US20030221952A1 - Replicating method for surface finish inspection - Google Patents
Replicating method for surface finish inspection Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20030221952A1 US20030221952A1 US10/157,475 US15747502A US2003221952A1 US 20030221952 A1 US20030221952 A1 US 20030221952A1 US 15747502 A US15747502 A US 15747502A US 2003221952 A1 US2003221952 A1 US 2003221952A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- replicated
- epoxy
- inspected
- release agent
- metallic coating
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
- G01N21/84—Systems specially adapted for particular applications
- G01N21/88—Investigating the presence of flaws or contamination
- G01N21/91—Investigating the presence of flaws or contamination using penetration of dyes, e.g. fluorescent ink
Definitions
- This invention relates to a method of inspecting a hard-to-access surface area of a component.
- an epoxy-based replicating technique was developed.
- the technique involves applying a petroleum distillate, which contains 10 to 12 chain-linked hydrocarbons, to the surface to be inspected. Finely ground charcoal must be mixed with the epoxy to provide proper reflective quantities. The mixture is then applied to the surface. After the mixture hardens, the replicated surface is removed and inspected.
- This technique has certain drawbacks. The ratio of ingredients must be precise or the replicated surface will not have proper reflective qualities. Further, if the mixture is not completed in 30 seconds, the replicating properties are sharply reduced. Accordingly, a new replicating technique is needed.
- the present invention overcomes a compromised encountering of prior art by providing a method for inspecting the surface finish of a component by first providing an original surface. A release agent is then applied to the original surface. An epoxy mixture is then applied onto the original surface over the release agent. After the epoxy mixture hardens into a replicated surface, it is removed. A metallic coating is then applied to the replicated surface and the replicated surface is then inspected.
- the epoxy mixture comprises charcoal.
- the step of applying metallic coating comprises sputtering a metallic coating of gold, aluminum, or silver.
- FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a gear having a surface to be inspected
- FIG. 2 is a fragmentary view of the gear in FIG. 1 to show a release agent being applied to the surface of a gear tooth;
- FIG. 3 is a fragmentary view like FIG. 2 to show an epoxy being applied to the release agent
- FIG. 4 shows a metal coating being applied onto a replicated surface
- FIG. 5 shows the replicated surface being inspected using an interferometer
- FIG. 6 shows the replicated surface being inspected using a scanning electron microscope.
- a gear 10 has a plurality of teeth 15 .
- the inside surface 20 of a tooth 15 is sought to be inspected in a non-destructive manner. Such inspection is critical to evaluate the gear manufacturing process and to evaluate the degradation of the gear caused by actual use. Because of the configuration of the teeth 15 , it is generally not possible to simply remove the gear and inspect it. Accordingly, a replica of that inside surface must be made and inspected.
- An inspector locates an imaginary target spot 25 on inner surface 20 of the tooth 15 for inspection.
- the spot 25 is picked as an original surface so that it can be consistently and repeatedly found for inspection or testing throughout the life of a particular gear or for comparing one gear to another gear.
- a release agent 30 is applied over the target inspection spot 25 using, for example, an eyedropper 35 .
- the release agent is a petroleum distillate containing aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbons.
- an epoxy mixture 40 is applied on top of the release agent 30 which had been applied over the original surface.
- the epoxy mixture may be any commercially available epoxy.
- the epoxy has a one-to-one ratio of resin to hardener.
- the epoxy mixture may be applied by an eyedropper 45 .
- the epoxy mixture is applied within the confines of the underlay of release agent so that the epoxy mixture will not adhere to the tooth 15 .
- Charcoal 43 may be added to the epoxy mixture to provide some reflective characteristics for the replica.
- the epoxy mixture will contain approximately 5% charcoal by volume but may also contain 0% to 30% charcoal by volume. Additionally, any powder that provides reflective qualities can be used in the same ratios.
- the epoxy mixture 40 hardens in approximately ten minutes for a typical spot size. Using larger or smaller spot sizes will affect the hardening time. Once the epoxy mixture hardens, it is removed using known methods such as by forceps. The hardened epoxy mixture has thus become a replicate 46 of the original surface.
- a metal coating 55 is then applied to the replicated surface 46 using deposition (not shown) or sputtering technique as shown in FIG. 4.
- a source of metal particles 50 emits metal particles 56 toward the replicated surface.
- the deposition technique involves evaporating a metal in a container with the replicated surface. The evaporated metal then deposits onto the replicated surface forming a thin layer. Other methods of applying a metal coating onto the replicated surface may also be used.
- the purpose of the metallic coating is to provide a reflective surface to the replicated surface 46 . By using the metallic coating, the charcoal content becomes less critical and in some instances avoided entirely.
- the metallic coating can be any material that has reflective qualities but is preferably gold, aluminum, or silver. In order to view the minute details sought, the metallic coating is preferably between 10 and 90 angstroms thick, but more preferably between 20 and 40 angstroms thick.
- FIG. 5 the replicated surface 46 is shown being inspected in an interferometer.
- interferometers There are many different interferometers available. All interferometers measure the difference in the phase of light reflected from the specimen.
- One example illustrated in FIG. 5 is known as a Twyman-Green interferometer.
- a laser and beam expander 80 transmits a beam 81 approximately the size of the specimen to be tested.
- a beam splitter 82 allows a portion of the beam 81 to pass through onto a reference surface 84 . Part of the beam 81 is reflected to the replicated surface 46 by the beam splitter 82 . The beams 81 are reflected back from the reference surface 84 and the replicated surface 46 towards the beam splitter 82 .
- the beam splitter 82 transmits the combined reflected beams 86 through an imaging lens 88 and a resulting interferogram 90 is formed.
- the surface finish can be determined.
- the interferogram can be analyzed using a computer and color-coded diagrams showing the variations in the surface can be obtained. Other types of interferometers can be used.
- Commercially-available units from, for example, Wyko Corporation (now part of Veeco Corporation of Woodbury, N.Y.) and Zygo Corporation of Middlefield, Conn., are available.
- the replicated surface 46 having a metal coating thereon is then put in an electron microscope 60 .
- the electron microscope 60 comprises an electron gun 62 that shoots a beam of electrons 65 onto the replicated surface 46 .
- Secondary electrons 68 are thrown off of the replicated surface 46 and are received by a receiver 70 .
- the receiver 70 then causes a picture of the surface to be displayed on the display 72 .
- a scanning electron microscope has a magnification of 5 to 500,000 times and a resolution of approximately 10 mm.
- the reflected surface can also be inspected using an optical microscope or a light sectioning microscope.
- the technique may be used to inspect a variety of surfaces such as metal, plastic, or ceramic.
Abstract
Description
- This invention relates to a method of inspecting a hard-to-access surface area of a component.
- There are many available techniques for inspecting metal surfaces such as optical microscopes and profilers having styluses. These methods work well for inspecting rolled steel or large surface areas where microscopes, cameras, and styluses are accessible. However, these techniques do not work well when inspecting the metal on internal surfaces or other hard-to-access areas such as gear teeth. Direct optical surface finish measurement of fine pitch gears is difficult because of line-of-sight problems. The adjacent tooth prevents the surface positioning perpendicular to the light beam. Angular positioning leads up to 20% loss of the reflected light. Replicas became necessary for fine pitch gears to get surface finish inspection without gear destruction. Further, these methods frequently require that a portion of the surface to be inspected be cut from the main article of manufacture and is thus destructive. A non-destructive method is therefore necessary to monitor accumulative damage.
- Accordingly, an epoxy-based replicating technique was developed. The technique involves applying a petroleum distillate, which contains 10 to 12 chain-linked hydrocarbons, to the surface to be inspected. Finely ground charcoal must be mixed with the epoxy to provide proper reflective quantities. The mixture is then applied to the surface. After the mixture hardens, the replicated surface is removed and inspected. This technique has certain drawbacks. The ratio of ingredients must be precise or the replicated surface will not have proper reflective qualities. Further, if the mixture is not completed in 30 seconds, the replicating properties are sharply reduced. Accordingly, a new replicating technique is needed.
- Accordingly, it is an object of this invention to provide an improved method of inspecting a surface in inaccessible areas without damaging the original article of manufacture and that does not depend on precise ratios of ingredients.
- The present invention overcomes a compromised encountering of prior art by providing a method for inspecting the surface finish of a component by first providing an original surface. A release agent is then applied to the original surface. An epoxy mixture is then applied onto the original surface over the release agent. After the epoxy mixture hardens into a replicated surface, it is removed. A metallic coating is then applied to the replicated surface and the replicated surface is then inspected.
- In another embodiment of the invention, the epoxy mixture comprises charcoal.
- In yet another embodiment of the invention, the step of applying metallic coating comprises sputtering a metallic coating of gold, aluminum, or silver.
- FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a gear having a surface to be inspected;
- FIG. 2 is a fragmentary view of the gear in FIG. 1 to show a release agent being applied to the surface of a gear tooth;
- FIG. 3 is a fragmentary view like FIG. 2 to show an epoxy being applied to the release agent;
- FIG. 4 shows a metal coating being applied onto a replicated surface;
- FIG. 5 shows the replicated surface being inspected using an interferometer; and
- FIG. 6 shows the replicated surface being inspected using a scanning electron microscope.
- Referring now to FIG. 1, a
gear 10 has a plurality ofteeth 15. In this example, theinside surface 20 of atooth 15 is sought to be inspected in a non-destructive manner. Such inspection is critical to evaluate the gear manufacturing process and to evaluate the degradation of the gear caused by actual use. Because of the configuration of theteeth 15, it is generally not possible to simply remove the gear and inspect it. Accordingly, a replica of that inside surface must be made and inspected. - An inspector locates an
imaginary target spot 25 oninner surface 20 of thetooth 15 for inspection. Thespot 25 is picked as an original surface so that it can be consistently and repeatedly found for inspection or testing throughout the life of a particular gear or for comparing one gear to another gear. Arelease agent 30 is applied over thetarget inspection spot 25 using, for example, aneyedropper 35. Various release agents can be used. Preferably, the release agent is a petroleum distillate containing aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbons. - Referring now to FIG. 3, an
epoxy mixture 40 is applied on top of therelease agent 30 which had been applied over the original surface. The epoxy mixture may be any commercially available epoxy. Preferably, the epoxy has a one-to-one ratio of resin to hardener. Similar to the release agent, the epoxy mixture may be applied by aneyedropper 45. The epoxy mixture is applied within the confines of the underlay of release agent so that the epoxy mixture will not adhere to thetooth 15. -
Charcoal 43 may be added to the epoxy mixture to provide some reflective characteristics for the replica. Preferably, the epoxy mixture will contain approximately 5% charcoal by volume but may also contain 0% to 30% charcoal by volume. Additionally, any powder that provides reflective qualities can be used in the same ratios. - The
epoxy mixture 40 hardens in approximately ten minutes for a typical spot size. Using larger or smaller spot sizes will affect the hardening time. Once the epoxy mixture hardens, it is removed using known methods such as by forceps. The hardened epoxy mixture has thus become areplicate 46 of the original surface. - A
metal coating 55 is then applied to the replicatedsurface 46 using deposition (not shown) or sputtering technique as shown in FIG. 4. In the sputtering technique, a source ofmetal particles 50 emitsmetal particles 56 toward the replicated surface. The deposition technique involves evaporating a metal in a container with the replicated surface. The evaporated metal then deposits onto the replicated surface forming a thin layer. Other methods of applying a metal coating onto the replicated surface may also be used. The purpose of the metallic coating is to provide a reflective surface to the replicatedsurface 46. By using the metallic coating, the charcoal content becomes less critical and in some instances avoided entirely. The metallic coating can be any material that has reflective qualities but is preferably gold, aluminum, or silver. In order to view the minute details sought, the metallic coating is preferably between 10 and 90 angstroms thick, but more preferably between 20 and 40 angstroms thick. - Referring now to FIG. 5, the replicated
surface 46 is shown being inspected in an interferometer. There are many different interferometers available. All interferometers measure the difference in the phase of light reflected from the specimen. One example illustrated in FIG. 5 is known as a Twyman-Green interferometer. A laser andbeam expander 80 transmits abeam 81 approximately the size of the specimen to be tested. Abeam splitter 82 allows a portion of thebeam 81 to pass through onto areference surface 84. Part of thebeam 81 is reflected to the replicatedsurface 46 by thebeam splitter 82. Thebeams 81 are reflected back from thereference surface 84 and the replicatedsurface 46 towards thebeam splitter 82. Thebeam splitter 82 transmits the combined reflectedbeams 86 through animaging lens 88 and a resulting interferogram 90 is formed. Using known formulas, the surface finish can be determined. The interferogram can be analyzed using a computer and color-coded diagrams showing the variations in the surface can be obtained. Other types of interferometers can be used. Commercially-available units from, for example, Wyko Corporation (now part of Veeco Corporation of Woodbury, N.Y.) and Zygo Corporation of Middlefield, Conn., are available. - Referring now to FIG. 6, the replicated
surface 46 having a metal coating thereon is then put in anelectron microscope 60. Theelectron microscope 60 comprises anelectron gun 62 that shoots a beam ofelectrons 65 onto the replicatedsurface 46.Secondary electrons 68 are thrown off of the replicatedsurface 46 and are received by areceiver 70. Thereceiver 70 then causes a picture of the surface to be displayed on thedisplay 72. A scanning electron microscope has a magnification of 5 to 500,000 times and a resolution of approximately 10 mm. - Optionally, the reflected surface can also be inspected using an optical microscope or a light sectioning microscope.
- Although the technique has been described for use on a gear, it is equally applicable to other components having surfaces which are difficult to access or are inconvenient to bring to a laboratory for analysis. By using this technique, a sample may be non-destructively taken in the field and inspected in a laboratory later.
- The technique may be used to inspect a variety of surfaces such as metal, plastic, or ceramic.
- While embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described, it is not intended that these embodiments illustrate and describe all possible forms of the invention. Rather, the words used in the specification are words of description rather than limitation, and it is understood that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Claims (9)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/157,475 US6656332B1 (en) | 2002-05-29 | 2002-05-29 | Replicating method for surface finish inspection |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/157,475 US6656332B1 (en) | 2002-05-29 | 2002-05-29 | Replicating method for surface finish inspection |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US6656332B1 US6656332B1 (en) | 2003-12-02 |
US20030221952A1 true US20030221952A1 (en) | 2003-12-04 |
Family
ID=29549242
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/157,475 Expired - Fee Related US6656332B1 (en) | 2002-05-29 | 2002-05-29 | Replicating method for surface finish inspection |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6656332B1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN107219109A (en) * | 2017-07-17 | 2017-09-29 | 北京航空航天大学 | A kind of labyrinth surface crack testing method based on photosensitive resin |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4198362A (en) * | 1978-10-02 | 1980-04-15 | Preiser Herman S | Method and apparatus for molding and replicating minute surface characteristics |
US4576850A (en) * | 1978-07-20 | 1986-03-18 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Shaped plastic articles having replicated microstructure surfaces |
US5623375A (en) * | 1991-10-15 | 1997-04-22 | Commissariat A L'energie Atomique | International dielectric mirror and production process for such a mirror |
-
2002
- 2002-05-29 US US10/157,475 patent/US6656332B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4576850A (en) * | 1978-07-20 | 1986-03-18 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Shaped plastic articles having replicated microstructure surfaces |
US4198362A (en) * | 1978-10-02 | 1980-04-15 | Preiser Herman S | Method and apparatus for molding and replicating minute surface characteristics |
US5623375A (en) * | 1991-10-15 | 1997-04-22 | Commissariat A L'energie Atomique | International dielectric mirror and production process for such a mirror |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN107219109A (en) * | 2017-07-17 | 2017-09-29 | 北京航空航天大学 | A kind of labyrinth surface crack testing method based on photosensitive resin |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US6656332B1 (en) | 2003-12-02 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Fuller Jr et al. | Fracture mechanics approach to the design of glass aircraft windows: A case study | |
Toh et al. | Whole field surface roughness measurement by laser speckle correlation technique | |
Dondeti et al. | A comparative study of dynamic fracture of soda-lime glass using photoelasticity, digital image correlation and digital gradient sensing techniques | |
AT411496B (en) | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR OPTICALLY TESTING SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS | |
US6656332B1 (en) | Replicating method for surface finish inspection | |
JP2002107119A (en) | Method and apparatus for measurement of thickness of specimen | |
US5610326A (en) | Non-destructive process for characterizing the surface condition of a part | |
US4043187A (en) | Method of measuring surface roughness | |
Bao et al. | A closer look at the diffuse and localised necking of a metallic thin sheet: Evolution of the two bands pattern | |
Romaniello et al. | Low-mass pre-main-sequence stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud. III. Accretion rates from Hubble Space Telescope WFPC2 observations | |
Karadzhinova et al. | Impact of GEM foil hole geometry on GEM detector gain | |
JP6503222B2 (en) | Nondestructive Evaluation Method for Corrosion Resistance of Stainless Steel Using Spectroscopic Ellipsometry | |
Negres et al. | Characterization of laser-induced damage by picosecond pulses on multi-layer dielectric coatings for petawatt-class lasers | |
Semenski et al. | Experimental caustics analysis in fracture mechanics of anisotropic materials | |
Negres et al. | The effect of pulse duration on the growth rate of laser-induced damage sites at 351 nm on fused silica surfaces | |
US11099002B2 (en) | Systems and methods of assessing a coating microstructure | |
US7289657B2 (en) | Method of inspecting photo-mask | |
Sheehan et al. | National ignition facility small optics laser-induced damage and photometry measurements program | |
Davis et al. | Antireflection Coatings for Semiconductor Failure Analysis | |
Chow et al. | Testing of optical components to assure performance in a high-average-power environment | |
Baker | Standards for surface flaws | |
US7154601B2 (en) | Testing method for a polarizing plate | |
JPH01250846A (en) | Defect inspecting equipment for transparent body | |
FR2846096A1 (en) | Device for detecting, analyzing and locating defects present on transparent and/or reflecting surface, in particular of silicon wafers and glass products | |
Baker et al. | The measurement and specification of coating defects |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, MICHIGAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MORDUKHOVICH, GREGORY;REEL/FRAME:013087/0750 Effective date: 20020521 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC., MICHIGAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:022117/0022 Effective date: 20050119 Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.,MICHIGAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:022117/0022 Effective date: 20050119 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, DISTRICT Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022201/0547 Effective date: 20081231 Owner name: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY,DISTRICT Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022201/0547 Effective date: 20081231 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SEC Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022553/0399 Effective date: 20090409 Owner name: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECU Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022553/0399 Effective date: 20090409 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC., MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY;REEL/FRAME:023124/0470 Effective date: 20090709 Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.,MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY;REEL/FRAME:023124/0470 Effective date: 20090709 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC., MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNORS:CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES;CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES;REEL/FRAME:023127/0273 Effective date: 20090814 Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.,MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNORS:CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES;CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES;REEL/FRAME:023127/0273 Effective date: 20090814 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, DISTRICT Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023156/0001 Effective date: 20090710 Owner name: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY,DISTRICT Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023156/0001 Effective date: 20090710 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST, MICHIGAN Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023161/0911 Effective date: 20090710 Owner name: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST,MICHIGAN Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023161/0911 Effective date: 20090710 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC., MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST;REEL/FRAME:025311/0725 Effective date: 20101026 Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC., MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY;REEL/FRAME:025245/0347 Effective date: 20100420 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, DELAWARE Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:025327/0222 Effective date: 20101027 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC, MICHIGAN Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:025780/0795 Effective date: 20101202 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
REMI | Maintenance fee reminder mailed | ||
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees | ||
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20151202 |