False, 0
- Assembly.EditPart2 True, True, lngErr
- Assembly.ClearSelection
- Assembly.SelectByID strFeatureName & “@” & objComponentPath,
- “BODYFEATURE”, 0, 0, 0
- Assembly.DeleteSelection False
- Assembly.EditAssembly
- Assembly.EditRebuild3
- Setting a part dimension typically involves setting the read-only status of the dimension to false, setting the system value for the dimension, and resetting the read-only status of the dimension to true (this is because all dimensions controlled by the knowledge management application are preferably maintained as read-only to prevent modification through the CAD system). A dimension is typically references by a string (e.g. D1@Sketch1). The following API functions may be used:
-
- objDoc.Parameter(strDimension).ReadOnly=False
- objDoc.Parameter(strDimension).SystemValue=varValue
- objDoc.Parameter(strDimension).ReadOnly=True
- Setting an assembly dimension typically involves all of the steps for setting an assembly dimension, except Parameter is additionally checked for existence on the components. The following API functions may be used:
-
- objDoc.Parameter(strDimension & “@” & strComponent).ReadOnly=False
- objDoc.Parameter(strDimension & “@” & strComponent).SystemValue=varValue
- objDoc.Parameter(strDimension & “@” & strComponent).ReadOnly=True OR
- objDoc.Parameter(strDimension & “@” & strComponent & “.Part”).ReadOnly=False
- objDoc.Parameter(strDimension & “@” & strComponent & “.Part”).SystemValue=varValue
- objDoc.Parameter(strDimension & “@” & strComponent & “.Part”).ReadOnly=True OR
- objDoc.Parameter(strDimension & “@” & strComponent & “.Assembly”).ReadOnly=False
- objDoc.Parameter(strDimension & “@” & strComponent & “.Assembly”).SystemValue=varValue
- objDoc.Parameter(strDimension & “@” & strComponent & “.Assembly”).ReadOnly=True
- Creating a component pattern typically involves selecting the parent assembly, putting the parent assembly in “edit” mode, selecting the component and the feature pattern, and inserting the feature pattern. The Derived Pattern is typically renamed by traversing the parent assembly and finding the Derived Pattern using the seed component. The following API functions may be used:
-
- objComponent.Select False
- Assembly.EditAssembly
- Assembly.ClearSelection
- Assembly.SelectByID strComponentPath, “COMPONENT”, 0, 0, 0
- Assembly.AndSelectByID strPatternName & “@” & strComponentPath2, “BODYFEATURE”, 0, 0, 0
- Assembly.InsertDerivedPattern
- Set objFeature=objDoc.FirstFeature
- objFeature.GetTypeName=“DerivedSketchPattern”
- arrSeed=def.SeedComponentArray( )
- arrSeed(i).Name
- def.ReleaseSelectionAccess
- Set objFeature=objFeature.GetNextFeature
- Removing a component pattern typically involves selecting the Derived Pattern from the parent model document and deleting the selection. In some models, the referenced configuration may need to be reset to prevent future selections from failing on this part. The following API functions may be used:
-
- oParentDoc.ClearSelection
- oParentDoc.SelectByID strPatternName, “COMPPATTERN”, 0, 0, 0
- oParentDoc.DeleteSelection False
- oParentComponent.ReferencedConfiguration=
- Assembly.EditRebuild3
- The knowledge management application typically requires a part for each feature in the pattern, and maintains a property containing the X and Y coordinates for each feature. In order to create a feature pattern, the is activated and is used to select the Sketch Pattern. A point for each component required is created, it's identifier is stored, the Sketch is inserted, and the document rebuilt. The Sketch and Feature are selected and a Pattern is created. The Sketch Pattern is then found and renamed by traversing the Document and finding the Pattern using the seed feature. The following API functions may be used:
-
- SW.ActivateDoc2 objDoc.GetTitle, True, lngErr
- objDoc.ClearSelection
- objDoc.SelectByID strSketchName, “SKETCH”, 0, 0, 0
- objDoc.SetAddToDB True
- objDoc.EditSketch
- Set oPoint=objDoc.CreatePoint2(lngX, lngY, 0)
- arrPointID=oPoint.GetId( )
- objDoc.InsertSketch
- objDoc.EditRebuild3
- objDoc.SelectByID strSketch, “SKETCH”, 0, 0, 0
- objDoc.AndSelectByID strFeature, “BODYFEATURE”, 0, 0, 0
- objDoc.ActivateSelectedFeature
-
objDoc.FeatureSketchDrivenPattern 1 - Set objFeature=objDoc.FirstFeature
- objFeature.GetTypeName=“SketchPattern”
- arrSeed=def.PatternFeatureArray( )
- Set subFeature=arrSeed(i)
- objModelDoc.GetEntityName(subFeature)=strSeedName
- def.ReleaseSelectionAccess
- Set objFeature=objFeature.GetNextFeature
- SW.ActivateDoc2 Assembly.GetTitle, True, lngErr
- SW.CloseDoc objDoc.GetTitle
- Removing a point in a sketch typically involves opening the document containing the sketch, putting the sketch in “edit” mode, traversing the sketch points to find the point with the corresponding identifier, selecting the point, and deleting the selected point. The following API functions may be used:
-
- SW.ActivateDoc2 objDoc.GetTitle, True, lngErr
- objDoc.ClearSelection
- objDoc.SelectByID strSketchName, “SKETCH”, 0, 0, 0
- objDoc.EditSketch
- Set oSketch=objModelDoc.GetActiveSketch2( )
- arrPoints=oSketch.GetSketchPoints
- arrID=arrPoints(i).GetId
- arrPoints(i).Select2 False, 0
- objDoc.DeleteSelection False
- objDoc.InsertSketch
- objDoc.EditRebuild3
- SW.ActivateDoc2 Assembly.GetTitle, True, lngErr
- SW.CloseDoc objDoc.GetTitle
- Removing a feature pattern typically involves selecting the derived pattern from the parent model document and deleting the selected derived pattern. The following API functions may be used:
-
- oParentDoc.ClearSelection
- oParentDoc.SelectByID strPatternName, “BODYFEATURE”, 0, 0, 0
- oParentDoc.DeleteSelection False
- Assembly.EditRebuild3
- Setting a custom property typically involves verifying the value and setting the value if necessary. The following API functions may be used:
-
- objDoc.GetCustominfoValue(“ ”, strName) ovarArgument
- objDoc.CustomInfo2(“ ”, strName)=varArgument
-
Assembly.EditRebuild 3
- Setting a component color typically involves retrieving the MaterialPropertyValues for the component from the component or the model document, changing the first three elements in the array to reflect the new color, and setting the new MaterialPropertyValues on the component. If the color is being removed, the RemoveMaterialProperty is called. The following API functions may be used:
-
- arr=objComponent.MaterialPropertyValues( )
- arr=objComponent.GetModelDoc.MaterialPropertyValues( )
- objComponent.MaterialPropertyValues=arr
-
Assembly.EditRebuild 3 - objComponent.RemoveMaterialProperty
- Closing SOLIDWORKS™ typically involves closing the top level assembly (which is typically the only one open at this point) and calling the Exit App API function.
- The following API functions may be used:
-
-
- SW.QuitDoc strTitle
- SW.ExitApp
- Various aspects of an exemplary embodiment of the present invention are described hereinafter with reference to modeling a fan. In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, a fan includes various sub-parts, including a fan assembly, a housing assembly, a motor assembly, and a mounting assembly. Certain components of the fan might have fixed characteristics. For example, a company might purchase three different motors that can be used in a fan, and these motors have fixed dimensions that cannot be changed in the model. CAD models of the motors may be created in the CAD system and imported into the knowledge management application for storage by the knowledge storage application. Other components of the fan might have characteristics that can be determined dynamically during modeling. For example, the dimensions of a fan hub might depend on the motor selected for the model. Models of these components might be created in the CAD system and imported into the knowledge management application, or rules for defining these components might be established. For purposes of the following example, the CAD system is presumed to be the SOLIDWORKS™ three-dimensional CAD system.
-
FIG. 5 shows an exemplaryuser interface screenshot 500 for importing information from the CAD system relating to a mounting assembly, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Thescreenshot 500 displays, among other things, a hierarchicalpart family tree 510 showing that a BuildingServicesFan part family includes sub-parts entitled FanAssembly, HousingAssembly, MotorAssembly, and MountingAssembly, with the sub-parts having their own part families entitled Rotor, Housing, Motor, and Mounting, respectively. Thescreenshot 500 shows information relating to the MountingAssembly sub-part (as indicated by the MountingAssembly sub-part being highlighted in the part family tree 510), including a list of allspecifications 520 relating to the MountingAssembly sub-part and awindow 530 for entering information about the MountingAssembly sub-part. Thescreenshot 500 also includes atoolbar 540 from which various functions of the knowledge management application (such as creating a new part family, sub-part, property, connection, or CAD specification) can be accessed using either pull-down menus or icons. Thewindow 530 includes aportion 531 showing that there is a single valid part family entitled Mounting associated with the MountingAssembly sub-part. It should be noted that there could be multiple part families associated with the MountingAssembly sub-part, and all valid part families would be displayed in theportion 531. Thewindow 530 also includes aportion 532 for defining a rule to determine the optimal part family for a particular model (in this case, the optimal part family is the Mounting part family by default). - In order to associate a mounting component defined in the CAD system with the Mounting part family, the user might highlight “Mounting” in the
part family tree 510 and then select a function from thetoolbar 540 to create a new geometric specification (this function can be accessed from either the File menu or an icon on the toolbar).FIG. 6 shows an exemplaryuser interface screenshot 600 for defining a new geometric specification relating to the Mounting part family, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Thescreenshot 600 shows information relating to the Mounting part family of the MountingAssembly sub-part (as indicated by the Mounting part family being highlighted in the part family tree 610), including a list of allspecifications 620 relating to the Mounting part family and awindow 630 for entering the new geometric specification for the Mounting part family. Thewindow 630 shows the geometry type 631 (in this case, “SolidWorks”) and a list of valid CAD part files 632 associated with the Mounting part family (in this case, none have yet been specified). - In order to associate a CAD part file with the Mounting part family, the user might select the “add part file”
control 633 and enter the name of a CAD part file, in which case the knowledge management application imports from the CAD system information relating to the specified CAD part file. The knowledge management application preferably displays a list of parameters defined for the part in the CAD part file.FIG. 7 shows an exemplaryuser interface screenshot 700 displaying information upon entry of the name of a new CAD part file, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Thescreenshot 700 shows thepart family tree 710, a list of allspecifications 720 relating to the Mounting part family, awindow 730 showing the new valid part file (Mounting-Aero.SLDPR), and awindow 740 displaying a list of parameters defined for the part in the CAD part file. - Once the CAD part file has been associated with the Mounting part family, the user typically defines various geometry features and associates the geometry features with specific CAD parts. In order to define a geometry feature and associate the geometry feature with one or more specific CAD parts, the user might select a function from the
toolbar 750 to create a new geometry feature (this function can be accessed from either the File menu or an icon on the toolbar).FIG. 8 shows an exemplaryuser interface screenshot 800 for defining a geometry feature, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Thescreenshot 800 includes awindow 840 for defining a geometry feature and associating the geometry feature with one or more specific CAD parts. In this case, a geometry feature having adisplay name 842 HubDiameter and asystem name HubDiameter 843 is associated with a corresponding CAD part entitled HubDiameter by specifying a formula inportion 844. -
FIG. 9 shows an exemplaryuser interface screenshot 900 showing geometry features (properties) defined for the CAD part file, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Thescreenshot 900 shows thepart family tree 910, a list of allspecifications 920 relating to the Mounting part family, and awindow 930 including aproperties portion 931 showing the geometry features associated with specific CAD parts (in this case, a HubDiameter geometry feature and a MountingDiameter geometry feature). - After the geometry features have been defined and associated with corresponding CAD parts, the user typically defines any mating rules associated with the CAD parts file. In order to define a mating, the user may select a function from the toolbar 950 (this function can be accessed from either the File menu or an icon on the toolbar).
FIG. 10 shows an exemplaryuser interface screenshot 1000 for defining a mating, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Thescreenshot 1000 shows thepart family tree 1010, a list of allspecifications 1020 relating to the Mounting part family, apart file window 1030, and awindow 1040 for entering mating information. -
FIG. 11 shows an exemplaryuser interface screenshot 1100 showing mating definitions, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Thescreenshot 1100 shows thepart family tree 1110, a list of allspecifications 1120 relating to the Mounting part family, and awindow 1130 displaying various mating (orientation)definitions 1131 for the CAD part. - As discussed above, the user can establish rules for attributes that may be difficult or impossible to model in the CAD system, including certain geometric attributes (such as “negative” attributes), certain geometry-based attributes that are not modeled as physical features of a structure or assembly, and non-geometric attributes (such as pricing and processes). For example, continuing with the fan modeling scenario above, it might be useful to establish a rule for computing a non-modeled geometry-based attribute, such as area covered by the sweep of the fan blade component when rotating. While this fan area might be useful, for example, for computing the volume of air moved by a fan blade component having a specified number of blades rotating at a specified rate, the fan area is typically not modeled as a physical feature of the fan.
FIG. 12 shows an exemplaryuser interface screenshot 1200 showing a rule for determining a fan area for the fan, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Thescreenshot 1200 shows the part family tree 1210 (with the part family BuildingServicesFan highlighted), a list of allspecifications 1220 relating to the BuildingServicesFan part family (with the FanArea specification highlighted), and awindow 1230 displaying therule 1240 for determining the fan area based on the diameter of the fan blade component. The user can establish other rules that utilize this FanArea value. - After component information has been imported from the CAD system and modeling rules have been established, the knowledge management application controls the CAD system through its API to produce a geometric model according to predetermined specifications. The specifications can be incorporated into the rules and/or provided by a user at run time. The CAD model may be produced for display to the user via the graphical user interface, or may be produced solely for the knowledge management application to obtain model-related information from the CAD system. As an example of the former, the knowledge management application can control the CAD system to generate a model and then produce a graphical display through the graphical user interface including a graphical representation of the model as generated by the CAD system (e.g., by displaying a display window generated by the computer-aided design system), with or without related information from the knowledge management system. As an example of the latter, the knowledge management application can control the CAD system to generate a model and then control the CAD system to compute the surface area of a component for a cost estimate to be produced by the knowledge management application.
-
FIG. 13 shows an exemplaryuser interface screenshot 1300 including an embedded graphical representation of a model generated by the CAD system, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Thescreenshot 1300 shows the part family tree 1310 (with the part family BuildingServicesFan highlighted), a list of allspecifications 1320 relating to the BuildingServicesFan part family, and awindow 1330 including aportion 1340 including a graphical representation of the model generated by the CAD system. - The user can specify how information is to be displayed by the knowledge management application. For example, the user can specify that the CAD system window be displayed under some conditions but not others, and can also specify what knowledge management system information to display along with the CAD system window.
-
FIG. 14 shows a first exemplaryuser interface screenshot 1400 including a sub-window generated by the CAD system, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Thescreenshot 1400 displays afunction list 1410, information from theknowledge management system 1430, and a sub-window 1440 generated by the CAD system including a graphical representation of the model generated by the CAD system and controls for manipulating the model. -
FIG. 15 shows a second exemplaryuser interface screenshot 1500 including a sub-window generated by the CAD system, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Thescreenshot 1500 displays afunction list 1510, apart family tree 1520, information from theknowledge management system 1530, a sub-window 1540 generated by the CAD system including a graphical representation of the model generated by the CAD system and controls for manipulating the model, andproperties information 1550. -
FIG. 16 shows a third exemplaryuser interface screenshot 1600 including a full view window generated by the CAD system, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Thescreenshot 1600 displays afunction list 1610 and afull view window 1630 generated by the CAD system. - In certain embodiments of the invention, the user can make rule changes on the fly, and the knowledge management application will control the CAD system to update the model accordingly and will display the updated graphical representation of the model to the user substantially in real time. In this way, the user essentially gets immediate feedback regarding the rule change.
- In certain embodiments of the invention, changes to a model can be made in the CAD system, and the knowledge management application will identify those changes through interactions with the CAD system and will modify and apply rules accordingly. For example, if the user makes a change in the CAD system that overrides a particular rule, the knowledge management application might cause appropriate tracking information to be stored by the knowledge storage application, create one or more revised rules that reflect the change, and apply other rules to update other components of the model according to the rules. The manner in which the knowledge management application can identify CAD system changes depends to a large degree on the CAD system API. For example, the CAD system might communicate the changes to the knowledge management application, or the knowledge management application might monitor or poll the CAD system for changes.
- In certain embodiments of the invention, the knowledge management application can cause a particular model part displayed in the CAD system window to be displayed or highlighted when the user is working on rules relating to that part. For example, with reference again to
FIG. 13 , if the user selects the Motor part family in thepart family tree 1310, the knowledge management application might cause the motor to be highlighted in thewindow 1340, for example, by changing the color of the motor. - In certain embodiments of the invention, the knowledge management application can cause information relating to a particular model part to be displayed when the user highlights that part in the CAD system window. For example, with reference again to
FIG. 13 , if the user highlights the fan blade component in theCAD window 1340, the knowledge management application might cause information relating to the fan blade component to be displayed in thewindow 1330, with appropriate highlighting in thepart family tree 1310 and the list ofspecifications 1320. - As discussed above, the knowledge management application can interoperate with two-dimensional CAD systems as well as three-dimensional CAD systems. In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the knowledge management application supports both the two-dimensional CAD system VISIO™ and the three-dimensional CAD system SOLIDWORKS™.
-
FIG. 17 shows an exemplaryuser interface screenshot 1700 including a window generated by a two-dimensional CAD system, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Thescreenshot 1700 displays afunction list 1710, apart family tree 1720, aCAD system window 1740, andproperties information 1750. - The knowledge management application can also interoperate with various analysis applications. Typically, the knowledge management application exports information to the analysis application for analysis. The knowledge management application can display analysis information to the user.
-
FIG. 18 shows an exemplaryuser interface screenshot 1800 including an analysis window, such as might be generated by the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Thescreenshot 1800 displays afunction list 1810, apart family tree 1820, aCAD system window 1840,properties information 1850, and ananalysis window 1860 generated by the analysis application. - Thus, in certain embodiments of the present invention, structures are defined in a CAD system and are associated with a structure class. Rules are defined for the structure class. When one of the structures is selected by the knowledge management system for a computer-aided design model, the rules are applied to the selected structure. These class-based rules make it easier for the user to define rules, since a single rule defined by the user gets applied to an entire class of structures, and therefore the user does not have to define the rule individually for each structure of the structure class.
-
FIG. 21 is a logic flow diagram showingexemplary logic 2100 for class-based rules in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Starting inblock 2102, structures (such as parts for an assembly) are defined in a CAD system, inblock 2104. The structures are associated with a structure class (such as a part family) in a knowledge management system, inblock 2106. At least one rule is defined that applies to the structure class, inblock 2108. When one of the structures is selected for a computer-aided design model by the knowledge management system, inblock 2110, the knowledge management system applies the rule(s) to the selected structure, inblock 2112. Thelogic 2100 ends inblock 2199. - As discussed above, the knowledge management application obtains a set of rules from a central database. The set of rules may include rules relating to geometric and non-geometric attributes. The non-geometric attributes may be dependent on geometric attributes. The knowledge management application generates instructions for modeling a geometric structure based on the set of rules. The knowledge management application communicates the instructions to a computer-aided design system, typically through an API of the computer-aided design system. The knowledge management application may produce a graphical display on a graphical user interface including information from the knowledge management system as well as information from the computer-aided design system (such as a graphical representation of a geometric model).
-
FIG. 22 is a logic flow diagram showingexemplary logic 2200 for the knowledge management application in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Starting inblock 2202, the logic obtains a set of rules from a central database, inblock 2204. The logic generates instructions for modeling a geometric structure based on the set of rules, inblock 2206. The logic communicates the instructions to a computer-aided design system, inblock 2208, typically through an application program interface of the computer-aided design system. The logic may produce a graphical display on a graphical user interface including a first portion including information from the knowledge management application and a second portion including information from the computer-aided design system, inblock 2210. The logic ends inblock 2299. - It should be noted that the logic flow diagrams are used herein to demonstrate various aspects of the invention, and should not be construed to limit the present invention to any particular logic flow or logic implementation. The described logic may be partitioned into different logic blocks (e.g., programs, modules, functions, or subroutines) without changing the overall results or otherwise departing from the true scope of the invention. Often times, logic elements may be added, modified, omitted, performed in a different order, or implemented using different logic constructs (e.g., logic gates, looping primitives, conditional logic, and other logic constructs) without changing the overall results or otherwise departing from the true scope of the invention.
- The present invention may be embodied in many different forms, including, but in no way limited to, computer program logic for use with a processor (e.g., a microprocessor, microcontroller, digital signal processor, or general purpose computer), programmable logic for use with a programmable logic device (e.g., a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) or other PLD), discrete components, integrated circuitry (e.g., an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC)), or any other means including any combination thereof. In a typical embodiment of the present invention, predominantly all of the knowledge management system applications are implemented as a set of computer program instructions that are executed by a computer under the control of an operating system.
- Computer program logic implementing all or part of the functionality previously described herein may be embodied in various forms, including, but in no way limited to, a source code form, a computer executable form, and various intermediate forms (e.g., forms generated by an assembler, compiler, linker, or locator). Source code may include a series of computer program instructions implemented in any of various programming languages (e.g., an object code, an assembly language, or a high-level language such as Fortran, C, C++, JAVA, or HTML) for use with various operating systems or operating environments. The source code may define and use various data structures and communication messages. The source code may be in a computer executable form (e.g., via an interpreter), or the source code may be converted (e.g., via a translator, assembler, or compiler) into a computer executable form.
- The computer program may be fixed in any form (e.g., source code form, computer executable form, or an intermediate form) either permanently or transitorily in a tangible storage medium, such as a semiconductor memory device (e.g., a RAM, ROM, PROM, EEPROM, or Flash-Programmable RAM), a magnetic memory device (e.g., a diskette or fixed disk), an optical memory device (e.g., a CD-ROM), a PC card (e.g., PCMCIA card), or other memory device. The computer program may be fixed in any form in a signal that is transmittable to a computer using any of various communication technologies, including, but in no way limited to, analog technologies, digital technologies, optical technologies, wireless technologies (e.g., Bluetooth), networking technologies, and internetworking technologies. The computer program may be distributed in any form as a removable storage medium with accompanying printed or electronic documentation (e.g., shrink wrapped software), preloaded with a computer system (e.g., on system ROM or fixed disk), or distributed from a server or electronic bulletin board over the communication system (e.g., the Internet or World Wide Web).
- Hardware logic (including programmable logic for use with a programmable logic device) implementing all or part of the functionality previously described herein may be designed using traditional manual methods, or may be designed, captured, simulated, or documented electronically using various tools, such as Computer Aided Design (CAD), a hardware description language (e.g., VHDL or AHDL), or a PLD programming language (e.g., PALASM, ABEL, or CUPL).
- Programmable logic may be fixed either permanently or transitorily in a tangible storage medium, such as a semiconductor memory device (e.g., a RAM, ROM, PROM, EEPROM, or Flash-Programmable RAM), a magnetic memory device (e.g., a diskette or fixed disk), an optical memory device (e.g., a CD-ROM), or other memory device. The programmable logic may be fixed in a signal that is transmittable to a computer using any of various communication technologies, including, but in no way limited to, analog technologies, digital technologies, optical technologies, wireless technologies (e.g., Bluetooth), networking technologies, and internetworking technologies. The programmable logic may be distributed as a removable storage medium with accompanying printed or electronic documentation (e.g., shrink wrapped software), preloaded with a computer system (e.g., on system ROM or fixed disk), or distributed from a server or electronic bulletin board over the communication system (e.g., the Internet or World Wide Web).
- The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the true scope of the invention. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive.
Claims (66)
Priority Applications (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/675,809 US20050071135A1 (en) | 2003-09-30 | 2003-09-30 | Knowledge management system for computer-aided design modeling |
US10/818,475 US20050071136A1 (en) | 2003-09-30 | 2004-04-05 | Knowledge management system with interactive rule changes for computer-aided design modeling |
PCT/US2004/031644 WO2005033985A1 (en) | 2003-09-30 | 2004-09-22 | Knowledge management system for computer-aided design modeling |
US12/444,890 US8762877B2 (en) | 2003-09-30 | 2009-02-13 | Creation and modification of valid functional design layouts |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/675,809 US20050071135A1 (en) | 2003-09-30 | 2003-09-30 | Knowledge management system for computer-aided design modeling |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/818,475 Continuation-In-Part US20050071136A1 (en) | 2003-09-30 | 2004-04-05 | Knowledge management system with interactive rule changes for computer-aided design modeling |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20050071135A1 true US20050071135A1 (en) | 2005-03-31 |
Family
ID=34377277
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/675,809 Abandoned US20050071135A1 (en) | 2003-09-30 | 2003-09-30 | Knowledge management system for computer-aided design modeling |
US12/444,890 Active US8762877B2 (en) | 2003-09-30 | 2009-02-13 | Creation and modification of valid functional design layouts |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/444,890 Active US8762877B2 (en) | 2003-09-30 | 2009-02-13 | Creation and modification of valid functional design layouts |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US20050071135A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2005033985A1 (en) |
Cited By (75)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20030220911A1 (en) * | 2002-05-23 | 2003-11-27 | Tompras Anthony D. | Solid model library tool |
US20050120010A1 (en) * | 2003-11-20 | 2005-06-02 | Apriori Technologies, Inc. | System and method for determining costs within an enterprise |
US20060020629A1 (en) * | 2004-03-01 | 2006-01-26 | Karthik Ramani | Multi-tier and multi-domain distributed rapid product configuration and design system |
US20060041842A1 (en) * | 2004-08-17 | 2006-02-23 | Loberg Barrie A | Capturing a user's intent in design software |
US20060059011A1 (en) * | 2004-09-15 | 2006-03-16 | Karen Ulreich | Systems for automated proposal generation |
US20060058993A1 (en) * | 2004-09-15 | 2006-03-16 | Karen Ulreich | Methods for automated proposal generation |
US20060080279A1 (en) * | 2004-10-13 | 2006-04-13 | Jones Ryan K | Customized and customizable engineering calculation and project detailing system |
US20060206225A1 (en) * | 2005-03-11 | 2006-09-14 | Wright Anthony P | Automatic data configuration strategy, such as for storing and manipulating product manufacturing data |
US20060267980A1 (en) * | 2005-05-30 | 2006-11-30 | Fujitsu Limited | CAD method, CAD system and program storage medium storing CAD program thereof |
US20070008621A1 (en) * | 2005-07-07 | 2007-01-11 | Naoyuki Satoh | Selection of a part in image showing three dimensional object |
US20070013709A1 (en) * | 2004-12-20 | 2007-01-18 | Bernard Charles | Process and system for rendering an object in a view using a product lifecycle management database |
US20070094175A1 (en) * | 2005-08-17 | 2007-04-26 | Tacton Systems Ab | Configuration assistance for complex products |
WO2007020231A3 (en) * | 2005-08-18 | 2007-05-03 | Pace Aerospace Engineering And | System for the computer-aided design of technical devices |
US20070120875A1 (en) * | 2005-11-30 | 2007-05-31 | Symons Corporation | Computer aided design interface |
WO2007093060A1 (en) | 2006-02-16 | 2007-08-23 | Dirtt Environmental Solutions, Ltd. | Integrating object-oriented design software with record-based cad software |
US20080077902A1 (en) * | 2006-09-26 | 2008-03-27 | Ichiro Harashima | Method of Determining Range Of Change in Design, Design Change Range Determining Apparatus, and Design Change Range Determining System |
US20080148297A1 (en) * | 2006-12-14 | 2008-06-19 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Application management system and method of controlling the same |
US20080234991A1 (en) * | 2005-08-17 | 2008-09-25 | Tomas Axling | Customizing of computer aided design models |
WO2008118952A1 (en) * | 2007-03-26 | 2008-10-02 | Hntb Holdings Ltd | Bridge information modeling |
US20090033656A1 (en) * | 2007-07-30 | 2009-02-05 | Larkins Darren | Database driven relational object modeling and design system, method and software |
US20090060393A1 (en) * | 2007-08-28 | 2009-03-05 | Naoyuki Satoh | Image searching device, image searching method, image searching program, and recording medium recording the image searching program |
US20090259440A1 (en) * | 2008-04-14 | 2009-10-15 | Reed Darwin G | Part standard geometry management in a computer aided design system |
WO2010022439A1 (en) * | 2008-08-26 | 2010-03-04 | Cinergix Pty Ltd | Modelling of systems |
US20100114355A1 (en) * | 2008-11-04 | 2010-05-06 | Ichiro Harashima | Method and system for management of manufacturing information |
US20100191360A1 (en) * | 2007-07-25 | 2010-07-29 | Object Geometries Ltd. | Solid freeform fabrication using a plurality of modeling materials |
US20100268513A1 (en) * | 2006-02-16 | 2010-10-21 | Dirtt Environmental Solutions Ltd. | Rendering and modifying cad design entities in object-oriented applications |
WO2011051639A1 (en) * | 2009-10-30 | 2011-05-05 | Centre Scientifique Et Technique Du Batiment (Cstb) | Configuration of construction products for a digital building model |
US20110130855A1 (en) * | 2009-10-02 | 2011-06-02 | Philpott Michael L | Template framework for automated process routing |
US20110191706A1 (en) * | 2004-08-17 | 2011-08-04 | Dirtt Environmental Solutions Ltd. | Automatically creating and modifying furniture layouts in design software |
US20110225208A1 (en) * | 2010-03-12 | 2011-09-15 | Intergraph Technologies Company | Integrated GIS System with Interactive 3D Interface |
WO2012058604A2 (en) * | 2010-10-28 | 2012-05-03 | Parametric Technology Corporation | Methods and systems for computer-aided design |
US20120109591A1 (en) * | 2010-10-28 | 2012-05-03 | Brian Thompson | Methods and systems for enforcing parametric constraints in a direct modeling interface in computer-aided design |
US8204902B1 (en) | 2009-02-27 | 2012-06-19 | Emergent Systems Corporation | Dynamic ranking of experts in a knowledge management system |
US20120253763A1 (en) * | 2011-03-30 | 2012-10-04 | The Boeing Company | Model Management for Computer Aided Design Systems |
US20120268463A1 (en) * | 2009-11-24 | 2012-10-25 | Ice Edge Business Solutions | Securely sharing design renderings over a network |
US8301419B1 (en) | 2009-10-09 | 2012-10-30 | The Boeing Company | Managing information for generating models of parts |
WO2012148680A1 (en) * | 2011-04-29 | 2012-11-01 | Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc. | Interactive configuration-management-based diagramming tool |
US8347236B1 (en) | 2009-02-24 | 2013-01-01 | Emergent Systems Corporation | Client server interface for a knowledge management system |
US20130024836A1 (en) * | 2010-11-22 | 2013-01-24 | Jason Adam Koerner | Interactive Graphical Construction of Parametric Components of Typical Cross Section Frameworks |
US20130097489A1 (en) * | 2011-10-14 | 2013-04-18 | Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc. | Drawing automation in computer aided design systems |
US20130132424A1 (en) * | 2011-11-23 | 2013-05-23 | Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc. | Massive model visualization with spatial indexing |
US8589128B2 (en) | 2010-10-28 | 2013-11-19 | Parametric Technology Corporation | Methods and systems for creation of a dynamically configurable product design |
US8762877B2 (en) | 2003-09-30 | 2014-06-24 | Ice Edge Business Solutions Ltd. | Creation and modification of valid functional design layouts |
US20140180646A1 (en) * | 2012-12-20 | 2014-06-26 | Dassault Systemes | Designing An Assembly Of Parts In A Three-Dimensional Scene |
US20140200862A1 (en) * | 2013-01-11 | 2014-07-17 | Tekla Corporation | Drawings and computer-aided modeling |
US8818769B2 (en) | 2010-10-28 | 2014-08-26 | Parametric Technology Corporation | Methods and systems for managing synchronization of a plurality of information items of a computer-aided design data model |
US8843884B1 (en) * | 2009-11-23 | 2014-09-23 | Jason Adam Koerner | Interactive graphical construction of parametric components of typical cross section frameworks |
US8892404B2 (en) | 2010-10-28 | 2014-11-18 | Parametric Technology Corporation | Methods and systems for consistent concurrent operation of a plurality of computer-aided design applications |
US8890867B2 (en) | 2010-10-28 | 2014-11-18 | Parametric Technology Corporation | Methods and systems for dynamically loading portions of a computer-aided design model on demand |
US20150324491A1 (en) * | 2014-05-09 | 2015-11-12 | Autodesk, Inc | Techniques for using controlled natural language to capture design intent for computer-aided design |
US9189571B2 (en) | 2011-06-11 | 2015-11-17 | Ice Edge Business Solutions, Ltd. | Automated re-use of structural components |
US20150363513A1 (en) * | 2014-06-13 | 2015-12-17 | Wolfram Alpha Llc | Method and system for designing products |
US9230043B2 (en) * | 2004-11-25 | 2016-01-05 | Jukka Suomi | Computer-aided modeling |
US9361585B1 (en) * | 2008-10-31 | 2016-06-07 | Emergent Systems Corporation | Method for determining data quality in a knowledge management system |
US20160314626A1 (en) * | 2015-04-23 | 2016-10-27 | Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc. | Massive model visualization with a product lifecycle management system |
US9519407B2 (en) | 2008-03-11 | 2016-12-13 | Ice Edge Business Solutions, Ltd. | Automatically creating and modifying furniture layouts in design software |
EP3005180A4 (en) * | 2013-05-31 | 2017-01-11 | Dirtt Environmental Solutions, Ltd. | Automatically incorporating third party features into a computer design schematic |
US9600770B1 (en) | 2014-02-13 | 2017-03-21 | Emergent Systems Corporation | Method for determining expertise of users in a knowledge management system |
US20170329867A1 (en) * | 2016-05-13 | 2017-11-16 | Cognitive Scale, Inc. | Ingesting a Natural Language Query into a Cognitive Graph |
US10037403B2 (en) | 2014-01-13 | 2018-07-31 | The Boeing Company | Method and system for managing aircraft parts |
CN108573112A (en) * | 2018-05-08 | 2018-09-25 | 北京特种工程设计研究院 | Aerospace test based on digitalized artificial emits two dimensional topology analysis method |
CN109359434A (en) * | 2018-12-11 | 2019-02-19 | 北京市政路桥股份有限公司 | Falsework system derivative design method |
US10318661B2 (en) * | 2016-07-27 | 2019-06-11 | Applied Software Technology, Inc. | Managing custom REVIT inheritance-based assembly families for manufacturing |
US20190213287A1 (en) * | 2018-01-08 | 2019-07-11 | Nuvolo Technologies Corporation | Space profile interpreter framework for a computer file |
WO2019152769A1 (en) * | 2018-02-05 | 2019-08-08 | Advanced Solutions Life Sciences, Llc | System and workstation for the design, fabrication and assembly of 3-dimensional constructs |
US20190303620A1 (en) * | 2018-03-27 | 2019-10-03 | Desprez, Llc | Systems for secure collaborative graphical design using secret sharing |
US10558199B2 (en) * | 2018-02-13 | 2020-02-11 | University Of Central Florida Research Foundation, Inc. | Method for the design and manufacture of composites having tunable physical properties |
US10573059B2 (en) | 2018-03-27 | 2020-02-25 | Desprez, Llc | Methods of secret sharing for secure collaborative graphical design |
US20200134560A1 (en) * | 2018-10-29 | 2020-04-30 | DIGIBILT, Inc. | Method and system for automatically creating a bill of materials |
US10922450B2 (en) | 2014-06-09 | 2021-02-16 | Dirtt Environmental Solutions, Ltd. | Associating computer-executable objects with timber frames within an architectural design environment |
US20210081582A1 (en) * | 2019-09-18 | 2021-03-18 | Bricsys Nv | Automated detail adaptation and insertion in a cad model |
US11030709B2 (en) | 2018-10-29 | 2021-06-08 | DIGIBILT, Inc. | Method and system for automatically creating and assigning assembly labor activities (ALAs) to a bill of materials (BOM) |
US11161308B2 (en) | 2007-07-25 | 2021-11-02 | Stratasys Ltd. | Solid freeform fabrication using a plurality of modeling materials |
US20210382884A1 (en) * | 2020-06-08 | 2021-12-09 | aPriori, Inc. | Insight generation based on retrieved plm data |
US11676106B2 (en) | 2020-10-14 | 2023-06-13 | Streamlinx Llc | Method and system for managing and sourcing materials and services for energy retrofit projects |
Families Citing this family (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9613458B2 (en) * | 2010-05-20 | 2017-04-04 | Mechanical Software Technologies, Inc. | Self drawing tool for a computer-implemented automated design, modeling and manufacturing system |
US9128733B2 (en) * | 2010-11-12 | 2015-09-08 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Display and resolution of incompatible layout constraints |
FI20125644L (en) * | 2012-06-12 | 2013-12-13 | Tekla Corp | Computer-aided modeling |
US20140280804A1 (en) * | 2013-03-13 | 2014-09-18 | Dell Products L.P. | Relationship driven dynamic workflow system |
US9785727B1 (en) | 2014-01-10 | 2017-10-10 | Verso Furniture, Inc. | Method and system of assembly design |
US9529951B2 (en) | 2014-05-29 | 2016-12-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Synthesis tuning system for VLSI design optimization |
US10404938B1 (en) | 2015-12-22 | 2019-09-03 | Steelcase Inc. | Virtual world method and system for affecting mind state |
US10181218B1 (en) | 2016-02-17 | 2019-01-15 | Steelcase Inc. | Virtual affordance sales tool |
US10380273B2 (en) | 2016-03-31 | 2019-08-13 | M.C. Dean Inc. | System and method for testing the validity of BIM-designed electrical wiring pathways |
US10182210B1 (en) | 2016-12-15 | 2019-01-15 | Steelcase Inc. | Systems and methods for implementing augmented reality and/or virtual reality |
US11567636B2 (en) * | 2018-03-07 | 2023-01-31 | Lutron Technology Company Llc | Configuring a load control system |
EP3640767A1 (en) * | 2018-10-17 | 2020-04-22 | Siemens Schweiz AG | Method for determining at least one area in at least one input model for at least one element to be placed |
US10902580B2 (en) * | 2019-04-18 | 2021-01-26 | Applied Software Technology, Inc. | Auto-dimensioning REVIT models |
US11244084B2 (en) | 2019-04-18 | 2022-02-08 | Applied Software Technology, Inc. | Spool sheet generation |
US11100257B2 (en) | 2019-04-18 | 2021-08-24 | Applied Software Technology, Inc. | Spool run route finding in CAD systems |
US20230359790A1 (en) * | 2022-05-05 | 2023-11-09 | D.TO, Inc | Apparatus and methods for determining and solving design problems using machine learning |
Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5293479A (en) * | 1991-07-08 | 1994-03-08 | Quintero Smith Incorporated | Design tool and method for preparing parametric assemblies |
US5355445A (en) * | 1991-04-25 | 1994-10-11 | Mitsui Petrochemical Industries, Ltd. | Knowledge base management system for an information reasoning apparatus |
US5455599A (en) * | 1993-11-02 | 1995-10-03 | Taligent Inc. | Object-oriented graphic system |
US20020183982A1 (en) * | 2001-03-26 | 2002-12-05 | Rauscher Thomas C. | Design and estimating tools for the design of communication infrastructure in a structure |
US6647305B1 (en) * | 2000-06-19 | 2003-11-11 | David H. Bigelow | Product design system and method |
US6725184B1 (en) * | 1999-06-30 | 2004-04-20 | Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation | Assembly and disassembly sequences of components in computerized multicomponent assembly models |
US6775581B2 (en) * | 2001-03-14 | 2004-08-10 | Delphi Technologies, Inc. | Horizontally-structured CAD/CAM modeling for virtual concurrent product and process design |
Family Cites Families (198)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4970666A (en) * | 1988-03-30 | 1990-11-13 | Land Development Laboratory, Inc. | Computerized video imaging system for creating a realistic depiction of a simulated object in an actual environment |
US5255207C1 (en) * | 1988-06-16 | 2001-01-09 | Larry Cornwell | Method for designing and detailing cabinets |
GB8822739D0 (en) | 1988-09-28 | 1988-11-23 | Zyqad Ltd | Improvements in/relating to knowledge engineering |
US5111392A (en) * | 1989-06-09 | 1992-05-05 | Steelcase Inc. | Design system for creating furniture layouts |
US5557537A (en) | 1990-07-12 | 1996-09-17 | Normann; Linda M. | Method and apparatus for designing and editing a distribution system for a building |
US6701288B1 (en) | 1990-07-12 | 2004-03-02 | First Graphics, Inc. | Method and apparatus for designing and editing a distribution system for a building |
CA2077173C (en) | 1991-11-22 | 2003-04-22 | Michael Chen | Method and apparatus for direct manipulation of 3-d objects on computer displays |
JPH0689314A (en) | 1992-04-16 | 1994-03-29 | Hitachi Ltd | Design assisting system and device therefor |
CA2134645C (en) | 1992-04-29 | 2000-04-18 | Linda M. Normann | Method and apparatus for designing and editing a distribution system for a building |
EP0621545A3 (en) * | 1993-04-21 | 1995-12-13 | Hitachi Ltd | Computer-aided design and production system for component arrangement and pipe routing. |
US5684713A (en) | 1993-06-30 | 1997-11-04 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Method and apparatus for the recursive design of physical structures |
US5625827A (en) | 1993-09-21 | 1997-04-29 | Gary M. Krause | Method and system of blueprint document manipulation |
US5514232A (en) | 1993-11-24 | 1996-05-07 | Burns; Marshall | Method and apparatus for automatic fabrication of three-dimensional objects |
US5555357A (en) * | 1994-06-03 | 1996-09-10 | Claris Corporation | Computer system and method for generating and manipulating charts and diagrams |
US5659477A (en) | 1994-12-28 | 1997-08-19 | Collins; Charles Michael | Self reproducing fundamental fabricating machines (F-Units) |
US5572639A (en) | 1995-05-08 | 1996-11-05 | Gantt; Brian D. | Method and apparatus for interactively manipulating and displaying presumptive relationships between graphic objects |
US6016147A (en) * | 1995-05-08 | 2000-01-18 | Autodesk, Inc. | Method and system for interactively determining and displaying geometric relationships between three dimensional objects based on predetermined geometric constraints and position of an input device |
US5692184A (en) | 1995-05-09 | 1997-11-25 | Intergraph Corporation | Object relationship management system |
US6020885A (en) | 1995-07-11 | 2000-02-01 | Sony Corporation | Three-dimensional virtual reality space sharing method and system using local and global object identification codes |
US6014503A (en) * | 1995-12-22 | 2000-01-11 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Computer aided building renovation supporting systems |
US5894310A (en) | 1996-04-19 | 1999-04-13 | Visionary Design Systems, Inc. | Intelligent shapes for authoring three-dimensional models |
US5977982A (en) | 1996-06-28 | 1999-11-02 | Avid Technology Inc. | System and method for modification of the visual characteristics of digital 3D objects |
US5995107A (en) | 1996-08-02 | 1999-11-30 | Autodesk, Inc. | Caching in a three dimensional modeling and animation system |
US5796401A (en) * | 1996-08-09 | 1998-08-18 | Winer; Peter W. | System for designing dynamic layouts adaptable to various display screen sizes and resolutions |
US6437805B1 (en) | 1996-09-23 | 2002-08-20 | National Instruments Corporation | System and method for accessing object capabilities in a graphical program |
US5870771A (en) | 1996-11-15 | 1999-02-09 | Oberg; Larry B. | Computerized system for selecting, adjusting, and previewing framing product combinations for artwork and other items to be framed |
WO1998033151A1 (en) | 1997-01-24 | 1998-07-30 | Sony Corporation | Device, method, and medium for generating graphic data |
KR20000064771A (en) | 1997-01-24 | 2000-11-06 | 이데이 노부유끼 | Apparatus for generating a shape data, a method for generating the shape data, and a medium thereof |
US6292810B1 (en) | 1997-03-03 | 2001-09-18 | Richard Steele Richards | Polymorphic enhanced modeling |
JP3932462B2 (en) | 1997-05-27 | 2007-06-20 | ソニー株式会社 | Client device, image display control method, shared virtual space providing device and method, and recording medium |
US6052669A (en) * | 1997-06-06 | 2000-04-18 | Haworth, Inc. | Graphical user interface supporting method and system for remote order generation of furniture products |
US6720949B1 (en) | 1997-08-22 | 2004-04-13 | Timothy R. Pryor | Man machine interfaces and applications |
US6110213A (en) * | 1997-11-06 | 2000-08-29 | Vlt Coporation | Fabrication rules based automated design and manufacturing system and method |
US20020069221A1 (en) | 1997-12-02 | 2002-06-06 | Ramana B. Rao | Method and system for representing a table with multiple focal levels |
US6037945A (en) | 1997-12-16 | 2000-03-14 | Xactware, Inc. | Graphical method for modeling and estimating construction costs |
US6446030B1 (en) * | 1998-01-24 | 2002-09-03 | Quantapoint, Inc. | Method and apparatus for establishing the layout of a building |
US6256595B1 (en) * | 1998-03-04 | 2001-07-03 | Amada Company, Limited | Apparatus and method for manually selecting, displaying, and repositioning dimensions of a part model |
US6285369B1 (en) * | 1998-05-12 | 2001-09-04 | Autodesk, Inc. | Electronic notebook for maintaining design information |
US6025849A (en) | 1998-06-01 | 2000-02-15 | Autodesk, Inc. | Framework for objects having authorable behaviors and appearance |
US6912293B1 (en) * | 1998-06-26 | 2005-06-28 | Carl P. Korobkin | Photogrammetry engine for model construction |
US6629065B1 (en) * | 1998-09-30 | 2003-09-30 | Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation | Methods and apparata for rapid computer-aided design of objects in virtual reality and other environments |
AU2382300A (en) * | 1998-12-23 | 2000-07-12 | National Institute Of Standards And Technology ("Nist") | Method and system for a virtual assembly design environment |
US6888542B1 (en) | 1999-01-27 | 2005-05-03 | Autodesk, Inc. | Error recovery in a computer aided design environment |
US7353192B1 (en) | 1999-02-16 | 2008-04-01 | Autobytel Inc. | Product configuration display system and method with user requested physical product alterations |
US6509906B1 (en) | 1999-04-29 | 2003-01-21 | Autodesk, Inc. | Display representations and streams for objects having authorable and dynamic behaviors and appearances |
US7062454B1 (en) | 1999-05-06 | 2006-06-13 | Jarbridge, Inc. | Previewing system and method |
US6493679B1 (en) | 1999-05-26 | 2002-12-10 | Wireless Valley Communications, Inc. | Method and system for managing a real time bill of materials |
US6850946B1 (en) * | 1999-05-26 | 2005-02-01 | Wireless Valley Communications, Inc. | Method and system for a building database manipulator |
US6317599B1 (en) | 1999-05-26 | 2001-11-13 | Wireless Valley Communications, Inc. | Method and system for automated optimization of antenna positioning in 3-D |
US6556211B2 (en) * | 1999-06-02 | 2003-04-29 | Punch Software, Llc | Method for constructing architectural models including scaled surface textures |
US6255207B1 (en) * | 1999-06-21 | 2001-07-03 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company | Composite planarizing dielectric layer employing high density plasma chemical vapor deposited (HDP-CVD) underlayer |
US7243054B2 (en) | 1999-07-14 | 2007-07-10 | Wireless Valley Communications, Inc. | Method and system for displaying network performance, cost, maintenance, and infrastructure wiring diagram |
US6499006B1 (en) | 1999-07-14 | 2002-12-24 | Wireless Valley Communications, Inc. | System for the three-dimensional display of wireless communication system performance |
US8397177B2 (en) | 1999-07-22 | 2013-03-12 | Tavusi Data Solutions Llc | Graphic-information flow method and system for visually analyzing patterns and relationships |
US6307573B1 (en) | 1999-07-22 | 2001-10-23 | Barbara L. Barros | Graphic-information flow method and system for visually analyzing patterns and relationships |
US8843850B2 (en) | 1999-07-22 | 2014-09-23 | Tavusi Data Solutions Llc | Graphic-information flow for visually analyzing patterns and relationships |
US7000190B2 (en) | 1999-08-19 | 2006-02-14 | National Instruments Corporation | System and method for programmatically modifying a graphical program in response to program information |
EP1098244A3 (en) | 1999-11-02 | 2001-06-13 | CANAL + Société Anonyme | Graphical user interface |
JP2001195491A (en) | 1999-11-02 | 2001-07-19 | Matsushita Electric Works Ltd | Selling support method for commodity associated with living space, method and system for charging the same and recording medium |
JP3548065B2 (en) | 1999-11-15 | 2004-07-28 | インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーション | Remote control system, server / client system, product terminal device control server, product terminal device operation method, device information sharing method, and storage medium |
US8271336B2 (en) * | 1999-11-22 | 2012-09-18 | Accenture Global Services Gmbh | Increased visibility during order management in a network-based supply chain environment |
US6727925B1 (en) * | 1999-12-20 | 2004-04-27 | Michelle Lyn Bourdelais | Browser-based room designer |
US6459435B1 (en) * | 2000-01-11 | 2002-10-01 | Bluebolt Networks, Inc. | Methods, systems and computer program products for generating storyboards of interior design surface treatments for interior spaces |
US6611725B1 (en) * | 2000-02-03 | 2003-08-26 | Solidworks Corporation | Computer drawing system |
US20010047250A1 (en) | 2000-02-10 | 2001-11-29 | Schuller Joan A. | Interactive decorating system |
US20010047251A1 (en) | 2000-03-03 | 2001-11-29 | Kemp William H. | CAD system which designs 3-D models |
US6859768B1 (en) * | 2000-03-03 | 2005-02-22 | The Beck Technology | Computer-implemented automated building design and modeling and project cost estimation and scheduling system |
US7216092B1 (en) | 2000-04-14 | 2007-05-08 | Deluxe Corporation | Intelligent personalization system and method |
US6690981B1 (en) | 2000-05-04 | 2004-02-10 | National Instruments Corporation | System and method for encapsulating user interface code for a graphical program |
US20020012007A1 (en) * | 2000-05-05 | 2002-01-31 | Twigg John M. | Internet based design/drafting system and method of use thereof |
US6651228B1 (en) | 2000-05-08 | 2003-11-18 | Real Intent, Inc. | Intent-driven functional verification of digital designs |
US6922685B2 (en) * | 2000-05-22 | 2005-07-26 | Mci, Inc. | Method and system for managing partitioned data resources |
US7039569B1 (en) * | 2000-06-09 | 2006-05-02 | Haws Richard R | Automatic adaptive dimensioning for CAD software |
JP2002041276A (en) | 2000-07-24 | 2002-02-08 | Sony Corp | Interactive operation-supporting system, interactive operation-supporting method and recording medium |
US6971063B1 (en) | 2000-07-28 | 2005-11-29 | Wireless Valley Communications Inc. | System, method, and apparatus for portable design, deployment, test, and optimization of a communication network |
US7505044B2 (en) | 2000-07-31 | 2009-03-17 | Bowsher M William | Universal ultra-high definition color, light, and object rendering, advising, and coordinating system |
US6922701B1 (en) | 2000-08-03 | 2005-07-26 | John A. Ananian | Generating cad independent interactive physical description remodeling, building construction plan database profile |
US7096173B1 (en) | 2000-08-04 | 2006-08-22 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and system for designing or deploying a communications network which allows simultaneous selection of multiple components |
US7085697B1 (en) | 2000-08-04 | 2006-08-01 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and system for designing or deploying a communications network which considers component attributes |
US7246045B1 (en) | 2000-08-04 | 2007-07-17 | Wireless Valley Communication, Inc. | System and method for efficiently visualizing and comparing communication network system performance |
US6625454B1 (en) | 2000-08-04 | 2003-09-23 | Wireless Valley Communications, Inc. | Method and system for designing or deploying a communications network which considers frequency dependent effects |
US7523411B2 (en) | 2000-08-22 | 2009-04-21 | Bruce Carlin | Network-linked interactive three-dimensional composition and display of saleable objects in situ in viewer-selected scenes for purposes of object promotion and procurement, and generation of object advertisements |
US7062722B1 (en) * | 2000-08-22 | 2006-06-13 | Bruce Carlin | Network-linked interactive three-dimensional composition and display of saleable objects in situ in viewer-selected scenes for purposes of promotion and procurement |
US7246044B2 (en) * | 2000-09-13 | 2007-07-17 | Matsushita Electric Works, Ltd. | Method for aiding space design using network, system therefor, and server computer of the system |
US6912429B1 (en) * | 2000-10-19 | 2005-06-28 | Destiny Networks, Inc. | Home automation system and method |
AU2002227376A1 (en) | 2000-10-30 | 2002-05-15 | Tririga, Inc. | Susiness asset management system |
US6628279B1 (en) * | 2000-11-22 | 2003-09-30 | @Last Software, Inc. | System and method for three-dimensional modeling |
US6910186B2 (en) * | 2000-12-08 | 2005-06-21 | Kyunam Kim | Graphic chatting with organizational avatars |
BR0116693A (en) | 2000-12-18 | 2004-08-17 | Wireless Valley Comm Inc | Computer system and method for collecting data from a spatially distributed object group or network and method for visualizing a spatially distributed object group or network |
US7266768B2 (en) | 2001-01-09 | 2007-09-04 | Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. | Systems and methods for manipulating electronic information using a three-dimensional iconic representation |
AU2002240341B2 (en) * | 2001-02-09 | 2007-11-01 | Mark Greenstein | Systems and methods for improving investment performance |
US7299416B2 (en) | 2001-02-15 | 2007-11-20 | Denny Jaeger | Metro for creating and using linear time line and play rectangle |
US6988091B2 (en) | 2001-04-02 | 2006-01-17 | Richard Levine | Method and system for coordination of CAD drawings providing collision detection between drawings |
US6721684B1 (en) | 2001-04-26 | 2004-04-13 | Nasser Saebi | Method of manufacturing and analyzing a composite building |
US7269632B2 (en) | 2001-06-05 | 2007-09-11 | Xdyne, Inc. | Networked computer system for communicating and operating in a virtual reality environment |
US7996191B2 (en) | 2001-08-10 | 2011-08-09 | Jon Milton Foster | Property development utilizing structure depicted in a motion picture or television show |
US6868297B1 (en) * | 2001-09-17 | 2005-03-15 | Impactxoft | Method and system for designing objects using functional modeling |
US7155375B1 (en) * | 2001-09-17 | 2006-12-26 | Impactxoft | Method and system for designing objects using design intent merge |
US7650260B1 (en) * | 2001-09-17 | 2010-01-19 | Impact Xoft | Method and system for designing objects using functional object representation |
US20060036513A1 (en) * | 2001-09-26 | 2006-02-16 | Jerry Whatley | System and method for providing property improvements |
CN1306444C (en) | 2001-11-07 | 2007-03-21 | 鹿岛建设株式会社 | Building production information integration system |
US7574323B2 (en) * | 2001-12-17 | 2009-08-11 | Wireless Valley Communications, Inc. | Textual and graphical demarcation of location, and interpretation of measurements |
US7340383B2 (en) | 2001-12-20 | 2008-03-04 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Control device, method and computer program product for browsing data |
US20040205519A1 (en) | 2002-01-10 | 2004-10-14 | Chris Chapel | Method and system for automatically generating construction documents |
US6952207B1 (en) * | 2002-03-11 | 2005-10-04 | Microsoft Corporation | Efficient scenery object rendering |
US8290849B2 (en) * | 2002-04-30 | 2012-10-16 | Analect Benefit Finance, Llc | Method and system for administering the hedging of an employee deferred compensation plan using swaps |
WO2004010384A2 (en) | 2002-07-23 | 2004-01-29 | Imagecom, Inc. | System and method for creating and updating a three-dimensional model and creating a related neutral file format |
US20050065951A1 (en) | 2002-08-30 | 2005-03-24 | Kathleen Liston | Visualization of commonalities in data from different sources |
JP2004135051A (en) | 2002-10-10 | 2004-04-30 | Sony Corp | Information processing system, apparatus and method for providing service, apparatus and method for processing information, recording medium, and program |
JP4185052B2 (en) * | 2002-10-15 | 2008-11-19 | ユニバーシティ オブ サザン カリフォルニア | Enhanced virtual environment |
US7146231B2 (en) * | 2002-10-22 | 2006-12-05 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.. | Smart process modules and objects in process plants |
US6996789B2 (en) | 2002-11-18 | 2006-02-07 | Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for performing an exponential path search |
US20040113945A1 (en) * | 2002-12-12 | 2004-06-17 | Herman Miller, Inc. | Graphical user interface and method for interfacing with a configuration system for highly configurable products |
US20050041028A1 (en) * | 2003-05-02 | 2005-02-24 | 123-D Software, Inc. | Computer aided design (CAD) system |
US20080036769A1 (en) * | 2003-05-02 | 2008-02-14 | Richard Coutts | Computer aided design (cad) system |
US7814436B2 (en) | 2003-07-28 | 2010-10-12 | Autodesk, Inc. | 3D scene orientation indicator system with scene orientation change capability |
US7661959B2 (en) | 2003-09-19 | 2010-02-16 | Minutes Matter Solutions, Inc. | Interior design system and method |
US8751950B2 (en) | 2004-08-17 | 2014-06-10 | Ice Edge Business Solutions Ltd. | Capturing a user's intent in design software |
US20050071135A1 (en) | 2003-09-30 | 2005-03-31 | Vredenburgh David W. | Knowledge management system for computer-aided design modeling |
US7277572B2 (en) * | 2003-10-10 | 2007-10-02 | Macpearl Design Llc | Three-dimensional interior design system |
US20080052687A1 (en) * | 2003-11-03 | 2008-02-28 | Agustin Gonzales-Tuchmann | Development environment for data transformation applications |
US7534157B2 (en) * | 2003-12-31 | 2009-05-19 | Ganz | System and method for toy adoption and marketing |
US7643966B2 (en) | 2004-03-10 | 2010-01-05 | Leica Geosystems Ag | Identification of 3D surface points using context-based hypothesis testing |
US7680694B2 (en) | 2004-03-11 | 2010-03-16 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | Method and apparatus for a user to shop online in a three dimensional virtual reality setting |
JP2007536634A (en) | 2004-05-04 | 2007-12-13 | フィッシャー−ローズマウント・システムズ・インコーポレーテッド | Service-oriented architecture for process control systems |
US20050268245A1 (en) * | 2004-05-11 | 2005-12-01 | Peter Gipps | User interface for path determination system |
US20060020430A1 (en) * | 2004-05-11 | 2006-01-26 | Peter Gipps | Path analysis system with client and server-side applications |
US20060206623A1 (en) * | 2005-03-10 | 2006-09-14 | Peter Gipps | Path determination system for vehicle infrastructure paths |
US20060020431A1 (en) * | 2004-05-11 | 2006-01-26 | Peter Gipps | Path determination system for transport system |
US7545373B2 (en) | 2004-08-03 | 2009-06-09 | Nextpat Limited | Applications with integrated capture |
US7277830B2 (en) | 2004-08-17 | 2007-10-02 | Dirtt Environmental Solutions Ltd. | Capturing a user's design intent with resolvable objects |
CA2577199C (en) | 2004-08-17 | 2015-12-22 | Dirtt Environmental Solutions, Ltd. | Capturing a user's intent in design software |
US7249005B2 (en) | 2004-08-17 | 2007-07-24 | Dirtt Environmental Solutions Ltd. | Design software incorporating efficient 3-D rendering |
US8510672B2 (en) | 2004-08-17 | 2013-08-13 | Dirtt Environmental Solutions Ltd | Automatically creating and modifying furniture layouts in design software |
US8276088B2 (en) * | 2007-07-11 | 2012-09-25 | Ricoh Co., Ltd. | User interface for three-dimensional navigation |
US8332401B2 (en) * | 2004-10-01 | 2012-12-11 | Ricoh Co., Ltd | Method and system for position-based image matching in a mixed media environment |
US8521737B2 (en) * | 2004-10-01 | 2013-08-27 | Ricoh Co., Ltd. | Method and system for multi-tier image matching in a mixed media environment |
US8600989B2 (en) * | 2004-10-01 | 2013-12-03 | Ricoh Co., Ltd. | Method and system for image matching in a mixed media environment |
US8335789B2 (en) * | 2004-10-01 | 2012-12-18 | Ricoh Co., Ltd. | Method and system for document fingerprint matching in a mixed media environment |
US20060271378A1 (en) * | 2005-05-25 | 2006-11-30 | Day Andrew P | System and method for designing a medical care facility |
US8423391B2 (en) * | 2005-07-28 | 2013-04-16 | Sap Ag | Systems and methods for automated parallelization of transport load builder |
US8650179B2 (en) * | 2005-08-18 | 2014-02-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Generating statistics for temporary tables during query optimization |
US20070088704A1 (en) | 2005-10-17 | 2007-04-19 | Julian Bourne | System and method for creation, distribution, and utilization of portable knowledge format |
US20070168374A1 (en) | 2006-01-13 | 2007-07-19 | Julian Bourne | Portable knowledge format for the distribution of content |
US7663644B2 (en) * | 2005-11-08 | 2010-02-16 | Autodesk, Inc. | Automatic element substitution in vector-based illustrations |
GB2432239A (en) * | 2005-11-15 | 2007-05-16 | Toshiba Kk | Building layout design support system |
US9563980B2 (en) | 2005-11-18 | 2017-02-07 | Autodesk, Inc. | Grip manipulatable shadows in 3D models |
US8255338B1 (en) * | 2006-01-10 | 2012-08-28 | Brittan Jeffrey C | Method for designing and estimating costs of food service equipment |
WO2008130337A1 (en) | 2006-01-13 | 2008-10-30 | Choice Enterprises Llc | Computer network-based 3d rendering system |
US7542886B2 (en) | 2006-01-27 | 2009-06-02 | Autodesk, Inc. | Method and apparatus for extensible utility network part types and part properties in 3D computer models |
US7788068B2 (en) | 2006-01-31 | 2010-08-31 | Autodesk, Inc. | Transferring load information and result information between analysis and design software |
US7587302B2 (en) | 2006-01-31 | 2009-09-08 | Autodesk, Inc. | Graphic interactive method to reorder sequential data values on graphic objects |
WO2007093060A1 (en) | 2006-02-16 | 2007-08-23 | Dirtt Environmental Solutions, Ltd. | Integrating object-oriented design software with record-based cad software |
US8762941B2 (en) | 2006-02-16 | 2014-06-24 | Dirtt Environmental Solutions, Ltd. | Rendering and modifying CAD design entities in object-oriented applications |
US20070204241A1 (en) | 2006-02-28 | 2007-08-30 | Autodesk, Inc. | Method for generating three dimensional stair objects in computer aided design drawings |
US20070219764A1 (en) | 2006-03-15 | 2007-09-20 | Autodesk, Inc. | Synchronized Physical and Analytical Flow System Models |
US7567844B2 (en) * | 2006-03-17 | 2009-07-28 | Honeywell International Inc. | Building management system |
US8244025B2 (en) | 2006-03-20 | 2012-08-14 | Siemens Energy, Inc. | Method of coalescing information about inspected objects |
US8442850B2 (en) * | 2006-03-30 | 2013-05-14 | Sap Ag | Providing accounting software application as enterprise services |
US20070250295A1 (en) | 2006-03-30 | 2007-10-25 | Subx, Inc. | Multidimensional modeling system and related method |
US7644363B2 (en) * | 2006-04-10 | 2010-01-05 | Autodesk, Inc. | “For-each” label components in CAD drawings |
WO2007120384A2 (en) * | 2006-04-14 | 2007-10-25 | Genesistp, Inc. | Method and system for manufacturing a structure |
US8307286B2 (en) | 2006-05-07 | 2012-11-06 | Wellcomemat Llc | Methods and systems for online video-based property commerce |
US8484556B2 (en) | 2006-08-22 | 2013-07-09 | Autodesk, Inc. | Drawing interoperability between different computer-aided design applications |
US8645973B2 (en) * | 2006-09-22 | 2014-02-04 | Oracle International Corporation | Mobile applications |
US8402473B1 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2013-03-19 | Sap Ag | Managing consistent interfaces for demand business objects across heterogeneous systems |
US7822584B1 (en) | 2006-09-30 | 2010-10-26 | Nasser Saebi | Method of performing a finite element analysis of a composite structure |
US7856342B1 (en) | 2006-10-02 | 2010-12-21 | Autodesk, Inc. | Automatic reinforcement modeling |
US7877237B1 (en) | 2006-10-05 | 2011-01-25 | Nasser Saebi | Method of performing a finite element analysis of a composite structure |
US8285707B2 (en) * | 2006-11-08 | 2012-10-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method of querying relational database management systems |
US8332827B2 (en) * | 2006-12-01 | 2012-12-11 | Murex S.A.S. | Produce graph oriented programming framework with scenario support |
US8086042B2 (en) * | 2006-12-29 | 2011-12-27 | Johns Manville | Weatherization imaging systems and methods |
US7733351B1 (en) * | 2007-02-06 | 2010-06-08 | Judith Sinnard | Method for forming an interactive image of indoor and outdoor spaces |
US8314799B2 (en) | 2007-04-13 | 2012-11-20 | Apple Inc. | Enhanced motion behavior framework |
CA2685088A1 (en) | 2007-04-24 | 2008-11-06 | Topplestone, Llc | Method and system for designing a pastry |
US20090273598A1 (en) | 2008-05-01 | 2009-11-05 | M.E.P. Cad, Inc. | Methods and apparatuses for automatically converting objects in CAD drawing from two-dimensions to three-dimensions |
US8224628B2 (en) | 2007-05-01 | 2012-07-17 | M.E.P. Cad, Inc. | Methods and apparatuses for placing a flexible drop in a CAD drawing |
US8441502B2 (en) | 2007-05-01 | 2013-05-14 | M.E.P. Cad, Inc. | Methods and apparatuses for resolving a CAD drawing conflict with an arm around |
CA2691881C (en) | 2007-05-01 | 2014-11-04 | M.E.P. Cad, Inc. | Methods and apparatuses for handling a conflict in a cad drawing |
US8150660B2 (en) | 2007-05-01 | 2012-04-03 | M.E.P. Cad, Inc. | Methods and apparatuses for automatically selecting a pipe in a CAD drawing |
US8368717B2 (en) | 2007-05-01 | 2013-02-05 | Auto Prep, Llc | Methods and apparatuses for comparing CAD drawings |
US7996756B2 (en) | 2007-09-12 | 2011-08-09 | Vistaprint Technologies Limited | System and methods for displaying user modifiable server-rendered images |
US8134553B2 (en) | 2007-09-24 | 2012-03-13 | Microsoft Corporation | Rendering three-dimensional objects on a server computer |
US20090113349A1 (en) | 2007-09-24 | 2009-04-30 | Mark Zohar | Facilitating electronic commerce via a 3d virtual environment |
US8510382B2 (en) * | 2007-10-15 | 2013-08-13 | Insidesales.com | Apparatus system and method for responding to web form inquiries |
US20090119039A1 (en) * | 2007-11-07 | 2009-05-07 | Sproutlets, Inc. | Approach for Controlling Electrical Power |
WO2009067675A1 (en) | 2007-11-23 | 2009-05-28 | Mercury Computer Systems, Inc. | Client-server visualization system with hybrid data processing |
US8386918B2 (en) * | 2007-12-06 | 2013-02-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Rendering of real world objects and interactions into a virtual universe |
US8566419B2 (en) * | 2007-12-12 | 2013-10-22 | Insidesales.com | Systems and methods for enhanced user communications |
AU2009206331A1 (en) | 2008-01-23 | 2009-07-30 | Sensable Technologies, Inc. | Haptically enabled dental modeling system |
EP2098994A1 (en) | 2008-03-04 | 2009-09-09 | Agfa HealthCare NV | System for real-time volume rendering on thin clients via a render server |
US20110078169A1 (en) * | 2008-05-05 | 2011-03-31 | Accela, Inc. | Electronic Blueprint Evaluation System For Approving Blueprints |
KR20110063617A (en) | 2008-05-13 | 2011-06-13 | 몬트레이 그룹 원 엘엘씨 | Apparatus and methods for interacting with multiple information forms across multiple types of computing devices |
US8427473B2 (en) | 2008-09-28 | 2013-04-23 | Rdv Systems Ltd. | Pseudo-realistic rendering of BIM data responsive to positional indicator |
US8108267B2 (en) | 2008-10-15 | 2012-01-31 | Eli Varon | Method of facilitating a sale of a product and/or a service |
US8352218B2 (en) | 2009-07-08 | 2013-01-08 | Graphisoft | Active building information modeling apparatus and method |
US8462147B2 (en) | 2009-09-15 | 2013-06-11 | Microsoft Corporation | Mega-mesh sculpting for environments |
US20120331422A1 (en) | 2011-06-22 | 2012-12-27 | Gemvision Corporation, LLC | Custom Jewelry Configurator |
-
2003
- 2003-09-30 US US10/675,809 patent/US20050071135A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2004
- 2004-09-22 WO PCT/US2004/031644 patent/WO2005033985A1/en active Application Filing
-
2009
- 2009-02-13 US US12/444,890 patent/US8762877B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5355445A (en) * | 1991-04-25 | 1994-10-11 | Mitsui Petrochemical Industries, Ltd. | Knowledge base management system for an information reasoning apparatus |
US5293479A (en) * | 1991-07-08 | 1994-03-08 | Quintero Smith Incorporated | Design tool and method for preparing parametric assemblies |
US5455599A (en) * | 1993-11-02 | 1995-10-03 | Taligent Inc. | Object-oriented graphic system |
US6725184B1 (en) * | 1999-06-30 | 2004-04-20 | Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation | Assembly and disassembly sequences of components in computerized multicomponent assembly models |
US6647305B1 (en) * | 2000-06-19 | 2003-11-11 | David H. Bigelow | Product design system and method |
US6775581B2 (en) * | 2001-03-14 | 2004-08-10 | Delphi Technologies, Inc. | Horizontally-structured CAD/CAM modeling for virtual concurrent product and process design |
US20020183982A1 (en) * | 2001-03-26 | 2002-12-05 | Rauscher Thomas C. | Design and estimating tools for the design of communication infrastructure in a structure |
Cited By (155)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20030220911A1 (en) * | 2002-05-23 | 2003-11-27 | Tompras Anthony D. | Solid model library tool |
US7469242B2 (en) * | 2002-05-23 | 2008-12-23 | The Boeing Company | Central based computer network of solid models and associated data with search capability |
US8762877B2 (en) | 2003-09-30 | 2014-06-24 | Ice Edge Business Solutions Ltd. | Creation and modification of valid functional design layouts |
US20050120010A1 (en) * | 2003-11-20 | 2005-06-02 | Apriori Technologies, Inc. | System and method for determining costs within an enterprise |
US20060020629A1 (en) * | 2004-03-01 | 2006-01-26 | Karthik Ramani | Multi-tier and multi-domain distributed rapid product configuration and design system |
US7725299B2 (en) * | 2004-03-01 | 2010-05-25 | Purdue Research Foundation | Multi-tier and multi-domain distributed rapid product configuration and design system |
US8510672B2 (en) | 2004-08-17 | 2013-08-13 | Dirtt Environmental Solutions Ltd | Automatically creating and modifying furniture layouts in design software |
US20060041842A1 (en) * | 2004-08-17 | 2006-02-23 | Loberg Barrie A | Capturing a user's intent in design software |
US8751950B2 (en) | 2004-08-17 | 2014-06-10 | Ice Edge Business Solutions Ltd. | Capturing a user's intent in design software |
US9536340B2 (en) | 2004-08-17 | 2017-01-03 | Dirtt Environmental Solutions, Ltd. | Software incorporating efficient 3-D rendering |
US20110191706A1 (en) * | 2004-08-17 | 2011-08-04 | Dirtt Environmental Solutions Ltd. | Automatically creating and modifying furniture layouts in design software |
US20060058993A1 (en) * | 2004-09-15 | 2006-03-16 | Karen Ulreich | Methods for automated proposal generation |
US20060059011A1 (en) * | 2004-09-15 | 2006-03-16 | Karen Ulreich | Systems for automated proposal generation |
US20060080279A1 (en) * | 2004-10-13 | 2006-04-13 | Jones Ryan K | Customized and customizable engineering calculation and project detailing system |
US9230043B2 (en) * | 2004-11-25 | 2016-01-05 | Jukka Suomi | Computer-aided modeling |
US20070013709A1 (en) * | 2004-12-20 | 2007-01-18 | Bernard Charles | Process and system for rendering an object in a view using a product lifecycle management database |
US9075931B2 (en) * | 2004-12-20 | 2015-07-07 | Dassault Systemes | Process and system for rendering an object in a view using a product lifecycle management database |
US20070288119A1 (en) * | 2005-03-11 | 2007-12-13 | The Boeing Company | Automatic Data Configuration Strategy, Such as For Storing and Manipulating Product Manufacturing Data |
US20060206225A1 (en) * | 2005-03-11 | 2006-09-14 | Wright Anthony P | Automatic data configuration strategy, such as for storing and manipulating product manufacturing data |
US20060267980A1 (en) * | 2005-05-30 | 2006-11-30 | Fujitsu Limited | CAD method, CAD system and program storage medium storing CAD program thereof |
US20070008621A1 (en) * | 2005-07-07 | 2007-01-11 | Naoyuki Satoh | Selection of a part in image showing three dimensional object |
US7457789B2 (en) | 2005-08-17 | 2008-11-25 | Tacton Systems Ab | Configuration assistance for complex products |
US20080234991A1 (en) * | 2005-08-17 | 2008-09-25 | Tomas Axling | Customizing of computer aided design models |
US8200457B2 (en) | 2005-08-17 | 2012-06-12 | Tacton Systems Ab | Customizing of computer aided design models |
US20070094175A1 (en) * | 2005-08-17 | 2007-04-26 | Tacton Systems Ab | Configuration assistance for complex products |
US20100106466A1 (en) * | 2005-08-18 | 2010-04-29 | Froehlich Martin | System for the computed-aided design of technical devices |
US8239173B2 (en) | 2005-08-18 | 2012-08-07 | Pace Aerospace Engineering And Information Technology Gmbh | System for the computed-aided design of technical devices |
WO2007020231A3 (en) * | 2005-08-18 | 2007-05-03 | Pace Aerospace Engineering And | System for the computer-aided design of technical devices |
US20070120875A1 (en) * | 2005-11-30 | 2007-05-31 | Symons Corporation | Computer aided design interface |
EP1987456A4 (en) * | 2006-02-16 | 2012-09-26 | Ice Edge Business Solutions Ltd | Integrating object-oriented design software with record-based cad software |
EP1987456A1 (en) * | 2006-02-16 | 2008-11-05 | Dirtt Environmental Solutions, Ltd. | Integrating object-oriented design software with record-based cad software |
WO2007093060A1 (en) | 2006-02-16 | 2007-08-23 | Dirtt Environmental Solutions, Ltd. | Integrating object-oriented design software with record-based cad software |
US8762941B2 (en) * | 2006-02-16 | 2014-06-24 | Dirtt Environmental Solutions, Ltd. | Rendering and modifying CAD design entities in object-oriented applications |
US20100268513A1 (en) * | 2006-02-16 | 2010-10-21 | Dirtt Environmental Solutions Ltd. | Rendering and modifying cad design entities in object-oriented applications |
US7908296B2 (en) * | 2006-02-16 | 2011-03-15 | Dirtt Environmental Solutions, Ltd. | Integrating object-oriented design software with record-based CAD software |
US20090049081A1 (en) * | 2006-02-16 | 2009-02-19 | Ice Edge Business Solutions Ltd. | Integrating object-oriented design software with record-based cad software |
US20080077902A1 (en) * | 2006-09-26 | 2008-03-27 | Ichiro Harashima | Method of Determining Range Of Change in Design, Design Change Range Determining Apparatus, and Design Change Range Determining System |
US8108059B2 (en) * | 2006-09-26 | 2012-01-31 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Method of determining range of change in design, design change range determining apparatus, and design change range determining system |
US20080148297A1 (en) * | 2006-12-14 | 2008-06-19 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Application management system and method of controlling the same |
US8555298B2 (en) * | 2006-12-14 | 2013-10-08 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Application management system and method of controlling the same |
US20080243445A1 (en) * | 2007-03-26 | 2008-10-02 | Hntb Holdings Ltd | Bridge information modeling |
WO2008118952A1 (en) * | 2007-03-26 | 2008-10-02 | Hntb Holdings Ltd | Bridge information modeling |
US8160841B2 (en) | 2007-03-26 | 2012-04-17 | Hntb Holdings Ltd | Bridge information modeling |
US9919474B2 (en) | 2007-07-25 | 2018-03-20 | Stratasys Ltd. | Solid freeform fabrication using a plurality of modeling materials |
US11161308B2 (en) | 2007-07-25 | 2021-11-02 | Stratasys Ltd. | Solid freeform fabrication using a plurality of modeling materials |
US20100191360A1 (en) * | 2007-07-25 | 2010-07-29 | Object Geometries Ltd. | Solid freeform fabrication using a plurality of modeling materials |
US9031680B2 (en) | 2007-07-25 | 2015-05-12 | Stratasys Ltd. | Solid freeform fabrication using a plurality of modeling materials |
US20090033656A1 (en) * | 2007-07-30 | 2009-02-05 | Larkins Darren | Database driven relational object modeling and design system, method and software |
US20090060393A1 (en) * | 2007-08-28 | 2009-03-05 | Naoyuki Satoh | Image searching device, image searching method, image searching program, and recording medium recording the image searching program |
US8135240B2 (en) * | 2007-08-28 | 2012-03-13 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Image searching device, method and recording medium |
US9519407B2 (en) | 2008-03-11 | 2016-12-13 | Ice Edge Business Solutions, Ltd. | Automatically creating and modifying furniture layouts in design software |
US20090259440A1 (en) * | 2008-04-14 | 2009-10-15 | Reed Darwin G | Part standard geometry management in a computer aided design system |
US10372833B2 (en) * | 2008-04-14 | 2019-08-06 | The Boeing Company | Part standard geometry management in a computer aided design system |
US20110224954A1 (en) * | 2008-08-26 | 2011-09-15 | Cinergix Pty Ltd | Modelling of systems |
WO2010022439A1 (en) * | 2008-08-26 | 2010-03-04 | Cinergix Pty Ltd | Modelling of systems |
US9361585B1 (en) * | 2008-10-31 | 2016-06-07 | Emergent Systems Corporation | Method for determining data quality in a knowledge management system |
US10002324B1 (en) * | 2008-10-31 | 2018-06-19 | Emergent Systems Corporation | Method for determining data quality in a knowledge management system |
US20100114355A1 (en) * | 2008-11-04 | 2010-05-06 | Ichiro Harashima | Method and system for management of manufacturing information |
US8347236B1 (en) | 2009-02-24 | 2013-01-01 | Emergent Systems Corporation | Client server interface for a knowledge management system |
US8204902B1 (en) | 2009-02-27 | 2012-06-19 | Emergent Systems Corporation | Dynamic ranking of experts in a knowledge management system |
US20110130855A1 (en) * | 2009-10-02 | 2011-06-02 | Philpott Michael L | Template framework for automated process routing |
US9335760B2 (en) | 2009-10-02 | 2016-05-10 | Apriori Technologies, Inc. | Template framework for automated process routing |
US8914141B2 (en) | 2009-10-02 | 2014-12-16 | Apriori Technologies, Inc. | Template framework for automated process routing |
US8301419B1 (en) | 2009-10-09 | 2012-10-30 | The Boeing Company | Managing information for generating models of parts |
FR2952208A1 (en) * | 2009-10-30 | 2011-05-06 | Ct Scient Et Tech Du Batiment Cstb | CONFIGURATION OF CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS FOR A DIGITAL BUILDING MODEL. |
WO2011051639A1 (en) * | 2009-10-30 | 2011-05-05 | Centre Scientifique Et Technique Du Batiment (Cstb) | Configuration of construction products for a digital building model |
US8843884B1 (en) * | 2009-11-23 | 2014-09-23 | Jason Adam Koerner | Interactive graphical construction of parametric components of typical cross section frameworks |
US9245064B2 (en) * | 2009-11-24 | 2016-01-26 | Ice Edge Business Solutions | Securely sharing design renderings over a network |
US20120268463A1 (en) * | 2009-11-24 | 2012-10-25 | Ice Edge Business Solutions | Securely sharing design renderings over a network |
US8896595B2 (en) | 2010-03-12 | 2014-11-25 | Intergraph Corporation | System, apparatus, and method of modifying 2.5D GIS data for a 2D GIS system |
US20110225208A1 (en) * | 2010-03-12 | 2011-09-15 | Intergraph Technologies Company | Integrated GIS System with Interactive 3D Interface |
US8525827B2 (en) | 2010-03-12 | 2013-09-03 | Intergraph Technologies Company | Integrated GIS system with interactive 3D interface |
US8589128B2 (en) | 2010-10-28 | 2013-11-19 | Parametric Technology Corporation | Methods and systems for creation of a dynamically configurable product design |
US20120109591A1 (en) * | 2010-10-28 | 2012-05-03 | Brian Thompson | Methods and systems for enforcing parametric constraints in a direct modeling interface in computer-aided design |
US8892404B2 (en) | 2010-10-28 | 2014-11-18 | Parametric Technology Corporation | Methods and systems for consistent concurrent operation of a plurality of computer-aided design applications |
US8890867B2 (en) | 2010-10-28 | 2014-11-18 | Parametric Technology Corporation | Methods and systems for dynamically loading portions of a computer-aided design model on demand |
WO2012058604A2 (en) * | 2010-10-28 | 2012-05-03 | Parametric Technology Corporation | Methods and systems for computer-aided design |
US8818769B2 (en) | 2010-10-28 | 2014-08-26 | Parametric Technology Corporation | Methods and systems for managing synchronization of a plurality of information items of a computer-aided design data model |
WO2012058604A3 (en) * | 2010-10-28 | 2012-07-05 | Parametric Technology Corporation | Methods and systems for computer-aided design |
US8566066B2 (en) * | 2010-10-28 | 2013-10-22 | Parametric Technology Corporation | Enforcing parametric constraints in a direct modeling interface in computer-aided design |
US20130024836A1 (en) * | 2010-11-22 | 2013-01-24 | Jason Adam Koerner | Interactive Graphical Construction of Parametric Components of Typical Cross Section Frameworks |
US20120253763A1 (en) * | 2011-03-30 | 2012-10-04 | The Boeing Company | Model Management for Computer Aided Design Systems |
US8838420B2 (en) * | 2011-03-30 | 2014-09-16 | The Boeing Company | Model management for computer aided design systems |
US8768654B2 (en) | 2011-04-29 | 2014-07-01 | Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc. | Interactive configuration-management-based diagramming tool |
WO2012148680A1 (en) * | 2011-04-29 | 2012-11-01 | Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc. | Interactive configuration-management-based diagramming tool |
US9189571B2 (en) | 2011-06-11 | 2015-11-17 | Ice Edge Business Solutions, Ltd. | Automated re-use of structural components |
US20130097489A1 (en) * | 2011-10-14 | 2013-04-18 | Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc. | Drawing automation in computer aided design systems |
US9177082B2 (en) * | 2011-10-14 | 2015-11-03 | Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc. | Drawing automation in computer aided design systems |
US20130132424A1 (en) * | 2011-11-23 | 2013-05-23 | Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc. | Massive model visualization with spatial indexing |
US8725763B2 (en) * | 2011-11-23 | 2014-05-13 | Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc. | Massive model visualization with spatial indexing |
US9582613B2 (en) | 2011-11-23 | 2017-02-28 | Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc. | Massive model visualization with spatial retrieval |
US9529507B2 (en) | 2011-11-23 | 2016-12-27 | Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc. | Massive model visualization in PDM systems |
US9053254B2 (en) | 2011-11-23 | 2015-06-09 | Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc. | Massive model visualization in PDM systems |
US20140180646A1 (en) * | 2012-12-20 | 2014-06-26 | Dassault Systemes | Designing An Assembly Of Parts In A Three-Dimensional Scene |
US11275870B2 (en) * | 2012-12-20 | 2022-03-15 | Dassault Systemes | Designing an assembly of parts in a three-dimensional scene |
US20140200862A1 (en) * | 2013-01-11 | 2014-07-17 | Tekla Corporation | Drawings and computer-aided modeling |
EP3005180A4 (en) * | 2013-05-31 | 2017-01-11 | Dirtt Environmental Solutions, Ltd. | Automatically incorporating third party features into a computer design schematic |
EP3005185A4 (en) * | 2013-05-31 | 2017-01-18 | DIRTT Environmental Solutions, Ltd. | Automatically resolving boundaries within an architectural design environment |
US10289758B2 (en) | 2013-05-31 | 2019-05-14 | Dirtt Environmental Solutions, Ltd. | Automatically resolving boundaries within an architectural design environment |
US10037403B2 (en) | 2014-01-13 | 2018-07-31 | The Boeing Company | Method and system for managing aircraft parts |
US9600770B1 (en) | 2014-02-13 | 2017-03-21 | Emergent Systems Corporation | Method for determining expertise of users in a knowledge management system |
US20150324494A1 (en) * | 2014-05-09 | 2015-11-12 | Autodesk, Inc | Techniques for using controlled natural language to capture design intent for computer-aided design |
US20150324491A1 (en) * | 2014-05-09 | 2015-11-12 | Autodesk, Inc | Techniques for using controlled natural language to capture design intent for computer-aided design |
US11113430B2 (en) * | 2014-05-09 | 2021-09-07 | Autodesk, Inc. | Techniques for using controlled natural language to capture design intent for computer-aided design |
US20150324492A1 (en) * | 2014-05-09 | 2015-11-12 | Autodesk, Inc | Techniques for using controlled natural language to capture design intent for computer-aided design |
US11062057B2 (en) * | 2014-05-09 | 2021-07-13 | Autodesk, Inc. | Techniques for using controlled natural language to capture design intent for computer-aided design |
US20150324493A1 (en) * | 2014-05-09 | 2015-11-12 | Autodesk, Inc | Techniques for using controlled natural language to capture design intent for computer-aided design |
US10839110B2 (en) * | 2014-05-09 | 2020-11-17 | Autodesk, Inc. | Techniques for using controlled natural language to capture design intent for computer-aided design |
US10657296B2 (en) * | 2014-05-09 | 2020-05-19 | Autodesk, Inc. | Techniques for using controlled natural language to capture design intent for computer-aided design |
US10922450B2 (en) | 2014-06-09 | 2021-02-16 | Dirtt Environmental Solutions, Ltd. | Associating computer-executable objects with timber frames within an architectural design environment |
US20150363513A1 (en) * | 2014-06-13 | 2015-12-17 | Wolfram Alpha Llc | Method and system for designing products |
US20160314626A1 (en) * | 2015-04-23 | 2016-10-27 | Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc. | Massive model visualization with a product lifecycle management system |
US10614632B2 (en) * | 2015-04-23 | 2020-04-07 | Siemens Industry Software Inc. | Massive model visualization with a product lifecycle management system |
US10860934B2 (en) | 2016-05-13 | 2020-12-08 | Cognitive Scale, Inc. | Universal cognitive graph having persistent knowledge elements |
US10769535B2 (en) | 2016-05-13 | 2020-09-08 | Cognitive Scale, Inc. | Ingestion pipeline for universal cognitive graph |
US11244229B2 (en) | 2016-05-13 | 2022-02-08 | Cognitive Scale, Inc. | Natural language query procedure where query is ingested into a cognitive graph |
US10565504B2 (en) | 2016-05-13 | 2020-02-18 | Cognitive Scale, Inc. | Structurally defining knowledge elements within a cognitive graph |
US20170329867A1 (en) * | 2016-05-13 | 2017-11-16 | Cognitive Scale, Inc. | Ingesting a Natural Language Query into a Cognitive Graph |
US10860935B2 (en) | 2016-05-13 | 2020-12-08 | Cognitive Scale, Inc. | Universal cognitive graph having persistent knowledge elements |
US10528870B2 (en) | 2016-05-13 | 2020-01-07 | Cognitive Scale, Inc. | Natural language query procedure where query is ingested into a cognitive graph |
US10699196B2 (en) | 2016-05-13 | 2020-06-30 | Cognitive Scale, Inc. | Lossless parsing when storing knowledge elements within a universal cognitive graph |
US10706358B2 (en) | 2016-05-13 | 2020-07-07 | Cognitive Scale, Inc. | Lossless parsing when storing knowledge elements within a universal cognitive graph |
US10706357B2 (en) | 2016-05-13 | 2020-07-07 | Cognitive Scale, Inc. | Ingesting information into a universal cognitive graph |
US10719766B2 (en) | 2016-05-13 | 2020-07-21 | Cognitive Scale, Inc. | Universal cognitive graph architecture |
US10860932B2 (en) | 2016-05-13 | 2020-12-08 | Cognitive Scale, Inc. | Universal graph output via insight agent accessing the universal graph |
US10796227B2 (en) | 2016-05-13 | 2020-10-06 | Cognitive Scale, Inc. | Ranking of parse options using machine learning |
US10860936B2 (en) | 2016-05-13 | 2020-12-08 | Cognitive Scale, Inc. | Universal quantification of knowledge elements within a cognitive graph |
US11295216B2 (en) | 2016-05-13 | 2022-04-05 | Cognitive Scale, Inc. | Structurally defining knowledge elements within a cognitive graph |
US10860933B2 (en) | 2016-05-13 | 2020-12-08 | Cognitive Scale, Inc. | Universal graph output via insight agent accessing the universal graph |
US10318661B2 (en) * | 2016-07-27 | 2019-06-11 | Applied Software Technology, Inc. | Managing custom REVIT inheritance-based assembly families for manufacturing |
US11544420B2 (en) | 2016-07-27 | 2023-01-03 | Evolve Mep, Llc | Managing custom computer-aided design inheritance-based assembly families for manufacturing |
US11514205B2 (en) | 2018-01-08 | 2022-11-29 | Nuvolo Technologies Corporation | Interpreter framework for a computer file |
US10628616B2 (en) * | 2018-01-08 | 2020-04-21 | Nuvolo Technologies Corporation | Space profile interpreter framework for a computer file |
US20190213287A1 (en) * | 2018-01-08 | 2019-07-11 | Nuvolo Technologies Corporation | Space profile interpreter framework for a computer file |
US11741272B2 (en) | 2018-01-08 | 2023-08-29 | Nuvolo Technologies Corporation | Interpreter framework for a computer file |
US11842125B2 (en) | 2018-01-08 | 2023-12-12 | Nuvolo Technologies Corporation | Space profile interpreter framework for a computer file |
US11222148B2 (en) | 2018-01-08 | 2022-01-11 | Nuvolo Technologies Corporation | Space profile interpreter framework for a computer file |
US11249459B2 (en) | 2018-02-05 | 2022-02-15 | Advanced Solutions Life Sciences, Llc | System and workstation for the design, fabrication and assembly of 3-dimensional constructs |
US10838404B2 (en) | 2018-02-05 | 2020-11-17 | Advanced Solutions Life Sciences, Llc | System and workstation for the design, fabrication and assembly of 3-dimensional constructs |
WO2019152769A1 (en) * | 2018-02-05 | 2019-08-08 | Advanced Solutions Life Sciences, Llc | System and workstation for the design, fabrication and assembly of 3-dimensional constructs |
US10558199B2 (en) * | 2018-02-13 | 2020-02-11 | University Of Central Florida Research Foundation, Inc. | Method for the design and manufacture of composites having tunable physical properties |
US11250164B2 (en) * | 2018-03-27 | 2022-02-15 | Desprez, Llc | Systems for secure collaborative graphical design using secret sharing |
US10573059B2 (en) | 2018-03-27 | 2020-02-25 | Desprez, Llc | Methods of secret sharing for secure collaborative graphical design |
US20190303620A1 (en) * | 2018-03-27 | 2019-10-03 | Desprez, Llc | Systems for secure collaborative graphical design using secret sharing |
CN108573112A (en) * | 2018-05-08 | 2018-09-25 | 北京特种工程设计研究院 | Aerospace test based on digitalized artificial emits two dimensional topology analysis method |
US11030709B2 (en) | 2018-10-29 | 2021-06-08 | DIGIBILT, Inc. | Method and system for automatically creating and assigning assembly labor activities (ALAs) to a bill of materials (BOM) |
US10997553B2 (en) * | 2018-10-29 | 2021-05-04 | DIGIBILT, Inc. | Method and system for automatically creating a bill of materials |
US20200134560A1 (en) * | 2018-10-29 | 2020-04-30 | DIGIBILT, Inc. | Method and system for automatically creating a bill of materials |
CN109359434A (en) * | 2018-12-11 | 2019-02-19 | 北京市政路桥股份有限公司 | Falsework system derivative design method |
US20210081582A1 (en) * | 2019-09-18 | 2021-03-18 | Bricsys Nv | Automated detail adaptation and insertion in a cad model |
EP4143702A1 (en) * | 2020-06-08 | 2023-03-08 | Apriori Technologies, Inc. | Insight generation based on retrieved plm data |
US11693868B2 (en) * | 2020-06-08 | 2023-07-04 | Apriori Technologies, Inc. | Insight generation based on retrieved PLM data |
WO2021252445A1 (en) * | 2020-06-08 | 2021-12-16 | aPriori, Inc. | Insight generation based on retrieved plm data |
US20210382884A1 (en) * | 2020-06-08 | 2021-12-09 | aPriori, Inc. | Insight generation based on retrieved plm data |
US11676106B2 (en) | 2020-10-14 | 2023-06-13 | Streamlinx Llc | Method and system for managing and sourcing materials and services for energy retrofit projects |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20100306681A1 (en) | 2010-12-02 |
US8762877B2 (en) | 2014-06-24 |
WO2005033985A1 (en) | 2005-04-14 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20050071135A1 (en) | Knowledge management system for computer-aided design modeling | |
US20050203718A1 (en) | Knowledge management system with integrated product document management for computer-aided design modeling | |
WO2005098687A1 (en) | Knowledge management system with interactive rule changes for computer-aided design modelling | |
US7079990B2 (en) | Automated connections of computer-aided design components | |
US10877874B2 (en) | Systems and methods for modeling and generating test requirements for software applications | |
US5019961A (en) | Computer apparatus and method for logical modelling | |
EP1510952B1 (en) | Capture, aggregation and/or visualisation of structural data of architectures | |
North et al. | Applications of graph visualization | |
US7707533B2 (en) | Data-mining-based knowledge extraction and visualization of analog/mixed-signal/custom digital circuit design flow | |
JP2004520635A (en) | Object-oriented software application with application framework for oil company model assets | |
WO1999014651A2 (en) | Method and system for database application software creation requiring minimal programming | |
Stoter et al. | Visualisation and editing of 3D objects organised in a DBMS | |
WO1996023280A1 (en) | Modelling and analysis of systems of three-dimensional object entities | |
Van Emmerik | Interactive design of 3D models with geometric constraints | |
US20070136333A1 (en) | Method of inspection and a user interface for a business measure modeling tool | |
Halfawy et al. | Modeling and implementation of smart AEC objects: an IFC perspective | |
JP4813639B2 (en) | Feature-type macro language for defining customized analysis and customized graphics functions | |
Woodbury et al. | Code checking by representation comparison | |
Russ | Development of a CAD model simplification framework for finite element analysis | |
Brockman et al. | The schema-based approach to workflow management | |
US7353488B1 (en) | Flow definition language for designing integrated circuit implementation flows | |
Pantelios | Development of a QGIS plugin for the CityGML 3D City Database | |
Schreiber | Specification and generation of user interfaces with the boss-system | |
Ng et al. | A visual approach to distributed programming | |
Willenborg | Simulation of explosions in urban space and result analysis based on CityGML City models and a cloud based 3D Web client |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: RULESTREAM CORPORATION, OHIO Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:VREDENBURGH, DAVID W.;SMITH, GREGORY J.;MATTERN, ROBERT J.;REEL/FRAME:014613/0934 Effective date: 20040218 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: QUAYE, ALBERT JR., PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:RULESTREAM COPORATION;REEL/FRAME:015084/0187 Effective date: 20040811 Owner name: QUAYE, ALBERT E. III, VIRGINIA Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:RULESTREAM COPORATION;REEL/FRAME:015084/0187 Effective date: 20040811 Owner name: QUAYE, JOSEPHINE D., PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:RULESTREAM COPORATION;REEL/FRAME:015084/0187 Effective date: 20040811 Owner name: HOURI MANAGEMTNE LIMITED, VIRGIN ISLANDS, BRITISH Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:RULESTREAM COPORATION;REEL/FRAME:015084/0187 Effective date: 20040811 Owner name: SCHLECK, JAMES D., NEW JERSEY Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:RULESTREAM COPORATION;REEL/FRAME:015084/0187 Effective date: 20040811 Owner name: MASTHEAD VENTURE PARTNERS CAPITAL, LP, MAINE Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:RULESTREAM COPORATION;REEL/FRAME:015084/0187 Effective date: 20040811 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: RULESTREAM CORPORATION, MASSACHUSETTS Free format text: PARTIAL RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MASTHEAD VENTURE PARTNERS CAPITAL, LP;REEL/FRAME:023203/0238 Effective date: 20090825 Owner name: SIEMENS PRODUCT LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE INC. Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:RULESTREAM CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:023203/0386 Effective date: 20090825 Owner name: SIEMENS PRODUCT LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE INC. Free format text: PARTIAL RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MASTHEAD VENTURE PARTNERS CAPITAL, LP;REEL/FRAME:023203/0238 Effective date: 20090825 |