EP0760089A1 - Testing of packages - Google Patents

Testing of packages

Info

Publication number
EP0760089A1
EP0760089A1 EP95917427A EP95917427A EP0760089A1 EP 0760089 A1 EP0760089 A1 EP 0760089A1 EP 95917427 A EP95917427 A EP 95917427A EP 95917427 A EP95917427 A EP 95917427A EP 0760089 A1 EP0760089 A1 EP 0760089A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
test
head
substrate
conveying path
station
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP95917427A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0760089B1 (en
Inventor
Christopher Fenlon
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Ishida Co Ltd
Original Assignee
ISHIDA BISHOPBARN Ltd
ISHIDA-BISHOPBARN Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by ISHIDA BISHOPBARN Ltd, ISHIDA-BISHOPBARN Ltd filed Critical ISHIDA BISHOPBARN Ltd
Publication of EP0760089A1 publication Critical patent/EP0760089A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0760089B1 publication Critical patent/EP0760089B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01M—TESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01M3/00—Investigating fluid-tightness of structures
    • G01M3/02—Investigating fluid-tightness of structures by using fluid or vacuum
    • G01M3/36—Investigating fluid-tightness of structures by using fluid or vacuum by detecting change in dimensions of the structure being tested

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an apparatus and method for testing packages, e.g. packages of snack foods such as bags of crisps.
  • the invention provides test apparatus having conveyor means for conveying test substrates, and one or more test stations arranged along the conveying path; there being at least one such test station having a test head adapted to be moved towards and away from the conveying path; wherein the head is normally urged towards the conveying path so that a package being conveyed along the path contacts the head and urges it away from the conveying path; and wherein the resulting displacement of the head is monitored.
  • the test head is urged solely by gravity towards the conveying path. Its contact surface is desirably such as to allow continuing movement of packages along the conveying surface. It preferably uses an array of low back line pressure rollers.
  • the apparatus has two test stations, each having a test head adapted to be raised by a substrate moving along the conveying path.
  • each test station includes means for deriving a signal related to the displacement of the test head.
  • the apparatus may also include computing means which receives data from the displacement detectors.
  • the test head When a substrate reaches a test station, the test head is raised thereby. If the substrate is "leaky", the test head will then fall somewhat.
  • the first test station is adapted to produce an additive output signal, or the data are treated additively by the computer. That is, if a substrate causes the head to rise by x and then to descend by y, the resulting datum corresponds to (x + y).
  • the second test station leads to a differential datum corresponding to (x - y).
  • the invention provides a method of testing a substrate, comprising conveying the substrate through a test station having a test head arranged so that passage of the substrate urges displacement of the test head, which is urged against the substrate.
  • the displacement of the head is monitored to gain information about the substrate.
  • the method uses apparatus as referred to above.
  • the apparatus shows a conveyor belt 10 having an upper conveying run 12.
  • the run 12 passes through two test stations 14, 16. These are essentially identical.
  • Each has a test head 18 associated with a vertical stem 20 which displaceably engages an encoder 22 which provides an output indicative of relative displacement of the stem 20.
  • the outputs from the encoders 22 are passed to a computer 24.
  • Each head 18 is primarily a carrier for a length of roller chain 26. This is a row of free-running rollers 28. Each roller 28 extends transversely of the conveyor run 12. It actually consists of a multiplicity of coaxial, independently rotatable rollers.
  • roller chain is available from, for example, Rexnord. (Its conventional use is for conveyor belts, to provide a surface on which a conveyed article can be held stationary while the belt continues to run. )
  • the chain 26 At the upstream end of each head 18, there is a lead-in formation 30, the chain 26 extending upwardly at an angle.
  • the heads are freely displaceSble upwardly and downwardly. They are normally gravitationally urged to contact the conveying run 12. (Alternatively they can have stop means so that they do not descend quite that far. )
  • the force can be varied by adding or removing weights 39 to a carrier 42.
  • the computer 24 receives the data from the two encoders 22.
  • the data are analysed to provide information relation to the nature of the package, particularly its compressibility and leakiness.
  • a substrate passes through a test station, it provides two pieces of data; a "rise” value for the amount that the head is raised by the arrival of a substrate; and a “fall” value (which may be zero) relating to the amount that the head falls while the substrate is beneath it.
  • these pieces of data from the first station 14 are combined additively, whereas they are combined substractively at the second station 16. This can give extremely high sensitivity, as will be explained.
  • a sound- package arriving " atr the first station may allow the first head to move down by a distance such that the encoder counts a value of 150. The same will happen at the second test station. But consider a leaky package. At the first test station, some air or gas will be squeezed out, e.g. so that the head moves down by 200 counts. At the second station, if a similar amount of further leakage occurs, the head will move down by 250 counts. Thus the fact that the package is leaky will be shown by the fact that the ratio of the counts from the first station to the counts from the second station is 200:250 instead of 1:1.
  • a package arriving at the first station may raise the first head by 150 counts. If the package is sound, the same would happen at the second station. But if, once again, the package is leaky such that each head descends by 50 counts during passage of the package, then the first head is initially raised to a height of 150 counts and then falls by 50 counts, giving a total (additive) value of 200.
  • the compressed package is such that it will only raise the second head through 100 counts. Assuming once again a leakage fall of 50 counts, the subtractive total is 50 counts. That is to say, the resulting values from the first and second heads are 200 counts and 50 counts.
  • ratio 200:250 instead of a given degree of leakiness being indicated by the ratio 200:250, it is indicated by the ratio 200:50. Clearly this is very much easier to detect. This means that much smaller leaks can be detected. This is further assisted by the consistency and lack of vibration resulting from the use of the gravity-urged system.
  • Data can also be passed to the computer 24 from a keyboard/display unit 50. For example this may be used to set acceptable limits for substrate thickness and leakiness.
  • the apparatus may include means for removing rejected substrates from the conveyor 10., e.g. a blower 52 actuable by the computer.
  • the computer may also receive an input from a substrate detector 60 immediately upstream of the first test station 14.
  • the keyboard can also be used to calibrate the system and allow for differences between the test stations. Thus it is set to calibration mode by means of the keyboard, and a standard. non-leaky substrate is run through the system. If the rise values of the two heads 18 are not identical, the computer stores a compensation value to be added to or substracted from the data given by one encoder.

Abstract

Packages (7) are conveyed through at least one, and preferably two, test stations (14, 16). At each station there is a test head (7) which is urged towards the conveying path, preferably by gravity. As a package (7) is conveyed through a station it displaces the head away from the path. The displacement is monitored. Preferably, subsequent displacement towards the path due to leakage of the package is also monitored.

Description

TESTING OF PACKAGES
The present invention relates to an apparatus and method for testing packages, e.g. packages of snack foods such as bags of crisps.
It is known to test a package by applying a load which tends to compress the package, and monitoring the effect. After an interval, the package may be tested again. For a good package, if the two tests use identical loads, then the package should behave identically, e.g. in terms of the amount of compression. But if the package contains air or other fluid and has a leak, the first test will cause some deflation. Thus the amount of compression will be greater than for a good package. Furthermore the package will already be in a deflated state at the start of the second test, and will undergo further deflation (unless it is already fully deflated). Testing equipment working on this principle has been brought to quite a high level of sophistication, e.g. as described in W093/17317. But we have now" found ways to improve the operation of -such test -systems.
In a first aspect, the invention provides test apparatus having conveyor means for conveying test substrates, and one or more test stations arranged along the conveying path; there being at least one such test station having a test head adapted to be moved towards and away from the conveying path; wherein the head is normally urged towards the conveying path so that a package being conveyed along the path contacts the head and urges it away from the conveying path; and wherein the resulting displacement of the head is monitored. Desirably, the test head is urged solely by gravity towards the conveying path. Its contact surface is desirably such as to allow continuing movement of packages along the conveying surface. It preferably uses an array of low back line pressure rollers.
Since it is the arrival of a substrate that causes the movement of the test head directly, there is no need for sophisticated devices for synchronising the action of a test station with the arrival of a package, or for synchronising the actions of a plurality of test stations. Since the arrival of a substrate acts to raise a test head, if a second substrate arrives while a first substrate is still at the head, this merely causes further raising of the head, if necessary. In contrast, with prior art systems using powered pistons, the result tended to be the bursting of one or more packages. Furthermore, since a test head can be urged by gravity, the mechanism can be very simple. It is also very consistant and reliable, whereas pneumatic systems in particular are prone to variability. They also inevitably introduce vibration.
Preferably the apparatus has two test stations, each having a test head adapted to be raised by a substrate moving along the conveying path. Preferably each test station includes means for deriving a signal related to the displacement of the test head. The apparatus may also include computing means which receives data from the displacement detectors.
When a substrate reaches a test station, the test head is raised thereby. If the substrate is "leaky", the test head will then fall somewhat. Preferably the first test station is adapted to produce an additive output signal, or the data are treated additively by the computer. That is, if a substrate causes the head to rise by x and then to descend by y, the resulting datum corresponds to (x + y). Preferably the second test station leads to a differential datum corresponding to (x - y).
In conventional apparatus having two or more test stations, it is necessary to make careful mechanical adjustments to the relative heights of the test heads. In the present invention, particularly with gravity-urged heads, this is much less of a problem. Furthermore, adjustment can be made electronically, rather than mechanically. Thus if a "good" (non-leaky) substrate is passed through the system, it should give identical values at all test stations. If it does not, a correction can be applied by the computer to the data from one or more test stations.
Should it be desired to vary the load applied by a test head, this can be done simply by adding or removing weights to it.
In further aspect the invention provides a method of testing a substrate, comprising conveying the substrate through a test station having a test head arranged so that passage of the substrate urges displacement of the test head, which is urged against the substrate. The displacement of the head is monitored to gain information about the substrate. Preferably there are two test stations, to which the substrate passes successively. Preferably the method uses apparatus as referred to above.
An embodiment of the invention will now be described in more detail with reference to the accompanying drawing, in which the sole figure is a schematic representation of apparatus embodying the invention.
The apparatus shows a conveyor belt 10 having an upper conveying run 12. The run 12 passes through two test stations 14, 16. These are essentially identical. Each has a test head 18 associated with a vertical stem 20 which displaceably engages an encoder 22 which provides an output indicative of relative displacement of the stem 20. The outputs from the encoders 22 are passed to a computer 24.
Each head 18 is primarily a carrier for a length of roller chain 26. This is a row of free-running rollers 28. Each roller 28 extends transversely of the conveyor run 12. It actually consists of a multiplicity of coaxial, independently rotatable rollers. Such roller chain is available from, for example, Rexnord. (Its conventional use is for conveyor belts, to provide a surface on which a conveyed article can be held stationary while the belt continues to run. ) At the upstream end of each head 18, there is a lead-in formation 30, the chain 26 extending upwardly at an angle.
The heads are freely displaceSble upwardly and downwardly. They are normally gravitationally urged to contact the conveying run 12. (Alternatively they can have stop means so that they do not descend quite that far. ) The force can be varied by adding or removing weights 39 to a carrier 42. When a substrate 7, such as a packet of crisps, passes along the conveyor 10, it contacts the first lead-in 30 of the first head 18, causing it to rise. The amount of the rise is sensed by the encoder 22. As the substrate passes between the head and the conveyor, for the main, flat length 32 of the head, the head should not move. But if the packet leaks, the head will descend somewhat. Any such descent is also sensed by the encoder 22. The package leaves the first test station, and a similar sequence of events happens at the second test station 16.
The computer 24 receives the data from the two encoders 22. The data are analysed to provide information relation to the nature of the package, particularly its compressibility and leakiness.
As a substrate passes through a test station, it provides two pieces of data; a "rise" value for the amount that the head is raised by the arrival of a substrate; and a "fall" value (which may be zero) relating to the amount that the head falls while the substrate is beneath it. Preferably these pieces of data from the first station 14 are combined additively, whereas they are combined substractively at the second station 16. This can give extremely high sensitivity, as will be explained.
With a conventional apparatus, having two test stations each having a plunger which is forced down onto a substrate, a sound- package arriving "atr the first station may allow the first head to move down by a distance such that the encoder counts a value of 150. The same will happen at the second test station. But consider a leaky package. At the first test station, some air or gas will be squeezed out, e.g. so that the head moves down by 200 counts. At the second station, if a similar amount of further leakage occurs, the head will move down by 250 counts. Thus the fact that the package is leaky will be shown by the fact that the ratio of the counts from the first station to the counts from the second station is 200:250 instead of 1:1. With the apparatus embodying the present invention, in a similar situation, a package arriving at the first station may raise the first head by 150 counts. If the package is sound, the same would happen at the second station. But if, once again, the package is leaky such that each head descends by 50 counts during passage of the package, then the first head is initially raised to a height of 150 counts and then falls by 50 counts, giving a total (additive) value of 200. The compressed package is such that it will only raise the second head through 100 counts. Assuming once again a leakage fall of 50 counts, the subtractive total is 50 counts. That is to say, the resulting values from the first and second heads are 200 counts and 50 counts. Thus instead of a given degree of leakiness being indicated by the ratio 200:250, it is indicated by the ratio 200:50. Clearly this is very much easier to detect. This means that much smaller leaks can be detected. This is further assisted by the consistency and lack of vibration resulting from the use of the gravity-urged system.
Data can also be passed to the computer 24 from a keyboard/display unit 50. For example this may be used to set acceptable limits for substrate thickness and leakiness. The apparatus may include means for removing rejected substrates from the conveyor 10., e.g. a blower 52 actuable by the computer. The computer may also receive an input from a substrate detector 60 immediately upstream of the first test station 14.
The keyboard can also be used to calibrate the system and allow for differences between the test stations. Thus it is set to calibration mode by means of the keyboard, and a standard. non-leaky substrate is run through the system. If the rise values of the two heads 18 are not identical, the computer stores a compensation value to be added to or substracted from the data given by one encoder.

Claims

CLAIMS :
1. Test apparatus having conveyor means (10) for conveying test substrates (7) , and one or more test stations (14,16) arranged along the conveying path (12); there being at least one such test station (14,16) having a test head (18) adapted to be moved towards and away from the conveying path; wherein the head (18) is normally urged towards the conveying path so that a package being conveyed along the path contacts the head and urges it away from the conveying path; and wherein the resulting displacement of the head is monitored.
2. Apparatus according to claim 1 wherein the test head (18) is urged solely by gravity towards the conveying path.
3. Apparatus according to claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the test head's contact surface is adapted to allow continuing movement of packages along the conveying surface.
4. Apparatus according to claim 3 wherein the contact surface is provided by an array of low back line pressure rollers.
5. Apparatus according to any preceding claim wherein the apparatus has two test stations, each having a test head adapted to be raised by a substrate moving along the conveying path.
6. Apparatus according to claim 5 wherein each test station includes means for deriving a signal related to the displacement of the test head, and the test apparatus includes computing means which receives data from the displacement detectors.
7. Apparatus according to claim 5 or claim 6 having means for determining at each test station a rise value R related to the distance through which the head is moved away from the conveying path by a package, and a fall value F related to the distance through which the head returns towards the conveying path while in contact with the package; and means for determining (R + F) for the first test station and (R - F) for the second test station.
8. Apparatus according to any preceding claim wherein the or each test head is adapted to receive weights to vary the load applied to that head.
9. A method of testing a substrate, comprising conveying the substrate through a test station having a test head arranged so that passage of the substrate urges displacement of the test head, which is urged against the substrate, and monitoring the displacement to gain information about the substrate.
10. A method according to claim 9 wherein the substrate passes successively through two test stations .
11. A method according to claim 9 or 10 which uses apparatus according to any of claims 1 to 8.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26.
EP95917427A 1994-05-03 1995-05-03 Testing of packages Expired - Lifetime EP0760089B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9408705 1994-05-03
GB9408705A GB9408705D0 (en) 1994-05-03 1994-05-03 Testing of packages
PCT/GB1995/001010 WO1995030137A1 (en) 1994-05-03 1995-05-03 Testing of packages

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0760089A1 true EP0760089A1 (en) 1997-03-05
EP0760089B1 EP0760089B1 (en) 2000-07-19

Family

ID=10754457

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP95917427A Expired - Lifetime EP0760089B1 (en) 1994-05-03 1995-05-03 Testing of packages

Country Status (9)

Country Link
US (1) US5786530A (en)
EP (1) EP0760089B1 (en)
JP (1) JPH09511831A (en)
AU (1) AU689255B2 (en)
DE (1) DE69518074T2 (en)
DK (1) DK0760089T3 (en)
ES (1) ES2149983T3 (en)
GB (1) GB9408705D0 (en)
WO (1) WO1995030137A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (32)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6202476B1 (en) * 1995-08-25 2001-03-20 Testamatic Limited Method of and apparatus for testing for leaks in a package
DE19542651C1 (en) * 1995-11-15 1997-01-09 Bosch Gmbh Robert Device for checking the tightness of tubular bag packs
GB9601014D0 (en) * 1996-01-18 1996-03-20 Testamatic Ltd Package tester
US6105419A (en) * 1997-03-25 2000-08-22 Recot, Inc. Apparatus and process for inspecting sealed packages
DE60001684T2 (en) 1999-04-07 2004-02-05 Ishida Co., Ltd. System for automatically checking packaging
DE60040640D1 (en) 1999-09-27 2008-12-11 Ishida Seisakusho Sealing seam inspection device for bagged goods
JP4498622B2 (en) * 2001-01-23 2010-07-07 株式会社イシダ Seal check device
JP4498626B2 (en) * 2001-02-08 2010-07-07 株式会社イシダ Seal check device
ITBO20010371A1 (en) * 2001-06-12 2002-12-12 Ima Spa METHOD FOR VERIFYING THE INTEGRITY OF PACKAGES, IN PARTICULAR SINGLE DOSE, AND STATION THAT IMPLEMENTS THIS METHOD
US6941796B2 (en) * 2001-07-03 2005-09-13 Ishida Co., Ltd. Package handling apparatus detecting package height
GB0116746D0 (en) * 2001-07-09 2001-08-29 Ishida Europ Mfg Ltd Conditioning of packages
US6470733B1 (en) * 2001-08-03 2002-10-29 Wayne R. Barr Automatic testing of package content and integrity
US6834533B2 (en) * 2001-10-31 2004-12-28 Lockheed Martin Corporation System and method for detecting bio-hazardous particulates in mail handling systems
US6711939B2 (en) * 2001-12-07 2004-03-30 Lockheed Martin Corporation Method and system for expelling test-sample volumes from luggage/packages
AUPS105202A0 (en) * 2002-03-12 2002-04-11 Tna Australia Pty Limited A conveyor
GB0315973D0 (en) * 2003-07-08 2003-08-13 Ishida Europ Ltd Seal testing apparatus
US7107823B1 (en) * 2003-11-17 2006-09-19 Cpor Solutions, Inc. Package seal inspecting apparatus, and method for inspecting package seals
US7231749B2 (en) * 2004-09-02 2007-06-19 Sealed Air Corporation (Us) Apparatus and system for detecting under-filled cushions
NL1028103C2 (en) * 2005-01-24 2006-07-25 Blueprint Holding Bv Density determination of packaging.
JP4699188B2 (en) * 2005-11-30 2011-06-08 株式会社イシダ Seal check device
JP4927399B2 (en) * 2005-12-22 2012-05-09 株式会社イシダ Seal check device
DE102007029278A1 (en) * 2007-06-22 2008-12-24 Haver & Boecker Ohg Packing machine and discharge device for a packing machine
JP5551981B2 (en) * 2009-07-28 2014-07-16 株式会社イシダ Boxing equipment
EP2929314A4 (en) * 2012-12-05 2016-07-27 Univ Florida Method and apparatus for testing quality of seal and package integrity
US9346169B2 (en) 2014-10-03 2016-05-24 Frito-Lay North America, Inc. Apparatus and method for universal, flexible pillow bag pattern creation
US9802720B2 (en) 2014-10-03 2017-10-31 Frito-Lay North America, Inc. Apparatus and method for maintaining a pattern of non-rigid objects in a desired position and orientation
US9346170B2 (en) 2014-10-03 2016-05-24 Frito-Lay North America, Inc. Apparatus and method for universal, flexible pillow bag pattern creation
US11059185B2 (en) 2014-10-03 2021-07-13 Frito-Lay North America, Inc. Apparatus and method for transferring a pattern from a universal surface to an ultimate package
CN105890853B (en) * 2016-04-11 2018-05-18 中国计量学院 Swim ring gas leakage on-line measuring device and its detection method
GB2549985B (en) * 2016-05-06 2020-01-08 Ishida Europe Ltd Container leak detection
EP3730915B1 (en) * 2019-04-25 2021-12-22 Snack Engineering Ltd Seal tester apparatus and method
CN111442887B (en) * 2020-05-25 2020-10-27 盐城佳华塑料制品有限公司 Finished product water wing leak hunting production line

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3195724A (en) * 1961-08-22 1965-07-20 Francis M Whitacre Machine for testing sealed cans and for rejecting defective cans
NL7606232A (en) * 1976-06-09 1977-12-13 Bouwe Prakken DEVICE FOR LINE-FILLED SEALED PACKAGING BAGS REMOVING NON-SEALED BAGS.
JPS59163532A (en) * 1983-03-09 1984-09-14 Hokkai Can Co Ltd Method and device for inspecting internal pressure of tightly sealed-up vessel
GB2138150B (en) * 1983-04-16 1986-04-30 Bishopbarn Ltd Package leak testing apparatus
GB8506443D0 (en) * 1985-03-13 1985-04-17 Bishopbarn Ltd Testing leaks in packages
GB9204137D0 (en) * 1992-02-26 1992-04-08 Fenlon Christopher Sealed package integrity testing machine
GB9205011D0 (en) * 1992-03-07 1992-04-22 Fenlon Christopher Sealed package integrity testing machine
US5251422A (en) * 1992-03-26 1993-10-12 Prototype Equipment Corporation Potato chip package vertical packaging machine
US5533385A (en) * 1995-02-06 1996-07-09 Frievalt; William Package seal integrity testing device and method of operation thereof

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO9530137A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH09511831A (en) 1997-11-25
AU2349995A (en) 1995-11-29
DE69518074D1 (en) 2000-08-24
DK0760089T3 (en) 2000-10-30
EP0760089B1 (en) 2000-07-19
DE69518074T2 (en) 2001-03-22
AU689255B2 (en) 1998-03-26
WO1995030137A1 (en) 1995-11-09
GB9408705D0 (en) 1994-06-22
ES2149983T3 (en) 2000-11-16
US5786530A (en) 1998-07-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU689255B2 (en) Testing of packages
US5542288A (en) Testing of packages
US4649740A (en) Apparatus for and method of testing for leaks in packages
US6941796B2 (en) Package handling apparatus detecting package height
US6955256B2 (en) Conveyor
US5531101A (en) Package testing
US20080115566A1 (en) Determination of the Seal Quality of Packages
US5258579A (en) Weighing method and weighing apparatus
WO2005005949A1 (en) Seal integrity testing apparatus and method
EP0540148A1 (en) Bag seal tester
EP1411337B1 (en) Apparatus for inspecting sealed packages
GB2259776A (en) Flexible envelope testing method and apparatus
EP2187192A2 (en) Method and apparatus for detecting leaks in food packages
GB2264564A (en) Sealed package integrity testing machine.
JP2003149073A (en) Method and device for detecting defectively sealed package
JP4302808B2 (en) Product inspection equipment
AU2003200907B2 (en) A conveyor
JPH0719112U (en) Device for detecting defective sealing of packaging bags
EP1538434A1 (en) Method and apparatus for leak testing gas-filled flexible packages

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19961126

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): CH DE DK ES FR GB IT LI NL

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: ISHIDA CO., LTD.

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19990119

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): CH DE DK ES FR GB IT LI NL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69518074

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20000824

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: PORTA CHECCACCI & ASSOCIATI S.P.A.

ET Fr: translation filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2149983

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20040517

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20050503

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20050511

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20050513

Year of fee payment: 11

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050531

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050531

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20050624

Year of fee payment: 11

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20060504

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20060531

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20060531

Year of fee payment: 12

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20061201

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EBP

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee

Effective date: 20061201

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20070131

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20060504

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20060531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20070503

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20100329

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20100430

Year of fee payment: 16

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 69518074

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 69518074

Country of ref document: DE

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20110503

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110503

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20111130