EP0922124A1 - Removal of fluoride-containing scales using aluminum salt solution - Google Patents

Removal of fluoride-containing scales using aluminum salt solution

Info

Publication number
EP0922124A1
EP0922124A1 EP97936086A EP97936086A EP0922124A1 EP 0922124 A1 EP0922124 A1 EP 0922124A1 EP 97936086 A EP97936086 A EP 97936086A EP 97936086 A EP97936086 A EP 97936086A EP 0922124 A1 EP0922124 A1 EP 0922124A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
salt
aluminum
solution
fluoride
aqueous
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP97936086A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0922124A4 (en
EP0922124B1 (en
Inventor
George Henry Webster
Byron Von Klock
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Texaco Development Corp
Original Assignee
Texaco Development Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Texaco Development Corp filed Critical Texaco Development Corp
Publication of EP0922124A1 publication Critical patent/EP0922124A1/en
Publication of EP0922124A4 publication Critical patent/EP0922124A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0922124B1 publication Critical patent/EP0922124B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23GCLEANING OR DE-GREASING OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY CHEMICAL METHODS OTHER THAN ELECTROLYSIS
    • C23G1/00Cleaning or pickling metallic material with solutions or molten salts
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23GCLEANING OR DE-GREASING OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY CHEMICAL METHODS OTHER THAN ELECTROLYSIS
    • C23G1/00Cleaning or pickling metallic material with solutions or molten salts
    • C23G1/02Cleaning or pickling metallic material with solutions or molten salts with acid solutions
    • C23G1/08Iron or steel
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23GCLEANING OR DE-GREASING OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY CHEMICAL METHODS OTHER THAN ELECTROLYSIS
    • C23G1/00Cleaning or pickling metallic material with solutions or molten salts
    • C23G1/02Cleaning or pickling metallic material with solutions or molten salts with acid solutions
    • C23G1/10Other heavy metals
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23GCLEANING OR DE-GREASING OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY CHEMICAL METHODS OTHER THAN ELECTROLYSIS
    • C23G1/00Cleaning or pickling metallic material with solutions or molten salts
    • C23G1/02Cleaning or pickling metallic material with solutions or molten salts with acid solutions
    • C23G1/10Other heavy metals
    • C23G1/106Other heavy metals refractory metals

Definitions

  • the invention is relates to the removal of scale from metal surfaces, and more
  • Water is used in the system to slurry the feed coal, to quench the hot
  • synthesis gas also referred to as "syngas” and to quench the hot slag byproduct.
  • Water is
  • tubes is usually chemically removed by inorganic acids such as sulfuric, hydrochloric, or
  • nitric acids When sulfuric acid is used for scale removal, CaSO is sometimes precipitated.
  • Scale can also be removed by mechanical means such as by scraping or by
  • ferric or aluminum ions can inhibit corrosion.
  • Fluoride-containing scale can be removed from metal surfaces such as
  • portion of the salt can be aluminum, iron and mixtures thereof.
  • the anionic portion of the salt can be aluminum, iron and mixtures thereof.
  • salt can be a chloride, a nitrate, a sulfate, and mixtures thereof. The contracting occurs in the
  • aqueous effluent also referred to as the aqueous effluent, grey water, or blowdown
  • the principal wastewater component is ammonium chloride.
  • Some materials found in the ash are partially water soluble, that is, a portion of
  • the material remains in the solid slag or ash fines and a portion dissolves in the water.
  • sodium and potassium compounds dissolve in water as their ions, and remain in
  • Wastewater treatment for a variety of contaminants can be
  • means for distilling gasification wastewater include falling film evaporation and forced
  • This invention provides a means of removing fluoride scale which
  • the main system heat exchanger In falling film evaporation, the main system heat exchanger is vertical.
  • brine to be evaporated is introduced to the top of the heat exchanger tubes and withdrawn
  • the brine is pumped to the top of the tubes from a brine sump located
  • liquid brine collects in the brine sump where it is recirculated by a pump to the top of the heat
  • the steam can then be condensed to form a water distillate which can be
  • gasification system can be continuously added to the brine sump, and a portion of the
  • the main system heat exchanger is
  • feed water is added to the brine sump or to the brine recirculation line.
  • the equipment surfaces acts as an insulator and must be removed periodically in order to
  • the primary scale components are silica (Si0 2 ), calcium
  • fluoride scale can be removed from
  • the cationic portion of the salt can be aluminum,
  • the anionic portion of the salt can be a chloride, a nitrate, a sulfate,
  • dissolved fluoride scale does not accelerate or increase the normal rate of metal corrosion that
  • Preferred salts are aluminum salt solutions made from aluminum chloride
  • nitrate is the preferred aluminum salt where the equipment being treated is part of a partial
  • the nitrate components of the aluminum nitrate salt become part of the synthesis gas, such as N 2 , NH, or CO.
  • the synthesis gas such as N 2 , NH, or CO.
  • aluminum chloride adds chloride to the feed in the form of ammonium chloride
  • aluminum sulfate adds sulfur and calcium sulfate precipitate in the evaporator
  • iron salts of inorganic acids can also be used to dissolve fluoride
  • iron salts are generally not as effective as aluminum salts on a molar comparison basis for dissolving fluoride scale and inhibiting fluoride corrosion of titanium in acidic solutions.
  • the aqueous salt solution of the inorganic acid should have a concentration of
  • the salt solution is more effective in dissolving fluoride scale with respect to
  • the aqueous inorganic salt solution is contacted with the scale surface for a
  • inorganic salt solutions including solutions of their hydrates
  • inorganic salt solutions including solutions of their hydrates
  • the initial pH of the aqueous salt solution is generally at least about 1.5
  • NaOH sodium hydroxide
  • KOH potassium hydroxide
  • the alkali metal hydroxide treatment particularly the NaOH treatment, is
  • the first scale cleaning solution generally chosen as the first scale cleaning solution, primarily because the caustic solution is
  • the aluminum salt solution particularly the aluminum nitrate solution.
  • the alkali metal hydroxide solution should have a concentration of about 1%
  • the alkali metal hydroxide solution should be contacted with the scale surface for a time
  • sodium hydroxide and potassium hydroxide can also be used.
  • a sodium nitrate inhibitor is
  • the next cleaning solution that is, the aqueous
  • inorganic salt solution can be introduced into the equipment and removed in similar fashion.
  • aqueous inorganic salt solution can be combined, diluted with water to a concentration of
  • the neutralized spent cleaning solution can then be used to slurry a feedstock
  • spent aluminum salt solution can be recycled to the gasifier feed as long as it is blended with
  • the feedstock at a low enough rate so that the pH of the feedstock is not reduced below 6.0.
  • cleaning solution is taken from the equipment being treated and dried at 105°C and the
  • cleaning solution in contact with the scale can be used to determine if the cleaning solution is
  • Blowdown water of the composition in Table 1 is evaporated in a falling film
  • HastelloyTM C-276 (Haynes Metals Co.) high nickel alloy that forms the sump.
  • the scale is mechanically removed from the metal surface of the brine sump
  • the composition of the scale is approximately 50%
  • ICP Inductively Coupled Plasma
  • caustic solution is determined.
  • the scale sample is then contacted with a solution of aluminum nitrate
  • the aluminum nitrate solution also contains 0.5 or 1% sodium nitrate
  • the aluminum nitrate solution is analyzed by ICP Methods for metal and ion chromatography for fluoride and the weight of Si, Ca and F dissolved by the aluminum
  • An acceptable corrosion rate would be less than about 10 mils/year, and
  • fluoride scale from titanium using an acid
  • the problem with using an acid cleaner is that the amount of fluoride scale in
  • the unit is not known ahead of time. Therefore, the amount of aluminum corrosion inhibitor

Abstract

Fluoride-containing scale can be removed from metal surfaces such as titanium, titanium alloys, nickel alloys, and stainless steel by contacting the metal surfaces with an aqueous salt solution of an inorganic acid, including its hydrates. The cationic portion of the salt can be aluminum, iron and mixtures thereof. The anionic portion of the salt can be a chloride, a nitrate, a sulfate, and mixtures thereof. The contracting occurs in the absence of the addition of an acid, such as hydrochloric, nitric, or sulfuric acid. The presence of the aqueous salt solution with the dissolved fluoride scale does not accelerate or increase the normal rate of metal corrosion that can occur in the absence of the aqueous salt solution or any acidic cleaning agent.

Description

REMOVAL OF FLUORIDE-CONTAINING SCALES USING ALUMINUM SALT SOLUTION
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application
No. 60/021,889, filed July 17, 1996.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The invention is relates to the removal of scale from metal surfaces, and more
particularly, to the removal of scales containing fluorides from metal surfaces.
2. Description of the Prior Art
When coal or other ash-containing organic materials are gasified in a high-
pressure, high-temperature partial oxidation quench gasification system, the ash material
commonly becomes partitioned between coarse slag, finely divided slag particles, and water-
soluble ash components. Water is used in the system to slurry the feed coal, to quench the hot
synthesis gas, also referred to as "syngas" and to quench the hot slag byproduct. Water is
also used to scrub particulate matter from the syngas, and to assist in conveying the slag
byproduct out of the gasifier.
Calcium fluoride and magnesium fluoride scale which forms on evaporator
tubes is usually chemically removed by inorganic acids such as sulfuric, hydrochloric, or
nitric acids. When sulfuric acid is used for scale removal, CaSO is sometimes precipitated.
During acid cleaning of fluoride scale, corrosive hydrofluoric acid is formed in the cleaning
solution and certain metals and metal alloys, such as titanium, nickel, and stainless steel can
become subject to severe corrosion from the hydrofluoric acid. The presence of fluoride ion
(F") in the solution interferes with the protective oxide films that form on these metals and allows for dissolution of the titanium, iron, and nickel ions in an acidic solution. Therefore,
chemical cleaning of fluoride scale by the use of acids alone in process equipment is not
practical. It is also noted that calcium scale can be chemically removed by use of ethylene
diamine tetracetic acid.
Scale can also be removed by mechanical means such as by scraping or by
impact with a hammer or by hydroblasting. However, chemical cleaning is preferred and is usually more thorough because scale can be dissolved and removed in places where a
hydroblasting nozzle cannot reach. It is therefore desirable to chemically dissolve fluoride
scale from equipment constructed of titanium or stainless steel. Titanium and stainless steels
are commonly used in the wastewater treatment industry, especially in the construction of
wastewater evaporators.
The literature has also addressed the problem of hydrofluoric acid corrosion in
process equipment made of stainless steels, nickel alloys and titanium alloys. Koch, G. H.,
"Localized Corrosion in Halides Other Than Chlorides," Environment Effects. June 1993
discloses that ferric or aluminum ions can inhibit corrosion.
The effect of water solutions and their corrosiveness in flue gas desulfurization
process scrubbers has also been studied. These solutions contain chlorides, fluorides and
sulfates at low pH, for example, 4800 mg/kg fluoride at a pH of 1. The addition of flyash
minerals which contain significant amounts of silicon, iron, and aluminum can inhibit
corrosion of titanium in otherwise aggressive fluoride containing solutions. It was also found
that if 10,000 mg aluminum/kg (added as aluminum sulfate) were added to a corrosive acidic
solution containing 10,000 mg kg chloride and 1,000 mg/kg fluoride, the solution is no longer
corrosive to titanium. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Fluoride-containing scale can be removed from metal surfaces such as
titanium, titanium alloys, nickel alloys, and stainless steel by contacting the metal surfaces
with an aqueous salt solution of an inorganic acid, including its hydrates. The cationic
portion of the salt can be aluminum, iron and mixtures thereof. The anionic portion of the
salt can be a chloride, a nitrate, a sulfate, and mixtures thereof. The contracting occurs in the
absence of the addition of an acid, such as hydrochloric, nitric, or sulfuric acid. The presence
of the aqueous salt solution with the dissolved fluoride scale does not accelerate or increase
the normal rate of metal corrosion that can occur in the absence of the aqueous salt solution or
any acidic cleaning agent.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
In order to conserve water, gasification system operating units seek to
recirculate the process water, usually after a purification treatment, such as removal of the
finely divided particulate slag or "slag fines" in a solids settler. Since the gasification
reaction consumes water by producing hydrogen in the synthesis gas, there is generally no
need to remove water from the system to prevent accumulation. Nevertheless, a portion of the process wastewater, also referred to as the aqueous effluent, grey water, or blowdown
water, is usually removed from the system as a purge wastewater stream to prevent excessive
buildup of corrosive salts, particularly chloride salts.
As shown in Table 1, which follows, with data from the gasification of high-
chloride Eastern U.S. coal, the composition of the wastewater blowdown from the gasification system is fairly complex. For a feedstock with relatively high levels of chloride,
the principal wastewater component is ammonium chloride.
TABLE 1 ASH CONTENT OF HIGH-CHLORIDE EASTERN COAL
Gasifier Feed Coal Blowdown Water Percentage (Flo =71 ,950 kg hr) (Flow=33,208 liters/hr) of Coal
Ash Mass Flow Mass Flow Material In Species Concentration (grams/hr) Concentration (grams/hr) Water
Ammonia N 1.4 % 1007300 1500 mg/L 49812 4.95
Sodium 590 micrograms/gram 42450.5 32 mg/L 1063 2.50
Potassium 1200 micrograms/gram 86340 12 mg/L 398 0.46
Aluminum 10000 micrograms/gram 719500 2.3 mg L 76 0.01
Calcium 2600 micrograms/gram 187070 20 mg/L 664 0.36
Magnesium 700 micrograms/gram 50365 4.3 mg/L 143 0.28
Boron 54 micrograms/gram 3885.3 37 mg/L 1229 31.62
Chloride 0.2 % 86340 2600 mg L 86341 100.0
Fluoride 0.019 % 13670.5 63 mg/L 2092 15.30
Formate 0 770 mg/L 25570
Silicon 19000 micrograms/gram 1367050 60 mg/L 1992 0.15
Some materials found in the ash are partially water soluble, that is, a portion of
the material remains in the solid slag or ash fines and a portion dissolves in the water. For
example, sodium and potassium compounds dissolve in water as their ions, and remain in
solids as sodium minerals. Boron compounds dissolve in water as boric acid and borate ions,
and remain in solids as oxidized boron minerals. Aluminum, silicon, calcium and magnesium
compounds are primarily insoluble, and fluoride compounds are also primarily insoluble.
Since wastewater blowdown from the gasification system contains salts and
other potentially environmentally harmful constituents, treatment is necessary before the water can be discharged. Wastewater treatment for a variety of contaminants can be
somewhat elaborate and expensive, therefore, other more economic means for treating the
wastewater are desirable.
Distillation of the wastewater or brine under certain conditions is an effective
and economical means for recovering relatively pure water from the wastewater. Suitable
means for distilling gasification wastewater include falling film evaporation and forced
circulation evaporation. This invention provides a means of removing fluoride scale which
forms on the metal surfaces of these evaporators, and on any other equipment.
In falling film evaporation, the main system heat exchanger is vertical. The
brine to be evaporated is introduced to the top of the heat exchanger tubes and withdrawn
from the bottom. The brine is pumped to the top of the tubes from a brine sump located
below the heat exchanger tubes. The brine falls downwardly through the tubes as a film on
the interior tube walls, receiving heat so that the water contained therein evaporates and forms
steam as the brine descends. A mixture of brine and steam exits the bottom of the heat
exchanger tubes and enters the brine sump, wherein the water vapor and concentrated liquid
brine separate. The steam exits from the top of the brine sump, and the residual concentrated
liquid brine collects in the brine sump where it is recirculated by a pump to the top of the heat
exchanger tubes. The steam can then be condensed to form a water distillate which can be
recycled to the gasification system. Feed water, such as effluent wastewater from the
gasification system can be continuously added to the brine sump, and a portion of the
concentrated brine is continuously withdrawn for the crystallization and recovery of the
concentrated salts contained therein. In forced circulation evaporation, the main system heat exchanger is
horizontal, with liquid brine pumped through the tubes and steam introduced on the shell side
of the exchanger to heat the brine. The brine does not boil as it travels through the tubes
because there is sufficient pressure therein to prevent boiling. The hot brine exiting the
exchanger tubes is then transferred upwardly to a brine sump located above the heat
exchanger. As the brine travels upwardly, the pressure drops and the hot brine boils to form a
two-phase mixture of concentrated brine and water vapor. When the two-phase mixture
enters the brine sump, the water vapor separates from the brine, and exits the sump to a
condenser where the water vapor is condensed to form distillate water. The brine is recycled
to the evaporator by means of a recirculation pump, with a portion removed as a brine
blowdown stream for further salt crystallization and recovery. Also as with the falling film
evaporator, feed water is added to the brine sump or to the brine recirculation line.
Although both falling film and forced circulation evaporators are commonly
used for water distillation applications, their usability depends on the rate of scale formation
and accumulation on the evaporator heat exchanger surfaces. The removal of scale from the
evaporator heat exchanger and sump surfaces is very important because scale formation on
the equipment surfaces acts as an insulator and must be removed periodically in order to
operate the evaporator unit effectively.
The composition of the scale shown in Table 2, which follows, was formed
from evaporation of gasification grey water wherein a falling film and a forced circulation
evaporator were used in series. The primary scale components are silica (Si02), calcium
fluoride (CaF2), and magnesium fluoride (MgF2). TABLE 2
COMPOSITION OF TUBE SCALE AND SUMP SCALE
FROM BLOWDOWN WATER EVAPORATION
Magnesium Silicon Phosphorus Sulfur Calcium Iron
(weight (weight (weight (weight (weight (weight
%) %) %) %) %) %)
Forced Circulation 91 2 2 0 3 2 Evaporator Tube Scale
Forced Circulation 1 80 0 7 8 4 Evaporator Sump Scale
Falling Film 3 55 0 2 40 0 Evaporator Tube Scale
Falling Film 3 43 1 0 49 4 Evaporator Sump Scale
In accordance with the present invention, fluoride scale can be removed from
titanium, titanium alloys, nickel alloys, and stainless steel by using an aqueous salt solution
of an inorganic acid, including its hydrates. The cationic portion of the salt can be aluminum,
iron or mixtures thereof. The anionic portion of the salt can be a chloride, a nitrate, a sulfate,
and mixtures thereof. The contacting occurs in the absence of the addition of an acid, such as
hydrochloric, nitric, or sulfuric acid. The presence of the aqueous salt solution with the
dissolved fluoride scale does not accelerate or increase the normal rate of metal corrosion that
can occur in the absence of the aqueous salt solution or any acidic cleaning agent.
Preferred salts are aluminum salt solutions made from aluminum chloride,
aluminum sulfate, aluminum nitrate, and their hydrates, and mixtures thereof. Aluminum
nitrate is the preferred aluminum salt where the equipment being treated is part of a partial
oxidation gasification system, because the spent solution can be returned to the gasification system, and has the least impact on the gasifier feed. The nitrate components of the aluminum nitrate salt become part of the synthesis gas, such as N2, NH, or CO. In contrast,
aluminum chloride adds chloride to the feed in the form of ammonium chloride, and
aluminum sulfate adds sulfur and calcium sulfate precipitate in the evaporator
Although iron salts of inorganic acids can also be used to dissolve fluoride
scale, iron salts are generally not as effective as aluminum salts on a molar comparison basis for dissolving fluoride scale and inhibiting fluoride corrosion of titanium in acidic solutions.
The aqueous salt solution of the inorganic acid should have a concentration of
about 1% to about 40%, preferably about 15% to about 20% and a temperature of about 32°F
to about 212°F. The salt solution is more effective in dissolving fluoride scale with respect to
rate and quantity dissolved if the solution is heated to a temperature of about 100°F to about
212°F and preferably to about 175°F to about 212°r In a comparison test, scale that
dissolved in 90 minutes at 100°F, was able to dissolve in one minute at 175°F.
The aqueous inorganic salt solution is contacted with the scale surface for a
time sufficient to effect removal or dissolution of the fluoride scale, which is generally from
about 30 minutes to about 24 hours, and preferably from about 1 hour to about 3 hours. A
combination of inorganic salt solutions, including solutions of their hydrates can also be used.
The initial pH of the aqueous salt solution is generally at least about 1.5
Before or after the treatment of the metal surface with the aqueous aluminum
salt solution of the inorganic acid, a solution of an alkali metal hydroxide such as sodium
hydroxide (NaOH) or potassium hydroxide (KOH) can be used to contact and treat the metal
surface to remove any silica-containing scale, or πon cyanide scale The alkali metal hydroxide treatment, particularly the NaOH treatment, is
generally chosen as the first scale cleaning solution, primarily because the caustic solution is
less expensive than the aluminum salt solution, particularly the aluminum nitrate solution.
The alkali metal hydroxide solution should have a concentration of about 1%
to about 25%, and preferably about 2% to about 6%, and should be heated to a temperature of
about 170°F to about 212°F, or to the boiling point of the solution at atmospheric pressure.
The alkali metal hydroxide solution should be contacted with the scale surface for a time
sufficient to effect removal of the silica or iron cyanide scale, which is generally from about
30 minutes to about 24 hours, and preferably about 2 hours to about 6 hours. A mixture of
sodium hydroxide and potassium hydroxide can also be used. A sodium nitrate inhibitor is
generally used with the caustic when scale is removed from titanium.
After the caustic cleaning operation has been completed, the caustic solution
should be removed from the equipment, such as by draining it therefrom, before introducing
the aqueous inorganic salt solution, and vice-versa. No special cleansing is necessary after
removal of each cleaning solution. Thus, the next cleaning solution, that is, the aqueous
inorganic salt solution can be introduced into the equipment and removed in similar fashion.
The combined spent neutralized solutions of the sodium hydroxide and the
aqueous inorganic salt solution can be combined, diluted with water to a concentration of
about 95% water and neutralized to a pH of about 7 using additional sodium hydroxide, if
necessary.
The neutralized spent cleaning solution can then be used to slurry a feedstock,
such as coal, for a partial oxidation reaction. Thus, for example, fluoride, sodium, aluminum
and silicon constituents become components of the byproduct slag. If the spent alkali solution is recycled to the gasifier, the recycled solution should be added in small quantities
to the feedstock so as not to increase sodium or potassium feed concentrations significantly
which can have an adverse effect on the refractory lining of the gasifier. An unneutralized
spent aluminum salt solution can be recycled to the gasifier feed as long as it is blended with
the feedstock at a low enough rate so that the pH of the feedstock is not reduced below 6.0.
It is noted that by use of the aqueous salt solution without an acid, instead of
using an inorganic acid cleaning solution with an added aluminum salt, the cleaning process
does not accelerate corrosion or increase the corrosion rate, whereas with an acid, care must
be used to add enough aluminum inhibitor to reduce or halt the acceleration of corrosion.
Since, the amount of scale in the equipment is not exactly known prior to cleaning and there
is an economic need to conserve chemical cleaning solutions, this is a significant
consideration.
The means for determining whether more cleaning solution needs to be added
to the equipment can be determined by a total dissolved solids analysis in which a filtered
cleaning solution is taken from the equipment being treated and dried at 105°C and the
residue weight measured.
The total dissolved solids concentration of the initial cleaning solution and the
cleaning solution in contact with the scale can be used to determine if the cleaning solution is
saturated with scale compounds. A molar ratio of 0.5 silica to alkali hydroxide and a molar
ratio of 0.65 calcium fluoride to aluminum salt solution should be used in determining the
saturation point of the cleaning solution. In this way, the amount of cleaning solution used
can be minimized. In the examples, and throughout the specification, all concentrations are in
weight percent, unless otherwise specified.
EXAMPLES 1 - 6
Blowdown water of the composition in Table 1 is evaporated in a falling film
evaporator to produce a mixture of water vapor and brine. This mixture is fed to the brine
sump of a falling film evaporator where the water vapor is separated from the brine and fed
to a condenser to recover the water distillate. After operation of the evaporator for about
42 days, scale develops on the titanium surface inside the evaporator tubes and on the surface
of the Hastelloy™ C-276 (Haynes Metals Co.) high nickel alloy that forms the sump.
The scale is mechanically removed from the metal surface of the brine sump
by peeling flakes from the surface and from the evaporator tubes by impacting the outside of
the titanium tubes with a hammer. The composition of the scale is approximately 50%
amorphous silica and 50% calcium fluoride. Separate 6 gram samples of the scale are
initially contacted with 100 grams of a sodium hydroxide solution having a concentration of
6% or 10% at a temperature of 170°F for at least 2 hours. After the treatment period the
caustic solution is analyzed by the Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) Instrument Method for
metals and ion chromatography for fluoride, and the weight of Si, Ca and F dissolved by the
caustic solution is determined.
The scale sample is then contacted with a solution of aluminum nitrate
(1 1.2%, 12% or 16%) at a pH of 1 -2 and a temperature of 100°F or 170°F for at least 2 hours.
In EXAMPLES 4-6, the aluminum nitrate solution also contains 0.5 or 1% sodium nitrate
(NaN03) which is used to inhibit hydride phase formation in titanium. After the treatment
period the aluminum nitrate solution is analyzed by ICP Methods for metal and ion chromatography for fluoride and the weight of Si, Ca and F dissolved by the aluminum
nitrate solution is determined The examples show that a fluoride containing scale is
effectively removed using aluminum nitrate solutions, with over 90% scale removal
accomplished in Examples 1 , 4 and 6. The results are recorded in Table 3, which follows.
TABLE 3 FALLING FILM EVAPORATOR SUMP SCALE REMOVAL
CAUSTIC TREATMENT
Time Temp Si Ca F Molar (hour) (°F) Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Ratio
(% of (% of (% of of Si initial initial initial dissolved scale scale scale to weight) weight) weight) NaOH in
Example Solution cleanmg solution
1 6% NaOH - 11 2% 2 170 30 0 3 043 A1(N03)3
2 6% NaOH - 1 1 2% 2 5 170 20 0 1 5 0 29 A1(N03)
-> 10% NaOH (l% NaNO3) - 4 170 7 7 0 3 7 0.064 1 1 2% A1(N03)3
4 10% NaOH (l% NaNO3) - 5 3 170 10 0 5 5 0 089 16% A 1(N03)3
5 10% NaOH (0 5% NaN03) - 5 8 170 9 1 0 3 7 0 097 12% A1(N03)3
6 10% NaOH (0 5% NaN03) - 5 5 170 7 6 0 3 6 0.086 16°/o Al(N03)3
NOTE Maximum capacity of NaOH solution is to dissolve 0 5 moles of Si for every mole of NaOH (2 moles of NaOH are required to form 1 mole of sodium silicate) Solution is completely utilized when ratio of Si to NaOH is 0 5
Maximum capacity of A1(N03)3 solution at 100°F is to dissolve approximately 1 3 moles of fluoride (0 65 moles CaF-,) for every mole of aluminum (previously determined in CaF2 dissolution tests) Solution is completely utilized when ratio of fluoride to aluminum is 1 3 or ratio of fluoride to N03 is
0 43 At 174°F 1 6 moles of fluoride (0 8 moles Cal ,) is dissolved per mole of aluminum TABLE 3 (Continued) FALLING FILM EVAPORATOR SUMP SCALE REMOVAL
NITRATE TREATMENT
Time Temp Si Ca F Molar (hour) (°F) Dissoiv Dissolved Dissolved Ratio ed (% of (% of ofF
(% of initial initial dissolved initial scale scale to scale weight) weight) N03in weight)
Example Solution cleaning solution
1 6% NaOH- 11.2% 2 100 0.4 15 15 0.28 A1(N03)3
2 6% NaOH- 11.2% 6.3 100 0.1 21 14 0.26 A1(N03)3
— 10%NaOH(l%NaNO3)- 4 100 0.3 22 17 0.32 11.2%A1(N03)3
4 10%NaOH(l%NaNO3)- 6 100 0 25 27 0.33
5 10% NaOH (0.5% NaN03) - 3.5 170 0.2 21 22 0.28 12%A1(N03)3
6 10% NaOH (0.5% NaN03) - 1 170 0.2 21 18 0.26 16%A1(N03)3
TABLE 3 (Continued) FALLING FILM EVAPORATOR SUMP SCALE REMOVAL
RESIDUE COMPOSITION
Example Description Residue after Residue after
Caustic Acid
Cleaning as a Cleaning as a SI O Ca F Al
% of Initial % of Initial
Scale Weight Scale Weight
1 6% NaOH - 1 1.2% 51 8 37 51 4 0 — A1(N03)3
2 6% NaOH - 1 1.2% 55 22* 35 53 6 0 — A1(N03)3
3 10% NaOH (l% NaNO3) - — 20** 8 0 50 23 — 1 1.2% A1(N03)3
4 10% NaOH (l% NaNO3) - 73 6 31 46 1 0 — 16% A1(N03)3
5 10%, NaOH (0.5% NaN03) - 71 2| *** 14 30 I 22 29 12% A1(N03)3
6 10% NaOH (0.5% NaN03) - 74 7*** 6 30 4 26 26 16% A10 IO3)3
The residue from Ex. 2 was subjected to further successive cleanings using fresh solutions of A10MO3)3 and NaOH until all the scale was completely dissolved. The following results were obtained and are presented in order of succession with the solution concentration, time, temperature, and percent residue after cleaning. 3rd Cleaning - 1 1.2% AI(N03)3 - 3 hrs - 14%; 4th Cleaning - 1 1.2% A1(N03)3 - 6 hrs - 13%; 5th Cleaning - 2% NaOH - 2 hrs - 6%; 6th Cleaning - 6% NaOH - 1.5 hrs completely dissolved the scale.
The residue from Ex. 3 was subjected to 3.2 g of 10% NaOH - 1% NaN03 at 170°F for 5.5 hrs. and the residue was reduced to 12% (the primary component of this reside was CaF2).
X-ray diffraction analyses showed this residue to predominantly contain A l,(OH)3F3.
EXAMPLE 9
Two aqueous solutions, designated "A" and "B" are prepared containing 1%
fluoride from calcium fluoride powder, and 4% aluminum chloride added as a corrosion
inhibitor. A 1% concentration of hydrochloric acid is also added to solution A. Both
solutions are heated to 100°F and contacted with grade 2 titanium for 24 hours. The corrosion
rates and other data are recorded in Table 4.
TABLE 4
Titanium
HC1 Solution Solution pH corrosion rate concentration pH (initial) (final) (mils/year)
Solution A 1% 0.3 0.4 636.6
Solution B — 2.7 3.3 0.8
An acceptable corrosion rate would be less than about 10 mils/year, and
preferably less than about 5 mils/year. The solution A corrosion rate is very high and would
result in substantial metal loss. It is evident that the use of an acid solution to dissolve
fluoride scale, even with corrosion inhibitor, can result in disastrous corrosion when cleaning
fluoride scale from titanium using an acid.
The problem with using an acid cleaner is that the amount of fluoride scale in
the unit is not known ahead of time. Therefore, the amount of aluminum corrosion inhibitor
would have to be extremely overdosed as a precautionary measure. By use of the aluminum
salt solution without an acid, the fluoride scale is dissolved and the titanium corrosion rates
are acceptably low.

Claims

What is claimed is:
1. A process for removing fluoride-containing scale from a metal surface
which comprises contacting the metal surface with a sufficient amount of an aqueous salt
solution of an inorganic acid, including its hydrates, to dissolve the fluoride-containing scale,
wherein the cationic portion of the salt is selected from the group consisting of aluminum,
iron, and mixtures thereof, and wherein the anionic portion if the salt is selected from the group consisting of chloride, nitrate, sulfate, and mixtures thereof, and wherein said
contacting occurs in the absence of the addition of an acid.
2. The process of claim 1 , wherein the contacting of the aqueous salt
solution with the metal surface and its presence with dissolved fluoride scale does not
increase the normal rate of corrosion of said metal that can occur in the absence of the
aqueous salt solution or any acidic cleaning agent.
3. The process of claim 1 wherein the aluminum salt is at least one
selected from the group consisting of aluminum nitrate, aluminum sulfate and aluminum
chloride.
4. The process of claim 3, wherein the aluminum salt is aluminum nitrate.
5. The process of claim 3, wherein the aluminum salt is aluminum sulfate.
6. The process of claim 3, wherein the aluminum salt is aluminum
chloride.
7. The process of claim 1, wherein the initial pH of the aqueous salt solution is at least 1.5.
8. The process of claim 1 wherein the salt of the inorganic acid is present
in a concentration of about 1% to about 40%.
9. The process of claim 8 wherein the salt of the inorganic acid is present
in a concentration of about 15% to about 20%.
10. The process of claim 1 wherein the aqueous salt solution is contacted
to the metal surfaces for about 30 minutes to about 24 hours.
11. The process of claim 1 wherein the metal surfaces comprise evaporator
heat exchanger tubes having scale deposited thereon from contact with wastewater blowdown
from a partial oxidation gasification plant.
12. The process of claim 1 wherein the metal surfaces are selected from the
group consisting of titanium, titanium alloys, nickel alloys and stainless steel.
13. The process of claim 1 wherein the aqueous solution has a temperature
of from about 32°F to about 212°F.
14. The process of claim 1, wherein an alkali metal hydroxide solution is
contacted to the metal surfaces prior to or after the contacting of the aqueous solution of the
aluminum salt or the hydrate.
15. The process of claim 11 wherein the concentration of the alkali metal
hydroxide varies from about 1% to about 25%.
16. The process of claim 11 wherein the temperature of the alkali metal
hydroxide varies from about 170°F to about 212°F.
17. The process of claim 11 wherein the alkali metal hydroxide solution is
contacted to the metal surfaces for about 2 to about 6 hours.
18. The process of claim 11 wherein the spent alkali metal hydroxide
solution and the spent solution of the aluminum salt of an inorganic acid or hydrate are
combined and fed to a gasifier in a partial oxidation gasification. AMENDED CLAIMS
[received by the International Bureau on 15 December 1997 (15.12.97); original claims 1, 9 and 15-18 amended; new claims 19-25 added; remaining claims unchanged (4 pages)]
1. A process for removing fluoride-containing scale from a metal surface
which comprises contacting the metal surface with a sufficient amount of an aqueous salt
solution of an inorganic acid, including its hydrates, to dissolve the fluoride-containing scale,
wherein the cationic portion of the salt is selected from the group consisting of aluminum,
iron, and mixtures thereof, and wherein the anionic portion of the salt is selected from the
group consisting of chloride, nitrate, sulfate, and mixtures thereof, and wherein said
contacting occurs in the absence of the addition of an acid.
2. The process of claim 1 , wherein the contacting of the aqueous salt
solution with the metal surface and its presence with dissolved fluoride scale does not
increase the normal rate of corrosion of said metal that can occur in the absence of the
aqueous salt solution or any acidic cleaning agent.
3. The process of claim 1 wherein the aluminum salt is at least one
selected from the group consisting of aluminum nitrate, aluminum sulfate and aluminum
chloride.
4. The process of claim 3, wherein the aluminum salt is aluminum nitrate.
5. The process of claim 3, wherein the aluminum salt is aluminum sulfate.
6. The process of claim 3, wherein the aluminum salt is aluminum
chloride.
7. The process of claim 1, wherein the initial pH of the aqueous salt
solution is at least 1.5.
8. The process of claim 1 wherein the salt of the inorganic acid is present
in a concentration of about 1 % to about 40%.
9. The process of claim 1 wherein the salt of the inorganic acid is present
in a concentration of about 15% to about 20%.
10. The process of claim 1 wherein the aqueous salt solution is contacted
to the metal surfaces for about 30 minutes to about 24 hours.
11. The process of claim 1 wherein the metal surfaces comprise evaporator
heat exchanger tubes having scale deposited thereon from contact with wastewater blowdown
from a partial oxidation gasification plant.
12. The process of claim 1 wherein the metal surfaces are selected from the
group consisting of titanium, titanium alloys, nickel alloys and stainless steel.
13. The process of claim 1 wherein the aqueous solution has a temperature
of from about 32°F to about 212°F.
14. The process of claim 1, wherein an alkali metal hydroxide solution is
contacted to the metal surfaces prior to or after the contacting of the aqueous solution of the
aluminum salt or the hydrate.
15. The process of claim 14 wherein the concentration of the alkali metal
hydroxide varies from about 1% to about 25%.
16. The process of claim 14 wherein the temperature of the alkali metal
hydroxide varies from about 170°F to about 212°F.
17. The process of claim 14 wherein the alkali metal hydroxide solution is
contacted to the metal surfaces for about 2 to about 6 hours.
18. The process of claim 14 wherein the spent alkali metal hydroxide
solution and the spent solution of the aluminum salt of an inorganic acid or hydrate are
combined and fed to a gasifier in a partial oxidation gasification.
19. The process of claim 1 1, wherein the partial oxidation gasification
utilizes a fluoride-containing feedstock.
20. The process of claim 8, wherein the salt of the inorganic acid is
selected from the group consisting of an aluminum salt, an iron salt, and mixtures thereof.
21. The process of claim 9, wherein the salt of the inorganic acid is
selected from the group consisting of an aluminum salt, an iron salt, and mixtures thereof.
22. The process of claim 1 , wherein the aqueous salt solution is completely
utilized when the ratio of fluoride to aluminum is 1.3:1 , respectively.
23. The process of claim 13, wherein the aqueous solution has a
temperature of from about 170°F to the boiling point of the solution at atmospheric pressure.
24. The process of claim 1, wherein the spent aqueous salt solution of the
inorganic acid is returned to the gasification system.
25. The process of claim 1 , wherein the saturation point of the cleaning
solution is determined by a total dissolved solids analysis.
STATEMENT UNDER ARTICLE 19
This Statement accompanies the Amendment Under Article 19.
Claim 1 has been amended to correct a typographical error in line 5 by changing "if* to -of-.
Claims 15, 16, 17 and 18 have been amended to have these claims depend from claim 14.
Claim 19 is new and recites an embodiment that is supported in the Specification in Table 1 on page 4. in the third item from the bottom of the Table, and in the specification on page 9. lines 21 to 23.
Claims 20 and 21 recite embodiments of the salt of the inorganic acid, support for which can be found in claim 1.
Claim 22 recites an embodiment with regard to the ratio of fluoride to aluminum in the salt solution, suppoπ for which can be found in the last two lines of the NOTE below Table 3 on page 12 of the specification.
Claim 23 is an embodiment of the temperature range for the aqueous solution, support for which can be found on page 9. line 6 of the specification.
Claim 24 is an embodiment reciting recycling of the spent aqueous salt solution to the gasification system, support for which can be found in the specification at page 7. line 12 to 13.
Claim 25 is an embodiment reciting the determination of the saturation point of the cleaning solution by a total dissolved solids analysis, support for which can be found in the specification at page 10. lines 17 to 21.
EP97936086A 1996-07-17 1997-07-14 Removal of fluoride-containing scales using aluminum salt solution Expired - Lifetime EP0922124B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US2188996P 1996-07-17 1996-07-17
US21889P 1996-07-17
US890698 1997-07-11
US08/890,698 US5993558A (en) 1996-07-17 1997-07-11 Removal of fluoride-containing scales using aluminum salt solution
PCT/US1997/012476 WO1998002599A1 (en) 1996-07-17 1997-07-14 Removal of fluoride-containing scales using aluminum salt solution

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0922124A1 true EP0922124A1 (en) 1999-06-16
EP0922124A4 EP0922124A4 (en) 1999-10-13
EP0922124B1 EP0922124B1 (en) 2002-05-22

Family

ID=26695212

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP97936086A Expired - Lifetime EP0922124B1 (en) 1996-07-17 1997-07-14 Removal of fluoride-containing scales using aluminum salt solution

Country Status (10)

Country Link
US (1) US5993558A (en)
EP (1) EP0922124B1 (en)
JP (1) JP3210679B2 (en)
KR (1) KR100314147B1 (en)
CN (1) CN1225692A (en)
AU (1) AU710195B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2260172C (en)
DE (1) DE69712765T2 (en)
ES (1) ES2179359T3 (en)
WO (1) WO1998002599A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20180097263A (en) 2017-02-23 2018-08-31 한승케미칼 주식회사 Waste water treatment method of removing fluorine and cyanides
KR20180114325A (en) 2017-04-10 2018-10-18 김상수 Waste water treatment method of removing fluorine and cyanides using rare metal

Families Citing this family (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6565987B2 (en) 1999-11-12 2003-05-20 Eastman Chemical Company Non-exuding optically brightened polyolefin blends
KR100785290B1 (en) * 2001-12-05 2007-12-12 삼성전자주식회사 Wavelength division multiplexing packet transfer system of ring structure
US7189289B2 (en) * 2002-02-08 2007-03-13 Sk Corporation Cleaning agent and method for cleaning heater tubes
JP4159334B2 (en) * 2002-09-30 2008-10-01 新日本製鐵株式会社 Discoloration removal cleaning agent and discoloration removal cleaning method for titanium and titanium alloy building materials
US7611588B2 (en) * 2004-11-30 2009-11-03 Ecolab Inc. Methods and compositions for removing metal oxides
JP5746758B2 (en) * 2011-05-02 2015-07-08 Hoya株式会社 Method and apparatus for manufacturing glass substrate of cover glass for electronic device and method and apparatus for removing alkali fluoride fluoroaluminate
US8933005B2 (en) * 2012-04-16 2015-01-13 Stefanie Slade Method and composition for removing latex paint
JP5910841B1 (en) * 2015-03-25 2016-04-27 パナソニックIpマネジメント株式会社 Cleaning liquid for glass polishing apparatus and cleaning method
US20190062870A1 (en) * 2017-08-30 2019-02-28 Bloom Energy Corporation Solubilization of scandium from fluoride bearing materials

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE628795C (en) * 1933-12-02 1936-04-16 Henkel & Cie Gmbh Method of removing beer stone
US2961355A (en) * 1958-01-20 1960-11-22 Dow Chemical Co Method of and solvent for removing inorganic fluoride scale deposits
US4264463A (en) * 1977-12-27 1981-04-28 Nissan Chemical Industries Ltd. Process for removing calcium oxalate scale
US4692252A (en) * 1986-03-24 1987-09-08 Vertech Treatment Systems, Inc. Method of removing scale from wet oxidation treatment apparatus
US4784774A (en) * 1987-10-08 1988-11-15 The B. F. Goodrich Company Compositions containing phosphonoalkane carboxylic acid for scale inhibition
US4936987A (en) * 1983-03-07 1990-06-26 Calgon Corporation Synergistic scale and corrosion inhibiting admixtures containing carboxylic acid/sulfonic acid polymers
DE4128107A1 (en) * 1991-08-24 1993-02-25 Metallgesellschaft Ag Cryolite deposits removal from equipment or parts of equipment - by contacting equipment with soln. contg. mineral acid and boron cpd., useful in conversion coating of metal surfaces
US5254286A (en) * 1991-05-31 1993-10-19 Calgon Corporation Composition for controlling scale in black liquor evaporators

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3852123A (en) * 1972-11-20 1974-12-03 Pennwalt Corp Sealing rinses for phosphate coatings on metal
US4361445A (en) * 1978-09-13 1982-11-30 Olin Corporation Copper alloy cleaning process
US4330419A (en) * 1980-10-20 1982-05-18 Halliburton Company Method of and solvent for removing inorganic fluoride deposits
WO1986002631A1 (en) * 1984-10-26 1986-05-09 Uht, Umwelt- Und Hygienetechnik Gmbh Solution process and solvent for hardly soluble carbonates
US5016810A (en) * 1989-08-25 1991-05-21 The United States Of America As Represented By The Department Of Energy Method for improving weldability of nickel aluminide alloys

Patent Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE628795C (en) * 1933-12-02 1936-04-16 Henkel & Cie Gmbh Method of removing beer stone
US2961355A (en) * 1958-01-20 1960-11-22 Dow Chemical Co Method of and solvent for removing inorganic fluoride scale deposits
US4264463A (en) * 1977-12-27 1981-04-28 Nissan Chemical Industries Ltd. Process for removing calcium oxalate scale
US4936987A (en) * 1983-03-07 1990-06-26 Calgon Corporation Synergistic scale and corrosion inhibiting admixtures containing carboxylic acid/sulfonic acid polymers
US4692252A (en) * 1986-03-24 1987-09-08 Vertech Treatment Systems, Inc. Method of removing scale from wet oxidation treatment apparatus
US4784774A (en) * 1987-10-08 1988-11-15 The B. F. Goodrich Company Compositions containing phosphonoalkane carboxylic acid for scale inhibition
US5254286A (en) * 1991-05-31 1993-10-19 Calgon Corporation Composition for controlling scale in black liquor evaporators
US5407583A (en) * 1991-05-31 1995-04-18 Calgon Corporation Controlling scale in black liquor evaporators
DE4128107A1 (en) * 1991-08-24 1993-02-25 Metallgesellschaft Ag Cryolite deposits removal from equipment or parts of equipment - by contacting equipment with soln. contg. mineral acid and boron cpd., useful in conversion coating of metal surfaces

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of WO9802599A1 *

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20180097263A (en) 2017-02-23 2018-08-31 한승케미칼 주식회사 Waste water treatment method of removing fluorine and cyanides
KR20180114325A (en) 2017-04-10 2018-10-18 김상수 Waste water treatment method of removing fluorine and cyanides using rare metal

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0922124A4 (en) 1999-10-13
DE69712765D1 (en) 2002-06-27
KR100314147B1 (en) 2001-11-16
AU3884197A (en) 1998-02-09
JP3210679B2 (en) 2001-09-17
JP2000513048A (en) 2000-10-03
EP0922124B1 (en) 2002-05-22
CN1225692A (en) 1999-08-11
CA2260172A1 (en) 1998-01-22
DE69712765T2 (en) 2002-12-05
KR20000023805A (en) 2000-04-25
WO1998002599A1 (en) 1998-01-22
ES2179359T3 (en) 2003-01-16
AU710195B2 (en) 1999-09-16
US5993558A (en) 1999-11-30
CA2260172C (en) 2003-01-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA2260205C (en) Minimizing evaporator scaling and recovery of salts during gasification
US5993558A (en) Removal of fluoride-containing scales using aluminum salt solution
US8778037B2 (en) Process of scrubbing volatiles from evaporator water vapor
US4515760A (en) Non-precipitating regulation of ammonia content in sour gas solvent scrubbing systems
JP4271033B2 (en) Method for preventing adhesion and corrosion caused by ammonium chloride and ammonium sulfate
PL108463B1 (en) Method of obtaining pure aluminium oxide
NL8202076A (en) METHOD FOR REMOVING IRON SULFIDE LAYERS FROM METAL SURFACES.
EP0568670B1 (en) Regeneration of hydrochloric acid
Kladnig A review of steel pickling and acid regeneration an environmental contribution
CN1090590C (en) Multisection stripping process for treating acid sewage from oil refinery
US5616306A (en) Method for removal of hydrogen sulfide from gases
MXPA99000649A (en) Elimination of oxide layers containing fluoride using an alumi salt solution
EP0662859A1 (en) Method and apparatus for cleaning a gas.
TW419531B (en) Removal of fluoride-containing scales using aluminum salt solution
US4992164A (en) Method of charge neutralization using chelants
RU2157400C1 (en) Method of minimization of evaporator scale and removal of salts in gasification process
RU2190698C2 (en) Method of cleaning metal surfaces from deposits
Wasco et al. Chemical Removal of Calcium Sulfate Scale.
EP0341802A1 (en) Removal of metal contaminants from oil
Butler Boiler feed waters

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19981231

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): DE ES FR GB IT NL SE

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 19990827

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A4

Designated state(s): DE ES FR GB IT NL SE

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Free format text: 6C 23G 1/00 A, 6C 23G 1/02 B, 6C 23G 1/08 B, 6B 08B 3/00 B, 6C 23G 1/10 B

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19991115

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69712765

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20020627

ET Fr: translation filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2179359

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20030225

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20030612

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20030619

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20030702

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20030703

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20030723

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20030731

Year of fee payment: 7

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040714

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040715

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040715

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050201

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050201

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed
GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20040714

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050331

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee

Effective date: 20050201

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20050714

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20040715