EP1244717B2 - Heterophasic copolymers - Google Patents

Heterophasic copolymers Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1244717B2
EP1244717B2 EP99974176A EP99974176A EP1244717B2 EP 1244717 B2 EP1244717 B2 EP 1244717B2 EP 99974176 A EP99974176 A EP 99974176A EP 99974176 A EP99974176 A EP 99974176A EP 1244717 B2 EP1244717 B2 EP 1244717B2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
copolymer
mfr
visbreaking
starting
heterophasic
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP99974176A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1244717B1 (en
EP1244717A1 (en
Inventor
Bo Malm
Pirjo Jääskeläinen
Torvald Vestberg
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Borealis Technology Oy
Original Assignee
Borealis Technology Oy
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=8556761&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP1244717(B2) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Borealis Technology Oy filed Critical Borealis Technology Oy
Publication of EP1244717A1 publication Critical patent/EP1244717A1/en
Publication of EP1244717B1 publication Critical patent/EP1244717B1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1244717B2 publication Critical patent/EP1244717B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08FMACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING CARBON-TO-CARBON UNSATURATED BONDS
    • C08F10/00Homopolymers and copolymers of unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbons having only one carbon-to-carbon double bond
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08FMACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING CARBON-TO-CARBON UNSATURATED BONDS
    • C08F210/00Copolymers of unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbons having only one carbon-to-carbon double bond
    • C08F210/04Monomers containing three or four carbon atoms
    • C08F210/06Propene
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08FMACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING CARBON-TO-CARBON UNSATURATED BONDS
    • C08F210/00Copolymers of unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbons having only one carbon-to-carbon double bond
    • C08F210/16Copolymers of ethene with alpha-alkenes, e.g. EP rubbers
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08FMACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING CARBON-TO-CARBON UNSATURATED BONDS
    • C08F8/00Chemical modification by after-treatment
    • C08F8/50Partial depolymerisation
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08LCOMPOSITIONS OF MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS
    • C08L23/00Compositions of homopolymers or copolymers of unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbons having only one carbon-to-carbon double bond; Compositions of derivatives of such polymers
    • C08L23/02Compositions of homopolymers or copolymers of unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbons having only one carbon-to-carbon double bond; Compositions of derivatives of such polymers not modified by chemical after-treatment
    • C08L23/10Homopolymers or copolymers of propene
    • C08L23/12Polypropene
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08FMACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING CARBON-TO-CARBON UNSATURATED BONDS
    • C08F2800/00Copolymer characterised by the proportions of the comonomers expressed
    • C08F2800/20Copolymer characterised by the proportions of the comonomers expressed as weight or mass percentages
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08FMACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING CARBON-TO-CARBON UNSATURATED BONDS
    • C08F2810/00Chemical modification of a polymer
    • C08F2810/10Chemical modification of a polymer including a reactive processing step which leads, inter alia, to morphological and/or rheological modifications, e.g. visbreaking

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to heterophasic copolymers, more particularly heterophasic copolymers of polypropylene, PP.
  • PP heterophasic copolymers also referred to as PP block copolymers, comprise a polymer matrix with a dispersed rubbery copolymer phase.
  • the matrix is a homopolymer or random copolymer matrix.
  • the rubbery copolymer phase is a reactor blend of an amorphous rubber, a rubber-like polymer which is normally an ethylene-propylene copolymer (rubber), and a semicrystalline ethylene copolymer.
  • the heterophasic copolymers are produced in two or more reactors.
  • the matrix homopolymer or random copolymer may be produced by standard polymerisation with Ziegler-Natta catalyst system in one or more slurry or bulk (loop) reactors or gas phase reactors or combinations of both.
  • the polymerisation is continued and the rubbery copolymer phase is produced in the matrix polymer using one or more gas phase reactors.
  • the composition of the rubbery phase is controlled in the second stage by the ethylene/propylene ratio and the amount of hydrogen.
  • the amorphous rubber content is generally assessed by dissolving the polymer in xylene.
  • the amount of xylene solubles, XS (weight-%) at room temperature (RT), corresponds to the amount of rubber.
  • the rubber composition is defined by the ethylene content by weight-% in the xylene solubles, C 2 of AM, where AM is the with acetone precipitated amorphous rubber content in the xylene soluble fraction, at RT.
  • the hydrogen in the second stage controls the molecular weight of the rubber, generally measured as the intrinsic viscosity (IV) of the with acetone precipitated amorphous rubber fraction (AM) of the xylene soluble fraction.
  • IV intrinsic viscosity
  • AM acetone precipitated amorphous rubber fraction
  • PP heterophasic copolymers with a high melt flow rate e.g. MFR >40 g/10 min, and with medium or high impact strength are difficult to produce directly by polymerisation with a Ziegler-Natta catalyst system.
  • MFR melt flow rate
  • the matrix polymer of a heterophasic copolymer needs to have an MFR which is 50 to 100% higher than the MFR of the final copolymer.
  • this requirement means that very high hydrogen concentrations have to be used in the polymerisation of the matrix polymer. In many cases that is not possible.
  • a matrix with a very high MFR is very brittle which then affects the whole copolymer.
  • Heterophasic copolymers with very high amounts of rubber (XS > 20 wt-%), so called super high impact copolymers or reactor-made thermoplastic olefin copolymers (rTPOs), are even more difficult to produce with high MFR.
  • Another known route to a high MFR product involves chemical treatment, i.e., visbreaking (peroxide treatment) of a molten PP heterophasic copolymer.
  • the visbroken copolymer also called a controlled rheology polymer, generally has low impact properties.
  • the narrower MWD also changes the mechanical properties of a polymer. For example, visbroken PP homopolymers and random copolymers have lower stiffness (tensile modulus, flexural modulus) and slightly higher impact properties than a standard PP homopolymer or random copolymer with the same MFR.
  • ethylene polymers and copolymers are cross-linked by the peroxide. That means that the molar mass of the ethylene polymer will increase corresponding to a great drop in MFR. This is seen as gel formation and lack of flowability.
  • Visbreaking of PP heterophasic copolymer, the block copolymer is more complicated because of the complex blend composition of homopolymer or random copolymer matrix, amorphous rubber and semicrystalline ethylene copolymer. Both the matrix polymer and the rubber decrease in molar mass, giving higher MFR, but the ethylene copolymers are cross-linked and then will cause problems in the PP copolymer.
  • the present invention addresses the need for PP heterophasic copolymers with good flow and impact characteristics.
  • a method of preparing a polypropylene heterophasic copolymer with good flow and impact properties which involves visbreaking a polypropylene heterophasic copolymer with an optimised rubber composition.
  • the amorphous rubber has an intrinsic viscosity of 2.5 to 4.5 and the ethylene content in the rubber, determined as C 2 of AM is from 20 wt-% to 40 wt-%.
  • the rubber should have a higher molecular mass than the matrix, IV rubber > IV matrix .
  • a heterophasic copolymer produced with an optimized rubber composition can be visbroken to high MFR materials without a significant loss of impact properties.
  • the rubber needs to be produced with a low comonomer ratio and a high enough molecular weight.
  • the starting heterophasic copolymer should be produced with a high enough rubber molar mass.
  • the IV of AM is 2.5 to 4.5 dl/g so that the visbroken copolymers fulfil the criteria for a good impact copolymer.
  • a suitably amorphous rubber is needed, which can be produced with CR between 0.25 and 0.7.
  • good impact properties at low temperatures in a visbroken PP heterophasic copolymer are determined by the amount of rubber (XS and AM in wt-%) and the rubber copolymer composition.
  • this invention involves visbreaking of PP heterophasic copolymer where the IV of the AM is 2.5 to 4.5 and C 2 of AM > 20 wt-% (corresponding to a CR > 0.25 mol/mol.), and the C 2 of AM ⁇ 40 wt-% (corresponding to a CR ⁇ 0.7 mol/mol).
  • starting polymer is meant the heterophasic polypropylene polymer which comprises a polymer matrix with a dispersed rubbery phase.
  • the matrix in the starting propylene polymer can be a homopolymer or a random copolymer.
  • the rubbery copolymer phase is typically a reactor blend of an amorphous rubber, a rubber-like polymer which is normally an ethylene-propylene copolymer (rubber), and a semicrystalline ethylene copolymer.
  • the starting polymer is produced by any convenient route with which it is possible to prepare a polymer that fulfils the intrinsic viscosity and ethylene content criteria discussed below.
  • the process comprises a first stage, in which the polymer matrix is prepared and a second stage, where the rubbery phase is produced in the polymer matrix.
  • the polymerisation is typically carried out in the presence of a Ziegler-Natta-type catalyst.
  • the Ziegler-Natta type catalyst typically used in the present invention is a propylene stereospecific, high yield Ziegler-Natta catalyst.
  • the catalyst in the second polymerisation stage is typically the same that is used in the first polymerisation stage.
  • the first stage polymerisation can be carried out in one or more bulk reactor(s), preferably loop reactor, or in one or more gas phase reactor(s). Typically, the reactors are connected in series.
  • Comonomer(s) are optionally used in any or every reactor in the first polymerisation stage.
  • comonomers are used C 2 - C 10 olefins, e.g. ethylene, 1-butene, 4-methyl-1-pentene, 1-hexene, dienes, or cyclic olefins, or a mixture thereof.
  • the second stage polymerisation in which the rubbery phase is polymerised in the matrix, is preferably carried out in one or more gas phase reactor(s).
  • the second stage polymerisation is typically carried out essentially immediately after the first stage polymerisation, i.e., the polymerisation product recovered from the first polymerisation stage is conducted to the first gas phase reactor in the second polymerisation stage.
  • the gas phase reactors in the second polymerisation zone are preferably connected in series.
  • Ethylene is used as comonomer in any or every reactor of the second polymerisation stage.
  • Hydrogen can be used in different amounts as a molar mass modifier or regulator in any or every reactor in the first and second polymerisation stage.
  • the heterophasic propylene copolymer is produced in a reactor system comprising at least one bulk reaction zone including at least one bulk reactor and at least one gas phase reaction zone including at least one gas phase reactor.
  • the reactors are connected in series, the bulk reaction zone being preferably arranged before the gas phase reaction zone.
  • a separation stage can be employed between the reaction zones to prevent the carryover of reactants from the first polymerisation stage into the second one.
  • the polymer matrix is produced in the first reaction zone, which is preferably a bulk reaction zone, and the rubbery phase is produced in the second reaction zone, which preferably is a gas phase reaction zone.
  • the polymerisation reaction system can also include a number of additional reactors, such as prereactors.
  • the prereactors include any reactor for preactivating and/or prepolymerising the catalyst with propylene and/or other ⁇ -olefin(s) and/or ethylene, if necessary. All reactors in the reactor system are preferably arranged in series.
  • the polymerisation of the heterophasic propylene copolymer comprises at least the following steps of
  • the starting heterophasic copolymer should be produced with such a rubbery copolymer fraction where the ethylene copolymer fraction is as small as possible.
  • the CR is in the range of 0.25 - 0.7, more preferably in the range of 0.4 - 0.7 (mol/mol). This low comonomer ratio gives a lower amount of ethylene copolymer and then the visbreaking to higher MFR can be carried out with less peroxide.
  • the starting polymer before visbreaking has IV of AM is 2.5 - 4.5 dl/g, and C 2 of AM 20 wt % - 40 wt %, which corresponds to a CR of 0.25 - 0.7.
  • the MFR of the starting polymer is 0.1 to 60 g/10 min, usually more preferably 0.3 to 40 g/10 min.
  • the amount of XS of the starting polymer is usually more than 10 wt-%, preferably 10 to 50 wt-%.
  • the intrinsic viscosity ratio of the rubbery phase to the matrix is suitably ⁇ 1, in other words, IV rubber ⁇ IV matrix .
  • the visbreaking is typically carried out essentially immediately after the production of the starting polymer, i.e., the product obtained from the second polymerisation stage can be conducted to visbreaking, which takes place in the pelletising stage in an extruder. It is also possible that the product of the second polymerisation stage is first pelletised, optionally stored, and the visbreaking is carried out using the pelletised product as starting material.
  • the visbreaking of the starting polymer, i.e., PP heterophasic copolymer to higher MFR can be carried out by standard methods with organic peroxides (e.g. Luperox 101 from Elf Atochem or Triganox 101 from Akzo) in an extruder at elevated temperature reflecting the so called half-life temperature of the chosen peroxide. Peroxides quantities of 150 to 1000 ppm are preferred, and the visbreaking is carried out at elevated temperatures of 180 to 300 °C, more preferably 200 to 250 °C.
  • organic peroxides e.g. Luperox 101 from Elf Atochem or Triganox 101 from Akzo
  • Peroxides quantities of 150 to 1000 ppm are preferred, and the visbreaking is carried out at elevated temperatures of 180 to 300 °C, more preferably 200 to 250 °C.
  • the higher MFR of the product typically means MFR greater than 40 g/10 min for medium or high impact heterophasic copolymers.
  • the higher MFR means greater than 10 g/10 min.
  • the visbroken copolymer is normally produced with a visbreaking ratio, MFR final /MFR initial , equal to or greater than 2, preferably at least 3 and often at least 4, which means that the MFR of the visbroken copolymer is at least 200% of the MFR of the starting polymer, preferably at least 300% and often at least 400% of the original value.
  • the impact properties of the visbroken polymer produced by this invention typically approximate to those of the polymer before visbreaking.
  • the impact properties of the visbroken polymer notably the results for the instrument falling weight test at low temperature in accordance with IS06603-2, with the same kind of failure as the starting polymer, are 80%, more preferably 90% of the original value.
  • MFR The melt flow rate of the polymer material was determined according to ISO standard 1133 using a piston load of 2.16 kg and a temperature of 230 °C.
  • the starting PP heterophasic copolymers were produced in a pilot plant having a loop reactor and a fluid bed gas phase reactor connected in series.
  • the catalyst, cocatalyst and donor were fed to the loop reactor.
  • the reactor medium was flashed away before the solid polymer containing the active catalyst entered the gas phase reactor.
  • the prepolymerised MgCl 2 - supported Ti catalyst (prepared according to patent EP-A 491,566 , included by references) was used in the polymerisation.
  • Cocatalyst was triethyl aluminium (TEA) and external donor was dicyclopentanedimethoxysilane (DCPDMS).
  • TAA triethyl aluminium
  • DCPDMS dicyclopentanedimethoxysilane
  • the PP homopolymer matrix was produced and the polymerisation was continued in the second stage (gas phase reactor) which produced the rubbery copolymer.
  • the polymerisation temperature was 70 °C in the loop reactor and 75 °C in the gas phase reactor.
  • the MFR of the first stage and the final product were adjusted with separate hydrogen feeds.
  • Standard formulation with 1500 ppm Irganox B215 (from Ciba) and 500 ppm Ca-stearate was used.
  • the ethene content of the amorphous phase, C2 of AM was 28 wt-% and the intrinsic viscosity (IV) of the fraction measured in decaline at 135 °C according to standard procedures, IV of AM was 3.2 di/g. (corresponding to a Mw of 480000 measured by GPC).
  • the copolymer was tested for mechanical properties by standard ISO tests. The results of this starting copolymer are found in Table A as ex A.
  • the pellets of the starting copolymer was soaked with a organic peroxide, 2,5-dimethyl-2,5-di(t-butyl peroxy)hexane, with trade name Triganox 101 from Akzo, at room temperature. Three levels of peroxide were used: 280, 380 and 500 ppm ( ex 1 - 3 ).
  • the pellets were then fed to the extruder using a melt temperature of 210 °C.
  • Al/D cyclohexyl methyl dimethoxysilane
  • the matrix polymer was now a PP random copolymer with an ethene content of 3.2 wt-% with a melting temperature of 144 °C.
  • the loop temperature was 68 °C.
  • the copolymer, B1 was visbroken as in examples 1- 3.
  • the used peroxide amounts were 150 and 400 ppm giving a final MFR of 11.9 g/10 min and 22 g/10 min( ex 4 and 5 ).
  • the visbreaking ratios were now 2.3 and 4.3.
  • the starting copolymer was produced as in examples 4-5 except that the external donor was DCPDMS as in examples 1-3.
  • the PP random copolymer matrix was produced with an ethene content of 4 wt-%, giving a melting temperature of 138 °C.
  • the rubbery copolymer was produced as in examples 4-5.
  • the PP copolymer, B2 was visbroken as in examples 4-5.
  • the used peroxide amount was 360 ppm, giving a final MFR of 36 g/10 min( ex 6 ).
  • the visbreaking ratio was 4.5.
  • the total IV of AM dropped to 1.4 dl/g.
  • the results of the mechanical properties of the visbroken PP copolymer ( ex 6 ) is collected in Table B. The falling weight impact is still excellent.
  • the starting PP heterophasic copolymer was produced as in example 6.
  • the PP random copolymer matrix had a ethene content of 1.7 wt-% giving a melting temperature of 150 °C.
  • the rubbery copolymer was produced as in example 6 but with smaller XS content.
  • the PP heterophasic copolymer, B3 was visbroken as in example 6 with 480 ppm peroxide.
  • the visbreaking ratio was 9.5.
  • This low rubber content PP heterophasic copolymer had good impact as the starting PP copolymer.
  • the starting PP heterophasic copolymer was produced as in examples 1-3 except that the amount of the rubbery copolymer in the second stage was larger.
  • the visbreaking ratio was 3.7, but due to the high IV of AM higher visbreaking ratios ( peroxide) could be used and still reach high stiffness / impact compared to the starting copolymer. Now the mechanical properties, stiffness/impact remained excellent down to -40 °C.
  • the starting PP heterophasic copolymer was produced as in example 1-3 except that more hydrogen was used to control the Mw of the second stage of the rubbery copolymer.
  • the test results are collected in Table A ( as compA1 ).
  • the starting PP heterophasic copolymer was the same as in examples 4-5 in Table B as ex B1 .
  • the impact properties dropped already at 0 °C.
  • the starting PP heterophasic copolymer was the same as in example 6 in Table B as ex B2.
  • the PP homopolymer matrix was produced as in examples 1-3, but in the second stage the gas ratio was 0.85 (mol/mol).
  • the test results are collected in Table D (as ex D1 ).
  • the good impact properties of the starting copolymer dropped for the visbroken copolymers already at room temperature.
  • the visbreaking ratios were 4.7 and 9.4. Compared to the examples in Table A and B the peroxide consumption was bigger.
  • the starting PP heterophasic copolymer was produced as in comparison examples 4 - 5 except that there was used a lower hydrogen feed to the gas phase reactor resulting in a higher IV of AM (higher Mw).
  • the C2 of AM was 45 wt-% and the IV of AM was 3.9 dl/g.
  • the results are collected in Table D (as ex D2 ).
  • the heterophasic copolymer, D2 was visbroken as in comparison example 4 -5 by using 500 and 1000 ppm of the peroxide giving visbroken copolymers with MFR 18.2 g/10 min and 40 g/10 min (compex 6 and 7 ).
  • the visbreaking ratios were 4.8 and 10.5, indicating a higher peroxide consumption as in comparison examples 6 - 7.
  • the good impact of the starting copolymer dropped rapidly for the visbroken copolymers already at room temperature.

Abstract

Polypropylene heterophasic copolymers with good flow and impact properties are made by visbreaking a starting polypropylene heterophasic copolymer of which the amorphous rubber has an intrinsic viscosity of 2 dl/g or more and the ethylene content in the amorphous rubber, determined as C2 of AM, is from 20 wt-% to 45 wt-%.

Description

    Field of the Invention
  • The present invention relates to heterophasic copolymers, more particularly heterophasic copolymers of polypropylene, PP.
  • Background of the Invention
  • PP heterophasic copolymers, also referred to as PP block copolymers, comprise a polymer matrix with a dispersed rubbery copolymer phase. The matrix is a homopolymer or random copolymer matrix. The rubbery copolymer phase is a reactor blend of an amorphous rubber, a rubber-like polymer which is normally an ethylene-propylene copolymer (rubber), and a semicrystalline ethylene copolymer.
  • The heterophasic copolymers are produced in two or more reactors. The matrix homopolymer or random copolymer may be produced by standard polymerisation with Ziegler-Natta catalyst system in one or more slurry or bulk (loop) reactors or gas phase reactors or combinations of both. In a second stage, the polymerisation is continued and the rubbery copolymer phase is produced in the matrix polymer using one or more gas phase reactors.
  • The composition of the rubbery phase is controlled in the second stage by the ethylene/propylene ratio and the amount of hydrogen. The comonomer ratio (CR) ethylene/propylene in mol/mol, which is otherwise expressed as

            CR = C2/C3

    determines the rubbery copolymer composition. When CR is equal to or higher than 9, essentially ethylene copolymers are produced, and when CR is lower than around 0.1, essentially PP random copolymers are produced. Generally, the lower the CR, the less ethylene copolymers are present in the rubbery phase.
  • The amorphous rubber content is generally assessed by dissolving the polymer in xylene. The amount of xylene solubles, XS (weight-%) at room temperature (RT), corresponds to the amount of rubber. The rubber composition is defined by the ethylene content by weight-% in the xylene solubles, C2 of AM, where AM is the with acetone precipitated amorphous rubber content in the xylene soluble fraction, at RT.
  • The hydrogen in the second stage controls the molecular weight of the rubber, generally measured as the intrinsic viscosity (IV) of the with acetone precipitated amorphous rubber fraction (AM) of the xylene soluble fraction. Intrinsic viscosity is measured in decaline at 135 °C.
  • There is a continuing need for PP heterophasic copolymers with improved properties, notably materials with good flow and impact characteristics, especially for moulding, injection moulding, thin wall packaging and engineering applications.
  • PP heterophasic copolymers with a high melt flow rate, e.g. MFR >40 g/10 min, and with medium or high impact strength are difficult to produce directly by polymerisation with a Ziegler-Natta catalyst system. The difficulty arises because the matrix polymer of a heterophasic copolymer needs to have an MFR which is 50 to 100% higher than the MFR of the final copolymer. In turn this requirement means that very high hydrogen concentrations have to be used in the polymerisation of the matrix polymer. In many cases that is not possible. In addition a matrix with a very high MFR is very brittle which then affects the whole copolymer.
  • Heterophasic copolymers with very high amounts of rubber (XS > 20 wt-%), so called super high impact copolymers or reactor-made thermoplastic olefin copolymers (rTPOs), are even more difficult to produce with high MFR.
  • Another known route to a high MFR product involves chemical treatment, i.e., visbreaking (peroxide treatment) of a molten PP heterophasic copolymer. The visbroken copolymer, also called a controlled rheology polymer, generally has low impact properties.
  • By visbreaking PP with heat or at more controlled conditions with organic peroxides the molar mass distribution, MWD, will be narrower because the long molecular chains are more easily broken up or scissored and the molar mass Mw will decrease, corresponding to an MFR increase. The MFR increases with increase in the amount of peroxide which is used.
  • Because the molar mass distribution is narrower and the molar mass is decreased by visbreaking, the flowability will be improved (= controlled rheology). The narrower MWD also changes the mechanical properties of a polymer. For example, visbroken PP homopolymers and random copolymers have lower stiffness (tensile modulus, flexural modulus) and slightly higher impact properties than a standard PP homopolymer or random copolymer with the same MFR.
  • During visbreaking, ethylene polymers and copolymers are cross-linked by the peroxide. That means that the molar mass of the ethylene polymer will increase corresponding to a great drop in MFR. This is seen as gel formation and lack of flowability.
  • Visbreaking of PP heterophasic copolymer, the block copolymer, is more complicated because of the complex blend composition of homopolymer or random copolymer matrix, amorphous rubber and semicrystalline ethylene copolymer. Both the matrix polymer and the rubber decrease in molar mass, giving higher MFR, but the ethylene copolymers are cross-linked and then will cause problems in the PP copolymer.
  • This negative reaction results in flow problems, or gels. The mechanical properties, both stiffness and impact, drop. The visbreaking of a heterophasic copolymer to a certain MFR consumes more organic peroxide than visbreaking of a corresponding homopolymer to the same MFR, because of the negative reactions with the ethylene copolymer. The consumption of the expensive peroxide increases the more rubbery copolymer there is in the heterophasic copolymer, and the more PE rich is the rubbery copolymer.
  • The present invention addresses the need for PP heterophasic copolymers with good flow and impact characteristics.
  • Summary of the Invention
  • According to the present invention, there is provided a method of preparing a polypropylene heterophasic copolymer with good flow and impact properties, which involves visbreaking a polypropylene heterophasic copolymer with an optimised rubber composition. The amorphous rubber has an intrinsic viscosity of 2.5 to 4.5 and the ethylene content in the rubber, determined as C2 of AM is from 20 wt-% to 40 wt-%. The rubber should have a higher molecular mass than the matrix, IV rubber > IV matrix .
    Figure imgb0001
  • Thus, we have found that a heterophasic copolymer produced with an optimized rubber composition can be visbroken to high MFR materials without a significant loss of impact properties. The rubber needs to be produced with a low comonomer ratio and a high enough molecular weight.
  • Because the amorphous rubber decreases in molar mass on visbreaking, the starting heterophasic copolymer should be produced with a high enough rubber molar mass. The IV of AM is 2.5 to 4.5 dl/g so that the visbroken copolymers fulfil the criteria for a good impact copolymer.
  • Moreover, a suitably amorphous rubber is needed, which can be produced with CR between 0.25 and 0.7.
  • More particularly, good impact properties at low temperatures in a visbroken PP heterophasic copolymer are determined by the amount of rubber (XS and AM in wt-%) and the rubber copolymer composition. In particular, this invention involves visbreaking of PP heterophasic copolymer where the IV of the AM is 2.5 to 4.5 and C2 of AM > 20 wt-% (corresponding to a CR > 0.25 mol/mol.), and the C2 of AM < 40 wt-% (corresponding to a CR < 0.7 mol/mol).
  • Detailed Description of the Invention
  • In this invention we define an optimized rubber composition of a heterophasic polymer for visbreaking to give good impact properties.
  • By "starting polymer" is meant the heterophasic polypropylene polymer which comprises a polymer matrix with a dispersed rubbery phase. The matrix in the starting propylene polymer can be a homopolymer or a random copolymer. The rubbery copolymer phase is typically a reactor blend of an amorphous rubber, a rubber-like polymer which is normally an ethylene-propylene copolymer (rubber), and a semicrystalline ethylene copolymer.
  • The starting polymer is produced by any convenient route with which it is possible to prepare a polymer that fulfils the intrinsic viscosity and ethylene content criteria discussed below. Typically, the process comprises a first stage, in which the polymer matrix is prepared and a second stage, where the rubbery phase is produced in the polymer matrix.
  • The polymerisation is typically carried out in the presence of a Ziegler-Natta-type catalyst. The Ziegler-Natta type catalyst typically used in the present invention is a propylene stereospecific, high yield Ziegler-Natta catalyst. The catalyst in the second polymerisation stage is typically the same that is used in the first polymerisation stage.
  • The first stage polymerisation can be carried out in one or more bulk reactor(s), preferably loop reactor, or in one or more gas phase reactor(s). Typically, the reactors are connected in series.
  • Comonomer(s) are optionally used in any or every reactor in the first polymerisation stage. Preferably as comonomers are used C2 - C10 olefins, e.g. ethylene, 1-butene, 4-methyl-1-pentene, 1-hexene, dienes, or cyclic olefins, or a mixture thereof.
  • The second stage polymerisation, in which the rubbery phase is polymerised in the matrix, is preferably carried out in one or more gas phase reactor(s). The second stage polymerisation is typically carried out essentially immediately after the first stage polymerisation, i.e., the polymerisation product recovered from the first polymerisation stage is conducted to the first gas phase reactor in the second polymerisation stage. The gas phase reactors in the second polymerisation zone are preferably connected in series.
  • Ethylene is used as comonomer in any or every reactor of the second polymerisation stage.
  • Hydrogen can be used in different amounts as a molar mass modifier or regulator in any or every reactor in the first and second polymerisation stage.
  • According to a preferred embodiment, the heterophasic propylene copolymer is produced in a reactor system comprising at least one bulk reaction zone including at least one bulk reactor and at least one gas phase reaction zone including at least one gas phase reactor. The reactors are connected in series, the bulk reaction zone being preferably arranged before the gas phase reaction zone. A separation stage can be employed between the reaction zones to prevent the carryover of reactants from the first polymerisation stage into the second one.
  • According to this preferred embodiment the polymer matrix is produced in the first reaction zone, which is preferably a bulk reaction zone, and the rubbery phase is produced in the second reaction zone, which preferably is a gas phase reaction zone.
  • In addition to the actual polymerisation reactors used, the polymerisation reaction system can also include a number of additional reactors, such as prereactors. The prereactors include any reactor for preactivating and/or prepolymerising the catalyst with propylene and/or other α-olefin(s) and/or ethylene, if necessary. All reactors in the reactor system are preferably arranged in series.
  • In summary, according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the polymerisation of the heterophasic propylene copolymer comprises at least the following steps of
    • subjecting propylene, and optionally comonomer(s) and/or hydrogen to polymerisation or copolymerisation in a first reaction zone or reactor in the presence of the catalyst,
    • transferring the first polymerisation product with the reaction medium into a second reaction zone or reactor, and feeding ethylene comonomer and optionally hydrogen and/or additional propylene into the second reaction zone or reactor,
    • continuing the polymerisation reaction in the second reaction zone in the presence of the first polymerisation product to produce a combined polymerisation product,
    • recovering the polymerisation product from second reaction zone.
  • To avoid the difficulties the starting heterophasic copolymer should be produced with such a rubbery copolymer fraction where the ethylene copolymer fraction is as small as possible. This can be done by appropriate choice of catalyst, and using low comonomer ratios, the CR is in the range of 0.25 - 0.7, more preferably in the range of 0.4 - 0.7 (mol/mol). This low comonomer ratio gives a lower amount of ethylene copolymer and then the visbreaking to higher MFR can be carried out with less peroxide.
  • The starting polymer before visbreaking has IV of AM is 2.5 - 4.5 dl/g, and C2 of AM 20 wt % - 40 wt %, which corresponds to a CR of 0.25 - 0.7. The MFR of the starting polymer is 0.1 to 60 g/10 min, usually more preferably 0.3 to 40 g/10 min. The amount of XS of the starting polymer is usually more than 10 wt-%, preferably 10 to 50 wt-%.
  • Furthermore, the intrinsic viscosity ratio of the rubbery phase to the matrix is suitably ≥ 1, in other words, IVrubber ≥ IVmatrix.
  • The visbreaking is typically carried out essentially immediately after the production of the starting polymer, i.e., the product obtained from the second polymerisation stage can be conducted to visbreaking, which takes place in the pelletising stage in an extruder. It is also possible that the product of the second polymerisation stage is first pelletised, optionally stored, and the visbreaking is carried out using the pelletised product as starting material.
  • The visbreaking of the starting polymer, i.e., PP heterophasic copolymer to higher MFR can be carried out by standard methods with organic peroxides (e.g. Luperox 101 from Elf Atochem or Triganox 101 from Akzo) in an extruder at elevated temperature reflecting the so called half-life temperature of the chosen peroxide. Peroxides quantities of 150 to 1000 ppm are preferred, and the visbreaking is carried out at elevated temperatures of 180 to 300 °C, more preferably 200 to 250 °C.
  • The higher MFR of the product typically means MFR greater than 40 g/10 min for medium or high impact heterophasic copolymers. For super high impact copolymers with XS > 20 wt-%, e.g. reactor made grades (rTPOs), the higher MFR means greater than 10 g/10 min. More generally, the visbroken copolymer is normally produced with a visbreaking ratio, MFRfinal/MFRinitial, equal to or greater than 2, preferably at least 3 and often at least 4, which means that the MFR of the visbroken copolymer is at least 200% of the MFR of the starting polymer, preferably at least 300% and often at least 400% of the original value.
  • The impact properties of the visbroken polymer produced by this invention typically approximate to those of the polymer before visbreaking. In a preferred aspect, the impact properties of the visbroken polymer, notably the results for the instrument falling weight test at low temperature in accordance with IS06603-2, with the same kind of failure as the starting polymer, are 80%, more preferably 90% of the original value.
  • Next, the invention will be further illustrated with the aid of the following non-limiting examples.
  • Description of Analytical Methods
  • MFR: The melt flow rate of the polymer material was determined according to ISO standard 1133 using a piston load of 2.16 kg and a temperature of 230 °C.
  • Xylene Solubles (XS):
  • Determination of xylene soluble fraction (XS):
    • 2.0 g of polymer are dissolved in 250 ml p-xylene at 135 °C under agitation. After 30±2 minutes the solution is allowed to cool for 15 minutes at ambient temperature and then allowed to settle for 30 minutes at 25±0.5 °C . The solution is filtered with filter paper into two 100 ml flasks.
  • The solution from the first 100 ml vessel is evaporated in nitrogen flow and the residue is dried under vacuum at 90 °C until constant weight is reached. XS % = 100 × m 1 × v 0 / m 0 × v 1
    Figure imgb0002
    • m0 = initial polymer amount (g)
    • m1 = weight of residue (g)
    • v0 = initial volume (ml)
    • v1 volume of analysed sample (ml)
    Amorphous rubber fraction of the xylene solubles (AM): Determination of AM:
  • The solution from the second 100 ml flask in the xylene solubles analysis is treated with 200 ml of acetone under vigorous stirring. The precipitate is filtered and dried in a vacuumoven at 90 °C. AM % = 100 × m 2 × v 0 / m 0 × v 1
    Figure imgb0003
    • m0 = initial polymer amount (g)
    • m2 = weight of precipitate (g)
    • v0 = initial volume (ml)
    • v1 volume of analysed sample (ml)
    Examples 1 - 3
  • Preparation of the starting PP heterophasic copolymers and the visbreaking.
  • The starting PP heterophasic copolymers were produced in a pilot plant having a loop reactor and a fluid bed gas phase reactor connected in series. The catalyst, cocatalyst and donor were fed to the loop reactor. The reactor medium was flashed away before the solid polymer containing the active catalyst entered the gas phase reactor.
  • The prepolymerised MgCl2 - supported Ti catalyst (prepared according to patent EP-A 491,566 , included by references) was used in the polymerisation. Cocatalyst was triethyl aluminium (TEA) and external donor was dicyclopentanedimethoxysilane (DCPDMS). Al/Ti mole ratio was 150 and Al/donor mole ratio = 2.
  • In the first stage (loop reactor) the PP homopolymer matrix was produced and the polymerisation was continued in the second stage (gas phase reactor) which produced the rubbery copolymer. The polymerisation temperature was 70 °C in the loop reactor and 75 °C in the gas phase reactor. The MFR of the first stage and the final product were adjusted with separate hydrogen feeds. The rubbery copolymer was produced with a low comonomer ratio, C2 / C3 = 0.43 (mol/mol). The homopolymer matrix had a MFR of 49 g/10 min and the final copolymer had a MFR = 12.1 g/10 min (after stabilisation and pelletising). Standard formulation with 1500 ppm Irganox B215 (from Ciba) and 500 ppm Ca-stearate was used.
  • The final copolymer had an ethene content of 7.6 wt-% (by FTIR) and a xylene soluble fraction at RT, XS = 23.3 wt-% and amorphous fraction (AM) of 20.6 wt-%. The ethene content of the amorphous phase, C2 of AM was 28 wt-% and the intrinsic viscosity (IV) of the fraction measured in decaline at 135 °C according to standard procedures, IV of AM was 3.2 di/g. (corresponding to a Mw of 480000 measured by GPC).
  • The copolymer was tested for mechanical properties by standard ISO tests. The results of this starting copolymer are found in Table A as ex A.
  • The PP heterophasic copolymer, A, was visbroken in a small twin screw extruder, BE-25 from Berstorff (screw diameter = 25 mm). The pellets of the starting copolymer was soaked with a organic peroxide, 2,5-dimethyl-2,5-di(t-butyl peroxy)hexane, with trade name Triganox 101 from Akzo, at room temperature. Three levels of peroxide were used: 280, 380 and 500 ppm (ex 1 - 3). The pellets were then fed to the extruder using a melt temperature of 210 °C. The used peroxide levels gave final copolymers with MFR of 37 g/10 min, 45 g/10 min and 66 g/10 min, which correspond to visbreaking ratios of 3.1, 3.8 and 5.5. By visbreaking the IV of AM dropped to 2.4 dl/g (measured in ex 2 ( the IV corresponding to a Mw = 280000 with a narrow MWD of 2.7).
  • The results of the mechanical properties of the visbroken copolymers (ex 1 - 3) are collected in Table A. The stiffness decreased slightly as expected and the impact dropped but stayed high also after visbreaking.
  • Examples 4 - 5
  • Preparation of the starting PP heterophasic copolymer with a PP random copolymer matrix and the visbreaking.
  • The starting PP copolymers were produced as in examples 1-3 except that the external donor used was cyclohexyl methyl dimethoxysilane (Al/D = 3) instead of DCPDMS. In the first stage the matrix polymer was now a PP random copolymer with an ethene content of 3.2 wt-% with a melting temperature of 144 °C. The loop temperature was 68 °C. The rubbery copolymer was produced with a comonomer ratio = 0.54 (mol/mol) in the gas phase reactor. The PP random copolymer matrix had a MFR = 13 g/10 min and the final copolymer had a MFR = 5.1 g/10 min after pelletising. Same formulation as in examples 1 - 3.
  • The final PP heterophasic copolymer had a total ethene content of 14.6 wt-% and a XS = 28.4 wt-% and AM = 27.6 wt-% with a C2 of AM = 28 wt-% and IV of AM = 3 dl/g ( corresponding to a Mw = 448000 and a MWD = 9.7, this fraction include also the XS (about 6 - 8 wt-%) of the random matrix which has a low Mw, broadening the GPC MWD).
  • The mechanical properties by ISO tests of the PP copolymer are collected in Table B as ex B1.
    (Analyses and tests, and abbreviation as in examples 1-3.)
  • The copolymer, B1 was visbroken as in examples 1- 3. The used peroxide amounts were 150 and 400 ppm giving a final MFR of 11.9 g/10 min and 22 g/10 min( ex 4 and 5). The visbreaking ratios were now 2.3 and 4.3. The IV of AM dropped to about 2 dl/g ( the IV corresponding to the measured MW = 217000 (ex 4) with the much narrower MWD = 3.4 than the starting copolymer).
  • The measured mechanical properties of the visbroken copolymers (ex 4 and 5 ) are collected in Table B. The impact stayed high also after visbreaking.
  • Example 6
  • Preparation of the starting PP heterophasic copolymer with a PP random copolymer matrix and visbreaking.
  • The starting copolymer was produced as in examples 4-5 except that the external donor was DCPDMS as in examples 1-3. The PP random copolymer matrix was produced with an ethene content of 4 wt-%, giving a melting temperature of 138 °C. The rubbery copolymer was produced as in examples 4-5. The random copolymer matrix had a MFR = 12 g/ 10 min and the final copolymer had a MFR = 8 g/10 min (same formulation and pelletising as in examples 4-5.)
  • The final PP copolymer had a total ethene content of 13 wt-% and XS = 28.1 wt-% and AM = 24.8 wt-%. The C2 of AM was 26 wt-% and IV of AM = 1.7 dl/g ( lower IV because the amorphous fraction from the matrix (approximately = 6 wt-%) is reducing the total IV of the rubber.)
  • The analyses and tests as in examples 4 - 5. The results are collected in Table B as in ex B2.
  • The PP copolymer, B2 was visbroken as in examples 4-5. The used peroxide amount was 360 ppm, giving a final MFR of 36 g/10 min(ex 6). The visbreaking ratio was 4.5. The total IV of AM dropped to 1.4 dl/g. The results of the mechanical properties of the visbroken PP copolymer (ex 6) is collected in Table B. The falling weight impact is still excellent.
  • Example 7
  • Preparation of starting PP heterophasic copolymer with a PP random copolymer matrix and visbreaking.
  • The starting PP heterophasic copolymer was produced as in example 6. The PP random copolymer matrix had a ethene content of 1.7 wt-% giving a melting temperature of 150 °C. The rubbery copolymer was produced as in example 6 but with smaller XS content.
    The PP random copolymer matrix had a MFR = 3.8 g/10 minand the final copolymer had a MFR = 2.1 g/10 min.
    (Same formulation and pelletising as in example 6).
  • The final PP heterophasic copolymer had a total ethene content of 7.3 wt-% and the XS = 15.1 wt-% and AM = 12.2 wt-%. The C2 of AM was 31 wt-% and IV of AM = 2.4 dl/g. Tests as in example 6 collected in Table B as ex B3.
  • The PP heterophasic copolymer, B3 was visbroken as in example 6 with 480 ppm peroxide. The MFR rose to 20 g/10 min with an IV of AM = 1.6 dl/g (ex 7). The visbreaking ratio was 9.5.
  • The mechanical properties of the starting PP copolymer and the visbroken one are collected in Table B.
  • This low rubber content PP heterophasic copolymer had good impact as the starting PP copolymer.
  • Example 8
  • Preparation of starting PP heterophasic copolymer with a high rubber content and visbreaking.
  • The starting PP heterophasic copolymer was produced as in examples 1-3 except that the amount of the rubbery copolymer in the second stage was larger. The PP homopolymer matrix had a MFR = 57 g/10 min and the final PP copolymer had a MFR = 4.7 g/10 min (after stabilisation and pelletising).
  • The final PP copolymer had an ethene content of 13.2 wt-% and the XS = 34.7 and AM = 33.2 wt-%. The C2 of AM was 29 wt-% and the IV of AM = 4.3 dl/g ( IV corresponding to a measured Mw = 788000 with the MWD = 5 ).
  • Tests were carried out as in example 1-3. The results of the PP copolymer are collected in Table C (as ex C).
  • The PP heterophasic copolymer C, was visbroken as in examples 1- 3 by using same peroxide = 200 ppm giving a MFR = 17.2 g/ 10 min(ex 8). The IV of AM dropped to 2.9 corresponding now to a Mw = 309000 with a narrower MWD = 2.9. The visbreaking ratio was 3.7, but due to the high IV of AM higher visbreaking ratios ( peroxide) could be used and still reach high stiffness / impact compared to the starting copolymer. Now the mechanical properties, stiffness/impact remained excellent down to -40 °C.
  • Comparison example 1
  • Preparation of the starting PP heterophasic copolymer with a low IV of AM and visbreaking.
  • The starting PP heterophasic copolymer was produced as in example 1-3 except that more hydrogen was used to control the Mw of the second stage of the rubbery copolymer.
  • The PP homopolymer matrix had a MFR = 35 g/10 min and the final copolymer had a MFR = 22.9 g/10 min (after stabilisation and pelletising).
  • The final PP copolymer had an ethene content of 3.9 wt-% and the XS = 15.6 wt-% and AM = 12.9 wt-%. The C2 of AM was 27 wt-% and the IV of AM = 1.9 dl/g. The test results are collected in Table A ( as compA1).
  • The PP heterophasic copolymer, compA1 was visbroken as in examples 1-3 with 250 ppm same peroxide giving a MFR rise to 52 g/10 min (compex 1) (visbreaking ratio = 2.3). The impact properties started to drop already at 0 °C.
  • Comparison examples 2
  • Preparation of the starting PP heterophasic copolymer with a PP random matrix and visbreaking with very high amounts of peroxide.
  • The starting PP heterophasic copolymer was the same as in examples 4-5 in Table B as ex B1.
    The heterophasic copolymer was visbroken as in examples 4-5 but the peroxide amount was 4000 ppm giving the final copolymer a MFR = 330 g/10 min ( compex 2) (visbreaking ratio = 65). The impact properties dropped already at 0 °C.
  • Comparison example 3
  • The starting PP heterophasic copolymer was the same as in example 6 in Table B as ex B2.
  • The heterophasic copolymer was visbroken as in example 6 but now the peroxide amount was 3000 ppm giving the final copolymer a MFR = 340 g/10 min (compex 3) (visbreaking ratio = 43). The impact properties started to drop at 0 °C.
  • Comparison example 4- 5
  • Preparation of the starting PP heterophasic copolymer produced with a high comonomer ratio and visbreaking.
  • The starting PP heterophasic copolymer was produced as in examples 1-3 except that the donor was cyclohexyl methyl dimethoxysilane, Al/D = 1 (Al/ Ti = 100). The PP homopolymer matrix was produced as in examples 1-3, but in the second stage the gas ratio was 0.85 (mol/mol). The PP homopolymer matrix had a MFR = 9 g/10 min and the final PP copolymer had a MFR = 3.6 g/10 min (after stabilisation and pelletising).
  • The final PP heterophasic copolymer had an ethene content of 12.6 wt-% and the xylene solubles, AM = 18.8 wt-%. The C2 of AM was 45 wt-% and IV of AM = 2.4 dl/g. The test results are collected in Table D (as ex D1).
  • The PP heterophasic copolymer, D1 was visbroken as in examples 1-3 with 500 and 1000 ppm of peroxide giving final copolymers with MFR = 16.8 g/10 min and 34 g/10 min (compex 4 - 5). The good impact properties of the starting copolymer dropped for the visbroken copolymers already at room temperature. The visbreaking ratios were 4.7 and 9.4. Compared to the examples in Table A and B the peroxide consumption was bigger.
  • Comparison examples 6 - 7
  • The starting PP heterophasic copolymer was produced as in comparison examples 4 - 5 except that there was used a lower hydrogen feed to the gas phase reactor resulting in a higher IV of AM (higher Mw).
    The PP homopolymer matrix had a MFR of 11 g/10 min and the copolymer had a MFR = 3.8 g/10 min (after stabilisation and pelletising).
  • The PP heterophasic copolymer had an ethene content of 12.5 wt-% and AM = 16.6 wt-%. The C2 of AM was 45 wt-% and the IV of AM was 3.9 dl/g. The results are collected in Table D (as ex D2).
  • The heterophasic copolymer, D2 was visbroken as in comparison example 4 -5 by using 500 and 1000 ppm of the peroxide giving visbroken copolymers with MFR 18.2 g/10 min and 40 g/10 min (compex 6 and 7 ). The visbreaking ratios were 4.8 and 10.5, indicating a higher peroxide consumption as in comparison examples 6 - 7. The good impact of the starting copolymer dropped rapidly for the visbroken copolymers already at room temperature.
  • In Tables A-D below the following abbreviation for the types of failure in the falling weight impact test are used.
    • duct = ductile
    • d/br = ductile / brittle (failure with yielding)
    • br/d = brittle / ductile (failure at yielding)
    • br = britt = brittle.
    TABLE A
    Property unit standard ex A ex 1 ex 2 ex 3 compA1 compex 1
    MFR, 2.16 kg/230 C g/10 min ISO1133 12.1 37 45.4 66 22.9 52
    Total ethene w% FTIR 7.6 3.9
    Xylene solubles
    XS w% 23.3 22.6 22.5 15.6
    AM w% 20.6 20.7 20.3 12.9
    C2 of AM w% FTIR 28 29 27
    IV of AM dl/g 3.25 2.4 1.93
    GPC of xylene solubles GPC
    Mw 281000
    Mn 104200
    MWD 2.7
    ISO ISO 527-2
    Tensile modulus Mpa ISO527-2 1180 1120 1070 1060 1530 1410
    Flexural Modulus Mpa ISO178 1160 1080 1060 950 1520 1380
    Izod notched, RT kJ/m2 ISO180/1A 18.5 13.9 12.5 10.8 6.7 5.9
    Izod notched, 0 C kJ/m2 ISO180/1A 13.4 10.6 9.7 7.9 5 4.6
    lzod notched.-30° C kJ/m2 ISO 180/1A 9.6 7.8 7.3 6.2 4.3 4.2
    Instrum.falling weight
    impact
    0 C ISO6603-2
    Total energy, Etot J 41 40 40 29 30 23
    type of failure duct duct (5) duct (6) d/br d/br (6) d/br (5)
    (3)
    d/br (7) d/br (5) d/br (4) br/d (4) br/d-br
    (5)
    - 20 C ISO6603-2
    Total energy, Etot J 40 41 37 26 26 -
    type of failure d/br d/br d/br d/br (7) d/br (3)
    br/d (3) br/d-
    br(7)
    Loop MFR g/10min ISO1133 49 35
    CR= C2 / C3 mol/mol 0.43 0.43
    Visbreaking
    Peroxide/Triganox 101 ppm - 280 380 500 - 250
    Visbreaking ratio, - 3.1 3.8 5.5 - 2.3
    MFRfinal/MFRstart
    Extruder melt temperature C 210 210 210 210
    Remarks visbr.from pellets visbr fr.pell.
    TABLE B
    Property unit standard ex B1 ex 4 ex 5 compex 2 comp ex B2 comp ex 6 compex 3 comp ex B3 comp ex 7
    MFR. 2.16kg/230 C g/ 10min ISO1133 5.1 11.9 22 330 8 36 340 2.1 20
    Ethene in matrix wt-% FTIR 3.2 -4 1.7
    Total ethene wt-% FTIR 14.6 13 12.8 7.3 7.4
    Xylene solubles
    XS wt-% 28.4 28.2 26.8 27 28.1 26.6 28 15.1 14.9
    AM wt-% 27.6 24.8 24.8 24.6 24 12.2 12.6
    C2 of AM wt-% FTIR 28 26 31
    IV of AM dl/g 3 -2 1.8 - 1.7 1.42 1 2.4 1.6
    GPC of xylene solubles GPC
    Mw 448000 217000
    Mn 46200 64300
    MWD 9.7 3.4
    ISO ISO527-2
    Tensile modulus MPa ISO527-2 530 - 480 410 520 460 410 1010 820
    Flexural modulus MPa ISO178 530 460 430 970 780
    Izod, notched, RT kJ/m2 ISO180/1 A 50.7 44.1 7.5 34.8 9 6.7 11.2 8.7
    Izod, notched, 0 C kJ/m2 ISO 180/1A 15.5 6.4 8.7 7 5.2 4.4 6
    Izod, notched, -30 C kJ/m2 ISO 180/1 A 9.9 8.5 4.5 3.6 3.8 3.7 3.9
    Instrum.falling weight 0 C impact ISO6603-2
    Total energy, Etot J - - - 39 13 27 38 22 27 36
    type of failure - - - ductile br/d-br ductile ductile duct(1) d/br-br/d duct (5)
    - 20 C ISO6603-2 d/br(9) d/br-br
    Total energy. Etot J 50 - 41 6 40 41 20 17 20
    type of failure ductile ductile brittle ductile ductile br/d br/d-br br/d (6)
    britt(4)
    - 40 C ISO6603-2
    Total energy, Etot J 55 - 44 - 30 39 - - -
    type of failure ductile duct (9) d/br (6) d/br
    d/br (1) br/d-br(4)
    Cast film , chill roll = 30 C 40um
    Film modulus,(1% sec) MPa ISO1184 260 260 -
    Gloss (60) ASTM 16
    D523
    Haze % ASTM 62 43.5
    D1003
    MFR loop g/10min ISO1133 13 12 3.8
    CR = C2 / C3 mol/mol 0.54 0.54 0.54
    Visbreaking
    Peroxide/Triganox 101 ppm - 150 400 4000 - 360 3000 - 480
    Visbreaking ratio, MFRfinal/MFRstart - 2.3 4.3 65 - 4.5 43 - 9.5
    Extruder melt temperature C 210 210 210 210 210 210
    Remark visbr. from pellets visbr. from pellets visbr.
    TABLE C
    Property unit standard ex C ex 8
    MFR, 2.16 kg/230 C g/10 min ISO1133 4.7 17.2
    Total ethene w% FTIR 13.2
    Xylene solubles
    AM wt-% 33.2 33.1
    XS wt-% 34.7 34.7
    C2 of AM wt-% FTIR 29
    IV of AM dl/g 4.3 2.35
    GPC of xylene solubles GPC
    Mw 788000 309000
    Mn 156600 105200
    MWD 5 2.9
    ISO ISO527-2
    Tensile modulus Mpa ISO527-2 670 660
    Flexural Modulus Mpa ISO178 660 630
    Charpy, notched, RT kJ/m2 ISO179/1eU 64 P 61 P
    Charpy, notched, -30 C kJ/m2 ISO179/1eU 10.9 10.8
    Instrum.falling weight impact
    - 20 C ISO6603-2
    Total energy, Etot J 43 40
    Type of failure ductile ductile
    - 40 C ISO6603-2
    Total energy, Etot J 46 45
    Type of failure duct (6) duct (2)
    d/br (4) d/br (8)
    Loop MFR g/10min ISO1133 57
    CR = C2 / C3 mol/mol 0.43
    Visbreaking
    Peroxide/Triganox 101 ppm - 200
    Visbreaking ratio. - 3.7
    MFRfinal/MFRstart
    extruder melt temperature C 210
    Remark visbr. from pellets
    TABLE D
    Property unit standard comp ex D1 comp ex 4 comp ex 5 comp ex D2 comp ex 8 comp ex 9
    MFR, 2.16 kg/230 C g/ 10 min ISO1133 3.6 16.8 34 3.8 18.2 40
    Total ethene w% FTIA 12.6 12.5
    Xylene
    solubles
    XS w% - -
    AM w% 18.8 16.6
    C2 of AM w% FTIR 45 45
    IV of AM dl/g 2.4 3.9
    ISO ISO527-2
    Tensile MPa ISO527-2 1000 990 950 1020 990 980
    modulus Flexural Modulus MPa ISO178 1100 1010 970 1060 1010 990
    Izod notched, RT kJ/m2 ISO180/1A 44.8 8.7 6.9 43.7 9.4 6
    Izod notched, -30° C kJ/m2 ISO180/1A 5.3 3.7 3.3 6.4 4.1 3.5
    Instrum. falling weight impact RT ISO6603-2
    Total energy, J 44 21 16 42 19 13
    Etot type of failure ductile br/d(5) br (5) br (8) br/d (2) ductile br/d (6) br (4) brittle
    - 20 C ISO6603-2
    Totalenergy, J 48 19 7 38 15 4
    Etot type of failure ductile br/d (4) br (6) brittle duct (5) d/br(5) br/d (1) br (9) brittle
    Loop MFR g/10min ISO1133 9 11
    CR=C2/C3 mol/mol 0.85 0.85
    Visbreaking
    Peroxide/ Triganox 101 ppm - 500 1000 - 500 1000
    Visbreaking ratio, MFRfinal/ M FRstart - 4.7 9.4 - 4.8 10.5
    Extruder melt C temperature 210 210 210 210
    Remarks visbr. from pellets visbr. pellets from

Claims (6)

  1. A method of preparing a polypropylene heterophasic copolymer with good flow and impact properties, which involves visbreaking a starting polypropylene heterophasic copolymer of which the amorphous rubber, measured as xylene solubles fraction (XS) at room temperature, has an ethylene content, determined as the ethylene content of the acetone precipitated amorphous rubber fraction of the xylene soluble fraction, C2 of AM, of from 20 wt-% to 40 wt-%, and an intrinsic viscosity, determined as the intrinsic viscosity of the acetone precipitated amorphous rubber fraction of the xylene soluble fraction, IV of AM, is 2.5 - 4.5 dl/g, wherein the polypropylene heterophasic copolymer is prepared in a two stage polymerization process by using in the second stage a comonomer ratio (CR) (mol/mol) of ethylene to propylene in the range of from 0.25 to 0.7.
  2. The method according to any preceding claim, wherein the melt flow rate (MFR) of the starting polymer is from 0.3 to 40 g/10 min.
  3. The method according to any preceding claim, wherein the amorphous rubber (XS) comprises 10 to 50 wt-% of the starting polymer.
  4. The method according to any preceding claim, wherein IVrubber ≥ IVmatrix.
  5. A visbroken polypropylene heterophasic copolymer obtainable by the method according to any preceding claim, with a visbreaking ratio, MFRfinalMFRinitial, which is ≥ 2.
  6. The visbroken polypropylene heterophasic copolymer according to claim 5, with a visbreaking ratio, which is at least 3.
EP99974176A 1999-11-12 1999-11-12 Heterophasic copolymers Expired - Lifetime EP1244717B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/FI1999/000942 WO2001036502A1 (en) 1999-11-12 1999-11-12 Heterophasic copolymers

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1244717A1 EP1244717A1 (en) 2002-10-02
EP1244717B1 EP1244717B1 (en) 2004-01-21
EP1244717B2 true EP1244717B2 (en) 2010-06-09

Family

ID=8556761

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP99974176A Expired - Lifetime EP1244717B2 (en) 1999-11-12 1999-11-12 Heterophasic copolymers

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (1) US6723829B1 (en)
EP (1) EP1244717B2 (en)
CN (1) CN1182165C (en)
AT (1) ATE258195T1 (en)
AU (1) AU1388300A (en)
DE (1) DE69914383T3 (en)
ES (1) ES2214070T5 (en)
WO (1) WO2001036502A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE202013103803U1 (en) 2013-08-22 2014-11-24 Kobusch-Sengewald Gmbh Multilayer film

Families Citing this family (45)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1186618A1 (en) 2000-09-08 2002-03-13 ATOFINA Research Controlled rheology polypropylene heterophasic copolymers
US6610792B2 (en) 2001-07-26 2003-08-26 Fina Technology, Inc. Polypropylene copolymers and method of preparing polyproylene copolymers
EP1312617A1 (en) * 2001-11-14 2003-05-21 ATOFINA Research Impact strength polypropylene
US7381773B2 (en) * 2001-11-27 2008-06-03 Basell Poliolefine Italia S.P.A. Clear and flexible propylene polymer compositions
EP1354901B1 (en) * 2002-04-18 2006-03-22 Borealis GmbH Propylene polymer composition with improved mechanical properties
US7217463B2 (en) 2002-06-26 2007-05-15 Avery Dennison Corporation Machine direction oriented polymeric films and methods of making the same
US7226977B2 (en) * 2004-04-19 2007-06-05 Sunoco, Inc. ( R&M) High melt flow rate thermoplastic polyolefins produced in-reactor
EP1598377A1 (en) * 2004-05-21 2005-11-23 Borealis Polymers Oy Process for producing heterophasic alpha-olefin polymers
EP1659151A1 (en) * 2004-11-18 2006-05-24 Borealis Technology OY Novel propylene polymer compositions
EP1795452B1 (en) * 2005-12-12 2010-02-10 Borealis Technology Oy In-mold labeled injection moulded article for packaging products containing high levels of organic solvents and method of manufacturing the same
EP1818365A1 (en) * 2006-02-14 2007-08-15 Borealis Technology Oy Polypropylene compositions
EP1849807A1 (en) * 2006-04-24 2007-10-31 Total Petrochemicals Research Feluy Catalyst composition for the copolymerization of propylene
DE602006012023D1 (en) 2006-05-26 2010-03-18 Borealis Tech Oy A polyolefin composition with improved resistance to breakage
CN103121320B (en) 2006-06-14 2015-06-24 艾利丹尼森公司 Conformable and die-cuttable machine direction oriented labelstocks and labels, and process for preparing
BRPI0713492A2 (en) 2006-06-20 2012-01-24 Avery Dennison Corp multi-layer polymeric film for labeling hot melt adhesives and label and label thereof
ES2536254T3 (en) * 2006-06-30 2015-05-21 Borealis Technology Oy Random polypropylene copolymer with high melt flow
EP1935938A1 (en) * 2006-12-18 2008-06-25 Borealis Technology Oy Improved high melt flow heterophasic polypropylene copolymers
CN103467630B (en) 2007-08-24 2016-08-10 格雷斯公司 There is self-limiting catalyst system and the method for the ratio of controlled aluminum and selective control agent
EP2062937A1 (en) * 2007-11-26 2009-05-27 Total Petrochemicals Research Feluy Heterophasic propylene copolymer for corrugated sheet and cast film applications
ES2337195T5 (en) * 2007-12-18 2013-03-01 Borealis Technology Oy Heterophasic polypropylene with high impact properties
EP2077286A1 (en) * 2008-01-07 2009-07-08 Total Petrochemicals Research Feluy Heterophasic propylene copolymer with improved creep behavior
CN102015879B (en) 2008-04-24 2013-11-20 博里利斯股份公司 High purity heterophasic propylene copolymers
BRPI0912920B1 (en) 2008-08-21 2019-07-09 W. R. Grace & Co. -Conn PROPILENE IMPACT POLYMERIZATION AND COPOLYMER PROCESS
EP2315789B1 (en) 2008-08-21 2015-09-02 W.R. Grace & CO. - CONN. Catalyst composition with mixed selectivity control agent and polymerisation method using it
CN102224179B (en) * 2008-11-21 2013-09-11 北欧化工公司 Method for improving flowability of heterophasic polypropylene powder
ES2543459T3 (en) * 2009-03-27 2015-08-19 Henkel Ag & Co. Kgaa Adhesives manufactured from polymer systems
US20100324225A1 (en) 2009-06-23 2010-12-23 Michael Zummallen Controlled-Rheology Polypropylene
EP2480604B1 (en) * 2009-09-22 2017-03-01 Basell Poliolefine Italia S.r.l. Propylene polymer compositions
EP2316882A1 (en) * 2009-10-29 2011-05-04 Borealis AG Heterophasic polypropylene resin
ES2375253T3 (en) * 2009-10-29 2012-02-28 Borealis Ag HETEROPHY? SICA POLYPROPYLENE RESIN WITH LONG CHAIN BRANCHES.
US8178623B2 (en) 2010-06-10 2012-05-15 Dow Global Technologies Llc High stiffness high impact propylene impact copolymers field of the invention
WO2011154287A1 (en) * 2010-06-10 2011-12-15 Borealis Ag New composition and use thereof
EP2397517B1 (en) * 2010-06-16 2012-12-26 Borealis AG Propylene polymer compositions having superior hexane extractables/impact balance
US9683096B2 (en) 2010-08-19 2017-06-20 Braskem America, Inc. Polypropylene resin suitable for soft nonwoven applications
ES2628836T3 (en) 2011-07-15 2017-08-04 Borealis Ag Non-oriented film
EP2554374B1 (en) 2011-08-01 2016-03-16 The Procter & Gamble Company A multilayer film, packages comprising the multilayer film, and processes for making
EP2664650B1 (en) * 2012-05-18 2016-08-17 Borealis AG Moulded article with improved stress whitening
US9676532B2 (en) 2012-08-15 2017-06-13 Avery Dennison Corporation Packaging reclosure label for high alcohol content products
PL2733175T3 (en) * 2012-11-16 2017-07-31 Borealis Ag Random propylene copolymer for bottles with good optical properties and low hexane content
DE102013022606B3 (en) 2013-11-27 2022-12-15 Loparex Germany Gmbh & Co. Kg Foil for labels and cover strips
DE102013113120B4 (en) 2013-11-27 2023-06-29 Loparex Germany Gmbh & Co. Kg Foil for labels and cover strips
AU2015270854B2 (en) 2014-06-02 2018-08-02 Avery Dennison Corporation Films with enhanced scuff resistance, clarity, and conformability
EP3015503A1 (en) 2014-10-27 2016-05-04 Borealis AG Heterophasic polypropylene with improved stiffness/impact balance
EP3307820B1 (en) 2015-06-12 2019-10-02 SABIC Global Technologies B.V. Process for manufacture of low emission polypropylene
US11149139B2 (en) * 2016-12-12 2021-10-19 Sabic Global Technologies B.V. Heterophasic propylene copolymer

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4061694A (en) 1976-12-21 1977-12-06 Dart Industries Inc. Low temperature impact strength molding compositions
US4087486A (en) 1975-05-15 1978-05-02 Standard Oil Company (Indiana) Polypropylene composition containing EPR
US4535135A (en) 1981-01-19 1985-08-13 Societe Nationale Des Poudres Et Explosifs Associations of bases, resulting from the combination of a lithium alkyl or aryl with an alkali metal amide or hydride, polymerization process in which they are used, and product obtained
EP0208330B1 (en) 1985-07-10 1989-05-03 Idemitsu Petrochemical Co. Ltd. Propylene polymer composition
US5258464A (en) 1990-01-29 1993-11-02 Shell Oil Company Impact copolymer compositions
US5362782A (en) 1990-05-14 1994-11-08 Shell Oil Company Polymer compositions
EP0457455B1 (en) 1990-05-14 1996-07-03 Shell Oil Company Polymer compositions
WO1998021273A2 (en) 1996-11-15 1998-05-22 Montell North America Inc. Polymer mixture for slush molding

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE4432798A1 (en) * 1994-09-15 1996-03-21 Basf Ag Highly flexible propylene-ethylene copolymers
US5820981A (en) * 1996-04-02 1998-10-13 Montell North America Inc. Radiation visbroken polypropylene and fibers made therefrom

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4087486A (en) 1975-05-15 1978-05-02 Standard Oil Company (Indiana) Polypropylene composition containing EPR
US4061694A (en) 1976-12-21 1977-12-06 Dart Industries Inc. Low temperature impact strength molding compositions
US4535135A (en) 1981-01-19 1985-08-13 Societe Nationale Des Poudres Et Explosifs Associations of bases, resulting from the combination of a lithium alkyl or aryl with an alkali metal amide or hydride, polymerization process in which they are used, and product obtained
EP0208330B1 (en) 1985-07-10 1989-05-03 Idemitsu Petrochemical Co. Ltd. Propylene polymer composition
US5258464A (en) 1990-01-29 1993-11-02 Shell Oil Company Impact copolymer compositions
US5362782A (en) 1990-05-14 1994-11-08 Shell Oil Company Polymer compositions
EP0457455B1 (en) 1990-05-14 1996-07-03 Shell Oil Company Polymer compositions
WO1998021273A2 (en) 1996-11-15 1998-05-22 Montell North America Inc. Polymer mixture for slush molding

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
E.P. MOORE JR.: "Polypropylene Handbook", 1996, HANSER PUBLISHERS, MUNICH VIENNA NEW YORK, pages: 245-248
JOURNAL OF POLYMER SCIENCE, vol. XXVIII, no. 116, 1958, pages 235-239
P. PARRINI ET AL.: "Intrinsic Viscosity and Molecular Weight of Isotactic Polypropylene", DIE MAKROMOLEKULARE CHEMIE, vol. 38, no. 1, 1960, pages 27-38

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE202013103803U1 (en) 2013-08-22 2014-11-24 Kobusch-Sengewald Gmbh Multilayer film

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE69914383T2 (en) 2004-10-28
ES2214070T3 (en) 2004-09-01
US6723829B1 (en) 2004-04-20
EP1244717B1 (en) 2004-01-21
CN1391587A (en) 2003-01-15
DE69914383D1 (en) 2004-02-26
ES2214070T5 (en) 2010-09-06
AU1388300A (en) 2001-05-30
ATE258195T1 (en) 2004-02-15
DE69914383T3 (en) 2010-11-25
CN1182165C (en) 2004-12-29
WO2001036502A1 (en) 2001-05-25
EP1244717A1 (en) 2002-10-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1244717B2 (en) Heterophasic copolymers
EP2283072B2 (en) Process for producing high purity heterophasic propylene copolymers
EP1434810B2 (en) Propylene random copolymer
US6365682B1 (en) Process for the production of propylene terpolymers
KR101441018B1 (en) Polypropylene composition comprising a propylene homopolymer component
EP0611801B1 (en) Olefin polymer films
EP1576047B1 (en) Polyethylene blow molding composition for producing small containers
EP1801156B1 (en) Polyolefin compositions
EP2638108B1 (en) Soft heterophasic propylene copolymers
EP1801157A1 (en) Polypropylene composition comprising a propylene copolymer component
HU210337B (en) Process for producing thermoplastic olefin polymeric composition
WO2009007132A1 (en) Heterophasic polyolefin composition
JPH06271720A (en) Composition for inflated film
JP2002145908A (en) Method for producing ethylene-based polymer

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20020506

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040121

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040121

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040121

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040121

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040121

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69914383

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20040226

Kind code of ref document: P

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040421

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040421

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040421

LTIE Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension

Effective date: 20040121

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2214070

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

ET Fr: translation filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041112

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041112

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041112

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041130

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: TOTAL PETROCHEMICALS RESEARCH FELUY S.A.

Effective date: 20041019

NLR1 Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo

Opponent name: TOTAL PETROCHEMICALS RESEARCH FELUY S.A.

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20041112

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

APAH Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO

APBP Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O

APBQ Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3O

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040621

APBU Appeal procedure closed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9O

PUAH Patent maintained in amended form

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009272

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT MAINTAINED AS AMENDED

27A Patent maintained in amended form

Effective date: 20100609

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: DC2A

Date of ref document: 20100715

Kind code of ref document: T5

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20111110

Year of fee payment: 13

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: *BOREALIS TECHNOLOGY OY

Effective date: 20121130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20121130

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 17

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 18

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20161118

Year of fee payment: 18

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20161118

Year of fee payment: 18

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20161121

Year of fee payment: 18

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20161114

Year of fee payment: 18

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20161123

Year of fee payment: 18

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 69914383

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20171201

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20180731

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171130

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171201

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171112

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180602

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20181226

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171113