US20040013291A1 - Method and a system for combining automated psychiatric profiling from combined input images of brain scans with observed expert and automated interpreter using a neural network - Google Patents

Method and a system for combining automated psychiatric profiling from combined input images of brain scans with observed expert and automated interpreter using a neural network Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20040013291A1
US20040013291A1 US10/437,448 US43744803A US2004013291A1 US 20040013291 A1 US20040013291 A1 US 20040013291A1 US 43744803 A US43744803 A US 43744803A US 2004013291 A1 US2004013291 A1 US 2004013291A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
profile
features
brain
image
neural network
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/437,448
Inventor
Yitzchak Hillman
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Publication of US20040013291A1 publication Critical patent/US20040013291A1/en
Priority to US11/334,365 priority Critical patent/US7428323B2/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G16INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
    • G16HHEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
    • G16H50/00ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics
    • G16H50/20ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics for computer-aided diagnosis, e.g. based on medical expert systems
    • GPHYSICS
    • G16INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
    • G16HHEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
    • G16H30/00ICT specially adapted for the handling or processing of medical images
    • G16H30/20ICT specially adapted for the handling or processing of medical images for handling medical images, e.g. DICOM, HL7 or PACS
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S128/00Surgery
    • Y10S128/92Computer assisted medical diagnostics
    • Y10S128/922Computer assisted medical diagnostics including image analysis
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S128/00Surgery
    • Y10S128/92Computer assisted medical diagnostics
    • Y10S128/923Computer assisted medical diagnostics by comparison of patient data to other data

Definitions

  • the present invention generally relates to a field of image processing and data image classification. More particularly, the present invention relates to a system and a method for detecting, processing and classifying biometric images using digital images.
  • This invention uses a computer based technique to predict brain disease, brain degenerative disease and atrophy as well as other psychiatric illnesses before their onset.
  • the brains of people with Alzheimer show early atrophy before onset of diseased symptoms.
  • Schizophrenia patients show minor changes even before their first psychotic episode. That raises the possibility of screening and early diagnosis for the disease and early intervention for people at risk.
  • This invention is an automated tool comprising a computed algorithm for the sake of providing automated early diagnosis of disease and psychiatric conditions.
  • Brain scan images are provided via an internet or network connection and are analyzed by the procedures described.
  • Alzheimer and Schizophrenia is probably the most expensive diseases for the National Health Service of any country. If it can be prevented by early detection, the implications are vast.
  • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in brain scans showed significant differences between healthy brains versus those of patients.
  • the brain changes began some time before the Alzheimer or schizophrenic patients first suffered dementia or a psychotic episode.
  • MRI perfusion scan image with additional MRI structural imagery proves to be an effective base image system to diagnose early stages of Alzheimer using the Neural Network Computed method described.
  • Both Voxel-Based Morphometry and volumetric changes, structural and functional variations are recorded on the database for analysis using the neural network classifier.
  • the advantages of using a Neural network/Fuzzy logic type of analysis is that structural atrophy can be classified not only by volumetric single or small parameter system but by a multi parameter classifier of normalized images having a multitude of variation of 3-D shapes in a time dependent (age or durational progression of the disease) axis.
  • the spatial normalization step aims to map each structural MRI to a template in standard 3-D and stereotactic space.
  • Atrophy rates for brain temporal lobe, cortex, Amygdalae, temporal gyrus, hippocampus, and entorhinal cortices are significantly increased in patients compared with controls.
  • Medial temporal lobe atrophy rates are an early and distinguishing feature of Alzheimer.
  • Atrophy rates for brain, temporal lobe, hippocampus, and entorhinal cortices are significantly increased in patients compared with controls.
  • Schizophrenia patients have significant deficits in cortical gray matter and in temporal lobe gray matter.
  • the temporal lobes of the brain are linked with speech and the experience of hallucinations.
  • Structural deviations were found in both untreated and minimally treated subjects. No relationships were found between any brain matter volumes and positive or negative symptoms.
  • Structural brain abnormalities were distributed throughout the cortex with particular decrement evident in gray matter. This feature is consistent with altered cell structure and disturbed neuronal connectivity, which accounts for the functional abnormality of psychosis.
  • brain abnormalities were not specific to schizophrenia; they were also present in the brains of people suffering from other kinds of psychosis, such as bipolar disorder. It is assumed that many mental illnesses begin with the same changes in brain structure and chemistry and that an initial common pathway diverges into different forms of mental illness. This means that treating anyone showing signs of the brain abnormalities should prevent the onset of other mental diseases as well.
  • the main objective of this invention is to provide a method and system to diagnose and profile dementia (especially Alzheimer) and psychiatric illness using images of brain scans.
  • the present invention uses the creation of a neural network or a multi-layer perceptron (MLP) neural network (NN) in which a centralized data bank combines brain scan images with experience from expert psychiatric advice and diagnosis placing emphasis on medical and psychiatric history of individuals being analyzed.
  • MLP multi-layer perceptron
  • NN multi-layer perceptron neural network
  • the computer algorithms involved in this procedure have already proved themselves clinically in other applications such as that described in US patent Roger et al. (U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,205,236 and 5,999,639 and 6,115,488) where very similar Neural Network based algorithms are currently used.
  • Another objective of the present invention is to complement the above-mentioned method of diagnosis and profiling with that disclosed in Israeli Patent Application No. 138975 whereby particular emphasis is made to certain features of the hand and foot, mentioned above.
  • These two objectives together provide for more accurate psychiatric profiling. It is intended to find correlations between palm hand and foot features, and features on brain scans. This may provide insight into psychiatric, psychological and character profiling. This is important in brain research as well as in providing more accurate diagnostics.
  • Another objective of the present invention is the classification of brain scans using MRS and fMRI (Magnetic resonance Spectroscopy and Functional MRI) indicating functional characteristics of the brain (i.e neural activity).
  • MRS and fMRI Magnetic resonance Spectroscopy and Functional MRI
  • brain areas can be selective for processing a particular type of visual information.
  • the fusiform face area responds strongly to faces while the para-hippocampus place area responds strongly to indoor and outdoor scenes depicting the layout of local space. It was also found that the magnitude of activity in these two brain areas is much livelier or stronger when one is seeing the picture (physically present in front of them) compared with just imagining it.
  • Portable scanning technique (such as laser scanners) could be used to gain some insight into what is happening in the minds of people who are unable to communicate because they are suffering from an injury or disorder that makes speech impossible.
  • a computed neural network is used to correlate sequenced brain neural activity with memorized sequences of template scan images recorded in a central database of template scan images that have been classified according to their psychiatric profile.
  • psychiatric profiling or “diagnosis” are intended to include profiling such as medical, psychiatric, genetic, psychological and character profiling.
  • a method for providing human psychiatric profiling using a process of analysis and classification of brain scan images comprising the steps of; a) obtaining a 3-D brain scan image and the result of a psychiatric profile analysis and parameters used to enhance the image of the scan; b) extracting the edges of the brain scan image, pinpointing reference points on it, positioning, standardizing its size, and aligning it; c) autocropping and extracting a specified plurality of features and regions and/or parameters within the brain scan; d) voting, matching or correlating extracted regions, images and parameters of a plurality of features of the scan with database template images and parameters; e) searching in a message memory for a plurality of messages that make up the profile of an individual, wherein each message corresponds to the respective feature or combination of features of a database, outputting each one of the said plurality of messages concurrently to form a first profile set of messages; f) obtaining a second set of feature detections and related message statements;
  • the said features of the brain scan is one or a combination of general anatomic structures including CSF, gray matter, ventricular fluid, and lesioned tissue white matter, neurological mapping of activity to specified stimuli (such as specific sight, sound, vocal, smell, touch, taste, suggested imagination or other).
  • the said second set is composed of none, one or a combination of the elements of the set of feature detections and related message statements that form a human profile made by an expert interpreter.
  • said second set is composed of none, one or a combination of the elements of the set of feature detections and related message statements that form a self profile of a person under analysis.
  • the detections and related messages accepted from the first output set are selected according to their likelihood of correct output detection reporting and analysis.
  • the input image is from an MRI scanner, fMRI, MRS, PET, CAT, SPECT, EEG, laser, or other.
  • the input image is provided in a form of a computer memory of 2-D slices forming a 3-D map or alternatively of a complete 3-D image.
  • the pinpointing of reference points is done by use of a matching template images.
  • known reference points are built into the input image.
  • areas and features are extracted using referencing to known given or calculated reference points.
  • the psychiatric analysis results are the profile results provided by readings of hand and foot palms.
  • a standardized normalized image is determined using a generic algorithm that uses the scanner image enhancement parameters as input parameters provided into the generic algorithm procedure.
  • said edge extractor or the position registration circuit, or the feature extractor comprises a neural network or in which the said pinpointing of reference points on the brain scan is done after and as a result of the said position registration using a neural network, or in which the said voting, matching and correlating extracted regions and images of features with database template images is done using a neural network or in which the said storing of the fourth set of detected features and related messages is in a form of a neural network or in which detection is performed by brain scan detector comprising a neural network.
  • the said neural network is a multi layer peceptron neural network.
  • the said pinpointing of reference points is done by setting the palm, hand or foot in an encompassing fixed shell before imaging thereby referencing from the outer shell.
  • the method is additionally comprising a device for measuring hardness and softness of specific mounts and areas of the skin, the bending angle of the fingers and finger formations on closed or clapped hands.
  • a mechanically driven and controlled blunt pin element is used to press automatically on the skin and palm mounts.
  • the pressure applied is controlled and measured, rebound rate of the skin and palm mount is measured using a laser scanner.
  • auto-cropping and voting are performed by a generic algorithm in which auto-cropping and voting parameters are automatically optimized using a generic algorithm that maximizes fitness.
  • a system for providing human profiling using the method as defined in any of the preceding claims comprising of: a) A mechanically driven blunt-pointed element adjoining an apparatus for measuring the angle of finger bending; b) a mechanically driven plate used for measuring the maximum allowed bending angle of the finger adjoining the apparatus; c) RAM memory storage; d) an microprocessor; e) input drive; f) a high resolution color printer; g) a computer operating system.
  • a brain scan is provided using conventional brain scanning techniques.
  • Parameters used in obtaining the scan are provided. These parameters indicate either filtering, thresholding or other image enhancing parameters used in obtaining the scanned image.
  • Brain scans of different “slices” and plains at differing given angles of the brain make up the input image to the system providing for a 3-D image of the brain. This scan is stored in memory.
  • Ordinary MRI may map gray and white matter, ventricular fluid, and lesioned tissue using both or either T1 or T2 times.
  • MRS fMRI and PET scans give other mappings.
  • Scan image normalisation uses the input parameters provided with the original brain scan image as parameters used in this generic algorithm.
  • a feature extractor is used for finding reference points on the brain image.
  • Pinpointing reference points is done automatically by matching template images of the brain to database images of brains.
  • a second feature extractor process or circuit is provided for extracting all the features necessary for profiling analysis of an individual. These include specific 2-D slices or plains on the 3-D brain scan image at specific brain areas and angles. Areas and features of these images are extracted by using a process of referencing from a given set of reference points on similar brain scan images.
  • a protocol for brain extraction and automatic tissue segmentation of MR images involves the brain extraction algorithm, proton density and T2-weighted images used to generate a brain mask encompassing the full intracranial cavity. Segmentation of brain tissues into gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) is accomplished on a T1-weighted image after applying the brain mask.
  • the fully automatic segmentation algorithm is histogram-based and uses the Expectation Maximization algorithm to model a four-Gaussian mixture for both global and local histograms.
  • the means of the local Gaussians for GM, WM, and CSF are used to set local thresholds for tissue classification. Reproducibility at the regional level by comparing segmentation results within the 12 major Talairach subdivisions.
  • a voting process or circuit compares the extracted brain scan features with a database of previously extracted brain scan features to categorize the object within a set of objects having similar or highly correlated images of the features by use of a neural network.
  • an edge extractor processes the brain scan images in order to determine the edges of the brain in the image. This is done simply by matching template images of objects having pre-determined outer edges declared as belonging to the object features.
  • Auto-cropping is performed by one of many methods.
  • Auto cropping of specific regions on the brain scan images is optimized by parameter-optimizing means using a genetic algorithm (GA) so as to maximize the true-positive image detection rate while minimizing the false-positive detection rate.
  • GA genetic algorithm
  • other optimization schemes may be used as well.
  • the cropping is performed automatically, although the images could be cropped manually, and the results stored as potential templates used for additional automatic classification.
  • Generic algorithms search the solution space to maximize a fitness (objective) function by use of simulated evolutionary operators.
  • the fitness function to be maximized reflects the goals of maximizing the number of true-positive pixel elements of major lines while minimizing the number of false-positive detections.
  • the use of generic algorithms requires determination of several issues: objective function design, parameter set representation, population initialization, choice of selection function, choice of genetic operators (reproduction mechanisms) for simulated evolution, and identification of termination criteria.
  • the design of the objective function is a key factor in the performance of any optimization algorithm.
  • Optimization may be achieved by maximizing the true positive rate (TP) for a feature relating to a given profile assessment message subject to the constraint of minimizing the false positive (FP) rate.
  • TP true positive rate
  • FP false positive
  • TP is the set of profile elements and features reported by a CAD
  • FN is set of profile elements and features that are known to be true and that are not reported by CAD.
  • a real-valued GA is an order of magnitude more efficient in CPU time than the binary GA, and provides higher precision with more consistent results across replications.
  • this embodiment of the present invention uses a floating-point representation of the generic algorithm.
  • This embodiment also seeds the initial population with some members known beforehand to be in an interesting part of the search space so as to iteratively improve existing solutions. Also, the number of members is limited to twenty or some other pre-determined number so as to reduce the computational cost of evaluating objective functions.
  • normalized geometric ranking is used, as discussed in greater detail in Houck, et al., supra, for the probabilistic selection process used to identify candidates for reproduction. Ranking is less prone to premature convergence caused by individuals that are far above average. The basic idea of ranking is to select solutions for the mating pool based on the relative fitness between solutions. This embodiment also uses the default genetic operation schemes of arithmetic crossover and non-uniform mutation included in Houck, et al.'s GA.
  • This embodiment continues to search for solutions until the objective function converges.
  • the search could be terminated after a predetermined number of generations.
  • termination due to loss of population diversity and/or lack of improvement is efficient when crossover is the primary source of variation in a population, homogeneous populations can be succeeded with better (higher) fitness when using mutation.
  • Crossover refers to generating new members of a population by combining elements from several of the most fitting members. This corresponds to keeping solutions in the best part of the search space.
  • Mutation refers to randomly altering elements from the most fitting members. This allows the algorithm to exit an area of the search space that may be just a local maximum. Since restarting populations that may have converged proves useful, several iterations of the GA are run until a consistent lack of increase in average fitness is recognized.
  • the most fitting GA solution may be further optimized by local searches.
  • An alternative embodiment of the invention uses the simplex method to further refine the optimized GA solution.
  • the auto-cropping system may also benefit from optimization of its parameters including contrast value, number of erodes, number of dilates and other parameters.
  • the method for optimizing the auto-cropper includes the steps of generating line masks by hand for some training data, selecting an initial population, and producing line masks for training data.
  • the method further includes the steps of measuring the percent of overlap of the hand-generated and automatically generated masks as well as the fraction of auto-cropped features outside the hand-generated masks.
  • the method further comprises selecting winning members, generating new members, and iterating in a like manner as described above until a predetermined objective function converges.
  • Thresholding, contrast and image enhancing parameters used by a particular brain scanner may be assumed as input parameters that are fed into system and associated with the particular brain scan image. These parameters are used for standardizing and normalizing the scanned image using generic algorithm techniques.
  • Feature extraction is obtained by first identifying and aligning the image brain scan using template matching then by use of further template matching, a point on the object is chosen as a reference point.
  • Features are then extracted by template matching with reference to the different reference points such that the bigger the brain area size, the larger the area chosen for template matching.
  • This brain size image adjustment is controlled by a parameter that is included amongst the optimization parameters optimized in the feature detection and auto cropping process.
  • Relevant features within objects are obtained according to the invention by providing a novel method and system for automated feature detection from digital object images. Parameters necessary for cropping the relevant digital feature images are optimized; the digital feature images are cropped based on the optimized cropping parameters for selecting profile and relevant feature for further analysis.
  • the detected features and relating profiles are then stored as a detection image and profile, the detection image and profile is processed for display, and a computer-aided detection image is produced for review by an expert such as a psychiatrist etc.
  • the expert first reviews the original scan image, reports a profile and a set of suspicious regions and features of interest that diagnose the particular profile and feature set, S1.
  • S1 is a subset of all possible profiles and features S of the objects under investigation,
  • a CAD (computer aided diagnosis) system or more particularly, the CAD system of the invention, operates on the original set of suspicious regions and features and reports a second set of suspicious diagnosis or regions of interest, which form profile and features set S2.
  • the expert then re-examines the set S2, accepts, or rejects members of set S2, thus forming a third profile set S3 that is a subset of set S2.
  • the expert then forms another set S4 that is a set of all profile attributes that belong to S1 in union with profile attributes S3.
  • the workup regions in S4 and the patients under analysis having S4 are then recommended for further psychiatric examination and diagnosis.
  • CAD system outputs are thereby incorporated with the expert's analysis in a way that optimizes the overall sensitivity of detecting true positive features and regions of interest as well as associated profile assessments.
  • the digital images are stored as digital representations of the original feature images on computer-readable storage media.
  • the digital representations or images are stored on a 12 GB hard drive of a general-purpose computer such as a PC having dual Pentium III microprocessors running at 566 MHZ, 512 MB of RAM memory, a high resolution color monitor, a pointing device, and a high resolution color inkjet HP printer.
  • the system operates within a Windows 2000 operating system connected via a modem to the Internet so as to receive and send results from around the globe via a worldwide network.
  • Template features are provided as inputs to the classifier, which classifies each template or combinations of templates as being associated with particular psychiatric or psychological set of profile elements “statements”.
  • a feature detector is only able to locate regions of interest in the digital representation of the original object that may be associated with a particular profile element or “statement”.
  • any detector there is a tradeoff between locating as many potentially suspicious regions as possible versus reducing the number of normal regions falsely detected as being potentially suspicious.
  • CAD systems are designed to provide the largest feature detection rates possible at the expense of detecting potentially significant numbers of irrelevant regions. Many of these unwanted detections are removed from consideration by applying pattern recognition techniques.
  • Pattern recognition is the process of making decisions based on measurements.
  • regions of interest or detections are located by a detector, and then accepted or rejected for display.
  • the first step in the process is to characterize the detected regions.
  • multiple measurements are computed from each of the detected regions.
  • Each measurement is referred to as a feature.
  • a collection of measurements for a detected region is referred to as a feature vector, wherein each element of the vector represents a feature value.
  • the feature vector is input to a discriminant function.
  • a classifier has a feature vector x applied to a set of discriminant functions g (x).
  • a discriminant function computes a single value as a function of an input feature vector. Discriminant functions may be learned from training data and implemented in a variety of functional forms.
  • test statistic The output of a discriminant function is referred to as a test statistic.
  • Classification is selecting a class according to the discriminant function with the greatest output value.
  • the test statistic is compared to a threshold value. For values of the test statistic above the threshold, the profile set associated with the feature vector is retained and displayed as potentially suspicious. When the test statistic is below the threshold, the profile set is not displayed.
  • One approach considered for this invention is a class of artificial neural networks. Artificial neural networks require training, whereby the discriminate function is formed with the assistance of labeled training data.
  • the classification process is implemented by means of a multi-layer perceptron (MLP) neural network (NN).
  • MLP multi-layer perceptron
  • NN neural network
  • other classifier means could be used such as, for example, a statistical quadratic classifier.
  • the embodiment of the MLP NN system is implemented by means of software running on a general-purpose computer.
  • the MLP NN could also be implemented in a hardware configuration by means readily obtained apparent to those with ordinary skill in the art.
  • the weight values are obtained by training the network. Training consists of repeatedly presenting feature vectors of known class membership as inputs to the network. Weight values are adjusted with a back propagation algorithm to reduce the mean squared error between actual and desired network outputs. Desired outputs of z. sub. 1 and z. sub. 2 for a suspicious input are +1 and ⁇ 1, respectively. Desired outputs of z. sub. 1 and z. sub. 2 for non-suspicious inputs are ⁇ 1 and +1, respectively. Other error metrics and output values may also be used.

Abstract

A method for psychiatric profiling comprising: (a) obtaining a 3-D brain scan image (and its enhancement parameters) and obtaining a psychiatric profile analysis; (b) extracting the edges of the scan, pinpointing reference points on it, positioning, standardizing, and aligning it; (c) autocropping, extracting a plurality of features and/or regions within the scan; (d) correlating said regions or features with database images and parameters; (e) searching a message memory for messages that make up an individual's profile (said messages correspond to feature/s of a database), outputting each message to form a first profile set of messages; (f) obtaining a second set of feature detections and message statements; (g) accepting output detections and related messages in the first set to form a third profile set (a subset of the first set), combining the second and third profile to form a fourth set, alternatively allowing the fourth set to equal the first set, alternatively allowing the third set to equal the second set; (h) storing in the message memory the fourth set, corresponding to the brain scan image or storing the fourth set which corresponds to new feature/s on the brain scan image, providing a corrected output based on said corrected fourth set. A system for providing human profiling using the method is also disclosed.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention generally relates to a field of image processing and data image classification. More particularly, the present invention relates to a system and a method for detecting, processing and classifying biometric images using digital images. [0001]
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • This invention uses a computer based technique to predict brain disease, brain degenerative disease and atrophy as well as other psychiatric illnesses before their onset. The brains of people with Alzheimer show early atrophy before onset of diseased symptoms. Schizophrenia patients show minor changes even before their first psychotic episode. That raises the possibility of screening and early diagnosis for the disease and early intervention for people at risk. [0002]
  • This invention is an automated tool comprising a computed algorithm for the sake of providing automated early diagnosis of disease and psychiatric conditions. [0003]
  • There are many tools and procedures for obtaining brain scan images. Likewise, there are countless algorithms and methods intended to improve scan images using image processing techniques. However, all automated diagnostic tools for brain scan images have one thing in common. They must all contain within their algorithms a method of data classification and storage as well as a method for training the classifier using an expert interpreter. This invention patents the use of a neural network (and as such includes a fuzzy logic type of classifier). [0004]
  • Brain scan images are provided via an internet or network connection and are analyzed by the procedures described. [0005]
  • Early treatment with behavioral therapy or drugs could prevent, or at least mitigate, the full onset of Alzheimer or even schizophrenia. The longer the disease or psychosis goes untreated, the worse the outcome. Alzheimer and Schizophrenia is probably the most expensive diseases for the National Health Service of any country. If it can be prevented by early detection, the implications are vast. [0006]
  • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in brain scans showed significant differences between healthy brains versus those of patients. The brain changes began some time before the Alzheimer or schizophrenic patients first suffered dementia or a psychotic episode. [0007]
  • Over the clinical course of Alzheimer, patients demonstrate progressive declines in functional ability that correlate with MMSE scores. In the preclinical phase, also called MCI, patients with MMSE score greater than 23 will demonstrate minimal impairment—generally, mild memory loss—while functioning normally and independently. [0008]
  • Though sensitivity issues are less of a problem in diagnosing dementia per se, Specificity issues differentiating Alzheimer from ordinary age related dementia proves a main hurdle. MRI perfusion scan image with additional MRI structural imagery proves to be an effective base image system to diagnose early stages of Alzheimer using the Neural Network Computed method described. Both Voxel-Based Morphometry and volumetric changes, structural and functional variations are recorded on the database for analysis using the neural network classifier. The advantages of using a Neural network/Fuzzy logic type of analysis is that structural atrophy can be classified not only by volumetric single or small parameter system but by a multi parameter classifier of normalized images having a multitude of variation of 3-D shapes in a time dependent (age or durational progression of the disease) axis. The spatial normalization step aims to map each structural MRI to a template in standard 3-D and stereotactic space. [0009]
  • Atrophy rates for brain temporal lobe, cortex, Amygdalae, temporal gyrus, hippocampus, and entorhinal cortices are significantly increased in patients compared with controls. Linear extrapolation backward suggested medial temporal lobe atrophy commenced 3.5 years before onset of symptoms, when all patients were asymptomatic. Medial temporal lobe atrophy rates are an early and distinguishing feature of Alzheimer. Atrophy rates for brain, temporal lobe, hippocampus, and entorhinal cortices are significantly increased in patients compared with controls. [0010]
  • Schizophrenia patients have significant deficits in cortical gray matter and in temporal lobe gray matter. The temporal lobes of the brain are linked with speech and the experience of hallucinations. There were also significant differences in whole brain volume, as well as significant enlargement of the lateral and third ventricles. Structural deviations were found in both untreated and minimally treated subjects. No relationships were found between any brain matter volumes and positive or negative symptoms. Structural brain abnormalities were distributed throughout the cortex with particular decrement evident in gray matter. This feature is consistent with altered cell structure and disturbed neuronal connectivity, which accounts for the functional abnormality of psychosis. These brain abnormalities were not specific to schizophrenia; they were also present in the brains of people suffering from other kinds of psychosis, such as bipolar disorder. It is assumed that many mental illnesses begin with the same changes in brain structure and chemistry and that an initial common pathway diverges into different forms of mental illness. This means that treating anyone showing signs of the brain abnormalities should prevent the onset of other mental diseases as well. [0011]
  • Additionally, researchers in a pilot program at the Israel “Nes-Ziona” psychiatric hospital found that it was possible to determine psychiatric illnesses using the methods disclosed in Israeli Patent Application No. 138975, especially emphasizing the measurements of hardness of specific mounts and areas of the skin, the bending angle of the fingers, spacing between the fingers, relative finger lengths, the mounts on fingers, finger formations on closed or clapped hands as well as other features of the palms disclosed in Israeli Patent Application No. 138975. [0012]
  • The process of decoding and analyzing brain scan images so as to provide an accurate psychiatric profile of individuals is difficult to provide under human evaluation. [0013]
  • Therefore, the main objective of this invention is to provide a method and system to diagnose and profile dementia (especially Alzheimer) and psychiatric illness using images of brain scans. Using MRI or other tools with brain scan analysis, the present invention uses the creation of a neural network or a multi-layer perceptron (MLP) neural network (NN) in which a centralized data bank combines brain scan images with experience from expert psychiatric advice and diagnosis placing emphasis on medical and psychiatric history of individuals being analyzed. The computer algorithms involved in this procedure have already proved themselves clinically in other applications such as that described in US patent Roger et al. (U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,205,236 and 5,999,639 and 6,115,488) where very similar Neural Network based algorithms are currently used. [0014]
  • Evolutionary development of the human brain occurred at the same time as the palms and during the first tool creation era of the first humans. Human brain and palm morphologies resultantly bear correlations. Therefore, another objective of the present invention is to complement the above-mentioned method of diagnosis and profiling with that disclosed in Israeli Patent Application No. 138975 whereby particular emphasis is made to certain features of the hand and foot, mentioned above. These two objectives together provide for more accurate psychiatric profiling. It is intended to find correlations between palm hand and foot features, and features on brain scans. This may provide insight into psychiatric, psychological and character profiling. This is important in brain research as well as in providing more accurate diagnostics. [0015]
  • Another objective of the present invention is the classification of brain scans using MRS and fMRI (Magnetic resonance Spectroscopy and Functional MRI) indicating functional characteristics of the brain (i.e neural activity). [0016]
  • It is assumed that different classifications of character, personality, psychological and psychiatric profiles would have a different spread of neural activity for similar neural stimuli, such as specific sight, sound, vocal, smell, touch, taste, suggested imagination or other. It is intended to find and use unique specific neural activity associated with each of these specified classifications indicating the link between the neural activity and the classification. Finding such a link and classifying it in the form of a computed neural network will aid in the psychiatric diagnosis, making it more accurate. [0017]
  • Using brain scan technology, we are now able to identify the content of a person's thought, albeit in a very limited context. However, it is assumed that although, the basic pattern of neural firing is maintained in the general population, significant variations on the general pattern apply. These variations are dependant amongst factors that include the psychiatric profile of the person. [0018]
  • In many previous studies have shown that brain areas can be selective for processing a particular type of visual information. In the cortical brain regions associated with mental processing, the fusiform face area responds strongly to faces while the para-hippocampus place area responds strongly to indoor and outdoor scenes depicting the layout of local space. It was also found that the magnitude of activity in these two brain areas is much livelier or stronger when one is seeing the picture (physically present in front of them) compared with just imagining it. [0019]
  • Portable scanning technique (such as laser scanners) could be used to gain some insight into what is happening in the minds of people who are unable to communicate because they are suffering from an injury or disorder that makes speech impossible. However, it is assumed that it will be possible to predict and analyze thought patterns with almost 100% accuracy if adjustment is made for the thought pattern analysis by taking into consideration the psychiatric profile of the individual being analyzed. Therefore, another objective of this patent is to categorize neural functional activity (agitated by specified stimuli) according to the psychiatric profile thereby providing for a method and system for analyzing thoughts. This procedure has special emphasis for the need of prostheses limbs in order to function. [0020]
  • A computed neural network is used to correlate sequenced brain neural activity with memorized sequences of template scan images recorded in a central database of template scan images that have been classified according to their psychiatric profile. [0021]
  • Other objectives and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following detailed description that follows. [0022]
  • In the present invention, the terms “psychiatric profiling” or “diagnosis” are intended to include profiling such as medical, psychiatric, genetic, psychological and character profiling. [0023]
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • There is thus provided in the present invention a method for providing human psychiatric profiling using a process of analysis and classification of brain scan images comprising the steps of; a) obtaining a 3-D brain scan image and the result of a psychiatric profile analysis and parameters used to enhance the image of the scan; b) extracting the edges of the brain scan image, pinpointing reference points on it, positioning, standardizing its size, and aligning it; c) autocropping and extracting a specified plurality of features and regions and/or parameters within the brain scan; d) voting, matching or correlating extracted regions, images and parameters of a plurality of features of the scan with database template images and parameters; e) searching in a message memory for a plurality of messages that make up the profile of an individual, wherein each message corresponds to the respective feature or combination of features of a database, outputting each one of the said plurality of messages concurrently to form a first profile set of messages; f) obtaining a second set of feature detections and related message statements; g) accepting some output detections and related messages in the first set to form a third profile set of features and related messages that is a subset of the first set, combining the third profile set of messages with the second set to form a fourth set alternatively allowing the fourth set to equal the first set, alternatively allowing the third set to equal the second set; h) storing in the said message memory the fourth set of detections and related messages corresponding to the said brain scan image or storing in the said message memory the fourth set of detections and related messages corresponding to a new combination of features on the brain scan image, providing a corrected output based on said corrected fourth set of detections and related messages. [0024]
  • According to one preferred embodiment of the method, the said features of the brain scan is one or a combination of general anatomic structures including CSF, gray matter, ventricular fluid, and lesioned tissue white matter, neurological mapping of activity to specified stimuli (such as specific sight, sound, vocal, smell, touch, taste, suggested imagination or other). [0025]
  • According to a preferred embodiment of the method, the said second set is composed of none, one or a combination of the elements of the set of feature detections and related message statements that form a human profile made by an expert interpreter. [0026]
  • In one embodiment, said second set is composed of none, one or a combination of the elements of the set of feature detections and related message statements that form a self profile of a person under analysis. In such case, in one embodiment the detections and related messages accepted from the first output set are selected according to their likelihood of correct output detection reporting and analysis. [0027]
  • In another embodiment, the input image is from an MRI scanner, fMRI, MRS, PET, CAT, SPECT, EEG, laser, or other. [0028]
  • In another embodiment the input image is provided in a form of a computer memory of 2-D slices forming a 3-D map or alternatively of a complete 3-D image. [0029]
  • In another embodiment the pinpointing of reference points is done by use of a matching template images. [0030]
  • In another embodiment, known reference points are built into the input image. [0031]
  • In another embodiment areas and features are extracted using referencing to known given or calculated reference points. [0032]
  • In another embodiment the psychiatric analysis results are the profile results provided by readings of hand and foot palms. [0033]
  • In another embodiment a standardized normalized image is determined using a generic algorithm that uses the scanner image enhancement parameters as input parameters provided into the generic algorithm procedure. [0034]
  • In another embodiment said edge extractor or the position registration circuit, or the feature extractor, comprises a neural network or in which the said pinpointing of reference points on the brain scan is done after and as a result of the said position registration using a neural network, or in which the said voting, matching and correlating extracted regions and images of features with database template images is done using a neural network or in which the said storing of the fourth set of detected features and related messages is in a form of a neural network or in which detection is performed by brain scan detector comprising a neural network. [0035]
  • In such case, In one embodiment the said neural network is a multi layer peceptron neural network. [0036]
  • In another embodiment the said pinpointing of reference points is done by setting the palm, hand or foot in an encompassing fixed shell before imaging thereby referencing from the outer shell. [0037]
  • In one embodiment the method is additionally comprising a device for measuring hardness and softness of specific mounts and areas of the skin, the bending angle of the fingers and finger formations on closed or clapped hands. In such case, in one embodiment, a mechanically driven and controlled blunt pin element is used to press automatically on the skin and palm mounts. In another embodiment the pressure applied is controlled and measured, rebound rate of the skin and palm mount is measured using a laser scanner. [0038]
  • In one embodiment auto-cropping and voting are performed by a generic algorithm in which auto-cropping and voting parameters are automatically optimized using a generic algorithm that maximizes fitness. [0039]
  • There is also provided in the present invention a system for providing human profiling using the method as defined in any of the preceding claims comprising of: a) A mechanically driven blunt-pointed element adjoining an apparatus for measuring the angle of finger bending; b) a mechanically driven plate used for measuring the maximum allowed bending angle of the finger adjoining the apparatus; c) RAM memory storage; d) an microprocessor; e) input drive; f) a high resolution color printer; g) a computer operating system.[0040]
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • A brain scan is provided using conventional brain scanning techniques. [0041]
  • Parameters used in obtaining the scan are provided. These parameters indicate either filtering, thresholding or other image enhancing parameters used in obtaining the scanned image. Brain scans of different “slices” and plains at differing given angles of the brain make up the input image to the system providing for a 3-D image of the brain. This scan is stored in memory. Ordinary MRI may map gray and white matter, ventricular fluid, and lesioned tissue using both or either T1 or T2 times. MRS fMRI and PET scans give other mappings. [0042]
  • In order to normalise and standardize the scans, into a standard scan image, a generic algorithm is used. Scan image normalisation uses the input parameters provided with the original brain scan image as parameters used in this generic algorithm. [0043]
  • A feature extractor is used for finding reference points on the brain image. [0044]
  • Pinpointing reference points is done automatically by matching template images of the brain to database images of brains. A second feature extractor process or circuit is provided for extracting all the features necessary for profiling analysis of an individual. These include specific 2-D slices or plains on the 3-D brain scan image at specific brain areas and angles. Areas and features of these images are extracted by using a process of referencing from a given set of reference points on similar brain scan images. [0045]
  • A protocol for brain extraction and automatic tissue segmentation of MR images involves the brain extraction algorithm, proton density and T2-weighted images used to generate a brain mask encompassing the full intracranial cavity. Segmentation of brain tissues into gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) is accomplished on a T1-weighted image after applying the brain mask. The fully automatic segmentation algorithm is histogram-based and uses the Expectation Maximization algorithm to model a four-Gaussian mixture for both global and local histograms. The means of the local Gaussians for GM, WM, and CSF are used to set local thresholds for tissue classification. Reproducibility at the regional level by comparing segmentation results within the 12 major Talairach subdivisions. [0046]
  • A voting process or circuit compares the extracted brain scan features with a database of previously extracted brain scan features to categorize the object within a set of objects having similar or highly correlated images of the features by use of a neural network. [0047]
  • The results of the system are optimally combined with the results given by the neural network computation. [0048]
  • Additional measurements of palm hand or foot are made. In order to measure hardness and softness of the palms of hand and foot regions, specific regions on the hand and foot are pressed using a mechanically driven and controlled blunt pin element that is pressed automatically on the skin and palm mounts. The pressure applied is controlled and measured. Rebound rate of the skin and palm mount is measured using the laser scanner as listed in patent Israeli Patent Application No. 138975. [0049]
  • Similarly, in order to measure the maximum bending angles of the fingers, automated controlled and measured pressure is applied on the fingers using a mechanically driven plate while measuring the maximum allowable bending angle of tie finger. An edge extractor processes the brain scan images in order to determine the edges of the brain in the image. This is done simply by matching template images of objects having pre-determined outer edges declared as belonging to the object features. [0050]
  • Auto-cropping is performed by one of many methods. Auto cropping of specific regions on the brain scan images is optimized by parameter-optimizing means using a genetic algorithm (GA) so as to maximize the true-positive image detection rate while minimizing the false-positive detection rate. Of course, other optimization schemes may be used as well. Preferably, the cropping is performed automatically, although the images could be cropped manually, and the results stored as potential templates used for additional automatic classification. [0051]
  • Generic algorithms search the solution space to maximize a fitness (objective) function by use of simulated evolutionary operators. In the present invention, the fitness function to be maximized reflects the goals of maximizing the number of true-positive pixel elements of major lines while minimizing the number of false-positive detections. The use of generic algorithms requires determination of several issues: objective function design, parameter set representation, population initialization, choice of selection function, choice of genetic operators (reproduction mechanisms) for simulated evolution, and identification of termination criteria. [0052]
  • The design of the objective function is a key factor in the performance of any optimization algorithm. The function optimization problem for detecting brain scan image features may be described as follows: given some finite domain, D, a particular set of feature detection parameters, x={t, f, k. sub. lo, k. sub. hl, . . . , d} where x is an element of D, and an objective function f. sub. obj. where x denotes the set of real numbers, find the x in D that maximizes or minimizes f. sub. obj. Optimization may be achieved by maximizing the true positive rate (TP) for a feature relating to a given profile assessment message subject to the constraint of minimizing the false positive (FP) rate. Assuming TN represents profile elements and features correctly identified as not belonging to our objects and FP represents profile elements and features reported as belonging to our objects under investigation. TP is the set of profile elements and features reported by a CAD, and FN is set of profile elements and features that are known to be true and that are not reported by CAD. [0053]
  • It is assumed systems may be optimized to maximize the TP and additional FN rates subject to the constraint of minimizing the FP rate. Different objective functions may be used. [0054]
  • A real-valued GA is an order of magnitude more efficient in CPU time than the binary GA, and provides higher precision with more consistent results across replications. [0055]
  • For that reason, this embodiment of the present invention uses a floating-point representation of the generic algorithm. [0056]
  • This embodiment also seeds the initial population with some members known beforehand to be in an interesting part of the search space so as to iteratively improve existing solutions. Also, the number of members is limited to twenty or some other pre-determined number so as to reduce the computational cost of evaluating objective functions. [0057]
  • In one embodiment of the invention, normalized geometric ranking is used, as discussed in greater detail in Houck, et al., supra, for the probabilistic selection process used to identify candidates for reproduction. Ranking is less prone to premature convergence caused by individuals that are far above average. The basic idea of ranking is to select solutions for the mating pool based on the relative fitness between solutions. This embodiment also uses the default genetic operation schemes of arithmetic crossover and non-uniform mutation included in Houck, et al.'s GA. [0058]
  • This embodiment continues to search for solutions until the objective function converges. Alternatively, the search could be terminated after a predetermined number of generations. Although termination due to loss of population diversity and/or lack of improvement is efficient when crossover is the primary source of variation in a population, homogeneous populations can be succeeded with better (higher) fitness when using mutation. Crossover refers to generating new members of a population by combining elements from several of the most fitting members. This corresponds to keeping solutions in the best part of the search space. Mutation refers to randomly altering elements from the most fitting members. This allows the algorithm to exit an area of the search space that may be just a local maximum. Since restarting populations that may have converged proves useful, several iterations of the GA are run until a consistent lack of increase in average fitness is recognized. [0059]
  • Once potentially optimum solutions are found by using the GA, the most fitting GA solution may be further optimized by local searches. An alternative embodiment of the invention uses the simplex method to further refine the optimized GA solution. [0060]
  • The auto-cropping system may also benefit from optimization of its parameters including contrast value, number of erodes, number of dilates and other parameters. [0061]
  • The method for optimizing the auto-cropper includes the steps of generating line masks by hand for some training data, selecting an initial population, and producing line masks for training data. The method further includes the steps of measuring the percent of overlap of the hand-generated and automatically generated masks as well as the fraction of auto-cropped features outside the hand-generated masks. The method further comprises selecting winning members, generating new members, and iterating in a like manner as described above until a predetermined objective function converges. [0062]
  • Thresholding, contrast and image enhancing parameters used by a particular brain scanner may be assumed as input parameters that are fed into system and associated with the particular brain scan image. These parameters are used for standardizing and normalizing the scanned image using generic algorithm techniques. [0063]
  • Feature extraction is obtained by first identifying and aligning the image brain scan using template matching then by use of further template matching, a point on the object is chosen as a reference point. Features are then extracted by template matching with reference to the different reference points such that the bigger the brain area size, the larger the area chosen for template matching. This brain size image adjustment is controlled by a parameter that is included amongst the optimization parameters optimized in the feature detection and auto cropping process. [0064]
  • Relevant features within objects are obtained according to the invention by providing a novel method and system for automated feature detection from digital object images. Parameters necessary for cropping the relevant digital feature images are optimized; the digital feature images are cropped based on the optimized cropping parameters for selecting profile and relevant feature for further analysis. [0065]
  • The detected features and relating profiles are then stored as a detection image and profile, the detection image and profile is processed for display, and a computer-aided detection image is produced for review by an expert such as a psychiatrist etc. [0066]
  • The expert first reviews the original scan image, reports a profile and a set of suspicious regions and features of interest that diagnose the particular profile and feature set, S1. S1 is a subset of all possible profiles and features S of the objects under investigation, A CAD (computer aided diagnosis) system, or more particularly, the CAD system of the invention, operates on the original set of suspicious regions and features and reports a second set of suspicious diagnosis or regions of interest, which form profile and features set S2. The expert then re-examines the set S2, accepts, or rejects members of set S2, thus forming a third profile set S3 that is a subset of set S2. The expert then forms another set S4 that is a set of all profile attributes that belong to S1 in union with profile attributes S3. The workup regions in S4 and the patients under analysis having S4 are then recommended for further psychiatric examination and diagnosis. [0067]
  • CAD system outputs are thereby incorporated with the expert's analysis in a way that optimizes the overall sensitivity of detecting true positive features and regions of interest as well as associated profile assessments. [0068]
  • The digital images are stored as digital representations of the original feature images on computer-readable storage media. In a preferred embodiment, the digital representations or images are stored on a 12 GB hard drive of a general-purpose computer such as a PC having dual Pentium III microprocessors running at 566 MHZ, 512 MB of RAM memory, a high resolution color monitor, a pointing device, and a high resolution color inkjet HP printer. The system operates within a Windows 2000 operating system connected via a modem to the Internet so as to receive and send results from around the globe via a worldwide network. [0069]
  • Template features are provided as inputs to the classifier, which classifies each template or combinations of templates as being associated with particular psychiatric or psychological set of profile elements “statements”. [0070]
  • In practice, a feature detector is only able to locate regions of interest in the digital representation of the original object that may be associated with a particular profile element or “statement”. In any detector, there is a tradeoff between locating as many potentially suspicious regions as possible versus reducing the number of normal regions falsely detected as being potentially suspicious. CAD systems are designed to provide the largest feature detection rates possible at the expense of detecting potentially significant numbers of irrelevant regions. Many of these unwanted detections are removed from consideration by applying pattern recognition techniques. [0071]
  • Pattern recognition is the process of making decisions based on measurements. In this system, regions of interest or detections are located by a detector, and then accepted or rejected for display. The first step in the process is to characterize the detected regions. Toward this end, multiple measurements are computed from each of the detected regions. Each measurement is referred to as a feature. A collection of measurements for a detected region is referred to as a feature vector, wherein each element of the vector represents a feature value. The feature vector is input to a discriminant function. A classifier has a feature vector x applied to a set of discriminant functions g (x). A discriminant function computes a single value as a function of an input feature vector. Discriminant functions may be learned from training data and implemented in a variety of functional forms. The output of a discriminant function is referred to as a test statistic. Classification is selecting a class according to the discriminant function with the greatest output value. The test statistic is compared to a threshold value. For values of the test statistic above the threshold, the profile set associated with the feature vector is retained and displayed as potentially suspicious. When the test statistic is below the threshold, the profile set is not displayed. [0072]
  • Many methods are available for designing discriminate functions. One approach considered for this invention is a class of artificial neural networks. Artificial neural networks require training, whereby the discriminate function is formed with the assistance of labeled training data. In a preferred embodiment, the classification process is implemented by means of a multi-layer perceptron (MLP) neural network (NN). Of course, other classifier means could be used such as, for example, a statistical quadratic classifier. [0073]
  • The embodiment of the MLP NN system is implemented by means of software running on a general-purpose computer. Alternatively, the MLP NN could also be implemented in a hardware configuration by means readily obtained apparent to those with ordinary skill in the art. [0074]
  • The weight values are obtained by training the network. Training consists of repeatedly presenting feature vectors of known class membership as inputs to the network. Weight values are adjusted with a back propagation algorithm to reduce the mean squared error between actual and desired network outputs. Desired outputs of z. sub. 1 and z. sub. 2 for a suspicious input are +1 and −1, respectively. Desired outputs of z. sub. 1 and z. sub. 2 for non-suspicious inputs are −1 and +1, respectively. Other error metrics and output values may also be used. [0075]

Claims (20)

1. A method for providing human psychiatric profiling using a process of analysis and classification of brain scan images comprising the steps of; a) obtaining a 3-D brain scan image and the result of a psychiatric profile analysis and parameters used to enhance the image of the scan; b) extracting the edges of the brain scan image, pinpointing reference points on it, positioning, standardizing its size, and aligning it; c) autocropping, extracting and masking a specified plurality of features and regions and/or parameters within the brain scan; d) voting, matching or correlating extracted regions, images and parameters of a plurality of features of the scan with database template images and parameters; e) searching in a message memory for a plurality of messages that make up the profile of an individual, wherein each message corresponds to the respective feature or combination of features of a database, outputting each one of the said plurality of messages concurrently to form a first profile set of messages; f) obtaining a second set of feature detections and related message statements; g) accepting some output detections and related messages in the first set to form a third profile set of features and related messages that is a subset of the first set, combining the third profile set of messages with the second set to form a fourth set, alternatively allowing the fourth set to equal the first set, alternatively allowing the third set to equal the second set; h) storing in the said message memory the fourth set of detections and related messages corresponding to the said brain scan image or storing in the said message memory the fourth set of detections and related messages corresponding to a new combination of features on the brain scan image, providing a corrected output based on said corrected fourth set of detections and related messages.
2. A method according to claim 1 wherein the said features of the brain scan is one or a combination of general anatomic structures including CSF, gray matter, ventricular fluid, and lesioned tissue white matter, neurological mapping of activity to specified stimuli (such as specific sight, sound, vocal, smell, touch, taste, suggested imagination or other).
3. A method according to claim 1 wherein the said second set is composed of none, one or a combination of the elements of the set of feature detections and related message statements that form a human profile made by an expert interpreter.
4. A method according to claim 1 wherein the said second set is composed of none, one or a combination of the elements of the set of feature detections and related message statements that form a self profile of a person under analysis.
5. A method according to claim 1 where the input image is from an MRI scanner, fMRI, MRS, PET, or other.
6. A method according to claim 1 in which the input image is provided in a form of a computer memory of 2-D slices forming a 3-D map or alternatively of a complete 3-D image.
7. A method according to claim 1 in which the pinpointing of reference points is done by use of a matching template images.
8. A method according to claim 1 in which known reference points are built into the input image.
9. A method according to claim 1 in which areas and features are extracted using referencing to known given or calculated reference points.
10. A method according to claim 1 wherein the psychiatric analysis results are the profile results provided by readings of hand and foot palms.
11. A method according to claim 1 in which a standardized normalized image is determined using a generic algorithm that uses the scanner image enhancement parameters as input parameters provided into the generic algorithm procedure.
12. A method according to claims 3 and 4 wherein said detections and related messages accepted from the first output set are selected according to their likelihood of correct output detection reporting and analysis.
13. A method according to claim 1 in which said edge extractor or the position registration circuit, or the feature extractor, comprises a neural network or in which the said pinpointing of reference points on the brain scan is done after and as a result of the said position registration using a neural network, or in which the said voting, matching and correlating extracted regions and images of features with database template images is done using a neural network or in which the said storing of the fourth set of detected features and related messages is in a form of a neural network or in which detection is performed by brain scan detector comprising a neural network.
14. A method according to claim 13 in which the said neural network is a multi layer peceptron neural network.
15. A method according to claim 1 wherein the said pinpointing of reference points is done by setting the palm, hand or foot in an encompassing fixed shell before imaging thereby referencing from the outer shell.
16. A method according to claim 1, additionally comprising a device for measuring hardness and softness of specific mounts and areas of the skin, the bending angle of the fingers and finger formations on closed or clapped hands.
17. A method according to claims 1 and 16 wherein a mechanically driven and controlled blunt pin element is used to press automatically on the skin and palm mounts.
18. A method according to claims 1 and 16 wherein the pressure applied is controlled and measured, rebound rate of the skin and palm mount is measured using a laser scanner.
19. A method according to claim 1 in which auto-cropping and voting is performed by a generic algorithm in which auto-cropping and voting parameters are automatically optimized using a generic algorithm that maximizes fitness.
20. A system for providing human profiling using the method as defined in any of the preceding claims comprising of: a) A mechanically driven blunt-pointed element adjoining an apparatus for measuring the angle of finger bending; b) a mechanically driven plate used for measuring the maximum allowed bending angle of the finger adjoining the apparatus; c) RAM memory storage; d) an microprocessor; e) input drive; f) a high resolution color printer; g) a computer operating system; h) Internet and network connection.
US10/437,448 2000-11-14 2003-05-14 Method and a system for combining automated psychiatric profiling from combined input images of brain scans with observed expert and automated interpreter using a neural network Abandoned US20040013291A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/334,365 US7428323B2 (en) 2000-11-14 2006-01-19 Method and system for automatic diagnosis of possible brain disease

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
IL13965500A IL139655A0 (en) 2000-11-14 2000-11-14 A method and a system for combining automated medical and psychiatric profiling from combined input images of brain scans with observed expert and automated interpreter using a neural network
IL139655 2000-11-14
PCT/IL2001/001047 WO2002039895A1 (en) 2000-11-14 2001-11-12 A method and a system for combining automated psychiatric profiling from combined input images of brain scans with observed expert and automated interpreter using a neural network

Related Parent Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/IL2001/001047 Continuation WO2002039895A1 (en) 2000-11-14 2001-11-12 A method and a system for combining automated psychiatric profiling from combined input images of brain scans with observed expert and automated interpreter using a neural network
PCT/IL2001/001047 Continuation-In-Part WO2002039895A1 (en) 2000-11-14 2001-11-12 A method and a system for combining automated psychiatric profiling from combined input images of brain scans with observed expert and automated interpreter using a neural network

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/334,365 Continuation-In-Part US7428323B2 (en) 2000-11-14 2006-01-19 Method and system for automatic diagnosis of possible brain disease

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20040013291A1 true US20040013291A1 (en) 2004-01-22

Family

ID=11074817

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/437,448 Abandoned US20040013291A1 (en) 2000-11-14 2003-05-14 Method and a system for combining automated psychiatric profiling from combined input images of brain scans with observed expert and automated interpreter using a neural network
US11/334,365 Expired - Fee Related US7428323B2 (en) 2000-11-14 2006-01-19 Method and system for automatic diagnosis of possible brain disease

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/334,365 Expired - Fee Related US7428323B2 (en) 2000-11-14 2006-01-19 Method and system for automatic diagnosis of possible brain disease

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (2) US20040013291A1 (en)
AU (1) AU2002223992A1 (en)
IL (1) IL139655A0 (en)
WO (1) WO2002039895A1 (en)

Cited By (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20020103429A1 (en) * 2001-01-30 2002-08-01 Decharms R. Christopher Methods for physiological monitoring, training, exercise and regulation
US20040092809A1 (en) * 2002-07-26 2004-05-13 Neurion Inc. Methods for measurement and analysis of brain activity
US20050228236A1 (en) * 2002-10-03 2005-10-13 The University Of Queensland Method and apparatus for assessing psychiatric or physical disorders
US20050283053A1 (en) * 2002-01-30 2005-12-22 Decharms Richard C Methods for physiological monitoring, training, exercise and regulation
US7024027B1 (en) * 2001-11-13 2006-04-04 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Method and apparatus for three-dimensional filtering of angiographic volume data
US20060120584A1 (en) * 2000-11-14 2006-06-08 Yitzchak Hillman Method and system for automatic diagnosis of possible brain disease
US20060155348A1 (en) * 2004-11-15 2006-07-13 Decharms Richard C Applications of the stimulation of neural tissue using light
US20070189627A1 (en) * 2006-02-14 2007-08-16 Microsoft Corporation Automated face enhancement
US20080001600A1 (en) * 2003-06-03 2008-01-03 Decharms Richard C Methods for measurement of magnetic resonance signal perturbations
US7567693B2 (en) 2001-01-30 2009-07-28 Decharms R Christopher Methods for physiological monitoring training, exercise and regulation
WO2010005969A2 (en) * 2008-07-07 2010-01-14 The Johns Hopkins University Advanced cost functions for image registration for automated image analysis: multi-channel, hypertemplate and atlas with built-in variability
US20110046451A1 (en) * 2008-05-15 2011-02-24 Jean Francois Horn Method and automated system for assisting in the prognosis of alzheimer's disease, and method for training such a system
WO2012170876A3 (en) * 2011-06-09 2013-03-07 Wake Forest University Health Sciences Agent-based brain model and related methods
US20130259346A1 (en) * 2012-03-30 2013-10-03 University Of Louisville Research Foundation, Inc. Computer aided diagnostic system incorporating 3d shape analysis of the brain for identifying developmental brain disorders
US20160150992A1 (en) * 2014-11-27 2016-06-02 Ybrain Inc. Electric device for measuring eeg signal or electric stimulation
US20180204089A1 (en) * 2009-05-01 2018-07-19 Hy-Ko Products Company Key blank identification system with groove scanning
CN110755045A (en) * 2019-10-30 2020-02-07 湖南财政经济学院 Skin disease comprehensive data analysis and diagnosis auxiliary system and information processing method
WO2021120536A1 (en) * 2019-12-19 2021-06-24 成都迈格因科技有限公司 Individualized positioning mapping system for atrial fibrillation lesions

Families Citing this family (38)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050197560A1 (en) * 2004-03-05 2005-09-08 Rao Stephen M. System for detecting symptoms, determining staging and gauging drug efficacy in cases of Alzheimer's disease
US20050197561A1 (en) * 2004-03-05 2005-09-08 Elsinger Catherine L. System for detecting symptoms, determining staging and gauging drug efficacy in cases of Parkinson's disease
EP1996959A4 (en) * 2006-03-03 2012-02-29 Medic Vision Brain Technologies Ltd System and method of automatic prioritization and analysis of medical images
US9535912B2 (en) * 2006-09-15 2017-01-03 Oracle International Corporation Techniques for checking whether a complex digital object conforms to a standard
US7830381B2 (en) * 2006-12-21 2010-11-09 Sectra Ab Systems for visualizing images using explicit quality prioritization of a feature(s) in multidimensional image data sets, related methods and computer products
US7747551B2 (en) * 2007-02-21 2010-06-29 Neurovista Corporation Reduction of classification error rates and monitoring system using an artificial class
JP5424902B2 (en) * 2007-03-06 2014-02-26 コーニンクレッカ フィリップス エヌ ヴェ Automatic diagnosis and automatic alignment supplemented using PET / MR flow estimation
US9402558B2 (en) * 2007-04-05 2016-08-02 New York University System and method for pain detection and computation of a pain quantification index
EP2158574B1 (en) * 2007-06-21 2018-12-12 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Model-based differential diagnosis of dementia and interactive setting of level of significance
US9119549B2 (en) * 2007-11-12 2015-09-01 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method for developing test for neuropsychiatric disease
EP2220622A1 (en) * 2007-12-14 2010-08-25 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Image analysis of brain image data
EP2225684B1 (en) * 2007-12-20 2019-07-03 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Method and device for case-based decision support
US8430816B2 (en) * 2008-05-20 2013-04-30 General Electric Company System and method for analysis of multiple diseases and severities
US8634614B2 (en) 2008-06-02 2014-01-21 Brainreader Aps System and method for volumetric analysis of medical images
US7949167B2 (en) * 2008-06-12 2011-05-24 Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. Automatic learning of image features to predict disease
US8126228B2 (en) * 2008-06-18 2012-02-28 International Business Machines Corporation Determining efficacy of therapeutic intervention in neurosychiatric disease
US8199982B2 (en) * 2008-06-18 2012-06-12 International Business Machines Corporation Mapping of literature onto regions of interest on neurological images
US8548823B2 (en) * 2008-07-08 2013-10-01 International Business Machines Corporation Automatically determining ideal treatment plans for complex neuropsychiatric conditions
US7996242B2 (en) * 2008-07-08 2011-08-09 International Business Machines Corporation Automatically developing neuropsychiatric treatment plans based on neuroimage data
US8388529B2 (en) 2008-07-08 2013-03-05 International Business Machines Corporation Differential diagnosis of neuropsychiatric conditions
US9198612B2 (en) 2008-07-08 2015-12-01 International Business Machines Corporation Determination of neuropsychiatric therapy mechanisms of action
US20100145194A1 (en) * 2008-11-13 2010-06-10 Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Inc. Histogram-based analysis method for the detection and diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases
US8831328B2 (en) 2009-06-23 2014-09-09 Agency For Science, Technology And Research Method and system for segmenting a brain image
US8965076B2 (en) 2010-01-13 2015-02-24 Illumina, Inc. Data processing system and methods
US8838201B2 (en) * 2010-06-22 2014-09-16 The Johns Hopkins University Atlas-based analysis for image-based anatomic and functional data of organism
CN103314412B (en) * 2011-01-04 2017-06-09 美国医软科技公司 For the system and method for the functional analysis of the soft organ dividing regions in SPECT CT images
US20130114870A1 (en) * 2011-11-04 2013-05-09 Patents Innovations, Llc Medical imaging for drug application analysis
US20170083669A1 (en) * 2012-01-20 2017-03-23 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus providing an online diagnostic assistant tool
CN104115149B (en) 2012-02-07 2017-11-17 皇家飞利浦有限公司 Interactive optimization for the scan database of statistics test
WO2014035138A1 (en) * 2012-08-31 2014-03-06 부산대학교 산학협력단 Medical information processing system
US10275876B2 (en) 2015-06-12 2019-04-30 International Business Machines Corporation Methods and systems for automatically selecting an implant for a patient
US10542961B2 (en) 2015-06-15 2020-01-28 The Research Foundation For The State University Of New York System and method for infrasonic cardiac monitoring
US11139068B2 (en) * 2016-11-04 2021-10-05 The University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill Methods, systems, and computer readable media for smart image protocoling
US10832808B2 (en) 2017-12-13 2020-11-10 International Business Machines Corporation Automated selection, arrangement, and processing of key images
CN111223563B (en) * 2018-11-23 2023-11-03 佳能医疗系统株式会社 Medical image diagnosis device and medical image diagnosis system
CN110246566A (en) * 2019-04-24 2019-09-17 中南大学湘雅二医院 Method, system and storage medium are determined based on the conduct disorder of convolutional neural networks
RU2020130849A (en) * 2020-09-18 2022-03-18 ОБЩЕСТВО С ОГРАНИЧЕННОЙ ОТВЕТСТВЕННОСТЬЮ "СберМедИИ" METHOD FOR DETECTING DEPRESSION ACCORDING TO STRUCTURAL MRI AND FUNCTIONAL MRI
US11651862B2 (en) 2020-12-09 2023-05-16 MS Technologies System and method for diagnostics and prognostics of mild cognitive impairment using deep learning

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5097252A (en) * 1987-03-24 1992-03-17 Vpl Research Inc. Motion sensor which produces an asymmetrical signal in response to symmetrical movement
US5249259A (en) * 1990-01-23 1993-09-28 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Genetic algorithm technique for designing neural networks
US5711300A (en) * 1995-08-16 1998-01-27 General Electric Company Real time in vivo measurement of temperature changes with NMR imaging
US5887588A (en) * 1995-02-23 1999-03-30 Usenius; Jussi-Pekka R. Automated method for classification and quantification of human brain metabolism
US5999639A (en) * 1997-09-04 1999-12-07 Qualia Computing, Inc. Method and system for automated detection of clustered microcalcifications from digital mammograms
US6240308B1 (en) * 1988-12-23 2001-05-29 Tyrone L. Hardy Method and apparatus for archiving and displaying anatomico-physiological data in a normalized whole brain mapping and imaging system
US6697660B1 (en) * 1998-01-23 2004-02-24 Ctf Systems, Inc. Method for functional brain imaging from magnetoencephalographic data by estimation of source signal-to-noise ratio
US20040092809A1 (en) * 2002-07-26 2004-05-13 Neurion Inc. Methods for measurement and analysis of brain activity

Family Cites Families (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5247936A (en) * 1988-07-27 1993-09-28 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Magnetic resonance imaging method and apparatus reversing white and black
WO1992022243A1 (en) * 1991-06-06 1992-12-23 Hardy Tyrone L Method and apparatus for archiving and displaying anatomico-physiological data
JP2502433B2 (en) * 1992-04-21 1996-05-29 オンキヨー株式会社 Relaxation system
US6133381A (en) 1996-09-26 2000-10-17 Albelmarle Corporation Brominated polystyrenic flame retardants
US5842990A (en) * 1997-08-21 1998-12-01 Northrop Grumman Corporation Stereotactic ultrasonic diagnostic process
US6385479B1 (en) * 1999-03-31 2002-05-07 Science & Technology Corporation @ Unm Method for determining activity in the central nervous system
US6430430B1 (en) * 1999-04-29 2002-08-06 University Of South Florida Method and system for knowledge guided hyperintensity detection and volumetric measurement
US6490472B1 (en) * 1999-09-03 2002-12-03 The Mcw Research Foundation, Inc. MRI system and method for producing an index indicative of alzheimer's disease
US6400978B1 (en) * 1999-10-29 2002-06-04 The Mclean Hospital Corporation Method and apparatus for detecting mental disorders
US7037267B1 (en) * 1999-11-10 2006-05-02 David Lipson Medical diagnostic methods, systems, and related equipment
US6463315B1 (en) * 2000-01-26 2002-10-08 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Analysis of cerebral white matter for prognosis and diagnosis of neurological disorders
US6785409B1 (en) * 2000-10-24 2004-08-31 Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V. Segmentation method and apparatus for medical images using diffusion propagation, pixel classification, and mathematical morphology
IL139655A0 (en) * 2000-11-14 2002-02-10 Hillman Yitzchak A method and a system for combining automated medical and psychiatric profiling from combined input images of brain scans with observed expert and automated interpreter using a neural network
DE10100830B4 (en) * 2001-01-10 2006-02-16 Jong-Won Park A method of segmenting the areas of white matter, gray matter and cerebrospinal fluid in the images of the human brain, and calculating the associated volumes
US20050197561A1 (en) * 2004-03-05 2005-09-08 Elsinger Catherine L. System for detecting symptoms, determining staging and gauging drug efficacy in cases of Parkinson's disease
US20050197560A1 (en) * 2004-03-05 2005-09-08 Rao Stephen M. System for detecting symptoms, determining staging and gauging drug efficacy in cases of Alzheimer's disease
US7873405B2 (en) * 2004-06-02 2011-01-18 Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. Automated detection of Alzheimer's disease by statistical analysis with positron emission tomography images
US9907485B2 (en) * 2004-10-15 2018-03-06 Brainlab Ag Targeted immunization and plaque destruction against Alzheimer's disease
US9924888B2 (en) * 2004-10-15 2018-03-27 Brainlab Ag Targeted infusion of agents against parkinson's disease
US7627370B2 (en) * 2004-10-20 2009-12-01 Marks Donald H Brain function decoding process and system
US20070100216A1 (en) * 2005-11-01 2007-05-03 Radcliffe Mark T Psycho/physiological deception detection system and method for controlled substance surveillance

Patent Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5097252A (en) * 1987-03-24 1992-03-17 Vpl Research Inc. Motion sensor which produces an asymmetrical signal in response to symmetrical movement
US6240308B1 (en) * 1988-12-23 2001-05-29 Tyrone L. Hardy Method and apparatus for archiving and displaying anatomico-physiological data in a normalized whole brain mapping and imaging system
US5249259A (en) * 1990-01-23 1993-09-28 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Genetic algorithm technique for designing neural networks
US5887588A (en) * 1995-02-23 1999-03-30 Usenius; Jussi-Pekka R. Automated method for classification and quantification of human brain metabolism
US5711300A (en) * 1995-08-16 1998-01-27 General Electric Company Real time in vivo measurement of temperature changes with NMR imaging
US6115488A (en) * 1997-08-28 2000-09-05 Qualia Computing, Inc. Method and system for combining automated detections from digital mammograms with observed detections of a human interpreter
US6205236B1 (en) * 1997-08-28 2001-03-20 Qualia Computing, Inc. Method and system for automated detection of clustered microcalcifications from digital mammograms
US5999639A (en) * 1997-09-04 1999-12-07 Qualia Computing, Inc. Method and system for automated detection of clustered microcalcifications from digital mammograms
US6697660B1 (en) * 1998-01-23 2004-02-24 Ctf Systems, Inc. Method for functional brain imaging from magnetoencephalographic data by estimation of source signal-to-noise ratio
US20040092809A1 (en) * 2002-07-26 2004-05-13 Neurion Inc. Methods for measurement and analysis of brain activity

Cited By (35)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7428323B2 (en) * 2000-11-14 2008-09-23 Yitzchak Hillman Method and system for automatic diagnosis of possible brain disease
US20060120584A1 (en) * 2000-11-14 2006-06-08 Yitzchak Hillman Method and system for automatic diagnosis of possible brain disease
US20020103429A1 (en) * 2001-01-30 2002-08-01 Decharms R. Christopher Methods for physiological monitoring, training, exercise and regulation
US20090299169A1 (en) * 2001-01-30 2009-12-03 Decharms R Christopher Methods for physiological monitoring, training, exercise and regulation
US7567693B2 (en) 2001-01-30 2009-07-28 Decharms R Christopher Methods for physiological monitoring training, exercise and regulation
US20110015515A1 (en) * 2001-01-30 2011-01-20 R. Christopher deCharms Methods For Physiological Monitoring, Training, Exercise And Regulation
US7024027B1 (en) * 2001-11-13 2006-04-04 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Method and apparatus for three-dimensional filtering of angiographic volume data
US20050283053A1 (en) * 2002-01-30 2005-12-22 Decharms Richard C Methods for physiological monitoring, training, exercise and regulation
US20120021394A1 (en) * 2002-01-30 2012-01-26 Decharms Richard Christopher Methods for physiological monitoring, training, exercise and regulation
US20070191704A1 (en) * 2002-07-26 2007-08-16 Decharms Richard C Methods for Measurement and Analysis of Brain Activity
US20040092809A1 (en) * 2002-07-26 2004-05-13 Neurion Inc. Methods for measurement and analysis of brain activity
US20090318794A1 (en) * 2002-07-26 2009-12-24 Decharms Richard Christopher Methods for measurement and analysis of brain activity
US20050228236A1 (en) * 2002-10-03 2005-10-13 The University Of Queensland Method and apparatus for assessing psychiatric or physical disorders
US20080001600A1 (en) * 2003-06-03 2008-01-03 Decharms Richard C Methods for measurement of magnetic resonance signal perturbations
US20090179642A1 (en) * 2003-06-03 2009-07-16 Decharms R Christopher Methods for measurement of magnetic resonance signal perturbations
US20060155348A1 (en) * 2004-11-15 2006-07-13 Decharms Richard C Applications of the stimulation of neural tissue using light
US20090163982A1 (en) * 2004-11-15 2009-06-25 Decharms R Christopher Applications of the stimulation of neural tissue using light
US20070189627A1 (en) * 2006-02-14 2007-08-16 Microsoft Corporation Automated face enhancement
US7634108B2 (en) * 2006-02-14 2009-12-15 Microsoft Corp. Automated face enhancement
US20110046451A1 (en) * 2008-05-15 2011-02-24 Jean Francois Horn Method and automated system for assisting in the prognosis of alzheimer's disease, and method for training such a system
WO2010005969A2 (en) * 2008-07-07 2010-01-14 The Johns Hopkins University Advanced cost functions for image registration for automated image analysis: multi-channel, hypertemplate and atlas with built-in variability
US20110103672A1 (en) * 2008-07-07 2011-05-05 The John Hopkins University Advanced cost functions for image registration for automated image analysis: multi-channel, hypertemplate and atlas with built-in variability
US8600131B2 (en) * 2008-07-07 2013-12-03 The Johns Hopkins University Advanced cost functions for image registration for automated image analysis: multi-channel, hypertemplate and atlas with built-in variability
WO2010005969A3 (en) * 2008-07-07 2010-04-01 The Johns Hopkins University Advanced cost functions for image registration for automated image analysis: multi-channel, hypertemplate and atlas with built-in variability
US20180204089A1 (en) * 2009-05-01 2018-07-19 Hy-Ko Products Company Key blank identification system with groove scanning
US11227181B2 (en) * 2009-05-01 2022-01-18 Hy-Ko Products Company Llc Key blank identification system with groove scanning
WO2012170876A3 (en) * 2011-06-09 2013-03-07 Wake Forest University Health Sciences Agent-based brain model and related methods
US9230321B2 (en) * 2012-03-30 2016-01-05 University Of Louisville Research Foundation, Inc. Computer aided diagnostic system incorporating 3D shape analysis of the brain for identifying developmental brain disorders
US20130259346A1 (en) * 2012-03-30 2013-10-03 University Of Louisville Research Foundation, Inc. Computer aided diagnostic system incorporating 3d shape analysis of the brain for identifying developmental brain disorders
US20160150992A1 (en) * 2014-11-27 2016-06-02 Ybrain Inc. Electric device for measuring eeg signal or electric stimulation
US10245425B2 (en) * 2014-11-27 2019-04-02 Ybrain Inc. Electric device for measuring EEG signal or electric stimulation
US11389643B2 (en) 2014-11-27 2022-07-19 Ybrain Inc. Electric device for measuring EEG signal or electric stimulation
CN110755045A (en) * 2019-10-30 2020-02-07 湖南财政经济学院 Skin disease comprehensive data analysis and diagnosis auxiliary system and information processing method
CN110755045B (en) * 2019-10-30 2022-06-07 湖南财政经济学院 Skin disease comprehensive data analysis and diagnosis auxiliary system
WO2021120536A1 (en) * 2019-12-19 2021-06-24 成都迈格因科技有限公司 Individualized positioning mapping system for atrial fibrillation lesions

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20060120584A1 (en) 2006-06-08
WO2002039895A1 (en) 2002-05-23
IL139655A0 (en) 2002-02-10
AU2002223992A1 (en) 2002-05-27
US7428323B2 (en) 2008-09-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20040013291A1 (en) Method and a system for combining automated psychiatric profiling from combined input images of brain scans with observed expert and automated interpreter using a neural network
US5873823A (en) Markers for use in screening patients for nervous system dysfunction and a method and apparatus for using same
Khedher et al. Early diagnosis of Alzheimer׳ s disease based on partial least squares, principal component analysis and support vector machine using segmented MRI images
US8634614B2 (en) System and method for volumetric analysis of medical images
US20210401289A1 (en) Brain functional connectivity correlation value adjustment method, brain functional connectivity correlation value adjustment system, brain activity classifier harmonization method, brain activity classifier harmonization system, and brain activity biomarker system
US20100158334A1 (en) Non-invasive joint evaluation
JP2009542351A (en) Analysis of brain patterns using temporal scales
US20030229278A1 (en) Method and system for knowledge extraction from image data
WO2010088763A1 (en) Methods and apparatuses for quantitatively determining the likelihood of a disease
CN112839577A (en) Method for adjusting brain function connection correlation value, system for adjusting brain function connection correlation value, method for coordinating brain activity classifier, system for coordinating brain activity classifier, and brain activity biomarker system
US9119549B2 (en) Method for developing test for neuropsychiatric disease
Putra et al. Identification of heart disease with iridology using backpropagation neural network
JP5611995B2 (en) Method for constructing information prediction device, method for using information prediction device, and corresponding storage medium and storage device
Nandakumar et al. DeepEZ: a graph convolutional network for automated epileptogenic zone localization from resting-state fMRI connectivity
SJ et al. A Features Fusion Approach for Neonatal and Pediatrics Brain Tumor Image Analysis Using Genetic and Deep Learning Techniques.
US11842491B2 (en) Novel, quantitative framework for the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic evaluation of spinal cord diseases
CN115337000B (en) Machine learning method for evaluating brain aging caused by diseases based on brain structure images
WO1999064983A9 (en) Method and apparatus for automatic shape characterization
Chitradevi et al. Brain Hemisphere Analysis Using Genetic Algorithm and Fuzzy Clustering in Alzheimer Disease
Morello et al. Ocular biometric measurements to diagnose neurological disorders due to wilson disease
Neelavathi et al. A system for diagnosing Alzheimer’s disease from brain MRI images using deep learning algorithm
Indhumathi et al. Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms on Prediction of Alzheimer from MRI
Marjuni et al. Second Order Statistical Method for Breast Thermal Images Classification
Ganesh et al. Multi class robust brain tumor with hybrid classification using DTA algorithm
Gül et al. Brain tumor magnetic resonance images enhanced by hybrid method based on deep learning paradigm

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO PAY ISSUE FEE