US20040204508A1 - Method for reducing the maximum water concentration in a multi-phase column reactor - Google Patents
Method for reducing the maximum water concentration in a multi-phase column reactor Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20040204508A1 US20040204508A1 US10/834,152 US83415204A US2004204508A1 US 20040204508 A1 US20040204508 A1 US 20040204508A1 US 83415204 A US83415204 A US 83415204A US 2004204508 A1 US2004204508 A1 US 2004204508A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- reactor
- reactor system
- gas
- predetermined region
- water
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G2/00—Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures of undefined composition from oxides of carbon
- C10G2/30—Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures of undefined composition from oxides of carbon from carbon monoxide with hydrogen
- C10G2/32—Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures of undefined composition from oxides of carbon from carbon monoxide with hydrogen with the use of catalysts
- C10G2/34—Apparatus, reactors
- C10G2/342—Apparatus, reactors with moving solid catalysts
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01F—MIXING, e.g. DISSOLVING, EMULSIFYING OR DISPERSING
- B01F33/00—Other mixers; Mixing plants; Combinations of mixers
- B01F33/40—Mixers using gas or liquid agitation, e.g. with air supply tubes
- B01F33/406—Mixers using gas or liquid agitation, e.g. with air supply tubes in receptacles with gas supply only at the bottom
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J8/00—Chemical or physical processes in general, conducted in the presence of fluids and solid particles; Apparatus for such processes
- B01J8/18—Chemical or physical processes in general, conducted in the presence of fluids and solid particles; Apparatus for such processes with fluidised particles
- B01J8/20—Chemical or physical processes in general, conducted in the presence of fluids and solid particles; Apparatus for such processes with fluidised particles with liquid as a fluidising medium
- B01J8/22—Chemical or physical processes in general, conducted in the presence of fluids and solid particles; Apparatus for such processes with fluidised particles with liquid as a fluidising medium gas being introduced into the liquid
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method for the preparation of hydrocarbons from synthesis gas, i.e., a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen, typically labeled the Fischer-Tropsch process. Particularly, this invention relates to a method for reducing the maximum water concentration in multi-phase column reactors operating at Fischer-Tropsch conditions.
- methane the main component of natural gas
- natural gas is predicted to outlast oil reserves by a significant margin.
- most natural gas is situated in areas that are geographically remote from population and industrial centers.
- the costs of compression, transportation, and storage make its use economically unattractive.
- methane is converted into a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen (i.e., synthesis gas or syngas).
- the syngas is converted into useful hydrocarbons.
- Fischer-Tropsch synthesis This second step, the preparation of hydrocarbons from synthesis gas, is well known in the art and is usually referred to as Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, the Fischer-Tropsch process, or Fischer-Tropsch reaction(s).
- Fischer-Tropsch synthesis generally entails contacting a stream of synthesis gas with a catalyst under temperature and pressure conditions that allow the synthesis gas to react and form hydrocarbons.
- the Fischer-Tropsch reaction is the catalytic hydrogenation of carbon monoxide to produce any of a variety of products ranging from methane to higher alkanes, olefins, and aliphatic alcohols.
- Research continues on the development of more efficient Fischer-Tropsch catalyst systems and reaction systems that increase the selectivity for high-value hydrocarbons in the Fischer-Tropsch product stream.
- Catalysts for use in such synthesis usually contain a catalytically active metal of Groups 8, 9, or 10 (in the New notation of the periodic table of the elements, which is followed throughout).
- a catalytically active metal of Groups 8, 9, or 10 (in the New notation of the periodic table of the elements, which is followed throughout).
- iron, cobalt, nickel, and ruthenium have been abundantly used as the catalytically active metals.
- Cobalt and ruthenium have been found to be most suitable for catalyzing a process in which synthesis gas is converted primarily to hydrocarbons having five or more carbon atoms (i.e., where the C 5+ selectivity of the catalyst is high).
- Liquid products are recovered from the suspended solid using any suitable technique, such as settling, filtration, magnetic separation, hydrocycloning, or the like, and then separating the liquids.
- a known problem in multi-phase reactors is that water is continuously formed during Fisher-Tropsch synthesis in the reactors.
- the presence of water limits conversion and prematurely deactivates catalyst systems such as iron and cobalt-based Fisher-Tropsch catalysts [e.g., Schanke et al., Catalysis Letter 34 (1995) 269; Hilnen et al., Applied Catalysis, 186 (1999) 169; van Berge et al., Catalysis Today, 58 (2000) 321).
- a high water partial pressure correlates to a high deactivation rate.
- it is believed that above a certain partial pressure of water the catalyst deactivates faster.
- deactivation rate and water concentration may have one or more thresholds, between which the relationship may or may not be linear.
- the relationship between deactivation rate and water concentration may depend on other physical parameters of the system. Regardless of the precise nature of the relationship, it is believed that reducing reactor water concentration would reduce the rate of catalyst deactivation.
- the total pressure has a direct influence on the wax selectivity, in that a higher pressure will result in a higher wax selectivity.
- a higher total pressure also correlates to a higher water partial pressure and therefore a higher deactivation rate. Therefore, if reactors are operated at conditions that are conducive to higher alpha values, per-pass conversion will necessarily have to be low to avoid premature catalyst deactivation due to water. A low per-pass conversion is undesirable, however, because it results in higher capital investment and operating costs.
- the water not only has a negative effect on the catalyst deactivation rate, but it also inhibits the rate of reaction (see for example, Kirillov, V. A. et al., in Natural Gas Conversion V, Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, vol. 119, A. Parmaliana et al., ed., Elsevier Science, New York, pp. 149-154, 1998).
- the water partial pressure is therefore a constraint that prevents the realization of the kinetic and/or wax selectivity potential of iron and cobalt-based Fisher-Tropsch catalysts. Therefore, in order to improve the efficiency of multi-phase reactors using iron and cobalt-based catalyst systems, there exists a need for a method to reduce the maximum water concentration reached in the system during Fisher-Tropsch synthesis.
- the present invention relates to a method for reducing the maximum water concentration in multi-phase reactors operating at Fischer-Tropsch conditions. More particularly, the present invention is based on the recognition of a high water concentration region and alteration of the flow patterns within the reactor in order to reduce the maximum water concentration in the reactor. This method increases the catalyst lifetime, thereby reducing the operating cost of the Fischer-Tropsch process.
- a method of reducing the maximum concentration of water in a multi-phase reactor containing an expanded slurry bed and a water-rich slurry region for Fisher-Tropsch synthesis includes changing the flow patterns of the fluids within the reactor and/or diluting the water concentration in the high water concentration region. More precisely, flow patterns are modified so as to cause a mixing of fluids from a water-rich region in the reactor with fluids in the rest of the reactor. The flow patterns may be changed by introducing a mixing enhancing fluid into the predetermined region, installing baffles into the predetermined region, or the combination of the two, or by other mechanical mixing methods known in the art.
- the introduction of the mixing enhancing fluid can also lead to a dilution of the water concentration in the predetermined region.
- the water-rich region is located between 1 ⁇ 2 H and H and between 1 ⁇ 2 R and R, where H is the height of the expanded slurry bed and R is the radius of the reactor.
- the expanded slurry bed is herein defined as the region within a reactor where an intimate liquid-solid-gas phase contact exists.
- the flow patterns are preferably changed or disrupted so that the difference between the highest water concentration in the reactor and the lowest water concentration in the reactor is minimized.
- the present invention allows higher per-pass conversions of syngas and/or use of higher total pressures at any degree of conversion, while protecting the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst from an excessive oxidation rate.
- FIG. 1 is a contour diagram of the water concentration in the liquid phase in a multi-phase reactor operating at Fischer-Tropsch conditions
- FIG. 2 is a plot of radial profiles of the dimensionless water concentration at four elevations along the expanded slurry bed
- FIG. 3 is a schematic cross-sectional side view of a multi-phase reactor constructed in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 4 is a schematic top view of an annular or toroidal fluid distributor in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 5 is a schematic cross-sectional side view of a multi-phase reactor system in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 6 is a schematic cross-sectional side view of a series of nozzles flush mounted on or protruding from the reactor wall in accordance with another preferred embodiment
- FIG. 7 is a schematic top view of a series of nozzles flush mounted on or protruding from the reactor wall in accordance with another preferred embodiment
- FIG. 1 a contour of water concentration in the liquid phase in an exemplary multi-phase 100 reactor operating at Fischer-Tropsch conditions is shown.
- the values of water concentration are color coded, where red indicates a high water concentration and blue indicates a low water concentration region.
- the water concentration distribution in the reactor is further illustrated in FIG. 2, wherein the radial profiles of the dimensionless water concentration are shown at four elevations along the expanded slurry bed.
- the dimensionless water concentration is defined as the local water concentration divided by the average water concentration of the whole reactor.
- the water concentration in the near wall region at the upper half of the expanded slurry bed in the reactor is significantly higher than in other regions in the reactor.
- the high water concentration tends to be located radially between approximately 0.5R and R and vertically between approximately 0.5H and H, in the region labeled 101 . Still more specifically, the high water concentration is located radially between approximately 0.75R and R, and still more specifically between approximately 0.75R and 0.875R, and vertically between approximately 0.75H and H, with the highest concentrations being in region 103 .
- a mixing enhancing fluid distributor 102 is included in the reactor.
- the mixing enhancing fluid distributor 102 preferably, but not necessarily, comprises an annular or toroidal ring 104 having output ports 106 and a feed line 108 .
- Ports 106 are preferably but not necessarily uniformly distributed on ring 104 .
- output ports 106 feed a mixing enhancing fluid into the high water concentration region, i.e. the mixing enhancing fluid distributor 102 is positioned in the slurry between approximately 0.5R and R and between approximately 0.5H and H.
- the mixing enhancing fluid distributor 102 is positioned radially between approximately 0.75R and R and still more preferably between 0.75R and 0.875R, and vertically between approximately 0.75H and H.
- the mixing enhancing fluid can be gas, or liquid, or gas and liquid mixtures.
- the mixing enhancing gas can be synthesis gas, inert gas, methane-rich gas, light hydrocarbons, hydrogen containing gas, tail gas from a Fischer-Tropsch reactor, tail gas from a GTL plant, tail gas from an olefin plant, liquids vaporizing at operating conditions, or a combination thereof.
- the synthesis gas can comprise a mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide having a hydrogen-to-carbon monoxide ratio that is the same as, lower, or higher than that of the feed to the reactor.
- the mixing enhancing gas can be a stream from a tail gas from other processes in a Gas-to-Liquids plant, including without limitation: hydrotreating, hydrocracking, or olefin production plants.
- the mixing enhancing liquid can be liquid hydrocarbons from the product streams of the Fischer-Tropsch reactor or from other processes in a Gas-to-Liquids plant.
- Output ports 106 are preferably but not necessarily uniformly distributed around the circumference of the mixing enhancing fluid distributor 102 , so that the flow of the mixing enhancing fluid into the high water concentration region disrupts or shifts the pattern of slurry flow within the reactor.
- it may also be desired to provide at least one, more preferably at least four, and still more preferably at least eight output ports 106 .
- it may be preferred to provide a plurality of mixing enhancing fluid distributors 102 positioned at different heights and/or different radial positions within the reactor, preferably but not necessarily between approximately 0.5R and R and between approximately 0.5H and H, more preferably between approximately 0.75R and R and between approximately 0.75H and H.
- the degree of mixing attained be sufficient to distribute the water present in the reactor evenly throughout the reactor. More precisely, it is preferred that the degree of mixing be such that the highest water concentration in the reactor is no more than 50% greater than the average water concentration in the reactor. It is still more preferred that the highest water concentration in the reactor be no more than 20% greater than the average water concentration in the reactor, and most preferred that the highest concentration be less than 10% greater than the lowest.
- the rate of flow of gas or liquid or the gas and liquid mixtures through mixing enhancing fluid distributor 102 is preferably sufficient to cause the desired degree of mixing.
- one or more passive mixing devices such as baffle plates 112 is positioned in the slurry between approximately 0.5R and R and between approximately 0.5H and H.
- the passive mixing device(s) is/are positioned between approximately 0.75R and R and between approximately 0.75H and H.
- the passive mixing device disrupts or shifts the pattern of slurry flow within the reactor, which in turn, reduces the maximum water concentration in the reactor.
- baffle plates 112 which are static, can be replaced with one or more passive but movable devices, such as non-driven paddles (not shown), or with one or more powered mixing devices, such as power-driven paddles (not shown) or magnetic mixing devices (not shown).
- passive but movable devices such as non-driven paddles (not shown)
- powered mixing devices such as power-driven paddles (not shown) or magnetic mixing devices (not shown).
- the mixing enhancing fluid is introduced into the high water concentration region through a series of flush mounted nozzles 207 or protruding nozzles 206 .
- the number of nozzles is preferably at least one, more preferably at least four, and still more preferably at least eight. If two or more nozzles are used, it is preferred that they be evenly distributed around the circumference of the reactor. It may be preferred to provide a plurality of mixing enhancing fluid nozzles positioned at different heights and/or different radial positions within the reactor between approximately 0.5R and R and between approximately 0.5H and H, more preferably between approximately 0.75R and R and between approximately 0.75H and H.
- the configurations of either the mixing enhancing fluid distributor 102 , nozzles 206 , 207 , or the baffle plates 112 or a combination thereof may be modified significantly without departing from the scope of the invention. More specifically, any method of disrupting the flow patterns that cause a localized concentration of water is contemplated. These include both powered and non-powered (static) mechanical devices, such as baffles 112 , fins, paddles, magnetically driven mixing devices, and fluid devices such as gas or liquid distributor 102 , nozzles 206 , 207 , and the like.
- any suitable water removal means i.e. separation methods
- Some of the water removal means may be incorporated into the multi-phase reactor itself, while others may be independent of the reactor and utilize a slurry transport means.
- gas-disengaging means may be utilized between the reactor and the water removal means to ease separation.
- different water removal means may be combined with each other in various arrangements to increase the efficiency of overall water removal.
- Preferred separation methods include separation by phase addition or creation, separation by barrier, separation by solid agent, and separation by external field or gradient. Separation methods are disclosed in greater detail in the co-pending U.S. patent applications cited above. Ser. No. 60/344,229, filed Dec. 28, 2001 and entitled “Water Removal in Fischer-Tropsch Processes,” which is incorporated herein by reference.
- the feed gases charged to the process of the preferred embodiment of the present invention comprise hydrogen, or a hydrogen source, and carbon monoxide.
- H 2 /CO mixtures suitable as a feedstock for conversion to hydrocarbons according to the process of this invention can be obtained from light hydrocarbons such as methane by means of steam reforming, partial oxidation, or other processes known in the art.
- the hydrogen is provided by free hydrogen, although some Fischer-Tropsch catalysts have sufficient water gas shift activity to convert some water to hydrogen for use in the Fischer-Tropsch process. It is preferred that the molar ratio of hydrogen to carbon monoxide in the feed be greater than 0.5:1 (e.g., from about 0.67 to 2.5).
- the feed gas stream contains hydrogen and carbon monoxide in a molar ratio of about 2:1.
- the feed gas may also contain carbon dioxide.
- the feed gas stream should contain a low concentration of compounds or elements that have a deleterious effect on the catalyst, such as poisons.
- the feed gas may need to be pre-treated to ensure that it contains low concentrations of sulfur or nitrogen compounds such as hydrogen sulfide, ammonia and carbonyl sulfides.
- the feed gas is contacted with a catalyst in a reaction zone.
- a catalyst in a reaction zone.
- Mechanical arrangements of conventional design may be employed as the reaction zone including but not limited to, for example, slurry bubble column, reactive distillation column, or ebulliating bed reactors, among others, may be used. Accordingly, the size and physical form of the catalyst particles may vary depending on the reactor in which they are to be used.
- the Fischer-Tropsch process is typically run in a continuous mode.
- the gas hourly space velocity defined by dividing the gas flow rate by the volume of the expanded catalyst bed, may range from about 50 1/hr to about 10,000 1/hr, preferably from about 300 1/hr to about 2,000 1/hr.
- the gas hourly space velocity is defined at the standard condition where the pressure is 1 bar and temperature is 0 degree centigrade.
- the reaction zone temperature is typically in the range from about 160° C. to about 300° C.
- the reaction zone is operated at conversion promoting conditions at temperatures from about 190° C. to about 260° C.
- the reaction zone pressure is preferably in the range of from about 80 psig (653 kPa) to about 1000 psig (6994 kPa), more preferably from 80 psig (653 kPa) to about 600 psig (4237 kPa), and still more preferably, from about 140 psig (1066 kPa) to about 500 psig (3497 kPa).
- the products resulting from the process will have a great range of molecular weights.
- the carbon number range of the product hydrocarbons will start at methane and continue to the limits observable by modem analysis, about 50 to 100 carbons per molecule.
- the process is particularly useful for making hydrocarbons having five or more carbon atoms especially when the above-referenced preferred space velocity, temperature and pressure ranges are employed.
- the effluent stream of the reaction zone will often be a mixed phase stream including liquid and vapor phase products.
- the effluent stream of the reaction zone may be cooled to condense the additional amounts of hydrocarbons and passed into a vapor-liquid separation zone separating the liquid and vapor phase products.
- the vapor phase material may be passed into a second stage of cooling for recovery of additional hydrocarbons.
- the liquid phase material from the initial vapor-liquid separation zone together with any liquid from a subsequent separation zone may be fed into a fractionation column.
- a stripping column is employed first to remove light hydrocarbons such as propane and butane.
- the remaining hydrocarbons may be passed into a fractionation column where they are separated by boiling point range into products such as naphtha, kerosene and fuel oils.
- Hydrocarbons recovered from the reaction zone and having a boiling point above that of the desired products may be passed into conventional processing equipment such as a hydrocracking zone in order to reduce their molecular weight.
- the gas phase recovered from the reactor zone effluent stream after hydrocarbon recovery may be partially recycled if it contains a sufficient quantity of hydrogen and/or carbon monoxide.
Abstract
The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for reducing the maximum water concentration in multi-phase reactors operating at Fischer-Tropsch conditions. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a method of reducing the maximum concentration of water in a multi-phase reactor containing an expanded slurry bed and a water-rich slurry region for Fisher-Tropsch synthesis includes changing the flow structure of a predetermined region in the reactor. The flow structure may be changed by introducing a mixing enhancing fluid into the predetermined region, installing baffles into the predetermined region, or by other methods known in the art. Preferably the predetermined region is located between ½ H and H and between ½ R and R, where H is the height of the expanded slurry bed and R is the radius of the reactor.
Description
- This application is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/193,357. filed Jul. 11, 2002, entitled Method for Reducing the Maximum Water Concentration in Multi-Phase Column Reactor, which is related to commonly assigned, co-pending U.S. Provisional Applications Serial No. 60/344,228, filed Dec. 28, 2001 and entitled “Method for Reducing Water Concentration in a Multi-phase Column Reactor,” Ser. No. 60/344,229, filed Dec. 28, 2001 and entitled Water Removal In Fischer-Tropsch Processes, and Ser. No. 10/034,452, filed Dec. 28, 2001 and entitled Water Stripping and Catalyst/Liquid Product Separation System, all of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
- The present invention relates to a method for the preparation of hydrocarbons from synthesis gas, i.e., a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen, typically labeled the Fischer-Tropsch process. Particularly, this invention relates to a method for reducing the maximum water concentration in multi-phase column reactors operating at Fischer-Tropsch conditions.
- Large quantities of methane, the main component of natural gas, are available in many areas of the world, and natural gas is predicted to outlast oil reserves by a significant margin. However, most natural gas is situated in areas that are geographically remote from population and industrial centers. The costs of compression, transportation, and storage make its use economically unattractive. To improve the economics of natural gas use, much research has focused on the use of methane as a starting material for the production of higher hydrocarbons and hydrocarbon liquids, which are more easily transported and thus more economical. The conversion of methane to hydrocarbons is typically carried out in two steps. In the first step, methane is converted into a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen (i.e., synthesis gas or syngas). In a second step, the syngas is converted into useful hydrocarbons.
- This second step, the preparation of hydrocarbons from synthesis gas, is well known in the art and is usually referred to as Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, the Fischer-Tropsch process, or Fischer-Tropsch reaction(s). Fischer-Tropsch synthesis generally entails contacting a stream of synthesis gas with a catalyst under temperature and pressure conditions that allow the synthesis gas to react and form hydrocarbons.
- More specifically, the Fischer-Tropsch reaction is the catalytic hydrogenation of carbon monoxide to produce any of a variety of products ranging from methane to higher alkanes, olefins, and aliphatic alcohols. Research continues on the development of more efficient Fischer-Tropsch catalyst systems and reaction systems that increase the selectivity for high-value hydrocarbons in the Fischer-Tropsch product stream.
- There are continuing efforts to design reactors that are more effective at producing these desired products. Product distribution, product selectivity, and reactor productivity depend heavily on the type and structure of the catalyst and on the reactor type and operating conditions. Catalysts for use in such synthesis usually contain a catalytically active metal of Groups 8, 9, or 10 (in the New notation of the periodic table of the elements, which is followed throughout). In particular, iron, cobalt, nickel, and ruthenium have been abundantly used as the catalytically active metals. Cobalt and ruthenium have been found to be most suitable for catalyzing a process in which synthesis gas is converted primarily to hydrocarbons having five or more carbon atoms (i.e., where the C5+ selectivity of the catalyst is high).
- Originally, the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis was operated in packed bed reactors. These reactors have several drawbacks, such as difficulty of temperature control, that can be overcome by using gas-agitated slurry reactors or slurry bubble column reactors. Gas-agitated reactors, sometimes called “slurry reactors,” “slurry bubble columns,” or “multi-phase reactors” operate by suspending catalytic particles in liquid and feeding gas reactants into the bottom of the reactor through a gas distributor, which produces small gas bubbles. As the gas bubbles rise through the reactor, the reactants are absorbed into the liquid and diffuse to the catalyst where, depending on the catalyst system, they are converted to gaseous and/or liquid products. If gaseous products are formed, they enter the gas bubbles and are collected at the top of the reactor. Liquid products are recovered from the suspended solid using any suitable technique, such as settling, filtration, magnetic separation, hydrocycloning, or the like, and then separating the liquids.
- A known problem in multi-phase reactors, however, is that water is continuously formed during Fisher-Tropsch synthesis in the reactors. The presence of water limits conversion and prematurely deactivates catalyst systems such as iron and cobalt-based Fisher-Tropsch catalysts [e.g., Schanke et al., Catalysis Letter 34 (1995) 269; Hilnen et al., Applied Catalysis, 186 (1999) 169; van Berge et al., Catalysis Today, 58 (2000) 321). Thus, a high water partial pressure correlates to a high deactivation rate. In addition, it is believed that above a certain partial pressure of water, the catalyst deactivates faster. For example, some have observed that partial pressures of water above about 6 bar deactivate certain Fischer-Tropsch catalysts, while partial pressures of water below that level do not [Schanke et al., Energy & Fuels, 10 (1997) 867]. It is further believed that the relationship between deactivation rate and water concentration may have one or more thresholds, between which the relationship may or may not be linear. Furthermore, the relationship between deactivation rate and water concentration may depend on other physical parameters of the system. Regardless of the precise nature of the relationship, it is believed that reducing reactor water concentration would reduce the rate of catalyst deactivation.
- For any given cobalt-based catalyst, along with the H2/CO ratio and the reaction temperature, the total pressure has a direct influence on the wax selectivity, in that a higher pressure will result in a higher wax selectivity. However, a higher total pressure (at any given degree of per-pass conversion) also correlates to a higher water partial pressure and therefore a higher deactivation rate. Therefore, if reactors are operated at conditions that are conducive to higher alpha values, per-pass conversion will necessarily have to be low to avoid premature catalyst deactivation due to water. A low per-pass conversion is undesirable, however, because it results in higher capital investment and operating costs. Additionally, for iron-based catalysts, the water not only has a negative effect on the catalyst deactivation rate, but it also inhibits the rate of reaction (see for example, Kirillov, V. A. et al., in Natural Gas Conversion V, Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, vol. 119, A. Parmaliana et al., ed., Elsevier Science, New York, pp. 149-154, 1998).
- The water partial pressure is therefore a constraint that prevents the realization of the kinetic and/or wax selectivity potential of iron and cobalt-based Fisher-Tropsch catalysts. Therefore, in order to improve the efficiency of multi-phase reactors using iron and cobalt-based catalyst systems, there exists a need for a method to reduce the maximum water concentration reached in the system during Fisher-Tropsch synthesis.
- The present invention relates to a method for reducing the maximum water concentration in multi-phase reactors operating at Fischer-Tropsch conditions. More particularly, the present invention is based on the recognition of a high water concentration region and alteration of the flow patterns within the reactor in order to reduce the maximum water concentration in the reactor. This method increases the catalyst lifetime, thereby reducing the operating cost of the Fischer-Tropsch process.
- In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a method of reducing the maximum concentration of water in a multi-phase reactor containing an expanded slurry bed and a water-rich slurry region for Fisher-Tropsch synthesis includes changing the flow patterns of the fluids within the reactor and/or diluting the water concentration in the high water concentration region. More precisely, flow patterns are modified so as to cause a mixing of fluids from a water-rich region in the reactor with fluids in the rest of the reactor. The flow patterns may be changed by introducing a mixing enhancing fluid into the predetermined region, installing baffles into the predetermined region, or the combination of the two, or by other mechanical mixing methods known in the art. The introduction of the mixing enhancing fluid can also lead to a dilution of the water concentration in the predetermined region. In some reactors, the water-rich region is located between ½ H and H and between ½ R and R, where H is the height of the expanded slurry bed and R is the radius of the reactor. The expanded slurry bed is herein defined as the region within a reactor where an intimate liquid-solid-gas phase contact exists. The flow patterns are preferably changed or disrupted so that the difference between the highest water concentration in the reactor and the lowest water concentration in the reactor is minimized.
- The present invention allows higher per-pass conversions of syngas and/or use of higher total pressures at any degree of conversion, while protecting the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst from an excessive oxidation rate.
- A better understanding of the present invention can be obtained when the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment is considered in conjunction with the following drawings, wherein:
- FIG. 1 is a contour diagram of the water concentration in the liquid phase in a multi-phase reactor operating at Fischer-Tropsch conditions;
- FIG. 2 is a plot of radial profiles of the dimensionless water concentration at four elevations along the expanded slurry bed;
- FIG. 3 is a schematic cross-sectional side view of a multi-phase reactor constructed in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention;
- FIG. 4 is a schematic top view of an annular or toroidal fluid distributor in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention;
- FIG. 5 is a schematic cross-sectional side view of a multi-phase reactor system in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention;
- FIG. 6 is a schematic cross-sectional side view of a series of nozzles flush mounted on or protruding from the reactor wall in accordance with another preferred embodiment;
- FIG. 7 is a schematic top view of a series of nozzles flush mounted on or protruding from the reactor wall in accordance with another preferred embodiment;
- In typical Fischer-Tropsch processes, water begins to accumulate unevenly in the operating reactor, forming a water-rich slurry region. As mentioned above, this is undesirable because water has a negative effect on the catalyst deactivation rate and inhibits the rate of reaction. To minimize this problem, the present invention changes the fluid flow patterns such that slurry from a water-rich region is mixed with slurry from regions having lower water concentrations. This effectively reduces the maximum water concentration in the reactor, thereby reducing the catalyst deactivation rate in the reactor.
- Referring initially to FIG. 1, a contour of water concentration in the liquid phase in an exemplary multi-phase100 reactor operating at Fischer-Tropsch conditions is shown. The values of water concentration are color coded, where red indicates a high water concentration and blue indicates a low water concentration region. The water concentration distribution in the reactor is further illustrated in FIG. 2, wherein the radial profiles of the dimensionless water concentration are shown at four elevations along the expanded slurry bed. The dimensionless water concentration is defined as the local water concentration divided by the average water concentration of the whole reactor. As shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, the water concentration in the near wall region at the upper half of the expanded slurry bed in the reactor is significantly higher than in other regions in the reactor. More specifically, if the expanded slurry bed is defined as having a height H and a radius R, the high water concentration tends to be located radially between approximately 0.5R and R and vertically between approximately 0.5H and H, in the region labeled 101. Still more specifically, the high water concentration is located radially between approximately 0.75R and R, and still more specifically between approximately 0.75R and 0.875R, and vertically between approximately 0.75H and H, with the highest concentrations being in
region 103. - Referring now to FIGS. 3 and 4, in one embodiment of the invention, a mixing enhancing
fluid distributor 102 is included in the reactor. The mixing enhancingfluid distributor 102 preferably, but not necessarily, comprises an annular ortoroidal ring 104 havingoutput ports 106 and afeed line 108.Ports 106 are preferably but not necessarily uniformly distributed onring 104. In one preferred embodiment,output ports 106 feed a mixing enhancing fluid into the high water concentration region, i.e. the mixing enhancingfluid distributor 102 is positioned in the slurry between approximately 0.5R and R and between approximately 0.5H and H. Still more specifically, the mixing enhancingfluid distributor 102 is positioned radially between approximately 0.75R and R and still more preferably between 0.75R and 0.875R, and vertically between approximately 0.75H and H. The mixing enhancing fluid can be gas, or liquid, or gas and liquid mixtures. The mixing enhancing gas can be synthesis gas, inert gas, methane-rich gas, light hydrocarbons, hydrogen containing gas, tail gas from a Fischer-Tropsch reactor, tail gas from a GTL plant, tail gas from an olefin plant, liquids vaporizing at operating conditions, or a combination thereof. The synthesis gas can comprise a mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide having a hydrogen-to-carbon monoxide ratio that is the same as, lower, or higher than that of the feed to the reactor. Alternatively, the mixing enhancing gas can be a stream from a tail gas from other processes in a Gas-to-Liquids plant, including without limitation: hydrotreating, hydrocracking, or olefin production plants. The mixing enhancing liquid can be liquid hydrocarbons from the product streams of the Fischer-Tropsch reactor or from other processes in a Gas-to-Liquids plant. -
Output ports 106 are preferably but not necessarily uniformly distributed around the circumference of the mixing enhancingfluid distributor 102, so that the flow of the mixing enhancing fluid into the high water concentration region disrupts or shifts the pattern of slurry flow within the reactor. Thus, it may also be desired to provide at least one, more preferably at least four, and still more preferably at least eightoutput ports 106. Further, in some embodiments, it may be preferred to provide a plurality of mixing enhancingfluid distributors 102 positioned at different heights and/or different radial positions within the reactor, preferably but not necessarily between approximately 0.5R and R and between approximately 0.5H and H, more preferably between approximately 0.75R and R and between approximately 0.75H and H. - It is preferred that the degree of mixing attained be sufficient to distribute the water present in the reactor evenly throughout the reactor. More precisely, it is preferred that the degree of mixing be such that the highest water concentration in the reactor is no more than 50% greater than the average water concentration in the reactor. It is still more preferred that the highest water concentration in the reactor be no more than 20% greater than the average water concentration in the reactor, and most preferred that the highest concentration be less than 10% greater than the lowest. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 3, the rate of flow of gas or liquid or the gas and liquid mixtures through mixing enhancing
fluid distributor 102 is preferably sufficient to cause the desired degree of mixing. - Referring now to FIG. 5, in another preferred embodiment, one or more passive mixing devices, such as
baffle plates 112, is positioned in the slurry between approximately 0.5R and R and between approximately 0.5H and H. The passive mixing device(s) is/are positioned between approximately 0.75R and R and between approximately 0.75H and H. Similarly to the mixing enhancingfluid distributor 102, the passive mixing device disrupts or shifts the pattern of slurry flow within the reactor, which in turn, reduces the maximum water concentration in the reactor. - Alternatively, baffle
plates 112, which are static, can be replaced with one or more passive but movable devices, such as non-driven paddles (not shown), or with one or more powered mixing devices, such as power-driven paddles (not shown) or magnetic mixing devices (not shown). - In another preferred embodiment of the invention, shown in FIGS. 6 and 7, the mixing enhancing fluid is introduced into the high water concentration region through a series of flush mounted
nozzles 207 or protrudingnozzles 206. The number of nozzles is preferably at least one, more preferably at least four, and still more preferably at least eight. If two or more nozzles are used, it is preferred that they be evenly distributed around the circumference of the reactor. It may be preferred to provide a plurality of mixing enhancing fluid nozzles positioned at different heights and/or different radial positions within the reactor between approximately 0.5R and R and between approximately 0.5H and H, more preferably between approximately 0.75R and R and between approximately 0.75H and H. - It will be understood that the configurations of either the mixing enhancing
fluid distributor 102,nozzles baffle plates 112 or a combination thereof may be modified significantly without departing from the scope of the invention. More specifically, any method of disrupting the flow patterns that cause a localized concentration of water is contemplated. These include both powered and non-powered (static) mechanical devices, such asbaffles 112, fins, paddles, magnetically driven mixing devices, and fluid devices such as gas orliquid distributor 102,nozzles - It is further contemplated that in some cases it may be desirable to remove water from the reactor in order to reduce the total water concentration in the reactor. Any suitable water removal means (i.e. separation methods) may be employed to remove water from the water-rich slurry region. Some of the water removal means may be incorporated into the multi-phase reactor itself, while others may be independent of the reactor and utilize a slurry transport means. It is contemplated that in cases where the water removal means is independent of the reactor, gas-disengaging means may be utilized between the reactor and the water removal means to ease separation. In addition, different water removal means may be combined with each other in various arrangements to increase the efficiency of overall water removal. Preferred separation methods include separation by phase addition or creation, separation by barrier, separation by solid agent, and separation by external field or gradient. Separation methods are disclosed in greater detail in the co-pending U.S. patent applications cited above. Ser. No. 60/344,229, filed Dec. 28, 2001 and entitled “Water Removal in Fischer-Tropsch Processes,” which is incorporated herein by reference.
- Fischer-Tropsch Operating Conditions
- The feed gases charged to the process of the preferred embodiment of the present invention comprise hydrogen, or a hydrogen source, and carbon monoxide. H2/CO mixtures suitable as a feedstock for conversion to hydrocarbons according to the process of this invention can be obtained from light hydrocarbons such as methane by means of steam reforming, partial oxidation, or other processes known in the art. Preferably the hydrogen is provided by free hydrogen, although some Fischer-Tropsch catalysts have sufficient water gas shift activity to convert some water to hydrogen for use in the Fischer-Tropsch process. It is preferred that the molar ratio of hydrogen to carbon monoxide in the feed be greater than 0.5:1 (e.g., from about 0.67 to 2.5). Preferably, the feed gas stream contains hydrogen and carbon monoxide in a molar ratio of about 2:1. The feed gas may also contain carbon dioxide. The feed gas stream should contain a low concentration of compounds or elements that have a deleterious effect on the catalyst, such as poisons. For example, the feed gas may need to be pre-treated to ensure that it contains low concentrations of sulfur or nitrogen compounds such as hydrogen sulfide, ammonia and carbonyl sulfides.
- The feed gas is contacted with a catalyst in a reaction zone. Mechanical arrangements of conventional design may be employed as the reaction zone including but not limited to, for example, slurry bubble column, reactive distillation column, or ebulliating bed reactors, among others, may be used. Accordingly, the size and physical form of the catalyst particles may vary depending on the reactor in which they are to be used.
- The Fischer-Tropsch process is typically run in a continuous mode. In this mode, typically, the gas hourly space velocity, defined by dividing the gas flow rate by the volume of the expanded catalyst bed, may range from about 50 1/hr to about 10,000 1/hr, preferably from about 300 1/hr to about 2,000 1/hr. The gas hourly space velocity is defined at the standard condition where the pressure is 1 bar and temperature is 0 degree centigrade. The reaction zone temperature is typically in the range from about 160° C. to about 300° C. Preferably, the reaction zone is operated at conversion promoting conditions at temperatures from about 190° C. to about 260° C. The reaction zone pressure is preferably in the range of from about 80 psig (653 kPa) to about 1000 psig (6994 kPa), more preferably from 80 psig (653 kPa) to about 600 psig (4237 kPa), and still more preferably, from about 140 psig (1066 kPa) to about 500 psig (3497 kPa).
- The products resulting from the process will have a great range of molecular weights. Typically, the carbon number range of the product hydrocarbons will start at methane and continue to the limits observable by modem analysis, about 50 to 100 carbons per molecule. The process is particularly useful for making hydrocarbons having five or more carbon atoms especially when the above-referenced preferred space velocity, temperature and pressure ranges are employed.
- The wide range of hydrocarbons produced in the reaction zone will typically result in liquid phase products being present at the reaction zone operating conditions. Therefore, the effluent stream of the reaction zone will often be a mixed phase stream including liquid and vapor phase products. The effluent stream of the reaction zone may be cooled to condense the additional amounts of hydrocarbons and passed into a vapor-liquid separation zone separating the liquid and vapor phase products. The vapor phase material may be passed into a second stage of cooling for recovery of additional hydrocarbons. The liquid phase material from the initial vapor-liquid separation zone together with any liquid from a subsequent separation zone may be fed into a fractionation column. Typically, a stripping column is employed first to remove light hydrocarbons such as propane and butane. The remaining hydrocarbons may be passed into a fractionation column where they are separated by boiling point range into products such as naphtha, kerosene and fuel oils. Hydrocarbons recovered from the reaction zone and having a boiling point above that of the desired products may be passed into conventional processing equipment such as a hydrocracking zone in order to reduce their molecular weight. The gas phase recovered from the reactor zone effluent stream after hydrocarbon recovery may be partially recycled if it contains a sufficient quantity of hydrogen and/or carbon monoxide.
- While the present invention has been disclosed and described in terms of a preferred embodiment, the invention is not limited to the preferred embodiment. For example, it will be understood that the various mechanical arrangements disclosed herein for the reducing the maximum water concentration in the reactor can be modified in number, shape, size, and configuration. In addition, various modifications to the operating conditions, feedstock, catalyst, and slurry content, among others, can be made without departing from the scope of the invention. In the claims that follow, any recitation of steps is not intended as a requirement that the steps be performed sequentially, or that one step be completed before another step is begun, unless explicitly so stated.
Claims (17)
1. A Fischer-Tropsch reactor system, comprising:
a slurry bed reactor receiving a synthesis gas feed and containing a hydrocarbon synthesis catalyst, said catalyst forming an expanded slurry bed under reaction conditions effective to form a product stream comprising hydrocarbons and water; and
means for changing the flow pattern within the reactor so as to cause mixing of slurry from a predetermined region within the reactor with fluids from the rest of the slurry bed.
2. The reactor system according to claim 1 wherein said predetermined region is located between ½ H and H and between ½ R and R, where H is the height of the expanded slurry bed and R is the radius of the reactor.
3. The reactor system according to claim 1 wherein said predetermined region is located between ¾ H and H and between ¾ R and R.
4. The reactor system according to claim 1 , further comprising a fluid inlet in said predetermined region.
5. The reactor system according to claim 1 wherein said flow changing means comprises an inlet for introducing a mixing enhancing fluid into said predetermined region.
6. The reactor system according to claim 5 wherein the mixing enhancing fluid is a gas or gas mixture selected from the group comprising synthesis gas, inert gas, methane-rich gas, light hydrocarbons, hydrogen containing gas, tail gas from a Fischer-Tropsch reactor, tail gas from a GTL plant, tail gas from an olefin plant, liquids vaporizing at operating conditions, and combinations thereof.
7. The reactor system according to claim 5 wherein the mixing enhancing fluid is a liquid that comprises liquid hydrocarbons from the product stream of the Fischer-Tropsch reactor or from other processes in a Gas-to-Liquids plant.
8. The reactor system according to claim 5 wherein said flow changing means comprises at least one mixing enhancing fluid distributor.
9. The reactor system according to claim 8 wherein the said mixing enhancing fluid distributor comprises an annular ring having at least one outlet port.
10. The reactor system according to claim 8 wherein a plurality of mixing enhancing fluid distributors are positioned at different heights in said predetermined region.
11. The reactor system according to claim 8 wherein a plurality of mixing enhancing fluid distributors are positioned at different radial positions in said water-rich slurry region.
12. The reactor system according to claim 5 wherein the mixing enhancing fluid is introduced into said predetermined region through at least one nozzle.
13. The reactor system according to claim 12 wherein said nozzles are positioned at different heights in the water-rich slurry region.
14. The reactor system according to claim 12 wherein said nozzles are positioned at different radial positions in the water-rich slurry region.
15. The reactor system according to claim 1 wherein said flow changing means comprises at least one static mixing device in said predetermined region.
16. The reactor system according to claim 1 wherein said flow changing means comprises at least one passive movable device in said predetermined region.
17. The reactor system according to claim 1 wherein said flow changing means comprises at least one power-driven device in said predetermined region.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/834,152 US20040204508A1 (en) | 2001-12-28 | 2004-04-28 | Method for reducing the maximum water concentration in a multi-phase column reactor |
Applications Claiming Priority (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US34422901P | 2001-12-28 | 2001-12-28 | |
US34422801P | 2001-12-28 | 2001-12-28 | |
US10/034,452 US6720358B2 (en) | 2001-12-28 | 2001-12-28 | Water stripping and catalyst/liquid product separation system |
US10/193,357 US6809122B2 (en) | 2001-12-28 | 2002-07-11 | Method for reducing the maximum water concentration in a multi-phase column reactor |
US10/834,152 US20040204508A1 (en) | 2001-12-28 | 2004-04-28 | Method for reducing the maximum water concentration in a multi-phase column reactor |
Related Parent Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/034,452 Division US6720358B2 (en) | 2001-12-28 | 2001-12-28 | Water stripping and catalyst/liquid product separation system |
US10/193,357 Division US6809122B2 (en) | 2001-12-28 | 2002-07-11 | Method for reducing the maximum water concentration in a multi-phase column reactor |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20040204508A1 true US20040204508A1 (en) | 2004-10-14 |
Family
ID=30114501
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/193,357 Expired - Fee Related US6809122B2 (en) | 2001-12-28 | 2002-07-11 | Method for reducing the maximum water concentration in a multi-phase column reactor |
US10/834,152 Abandoned US20040204508A1 (en) | 2001-12-28 | 2004-04-28 | Method for reducing the maximum water concentration in a multi-phase column reactor |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/193,357 Expired - Fee Related US6809122B2 (en) | 2001-12-28 | 2002-07-11 | Method for reducing the maximum water concentration in a multi-phase column reactor |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US6809122B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1569884A2 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2003251837A1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2492117A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2004007406A2 (en) |
ZA (1) | ZA200410201B (en) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090239959A1 (en) * | 2008-03-24 | 2009-09-24 | Paul Steven Wallace | Methods and systems for reactor low product variation |
US20090239960A1 (en) * | 2008-03-24 | 2009-09-24 | Paul Steven Wallace | Methods and systems for fischer tropsch reactor low product variation |
US9243189B2 (en) | 2010-10-29 | 2016-01-26 | Asa Energy Conversions Ltd. | Conversion of natural gas |
CN110903870A (en) * | 2018-09-18 | 2020-03-24 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Process for preparing methane by single pass of coal-based synthesis gas in slurry bed |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
BRPI0311914B1 (en) * | 2002-06-18 | 2015-08-18 | Sasol Tech Pty Ltd | Process for the production of purified water from fischer-tropsch reaction water |
FR2866791B1 (en) * | 2004-02-27 | 2006-07-14 | Look Cycle Int | PLATINUM FOR RAPID CONNECTION OF A CYCLING SHOE ON AN AUTOMATIC CYCLE PEDAL |
US20080260631A1 (en) | 2007-04-18 | 2008-10-23 | H2Gen Innovations, Inc. | Hydrogen production process |
CN108905904A (en) * | 2018-09-05 | 2018-11-30 | 上海兖矿能源科技研发有限公司 | A kind of gas distributor for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis device |
CN109112872B (en) * | 2018-10-25 | 2023-12-05 | 厦门中乾机械有限公司 | Multifunctional pulping machine |
Citations (52)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2250421A (en) * | 1938-05-07 | 1941-07-22 | Kellogg M W Co | Method of catalytic synthesis |
US2509136A (en) * | 1949-06-17 | 1950-05-23 | Gulf Oil Corp | Process and apparatus for concentrating dilute solutions |
US2617816A (en) * | 1950-10-11 | 1952-11-11 | Joyce H Crowell | Catalytic conversion of carbon monoxide and hydrogen to hydrocarbons and oxygenated organic compounds |
US2853369A (en) * | 1955-01-12 | 1958-09-23 | Kolbel Herbert | Apparatus for carrying out gaseous catalytic reactions in liquid medium |
US3432036A (en) * | 1964-12-09 | 1969-03-11 | Clark & Vicario Corp | Conditioning papermaking stock |
US3807142A (en) * | 1971-09-27 | 1974-04-30 | S Rich | Method and apparatus for high efficiency removal of gases and particles from paper pulp suspensions and other fluids |
US4093643A (en) * | 1975-12-24 | 1978-06-06 | Exxon Research And Engineering Company | Catalytic formation of hydrocarbons from CO, H2 mixtures and process for maintaining catalytic activity |
US4312741A (en) * | 1979-07-09 | 1982-01-26 | Institut Francais Du Petrole | Process and apparatus for catalytic hydrocarbon conversion |
US4366123A (en) * | 1981-09-21 | 1982-12-28 | Mitsui Petrochemical Industries Ltd. | Anchor agitator for gaseous phase polymerization vessel |
US4428839A (en) * | 1979-08-09 | 1984-01-31 | The British Petroleum Company Limited | Separator for oil, gas and water |
US4520215A (en) * | 1984-04-16 | 1985-05-28 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Catalytic conversion of olefinic Fischer-Tropsch light oil to heavier hydrocarbons |
US4605678A (en) * | 1984-03-12 | 1986-08-12 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Separation of catalyst from slurry bubble column wax and catalyst recycle |
US4973453A (en) * | 1988-02-05 | 1990-11-27 | Gtg, Inc. | Apparatus for the production of heavier hydrocarbons from gaseous light hydrocarbons |
US5015366A (en) * | 1990-04-10 | 1991-05-14 | The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy | Process and apparatus for coal hydrogenation |
US5023276A (en) * | 1982-09-30 | 1991-06-11 | Engelhard Corporation | Preparation of normally liquid hydrocarbons and a synthesis gas to make the same, from a normally gaseous hydrocarbon feed |
US5240593A (en) * | 1991-02-05 | 1993-08-31 | Moredock James G | Apparatus for the purification of fluids |
US5260239A (en) * | 1992-12-18 | 1993-11-09 | Exxon Research & Engineering Company | External catalyst rejuvenation system for the hydrocarbon synthesis process |
US5268344A (en) * | 1992-12-18 | 1993-12-07 | Exxon Research & Engineering Company | Draft tube for catalyst rejuvenation and distribution |
US5276237A (en) * | 1991-12-20 | 1994-01-04 | Amoco Corporation | Membrane and use thereof in oxidative conversion |
US5288673A (en) * | 1992-12-18 | 1994-02-22 | Exxon Research And Engineering Company | Temperature control in draft tubes for catalyst rejuvenation |
US5348982A (en) * | 1990-04-04 | 1994-09-20 | Exxon Research & Engineering Co. | Slurry bubble column (C-2391) |
US5407644A (en) * | 1992-02-25 | 1995-04-18 | Den Norske Stats Oljesselskap A.S. | Catalytic multi-phase reactor |
US5422375A (en) * | 1992-02-25 | 1995-06-06 | Den Norske Stats Oljeselskap As | Method of conducting catalytic converter multi-phase reaction |
US5517473A (en) * | 1993-08-06 | 1996-05-14 | Sony Corporation | Translation and rotation mechanism for cartridge loading |
US5520890A (en) * | 1993-08-24 | 1996-05-28 | Den Norske Stats Oljeselskap A.S | Solid/liquid slurry treatment apparatus and catalytic multi-phase reactor |
US5527473A (en) * | 1993-07-15 | 1996-06-18 | Ackerman; Carl D. | Process for performing reactions in a liquid-solid catalyst slurry |
US5565177A (en) * | 1988-12-16 | 1996-10-15 | Uop | Side mounted FCC stripper with two-zone stripping |
US5639798A (en) * | 1994-12-15 | 1997-06-17 | Wexford P.A. Syncrude Limited Partnership | Process and catalyst for production of hydrocarbons |
US5770629A (en) * | 1997-05-16 | 1998-06-23 | Exxon Research & Engineering Company | Slurry hydrocarbon synthesis with external product filtration |
US5811469A (en) * | 1997-05-06 | 1998-09-22 | Exxon Research And Engineering Company | Slurry hydrocarbon synthesis with downcomer fed product filtration (LAW552) |
US5827902A (en) * | 1996-08-07 | 1998-10-27 | Agip Petroli S.P.A. | Fischer-Tropsch process with a multistage bubble column reactor |
US5827903A (en) * | 1996-01-31 | 1998-10-27 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Department Of Energy | Separation of catalyst from Fischer-Tropsch slurry |
US5844006A (en) * | 1993-01-27 | 1998-12-01 | Sasol Chemical Industries (Proprietary) Limited | Process for producing liquid and, optionally, gaseous products from gaseous reactants |
US5917078A (en) * | 1998-09-25 | 1999-06-29 | General Electric Company | Process for the isolation and removal of unwanted water from a chemical reaction |
US5939350A (en) * | 1997-02-10 | 1999-08-17 | Energy International Corporation | Processes and catalysts for conducting fischer-tropsch synthesis in a slurry bubble column reactor |
US5948378A (en) * | 1998-01-30 | 1999-09-07 | Exxon Research And Engineering Co. | Removal of ammonia and cyanide from synthesis gas with water production |
US5958985A (en) * | 1996-12-13 | 1999-09-28 | Shell Oil Company | Process for the preparation of hydrocarbons |
US5961933A (en) * | 1996-07-26 | 1999-10-05 | Institut Francais Du Petrole | Process and apparatus for operation of a slurry bubble column with application to the fischer-tropsch synthesis |
US5962537A (en) * | 1997-05-06 | 1999-10-05 | Exxon Research And Engineering Co | Multizone downcomer for slurry hydrocarbon syntheses process |
US5981608A (en) * | 1995-06-16 | 1999-11-09 | Shell Oil Company | Catalyst and process for the preparation of hydrocarbons |
US6068760A (en) * | 1997-08-08 | 2000-05-30 | Rentech, Inc. | Catalyst/wax separation device for slurry Fischer-Tropsch reactor |
US6069179A (en) * | 1993-02-24 | 2000-05-30 | Den Norske Stats Oljeselskap As | Method of conducting catalytic converter multi-phase reaction |
US6100304A (en) * | 1999-05-26 | 2000-08-08 | Energy International Corportion | Processes and palladium-promoted catalysts for conducting Fischer-Tropsch synthesis |
US6114400A (en) * | 1998-09-21 | 2000-09-05 | Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. | Synthesis gas production by mixed conducting membranes with integrated conversion into liquid products |
US6156809A (en) * | 1999-04-21 | 2000-12-05 | Reema International Corp. | Multiple reactor system and method for fischer-tropsch synthesis |
US6169120B1 (en) * | 1999-09-17 | 2001-01-02 | Syntroleum Corporation | Extended catalyst life two stage hydrocarbon synthesis process |
US6191066B1 (en) * | 1998-05-27 | 2001-02-20 | Energy International Corporation | Fischer-Tropsch activity for non-promoted cobalt-on-alumina catalysts |
US6225358B1 (en) * | 1999-02-16 | 2001-05-01 | Syntroleum Corporation | System and method for converting light hydrocarbons to heavier hydrocarbons with improved water disposal |
US6271432B2 (en) * | 1998-05-27 | 2001-08-07 | Energy International | Fischer-tropsch activity for non-promoted cobalt-on-alumina catalysts |
US6277338B1 (en) * | 1997-10-10 | 2001-08-21 | Syntroleum Corporation | System for converting light hydrocarbons to heavier hydrocarbons with separation of water into oxygen and hydrogen |
US6403660B1 (en) * | 1998-06-11 | 2002-06-11 | Sasol Technolgy (Proprietary) Limited | Production of hydrocarbons |
US6462097B1 (en) * | 2000-03-31 | 2002-10-08 | Institut Francais Du Petrole | Process for the production of purified water and hydrocarbons from fossil resources |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5900159A (en) * | 1996-02-29 | 1999-05-04 | Shell Oil Company | Method for separating liquid from a slurry |
AU774304B2 (en) | 1999-10-14 | 2004-06-24 | Sasol Technology (Pty) Limited | Handling of a catalyst |
-
2002
- 2002-07-11 US US10/193,357 patent/US6809122B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2003
- 2003-07-10 CA CA002492117A patent/CA2492117A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2003-07-10 EP EP03764430A patent/EP1569884A2/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2003-07-10 AU AU2003251837A patent/AU2003251837A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2003-07-10 WO PCT/US2003/021560 patent/WO2004007406A2/en not_active Application Discontinuation
-
2004
- 2004-04-28 US US10/834,152 patent/US20040204508A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2004-12-17 ZA ZA200410201A patent/ZA200410201B/en unknown
Patent Citations (53)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2250421A (en) * | 1938-05-07 | 1941-07-22 | Kellogg M W Co | Method of catalytic synthesis |
US2509136A (en) * | 1949-06-17 | 1950-05-23 | Gulf Oil Corp | Process and apparatus for concentrating dilute solutions |
US2617816A (en) * | 1950-10-11 | 1952-11-11 | Joyce H Crowell | Catalytic conversion of carbon monoxide and hydrogen to hydrocarbons and oxygenated organic compounds |
US2853369A (en) * | 1955-01-12 | 1958-09-23 | Kolbel Herbert | Apparatus for carrying out gaseous catalytic reactions in liquid medium |
US3432036A (en) * | 1964-12-09 | 1969-03-11 | Clark & Vicario Corp | Conditioning papermaking stock |
US3807142A (en) * | 1971-09-27 | 1974-04-30 | S Rich | Method and apparatus for high efficiency removal of gases and particles from paper pulp suspensions and other fluids |
US4093643A (en) * | 1975-12-24 | 1978-06-06 | Exxon Research And Engineering Company | Catalytic formation of hydrocarbons from CO, H2 mixtures and process for maintaining catalytic activity |
US4312741A (en) * | 1979-07-09 | 1982-01-26 | Institut Francais Du Petrole | Process and apparatus for catalytic hydrocarbon conversion |
US4428839A (en) * | 1979-08-09 | 1984-01-31 | The British Petroleum Company Limited | Separator for oil, gas and water |
US4366123A (en) * | 1981-09-21 | 1982-12-28 | Mitsui Petrochemical Industries Ltd. | Anchor agitator for gaseous phase polymerization vessel |
US5023276A (en) * | 1982-09-30 | 1991-06-11 | Engelhard Corporation | Preparation of normally liquid hydrocarbons and a synthesis gas to make the same, from a normally gaseous hydrocarbon feed |
US4605678A (en) * | 1984-03-12 | 1986-08-12 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Separation of catalyst from slurry bubble column wax and catalyst recycle |
US4520215A (en) * | 1984-04-16 | 1985-05-28 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Catalytic conversion of olefinic Fischer-Tropsch light oil to heavier hydrocarbons |
US4973453A (en) * | 1988-02-05 | 1990-11-27 | Gtg, Inc. | Apparatus for the production of heavier hydrocarbons from gaseous light hydrocarbons |
US5565177A (en) * | 1988-12-16 | 1996-10-15 | Uop | Side mounted FCC stripper with two-zone stripping |
US5348982A (en) * | 1990-04-04 | 1994-09-20 | Exxon Research & Engineering Co. | Slurry bubble column (C-2391) |
US5015366A (en) * | 1990-04-10 | 1991-05-14 | The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy | Process and apparatus for coal hydrogenation |
US5240593A (en) * | 1991-02-05 | 1993-08-31 | Moredock James G | Apparatus for the purification of fluids |
US5276237A (en) * | 1991-12-20 | 1994-01-04 | Amoco Corporation | Membrane and use thereof in oxidative conversion |
US5407644A (en) * | 1992-02-25 | 1995-04-18 | Den Norske Stats Oljesselskap A.S. | Catalytic multi-phase reactor |
US5422375A (en) * | 1992-02-25 | 1995-06-06 | Den Norske Stats Oljeselskap As | Method of conducting catalytic converter multi-phase reaction |
US5260239A (en) * | 1992-12-18 | 1993-11-09 | Exxon Research & Engineering Company | External catalyst rejuvenation system for the hydrocarbon synthesis process |
US5268344A (en) * | 1992-12-18 | 1993-12-07 | Exxon Research & Engineering Company | Draft tube for catalyst rejuvenation and distribution |
US5288673A (en) * | 1992-12-18 | 1994-02-22 | Exxon Research And Engineering Company | Temperature control in draft tubes for catalyst rejuvenation |
US5844006A (en) * | 1993-01-27 | 1998-12-01 | Sasol Chemical Industries (Proprietary) Limited | Process for producing liquid and, optionally, gaseous products from gaseous reactants |
US6069179A (en) * | 1993-02-24 | 2000-05-30 | Den Norske Stats Oljeselskap As | Method of conducting catalytic converter multi-phase reaction |
US5527473A (en) * | 1993-07-15 | 1996-06-18 | Ackerman; Carl D. | Process for performing reactions in a liquid-solid catalyst slurry |
US5517473A (en) * | 1993-08-06 | 1996-05-14 | Sony Corporation | Translation and rotation mechanism for cartridge loading |
US5520890A (en) * | 1993-08-24 | 1996-05-28 | Den Norske Stats Oljeselskap A.S | Solid/liquid slurry treatment apparatus and catalytic multi-phase reactor |
US5639798A (en) * | 1994-12-15 | 1997-06-17 | Wexford P.A. Syncrude Limited Partnership | Process and catalyst for production of hydrocarbons |
US5981608A (en) * | 1995-06-16 | 1999-11-09 | Shell Oil Company | Catalyst and process for the preparation of hydrocarbons |
US5827903A (en) * | 1996-01-31 | 1998-10-27 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Department Of Energy | Separation of catalyst from Fischer-Tropsch slurry |
US6060524A (en) * | 1996-07-26 | 2000-05-09 | Institut Francais Du Petrole, | Process and apparatus for operation of a slurry bubble column with application to the fischer-tropsch synthesis |
US5961933A (en) * | 1996-07-26 | 1999-10-05 | Institut Francais Du Petrole | Process and apparatus for operation of a slurry bubble column with application to the fischer-tropsch synthesis |
US5827902A (en) * | 1996-08-07 | 1998-10-27 | Agip Petroli S.P.A. | Fischer-Tropsch process with a multistage bubble column reactor |
US5958985A (en) * | 1996-12-13 | 1999-09-28 | Shell Oil Company | Process for the preparation of hydrocarbons |
US5939350A (en) * | 1997-02-10 | 1999-08-17 | Energy International Corporation | Processes and catalysts for conducting fischer-tropsch synthesis in a slurry bubble column reactor |
US5811469A (en) * | 1997-05-06 | 1998-09-22 | Exxon Research And Engineering Company | Slurry hydrocarbon synthesis with downcomer fed product filtration (LAW552) |
US5962537A (en) * | 1997-05-06 | 1999-10-05 | Exxon Research And Engineering Co | Multizone downcomer for slurry hydrocarbon syntheses process |
US5770629A (en) * | 1997-05-16 | 1998-06-23 | Exxon Research & Engineering Company | Slurry hydrocarbon synthesis with external product filtration |
US6068760A (en) * | 1997-08-08 | 2000-05-30 | Rentech, Inc. | Catalyst/wax separation device for slurry Fischer-Tropsch reactor |
US6277338B1 (en) * | 1997-10-10 | 2001-08-21 | Syntroleum Corporation | System for converting light hydrocarbons to heavier hydrocarbons with separation of water into oxygen and hydrogen |
US5948378A (en) * | 1998-01-30 | 1999-09-07 | Exxon Research And Engineering Co. | Removal of ammonia and cyanide from synthesis gas with water production |
US6271432B2 (en) * | 1998-05-27 | 2001-08-07 | Energy International | Fischer-tropsch activity for non-promoted cobalt-on-alumina catalysts |
US6191066B1 (en) * | 1998-05-27 | 2001-02-20 | Energy International Corporation | Fischer-Tropsch activity for non-promoted cobalt-on-alumina catalysts |
US6403660B1 (en) * | 1998-06-11 | 2002-06-11 | Sasol Technolgy (Proprietary) Limited | Production of hydrocarbons |
US6114400A (en) * | 1998-09-21 | 2000-09-05 | Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. | Synthesis gas production by mixed conducting membranes with integrated conversion into liquid products |
US5917078A (en) * | 1998-09-25 | 1999-06-29 | General Electric Company | Process for the isolation and removal of unwanted water from a chemical reaction |
US6225358B1 (en) * | 1999-02-16 | 2001-05-01 | Syntroleum Corporation | System and method for converting light hydrocarbons to heavier hydrocarbons with improved water disposal |
US6156809A (en) * | 1999-04-21 | 2000-12-05 | Reema International Corp. | Multiple reactor system and method for fischer-tropsch synthesis |
US6100304A (en) * | 1999-05-26 | 2000-08-08 | Energy International Corportion | Processes and palladium-promoted catalysts for conducting Fischer-Tropsch synthesis |
US6169120B1 (en) * | 1999-09-17 | 2001-01-02 | Syntroleum Corporation | Extended catalyst life two stage hydrocarbon synthesis process |
US6462097B1 (en) * | 2000-03-31 | 2002-10-08 | Institut Francais Du Petrole | Process for the production of purified water and hydrocarbons from fossil resources |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090239959A1 (en) * | 2008-03-24 | 2009-09-24 | Paul Steven Wallace | Methods and systems for reactor low product variation |
US20090239960A1 (en) * | 2008-03-24 | 2009-09-24 | Paul Steven Wallace | Methods and systems for fischer tropsch reactor low product variation |
US7879297B2 (en) | 2008-03-24 | 2011-02-01 | General Electric Company | Methods and systems for reactor low product variation |
US9243189B2 (en) | 2010-10-29 | 2016-01-26 | Asa Energy Conversions Ltd. | Conversion of natural gas |
CN110903870A (en) * | 2018-09-18 | 2020-03-24 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Process for preparing methane by single pass of coal-based synthesis gas in slurry bed |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US6809122B2 (en) | 2004-10-26 |
WO2004007406A3 (en) | 2005-06-30 |
US20030125397A1 (en) | 2003-07-03 |
ZA200410201B (en) | 2006-03-29 |
AU2003251837A1 (en) | 2004-02-02 |
WO2004007406A2 (en) | 2004-01-22 |
EP1569884A2 (en) | 2005-09-07 |
CA2492117A1 (en) | 2004-01-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6800664B1 (en) | Conjoined reactor system | |
US20080293834A1 (en) | Production of Liquid and, Optionally, Gaseous Hydrocarbons from Gaseous Reactants Into an Expanded Slurry Bed | |
KR20040030805A (en) | Direct production of high purity fischer-tropsch wax | |
US6809122B2 (en) | Method for reducing the maximum water concentration in a multi-phase column reactor | |
CA2454237C (en) | Optimizing the production rate of slurry bubble reactors by using large gas flow rates and moderate single pass conversion | |
US6914082B2 (en) | Slurry bubble reactor operated in well-mixed gas flow regime | |
EP0983328A1 (en) | Multizone downcomer for slurry hydrocarbon syntheses process | |
AU2002324539A1 (en) | Optimizing the production rate of slurry bubble reactors by using large gas flow rates and moderate single pass conversion | |
EP1636151B1 (en) | Process for producing liquid and, optionally, gaseous products from gaseous reactants | |
US6720358B2 (en) | Water stripping and catalyst/liquid product separation system | |
US6956063B2 (en) | Method for reducing water concentration in a multi-phase column reactor | |
US5869541A (en) | Conversion of synthesis gas to hydrocarbons in the presence of a liquid phase | |
US6897246B2 (en) | Recycling light olefins in multistage Fischer Tropsch processes | |
ZA200404850B (en) | Method for reducing water concentration ion a multi-phase column reactor. | |
AU2012277857A1 (en) | Stacked catalyst bed for Fischer-Tropsch | |
MXPA00002899A (en) | A process for optimizing hydrocarbon synthesis |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, TEXAS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ZHANG, JIANPING;ESPINOZA, RAFAEL L.;MOHEDAS, SERGIO R.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:015313/0391;SIGNING DATES FROM 20020802 TO 20020806 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |