US20040176069A1 - Call security system - Google Patents
Call security system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20040176069A1 US20040176069A1 US10/796,871 US79687104A US2004176069A1 US 20040176069 A1 US20040176069 A1 US 20040176069A1 US 79687104 A US79687104 A US 79687104A US 2004176069 A1 US2004176069 A1 US 2004176069A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- user
- access
- deviation
- call
- unit
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04M—TELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
- H04M3/00—Automatic or semi-automatic exchanges
- H04M3/38—Graded-service arrangements, i.e. some subscribers prevented from establishing certain connections
- H04M3/382—Graded-service arrangements, i.e. some subscribers prevented from establishing certain connections using authorisation codes or passwords
Definitions
- the present invention is:
- the present invention is directed to call-switching equipment for telephone networks and in particular to devices for curbing abuse of direct-inward-access systems.
- DISA Direct Inward Service Access
- RSA Remote Service Access
- DISA Direct Inward Service Access
- DISA offers both cost and administrative advantages. If the firm that owns the PBX subscribes to bulk-rate toll services, such as WATS, placing a call through remote service access can reduce the cost of the call. For example, an employee whose home office is in Seattle but who has traveled to San Diego may want to call a customer in Fort Lauderdale. If he uses his telephone-company calling card, a ten-minute call at AT&T daytime rates may cost around $3.00. In contrast, his company may pay around $.09 a minute on the average for both incoming and outgoing bulk services, so if the employee places the call instead to his Seattle office, which then switches it to the customer in Fort Lauderdale, the cost may be only about $1.80.
- WATS bulk-rate toll services
- the company's call-accounting system can thereby keep track of such calls automatically, relieving the company's accounting department of the need to allocate telephone costs manually among its various departments. In certain circumstances, it also provides a tool for measuring the performance of personnel whose jobs involve high levels of telephone activity.
- the present invention is a method and apparatus for reducing the vulnerability of the telecommunications system to unauthorized use that is easy to implement and that can reduce the instances of unauthorized access even during periods when telecommunications personnel are not able to give attention to the traffic on the system.
- the telecommunications system collects statistics of each user's pattern of telecommunications usage. Typically, these statistics will be in the form of, say, the average number of calls per day or the average number of calls per day on given days of the week. It may also include the mean busy hour for the given days of the week. Moreover, daily averages may be taken not only for all calls but also for all calls of a particular type, e.g., of all international calls.
- the caller might be required to say his name before the connection is made, he might be transferred to a human operator for verification of access, or the requested connection may simply be denied. Additionally, the system would typically give the system administrator some kind of an alerting message to indicate that abnormal usage is occurring.
- the invention can be practiced in a way that makes it very easy for the administrator to implement.
- apparatus for practicing the invention can be provided in the form of circuitry that is simply connected to one of the communications system's ordinary lines.
- that line would be one of the PBX's internal extensions.
- the PBX is then simply configured so that it connects the DISA trunk line or lines to that extension whenever an incoming call comes over that DISA line.
- the access-control circuit at that extension takes the call, checks for the user's identifier and password, requests the number of the called party, and, if the above-mentioned statistical requirements are met, simply sends the conventional transfer signal, e.g., a hook flash, to the PBX to obtain (typically) an outgoing trunk and delivers to the PBX the destination indicated by the incoming call.
- the PBX then makes the necessary connections in the conventional manner, and the access-control circuit is free to handle the next DISA call.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a communications system that implements the teachings of the present invention
- FIGS. 2A and 2B together form a flow chart that illustrates the call-processing sequence followed by a typical embodiment of the access-control circuit of FIG. 1;
- FIG. 3 is a flow chart that illustrates the manner in which a system administrator might program the access-control circuit
- FIG. 4 is a flow chart that depicts the “add or edit auth. codes” step of FIG. 3 in more detail.
- FIG. 5 is a flow chart that depicts the “reports” step of FIG. 3 in more detail.
- FIG. 6 is a flow chart that depicts the “system edit utilities” step in more detail.
- FIG. 1 depicts a telecommunications system 10 that includes a conventional private branch exchange (PBX) 12 to which the owner's trunks 14 and 16 devoted to remote access, and possibly some other trunks not shown, are connected. Also connected to the PBX 12 are internal extension lines 18 , including particularly at least one access-control extension line 20 , to which an access-control circuit 22 of the present invention has been connected.
- PBX private branch exchange
- the PBX 12 has the conventional monitoring and control circuitry 24 by which it monitors the lines for dial and supervisory signals and operates a switch matrix 26 that makes the connections between lines that are the PBX's ultimate purpose.
- trunk 14 is one employed for DISA service.
- the user will have dialed his company's number for such service, typically a WATS number (i.e., an “800” number in North America), and will thereby have been connected to the PBX 12 .
- the monitoring-and supervisory-signal circuitry 24 will then apply a stutter dial tone to the DISA trunk 14 , in response to which the user will enter the authorization code that he has been assigned for use in obtaining an outgoing trunk.
- circuit 24 After verifying that the code is correct, circuit 24 operates the switch matrix to connect the incoming trunk 14 with another, outgoing trunk, say, trunk 16 , whereupon the originating user hears dial tone received over trunk 16 and is thereby prompted to dial the ultimate-destination number.
- the PBX 12 is configured so that the switch matrix 26 initially connects all incoming calls from WATS trunk 14 to one of the extension lines 20 to which the access-control circuit 22 is connected. That is, to implement the present invention, the telephone administrator will have been required essentially only to obtain an access-control module 22 from the manufacturer, plug it into one or more extension jacks, and configure the PBX 12 in an arrangement conventionally-referred to as DIT (Direct Inward Termination), for connection of all trunk- 14 calls to a free one of the access-control extensions 20 .
- DIT Direct Inward Termination
- the access-control module 22 can be implemented in many ways, a typical one being shown in FIG. 1, which depicts it as including a computer 28 .
- a dial-signal circuit 30 and, in this case, a voice synthesizer 32 .
- the dial-signal circuit 30 can generate and recognize dial and supervisory signals, and it can also sample a short record of, say, received voice signals for purposes that will be explained below.
- the speech synthesizer can generate voice prompts. (Those skilled in the art will readily recognize that the voice prompts that will be described below are not necessary in order to practice the present invention, but we believe that such an approach is desirable.)
- the computer 28 receives notification from the dial-signal circuit 30 that an incoming call is present on, say, line 33 , and it accordingly returns the off-hook signal and operates the speech synthesizer 32 for that line to generate a voice prompt that asks the user for his authorization code in the form of a user ID and a password.
- a user ID and a password are not have to be assigned separately, but it is often appropriate to do so; regular changing of passwords is desirable for security purposes, but a fixed user ID is desirable for continuity in recordkeeping.
- the computer If the user enters the proper authorization code, the computer then operates the speech synthesizer 32 to request the called number.
- the computer verifies it as a destination to which the user is entitled to have his call directed. If the user is indeed so authorized, the computer simply operates the dial-signal circuitry 30 to generate a hook flash or other transfer-indicating signal and then transmit the digits of the destination that the access-control module 22 received from the user in response to the destination prompt. This will cause the PBX 12 to respond in the conventional fashion by connecting the incoming trunk 14 to the appropriate communications resource, which either is one of the internal extension lines 18 or an external trunk 16 , and thereby disconnecting it from the access-control module 22 . Then, if other calls come in on other DISA-designated trunks (not shown), the PBX 12 can route them to the access-control module 22 by way of line 33 even though the call initially received over that line is still in progress.
- an incoming call can arrive while the call-control module 22 is still in the process of directing calls received on all of the access-control lines 20 , and the result will be that the PBX will return a busy signal in the conventional manner so that the prospective user will be required to call again if he is to make the connection through the company's PBX and thereby avail himself of the lower, WATS-line rates.
- the call may be held briefly in an automatic-call-distribution arrangement to be connected to the call-control module when a line becomes free. Further, if the PBX is so equipped, the call may be transferred upon encountering a busy or no-answer condition to an alternate destination, such as the console attendant.
- the access-control module 22 makes the necessary transfer only if the user is entitled to access to the indicated destination. Entitlement here is determined by three factors. First, certain destinations, typically highly sensitive ones such as those employed to program the PBX 12 or the access-control module 22 , can be reached by only one or very few users, as will be described below. Accordingly, these are not among the locations to which access is ordinarily granted.
- the system administrator by programming the access-control module, can assign each user a service class. In the illustrated embodiment, there are ten of these. If a user has been assigned only service class 0, then he is allowed access only to the PBX's local extensions, except, of course, those particularly identified as highly sensitive. If a user has been assigned service class 1, 2, 3, or 7, he is ordinarily accorded access to DISA service; that is, by calling in on a WATS line, he can be granted access to an outgoing facility. (The differences among classes 1, 2, 3, and 7 will be described below.) Classes 4, 5, and 6 provide for access to fixed destinations, such as modem-pool ports, not under the control of the caller.
- Service classes 8 and 9 are special classes for particular users who require access to sensitive destinations other than the programming functions of the access-control module.
- the user is not granted immediate access to any location. Instead, the user is asked to hang up, and the access-control module 22 places a call to a predetermined location where that user is supposed to be. This adds an additional level of confidence that the user is who he says he is. If the users service class is 8, the access-control module 22 transfers that call to another predetermined location; that is, a user assigned to service class 8 is permitted to make a call only between two locations that have been determined in advance by previous programming.
- a user assigned service class 9 receives a callback in a manner the same as that in which users assigned service class 8 are. However, rather than being transferred to a second location, the service-class-9 user is granted access to the programming functions of the access-control module.
- the callback location programmed for service class 9 is the office of the system administrator, so reprogramming of the access-control module ordinarily can be performed only from that location.
- the third constraint on access to requested destinations is that imposed by the “global class of service,” which the system administrator can change from time to time by programming in the normal manner. If the system administrator institutes global class 0, then incoming remote-service-access calls are granted access only to local extensions, regardless of the individual service class for the calling user. Global class 1 does not impose such a restriction, and users assigned individual service class 1, 2, 3, or 7 are granted access to outgoing facilities when global class 1 prevails.
- Global class 2 is instituted when the system administrator wants to take advantage of the call-pattern-monitoring aspects of the present invention.
- users assigned service class 7 are granted access to outgoing facilities just as they are under global class 1.
- users assigned to service class 1, 2, or 3 are also granted access to outgoing facilities under global class 2, with the exception that access to those outgoing lines is subject to certain restrictions when the access-control module 22 has detected certain traffic anomalies, which will now be described.
- the access-control module 22 maintains statistics on each user's communications traffic.
- the access-control module logs the number of calls by type (regular, long-distance, or international, for instance) and day of the week and keeps statistics of that user's usage.
- the call-control module maintains the average over the previous thirty days by day of the week, typically omitting from that computation any day on which the user made no calls.
- B m is the mean busy hour for the current day of the week
- B c is the mean busy hour for the current day
- the busy hours are given in accordance with a 24-hour clock.
- the mean busy hour is computed by multiplying the number of each clock hour by the number of calls in that hour and dividing the sum of the results by the total number of calls.
- p 1 , p 2 , p 3 , and p 4 are the ratios of current internal, same-area-code, different-area-code, and different-country calls, respectively, to the total number of calls and p 1 ′, p 2 ′, p 3 ′, and p 4 ′ are the corresponding historical values.
- F/T access is accorded as it is under global service class 1 . If F/T exceeds 2 but is less than 3, then the individual user's service class is temporarily switched from its normal value to ⁇ 1. A user whose class is ⁇ 1 is not immediately switched to the outgoing line when he requests it. Instead, he is given a verbal prompt that requests that he speak his name. If he does this, he will be accorded the access that he requests.
- the dial-and-supervision circuit 30 may be used to detect, say, the onset of voice whose amplitude exceeds a certain threshold as well as the interruption of voice for more than a predetermined-maximum time. The time interval between these two events, which would be assumed to contain the user's voice response, would be measured, and samples would be taken of the voice signal during that interval.
- f 4 1 + k ⁇ [ ( d - d ′ ) / d ′ ] 2 ⁇ ⁇ n ⁇ ( x n - x ′ n ) 2 ,
- the access-control module can include a feature by which it responds to a call from a user whose code is ⁇ 2 by placing a call to the extension of the system administrator and delivering a message that such a call has occurred. The invention can thus be employed to alert the system administrator to unusual usage without requiring any significant initiative on the administrator's part.
- FIGS. 2A and 2B present in flow-chart form a typical procedure by which these features can be implemented.
- the access-control module 22 receives a call, it sends a verbal greeting, as block 60 of the flow chart indicates, and then sends a verbal prompt requesting the user ID and password, as block 62 indicates.
- the user may not respond with an authorization code, as a negative result of test 64 represents, and block 66 represents branching on whether the prompt has been given three times. If not, it is repeated.
- the call is aborted, as block 68 indicates, simply by sending an on-hook signal, i.e., by hanging up.
- Block 70 represents branching on the result of the checking process. If the code was incorrect, the user is ordinarily given a verbal message that indicates that the call cannot be completed, as block 74 indicates, and the access-control module 22 then ordinarily sends transfer signals to the PBX 12 to cause it to connect the call to a default destination, such as the extension of the local operator. Block 76 represents such a transfer.
- the computer 28 determines whether the individual service class assigned to the user is 7 or less than 4 on the one hand or some other value on the other, as block 77 indicates. In the latter case, represented by a negative result of the block- 77 decision, the service class is either one of the dialback classes 8 and 9 or one of the “deadbolt” classes 4, 5, and 6.
- the deadbolt classes yield a positive result of the block- 78 decision and the call is directed, without any further user input, to the destination assigned the user, as block 79 indicates. That is, a user in class 4, 5, or 6 is afforded access to only one, predetermined destination. If the user is in class 8 or 9, on the other hand, he requires a dialback, as will be explained presently.
- the computer 28 operates the speech synthesizer 32 to request that the user dial the number of his intended destination, as block 80 indicates. If the resultant dialed number designates an external destination, as an affirmative result of test 82 indicates, the computer 28 must determine whether it can fulfill the request. If the service class for the user is 0 or ⁇ 2, then the result of a test represented by block 84 is affirmative, and the user is notified that the call cannot be completed, as block 74 indicates. Typically, he will then be connected to the system operator or other default destination, as block 76 indicates.
- step 86 If the service class is 1, 2, 3, or 7, as an affirmative result of the test of block 86 indicates, the call can be completed, and the computer 28 's routine proceeds to step 88 , in which it validates the requested destination. That is, it determines whether the destination exists and if access to it is permitted. This step primarily concerns local extensions, but some embodiments of the invention may also place, say, certain area codes off limits.
- the access-control module 22 proceeds to transfer the call, typically by operating its dial-signal circuit 30 to execute a hook flash, as block 92 indicates, and then dialing the number received from the user, as block 94 indicates.
- a negative result of the test represented by block 86 means that the service class is ⁇ 1, so the user is prompted to speak his last name, as block 101 indicates. As block 102 indicates, the user's failure to respond will cause the routine to proceed to steps 74 and 76 , in which it notifies the user that the call will not be processed further. Otherwise, further processing proceeds in a manner similar to that in which it proceeds for calls from users in service classes 1, 2, 3, and 7.
- the test represented by block 78 yields a negative result, and the routine proceeds to the step of block 103 .
- That step is the dialback procedure, in which the computer 28 operates the speech synthesizer 32 to direct the user to hang up and operates the dial-signal circuit 30 to dial the dialback number associated with that user. If no answer results at that extension, the computer 28 operates the dial-signal circuit to go back on hook, as blocks 104 and 98 indicate. If the user does answer, the speech synthesizer 32 again requests the authorization code, as block 106 indicates, and an incorrect response again results in the lines being released, as blocks 108 and 98 indicate.
- Block 112 represents a series of steps similar to steps 92 , 94 , 96 , and 98 .
- the user Admitted to the administrative-utilities, the user is first given a voice prompt to select one of four menu selections respectively represented by blocks 116 , 118 , 120 , and 122 of FIG. 3: (1) adding or editing authorization codes, (2) requesting a report, (3) requesting the system edit utilities for purposes that will be shortly explained, and (4) changing the global service class. The user chooses from this menu by dialing the digit associated with each choice.
- Dialing a “1” admits the user to the choices depicted in FIG. 4.
- the access-control module again requests that the user make a menu choice by dialing one of the digits “1” through “4” in order to add, edit, delete, or find, respectively, a user ID and/or password.
- the speech synthesizer 32 gives him an automatically assigned new number and prompts him to enter a user number if he wishes to change what has been assigned.
- a password will be assigned, and the administrator is given an opportunity to keep what was assigned or change it.
- a default service class is assigned and the administrator is given the opportunity to keep or change it.
- the access-control module 22 uses its speech synthesizer 32 to repeat the assigned password, as block 134 indicates.
- the access-control module 22 prompts the administrator to make a further-selection, but the administrator can simply hang up at this point if no further changes are to be made. Otherwise, he may, for instance, dial “2,” which indicates that he wishes to edit the entries for an existing user.
- Block 136 represents this choice, in response to which the access-control module 22 prompts the administrator to enter the ID code of the user whose entries are to be changed, the new class of service for that user, the new dialback number if the service class is 8 or 9, the destination extension if the service class is 8, and the new password.
- Blocks 138 , 140 , 142 , 144 , and 146 represent these entries, which are followed by the access-control module 22 's recitation of the new password, which block 148 represents.
- the system administrator also has the option of pressing the “4” key and thereby “looking up” the password assigned to a given user or the user assigned a given password.
- the access-control module 22 's computer 28 will typically be in the form of an off-the-shelf computer and thus will ordinarily-include an output device 160 .
- This may be a serial port for driving a printer.
- the floppy disk drive may be employed as an output device.
- most embodiments of the invention will include some output device other than just the speech synthesizer 32 for generating reports.
- the system administrator dials a “2” in response to the initial prompt of FIG. 3, and this results in the administrator's being afforded the choices that FIG. 5 represents.
- Pressing the “1” key selects the user-code list, and the administrator is prompted to enter the user-code range for which the list is to be generated.
- the access-control module generates this report, typically by generating a hard copy by way of a printer.
- the contents of the report would typically be of a generally historical nature, giving, for instance, the average traffic for each user by day of the week and, for instance, breaking down the calls by type, e.g., internal, same area code, different area code, and different country code.
- This report might also include various current system parameters.
- Blocks 160 , 162 , and 164 represent the process for generating this report.
- Dialing “2” gives the administrator a call-detail report, which lists each call in reverse order of occurrence, telling the date; time, destination, and disposition of the call. This report is particularly convenient because large blocks of “failed authorization code” entries in the report's disposition column are easily identifiable symptoms of attempts at unauthorized access. In the illustrated embodiment, the last 5,000 call records are usually retained, and the system administrator can restrict the size of the report by selecting a user-code range. Blocks 166 , 168 , and 170 represent the generation of such a report.
- the active-code list which also is organized by user code, lists only those for which traffic has occurred since the last time a daily report was generated. This gives the historical data but also gives the data for the current day, including a histogram of activity by hour of the day. Like other reports, the active-code list can be restricted by user-code range. The report would also include flags, typically in the form of asterisks in the margins, to identify those authorization codes for which unusual activity has occurred, “unusual” being activity characterized by the deviations defined above. Blocks 172 , 174 , and 176 represent generation of such a report.
- the administrator can gain access to the system-edit utilities from the main menu of FIG. 3 by pressing the “3” key. This enables the administrator to perform various configurational operations that FIG. 6 depicts. As was indicated in connection with block 76 of FIG. 2A, inability to “complete your call as dialed” ordinarily causes the call to be forwarded to a default destination, and dialing “1” gives the administrator a prompt in response to which he can enter the extension, to which such calls are to be directed. Block 182 represents this function.
- dialing “2” enables the system administrator to enter the current date and time and thus to set the real-time clock on which the system bases its statistics, as block 184 indicates.
- Block 186 indicates that dialing a “3” enables the system administrator to set various system parameters.
- the first prompt that the administrator receives in response to the “3” entry is one that requests the number of digits in the user ID codes, as block 188 indicates.
- the next prompt, represented by block 190 requests the duration of the pre-release delay imposed in step 100 of FIG. 2B.
- Block 192 represents setting this parameter.
- the last prompt requests that the network-access digit be set. This is typically the “9” digit, and it is used to obtain an outside line. Block 194 represents this action.
- the system typically backs up its volatile files by writing them onto, for instance, a floppy disk in response to various predetermined occurrences.
- the system administrator can request that an additional backup occur by dialing “4” under the system-edit-utilities menu, as block 196 indicates.
- the broader aspects of the invention do not require a PBX; they can be implemented, for instance, in other communications facilities whose calls ostensibly identify the users who make them.
- Telephone operating companies for instance, can use the invention at central offices to restrict access both for their benefit and for that of their customers.
- the present invention can be realized in a wide range of embodiments and thus constitutes a significant advance in the art.
Abstract
A method and apparatus for reducing the vulnerability of the telecommunications system to unauthorized use that can reduce the instances of unauthorized access. The telecommunications system collects statistics of each user's pattern of telecommunications usage. Typically, these statistics will be in the form of, say, the average number of calls per day or the average number of calls per day on given days of the week. These statistics are taken for a reference period, such as the preceding thirty days, and the corresponding quantity for the current day is also computed. If the current statistics are not excessive as compared with the reference statistics, then access to a communications resource is granted. But if a predetermined deviation is found then a supplemental restriction is placed upon the call.
Description
- The present invention is:
- a) a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/160,357 filed May 31, 2002 which is a continuation of,
- b) application Ser. No. 09/712,701 filed Nov. 13, 2000 (now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,505,039) which is a continuation of,
- c) application Ser. No. 08/445,576 filed May 22, 1995 entitled “Call Security System” (now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,185,415) which is a continuation of
- d) application Ser. No. 07/856,525, filed on Mar. 24, 1992, now abandoned.
- Priority of the above applications is claimed.
- The present invention is directed to call-switching equipment for telephone networks and in particular to devices for curbing abuse of direct-inward-access systems.
- The combination of electronic, stored-program telephone switching systems with discounted bulk toll offerings gives rise to a feature that provides a convenient way to reduce telecommunications costs. In accordance with this feature, an authorized person at remote location can place a call to a “home office” private branch exchange (PBX), receive dial tone from the PBX, and place an outgoing call just as if he were calling from his office.
- The industry uses the acronyms RSA (Remote Service Access) and DISA (Direct Inward Service Access) interchangeably to refer to this feature, to which we refer herein as DISA. DISA features are currently available primarily in conjunction with PBX systems, and we will accordingly refer to PBX systems for the purpose of concreteness. However, DISA-like features are also available to users of certain central-office-based services, and it will become apparent that the invention to be described below is applicable to these types of arrangements, too, as well as to a host of non-voice-based services, including but not limited to data networks and modem pools. The invention is equally powerful in providing protection of sensitive internal destinations, such as the maintenance ports of communications and computer systems.
- DISA offers both cost and administrative advantages. If the firm that owns the PBX subscribes to bulk-rate toll services, such as WATS, placing a call through remote service access can reduce the cost of the call. For example, an employee whose home office is in Seattle but who has traveled to San Diego may want to call a customer in Fort Lauderdale. If he uses his telephone-company calling card, a ten-minute call at AT&T daytime rates may cost around $3.00. In contrast, his company may pay around $.09 a minute on the average for both incoming and outgoing bulk services, so if the employee places the call instead to his Seattle office, which then switches it to the customer in Fort Lauderdale, the cost may be only about $1.80.
- Moreover, the company's call-accounting system can thereby keep track of such calls automatically, relieving the company's accounting department of the need to allocate telephone costs manually among its various departments. In certain circumstances, it also provides a tool for measuring the performance of personnel whose jobs involve high levels of telephone activity.
- Unfortunately, unscrupulous people can sometimes discover the passwords by which the DISA systems' owners attempt to restrict access to their facilities. Indeed, such occurrences have happened frequently, some of them resulting in large losses to the company that has availed itself of the DISA feature. In like manner, loss and system damage have resulted from fraudulent abuse of voice mail and messaging systems, to which the application of the invention is equally applicable.
- Responses to this problem have been various. Some users have simply discontinued the DISA feature because of the risk of significant loss. Others have reconfigured to disable its use for calls to destination area codes known to be favorites of “hackers,” and they may also monitor telephone traffic so as to identify unusual activity.
- Of course, discontinuing the DISA service does eliminate the problem, but it also eliminates the savings that ordinarily result from DISA-service use. The other approaches can be fairly effective in general, but they lack flexibility, require excessive attention from the telecommunications manager or both.
- The present invention is a method and apparatus for reducing the vulnerability of the telecommunications system to unauthorized use that is easy to implement and that can reduce the instances of unauthorized access even during periods when telecommunications personnel are not able to give attention to the traffic on the system.
- In accordance with the invention, the telecommunications system collects statistics of each user's pattern of telecommunications usage. Typically, these statistics will be in the form of, say, the average number of calls per day or the average number of calls per day on given days of the week. It may also include the mean busy hour for the given days of the week. Moreover, daily averages may be taken not only for all calls but also for all calls of a particular type, e.g., of all international calls.
- These statistics are taken for a reference period, such as the preceding thirty days, and the corresponding quantity for the current day is also computed. If the current statistics are not excessive as compared with the reference statistics, then access to a communications resource—e.g., an outgoing trunk line—is granted to the call without any supplemental access restrictions. But if a predetermined deviation is detected between the current statistics and the reference statistics, then a supplemental restriction is placed upon the call.
- For instance, the caller might be required to say his name before the connection is made, he might be transferred to a human operator for verification of access, or the requested connection may simply be denied. Additionally, the system would typically give the system administrator some kind of an alerting message to indicate that abnormal usage is occurring.
- With this type of system, the restrictions are imposed, in some sense, in “real time”; there is ordinarily no need for a human administrator to take initiative to impose the restrictions or, even to analyze records for unusual activity.
- In accordance with one aspect of the invention, moreover, the invention can be practiced in a way that makes it very easy for the administrator to implement. Specifically, apparatus for practicing the invention can be provided in the form of circuitry that is simply connected to one of the communications system's ordinary lines. In the case of a PBX, that line would be one of the PBX's internal extensions. The PBX is then simply configured so that it connects the DISA trunk line or lines to that extension whenever an incoming call comes over that DISA line. The access-control circuit at that extension takes the call, checks for the user's identifier and password, requests the number of the called party, and, if the above-mentioned statistical requirements are met, simply sends the conventional transfer signal, e.g., a hook flash, to the PBX to obtain (typically) an outgoing trunk and delivers to the PBX the destination indicated by the incoming call. The PBX then makes the necessary connections in the conventional manner, and the access-control circuit is free to handle the next DISA call.
- Clearly, such an arrangement is simple to implement, since it requires only that the access-control circuit be connected to an extension and that the PBX undergo the minor reconfiguration required to direct DISA calls to that extension.
- These and further features and advantages of the present invention are described in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a communications system that implements the teachings of the present invention;
- FIGS. 2A and 2B together form a flow chart that illustrates the call-processing sequence followed by a typical embodiment of the access-control circuit of FIG. 1;
- FIG. 3 is a flow chart that illustrates the manner in which a system administrator might program the access-control circuit;
- FIG. 4 is a flow chart that depicts the “add or edit auth. codes” step of FIG. 3 in more detail.
- FIG. 5 is a flow chart that depicts the “reports” step of FIG. 3 in more detail; and
- FIG. 6 is a flow chart that depicts the “system edit utilities” step in more detail.
- FIG. 1 depicts a telecommunications system10 that includes a conventional private branch exchange (PBX) 12 to which the owner's
trunks PBX 12 areinternal extension lines 18, including particularly at least one access-control extension line 20, to which an access-control circuit 22 of the present invention has been connected. - The
PBX 12 has the conventional monitoring andcontrol circuitry 24 by which it monitors the lines for dial and supervisory signals and operates aswitch matrix 26 that makes the connections between lines that are the PBX's ultimate purpose. - We assume that
trunk 14 is one employed for DISA service. In conventional operation, the user will have dialed his company's number for such service, typically a WATS number (i.e., an “800” number in North America), and will thereby have been connected to thePBX 12. The monitoring-and supervisory-signal circuitry 24 will then apply a stutter dial tone to theDISA trunk 14, in response to which the user will enter the authorization code that he has been assigned for use in obtaining an outgoing trunk. After verifying that the code is correct,circuit 24 operates the switch matrix to connect theincoming trunk 14 with another, outgoing trunk, say,trunk 16, whereupon the originating user hears dial tone received overtrunk 16 and is thereby prompted to dial the ultimate-destination number. - For use with the present invention, however, the
PBX 12 is configured so that theswitch matrix 26 initially connects all incoming calls fromWATS trunk 14 to one of the extension lines 20 to which the access-control circuit 22 is connected. That is, to implement the present invention, the telephone administrator will have been required essentially only to obtain an access-control module 22 from the manufacturer, plug it into one or more extension jacks, and configure thePBX 12 in an arrangement conventionally-referred to as DIT (Direct Inward Termination), for connection of all trunk-14 calls to a free one of the access-control extensions 20. - The access-
control module 22 can be implemented in many ways, a typical one being shown in FIG. 1, which depicts it as including acomputer 28. Forline 33, it also includes a dial-signal circuit 30 and, in this case, avoice synthesizer 32. It includes similar circuits for the other access-control lines 20. The dial-signal circuit 30 can generate and recognize dial and supervisory signals, and it can also sample a short record of, say, received voice signals for purposes that will be explained below. The speech synthesizer can generate voice prompts. (Those skilled in the art will readily recognize that the voice prompts that will be described below are not necessary in order to practice the present invention, but we believe that such an approach is desirable.) - Briefly, the
computer 28 receives notification from the dial-signal circuit 30 that an incoming call is present on, say,line 33, and it accordingly returns the off-hook signal and operates thespeech synthesizer 32 for that line to generate a voice prompt that asks the user for his authorization code in the form of a user ID and a password. (User IDs and passwords do not have to be assigned separately, but it is often appropriate to do so; regular changing of passwords is desirable for security purposes, but a fixed user ID is desirable for continuity in recordkeeping.) If the user enters the proper authorization code, the computer then operates thespeech synthesizer 32 to request the called number. - When the user has entered that number, the computer verifies it as a destination to which the user is entitled to have his call directed. If the user is indeed so authorized, the computer simply operates the dial-
signal circuitry 30 to generate a hook flash or other transfer-indicating signal and then transmit the digits of the destination that the access-control module 22 received from the user in response to the destination prompt. This will cause thePBX 12 to respond in the conventional fashion by connecting theincoming trunk 14 to the appropriate communications resource, which either is one of theinternal extension lines 18 or anexternal trunk 16, and thereby disconnecting it from the access-control module 22. Then, if other calls come in on other DISA-designated trunks (not shown), thePBX 12 can route them to the access-control module 22 by way ofline 33 even though the call initially received over that line is still in progress. - Of course, an incoming call can arrive while the call-
control module 22 is still in the process of directing calls received on all of the access-control lines 20, and the result will be that the PBX will return a busy signal in the conventional manner so that the prospective user will be required to call again if he is to make the connection through the company's PBX and thereby avail himself of the lower, WATS-line rates. Alternately, if the PBX is so equipped, the call may be held briefly in an automatic-call-distribution arrangement to be connected to the call-control module when a line becomes free. Further, if the PBX is so equipped, the call may be transferred upon encountering a busy or no-answer condition to an alternate destination, such as the console attendant. - As is stated above, the access-
control module 22 makes the necessary transfer only if the user is entitled to access to the indicated destination. Entitlement here is determined by three factors. First, certain destinations, typically highly sensitive ones such as those employed to program thePBX 12 or the access-control module 22, can be reached by only one or very few users, as will be described below. Accordingly, these are not among the locations to which access is ordinarily granted. - Secondly, the system administrator, by programming the access-control module, can assign each user a service class. In the illustrated embodiment, there are ten of these. If a user has been assigned only
service class 0, then he is allowed access only to the PBX's local extensions, except, of course, those particularly identified as highly sensitive. If a user has been assignedservice class classes Classes 4, 5, and 6 provide for access to fixed destinations, such as modem-pool ports, not under the control of the caller. -
Service classes 8 and 9 are special classes for particular users who require access to sensitive destinations other than the programming functions of the access-control module. In these service classes, the user is not granted immediate access to any location. Instead, the user is asked to hang up, and the access-control module 22 places a call to a predetermined location where that user is supposed to be. This adds an additional level of confidence that the user is who he says he is. If the users service class is 8, the access-control module 22 transfers that call to another predetermined location; that is, a user assigned to service class 8 is permitted to make a call only between two locations that have been determined in advance by previous programming. - A user assigned
service class 9 receives a callback in a manner the same as that in which users assigned service class 8 are. However, rather than being transferred to a second location, the service-class-9 user is granted access to the programming functions of the access-control module. Typically, the callback location programmed forservice class 9 is the office of the system administrator, so reprogramming of the access-control module ordinarily can be performed only from that location. - The third constraint on access to requested destinations is that imposed by the “global class of service,” which the system administrator can change from time to time by programming in the normal manner. If the system administrator institutes
global class 0, then incoming remote-service-access calls are granted access only to local extensions, regardless of the individual service class for the calling user.Global class 1 does not impose such a restriction, and users assignedindividual service class global class 1 prevails. -
Global class 2 is instituted when the system administrator wants to take advantage of the call-pattern-monitoring aspects of the present invention. Underglobal class 2 , users assignedservice class 7 are granted access to outgoing facilities just as they are underglobal class 1. Ordinarily, users assigned toservice class global class 2, with the exception that access to those outgoing lines is subject to certain restrictions when the access-control module 22 has detected certain traffic anomalies, which will now be described. - In general, the access-
control module 22 maintains statistics on each user's communications traffic. In the illustrated embodiment, for example, the access-control module logs the number of calls by type (regular, long-distance, or international, for instance) and day of the week and keeps statistics of that user's usage. In the illustrated embodiment, for instance, the call-control module maintains the average over the previous thirty days by day of the week, typically omitting from that computation any day on which the user made no calls. - When a user attempts to make a DISA call, the total number of such calls made by that user for that day is compared with the mean number of calls for that day of the week.
- This is the point at which, the differences among
service classes classes - If the number of calls for the current day does not exceed the mean number of calls for the current day of the week, then access is accorded as it is under
global service class 1. If it does exceed that mean value, on the other hand, the action taken in response to the request to place the DISA call depends on how unusual the current activity for that user is. - To make this assessment, the access-control module computes a value F/T, where F is a factor, to be described below, associated with the user and T=1+aR, where R is a fraction between zero and 9.99 that the system administrator enters to indicate how sensitive the system is to be to variation in users' calling patterns, and a is 2.0 if the reference period for which statistics have been taken is less than fourteen days (as it will be when a new user has been added) and otherwise is 1.0 on weekdays and 0.5 on weekends.
- The factor F is given by F=f1f2f3, where f1 is the ratio of the total calls for the current day to the mean number of calls for this day of the week.
- Factor f2 in this equation is given by f2=|+¦ΔB¦/12, where ΔB is given as follows:
- 24−¦Bm−Bc¦otherwise,
- and Bm is the mean busy hour for the current day of the week, Bc is the mean busy hour for the current day, and the busy hours are given in accordance with a 24-hour clock.
- The mean busy hour, of course, is computed by multiplying the number of each clock hour by the number of calls in that hour and dividing the sum of the results by the total number of calls.
- Factor f3 is given by
- f 3 =|+[¦P 1 −P 1 ′¦+¦P 2 −P 2 ′¦+¦P 3 −P 3 ′¦+¦P 4 −P 4′¦]/2
- where p1, p2, p3, and p4 are the ratios of current internal, same-area-code, different-area-code, and different-country calls, respectively, to the total number of calls and p1′, p2′, p3′, and p4′ are the corresponding historical values.
- If this value F/T is less than 2, then access is accorded as it is under
global service class 1 . If F/T exceeds 2 but is less than 3, then the individual user's service class is temporarily switched from its normal value to −1. A user whose class is −1 is not immediately switched to the outgoing line when he requests it. Instead, he is given a verbal prompt that requests that he speak his name. If he does this, he will be accorded the access that he requests. - To verify that the user gives the right name requires speech-analysis programming, of course, so it may be considered preferable in some embodiments to dispense with this feature, since it may make the circuitry more elaborate than is considered worthwhile. As a practical matter, however, requesting that the user give his name and then merely testing to see whether voice signals result can itself prevent many unauthorized accesses; a “hacker” is often loath to leave a record of his voice.
- An intermediate approach is to use a verification criterion that does not require the costly equipment and complex algorithms ordinarily associated with speech processing. For example, the dial-and-
supervision circuit 30 may be used to detect, say, the onset of voice whose amplitude exceeds a certain threshold as well as the interruption of voice for more than a predetermined-maximum time. The time interval between these two events, which would be assumed to contain the user's voice response, would be measured, and samples would be taken of the voice signal during that interval. Normalized versions of the resultant values might then be compared point-by-point with a similarly obtained reference record for the user, and a factor f4 might be computed in accordance with: - where k is a normalizing constant whose value depends on the number of samples used, d is the duration of the answer, Xn is the nth sample of the received voice response, and the primed values are the corresponding quantities taken from the reference voice record. This factor then could be used in a modified criterion quantity F′=f1f2f3f4, and the user can be treated as having responded properly if the value of F′/T does not exceed 3.
- In the illustrated embodiment, if the quantity F/T or F′/T exceeds 3, then the individual-service class is temporarily changed to −2, and the user is not permitted access to outbound trunks. Additionally, the access-control module can include a feature by which it responds to a call from a user whose code is −2 by placing a call to the extension of the system administrator and delivering a message that such a call has occurred. The invention can thus be employed to alert the system administrator to unusual usage without requiring any significant initiative on the administrator's part.
- FIGS. 2A and 2B present in flow-chart form a typical procedure by which these features can be implemented. When the access-
control module 22 receives a call, it sends a verbal greeting, asblock 60 of the flow chart indicates, and then sends a verbal prompt requesting the user ID and password, asblock 62 indicates. The user may not respond with an authorization code, as a negative result oftest 64 represents, and block 66 represents branching on whether the prompt has been given three times. If not, it is repeated. After the third pass, however, the call is aborted, asblock 68 indicates, simply by sending an on-hook signal, i.e., by hanging up. - Ordinarily, however, the user does enter a code, and the
computer 28 checks the code, asblock 70 indicates.Block 72 represents branching on the result of the checking process. If the code was incorrect, the user is ordinarily given a verbal message that indicates that the call cannot be completed, asblock 74 indicates, and the access-control module 22 then ordinarily sends transfer signals to thePBX 12 to cause it to connect the call to a default destination, such as the extension of the local operator.Block 76 represents such a transfer. - If the user does enter a proper authorization code, on the other hand, the
computer 28 determines whether the individual service class assigned to the user is 7 or less than 4 on the one hand or some other value on the other, asblock 77 indicates. In the latter case, represented by a negative result of the block-77 decision, the service class is either one of thedialback classes 8 and 9 or one of the “deadbolt”classes 4, 5, and 6. The deadbolt classes yield a positive result of the block-78 decision and the call is directed, without any further user input, to the destination assigned the user, asblock 79 indicates. That is, a user inclass 4, 5, or 6 is afforded access to only one, predetermined destination. If the user is inclass 8 or 9, on the other hand, he requires a dialback, as will be explained presently. - But first consider the result of a positive outcome of the block-77 decision. The
computer 28 operates thespeech synthesizer 32 to request that the user dial the number of his intended destination, asblock 80 indicates. If the resultant dialed number designates an external destination, as an affirmative result oftest 82 indicates, thecomputer 28 must determine whether it can fulfill the request. If the service class for the user is 0 or −2, then the result of a test represented byblock 84 is affirmative, and the user is notified that the call cannot be completed, asblock 74 indicates. Typically, he will then be connected to the system operator or other default destination, asblock 76 indicates. - If the service class is 1, 2, 3, or 7, as an affirmative result of the test of
block 86 indicates, the call can be completed, and thecomputer 28's routine proceeds to step 88, in which it validates the requested destination. That is, it determines whether the destination exists and if access to it is permitted. This step primarily concerns local extensions, but some embodiments of the invention may also place, say, certain area codes off limits. - If the destination does not exist or it is one to which general access is denied, a negative determination results from the test represented by
block 90, and the routine proceeds toblocks control module 22 proceeds to transfer the call, typically by operating its dial-signal circuit 30 to execute a hook flash, asblock 92 indicates, and then dialing the number received from the user, asblock 94 indicates. - In order then to operate properly with most PBXs, it is necessary to branch again on whether the destination is internal or external, as
block 96 indicates. If the destination is internal, then the access-control module 22 can operate the dial-signal circuit to go back on hook immediately, asblock 98 indicates. For external calls, however, the transfer may not operate properly if the extension goes on hook immediately after the number is dialed. In those situations, therefore, the access-control module 22 performs a pre-release delay, represented byblock 100, before proceeding to therelease step 98. - A negative result of the test represented by
block 86 means that the service class is −1, so the user is prompted to speak his last name, asblock 101 indicates. Asblock 102 indicates, the user's failure to respond will cause the routine to proceed tosteps service classes - If the class of service is 8 or 9, then the test represented by
block 78 yields a negative result, and the routine proceeds to the step ofblock 103. That step is the dialback procedure, in which thecomputer 28 operates thespeech synthesizer 32 to direct the user to hang up and operates the dial-signal circuit 30 to dial the dialback number associated with that user. If no answer results at that extension, thecomputer 28 operates the dial-signal circuit to go back on hook, asblocks speech synthesizer 32 again requests the authorization code, asblock 106 indicates, and an incorrect response again results in the lines being released, asblocks control module 22 sends transfer signals to thePBX 12 to cause it to connect the call to the destination extension previously programmed for that user, asblocks Block 112 represents a series of steps similar tosteps - If the service class is 9, on the other hand, the user is admitted to the administration-utility functions of the access-
control module 22, asblock 111 indicates. - At this stage, the user is able to set the several parameters described above and perform other administrative functions.
- Admitted to the administrative-utilities, the user is first given a voice prompt to select one of four menu selections respectively represented by
blocks - Dialing a “1” admits the user to the choices depicted in FIG. 4. As FIG. 4 shows, the access-control module again requests that the user make a menu choice by dialing one of the digits “1” through “4” in order to add, edit, delete, or find, respectively, a user ID and/or password. If the administrator enters a “1,” the
speech synthesizer 32 gives him an automatically assigned new number and prompts him to enter a user number if he wishes to change what has been assigned. In a similar manner, a password will be assigned, and the administrator is given an opportunity to keep what was assigned or change it. Likewise a default service class is assigned and the administrator is given the opportunity to keep or change it. He is then prompted to enter the dialback number if the class of service is 8 or 9, and the destination extension if the service class is 8, asblocks control module 22 then uses itsspeech synthesizer 32 to repeat the assigned password, asblock 134 indicates. - At this point, the access-
control module 22 prompts the administrator to make a further-selection, but the administrator can simply hang up at this point if no further changes are to be made. Otherwise, he may, for instance, dial “2,” which indicates that he wishes to edit the entries for an existing user.Block 136 represents this choice, in response to which the access-control module 22 prompts the administrator to enter the ID code of the user whose entries are to be changed, the new class of service for that user, the new dialback number if the service class is 8 or 9, the destination extension if the service class is 8, and the new password.Blocks control module 22's recitation of the new password, which block 148 represents. - If the administrator wants to delete a previously authorized user, he dials “3” and then dials the ID code of that user in response to a prompt, as
blocks - As
blocks - The access-
control module 22'scomputer 28 will typically be in the form of an off-the-shelf computer and thus will ordinarily-include anoutput device 160. This may be a serial port for driving a printer. Alternatively, the floppy disk drive may be employed as an output device. In any event, most embodiments of the invention will include some output device other than just thespeech synthesizer 32 for generating reports. - To obtain one of these reports, the system administrator dials a “2” in response to the initial prompt of FIG. 3, and this results in the administrator's being afforded the choices that FIG. 5 represents. Pressing the “1” key selects the user-code list, and the administrator is prompted to enter the user-code range for which the list is to be generated. When he has done so, the access-control module generates this report, typically by generating a hard copy by way of a printer. The contents of the report would typically be of a generally historical nature, giving, for instance, the average traffic for each user by day of the week and, for instance, breaking down the calls by type, e.g., internal, same area code, different area code, and different country code. This report might also include various current system parameters.
Blocks - Dialing “2” gives the administrator a call-detail report, which lists each call in reverse order of occurrence, telling the date; time, destination, and disposition of the call. This report is particularly convenient because large blocks of “failed authorization code” entries in the report's disposition column are easily identifiable symptoms of attempts at unauthorized access. In the illustrated embodiment, the last 5,000 call records are usually retained, and the system administrator can restrict the size of the report by selecting a user-code range.
Blocks - Whereas the user-code list is generated in order of user code and concentrates on historical data, the active-code list, which also is organized by user code, lists only those for which traffic has occurred since the last time a daily report was generated. This gives the historical data but also gives the data for the current day, including a histogram of activity by hour of the day. Like other reports, the active-code list can be restricted by user-code range. The report would also include flags, typically in the form of asterisks in the margins, to identify those authorization codes for which unusual activity has occurred, “unusual” being activity characterized by the deviations defined above.
Blocks - Even without administrator initiative, a daily active-code report is typically generated every morning and stored in memory, and the administrator can request that such a report be printed out by pressing the “4” key, as
blocks - As was indicated above, the administrator can gain access to the system-edit utilities from the main menu of FIG. 3 by pressing the “3” key. This enables the administrator to perform various configurational operations that FIG. 6 depicts. As was indicated in connection with
block 76 of FIG. 2A, inability to “complete your call as dialed” ordinarily causes the call to be forwarded to a default destination, and dialing “1” gives the administrator a prompt in response to which he can enter the extension, to which such calls are to be directed.Block 182 represents this function. - Similarly, dialing “2” enables the system administrator to enter the current date and time and thus to set the real-time clock on which the system bases its statistics, as
block 184 indicates. -
Block 186 indicates that dialing a “3” enables the system administrator to set various system parameters. The first prompt that the administrator receives in response to the “3” entry is one that requests the number of digits in the user ID codes, asblock 188 indicates. The next prompt, represented byblock 190, requests the duration of the pre-release delay imposed instep 100 of FIG. 2B. - With the next prompt, the administrator is invited to set the parameter R used in the calculations above to determine whether users' call patterns have deviated excessively from historical norms. As was just explained, this factor is also used in determining whether to flag various report entries.
Block 192 represents setting this parameter. - The last prompt requests that the network-access digit be set. This is typically the “9” digit, and it is used to obtain an outside line.
Block 194 represents this action. - The system typically backs up its volatile files by writing them onto, for instance, a floppy disk in response to various predetermined occurrences. The system administrator can request that an additional backup occur by dialing “4” under the system-edit-utilities menu, as
block 196 indicates. - When the system administrator presses the “4” key to make
menu selection 122 in FIG. 3, he receives a prompt that requests the current global class of service. Pressing the “0,”“1,” or “2” key sets the corresponding global class of service. - We believe that an access-control module that can be programmed in this manner, i.e., by simply dialing from the administrator's extension, is particularly simple to install and use and lends itself to relatively low-cost manufacture. However, the broader teachings of the present invention are readily embodied in systems that, for instance, are programmable from a conventional, attached keyboard.
- Additionally, those skilled in the art will recognize that figures of merit other than that identified as “F” in the above description can be used to indicate whether a sufficient deviation from the historical pattern has occurred. Moreover, the deviations do not have to be calculated on the basis of individual days of the week and can simply be calculated on the basis of days generally or weekend days versus weekdays, for instance.
- Furthermore, the broader aspects of the invention do not require a PBX; they can be implemented, for instance, in other communications facilities whose calls ostensibly identify the users who make them. Telephone operating companies, for instance, can use the invention at central offices to restrict access both for their benefit and for that of their customers.
- Accordingly, the present invention can be realized in a wide range of embodiments and thus constitutes a significant advance in the art.
Claims (10)
1. A method of determining if a use of a particular unit is fraudulent comprising the steps of,
monitoring the use of said particular unit, for a plurality of times that said unit is used, to collect statistics concerning the use of said particular unit over a time period having a specific length to establish a normal usage pattern for said particular unit, said pattern being established over a plurality of uses of said unit, determining if more than a predetermined deviation exits between the use of said unit during a second period of time and said normal usage pattern,
taking a first type of action if said deviation is below a first value,
taking a second type of action if said deviation is above said first value.
2. A method for preventing unauthorized use of a particular unit comprising the steps of,
monitoring the use of said particular unit to collect statistics to establish a normal pattern of use of said particular unit, said pattern of use and said monitoring covering a first period of time having a specific length and covering a plurality of times said unit is used,
determining if there is more than a predetermined deviation between the use of said particular unit and said normal pattern of use during a second period of time having a length equal to said specific length,
taking a first type of action if said deviation is below a first value,
taking a second type of action if said deviation is above said first value.
3. A computerized system for preventing fraudulent use of a particular item, first means which monitors use of said particular item to collect statistics over a first period of time having a specific length to establish a normal pattern of use of said particular item, said specific length covering a plurality of uses of said item,
second means which determines if there is more than a particular amount of deviation between use of said particular item during a second period having a length equal to said specific length and said normal pattern of use,
whereby a first type of action is taken if said deviation is below a first value, and a second type of action if said deviation is above said first value.
4. The system recited in claim 3 wherein said first means is a computer program,
5. The system recited in claim 3 wherein said second means is a computer program.
6. The method recited in claim 1 wherein said statistics are collected by a computer program.
7. The method recited in claims 1 wherein said determining step is done by a programmed computer.
8. The method in claim 2 wherein said unauthorized use is fraudulent.
9. The method recited in claim 2 wherein said collecting and determining are performed by a programmed digital computer.
10. A method of providing security for a particular item including,
monitoring use of said particular item to collect statistics over a first period of time having a particular length to establish a normal pattern of use of said particular item, said pattern covering a plurality of uses of said item,
determining if there is more than a predetermined deviation between the use of said particular item during a second period of time having a length equal to said particular length and said normal pattern of use,
taking a first type of action if said deviation is below a first value,
taking a second type of action if said deviation is above said first value.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/796,871 US20040176069A1 (en) | 1992-03-24 | 2004-03-08 | Call security system |
Applications Claiming Priority (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US85652592A | 1992-03-24 | 1992-03-24 | |
US08/445,576 US6185415B1 (en) | 1992-03-24 | 1995-05-22 | Call security system |
US09/712,701 US6505039B1 (en) | 1992-03-24 | 2000-11-13 | Call security system which detects fraud by examination of call history |
US10/160,357 US7747243B2 (en) | 1992-03-24 | 2002-05-31 | Call security system |
US10/796,871 US20040176069A1 (en) | 1992-03-24 | 2004-03-08 | Call security system |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/160,357 Continuation US7747243B2 (en) | 1992-03-24 | 2002-05-31 | Call security system |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20040176069A1 true US20040176069A1 (en) | 2004-09-09 |
Family
ID=27034348
Family Applications (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/160,357 Expired - Fee Related US7747243B2 (en) | 1992-03-24 | 2002-05-31 | Call security system |
US10/796,871 Abandoned US20040176069A1 (en) | 1992-03-24 | 2004-03-08 | Call security system |
US12/783,515 Expired - Fee Related US8200190B2 (en) | 1992-03-24 | 2010-05-19 | Call security system |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/160,357 Expired - Fee Related US7747243B2 (en) | 1992-03-24 | 2002-05-31 | Call security system |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/783,515 Expired - Fee Related US8200190B2 (en) | 1992-03-24 | 2010-05-19 | Call security system |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (3) | US7747243B2 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090217039A1 (en) * | 2008-02-05 | 2009-08-27 | Sipera Systems, Inc. | System, Method and Apparatus for Authenticating Calls |
Families Citing this family (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7338475B2 (en) * | 2004-12-17 | 2008-03-04 | Cardinal Health 303, Inc. | Electret enhanced automatic IV drip chamber shutoff |
US20080075307A1 (en) * | 2006-01-30 | 2008-03-27 | Penton Audio Usa | Digital Signal Processing Amplifier |
EP2078435B1 (en) * | 2006-10-20 | 2011-11-23 | Research In Motion Limited | Multi-mode mobile device, call statistics server, corresponding methods and system for the collection of call statistics for the multi-mode mobile device |
US8406395B2 (en) * | 2011-04-07 | 2013-03-26 | Infosys Limited | System and method for identifying telecom users based on call usage patterns |
US10389612B1 (en) * | 2017-01-25 | 2019-08-20 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Product agnostic pattern detection and management |
JP6440231B1 (en) * | 2018-01-15 | 2018-12-19 | Necプラットフォームズ株式会社 | Incoming call control apparatus, incoming call control system, incoming call control method, and program |
Citations (30)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4182934A (en) * | 1978-09-26 | 1980-01-08 | Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated | Method and apparatus for detecting irregular telephone calls |
US4463348A (en) * | 1981-11-23 | 1984-07-31 | General Electric Company | Refrigerator door usage monitor and display system |
US4481384A (en) * | 1981-04-16 | 1984-11-06 | Mitel Corporation | Voice recognizing telephone call denial system |
US4534056A (en) * | 1982-08-26 | 1985-08-06 | Westinghouse Electric Corp. | Voice-recognition elevator security system |
US4827744A (en) * | 1986-04-10 | 1989-05-09 | Kokusan Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Vehicle use lock system |
US4829554A (en) * | 1985-01-31 | 1989-05-09 | Harris Corporation | Cellular mobile telephone system and method |
US4876717A (en) * | 1986-09-30 | 1989-10-24 | American Telephone And Telegraph Company | Adjunct processor for providing computer facility access protection via call transfer |
US4893330A (en) * | 1989-06-01 | 1990-01-09 | American Telephone And Telegraph Company, At&T Bell Laboratories | Method and apparatus for restricting credit card communication calls |
US4893335A (en) * | 1984-09-14 | 1990-01-09 | Fuller Research And Development Company | Remote access telephone control system |
US4896346A (en) * | 1988-11-21 | 1990-01-23 | American Telephone And Telegraph Company, At&T Bell Laboratories | Password controlled switching system |
US4908850A (en) * | 1988-01-11 | 1990-03-13 | American Communications & Engineering, Inc. | Voice services network with automated billing |
US4953198A (en) * | 1989-07-05 | 1990-08-28 | At&T Company | Public cordless telephone |
US4955049A (en) * | 1989-08-11 | 1990-09-04 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson | Method of supervising mobile telephone subscriptions in a mobile telephone system |
US4958368A (en) * | 1988-10-31 | 1990-09-18 | Gte Mobilnet Incorporated | Customer activation system |
US5091942A (en) * | 1990-07-23 | 1992-02-25 | Ericsson Ge Mobile Communications Holding, Inc. | Authentication system for digital cellular communications |
US5109408A (en) * | 1989-11-30 | 1992-04-28 | At&T Bell Laboratories | Arrangement for intentionally blocking telephone calls to predefined destination numbers but allowing such blocking to be selectively overridden |
US5144649A (en) * | 1990-10-24 | 1992-09-01 | Gte Mobile Communications Service Corporation | Cellular radiotelephone credit card paystation method |
US5163086A (en) * | 1990-12-31 | 1992-11-10 | At&T Bell Laboratories | Telephone network credit card calling apparatus and method of operation to determine validation and fraudulent use of credit cards in placing telephone calls |
US5168517A (en) * | 1989-03-13 | 1992-12-01 | Herbert Waldman | Apparatus and methods for selectively forwarding telephone calls |
US5220593A (en) * | 1990-10-24 | 1993-06-15 | Gte Mobile Communications Service Corporation | Cellular radiotelephone credit card paystation method |
US5237612A (en) * | 1991-03-29 | 1993-08-17 | Ericsson Ge Mobile Communications Inc. | Cellular verification and validation system |
US5309501A (en) * | 1991-11-27 | 1994-05-03 | At&T Bell Laboratories | Arrangement for detecting fraudulently identified mobile stations in a cellular mobile telecommunications network |
US5335265A (en) * | 1991-11-08 | 1994-08-02 | Electronic Data Systems Corporation | Apparatus for detecting and preventing subscriber number cloning in a cellular mobile telephone system |
US5335278A (en) * | 1991-12-31 | 1994-08-02 | Wireless Security, Inc. | Fraud prevention system and process for cellular mobile telephone networks |
US5345595A (en) * | 1992-11-12 | 1994-09-06 | Coral Systems, Inc. | Apparatus and method for detecting fraudulent telecommunication activity |
US5392357A (en) * | 1991-12-09 | 1995-02-21 | At&T Corp. | Secure telecommunications |
US5852811A (en) * | 1987-04-15 | 1998-12-22 | Proprietary Financial Products, Inc. | Method for managing financial accounts by a preferred allocation of funds among accounts |
US6185415B1 (en) * | 1992-03-24 | 2001-02-06 | Atcomm Corporation | Call security system |
US6185416B1 (en) * | 1993-06-29 | 2001-02-06 | Cellco Partnership | Method and apparatus for fraud control in cellular telephone systems |
US6330546B1 (en) * | 1992-09-08 | 2001-12-11 | Hnc Software, Inc. | Risk determination and management using predictive modeling and transaction profiles for individual transacting entities |
Family Cites Families (58)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4071698A (en) | 1977-01-10 | 1978-01-31 | Franklin V. Barger, Jr. | Telephone system for audio demonstration and marketing of goods or services |
US4792968A (en) | 1985-07-10 | 1988-12-20 | Fdr Interactive Technologies | Statistical analysis system for use with public communication facility |
US4799255A (en) | 1987-01-30 | 1989-01-17 | American Telephone And Telegraph Company - At&T Information Systems | Communication facilities access control arrangement |
US4935956A (en) | 1988-05-02 | 1990-06-19 | Telequip Ventures, Inc. | Automated public phone control for charge and collect billing |
US5018190A (en) | 1989-09-21 | 1991-05-21 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Device to block unauthorized modem access over a PBX line |
JPH0420055A (en) | 1990-05-14 | 1992-01-23 | Fujitsu Ltd | Telephone terminal set |
US5125022A (en) | 1990-05-15 | 1992-06-23 | Vcs Industries, Inc. | Method for recognizing alphanumeric strings spoken over a telephone network |
US5127043A (en) | 1990-05-15 | 1992-06-30 | Vcs Industries, Inc. | Simultaneous speaker-independent voice recognition and verification over a telephone network |
WO1993012606A1 (en) * | 1991-12-12 | 1993-06-24 | Cellular Technical Services Company, Inc. | Real-time information system for cellular telephones |
US5539810A (en) * | 1992-01-27 | 1996-07-23 | Highwaymaster Communications, Inc. | Data messaging in a communications network |
US5826195A (en) * | 1992-01-27 | 1998-10-20 | Highwaymaster Communications, Inc. | Data messaging in a communications network |
US5375244A (en) * | 1992-05-29 | 1994-12-20 | At&T Corp. | System and method for granting access to a resource |
US5812650A (en) * | 1992-07-09 | 1998-09-22 | Gammino; John R. | Method and apparatus for intercepting potentially fraudulent |
US5809125A (en) * | 1992-07-09 | 1998-09-15 | Gammino; John R. | Method and apparatus for intercepting potentially fraudulent telephone calls |
US5351290A (en) * | 1992-09-11 | 1994-09-27 | Intellicall, Inc. | Telecommunications fraud prevention system and method |
US5602906A (en) * | 1993-04-30 | 1997-02-11 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Toll fraud detection system |
US5566234A (en) * | 1993-08-16 | 1996-10-15 | Mci Communications Corporation | Method for controlling fraudulent telephone calls |
US5504810A (en) * | 1993-09-22 | 1996-04-02 | At&T Corp. | Telecommunications fraud detection scheme |
US5812955A (en) * | 1993-11-04 | 1998-09-22 | Ericsson Inc. | Base station which relays cellular verification signals via a telephone wire network to verify a cellular radio telephone |
CA2110643C (en) * | 1993-12-03 | 1997-07-08 | Deborah L. Pinard | Method of telephone signalling via data link |
US5392335A (en) * | 1994-01-13 | 1995-02-21 | At&T Corp. | Arrangement for preventing perpetration of toll fraud through an adjunct processor |
US5623539A (en) * | 1994-01-27 | 1997-04-22 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Using voice signal analysis to identify authorized users of a telephone system |
US5514862A (en) * | 1994-05-20 | 1996-05-07 | At&T Corp. | Portable data carrier |
US5719926A (en) * | 1994-06-10 | 1998-02-17 | Communications Product Development, Inc. | Prepaid long-distance telephone service system with flexible operating parameters |
US5517567A (en) * | 1994-08-23 | 1996-05-14 | Daq Electronics Inc. | Key distribution system |
US5627886A (en) * | 1994-09-22 | 1997-05-06 | Electronic Data Systems Corporation | System and method for detecting fraudulent network usage patterns using real-time network monitoring |
US5615253A (en) * | 1994-10-28 | 1997-03-25 | At&T | Method for processing forwarded telephone calls |
US5655004A (en) * | 1995-05-12 | 1997-08-05 | Holbrook; William F. | Method and apparatus for detection of cellular phone fraud |
US5617470A (en) * | 1995-06-02 | 1997-04-01 | Depasquale; George B. | Apparatus and method for preventing unauthorized access to a system |
US5598459A (en) * | 1995-06-29 | 1997-01-28 | Ericsson Inc. | Authentication and handover methods and systems for radio personal communications |
GB2303275B (en) * | 1995-07-13 | 1997-06-25 | Northern Telecom Ltd | Detecting mobile telephone misuse |
US5596632A (en) * | 1995-08-16 | 1997-01-21 | Mci Communications Corporation | Message-based interface for phone fraud system |
US5839063A (en) * | 1995-09-01 | 1998-11-17 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Authentication system and method for preventing wireless communication fraud |
US5673309A (en) * | 1995-11-17 | 1997-09-30 | Avery Dennison Corporation | ATM phone card system |
US5905949A (en) * | 1995-12-21 | 1999-05-18 | Corsair Communications, Inc. | Cellular telephone fraud prevention system using RF signature analysis |
US5805686A (en) * | 1995-12-22 | 1998-09-08 | Mci Corporation | Telephone fraud detection system |
US5991617A (en) * | 1996-03-29 | 1999-11-23 | Authentix Network, Inc. | Method for preventing cellular telephone fraud |
US5757896A (en) * | 1996-05-31 | 1998-05-26 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method and apparatus for preventing pin fraud on coin telephones that use battery reversal pulses to meter charges |
US6141404A (en) * | 1996-06-13 | 2000-10-31 | @Track Communications, Inc. | Voice and data communication |
US5940751A (en) * | 1996-06-27 | 1999-08-17 | Cellular Technical Services Company, Inc. | System and method for detection of fraud in a wireless telephone system |
US5956635A (en) * | 1996-07-16 | 1999-09-21 | Cellular Technical Services Company, Inc. | Detection and prevention of channel grabbing in a wireless communications system |
US6026293A (en) * | 1996-09-05 | 2000-02-15 | Ericsson Inc. | System for preventing electronic memory tampering |
US5758277A (en) * | 1996-09-19 | 1998-05-26 | Corsair Communications, Inc. | Transient analysis system for characterizing RF transmitters by analyzing transmitted RF signals |
US5924025A (en) * | 1996-10-25 | 1999-07-13 | Cellular Technical Services Company, Inc. | System and method for detection of redial fraud in a cellular telephone system |
FI104876B (en) * | 1996-11-12 | 2000-04-14 | Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd | System and method for retrieving data from a database |
US6058301A (en) * | 1996-11-27 | 2000-05-02 | Airtouch Communications, Inc. | Cellular fraud prevention using selective roaming |
GB2321364A (en) * | 1997-01-21 | 1998-07-22 | Northern Telecom Ltd | Retraining neural network |
GB2321362A (en) * | 1997-01-21 | 1998-07-22 | Northern Telecom Ltd | Generic processing capability |
DE69837193T2 (en) * | 1997-01-31 | 2007-11-22 | Alcatel USA Sourcing, L.P., Plano | PERIPHERAL DEVICE FOR INTELLIGENT SERVICES |
US5956634A (en) * | 1997-02-28 | 1999-09-21 | Cellular Technical Services Company, Inc. | System and method for detection of fraud in a wireless telephone system |
US6188753B1 (en) * | 1997-06-30 | 2001-02-13 | Sprint Communications Co. L.P. | Method and apparatus for detection and prevention of calling card fraud |
US5970129A (en) * | 1997-06-30 | 1999-10-19 | Sprint Communications Co. L.P. | Administrative monitoring system for calling card fraud prevention |
US6078807A (en) * | 1997-08-26 | 2000-06-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Telephony fraud detection using voice recognition techniques |
US6064972A (en) * | 1997-09-17 | 2000-05-16 | At&T Corp | Risk management technique for network access |
US6072863A (en) * | 1998-04-01 | 2000-06-06 | Elcotel, Inc. | Apparatus for conditioning automatic coin validation signals, and method-of-use therefor |
US6104795A (en) * | 1998-12-04 | 2000-08-15 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method and apparatus for detecting and announcing pin fraud on coin telephones that use battery reversal pulses to meter charges |
US6526389B1 (en) * | 1999-04-20 | 2003-02-25 | Amdocs Software Systems Limited | Telecommunications system for generating a three-level customer behavior profile and for detecting deviation from the profile to identify fraud |
US6947532B1 (en) * | 2000-05-22 | 2005-09-20 | Mci, Inc. | Fraud detection based on call attempt velocity on originating number |
-
2002
- 2002-05-31 US US10/160,357 patent/US7747243B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2004
- 2004-03-08 US US10/796,871 patent/US20040176069A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2010
- 2010-05-19 US US12/783,515 patent/US8200190B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (33)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4182934A (en) * | 1978-09-26 | 1980-01-08 | Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated | Method and apparatus for detecting irregular telephone calls |
US4481384A (en) * | 1981-04-16 | 1984-11-06 | Mitel Corporation | Voice recognizing telephone call denial system |
US4463348A (en) * | 1981-11-23 | 1984-07-31 | General Electric Company | Refrigerator door usage monitor and display system |
US4534056A (en) * | 1982-08-26 | 1985-08-06 | Westinghouse Electric Corp. | Voice-recognition elevator security system |
US4893335A (en) * | 1984-09-14 | 1990-01-09 | Fuller Research And Development Company | Remote access telephone control system |
US4829554A (en) * | 1985-01-31 | 1989-05-09 | Harris Corporation | Cellular mobile telephone system and method |
US4827744A (en) * | 1986-04-10 | 1989-05-09 | Kokusan Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Vehicle use lock system |
US4876717A (en) * | 1986-09-30 | 1989-10-24 | American Telephone And Telegraph Company | Adjunct processor for providing computer facility access protection via call transfer |
US5852811A (en) * | 1987-04-15 | 1998-12-22 | Proprietary Financial Products, Inc. | Method for managing financial accounts by a preferred allocation of funds among accounts |
US4908850A (en) * | 1988-01-11 | 1990-03-13 | American Communications & Engineering, Inc. | Voice services network with automated billing |
US4908850B1 (en) * | 1988-01-11 | 1995-02-07 | American Communications & Engi | Voice services network with automated billing |
US4958368A (en) * | 1988-10-31 | 1990-09-18 | Gte Mobilnet Incorporated | Customer activation system |
US4896346A (en) * | 1988-11-21 | 1990-01-23 | American Telephone And Telegraph Company, At&T Bell Laboratories | Password controlled switching system |
US5168517A (en) * | 1989-03-13 | 1992-12-01 | Herbert Waldman | Apparatus and methods for selectively forwarding telephone calls |
US4893330A (en) * | 1989-06-01 | 1990-01-09 | American Telephone And Telegraph Company, At&T Bell Laboratories | Method and apparatus for restricting credit card communication calls |
US4953198A (en) * | 1989-07-05 | 1990-08-28 | At&T Company | Public cordless telephone |
US4955049A (en) * | 1989-08-11 | 1990-09-04 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson | Method of supervising mobile telephone subscriptions in a mobile telephone system |
US5109408A (en) * | 1989-11-30 | 1992-04-28 | At&T Bell Laboratories | Arrangement for intentionally blocking telephone calls to predefined destination numbers but allowing such blocking to be selectively overridden |
US5091942A (en) * | 1990-07-23 | 1992-02-25 | Ericsson Ge Mobile Communications Holding, Inc. | Authentication system for digital cellular communications |
US5144649A (en) * | 1990-10-24 | 1992-09-01 | Gte Mobile Communications Service Corporation | Cellular radiotelephone credit card paystation method |
US5220593A (en) * | 1990-10-24 | 1993-06-15 | Gte Mobile Communications Service Corporation | Cellular radiotelephone credit card paystation method |
US5163086A (en) * | 1990-12-31 | 1992-11-10 | At&T Bell Laboratories | Telephone network credit card calling apparatus and method of operation to determine validation and fraudulent use of credit cards in placing telephone calls |
US5237612A (en) * | 1991-03-29 | 1993-08-17 | Ericsson Ge Mobile Communications Inc. | Cellular verification and validation system |
US5335265A (en) * | 1991-11-08 | 1994-08-02 | Electronic Data Systems Corporation | Apparatus for detecting and preventing subscriber number cloning in a cellular mobile telephone system |
US5309501A (en) * | 1991-11-27 | 1994-05-03 | At&T Bell Laboratories | Arrangement for detecting fraudulently identified mobile stations in a cellular mobile telecommunications network |
US5392357A (en) * | 1991-12-09 | 1995-02-21 | At&T Corp. | Secure telecommunications |
US5335278A (en) * | 1991-12-31 | 1994-08-02 | Wireless Security, Inc. | Fraud prevention system and process for cellular mobile telephone networks |
US6185415B1 (en) * | 1992-03-24 | 2001-02-06 | Atcomm Corporation | Call security system |
US6505039B1 (en) * | 1992-03-24 | 2003-01-07 | Atcomm Corporation | Call security system which detects fraud by examination of call history |
US6330546B1 (en) * | 1992-09-08 | 2001-12-11 | Hnc Software, Inc. | Risk determination and management using predictive modeling and transaction profiles for individual transacting entities |
US5615408A (en) * | 1992-11-12 | 1997-03-25 | Coral Systems, Inc. | Apparatus and method for credit based management of telecommunication activity |
US5345595A (en) * | 1992-11-12 | 1994-09-06 | Coral Systems, Inc. | Apparatus and method for detecting fraudulent telecommunication activity |
US6185416B1 (en) * | 1993-06-29 | 2001-02-06 | Cellco Partnership | Method and apparatus for fraud control in cellular telephone systems |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090217039A1 (en) * | 2008-02-05 | 2009-08-27 | Sipera Systems, Inc. | System, Method and Apparatus for Authenticating Calls |
US9197746B2 (en) * | 2008-02-05 | 2015-11-24 | Avaya Inc. | System, method and apparatus for authenticating calls |
US9961197B2 (en) | 2008-02-05 | 2018-05-01 | Avaya Inc. | System, method and apparatus for authenticating calls |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20100310055A1 (en) | 2010-12-09 |
US7747243B2 (en) | 2010-06-29 |
US20020173292A1 (en) | 2002-11-21 |
US8200190B2 (en) | 2012-06-12 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6505039B1 (en) | Call security system which detects fraud by examination of call history | |
US8200190B2 (en) | Call security system | |
US10230838B2 (en) | Telecommunication call management and monitoring system with voiceprint verification | |
US7853243B2 (en) | Telecommunication call management and monitoring system | |
US4802199A (en) | Method and apparatus for providing virtual facility communication service | |
US6665380B1 (en) | Inmate messaging system and method | |
US5260986A (en) | Group notification service and system | |
US5933480A (en) | Method for billing and controlling fraud in providing pay information services | |
CA2210710C (en) | Teleworking arrangements | |
US8494144B2 (en) | System and method for controlled call handling | |
US5463685A (en) | Network based outbound call management | |
US5901284A (en) | Method and system for communication access restriction | |
EP0581528A1 (en) | Data communications equipment security device using calling party directory number | |
US5392335A (en) | Arrangement for preventing perpetration of toll fraud through an adjunct processor | |
US5943414A (en) | Transparent protected access to corporate dialing plan | |
GB2253542A (en) | Improvements in and relating to telephone systems | |
CA2241396C (en) | Automatic operator and last-number-credit | |
CA2157226A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for controlling access to dial-up ports on public switched telephone networks |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO PAY ISSUE FEE |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: HANGER SOLUTIONS, LLC, GEORGIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:INTELLECTUAL VENTURES ASSETS 161 LLC;REEL/FRAME:052159/0509 Effective date: 20191206 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES ASSETS 161 LLC, DELAWARE Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:CUFER ASSET LTD. L.L.C.;REEL/FRAME:051873/0365 Effective date: 20191126 |