EP1745932A1 - Method for validating warranty compliance and ink compatibility assurance - Google Patents

Method for validating warranty compliance and ink compatibility assurance Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1745932A1
EP1745932A1 EP05076690A EP05076690A EP1745932A1 EP 1745932 A1 EP1745932 A1 EP 1745932A1 EP 05076690 A EP05076690 A EP 05076690A EP 05076690 A EP05076690 A EP 05076690A EP 1745932 A1 EP1745932 A1 EP 1745932A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
fluid
smart card
print station
replaceable
container
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP05076690A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1745932B1 (en
Inventor
Dan C. c/o Eastman Kodak Company Lyman
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Eastman Kodak Co
Original Assignee
Eastman Kodak Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Eastman Kodak Co filed Critical Eastman Kodak Co
Priority to EP20050076690 priority Critical patent/EP1745932B1/en
Priority to DE200560005470 priority patent/DE602005005470T2/en
Publication of EP1745932A1 publication Critical patent/EP1745932A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1745932B1 publication Critical patent/EP1745932B1/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B41PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
    • B41JTYPEWRITERS; SELECTIVE PRINTING MECHANISMS, i.e. MECHANISMS PRINTING OTHERWISE THAN FROM A FORME; CORRECTION OF TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS
    • B41J2/00Typewriters or selective printing mechanisms characterised by the printing or marking process for which they are designed
    • B41J2/005Typewriters or selective printing mechanisms characterised by the printing or marking process for which they are designed characterised by bringing liquid or particles selectively into contact with a printing material
    • B41J2/01Ink jet
    • B41J2/17Ink jet characterised by ink handling
    • B41J2/175Ink supply systems ; Circuit parts therefor
    • B41J2/17503Ink cartridges
    • B41J2/17506Refilling of the cartridge
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B41PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
    • B41JTYPEWRITERS; SELECTIVE PRINTING MECHANISMS, i.e. MECHANISMS PRINTING OTHERWISE THAN FROM A FORME; CORRECTION OF TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS
    • B41J2/00Typewriters or selective printing mechanisms characterised by the printing or marking process for which they are designed
    • B41J2/005Typewriters or selective printing mechanisms characterised by the printing or marking process for which they are designed characterised by bringing liquid or particles selectively into contact with a printing material
    • B41J2/01Ink jet
    • B41J2/17Ink jet characterised by ink handling
    • B41J2/175Ink supply systems ; Circuit parts therefor
    • B41J2/17503Ink cartridges
    • B41J2/17543Cartridge presence detection or type identification
    • B41J2/17546Cartridge presence detection or type identification electronically

Definitions

  • the present embodiments relate to a method for affecting an ink compatibility assurance program.
  • Ink jet printing systems consist of a fluid system supporting one or more printheads.
  • Typical ink jet printheads operate by forcing fluid through a droplet generator that contains an array of orifices, forming droplets of ink.
  • the type of ink used in the printhead is important; the type of ink used will enhance overall reliability of the system or cause the printhead to fail.
  • ink parameters are finely tuned to work in conjunction with the printhead portion of the system.
  • the use of an ink that is not certified to work with a particular system can adversely affect the quality of printing, the frequency of print systems errors, and/or the longevity of print system components.
  • a printhead may be considered a high cost consumable element in the printing system, it is often warranted by the manufacturer to meet certain reliability criteria and, therefore, the manufacturer often ends up absorbing the large cost of a customer's use of non-approved ink in a print system. This is an expense that manufactures desire to avoid.
  • the customer purchases the system with the agreement that the customer must use approved ink. For various reason (i.e., low cost, better short term performance at the expense of reduced printhead life, availability of a specific color, and the like) a customer may be tempted to use non-approved ink.
  • Hillmann US Patent Number 5,365,312 discloses a technique for tracking the use of replaceable ink reservoirs, toner cartridges, and ribbon cassettes by permanently modifying the electronic memory associated with these devices.
  • a drop counting technique is used to determine usage and misusage of ink.
  • a method for validating warranty compliance for compatible fluid use of a printing system entails fluidly engaging a replaceable fluid container with a print station.
  • the container includes a smart card adapted to track volumetric credits.
  • the print station requests that fluid be added to a reservoir from the container.
  • the method continues by ascertaining the presence of the smart card in the reader/writer and reading the smart card to obtain information related to the fluid.
  • the print station operates per the information from the smart card.
  • the method ends by ascertaining the amount of fluid amount removed from the container and writing the withdrawn amount to the smart card as a debit, thereby maintaining printhead operation under warranty.
  • Embodied methods for validating warranty compliance of using replaceable fluids with print stations pertain to situations wherein a smart card is not present, wherein low volume or a zero volume exists on the smart card, wherein the print station cannot read the information on the smart card, wherein the fluid in the container had passed an expiration date, and wherein the fluid in the container is incompatible with the fluid in the print station.
  • the embodied methods provide a secure way of determining when a customer has used non-approved ink in a continuous ink jet printing system.
  • the methods provide a manner of relating this information to the printhead manufacturer using the printhead memory.
  • Figure 1 depicts an ink jet print station 10, such as a Kodak Versamark DT92 print station available from Kodak Versamark of Dayton, Ohio.
  • the print station has a printhead 70 connected to a reservoir 12 for holding fluid 13 usable by the print station for cleaning or for printing.
  • a fluid supply line 14 communicates with the reservoir 12 and a replaceable fluid container 16.
  • the replaceable fluid container 16 can hold fluid for the print station.
  • the fluid 17 can be ink, cleaning fluid, a replenishment fluid or combinations of these fluids.
  • a controllable valve 18 is disposed in the fluid supply line 14 for controlling fluid flow through the fluid supply line 14.
  • the controllable valve is operated by a controller 22 that in turn receives information from a reader/writer 24.
  • the smart card 20 has information 21 concerning the replaceable fluid container 16. The information on the smart card 20 can be read by the reader/writer 24. After the controller 22 has received information from the smart card 20, the controller can provide a controlled release of fluid 13 from the replaceable container 16 to the reservoir.
  • a flow meter 26 can optionally be disposed in the fluid supply line 14 and be in communication with the controller 22.
  • the print station can have a user interface 72 in communication with the controller 22 enabling the controller 22 to advise a user that the fluid in the reservoir is not compatible with the print station.
  • the print station can advise a user that a valid smart card with volume remaining on the card is in use.
  • the print station can provide other messages as well, such as messages that the new ink of a second replaceable container is not compatible with the ink of the reservoir or that flushing needs to occur prior to use of the new ink of the second replaceable container.
  • Other example messages the print station can provide include a message that the expiration date for fluid in the replaceable container has passed, a message that a smart card has not been installed, and a message that the smart card volumetric credits are low.
  • the print station has a sensor 74 for measuring the level of fluid in the container that is in communication with the controller.
  • the print station has a fluid line 84 connected between the reservoir to the printhead.
  • a pump 86 is disposed in the fluid line to supply fluid from the reservoir to the printhead.
  • the print station has a fluid return line 88 from the printhead to the reservoir.
  • An example of a smart card usable with the print station is model MPCOS-EMV16K available from GemPlus of Germany.
  • An exemplary smart card reader for reading from and writing to the smart card is model 410 available from GemPlus of Luxembourg.
  • the smart card preferably is one that complies with the ISO standard ISO 7816.
  • the controller can be a central processing unit (CPU) or a gate array logic device.
  • the controller can conjunctively operate the print station.
  • the gate array logic device can be a model Spartan XC2S100E available from Xilinx.
  • the reservoir 12 can have a capacity between one liter and six liters. It is envisioned that the replaceable container can have capacity between 1 liter and 220 liters.
  • the fluid of the reservoir or the replaceable fluid container can be water-based ink, oil-based ink, solvent-based ink, cleaning fluid, replenishment fluid, or a toner.
  • An example of an ink that could be used in the print station is model FD7101 from Kodak Versamark of Dayton, Ohio.
  • An example of a cleaning fluid is model FF5000 from Kodak Versamark.
  • An example of a replenishment fluid is product number FR1014 from Kodak Versamark.
  • the fluid supply line can be flexible tubing having an inner diameter between 0.25 cm and 2.5 cm, which is compatible with the fluid.
  • the controllable valves are preferably motor valves, solenoid valves, hydraulic valves, pneumatic valves, or other electrically controlled valves.
  • FIG. 2 depicts a preferred embodiment of a smart card usable in the print station.
  • the smart card includes a microchip 28 embedded in a substrate 30, wherein the microchip has flash memory 32, random access memory (RAM) 34, a microprocessor 36, and a communication link 38 for transmitting and receiving data from a non-card source 40.
  • RAM random access memory
  • Figure 3 shows the smart card with the following information stored on the card, information about the container 42, operating properties of the fluid 44, reliability properties of the fluid 46, specifications on the physical properties of fluid in the container 48, volumetric measurements on the fluid in the container 50, batch expiration dates 52, batch number 54, manufacturing plant identification information 56, customer name 58, customer address 60, authorization to charge based on amount printed 62, performance parameters that enable the system run faster for a defined period of time 64, printhead information 66.
  • the smart card can also include a security encryption algorithm 68 to prevent unauthorized communication with the smart card.
  • Figure 4 shows an embodiment of an ink jet printhead usable in these methods, more specifically a drop generator 76 has an orifice structure 78 attached to the drop generator forming a jet array 80. Disposed opposite the jet array is an optional charge device 81 connected to a catcher 82. The drop generator is supplied with fluid from a fluid line 84. The catcher 82 communicates to a fluid return line 88 to return fluid from the catcher to the reservoir 12.
  • This inventive method provides a feature of tracking ink usage to prevent printhead damage.
  • the device can completely break down or fail because other parameters for the printing machine have not been reset due to the use of the wrong ink.
  • the present device and method were designed to maximize the longevity and reduce repair needs for a printing system.
  • the warranty can extend for the full duration of the intended period, which creates a positive customer-manufacturer relationship.
  • Use of a smart card assists in maximizing the warranty relationship by helping insure the tracking of ink usage to a system.
  • the methods additionally minimize the extent to which a manufacturer is financially exposed when a customer damages a printhead by using uncertified competitor inks and returns the printhead to the manufacturer for replacement.
  • Figure 5 depicts a method for using a smart card with a replaceable fluid container for an ink jet printing system. This method is used for validating warranty compliance for compatible fluid use of a printing system.
  • the method entails fluidly engaging a replaceable fluid container associated with a print station (Step 100).
  • the replaceable fluid container contains fluid and contains an associated removable smart card.
  • the smart card is adapted to track volumetric credits.
  • fluid is used.
  • fluid is withdrawn from the replaceable fluid container to the print station (Step 102).
  • the request for fluid from the replaceable fluid container occurs when the print station is in a state that permits filling of the replaceable fluid container, such as a standby mode.
  • the print station ascertains whether the smart card is present by using a reader/writer (Step 104).
  • the print station can ascertain the presence of the smart card by determining if a communication link exists between the smart card and the controller.
  • the controller reads the smart card to obtain information related to the fluid.
  • the information includes volumetric information, fluid specific data, print station operation parameter information, and combinations thereof (Step 106).
  • the print station performs operations based upon the information obtained from the smart card (Step 108).
  • Volumetric information includes the volume of ink or fluid or replenishment liquid in the replaceable fluid container.
  • Fluid specific data includes ink expiration dates, ink batch number, another fluid number if a cleaning fluid or replenishment fluid is used.
  • Parameter information includes operating temperature for the ink, specific state tables to use when operating the printhead, temperature correction coefficients for stimulation and charge voltages that are applied to the charge device that is an optional part for the catcher assembly, short detection limits, short detection delays, and similar operating conditions.
  • the smart card of the replaceable fluid container has stored in memory the specifications on the fluid for use in the printing system and the volume of fluid initially in the replaceable fluid container. Other information is also stored on the smart card, including particular user information, user biometrics optionally, and other user identifying codes. Security and encryption features can be on the smart card as well.
  • the smart card can have a financial feature of indicating the amount of credit a customer has that can be debited from as the customer uses the fluid from the replaceable fluid container for the printing system.
  • the amount of fluid amount withdrawn from the replaceable fluid container is calculated (Step 110).
  • the withdrawn fluid amount removed can be calculated by using a flow totalizer and a flow meter to measure a flow rate from the replaceable fluid container.
  • the flow meter and controller integrate the flow rate over time to derive a total flow volume.
  • the amount of fluid withdrawn from the replaceable fluid container can be calculated using other methods, such as a float switch, a pressure transducers, ultrasonic measurement, or optic measurement.
  • the method ends by withdrawing the fluid amount from smart card using the reader/writer by debiting the fluid amount the smart card, (Step 112), thereby maintaining printhead operation under warranty.
  • Operating the print station refers to the condition of running fluid through the printhead and fluid assembly, such as printing images with ink or cleaning the orifice structure with a cleaning fluid.
  • the methods can include linking the print station and smart card to a website to provide real time reports on a customer or providing a link from the smart card to a customer ordering site that enables fluid to be automatically refilled.
  • the method can include initiating a customer service call to the customer when a warranty breach occurs.
  • Figure 6 depicts the embodiment of the method, wherein the smart card is not present.
  • Step 208a If the rejection choice is selected or if no response is given, the fluid flow to the reservoir is restricted (Step 208b or Step 208c).
  • Step 208d the print station utilizes steps for validating warranty compliance for compatible fluid as depicted in Figure 5.
  • Figure 7 depicts embodiment of the preferred method, wherein the information on the smart card alerts the user that a low volume exists on the card.
  • the print station determines that the smart card contains a zero volumetric credit (Step 304)
  • the print station alerts the user that a warrant breach condition exists because of the zero volumetric credit (Step 306).
  • the print station offers the user at least the following choices: acceptance, rejection, no response, or installation of a smart card regarding the warranty breach condition (Step 208).
  • Step 208a If the rejection choice is selected or if no response is given, the fluid flow to the reservoir from the replaceable fluid container is restricted (Step 208b or Step 208c).
  • Step 308 the print station utilizes steps for validating warranty compliance for compatible fluid as depicted in Figure 5.
  • Another embodied method handles the situations when the smart is unreadable.
  • Step 100 After the replaceable fluid container has been inserted with an associated smart card (Step 100) and during printing operations, fluid is withdrawn from the replaceable fluid container to the print station (Step 102).
  • the print station then ascertains whether the smart card is readable or not (Step 404).
  • the print station sends a message to the user through the user interface alerting that a warranty breach condition exists since the smart card is unreadable (Step 406).
  • the print station offers the user at least the following choices: acceptance, rejection, no response, or installation of a smart card regarding the warranty breach condition (Step 208).
  • Step 208a If the user chooses the rejection response or does not respond, the fluid flow to the reservoir from the replaceable fluid container is restricted (Step 208b or Step 208c).
  • Step 408 If the user inserts a card that is readable with valid volumetric credits, the replaceable fluid container is filled with fluid (Step 408).
  • the print station utilizes steps for validating warranty compliance for compatible fluid as depicted in Figure 5.
  • Another method embodiment involves the smart card providing an expiration date of the fluid in the replacement container to the controller, wherein the controller is adapted to determine if an expiration date of the fluid has passed.
  • Figure 9 depicts an alternative embodiment, wherein the ink in the print system has passed an expiration date.
  • the print station alerts the user through the user interface that warranty breach condition exists to the shelf life of the fluid being exceeded (Step 506).
  • the print station presents the user at least the following four choices: acceptance, rejection, no response, or installation of a smart card regarding the warranty breach condition (Step 208).
  • Step 208a If the acceptance choice is selected, reservoir is filled with fluid from the replaceable fluid container and a message indicating a warranty breach occurred is transmitted to the printhead (Step 208a). If the rejection choice is selected or if no response is given, the fluid flow to the reservoir from the replaceable fluid container is restricted (Step 208b or Step 208c).
  • the print station fills the reservoir with fluid from the replaceable fluid container.
  • the print station installs the second smart card by reading the second smart card to obtain information related to the fluid (Step 106).
  • the information includes volumetric information, fluid specific data, print station operation parameter information, and combinations thereof.
  • the print station with the controller operates using the information obtained from the second smart card (Step 108).
  • the print station ascertains if fluid has been withdrawn from the replaceable fluid container and, if so, the volumetric amount (Step 110).
  • the reader/writer then debits the withdrawn fluid amount from the second smart card (Step 112), thereby maintaining printhead operation under warranty.
  • the smart card and smart card reader will function as follows: upon installation of an ink, the operator selects the ink number using the normal selection process from the controller. The smart card from the container is inserted into the fluid system's smart card reader. The fluid system periodically checks the smart card. If the ink does not match that on the system, a warning, such as "Incorrect Ink Attached", will be issued. If a smart card is not detected, a warning, such as "Ink Card Not Installed", will be issued.
  • the inkdex file for the ink in use will be stored on the smart card.
  • the system will check the version umber on the smart card's inkdex file and compare the version number to version number being run on the system. If the smart card version is more recent, the system will automatically transfer the smart card version onto the system processor board and reload the inkdex file. Other information will be stored on the smart card, such as "date of manufacture”, "batch number”, and "expiration date”. If upon querying the smart card and system determines that the expiration date on the ink has passed, the system will issue a warning, such as Ink Shelf Life Expired".
  • a smart card serves as a secure memory on which the print station can track the usage of ink from the container.
  • the smart card is distributed with each container of ink. Initially, a register on the smart card is set to an amount of ink corresponding to the size of the ink container. The initially set amount is known as the "volume register".
  • the smart card and smart card reader conform to ISO-78126 and are specifically chosen because the memory is secure in the following respects: (a) the smart card output cannot be emulated by another device; (b) the smart card cannot be "re-charged” (i.e., memory locations on the card cannot be written to the secure interface, since only the processor knows the encryption algorithm and keys); and (c) the smart card memory cannot be copied.
  • the smart card memory is non-volatile and requires no external power for memory retention.
  • any secure memory device can be used.
  • the smart card embodiment uses variations algorithms to encrypt information, but one skilled in the art will recognize many algorithms and keys that can be used to secure code exchange.
  • Figure 10 depicts an embodied method, wherein the fluid in the replaceable fluid container is not compatible with the fluid already present in the reservoir.
  • the print station ascertains whether the fluid in the replaceable fluid container is compatible with the fluid in the print station by reading the information on the smart card (Step 604).
  • the print head contains information about the fluid already present in the reservoir.
  • the print station compares the information on the smart card with the information about the current fluids. If the fluids are not compatible, the print station presents the user at least the following four choices: acceptance, rejection, no response, or installation of a smart card regarding the warranty breach condition (Step 208).
  • Step 208a If no response is given or if the response is rejection, fluid from the replaceable fluid container is not allowed to flow to the reservoir (Step 208b and Step 208c).
  • the print station allows the reservoir to be filled with the fluid from the replaceable fluid container (Step 608).
  • the print station utilizes steps for validating warranty compliance for compatible fluid using a second smart card as depicted in Figure 9.

Abstract

A method for validating warranty compliance for compatible fluid use of a printing system entails fluidly engaging a replaceable fluid container with a print station. The container includes a smart card adapted to track volumetric credits. Through use, the print station requests that fluid be added to a reservoir from the container. The method continues by ascertaining the presence of the smart card in the reader/writer and reading the smart card to obtain information related to the fluid. The print station operates per the information from the smart card. The method ends by ascertaining the amount of fluid amount removed from the container and writing the withdrawn amount to the smart card as a debit, thereby maintaining printhead operation under warranty.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present embodiments relate to a method for affecting an ink compatibility assurance program.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Current ink jet printing systems consist of a fluid system supporting one or more printheads. Typical ink jet printheads operate by forcing fluid through a droplet generator that contains an array of orifices, forming droplets of ink. The type of ink used in the printhead is important; the type of ink used will enhance overall reliability of the system or cause the printhead to fail.
  • In continuous ink jet printing systems, ink parameters are finely tuned to work in conjunction with the printhead portion of the system. The use of an ink that is not certified to work with a particular system can adversely affect the quality of printing, the frequency of print systems errors, and/or the longevity of print system components.
  • Since a printhead may be considered a high cost consumable element in the printing system, it is often warranted by the manufacturer to meet certain reliability criteria and, therefore, the manufacturer often ends up absorbing the large cost of a customer's use of non-approved ink in a print system. This is an expense that manufactures desire to avoid.
  • Typically, the customer purchases the system with the agreement that the customer must use approved ink. For various reason (i.e., low cost, better short term performance at the expense of reduced printhead life, availability of a specific color, and the like) a customer may be tempted to use non-approved ink.
  • A need exists for a method to track the consumption of ink or other fluids by an ink jet printing system. If non-approved ink is being used by the customer, a need exists for a method to let the manufacturer know that the conditions of the warranty have been violated.
  • Hillmann US Patent Number 5,365,312 discloses a technique for tracking the use of replaceable ink reservoirs, toner cartridges, and ribbon cassettes by permanently modifying the electronic memory associated with these devices. A drop counting technique is used to determine usage and misusage of ink.
  • Other system for detecting ink cartridge status are known in the art, as exampled by Hilton US Patent Number 6158837 , Lefebvre US Patent Number 6,116,715 ; Lee US Patent Number 6,062,669 . The prior art listed herein is hereby incorporated by reference.
  • A need exists for a method that allows the customer to continue to operate while alerting the printhead manufacturer that non-approved ink is being used.
  • The embodied methods herein are designed to meet these needs.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • A method for validating warranty compliance for compatible fluid use of a printing system entails fluidly engaging a replaceable fluid container with a print station. The container includes a smart card adapted to track volumetric credits. Through use, the print station requests that fluid be added to a reservoir from the container. The method continues by ascertaining the presence of the smart card in the reader/writer and reading the smart card to obtain information related to the fluid. The print station operates per the information from the smart card. The method ends by ascertaining the amount of fluid amount removed from the container and writing the withdrawn amount to the smart card as a debit, thereby maintaining printhead operation under warranty.
  • Embodied methods for validating warranty compliance of using replaceable fluids with print stations pertain to situations wherein a smart card is not present, wherein low volume or a zero volume exists on the smart card, wherein the print station cannot read the information on the smart card, wherein the fluid in the container had passed an expiration date, and wherein the fluid in the container is incompatible with the fluid in the print station.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • In the detailed description of the preferred embodiments presented below, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, in which:
    • Figure 1 depicts an overall schematic of a printing system and a smart card.
    • Figure 2 depicts a representative view of the components of the smart card.
    • Figure 3 depicts a graphic representation of the data fields that can be stored on the smart card.
    • Figure 4 depicts a printhead that operates within the print station of the device
    • Figure 5 depicts a flow chart of the sequence of steps in an embodied method for validating warranty compliance for compatible fluid use of a printing system.
    • Figure 6 depicts a flow cart of the sequence of steps in an embodied method for validating warranty compliance for compatible fluid use of a printing system.
    • Figure 7 depicts a flow cart of the sequence of steps in an embodied method for validating warranty compliance for compatible fluid use of a printing system.
    • Figure 8 depicts a flow cart of the sequence of steps in an embodied method for validating warranty compliance for compatible fluid use of a printing system.
    • Figure 9 depicts a flow cart of the sequence of steps in an embodied method for validating warranty compliance for compatible fluid use of a printing system.
    • Figure 10 depicts a flow cart of the sequence of steps in an embodied method for validating warranty compliance for compatible fluid use of a printing system.
    • The present embodiments are detailed below with reference to the listed Figures.
    DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • Before explaining the present embodiments in detail, it is to be understood that the embodiments are not limited to the particular descriptions and that it can be practiced or carried out in various ways.
  • The embodied methods provide a secure way of determining when a customer has used non-approved ink in a continuous ink jet printing system. The methods provide a manner of relating this information to the printhead manufacturer using the printhead memory.
  • The embodied methods are preferably used on an ink jet print. Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, and Figure 4 depicts an exemplary system on which the methods can be used. Figure 1 depicts an ink jet print station 10, such as a Kodak Versamark DT92 print station available from Kodak Versamark of Dayton, Ohio. The print station has a printhead 70 connected to a reservoir 12 for holding fluid 13 usable by the print station for cleaning or for printing.
  • A fluid supply line 14 communicates with the reservoir 12 and a replaceable fluid container 16. The replaceable fluid container 16 can hold fluid for the print station. The fluid 17 can be ink, cleaning fluid, a replenishment fluid or combinations of these fluids.
  • A controllable valve 18 is disposed in the fluid supply line 14 for controlling fluid flow through the fluid supply line 14. The controllable valve is operated by a controller 22 that in turn receives information from a reader/writer 24. The smart card 20 has information 21 concerning the replaceable fluid container 16. The information on the smart card 20 can be read by the reader/writer 24. After the controller 22 has received information from the smart card 20, the controller can provide a controlled release of fluid 13 from the replaceable container 16 to the reservoir.
  • A flow meter 26 can optionally be disposed in the fluid supply line 14 and be in communication with the controller 22.
  • The print station can have a user interface 72 in communication with the controller 22 enabling the controller 22 to advise a user that the fluid in the reservoir is not compatible with the print station. The print station can advise a user that a valid smart card with volume remaining on the card is in use. The print station can provide other messages as well, such as messages that the new ink of a second replaceable container is not compatible with the ink of the reservoir or that flushing needs to occur prior to use of the new ink of the second replaceable container. Other example messages the print station can provide include a message that the expiration date for fluid in the replaceable container has passed, a message that a smart card has not been installed, and a message that the smart card volumetric credits are low.
  • The print station has a sensor 74 for measuring the level of fluid in the container that is in communication with the controller.
  • The print station has a fluid line 84 connected between the reservoir to the printhead. A pump 86 is disposed in the fluid line to supply fluid from the reservoir to the printhead. Additionally, the print station has a fluid return line 88 from the printhead to the reservoir.
  • An example of a smart card usable with the print station is model MPCOS-EMV16K available from GemPlus of Luxembourg. An exemplary smart card reader for reading from and writing to the smart card is model 410 available from GemPlus of Luxembourg. The smart card preferably is one that complies with the ISO standard ISO 7816.
  • The controller can be a central processing unit (CPU) or a gate array logic device. The controller can conjunctively operate the print station. The gate array logic device can be a model Spartan XC2S100E available from Xilinx.
  • The reservoir 12 can have a capacity between one liter and six liters. It is envisioned that the replaceable container can have capacity between 1 liter and 220 liters.
  • The fluid of the reservoir or the replaceable fluid container can be water-based ink, oil-based ink, solvent-based ink, cleaning fluid, replenishment fluid, or a toner. An example of an ink that could be used in the print station is model FD7101 from Kodak Versamark of Dayton, Ohio. An example of a cleaning fluid is model FF5000 from Kodak Versamark. An example of a replenishment fluid is product number FR1014 from Kodak Versamark.
  • The fluid supply line can be flexible tubing having an inner diameter between 0.25 cm and 2.5 cm, which is compatible with the fluid.
  • The controllable valves are preferably motor valves, solenoid valves, hydraulic valves, pneumatic valves, or other electrically controlled valves.
  • Figure 2 depicts a preferred embodiment of a smart card usable in the print station. The smart card includes a microchip 28 embedded in a substrate 30, wherein the microchip has flash memory 32, random access memory (RAM) 34, a microprocessor 36, and a communication link 38 for transmitting and receiving data from a non-card source 40.
  • Figure 3 shows the smart card with the following information stored on the card, information about the container 42, operating properties of the fluid 44, reliability properties of the fluid 46, specifications on the physical properties of fluid in the container 48, volumetric measurements on the fluid in the container 50, batch expiration dates 52, batch number 54, manufacturing plant identification information 56, customer name 58, customer address 60, authorization to charge based on amount printed 62, performance parameters that enable the system run faster for a defined period of time 64, printhead information 66. The smart card can also include a security encryption algorithm 68 to prevent unauthorized communication with the smart card.
  • Figure 4 shows an embodiment of an ink jet printhead usable in these methods, more specifically a drop generator 76 has an orifice structure 78 attached to the drop generator forming a jet array 80. Disposed opposite the jet array is an optional charge device 81 connected to a catcher 82. The drop generator is supplied with fluid from a fluid line 84. The catcher 82 communicates to a fluid return line 88 to return fluid from the catcher to the reservoir 12.
  • Often, if a customer uses ink that is not approved by a manufacturer, the life of the printhead is reduced and/or the printhead can be damaged and ultimately non-refurbishable, which is wasteful for recycling and environmental purposes. This inventive method provides a feature of tracking ink usage to prevent printhead damage.
  • If the wrong ink is used in the printing device, the device can completely break down or fail because other parameters for the printing machine have not been reset due to the use of the wrong ink. The present device and method were designed to maximize the longevity and reduce repair needs for a printing system. When customers use appropriate inks, the warranty can extend for the full duration of the intended period, which creates a positive customer-manufacturer relationship. Use of a smart card assists in maximizing the warranty relationship by helping insure the tracking of ink usage to a system.
  • The methods additionally minimize the extent to which a manufacturer is financially exposed when a customer damages a printhead by using uncertified competitor inks and returns the printhead to the manufacturer for replacement.
  • With reference to the figures, Figure 5 depicts a method for using a smart card with a replaceable fluid container for an ink jet printing system. This method is used for validating warranty compliance for compatible fluid use of a printing system. The method entails fluidly engaging a replaceable fluid container associated with a print station (Step 100). The replaceable fluid container contains fluid and contains an associated removable smart card. The smart card is adapted to track volumetric credits.
  • During use of the print station, fluid is used. When the fluid falls below a preset level, fluid is withdrawn from the replaceable fluid container to the print station (Step 102). The request for fluid from the replaceable fluid container occurs when the print station is in a state that permits filling of the replaceable fluid container, such as a standby mode.
  • The print station ascertains whether the smart card is present by using a reader/writer (Step 104). The print station can ascertain the presence of the smart card by determining if a communication link exists between the smart card and the controller.
  • The controller reads the smart card to obtain information related to the fluid. The information includes volumetric information, fluid specific data, print station operation parameter information, and combinations thereof (Step 106). The print station performs operations based upon the information obtained from the smart card (Step 108).
  • Volumetric information includes the volume of ink or fluid or replenishment liquid in the replaceable fluid container. Fluid specific data includes ink expiration dates, ink batch number, another fluid number if a cleaning fluid or replenishment fluid is used. Parameter information includes operating temperature for the ink, specific state tables to use when operating the printhead, temperature correction coefficients for stimulation and charge voltages that are applied to the charge device that is an optional part for the catcher assembly, short detection limits, short detection delays, and similar operating conditions.
  • The smart card of the replaceable fluid container has stored in memory the specifications on the fluid for use in the printing system and the volume of fluid initially in the replaceable fluid container. Other information is also stored on the smart card, including particular user information, user biometrics optionally, and other user identifying codes. Security and encryption features can be on the smart card as well. The smart card can have a financial feature of indicating the amount of credit a customer has that can be debited from as the customer uses the fluid from the replaceable fluid container for the printing system.
  • Continuing with Figure 5, the amount of fluid amount withdrawn from the replaceable fluid container is calculated (Step 110). The withdrawn fluid amount removed can be calculated by using a flow totalizer and a flow meter to measure a flow rate from the replaceable fluid container. The flow meter and controller integrate the flow rate over time to derive a total flow volume. The amount of fluid withdrawn from the replaceable fluid container can be calculated using other methods, such as a float switch, a pressure transducers, ultrasonic measurement, or optic measurement.
  • The method ends by withdrawing the fluid amount from smart card using the reader/writer by debiting the fluid amount the smart card, (Step 112), thereby maintaining printhead operation under warranty.
  • Operating the print station refers to the condition of running fluid through the printhead and fluid assembly, such as printing images with ink or cleaning the orifice structure with a cleaning fluid.
  • Alternatively, the methods can include linking the print station and smart card to a website to provide real time reports on a customer or providing a link from the smart card to a customer ordering site that enables fluid to be automatically refilled. The method can include initiating a customer service call to the customer when a warranty breach occurs.
  • Figure 6 depicts the embodiment of the method, wherein the smart card is not present. Once the print station has ascertained that the smart card is absent (Step 204), the print station sends a message to a user interface alerting the user of a warranty breach condition since the smart card is absent (Step 206). The print station offers the user at least the following choices: acceptance, rejection, no response, or installation of a smart card regarding the warranty breach condition (Step 208).
  • If the acceptance choice is selected, the reservoir is filled with fluid from the replaceable fluid container and a message indicating a warranty breach occurred is transmitted to the printhead. The message on the printhead cannot be reset or erased (Step 208a). If the rejection choice is selected or if no response is given, the fluid flow to the reservoir is restricted (Step 208b or Step 208c).
  • If the user installs a valid smart card to avoid a warranty breach (Step 208d), the print station utilizes steps for validating warranty compliance for compatible fluid as depicted in Figure 5.
  • Figure 7 depicts embodiment of the preferred method, wherein the information on the smart card alerts the user that a low volume exists on the card. Once the print station determines that the smart card contains a zero volumetric credit (Step 304), the print station alerts the user that a warrant breach condition exists because of the zero volumetric credit (Step 306). The print station offers the user at least the following choices: acceptance, rejection, no response, or installation of a smart card regarding the warranty breach condition (Step 208).
  • If the acceptance choice is selected, the reservoir is filled with fluid from the replaceable fluid container. A message is also transmitted to the printhead that cannot be reset or erased. The message indicates that a warranty breach occurred (Step 208a). If the rejection choice is selected or if no response is given, the fluid flow to the reservoir from the replaceable fluid container is restricted (Step 208b or Step 208c).
  • If the user installs a valid smart card with volumetric credits to avoid a warranty breach (Step 308), the print station utilizes steps for validating warranty compliance for compatible fluid as depicted in Figure 5.
  • Another embodied method, as depicted in Figure 8, handles the situations when the smart is unreadable. After the replaceable fluid container has been inserted with an associated smart card (Step 100) and during printing operations, fluid is withdrawn from the replaceable fluid container to the print station (Step 102). The print station then ascertains whether the smart card is readable or not (Step 404). When the smart card is not readable by the reader/writer, the print station sends a message to the user through the user interface alerting that a warranty breach condition exists since the smart card is unreadable (Step 406). The print station offers the user at least the following choices: acceptance, rejection, no response, or installation of a smart card regarding the warranty breach condition (Step 208).
  • If the user chooses the acceptance response, the reservoir is filled with the fluid from the replaceable fluid container. A message indicating a warranty breach is transmitted to the printhead. The message cannot be reset or erased (Step 208a). If the user chooses the rejection response or does not respond, the fluid flow to the reservoir from the replaceable fluid container is restricted (Step 208b or Step 208c).
  • If the user inserts a card that is readable with valid volumetric credits, the replaceable fluid container is filled with fluid (Step 408). The print station utilizes steps for validating warranty compliance for compatible fluid as depicted in Figure 5.
  • Another method embodiment involves the smart card providing an expiration date of the fluid in the replacement container to the controller, wherein the controller is adapted to determine if an expiration date of the fluid has passed.
  • Figure 9 depicts an alternative embodiment, wherein the ink in the print system has passed an expiration date.
  • Once the print station has determined that the fluid in the replaceable fluid container has exceeded a shelf life (Step 504), the print station alerts the user through the user interface that warranty breach condition exists to the shelf life of the fluid being exceeded (Step 506). The print station presents the user at least the following four choices: acceptance, rejection, no response, or installation of a smart card regarding the warranty breach condition (Step 208).
  • If the acceptance choice is selected, reservoir is filled with fluid from the replaceable fluid container and a message indicating a warranty breach occurred is transmitted to the printhead (Step 208a). If the rejection choice is selected or if no response is given, the fluid flow to the reservoir from the replaceable fluid container is restricted (Step 208b or Step 208c).
  • If the user replaces the ink in the replaceable fluid container with a valid second smart card, the print station fills the reservoir with fluid from the replaceable fluid container. The print station installs the second smart card by reading the second smart card to obtain information related to the fluid (Step 106). The information includes volumetric information, fluid specific data, print station operation parameter information, and combinations thereof. The print station with the controller operates using the information obtained from the second smart card (Step 108). The print station ascertains if fluid has been withdrawn from the replaceable fluid container and, if so, the volumetric amount (Step 110). The reader/writer then debits the withdrawn fluid amount from the second smart card (Step 112), thereby maintaining printhead operation under warranty.
  • As an example, the smart card and smart card reader will function as follows: upon installation of an ink, the operator selects the ink number using the normal selection process from the controller. The smart card from the container is inserted into the fluid system's smart card reader. The fluid system periodically checks the smart card. If the ink does not match that on the system, a warning, such as "Incorrect Ink Attached", will be issued. If a smart card is not detected, a warning, such as "Ink Card Not Installed", will be issued.
  • The inkdex file for the ink in use will be stored on the smart card. During startup and whenever a new smart card has been installed, the system will check the version umber on the smart card's inkdex file and compare the version number to version number being run on the system. If the smart card version is more recent, the system will automatically transfer the smart card version onto the system processor board and reload the inkdex file. Other information will be stored on the smart card, such as "date of manufacture", "batch number", and "expiration date". If upon querying the smart card and system determines that the expiration date on the ink has passed, the system will issue a warning, such as Ink Shelf Life Expired".
  • A smart card serves as a secure memory on which the print station can track the usage of ink from the container. The smart card is distributed with each container of ink. Initially, a register on the smart card is set to an amount of ink corresponding to the size of the ink container. The initially set amount is known as the "volume register".
  • In the general embodiment, the smart card and smart card reader conform to ISO-78126 and are specifically chosen because the memory is secure in the following respects: (a) the smart card output cannot be emulated by another device; (b) the smart card cannot be "re-charged" (i.e., memory locations on the card cannot be written to the secure interface, since only the processor knows the encryption algorithm and keys); and (c) the smart card memory cannot be copied.
  • Additionally, the smart card memory is non-volatile and requires no external power for memory retention. In an alternative embodiment, any secure memory device can be used. The smart card embodiment uses variations algorithms to encrypt information, but one skilled in the art will recognize many algorithms and keys that can be used to secure code exchange.
  • Figure 10 depicts an embodied method, wherein the fluid in the replaceable fluid container is not compatible with the fluid already present in the reservoir. The print station ascertains whether the fluid in the replaceable fluid container is compatible with the fluid in the print station by reading the information on the smart card (Step 604). The print head contains information about the fluid already present in the reservoir. The print station then compares the information on the smart card with the information about the current fluids. If the fluids are not compatible, the print station presents the user at least the following four choices: acceptance, rejection, no response, or installation of a smart card regarding the warranty breach condition (Step 208).
  • If the response is acceptance, the reservoir is filled with the fluid from the replaceable fluid container. The print station then transmits a message to the user through the user interface indicating that a warranty breach occurred. The message is also sent to the printhead and cannot be reset or erased (Step 208a). If no response is given or if the response is rejection, fluid from the replaceable fluid container is not allowed to flow to the reservoir (Step 208b and Step 208c).
  • If the user replaces the fluid in the replaceable fluid container with compatible fluid and inserts a valid second smart card, the print station allows the reservoir to be filled with the fluid from the replaceable fluid container (Step 608). The print station utilizes steps for validating warranty compliance for compatible fluid using a second smart card as depicted in Figure 9.
  • The embodiments have been described in detail with particular reference to certain preferred embodiments thereof, but it will be understood that variations and modifications can be effected within the scope of the embodiments, especially to those skilled in the art.
  • PARTS LIST
  • 10.
    print station
    12.
    reservoir
    13.
    fluid
    14.
    fluid supply line
    16.
    replaceable fluid container
    17.
    replacement fluid
    18.
    controllable valve
    20.
    smart card
    21.
    information
    22.
    controller
    24.
    reader/writer
    26.
    flow meter
    28.
    microchip
    30.
    substrate
    32.
    flash memory
    34.
    random access memory (RAM)
    36.
    microprocessor
    38.
    communication link
    40.
    non-card source
    42.
    data - information about container
    44.
    data - operating properties of fluid
    46.
    data - reliability properties of fluid
    48.
    data - specifications on the physical properties of fluid in container
    50.
    data - volumetric measurements on fluid in container
    52.
    data - batch expiration date
    54.
    data - batch number
    56.
    data - manufacturing plant identification number
    58.
    data - customer name
    60.
    data - customer address
    62.
    data - authorization to charge based on amount printed
    64.
    data - performance parameters
    66.
    data - printhead information
    68.
    security encryption algorithm
    70.
    printhead
    72.
    user interface
    74.
    sensor
    76.
    drop generator
    78.
    orifice structure
    80.
    jet array
    81.
    charge device
    82.
    catcher
    84.
    fluid line
    86.
    pump
    88.
    fluid return line
    100.
    step - fluidly engaging a replaceable fluid container associated with a print station with a smart card adapted to track volumetric credits
    102.
    step - requesting to withdraw the fluid from the replaceable fluid container
    104.
    step - ascertaining the presence of the smart card in the reader/writer
    106.
    step - reading the smart card with the controller to obtain information related to the fluid
    108.
    step - operating the print station with the controller and smart card using the print station operation parameter information
    110.
    step - ascertaining a withdrawn fluid amount removed from the replaceable fluid container
    112.
    step - writing the withdrawn fluid amount to the smart card from the controller using the reader/writer
    204.
    step - ascertaining the absence of the smart card in the reader/writer
    206.
    step - sending a message to a user interface on the print station alerting a user to a warranty breach condition due to the smart card being absent
    208.
    step - offering a choice of acceptance, rejection, no response or installation of the smart card regarding the warranty breach condition
    208a.
    step ― if acceptance, filling the reservoir with fluid from the replaceable fluid container and transmitting a message to the printhead
    208b.
    step ― if rejection, restricting fluid to the reservoir
    208c.
    step ― if no response, restricting fluid to the reservoir
    208d.
    step ― if installation of the smart card with volumetric credits, filling the reservoir with fluid from the replaceable fluid container
    304.
    step - ascertaining a zero volumetric credit on the smart card in the reader/writer
    306.
    step - sending a message to a user interface on the print station alerting a user to a warranty breach condition due to the zero volumetric credit on the smart card
    308.
    step - if installation of the smart card with volumetric credits, filling the reservoir with fluid from the replaceable fluid container
    404.
    step - ascertaining that the smart card in the reader/writer is unreadable
    406.
    step - sending a message to a user interface on the print station alerting a user to a warranty breach condition due to the smart card being unreadable
    408.
    step - if installation of the smart card with volumetric credits that is readable by the reader/writer, filling the reservoir with fluid from the replaceable fluid container
    504.
    step - ascertaining that the fluid of the replaceable fluid container exceeded a shelf life using the smart card
    506.
    step - sending a message to a user interface on the print station alerting a user to a warranty breach condition due to the shelf life being exceeded
    508.
    step - if installation of the second smart card, filling the reservoir with fluid from the replaceable fluid container
    604.
    step - ascertaining that a replaceable fluid in the replaceable fluid container is incompatible with the fluid in the print station using the smart card in the reader/writer
    606.
    step - sending a message to a user interface on the print station alerting a user to a warranty breach condition due to the fluid in the replaceable fluid is incompatible with the fluid in the print station
    608.
    step - installation of a compatible fluid with a second smart card, filling the reservoir with fluid from the replaceable fluid container

Claims (10)

  1. A method for validating warranty compliance for compatible fluid use of a printing system, wherein the method comprises the steps of
    a. fluidly engaging a replaceable fluid container associated with a print station with a smart card adapted to track volumetric credits, wherein the replaceable fluid container contains fluid, and wherein the print station comprises: a printhead comprising a drop generator, a reservoir, an orifice structure and a catcher assembly; a controller connected to the printhead; and reader/writer for smart cards connected to the controller;
    b. requesting to withdraw the fluid from the replaceable fluid container;
    c. ascertaining the presence of the smart card in the reader/writer;
    d. reading the smart card with the controller to obtain information related to the fluid, wherein the information comprises volumetric information, fluid specific data, print station operation parameter information, and combinations thereof;
    e. operating the print station with the controller and smart card using the print station operation parameter information;
    f. ascertaining a withdrawn fluid amount removed from the replaceable fluid container; and
    g. writing the withdrawn fluid amount to the smart card from the controller using the reader/writer, wherein the reader/writer debits the withdrawn fluid amount from the smart card, thereby maintaining printhead operation under warranty.
  2. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of requesting to withdraw the fluid is indicated when the fluid amount in the replaceable fluid container falls below a preset value.
  3. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of requesting to withdraw fluid occurs when the print station is in a state that permits filling of the replaceable fluid container.
  4. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of ascertaining of the presence of the smart card is by determining if a communication link exists between the smart card and the controller.
  5. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of ascertaining the withdrawn fluid amount removed from the replaceable fluid container is performed by the steps of
    a. using a flow totalizer on the replaceable fluid container, wherein the flow totalizer is in communication with the controller; and
    b. using a flow meter to measure a flow rate from the replaceable fluid container, wherein the flow meter is in communication with the controller, and wherein the controller integrates the flow rate over time to derive a total flow volume.
  6. The method of claim 5, further comprising the step of ascertaining the withdrawn fluid amount using a float switch, a pressure transducers, ultrasonic measurement, or optic measurement.
  7. The method of claim 1, wherein the steps of reading the smart card with the controller and of writing the withdrawn fluid amount to the smart card are encrypted.
  8. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of linking the print station and smart card to a website to provide real time reports on a customer.
  9. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of initiating a customer service call to the customer when a warranty breach occurs.
  10. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of providing a link from the smart card to a customer ordering site that enables fluid to be automatically refilled.
EP20050076690 2005-07-22 2005-07-22 Method for validating warranty compliance and ink compatibility assurance Expired - Fee Related EP1745932B1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP20050076690 EP1745932B1 (en) 2005-07-22 2005-07-22 Method for validating warranty compliance and ink compatibility assurance
DE200560005470 DE602005005470T2 (en) 2005-07-22 2005-07-22 METHOD FOR CONFIRMING THE COMPLIANCE WITH GUARANTEE CONDITIONS AND FOR ENSURING THE USE OF COMPATIBLE INKS

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP20050076690 EP1745932B1 (en) 2005-07-22 2005-07-22 Method for validating warranty compliance and ink compatibility assurance

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1745932A1 true EP1745932A1 (en) 2007-01-24
EP1745932B1 EP1745932B1 (en) 2008-03-19

Family

ID=36297220

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP20050076690 Expired - Fee Related EP1745932B1 (en) 2005-07-22 2005-07-22 Method for validating warranty compliance and ink compatibility assurance

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1745932B1 (en)
DE (1) DE602005005470T2 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2019152006A1 (en) 2018-01-31 2019-08-08 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Print substance end-of-life predictions
WO2020027831A1 (en) * 2018-08-01 2020-02-06 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Load cells for print supplies

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5365312A (en) 1988-07-25 1994-11-15 Mannesmann Ag Arrangement for printer equipment for monitoring reservoirs that contain printing medium
EP0903237A2 (en) * 1997-09-19 1999-03-24 Xerox Corporation Printer having mode for non-qualified marking material
US6062669A (en) 1996-09-21 2000-05-16 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method for detecting ink cartridge status
US6116715A (en) 1996-08-23 2000-09-12 Pitney Bowes Inc. Device and method for sensing low ink level in an ink cartridge of a postage meter
US6155664A (en) * 1998-06-19 2000-12-05 Lexmark International, Inc. Off-carrier inkjet print supply with memory
US20010007458A1 (en) * 1997-05-20 2001-07-12 Purcell David A. Intelligent printer components and printing system
US20030160839A1 (en) * 2000-12-05 2003-08-28 Seiko Epson Corporation Printing apparatus and ink cartridge therefor

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5365312A (en) 1988-07-25 1994-11-15 Mannesmann Ag Arrangement for printer equipment for monitoring reservoirs that contain printing medium
US6116715A (en) 1996-08-23 2000-09-12 Pitney Bowes Inc. Device and method for sensing low ink level in an ink cartridge of a postage meter
US6062669A (en) 1996-09-21 2000-05-16 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method for detecting ink cartridge status
US20010007458A1 (en) * 1997-05-20 2001-07-12 Purcell David A. Intelligent printer components and printing system
EP0903237A2 (en) * 1997-09-19 1999-03-24 Xerox Corporation Printer having mode for non-qualified marking material
US6158837A (en) 1997-09-19 2000-12-12 Xerox Corporation Printer having print mode for non-qualified marking material
US6155664A (en) * 1998-06-19 2000-12-05 Lexmark International, Inc. Off-carrier inkjet print supply with memory
US20030160839A1 (en) * 2000-12-05 2003-08-28 Seiko Epson Corporation Printing apparatus and ink cartridge therefor

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2019152006A1 (en) 2018-01-31 2019-08-08 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Print substance end-of-life predictions
EP3658382A4 (en) * 2018-01-31 2021-02-24 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Print substance end-of-life predictions
US11055038B2 (en) 2018-01-31 2021-07-06 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Print substance end-of-life predictions
US11327694B2 (en) 2018-01-31 2022-05-10 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Print substance end-of-life predictions
WO2020027831A1 (en) * 2018-08-01 2020-02-06 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Load cells for print supplies
US11479049B2 (en) 2018-08-01 2022-10-25 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Load cells for print supplies

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE602005005470D1 (en) 2008-04-30
EP1745932B1 (en) 2008-03-19
DE602005005470T2 (en) 2009-04-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA2369445C (en) Intelligent fluid delivery system for a fluid jet printing system
JP4093623B2 (en) Printer cartridge having replaceable ink container
US6325495B1 (en) Method and apparatus for preventing the unauthorized use of a retaining cartridge
US7434900B2 (en) Inkjet printer for printing on goods
US6532351B2 (en) Wireless interaction with memory associated with a replaceable module for office equipment
JP4106156B2 (en) Stencil printing machine
US20100241505A1 (en) Ink cartridge vending machine
WO2005108098A1 (en) Ink compatibility assurance system
US5920054A (en) Closed loop information path for medical fluid delivery systems
KR101019841B1 (en) Systems and methods for refilling printing cartridges
US20150070416A1 (en) Printer and Printing System
JPH10202901A (en) Ink cartridge capable of detecting ink level
JP2004062914A (en) Method, program product and system for controlling ink management
TW200911541A (en) Non-volatile memory data integrity validation
US7401052B2 (en) Method for validating warranty compliance and ink compatibility assurance
US20040012645A1 (en) System and method for filling a reservoir
EP1745932B1 (en) Method for validating warranty compliance and ink compatibility assurance
EP1939818B1 (en) Ensuring print quality for postage meter systems
JP2004529795A (en) Monitoring liquid usage
TWI276542B (en) Memory device on a printer consumable programmed with target intervention rate data, and methods
JP2007083571A (en) Method for verifying observance of warranty rules by confirming adaptability to fluid
JP2022114694A (en) Ink amount management device of ink cartridge
JP2002104598A (en) Oil feeder

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20070615

AKX Designation fees paid

Designated state(s): DE FR GB

GRAC Information related to communication of intention to grant a patent modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCIGR1

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 602005005470

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20080430

Kind code of ref document: P

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20081222

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20120712

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20130624

Year of fee payment: 9

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20140331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130731

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20140722

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140722

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20170726

Year of fee payment: 13

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602005005470

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190201