US20040015210A1 - Cochlear implant devices - Google Patents
Cochlear implant devices Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20040015210A1 US20040015210A1 US10/607,474 US60747403A US2004015210A1 US 20040015210 A1 US20040015210 A1 US 20040015210A1 US 60747403 A US60747403 A US 60747403A US 2004015210 A1 US2004015210 A1 US 2004015210A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- electrodes
- electrode
- stimulation
- different
- pitch
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
- H04R25/50—Customised settings for obtaining desired overall acoustical characteristics
- H04R25/502—Customised settings for obtaining desired overall acoustical characteristics using analog signal processing
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
- A61N1/18—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
- A61N1/32—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
- A61N1/36—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation
- A61N1/36036—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation of the outer, middle or inner ear
- A61N1/36038—Cochlear stimulation
Definitions
- the present invention relates to improvements in auditory prostheses, and more particularly to improvements in stimulation procedures and arrangements for cochlear implants.
- the successful operation of a cochlear implant depends in part on the ability to convey pitch information. Differing pitch percepts may be produced by a cochlear implant in two distinct ways. Firstly, electrical stimulation at different sites in the cochlea excites different groups of neurons and because of the tonotopic arrangement of neurons in the cochlea, different pitch sensations result. By tonotopic is meant that the percept corresponding to a particular site in the cochlea changes in pitch from lower to higher as the site is changed in an apical to basal direction. Pitch varied in this way is known as “place pitch”. Secondly different pulse rates of electrical stimulation produce different pitch sensations. Pitch varied in this way is known as “rate pitch”. The current invention deals with various means of varying place pitch.
- bipolar stimulation generally comprises passing biphasic current pulses between pairs of electrode bands, for example on a 22-band electrode array.
- the bands may be numbered from 1 at the basal end (broad part of the cochlea spiral, corresponding to high frequencies, near the entry point of the array) to 22 at the apical end (somewhere in the middle of the spiral, corresponding to lower frequencies).
- bipolar stimulation may involve passing current flows between any two bands.
- the term bipolar is also used in a specific sense to describe stimulation using two bands adjacent one another (e.g. 3 and 4) if the foregoing numbering system is utilised. More commonly, a bipolar+1 system is utilised where current flows between a band and the next but one band (e.g. 3 and 5).
- bipolar+n systems are known where current flows between electrode k and electrode k+n+1.
- monopolar Another known mode of stimulation is “monopolar” or “remote ground”.
- monopolar is used.
- current flows between one electrode inside the cochlea (possibly one of the 1 to 22 electrodes in the known system discussed above) and a single electrode somewhere outside the cochlea. This arrangement has some advantages including lower current requirements but, until now, a perceived disadvantage in precision with which current may be delivered.
- Another known mode of stimulation employs a single electrode, possibly one band on the bared array (22-band array discussed above) as a return electrode for all stimuli, but different first bands (e.g. 3,1; 4,1; 5,1 . . . 22,1).
- This is a particular type of bipolar (referred hereinafter as “variable bipolar”) stimulation. If the return electrode is inside the cochlea it is similar to bipolar stimulation but is very similar to monopolar stimulation if the return electrode is outside the cochlea.
- a still further arrangement referred to as “common ground” uses a variable first electrode and all the other electrodes are connected together as a return.
- the pitch sensation changes regularly and monotonically (from high for low numbered electrodes to low for high numbered electrodes), as would be expected from the tonotopic arrangement of the cochlea.
- this is not always the case, and the pitch sensations perceived for the different modes described above are different.
- the current distribution associated with stimulation of a given electrode site may also be varied by the type of electrode in the array, or more relevantly, the geometry of the electrode.
- the geometry of the electrode There are various geometries disclosed in the prior art, including band electrodes, and sided arrays with conductive material only on part of the array surface. Use of different electrode geometries will also produce different current distributions around the site of the stimulus. In known arrangements, various electrode geometries have been used for differing purposes, however, the geometry of the intracochlear electrodes in any particular patient has been the same.
- the objective of the present invention is to provide an improved arrangement for use in cochlear implant devices and an improved method of stimulating electrodes in such devices that will result in better speech perception in patients.
- the present invention provides an improved method of stimulating a cochlear prosthesis, said prosthesis comprising an electrode array including a plurality of individually addressable electrodes, and a stimulator device adapted to provide electrical stimuli to selected groups of said electrodes in response to sound signals, said stimuli and the corresponding groupings of electrodes being determined by reference to a predefined instruction set,
- an auditory prosthesis comprising an electrode array including a plurality of individually addressable electrodes, and a stimulator device adapted to provide electrical stimuli to selected groups of said electrodes in response to sound signals, said stimuli and the corresponding groupings of electrodes being determined by reference to a predefined instruction set,
- a “group” of electrodes may comprise one electrode and where more than one electrode comprises a group, those electrodes may be adjacent one another or may be selected in any desired pattern from the complete array to achieve a desired beneficial result in any patient.
- the different stimulation modes may include but not be limited to any one of bipolar, variable bipolar, monopolar or common ground modes.
- FIG. 1 illustrates estimates of pitch for several patients
- FIGS. 2, 4 and 6 illustrates pitch estimations by patients in response to stimulation in different modes
- FIGS. 3, 5 and 7 illustrate pitch maps using combined modes
- FIG. 8 illustrates the general arrangement of a cochlear implant system
- FIG. 9 illustrates a further set of pitch estimates for different modes in three patients P7, P8, P9.
- Cochlear implant devices that may, although not necessarily, be employed in the performance of the present invention are the Cochlear CI1 (22 active bands on the array), the CI1 (“20+2”) (20 active bands on the array and a choice of two electrodes outside the cochlear) and any similar future development.
- the Cochlear CI1 is the device that is presently in widespread use.
- the “20+2” version is essentially an experimental variant of the CI1 in which two circuit points are connected to two external electrodes instead of the two most basal bands. This allows monopolar stimulation.
- Sound signals are detected by microphone 8 , and passed to speech processor 7 .
- Processor 7 analyses the incoming sound signal and produces a set of stimulus instructions for the electrode array 1 .
- Power and signals are communicated to the receiver/stimulators unit (RSU) 3 , preferably via a transcutaneous inductive link 5 , 6 .
- the RSU 3 provides stimuli to selected electrodes of electrode array 1 via the wire is connection 2 .
- the stimuli are preferably short biphasic pulses.
- the present invention provides an improved stimulation arrangement by recognising that utilising different geometries of current distribution for a single implanted array can enable a better range of pitch percepts for the patient.
- a stimulation pattern which is, for example, fixed in bipolar+1 mode for all electrodes
- a mixture of modes may be used for different electrodes, for example.
- the electrode geometry may be varied within the array, to allow for different sites within the cochlea to be stimulated by different geometries of current distribution, and so produce an improved set of pitch percepts.
- the present Cochlear array in its standard bipolar mode provides “longitudinal” stimulation, as current flows between two bands at different positions along the array. “Radial” stimulation is another possibility. In such a case, a band might be split, and current might flow between the halves of the band. It will be appreciated that the use of a specialised array, in which for example certain electrodes are split rings and the remainder are bands, is a means of implementing the present invention.
- pitch was measured using a single interval numerical estimation method similar to that used in previous studies on pitch estimation for electrical stimulation (Shannon, 1983; Dorman et al., 1990), and this is the basis for the left hand scale on the pitch estimates graphs in the accompanying figures.
- FIG. 1 illustrates the results of another study of pitch estimations for 6 subjects with deeply inserted electrode arrays.
- monopolar was also used for subjects S5 and S6. This shows departures from the expected regular variation of pitch estimate with electrode for four patients (S3, S4, S5, S6) for bipolar+1 stimulation, and for two subjects with monopolar stimulation (S5, S6).
- N is the number of repetitions, and the accompanying key indicates the differing percepts obtained for some patients using bipolar+1, monopolar with ball electrode (MONO-B), and monopolar with plate electrode (MONO-P).
- Pulsedur is the pulse duration in for each phase of the biphasic pulse each case in ⁇ s.
- FIGS. 2 to 7 illustrate examples of the use of combining modes to produce a more appropriate pitch set for a given patient. It is emphasised that in any given case detailed study needs to be made of responses by the patient to design an optimum pitch set for that patient. In some patients, the present invention may not be required, or may be ineffective—this needs to be determined on a case by case basis, and desirable pitch sets will not always be achievable. In general, it is greatly desirable to produce a pitch set in which stimulation of progressively more apical electrodes results in a regularly and monotonically decreasing pitch percept.
- FIG. 2 (taken from FIG. 1) a comparison of the percepts for monopolar and bipolar+1 modes shows a relatively flat response with monopolar mode for the more basal electrodes, and a more desired outcome above electrode 12 . Conversely, the pitch percepts for bipolar+1 mode above electrode 12 show little variation, however, regular and monotonic percepts were recorded at the basal end.
- FIG. 3 shows a pitch set for the same patient as in FIG. 2, where the modes of stimulation have been mixed to provide a more regular outcome.
- FIG. 4 illustrates for another patient the percepts obtained for common ground, and those obtained for bipolar+1 mode.
- FIG. 5 shows a pitch set derived by combining the common ground and bipolar+1 modes for this patient. Again, a much more regular pitch set can be derived than from either alone.
- FIG. 6 illustrates variable bipolar mode and bipolar+1 mode percepts for another patient.
- variable bipolar is meant in this case utilising electrode 1 as the return electrode.
- FIG. 7 provides a pitch set combining the variable bipolar and bipolar+1 modes. Again, a much more regular pattern of pitch percepts can be obtained.
Abstract
An improved cochlear implant and method of stimulating are disclosed. The method comprises stimulating an electrode array using a set of current stimuli having different geometries, so as to provide a more regular and monotonic set of pitch percepts for a user. In one embodiment, this may be achieved by combining different modes of stimulation for a patient, so that some channels utilise one mode and other channels utilise one or more different modes,
Description
- The present invention relates to improvements in auditory prostheses, and more particularly to improvements in stimulation procedures and arrangements for cochlear implants.
- The successful operation of a cochlear implant depends in part on the ability to convey pitch information. Differing pitch percepts may be produced by a cochlear implant in two distinct ways. Firstly, electrical stimulation at different sites in the cochlea excites different groups of neurons and because of the tonotopic arrangement of neurons in the cochlea, different pitch sensations result. By tonotopic is meant that the percept corresponding to a particular site in the cochlea changes in pitch from lower to higher as the site is changed in an apical to basal direction. Pitch varied in this way is known as “place pitch”. Secondly different pulse rates of electrical stimulation produce different pitch sensations. Pitch varied in this way is known as “rate pitch”. The current invention deals with various means of varying place pitch.
- There are several commonly known methods or modes of stimulation. Each of these different known modes of operation has traditionally been employed using only one mode in each patient.
- One of the current known modes used is bipolar stimulation which generally comprises passing biphasic current pulses between pairs of electrode bands, for example on a 22-band electrode array. The bands may be numbered from 1 at the basal end (broad part of the cochlea spiral, corresponding to high frequencies, near the entry point of the array) to 22 at the apical end (somewhere in the middle of the spiral, corresponding to lower frequencies). In its general sense, bipolar stimulation may involve passing current flows between any two bands. The term bipolar is also used in a specific sense to describe stimulation using two bands adjacent one another (e.g. 3 and 4) if the foregoing numbering system is utilised. More commonly, a bipolar+1 system is utilised where current flows between a band and the next but one band (e.g. 3 and 5). Similarly, “bipolar+n” systems are known where current flows between electrode k and electrode k+n+1.
- Another known mode of stimulation is “monopolar” or “remote ground”. In the following, when reference is made to this system, the term “monopolar” is used. In this case, current flows between one electrode inside the cochlea (possibly one of the 1 to 22 electrodes in the known system discussed above) and a single electrode somewhere outside the cochlea. This arrangement has some advantages including lower current requirements but, until now, a perceived disadvantage in precision with which current may be delivered.
- Another known mode of stimulation employs a single electrode, possibly one band on the bared array (22-band array discussed above) as a return electrode for all stimuli, but different first bands (e.g. 3,1; 4,1; 5,1 . . . 22,1). This is a particular type of bipolar (referred hereinafter as “variable bipolar”) stimulation. If the return electrode is inside the cochlea it is similar to bipolar stimulation but is very similar to monopolar stimulation if the return electrode is outside the cochlea.
- A still further arrangement referred to as “common ground” uses a variable first electrode and all the other electrodes are connected together as a return.
- Generally, as the stimulating electrode changes (in the above-mentioned 22 band array), or in other words the site of stimulation in the cochlea, the pitch sensation changes regularly and monotonically (from high for low numbered electrodes to low for high numbered electrodes), as would be expected from the tonotopic arrangement of the cochlea. However, this is not always the case, and the pitch sensations perceived for the different modes described above are different.
- The current distribution associated with stimulation of a given electrode site may also be varied by the type of electrode in the array, or more relevantly, the geometry of the electrode. There are various geometries disclosed in the prior art, including band electrodes, and sided arrays with conductive material only on part of the array surface. Use of different electrode geometries will also produce different current distributions around the site of the stimulus. In known arrangements, various electrode geometries have been used for differing purposes, however, the geometry of the intracochlear electrodes in any particular patient has been the same.
- The objective of the present invention is to provide an improved arrangement for use in cochlear implant devices and an improved method of stimulating electrodes in such devices that will result in better speech perception in patients.
- According to one aspect the present invention provides an improved method of stimulating a cochlear prosthesis, said prosthesis comprising an electrode array including a plurality of individually addressable electrodes, and a stimulator device adapted to provide electrical stimuli to selected groups of said electrodes in response to sound signals, said stimuli and the corresponding groupings of electrodes being determined by reference to a predefined instruction set,
- characterised in that in response to different sound signals at least two distinct current distribution geometries may be induced in the auditory structures of a user.
- The variations in current distribution geometries which are referred to are intended to encompass changes in geometry, rather than mere changes in intensity. These variations may be produced by a variety of factors including selection of different modes of stimulation and use of different electrode geometries.
- According to another aspect the present invention provides an auditory prosthesis, comprising an electrode array including a plurality of individually addressable electrodes, and a stimulator device adapted to provide electrical stimuli to selected groups of said electrodes in response to sound signals, said stimuli and the corresponding groupings of electrodes being determined by reference to a predefined instruction set,
- characterised in that in response to different sound signals at least two distinct current distribution geometries may be induced in the auditory structures of a user.
- It will be appreciated that in the foregoing paragraph and in the following specification and claims a “group” of electrodes may comprise one electrode and where more than one electrode comprises a group, those electrodes may be adjacent one another or may be selected in any desired pattern from the complete array to achieve a desired beneficial result in any patient. Further the different stimulation modes may include but not be limited to any one of bipolar, variable bipolar, monopolar or common ground modes.
- The invention will be described with reference to the accompanying figures, in which:
- FIG. 1 illustrates estimates of pitch for several patients;
- FIGS. 2, 4 and6 illustrates pitch estimations by patients in response to stimulation in different modes;
- FIGS. 3, 5 and7 illustrate pitch maps using combined modes;
- FIG. 8 illustrates the general arrangement of a cochlear implant system; and
- FIG. 9 illustrates a further set of pitch estimates for different modes in three patients P7, P8, P9.
- The present invention will be more fully described in relation to the commercially available cochlear implant devices, receiver stimulator units and speech processors, particularly those available from Cochlear Pty. Ltd. However, it will be understood that the present invention may be implemented in other arrangements—the inventive concept is of broad application. Cochlear implant devices that may, although not necessarily, be employed in the performance of the present invention are the Cochlear CI1 (22 active bands on the array), the CI1 (“20+2”) (20 active bands on the array and a choice of two electrodes outside the cochlear) and any similar future development. The Cochlear CI1 is the device that is presently in widespread use. The “20+2” version is essentially an experimental variant of the CI1 in which two circuit points are connected to two external electrodes instead of the two most basal bands. This allows monopolar stimulation.
- The general arrangement may be understood with reference to FIG. 8. The reader will be aware of the principles generally used in construction and operation of such an arrangement, and so only a general overview will be provided.
- Sound signals are detected by
microphone 8, and passed tospeech processor 7.Processor 7 analyses the incoming sound signal and produces a set of stimulus instructions for theelectrode array 1. Various techniques for speech processing are known to those skilled in this field, and the present invention is not dependant on any particular form of processing being employed. Power and signals are communicated to the receiver/stimulators unit (RSU)3, preferably via a transcutaneousinductive link electrode array 1 via the wire isconnection 2. The stimuli are preferably short biphasic pulses. - It will be appreciated that conventional devices allow for the selection of the mode of stimualtion, and may be used to provide the combined mode stimulation according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- The present invention provides an improved stimulation arrangement by recognising that utilising different geometries of current distribution for a single implanted array can enable a better range of pitch percepts for the patient. Instead of a stimulation pattern which is, for example, fixed in
bipolar+ 1 mode for all electrodes, a mixture of modes may be used for different electrodes, for example. Similarly, the electrode geometry may be varied within the array, to allow for different sites within the cochlea to be stimulated by different geometries of current distribution, and so produce an improved set of pitch percepts. These changes operate to change the current distribution associated with stimulation at a given implanted site, which alters the associated pitch percept and allows for a wider range of possible pitch percepts to be delivered. - For example, some patients might obtain an optimum result if bipolar+1 stimulation was used on the basal electrodes and monopolar stimulation was used on the more apical electrodes. The present Cochlear array (in its standard bipolar mode) provides “longitudinal” stimulation, as current flows between two bands at different positions along the array. “Radial” stimulation is another possibility. In such a case, a band might be split, and current might flow between the halves of the band. It will be appreciated that the use of a specialised array, in which for example certain electrodes are split rings and the remainder are bands, is a means of implementing the present invention.
- Studies carried out by the inventors provide support for the need to develop an invention of the type described here, by the use of which the place pitch perceived by a patient may be improved. These studies have been made regarding pitch estimation for different modes of stimulation with either standard electrode insertion depths or with deep electrode insertions. In a first of these studies nine postlinguistically deafened adult patients with electrode arrays inserted to standard depths were investigated. Pitch estimates for stimulating electrodes along the electrode array were then determined using bipolar, common ground and “variable bipolar” stimulation (i.e. in this case between individual electrodes along the array and the most basal electrode on the array). At the maximum comfort level of the patients, pitch was measured using a single interval numerical estimation method similar to that used in previous studies on pitch estimation for electrical stimulation (Shannon, 1983; Dorman et al., 1990), and this is the basis for the left hand scale on the pitch estimates graphs in the accompanying figures.
- The results of this investigation as shown in part in the accompanying FIG. 9 indicated some differences to the expected regularity and monotonicity of pitch estimations. It was also observed when using “variable bipolar” stimulation that a reduced range for pitch for patients occurred when the return electrode was internal to the cochlea. Individual differences in pitch estimations were also observed among the three modes of stimulation for most patients. Furthermore, current levels needed to achieve threshold (T) and comfortable listening (C) levels varied with the mode of stimulation employed. No consistent pattern emerged with threshold and comfortable listening levels for bipolar stimulation. With variable bipolar stimulation threshold and comfortable listening levels increased in an apical to basal direction for most patients. Perhaps this was to be expected because of the narrowing spatial extent. With common ground stimulation, there was a tendency for threshold and comfortable listening levels to be higher for electrodes in the middle of the array rather than either end of the array. The size of the dynamic range when common ground stimulation was used seemed to be substantially equivalent to that using bipolar stimulation and was usually greater than for variable bipolar stimulation.
- FIG. 1 illustrates the results of another study of pitch estimations for 6 subjects with deeply inserted electrode arrays. In addition to the bipolar+1 stimulation used on all subjects, monopolar was also used for subjects S5 and S6. This shows departures from the expected regular variation of pitch estimate with electrode for four patients (S3, S4, S5, S6) for bipolar+1 stimulation, and for two subjects with monopolar stimulation (S5, S6). For each patient, N is the number of repetitions, and the accompanying key indicates the differing percepts obtained for some patients using
bipolar+ 1, monopolar with ball electrode (MONO-B), and monopolar with plate electrode (MONO-P). Pulsedur is the pulse duration in for each phase of the biphasic pulse each case in μs. - These investigations support the need for this invention in which the place pitch perceived by a patient may be improved by utilizing more than one mode of stimulation in the one patient.
- FIGS.2 to 7 illustrate examples of the use of combining modes to produce a more appropriate pitch set for a given patient. It is emphasised that in any given case detailed study needs to be made of responses by the patient to design an optimum pitch set for that patient. In some patients, the present invention may not be required, or may be ineffective—this needs to be determined on a case by case basis, and desirable pitch sets will not always be achievable. In general, it is greatly desirable to produce a pitch set in which stimulation of progressively more apical electrodes results in a regularly and monotonically decreasing pitch percept.
- Referring to FIG. 2, (taken from FIG. 1) a comparison of the percepts for monopolar and bipolar+1 modes shows a relatively flat response with monopolar mode for the more basal electrodes, and a more desired outcome above
electrode 12. Conversely, the pitch percepts for bipolar+1 mode aboveelectrode 12 show little variation, however, regular and monotonic percepts were recorded at the basal end. FIG. 3 shows a pitch set for the same patient as in FIG. 2, where the modes of stimulation have been mixed to provide a more regular outcome. - FIG. 4 (taken from FIG. 9) illustrates for another patient the percepts obtained for common ground, and those obtained for bipolar+1 mode. FIG. 5 shows a pitch set derived by combining the common ground and bipolar+1 modes for this patient. Again, a much more regular pitch set can be derived than from either alone.
- FIG. 6 (taken from FIG. 9) illustrates variable bipolar mode and bipolar+1 mode percepts for another patient. By variable bipolar is meant in this
case utilising electrode 1 as the return electrode. As this patient has several bands outside the cochlea, this is very similar to monopolar for this patient. FIG. 7 provides a pitch set combining the variable bipolar and bipolar+1 modes. Again, a much more regular pattern of pitch percepts can be obtained. - It will be appreciated that other techniques for varying the current distribution associated with a given stimulation site may be used to provide further differences in pitch percepts, so as to select a pitch set for a given patient so as to produce a more regular and monotonic function. Further, the use of techniques such as composite pitch to provide pitch percepts not perceived with any given electrode site under, say, bipolar+1 stimulation can provide additional percepts to those possible using a single mode alone. It will be appreciated that while the discussion above has predominantly been concerned with combining modes, variation of other aspects as discussed, and combinations of, say, electrode geometry variations and mode variations are contemplated within the scope of the present invention.
Claims (10)
1. An improved method of stimulating a cochlear prosthesis, said prosthesis comprising an electrode array including a plurality of individually addressable electrodes, and a stimulator device adapted to provide electrical stimuli to selected groupings of said electrodes in response to sound signals, said stimuli and the corresponding groupings of electrodes being determined by reference to a predefined instruction set,
characterised in that in response to different sound signals at least two distinct current distribution geometries may be induced in the auditory structures of a user.
2. A method according to claim 1 , wherein said different current distribution geometries are induced by one or a combination of factors selected from the group comprising:
selection of different modes of stimulation; and
use of different electrode geometries.
3. A method according to claim 1 or claim 2 , wherein said electrodes are grouped into at least two groups, and the electrode or electrodes in each said group are stimulated using different stimulation modes.
4. A method according to claim 1 or claim 2 , wherein one or more electrodes in one or more groups of said electrodes in the electrode array have a differing geometry to the electrode or electrodes in another group of said electrodes in the electrode array.
5. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said electrode array includes at least one extra-cochlear electrode.
6. An auditory prosthesis, comprising an electrode array including a plurality of individually addressable electrodes, and a stimulator device adapted to provide electrical stimuli to selected groupings of said electrodes in response to sound signals, said stimuli and the corresponding groupings of electrodes being determined by reference to a predefined instruction set,
characterised in that in response to different sound signals at least two distinct current distribution geometries may be induced in the auditory structures of a user.
7. A prosthesis according to claim 6 , wherein said different current distribution geometries are induced by one or a combination of factors selected from the group comprising:
selection of different modes of stimulation; and
use of different electrode geometries.
8. A prosthesis according to claim 6 or claim 7 , wherein said electrodes are grouped into at least two groups, and the electrode or electrodes in each said group are stimulated using different stimulation modes.
9. A prosthesis according to claim 6 or claim 7 , wherein one or more electrodes in one or more groups of said electrodes in the electrode array have a differing geometry to the electrode or electrodes in another group of said electrodes in the electrode array.
10. A prosthesis according to any one of claims 8 to 13, wherein said electrode array includes at least one extra-cochlear electrode.
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/607,474 US20040015210A1 (en) | 1993-07-01 | 2003-06-26 | Cochlear implant devices |
US11/265,136 US7627377B2 (en) | 1993-07-01 | 2005-11-03 | Cochlear implant devices |
Applications Claiming Priority (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AUPL974893 | 1993-07-01 | ||
AUPL9748 | 1993-07-01 | ||
US39715595A | 1995-04-03 | 1995-04-03 | |
US08/762,604 US6611717B1 (en) | 1993-07-01 | 1996-12-09 | Implant device |
US10/607,474 US20040015210A1 (en) | 1993-07-01 | 2003-06-26 | Cochlear implant devices |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US08/762,604 Division US6611717B1 (en) | 1993-07-01 | 1996-12-09 | Implant device |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/265,136 Continuation US7627377B2 (en) | 1993-07-01 | 2005-11-03 | Cochlear implant devices |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20040015210A1 true US20040015210A1 (en) | 2004-01-22 |
Family
ID=3777031
Family Applications (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US08/762,604 Expired - Fee Related US6611717B1 (en) | 1993-07-01 | 1996-12-09 | Implant device |
US10/607,474 Abandoned US20040015210A1 (en) | 1993-07-01 | 2003-06-26 | Cochlear implant devices |
US11/265,136 Expired - Fee Related US7627377B2 (en) | 1993-07-01 | 2005-11-03 | Cochlear implant devices |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US08/762,604 Expired - Fee Related US6611717B1 (en) | 1993-07-01 | 1996-12-09 | Implant device |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/265,136 Expired - Fee Related US7627377B2 (en) | 1993-07-01 | 2005-11-03 | Cochlear implant devices |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (3) | US6611717B1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP0663137B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP3600239B2 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE225590T1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2143623C (en) |
DE (1) | DE69431467T2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO1995001709A1 (en) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050177205A1 (en) * | 2004-01-09 | 2005-08-11 | Bomjun Kwon | Stimulation mode for cochlear implant speech coding |
US20060265061A1 (en) * | 2005-05-19 | 2006-11-23 | Cochlear Limited | Independent and concurrent processing multiple audio input signals in a prosthetic hearing implant |
US20080234783A1 (en) * | 2007-03-21 | 2008-09-25 | Cochlear Americas | Stimulating auditory nerve fibers to provide pitch representation |
US20090012580A1 (en) * | 2007-07-03 | 2009-01-08 | Med-El Elektromedizinische Geraete Gmbh | Cochlear Implant Pitch Intensity |
Families Citing this family (28)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5601617A (en) * | 1995-04-26 | 1997-02-11 | Advanced Bionics Corporation | Multichannel cochlear prosthesis with flexible control of stimulus waveforms |
AU731837B2 (en) * | 1995-12-01 | 2001-04-05 | Cochlear Limited | A feedback system to control electrode voltages in a cochlear stimulator and the like |
US6289247B1 (en) | 1998-06-02 | 2001-09-11 | Advanced Bionics Corporation | Strategy selector for multichannel cochlear prosthesis |
US8260430B2 (en) | 2010-07-01 | 2012-09-04 | Cochlear Limited | Stimulation channel selection for a stimulating medical device |
AU2001265692B2 (en) * | 2000-06-19 | 2004-09-09 | Cochlear Limited | Sound processor for a cochlear implant |
AUPQ820500A0 (en) | 2000-06-19 | 2000-07-13 | Cochlear Limited | Travelling wave sound processor |
US7822478B2 (en) | 2000-08-21 | 2010-10-26 | Cochlear Limited | Compressed neural coding |
AUPQ952800A0 (en) | 2000-08-21 | 2000-09-14 | Cochlear Limited | Power efficient electrical stimulation |
US8285382B2 (en) | 2000-08-21 | 2012-10-09 | Cochlear Limited | Determining stimulation signals for neural stimulation |
AU2001281588B2 (en) * | 2000-08-21 | 2007-01-11 | Cochlear Limited | Power efficient electrical stimulation |
US9008786B2 (en) | 2000-08-21 | 2015-04-14 | Cochlear Limited | Determining stimulation signals for neural stimulation |
WO2002082982A1 (en) | 2001-04-18 | 2002-10-24 | Cochlear Limited | Method and apparatus for measurement of evoked neural response |
AUPR604801A0 (en) | 2001-06-29 | 2001-07-26 | Cochlear Limited | Multi-electrode cochlear implant system with distributed electronics |
US7292891B2 (en) | 2001-08-20 | 2007-11-06 | Advanced Bionics Corporation | BioNet for bilateral cochlear implant systems |
AUPS318202A0 (en) | 2002-06-26 | 2002-07-18 | Cochlear Limited | Parametric fitting of a cochlear implant |
AU2002951218A0 (en) | 2002-09-04 | 2002-09-19 | Cochlear Limited | Method and apparatus for measurement of evoked neural response |
US7103417B1 (en) * | 2003-04-18 | 2006-09-05 | Advanced Bionics Corporation | Adaptive place-pitch ranking procedure for optimizing performance of a multi-channel neural stimulator |
EP1765459B1 (en) | 2004-06-15 | 2018-11-28 | Cochlear Limited | Automatic determination of the threshold of an evoked neural response |
US7801617B2 (en) | 2005-10-31 | 2010-09-21 | Cochlear Limited | Automatic measurement of neural response concurrent with psychophysics measurement of stimulating device recipient |
US8190268B2 (en) | 2004-06-15 | 2012-05-29 | Cochlear Limited | Automatic measurement of an evoked neural response concurrent with an indication of a psychophysics reaction |
US20110307030A1 (en) * | 2005-03-24 | 2011-12-15 | Michael Sasha John | Methods for Evaluating and Selecting Electrode Sites of a Brain Network to Treat Brain Disorders |
CN100502819C (en) * | 2005-05-24 | 2009-06-24 | 北京大学科技开发部 | Artificial cochlea manufacture method suitable for Chinese voice coding strategy |
US8571675B2 (en) | 2006-04-21 | 2013-10-29 | Cochlear Limited | Determining operating parameters for a stimulating medical device |
CN101744672B (en) * | 2008-12-16 | 2011-09-21 | 上海冠芯电子科技有限公司 | Encapsulating method for making cochlear prosthesis implanting device by utilizing vacuum extractor |
US10806926B2 (en) * | 2009-10-20 | 2020-10-20 | Man & Science Sa | Implantable electrical stimulator |
US8515540B2 (en) | 2011-02-24 | 2013-08-20 | Cochlear Limited | Feedthrough having a non-linear conductor |
CN113908424A (en) | 2014-04-24 | 2022-01-11 | 佐治亚科技研究公司 | Microneedle and method for producing same |
US10743114B2 (en) * | 2016-11-22 | 2020-08-11 | Cochlear Limited | Dynamic stimulus resolution adaption |
Citations (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4441202A (en) * | 1979-05-28 | 1984-04-03 | The University Of Melbourne | Speech processor |
US4515158A (en) * | 1980-12-12 | 1985-05-07 | The Commonwealth Of Australia Secretary Of Industry And Commerce | Speech processing method and apparatus |
US4532930A (en) * | 1983-04-11 | 1985-08-06 | Commonwealth Of Australia, Dept. Of Science & Technology | Cochlear implant system for an auditory prosthesis |
US4593696A (en) * | 1985-01-17 | 1986-06-10 | Hochmair Ingeborg | Auditory stimulation using CW and pulsed signals |
US4648403A (en) * | 1985-05-16 | 1987-03-10 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Method and apparatus for providing spread correction in a multi-channel cochlear prosthesis |
US4813417A (en) * | 1987-03-13 | 1989-03-21 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Signal processor for and an auditory prosthesis utilizing channel dominance |
US4823795A (en) * | 1987-03-13 | 1989-04-25 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Signal processor for and an auditory prosthesis having spectral to temporal transformation |
US5061282A (en) * | 1989-10-10 | 1991-10-29 | Jacobs Jared J | Cochlear implant auditory prosthesis |
US5095904A (en) * | 1989-09-08 | 1992-03-17 | Cochlear Pty. Ltd. | Multi-peak speech procession |
US5215085A (en) * | 1988-06-29 | 1993-06-01 | Erwin Hochmair | Method and apparatus for electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve |
US5884262A (en) * | 1996-03-28 | 1999-03-16 | Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc. | Computer network audio access and conversion system |
US6104711A (en) * | 1997-03-06 | 2000-08-15 | Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc. | Enhanced internet domain name server |
US6359880B1 (en) * | 1997-03-11 | 2002-03-19 | James E. Curry | Public wireless/cordless internet gateway |
US20060219473A1 (en) * | 2005-03-31 | 2006-10-05 | Avaya Technology Corp. | IP phone intruder security monitoring system |
Family Cites Families (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4400590A (en) * | 1980-12-22 | 1983-08-23 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Apparatus for multichannel cochlear implant hearing aid system |
US4408608A (en) * | 1981-04-09 | 1983-10-11 | Telectronics Pty. Ltd. | Implantable tissue-stimulating prosthesis |
AU562749B2 (en) * | 1982-08-20 | 1987-06-18 | University Of Melbourne, The | Hearing prosthesis |
AU569636B2 (en) * | 1984-09-07 | 1988-02-11 | University Of Melbourne, The | Bipolar paired pulse supplied prosthetic device |
US4592359A (en) * | 1985-04-02 | 1986-06-03 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Multi-channel implantable neural stimulator |
US4918745A (en) * | 1987-10-09 | 1990-04-17 | Storz Instrument Company | Multi-channel cochlear implant system |
JPH0323854A (en) * | 1989-06-21 | 1991-01-31 | Toshiba Corp | Shock wave treatment apparatus and continuous wave hyperthermia device |
US5569307A (en) * | 1989-09-22 | 1996-10-29 | Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific Research | Implantable cochlear stimulator having backtelemetry handshake signal |
US5522865A (en) * | 1989-09-22 | 1996-06-04 | Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific Research | Voltage/current control system for a human tissue stimulator |
US5531774A (en) * | 1989-09-22 | 1996-07-02 | Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific Research | Multichannel implantable cochlear stimulator having programmable bipolar, monopolar or multipolar electrode configurations |
US5603726A (en) * | 1989-09-22 | 1997-02-18 | Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific Research | Multichannel cochlear implant system including wearable speech processor |
JPH06506322A (en) * | 1990-11-01 | 1994-07-14 | コクリヤ プロプライエタリー リミテッド | Bimodal audio processing device |
US5549658A (en) * | 1994-10-24 | 1996-08-27 | Advanced Bionics Corporation | Four-Channel cochlear system with a passive, non-hermetically sealed implant |
-
1994
- 1994-07-01 WO PCT/AU1994/000370 patent/WO1995001709A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1994-07-01 EP EP94919517A patent/EP0663137B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1994-07-01 CA CA002143623A patent/CA2143623C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1994-07-01 DE DE69431467T patent/DE69431467T2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1994-07-01 JP JP50317395A patent/JP3600239B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1994-07-01 AT AT94919517T patent/ATE225590T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
1996
- 1996-12-09 US US08/762,604 patent/US6611717B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2003
- 2003-06-26 US US10/607,474 patent/US20040015210A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2005
- 2005-11-03 US US11/265,136 patent/US7627377B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4441202A (en) * | 1979-05-28 | 1984-04-03 | The University Of Melbourne | Speech processor |
US4515158A (en) * | 1980-12-12 | 1985-05-07 | The Commonwealth Of Australia Secretary Of Industry And Commerce | Speech processing method and apparatus |
US4532930A (en) * | 1983-04-11 | 1985-08-06 | Commonwealth Of Australia, Dept. Of Science & Technology | Cochlear implant system for an auditory prosthesis |
US4593696A (en) * | 1985-01-17 | 1986-06-10 | Hochmair Ingeborg | Auditory stimulation using CW and pulsed signals |
US4648403A (en) * | 1985-05-16 | 1987-03-10 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Method and apparatus for providing spread correction in a multi-channel cochlear prosthesis |
US4823795A (en) * | 1987-03-13 | 1989-04-25 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Signal processor for and an auditory prosthesis having spectral to temporal transformation |
US4813417A (en) * | 1987-03-13 | 1989-03-21 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Signal processor for and an auditory prosthesis utilizing channel dominance |
US5215085A (en) * | 1988-06-29 | 1993-06-01 | Erwin Hochmair | Method and apparatus for electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve |
US5095904A (en) * | 1989-09-08 | 1992-03-17 | Cochlear Pty. Ltd. | Multi-peak speech procession |
US5061282A (en) * | 1989-10-10 | 1991-10-29 | Jacobs Jared J | Cochlear implant auditory prosthesis |
US5884262A (en) * | 1996-03-28 | 1999-03-16 | Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc. | Computer network audio access and conversion system |
US6104711A (en) * | 1997-03-06 | 2000-08-15 | Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc. | Enhanced internet domain name server |
US6282574B1 (en) * | 1997-03-06 | 2001-08-28 | Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc. | Method, server and telecommunications system for name translation on a conditional basis and/or to a telephone number |
US6359880B1 (en) * | 1997-03-11 | 2002-03-19 | James E. Curry | Public wireless/cordless internet gateway |
US20060219473A1 (en) * | 2005-03-31 | 2006-10-05 | Avaya Technology Corp. | IP phone intruder security monitoring system |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050177205A1 (en) * | 2004-01-09 | 2005-08-11 | Bomjun Kwon | Stimulation mode for cochlear implant speech coding |
US8036753B2 (en) * | 2004-01-09 | 2011-10-11 | Cochlear Limited | Stimulation mode for cochlear implant speech coding |
US20060265061A1 (en) * | 2005-05-19 | 2006-11-23 | Cochlear Limited | Independent and concurrent processing multiple audio input signals in a prosthetic hearing implant |
US8369958B2 (en) | 2005-05-19 | 2013-02-05 | Cochlear Limited | Independent and concurrent processing multiple audio input signals in a prosthetic hearing implant |
US20080234783A1 (en) * | 2007-03-21 | 2008-09-25 | Cochlear Americas | Stimulating auditory nerve fibers to provide pitch representation |
US8019430B2 (en) | 2007-03-21 | 2011-09-13 | Cochlear Limited | Stimulating auditory nerve fibers to provide pitch representation |
US20090012580A1 (en) * | 2007-07-03 | 2009-01-08 | Med-El Elektromedizinische Geraete Gmbh | Cochlear Implant Pitch Intensity |
US7979135B2 (en) * | 2007-07-03 | 2011-07-12 | Med-El Elektromedizinische Geraete Gmbh | Cochlear implant pitch intensity |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CA2143623C (en) | 2004-10-12 |
US20060052840A1 (en) | 2006-03-09 |
EP0663137A4 (en) | 1996-10-02 |
DE69431467T2 (en) | 2003-08-07 |
JPH08501241A (en) | 1996-02-13 |
EP0663137A1 (en) | 1995-07-19 |
EP0663137B1 (en) | 2002-10-02 |
US6611717B1 (en) | 2003-08-26 |
CA2143623A1 (en) | 1995-01-12 |
WO1995001709A1 (en) | 1995-01-12 |
JP3600239B2 (en) | 2004-12-15 |
DE69431467D1 (en) | 2002-11-07 |
ATE225590T1 (en) | 2002-10-15 |
US7627377B2 (en) | 2009-12-01 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7627377B2 (en) | Cochlear implant devices | |
US7251530B1 (en) | Optimizing pitch and other speech stimuli allocation in a cochlear implant | |
US7039466B1 (en) | Spatial decimation stimulation in an implantable neural stimulator, such as a cochlear implant | |
Chatterjee et al. | Noise enhances modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant listeners: Stochastic resonance in a prosthetic sensory system? | |
US20080033507A1 (en) | Systems for fitting a cochlear implant to a patient | |
EP2964319B1 (en) | Electrical cochlear stimulation system | |
US7899547B1 (en) | Level-dependent stimulation methods and systems | |
US20110166625A1 (en) | Methods and Apparatus For Cochlear Implant Signal Processing | |
US9919155B2 (en) | Stimulation channel conditioning | |
US7340308B1 (en) | Method for electrically stimulating the cochlea | |
JP2000508210A (en) | Hearing prosthesis | |
EP1206898A1 (en) | Electrode array with non-uniform electrode spacing | |
Burian et al. | Electrical stimulation with multichannel electrodes in deaf patients | |
US8165689B1 (en) | Methods and systems of compensating for a disabled electrode | |
US20110106211A1 (en) | Methods and Systems for Presenting an Audio Signal to a Cochlear Implant Patient | |
AU681413B2 (en) | Cochlear implant devices | |
US20210069495A1 (en) | Dynamic Current Steering | |
US9844670B2 (en) | Complex stimulation channel arrangements |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: THE UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:CLARK, GRAEME MILBOURNE;COHEN, LAWRENCE THOMAS;BUSBY, PETER ANDREW;REEL/FRAME:014265/0122 Effective date: 19950223 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |