EP1147495B1 - Substrates for printing - Google Patents

Substrates for printing Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1147495B1
EP1147495B1 EP00900703A EP00900703A EP1147495B1 EP 1147495 B1 EP1147495 B1 EP 1147495B1 EP 00900703 A EP00900703 A EP 00900703A EP 00900703 A EP00900703 A EP 00900703A EP 1147495 B1 EP1147495 B1 EP 1147495B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
substrate
features
substrate according
pattern
image data
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Revoked
Application number
EP00900703A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1147495A1 (en
Inventor
Robert John Furley
Robert George Stone
Paul Van Braeckel
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Governor and Co of Bank of England
Original Assignee
Governor and Co of Bank of England
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=10846407&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP1147495(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Governor and Co of Bank of England filed Critical Governor and Co of Bank of England
Publication of EP1147495A1 publication Critical patent/EP1147495A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1147495B1 publication Critical patent/EP1147495B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Revoked legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B42BOOKBINDING; ALBUMS; FILES; SPECIAL PRINTED MATTER
    • B42DBOOKS; BOOK COVERS; LOOSE LEAVES; PRINTED MATTER CHARACTERISED BY IDENTIFICATION OR SECURITY FEATURES; PRINTED MATTER OF SPECIAL FORMAT OR STYLE NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; DEVICES FOR USE THEREWITH AND NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; MOVABLE-STRIP WRITING OR READING APPARATUS
    • B42D25/00Information-bearing cards or sheet-like structures characterised by identification or security features; Manufacture thereof
    • B42D25/20Information-bearing cards or sheet-like structures characterised by identification or security features; Manufacture thereof characterised by a particular use or purpose
    • B42D25/29Securities; Bank notes
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B41PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
    • B41MPRINTING, DUPLICATING, MARKING, OR COPYING PROCESSES; COLOUR PRINTING
    • B41M3/00Printing processes to produce particular kinds of printed work, e.g. patterns
    • B41M3/10Watermarks
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B41PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
    • B41MPRINTING, DUPLICATING, MARKING, OR COPYING PROCESSES; COLOUR PRINTING
    • B41M3/00Printing processes to produce particular kinds of printed work, e.g. patterns
    • B41M3/14Security printing
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07DHANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
    • G07D7/00Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency
    • G07D7/005Testing security markings invisible to the naked eye, e.g. verifying thickened lines or unobtrusive markings or alterations
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07DHANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
    • G07D7/00Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency
    • G07D7/20Testing patterns thereon
    • G07D7/202Testing patterns thereon using pattern matching
    • G07D7/206Matching template patterns

Definitions

  • This invention concerns substrates, primarily papers and in particular to a method of modifying the substrate to make it suitable for use in printing security documents.
  • Methods are known for modifying substrates so that genuine substrates can be identified and distinguished from counterfeit substrates.
  • these methods include marking the genuine substrate with materials which fluoresce under ultra-violet, or which only emit light at some special region of the visible spectrum, or involve the addition of special material such as magnetic materials or infra-red absorbing pigments, or the inclusion of large scale water marking in pictorial or bar code form on or in the substrate. All these methods require either a gross alteration of the substrate (as in watermarking methods) or the inclusion of special materials usually requiring special detectors to determine if the substrate of any document is genuine.
  • EP No. 0882599 describes a substrate printed with a pattern which can be seen as a single printing but when copied is revealed to the eye as two printings by the copier reproduction system.
  • the features will not normally be reproduced by a copier or printer supplied with image data signals obtained from an unprotected such system, as it can be arranged that if the computer system or copier detects the said features it can therefore refuse to process the image.
  • a substrate on which a security document is to be printed includes a plurality of physical features in the surface thereof which when illuminated and imaged produce image data signals in the output of a photoelectric device characterised in that :
  • the features may be repeated at regular intervals.
  • Each of the physical features may be similar in character to each of the other features in the said surface.
  • Documents of the same type may be printed on substrate bearing similar features having a similar fixed relationship over the surface of the substrate.
  • bank notes of one denomination may be printed on a substrate having surface features of a particular type and one or more particular spacings.
  • the spacing may be selected so as to be constant in one direction only or varied according to a special, known pattern.
  • a similar or different regular spacing may be selected for features in another direction bearing a particular spacial relationship relative to the first said direction, for example perpendicular to the said first direction.
  • the features are arranged in a 2D matrix in the substrate surface.
  • Secondary encoding of a substrate may be achieved by introducing a variation into the matrix such as by omitting features from particular positions in such a regular matrix.
  • every fourth feature along each third line may be omitted.
  • security documents are encoded using both primary and secondary encodings.
  • secondary encoding may be provided if the matrix is formed from features having two distinctive characteristic and, instead of omitting features at specific positions within the matrix, features of one type are located at one set of positions in the matrix, and features of the other type are located at other positions in the matrix.
  • one set of features may be generally circular in shape, whereas interspersed features producing a secondary encoding may have a different readily distinguishable shape such as rectangular or triangular.
  • the encoding of a substrate can be achieved by selecting the spacing between features or selecting features having a specific characteristic such as shape which can be identified in image data signals relating thereto, and/or by the substitution of features having a first characteristic at selected points in a regularly occurring matrix of such features by other features having a second different characteristic, and/or the omission of features at particular points in a matrix, there is an almost infinite number of possible combinations and permutations available to encode security document substrates.
  • each individual type of security document such as banknotes of different denominations, cheques originating from different banks, passports issued by different offices, and the like, if desired can be uniquely identified by a particular primary and/or secondary encoding selected for the substrate on which they are to be printed.
  • Image analysis techniques for identifying the presence of regularly occurring patterns and/or drop-outs within regularly occurring patterns and/or shape(s) or other visibly distinguishable features of detectable features in an image, are readily available and known, and by using high speed processors such as DSPs and the like, image data can be checked and verified or otherwise, virtually instantaneously as documents are scanned.
  • a physical feature is selected for encoding the surface of a substrate to provide a primary encoding, which will not appear in the electrostatic image of a photocopier. This ensures that attempts to reproduce the original by photocopying will merely produce a copy containing the printed content of the document unless the substrate onto which it is copied contains the correct physical encoding in the surface thereof.
  • any variation in the primary encoding which constitutes the secondary encoding is even less capable of being distinguished by the naked eye or picked up by a photosensitive device as used in a photocopier.
  • the physical feature encoding is in the form of a repeat pattern.
  • the identification features are such that the appearance of the security document (for example a bank note) is not affected or disturbed aesthetically, since in the case of banknotes, the introduction of new notes provided on substrate according to the invention is permissable alongside existing banknotes printed on unencoded substrate, since if the general appearance of the documents is unchanged to the naked eye, old but nevertheless authentic notes which do not contain the physical feature encoding on the substrate surface provided by the invention, will appear similar to banknotes printed on encoded substrate.
  • the security document for example a bank note
  • Examples of physical feature encoding of a substrate as aforesaid comprise, embossing with inkless intaglio or embossing the surface by calendaring during manufacture of the substrate.
  • Two or more different encoding techniques may be combined in any substrate.
  • the invention also lies in impressing in the surface of a substrate onto which a security document is to be printed indentations and/or grooves in accordance with a first pattern which contains encoded therein a second pattern, to enable a security document printed on such a substrate to be identified by subjecting image data signals obtained from scanning the document to an appropriate mathematical algorithm to determine whether the second pattern can be found in image data signals relating to the first pattern.
  • a pattern may be encoded to produce multiple iterations of a code on the substrate.
  • the encoded pattern may not extend over the whole of the surface of the substrate forming each document but only over selected areas which align with particular printed areas of the substrate, and according to another aspect of the invention, the printed areas are selected so as to enhance the detection of the substrate surface variation during scanning and conversion of the image into image data signals.
  • Redundancy created by multiple iterations can be used to advantage since the large number of similar iterations enhances the detectability of the code by increasing the effective signal to noise ratio. This in combination with the selection of particular regions of the printed areas of the final document in which to locate the iterations, facilitates the detection by a data processor of the presence of an otherwise substantially invisible pattern in the data signals derived from the scanning.
  • the encoding of the documents must be capable of being read for example by optically scanning the documents and generating image data signals which can be handled by a computer, or by using a specialist imaging and image analysing apparatus performing this function.
  • the invention also lies in a security document substrate adapted to be identifiable as such by having detectable surface features therein features to enable identification as aforesaid.
  • the invention also lies in a security document when printed on a substrate as aforesaid.
  • a primary application of the invention lies in treating the surface of a substrate as aforesaid for use in the production of security documents so as to inhibit or degrade the reproduction of such security documents using a scanning process which converts the image into image data signals for controlling a printing process, in which a second control is introduced if surface encoding is detected by subjecting the image data signals to an appropriate algorithm, which second control serves to downgrade or inhibit the printing process so as to prevent the reproduction of the original document, or of a good quality reproduction thereof.
  • the invention also provides a method of verification, of a security document when printed on a substrate as aforesaid wherein in a first step of verification a scanning process is employed to convert the image of the surface of the substrate of the document into image data signals for controlling a printing process, and when surface encoding is detected, a second step of verification is introduced by subjecting the image data signals to an appropriate algorithm, said second step of verification, if failing, serving to downgrade or inhibit the printing process so as to prevent reproduction of the document, or at least a good quality reproduction thereof.
  • bank note authentication devices can be provided at relatively low cost to be associated with tills in shops, banks and post offices, so that at transaction points bank notes tendered by the public can be verified before they are accepted.
  • the surface treatment of a substrate in accordance with the invention includes any technique which results in lighter and darker regions to be visible in the surface of a treated sheet of substrate when illuminated for scanning.
  • Either or both primary and secondary encodings may be in the form of repeat pattern which are distinguishable under appropriate illumination to provide detectable content in digital signals obtained by scanning.
  • the substrate may be embossed during its manufacture.
  • the substrate is customary in paper or sheet plastics manufacture to make the material smooth enough for printing by passing it through a high pressure nip between two steel rollers, a process known as calendaring.
  • calendaring By forming one or both of these rollers with indentations, a paper or plastics substrate forced therebetween, will be formed with an embossing pattern corresponding to the indentations.
  • the substrate will be encoded as required by the invention, and can be detected by suitable illumination and converted into digital data signals by a scanner for analysis by a data processor.
  • an encoded structure can be formed in the surface such that the actual surface of the substrate is sufficiently smooth to accept printing ink to enable a security document to be printed thereon, but at the same time contains a fine pattern of less smooth regions, which may be less receptive of printing ink.
  • the surface may also be modified by a technique in which selected regions of a substrate describe a repeat pattern by being impregnated with a fluid such as a resin, or lacquer, such that the optical absorbtion or reflectance characteristics or optical density of the substrate is altered sufficiently as between impregnated and non-impregnated areas as to be discernable under incident light as during scanning for digitising.
  • a fluid such as a resin, or lacquer
  • the surface of the substrate can be etched by a laser beam, so as to produce cavities or grooves in the surface to be printed (or awaiting printing). This technique lends itself to the production of very fine patterns in the surface of the substrate and since a laser beam can be modulated very accurately can be used to introduce depth modulation in any such grooves or cavities as well as or instead of edge or thickness of spacing modulation.
  • Watermarks alter the thickness and/or texture of a substrate, which variations and/or can be rendered visible under incident light and can be used to form primary and/or secondary encoding of the invention. They may be formed in two ways.
  • the wet paper is embossed using an embossing roller as it is being formed, thereby impacting a mark in the paper corresponding to the embossing.
  • the embossing in a suitable repeat pattern which extends over the area of the web, so the paper can be encoded with the watermark pattern.
  • a second technique for forming a watermark uses the so-called cylinder-mould method.
  • the watermark is formed by a cylindrical wire mesh on which is impressed "mouldings" in the form of images.
  • fibres build up to a greater or lesser extent on the mesh moundings and where the thickness of the paper is greater, this gives a darker effect when viewed in transmission than do regions which are thinner and therefore which appear lighter when viewed in transmission.
  • either types of watermark is just visible in incident light this can be used to provide the background coding required by the invention.
  • either watermarking technique may be employed to apply a pattern in the surface of a substrate especially a paper substrate. which is virtually imperceptible to the naked eye, but which will appear as a low contrast pattern when subjected to incident light as where a document is arranged for scanning and digitising.
  • the techniques so far described provide a surface encoded substrate which subsequently can be printed to form a security document.
  • some of the encoding techniques, eg embossing, may be applied after some or all of the printing of the document has occurred.
  • embossing may be applied after a title, or other text, or personal data for example in the case of an ID document has been printed onto a plain substrate, and a surface encoding formed as a post-printing step.
  • Encoding by embossing can be achieved whilst printing at least some regions of a document.
  • the surface encoding may be imparted to the document by so-called "blind" intaglio printing, or intaglio printing with colourless ink.
  • an image is printed using a plate containing engraved areas, some of which are filled with ink and some of which are left empty in the case of blind intaglio printing.
  • the engraved plate inked as appropriate, is pressed under high pressure against the substrate so as to cause the ink to transfer to the substrate.
  • the substrate can become embossed with the engraved image, under the pressure applied, with parts of the substrate surface being printed, and others merely embossed.
  • the resulting substrate is shown in Figure 1, except that in practice the identification features, in this case a repetitive barcode pattern, would be invisible to the naked eye.
  • banknote is conventionally printed over the substrate and the result is shown in Figure 2.
  • the banknote design may be printed either before or after the identification features physically formed in this case by embossing ( Figure 3).
  • the encoded document when scanned into a computer is converted to a digital format.
  • This typically means that the image is analysed into red, green and blue channels for each picture element or pixel.
  • the colour of the picture element is assigned a value in each of these channels on a scale from 0 to 255 (8 bits) typically such that a full intensity is assigned to the value 255 and 'no colour' the value 0.
  • bright white will be represented by all three channels having the value 255 and black by a zero intensity having the value 0.
  • pixels relating to the embossed encoding will be affected by the shadowing from the embossing caused by the lighting in the detection device. They will generally be within a band close to the paper background values.
  • the embossing is shallow so that the shadows are weak and mainly within a band of 20 grey scale values relative to that of the paper background.
  • the embossed encoding could be extracted using a contrast enhancement routine such as is commonly known as 'equalisation'.
  • a contrast enhancement routine such as is commonly known as 'equalisation'.
  • This type of routine sets the maximum value of the pixels in each channel to 255 and the minimum value to 0 and then attempts to smoothly redistribute the intervening pixel values between the two. This has the effect of increasing the difference between the pixel values close to the paper background and thus those relating to the code so that they are easier to recognise in an image recognition program or routine.
  • This method has the disadvantage that other design features unrelated to the code are still present and need to be disregarded by the recognition routine.

Abstract

A substrate for a security document such as a banknote, has physically formed therein identification features which are invisible to the eye but are repetitive so as to be detectable, after scanning, by computer. The features may be arranged in a 2D matrix and be spaced at regular intervals over the substrate. The physical features may be formed by embossing, surface treatment of lacquered papers, impregnation, laser treatment or watermarking. The features enable banknote verification and determination of denomination. Reproduction of the document by printing may be inhibited by subjecting the image data signals to an algorithm which serves as a second control to downgrade or inhibit reproduction.

Description

Field of Invention
This invention concerns substrates, primarily papers and in particular to a method of modifying the substrate to make it suitable for use in printing security documents.
Background to the invention
It is known to scan a printed document and convert the image into digital data for feeding into a computer. A copy of the original document can be printed out using the digital image data using a laser jet or inkjet printer, and in this situation, the imaging device (usually a scanner), computer and printer, acts like a copier. The stored data can be edited or manipulated using graphics software so that the final print can be a very accurate reproduction of the original. Furthermore, the data can be transmitted for example via the internet or by modem and telephone line to a remote location, or stored for future use on a disk or other memory device, and this technology can be used to counterfeit security documents such as cheques, banknotes, identity documents and the like.
Prior art
Methods are known for modifying substrates so that genuine substrates can be identified and distinguished from counterfeit substrates. Typically these methods include marking the genuine substrate with materials which fluoresce under ultra-violet, or which only emit light at some special region of the visible spectrum, or involve the addition of special material such as magnetic materials or infra-red absorbing pigments, or the inclusion of large scale water marking in pictorial or bar code form on or in the substrate. All these methods require either a gross alteration of the substrate (as in watermarking methods) or the inclusion of special materials usually requiring special detectors to determine if the substrate of any document is genuine. Such methods tend to be expensive, the effects are usually readily visible to the naked eye, and it is not impossible to modify paper and other substrates in a similar manner, so as to confuse a verification process. For example, EP No. 0882599 describes a substrate printed with a pattern which can be seen as a single printing but when copied is revealed to the eye as two printings by the copier reproduction system.
Object of the invention
It is one object of the present invention to provide a special substrate on which security documents can be printed, having features which will not be reproduced by a photocopier but which can be detected using a computer or other data processor based image system. However, the features will not normally be reproduced by a copier or printer supplied with image data signals obtained from an unprotected such system, as it can be arranged that if the computer system or copier detects the said features it can therefore refuse to process the image.
Summary of the invention
According to one aspect of the present invention a substrate on which a security document is to be printed includes a plurality of physical features in the surface thereof which when illuminated and imaged produce image data signals in the output of a photoelectric device characterised in that:
  • 1. the contrast between the features and the remainder of the substrate surface is selected so that image data signals corresponding to the features are substantially indistinguishable from image data signals relating to the remainder of the substrate surface and/or from background noise signals in the output of the photoelectric device and are thereby indistinguishable by eye; and
  • 2. the features are repeated at intervals over at least some of the surface area of the substrate, whereby time or position of signals relating to each feature will bear at least one fixed relationship to signals relating to other of said features, whereby a computing device supplied with the image data signals can be programmed to identify whether feature signals bearing the said at least one fixed relationship are present in the data, to assist in identifying the imaged document.
  • The features may be repeated at regular intervals.
    Each of the physical features may be similar in character to each of the other features in the said surface.
    Documents of the same type may be printed on substrate bearing similar features having a similar fixed relationship over the surface of the substrate. Thus for example bank notes of one denomination may be printed on a substrate having surface features of a particular type and one or more particular spacings.
    The spacing may be selected so as to be constant in one direction only or varied according to a special, known pattern.
    A similar or different regular spacing may be selected for features in another direction bearing a particular spacial relationship relative to the first said direction, for example perpendicular to the said first direction.
    In a preferred example the features are arranged in a 2D matrix in the substrate surface.
    The existence of such features in a substrate surface constitutes a primary encoding of the substrate allowing substrates to be distinguished from substrates not containing said features, or to be distinguished one from another depending on the choice of features.
    Secondary encoding of a substrate may be achieved by introducing a variation into the matrix such as by omitting features from particular positions in such a regular matrix.
    Thus for example every fourth feature along each third line may be omitted.
    Preferably security documents are encoded using both primary and secondary encodings.
    In addition or alternatively secondary encoding may be provided if the matrix is formed from features having two distinctive characteristic and, instead of omitting features at specific positions within the matrix, features of one type are located at one set of positions in the matrix, and features of the other type are located at other positions in the matrix. Thus in a simple example one set of features may be generally circular in shape, whereas interspersed features producing a secondary encoding may have a different readily distinguishable shape such as rectangular or triangular.
    Since the encoding of a substrate can be achieved by selecting the spacing between features or selecting features having a specific characteristic such as shape which can be identified in image data signals relating thereto, and/or by the substitution of features having a first characteristic at selected points in a regularly occurring matrix of such features by other features having a second different characteristic, and/or the omission of features at particular points in a matrix, there is an almost infinite number of possible combinations and permutations available to encode security document substrates.
    Therefore not only does the invention permit a reliable method for identification of security documents, so as to readily detect forgeries which are not printed on an appropriate substrate, but each individual type of security document such as banknotes of different denominations, cheques originating from different banks, passports issued by different offices, and the like, if desired can be uniquely identified by a particular primary and/or secondary encoding selected for the substrate on which they are to be printed.
    Image analysis techniques for identifying the presence of regularly occurring patterns and/or drop-outs within regularly occurring patterns and/or shape(s) or other visibly distinguishable features of detectable features in an image, are readily available and known, and by using high speed processors such as DSPs and the like, image data can be checked and verified or otherwise, virtually instantaneously as documents are scanned.
    Preferably a physical feature is selected for encoding the surface of a substrate to provide a primary encoding, which will not appear in the electrostatic image of a photocopier. This ensures that attempts to reproduce the original by photocopying will merely produce a copy containing the printed content of the document unless the substrate onto which it is copied contains the correct physical encoding in the surface thereof.
    More preferably, if a secondary encoding is present, any variation in the primary encoding which constitutes the secondary encoding is even less capable of being distinguished by the naked eye or picked up by a photosensitive device as used in a photocopier.
    Preferably the physical feature encoding is in the form of a repeat pattern.
    As the identification features are such that the appearance of the security document (for example a bank note) is not affected or disturbed aesthetically, since in the case of banknotes, the introduction of new notes provided on substrate according to the invention is permissable alongside existing banknotes printed on unencoded substrate, since if the general appearance of the documents is unchanged to the naked eye, old but nevertheless authentic notes which do not contain the physical feature encoding on the substrate surface provided by the invention, will appear similar to banknotes printed on encoded substrate.
    Examples of physical feature encoding of a substrate as aforesaid comprise, embossing with inkless intaglio or embossing the surface by calendaring during manufacture of the substrate.
    Two or more different encoding techniques may be combined in any substrate.
    The invention also lies in impressing in the surface of a substrate onto which a security document is to be printed indentations and/or grooves in accordance with a first pattern which contains encoded therein a second pattern, to enable a security document printed on such a substrate to be identified by subjecting image data signals obtained from scanning the document to an appropriate mathematical algorithm to determine whether the second pattern can be found in image data signals relating to the first pattern.
    A pattern may be encoded to produce multiple iterations of a code on the substrate.
    The encoded pattern may not extend over the whole of the surface of the substrate forming each document but only over selected areas which align with particular printed areas of the substrate, and according to another aspect of the invention, the printed areas are selected so as to enhance the detection of the substrate surface variation during scanning and conversion of the image into image data signals.
    Redundancy created by multiple iterations can be used to advantage since the large number of similar iterations enhances the detectability of the code by increasing the effective signal to noise ratio. This in combination with the selection of particular regions of the printed areas of the final document in which to locate the iterations, facilitates the detection by a data processor of the presence of an otherwise substantially invisible pattern in the data signals derived from the scanning.
    For a document identification system to work, the encoding of the documents must be capable of being read for example by optically scanning the documents and generating image data signals which can be handled by a computer, or by using a specialist imaging and image analysing apparatus performing this function.
    The invention also lies in a security document substrate adapted to be identifiable as such by having detectable surface features therein features to enable identification as aforesaid.
    The invention also lies in a security document when printed on a substrate as aforesaid.
    A primary application of the invention lies in treating the surface of a substrate as aforesaid for use in the production of security documents so as to inhibit or degrade the reproduction of such security documents using a scanning process which converts the image into image data signals for controlling a printing process, in which a second control is introduced if surface encoding is detected by subjecting the image data signals to an appropriate algorithm, which second control serves to downgrade or inhibit the printing process so as to prevent the reproduction of the original document, or of a good quality reproduction thereof.
    Thus, the invention also provides a method of verification, of a security document when printed on a substrate as aforesaid wherein in a first step of verification a scanning process is employed to convert the image of the surface of the substrate of the document into image data signals for controlling a printing process, and when surface encoding is detected, a second step of verification is introduced by subjecting the image data signals to an appropriate algorithm, said second step of verification, if failing, serving to downgrade or inhibit the printing process so as to prevent reproduction of the document, or at least a good quality reproduction thereof.
    Thus for example bank note authentication devices can be provided at relatively low cost to be associated with tills in shops, banks and post offices, so that at transaction points bank notes tendered by the public can be verified before they are accepted.
    In the case of a currency note, it may be of further interest to determine what denomination it is, and if more than one originating organisation is involved, it may also be advantageous to determine which organisation issued the note. Computer based document checking facilities of this type can be used as note accepters, can be used in note exchangers, and can be used to enable blind persons to discover what bank notes they have in their possession.
    Description of different encoding techniques
    The surface treatment of a substrate in accordance with the invention includes any technique which results in lighter and darker regions to be visible in the surface of a treated sheet of substrate when illuminated for scanning.
    Either or both primary and secondary encodings may be in the form of repeat pattern which are distinguishable under appropriate illumination to provide detectable content in digital signals obtained by scanning.
    (1) Embossing
    In a first technique embodying the invention, the substrate may be embossed during its manufacture. Thus it is customary in paper or sheet plastics manufacture to make the material smooth enough for printing by passing it through a high pressure nip between two steel rollers, a process known as calendaring. By forming one or both of these rollers with indentations, a paper or plastics substrate forced therebetween, will be formed with an embossing pattern corresponding to the indentations. By suitably encoding the embossed features, the substrate will be encoded as required by the invention, and can be detected by suitable illumination and converted into digital data signals by a scanner for analysis by a data processor.
    (2) Surface treatment of lacquered papers
    Where a paper or plastics substrate material has mixed therewith a resin or lacquer or other material to provide a smooth surface for printing, an encoded structure can be formed in the surface such that the actual surface of the substrate is sufficiently smooth to accept printing ink to enable a security document to be printed thereon, but at the same time contains a fine pattern of less smooth regions, which may be less receptive of printing ink.
    (3) Impregnation
    The surface may also be modified by a technique in which selected regions of a substrate describe a repeat pattern by being impregnated with a fluid such as a resin, or lacquer, such that the optical absorbtion or reflectance characteristics or optical density of the substrate is altered sufficiently as between impregnated and non-impregnated areas as to be discernable under incident light as during scanning for digitising.
    (4) Laser treatment
    The surface of the substrate can be etched by a laser beam, so as to produce cavities or grooves in the surface to be printed (or awaiting printing). This technique lends itself to the production of very fine patterns in the surface of the substrate and since a laser beam can be modulated very accurately can be used to introduce depth modulation in any such grooves or cavities as well as or instead of edge or thickness of spacing modulation.
    (5) Watermarking
    Watermarks alter the thickness and/or texture of a substrate, which variations and/or can be rendered visible under incident light and can be used to form primary and/or secondary encoding of the invention. They may be formed in two ways.
    In the Fourdrinier paper making method, the wet paper is embossed using an embossing roller as it is being formed, thereby impacting a mark in the paper corresponding to the embossing. By forming the embossing in a suitable repeat pattern which extends over the area of the web, so the paper can be encoded with the watermark pattern.
    A second technique for forming a watermark uses the so-called cylinder-mould method. In this method the watermark is formed by a cylindrical wire mesh on which is impressed "mouldings" in the form of images. During manufacture of the paper, fibres build up to a greater or lesser extent on the mesh moundings and where the thickness of the paper is greater, this gives a darker effect when viewed in transmission than do regions which are thinner and therefore which appear lighter when viewed in transmission. However where either types of watermark is just visible in incident light this can be used to provide the background coding required by the invention.
    In accordance with the invention either watermarking technique may be employed to apply a pattern in the surface of a substrate especially a paper substrate. which is virtually imperceptible to the naked eye, but which will appear as a low contrast pattern when subjected to incident light as where a document is arranged for scanning and digitising.
    The techniques so far described provide a surface encoded substrate which subsequently can be printed to form a security document. However some of the encoding techniques, eg embossing, may be applied after some or all of the printing of the document has occurred.
    For example embossing may be applied after a title, or other text, or personal data for example in the case of an ID document has been printed onto a plain substrate, and a surface encoding formed as a post-printing step.
    Encoding by embossing can be achieved whilst printing at least some regions of a document. Thus the surface encoding may be imparted to the document by so-called "blind" intaglio printing, or intaglio printing with colourless ink. In such a method an image is printed using a plate containing engraved areas, some of which are filled with ink and some of which are left empty in the case of blind intaglio printing. The engraved plate, inked as appropriate, is pressed under high pressure against the substrate so as to cause the ink to transfer to the substrate. The substrate can become embossed with the engraved image, under the pressure applied, with parts of the substrate surface being printed, and others merely embossed.
    Description of Drawings
    In the accompanying drawings:-
  • Figure 1 shows a banknote substrate physically formed with barcode features in practice not discernable to the naked eye;
  • Figure 2 shows a banknote image printed over the substrate;
  • Figure 3 is a flow chart of the process for embossing the barcode features on the substrate;
  • Figures 4 and 5 show images of the banknote revealed by a computer code extraction routine; and
  • Figure 6 is a flow chart of one possible detection routine.
  • Description of Embodiment Production
    The process for physically forming in this case embossing, identification features on a banknote (or other security document) substrate will be clear from Figure 3 without further description.
    The resulting substrate is shown in Figure 1, except that in practice the identification features, in this case a repetitive barcode pattern, would be invisible to the naked eye.
    The banknote is conventionally printed over the substrate and the result is shown in Figure 2.
    Since in practice the identification features are invisible to the naked eye, they are not aesthetically disturbing and do not affect the freedom of design of the banknote image. It is to be noted that the banknote design may be printed either before or after the identification features physically formed in this case by embossing (Figure 3).
    Detection
    There are various ways that computer based equipment can detect the aforesaid identification features and two such methods are described hereinafter.
    The encoded document when scanned into a computer, is converted to a digital format. This typically means that the image is analysed into red, green and blue channels for each picture element or pixel. The colour of the picture element is assigned a value in each of these channels on a scale from 0 to 255 (8 bits) typically such that a full intensity is assigned to the value 255 and 'no colour' the value 0. Thus, bright white will be represented by all three channels having the value 255 and black by a zero intensity having the value 0.
    When a real image, such as that of the printed banknote is scanned into the system, most of the pixel values will lie in a central region between, say, 230 for the paper background and 40 for the darkest print. The pixels relating to the embossed encoding will be affected by the shadowing from the embossing caused by the lighting in the detection device. They will generally be within a band close to the paper background values.
    Assume, for example, that the embossing is shallow so that the shadows are weak and mainly within a band of 20 grey scale values relative to that of the paper background.
    It is a simple matter for a computer program to reset all values between a value just below that of the paper (in this example, 228) and the bottom of the values relating to the encoding band (in this example say, 210) to a value of 10, or even zero (near black) and to reset all other values between 210 and 0 in this example to 230 (in other words the same colour as the paper background).
    This procedure has the effect of eliminating all the printed design features but not the encoding and those very weak features associated with the design, which are usually very few in number since they cannot be easily seen and would not therefore be included in the design for aesthetic reasons. The embossed encoding itself would by this procedure now be rendered black (see Figure 4) so that it can be read by a program especially designed to recognise the coding. As a simple sample, if the coding were a series of Alphanumeric characters such as letters and numbers, an optical character recognition program could be used to read the data and determine if it was likely to be a known code. Alternatively, more sophisticated image detection techniques could be used, especially if the coding were of a more complex type such as that used in digital watermarking for example. In some cases, it may be preferred in order to show the encoding only (Figure 6).
    Alternatively, the embossed encoding could be extracted using a contrast enhancement routine such as is commonly known as 'equalisation'. This is shown in Figure 6. This type of routine sets the maximum value of the pixels in each channel to 255 and the minimum value to 0 and then attempts to smoothly redistribute the intervening pixel values between the two. This has the effect of increasing the difference between the pixel values close to the paper background and thus those relating to the code so that they are easier to recognise in an image recognition program or routine. This method has the disadvantage that other design features unrelated to the code are still present and need to be disregarded by the recognition routine.
    However, more sophisticated routines, can be used which recognise complex encoding patterns such as those used for high-level codes in complex images and patterns.

    Claims (24)

    1. A substrate on which a security document is to be printed comprising a plurality of identification features in the surface thereof, which when illuminated and imaged by scanning, produce image data signals in the output of a photoelectric device characterised in that :
      (i) the contrast between the identification features and the remainder of the substrate surface is such that image data signals corresponding to said features are substantially indistinguishable from image data signals relating to the remainder of the substrate surface and/or from background noise signals in the output of the photoelectric device and are thereby indistinguishable by eye; and
      (ii) the features repeat at intervals over at least some of the surface area of the substrate, whereby upon validation time or position of signals relating to each feature will bear at least one fixed relationship to signals relating to other of said features, whereby a computing device supplied with the image data signals can be programmed to identify whether feature signals bearing the said at least one fixed relationship are present in the data, to assist in identifying the imaged document.
    2. A substrate according to claim 1, wherein the idendfication features are repeated at regular intervals.
    3. A substrate according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein each of the identification features is similar in character to each of the other features in the said surface.
    4. A substrate according to any of claims 1 to 3, wherein the spacing of identification features is such as to be constant in one direction only or varied according to a special, known pattern, and similar or different regular spacings are selected for features in another direction, bearing a particular spacial relationship relative to the first said direction, for example perpendicular to said one direction.
    5. A substrate according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the features are arranged in a 2D matrix in the substrate surface.
    6. A substrate according to claim 5, having a secondary encoding comprising a variation introduced into the matrix, such as by omitting features from particular positions in such a regular matrix.
    7. A substrate according to claim 5, wherein the matrix comprises features having two distinctive types of characteristics, the features of one type being located at one set of positions in the matrix, and the features of the other type being located at other positions in the matrix.
    8. A substrate according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein the identification feature encoded in the surface provides a primary encoding which will not appear in the electrostatic image of a photocopier.
    9. A substrate according to claim 8, wherein the identification feature encoding is in the form of a repeating pattern.
    10. A substrate according to claim 8 or claim 9, wherein the identification feature encoding comprises an embossing with inkless intaglio or an embossing of the surface by calendaring during manufacture of the substrate.
    11. A substrate according to any one of claims 1 to 10, wherein two or more different encoding techniques are combined in the substrate.
    12. A substrate according to claim 11, wherein the identification features are impressed in the surface of a substrate onto which a security document is to be printed, comprising indentations and/or grooves in accordance with a first pattern which contains encoded therein a second pattern, thereby to enable a security document printed on such a substrate to be identified by subjecting image data signals obtained from scanning the document to an appropriate mathematical algorithm to determine whether the second pattern can be found in image data signals relating to the first pattern.
    13. A substrate according to any one of claims 1 to 12, wherein the pattern is encoded to produce multiple iterations of a code on the substrate.
    14. A substrate according to any one of claims 1 to 13, wherein the encoded pattern extends over selected areas which align with particular prinred areas of the substrate.
    15. A substrate according to claim 14, wherein the printed areas are such as to enhance the detection of the substrare surface variation during scanning and conversion of the image into image data signals.
    16. A surface treated substrate in accordance with any one of claims 1 to 15, having any lighter and darker regions visible in the surface of a treated sheet of substrate when illuminated for scanning, but not visible to the eye.
    17. A substrate according to claim 16, in which the identification features are embossed during its manufacture.
    18. A substrate according to claim 16, comprising paper or plastics material mixed with a resin or lacquer or other material to provide a smooth surface for printing, and an encoded structure in the surface such that the actual surface is sufficiently smooth to accept printing ink to enable a security document to be printed thereon, but at the same time contains a fine pattern of less smooth regions, which are less receptive of printing ink.
    19. A substrate according to claim 16 wherein selected regions describe a repeat identification pattern by being impregnated with a fluid such as a resin, or lacquer, such that the optical absorbtion or reflectance characteristics or optical density of the substrate is altered sufficiently as between impregnated and non-impregnated areas as to be discernable under incident light.
    20. A substrate according to claim 16, in which the surface is etched as by a laser beam, so as to produce cavities or grooves in the surface to be printed (or awaiting printing).
    21. A substrate according to claim 16, comprising watermarking to vary the thickness and/or texture of a substrate, which variations can be rendered visible under incident light and form the primary and/or secondary encoding.
    22. A substrate according to any of claims 1 to 21, characterized in that said substrate is a security document substrate.
    23. A security document when printed on a substrate as claimed in any of claims 1 to 22.
    24. A method of verification of a security document according to claim 22 or claim 23, wherein in a first step of verification a scanning process is employed to convert the image of the surface of the substrate of the document into image data signals for controlling a printing process, and when surface encoding is detected, a second step of verification is introduced by subjecting the image data signals to an appropriate algorithm, said second step of verification, if failing, serving to downgrade or inhibit the printing process so as to prevent reproduction of the document, or at least a good quality reproduction thereof.
    EP00900703A 1999-01-26 2000-01-20 Substrates for printing Revoked EP1147495B1 (en)

    Applications Claiming Priority (3)

    Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
    GBGB9901522.4A GB9901522D0 (en) 1999-01-26 1999-01-26 Substrates for printing
    GB9901522 1999-01-26
    PCT/GB2000/000129 WO2000045344A1 (en) 1999-01-26 2000-01-20 Substrates for printing

    Publications (2)

    Publication Number Publication Date
    EP1147495A1 EP1147495A1 (en) 2001-10-24
    EP1147495B1 true EP1147495B1 (en) 2003-01-02

    Family

    ID=10846407

    Family Applications (1)

    Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
    EP00900703A Revoked EP1147495B1 (en) 1999-01-26 2000-01-20 Substrates for printing

    Country Status (10)

    Country Link
    EP (1) EP1147495B1 (en)
    JP (1) JP2002536202A (en)
    AT (1) ATE230510T1 (en)
    AU (1) AU3063100A (en)
    CA (1) CA2357727A1 (en)
    DE (1) DE60001098D1 (en)
    GB (2) GB9901522D0 (en)
    HK (1) HK1043417A1 (en)
    MX (1) MXPA01007401A (en)
    WO (1) WO2000045344A1 (en)

    Cited By (8)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    US7321667B2 (en) 2002-01-18 2008-01-22 Digimarc Corporation Data hiding through arrangement of objects
    US7728048B2 (en) 2002-12-20 2010-06-01 L-1 Secure Credentialing, Inc. Increasing thermal conductivity of host polymer used with laser engraving methods and compositions
    US7773770B2 (en) 1999-12-28 2010-08-10 Digimarc Corporation Substituting or replacing components in media objects based on steganographic encoding
    US7789311B2 (en) 2003-04-16 2010-09-07 L-1 Secure Credentialing, Inc. Three dimensional data storage
    US8059860B2 (en) 1998-04-16 2011-11-15 Brundage Trent J Steganographic encoding
    US8087583B2 (en) 2002-02-12 2012-01-03 Digimarc Corporation Associating media through encoding
    US8300274B2 (en) 1999-11-10 2012-10-30 Digimarc Corporation Process for marking substrates with information using a texture pattern and related substrates
    US8505108B2 (en) 1993-11-18 2013-08-06 Digimarc Corporation Authentication using a digital watermark

    Families Citing this family (48)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    US6345104B1 (en) 1994-03-17 2002-02-05 Digimarc Corporation Digital watermarks and methods for security documents
    US7113615B2 (en) 1993-11-18 2006-09-26 Digimarc Corporation Watermark embedder and reader
    US5748763A (en) 1993-11-18 1998-05-05 Digimarc Corporation Image steganography system featuring perceptually adaptive and globally scalable signal embedding
    US6449377B1 (en) 1995-05-08 2002-09-10 Digimarc Corporation Methods and systems for watermark processing of line art images
    US6961442B2 (en) 2001-03-09 2005-11-01 Digimarc Corporation Watermarking a carrier on which an image will be placed or projected
    US7778437B2 (en) 1994-03-17 2010-08-17 Digimarc Corporation Media and methods employing steganographic marking
    US6985600B2 (en) 1994-03-17 2006-01-10 Digimarc Corporation Printing media and methods employing digital watermarking
    US6560349B1 (en) 1994-10-21 2003-05-06 Digimarc Corporation Audio monitoring using steganographic information
    US7555139B2 (en) 1995-05-08 2009-06-30 Digimarc Corporation Secure documents with hidden signals, and related methods and systems
    US6744906B2 (en) 1995-05-08 2004-06-01 Digimarc Corporation Methods and systems using multiple watermarks
    US9630443B2 (en) 1995-07-27 2017-04-25 Digimarc Corporation Printer driver separately applying watermark and information
    US6786420B1 (en) 1997-07-15 2004-09-07 Silverbrook Research Pty. Ltd. Data distribution mechanism in the form of ink dots on cards
    US6618117B2 (en) 1997-07-12 2003-09-09 Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd Image sensing apparatus including a microcontroller
    US6690419B1 (en) 1997-07-15 2004-02-10 Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd Utilising eye detection methods for image processing in a digital image camera
    US7551201B2 (en) 1997-07-15 2009-06-23 Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd Image capture and processing device for a print on demand digital camera system
    US7110024B1 (en) 1997-07-15 2006-09-19 Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd Digital camera system having motion deblurring means
    US6879341B1 (en) 1997-07-15 2005-04-12 Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd Digital camera system containing a VLIW vector processor
    US6624848B1 (en) 1997-07-15 2003-09-23 Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd Cascading image modification using multiple digital cameras incorporating image processing
    US7054463B2 (en) 1998-01-20 2006-05-30 Digimarc Corporation Data encoding using frail watermarks
    AUPP702098A0 (en) 1998-11-09 1998-12-03 Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd Image creation method and apparatus (ART73)
    US6963884B1 (en) 1999-03-10 2005-11-08 Digimarc Corporation Recoverable digital content degradation: method and apparatus
    AUPQ056099A0 (en) 1999-05-25 1999-06-17 Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd A method and apparatus (pprint01)
    JP2003527779A (en) 1999-09-01 2003-09-16 ディジマーク コーポレイション Method of forming watermark on digital image by specifying intensity for each area
    US20010037455A1 (en) * 2000-03-09 2001-11-01 Lawandy Nabil M. Authentication using a digital watermark
    US6952485B1 (en) 2000-09-11 2005-10-04 Digimarc Corporation Watermark encoding and decoding in imaging devices and imaging device interfaces
    US7246239B2 (en) 2001-01-24 2007-07-17 Digimarc Corporation Digital watermarks for checking authenticity of printed objects
    US6859225B1 (en) 2000-10-20 2005-02-22 Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd Method and apparatus for fault tolerant data storage on photographs
    NL1017173C2 (en) * 2001-01-23 2002-08-14 Joh Enschedu B V Security image with double band encryption.
    WO2002098671A2 (en) 2001-06-06 2002-12-12 Spectra Systems Corporation Marking and authenticating articles
    US8094869B2 (en) 2001-07-02 2012-01-10 Digimarc Corporation Fragile and emerging digital watermarks
    NL1018485C2 (en) * 2001-07-06 2003-01-08 Nl Bank Nv Series of value documents with a watermark in the form of a barcode.
    ATE509326T1 (en) 2001-12-18 2011-05-15 L 1 Secure Credentialing Inc MULTIPLE IMAGE SECURITY FEATURES FOR IDENTIFYING DOCUMENTS AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING THEM
    AU2003221894A1 (en) 2002-04-09 2003-10-27 Digimarc Id Systems, Llc Image processing techniques for printing identification cards and documents
    US7824029B2 (en) 2002-05-10 2010-11-02 L-1 Secure Credentialing, Inc. Identification card printer-assembler for over the counter card issuing
    US7974495B2 (en) 2002-06-10 2011-07-05 Digimarc Corporation Identification and protection of video
    US8171567B1 (en) 2002-09-04 2012-05-01 Tracer Detection Technology Corp. Authentication method and system
    ES2283498T3 (en) * 2002-11-08 2007-11-01 European Central Bank INSERTION OF A WATER BRAND IN A SAFETY DOCUMENT.
    DE10305288B4 (en) * 2003-02-10 2005-06-30 Leonhard Kurz Gmbh & Co. Kg Security document with at least one security element
    AU2005220385B2 (en) 2004-03-12 2010-07-15 Ingenia Holdings Limited Authenticity verification methods, products and apparatuses
    CA2559271A1 (en) 2004-03-12 2005-09-22 Ingenia Technology Limited Methods and apparatuses for creating authenticatable printed articles and subsequently verifying them
    DE502005001115D1 (en) * 2004-04-27 2007-09-06 Bundesdruckerei Gmbh SAFETY FEATURES FOR DATA CARRIES, CORRESPONDING DATA CARRIER AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING A SAFETY FEATURE
    GB2417074B (en) * 2004-08-13 2007-11-21 Ingenia Technology Ltd Authenticity verification methods,products and apparatuses
    GB2417592B (en) 2004-08-13 2006-07-26 Ingenia Technology Ltd Authenticity verification of articles
    JP5123181B2 (en) 2005-07-27 2013-01-16 インジェニア・テクノロジー・(ユーケイ)・リミテッド Authenticity verification
    JP2009521039A (en) 2005-12-23 2009-05-28 インジェニア・ホールディングス・(ユー・ケイ)・リミテッド Optical authentication
    GB2466311B (en) 2008-12-19 2010-11-03 Ingenia Holdings Self-calibration of a matching algorithm for determining authenticity
    GB2476226B (en) 2009-11-10 2012-03-28 Ingenia Holdings Ltd Optimisation
    US20170309105A1 (en) * 2016-04-25 2017-10-26 Leadot Innovation, Inc. Method of Determining Currency and Denomination of an Inserted Bill in a Bill Acceptor Having a Single Slot and Related Device

    Family Cites Families (13)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    US3922539A (en) * 1974-04-02 1975-11-25 Pitney Bowes Inc Improved circuit for detecting the passage of an article beating a repetitive marking
    US4908873A (en) * 1983-05-13 1990-03-13 Philibert Alex C Document reproduction security system
    US4715623A (en) * 1984-09-28 1987-12-29 American Bank Note Company Documents having a revealable concealed identifier and the method of making such documents
    FR2675607B1 (en) * 1991-04-18 1993-08-27 Banque De France METHOD FOR ANALYZING A TRUST OR SECURITY DOCUMENT HAVING A PRINTED GRAPHICS AND TWO OVERLAPED SECURITY SIGNS, AND DEVICE FOR IMPLEMENTING THE PROCESS.
    GB2297159B (en) * 1992-08-03 1997-02-05 Ricoh Kk Copying apparatus including an original-discrimination system for discriminating special documents
    CA2129075C (en) * 1993-10-18 1999-04-20 Joseph J. Daniele Electronic copyright royalty accounting system using glyphs
    GB9323352D0 (en) * 1993-11-12 1994-01-05 De La Rue Thomas & Co Ltd Security documents and the like device
    US6345104B1 (en) * 1994-03-17 2002-02-05 Digimarc Corporation Digital watermarks and methods for security documents
    EP0940780B1 (en) * 1994-01-20 2001-05-30 Omron Corporation Image processing device and method for detecting a reference pattern
    US5919730A (en) * 1996-02-08 1999-07-06 Eastman Kodak Company Copy restrictive documents
    EP0895691B1 (en) * 1996-04-23 2002-07-10 Charney, Leon H. Method and system for identifying documents generated by an unauthorized software copy
    US5772250A (en) * 1997-04-11 1998-06-30 Eastman Kodak Company Copy restrictive color-reversal documents
    PL189595B1 (en) * 1997-06-06 2005-08-31 De La Rue Giori Sa Counterfeit-preventing safety pattern for securities, security piece and method of printing such pattern on securities

    Cited By (11)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    US8505108B2 (en) 1993-11-18 2013-08-06 Digimarc Corporation Authentication using a digital watermark
    US8059860B2 (en) 1998-04-16 2011-11-15 Brundage Trent J Steganographic encoding
    US8300274B2 (en) 1999-11-10 2012-10-30 Digimarc Corporation Process for marking substrates with information using a texture pattern and related substrates
    US7773770B2 (en) 1999-12-28 2010-08-10 Digimarc Corporation Substituting or replacing components in media objects based on steganographic encoding
    US7321667B2 (en) 2002-01-18 2008-01-22 Digimarc Corporation Data hiding through arrangement of objects
    US7532741B2 (en) 2002-01-18 2009-05-12 Digimarc Corporation Data hiding in media
    US7831062B2 (en) 2002-01-18 2010-11-09 Digimarc Corporation Arrangement of objects in images or graphics to convey a machine-readable signal
    US8515121B2 (en) 2002-01-18 2013-08-20 Digimarc Corporation Arrangement of objects in images or graphics to convey a machine-readable signal
    US8087583B2 (en) 2002-02-12 2012-01-03 Digimarc Corporation Associating media through encoding
    US7728048B2 (en) 2002-12-20 2010-06-01 L-1 Secure Credentialing, Inc. Increasing thermal conductivity of host polymer used with laser engraving methods and compositions
    US7789311B2 (en) 2003-04-16 2010-09-07 L-1 Secure Credentialing, Inc. Three dimensional data storage

    Also Published As

    Publication number Publication date
    WO2000045344A1 (en) 2000-08-03
    JP2002536202A (en) 2002-10-29
    AU3063100A (en) 2000-08-18
    DE60001098D1 (en) 2003-02-06
    MXPA01007401A (en) 2002-06-04
    GB0001165D0 (en) 2000-03-08
    EP1147495A1 (en) 2001-10-24
    HK1043417A1 (en) 2002-09-13
    CA2357727A1 (en) 2000-08-03
    ATE230510T1 (en) 2003-01-15
    GB9901522D0 (en) 1999-03-17
    GB2346110A (en) 2000-08-02
    GB2346110B (en) 2001-09-05

    Similar Documents

    Publication Publication Date Title
    EP1147495B1 (en) Substrates for printing
    AU3062600A (en) Printing of security documents
    CN101159799B (en) The digital watermarking of vital document and method
    US6980654B2 (en) System and method for authenticating an article
    US6991260B2 (en) Anti-counterfeiting see-through security feature using line patterns
    US7104709B1 (en) Document printing process
    EP1418542B1 (en) Watermarking a security document
    US20060061088A1 (en) Method and apparatus for internet coupon fraud deterrence
    JP5585915B2 (en) Printed material capable of authenticating authenticity and authentication method of the printed material
    US8736910B2 (en) Method and device superimposing two marks for securing documents against forgery with
    JP2003246134A (en) Truth or falsehood discriminable printed matter, and method for discriminating, and method for embedding information in printed matter
    JP5652787B2 (en) Printed material capable of authenticating authenticity and authentication method of the printed material
    JP2005171429A (en) Watermarked paper
    RU2286260C2 (en) Controlling element for printed objects
    JP2008062417A (en) Medium for preventing forgery and manufacturing method thereof
    JP2001010197A (en) Forgery preventive paper and its genuineness/falseness discriminating method, and its genuineness/falseness discriminating device
    RU2409863C2 (en) Method of controlling double-sided register on object printed on machine with double-sided printing
    WO2003061981A1 (en) Autheticatable printed sheet, manufacturing method thereof, manufacturing apparatus thereof, authentication method thereof, and authentication apparatus thereof

    Legal Events

    Date Code Title Description
    PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

    17P Request for examination filed

    Effective date: 20010713

    AK Designated contracting states

    Kind code of ref document: A1

    Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

    AX Request for extension of the european patent

    Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

    17Q First examination report despatched

    Effective date: 20011102

    GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

    GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

    GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

    GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

    GRAA (expected) grant

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

    AK Designated contracting states

    Kind code of ref document: B1

    Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: NL

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20030102

    Ref country code: LI

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20030102

    Ref country code: IT

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRE;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.SCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20030102

    Ref country code: GR

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20030102

    Ref country code: FR

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20030102

    Ref country code: FI

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20030102

    Ref country code: CH

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20030102

    Ref country code: BE

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20030102

    Ref country code: AT

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20030102

    REF Corresponds to:

    Ref document number: 230510

    Country of ref document: AT

    Date of ref document: 20030115

    Kind code of ref document: T

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: GB

    Ref legal event code: FG4D

    Free format text: 20030102

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: CH

    Ref legal event code: EP

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: LU

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20030120

    Ref country code: IE

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20030120

    Ref country code: CY

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20030120

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: MC

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20030131

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: IE

    Ref legal event code: FG4D

    REF Corresponds to:

    Ref document number: 60001098

    Country of ref document: DE

    Date of ref document: 20030206

    Kind code of ref document: P

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: SE

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20030402

    Ref country code: PT

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20030402

    Ref country code: DK

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20030402

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: DE

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20030403

    LTIE Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension

    Effective date: 20030102

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: CH

    Ref legal event code: PL

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: ES

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20030730

    PLBI Opposition filed

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

    PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: IE

    Ref legal event code: MM4A

    EN Fr: translation not filed
    26 Opposition filed

    Opponent name: GIESECKE & DEVRIENT GMBH

    Effective date: 20031002

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: GB

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20040120

    PLAS Information related to reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition deleted

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDOBS3

    PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

    GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

    Effective date: 20040120

    RDAF Communication despatched that patent is revoked

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREV1

    RDAG Patent revoked

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009271

    STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

    Free format text: STATUS: PATENT REVOKED

    27W Patent revoked

    Effective date: 20041108

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: HK

    Ref legal event code: WD

    Ref document number: 1043417

    Country of ref document: HK