US20010022877A1 - Ultra-fast tunable optical filters - Google Patents

Ultra-fast tunable optical filters Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20010022877A1
US20010022877A1 US09/778,522 US77852201A US2001022877A1 US 20010022877 A1 US20010022877 A1 US 20010022877A1 US 77852201 A US77852201 A US 77852201A US 2001022877 A1 US2001022877 A1 US 2001022877A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
optical
coupler
signal
resonator
filter
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US09/778,522
Other versions
US6411756B2 (en
Inventor
Dan Sadot
Daniel Majer
Eyal Shekel
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
AL CIELO Ltd
Ben Gurion University of the Negev Research and Development Authority Ltd
Original Assignee
Ben Gurion University of the Negev Research and Development Authority Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Ben Gurion University of the Negev Research and Development Authority Ltd filed Critical Ben Gurion University of the Negev Research and Development Authority Ltd
Priority to US09/778,522 priority Critical patent/US6411756B2/en
Publication of US20010022877A1 publication Critical patent/US20010022877A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US6411756B2 publication Critical patent/US6411756B2/en
Assigned to AL CIELO LTD reassignment AL CIELO LTD ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CHIARO NETWORKS LTD
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02FOPTICAL DEVICES OR ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE CONTROL OF LIGHT BY MODIFICATION OF THE OPTICAL PROPERTIES OF THE MEDIA OF THE ELEMENTS INVOLVED THEREIN; NON-LINEAR OPTICS; FREQUENCY-CHANGING OF LIGHT; OPTICAL LOGIC ELEMENTS; OPTICAL ANALOGUE/DIGITAL CONVERTERS
    • G02F1/00Devices or arrangements for the control of the intensity, colour, phase, polarisation or direction of light arriving from an independent light source, e.g. switching, gating or modulating; Non-linear optics
    • G02F1/01Devices or arrangements for the control of the intensity, colour, phase, polarisation or direction of light arriving from an independent light source, e.g. switching, gating or modulating; Non-linear optics for the control of the intensity, phase, polarisation or colour 
    • G02F1/21Devices or arrangements for the control of the intensity, colour, phase, polarisation or direction of light arriving from an independent light source, e.g. switching, gating or modulating; Non-linear optics for the control of the intensity, phase, polarisation or colour  by interference
    • G02F1/225Devices or arrangements for the control of the intensity, colour, phase, polarisation or direction of light arriving from an independent light source, e.g. switching, gating or modulating; Non-linear optics for the control of the intensity, phase, polarisation or colour  by interference in an optical waveguide structure

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the field of tunable optical filters, especially for use in optical communications systems.
  • High-speed data communications systems need to support the aggregate bandwidth requirements of current and future applications such as supercomputer interconnection high-quality video conferencing, and multimedia traffic. It has long been clear that these bandwidth requirements can only be met by using optical transmission technologies. Many current approaches favor packet switching and ATM (asynchronous transfer mode) technology, due to their flexibility. The most promising candidate for the future hardware backbone for such networks is dense optical WDM (wavelength division multiplexing), a method of multiplexing a large number of optical data channels on a wavelength basis, i.e. each wavelength is regarded as a different channel, and is routed and manipulated separately from all other wavelengths.
  • WDM wavelength division multiplexing
  • Dense WDM needs advanced optoelectronic components and subsystems, capable of handling the extremely high aggregate bit rates and traffic levels demanded by modern optical data communications systems.
  • One of the most critical components needed for implementation of WDM packet-switched systems is an ultra-fast tunable filter—a wavelength selective element in which the central wavelength of the selected bandpass can be tuned externally and dynamically at a very high rate.
  • tunable filter is based on the Acousto-Optical effect. Such components depend on the interaction between an acoustic wave generated in the device, and the optical signal inputted to the component. Tunability is achieved by altering the frequency of the acoustic wave, which can be simply accomplished by altering the frequency of the electronic signal used to generate the acoustic wave. These filters are, however, polarization dependent, which causes many practical problems. Tuning speeds are reasonably high, of the order of microseconds.
  • Yet another tunable filter is based on a micromachined semiconductor structure, where the thickness of one of the parts of the structure is altered electrically.
  • tuning speeds of the order of microseconds can be achieved.
  • next generation packet-switched WDM networks are being designed for use with traffic throughputs of the order of Tbits/sec. Such systems therefore require switching and tuning speeds of the order of one nanosecond, and it is evident that even the fastest of the above mentioned filter technologies falls woefully short of these requirements, by about three orders of magnitude.
  • the present invention seeks to provide an improved high speed tunable optical filter which overcomes disadvantages and drawbacks of existing tunable optical filters, which provides tuning speeds of the order of one nanosecond, and which is capable of implementation as a low cost, high production volume monolithic component.
  • a tunable optical filter including at least one multiport optical coupler, to one connection port of which is inputted an optical signal, and from another one of which is outputted an optical signal to the end user, an optical transmission line of predetermined length configured as a resonator, with one of its ends connected to yet another one of the connection ports, and its other end connected to still another one of the connection ports, and with a phase modulator inserted in the above mentioned resonator such that the interaction of the phase modulated signal in the resonator with the input signal allows only signals of a preselected wavelength to be transmitted from the output port to the end user.
  • the output signal can be extracted from the resonator, by means of an additional coupler inserted into the resonator.
  • an additional coupler inserted into the resonator.
  • the use of three-port couplers is sufficient.
  • a filter with variable finesse can be provided by the use of couplers with variable power splitting ratios.
  • a compound resonator tunable optical filter including at least three multiport optical couplers, to one of the ports of the first coupler is inputted an optical signal, and from one of the ports of the last coupler is outputted a filtered optical signal to the end user, at least two optical resonators of predetermined length interconnecting the free ports of the couplers, and at least one phase modulator inserted in at least one of the above mentioned optical resonators, such that the interaction of the phase modulated signal with the input signal to the first coupler is operative to allow only signals of a preselected wavelength to be transmitted from the output port of the last coupler to the end user.
  • the optical output signal of the filter may be converted into such a signal by means of a fast photodetector mounted on the output port.
  • the output optical data signal may be utilized directly.
  • an optical filter including at least one multiport optical coupler one connection port of the at least one multiport optical coupler receiving an input optical signal, and another connection port of the at least one multiport optical coupler outputting a filtered optical signal, and at least one tunable optical resonator connected to at least one of the at least one multiport optical coupler.
  • an optical filter as described above and wherein the at least one multiport optical coupler has at least first, second, third and fourth connection ports, the first connection port receiving an optical signal, the second connection port outputting a filtered optical signal and the at least one tunable optical resonator being connected across the third and fourth connection ports.
  • an optical filter as described above and wherein the at least one multiport optical coupler consists of at least first and second optical couplers, each having at least first, second and third connection ports, the first connection port of the first optical coupler receives an optical signal, the second and third connection ports of the first optical coupler are coupled to the at least one tunable optical resonator, the first and second connection ports of the second optical coupler are coupled to the at least one tunable optical resonator, and the third connection port of the second optical coupler outputs a filtered optical signal.
  • an optical filter as described above and wherein the at least one tunable optical resonator is operative to select an optical signal with a specific wavelength or to enable the polarization of the filtered optical output signal to be selected.
  • an optical filter with variable finesse consisting of an optical element with variable finesse receiving an optical signal and providing a filtered output, and a finesse controller operative to select the finesse of the variable finesse optical element.
  • the variable finesse optical element of this embodiment could consist of an optical coupler with variable power splitting ratio between its connection ports.
  • an optical filter with variable finesse consisting of at least one multiport optical coupler with variable power splitting ratio, one connection port of the at least one multiport optical coupler receiving an input optical signal, and another connection port of the at least one multiport optical coupler outputting a filtered optical signal, and at least one tunable optical resonator connected to at least one of the at least one multiport optical couplers.
  • an optical filter with variable finesse wherein the at least one multiport optical coupler with variable power splitting ratio, has at least first, second, third and fourth connection ports, the first connection port receiving an optical signal, and the second connection port outputting a filtered optical signal, and the at least one tunable optical resonator being connected across the third and fourth connection ports.
  • an optical filter with variable finesse wherein the at least one multiport optical coupler with variable power splitting ratio consists of at least first and second optical couplers, at least one of which has variable power splitting ratio, and each having at least first, second and third connection ports, the first connection port of the first optical coupler receives an optical signal, the second and third connection ports of the first optical coupler are coupled to the at least one tunable optical resonator, the first and second connection ports of the second optical coupler are coupled to the at least one tunable optical resonator, and the third connection port of the second optical coupler outputs a filtered optical signal.
  • an optical filter with variable finesse wherein the at least one tunable optical resonator is operative to select an optical signal with a specific wavelength, thereby providing tunability to both the wavelength and finesse of the optical filter, or enabling the polarization of the filtered optical output signal to be selected.
  • an integrated optical filter consisting of at least one multiport optical coupler, one connection port of the at least one multiport optical coupler receiving an input optical signal, and another connection port of the at least one multiport optical coupler outputting a filtered optical signal, and at least one optical resonator connected to at least one of the at least one multiport optical coupler, and wherein at least one of the at least one multiport optical coupler and the at least one optical resonator are formed on an integrated optical substrate.
  • an integrated optical filter wherein the at least one multiport optical coupler has at least first, second, third and fourth connection ports, the first connection port receiving an optical signal, the second connection port outputting a filtered optical signal, and the at least one optical resonator is connected across the third and fourth connection ports, and wherein at least one of the at least one multiport optical coupler and the at least one optical resonator are formed on an integrated optical substrate.
  • an integrated optical filter wherein the at least one multiport optical coupler consists of at least first and second optical couplers, each having at least first, second and third connection ports, the first connection port of the first optical coupler receives an optical signal, the second and third connection ports of the first optical coupler are coupled to the at least one optical resonator, the first and second connection ports of the second optical coupler are coupled to the at least one optical resonator, and the third connection port of the second optical coupler outputs a filtered optical signal, and wherein at least one of the at least one multiport optical coupler and the at least one optical resonator are formed on an integrated optical substrate.
  • an integrated optical filter wherein the at least one optical resonator is a tunable optical resonator, or in which at least one of the at least one optical couplers and the at least one optical resonators includes a discrete non-integrated optical component.
  • an optical filter of the compound resonator type consisting of at least three optical couplers, each having at least three connection ports, and at least two optical resonators, at least one of which is tunable, each of the at least two optical resonators being connected between two of the at least three optical couplers, and wherein the first connection port of the first optical coupler receives an input optical signal, and the last connection port of the last optical coupler outputs a filtered optical signal.
  • an optical filter of the compound resonator type consisting of at least first, second and third optical couplers each having at least first, second and third connection ports, and at least first and second optical resonators, at least one of which is tunable, each of the at least first and second optical resonators being connected between two of the at least first, second and third optical couplers, and wherein the first connection port of the first optical coupler receives an input optical signal, the second and third connection ports of the first optical coupler are coupled to the first of the at least first and second optical resonators, the first and second connection ports of the second optical coupler are coupled to the first of the at least first and second optical resonators, the third and fourth connection ports of the second optical coupler are coupled to the second of the at least first and second optical resonators, the first and second connection ports of the third optical coupler are coupled to the second of the at least first and second optical resonators, and the first connection ports of the third optical coupler are coupled to the second of the at least first and second optical
  • an optical filter of the compound resonator type as described in the previous two paragraphs and wherein the optical resonators consist of loops of optical transmission medium differing in length from each other by predetermined amounts, or wherein this difference in length is controlled by means of a piezoelectric transducer operative to stabilize the length.
  • an optical filter of the compound resonator type, as described in the previous paragraphs, and wherein at least one of the optical couplers or one of the optical resonators is formed on an integrated optics substrate.
  • an integrated optical filter of the compound resonator type, consisting of at least three optical couplers, at least one of which is formed on an integrated optics substrate, each of the at least three optical couplers having at least three connection ports, and at least two optical resonators, at least one of which is formed on an integrated optics substrate, each of the at least two optical resonators being connected between two of the at least three optical couplers, and wherein the first connection port of the first optical coupler receives an input optical signal, and the last connection port of the last optical coupler outputs a filtered optical signal.
  • an integrated optical filter of the compound resonator type, consisting of at least first, second and third optical couplers, at least one of which is formed on an integrated optics substrate, each of the at least first, second and third optical couplers having at least first, second and third connection ports, and at least first and second optical resonators, at least one of which is formed on an integrated optics substrate, each of the at least first and second optical resonators being connected between two of the at least first, second and third optical couplers, and wherein the first connection port of the first optical coupler receives an input optical signal, the second and third connection ports of the first optical coupler are coupled to the first of the at least first and second optical resonators, the first and second connection ports of the second optical coupler are coupled to the first of the at least first and second optical resonators, the third and fourth connection ports of the second optical coupler are coupled to the second of the at least first and second optical resonators,
  • an integrated optical filter of the compound resonator type wherein at least one of the optical resonators is tunable.
  • an optical filter wherein the tunable optical resonator is tuned by altering the phase of an optical signal traversing through it by means of a phase modulator.
  • an optical filter whose filtered optical output is converted to an electronic signal by means of a photodetector.
  • an active wavelength division multiplexing system including an optical filter as described in this invention, the filter being operative to select a desired wavelength of an optical signal.
  • the tunable optical filter When the tunable optical filter is implemented using bulk fiber optical components, a loop of fiber acts as the tuned resonator and a bulk electro-optical phase modulator is inserted in the loop to provide the variable phase delay which provides the resonator with its tunability.
  • the filter can also be implemented on a monolithic integrated optics chip, such as of gallium arsenide, with all of the component parts defined by means of standard semiconductor manufacturing techniques.
  • the operation of the filters is based on an interferometric interaction between the input optical signal and its delayed replica produced as a result of the signal traversing the resonator.
  • an output signal is obtained at a specific wavelength and with the appropriate design, the device operates as an optical narrow bandpass filter.
  • the output spectrum characteristics can be controlled by the phase delay introduced by the phase modulator, so that the device can perform dynamic interferometric processing of the optical signal, creating a dynamic tunable filter. Since optical phase modulation can be performed at exceedingly high rates, the result is an ultra-fast tunable wavelength selective filter.
  • Current technology phase modulators are capable of operation in the 10 GHz range, so that tuning times of the order of one nanosecond are attained. The filter thus offers an attractive solution for the ultra-fast tuning speeds required in Tbit/sec packet-switched WDM networks.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a single resonator tunable delay-line optical filter constructed and operated according to a preferred implementation of the present invention, showing a single optical coupler, a loop of optical transmission line with a phase modulator acting as a tuned resonator, and an optional photodetector for converting the outputted optical signal to an electronic signal if required.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic view of a single resonator tunable delay-line optical filter constructed and operated according to another preferred implementation of the present invention, which differs from the implementation shown in FIG. 1 in that an additional optical coupler is inserted into the resonator loop, and the filtered output optical signal extracted from this second coupler
  • FIG. 3 is a representation of a 5-node WDM network frequency comb, with 100 GHz channel spacing, and 20 GHz channel bandwidth, and the frequency comb of a single resonator filter for use in that WDM system, constructed according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic view of a compound resonator tunable delay-line optical filter constructed and operative according to another preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 shows frequency response transmission plots for a single resonator tunable filter, constructed and operated according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 6 presents theoretical frequency response transmission plots for the compound resonator tunable filter shown schematically in FIG. 3, illustrating the advantages of the compound resonator filter over the single resonator filter.
  • FIG. 7 shows the frequency response transmission plots for three compound resonator filters constructed with different couplers, illustrating the variation in filter finesse attainable thereby.
  • FIG. 8 shows a computer simulation of frequency response transmission plots for three cases of wavelength misalignment between the transmitter laser and a compound resonator tunable filter used in the receiver of an optical communication link.
  • FIG. 9 presents plots of the BER (bit error rate) of the optical communication system with the three wavelength misalignment cases described in FIG. 8.
  • FIG. 10 shows a graph of the optical transmission as a function of the tuning of a single resonator tunable filter, constructed and operated according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, for signals of different optical polarization.
  • FIG. 11A and 11B show an additional embodiment of the present invention, in the form of a single resonator tunable delay line optical filter implemented on a monolithic integrated optics substrate of gallium arsenide.
  • FIG. 11A shows a schematic layout view of the circuit on the chip, whilst FIG. 11B is a cut-away cross section of the chip, showing the microelectronic structure of the chip.
  • FIG. 12A and 12B illustrate a more advanced embodiment of the monolithic optical filter, including three couplers and three gates, for providing dynamic control both of the filter center frequency, and of the filter finesse value.
  • FIG. 12A shows a schematic layout view of the circuit on the chip, whilst FIG. 12B is a cut-away cross section of the chip, showing the microelectronic structure of the chip.
  • FIG. 13 shows an additional embodiment of the present invention, in the form of a compound resonator tunable delay line optical filter implemented on a monolithic integrated optics substrate of gallium arsenide.
  • FIG. 1 shows the construction and operation of a single resonator tunable delay line optical filter according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention. It comprises an optical coupler 6 with four ports labeled 1 to 4 , a fiber loop 8 , and an optical phase modulator 10 .
  • the fiber loop 8 is connected between ports 3 and 2 of the coupler 6 , and thus interacts with the coupler as a resonant element.
  • the optical coupler 6 is designed to optimize the filter performance in terms of transmitted power and filter finesse.
  • the optical signal is inputted through port 1 , and the filtered signal is outputted through port 4 . If an electronic data signal output is required for the end use application, such as for communications systems, the optical output signal is converted into an electronic data signal by means of photodetector 12 . For optical signal output use, such as in an optical spectrum analyzer, the output signal is taken directly from port 4 .
  • the embodiment shown in FIG. 1 acts as a stop band filter, transmitting all wavelengths except that selected by the filter.
  • FIG. 2 A further embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG. 2, and operates as a pass band filter, transmitting only the wavelength selected by the filter.
  • This embodiment differs from the embodiment shown in FIG. 1 in that the filtered output signal is extracted from the resonator by means of an additional optical coupler 14 inserted into the resonator loop 8 .
  • couplers having only 3 ports, 1 , 2 and 3 for the input coupler 6 , and 11 , 12 and 13 for the output coupler 14 .
  • the fourth port of each of these couplers is terminated internally with a built-in absorber.
  • the output signal is taken from port 11 of the output coupler 14 , either as an optical output, or converted into an electronic signal by means of photodetector 15 .
  • I filter ( R - e i ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ) ⁇ ( R - e - i ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ) ( 1 - t 23 ) 2 + 4 ⁇ ⁇ t 23 ⁇ sin 2 ⁇ ( ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ nL ⁇ ( v - v 0 ) c ) , ( 1 )
  • [0058] 23 is the complex transfer coefficient of the field amplitude from port 2 to port 3 of the coupler 6 .
  • is the total optical field phase delay after propagating through loop 8 .
  • R is the power reflection coefficient of the coupler 6 , i.e.
  • v is the optical frequency
  • n is the refractive index of the optical medium constituting the loop 8 .
  • L is the loop length
  • k being any integer.
  • the resulting frequency characteristic of the filter is a comb of narrow passband frequencies, one frequency for each value of k.
  • the phase modulator 10 inserted within the fiber loop is operative to control the phase delay of the signal traversing the fiber loop.
  • This enables external control of the phase matching condition of the fiber loop resonator.
  • a change of the phase matching condition leads to a frequency shift of the resonance frequency v 0 , proportional to the phase shift imposed by the phase modulator
  • This mechanism essentially adds dynamic tuning capability to the filter.
  • phase modulators such as those based on LiNbO 3 technology, are capable of high-speed operation in the multi-GHz range.
  • the filter according to the present invention can therefore be tuned in extremely short time periods, of the order of a nanosecond. This is approximately three orders of magnitude faster than other currently known filters.
  • I filter ( R - ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ) ⁇ ( R - ⁇ - i ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ) ( 1 - t 23 ) 2 + 4 ⁇ ⁇ t 23 ⁇ sin 2 ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ nL ⁇ [ v - ( v 0 + c ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ nL ) ] / c ⁇ . ( 6 )
  • the filter must reject all unselected channels within the WDM band, which is achieved by providing a sufficiently large free spectral range (FSR), and
  • the filter must minimize crosstalk from adjacent unselected channels, which is achieved by constructing the filter with a high finesse value design.
  • the single-resonator tunable filter when constructed using practical lengths of optical fiber, performs well in terms of filter finesse (typically above 1250), its FSR is not satisfactory since only 20 GHz separates between two adjacent channels. A much more realistic requirement is an FSR of the order of 100 GHz, equivalent to about 0.8 nm, which is a candidate for the standard channel spacing in dense WDM systems.
  • the filter FSR should be slightly larger than the channel spacing:
  • is the channel spacing of the WDM system
  • FWHM is the filter bandwidth
  • FIG. 3 In the upper section of FIG. 3 is a representation of a typical 5-node WDM network frequency comb, with 100 GHz channel spacing and 20 GHz channel bandwidth, and in the lower section, the frequency comb of a single resonator filter constructed according to the present invention for use in that WDM system, and having an FSR of 120 GHz typically, and a 20 GHz FWHM bandwidth.
  • Equation (7) should be amended to:
  • FIG. 4 shows a compound resonator tunable delay line optical filter constructed and operated according to another preferred embodiment of the present invention. It comprises three optical couplers 20 , 21 , 22 , two fiber optical loops 24 , 25 , denoted by the terms L 1 and L 2 , and an optical phase modulator 30 .
  • the optical signal is inputted through port 1 of the coupler 20 , and the filtered signal is outputted through port 4 of coupler 22 .
  • the optical signal is converted by means of photodetector 32 .
  • the three optical couplers need not be identical, and can be selected to optimize the filter performance in terms of transmitted power and filter finesse.
  • E out E in ⁇ t 1 ⁇ t 2 ⁇ t 3 ⁇ exp ⁇ [ - i ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ( L 1 + L 2 ) ] ⁇ 1 - r 1 ⁇ r 2 ⁇ exp ⁇ ( - 2 ⁇ ⁇ i ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ L 1 ) - r 1 ⁇ r 3 ⁇ t 2 3 ⁇ exp ⁇ [ - 2 ⁇ ⁇ i ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ( L 1 + L 2 ) ] 1 - r 2 ⁇ r 3 ⁇ exp ⁇ ⁇ ( - 2 ⁇ ⁇ i ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ L 2 ) ⁇ [ 1 - r 2 ⁇ r 3 ⁇ exp ⁇ ⁇ ( - 2 ⁇ ⁇ i ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ L 2 ) ⁇ [ 1 - r 2 ⁇ r 3 ⁇ exp ⁇ ⁇ ( - 2 ⁇ ⁇ i
  • L 1 and L 2 are the single-pass lengths of each resonator loop
  • is the propagation constant in the fiber
  • t 1 and R 1 are the field amplitude transmission and reflection coefficients of optical coupler t, respectively, and are defined by
  • r 14 is the complex transfer coefficient from port t to port j of the coupler.
  • the compound resonator filter has much more design flexibility, due to the additional loop resonator, and the additional independent transmission and reflection coefficients of the additional optical couplers.
  • This allows the construction of filters with a wide selection range of FSR, FWHM, and filter finesse In particular, it is feasible and practical to realize a filter with FSR in the order of hundreds of GHz, i.e., a few nm, as required for dense WDM applications in optical communications.
  • FIG. 5 shows transmission plots for a single-resonator tunable filter, constructed and operated according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, with a loop 8 of length 1 cm, and a coupler 6 with power splitting ratio of 10/90.
  • the curves were calculated from equation (1).
  • the filter finesse exceeds 125.
  • FIG. 6 presents theoretical frequency response transmission plots for the compound resonator tunable filter shown schematically in FIG. 4.
  • the compound resonator configuration has major advantages over the single resonator design. Most important is that the FSR can be extended to the range of hundreds of Ghz (a few nm.) and more. This is achieved using an appropriate design of the two fiber loop resonators L 1 and L 2 , 24 and 25 , with a very slight length difference between them, of the order of fractions of a mm. This length difference can be accurately controlled with a PZT (piezo-electric transducer).
  • PZT piezo-electric transducer
  • a further important advantage of the compound resonator is the large sidemode rejection ratio, which is significantly increased in comparison with the single resonator filter. While the single resonator filter exhibits 10 dB sidelobe suppression, that of the compound resonator filter whose results are shown in FIG. 6 exceeds 40 dB.
  • the filter finesse can be designed more flexibly, since there are more independent coupler reflection and transmission parameters to use for optimization of the desired finesse.
  • the filter of FIG. 6 has a finesse of over 1000. This filter is constructed with a fiber loop length of 20 cm, and a loop length difference of 0.1 mm.
  • the input coupler 20 has a power splitting ratio of 2/98, the intermediate coupler 21 , a ratio of 1/99, and the output coupler 22 , a ratio of 10/99.
  • FIG. 7 shows the frequency response transmission plots for three compound resonator filters constructed using couplers with different power splitting ratios, illustrating the variation in filter finesse attainable thereby.
  • Response curve 1 is obtained from a compound resonator filter with coupler splitting ratios of 20/80, 8/92 and 10/90 for the input, intermediate and output couplers respectively, and the resulting filter has a finesse of about 25.
  • Response curve II has couplers of splitting ratios 10/90, 1/99 and 10/90 respectively, resulting in a finesse of the order of 250.
  • Response curve III has couplers of splitting ratios 1/99, 0.1/99.9 and 10/90 respectively, and the filter a finesse of 1000.
  • the ability to select the filter finesse is an important feature of the compound resonator filter, since different optical communications systems require different wavelength selective curves to optimize system performance
  • One important consideration in filter design consideration is the wavelength stability of the transmitter laser used in the system. If the wavelength stability of the laser is such that there could arise significant wavelength misalignment between the laser frequency and the filter mid-band frequency, then a filter with lower finesse is required to compensate for this misalignment.
  • FIG. 8 shows a computer simulation of frequency response transmission plots for three cases of wavelength misalignment between the transmitter laser and the filter at the receiver of an IM/DD (intensity-modulation/direct-detection) optical communication link.
  • the laser spectrum chosen was one with a Lorenzian lineshape and a bandwidth of 1 GHz, which would represent the modulation of a datastream running at 1 Gbit/sec.
  • the spectral response curves of the filter are generated from equation (11), while the filter finesse is 25.
  • the three different curves represent the following cases: a perfectly aligned case (curve I), a 15 GHz wavelength misalignment (curve II) and a 30 GHz wavelength misalignment (curve III).
  • a filter of low finesse is essential to compensate for the misalignment.
  • FIG. 9 presents plots of the BER (bit error rate) of an IM/DD optical communication system with the three wavelength misalignment cases described in FIG. 8.
  • the filter itself uses couplers with power splitting ratios of 50/50, 1/99 and 10/90, and has a finesse of 25. It uses a PIN photodiode for detection, and the whole system has an NEP of 30 pW/ ⁇ square root ⁇ Hz, and a responsistivity of 4.
  • the transmission bit rate is 1.25 Gbit/sec. It is observed that for a system with a perfectly aligned laser, as shown by curve 1, the receiver sensitivity, defined at a BER of 10 ⁇ 9 , is ⁇ 18.5 dBm.
  • FIG. 10 is a graph of the optical transmission as a function of the tuning of the compound resonator tunable filter of FIG. 6., which illustrates how a filter constructed and operative according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, can perform polarization selection.
  • the integrated optics monolithic implementation also has a number of technological advantages.
  • the optical loop resonator length can be made significantly smaller, down to the order of a millimeter or less.
  • the resonance build-up time is considerably shorter, thus increasing the filter tuning speed.
  • the filter free spectral range (FSR) can be increased by an order of magnitude, up to the order of a hundred GHz. This is sufficient for current WDM systems using a small number of laser sources, with 10 GHz bandwidth typically.
  • a fixed wavelength monolithic filter is obtained, which can be constructed with selected center wavelength and finesse according to the parameters and dimensions chosen. Because of its small size and superior properties, such filters are useful for static switched WDM optical communication system applications.
  • the fiber loop configuration includes connections to an external phase modulator, which introduces losses of an additional pair of connectors (about 0.2 dB each).
  • the integrated optics configuration incorporates the phase modulator on the same chip. Therefore, losses are reduced because of the reduction in the use of one set of connectors.
  • the monolithic design leads to a very small device, of size similar to that of semiconductor lasers and suitable for integration with other OEIC (Optoelectronic integrated circuit) components into complete integrated optics communications systems.
  • OEIC Optoelectronic integrated circuit
  • FIGS. 11A and 11B show a schematic view of an additional embodiment of the present invention, in the form of a single resonator tunable delay line optical filter implemented on a monolithic integrated optics substrate of gallium arsenide. Any other suitable integrated optics substrate material could also be used.
  • FIG. 11A is a plan view of the chip layout, while FIG. 11B is a cut-away cross section of the chip showing the microelectronic structure of the chip.
  • the filter is manufactured on an MBE (molecular beam epitaxy) grown n-type GaAs wafer 40 . Using standard photolithographic techniques, a mesa is defined and etched by RIE (reactive ion etching).
  • the mesa defines the waveguide 42 , and the resonator loop 43 of the optical structure of the filter. These waveguides are defined using one of the standard cladding/core/cladding waveguiding structures used in integrated optics GaAs technology.
  • a metal gate 44 over part of the resonator loop, and its associated bond pad 46 are defined by a further process.
  • the device is covered with an insulating layer 41 such as polyimide to passivate the device, and to insulate the gate 46 from the wafer A via 45 in the polyimide layer facilitates the gate-to-resonator loop contact area.
  • An Ohmic contact is evaporated onto the back of the wafer, and is alloyed in Finally, the substrate is cleaved to create cleaved edge facets 47 for interface to the input and output optical signals
  • the signal applied to the gate creates an electric field across that section of the resonator loop, causing a change in the waveguide refractive index by means of a physical effect, such as the linear electro-optic effect.
  • the change in refractive index introduces a phase change in the optical signal propagating in the resonator loop, analogous to that introduced by the Lithium Niobate phase modulator 10 of the fiber optical implementation shown in FIG. 1. If this gate is omitted, a static monolithic filter is obtained.
  • the coupling between the through-waveguide 42 and the resonator loop 43 takes place across the gap 48 , whose width and length are calculated to provide the correct power splitting ratio for the designed filter operation.
  • FIGS. 12A and 12B illustrate a schematic view of a more advanced embodiment of the monolithic optical filter.
  • FIG. 12A is a plan view of the chip layout
  • FIG. 12B is a cut-away cross section of the chip showing the microelectronic structure of the chip.
  • This construction comprises a GaAs wafer 52 on which are defined a first waveguide 53 , and a second waveguide 63 , with a resonator loop 56 disposed between them.
  • a first metal gate 59 is located above a section of the resonator loop, and two further gates 54 and 55 are located between each waveguide and the resonator loop.
  • the whole GaAs structure is covered with an insulating layer 58 such as polyimide, containing vias 57 to provide contact between these three gates and the underlying GaAs layer.
  • an insulating layer 58 such as polyimide
  • the manufacturing technique is similar to that of the simpler embodiment filter shown in FIGS. 11A and 11B.
  • This advanced embodiment acts as a bandpass filter, by selecting, from the range of wavelengths inputted to the first waveguide 53 , the specific wavelength to be switched to the second waveguide 63 , by means of the resonance loop 56 .
  • the first gate 59 together with the section of resonator loop under it operate as a phase modulator for tuning the filter passband.
  • a static filter is obtained.
  • the two other gates 54 and 55 are operative to change the coupling between the first waveguide and the resonator loop, and between the resonator loop and the second waveguide as a function of the voltage applied to them In this way, the filter finesse can be changed dynamically by means of the control signals applied to gates 54 and 55
  • FIG. 13 shows a schematic layout view of a compound resonator monolithic tunable filter constructed and operated according to another preferred embodiment of the present invention, analogous to the fiber optical implementation described in FIG. 4.
  • Use of the compound resonator monolithic embodiment enables filters with an FSR of up to 5 Thz to be constructed, for use in the next generation WDM system technology.
  • the embodiment shown in FIG. 13 is constructed on a substrate 52 of Gallium Arsenide, and has a passivating layer 58 of polyimide, as in the previously described monolithic embodiments. It has two resonator loops 56 , 70 , and a variable phase modulator gate 59 acting on one of the loops 56 .
  • the phase change is varied by means of a voltage applied to pad 60 .
  • This embodiment of the filter can also be constructed in a fixed wavelength form, in which case the gate 59 and pad 60 are not fabricated.
  • the coupling between the two resonators can be varied by means of gate 55 .
  • Gate 54 varies the coupling between the input line 53 and the first resonator 56 , and gate 74 , the coupling between the second resonator 70 and the output port 76 .
  • the filter finesse can be changed dynamically by means of control signals applied to gates 54 , 55 and 74 .
  • the optical signal is inputted through line 53 , and the filtered signal outputted through line 63 to the output port 76 .

Abstract

An optical filter including at least one multiport optical coupler formed on a gallium arsenide substrate, one connection port of the at least one multiport optical coupler receiving an input optical signal, and another connection port of the at least one multiport optical coupler outputting a filtered optical signal and at least one electrically tunable optical resonator, formed on the gallium arsenide substrate and connected to at least one of the at least multiport optical coupler.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to the field of tunable optical filters, especially for use in optical communications systems. [0001]
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • High-speed data communications systems need to support the aggregate bandwidth requirements of current and future applications such as supercomputer interconnection high-quality video conferencing, and multimedia traffic. It has long been clear that these bandwidth requirements can only be met by using optical transmission technologies. Many current approaches favor packet switching and ATM (asynchronous transfer mode) technology, due to their flexibility. The most promising candidate for the future hardware backbone for such networks is dense optical WDM (wavelength division multiplexing), a method of multiplexing a large number of optical data channels on a wavelength basis, i.e. each wavelength is regarded as a different channel, and is routed and manipulated separately from all other wavelengths. [0002]
  • Dense WDM needs advanced optoelectronic components and subsystems, capable of handling the extremely high aggregate bit rates and traffic levels demanded by modern optical data communications systems. One of the most critical components needed for implementation of WDM packet-switched systems is an ultra-fast tunable filter—a wavelength selective element in which the central wavelength of the selected bandpass can be tuned externally and dynamically at a very high rate. [0003]
  • Fast tunable filters are known and available commercially, but the tuning speed of all currently known types falls far short of the requirements of future and even of some current optical data transmission systems. The most common optical filters are based on classical interferometers, and include Fabry-Perot and Bragg filters. Such filters are tuned by mechanically moving the resonator structure, and the tuning speed is therefore comparatively slow—typically of the order of milliseconds, or, for the very fastest types, several tens of microseconds. [0004]
  • Another type of tunable filter is based on the Acousto-Optical effect. Such components depend on the interaction between an acoustic wave generated in the device, and the optical signal inputted to the component. Tunability is achieved by altering the frequency of the acoustic wave, which can be simply accomplished by altering the frequency of the electronic signal used to generate the acoustic wave. These filters are, however, polarization dependent, which causes many practical problems. Tuning speeds are reasonably high, of the order of microseconds. [0005]
  • Yet another tunable filter is based on a micromachined semiconductor structure, where the thickness of one of the parts of the structure is altered electrically. Here too, tuning speeds of the order of microseconds can be achieved. [0006]
  • The next generation packet-switched WDM networks are being designed for use with traffic throughputs of the order of Tbits/sec. Such systems therefore require switching and tuning speeds of the order of one nanosecond, and it is evident that even the fastest of the above mentioned filter technologies falls woefully short of these requirements, by about three orders of magnitude. [0007]
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention seeks to provide an improved high speed tunable optical filter which overcomes disadvantages and drawbacks of existing tunable optical filters, which provides tuning speeds of the order of one nanosecond, and which is capable of implementation as a low cost, high production volume monolithic component. [0008]
  • There is thus provided in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention, a tunable optical filter including at least one multiport optical coupler, to one connection port of which is inputted an optical signal, and from another one of which is outputted an optical signal to the end user, an optical transmission line of predetermined length configured as a resonator, with one of its ends connected to yet another one of the connection ports, and its other end connected to still another one of the connection ports, and with a phase modulator inserted in the above mentioned resonator such that the interaction of the phase modulated signal in the resonator with the input signal allows only signals of a preselected wavelength to be transmitted from the output port to the end user. [0009]
  • In accordance with another preferred embodiment of the invention, the output signal can be extracted from the resonator, by means of an additional coupler inserted into the resonator. In this case, the use of three-port couplers is sufficient. [0010]
  • In accordance with a further preferred embodiment of the invention, a filter with variable finesse can be provided by the use of couplers with variable power splitting ratios. [0011]
  • In accordance with yet another preferred embodiment of the invention, there is provided a compound resonator tunable optical filter including at least three multiport optical couplers, to one of the ports of the first coupler is inputted an optical signal, and from one of the ports of the last coupler is outputted a filtered optical signal to the end user, at least two optical resonators of predetermined length interconnecting the free ports of the couplers, and at least one phase modulator inserted in at least one of the above mentioned optical resonators, such that the interaction of the phase modulated signal with the input signal to the first coupler is operative to allow only signals of a preselected wavelength to be transmitted from the output port of the last coupler to the end user. [0012]
  • In applications where an electronic signal is required for the end use, the optical output signal of the filter may be converted into such a signal by means of a fast photodetector mounted on the output port. In applications where an optical signal is required for the end use, such as for optical spectrum analysis, the output optical data signal may be utilized directly. [0013]
  • In accordance with a further preferred embodiment of the invention, there is provided an optical filter including at least one multiport optical coupler one connection port of the at least one multiport optical coupler receiving an input optical signal, and another connection port of the at least one multiport optical coupler outputting a filtered optical signal, and at least one tunable optical resonator connected to at least one of the at least one multiport optical coupler. [0014]
  • In accordance with vet another preferred embodiment of the invention, there is provided an optical filter as described above and wherein the at least one multiport optical coupler has at least first, second, third and fourth connection ports, the first connection port receiving an optical signal, the second connection port outputting a filtered optical signal and the at least one tunable optical resonator being connected across the third and fourth connection ports. [0015]
  • In accordance with still another preferred embodiment of the invention, there is provided an optical filter as described above and wherein the at least one multiport optical coupler consists of at least first and second optical couplers, each having at least first, second and third connection ports, the first connection port of the first optical coupler receives an optical signal, the second and third connection ports of the first optical coupler are coupled to the at least one tunable optical resonator, the first and second connection ports of the second optical coupler are coupled to the at least one tunable optical resonator, and the third connection port of the second optical coupler outputs a filtered optical signal. [0016]
  • In accordance with another preferred embodiment of the invention, there is provided an optical filter as described above and wherein the at least one tunable optical resonator is operative to select an optical signal with a specific wavelength or to enable the polarization of the filtered optical output signal to be selected. [0017]
  • In accordance with yet a further preferred embodiment of the invention, there is provided an optical filter with variable finesse consisting of an optical element with variable finesse receiving an optical signal and providing a filtered output, and a finesse controller operative to select the finesse of the variable finesse optical element. The variable finesse optical element of this embodiment could consist of an optical coupler with variable power splitting ratio between its connection ports. [0018]
  • In accordance with still another preferred embodiment of the invention, there provided an optical filter with variable finesse consisting of at least one multiport optical coupler with variable power splitting ratio, one connection port of the at least one multiport optical coupler receiving an input optical signal, and another connection port of the at least one multiport optical coupler outputting a filtered optical signal, and at least one tunable optical resonator connected to at least one of the at least one multiport optical couplers. [0019]
  • There is provided in accordance with a further preferred embodiment of the invention, an optical filter with variable finesse wherein the at least one multiport optical coupler with variable power splitting ratio, has at least first, second, third and fourth connection ports, the first connection port receiving an optical signal, and the second connection port outputting a filtered optical signal, and the at least one tunable optical resonator being connected across the third and fourth connection ports. [0020]
  • In accordance with still another preferred embodiment of the invention, there is provided an optical filter with variable finesse wherein the at least one multiport optical coupler with variable power splitting ratio consists of at least first and second optical couplers, at least one of which has variable power splitting ratio, and each having at least first, second and third connection ports, the first connection port of the first optical coupler receives an optical signal, the second and third connection ports of the first optical coupler are coupled to the at least one tunable optical resonator, the first and second connection ports of the second optical coupler are coupled to the at least one tunable optical resonator, and the third connection port of the second optical coupler outputs a filtered optical signal. [0021]
  • In addition, there is provided in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the invention, an optical filter with variable finesse wherein the at least one tunable optical resonator is operative to select an optical signal with a specific wavelength, thereby providing tunability to both the wavelength and finesse of the optical filter, or enabling the polarization of the filtered optical output signal to be selected. [0022]
  • Additionally, there is provided in accordance with still another preferred embodiment of the invention, an integrated optical filter consisting of at least one multiport optical coupler, one connection port of the at least one multiport optical coupler receiving an input optical signal, and another connection port of the at least one multiport optical coupler outputting a filtered optical signal, and at least one optical resonator connected to at least one of the at least one multiport optical coupler, and wherein at least one of the at least one multiport optical coupler and the at least one optical resonator are formed on an integrated optical substrate. [0023]
  • In accordance with yet another preferred embodiment of the invention, there is provided an integrated optical filter wherein the at least one multiport optical coupler has at least first, second, third and fourth connection ports, the first connection port receiving an optical signal, the second connection port outputting a filtered optical signal, and the at least one optical resonator is connected across the third and fourth connection ports, and wherein at least one of the at least one multiport optical coupler and the at least one optical resonator are formed on an integrated optical substrate. [0024]
  • Additionally, there is provided in accordance with a further preferred embodiment of the invention, an integrated optical filter wherein the at least one multiport optical coupler consists of at least first and second optical couplers, each having at least first, second and third connection ports, the first connection port of the first optical coupler receives an optical signal, the second and third connection ports of the first optical coupler are coupled to the at least one optical resonator, the first and second connection ports of the second optical coupler are coupled to the at least one optical resonator, and the third connection port of the second optical coupler outputs a filtered optical signal, and wherein at least one of the at least one multiport optical coupler and the at least one optical resonator are formed on an integrated optical substrate. [0025]
  • In addition, there is provided in accordance with other preferred embodiments of the invention, an integrated optical filter wherein the at least one optical resonator is a tunable optical resonator, or in which at least one of the at least one optical couplers and the at least one optical resonators includes a discrete non-integrated optical component. [0026]
  • In accordance with still another preferred embodiment of the invention, there is provided an optical filter of the compound resonator type, consisting of at least three optical couplers, each having at least three connection ports, and at least two optical resonators, at least one of which is tunable, each of the at least two optical resonators being connected between two of the at least three optical couplers, and wherein the first connection port of the first optical coupler receives an input optical signal, and the last connection port of the last optical coupler outputs a filtered optical signal. [0027]
  • Additionally, there is provided in accordance with a further preferred embodiment of the invention, an optical filter of the compound resonator type, consisting of at least first, second and third optical couplers each having at least first, second and third connection ports, and at least first and second optical resonators, at least one of which is tunable, each of the at least first and second optical resonators being connected between two of the at least first, second and third optical couplers, and wherein the first connection port of the first optical coupler receives an input optical signal, the second and third connection ports of the first optical coupler are coupled to the first of the at least first and second optical resonators, the first and second connection ports of the second optical coupler are coupled to the first of the at least first and second optical resonators, the third and fourth connection ports of the second optical coupler are coupled to the second of the at least first and second optical resonators, the first and second connection ports of the third optical coupler are coupled to the second of the at least first and second optical resonators, and the third connection port of the third optical coupler outputs a filtered optical signal. [0028]
  • In addition, there is provided in accordance with other preferred embodiments of the invention, an optical filter of the compound resonator type, as described in the previous two paragraphs and wherein the optical resonators consist of loops of optical transmission medium differing in length from each other by predetermined amounts, or wherein this difference in length is controlled by means of a piezoelectric transducer operative to stabilize the length. [0029]
  • In accordance with still another preferred embodiment of the invention, there is provided an optical filter, of the compound resonator type, as described in the previous paragraphs, and wherein at least one of the optical couplers or one of the optical resonators is formed on an integrated optics substrate. [0030]
  • In accordance with yet a further preferred embodiment of the invention, there is provided an integrated optical filter, of the compound resonator type, consisting of at least three optical couplers, at least one of which is formed on an integrated optics substrate, each of the at least three optical couplers having at least three connection ports, and at least two optical resonators, at least one of which is formed on an integrated optics substrate, each of the at least two optical resonators being connected between two of the at least three optical couplers, and wherein the first connection port of the first optical coupler receives an input optical signal, and the last connection port of the last optical coupler outputs a filtered optical signal. [0031]
  • There is further provided in accordance with yet another preferred embodiment of the invention, an integrated optical filter, of the compound resonator type, consisting of at least first, second and third optical couplers, at least one of which is formed on an integrated optics substrate, each of the at least first, second and third optical couplers having at least first, second and third connection ports, and at least first and second optical resonators, at least one of which is formed on an integrated optics substrate, each of the at least first and second optical resonators being connected between two of the at least first, second and third optical couplers, and wherein the first connection port of the first optical coupler receives an input optical signal, the second and third connection ports of the first optical coupler are coupled to the first of the at least first and second optical resonators, the first and second connection ports of the second optical coupler are coupled to the first of the at least first and second optical resonators, the third and fourth connection ports of the second optical coupler are coupled to the second of the at least first and second optical resonators, the first and second connection ports of the third optical coupler are coupled to the second of the at least first and second optical resonators, and the third connection port of the third optical coupler outputs a filtered optical signal. [0032]
  • Additionally, there is provided in accordance with a further preferred embodiment of the invention, an integrated optical filter of the compound resonator type wherein at least one of the optical resonators is tunable. [0033]
  • In accordance with another preferred embodiment of the invention, there is further provided an optical filter wherein the tunable optical resonator is tuned by altering the phase of an optical signal traversing through it by means of a phase modulator. [0034]
  • In addition, there is provided in accordance with yet another preferred embodiment of the invention, an optical filter whose filtered optical output is converted to an electronic signal by means of a photodetector. [0035]
  • There is additionally provided in accordance with yet another preferred embodiment of the invention, an active wavelength division multiplexing system including an optical filter as described in this invention, the filter being operative to select a desired wavelength of an optical signal. [0036]
  • When the tunable optical filter is implemented using bulk fiber optical components, a loop of fiber acts as the tuned resonator and a bulk electro-optical phase modulator is inserted in the loop to provide the variable phase delay which provides the resonator with its tunability. In order to miniaturize the filter to make it compatible with the other integrated opto-electronic components of an optical communications system, and in order to provide the very short loop lengths needed to meet the required specifications of the filter for dense WDM use, and in order to reduce the manufacturing costs of such a filter, the filter can also be implemented on a monolithic integrated optics chip, such as of gallium arsenide, with all of the component parts defined by means of standard semiconductor manufacturing techniques. [0037]
  • The operation of the filters is based on an interferometric interaction between the input optical signal and its delayed replica produced as a result of the signal traversing the resonator. When the input signal and the delayed signal are in phase at the output port of the last coupler, an output signal is obtained at a specific wavelength and with the appropriate design, the device operates as an optical narrow bandpass filter. The output spectrum characteristics can be controlled by the phase delay introduced by the phase modulator, so that the device can perform dynamic interferometric processing of the optical signal, creating a dynamic tunable filter. Since optical phase modulation can be performed at exceedingly high rates, the result is an ultra-fast tunable wavelength selective filter. Current technology phase modulators are capable of operation in the 10 GHz range, so that tuning times of the order of one nanosecond are attained. The filter thus offers an attractive solution for the ultra-fast tuning speeds required in Tbit/sec packet-switched WDM networks.[0038]
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The present invention will be understood and appreciated more fully from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the drawings, in which: [0039]
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a single resonator tunable delay-line optical filter constructed and operated according to a preferred implementation of the present invention, showing a single optical coupler, a loop of optical transmission line with a phase modulator acting as a tuned resonator, and an optional photodetector for converting the outputted optical signal to an electronic signal if required. [0040]
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic view of a single resonator tunable delay-line optical filter constructed and operated according to another preferred implementation of the present invention, which differs from the implementation shown in FIG. 1 in that an additional optical coupler is inserted into the resonator loop, and the filtered output optical signal extracted from this second coupler [0041]
  • FIG. 3 is a representation of a 5-node WDM network frequency comb, with 100 GHz channel spacing, and 20 GHz channel bandwidth, and the frequency comb of a single resonator filter for use in that WDM system, constructed according to the present invention. [0042]
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic view of a compound resonator tunable delay-line optical filter constructed and operative according to another preferred embodiment of the present invention. [0043]
  • FIG. 5 shows frequency response transmission plots for a single resonator tunable filter, constructed and operated according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention. [0044]
  • FIG. 6 presents theoretical frequency response transmission plots for the compound resonator tunable filter shown schematically in FIG. 3, illustrating the advantages of the compound resonator filter over the single resonator filter. [0045]
  • FIG. 7 shows the frequency response transmission plots for three compound resonator filters constructed with different couplers, illustrating the variation in filter finesse attainable thereby. [0046]
  • FIG. 8 shows a computer simulation of frequency response transmission plots for three cases of wavelength misalignment between the transmitter laser and a compound resonator tunable filter used in the receiver of an optical communication link. [0047]
  • FIG. 9 presents plots of the BER (bit error rate) of the optical communication system with the three wavelength misalignment cases described in FIG. 8. [0048]
  • FIG. 10 shows a graph of the optical transmission as a function of the tuning of a single resonator tunable filter, constructed and operated according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, for signals of different optical polarization. [0049]
  • FIG. 11A and 11B show an additional embodiment of the present invention, in the form of a single resonator tunable delay line optical filter implemented on a monolithic integrated optics substrate of gallium arsenide. FIG. 11A shows a schematic layout view of the circuit on the chip, whilst FIG. 11B is a cut-away cross section of the chip, showing the microelectronic structure of the chip. [0050]
  • FIG. 12A and 12B illustrate a more advanced embodiment of the monolithic optical filter, including three couplers and three gates, for providing dynamic control both of the filter center frequency, and of the filter finesse value. FIG. 12A shows a schematic layout view of the circuit on the chip, whilst FIG. 12B is a cut-away cross section of the chip, showing the microelectronic structure of the chip. [0051]
  • FIG. 13 shows an additional embodiment of the present invention, in the form of a compound resonator tunable delay line optical filter implemented on a monolithic integrated optics substrate of gallium arsenide. [0052]
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
  • Reference is now made to FIG. 1, which shows the construction and operation of a single resonator tunable delay line optical filter according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention. It comprises an [0053] optical coupler 6 with four ports labeled 1 to 4, a fiber loop 8, and an optical phase modulator 10. The fiber loop 8 is connected between ports 3 and 2 of the coupler 6, and thus interacts with the coupler as a resonant element. The optical coupler 6 is designed to optimize the filter performance in terms of transmitted power and filter finesse.
  • The optical signal is inputted through [0054] port 1, and the filtered signal is outputted through port 4. If an electronic data signal output is required for the end use application, such as for communications systems, the optical output signal is converted into an electronic data signal by means of photodetector 12. For optical signal output use, such as in an optical spectrum analyzer, the output signal is taken directly from port 4. The embodiment shown in FIG. 1 acts as a stop band filter, transmitting all wavelengths except that selected by the filter.
  • A further embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG. 2, and operates as a pass band filter, transmitting only the wavelength selected by the filter. This embodiment differs from the embodiment shown in FIG. 1 in that the filtered output signal is extracted from the resonator by means of an additional [0055] optical coupler 14 inserted into the resonator loop 8. In this embodiment, use may be made of couplers having only 3 ports, 1, 2 and 3 for the input coupler 6, and 11, 12 and 13 for the output coupler 14. The fourth port of each of these couplers is terminated internally with a built-in absorber. The output signal is taken from port 11 of the output coupler 14, either as an optical output, or converted into an electronic signal by means of photodetector 15.
  • The performance of these filters can be calculated using Fabry-Perot resonator theory, as described in a number of standard works on Opto-electronics, such as for instance, in “Guided Wave Optoelectronics”, [0056] Chapter 3, Springer Verlag, 1990, by T Tamir. Using the nomenclature of the simplest embodiment shown in FIG. 1, it can be shown that the normalized light intensity lfilter at the output port 4 is described by: I filter = ( R - e i δ ) · ( R - e - i δ ) ( 1 - t 23 ) 2 + 4 t 23 sin 2 ( π nL ( v - v 0 ) c ) , ( 1 )
    Figure US20010022877A1-20010920-M00001
  • where, [0057]
  • [0058] 23 is the complex transfer coefficient of the field amplitude from port 2 to port 3 of the coupler 6,
  • δ is the total optical field phase delay after propagating through [0059] loop 8,
  • R is the power reflection coefficient of the [0060] coupler 6, i.e. |t23|2
  • v is the optical frequency, [0061]
  • n is the refractive index of the optical medium constituting the [0062] loop 8,
  • c is the speed of light, [0063]
  • L is the loop length, and [0064]
  • v[0065] 0 is the resonance frequency satisfying the condition: 2 π v 0 nL c = 2 k π , ( 2 )
    Figure US20010022877A1-20010920-M00002
  • k being any integer. [0066]
  • The resulting frequency characteristic of the filter is a comb of narrow passband frequencies, one frequency for each value of k. [0067]
  • An important figure of merit for characterizing the wavelength selectivity of filters Is the finesse. The finesse is defined as the ratio between the free spectral range (FSR), which is the frequency range between two resonance frequencies, and the full width half maximum (FWHM) of the filter: [0068] Finesse = FSR FWHM . ( 3 )
    Figure US20010022877A1-20010920-M00003
  • The free spectral range (FSR) is a function of the loop length, and is given by: [0069] FSR = c nl . ( 4 )
    Figure US20010022877A1-20010920-M00004
  • The [0070] phase modulator 10 inserted within the fiber loop is operative to control the phase delay of the signal traversing the fiber loop. This enables external control of the phase matching condition of the fiber loop resonator. A change of the phase matching condition leads to a frequency shift of the resonance frequency v0, proportional to the phase shift imposed by the phase modulator This mechanism essentially adds dynamic tuning capability to the filter. Currently available phase modulators, such as those based on LiNbO3 technology, are capable of high-speed operation in the multi-GHz range. The filter according to the present invention can therefore be tuned in extremely short time periods, of the order of a nanosecond. This is approximately three orders of magnitude faster than other currently known filters.
  • The phase displacement Δδ imposed by the phase modulator causes a shift Δv in the optical resonance frequency v[0071] 0, given by: Δ v = c Δ δ π nL ( 5 )
    Figure US20010022877A1-20010920-M00005
  • so that the normalized light intensity l[0072] filter at the output port 4 of the phase tuned filter is described by equation (1), but with the term v0 replaced by v0÷Δv, as follows: I filter = ( R - δ ) · ( R - - i δ ) ( 1 - t 23 ) 2 + 4 t 23 sin 2 { π nL [ v - ( v 0 + c Δ δ π nL ) ] / c } . ( 6 )
    Figure US20010022877A1-20010920-M00006
  • In order to design a filter for dense WDM applications, two important conditions must be fulfilled: [0073]
  • (1) the filter must reject all unselected channels within the WDM band, which is achieved by providing a sufficiently large free spectral range (FSR), and [0074]
  • (2) the filter must minimize crosstalk from adjacent unselected channels, which is achieved by constructing the filter with a high finesse value design. [0075]
  • Although the single-resonator tunable filter, when constructed using practical lengths of optical fiber, performs well in terms of filter finesse (typically above 1250), its FSR is not satisfactory since only 20 GHz separates between two adjacent channels. A much more realistic requirement is an FSR of the order of 100 GHz, equivalent to about 0.8 nm, which is a candidate for the standard channel spacing in dense WDM systems. The filter FSR should be slightly larger than the channel spacing: [0076]
  • FSR=Δ+FWHM.  (7)
  • where [0077]
  • Δ is the channel spacing of the WDM system, and [0078]
  • FWHM is the filter bandwidth. [0079]
  • Accordingly, all N channels adjacent to the selected one will be rejected, where [0080] N = FSR FWHM - 2 = Finesse - 2 Finesse . ( 8 )
    Figure US20010022877A1-20010920-M00007
  • In the upper section of FIG. 3 is a representation of a typical 5-node WDM network frequency comb, with 100 GHz channel spacing and 20 GHz channel bandwidth, and in the lower section, the frequency comb of a single resonator filter constructed according to the present invention for use in that WDM system, and having an FSR of 120 GHz typically, and a 20 GHz FWHM bandwidth. [0081]
  • As illustrated in FIG. 3 and shown by equation (8), such a WDM system would be capable of supporting 5 channels at any given time−1 selected channel and 4 rejected channels. [0082]
  • However, because of the performance limitations of the currently available DFB and DBR semiconductor lasers used in optical data communications systems, and particularly because of the instability of the central wavelength, a more conservative design is required. Equation (7) should be amended to: [0083]
  • FSR=Δ+k·FWHM,   (9)
  • where k is a factor which depends on the variance of the central wavelength. Using this design, the number of nodes that the tunable filter can support becomes: [0084] N 1 k · Finesse ( 10 )
    Figure US20010022877A1-20010920-M00008
  • However, according to equation (4), in order to achieve an FSR of the order of 100 GHz with a single fiber loop, the required loop length is about 2 mm. This length is totally unrealistic for practical construction of single resonator filters using fiber optical loops. Two further embodiments of the present invention are thus proposed for providing practical solutions to this problem. [0085]
  • In the next section, an embodiment of the present invention using a compound-resonator structure implemented using optical fiber construction is proposed. The compound resonator filter design removes the severe loop length limitation mentioned above [0086]
  • In a later section, a further embodiment of the present invention with a single resonator structure is proposed, but the loop length problem is overcome to a large extent by implementation of the filter on a microscopic scale on an integrated optics Gallium Arsenide substrate, using standard semiconductor manufacturing techniques [0087]
  • FIG. 4 shows a compound resonator tunable delay line optical filter constructed and operated according to another preferred embodiment of the present invention. It comprises three [0088] optical couplers 20, 21, 22, two fiber optical loops 24, 25, denoted by the terms L1 and L2, and an optical phase modulator 30. The optical signal is inputted through port 1 of the coupler 20, and the filtered signal is outputted through port 4 of coupler 22. As previously, if an electronic output signal is required, the optical signal is converted by means of photodetector 32. The three optical couplers need not be identical, and can be selected to optimize the filter performance in terms of transmitted power and filter finesse. It can be shown that the compound filter has the following transfer function: E out = E in · t 1 t 2 t 3 exp [ - i β ( L 1 + L 2 ) ] { 1 - r 1 r 2 exp ( - 2 i β L 1 ) - r 1 r 3 t 2 3 exp [ - 2 i β ( L 1 + L 2 ) ] 1 - r 2 r 3 exp ( - 2 i β L 2 ) } [ 1 - r 2 r 3 exp ( - 2 i β L 2 ) ] ( 11 )
    Figure US20010022877A1-20010920-M00009
  • where [0089]
  • L[0090] 1 and L2 are the single-pass lengths of each resonator loop,
  • β is the propagation constant in the fiber, [0091]
  • t[0092] 1 and R1 are the field amplitude transmission and reflection coefficients of optical coupler t, respectively, and are defined by
  • t1=t13=t24 r1=t14=t23,   (12)
  • where r[0093] 14 is the complex transfer coefficient from port t to port j of the coupler.
  • The compound resonator filter has much more design flexibility, due to the additional loop resonator, and the additional independent transmission and reflection coefficients of the additional optical couplers. This allows the construction of filters with a wide selection range of FSR, FWHM, and filter finesse In particular, it is feasible and practical to realize a filter with FSR in the order of hundreds of GHz, i.e., a few nm, as required for dense WDM applications in optical communications. [0094]
  • FIG. 5 shows transmission plots for a single-resonator tunable filter, constructed and operated according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, with a [0095] loop 8 of length 1 cm, and a coupler 6 with power splitting ratio of 10/90. The curves were calculated from equation (1). The different curves, plotted for phase shifts of 0, π/4 and π/2, show the level of tunability achievable in such a filter using phase modulation. In this example, the filter finesse exceeds 125.
  • FIG. 6 presents theoretical frequency response transmission plots for the compound resonator tunable filter shown schematically in FIG. 4. The compound resonator configuration has major advantages over the single resonator design. Most important is that the FSR can be extended to the range of hundreds of Ghz (a few nm.) and more. This is achieved using an appropriate design of the two fiber loop resonators L[0096] 1 and L2, 24 and 25, with a very slight length difference between them, of the order of fractions of a mm. This length difference can be accurately controlled with a PZT (piezo-electric transducer).
  • A further important advantage of the compound resonator is the large sidemode rejection ratio, which is significantly increased in comparison with the single resonator filter. While the single resonator filter exhibits 10 dB sidelobe suppression, that of the compound resonator filter whose results are shown in FIG. 6 exceeds 40 dB. [0097]
  • Furthermore, the filter finesse can be designed more flexibly, since there are more independent coupler reflection and transmission parameters to use for optimization of the desired finesse. The filter of FIG. 6 has a finesse of over 1000. This filter is constructed with a fiber loop length of 20 cm, and a loop length difference of 0.1 mm. The [0098] input coupler 20 has a power splitting ratio of 2/98, the intermediate coupler 21, a ratio of 1/99, and the output coupler 22, a ratio of 10/99.
  • FIG. 7 shows the frequency response transmission plots for three compound resonator filters constructed using couplers with different power splitting ratios, illustrating the variation in filter finesse attainable thereby. [0099] Response curve 1 is obtained from a compound resonator filter with coupler splitting ratios of 20/80, 8/92 and 10/90 for the input, intermediate and output couplers respectively, and the resulting filter has a finesse of about 25. Response curve II has couplers of splitting ratios 10/90, 1/99 and 10/90 respectively, resulting in a finesse of the order of 250. Response curve III has couplers of splitting ratios 1/99, 0.1/99.9 and 10/90 respectively, and the filter a finesse of 1000.
  • The ability to select the filter finesse is an important feature of the compound resonator filter, since different optical communications systems require different wavelength selective curves to optimize system performance One important consideration in filter design consideration is the wavelength stability of the transmitter laser used in the system. If the wavelength stability of the laser is such that there could arise significant wavelength misalignment between the laser frequency and the filter mid-band frequency, then a filter with lower finesse is required to compensate for this misalignment. [0100]
  • FIG. 8 shows a computer simulation of frequency response transmission plots for three cases of wavelength misalignment between the transmitter laser and the filter at the receiver of an IM/DD (intensity-modulation/direct-detection) optical communication link. The laser spectrum chosen was one with a Lorenzian lineshape and a bandwidth of 1 GHz, which would represent the modulation of a datastream running at 1 Gbit/sec. The spectral response curves of the filter are generated from equation (11), while the filter finesse is 25. The three different curves represent the following cases: a perfectly aligned case (curve I), a 15 GHz wavelength misalignment (curve II) and a 30 GHz wavelength misalignment (curve III). As is evident, when the wavelength misalignment is large (15 or 30 GHz), a filter of low finesse is essential to compensate for the misalignment. [0101]
  • FIG. 9 presents plots of the BER (bit error rate) of an IM/DD optical communication system with the three wavelength misalignment cases described in FIG. 8. The filter itself uses couplers with power splitting ratios of 50/50, 1/99 and 10/90, and has a finesse of 25. It uses a PIN photodiode for detection, and the whole system has an NEP of 30 pW/{square root}Hz, and a responsistivity of 4. The transmission bit rate is 1.25 Gbit/sec. It is observed that for a system with a perfectly aligned laser, as shown by [0102] curve 1, the receiver sensitivity, defined at a BER of 10−9, is −18.5 dBm. The same system using a laser with wavelength misalignment of 15 Ghz, as shown in curve II, suffers a power penalty of about 2 dBm, while a 30 GHz misalignment, as shown in curve III, produces a loss of about 7.5 dBm compared with the perfectly aligned case. These noise figures are obtained with a filter of relatively low finesse, 25, specifically selected to compensate for the laser misalignment. If a narrower band filter with higher finesse were used, the power penalty with wavelength misalignment becomes much higher
  • On the other hand, the use of a filter with a very low finesse increases the power penalty as a result of crosstalk between adjacent channels Therefore, an optimization procedure must be followed to minimize the power penalties derived from both wavelength misalignment and channel crosstalk [0103]
  • Because of birefringence in the active optical medium in the phase modulator, transmission of the TE and TM polarization components of the output of the filter will change with the wavelength to which the filter is tuned. This effect allows yet a further embodiment of the present invention, whereby the filter acts as a polarization selector for separating TE and TM components of a mixed polarization signal In this embodiment, an additional polarizer must be used in the output or input line to remove the polarization component not required. FIG. 10 is a graph of the optical transmission as a function of the tuning of the compound resonator tunable filter of FIG. 6., which illustrates how a filter constructed and operative according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, can perform polarization selection. [0104]
  • All of the above described implementations of the present invention, using optical fibers are comparatively expensive to manufacture, since each component part has to be assembled in the filter and fine tuned individually. Furthermore, the use of the bulk fiber configuration results in a bulky component package. [0105]
  • Both of these disadvantage can be overcome by means of a further embodiment of the present invention, whereby the filter is implemented by monolithic integration on a single opto-electronic chip, as used in integrated optics technology. The main advantage of this integrated chip implementation is commercial, since production using standard semiconductor industry technology enables the filters to be manufactured at lower cost, more reproducibly and with higher reliability. Such mass production is essential to allow the proliferation of WDM-based optical data communication systems. [0106]
  • However, besides the commercial advantages, the integrated optics monolithic implementation also has a number of technological advantages. Firstly, the optical loop resonator length can be made significantly smaller, down to the order of a millimeter or less. As a result, the resonance build-up time is considerably shorter, thus increasing the filter tuning speed. More important, the filter free spectral range (FSR) can be increased by an order of magnitude, up to the order of a hundred GHz. This is sufficient for current WDM systems using a small number of laser sources, with 10 GHz bandwidth typically. In order to achieve a monolithic filter with an FSR of 5 Thz, as demanded by the requirements of the currently proposed WDM networks, which will be required to cover the whole EDFA (Erbium Doped Fiber-Optical Amplifiers) bandwidth, a more advanced configuration must be used, such as the compound resonator filter described previously [0107]
  • If the monolithic embodiment is constructed without incorporating a phase modulation element, a fixed wavelength monolithic filter is obtained, which can be constructed with selected center wavelength and finesse according to the parameters and dimensions chosen. Because of its small size and superior properties, such filters are useful for static switched WDM optical communication system applications. [0108]
  • In addition, the losses within the device can be decreased. The fiber loop configuration includes connections to an external phase modulator, which introduces losses of an additional pair of connectors (about 0.2 dB each). The integrated optics configuration incorporates the phase modulator on the same chip. Therefore, losses are reduced because of the reduction in the use of one set of connectors. [0109]
  • Furthermore, temperature dependence can be overcome quite simply, since the whole device is integrated on a very small chip, which can be kept at fixed temperature by means of simple and inexpensive control methods. [0110]
  • Finally, the monolithic design leads to a very small device, of size similar to that of semiconductor lasers and suitable for integration with other OEIC (Optoelectronic integrated circuit) components into complete integrated optics communications systems. [0111]
  • FIGS. 11A and 11B show a schematic view of an additional embodiment of the present invention, in the form of a single resonator tunable delay line optical filter implemented on a monolithic integrated optics substrate of gallium arsenide. Any other suitable integrated optics substrate material could also be used. FIG. 11A is a plan view of the chip layout, while FIG. 11B is a cut-away cross section of the chip showing the microelectronic structure of the chip. The filter is manufactured on an MBE (molecular beam epitaxy) grown n-[0112] type GaAs wafer 40. Using standard photolithographic techniques, a mesa is defined and etched by RIE (reactive ion etching). The mesa defines the waveguide 42, and the resonator loop 43 of the optical structure of the filter. These waveguides are defined using one of the standard cladding/core/cladding waveguiding structures used in integrated optics GaAs technology. A metal gate 44 over part of the resonator loop, and its associated bond pad 46, are defined by a further process. The device is covered with an insulating layer 41 such as polyimide to passivate the device, and to insulate the gate 46 from the wafer A via 45 in the polyimide layer facilitates the gate-to-resonator loop contact area. An Ohmic contact is evaporated onto the back of the wafer, and is alloyed in Finally, the substrate is cleaved to create cleaved edge facets 47 for interface to the input and output optical signals
  • The [0113] gate 44 located above a section of the resonator loop together with the section of the loop itself, act as a phase modulation element. The signal applied to the gate creates an electric field across that section of the resonator loop, causing a change in the waveguide refractive index by means of a physical effect, such as the linear electro-optic effect. The change in refractive index introduces a phase change in the optical signal propagating in the resonator loop, analogous to that introduced by the Lithium Niobate phase modulator 10 of the fiber optical implementation shown in FIG. 1. If this gate is omitted, a static monolithic filter is obtained. The coupling between the through-waveguide 42 and the resonator loop 43 takes place across the gap 48, whose width and length are calculated to provide the correct power splitting ratio for the designed filter operation.
  • FIGS. 12A and 12B illustrate a schematic view of a more advanced embodiment of the monolithic optical filter. FIG. 12A is a plan view of the chip layout, while FIG. 12B is a cut-away cross section of the chip showing the microelectronic structure of the chip. This construction comprises a [0114] GaAs wafer 52 on which are defined a first waveguide 53, and a second waveguide 63, with a resonator loop 56 disposed between them. A first metal gate 59 is located above a section of the resonator loop, and two further gates 54 and 55 are located between each waveguide and the resonator loop. Before deposition of the metallic gates the whole GaAs structure is covered with an insulating layer 58 such as polyimide, containing vias 57 to provide contact between these three gates and the underlying GaAs layer. The manufacturing technique is similar to that of the simpler embodiment filter shown in FIGS. 11A and 11B.
  • This advanced embodiment acts as a bandpass filter, by selecting, from the range of wavelengths inputted to the [0115] first waveguide 53, the specific wavelength to be switched to the second waveguide 63, by means of the resonance loop 56. The first gate 59 together with the section of resonator loop under it operate as a phase modulator for tuning the filter passband. As in the embodiment of FIG. 11A and 11B, if this embodiment is constructed without the phase modulator gate 59, a static filter is obtained.
  • The two [0116] other gates 54 and 55 are operative to change the coupling between the first waveguide and the resonator loop, and between the resonator loop and the second waveguide as a function of the voltage applied to them In this way, the filter finesse can be changed dynamically by means of the control signals applied to gates 54 and 55
  • FIG. 13 shows a schematic layout view of a compound resonator monolithic tunable filter constructed and operated according to another preferred embodiment of the present invention, analogous to the fiber optical implementation described in FIG. 4. Use of the compound resonator monolithic embodiment enables filters with an FSR of up to 5 Thz to be constructed, for use in the next generation WDM system technology. [0117]
  • The embodiment shown in FIG. 13 is constructed on a [0118] substrate 52 of Gallium Arsenide, and has a passivating layer 58 of polyimide, as in the previously described monolithic embodiments. It has two resonator loops 56, 70, and a variable phase modulator gate 59 acting on one of the loops 56. The phase change is varied by means of a voltage applied to pad 60. This embodiment of the filter can also be constructed in a fixed wavelength form, in which case the gate 59 and pad 60 are not fabricated. The coupling between the two resonators can be varied by means of gate 55. Gate 54 varies the coupling between the input line 53 and the first resonator 56, and gate 74, the coupling between the second resonator 70 and the output port 76. In this way, the filter finesse can be changed dynamically by means of control signals applied to gates 54, 55 and 74. The optical signal is inputted through line 53, and the filtered signal outputted through line 63 to the output port 76.
  • Some of the component parts of the monolithic implementations described in FIGS. 10, 11 and [0119] 12 may be implemented as discrete non-integrated components, if such hybrid construction is necessary convenient or economical for the specific application required.
  • It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited by what has been particularly shown and described hereinabove. Rather the scope of the present invention includes both combinations and subcombinations of various features described hereinabove as well as variations and modifications thereto which would occur to a person of skill in the art upon reading the above description and which are not in the prior art. [0120]

Claims (41)

We claim:
1. An optical filter comprising:
at least one multiport optical coupler, one connection port of said at least one multiport optical coupler receiving an input optical signal, and another connection port of said at least one multiport optical coupler outputting a filtered optical signal; and
at least one tunable optical resonator connected to at least one of said at least one multiport optical coupler.
2. An optical filter according to
claim 1
and wherein:
said at least one multiport optical coupler, has at least first, second, third and fourth connection ports, said first connection port receiving an optical signal, said second connection port outputting a filtered optical signal; and
said at least one tunable optical resonator is connected across said third and fourth connection ports.
3. An optical filter according to
claim 1
and wherein:
said at least one multiport optical coupler comprises at least first and second optical couplers, each having at least first, second and third connection ports;
said first connection port of said first optical coupler receives an optical signal,
said second and third connection ports of said first optical coupler are coupled to said at least one tunable optical resonator,
said first and second connection ports of said second optical coupler are coupled to said at least one tunable optical resonator, and
said third connection port of said second optical coupler outputs a filtered optical signal.
4. An optical filter according to
claim 1
and wherein said at least one tunable optical resonator is operative to select an optical signal with a specific wavelength.
5. An optical filter according to
claim 1
and wherein said at least one tunable optical resonator is operative to enable the polarization of said filtered optical output signal to be selected.
6. An optical filter with variable finesse comprising:
an optical element with variable finesse receiving an optical signal and providing a filtered output; and
a finesse controller operative to select the finesse of said variable finesse optical element.
7. An optical filter with variable finesse according to
claim 6
and wherein said optical element with variable finesse comprises an optical coupler with variable power splitting ratio between its connection ports.
8. An optical filter with variable finesse according to
claim 6
and comprising:
at least one multiport optical coupler with variable power splitting ratio, one connection port of said at least one multiport optical coupler receiving an input optical signal, and another connection port of said at least one multiport optical coupler outputting a filtered optical signal; and
at least one tunable optical resonator connected to at least one of said at least one multiport optical coupler.
9. An optical filter with variable finesse according to
claim 8
and wherein:
said at least one multiport optical coupler with variable power splitting ratio, has at least first, second, third and fourth connection ports, said first connection port receiving an optical signal, said second connection port outputting a filtered optical signal; and
said at least one tunable optical resonator is connected across said third and fourth connection ports
10. An optical filter with variable finesse according to
claim 8
and wherein:
said at least one multiport optical coupler with variable power splitting ratio comprises at least first and second optical couplers, at least one of which has variable power splitting ratio, and each having at least first, second and third connection ports;
said first connection port of said first optical coupler receives an optical signal,
said second and third connection ports of said first optical coupler are coupled to said at least one tunable optical resonator,
said first and second connection ports of said second optical coupler are coupled to said at least one tunable optical resonator, and
said third connection port of said second optical coupler outputs a filtered optical signal.
11. An optical filter with variable finesse according to
claim 6
and wherein said at least one tunable optical resonator is operative to select an optical signal with a specific wavelength thereby providing tunability to both the wavelength and finesse of said optical filter.
12. An optical filter according to
claim 6
and wherein said at least one tunable optical resonator is operative to enable the polarization of said filtered optical output signal to be selected.
13. An integrated optical filter comprising:
at least one multiport optical coupler, one connection port of said at least one multiport optical coupler receiving an input optical signal, and another connection port of said at least one multiport optical coupler outputting a filtered optical signal; and
at least one optical resonator connected to at least one of said at least one multiport optical couplers; and wherein
at least one of said at least one multiport optical coupler and said at least one optical resonator are formed on an integrated optics substrate.
14. An integrated optical filter according to
claim 13
, and wherein
said at least one multiport optical coupler has at least first, second, third and fourth connection ports, said first connection port receiving an optical signal, said second connection port outputting a filtered optical signal; and
said at least one optical resonator is connected across said third and fourth connection ports, and
at least one of said at least one multiport optical coupler and said at least one optical resonator are formed on an integrated optics substrate.
15. An integrated optical filter according to
claim 13
and wherein:
said at least one multiport optical coupler comprises at least first and second optical couplers, each having at least first, second and third connection ports;
said first connection port of said first optical coupler receives an optical signal,
said second and third connection ports of said first optical coupler are coupled to said at least one optical resonator,
said first and second connection ports of said second optical coupler are coupled to said at least one optical resonator, and
said third connection port of said second optical coupler outputs a filtered optical signal, and
at least one of said at least one multiport optical coupler and said at least one optical resonator are formed on an integrated optics substrate.
16. An integrated optical filter according to
claim 13
and wherein said at least one optical resonator comprises a tunable optical resonator.
17. An integrated optical filter according to
claim 13
and wherein at least one of said at least one multiport optical coupler and said at least one optical resonator includes a discrete non-integrated optical component.
18. An optical filter comprising:
at least three optical couplers, each having at least three connection ports; and
at least two optical resonators, at least one of which is tunable, each of said at least two optical resonators being connected between two of said at least three optical couplers; and wherein
first connection port of said first optical coupler receives an input optical signal, and
last connection port of said last optical coupler outputs a filtered optical signal.
19. An optical filter according to
claim 18
and comprising:
at least first, second and third optical couplers each having at least first, second and third connection ports; and
at least first and second optical resonators, at least one of which is tunable, each of said at least first and second optical resonators being connected between two of said at least first, second and third optical couplers; and wherein
said first connection port of said first optical coupler receives an input optical signal,
said second and third connection ports of said first optical coupler are coupled to the first of said at least first and second optical resonators,
said first and second connection ports of said second optical coupler are coupled to the first of said at least first and second optical resonators,
said third and fourth connection ports of said second optical coupler are coupled to the second of said at least first and second optical resonators,
said first and second connection ports of said third optical coupler are coupled to the second of said at least first and second optical resonators, and
said third connection port of said third optical coupler outputs a filtered optical signal.
20. An optical filter according to
claim 18
and wherein said optical resonators comprise loops of optical transmission medium differing in length from each other by predetermined amounts.
21. An optical filter according to
claim 20
and wherein said difference in length of said loops of optical transmission medium is controlled by means of a piezoelectric transducer operative to stabilize the resonator length.
22. An optical filter according to
claim 18
and wherein at least one of said optical couplers is formed on an integrated optics substrate.
23. An optical filter according to
claim 18
and wherein at least one of said optical resonators is formed on an integrated optics substrate.
24. An integrated optical filter comprising:
at least three optical couplers, at least one of which is formed on an integrated optics substrate, each of said at least three optical couplers having at least three connection ports; and
at least two optical resonators, at least one of which is formed on an integrated optics substrate, each of said at least two optical resonators being connected between two of said at least three optical couplers; and wherein
first connection port of said first optical coupler receives an input optical signal, and
last connection port of said last optical coupler outputs a filtered optical signal.
25. An integrated optical filter according to
claim 24
and comprising:
at least first, second and third optical couplers, at least one of which is formed on an integrated optics substrate, each of said at least first, second and third optical couplers having at least first, second and third connection ports; and
at least first and second optical resonators, at least one of which is formed on an integrated optics substrate, each of said at least first and second optical resonators being connected between two of said at least first, second and third optical couplers; and wherein:
said first connection port of said first optical coupler receives an input optical signal,
said second and third connection ports of said first optical coupler are coupled to first of said at least first and second optical resonators,
said first and second connection ports of said second optical coupler are coupled to first of said at least first and second optical resonators,
said third and fourth connection ports of said second optical coupler are coupled to second of said at least first and second optical resonators,
said first and second connection ports of said third optical coupler are coupled to second of said at least first and second optical resonators, and
said third connection port of said third optical coupler outputs a filtered optical signal.
26. An integrated optical filter according to
claim 24
and wherein at least one of said optical resonators is tunable.
27. An optical filter according to
claim 1
and wherein said tunable optical resonator is tuned by altering the phase of an optical signal traversing through it by means of a phase modulator.
28. An optical filter according to
claim 6
and wherein said tunable optical resonator is tuned by altering the phase of an optical signal traversing through it by means of a phase modulator.
29. An optical filter according to
claim 13
and wherein said tunable optical resonator is tuned by altering the phase of an optical signal traversing through it by means of a phase modulator.
30. An optical filter according to
claim 18
and wherein said tunable optical resonator is tuned by altering the phase of an optical signal traversing through it by means of a phase modulator.
31. An optical filter according to
claim 24
and wherein said tunable optical resonator is tuned by altering the phase of an optical signal traversing through it by means of a phase modulator.
32. An optical filter according to
claim 1
and wherein said filtered optical output is converted to an electronic signal by means of a photodetector.
33. An optical filter according to
claim 6
and wherein said filtered optical output is converted to an electronic signal by means of a photodetector.
34. An optical filter according to
claim 13
and wherein said filtered optical output is converted to an electronic signal by means of a photodetector.
35. An optical filter according to
claim 18
and wherein said filtered optical output is converted to an electronic signal by means of a photodetector.
36. An optical filter according to
claim 24
and wherein said filtered optical output is converted to an electronic signal by means of a photodetector.
37. An active wavelength division multiplexing system including an optical filter according to
claim 1
, said filter being operative to select a desired wavelength of an optical signal.
38. An active wavelength division multiplexing system including an optical filter according to
claim 6
, said filter being operative to select a desired wavelength of an optical signal.
39. An active wavelength division multiplexing system including an optical filter according to
claim 13
, said filter being operative to select a desired wavelength of an optical signal.
40. An active wavelength division multiplexing system including an optical filter according to
claim 18
, said filter being operative to select a desired wavelength of an optical signal.
41. An active wavelength division multiplexing system including an optical filter according to
claim 24
, said filter being operative to select a desired wavelength of an optical signal.
US09/778,522 1996-08-04 2001-02-07 Ultra-fast tunable optical filters Expired - Lifetime US6411756B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/778,522 US6411756B2 (en) 1996-08-04 2001-02-07 Ultra-fast tunable optical filters

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
IL11900696A IL119006A (en) 1996-08-04 1996-08-04 Tunable delay line optical filters
IL119006 1996-08-04
US09/230,959 US6222964B1 (en) 1996-08-04 1997-08-03 Ultra-fast tunable optical filters
US09/778,522 US6411756B2 (en) 1996-08-04 2001-02-07 Ultra-fast tunable optical filters

Related Parent Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/230,959 Continuation US6222964B1 (en) 1996-08-04 1997-08-03 Ultra-fast tunable optical filters
PCT/IL1997/000264 Continuation WO1998005995A1 (en) 1996-08-04 1997-08-03 Ultra-fast tunable optical filters

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20010022877A1 true US20010022877A1 (en) 2001-09-20
US6411756B2 US6411756B2 (en) 2002-06-25

Family

ID=11069155

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/230,959 Expired - Lifetime US6222964B1 (en) 1996-08-04 1997-08-03 Ultra-fast tunable optical filters
US09/778,522 Expired - Lifetime US6411756B2 (en) 1996-08-04 2001-02-07 Ultra-fast tunable optical filters

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/230,959 Expired - Lifetime US6222964B1 (en) 1996-08-04 1997-08-03 Ultra-fast tunable optical filters

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (2) US6222964B1 (en)
EP (1) EP0979435A1 (en)
AU (1) AU3633497A (en)
IL (1) IL119006A (en)
WO (1) WO1998005995A1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7245833B1 (en) * 2002-11-15 2007-07-17 Itt Manufacturing Enterprises, Inc. Photonic channelized RF receiver employing dense wavelength division multiplexing
US20120237165A1 (en) * 2002-08-29 2012-09-20 Gurtej Singh Sandhu Resonator for thermo optic device
US9288557B2 (en) * 2013-05-01 2016-03-15 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Method and apparatus for analyzing the spectrum of radio-frequency signals using unamplified fiber optic recirculation loops

Families Citing this family (57)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6996310B2 (en) 1997-06-09 2006-02-07 Cambrius, Inc. Directional-coupler assisted add/drop filter with induced on/off switching and modulation
US7106917B2 (en) 1998-11-13 2006-09-12 Xponent Photonics Inc Resonant optical modulators
WO2000036715A1 (en) * 1998-11-25 2000-06-22 The University Of New Mexico Precisely wavelength-tunable and wavelength-switchable narrow linewidth lasers
US6633696B1 (en) * 1998-12-07 2003-10-14 California Institute Of Technology Resonant optical wave power control devices and methods
US7310363B1 (en) * 1999-09-28 2007-12-18 The Regents Of The University Of California Integrated wavelength tunable single and two-stage all-optical wavelength converter
JP2001201573A (en) * 2000-01-20 2001-07-27 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Coherent laser radar device and target measuring method
US6693033B2 (en) 2000-02-10 2004-02-17 Motorola, Inc. Method of removing an amorphous oxide from a monocrystalline surface
AU2001245287A8 (en) * 2000-02-17 2009-07-16 Aleph Lightgale Corp Fiber-ring optical resonators
GB2359636B (en) * 2000-02-22 2002-05-01 Marconi Comm Ltd Wavelength selective optical filter
WO2001063336A1 (en) * 2000-02-23 2001-08-30 Princeton Lightwave Inc. Absorption matched ring resonator modulator/switch priority
US6638838B1 (en) 2000-10-02 2003-10-28 Motorola, Inc. Semiconductor structure including a partially annealed layer and method of forming the same
US6714565B1 (en) * 2000-11-01 2004-03-30 Agilent Technologies, Inc. Optically tunable Fabry Perot microelectromechanical resonator
US6839491B2 (en) * 2000-12-21 2005-01-04 Xponent Photonics Inc Multi-layer dispersion-engineered waveguides and resonators
US20020096683A1 (en) * 2001-01-19 2002-07-25 Motorola, Inc. Structure and method for fabricating GaN devices utilizing the formation of a compliant substrate
US20040126054A1 (en) * 2001-02-23 2004-07-01 Giora Griffel Absorption matched ring resonation modulator/switch priority
US6673646B2 (en) 2001-02-28 2004-01-06 Motorola, Inc. Growth of compound semiconductor structures on patterned oxide films and process for fabricating same
US6766070B2 (en) * 2001-04-27 2004-07-20 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy High power fiber optic modulator system and method
US7088877B2 (en) * 2001-06-13 2006-08-08 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus for tuning a bragg grating in a semiconductor substrate
US6709989B2 (en) 2001-06-21 2004-03-23 Motorola, Inc. Method for fabricating a semiconductor structure including a metal oxide interface with silicon
US6646293B2 (en) 2001-07-18 2003-11-11 Motorola, Inc. Structure for fabricating high electron mobility transistors utilizing the formation of complaint substrates
US6693298B2 (en) 2001-07-20 2004-02-17 Motorola, Inc. Structure and method for fabricating epitaxial semiconductor on insulator (SOI) structures and devices utilizing the formation of a compliant substrate for materials used to form same
US6667196B2 (en) 2001-07-25 2003-12-23 Motorola, Inc. Method for real-time monitoring and controlling perovskite oxide film growth and semiconductor structure formed using the method
US6639249B2 (en) 2001-08-06 2003-10-28 Motorola, Inc. Structure and method for fabrication for a solid-state lighting device
US6673667B2 (en) 2001-08-15 2004-01-06 Motorola, Inc. Method for manufacturing a substantially integral monolithic apparatus including a plurality of semiconductor materials
IL145320A (en) * 2001-09-06 2006-12-10 Gilad Optical Switches Ltd Tunable optical filter
US6928091B1 (en) * 2001-09-26 2005-08-09 Oewaves, Inc. Opto-electronic oscillator including a tunable electro-optic filter
US6766083B2 (en) * 2001-10-16 2004-07-20 International Business Machines Corporation Tunable coupler device and optical filter
US6907169B2 (en) 2001-10-30 2005-06-14 Xponent Photonics Inc Polarization-engineered transverse-optical-coupling apparatus and methods
CN102621630B (en) * 2001-10-30 2015-03-25 Hoya美国公司 Optical junction apparatus and methods employing optical power transverse-transfer
US6870992B2 (en) * 2001-11-23 2005-03-22 Xponent Photonics Inc Alignment apparatus and methods for transverse optical coupling
US7260655B1 (en) 2001-12-03 2007-08-21 Cheetah Omni, Llc Optical routing using star switching fabric with reduced effective switching time
US7209657B1 (en) 2001-12-03 2007-04-24 Cheetah Omni, Llc Optical routing using a star switching fabric
US7034975B1 (en) 2001-12-03 2006-04-25 Cheetah Onmi, Llc High speed MEMS device
US7110671B1 (en) 2001-12-03 2006-09-19 Cheetah Omni, Llc Method and apparatus for scheduling communication using a star switching fabric
ATE272228T1 (en) * 2002-01-08 2004-08-15 Cit Alcatel VARIABLE OPTICAL DELAY LINE AND USE OF THE VARIABLE OPTICAL DELAY LINE
WO2003081324A1 (en) * 2002-03-18 2003-10-02 Clarendon Photonics, Inc. Optical filter with dynamically controlled lineshape and method of operation
US6671437B2 (en) * 2002-05-08 2003-12-30 Lambda Crossing Ltd. Method and device for tunable frequency selective filtering of optical signals
US7801446B2 (en) * 2002-06-14 2010-09-21 Infinera Corporation Wavelength division multiplexed optical communication system with rapidly-tunable optical filters
US6950577B2 (en) * 2002-07-01 2005-09-27 Intel Corporation Waveguide-based Bragg gratings with spectral sidelobe suppression and method thereof
US7245792B2 (en) * 2002-08-16 2007-07-17 Intel Corporation Silicon-based tunable single passband optical filter
US20050163185A1 (en) * 2002-10-02 2005-07-28 Vahala Kerry J. Surface functionalization of micro-resonators
US7781217B2 (en) * 2002-10-02 2010-08-24 California Institute Of Technology Biological and chemical microcavity resonant sensors and methods of detecting molecules
DE60316334T2 (en) * 2002-10-02 2008-06-26 California Institute Of Technology, Pasadena Method for producing an ultrahigh-quality microresonator made of quartz glass on a silicon substrate
US6901178B2 (en) * 2002-11-15 2005-05-31 Lucent Technologies Inc. Fast tunable optical filter
EP1646898A1 (en) 2003-07-15 2006-04-19 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Optical coupled-resonator filters with asymmetric coupling
US20050135733A1 (en) * 2003-12-19 2005-06-23 Benoit Reid Integrated optical loop mirror
US7769071B2 (en) * 2004-02-02 2010-08-03 California Institute Of Technology Silica sol gel micro-laser on a substrate
US7515617B1 (en) 2005-11-15 2009-04-07 California Institute Of Technology Photonic device having higher order harmonic emissions
US7951299B2 (en) 2007-02-27 2011-05-31 California Institute Of Technology Method of fabricating a microresonator
US7466881B1 (en) * 2007-07-13 2008-12-16 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Optical switch
US8139904B2 (en) * 2007-09-18 2012-03-20 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for implementing optical deflection switching using coupled resonators
US8092855B2 (en) 2007-11-28 2012-01-10 California Institute Of Technology Click chemistry surface functionalization for resonant micro-cavity sensors
DE112008003901B4 (en) * 2008-06-09 2018-09-27 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development Lp Cylindrical resonators for optical signal routing
US8606055B2 (en) * 2009-11-06 2013-12-10 Cornell University Pin diode tuned multiple ring waveguide resonant optical cavity switch and method
WO2011103480A2 (en) 2010-02-19 2011-08-25 California Institute Of Technology Swept-frequency semiconductor laser coupled to microfabricated biomolecular sensor and methods related thereto
US10361891B2 (en) * 2016-12-28 2019-07-23 Infinera Corporation Fast least-mean-square (LMS) equalization
US20220390280A1 (en) * 2019-11-19 2022-12-08 Universiteit Gent On-chip temperature-insensitive read-out

Family Cites Families (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4146297A (en) 1978-01-16 1979-03-27 Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated Tunable optical waveguide directional coupler filter
US4461535A (en) 1981-10-21 1984-07-24 Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated Wavelength filters
JPS59181317A (en) 1983-03-31 1984-10-15 Sumitomo Electric Ind Ltd Optical modulating element
JPS60149030A (en) 1983-12-21 1985-08-06 Nec Corp Photoswitch
US4695121A (en) * 1985-01-28 1987-09-22 Polaroid Corporation Integrated optic resonant structres and fabrication method
EP0216212A3 (en) 1985-09-25 1989-03-29 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft External optical resonator for a semiconductor laser
US4750801A (en) 1985-09-30 1988-06-14 American Telephone And Telegraph Company, At&T Bell Laboratories Optical waveguide resonator filters
JPH0721599B2 (en) * 1987-01-21 1995-03-08 国際電信電話株式会社 Waveguide type optical switch
US4900119A (en) 1988-04-01 1990-02-13 Canadian Patents & Development Ltd. Wavelength selective optical devices using optical directional coupler
JPH025663A (en) * 1988-06-23 1990-01-10 Nec Corp Optical packet exchange
US4896948A (en) 1989-02-21 1990-01-30 International Business Machines Corporation Simplified double-cavity tunable optical filter using voltage-dependent refractive index
US5022730A (en) 1989-12-12 1991-06-11 At&T Bell Laboratories Wavelength tunable optical filter
US5073004A (en) * 1990-05-18 1991-12-17 At&T Bell Laboratories Tunable optical filter
CA2101411C (en) 1992-08-14 2003-06-10 Jean-Pierre Weber Tunable optical filter
US5351317A (en) 1992-08-14 1994-09-27 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson Interferometric tunable optical filter
US5621828A (en) 1992-09-24 1997-04-15 Interuniversitair Micro-Elektronica Centrum Vzw Integrated tunable optical filter
JPH06160240A (en) * 1992-11-19 1994-06-07 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Estimation system for optical transmission characteristics
JPH08160475A (en) * 1994-12-01 1996-06-21 Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> Superhigh-speed optical solinton pulse generating device

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120237165A1 (en) * 2002-08-29 2012-09-20 Gurtej Singh Sandhu Resonator for thermo optic device
US9042697B2 (en) * 2002-08-29 2015-05-26 Micron Technology, Inc. Resonator for thermo optic device
US7245833B1 (en) * 2002-11-15 2007-07-17 Itt Manufacturing Enterprises, Inc. Photonic channelized RF receiver employing dense wavelength division multiplexing
US9288557B2 (en) * 2013-05-01 2016-03-15 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Method and apparatus for analyzing the spectrum of radio-frequency signals using unamplified fiber optic recirculation loops

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO1998005995A1 (en) 1998-02-12
EP0979435A4 (en) 2000-02-16
AU3633497A (en) 1998-02-25
IL119006A (en) 2001-04-30
EP0979435A1 (en) 2000-02-16
IL119006A0 (en) 1996-11-14
US6222964B1 (en) 2001-04-24
US6411756B2 (en) 2002-06-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6222964B1 (en) Ultra-fast tunable optical filters
US5351317A (en) Interferometric tunable optical filter
US5002349A (en) Integrated acousto-optic filters and switches
US7257283B1 (en) Transmitter-receiver with integrated modulator array and hybrid bonded multi-wavelength laser array
US6891865B1 (en) Wavelength tunable laser
US6928091B1 (en) Opto-electronic oscillator including a tunable electro-optic filter
US6873631B2 (en) Integrated opto-electronic oscillators having optical resonators
US5022730A (en) Wavelength tunable optical filter
Senior et al. Devices for wavelength multiplexing and demultiplexing
CN110729630B (en) Laser with high-speed wavelength tuning made of lithium niobate material
US20030161570A1 (en) Method and apparatus for integrating an optical transmit module
US10205299B2 (en) External cavity laser comprising a photonic crystal resonator
US6282345B1 (en) Device for coupling waveguides to one another
JPH08234244A (en) Tunable silicon-based optical router
SE506798C2 (en) Method and apparatus for transmitting signals in an optical fiber
EP0591863B1 (en) Optical receiver, optical semiconductor apparatus, and optical communication system utilizing the same
JPH081503B2 (en) Wavelength division multiplexing optical communication system
US20220173572A1 (en) Optical system and method for locking a wavelength of a tunable laser
Koch et al. Photonic integrated circuits
Saito et al. Burst-Tolerant $\lambda $-Switching of Electro-Optically Tunable Reflection-type Transversal Filter Laser with Single Active Region
JPH07307527A (en) Optical semiconductor device, method of driving communication light source, and optical communication system using thereof
Ramirez et al. Hybrid III-V on Si photonic integrated circuits for high-speed optical communications: Roadmap and perspectives
CN114583541A (en) Hybrid integrated laser
CN117374735A (en) Wavelength tunable laser based on wavelength division multiplexer
Sabella et al. Optical Networking Devices

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

AS Assignment

Owner name: AL CIELO LTD, ISRAEL

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:CHIARO NETWORKS LTD;REEL/FRAME:016902/0921

Effective date: 20050303

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

REMI Maintenance fee reminder mailed
FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 12

SULP Surcharge for late payment

Year of fee payment: 11