EP2244491B2 - Method for operating a hearing aid with feedback suppression and hearing aid with a diplexer - Google Patents

Method for operating a hearing aid with feedback suppression and hearing aid with a diplexer Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2244491B2
EP2244491B2 EP10155131.5A EP10155131A EP2244491B2 EP 2244491 B2 EP2244491 B2 EP 2244491B2 EP 10155131 A EP10155131 A EP 10155131A EP 2244491 B2 EP2244491 B2 EP 2244491B2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
frequency
signal
cut
input signal
low
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP10155131.5A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2244491B1 (en
EP2244491A1 (en
Inventor
Ulrich Kornagel
Stefan Petrausch
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sivantos Pte Ltd
Original Assignee
Siemens Medical Instruments Pte Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=42244270&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP2244491(B2) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Siemens Medical Instruments Pte Ltd filed Critical Siemens Medical Instruments Pte Ltd
Publication of EP2244491A1 publication Critical patent/EP2244491A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2244491B1 publication Critical patent/EP2244491B1/en
Publication of EP2244491B2 publication Critical patent/EP2244491B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/45Prevention of acoustic reaction, i.e. acoustic oscillatory feedback
    • H04R25/453Prevention of acoustic reaction, i.e. acoustic oscillatory feedback electronically
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R2430/00Signal processing covered by H04R, not provided for in its groups
    • H04R2430/03Synergistic effects of band splitting and sub-band processing

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a specified in claim 1 method for operating a hearing and a specified in claim 6 hearing with a crossover.
  • frequency-distorting algorithms are used for different purposes and at different points of signal processing. For example, is from the DE 699 22 940 T2 a hearing aid with a combination of audio compression and feedback suppression known.
  • Common to all frequency-distorting algorithms is that they should usually only act from a so-called cut-off frequency, because distortions of low frequencies disturb the sound impression, but distortions of high frequencies are less critical.
  • FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of an exemplary implementation of a frequency distortion in a hearing aid.
  • An input signal 100 is divided by a crossover filter 1 ("split-band filter") with a predefinable limit frequency GF ("split frequency”) into a low-frequency and a high-frequency signal component 101, 102.
  • the high-frequency signal component 102 is then distorted in a frequency equalizer 2.
  • the distorted output signal 103 is supplied to an input of an adder 3.
  • the low-frequency signal component 101 passes through an all-pass filter 4, which rotates the phase of the signal component 101 in such a way that signal deletion in the region of the limit frequency GF does not occur during a subsequent signal addition in the adder 3.
  • the phase-rotated low-frequency signal component 104 is supplied to a further input of the adder 3. At the output of the adder 3, the sum of the two signal components 103, 104 is available as an output signal 105.
  • Crossovers are not ideal and have a finite frequency overlap at their cutoff frequency GF.
  • FIG. 2 is shown as an example of the frequency response of a crossover in a hearing aid with the limit frequency GF 1800 Hz.
  • the curves K1, K2 show the damping D in dB as a function of the frequency F in Hz in the range 0 to 4000 Hz.
  • the curve K1 shows a low-pass characteristic and the curve K2 a high-pass characteristic.
  • the WO 93/20669 A1 discloses a hearing apparatus with a variable high-pass filter which attenuates a low-frequency range of a microphone signal of the hearing device for the suppression of noise.
  • the stated object is achieved with the method for operating a hearing device of independent claim 1 and with the hearing device of independent claim 5.
  • the invention claims a method for operating a hearing device by dividing an input signal into a low-frequency and a high-frequency signal component with a crossover and setting a cutoff frequency of the crossover based on an analysis of the input signal such that artifacts in an output signal of the hearing device are reduced.
  • the invention offers the advantage that artefacts resulting from signal superimposition can be avoided.
  • a further development of the method may comprise a distortion, for example compression or displacement, of the high-frequency signal component and superposition of the low-frequency signal component and the distorted high-frequency signal component relative to the output signal, whereby artifacts can be formed.
  • a distortion for example compression or displacement
  • Another embodiment of the method may include determining the cutoff frequency by analyzing the signal level or the tonality of the input signal.
  • the method may preferably include setting the cutoff frequency to a frequency at which the input signal has the lowest possible signal level and / or the lowest possible tonality. This effectively minimizes artifacts caused by overlapping bands of the crossover network.
  • the method may include detecting feedback, wherein the cutoff frequency is temporarily lowered upon detection of feedback.
  • the invention also claims a hearing device with a crossover characterized by a frequency difference, which divides an input signal into a low-frequency and a high-frequency signal component.
  • the hearing device also comprises a first means by which the cutoff frequency of the crossover can be adjusted based on an analysis of the input signal such that artefacts in an output signal of the hearing aid are reduced.
  • the first means may be a switching logic.
  • a further embodiment of the invention may comprise a frequency equalizer which distorts, for example compresses or shifts, the high-frequency signal component.
  • the hearing device can further iron on an adder, which forms the output signal by superimposing the low-frequency signal component with de-distorted high-frequency signal component, wherein artifacts can be formed.
  • the first means can determine the cutoff frequency by analyzing the signal level or the tonality of the input signal.
  • the first means can set the cutoff frequency to a frequency at which the input signal has the lowest possible signal level and / or the lowest possible tonality.
  • the hearing device may comprise a feedback suppression with a feedback detector, which temporarily lowers the cutoff frequency upon occurrence of a feedback.
  • FIG. 3 shows in three graphs the effect of the cutoff frequency GF of a crossover in a hearing device in a typical application.
  • the upper diagram shows the frequency response K3 of the signal amplitude A in dB of an input signal, for example a microphone signal, as a function of the frequency F in Hz between 0 and 4000 Hz.
  • a flute tone with a fundamental tone P1 unfavorably falls exactly to the limit frequency GF 1800 Hz of the crossover.
  • the middle graph of the FIG. 3 shows the frequency response of the crossover with a cut-off frequency GF at 1800 Hz.
  • the curves K1, K2 indicate the attenuations D in dB as a function of the frequency F in Hz.
  • the curve K1 shows a low-pass characteristic and the curve K2 a high-pass characteristic.
  • At the outputs of the crossover are thus a low-frequency and a high-frequency signal component available.
  • the high-frequency signal component is now shifted upwards by 100 Hz in frequency.
  • the curve K4 shows an output signal with a prominent double mode P2, which is perceived as a strong distortion.
  • the cutoff frequency GF of the crossover is set, for example, to 1200 Hz.
  • this effect of the invention is shown in three graphs.
  • the upper diagram shows as in FIG. 3 the frequency response K3 of the signal amplitude A in dB of an input signal as a function of the frequency F in Hz between 0 and 4000 Hz.
  • a flute tone has its root P1 at 1800 Hz.
  • the middle graph of the FIG. 4 shows the frequency response of the crossover with a shifted to 1200 Hz limit frequency GF.
  • the curves K1, K2 indicate the attenuations D in dB as a function of the frequency F in Hz.
  • the curve K1 shows a low-pass characteristic and the curve K2 a high-pass characteristic.
  • At the outputs of the crossover are thus a low-frequency and a high-frequency signal component available.
  • the high-frequency signal component is now shifted upwards by 100 Hz in frequency.
  • the crossover frequency GF of the crossover can be freely adjusted within a certain frequency range, overlapping artifacts can be significantly reduced by analyzing an input signal either for signal volume A or tonality and then setting the cutoff frequency accordingly.
  • the cutoff frequency is set to a frequency at which the input signal has a particularly low signal amplitude A or is particularly tonal.
  • FIG. 5 shows a block diagram of a typical embodiment of the invention.
  • An input signal 100 of a hearing device for example a microphone signal
  • a crossover network 1 with a predefinable limit frequency GF into a low-frequency and a high-frequency signal component 101, 102.
  • the high-frequency signal portion 102 is then distorted in a frequency equalizer 2, for example, frequency-compressed or shifted the frequency.
  • Such a distorted output signal 103 is supplied to an input of an adder 3.
  • the low-frequency signal component 101 passes through an all-pass filter 4, which rotates the phase in such a way that signal deletions in the region of the limit frequency GF do not occur during a subsequent signal addition in the adder 3.
  • the phase-rotated low-frequency signal component 104 is supplied to a further input of the adder 3. At the output of the adder 3 is available as a sum, an output signal 105 is available.
  • the input signal 100 is split into frequency bands 106 with the aid of a filter bank 5.
  • the bands 106 are then analyzed in a switching logic 6 with respect to their signal amplitude. From a predeterminable list of possible cutoff frequencies, for example 1000 Hz, 1250 Hz, 1500 Hz and 2000 Hz, that is selected in whose environment the signal level is as low as possible.
  • the crossover 1 With an output signal 107 of the switching logic 6, the crossover 1 is now faded to this selected limit frequency GF.
  • the shift of the limit frequency GF artefacts caused by overlapping bands of the crossover 1 thus minimized.
  • a frequency distortion for improved feedback suppression in hearing devices may, depending on the ear coupling, in addition to the described "electrical" superposition also to an acoustic superposition of sound from the hearing and sound that comes directly to the eardrum acoustically come. This is due to physical reasons, especially at low frequencies.
  • the problem arises that undistorted signal components over the physical path overlap with intended distorted signal components via the hearing device in the same frequency band and lead to unwanted artifacts. Since this occurs preferably at low frequencies, the countermeasure would be to increase the cutoff frequency GF of the crossover 1 to such an extent that the superimposition occurring becomes insignificant. However, this increases the risk of feedback whistles in the low frequency band.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Neurosurgery (AREA)
  • Otolaryngology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Tone Control, Compression And Expansion, Limiting Amplitude (AREA)
  • Circuit For Audible Band Transducer (AREA)
  • Amplifiers (AREA)

Abstract

The method involves segmenting an input signal (100) of the hearing device into a low frequency and a high frequency signal components (101,102) by a frequency separating filter (1). The high frequency signal components are distorted. The low frequency signal component and the distorted high frequency signal component are overlaid to an output signal. A predetermined threshold frequency (GF) of the frequency separating filter is positioned through an analysis of the input signal such that artifacts in an output signal (105) of the hearing device are reduced. An independent claim is also included for a hearing device with a frequency distortion module.

Description

Die Erfindung betrifft ein im Patentanspruch 1 angegebenes Verfahren zum Betrieb einer Hörvorrichtung und eine im Patentanspruch 6 angegebene Hörvorrichtung mit einer Frequenzweiche.The invention relates to a specified in claim 1 method for operating a hearing and a specified in claim 6 hearing with a crossover.

Bei Hörvorrichtungen, insbesondere bei Hörgeräten, werden frequenzverzerrende Algorithmen zu unterschiedlichen Zwecken und an unterschiedlichen Stellen einer Signalverarbeitung eingesetzt. Beispielsweise ist aus der DE 699 22 940 T2 ein Hörgerät mit einer Kombination von Audiokompression und Rückkopplungsunterdrückung bekannt. Gemein ist allen frequenzverzerrenden Algorithmen, dass sie in der Regel erst ab einer sogenannten Grenzfrequenz wirken sollen, weil Verzerrungen von tiefen Frequenzen den Höreindruck sehr stören, während aber Verzerrungen hoher Frequenzen weniger kritisch sind.In hearing devices, in particular in hearing aids, frequency-distorting algorithms are used for different purposes and at different points of signal processing. For example, is from the DE 699 22 940 T2 a hearing aid with a combination of audio compression and feedback suppression known. Common to all frequency-distorting algorithms is that they should usually only act from a so-called cut-off frequency, because distortions of low frequencies disturb the sound impression, but distortions of high frequencies are less critical.

Figur 1 zeigt ein Blockschaltbild einer beispielhaften Reali-sierung einer Frequenzverzerrung in einem Hörgerät. Ein Eingangssignal 100 wird durch eine Frequenzweiche 1 ("Split-Band Filter") mit einer vorgebbaren Grenzfrequenz GF ("Split Frequency") in einen niederfrequenten und einen hochfrequenten Signalanteil 101, 102 geteilt. Der hochfrequente Signalanteil 102 wird anschließend in einem Frequenzverzerrer 2 verzerrt. Das verzerrte Ausgangssignal 103 wird einem Eingang eines Addieres 3 zugeführt. Der niederfrequente Signalanteil 101 durchläuft ein All-Pass Filter 4, das die Phase des Signalanteils 101 derart dreht, dass es bei einer darauffolgenden Signaladdition im Addierer 3 nicht zu Signalauslöschungen im Bereich der Grenzfrequenz GF kommt. Der phasengedrehte niederfrequente Signalanteil 104 wird einem weiteren Eingang des Addierers 3 zugeführt. Am Ausgang des Addierers 3 steht die Summe der beiden Signalanteile 103, 104 als Ausgangssignal 105 zur Verfügung. FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of an exemplary implementation of a frequency distortion in a hearing aid. An input signal 100 is divided by a crossover filter 1 ("split-band filter") with a predefinable limit frequency GF ("split frequency") into a low-frequency and a high-frequency signal component 101, 102. The high-frequency signal component 102 is then distorted in a frequency equalizer 2. The distorted output signal 103 is supplied to an input of an adder 3. The low-frequency signal component 101 passes through an all-pass filter 4, which rotates the phase of the signal component 101 in such a way that signal deletion in the region of the limit frequency GF does not occur during a subsequent signal addition in the adder 3. The phase-rotated low-frequency signal component 104 is supplied to a further input of the adder 3. At the output of the adder 3, the sum of the two signal components 103, 104 is available as an output signal 105.

Frequenzweichen sind nicht ideal und haben bei ihrer Grenzfrequenz GF eine endliche Frequenzüberlappung. In Figur 2 ist als Beispiel der Frequenzgang einer Frequenzweiche in einem Hörgerät mit der Grenzfrequenz GF 1800 Hz dargestellt. Die Kurven K1, K2 zeigen die Dämpfung D in dB in Abhängigkeit der Frequenz F in Hz im Bereich 0 bis 4000 Hz. Die Kurve K1 zeigt eine Tiefpasscharakteristik und die Kurve K2 eine Hochpasscharakteristik.Crossovers are not ideal and have a finite frequency overlap at their cutoff frequency GF. In FIG. 2 is shown as an example of the frequency response of a crossover in a hearing aid with the limit frequency GF 1800 Hz. The curves K1, K2 show the damping D in dB as a function of the frequency F in Hz in the range 0 to 4000 Hz. The curve K1 shows a low-pass characteristic and the curve K2 a high-pass characteristic.

Wird nun ein Tiefpass K1 gefilterter Signalanteil nicht verzerrt und ein Hochpass K2 gefilterter Signalanteil verzerrt, kommt es bei einer Addition der Signalanteile K1, K2 vor allem im Bereich der Grenzfrequenz GF zu nicht zu vernachlässigenden Überlagerungen von beiden Signalanteilen was in einem Ausgangssignal des Hörgeräts als Modulation oder starke Rauhigkeit wahrgenommen wird. Beide Wirkungen sind sehr störend und fallen in der Wahrnehmung durch einen Hörgeräteträger meist deutlich stärker auf als die Frequenzverzerrung an sich.If a low-pass K1 filtered signal component is not distorted and a high-pass K2 filtered signal component is distorted, superimposing of both signal components occurs in addition to the signal components K1, K2, above all in the region of the limit frequency GF, which results in an output signal of the hearing aid as modulation or strong roughness is perceived. Both effects are very disturbing and usually noticeably more noticeable in the perception by a hearing aid wearer than the frequency distortion itself.

Neben dieser "elektrischen" Signalüberlagerung kann es aber auch zu einer akustischen Überlagerung von einem frequenzverzerrtem und einem nicht frequenzverzerrtem Signal kommen. Besonders in den tiefen Frequenzbereichen und bei einer offenen Hörgeräteversorgung ist eine akustische Überlagerung nicht zu vernachlässigen. Direktschall überlagert sich mit dem frequenzverzerrten Signalanteil, den das Hörgerät ausgibt, was wiederum zu den bereits beschriebenen Artefakten führt.In addition to this "electrical" signal superposition, it can also lead to an acoustic superposition of a frequency-distorted and a non-frequency-distorted signal. Especially in the low frequency ranges and with an open hearing aid supply, an acoustic overlay is not negligible. Direct sound is superimposed on the frequency-distorted signal component that the hearing aid outputs, which in turn leads to the artefacts already described.

Die WO 93/20669 A1 offenbart eine Hörvorrichtung mit einem variablen Hochpassfilter, das zur Unterdrückung von Störgeräuschen einen tieffrequenten Bereich eines Mikrofonsignals der Hörvorrichtung dämpft.The WO 93/20669 A1 discloses a hearing apparatus with a variable high-pass filter which attenuates a low-frequency range of a microphone signal of the hearing device for the suppression of noise.

Es ist Aufgabe der Erfindung die geschilderten Nachteile zu überwinden und ein Verfahren zum Betrieb einer Hörvorrichtung und eine Hörvorrichtung mit Frequenzweiche anzugeben, die ein Auftreten von Artefakten bei einer Überlagerung von unverzerrten und frequenzverzerrten Signalanteilen reduzieren.It is an object of the invention to overcome the disadvantages described and to provide a method for operating a hearing device and a hearing device with crossover, which reduce the occurrence of artifacts in a superposition of undistorted and frequency-distorted signal components.

Gemäß der Erfindung wird die gestellte Aufgabe mit dem Verfahren zum Betrieb einer Hörvorrichtung des unabhängigen Patentanspruchs 1 und mit der Hörvorrichtung des unabhängigen Patentanspruchs 5 gelöst.According to the invention, the stated object is achieved with the method for operating a hearing device of independent claim 1 and with the hearing device of independent claim 5.

Die Erfindung beansprucht ein Verfahren zum Betrieb einer Hörvorrichtung durch Aufteilen eines Eingangssignals in einen niederfrequenten und einen hochfrequenten Signalanteil mit einer Frequenzweiche und durch Einstellen einer Grenzfrequenz der Frequenzweiche aufgrund einer Analyse des Eingangssignals derart, dass Artefakte in einem Ausgangssignal der Hörvorrichtung reduziert werden. Die Erfindung bietet den Vorteil, dass durch Signalüberlagerung entstehende Artefakte vermieden werden können.The invention claims a method for operating a hearing device by dividing an input signal into a low-frequency and a high-frequency signal component with a crossover and setting a cutoff frequency of the crossover based on an analysis of the input signal such that artifacts in an output signal of the hearing device are reduced. The invention offers the advantage that artefacts resulting from signal superimposition can be avoided.

Eine Weiterbildung des Verfahrens kann ein Verzerren, beispielweise ein Komprimieren oder Verschieben, des hochfrequenten Signalanteils und ein Überlagern des niederfrequenten Signalanteils und des verzerrten hochfrequenten Signalanteils zu dem Ausgangssignal umfassen, wobei Artefakte gebildet werden können.A further development of the method may comprise a distortion, for example compression or displacement, of the high-frequency signal component and superposition of the low-frequency signal component and the distorted high-frequency signal component relative to the output signal, whereby artifacts can be formed.

Eine weitere Ausführungsform des Verfahrens kann ein Ermitteln der Grenzfrequenz durch Analysieren des Signalpegels oder der Tonalität des Eingangssignals umfassen.Another embodiment of the method may include determining the cutoff frequency by analyzing the signal level or the tonality of the input signal.

Vorzugsweise kann das Verfahren ein Einstellen der Grenzfrequenz auf eine Frequenz, bei der das Eingangssignal einen möglichst geringen Signalpegel und/oder eine möglichst geringe Tonalität aufweist, umfassen. Dadurch werden Artefakte, die durch überlappende Bänder der Frequenzweiche entstehen, effektiv minimiert.The method may preferably include setting the cutoff frequency to a frequency at which the input signal has the lowest possible signal level and / or the lowest possible tonality. This effectively minimizes artifacts caused by overlapping bands of the crossover network.

Des Weiteren kann das Verfahren eine Detektion von Rückkopplungen umfassen, wobei die Grenzfrequenz bei einem Erkennen einer Rückkopplung vorübergehend abgesenkt wird. Vorteilhaft daran ist, dass Rückkopplungspfeifen infolge einer ungünstigen Grenzfrequenz vermieden wird.Furthermore, the method may include detecting feedback, wherein the cutoff frequency is temporarily lowered upon detection of feedback. The advantage of this is that feedback whistles is avoided as a result of an unfavorable cut-off frequency.

Die Erfindung beansprucht auch eine Hörvorrichtung mit einer durch eine Grenzfrequenz charakterisierten Frequenzweiche, die ein Eingangssignal in einen niederfrequenten und einen hochfrequenten Signalanteil aufteilt. Die Hörvorrichtung umfasst außerdem ein erstes Mittel, durch das die Grenzfrequenz der Frequenzweiche aufgrund einer Analyse des Eingangssignals derart einstellbar ist, dass Artefakte in einem Ausgangssignal des Hörgeräts reduziert werden. Das erste Mittel kann eine Umschaltlogik sein.The invention also claims a hearing device with a crossover characterized by a frequency difference, which divides an input signal into a low-frequency and a high-frequency signal component. The hearing device also comprises a first means by which the cutoff frequency of the crossover can be adjusted based on an analysis of the input signal such that artefacts in an output signal of the hearing aid are reduced. The first means may be a switching logic.

Eine weitere Ausführungsform der Erfindung kann einen Frequenzverzerrer umfassen, der den hochfrequenten Signalanteil verzerrt, beispielweise komprimiert oder verschiebt. Die Hörvorrichtung kann des Weiteren einen Addierer aufeisen, der durch Überlagerung des niederfrequenten Signalanteils mit deverzerrten hochfrequenten Signalanteil das Ausgangssignal bildet, wobei Artefakte bildbar sind.A further embodiment of the invention may comprise a frequency equalizer which distorts, for example compresses or shifts, the high-frequency signal component. The hearing device can further iron on an adder, which forms the output signal by superimposing the low-frequency signal component with de-distorted high-frequency signal component, wherein artifacts can be formed.

In einer Weiterbildung kann das erste Mittel die Grenzfrequenz durch Analysieren des Signalpegels oder der Tonalität des Eingangssignals ermitteln.In a development, the first means can determine the cutoff frequency by analyzing the signal level or the tonality of the input signal.

Vorzugsweise kann das erste Mittel die Grenzfrequenz auf eine Frequenz einstellen, bei der das Eingangssignal einen möglichst geringen Signalpegel und/oder eine möglichst geringe Tonalität aufweist.Preferably, the first means can set the cutoff frequency to a frequency at which the input signal has the lowest possible signal level and / or the lowest possible tonality.

Des Weiteren kann die Hörvorrichtung eine Rückkopplungsunterdrückung mit einem Rückkopplungsdetektor umfassen, der die Grenzfrequenz bei einem Auftreten einer Rückkopplung vorübergehend absenkt.Furthermore, the hearing device may comprise a feedback suppression with a feedback detector, which temporarily lowers the cutoff frequency upon occurrence of a feedback.

Weitere Besonderheiten und Vorteile der Erfindung werden aus den nachfolgenden Erläuterungen eines Ausführungsbeispiels anhand von schematischen Zeichnungen ersichtlich.Other features and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following explanations of an embodiment with reference to schematic drawings.

Es zeigen:

Figur 1:
ein Blockschaltbild einer Anordnung mit Frequenz- weiche gemäß Stand der Technik,
Figur 2:
ein Schaubild eines Frequenzgangs einer Frequenz- weiche gemäß Stand der Technik,
Figur 3:
Schaubilder von Frequenzgängen bei einem Hörgerät gemäß Stand der Technik,
Figur 4:
Schaubilder von Frequenzgängen bei einem erfin- dungsgemäßen Hörgerät und
Figur 5:
ein Blockschaltbild einer erfindungsgemäßen Anord- nung.
Show it:
FIG. 1:
1 is a block diagram of a prior art frequency-locked device;
FIG. 2:
4 is a graph of a frequency response of a frequency sweep according to the prior art;
FIG. 3:
Charts of frequency responses in a hearing aid according to the prior art,
FIG. 4:
Charts of frequency responses in a hearing aid according to the invention and
FIG. 5:
a block diagram of an arrangement according to the invention.

Figur 3 gibt in drei Schaubildern die Wirkung der Grenzfrequenz GF einer Frequenzweiche bei einer Hörvorrichtung in einer typischen Anwendung wieder. Das obere Schaubild zeigt den Frequenzgang K3 der Signalamplitude A in dB eines Eingangssignals, beispielsweise ein Mikrofonsignal, in Abhängigkeit der Frequenz F in Hz zwischen 0 und 4000 Hz. Ein Flötenton mit einem Grundton P1 fällt ungünstigerweise genau auf die Grenzfrequenz GF 1800 Hz der Frequenzweiche. FIG. 3 shows in three graphs the effect of the cutoff frequency GF of a crossover in a hearing device in a typical application. The upper diagram shows the frequency response K3 of the signal amplitude A in dB of an input signal, for example a microphone signal, as a function of the frequency F in Hz between 0 and 4000 Hz. A flute tone with a fundamental tone P1 unfavorably falls exactly to the limit frequency GF 1800 Hz of the crossover.

Das mittlere Schaubild der Figur 3 zeigt den Frequenzgang der Frequenzweiche mit einer Grenzfrequenz GF bei 1800 Hz. Die Kurven K1, K2 geben die Dämpfungen D in dB in Abhängigkeit der Frequenz F in Hz an. Die Kurve K1 zeigt eine Tiefpasscharakteristik und die Kurve K2 eine Hochpasscharakteristik. An den Ausgängen der Frequenzweiche stehen somit ein niederfrequenter und ein hochfrequenter Signalanteil zur Verfügung. Der hochfrequente Signalanteil wird nun um 100 Hz in der Frequenz nach oben verschoben.The middle graph of the FIG. 3 shows the frequency response of the crossover with a cut-off frequency GF at 1800 Hz. The curves K1, K2 indicate the attenuations D in dB as a function of the frequency F in Hz. The curve K1 shows a low-pass characteristic and the curve K2 a high-pass characteristic. At the outputs of the crossover are thus a low-frequency and a high-frequency signal component available. The high-frequency signal component is now shifted upwards by 100 Hz in frequency.

Werden der um 100 Hz frequenzverschobene hochfrequente Signalanteil und der unverzerrte niederfrequente Signalanteil addiert, ergibt sich ein Frequenzgang K4 entsprechend dem unteren Schaubild der Figur 3. Die Kurve K4 zeigt ein Ausgangssignal mit einer prominenten doppelten Mode P2, die als starke Verzerrung wahrgenommen wird.If the frequency-shifted by 100 Hz high-frequency signal component and the undistorted low-frequency signal component added, resulting in a frequency response K4 according to the lower graph of FIG. 3 , The curve K4 shows an output signal with a prominent double mode P2, which is perceived as a strong distortion.

Erfindungsgemäß wird nun diese starke Verzerrung vermieden, indem die Grenzfrequenz GF der Frequenzweiche beispielsweise auf 1200 Hz eingestellt wird. In Figur 4 ist diese Wirkung der Erfindung in drei Schaubildern dargestellt. Das obere Schaubild zeigt wie in Figur 3 den Frequenzgang K3 der Signalamplitude A in dB eines Eingangssignals in Abhängigkeit der Frequenz F in Hz zwischen 0 und 4000 Hz. Ein Flötenton hat seinen Grundton P1 bei 1800 Hz.According to this strong distortion is now avoided by the cutoff frequency GF of the crossover is set, for example, to 1200 Hz. In FIG. 4 this effect of the invention is shown in three graphs. The upper diagram shows as in FIG. 3 the frequency response K3 of the signal amplitude A in dB of an input signal as a function of the frequency F in Hz between 0 and 4000 Hz. A flute tone has its root P1 at 1800 Hz.

Das mittlere Schaubild der Figur 4 zeigt den Frequenzgang der Frequenzweiche mit einer zu 1200 Hz verschobenen Grenzfrequenz GF. Die Kurven K1, K2 geben die Dämpfungen D in dB in Abhängigkeit der Frequenz F in Hz an. Die Kurve K1 zeigt eine Tiefpasscharakteristik und die Kurve K2 eine Hochpasscharakteristik. An den Ausgängen der Frequenzweiche stehen somit ein niederfrequenter und ein hochfrequenter Signalanteil zur Verfügung. Der hochfrequente Signalanteil wird nun um 100 Hz in der Frequenz nach oben verschoben.The middle graph of the FIG. 4 shows the frequency response of the crossover with a shifted to 1200 Hz limit frequency GF. The curves K1, K2 indicate the attenuations D in dB as a function of the frequency F in Hz. The curve K1 shows a low-pass characteristic and the curve K2 a high-pass characteristic. At the outputs of the crossover are thus a low-frequency and a high-frequency signal component available. The high-frequency signal component is now shifted upwards by 100 Hz in frequency.

Werden der um 100 Hz frequenzverschobene hochfrequente Signalanteil und der unverzerrte niederfrequente Signalanteil addiert, ergibt sich ein Frequenzgang K5 entsprechend dem unteren Schaubild der Figur 4. Die Kurve K5 zeigt ein Ausgangssignal ohne eine prominente doppelte Mode. Der Grundton P3 der Flöte wird nahezu verzerrungsfrei wiedergegeben.If the frequency-shifted by 100 Hz high-frequency signal component and the undistorted low-frequency signal component added, resulting in a frequency response K5 according to the lower graph of the FIG. 4 , The curve K5 shows an output without a prominent double mode. The root note P3 of the flute is played almost distortion-free.

Mit dem erfindungsgemäßen Verfahren kann daher sehr effektiv eine störende "elektrische" Überlagerung vermieden bzw. unhörbar gemacht werden. Die erfindungsgemäße Lösung kann unabhängig von einer aus dem Stand der Technik bekannten An-Ausschalt-Logik eingesetzt werden, wodurch sich die Vorteile ergänzen können.With the method according to the invention, therefore, a disturbing "electrical" superposition can be very effectively avoided or rendered inaudible. The solution according to the invention can be used independently of a known from the prior art on-off logic, which can complement the benefits.

Kann die Grenzfrequenz GF der Frequenzweiche in einem bestimmten Frequenzbereich frei eingestellt werden, können Überlappungsartefakte deutlich reduziert werden, indem ein Eingangssignal entweder nach Signallautstärke A oder nach Tonalität analysiert und dann die Grenzfrequenz entsprechend eingestellt wird. Bevorzugt wird die Grenzfrequenz auf eine Frequenz gestellt, bei der das Eingangssignal besonders wenig Signalamplitude A aufweist oder besonders wenig tonal ist.If the crossover frequency GF of the crossover can be freely adjusted within a certain frequency range, overlapping artifacts can be significantly reduced by analyzing an input signal either for signal volume A or tonality and then setting the cutoff frequency accordingly. Preferably, the cutoff frequency is set to a frequency at which the input signal has a particularly low signal amplitude A or is particularly tonal.

Figur 5 zeigt ein Blockschaltbild eines typischen Ausführungsbeispiels der Erfindung. Ein Eingangssignal 100 einer Hörvorrichtung, beispielsweise ein Mikrofonsignal, wird durch eine Frequenzweiche 1 mit einer vorgebbaren Grenzfrequenz GF in einen niederfrequenten und einen hochfrequenten Signalanteil 101, 102 geteilt. Der hochfrequente Signalanteil 102 wird anschließend in einem Frequenzverzerrer 2 verzerrt, zum Beispiel frequenzkomprimiert oder die Frequenz verschoben. Ein so verzerrtes Ausgangssignal 103 wird einem Eingang eines Addieres 3 zugeführt. Der niederfrequente Signalanteil 101 durchläuft ein All-Pass Filter 4, das die Phase derart dreht, dass es bei einer darauffolgenden Signaladdition in dem Addierer 3 nicht zu Signalauslöschungen im Bereich der Grenzfrequenz GF kommt. Der phasengedrehte niederfrequente Signalanteil 104 wird einem weiteren Eingang des Addierers 3 zugeführt. Am Ausgang des Addierers 3 steht als Summe ein Ausgangssignal 105 zur Verfügung. FIG. 5 shows a block diagram of a typical embodiment of the invention. An input signal 100 of a hearing device, for example a microphone signal, is divided by a crossover network 1 with a predefinable limit frequency GF into a low-frequency and a high-frequency signal component 101, 102. The high-frequency signal portion 102 is then distorted in a frequency equalizer 2, for example, frequency-compressed or shifted the frequency. Such a distorted output signal 103 is supplied to an input of an adder 3. The low-frequency signal component 101 passes through an all-pass filter 4, which rotates the phase in such a way that signal deletions in the region of the limit frequency GF do not occur during a subsequent signal addition in the adder 3. The phase-rotated low-frequency signal component 104 is supplied to a further input of the adder 3. At the output of the adder 3 is available as a sum, an output signal 105 is available.

Zur erfindungsgemäßen Einstellung bzw. Regelung der Grenzfrequenz GF wird das Eingangssignal 100 mit Hilfe einer Filterbank 5 in Frequenzbänder 106 zerlegt. Die Bänder 106 werden anschließend in einer Umschaltlogik 6 in Bezug auf ihre Signalamplitude analysiert. Aus einer vorgebbaren Liste von möglichen Grenzfrequenzen, beispielsweise 1000 Hz, 1250 Hz, 1500 Hz und 2000 Hz, wird diejenige ausgewählt, in deren Umgebung der Signalpegel möglichst gering ist. Mit einem Ausgangssignal 107 der Umschaltlogik 6 wird nun die Frequenzweiche 1 zu dieser ausgewählten Grenzfrequenz GF übergeblendet. Infolge der Verschiebung der Grenzfrequenz GF werden Artefakte, die durch überlappende Bänder der Frequenzweiche 1 entstehen, somit minimiert.For adjusting or regulating the limit frequency GF according to the invention, the input signal 100 is split into frequency bands 106 with the aid of a filter bank 5. The bands 106 are then analyzed in a switching logic 6 with respect to their signal amplitude. From a predeterminable list of possible cutoff frequencies, for example 1000 Hz, 1250 Hz, 1500 Hz and 2000 Hz, that is selected in whose environment the signal level is as low as possible. With an output signal 107 of the switching logic 6, the crossover 1 is now faded to this selected limit frequency GF. As a result of the shift of the limit frequency GF artefacts caused by overlapping bands of the crossover 1, thus minimized.

Für den Fall einer Frequenzverzerrung zur verbesserten Rückkopplungsunterdrückung bei Hörvorrichtungen kann es, je nach Ohrankopplung, neben der beschriebenen "elektrischen" Überlagerung auch zu einer akustischen Überlagerung von Schall aus der Hörvorrichtung und Schall, der akustisch direkt an das Trommelfell gelangt, kommen. Dies erfolgt physikalisch bedingt vor allem bei niedrigen Frequenzen. Auch hierbei tritt das Problem auf, dass sich unverzerrte Signalanteile über den physikalischen Pfad mit beabsichtigt verzerrten Signalanteilen über die Hörvorrichtung im selben Frequenzband überlagern und zu unerwünschten Artefakten führen. Da dies vorzugsweise bei tiefen Frequenzen auftritt, wäre die Gegenmaßnahme, die Grenzfrequenz GF der Frequenzweiche 1 soweit zu erhöhen, dass die auftretende Überlagerung unbedeutend wird. Dies erhöht jedoch das Risiko von Rückkopplungspfeifen im tiefen Frequenzband.In the case of a frequency distortion for improved feedback suppression in hearing devices may, depending on the ear coupling, in addition to the described "electrical" superposition also to an acoustic superposition of sound from the hearing and sound that comes directly to the eardrum acoustically come. This is due to physical reasons, especially at low frequencies. Here, too, the problem arises that undistorted signal components over the physical path overlap with intended distorted signal components via the hearing device in the same frequency band and lead to unwanted artifacts. Since this occurs preferably at low frequencies, the countermeasure would be to increase the cutoff frequency GF of the crossover 1 to such an extent that the superimposition occurring becomes insignificant. However, this increases the risk of feedback whistles in the low frequency band.

Eine vorteilhafte Abhilfe hierzu stellt die Kombination des erfindungsgemäßen Verfahrens mit einem Rückkopplungsdetektor 7 gemäß Figur 5 dar. Wird Rückkopplungspfeifen detektiert - was in der Regel das störendere Artefakt ist - wird die Grenzfrequenz GF durch den Rückkopplungsdetektor 7 geeignet abgesenkt und das Rückkopplungspfeifen schnell unterdrückt. Die dabei gegebenenfalls kurzfristig auftretenden oben beschriebenen Überlagerungsartefakte stellen hierbei das geringere Übel dar. Nach erfolgreicher Unterdrückung des Rückkopplungspfeifens und/oder wenn im unteren Band dominante/tonale Signalanteile auftreten, kann die Grenzfrequenz GF der Frequenzweiche 1 wieder angehoben werden.An advantageous remedy for this is the combination of the method according to the invention with a feedback detector 7 according to FIG. 5 If feedback whistles are detected - which is usually the more disturbing artifact - the cutoff frequency GF is suitably lowered by the feedback detector 7 and the feedback whistling is quickly suppressed. The superposition artifacts described above, which may occur at short notice, are the lesser evil. After successful suppression of feedback whistling and / or dominant / tonal signal components occur in the lower band, the limit frequency GF of the crossover 1 can be raised again.

BezugszeichenlisteLIST OF REFERENCE NUMBERS

11
Frequenzweiche / Split-Band FilterCrossover / split band filter
22
FrequenzverzerrerFrequenzverzerrer
33
Addiereradder
44
All-Pass FilterAll-pass filter
55
Filterbankfilter bank
66
Umschaltlogikswitching logic
77
RückkopplungsdetektorFeedback detector
100100
Eingangssignal / MikrofonsignalInput signal / microphone signal
101101
niederfrequentes SignalLow frequency signal
102102
hochfrequentes Signalhigh-frequency signal
103103
verzerrtes Signaldistorted signal
104104
phasenkompensiertes Signalphase-compensated signal
105105
Ausgangssignaloutput
106106
Frequenzbänderfrequency bands
107107
Ausgangssignal der UmschaltlogikOutput signal of the switching logic
AA
Signalamplitudesignal amplitude
DD
Dämpfungdamping
FF
Frequenzfrequency
GFGF
Grenzfrequenzcut-off frequency
K1K1
Frequenzgang TiefpassFrequency response lowpass
K2K2
Frequenzgang HochpassFrequency response high pass
K3K3
Frequenzgang des Eingangssignals 100Frequency response of the input signal 100
K4K4
Frequenzgang des Ausgangssignals 105Frequency response of the output signal 105
K5K5
Frequenzgang des Ausgangssignals 105 nach Verschie- bung der Grenzfrequenz GFFrequency response of the output signal 105 after shifting the limit frequency GF
P1P1
Grundton im Eingangssignal 100Basic tone in the input signal 100
P2P2
verzerrter Grundton im Ausgangssignal 105 / Modedistorted fundamental in output signal 105 / mode
P3P3
unverzerrter Grundton im Ausgangssignal 105undistorted root in the output signal 105

Claims (8)

  1. Method for operating a hearing apparatus, by:
    - splitting an input signal (100) of the hearing apparatus into a low-frequency and a high-frequency signal component (101, 102) by means of a crossover filter (1),
    - frequency distortion (2) of the high-frequency signal component (102) and
    - overlaying (3) the low-frequency signal component (104) and the distorted high-frequency signal component (103) to form the output signal (105)
    characterised by:
    - setting (107) a predefinable cut-off frequency (GF) of the crossover filter (1) by analysing the input signal (100) so that artefacts in the output signal (105) are reduced.
  2. Method according to claim 1, characterised by:
    - determining (6) the cut-off frequency (GF) by analysing the signal level (A) or tonality of the input signal (100).
  3. Method according to one of the preceding claims, characterised by,
    - setting (107) the cut-off frequency (GF) to a frequency, at which the input signal (100) has the lowest possible signal level (A) and/or the lowest possible tonality.
  4. Method according to one of claims 2 to 4, characterised by:
    - identifying (7) feedback, with the cut-off frequency (GF) being momentarily lowered when feedback is identified.
  5. Hearing apparatus with
    - a crossover filter (1) characterised by a cut-off frequency (GF), which splits an input signal (100) into a low-frequency and a high-frequency signal component (101, 102),
    - a frequency distorter (2), which distorts the high-frequency signal component (102), and
    - an adding unit (3), which forms an output signal (105) by overlaying the low-frequency signal component (104) with the distorted high-frequency signal component (103), characterised by:
    - a first means (6), which can be used to set the cut-off frequency (GF) based on an analysis of the input signal (100) using the first means (6) so that artefacts in the output signal (105) are reduced.
  6. Hearing apparatus according to claim 5, characterised in that the first means (6) determines the cut-off frequency (GF) by analysing the signal level (A) or tonality of the input signal (100).
  7. Hearing apparatus according to claims 5 or 6, characterised in that the first means (6) sets the cut-off frequency (GF) to a frequency, at which the input signal (100) has the lowest possible signal level (A) and/or the lowest possible tonality.
  8. Hearing apparatus according to one of claims 5 to 7 having feedback suppression, characterised by:
    - a feedback detector (7), which momentarily lowers the cut-off frequency (GF) when feedback is identified.
EP10155131.5A 2009-04-24 2010-03-02 Method for operating a hearing aid with feedback suppression and hearing aid with a diplexer Active EP2244491B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US17225909P 2009-04-24 2009-04-24
DE102009018812.6A DE102009018812B4 (en) 2009-04-24 2009-04-24 Method for operating a hearing device and hearing device with a crossover network

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2244491A1 EP2244491A1 (en) 2010-10-27
EP2244491B1 EP2244491B1 (en) 2011-06-22
EP2244491B2 true EP2244491B2 (en) 2014-09-17

Family

ID=42244270

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP10155131.5A Active EP2244491B2 (en) 2009-04-24 2010-03-02 Method for operating a hearing aid with feedback suppression and hearing aid with a diplexer

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US8411885B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2244491B2 (en)
AT (1) ATE514291T1 (en)
DE (1) DE102009018812B4 (en)
DK (1) DK2244491T4 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102017203630B3 (en) 2017-03-06 2018-04-26 Sivantos Pte. Ltd. Method for frequency distortion of an audio signal and hearing device operating according to this method
DE102017203631B3 (en) 2017-03-06 2018-05-17 Sivantos Pte. Ltd. Method for frequency distortion of an audio signal

Families Citing this family (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102009018812B4 (en) * 2009-04-24 2015-05-28 Siemens Medical Instruments Pte. Ltd. Method for operating a hearing device and hearing device with a crossover network
US11665482B2 (en) 2011-12-23 2023-05-30 Shenzhen Shokz Co., Ltd. Bone conduction speaker and compound vibration device thereof
US11589172B2 (en) 2014-01-06 2023-02-21 Shenzhen Shokz Co., Ltd. Systems and methods for suppressing sound leakage
DK2988529T3 (en) * 2014-08-20 2020-02-24 Sivantos Pte Ltd ADAPTIVE DISTRIBUTION FREQUENCY IN HEARING AID DEVICES
US10666305B2 (en) 2015-12-16 2020-05-26 Kumu Networks, Inc. Systems and methods for linearized-mixer out-of-band interference mitigation
DE102017200320A1 (en) 2017-01-11 2018-07-12 Sivantos Pte. Ltd. Method for frequency distortion of an audio signal
JP6837573B2 (en) 2017-03-27 2021-03-03 クム ネットワークス, インコーポレイテッドKumu Networks, Inc. Linearity-enhanced mixer
NL2021071B1 (en) * 2018-06-07 2019-12-13 Interhear B V Method for processing an audio signal for a hearing aid
EP3834200A4 (en) 2018-09-12 2021-08-25 Shenzhen Voxtech Co., Ltd. Signal processing device having multiple acoustic-electric transducers

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4099035A (en) 1976-07-20 1978-07-04 Paul Yanick Hearing aid with recruitment compensation
US4882762A (en) 1988-02-23 1989-11-21 Resound Corporation Multi-band programmable compression system

Family Cites Families (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4790018A (en) * 1987-02-11 1988-12-06 Argosy Electronics Frequency selection circuit for hearing aids
US5278912A (en) 1991-06-28 1994-01-11 Resound Corporation Multiband programmable compression system
US5285502A (en) * 1992-03-31 1994-02-08 Auditory System Technologies, Inc. Aid to hearing speech in a noisy environment
US5832097A (en) * 1995-09-19 1998-11-03 Gennum Corporation Multi-channel synchronous companding system
US6434246B1 (en) 1995-10-10 2002-08-13 Gn Resound As Apparatus and methods for combining audio compression and feedback cancellation in a hearing aid
DE19619312A1 (en) * 1996-05-13 1997-11-20 Siemens Audiologische Technik Amplification system for hearing aid input signals
US6181801B1 (en) 1997-04-03 2001-01-30 Resound Corporation Wired open ear canal earpiece
US5987146A (en) 1997-04-03 1999-11-16 Resound Corporation Ear canal microphone
JP2967756B2 (en) * 1997-04-25 1999-10-25 日本電気株式会社 Track servo device for optical disk
WO2000002418A1 (en) * 1998-07-02 2000-01-13 Beltone Netherlands B.V. Hearing instrument
US6831986B2 (en) 2000-12-21 2004-12-14 Gn Resound A/S Feedback cancellation in a hearing aid with reduced sensitivity to low-frequency tonal inputs
DE10244184B3 (en) * 2002-09-23 2004-04-15 Siemens Audiologische Technik Gmbh Feedback compensation for hearing aids with system distance estimation
DK1742509T3 (en) 2005-07-08 2013-11-04 Oticon As A system and method for eliminating feedback and noise in a hearing aid
JP5022792B2 (en) * 2007-07-02 2012-09-12 株式会社日立国際電気 DCDC converter unit, power amplifier, and base station apparatus
WO2009143898A1 (en) 2008-05-30 2009-12-03 Phonak Ag Method for adapting sound in a hearing aid device by frequency modification and such a device
DE102009018812B4 (en) * 2009-04-24 2015-05-28 Siemens Medical Instruments Pte. Ltd. Method for operating a hearing device and hearing device with a crossover network

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4099035A (en) 1976-07-20 1978-07-04 Paul Yanick Hearing aid with recruitment compensation
US4882762A (en) 1988-02-23 1989-11-21 Resound Corporation Multi-band programmable compression system

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102017203630B3 (en) 2017-03-06 2018-04-26 Sivantos Pte. Ltd. Method for frequency distortion of an audio signal and hearing device operating according to this method
DE102017203631B3 (en) 2017-03-06 2018-05-17 Sivantos Pte. Ltd. Method for frequency distortion of an audio signal
US10397712B2 (en) 2017-03-06 2019-08-27 Sivantos Pte. Ltd. Method for frequency distortion of an audio signal, method for suppressing an acoustic feedback in an acoustic system and hearing aid
US10674283B2 (en) 2017-03-06 2020-06-02 Sivantos Pte. Ltd. Method for distorting the frequency of an audio signal and hearing apparatus operating according to this method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE102009018812B4 (en) 2015-05-28
ATE514291T1 (en) 2011-07-15
DK2244491T3 (en) 2011-10-03
US20100272289A1 (en) 2010-10-28
DE102009018812A1 (en) 2010-11-11
EP2244491B1 (en) 2011-06-22
EP2244491A1 (en) 2010-10-27
US8411885B2 (en) 2013-04-02
DK2244491T4 (en) 2015-01-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2244491B2 (en) Method for operating a hearing aid with feedback suppression and hearing aid with a diplexer
DE102006020832B4 (en) Method for suppressing feedback in hearing devices
EP2180726B1 (en) Sound localization in binaural hearing aids
EP1366564B1 (en) Device for the noise-dependent adjustment of sound volumes
DE112012006458B4 (en) signal processing device
DE102006047965A1 (en) Method for the reduction of occlusion effects with acoustic device locking an auditory passage, involves using signal from transmission path of audio signal, and transmission function is observed by output of output converter
DE102009016845B3 (en) Arrangement and method for detecting feedback in hearing devices
EP2437258A2 (en) Method and device for frequency compression with selective frequency shifting
DE112012006457T5 (en) Frequency characteristic modification device
EP2360945B1 (en) Hearing aid with frequency shift and accompanying method
DE102009021310B4 (en) Binaural hearing apparatus and method for operating a binaural hearing apparatus with frequency distortion
DE10242700B4 (en) Feedback compensator in an acoustic amplification system, hearing aid, method for feedback compensation and application of the method in a hearing aid
DE102019111150A1 (en) Audio system and method for controlling an audio system
DE102004026801A1 (en) Acoustic signal processing unit
DE102017203631B3 (en) Method for frequency distortion of an audio signal
EP2437521B1 (en) Method for frequency compression with harmonic adjustment and corresponding device
DE202016101050U1 (en) Device for configuring a user-specific hearing system
DE102008058496B4 (en) Filter bank system with specific stop attenuation components for a hearing device
EP2648424B1 (en) Method for limiting the output level in hearing aids
DE102018207780B3 (en) Method for operating a hearing aid
DE3840551C2 (en)
DE10159928A1 (en) Preventing oscillations in hearing aid caused by feedback involves reducing gain for lower input signal levels if oscillations detected, reducing it to lesser extent or not at all for higher levels
DE202010012133U1 (en) Device for changing an audio signal via its frequency response
EP2575377A1 (en) Amplification configuration for a hearing aid
DE102010044231A1 (en) Device for changing audio signals over frequency range within frequency band in sound processing of movie and music, has interface changing and entering default parameter into absolute value, and dynamic processor downstream to output

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20100820

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA ME RS

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: H04R 25/00 20060101AFI20101208BHEP

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502010000035

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20110804

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 502010000035

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: FDST PATENTANWAELTE FREIER DOERR STAMMLER TSCH, DE

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 502010000035

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: SIVANTOS PTE. LTD., SG

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: SIEMENS MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS PTE. LTD., SINGAPORE, SG

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 502010000035

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: MAIER, DANIEL OLIVER, DIPL.-ING. UNIV., DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20110622

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110622

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110922

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110622

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110622

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110923

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110622

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110622

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110622

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110622

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110622

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FD4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110622

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111022

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110622

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110622

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111024

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110622

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110622

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: GN RESOUND A/S (DK)/WIDEX A/S (DK)/ PHONAK AG (CH)

Effective date: 20120322

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110622

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R026

Ref document number: 502010000035

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20120322

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: SIEMENS MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS PTE. LTD.

Effective date: 20120331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110622

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111003

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110922

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110622

APAH Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO

APBM Appeal reference recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREFNO

APBP Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110622

APBU Appeal procedure closed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9O

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110622

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120302

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100302

PUAH Patent maintained in amended form

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009272

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT MAINTAINED AS AMENDED

27A Patent maintained in amended form

Effective date: 20140917

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B2

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R102

Ref document number: 502010000035

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: AELC

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R102

Ref document number: 502010000035

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20140917

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T4

Effective date: 20141219

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140917

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 502010000035

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: FDST PATENTANWAELTE FREIER DOERR STAMMLER TSCH, DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 502010000035

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: FDST PATENTANWAELTE FREIER DOERR STAMMLER TSCH, DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 502010000035

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: FDST PATENTANWAELTE FREIER DOERR STAMMLER TSCH, DE

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 502010000035

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: SIVANTOS PTE. LTD., SG

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: SIEMENS MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS PTE. LTD., SINGAPORE, SG

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 7

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 514291

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20150302

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150302

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 8

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230320

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20230323

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20230323

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230320

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20230402

Year of fee payment: 14