EP1946276A1 - Security system entry control - Google Patents
Security system entry controlInfo
- Publication number
- EP1946276A1 EP1946276A1 EP07719653A EP07719653A EP1946276A1 EP 1946276 A1 EP1946276 A1 EP 1946276A1 EP 07719653 A EP07719653 A EP 07719653A EP 07719653 A EP07719653 A EP 07719653A EP 1946276 A1 EP1946276 A1 EP 1946276A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- security system
- entry
- user
- detectors
- alarm
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B25/00—Alarm systems in which the location of the alarm condition is signalled to a central station, e.g. fire or police telegraphic systems
- G08B25/008—Alarm setting and unsetting, i.e. arming or disarming of the security system
Definitions
- the present invention relates to intrusion security systems and more particularly to arming and disarming control of such security systems.
- a conventional security system integrates a number of sensors or detectors for detecting an intrusion within protected premises, such as a home or place of business, with a control system for interpreting the sensor or detectors signals for the purposes of generating an alarm.
- the control system for small security systems typically has a single control panel and a single keypad.
- the control panel is connected by wire or wirelessly to all sensors or detectors, and has control over alarm generation whether by local siren or by telecommunications, such as telephone network or cable network.
- the control panel is also connected to the keypad that serves as the user interface within the protected premises for arming and disarming the security system, and for programming or configuring the security system.
- Most security systems today allow for the user to enter a code at the keypad to arm the security system, and either the same or a different code to disarm the security system.
- the keypad is safely located within the protected premises, and for those detectors that would detect an entry or exit, there is a timer used to delay the action of alarm generation from the time that a sensor or a detector generates an intrusion signal. This timer may be set to about 15 to 60 seconds, and allows for entry and exit by a user.
- the keypad can also be used for programming or setting features, such as which sensors or detectors, identified as zones within the protected premises, are to be activated or deactivated. This is done commonly by using the keypad, and in many systems, the user enters a special security code at the keypad to enter a programming or setting mode.
- Stay mode is an armed mode where the premises are protected from intrusion while occupants remain within the premises. In this mode of operation, the detection of sensors and detectors within the protected premises is ignored, such as passive infrared motion detectors, Doppler shift microwave intrusion detectors, inside passage door sensors and floor load cell sensors. Only sensors and detectors that essentially monitor entry or egress remain activated.
- the stay mode is configured typically by entering the programming mode and selecting zones to be deactivated in the stay mode.
- the stay mode is turned on and off (namely to be in the away mode) by entering a security code and selecting the stay or away mode.
- the stay mode protects the perimeter of the premises and is very important in areas where there is a threat of intrusion while an occupant remains within the premises.
- the system is disarmed and then re-armed in an away mode, in which sensors and detectors within the protected premises are active.
- Such conventional security systems are vulnerable to intruders who are able to monitor the premises from outside and enter the premises at the moment when an occupant leaves or enters and other occupants remain within the premises with the security system armed in the stay mode.
- the timer used to allow exit or entry causes one or more zones of the security system to be by-passed during the timed period, and this may allow not only the occupant to leave or enter without generating an alarm but also the intruder.
- the stay mode will allow the intruder to move about without generating an alarm. Because an occupant may be able to call 911 or use a panic button of the security system to generate an alarm, such intruders are likely to use violence to subdue any occupants remaining within the premises.
- a security system that allows users to enter and/or exit secured premises without compromising the security of the rest of the system.
- a security system that when armed in an away mode immediately switches in a single action to an armed stay mode (without first being temporarily disarmed) when a user enters the premises and enters a code.
- a security system that includes a keypad for security code entry by users in which code entry specifies the action of the code including arm or disarm and at least one of entry and exit.
- code entry specifies the action of the code including arm or disarm and at least one of entry and exit.
- authentication of the person entering is important, while for exit, authentication may be - A -
- a security system in which a satellite keypad is used for code entry near a point of protected premises entry or exit to enter an entry or exit code. Such a keypad can be used to authenticate an exit by merely pressing a button on the keypad because the keypad is located within the secured unarmed premises and the primary exit path associated with the keypad is not ambiguous.
- a security system that is to be used by at least some users at all times in the stay mode and such users only have codes to allow for entry and exit while other users have codes for arming and disarming the security system in addition to entry and exit.
- a security system having more than one stay mode configuration with the ability to select a desired one of the stay mode configurations.
- Such configurations may be organized as a function of different levels of security, and optionally with the level of security being displayed at a user interface.
- One example of such different configurations is a nighttime stay mode in which sleeping quarter zones are not armed, while daytime quarter zones are armed, and a daytime stay mode in which all interior zones are not armed.
- stay mode configurations are determined by occupant usage of the premises, namely unused quarters are armed and used quarters are unarmed, while the interior-exterior perimeter remains armed.
- a sliding glass door leading onto a closed deck may be unarmed in a stay mode when outdoor areas are considered within protected premises. Other doors and windows may be armed.
- a satellite keypad within the unarmed area may be used to switch between stay mode configurations before an occupant enters an interior armed zone, or pass authentication may be done immediately following entry into the armed interior zone.
- a security system in which detector zones are classified as "with entry and/or exit delay" or as “immediate alarm”, the latter class either requiring a user to provide a specific disarm authentication or immediately generating an alarm without allowing for the user to stop the alarm generation.
- the specific disarm authentication may optionally be available to a reduced number of users or occupants, while authentication for entry or exit via zones specifically identified for this purpose is made available for all authorized users or occupants.
- the security system may be programmed with different classification configurations of the zones with the ability to select a desired one of the classification configurations.
- the classification configuration may be combined with the stay mode configuration, in accordance with the sixth aspect of the present invention. This also allows for the option of organizing configurations according to security level.
- a security system is operative to use a wireless transmitter to authorize an entry or exit.
- the transmitter may be used as a substitute for manual code entry, or as a first step in authentication, namely to enable the function of entry or exit with a delay (and thus without generating an immediate alarm), while still requiring the user to enter a code or otherwise provide authentication.
- the security system is configured to allow entry or exit using different paths through protected premises and the wireless transmitter has a range to be detected when entry or exit is possible via different paths
- the invention provides the ability to determine a path for entry or exit following wireless transmitter authorization by detecting a path-distinguishing zone within the security system.
- a security system is operative to by-pass a zone and automatically re-arm the zone when it is detected that the by-pass is no longer required.
- the by-pass of a zone representing a window sensor may be authenticated using a keypad, and the by-pass is automatically removed when the window is closed again.
- the removal of the by-pass can be instant or after a short delay of a few seconds, the latter providing a "debounce" function.
- Figure 1 is a flow chart illustrating the sequence of operational steps of a security system in a stay mode according to one embodiment of the invention
- Figure 2 is a schematic block diagram of a security system having a entry authorization controller generating a pass signal for canceling an intrusion event
- Figure 3 is a schematic block diagram of a security system having a entry authorization controller generating a zone specific pass signal for canceling an intrusion event for a specific zone;
- Figure 4 is a schematic block diagram of a security system having a entry authorization controller cooperating with an arm/disarm authentication controller to generate a pass signal for canceling an intrusion event;
- Figure 5a is a schematic representation of the content of an intrusion event stack corresponding to the embodiment of Figure 2 for two entries into the protected premises with a single authenticated pass;
- Figure 5b is a schematic representation of the content of an intrusion event stack corresponding to the embodiment of Figure 3 for one authorized exit and one intrusion entry into the protected premises with a single authenticated zone specific pass
- Figure 5c is a schematic representation of the content of an intrusion event stack corresponding to the embodiment of Figure 3 for two entries into the protected premises with a single authenticated zone specific pass
- Figure 6 is a hardware block diagram of one possible implementation of the invention.
- a security system is schematically summarized in which steps 30 through 40 are found in conventional systems, while steps 50 and up are new.
- a security system is armed in the single "stay mode" at step 30, and as long as no intrusion is detected (step 32) among the stay mode active sensors and detectors no action is taken.
- the arming in the stay mode involves selecting one of a number of stay modes with different levels of security. These different "stay modes" may correspond to different partitions of the secured premises in addition to different levels of security.
- an exit or entry delay countdown is started at step 33. This is followed by indicating the zone of the intrusion on the security system user interface at step 34.
- zones may be classified "entry/exit delay” and "immediate”. If the intrusion detected in step 32 is in a zone that is "immediate", the system may immediate jump to step 37 or it may operate with delay without offering the option of normal pass authentication. This may be done by following conventional operation requiring the user to enter a system disarm code
- step 35 that in accordance with the present invention may not be available to all users or occupants, or by following the embodiment of
- the user has an additional option of authenticating a pass (step 50), namely to authorize the entry or exit from the secured premises, before the delay lapses.
- Authenticating a pass at step 50 may involve entering a special code at a keypad or any equivalent means of authenticating an occupant of the secured premises.
- pass authentication the security system remains armed and active for all other zones. For the zone that was used for the entry or exit, the system will detect that the zone is "open”, namely that intrusion is detected, and that it is later "closed”, namely that the intrusion detection ceases. The system will make sure that the intrusion detection ceases at step 51 , for example the door sensor detects that the door is closed following entry or exit.
- a delay may be provided as a maximum time that a door may remain open before an alarm is generated.
- the door zone may be immediately re-armed (or re-armed after a short "debounce" delay of a few seconds to make sure that the door has been properly and permanently shut) or, particularly in the case of exit, it may remain unarmed for the duration of an exit delay.
- the display of the zone on the security system interface as being subject to intrusion is reset at step 52, and the Entry/Exit Delay is reset at step 53.
- the security system then returns to the normal armed stay mode at step 30.
- FIGS 2 to 4 schematically illustrate a security system according to a first embodiment.
- the security system comprises the elements illustrated in Figure 6, namely a microcontroller 60 programmed with suitable program code that when executed performs the functions illustrated in Figure 1 , a power supply 61 with battery back-up and AC/DC converter, a clock signal source oscillator 62, and non-volatile memory 63.
- a security system keypad/display unit 64 is connected to the microcontroller 60 via a serial bus 65.
- Zone inputs can be analog signals generated by intrusion detectors connected to ADC pins of microcontroller 60, and a software module running on processor 60 can interpret the analog states and maintain a register or memory store for each zone with corresponding detector states for interpretation by filter 12.
- Zone inputs can also be from bus 65, or a wireless interface module that comprises wireless hardware circuitry 66 and a corresponding wireless interface software module running on processor 60.
- Filter 12 is configured using a programming interface 18 to indicate to filter 12 the list of enabled and disabled zones as well as the stay mode zones. Filter 12 is essentially a software module on processor 60.
- Zones can be identified typically as being immediate alarm or with a timer or countdown before generating an alarm, active or enabled, disabled or by-passed, in a follow mode where the zone is by- passed as a function of detection by another zone and otherwise active.
- Follow mode is used for zones next to doors, for example.
- the manager 16 only considers intrusion events coming from enabled armed zones in the selected mode of away or stay.
- manager 16 causes the status display 20 to show the event.
- Alarm manager 16 is essentially a software module running on processor 60.
- Programming interface 18 uses keypad and display 64 to first authenticate a master user and allow such master user to configure the system including defining the valid user codes.
- the programming interface is essentially a software module running on processor 60 operating in conjunction with keypad/display 64.
- the alarm manager 16 receives an intrusion signal from a sensor or detector 10 through filter 12, it enters the event in memory 17 (provided within processor 60) that may be arranged as a stack or circular buffer, and begins a timer countdown before an alarm is generated using unit 25.
- the siren output is done using driver circuit 25a connected to an output pin of processor 60, while the silent alarm is done using telephone dialer circuit 25b and a modem software module running on processor 60.
- the entry authorization controller 24 involves the use of a wireless transmitter to authenticate a pass.
- the transmitter may be a portable, battery-powered transceiver carried on a keychain or the like. It may be used as a substitute for manual code entry, or as a first step in authentication, namely to enable the function of entry or exit with a delay (and thus without generating an immediate alarm), while still requiring the user to enter a code or otherwise provide authentication.
- the security system includes a wireless receiver that detects the code transmitted by the user's transmitter. When using a transmitter to enable entry, the perimeter can remain armed and be operative to generate an instant alarm when the perimeter is breached. Use of the transmitter allows for entry to take place without an instant alarm.
- the user transceiver can also have a display of the system state, such as solid green for disarmed, flashing green for pass authentication in stay mode, flashing red for alarm, solid red for fully armed or away mode, and solid yellow for armed in stay mode.
- the wireless transmitter can serve a dual function, namely to activate the pass authentication and to actuate a gate or garage door opener.
- the invention provides the ability to determine a path for entry or exit following wireless transmitter authorization by detecting a path-distinguishing zone within the security system.
- a path is a collection of zones operating with an entry or exit delay that would involve detection as a person enters or exits the premises. By determining which path is to be used for an entry or exit, other paths can be left armed in an instant mode.
- the interface 18 may be used to program more than one stay mode configuration. Such configurations may be organized as a function of different levels of security. Display 20 may display the selected level of security.
- One example of such different configurations is a nighttime stay mode in which sleeping quarter zones are not armed, while daytime quarter zones are armed, and a daytime stay mode in which all interior zones are not armed.
- stay mode configurations are determined by occupant usage of the premises, namely unused quarters are armed and used quarters are unarmed, while the interior-exterior perimeter remains armed.
- a sliding glass door leading onto a closed deck may be unarmed in a stay mode when outdoor areas are considered within protected premises. Other doors and windows may be armed.
- a satellite keypad associated with controller 22 and/or controller 24 can be provided within the unarmed area for switching between stay mode configurations before an occupant enters an interior armed zone, or pass authentication may be done immediately following entry into the armed interior zone.
- the arm/disarm controller 22 and likewise the entry authorization controller 24 are provided by using keypad/display unit 64 in conjunction with corresponding software modules running on processor 60. Security codes established using interface 18 are stored in non-volatile memory 63.
- the programming interface 18 is used to classify zones as "with entry and/or exit delay” or as “immediate alarm”, the latter class either requiring a user to provide a specific disarm authentication or immediately generating an alarm without allowing for the user to stop the alarm generation.
- the interface 18 communicates this configuration to alarm manager 16, preferably via stay mode filter 12.
- the stay mode filter signals to alarm manager 16 that an armed zone has detected intrusion
- the alarm manager 16 determines whether the zone is "with delay” or "immediate”. If the zone is "with delay”, then pass authentication may be used as in the embodiment of Figures 2 or 3.
- the system may be configured either to generate an immediate alarm, namely manager 16 signals alarm 25 immediately, or else, a delay is implemented with alarm generation being avoided either by system disarm or by special pass authentication.
- the specific disarm authentication is preferably available to a reduced number of users or occupants, while authentication for entry or exit via zones specifically identified for this purpose is made available for all authorized users or occupants.
- the programming interface 18 can be used in some embodiments to define in each stay mode configuration which zones may be used by which users for entry and/or exit.
- Separate lists may handle entry and exit, since it may be acceptable for a user to authenticate an exit through a door, while the same door would not be secure for entry. For example, it may be acceptable to authenticate a user from within the premises to exit through a door leading into a back alley, while no user should be allowed to enter through such back alley due to a higher risk of an intruder entering with the user by force. Likewise, some users may be authorized to enter or to exit via certain zones, while others are not. Pass authentication can identify individual users or a level of user (group of users) so that more precise management of entry and exit of users can be provided. Logging of user entry and exit can be done efficiently when authentication is unique to each user. In the case that some users, such as employees or children, are not authorized to arm or disarm the system, but instead merely to use pass authorization, then greater security can be provided.
- the security system may be programmed with different classification configurations of the zones with the ability to select a desired one of the classification configurations.
- the classification configuration may be combined with the stay mode configuration and communicated to alarm manager 16 via the stay mode filter 12. This also allows for the option of organizing configurations according to security level that can be displayed on display 20.
- an arm/disarm controller 22 is included for authenticating a user and then either arming the security system or disarming the security system by signaling the alarm manager 16 accordingly.
- a entry authorization controller 24 is also provided for authenticating a user and issuing a pass.
- the valid user codes used by the two controllers 22 and 24 may be the same or different, and may be user specific or not.
- the alarm manager 16 responds to the pass signal by removing or otherwise ignoring one intrusion event in memory 17. If only one event was recorded, a single pass will cause the alarm manager to continue to operate in the armed stay mode, and the display 20 will indicate no intrusion events. If two or more events were recorded, a single pass will cause the alarm manager merely to remove or ignore the first received event, and the display will show the remaining events (namely the zones where intrusion was detected). The user would need to use the entry authorization controller 24 repeatedly to generate additional pass signals to remove all events to prevent an alarm from being generated. However, in conventional configurations, two events generated during exit or entry would be an indication of foul play.
- the operation is similar to Figure 2 except that the controller 24 generates a pass signal that identifies the zone through which the pass is to be authorized, and manager 16 removes or ignores the event corresponding to the identified zone only. This allows for a clear identification on display 20 of the exact zones where an unauthorized event was detected after the user authenticates the zone specific pass.
- Zone identification in the pass signal can be done by using a keypad that is related to the specific entry/exit zone.
- a satellite keypad can be located near an entrance/exit for this purpose.
- Such a co- located keypad can be set to identify the local entrance/exit by default, while still be used with an additional key press for authenticating an exit or entry via a different door.
- the stay mode controller 24 functionality may be provided by cooperating with controller 22 for the purposes of authenticating the user, while for example allowing the user to press a key on a keypad to issue a pass authentication instead of a disarm or arm signal command.
- the user may enter the secured premises, thus creating an intrusion event.
- controller 24 causes an indicator on the interface keypad to flash or otherwise to indicate that the system will disarm very shortly, say in 3 seconds. If the user presses a key on the keypad, possibly associated with the flashing indicator, then controller 24 issues to alarm manager 16 a pass authentication signal. If the key is not pressed within the short time period, then controller 24 issues the authenticated disarm signal. For the user, this embodiment allows for a single code to be used and for a simply key press to change the authenticated function from full disarm to pass.
- a user enters at controller 22 the normal disarm code.
- the controller 24 then causes display 20 to indicate that disarm has been authenticated and will take effect shortly.
- the user may press a key within the short time period to cause controller 24 to issue to alarm manager 16 a pass authentication instead of a disarm signal. In absence of the user entry within the short period, the controller 24 sends the disarm signal.
- the key to be pressed can indicate the zone for which the pass is to be issued, and thus will trigger the pass and specify the zone at the same time.
- pass authentication is done using a controller 24 within the secured premises.
- a user is authenticated outside secured premises as part of access control, such authentication can be either used in combination with inside authentication for pass authentication purposes, or may be used as a substitute for inside secured premises pass authentication.
- security system configuration can be defined as a function of specific doors and/or as a function of specific users.
- access control authentication may be used for pass authentication in some stay mode configurations and not others.
- the events may be recorded as shown.
- the pass does not identify the event, and so it is assumed that it is the first event to be passed.
- the display will continue to show the outstanding "patio door” zone event after the pass is authenticated, and the alarm will be generated unless other action is taken.
- the events may be recorded as shown.
- the pass identifies the event, and so remaining occupants will see on the display the outstanding "patio door” zone event, and the alarm will be generated unless other action is taken.
- the security system is operative to by-pass a zone and automatically re-arm the zone when it is detected that the by-pass is no longer required.
- the by-pass of a zone representing a window sensor may be authenticated using a keypad, and the by-pass is automatically removed when the window is closed again.
- the removal of the by-pass can be instant or after a short delay of a few seconds, the latter providing a "debounce" function.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/381,675 US7965171B2 (en) | 2006-05-04 | 2006-05-04 | Security system entry control |
PCT/CA2006/001578 WO2007128095A1 (en) | 2006-05-04 | 2006-09-25 | Security system with user authentication without disarming |
US88453607P | 2007-01-11 | 2007-01-11 | |
PCT/CA2007/000727 WO2007128102A1 (en) | 2006-05-04 | 2007-04-27 | Security system entry control |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1946276A1 true EP1946276A1 (en) | 2008-07-23 |
EP1946276A4 EP1946276A4 (en) | 2010-05-05 |
EP1946276B1 EP1946276B1 (en) | 2013-10-02 |
Family
ID=38667361
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP07719653.3A Active EP1946276B1 (en) | 2006-05-04 | 2007-04-27 | Security system entry control |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1946276B1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2007128102A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2022268309A1 (en) * | 2021-06-23 | 2022-12-29 | Legat Philipp | Smart data collection |
Families Citing this family (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CA2750768A1 (en) * | 2009-02-25 | 2010-09-02 | Tyco Safety Products Canada Ltd. | Security system with keyfob alert notification |
GB2520099B (en) * | 2014-06-26 | 2015-11-04 | Cocoon Alarm Ltd | Intruder detection method and system |
US10306401B2 (en) | 2015-12-21 | 2019-05-28 | Google Llc | Systems and methods for learning and controlling area zones |
US10636278B2 (en) * | 2018-02-02 | 2020-04-28 | Ademco Inc. | Systems and methods for arming a security system |
Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5225806A (en) * | 1991-12-20 | 1993-07-06 | Honeywell Inc. | Security system having mode control of sensor points |
US5461372A (en) * | 1993-01-19 | 1995-10-24 | Honeywell Inc. | System and method for modifying security in a security system |
US6111502A (en) * | 1997-03-19 | 2000-08-29 | Alcea | Method and device for keeping watch over premises by having differing activation times of sensors |
WO2002023498A1 (en) * | 2000-09-15 | 2002-03-21 | Technopuce | Surveillance method and device for triggering a warning during an intrusion in the monitored zone |
EP1400939A1 (en) * | 2002-09-20 | 2004-03-24 | Charlie Sherlock | A system for monitoring an environment |
US6912429B1 (en) * | 2000-10-19 | 2005-06-28 | Destiny Networks, Inc. | Home automation system and method |
EP1643470A2 (en) * | 2004-10-04 | 2006-04-05 | Honeywell International Inc. | Method of programming security control panels for door entry device compatibility |
Family Cites Families (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4271405A (en) * | 1978-01-03 | 1981-06-02 | Kitterman Lawrence P | Alarm control system |
US5309144A (en) * | 1990-04-19 | 1994-05-03 | Lacombe David K | Proximity sensing security system |
US20060090079A1 (en) * | 2004-10-21 | 2006-04-27 | Honeywell International, Inc. | Voice authenticated alarm exit and entry interface system |
-
2007
- 2007-04-27 EP EP07719653.3A patent/EP1946276B1/en active Active
- 2007-04-27 WO PCT/CA2007/000727 patent/WO2007128102A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5225806A (en) * | 1991-12-20 | 1993-07-06 | Honeywell Inc. | Security system having mode control of sensor points |
US5461372A (en) * | 1993-01-19 | 1995-10-24 | Honeywell Inc. | System and method for modifying security in a security system |
US6111502A (en) * | 1997-03-19 | 2000-08-29 | Alcea | Method and device for keeping watch over premises by having differing activation times of sensors |
WO2002023498A1 (en) * | 2000-09-15 | 2002-03-21 | Technopuce | Surveillance method and device for triggering a warning during an intrusion in the monitored zone |
US6912429B1 (en) * | 2000-10-19 | 2005-06-28 | Destiny Networks, Inc. | Home automation system and method |
EP1400939A1 (en) * | 2002-09-20 | 2004-03-24 | Charlie Sherlock | A system for monitoring an environment |
EP1643470A2 (en) * | 2004-10-04 | 2006-04-05 | Honeywell International Inc. | Method of programming security control panels for door entry device compatibility |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
HONEYWELL: "Galaxy 16 and 16 plus user's guide" INTERNET CITATION 2003, XP002440981 Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://www.pr-alarms.co.uk/images/galaxy16userguide.pdf> [retrieved on 2007-07-03] * |
See also references of WO2007128102A1 * |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2022268309A1 (en) * | 2021-06-23 | 2022-12-29 | Legat Philipp | Smart data collection |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP1946276A4 (en) | 2010-05-05 |
EP1946276B1 (en) | 2013-10-02 |
WO2007128102A1 (en) | 2007-11-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20100026487A1 (en) | Security system control panel | |
US9235980B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for automatically disarming a security system | |
US8269602B2 (en) | Security access control system and method for making same | |
CA2529642C (en) | Door security device for use in security systems | |
US7511602B2 (en) | Keyless entry module and method | |
CN111691764B (en) | Household intelligent door lock and control method thereof | |
EP1946276B1 (en) | Security system entry control | |
US5955981A (en) | Security for remote operation devices | |
CA2648482C (en) | Security system entry control | |
JP2683369B2 (en) | Card lock device | |
ES2440248T3 (en) | Input control with security system | |
JPH10275263A (en) | Room entering and leaving management device | |
JP2798249B2 (en) | Security system | |
JP3580780B2 (en) | Multi-area security system | |
KR20080092546A (en) | Going in and out man management type electronic door lock | |
JPH04108970A (en) | Operational controller | |
KR20090007268A (en) | Going in and out man management type electronic door lock | |
JPH0577119B2 (en) |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20080611 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA HR MK RS |
|
A4 | Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched |
Effective date: 20100408 |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: G08B 13/00 20060101AFI20080212BHEP Ipc: G08B 13/22 20060101ALI20100331BHEP |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20100820 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20130429 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA HR MK RS |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 634960 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20131015 Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602007033118 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20131128 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2440248 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 Effective date: 20140128 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 634960 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20131002 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: VDEP Effective date: 20131002 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20131002 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20131002 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140202 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20131002 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20131002 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20131002 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20131002 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20131002 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20131002 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20131002 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20131002 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20131002 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140203 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602007033118 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20131002 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20131002 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20131002 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20140423 Year of fee payment: 8 Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20140424 Year of fee payment: 8 Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20140416 Year of fee payment: 8 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20140429 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20140703 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20131002 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602007033118 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20140703 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20131002 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140427 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20140427 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140427 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140430 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140430 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140427 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602007033118 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150427 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20151103 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20151231 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150430 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20131002 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20131002 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140103 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20131002 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20070427 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150428 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20180704 |