EP1176031A1 - Production of support for lithographic printing plate - Google Patents

Production of support for lithographic printing plate Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1176031A1
EP1176031A1 EP01000213A EP01000213A EP1176031A1 EP 1176031 A1 EP1176031 A1 EP 1176031A1 EP 01000213 A EP01000213 A EP 01000213A EP 01000213 A EP01000213 A EP 01000213A EP 1176031 A1 EP1176031 A1 EP 1176031A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
substrate
salt
orthophosphate
metal
aluminium
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP01000213A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1176031B1 (en
Inventor
Felton Rudolph Mayers
Tu Vinh Chau
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Agfa Gevaert NV
Agfa Gevaert AG
Original Assignee
Agfa Gevaert NV
Agfa Gevaert AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Agfa Gevaert NV, Agfa Gevaert AG filed Critical Agfa Gevaert NV
Priority to EP20010000213 priority Critical patent/EP1176031B1/en
Publication of EP1176031A1 publication Critical patent/EP1176031A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1176031B1 publication Critical patent/EP1176031B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C21/00Alloys based on aluminium
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B41PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
    • B41NPRINTING PLATES OR FOILS; MATERIALS FOR SURFACES USED IN PRINTING MACHINES FOR PRINTING, INKING, DAMPING, OR THE LIKE; PREPARING SUCH SURFACES FOR USE AND CONSERVING THEM
    • B41N3/00Preparing for use and conserving printing surfaces
    • B41N3/03Chemical or electrical pretreatment
    • B41N3/034Chemical or electrical pretreatment characterised by the electrochemical treatment of the aluminum support, e.g. anodisation, electro-graining; Sealing of the anodised layer; Treatment of the anodic layer with inorganic compounds; Colouring of the anodic layer
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B41PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
    • B41NPRINTING PLATES OR FOILS; MATERIALS FOR SURFACES USED IN PRINTING MACHINES FOR PRINTING, INKING, DAMPING, OR THE LIKE; PREPARING SUCH SURFACES FOR USE AND CONSERVING THEM
    • B41N3/00Preparing for use and conserving printing surfaces
    • B41N3/03Chemical or electrical pretreatment
    • B41N3/038Treatment with a chromium compound, a silicon compound, a phophorus compound or a compound of a metal of group IVB; Hydrophilic coatings obtained by hydrolysis of organometallic compounds

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a method for the production of a support for use as a substrate for a lithographic printing plate. More specifically, the invention provides a method for the surface treatment of a support material, whereby a substrate having particularly favourable lithographic properties may be obtained.
  • the material used as the support material depends upon the specific purpose for which the printing plate is to be used and may be, for example, a metal, paper or plastics material.
  • the preferred substrate is aluminium, most preferably electrochemically roughened aluminium which includes a surface layer of anodic aluminium oxide.
  • said aluminium may be laminated to another metal, such as copper or zinc, or to a plastics material, for example a polyester material such as poly(ethylene terephthalate).
  • aluminium substrates intended for use as support materials for lithographic printing plates and their precursors have been subjected to surface treatments prior to application of a light sensitive coating material. These treatments serve to improve the lithographic properties of the aluminium, in particular, its hydrophilicity. This is important during printing operations, since the basis of lithography is the ability of the lithographic plate to accept ink in image areas whilst rejecting ink and accepting water in background (non-image) areas, so that the printed image remains free from dirt and other contamination in said background areas.
  • the light-sensitive coating of a lithographic printing plate precursor is imagewise exposed to radiation in order to change the solubility characteristics of the coating in the radiation-struck areas. The soluble areas are subsequently dissolved away by treatment with a developing solution, to expose the aluminium surface which must be capable of rejecting ink and accepting water.
  • a typical surface treatment comprises an initial graining treatment, wherein the aluminium surface is roughened by either mechanical or electrochemical means, and a subsequent anodising treatment, by means of which a layer of aluminium oxide is formed on the surface of the aluminium.
  • Anodising treatments may, for example, be carried out by passing a grained aluminium web through a bath of a suitable anodising acid, such as sulphuric or phosphoric acid, or a mixture thereof, whilst an electric current flows through the anodising bath and the web serves as the anode.
  • post-anodic dip - is usually applied in order to improve specific lithographic printing properties of the substrate, such as clean up of background areas, coating adhesion or corrosion resistance, and will typically involve treating the aluminium with a solution, often an aqueous solution, of the chosen reagent.
  • aqueous solutions containing, for example, various inorganic salts or organic derivatives such as poly(acrylic acid) or various aqueous-soluble copolymers.
  • EP-A-567178 discloses the treatment of grained and anodised aluminium with an aqueous solution of an alkali metal bicarbonate, whilst the use of solutions containing anions including chloride, fluoride, nitrate, carboxylate, sulphate and phosphate for application to anodised aluminium is described in JP-A-10129143.
  • GB Patent No 1128506 deals with a process wherein anodised aluminium is treated with an aqueous solution of titanium, zirconium or hafnium tetrachloride - or the corresponding double fluoride formed with, for example, alkali metal fluorides - and subsequently dipped in an aqueous alkaline solution of potassium tetrapyrophosphate.
  • GB Patent No 1504503 teaches the use of potassium titanium fluoride in combination with a vegetable tannin compound and a soluble lithium compound in the treatment of anodised aluminium surfaces in order to improve corrosion resistance
  • EP-A-178020 discloses a treatment process for otherwise untreated aluminium which provides excellent corrosion resistance and paint adhesion characteristics and involves sequentially contacting the surface with (1) an aqueous acidic solution containing hafnium, zirconium and/or titanium ions, fluoride ions, a tannin compound and a sequestering agent and (2) a solution comprising a polyphenolic compound or acid salt thereof.
  • an object of the present invention to provide a post-anodic dip treatment for grained and anodised aluminium which eliminates the problem of poor ease of deletion during printing platemaking which is associated with the use of fluoride derivatives of titanium, hafnium and zirconium, whilst at the same time retaining the advantageous properties which are associated with the use of these materials.
  • Said treatment of said at least one grained and anodised surface with an aqueous solution comprising at least one salt of a metal from Group IB, IIB, IVA, IVB, VB, VIA, VIB, VIIB or VIII of the Periodic Table is preferably carried out by treating said substrate with an aqueous solution, preferably containing from 0.01% to 10.0% (w/w) (more preferably from 0.05% to 1.5%) of said salt at a preferred temperature of from 10° to 90°C (more preferably from 40° to 80°C) for a preferred dwell time of from 0.1 second to 5 minutes (more preferably from 0.2 second to 30 seconds) at a pH which preferably lies between 1 and 6, most preferably between 3.5 and 5.5.
  • Various coating techniques may be employed for application of the salt, such as dip coating, slot coating, reverse roll coating or electrochemical coating; most preferred, however, is spray coating.
  • Spray coating most preferred, however, is spray coating.
  • Single pass processes are also preferred since they facilitate the avoidance of contamination which could otherwise occur as a consequence of re-circulation of the solution.
  • Suitable salts which may be used for the said treatment include, for example, salts of titanium, zirconium, hafnium, molybdenum, tungsten, vanadium, manganese, nickel, copper, zinc, tin, niobium, tantalum, cerium, selenium, silicon, cobalt or iron.
  • Said salts may include the metal either as the cation, for example in halide, sulphate or nitrate salts, or as part of a complexed anion.
  • the hafnium, zirconium or titanium salt comprises a salt wherein the metal is present in a metal-complex anion, such as a chlorotitanate or fluorozirconate anion.
  • a metal-complex anion such as a chlorotitanate or fluorozirconate anion.
  • alkali metal fluorozirconates particularly potassium hexafluorozirconate.
  • Said treatment of at least one treated surface with an aqueous solution comprising at least one orthophosphate salt of an alkali metal is preferably carried out by treating said substrate with an aqueous solution, preferably containing from 0.01% to 10.0% (w/w) (more preferably from 0.05% to 1.5%) of an orthophosphate salt of an alkali metal at a preferred temperature of from 5° to 90°C (more preferably from 40° to 80°C) for a preferred dwell time of from 0.05 second to 5 minutes (more preferably from 0.1 second to 30 seconds) at a pH which preferably lies between 3 and 7, most preferably around 4.5.
  • orthophosphate salt of an alkali metal such as dip coating, slot coating, reverse roll coating or electrochemical coating; most preferred, however, is spray coating.
  • Spray coating most preferred, however, is spray coating.
  • Single pass processes are also preferred since they facilitate the avoidance of contamination which could otherwise occur as a consequence of re-circulation of the solution.
  • orthophosphate salts of alkali metals which may be used for the said treatment are the orthophosphates of sodium or potassium, including the hydrogen and dihydrogen orthophosphates. It has been found that these materials provide superior results, and are therefore preferred.
  • Other phosphorus-containing compounds such as hypophosphonate, hypophosphate, pyrophosphonate, pyrophosphate, phosphonate, polyphosphonate or metaphosphonate derivatives have been reported in the prior art, but generally provide printing plates of lower quality than those obtained by the application of orthophosphate salts.
  • alkali metal fluorophosphates or difluorophosphates, phosphosilicates and phosphoborates all of which facilitate the controlled release of phosphate into the coating bath, and various organic materials, such as the copolymer of acrylic acid and vinyl phosphonic acid, has been investigated.
  • the cheaper orthophosphates are the most preferred materials, giving excellent performance at optimum cost, with sodium dihydrogen orthophosphate and, most particularly, potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate being especially preferred.
  • the orthophosphate salt of an alkali metal may be applied to the substrate simultaneously with the salt of a metal from Group IB, IIB, IVA, IVB, VB, VIA, VIB, VIIB or VIII of the Periodic Table, or it may be applied in a separate treatment, subsequent to the application of the said salt; in either case, plates showing excellent ease of deletion, as well as other desirable properties, are obtained.
  • precipitation problems which are associated with the simultaneous treatment method are not apparent when the treatments are carried out as separate stages, with the orthophosphate salt of an alkali metal being applied subsequent to the treatment with the salt of a metal from Group IB, IIB, IVA, IVB, VB, VIA, VIB, VIIB or VIII of the Periodic Table.
  • the aqueous solution of the salt of a metal from Group IB, IIB, IVA, IVB, VB, VIA, VIB, VIIB or VIII of the Periodic Table or the aqueous solution of at least one orthophosphate salt of an alkali metal - or the combined solution, if this is to be employed.
  • the solution or solutions may include materials such as sequestering agents, tannin, sulphuric acid, fluorides and other additives which are known to improve the lithographic properties of a substrate, including various organic and inorganic polymeric materials.
  • said substrate may be rinsed with water following said treatment with an aqueous solution comprising at least one salt of a metal from Group IB, IIB, IVA, IVB, VB, VIA, VIB, VIIB or VIII of the Periodic Table, and prior to said treatment with an aqueous solution comprising at least one orthophosphate salt of an alkali metal.
  • an aqueous solution comprising at least one salt of a metal from Group IB, IIB, IVA, IVB, VB, VIA, VIB, VIIB or VIII of the Periodic Table
  • Said aluminium substrate may comprises pure aluminium or an aluminium alloy containing small amounts of, for example, manganese, nickel, cobalt, zinc, iron, copper, magnesium, titanium, vanadium, silicon or zirconium.
  • Said substrate is generally provided in the form of a continuous web or roll of material.
  • said substrate is subjected to a degreasing treatment prior to said graining treatment.
  • Said degreasing treatment is most conveniently carried out by means of an aqueous alkaline solution.
  • said treatment involves passing said substrate through a bath containing a 1-20% w/v solution of, for example, sodium or potassium hydroxide at a temperature of 30-80°C for a dwell time of from 5-60 seconds.
  • said substrate is rinsed with water prior to further treatment.
  • Said graining treatment can involve mechanical graining, wherein the surface of the substrate is subjected to mechanical forces which may, for example, be achieved by the use of a slurry of very small metal balls or via brush graining techniques.
  • electrochemical graining may be employed; said technique typically comprises passing a substrate through a solution of a mineral or organic acid, or a mixture thereof, such as a mixture of hydrochloric and acetic acids, whilst applying an electric current to the acid solution.
  • solutions of suitable inorganic salts in mineral acids are also found to provide highly acceptable results; particularly favoured in this respect is a mixed electrolyte comprising hydrochloric acid, hydrated aluminium chloride and hydrated aluminium sulphate.
  • suitable graining conditions could involve the use of a bath of aqueous hydrochloric acid at a concentration of from 1-30 g/l and a temperature of 5-70°C, with a dwell time of from 1-60 seconds at a charge density of 200-800 C/dm 2 and an applied potential of from 1-60 V. The grained substrate is then rinsed with water prior to further processing.
  • said grained substrate should be subjected to a desmutting treatment in order to remove by-products formed during the course of said electrograining treatment, and deposited on the surface of the substrate.
  • a desmutting treatment in order to remove by-products formed during the course of said electrograining treatment, and deposited on the surface of the substrate.
  • the process involves treatment of the grained substrate with an aqueous acid or alkali according to the methods well known in the art.
  • Suitable desmutting conditions could, for example, involve treatment of the grained substrate with aqueous phosphoric acid at a concentration of around 20-400 g/l at a temperature in the region of 20-80°C for a dwell time of the order of 1 second to 5 minutes; alternatively, a higher temperature treatment - using sulphuric acid at 50-300 g/l and 30-80°C for a shorter dwell time of around 8 seconds - may be employed, or an alkaline treatment, with 2-20 g/l aqueous sodium hydroxide at 5-60°C, would suffice.
  • the substrate is rinsed with water following desmutting.
  • Anodising of the grained substrate is carried out by means of any of the standard techniques well known in the art, and typically involves passing the substrate through a bath containing an aqueous mineral acid, such as sulphuric, phosphoric, nitric, hydrofluoric or chromic acid, or an aqueous solution of an organic acid, for example oxalic, tartaric, citric, acetic or oleic acid, or a mixture of these acids, whilst applying an electric current to the anodising bath.
  • an aqueous mineral acid such as sulphuric, phosphoric, nitric, hydrofluoric or chromic acid
  • an organic acid for example oxalic, tartaric, citric, acetic or oleic acid, or a mixture of these acids
  • Suitable anodising conditions would involve the use of a bath of sulphuric acid at a concentration of from 10 to 300 g/l, preferably 100-150 g/l, and a temperature in the range of from 20-60°C, preferably 40-60°C, with a dwell time of from 1 to 120 seconds, preferably 3 to 40 seconds, an applied potential of from 5-60 V, preferably 10-50 V, and a charge density of from 100-500 C/dm 2 , preferably 200-400 C/dm 2 .
  • the grained and anodised substrate is then rinsed with water prior to further processing.
  • the process provided by the present invention may be successfully employed using various forms of process and coating technology. Principally, said process is suitable for use with the different forms of cell alignment associated with flat bed technology and vertical cell technology, both of which are well known to those skilled in the art.
  • the support provided by the method of the present invention may subsequently be coated with a light-sensitive coating to give a lithographic printing plate precursor.
  • a light-sensitive coating to give a lithographic printing plate precursor.
  • Various coatings of the types well known to those skilled in the art may be applied for this purpose, for example, positive-working coatings incorporating quinone diazide derivatives, negative-working coatings incorporating diazo or azide resins or photocrosslinkable resins or silver halide based coatings.
  • the coatings may be applied by any of the standard coating techniques known to the skilled person, such as curtain coating, dip coating, meniscus coating, slot coating, reverse roll coating, and the like.
  • the thus-obtained lithographic printing plate precursor may then be imagewise exposed and the non-image areas can be developed away to provide a lithographic printing plate which is subsequently used on a printing press to produce copies.
  • Lithographic printing plates produced from aluminium supports obtained by the method of the present invention show excellent performance in terms of ease of deletion, as well as good corrosion resistance, solvent resistance, clean-up and roll-up on press. No background staining is observed and plates exhibit excellent ink-water balance and damping latitude performance, as well as good run length.
  • An aluminium alloy substrate comprising Al ⁇ 99.1%, Si ⁇ 0.2%, Fe ⁇ 0.4%, Cu ⁇ 0.05%, Mn ⁇ 0.05%, Mg ⁇ 0.05%, Zn ⁇ 0.07%, Ti ⁇ 0.05% and V ⁇ 0.05% was conventionally degreased, rinsed and subjected to an electrochemical graining treatment using a liquor comprising hydrochloric acid (9 g/l) and acetic acid (25 g/l) at a temperature of 30°C for a dwell time of 20 seconds at a charge density of 500 C/dm 2 .
  • the grained substrate was subjected to an anodising process by treating with sulphuric acid (145 g/l) at 45°C for a dwell time of 20 seconds at a charge density of 250 C/dm 2 , then rinsed with water.
  • the grained and anodised aluminium substrate was then treated by spray coating for 20 seconds with an aqueous solution of potassium hexafluorozirconate (5 g/l) having pH 4.0 at 60°C, then spray coated with an aqueous solution of potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate (12 g/l) having pH 4.5 at 60°C for 20 seconds. No evidence of precipitation was observed during, or subsequent to, either treatment.
  • the resulting substrate was rinsed with water and coated with a solution of a naphthoquinone diazide photosensitive resin and a cresol novolak support resin in 2-methoxypropanol to produce a light-sensitive coating layer, and the coated substrate was baked at 130°C for 5 minutes.
  • the resulting lithographic printing plate precursor was imagewise exposed to UV light at 100-300 mJ/cm 2 and the non-image areas were developed away with an aqueous alkaline developer solution by immersion for 30 seconds at 20°C.
  • the resulting lithographic printing plate was rinsed with water and dried in a stream of cool air and subsequently produced 250,000 excellent quality copies on a Drent Web Offset press.
  • the plate showed excellent roll-up and clean-up, with no background staining, on press. Ink/water balance, damping latitude and solvent resistance were also all exceptionally good.
  • Posidel A a commercial deletion fluid supplied by Agfa-Gevaert
  • the plate showed excellent ease of deletion and little evidence of residual staining.
  • An aluminium alloy substrate comprising Al ⁇ 98.0%, Si ⁇ 0.5%, Fe ⁇ 0.7%, Cu ⁇ 0.05%, Mn 1.0-1.5%, Mg ⁇ 0.15%, Zn ⁇ 0.1%, Ti ⁇ 0.05% and V ⁇ 0.05% was degreased, grained, desmutted and anodised as described in Example 1.
  • the grained and anodised aluminium substrate was then treated by spray coating for a dwell time of 3.5 seconds with an aqueous solution of potassium hexafluorozirconate (5 g/l) having pH 4.0 at 80°C, then further spray coated with an aqueous solution of potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate (8 g/l) having pH 4.5 at 70°C for 0.5 second. No evidence of precipitation was observed during, or subsequent to, either treatment.
  • the resulting substrate was rinsed with water and coated with a solution of a naphthoquinone diazide photosensitive resin and a cresol novolak support resin in 2-methoxypropanol and tetrahydrofuran (1:1) which contained dispersed particles of silica having an average diameter of approximately 4 ⁇ m.
  • the coated substrate was baked at 140°C for 30 seconds to 1 minute to produce a light-sensitive coating layer having a mat surface layer which promoted good vacuum drawdown performance during imagewise exposure. This was carried out using UV light at 100-300 mJ/cm 2 , after which the non-image areas were developed away with an aqueous alkaline developer solution by immersion for 30 seconds at 20°C.
  • the resulting lithographic printing plate was rinsed with water and dried in a stream of cool air and subsequently produced 250,000 excellent quality copies on a Drent Web Offset press.
  • the plate showed excellent roll-up and clean-up, with no background staining, on press. Ink/water balance, damping latitude and solvent resistance were also all exceptionally good.
  • Posidel A a commercial deletion fluid supplied by Agfa-Gevaert
  • the plate showed excellent ease of deletion and little evidence of residual staining.
  • An aluminium alloy substrate as in Example 1 was conventionally degreased, rinsed and subjected to an electrochemical graining treatment using a liquor comprising hydrochloric acid (12 g/l) and sulphuric acid (9 g/l) at a temperature of 40°C for a dwell time of 5 seconds at a charge density of 540-550 C/dm 2 .
  • a liquor comprising hydrochloric acid (12 g/l) and sulphuric acid (9 g/l) at a temperature of 40°C for a dwell time of 5 seconds at a charge density of 540-550 C/dm 2 .
  • sulphuric acid 145 g/l
  • the grained substrate was subjected to an anodising process by treating with sulphuric acid (145 g/l) at 57°C for a dwell time of 6 seconds at a charge density of 250 C/dm 2 , then rinsed with water.
  • the grained and anodised aluminium substrate was slot coated for 5 seconds with an aqueous solution of potassium hexafluorozirconate (5 g/l) having pH 4.0 at 70°C, then further treated by slot coating with an aqueous solution of potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate (4 g/l) having pH 4.5 at 70°C for 1.0 second. No evidence of precipitation was observed during, or subsequent to, either treatment.
  • the resulting substrate was rinsed with water and coated with a solution of a naphthoquinone diazide photosensitive resin and a cresol novolak support resin in 2-methoxypropanol to produce a light-sensitive coating layer, and the coated substrate was baked at 130°C for 5 minutes.
  • the resulting lithographic printing plate precursor was imagewise exposed to UV light at 100-300 mJ/cm 2 and the non-image areas were developed away with an aqueous alkaline developer solution by immersion for 30 seconds at 20°C.
  • the resulting lithographic printing plate was rinsed with water and dried in a stream of cool air and subsequently produced 250,000 excellent quality copies on a Drent Web Offset press.
  • the plate showed excellent roll-up and clean-up, with no background staining, on press. Ink/water balance, damping latitude and solvent resistance were also all exceptionally good.
  • Posidel A a commercial deletion fluid supplied by Agfa-Gevaert
  • the plate showed excellent ease of deletion and little evidence of residual staining.
  • An aluminium alloy substrate was degreased, grained, desmutted and anodised as described in Example 1.
  • the grained and anodised aluminium substrate was then treated by spray coating for a dwell time of 3.5 seconds with an aqueous solution of sodium hexachlorotitanate (5 g/l) having pH 4.0 at 80°C, then further spray coated with an aqueous solution of sodium dihydrogen orthophosphate (8 g/l) having pH 4.5 at 70°C for 0.5 second. No evidence of precipitation was observed during, or subsequent to, either treatment.
  • the resulting substrate was rinsed with water and coated with a solution of a naphthoquinone diazide photosensitive resin and a cresol novolak support resin in 2-methoxypropanol to produce a light-sensitive coating layer, and the coated substrate was baked at 130°C for 5 minutes.
  • the resulting lithographic printing plate precursor was imagewise exposed to UV light at 100-300 mJ/cm 2 and the non-image areas were developed away with an aqueous alkaline developer solution by immersion for 30 seconds at 20°C.
  • the resulting lithographic printing plate was rinsed with water and dried in a stream of cool air and subsequently produced 250,000 excellent quality copies on a Drent Web Offset press.
  • the plate showed excellent roll-up and clean-up, with no background staining, on press. Ink/water balance, damping latitude and solvent resistance were also all exceptionally good.
  • Posidel A a commercial deletion fluid supplied by Agfa-Gevaert
  • the plate showed excellent ease of deletion and little evidence of residual staining.
  • An aluminium alloy substrate was degreased, grained, desmutted and anodised as described in Example 1.
  • the grained and anodised aluminium substrate was treated for 20 seconds with an aqueous solution of potassium hexafluorozirconate (5 g/l) and poly(vinyl phosphonic acid) (2 g/l) having pH 4.0 at 60°C. No evidence of precipitation was observed during, or subsequent to, the said treatment.
  • the resulting substrate was rinsed with water and coated with a solution of a naphthoquinone diazide photosensitive resin and a cresol novolak support resin in 2-methoxypropanol to produce a light-sensitive coating layer, and the coated substrate was baked at 130°C for 5 minutes.
  • the resulting lithographic printing plate precursor was imagewise exposed to UV light at 100-300 mJ/cm 2 and the non-image areas were developed away with an aqueous alkaline developer solution by immersion for 30 seconds at 20°C.
  • the resulting lithographic printing plate was rinsed with water and dried in a stream of cool air and subsequently produced 250,000 excellent quality copies on a Drent Web Offset press.
  • the plate showed excellent roll-up and clean-up, with no background staining, on press. Ink/water balance, damping latitude and solvent resistance were also all exceptionally good. On treatment with Posidel A (a commercial deletion fluid supplied by Agfa-Gevaert) the plate showed moderate ease of deletion and evidence of residual staining was observed.
  • An aluminium alloy substrate was degreased, grained, desmutted and anodised as described in Example 1.
  • the grained and anodised aluminium substrate was spray coated for 20 seconds with an aqueous solution of potassium hexafluorozirconate (5 g/l) having pH 4.0 at 60°C, then treated with an aqueous solution of a poly(vinyl phosphonic acid) (2 g/l) having pH 3.5 by spray coating at 60°C for 20 seconds. No evidence of precipitation was observed during, or subsequent to, either treatment.
  • the resulting substrate was rinsed with water and coated with a solution of a naphthoquinone diazide photosensitive resin and a cresol novolak support resin in 2-methoxypropanol to produce a light-sensitive coating layer, and the coated substrate was baked at 130°C for 5 minutes.
  • the resulting lithographic printing plate precursor was imagewise exposed to UV light at 100-300 mJ/cm 2 and the non-image areas were developed away with an aqueous alkaline developer solution by immersion for 30 seconds at 20°C.
  • the resulting lithographic printing plate was rinsed with water and dried in a stream of cool air and subsequently produced 250,000 excellent quality copies on a Drent Web Offset press.
  • the plate showed excellent roll-up and clean-up, with no background staining, on press; ink/water balance and damping latitude were also very good.
  • Posidel A a commercial deletion fluid supplied by Agfa-Gevaert
  • the plate showed excellent ease of deletion and little evidence of residual staining.
  • solvent resistance and corrosion resistance the performance was poor.
  • An aluminium alloy substrate was degreased, grained, desmutted and anodised as described in Example 1.
  • the grained and anodised aluminium substrate was treated for 20 seconds with an aqueous solution of potassium hexafluorozirconate (5 g/l) and sodium pyrophosphate (8 g/l) having pH 4.0 at 60°C. No evidence of precipitation was observed during, or subsequent to, the said treatment.
  • the resulting substrate was rinsed with water and coated with a solution of a naphthoquinone diazide photosensitive resin and a cresol novolak support resin in 2-methoxypropanol to produce a light-sensitive coating layer, and the coated substrate was baked at 130°C for 5 minutes.
  • the resulting lithographic printing plate precursor was imagewise exposed to UV light at 100-300 mJ/cm 2 and the non-image areas were developed away with an aqueous alkaline developer solution by immersion for 30 seconds at 20°C.
  • the resulting lithographic printing plate was rinsed with water and dried in a stream of cool air and subsequently produced 250,000 excellent quality copies on a Drent Web Offset press.
  • the plate showed excellent roll-up and clean-up, with no background staining, on press. Ink/water balance, damping latitude and solvent resistance were also all exceptionally good.
  • Posidel A a commercial deletion fluid supplied by Agfa-Gevaert
  • the plate showed excellent ease of deletion and little evidence of residual staining.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Electrochemistry (AREA)
  • Printing Plates And Materials Therefor (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention provides a process for the manufacture of a substrate for use in the production of lithographic printing plates, the process comprising the steps of:
  • (a) providing an aluminium substrate;
  • (b) graining at least one surface of said substrate;
  • (c) applying an anodic layer to said at least one grained surface;
  • (d) treating said at least one grained and anodised surface with an aqueous solution comprising at least one salt of a metal from Group IB, IIB, IVA, IVB, VB, VIA, VIB, VIIB or VIII of the Periodic Table; and
  • (e) treating said at least one treated surface with an aqueous solution comprising at least one orthophosphate salt of an alkali metal.
  • Lithographic printing plates produced from aluminium supports obtained by the method of the present invention show excellent performance in terms of ease of deletion, as well as good corrosion resistance, solvent resistance, clean-up and roll-up on press. No background staining is observed and plates exhibit excellent ink-water balance and damping latitude performance, as well as good run length.

    Description

    • This invention relates to a method for the production of a support for use as a substrate for a lithographic printing plate. More specifically, the invention provides a method for the surface treatment of a support material, whereby a substrate having particularly favourable lithographic properties may be obtained.
    • The material used as the support material depends upon the specific purpose for which the printing plate is to be used and may be, for example, a metal, paper or plastics material. Generally for printing plates, however, the preferred substrate is aluminium, most preferably electrochemically roughened aluminium which includes a surface layer of anodic aluminium oxide. Optionally, said aluminium may be laminated to another metal, such as copper or zinc, or to a plastics material, for example a polyester material such as poly(ethylene terephthalate).
    • Conventionally, aluminium substrates intended for use as support materials for lithographic printing plates and their precursors have been subjected to surface treatments prior to application of a light sensitive coating material. These treatments serve to improve the lithographic properties of the aluminium, in particular, its hydrophilicity. This is important during printing operations, since the basis of lithography is the ability of the lithographic plate to accept ink in image areas whilst rejecting ink and accepting water in background (non-image) areas, so that the printed image remains free from dirt and other contamination in said background areas. Thus, the light-sensitive coating of a lithographic printing plate precursor is imagewise exposed to radiation in order to change the solubility characteristics of the coating in the radiation-struck areas. The soluble areas are subsequently dissolved away by treatment with a developing solution, to expose the aluminium surface which must be capable of rejecting ink and accepting water.
    • A typical surface treatment comprises an initial graining treatment, wherein the aluminium surface is roughened by either mechanical or electrochemical means, and a subsequent anodising treatment, by means of which a layer of aluminium oxide is formed on the surface of the aluminium. Anodising treatments may, for example, be carried out by passing a grained aluminium web through a bath of a suitable anodising acid, such as sulphuric or phosphoric acid, or a mixture thereof, whilst an electric current flows through the anodising bath and the web serves as the anode. The presence of a surface anodic layer greatly enhances the hydrophilicity of the aluminium surface, and the adhesion of the subsequently formed image layer is found to be much improved when the surface of the aluminium is subjected to a graining treatment prior to anodising.
    • Additionally, there is generally a requirement for a further surface treatment following the anodising process. Such a treatment - referred to as a post-anodic dip - is usually applied in order to improve specific lithographic printing properties of the substrate, such as clean up of background areas, coating adhesion or corrosion resistance, and will typically involve treating the aluminium with a solution, often an aqueous solution, of the chosen reagent. Commonly used post-anodic dips include aqueous solutions containing, for example, various inorganic salts or organic derivatives such as poly(acrylic acid) or various aqueous-soluble copolymers.
    • Thus, EP-A-567178 discloses the treatment of grained and anodised aluminium with an aqueous solution of an alkali metal bicarbonate, whilst the use of solutions containing anions including chloride, fluoride, nitrate, carboxylate, sulphate and phosphate for application to anodised aluminium is described in JP-A-10129143. In addition, GB Patent No 1128506 deals with a process wherein anodised aluminium is treated with an aqueous solution of titanium, zirconium or hafnium tetrachloride - or the corresponding double fluoride formed with, for example, alkali metal fluorides - and subsequently dipped in an aqueous alkaline solution of potassium tetrapyrophosphate. Indeed, the successful use of various fluoride derivatives of titanium, hafnium and zirconium for post-anodic dip treatments has been widely reported; for example, GB Patent No 1504503 teaches the use of potassium titanium fluoride in combination with a vegetable tannin compound and a soluble lithium compound in the treatment of anodised aluminium surfaces in order to improve corrosion resistance, whilst EP-A-178020 discloses a treatment process for otherwise untreated aluminium which provides excellent corrosion resistance and paint adhesion characteristics and involves sequentially contacting the surface with (1) an aqueous acidic solution containing hafnium, zirconium and/or titanium ions, fluoride ions, a tannin compound and a sequestering agent and (2) a solution comprising a polyphenolic compound or acid salt thereof.
    • The present inventors have found, however, that the use of fluoride derivatives of this type can give rise to problems during the platemaking process, thereby resulting in the production of printing plates of inferior quality. Specifically, it was observed that the ease of performing deletions was adversely affected, such that corrections to the plate surface could only be carried out with difficulty. As a consequence, costly delays were experienced during platemaking, and the vigorous treatments required in order to effect the corrections gave rise to damage to the plate surface, with a resulting deleterious effect on printing performance.
    • It is, therefore, an object of the present invention to provide a post-anodic dip treatment for grained and anodised aluminium which eliminates the problem of poor ease of deletion during printing platemaking which is associated with the use of fluoride derivatives of titanium, hafnium and zirconium, whilst at the same time retaining the advantageous properties which are associated with the use of these materials.
    • Initially, the present inventors studied the possible addition of further materials to the post-anodic dip to study their effects in combination with the said fluoride derivatives. Specifically, a series of experiments was carried out with an aqueous solution of potassium hexafluorozirconate to which various other salts had been added; the intention was to examine the potential benefits of several alternative anions in combination with the hexafluorozirconate. It was found that particularly beneficial results were achieved when orthophosphate salts were present in the post-anodic bath, and that the resulting printing plates showed good ease of deletion. Unfortunately, however, severe practical difficulties were associated with this procedure, and the addition of orthophosphate salts to the post-anodic bath in this way was shown to give rise to severe precipitation problems during manufacture, to the extent that the resulting process could not be considered to be commercially viable. Hence, the inventors sought an alternative process, by means of which the beneficial results of the treatment could be maintained, whilst at the same time eliminating the said practical problems.
    • According to the present invention there is provided a process for the manufacture of a substrate for use in the production of lithographic printing plates, said process comprising the steps of:
    • (a) providing an aluminium substrate;
    • (b) graining at least one surface of said substrate;
    • (c) applying an anodic layer to said at least one grained surface;
    • (d) treating said at least one grained and anodised surface with an aqueous solution comprising at least one salt of a metal from Group IB, IIB, IVA, IVB, VB, VIA, VIB, VIIB or VIII of the Periodic Table; and
    • (e) treating said at least one treated surface with an aqueous solution comprising at least one orthophosphate salt of an alkali metal.
    • Said treatment of said at least one grained and anodised surface with an aqueous solution comprising at least one salt of a metal from Group IB, IIB, IVA, IVB, VB, VIA, VIB, VIIB or VIII of the Periodic Table is preferably carried out by treating said substrate with an aqueous solution, preferably containing from 0.01% to 10.0% (w/w) (more preferably from 0.05% to 1.5%) of said salt at a preferred temperature of from 10° to 90°C (more preferably from 40° to 80°C) for a preferred dwell time of from 0.1 second to 5 minutes (more preferably from 0.2 second to 30 seconds) at a pH which preferably lies between 1 and 6, most preferably between 3.5 and 5.5. Various coating techniques may be employed for application of the salt, such as dip coating, slot coating, reverse roll coating or electrochemical coating; most preferred, however, is spray coating. Single pass processes are also preferred since they facilitate the avoidance of contamination which could otherwise occur as a consequence of re-circulation of the solution.
    • Suitable salts which may be used for the said treatment include, for example, salts of titanium, zirconium, hafnium, molybdenum, tungsten, vanadium, manganese, nickel, copper, zinc, tin, niobium, tantalum, cerium, selenium, silicon, cobalt or iron. Said salts may include the metal either as the cation, for example in halide, sulphate or nitrate salts, or as part of a complexed anion. Particularly favourable results are achieved with salts of titanium, zirconium or hafnium, such as hafnium sulphate, zirconium phosphate, titanium nitrate, hafnium acetate, zirconium fluoride and titanium chloride. Most preferably, however, the hafnium, zirconium or titanium salt comprises a salt wherein the metal is present in a metal-complex anion, such as a chlorotitanate or fluorozirconate anion. Especially preferred in this regard are the alkali metal fluorozirconates, particularly potassium hexafluorozirconate.
    • Said treatment of at least one treated surface with an aqueous solution comprising at least one orthophosphate salt of an alkali metal is preferably carried out by treating said substrate with an aqueous solution, preferably containing from 0.01% to 10.0% (w/w) (more preferably from 0.05% to 1.5%) of an orthophosphate salt of an alkali metal at a preferred temperature of from 5° to 90°C (more preferably from 40° to 80°C) for a preferred dwell time of from 0.05 second to 5 minutes (more preferably from 0.1 second to 30 seconds) at a pH which preferably lies between 3 and 7, most preferably around 4.5. Various coating techniques may be employed for application of the orthophosphate salt of an alkali metal, such as dip coating, slot coating, reverse roll coating or electrochemical coating; most preferred, however, is spray coating. Single pass processes are also preferred since they facilitate the avoidance of contamination which could otherwise occur as a consequence of re-circulation of the solution.
    • Particularly suitable orthophosphate salts of alkali metals which may be used for the said treatment are the orthophosphates of sodium or potassium, including the hydrogen and dihydrogen orthophosphates. It has been found that these materials provide superior results, and are therefore preferred. Other phosphorus-containing compounds, such as hypophosphonate, hypophosphate, pyrophosphonate, pyrophosphate, phosphonate, polyphosphonate or metaphosphonate derivatives have been reported in the prior art, but generally provide printing plates of lower quality than those obtained by the application of orthophosphate salts.
    • In addition, the use of alkali metal fluorophosphates or difluorophosphates, phosphosilicates and phosphoborates, all of which facilitate the controlled release of phosphate into the coating bath, and various organic materials, such as the copolymer of acrylic acid and vinyl phosphonic acid, has been investigated. However, from an economic viewpoint, the cheaper orthophosphates are the most preferred materials, giving excellent performance at optimum cost, with sodium dihydrogen orthophosphate and, most particularly, potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate being especially preferred.
    • The orthophosphate salt of an alkali metal may be applied to the substrate simultaneously with the salt of a metal from Group IB, IIB, IVA, IVB, VB, VIA, VIB, VIIB or VIII of the Periodic Table, or it may be applied in a separate treatment, subsequent to the application of the said salt; in either case, plates showing excellent ease of deletion, as well as other desirable properties, are obtained. However, precipitation problems which are associated with the simultaneous treatment method are not apparent when the treatments are carried out as separate stages, with the orthophosphate salt of an alkali metal being applied subsequent to the treatment with the salt of a metal from Group IB, IIB, IVA, IVB, VB, VIA, VIB, VIIB or VIII of the Periodic Table.
    • Additionally, other materials may be incorporated in the aqueous solution of the salt of a metal from Group IB, IIB, IVA, IVB, VB, VIA, VIB, VIIB or VIII of the Periodic Table, or the aqueous solution of at least one orthophosphate salt of an alkali metal - or the combined solution, if this is to be employed. Specifically, the solution or solutions may include materials such as sequestering agents, tannin, sulphuric acid, fluorides and other additives which are known to improve the lithographic properties of a substrate, including various organic and inorganic polymeric materials.
    • Optionally, said substrate may be rinsed with water following said treatment with an aqueous solution comprising at least one salt of a metal from Group IB, IIB, IVA, IVB, VB, VIA, VIB, VIIB or VIII of the Periodic Table, and prior to said treatment with an aqueous solution comprising at least one orthophosphate salt of an alkali metal.
    • Said aluminium substrate may comprises pure aluminium or an aluminium alloy containing small amounts of, for example, manganese, nickel, cobalt, zinc, iron, copper, magnesium, titanium, vanadium, silicon or zirconium. Said substrate is generally provided in the form of a continuous web or roll of material.
    • Preferably, said substrate is subjected to a degreasing treatment prior to said graining treatment. Said degreasing treatment is most conveniently carried out by means of an aqueous alkaline solution. Typically, said treatment involves passing said substrate through a bath containing a 1-20% w/v solution of, for example, sodium or potassium hydroxide at a temperature of 30-80°C for a dwell time of from 5-60 seconds. Following said degreasing treatment, said substrate is rinsed with water prior to further treatment.
    • Any of the known techniques may be utilised for graining the substrate. Said graining treatment can involve mechanical graining, wherein the surface of the substrate is subjected to mechanical forces which may, for example, be achieved by the use of a slurry of very small metal balls or via brush graining techniques. Alternatively, and most preferably, electrochemical graining may be employed; said technique typically comprises passing a substrate through a solution of a mineral or organic acid, or a mixture thereof, such as a mixture of hydrochloric and acetic acids, whilst applying an electric current to the acid solution. Alternatively, solutions of suitable inorganic salts in mineral acids are also found to provide highly acceptable results; particularly favoured in this respect is a mixed electrolyte comprising hydrochloric acid, hydrated aluminium chloride and hydrated aluminium sulphate. By way of illustration, suitable graining conditions could involve the use of a bath of aqueous hydrochloric acid at a concentration of from 1-30 g/l and a temperature of 5-70°C, with a dwell time of from 1-60 seconds at a charge density of 200-800 C/dm2 and an applied potential of from 1-60 V. The grained substrate is then rinsed with water prior to further processing.
    • Following electrochemical graining, said grained substrate should be subjected to a desmutting treatment in order to remove by-products formed during the course of said electrograining treatment, and deposited on the surface of the substrate. Typically, the process involves treatment of the grained substrate with an aqueous acid or alkali according to the methods well known in the art. Suitable desmutting conditions could, for example, involve treatment of the grained substrate with aqueous phosphoric acid at a concentration of around 20-400 g/l at a temperature in the region of 20-80°C for a dwell time of the order of 1 second to 5 minutes; alternatively, a higher temperature treatment - using sulphuric acid at 50-300 g/l and 30-80°C for a shorter dwell time of around 8 seconds - may be employed, or an alkaline treatment, with 2-20 g/l aqueous sodium hydroxide at 5-60°C, would suffice. The substrate is rinsed with water following desmutting.
    • Anodising of the grained substrate is carried out by means of any of the standard techniques well known in the art, and typically involves passing the substrate through a bath containing an aqueous mineral acid, such as sulphuric, phosphoric, nitric, hydrofluoric or chromic acid, or an aqueous solution of an organic acid, for example oxalic, tartaric, citric, acetic or oleic acid, or a mixture of these acids, whilst applying an electric current to the anodising bath. Suitable anodising conditions would involve the use of a bath of sulphuric acid at a concentration of from 10 to 300 g/l, preferably 100-150 g/l, and a temperature in the range of from 20-60°C, preferably 40-60°C, with a dwell time of from 1 to 120 seconds, preferably 3 to 40 seconds, an applied potential of from 5-60 V, preferably 10-50 V, and a charge density of from 100-500 C/dm2, preferably 200-400 C/dm2. The grained and anodised substrate is then rinsed with water prior to further processing.
    • The process provided by the present invention may be successfully employed using various forms of process and coating technology. Principally, said process is suitable for use with the different forms of cell alignment associated with flat bed technology and vertical cell technology, both of which are well known to those skilled in the art.
    • The support provided by the method of the present invention may subsequently be coated with a light-sensitive coating to give a lithographic printing plate precursor. Various coatings of the types well known to those skilled in the art may be applied for this purpose, for example, positive-working coatings incorporating quinone diazide derivatives, negative-working coatings incorporating diazo or azide resins or photocrosslinkable resins or silver halide based coatings. The coatings may be applied by any of the standard coating techniques known to the skilled person, such as curtain coating, dip coating, meniscus coating, slot coating, reverse roll coating, and the like.
    • The thus-obtained lithographic printing plate precursor may then be imagewise exposed and the non-image areas can be developed away to provide a lithographic printing plate which is subsequently used on a printing press to produce copies.
    • Lithographic printing plates produced from aluminium supports obtained by the method of the present invention show excellent performance in terms of ease of deletion, as well as good corrosion resistance, solvent resistance, clean-up and roll-up on press. No background staining is observed and plates exhibit excellent ink-water balance and damping latitude performance, as well as good run length.
    • The invention will now be illustrated, though without limitation, by reference to the following examples:
    • EXAMPLES Example 1
    • An aluminium alloy substrate comprising Al ≥99.1%, Si ≤0.2%, Fe ≤0.4%, Cu ≤0.05%, Mn ≤0.05%, Mg ≤0.05%, Zn ≤0.07%, Ti ≤0.05% and V ≤0.05% was conventionally degreased, rinsed and subjected to an electrochemical graining treatment using a liquor comprising hydrochloric acid (9 g/l) and acetic acid (25 g/l) at a temperature of 30°C for a dwell time of 20 seconds at a charge density of 500 C/dm2. Following water rinsing and desmutting in a solution of phosphoric acid (260 g/l) at 45°C for 20 seconds, the grained substrate was subjected to an anodising process by treating with sulphuric acid (145 g/l) at 45°C for a dwell time of 20 seconds at a charge density of 250 C/dm2, then rinsed with water.
    • The grained and anodised aluminium substrate was then treated by spray coating for 20 seconds with an aqueous solution of potassium hexafluorozirconate (5 g/l) having pH 4.0 at 60°C, then spray coated with an aqueous solution of potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate (12 g/l) having pH 4.5 at 60°C for 20 seconds. No evidence of precipitation was observed during, or subsequent to, either treatment.
    • The resulting substrate was rinsed with water and coated with a solution of a naphthoquinone diazide photosensitive resin and a cresol novolak support resin in 2-methoxypropanol to produce a light-sensitive coating layer, and the coated substrate was baked at 130°C for 5 minutes. The resulting lithographic printing plate precursor was imagewise exposed to UV light at 100-300 mJ/cm2 and the non-image areas were developed away with an aqueous alkaline developer solution by immersion for 30 seconds at 20°C. The resulting lithographic printing plate was rinsed with water and dried in a stream of cool air and subsequently produced 250,000 excellent quality copies on a Drent Web Offset press. The plate showed excellent roll-up and clean-up, with no background staining, on press. Ink/water balance, damping latitude and solvent resistance were also all exceptionally good. On treatment with Posidel A (a commercial deletion fluid supplied by Agfa-Gevaert) the plate showed excellent ease of deletion and little evidence of residual staining.
    • Example 2
    • An aluminium alloy substrate comprising Al ≥98.0%, Si ≤0.5%, Fe ≤0.7%, Cu ≤0.05%, Mn 1.0-1.5%, Mg ≤0.15%, Zn ≤0.1%, Ti ≤0.05% and V ≤0.05% was degreased, grained, desmutted and anodised as described in Example 1.
    • The grained and anodised aluminium substrate was then treated by spray coating for a dwell time of 3.5 seconds with an aqueous solution of potassium hexafluorozirconate (5 g/l) having pH 4.0 at 80°C, then further spray coated with an aqueous solution of potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate (8 g/l) having pH 4.5 at 70°C for 0.5 second. No evidence of precipitation was observed during, or subsequent to, either treatment.
    • The resulting substrate was rinsed with water and coated with a solution of a naphthoquinone diazide photosensitive resin and a cresol novolak support resin in 2-methoxypropanol and tetrahydrofuran (1:1) which contained dispersed particles of silica having an average diameter of approximately 4 µm. The coated substrate was baked at 140°C for 30 seconds to 1 minute to produce a light-sensitive coating layer having a mat surface layer which promoted good vacuum drawdown performance during imagewise exposure. This was carried out using UV light at 100-300 mJ/cm2, after which the non-image areas were developed away with an aqueous alkaline developer solution by immersion for 30 seconds at 20°C. The resulting lithographic printing plate was rinsed with water and dried in a stream of cool air and subsequently produced 250,000 excellent quality copies on a Drent Web Offset press. The plate showed excellent roll-up and clean-up, with no background staining, on press. Ink/water balance, damping latitude and solvent resistance were also all exceptionally good. On treatment with Posidel A (a commercial deletion fluid supplied by Agfa-Gevaert) the plate showed excellent ease of deletion and little evidence of residual staining.
    • Example 3
    • An aluminium alloy substrate as in Example 1 was conventionally degreased, rinsed and subjected to an electrochemical graining treatment using a liquor comprising hydrochloric acid (12 g/l) and sulphuric acid (9 g/l) at a temperature of 40°C for a dwell time of 5 seconds at a charge density of 540-550 C/dm2. Following water rinsing and desmutting in sulphuric acid (145 g/l) at 70°C, the grained substrate was subjected to an anodising process by treating with sulphuric acid (145 g/l) at 57°C for a dwell time of 6 seconds at a charge density of 250 C/dm2, then rinsed with water.
    • The grained and anodised aluminium substrate was slot coated for 5 seconds with an aqueous solution of potassium hexafluorozirconate (5 g/l) having pH 4.0 at 70°C, then further treated by slot coating with an aqueous solution of potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate (4 g/l) having pH 4.5 at 70°C for 1.0 second. No evidence of precipitation was observed during, or subsequent to, either treatment.
    • The resulting substrate was rinsed with water and coated with a solution of a naphthoquinone diazide photosensitive resin and a cresol novolak support resin in 2-methoxypropanol to produce a light-sensitive coating layer, and the coated substrate was baked at 130°C for 5 minutes. The resulting lithographic printing plate precursor was imagewise exposed to UV light at 100-300 mJ/cm2 and the non-image areas were developed away with an aqueous alkaline developer solution by immersion for 30 seconds at 20°C. The resulting lithographic printing plate was rinsed with water and dried in a stream of cool air and subsequently produced 250,000 excellent quality copies on a Drent Web Offset press. The plate showed excellent roll-up and clean-up, with no background staining, on press. Ink/water balance, damping latitude and solvent resistance were also all exceptionally good. On treatment with Posidel A (a commercial deletion fluid supplied by Agfa-Gevaert) the plate showed excellent ease of deletion and little evidence of residual staining.
    • Example 5
    • An aluminium alloy substrate was degreased, grained, desmutted and anodised as described in Example 1.
    • The grained and anodised aluminium substrate was then treated by spray coating for a dwell time of 3.5 seconds with an aqueous solution of sodium hexachlorotitanate (5 g/l) having pH 4.0 at 80°C, then further spray coated with an aqueous solution of sodium dihydrogen orthophosphate (8 g/l) having pH 4.5 at 70°C for 0.5 second. No evidence of precipitation was observed during, or subsequent to, either treatment.
    • The resulting substrate was rinsed with water and coated with a solution of a naphthoquinone diazide photosensitive resin and a cresol novolak support resin in 2-methoxypropanol to produce a light-sensitive coating layer, and the coated substrate was baked at 130°C for 5 minutes. The resulting lithographic printing plate precursor was imagewise exposed to UV light at 100-300 mJ/cm2 and the non-image areas were developed away with an aqueous alkaline developer solution by immersion for 30 seconds at 20°C. The resulting lithographic printing plate was rinsed with water and dried in a stream of cool air and subsequently produced 250,000 excellent quality copies on a Drent Web Offset press. The plate showed excellent roll-up and clean-up, with no background staining, on press. Ink/water balance, damping latitude and solvent resistance were also all exceptionally good. On treatment with Posidel A (a commercial deletion fluid supplied by Agfa-Gevaert) the plate showed excellent ease of deletion and little evidence of residual staining.
    • Comparative Example 1
    • An aluminium alloy substrate was degreased, grained, desmutted and anodised as described in Example 1.
    • The grained and anodised aluminium substrate was treated for 20 seconds with an aqueous solution of potassium hexafluorozirconate (5 g/l) and poly(vinyl phosphonic acid) (2 g/l) having pH 4.0 at 60°C. No evidence of precipitation was observed during, or subsequent to, the said treatment.
    • The resulting substrate was rinsed with water and coated with a solution of a naphthoquinone diazide photosensitive resin and a cresol novolak support resin in 2-methoxypropanol to produce a light-sensitive coating layer, and the coated substrate was baked at 130°C for 5 minutes. The resulting lithographic printing plate precursor was imagewise exposed to UV light at 100-300 mJ/cm2 and the non-image areas were developed away with an aqueous alkaline developer solution by immersion for 30 seconds at 20°C. The resulting lithographic printing plate was rinsed with water and dried in a stream of cool air and subsequently produced 250,000 excellent quality copies on a Drent Web Offset press. The plate showed excellent roll-up and clean-up, with no background staining, on press. Ink/water balance, damping latitude and solvent resistance were also all exceptionally good. On treatment with Posidel A (a commercial deletion fluid supplied by Agfa-Gevaert) the plate showed moderate ease of deletion and evidence of residual staining was observed.
    • Comparative Example 2
    • An aluminium alloy substrate was degreased, grained, desmutted and anodised as described in Example 1.
    • After rinsing with water, the grained and anodised aluminium substrate was spray coated for 20 seconds with an aqueous solution of potassium hexafluorozirconate (5 g/l) having pH 4.0 at 60°C, then treated with an aqueous solution of a poly(vinyl phosphonic acid) (2 g/l) having pH 3.5 by spray coating at 60°C for 20 seconds. No evidence of precipitation was observed during, or subsequent to, either treatment.
    • The resulting substrate was rinsed with water and coated with a solution of a naphthoquinone diazide photosensitive resin and a cresol novolak support resin in 2-methoxypropanol to produce a light-sensitive coating layer, and the coated substrate was baked at 130°C for 5 minutes. The resulting lithographic printing plate precursor was imagewise exposed to UV light at 100-300 mJ/cm2 and the non-image areas were developed away with an aqueous alkaline developer solution by immersion for 30 seconds at 20°C. The resulting lithographic printing plate was rinsed with water and dried in a stream of cool air and subsequently produced 250,000 excellent quality copies on a Drent Web Offset press. The plate showed excellent roll-up and clean-up, with no background staining, on press; ink/water balance and damping latitude were also very good. On treatment with Posidel A (a commercial deletion fluid supplied by Agfa-Gevaert) the plate showed excellent ease of deletion and little evidence of residual staining. However, in terms of solvent resistance and corrosion resistance, the performance was poor.
    • Comparative Example 3
    • An aluminium alloy substrate was degreased, grained, desmutted and anodised as described in Example 1.
    • The grained and anodised aluminium substrate was treated for 20 seconds with an aqueous solution of potassium hexafluorozirconate (5 g/l) and sodium pyrophosphate (8 g/l) having pH 4.0 at 60°C. No evidence of precipitation was observed during, or subsequent to, the said treatment.
    • The resulting substrate was rinsed with water and coated with a solution of a naphthoquinone diazide photosensitive resin and a cresol novolak support resin in 2-methoxypropanol to produce a light-sensitive coating layer, and the coated substrate was baked at 130°C for 5 minutes. The resulting lithographic printing plate precursor was imagewise exposed to UV light at 100-300 mJ/cm2 and the non-image areas were developed away with an aqueous alkaline developer solution by immersion for 30 seconds at 20°C. The resulting lithographic printing plate was rinsed with water and dried in a stream of cool air and subsequently produced 250,000 excellent quality copies on a Drent Web Offset press. The plate showed excellent roll-up and clean-up, with no background staining, on press. Ink/water balance, damping latitude and solvent resistance were also all exceptionally good. On treatment with Posidel A (a commercial deletion fluid supplied by Agfa-Gevaert) the plate showed excellent ease of deletion and little evidence of residual staining.

    Claims (13)

    1. A process for the manufacture of a substrate for use in the production of lithographic printing plates, said process comprising the steps of:
      (a) providing an aluminium substrate;
      (b) graining at least one surface of said substrate;
      (c) applying an anodic layer to said at least one grained surface;
      (d) treating said at least one grained and anodised surface with an aqueous solution comprising at least one salt of a metal from Group IB, IIB, IVA, IVB, VB, VIA, VIB, VIIB or VIII of the Periodic Table; and
      (e) treating said at least one treated surface with an aqueous solution comprising at least one orthophosphate salt of an alkali metal.
    2. A process as defined in claim 1 wherein said orthophosphate salt of an alkali metal comprises trisodium orthophosphate, disodium hydrogen orthophosphate, sodium dihydrogen orthophosphate, tripotassium orthophosphate, dipotassium hydrogen orthophosphate or potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate.
    3. A process as defined in claim 1 or 2 wherein said salt of a metal from Group IB, IIB, IVA, IVB, VB, VIA, VIB, VIIB or VIII of the Periodic Table comprises a salt of titanium, zirconium, hafnium, molybdenum, tungsten, vanadium, manganese, nickel, copper, zinc, tin, niobium, tantalum, cerium, selenium, silicon, cobalt or iron.
    4. A process as defined in any of claims 1 to 3 wherein said salt of a metal from Group IB, IIB, IVA, IVB, VB, VIA, VIB, VIIB or VIII of the Periodic Table includes the metal as the cation.
    5. A process as defined in claim 4 wherein said salt comprises a sulphate, phosphate, nitrate, acetate, fluoride or chloride salt of titanium, zirconium or hafnium.
    6. A process as defined in any of claims 1 to 3 wherein said salt of a metal from Group IB, IIB, IVA, IVB, VB, VIA, VIB, VIIB or VIII of the Periodic Table includes the metal as part of a complexed anion.
    7. A process as defined in claim 6 wherein said salt comprises an alkali metal fluorozirconate.
    8. A process as defined in claim 7 wherein said alkali metal fluorozirconate comprises potassium hexafluorozirconate.
    9. A process as defined in any preceding claim wherein said metallic substrate comprises aluminium or an aluminium alloy containing small amounts of at least one of manganese, nickel, cobalt, zinc, iron, copper, magnesium, titanium, vanadium, silicon or zirconium.
    10. A process as defined in any preceding claim wherein said graining treatment comprises a mechanical or electrochemical graining treatment.
    11. A process as defined in claim 10 wherein said electrochemical graining treatment comprises passing a substrate through a solution of a mineral or organic acid, or a mixture thereof, whilst applying an electric current to the acid solution.
    12. A process as defined in any preceding claim wherein said anodic layer is applied to said at least on grained surface of the substrate by passing said substrate through an aqueous mineral or organic acid, or a mixture thereof, whilst applying an electric current to the acid solution.
    13. A lithographic printing plate precursor manufactured by applying a light-sensitive coating to a substrate obtained according to the process as defined in any preceding claim.
    EP20010000213 2000-07-17 2001-06-14 Production of support for lithographic printing plate Expired - Lifetime EP1176031B1 (en)

    Priority Applications (1)

    Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
    EP20010000213 EP1176031B1 (en) 2000-07-17 2001-06-14 Production of support for lithographic printing plate

    Applications Claiming Priority (3)

    Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
    EP00202518 2000-07-17
    EP00202518 2000-07-17
    EP20010000213 EP1176031B1 (en) 2000-07-17 2001-06-14 Production of support for lithographic printing plate

    Publications (2)

    Publication Number Publication Date
    EP1176031A1 true EP1176031A1 (en) 2002-01-30
    EP1176031B1 EP1176031B1 (en) 2004-04-07

    Family

    ID=26072504

    Family Applications (1)

    Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
    EP20010000213 Expired - Lifetime EP1176031B1 (en) 2000-07-17 2001-06-14 Production of support for lithographic printing plate

    Country Status (1)

    Country Link
    EP (1) EP1176031B1 (en)

    Cited By (5)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    EP1506854A1 (en) * 2003-08-13 2005-02-16 Agfa-Gevaert Method for postbaking a lithographic printing plate
    US7225560B2 (en) 2005-02-04 2007-06-05 Printing Research, Inc. Computer to plate curing system
    EP1972461A1 (en) * 2007-03-20 2008-09-24 Agfa Graphics N.V. A method for making a lithographic printing plate support
    US7685738B2 (en) 2005-02-04 2010-03-30 Printing Research, Inc. Computer to plate color sensor and drying/curing system and method
    EP2138592A3 (en) * 2008-06-24 2012-05-23 Bridgnorth Aluminium Ltd. Alloy

    Families Citing this family (1)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    CN110527994A (en) * 2019-09-28 2019-12-03 立邦涂料(重庆)化工有限公司 A kind of without phosphorus chemical conversion agent based on fluorine zirconic acid, preparation method and application method

    Citations (6)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    US3440050A (en) * 1965-02-05 1969-04-22 Polychrome Corp Lithographic plate
    GB1282944A (en) * 1968-12-06 1972-07-26 Alusuisse Improvements in the production of pre-sensitised plates for forming offset printing plates
    GB2166255A (en) * 1984-10-25 1986-04-30 Nippon Foil Mfg Composition for coating lithographic substrate plates
    US4970116A (en) * 1987-12-07 1990-11-13 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Substrates for presensitized plates for use in making lithographic printing plates
    DE4105887A1 (en) * 1990-03-09 1991-09-12 Fuji Photo Film Co Ltd Photosensitive lithographic plate with hydrophilic coat - contg. amino phosphoric acid or phosphonic or phosphinic acid or salt, preventing stating and soiling
    EP0497351A1 (en) * 1991-01-31 1992-08-05 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Presensitized plate for use in making lithographic printing plate

    Patent Citations (6)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    US3440050A (en) * 1965-02-05 1969-04-22 Polychrome Corp Lithographic plate
    GB1282944A (en) * 1968-12-06 1972-07-26 Alusuisse Improvements in the production of pre-sensitised plates for forming offset printing plates
    GB2166255A (en) * 1984-10-25 1986-04-30 Nippon Foil Mfg Composition for coating lithographic substrate plates
    US4970116A (en) * 1987-12-07 1990-11-13 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Substrates for presensitized plates for use in making lithographic printing plates
    DE4105887A1 (en) * 1990-03-09 1991-09-12 Fuji Photo Film Co Ltd Photosensitive lithographic plate with hydrophilic coat - contg. amino phosphoric acid or phosphonic or phosphinic acid or salt, preventing stating and soiling
    EP0497351A1 (en) * 1991-01-31 1992-08-05 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Presensitized plate for use in making lithographic printing plate

    Cited By (8)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    EP1506854A1 (en) * 2003-08-13 2005-02-16 Agfa-Gevaert Method for postbaking a lithographic printing plate
    US7225560B2 (en) 2005-02-04 2007-06-05 Printing Research, Inc. Computer to plate curing system
    US7685738B2 (en) 2005-02-04 2010-03-30 Printing Research, Inc. Computer to plate color sensor and drying/curing system and method
    EP1972461A1 (en) * 2007-03-20 2008-09-24 Agfa Graphics N.V. A method for making a lithographic printing plate support
    WO2008113722A1 (en) * 2007-03-20 2008-09-25 Agfa Graphics Nv A method for making a lithographic printing plate precursor
    CN101646567B (en) * 2007-03-20 2011-11-16 爱克发印艺公司 A method for making a lithographic printing plate precursor
    EP2138592A3 (en) * 2008-06-24 2012-05-23 Bridgnorth Aluminium Ltd. Alloy
    TWI405856B (en) * 2008-06-24 2013-08-21 Bridgnorth Aluminium Ltd Alloy

    Also Published As

    Publication number Publication date
    EP1176031B1 (en) 2004-04-07

    Similar Documents

    Publication Publication Date Title
    US4445998A (en) Method for producing a steel lithographic plate
    US4840713A (en) Process for the electrochemical roughening of aluminum for use in printing plate supports
    US5556531A (en) Process for the aftertreatment of aluminum materials substrates of such materials and their use for offset printing plates
    US4689272A (en) Process for a two-stage hydrophilizing post-treatment of aluminum oxide layers with aqueous solutions and use thereof in the manufacture of supports for offset printing plates
    EP0067056B2 (en) Lithographic printing plate having an aluminium alloy support
    EP0268790B1 (en) Process for electrochemically modifying support materials of aluminum or aluminum alloys, which have been grained in a multi-stage process and use of these materials in the manufacture of offset-printing plates
    EP1002644B1 (en) Production of support for lithographic printing plate.
    US4661219A (en) Process for the electrochemical roughening of aluminum for use in printing plate supports
    US6540901B2 (en) Production of support for lithographic printing plate
    EP0097301B1 (en) Process for the removing modification of electrochemical roughened aluminium carrier materials, and their use in the production of offset printing plates
    EP1176031B1 (en) Production of support for lithographic printing plate
    EP0086956B1 (en) Method of producing support materials for offset printing platens
    US4666576A (en) Process for the electrochemical roughening of aluminum for use in printing plate supports
    EP0096347B1 (en) Aluminium alloy, a support of lithographic printing plate and a lithographic printing plate using the same
    CA1225613A (en) Printing plates made by treating anodized aluminum with silicate and carboxylate composition
    EP1000768B1 (en) Production of lithographic printing plate support
    US4585529A (en) Method for producing a metal lithographic plate
    EP1136280B1 (en) Substrate for a planographic printing plate and substrate fabrication method
    JP2002121684A (en) Production of support for planographic printing plate
    US4522891A (en) Support for lithographic printing plate
    US4678551A (en) Process for producing an aluminum support for a lithographic printing plate
    EP0035730A2 (en) Process for modifying the surface of aluminium printing-plate carrier materials, and process for producing printing plates from these materials
    JP2799926B2 (en) Aluminum lithographic printing plate
    GB1561378A (en) Anodised aluminium sheets for making lithographic printing plates
    GB2343680A (en) Lithographic printing plate support

    Legal Events

    Date Code Title Description
    PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

    AK Designated contracting states

    Kind code of ref document: A1

    Designated state(s): DE FR GB

    Kind code of ref document: A1

    Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

    AX Request for extension of the european patent

    Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

    17P Request for examination filed

    Effective date: 20020730

    AKX Designation fees paid

    Free format text: DE FR GB

    GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

    GRAS Grant fee paid

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

    GRAA (expected) grant

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

    AK Designated contracting states

    Kind code of ref document: B1

    Designated state(s): DE FR GB

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: FR

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20040407

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: GB

    Ref legal event code: FG4D

    REF Corresponds to:

    Ref document number: 60102631

    Country of ref document: DE

    Date of ref document: 20040513

    Kind code of ref document: P

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: IE

    Ref legal event code: FG4D

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: DE

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20040708

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: GB

    Ref legal event code: 746

    Effective date: 20040921

    PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

    STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

    Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: IE

    Ref legal event code: MM4A

    EN Fr: translation not filed
    26N No opposition filed

    Effective date: 20050110

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: GB

    Ref legal event code: 732E

    PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: GB

    Payment date: 20070523

    Year of fee payment: 7

    GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

    Effective date: 20080614

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: GB

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20080614