US20030221952A1 - Replicating method for surface finish inspection - Google Patents

Replicating method for surface finish inspection Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20030221952A1
US20030221952A1 US10/157,475 US15747502A US2003221952A1 US 20030221952 A1 US20030221952 A1 US 20030221952A1 US 15747502 A US15747502 A US 15747502A US 2003221952 A1 US2003221952 A1 US 2003221952A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
replicated
epoxy
inspected
release agent
metallic coating
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US10/157,475
Other versions
US6656332B1 (en
Inventor
Gregory Mordukhovich
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
GM Global Technology Operations LLC
Original Assignee
Motors Liquidation Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Motors Liquidation Co filed Critical Motors Liquidation Co
Priority to US10/157,475 priority Critical patent/US6656332B1/en
Assigned to GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION reassignment GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: MORDUKHOVICH, GREGORY
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US6656332B1 publication Critical patent/US6656332B1/en
Publication of US20030221952A1 publication Critical patent/US20030221952A1/en
Assigned to GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC. reassignment GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
Assigned to UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY reassignment UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Assigned to CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES, CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES reassignment CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Assigned to GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC. reassignment GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC. RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Assigned to GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC. reassignment GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC. RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES, CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES
Assigned to UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY reassignment UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Assigned to UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST reassignment UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Assigned to GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC. reassignment GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC. RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST
Assigned to GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC. reassignment GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC. RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Assigned to WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY reassignment WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Assigned to GM Global Technology Operations LLC reassignment GM Global Technology Operations LLC CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N21/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
    • G01N21/84Systems specially adapted for particular applications
    • G01N21/88Investigating the presence of flaws or contamination
    • G01N21/91Investigating the presence of flaws or contamination using penetration of dyes, e.g. fluorescent ink

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a method of inspecting a hard-to-access surface area of a component.
  • an epoxy-based replicating technique was developed.
  • the technique involves applying a petroleum distillate, which contains 10 to 12 chain-linked hydrocarbons, to the surface to be inspected. Finely ground charcoal must be mixed with the epoxy to provide proper reflective quantities. The mixture is then applied to the surface. After the mixture hardens, the replicated surface is removed and inspected.
  • This technique has certain drawbacks. The ratio of ingredients must be precise or the replicated surface will not have proper reflective qualities. Further, if the mixture is not completed in 30 seconds, the replicating properties are sharply reduced. Accordingly, a new replicating technique is needed.
  • the present invention overcomes a compromised encountering of prior art by providing a method for inspecting the surface finish of a component by first providing an original surface. A release agent is then applied to the original surface. An epoxy mixture is then applied onto the original surface over the release agent. After the epoxy mixture hardens into a replicated surface, it is removed. A metallic coating is then applied to the replicated surface and the replicated surface is then inspected.
  • the epoxy mixture comprises charcoal.
  • the step of applying metallic coating comprises sputtering a metallic coating of gold, aluminum, or silver.
  • FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a gear having a surface to be inspected
  • FIG. 2 is a fragmentary view of the gear in FIG. 1 to show a release agent being applied to the surface of a gear tooth;
  • FIG. 3 is a fragmentary view like FIG. 2 to show an epoxy being applied to the release agent
  • FIG. 4 shows a metal coating being applied onto a replicated surface
  • FIG. 5 shows the replicated surface being inspected using an interferometer
  • FIG. 6 shows the replicated surface being inspected using a scanning electron microscope.
  • a gear 10 has a plurality of teeth 15 .
  • the inside surface 20 of a tooth 15 is sought to be inspected in a non-destructive manner. Such inspection is critical to evaluate the gear manufacturing process and to evaluate the degradation of the gear caused by actual use. Because of the configuration of the teeth 15 , it is generally not possible to simply remove the gear and inspect it. Accordingly, a replica of that inside surface must be made and inspected.
  • An inspector locates an imaginary target spot 25 on inner surface 20 of the tooth 15 for inspection.
  • the spot 25 is picked as an original surface so that it can be consistently and repeatedly found for inspection or testing throughout the life of a particular gear or for comparing one gear to another gear.
  • a release agent 30 is applied over the target inspection spot 25 using, for example, an eyedropper 35 .
  • the release agent is a petroleum distillate containing aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbons.
  • an epoxy mixture 40 is applied on top of the release agent 30 which had been applied over the original surface.
  • the epoxy mixture may be any commercially available epoxy.
  • the epoxy has a one-to-one ratio of resin to hardener.
  • the epoxy mixture may be applied by an eyedropper 45 .
  • the epoxy mixture is applied within the confines of the underlay of release agent so that the epoxy mixture will not adhere to the tooth 15 .
  • Charcoal 43 may be added to the epoxy mixture to provide some reflective characteristics for the replica.
  • the epoxy mixture will contain approximately 5% charcoal by volume but may also contain 0% to 30% charcoal by volume. Additionally, any powder that provides reflective qualities can be used in the same ratios.
  • the epoxy mixture 40 hardens in approximately ten minutes for a typical spot size. Using larger or smaller spot sizes will affect the hardening time. Once the epoxy mixture hardens, it is removed using known methods such as by forceps. The hardened epoxy mixture has thus become a replicate 46 of the original surface.
  • a metal coating 55 is then applied to the replicated surface 46 using deposition (not shown) or sputtering technique as shown in FIG. 4.
  • a source of metal particles 50 emits metal particles 56 toward the replicated surface.
  • the deposition technique involves evaporating a metal in a container with the replicated surface. The evaporated metal then deposits onto the replicated surface forming a thin layer. Other methods of applying a metal coating onto the replicated surface may also be used.
  • the purpose of the metallic coating is to provide a reflective surface to the replicated surface 46 . By using the metallic coating, the charcoal content becomes less critical and in some instances avoided entirely.
  • the metallic coating can be any material that has reflective qualities but is preferably gold, aluminum, or silver. In order to view the minute details sought, the metallic coating is preferably between 10 and 90 angstroms thick, but more preferably between 20 and 40 angstroms thick.
  • FIG. 5 the replicated surface 46 is shown being inspected in an interferometer.
  • interferometers There are many different interferometers available. All interferometers measure the difference in the phase of light reflected from the specimen.
  • One example illustrated in FIG. 5 is known as a Twyman-Green interferometer.
  • a laser and beam expander 80 transmits a beam 81 approximately the size of the specimen to be tested.
  • a beam splitter 82 allows a portion of the beam 81 to pass through onto a reference surface 84 . Part of the beam 81 is reflected to the replicated surface 46 by the beam splitter 82 . The beams 81 are reflected back from the reference surface 84 and the replicated surface 46 towards the beam splitter 82 .
  • the beam splitter 82 transmits the combined reflected beams 86 through an imaging lens 88 and a resulting interferogram 90 is formed.
  • the surface finish can be determined.
  • the interferogram can be analyzed using a computer and color-coded diagrams showing the variations in the surface can be obtained. Other types of interferometers can be used.
  • Commercially-available units from, for example, Wyko Corporation (now part of Veeco Corporation of Woodbury, N.Y.) and Zygo Corporation of Middlefield, Conn., are available.
  • the replicated surface 46 having a metal coating thereon is then put in an electron microscope 60 .
  • the electron microscope 60 comprises an electron gun 62 that shoots a beam of electrons 65 onto the replicated surface 46 .
  • Secondary electrons 68 are thrown off of the replicated surface 46 and are received by a receiver 70 .
  • the receiver 70 then causes a picture of the surface to be displayed on the display 72 .
  • a scanning electron microscope has a magnification of 5 to 500,000 times and a resolution of approximately 10 mm.
  • the reflected surface can also be inspected using an optical microscope or a light sectioning microscope.
  • the technique may be used to inspect a variety of surfaces such as metal, plastic, or ceramic.

Abstract

A method of inspecting the surface finish of a component comprising providing an original surface to be inspected. A release agent is applied onto the original surface and an epoxy mixture is applied over the release agent. The epoxy mixture is allowed to harden into a replicated surface. Once the epoxy mixture has hardened, the replicated surface is removed and a metallic coating is applied thereon. The coated replicated surface is then ready for inspection.

Description

    TECHNICAL FIELD
  • This invention relates to a method of inspecting a hard-to-access surface area of a component. [0001]
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • There are many available techniques for inspecting metal surfaces such as optical microscopes and profilers having styluses. These methods work well for inspecting rolled steel or large surface areas where microscopes, cameras, and styluses are accessible. However, these techniques do not work well when inspecting the metal on internal surfaces or other hard-to-access areas such as gear teeth. Direct optical surface finish measurement of fine pitch gears is difficult because of line-of-sight problems. The adjacent tooth prevents the surface positioning perpendicular to the light beam. Angular positioning leads up to 20% loss of the reflected light. Replicas became necessary for fine pitch gears to get surface finish inspection without gear destruction. Further, these methods frequently require that a portion of the surface to be inspected be cut from the main article of manufacture and is thus destructive. A non-destructive method is therefore necessary to monitor accumulative damage. [0002]
  • Accordingly, an epoxy-based replicating technique was developed. The technique involves applying a petroleum distillate, which contains 10 to 12 chain-linked hydrocarbons, to the surface to be inspected. Finely ground charcoal must be mixed with the epoxy to provide proper reflective quantities. The mixture is then applied to the surface. After the mixture hardens, the replicated surface is removed and inspected. This technique has certain drawbacks. The ratio of ingredients must be precise or the replicated surface will not have proper reflective qualities. Further, if the mixture is not completed in 30 seconds, the replicating properties are sharply reduced. Accordingly, a new replicating technique is needed. [0003]
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • Accordingly, it is an object of this invention to provide an improved method of inspecting a surface in inaccessible areas without damaging the original article of manufacture and that does not depend on precise ratios of ingredients. [0004]
  • The present invention overcomes a compromised encountering of prior art by providing a method for inspecting the surface finish of a component by first providing an original surface. A release agent is then applied to the original surface. An epoxy mixture is then applied onto the original surface over the release agent. After the epoxy mixture hardens into a replicated surface, it is removed. A metallic coating is then applied to the replicated surface and the replicated surface is then inspected. [0005]
  • In another embodiment of the invention, the epoxy mixture comprises charcoal. [0006]
  • In yet another embodiment of the invention, the step of applying metallic coating comprises sputtering a metallic coating of gold, aluminum, or silver.[0007]
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a gear having a surface to be inspected; [0008]
  • FIG. 2 is a fragmentary view of the gear in FIG. 1 to show a release agent being applied to the surface of a gear tooth; [0009]
  • FIG. 3 is a fragmentary view like FIG. 2 to show an epoxy being applied to the release agent; [0010]
  • FIG. 4 shows a metal coating being applied onto a replicated surface; [0011]
  • FIG. 5 shows the replicated surface being inspected using an interferometer; and [0012]
  • FIG. 6 shows the replicated surface being inspected using a scanning electron microscope.[0013]
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
  • Referring now to FIG. 1, a [0014] gear 10 has a plurality of teeth 15. In this example, the inside surface 20 of a tooth 15 is sought to be inspected in a non-destructive manner. Such inspection is critical to evaluate the gear manufacturing process and to evaluate the degradation of the gear caused by actual use. Because of the configuration of the teeth 15, it is generally not possible to simply remove the gear and inspect it. Accordingly, a replica of that inside surface must be made and inspected.
  • An inspector locates an [0015] imaginary target spot 25 on inner surface 20 of the tooth 15 for inspection. The spot 25 is picked as an original surface so that it can be consistently and repeatedly found for inspection or testing throughout the life of a particular gear or for comparing one gear to another gear. A release agent 30 is applied over the target inspection spot 25 using, for example, an eyedropper 35. Various release agents can be used. Preferably, the release agent is a petroleum distillate containing aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbons.
  • Referring now to FIG. 3, an [0016] epoxy mixture 40 is applied on top of the release agent 30 which had been applied over the original surface. The epoxy mixture may be any commercially available epoxy. Preferably, the epoxy has a one-to-one ratio of resin to hardener. Similar to the release agent, the epoxy mixture may be applied by an eyedropper 45. The epoxy mixture is applied within the confines of the underlay of release agent so that the epoxy mixture will not adhere to the tooth 15.
  • [0017] Charcoal 43 may be added to the epoxy mixture to provide some reflective characteristics for the replica. Preferably, the epoxy mixture will contain approximately 5% charcoal by volume but may also contain 0% to 30% charcoal by volume. Additionally, any powder that provides reflective qualities can be used in the same ratios.
  • The [0018] epoxy mixture 40 hardens in approximately ten minutes for a typical spot size. Using larger or smaller spot sizes will affect the hardening time. Once the epoxy mixture hardens, it is removed using known methods such as by forceps. The hardened epoxy mixture has thus become a replicate 46 of the original surface.
  • A [0019] metal coating 55 is then applied to the replicated surface 46 using deposition (not shown) or sputtering technique as shown in FIG. 4. In the sputtering technique, a source of metal particles 50 emits metal particles 56 toward the replicated surface. The deposition technique involves evaporating a metal in a container with the replicated surface. The evaporated metal then deposits onto the replicated surface forming a thin layer. Other methods of applying a metal coating onto the replicated surface may also be used. The purpose of the metallic coating is to provide a reflective surface to the replicated surface 46. By using the metallic coating, the charcoal content becomes less critical and in some instances avoided entirely. The metallic coating can be any material that has reflective qualities but is preferably gold, aluminum, or silver. In order to view the minute details sought, the metallic coating is preferably between 10 and 90 angstroms thick, but more preferably between 20 and 40 angstroms thick.
  • Referring now to FIG. 5, the replicated [0020] surface 46 is shown being inspected in an interferometer. There are many different interferometers available. All interferometers measure the difference in the phase of light reflected from the specimen. One example illustrated in FIG. 5 is known as a Twyman-Green interferometer. A laser and beam expander 80 transmits a beam 81 approximately the size of the specimen to be tested. A beam splitter 82 allows a portion of the beam 81 to pass through onto a reference surface 84. Part of the beam 81 is reflected to the replicated surface 46 by the beam splitter 82. The beams 81 are reflected back from the reference surface 84 and the replicated surface 46 towards the beam splitter 82. The beam splitter 82 transmits the combined reflected beams 86 through an imaging lens 88 and a resulting interferogram 90 is formed. Using known formulas, the surface finish can be determined. The interferogram can be analyzed using a computer and color-coded diagrams showing the variations in the surface can be obtained. Other types of interferometers can be used. Commercially-available units from, for example, Wyko Corporation (now part of Veeco Corporation of Woodbury, N.Y.) and Zygo Corporation of Middlefield, Conn., are available.
  • Referring now to FIG. 6, the replicated [0021] surface 46 having a metal coating thereon is then put in an electron microscope 60. The electron microscope 60 comprises an electron gun 62 that shoots a beam of electrons 65 onto the replicated surface 46. Secondary electrons 68 are thrown off of the replicated surface 46 and are received by a receiver 70. The receiver 70 then causes a picture of the surface to be displayed on the display 72. A scanning electron microscope has a magnification of 5 to 500,000 times and a resolution of approximately 10 mm.
  • Optionally, the reflected surface can also be inspected using an optical microscope or a light sectioning microscope. [0022]
  • Although the technique has been described for use on a gear, it is equally applicable to other components having surfaces which are difficult to access or are inconvenient to bring to a laboratory for analysis. By using this technique, a sample may be non-destructively taken in the field and inspected in a laboratory later. [0023]
  • The technique may be used to inspect a variety of surfaces such as metal, plastic, or ceramic. [0024]
  • While embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described, it is not intended that these embodiments illustrate and describe all possible forms of the invention. Rather, the words used in the specification are words of description rather than limitation, and it is understood that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. [0025]

Claims (9)

1. A method of inspecting a hard-to-access surface finish of a component comprising:
providing an original surface on the hard-to-access surface;
applying release agent onto the original surface;
applying an epoxy over the release agent;
allowing the epoxy to harden into a replicated surface;
removing the replicated surface;
applying a metallic coating onto the replicated surface; and
inspecting the coated replicated surface.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the epoxy is a mixture comprising charcoal.
3. The method of claim 2 wherein the epoxy is a mixture comprising 5% or less charcoal by volume.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein applying a metallic coating comprises sputtering a metallic coating of gold or aluminum or silver.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein the metallic coating applied is 20 to 40 angstroms thick.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein the coated replicated surface is inspected using a scanning electron microscope.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein the coated replicated surface is inspected using an optical microscope.
8. The method of claim 1 wherein the coated replicated surface is inspected using an interferometer.
9. The method of claim 1 wherein the release agent is a petroleum distillate.
US10/157,475 2002-05-29 2002-05-29 Replicating method for surface finish inspection Expired - Fee Related US6656332B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/157,475 US6656332B1 (en) 2002-05-29 2002-05-29 Replicating method for surface finish inspection

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/157,475 US6656332B1 (en) 2002-05-29 2002-05-29 Replicating method for surface finish inspection

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US6656332B1 US6656332B1 (en) 2003-12-02
US20030221952A1 true US20030221952A1 (en) 2003-12-04

Family

ID=29549242

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/157,475 Expired - Fee Related US6656332B1 (en) 2002-05-29 2002-05-29 Replicating method for surface finish inspection

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US6656332B1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107219109A (en) * 2017-07-17 2017-09-29 北京航空航天大学 A kind of labyrinth surface crack testing method based on photosensitive resin

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4198362A (en) * 1978-10-02 1980-04-15 Preiser Herman S Method and apparatus for molding and replicating minute surface characteristics
US4576850A (en) * 1978-07-20 1986-03-18 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Shaped plastic articles having replicated microstructure surfaces
US5623375A (en) * 1991-10-15 1997-04-22 Commissariat A L'energie Atomique International dielectric mirror and production process for such a mirror

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4576850A (en) * 1978-07-20 1986-03-18 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Shaped plastic articles having replicated microstructure surfaces
US4198362A (en) * 1978-10-02 1980-04-15 Preiser Herman S Method and apparatus for molding and replicating minute surface characteristics
US5623375A (en) * 1991-10-15 1997-04-22 Commissariat A L'energie Atomique International dielectric mirror and production process for such a mirror

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107219109A (en) * 2017-07-17 2017-09-29 北京航空航天大学 A kind of labyrinth surface crack testing method based on photosensitive resin

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US6656332B1 (en) 2003-12-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Fuller Jr et al. Fracture mechanics approach to the design of glass aircraft windows: A case study
Toh et al. Whole field surface roughness measurement by laser speckle correlation technique
Dondeti et al. A comparative study of dynamic fracture of soda-lime glass using photoelasticity, digital image correlation and digital gradient sensing techniques
AT411496B (en) METHOD AND DEVICE FOR OPTICALLY TESTING SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS
US6656332B1 (en) Replicating method for surface finish inspection
JP2002107119A (en) Method and apparatus for measurement of thickness of specimen
US5610326A (en) Non-destructive process for characterizing the surface condition of a part
US4043187A (en) Method of measuring surface roughness
Bao et al. A closer look at the diffuse and localised necking of a metallic thin sheet: Evolution of the two bands pattern
Romaniello et al. Low-mass pre-main-sequence stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud. III. Accretion rates from Hubble Space Telescope WFPC2 observations
Karadzhinova et al. Impact of GEM foil hole geometry on GEM detector gain
JP6503222B2 (en) Nondestructive Evaluation Method for Corrosion Resistance of Stainless Steel Using Spectroscopic Ellipsometry
Negres et al. Characterization of laser-induced damage by picosecond pulses on multi-layer dielectric coatings for petawatt-class lasers
Semenski et al. Experimental caustics analysis in fracture mechanics of anisotropic materials
Negres et al. The effect of pulse duration on the growth rate of laser-induced damage sites at 351 nm on fused silica surfaces
US11099002B2 (en) Systems and methods of assessing a coating microstructure
US7289657B2 (en) Method of inspecting photo-mask
Sheehan et al. National ignition facility small optics laser-induced damage and photometry measurements program
Davis et al. Antireflection Coatings for Semiconductor Failure Analysis
Chow et al. Testing of optical components to assure performance in a high-average-power environment
Baker Standards for surface flaws
US7154601B2 (en) Testing method for a polarizing plate
JPH01250846A (en) Defect inspecting equipment for transparent body
FR2846096A1 (en) Device for detecting, analyzing and locating defects present on transparent and/or reflecting surface, in particular of silicon wafers and glass products
Baker et al. The measurement and specification of coating defects

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, MICHIGAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MORDUKHOVICH, GREGORY;REEL/FRAME:013087/0750

Effective date: 20020521

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

AS Assignment

Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC., MICHIGAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:022117/0022

Effective date: 20050119

Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.,MICHIGAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:022117/0022

Effective date: 20050119

AS Assignment

Owner name: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, DISTRICT

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022201/0547

Effective date: 20081231

Owner name: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY,DISTRICT

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022201/0547

Effective date: 20081231

AS Assignment

Owner name: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SEC

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022553/0399

Effective date: 20090409

Owner name: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECU

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022553/0399

Effective date: 20090409

AS Assignment

Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC., MICHIGAN

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY;REEL/FRAME:023124/0470

Effective date: 20090709

Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.,MICHIGAN

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY;REEL/FRAME:023124/0470

Effective date: 20090709

AS Assignment

Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC., MICHIGAN

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNORS:CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES;CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES;REEL/FRAME:023127/0273

Effective date: 20090814

Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.,MICHIGAN

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNORS:CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES;CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES;REEL/FRAME:023127/0273

Effective date: 20090814

AS Assignment

Owner name: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, DISTRICT

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023156/0001

Effective date: 20090710

Owner name: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY,DISTRICT

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023156/0001

Effective date: 20090710

AS Assignment

Owner name: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST, MICHIGAN

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023161/0911

Effective date: 20090710

Owner name: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST,MICHIGAN

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023161/0911

Effective date: 20090710

AS Assignment

Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC., MICHIGAN

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST;REEL/FRAME:025311/0725

Effective date: 20101026

Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC., MICHIGAN

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY;REEL/FRAME:025245/0347

Effective date: 20100420

AS Assignment

Owner name: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, DELAWARE

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:025327/0222

Effective date: 20101027

AS Assignment

Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC, MICHIGAN

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:025780/0795

Effective date: 20101202

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

REMI Maintenance fee reminder mailed
LAPS Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees
LAPS Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

STCH Information on status: patent discontinuation

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362

FP Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee

Effective date: 20151202