EP0045017B1 - Process for surface treatment of stainless steel sheet - Google Patents

Process for surface treatment of stainless steel sheet Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0045017B1
EP0045017B1 EP81105614A EP81105614A EP0045017B1 EP 0045017 B1 EP0045017 B1 EP 0045017B1 EP 81105614 A EP81105614 A EP 81105614A EP 81105614 A EP81105614 A EP 81105614A EP 0045017 B1 EP0045017 B1 EP 0045017B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
weight
treatment
stainless steel
steel sheet
phosphoric acid
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
EP81105614A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0045017A1 (en
Inventor
Tomoge Hitomi
Takehisa Konishi
Tetsutaro Ogushi
Kazuaki Hatakeyama
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Kinzoku Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Nippon Kinzoku Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from JP10155580A external-priority patent/JPS5847477B2/en
Priority claimed from JP10155680A external-priority patent/JPS5847478B2/en
Priority claimed from JP11586580A external-priority patent/JPS5847479B2/en
Priority claimed from JP56085952A external-priority patent/JPS5912755B2/en
Application filed by Nippon Kinzoku Co Ltd filed Critical Nippon Kinzoku Co Ltd
Publication of EP0045017A1 publication Critical patent/EP0045017A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0045017B1 publication Critical patent/EP0045017B1/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25DPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25D9/00Electrolytic coating other than with metals
    • C25D9/04Electrolytic coating other than with metals with inorganic materials
    • C25D9/08Electrolytic coating other than with metals with inorganic materials by cathodic processes
    • C25D9/10Electrolytic coating other than with metals with inorganic materials by cathodic processes on iron or steel

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a process for surface treatment of a stainless steel sheet (including a stainless steel strip) according to which electrochemical treatment is performed using the stainless steel sheet as a cathode for forming a noncorroding film on the surface thereof.
  • Chrome plating is known as a process for surface treatment of this type.
  • Chrome plating is a kind of electroplating according to which a surface film of pure chrome is formed on the surface of the stainless steel sheet by electrodeposition of metal chrome.
  • This surface film is advantageous in that it is noncorroding and has excellent gloss.
  • This film is utilized for treating stainless steel sheets which are inexpensive but are not sufficiently noncorroding, such as sheets according to JIS SUS430.
  • this chrome plating adopts as a treatment solution a mixture of sulfuric acid and chromic acid of high concentration. For this reason, the waste solution from the treatment contains a large amount of chromic acid and thus requires costly treatment for prevention of pollution.
  • Chrome plating further requires a large current of over several amperes per dm 2 and a long treatment time. This plating process thus results in great power consumption (e.g. integrated current density 6,000 A ⁇ sec/dm 2 ) and higher treatment cost.
  • Japanese Patent Disclosure (Kokai) No. 53-30434 proposes, as an alternative to chrome plating, to perform an electrochemical treatment using a mixture of chromic acid, dichromic acid and phosphoric acid as a treatment solution, and a stainless steel sheet as a cathode for forming a noncorroding film on the surface of the stainless steel sheet.
  • This process is advantageous in that the concentration of residual chromic acid in the solution is low, and the treatment of the waste solution is easy. Furthermore, a corrosion resistance comparable to that obtained with chromic plating may be obtained with a smaller current density and a shorter conduction time.
  • the present invention has been made in view of this and has for its object to provide a process for surface treatment of a stainless steel sheet wherein the treatment solution is improved so that gloss and resistance to sulfurous acid are improved.
  • a process for surface treatment of a stainless steel sheet is characterized by dipping a stainless steel sheet having a BA film or a passive film in a treatment solution and carrying out cathodic treatment under conditions of 1 to 600 A ⁇ sec/dm 2 integrated current density and 0 to 90°C solution temperature, said treatment solution containing 0.1 to 70.0% by weight of phosphoric acid, 0.1 to 10.0% by weight of a molybdate and/or 0.1 to 10.0% by weight of chromic acid, and 0.1 to 2% by weight of a member selected from the group consisting of magnesium oxide, sodium silicate, and mixtures thereof.
  • a process for surface treatment of a stainless steel sheet is characterized by dipping a stainless steel sheet having a BA (bright annealing) film or a passive film in a treatment solution and carrying out cathodic treatment under conditions of 1 to 600 A.sec/dm 2 integrated current density and 10 to 90°C solution temperature, said treatment solution containing 0.1 to 50.0% by weight of phosphoric acid, 0.1 to 10.0% by weight of chromic acid, and 0.1 to 2% by weight of a member selected from the group consisting of magnesium oxide, sodium silicate, and mixtures thereof.
  • BA blue annealing
  • a process for surface treatment of a stainless steel sheet is characterized by, before or after dipping a stainless steel having a BA film or a passive film in a first treatment solution containing 0.1 to 50.0% by weight of phosphoric acid, 0.1 to 10.0% by weight of chromic acid, and 0.1 to 2.0% by weight of a member selected from the group consisting of magnesium oxide, sodium silicate and mixtures thereof and carrying out cathodic treatment under the conditions of 1 to 600 A.sec/dm 2 integrated current density and 0 to 90°C solution temperature, dipping the stainless steel sheet in a second treatment solution containing 0.1 to 70% by weight of phosphoric acid and 0.1 to 10% by weight of a molybdate and carrying out cathodic treatment under the conditions of 1 to 600 A.sec/dm 2 integrated current density and 10 to 90°C solution temperature.
  • a process for surface treatment of a stainless steel sheet is characterized by dipping a stainless steel sheet having a BA film or a passive film in a 0.1 to 70% by weight aqueous solution of phosphoric acid, and carrying out cathodic treatment under the conditions of 1 to 600 A.sec/dm 2 integrated current density and 10 to 90°C solution temperature, utilizing the stainless steel as a cathode and metal molybdenum as an anode.
  • a BA (bright annealing) film or a passive film must be formed on the surface of the stainless steel sheet to be treated.
  • the BA film or the passive film is a film which renders the surface of the stainless steel sheet inactive.
  • the BA film may be obtained by bright heat- treatment according to which the sheet is heated in a vacuum, an inert gas, a reducing gas, or a hot salt.
  • the passive film may be obtained by leaving the sheet in air or dipping the stainless steel sheet in a 20% (by volume) aqueous solution of nitric acid at room temperature for 30 minutes or at 65°C for 10 minutes.
  • a stainless steel sheet having a BA film or a passive film formed thereon undergoes cathodic treatment in a treatment solution containing phosphoric acid, chromic acid, magnesium oxide and/or sodium silicate.
  • Phosphoric acid and chromic acid contained in this treatment solution are necessary components for forming a noncorroding film on the surface of the stainless steel sheet.
  • the lower limit of the amount of phosphoric acid to be used has been set at 0.1 % by weight since with smaller amounts of phosphoric acid satisfactory corrosion resistance may not be obtained.
  • the upper limit of phosphoric acid to be used has also been set to 50% by weight, since larger amounts of phosphoric acid may result in more or less loss of gloss at the surface of the stainless sheet and a greater waste of solution.
  • the preferable range of the amount of phosphoric acid to be used herein is 5 to 20% by weight.
  • the range for the amount of chromic acid has also been set between 0.1 and 10.0% by weight for the same reason as in the case of phosphoric acid. When the amount of chromic acid is not in this range satisfactory corrosion resistance may not be obtained. When the amount of chromic acid is out of this range surface gloss is lost and the amount of the waste solution will be great.
  • the preferable range of the amount of chromic acid is 0.5 to 1.8% by weight.
  • Magnesium oxide and sodium silicate are components for preventing loss of gloss at the surface of the stainless steel sheet.
  • the range of the amount of magnesium oxide has been limited since satisfactory gloss may not be obtained below 0.1% or above 2.0% by weight.
  • the preferable range of the amount of magnesium oxide is 0.5 to 1.5% by weight.
  • the amount of sodium silicate has been limited between 0.1 and 2% by weight. When this amount is less than 0.1% by weight satisfactory gloss may not be obtained. When the amount of sodium silicate exceeds 2% by weight it precipitates in the form of gel from the solution so that it may not exhibit the advantageous effects of sodium silicate.
  • the preferable range of sodium silicate is 0.1 to 0.8% by weight. When both magnesium oxide and sodium silicate are employed as a mixture the amount of the mixture ranges between 0.1 and 2% by weight.
  • the amount of the mixture of magnesium oxide and sodium silicate ranges beteween 1.0 and 1.8% by weight.
  • the treating conditions for cathodic treatment in such a treatment solution are 1 to 600 A.sec/dm 2 integrated current density and 0 to 90°C solution temperature.
  • the integrated current density has been limited to the range of 1 to 600 A ⁇ sec/dm 2 since a lower integrated current density than 1 A ⁇ sec/dm 2 results in insufficient corrosion resistance and a higher integrated current density than 600 A.sec/dm 2 results in unsatisfactory surface gloss and higher cost.
  • the preferable range of integrated current density is 60 to 360 A ⁇ sec/dm 2 .
  • the solution temperature has been limited to the range of 0 to 90°C since the solution temperature below 0°C results in a longer treating time and difficulty in maintaining the temperature of the treatment solution; a higher solution temperature than 90°C results in degradation in quality of the treatment solution.
  • the preferable range of solution temperature is 50 to 70°C.
  • the present invention provides three options:
  • the mixing ratio of the respective components in the first treatment solution is the same as that described before with reference to the first aspect of the present invention.
  • the mixing ratio of the respective components of the second treatment solution is the same as that described with reference to the first preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • the cathodic treatment conditions in the first treatment solution are 1 to 600 A-sec/dm 2 in integrated current density, and 0 to 90°C in solution temperature, preferably 10 to 30°C.
  • the integrated current density has been limited to this range for the reasons as described below. When the integrated current density is below 1 A.sec/dm 2 , the gloss may be maintained but the resistance to corrosion, such as resistance to sulfurous acid, salt damage (table 1) and so on, is not satisfactory.
  • the integrated current density exceeds 600 A-sec/dm 2 , the gloss may not be maintained and the process is uneconomical.
  • the temperature of this treatment solution should be controlled between 0 and 90°C for the reasons to be described below. When the solution temperature is below 0°C, the treatment time becomes longer and maintenance of the temperature of treatment solution becomes difficult.
  • the treatment time may be shortened and the power consumption may be reduced with an increase in temperature of the treatment solution.
  • a solution temperature ranging from 70 to 90°C
  • a film of sufficient corrosion resistance may be formed on the surface of the stainless steel sheet with an integrated current density of below 1 A.sec/dm 2 , or even at 0 A ⁇ sec/dm 2 (dipping in the solution with no electric current flowing through the stainless steel sheet).
  • the cathodic treatment conditions in the second treatment solution are 1 to 600 A-sec/dm 2 integrated current density, and 10 to 90°C solution temperature, preferably 40 to 60°C.
  • the integrated current density has been set within the range of 1 to 600 A ⁇ sec/dm 2 for the reasons to be described below. When the integrated current density is below 1 A-sec/dm 2 , the gloss may be obtained but the corrosion resistance may not be sufficient. When the integrated current density exceeds 600 A-sec/dm 2 , the surface gloss may not be obtained, discoloration may occur, and the process is uneconomical. Particularly for improving the resistance to sulfurous acid, it is preferable to set the integrated current density within the range of 60 to 200 A ⁇ sec/dm 2 .
  • the integrated current density is preferable to set within the range of 40 to 80 A-sec/dm 2 .
  • the integrated current density is preferably set within the range of 60 to 80 A-secldm 2 .
  • the solution temperature of the second treatment solution has been set to be within the range of 0 to 90°C for the same reasons described with reference to the second aspect of the present invention.
  • the treatment time may be shortened and the power consumption may be reduced with a higher solution temperature.
  • a solution temperature ranging from 70 to 90°C
  • a corrosion resistant film may be formed on the surface of the stainless steel sheet with an integrated current density of below 1 A.sec/dm 2 , or even at 0 A ⁇ sec/dm 2 (dipping in the solution with no electric current flowing through the stainless steel sheet).
  • the cathodic treatment conditions with a solution mixture of the first and second treatment solutions may be substantially the same as those described with reference to the cathodic treatment with either the first or second treatment solution, and may be appropriately selected accordingly.
  • a stainless steel sheet having a BA film or a passive filmed formed thereon is dipped in an aqueous solution containing 0.1 to 70% by weight of phosphoric acid, preferable 5 to 50% by weight, and cathodic treatment of the stainless steel sheet is carried out under the treatment conditions of 1 to 600 A.sec/dm 2 integrated current density, and 10 to 90°C solution temperature, preferably 40 to 60°C, using the stainless steel sheet as a cathode and metal molybdenum as an anode.
  • the reasons for setting the phosphoric acid amount and the cathodic protection conditions are the same as those described with reference to the second aspect of the present invention.
  • Metal molybdenum is used as the anode in this process for electrolytically eluting the metal molybdenum during electrolysis.
  • This metal molybdenum improves the resistance to sulfurous acid of the noncorroding film formed on the surface of the stainless steel sheet. It also maintains excellent gloss.
  • Metal molybdenum of higher purity is preferable for improving the corrosion resistance to thereby prevent degradation of the treatment solution.
  • the metal molybdenum as the anode since the metal molybdenum as the anode is electrolytically eluted, the molybdate need not be incorporated in advance, thus improving the workability of the treatment. Furthermore, since the metal molybdenum does not contain a large amount of impurities, it prevents degradation in quality of the treatment solution and prolongs the life of the treatment solution.
  • the treatment time may be shortened with a higher solution temperature and a greater current density.
  • a corrosion resistant film may be formed, generally, in 10 seconds to 10 minutes.
  • a film having corrosion resistance may be formed on the surface of a stainless steel sheet, and its corrosion resistance will not be degraded for a long period of time after treatment.
  • This film is rich in gloss and improves the resistance to corrosion of a stainless steel sheet having insufficient resistance to corrosion, thus improving its product value.
  • JIS SUS 430 No. 1
  • JIS SUS 434 No. 2
  • JIS SUS 304 No. 3
  • the treatment solution contained 9.25% by weight of phosphoric acid, 1.68% by weight of chromic acid, 0.78% by weight of magnesium oxide, and 0.10% by weight of sodium silicate.
  • the stainless steel sheets were subjected to cathodic treatment for 3 minutes at a current density of 2.0 Aldm 2 and a solution temperature of 20°C.
  • Example 3 The gloss of the surfaces of the stainless steel sheets obtained in Example 1 was compared with the gloss of the stainless steel sheets having the BAfilm formed thereon. The presence or absence of gloss was evaluated. The obtained results are shown in Table 3.
  • Stainless steel sheet raw materials were used which were obtained by bright annealing the sheets according to JIS SUS 430, JIS SUS 434, and JIS SUS 420J2 to form BA films, and by hair-line treating (forming a passive film on) the sheet according to JIS SUS 304.
  • the treatment solution contained 9.37% by weight of phosphoric acid and 1.34% by weight of sodium molybdate.
  • a stainless steel sheet as in the above example was similarly subjected to cathodic treatment with a treatment solution which contained phosphoric acid but which did not contain a molybdate.
  • the results of the corrosion resistance test on this stainless steel sheet are also shown in Table 4.
  • Example 3 The surface gloss of the stainless steel sheet (JIS SUS 430) obtained in Example 3 was compared with that of the stainless steel sheet having the BA film formed thereon. The presence or absence of gloss was evaluated. The obtained results are shown in Table 5.
  • Stainless steel sheets were used which were obtained by bright annealing sheets according to JIS SUS 430 to form BA films thereon.
  • the first treatment solution contained 9.25% by weight of phosphoric acid, 1.68% by weight of chromic acid, 0.78% by weight of magnesium oxide, and 0.10% by weight of sodium silicate.
  • the stainless steel sheets were subjected to cathodic treatment by varying the treatment conditions within the ranges according to the present invention.
  • the second treatment solution contained 9.37% by weight of phosphoric acid and 1.34% by weight of sodium molybdate.
  • the stainless steel sheets were subjected to cathodic treatment again by varying the treatment conditions within the ranges according to the present invention.
  • the stainless steel sheets surface-treated in this manner were subjected to the corrosion resistance test according to the method shown in Table 1 (the resistance to sulfurous acid was evaluated according to the sulfurous acid gas corrosion test as defined in Dln, and the resistance to salt damage was evaluated according to the Dip and Dry method (GM conditions)).
  • the obtained results are shown in Table 6.
  • Observations were made on gloss and discoloration of the surfaces of the sheets, and the obtained results are also shown in Table 6.
  • stainless steel sheets were subjected to various treatment methods. Some stainless steel sheets were subjected to the first and second treatments wherein the treatment conditions deviated from the ranges according to the present invention (Nos. 9 to 12). A stainless steel sheet was subjected to cathodic treatment in the first treatment solution but not to the second treatment (No. 13). Stainless steel sheets were subjected to the first treatment but not to the second treatment (Nos. 14 and 15). A stainless steel sheet which did not have a BA film was subjected to the first and second treatments (No. 16). A stainless steel sheet was subjected to the second treatment first and to the first treatment thereafter (No. 17). A stainless steel sheet was subjected to a treatment with a solution mixture of the first and second treatment solutions (No. 18). These stainless steel sheets were subjected to the corrosion resistance test and were evaluated for gloss and discoloration. The results are shown in Table 6.
  • the composition of the solution mixture was 9.37% by weight of phosphoric acid, 1.68% by weight of chromic acid, 0.78% by weight of magnesium oxide, and 1.34% by weight of a molybdate.
  • the treatment conditions were 1 Aldm 2 current density, 60 second treatment time, and 50°C solution temperature.
  • stainless steel sheets were subjected to dipping (without conduction of current) instead of cathodic treatment in the first and second treatment solutions (Nos. 19 to 21). These stainless steel sheets were subjected to the corrosion resistance test and were evaluated for gloss and discoloration. The results are shown in Table 6.
  • Stainless steel sheets were obtained by bright annealing the sheets according to JIS SUS 430 to form BA films thereon. A treatment was carried out using these sheets as cathodes and metal molybdenum plates of 99.0% by weight purity as anodes in a treatment solution containing 10% by weight of phosphoric acid.
  • the stainless steel sheet having a BA film was also subjected to the corrosion resistance test and the obtained results are shown in Table 7.
  • the stainless steel sheet having neither the BA film nor the passive film was subjected to cathodic treatment under the same conditions as in the example.
  • the results of the corrosion resistance test of this sheet are also shown in Table 7.
  • a treatment solution containing sodium molybdenum also results in good corrosion resistance of the resultant sheet. However, as will be made clear in Example 8, degradation in quality of the treatment solution is significant with this composition.
  • the surface gloss of the stainless steel sheet (JIS SUS 430) obtained in Example 6 was compared with that of the stainless steel sheet having a BA film formed thereon. Evaluations were made as to the presence or absence of gloss. The obtained results are shown in Table 8.
  • Example 6 To the treatment solution used in Example 6 was added 0.5% by weight of sodium molybdate. Cathodic treatment was carried out using a ferrite anode. Degradation in quality of the treatment solution was evaluated. Degradation in quality of the treatment solution was first observed after 25 hours.
  • a belt-shaped plate of a sample 100 mm in width was continuously treated in 1 liter of the electrolytic solution.
  • the solution was judged to have degraded when the rusting rate according to the sulfurous acid resistance test exceeded 10%.
  • corrosion resistance particularly resistance to sulfurous acid
  • gloss may be maintained, providing an excellent process for surface treatment of stainless steel sheets for automobiles.
  • preparation for the treatment is easy and degradation in the treatment solution may be prevented for a long period of time.

Description

  • The present invention relates to a process for surface treatment of a stainless steel sheet (including a stainless steel strip) according to which electrochemical treatment is performed using the stainless steel sheet as a cathode for forming a noncorroding film on the surface thereof.
  • Chrome plating is known as a process for surface treatment of this type. Chrome plating is a kind of electroplating according to which a surface film of pure chrome is formed on the surface of the stainless steel sheet by electrodeposition of metal chrome. This surface film is advantageous in that it is noncorroding and has excellent gloss. This film is utilized for treating stainless steel sheets which are inexpensive but are not sufficiently noncorroding, such as sheets according to JIS SUS430.
  • However, this chrome plating adopts as a treatment solution a mixture of sulfuric acid and chromic acid of high concentration. For this reason, the waste solution from the treatment contains a large amount of chromic acid and thus requires costly treatment for prevention of pollution.
  • Chrome plating further requires a large current of over several amperes per dm2 and a long treatment time. This plating process thus results in great power consumption (e.g. integrated current density 6,000 A·sec/dm2) and higher treatment cost.
  • In view of these problems, Japanese Patent Disclosure (Kokai) No. 53-30434 proposes, as an alternative to chrome plating, to perform an electrochemical treatment using a mixture of chromic acid, dichromic acid and phosphoric acid as a treatment solution, and a stainless steel sheet as a cathode for forming a noncorroding film on the surface of the stainless steel sheet.
  • This process is advantageous in that the concentration of residual chromic acid in the solution is low, and the treatment of the waste solution is easy. Furthermore, a corrosion resistance comparable to that obtained with chromic plating may be obtained with a smaller current density and a shorter conduction time.
  • However, this process has drawbacks in that resistance to sulfurous acid which is essential in stainless steel sheets for automobiles is poor, and surface gloss is poor, thus reducing the product value as compared with chrome-plated stainless steel sheets.
  • The present invention has been made in view of this and has for its object to provide a process for surface treatment of a stainless steel sheet wherein the treatment solution is improved so that gloss and resistance to sulfurous acid are improved.
  • The solution of this task according to the invention is realized in that a process for surface treatment of a stainless steel sheet is characterized by dipping a stainless steel sheet having a BA film or a passive film in a treatment solution and carrying out cathodic treatment under conditions of 1 to 600 A·sec/dm2 integrated current density and 0 to 90°C solution temperature, said treatment solution containing 0.1 to 70.0% by weight of phosphoric acid, 0.1 to 10.0% by weight of a molybdate and/or 0.1 to 10.0% by weight of chromic acid, and 0.1 to 2% by weight of a member selected from the group consisting of magnesium oxide, sodium silicate, and mixtures thereof.
  • According to a first aspect of the present invention, a process for surface treatment of a stainless steel sheet is characterized by dipping a stainless steel sheet having a BA (bright annealing) film or a passive film in a treatment solution and carrying out cathodic treatment under conditions of 1 to 600 A.sec/dm2 integrated current density and 10 to 90°C solution temperature, said treatment solution containing 0.1 to 50.0% by weight of phosphoric acid, 0.1 to 10.0% by weight of chromic acid, and 0.1 to 2% by weight of a member selected from the group consisting of magnesium oxide, sodium silicate, and mixtures thereof.
  • According to a first preferred embodiment of the present invention, a process for surface treatment of a stainless steel sheet is characterized by, before or after dipping a stainless steel having a BA film or a passive film in a first treatment solution containing 0.1 to 50.0% by weight of phosphoric acid, 0.1 to 10.0% by weight of chromic acid, and 0.1 to 2.0% by weight of a member selected from the group consisting of magnesium oxide, sodium silicate and mixtures thereof and carrying out cathodic treatment under the conditions of 1 to 600 A.sec/dm2 integrated current density and 0 to 90°C solution temperature, dipping the stainless steel sheet in a second treatment solution containing 0.1 to 70% by weight of phosphoric acid and 0.1 to 10% by weight of a molybdate and carrying out cathodic treatment under the conditions of 1 to 600 A.sec/dm2 integrated current density and 10 to 90°C solution temperature.
  • According to another preferred embodiment of the present invention, a process for surface treatment of a stainless steel sheet having a BA film or a passive film in a treatment solution containing 0.1 to 50.0% by weight of phosphoric acid, 0.1 to 10.0% by weight of chromic acid, 0.1 to 2.0% by weight of a member selected from the group consisting of magnesium oxide, sodium silicate and mixtures thereof, and 0.1 to 10.0% by weight of a molybdate, and carrying out cathodic treatment under the conditions of 1 to 600 A·sec/dm2 integrated current density and 10 to 90°C solution temperature.
  • According to a further embodiment of the present invention, a process for surface treatment of a stainless steel sheet is characterized by dipping a stainless steel sheet having a BA film or a passive film in a 0.1 to 70% by weight aqueous solution of phosphoric acid, and carrying out cathodic treatment under the conditions of 1 to 600 A.sec/dm2 integrated current density and 10 to 90°C solution temperature, utilizing the stainless steel as a cathode and metal molybdenum as an anode.
  • Before practicing the present invention, a BA (bright annealing) film or a passive film must be formed on the surface of the stainless steel sheet to be treated. The BA film or the passive film is a film which renders the surface of the stainless steel sheet inactive. The BA film may be obtained by bright heat- treatment according to which the sheet is heated in a vacuum, an inert gas, a reducing gas, or a hot salt. The passive film may be obtained by leaving the sheet in air or dipping the stainless steel sheet in a 20% (by volume) aqueous solution of nitric acid at room temperature for 30 minutes or at 65°C for 10 minutes.
  • The reason why the BA film or the passive film should be formed before the treatment according to the present invention is that if such a film is not formed in advance, corrosion resistance may not be improved even if cathodic treatment is conducted according to this invention. This has been confirmed by experiments to be described later (Example 1).
  • As has been described above, according to one of the preferred embodiments of the present invention, a stainless steel sheet having a BA film or a passive film formed thereon undergoes cathodic treatment in a treatment solution containing phosphoric acid, chromic acid, magnesium oxide and/or sodium silicate.
  • Phosphoric acid and chromic acid contained in this treatment solution are necessary components for forming a noncorroding film on the surface of the stainless steel sheet. The lower limit of the amount of phosphoric acid to be used has been set at 0.1 % by weight since with smaller amounts of phosphoric acid satisfactory corrosion resistance may not be obtained. The upper limit of phosphoric acid to be used has also been set to 50% by weight, since larger amounts of phosphoric acid may result in more or less loss of gloss at the surface of the stainless sheet and a greater waste of solution. The preferable range of the amount of phosphoric acid to be used herein is 5 to 20% by weight.
  • The range for the amount of chromic acid has also been set between 0.1 and 10.0% by weight for the same reason as in the case of phosphoric acid. When the amount of chromic acid is not in this range satisfactory corrosion resistance may not be obtained. When the amount of chromic acid is out of this range surface gloss is lost and the amount of the waste solution will be great. The preferable range of the amount of chromic acid is 0.5 to 1.8% by weight.
  • Magnesium oxide and sodium silicate are components for preventing loss of gloss at the surface of the stainless steel sheet. The range of the amount of magnesium oxide has been limited since satisfactory gloss may not be obtained below 0.1% or above 2.0% by weight. The preferable range of the amount of magnesium oxide is 0.5 to 1.5% by weight.
  • The amount of sodium silicate has been limited between 0.1 and 2% by weight. When this amount is less than 0.1% by weight satisfactory gloss may not be obtained. When the amount of sodium silicate exceeds 2% by weight it precipitates in the form of gel from the solution so that it may not exhibit the advantageous effects of sodium silicate. The preferable range of sodium silicate is 0.1 to 0.8% by weight. When both magnesium oxide and sodium silicate are employed as a mixture the amount of the mixture ranges between 0.1 and 2% by weight.
  • When the amount is below 0.1% by weight the satisfactory effects provided by addition of these members may not be obtained. When the amount exceeds 2% by weight the surface gloss may not be obtained. More preferably, the amount of the mixture of magnesium oxide and sodium silicate ranges beteween 1.0 and 1.8% by weight.
  • The treating conditions for cathodic treatment in such a treatment solution are 1 to 600 A.sec/dm2 integrated current density and 0 to 90°C solution temperature. The integrated current density has been limited to the range of 1 to 600 A·sec/dm2 since a lower integrated current density than 1 A·sec/dm2 results in insufficient corrosion resistance and a higher integrated current density than 600 A.sec/dm2 results in unsatisfactory surface gloss and higher cost. The preferable range of integrated current density is 60 to 360 A·sec/dm2. The solution temperature has been limited to the range of 0 to 90°C since the solution temperature below 0°C results in a longer treating time and difficulty in maintaining the temperature of the treatment solution; a higher solution temperature than 90°C results in degradation in quality of the treatment solution. The preferable range of solution temperature is 50 to 70°C.
  • Thus, the present invention provides three options:
    • (a) a process for carrying out cathodic treatment of a stainless steel sheet having BA film or passive film formed thereon under predetermined conditions with a solution mixture (first treatment solution) containing phosphoric acid, chromic acid, and magnesium oxide and/or sodium silicate; and thereafter carrying out again cathodic treatment under predetermined conditions with a solution mixture (second treatment solution) containing phosphoric acid and a molybdate;
    • (b) a process of carrying out cathodic treatment of a stainless steel sheet having BA film or a passive film formed thereon under predetermined-conditions with a solution mixture (second treatment solution) containing phosphoric acid and a molybdate; and thereafter carrying out again cathodic treatment under predetermined conditions with a solution mixture (first treatment solution) containing phosphoric acid, chromic acid, and magnesium oxide and/or sodium silicate; and
    • (c) a process for carrying out cathodic treatment in a solution mixture (solution mixture of the first and second treatment solutions) containing phosphoric acid, chromic acid, the molybdate, and magnesium oxide and/or sodium silicate.
  • Among these three options, the best effects are obtained with the first method (a).
  • The mixing ratio of the respective components in the first treatment solution is the same as that described before with reference to the first aspect of the present invention. Similarly, the mixing ratio of the respective components of the second treatment solution is the same as that described with reference to the first preferred embodiment of the present invention. The cathodic treatment conditions in the first treatment solution are 1 to 600 A-sec/dm2 in integrated current density, and 0 to 90°C in solution temperature, preferably 10 to 30°C. The integrated current density has been limited to this range for the reasons as described below. When the integrated current density is below 1 A.sec/dm2, the gloss may be maintained but the resistance to corrosion, such as resistance to sulfurous acid, salt damage (table 1) and so on, is not satisfactory. When the integrated current density exceeds 600 A-sec/dm2, the gloss may not be maintained and the process is uneconomical. Particularly for improving the resistance to sulfurous acid, it is preferable to set the integrated current density within the range of 40 to 120 A-sec/dm2. Particularly for improving the resistance to salt damage, it is preferable to set the integrated current density of 10 to 80 A·sec/dm2. For improving both these resistance characteristics, it is preferable to set the integrated current density within the range of 50 to 70 A-sec/dm2. The temperature of this treatment solution should be controlled between 0 and 90°C for the reasons to be described below. When the solution temperature is below 0°C, the treatment time becomes longer and maintenance of the temperature of treatment solution becomes difficult. When the solution temperature exceeds 90°C, the effects of improving resistance to corrosion may not be obtained. In the cathodic protection with the first treatment solution, the treatment time may be shortened and the power consumption may be reduced with an increase in temperature of the treatment solution. With a solution temperature ranging from 70 to 90°C, a film of sufficient corrosion resistance may be formed on the surface of the stainless steel sheet with an integrated current density of below 1 A.sec/dm2, or even at 0 A·sec/dm2 (dipping in the solution with no electric current flowing through the stainless steel sheet).
  • The cathodic treatment conditions in the second treatment solution are 1 to 600 A-sec/dm2 integrated current density, and 10 to 90°C solution temperature, preferably 40 to 60°C. The integrated current density has been set within the range of 1 to 600 A·sec/dm2 for the reasons to be described below. When the integrated current density is below 1 A-sec/dm2, the gloss may be obtained but the corrosion resistance may not be sufficient. When the integrated current density exceeds 600 A-sec/dm2, the surface gloss may not be obtained, discoloration may occur, and the process is uneconomical. Particularly for improving the resistance to sulfurous acid, it is preferable to set the integrated current density within the range of 60 to 200 A·sec/dm2. Particularly for improving the resistance to salt damage, it is preferable to set the integrated current density within the range of 40 to 80 A-sec/dm2. For improving both these resistances, the integrated current density is preferably set within the range of 60 to 80 A-secldm2. The solution temperature of the second treatment solution has been set to be within the range of 0 to 90°C for the same reasons described with reference to the second aspect of the present invention.
  • As for the cathodic treatment in the second treatment solution, the treatment time may be shortened and the power consumption may be reduced with a higher solution temperature. With a solution temperature ranging from 70 to 90°C, a corrosion resistant film may be formed on the surface of the stainless steel sheet with an integrated current density of below 1 A.sec/dm2, or even at 0 A·sec/dm2 (dipping in the solution with no electric current flowing through the stainless steel sheet).
  • The cathodic treatment conditions with a solution mixture of the first and second treatment solutions may be substantially the same as those described with reference to the cathodic treatment with either the first or second treatment solution, and may be appropriately selected accordingly.
  • According to the third aspect of the present invention, a stainless steel sheet having a BA film or a passive filmed formed thereon is dipped in an aqueous solution containing 0.1 to 70% by weight of phosphoric acid, preferable 5 to 50% by weight, and cathodic treatment of the stainless steel sheet is carried out under the treatment conditions of 1 to 600 A.sec/dm2 integrated current density, and 10 to 90°C solution temperature, preferably 40 to 60°C, using the stainless steel sheet as a cathode and metal molybdenum as an anode. The reasons for setting the phosphoric acid amount and the cathodic protection conditions are the same as those described with reference to the second aspect of the present invention.
  • Metal molybdenum is used as the anode in this process for electrolytically eluting the metal molybdenum during electrolysis. This metal molybdenum improves the resistance to sulfurous acid of the noncorroding film formed on the surface of the stainless steel sheet. It also maintains excellent gloss. Metal molybdenum of higher purity is preferable for improving the corrosion resistance to thereby prevent degradation of the treatment solution.
  • According to this process, since the metal molybdenum as the anode is electrolytically eluted, the molybdate need not be incorporated in advance, thus improving the workability of the treatment. Furthermore, since the metal molybdenum does not contain a large amount of impurities, it prevents degradation in quality of the treatment solution and prolongs the life of the treatment solution.
  • According to the present invention, the treatment time may be shortened with a higher solution temperature and a greater current density. With the treatment solution and the treatment conditions according to the present invention, a corrosion resistant film may be formed, generally, in 10 seconds to 10 minutes.
  • In accordance with the present invention, a film having corrosion resistance may be formed on the surface of a stainless steel sheet, and its corrosion resistance will not be degraded for a long period of time after treatment. This film is rich in gloss and improves the resistance to corrosion of a stainless steel sheet having insufficient resistance to corrosion, thus improving its product value.
  • Example 1
  • As raw materials, stainless steel sheets (or strip) of JIS SUS 430 (No. 1), JIS SUS 434 (No. 2), and JIS SUS 304 (No. 3) having on their surface BA film formed by bright annealing were used. The treatment solution contained 9.25% by weight of phosphoric acid, 1.68% by weight of chromic acid, 0.78% by weight of magnesium oxide, and 0.10% by weight of sodium silicate.
  • The stainless steel sheets were subjected to cathodic treatment for 3 minutes at a current density of 2.0 Aldm2 and a solution temperature of 20°C.
  • The surface-treated stainless steel sheets were then subjected to a corrosion resistance test according to the conditions shown in Table 1. The obtained results are shown in Table 2.
  • For the purpose of comparison, a conventional stainless steel sheet having simply a BA film formed thereon, i.e. without carrying out the cathodic treatment according to this invention, was also subjected to the corrosion test according to the method shown in Table 1, and the obtained results are also shown in Table 2.
  • A stainless steel sheet without a BA or passive film formed thereon was subjected to the cathodic treatment under the same conditions as in the example described above. The corrosion test results of this material are also shown in Table 2.
  • In the example described above, another treatment solution containing phosphoric acid and chromic acid but not containing magnesium oxide and sodium silicate was similarly used for surface treatment. The results of the corrosion tests on the stainless steel sheet obtained with this treatment solution are also shown in Table 2.
    Figure imgb0001
    Figure imgb0002
    Figure imgb0003
  • Example 2
  • The gloss of the surfaces of the stainless steel sheets obtained in Example 1 was compared with the gloss of the stainless steel sheets having the BAfilm formed thereon. The presence or absence of gloss was evaluated. The obtained results are shown in Table 3.
  • For the purpose of comparison, the same evaluations were made on stainless steel sheets treated with the treatment solutions wherein the amounts of phosphoric acid, chromic acid, magnesium oxide and sodium silicate deviated from the ranges according to the present invention, and on stainless steel sheets obtained at integrated current densities which deviated from the ranges according to the present invention. The obtained results are shown in Table 3.
    Figure imgb0004
  • Example 3
  • Stainless steel sheet raw materials were used which were obtained by bright annealing the sheets according to JIS SUS 430, JIS SUS 434, and JIS SUS 420J2 to form BA films, and by hair-line treating (forming a passive film on) the sheet according to JIS SUS 304. The treatment solution contained 9.37% by weight of phosphoric acid and 1.34% by weight of sodium molybdate.
  • These stainless steel sheets were subjected to cathodic treatment in this treatment solution under the conditions of a current density of 1.0 A/dm2, a solution temperature of 20°C, and a treatment time of 3 minutes (treatment 1). These stainless steel sheets were then subjected to cathodic treatment again at a current density of 1.0 A/dm2, a solution temperature of 50°C, and a treatment time of 30 seconds (treatment 2).
  • The stainless steel sheets surface-treated in this manner then underwent the corrosion resistance test shown in Table 1, and the obtained results are shown in Table 4.
  • For the purpose of comparison, a stainless steel sheet having a BA film formed thereon was similarly subjected to the corrosion resistance test and the obtained results are shown in Table 4.
  • A stainless steel sheet having neither the BA film nor the passive film was subjected to cathodic protection under the same conditions as this example. The obtained results are also shown in Table 4.
  • A stainless steel sheet as in the above example was similarly subjected to cathodic treatment with a treatment solution which contained phosphoric acid but which did not contain a molybdate. The results of the corrosion resistance test on this stainless steel sheet are also shown in Table 4.
    Figure imgb0005
  • Example 4
  • The surface gloss of the stainless steel sheet (JIS SUS 430) obtained in Example 3 was compared with that of the stainless steel sheet having the BA film formed thereon. The presence or absence of gloss was evaluated. The obtained results are shown in Table 5.
  • For the purpose of comparison, evaluations were made on the presence or absence of gloss on the stainless steel sheets obtained with the treatment solutions wherein the amounts of phosphoric acid and molybdate deviated from the ranges according to the present invention, and on the stainless steel sheets obtained at current densities which deviated from the ranges according to the present invention. The obtained results are also shown in Table 5.
    Figure imgb0006
  • Example 5
  • Stainless steel sheets were used which were obtained by bright annealing sheets according to JIS SUS 430 to form BA films thereon. The first treatment solution contained 9.25% by weight of phosphoric acid, 1.68% by weight of chromic acid, 0.78% by weight of magnesium oxide, and 0.10% by weight of sodium silicate. The stainless steel sheets were subjected to cathodic treatment by varying the treatment conditions within the ranges according to the present invention. The second treatment solution contained 9.37% by weight of phosphoric acid and 1.34% by weight of sodium molybdate. The stainless steel sheets were subjected to cathodic treatment again by varying the treatment conditions within the ranges according to the present invention.
  • The stainless steel sheets surface-treated in this manner were subjected to the corrosion resistance test according to the method shown in Table 1 (the resistance to sulfurous acid was evaluated according to the sulfurous acid gas corrosion test as defined in Dln, and the resistance to salt damage was evaluated according to the Dip and Dry method (GM conditions)). The obtained results are shown in Table 6. Observations were made on gloss and discoloration of the surfaces of the sheets, and the obtained results are also shown in Table 6.
  • For the purpose of comparison, stainless steel sheets were subjected to various treatment methods. Some stainless steel sheets were subjected to the first and second treatments wherein the treatment conditions deviated from the ranges according to the present invention (Nos. 9 to 12). A stainless steel sheet was subjected to cathodic treatment in the first treatment solution but not to the second treatment (No. 13). Stainless steel sheets were subjected to the first treatment but not to the second treatment (Nos. 14 and 15). A stainless steel sheet which did not have a BA film was subjected to the first and second treatments (No. 16). A stainless steel sheet was subjected to the second treatment first and to the first treatment thereafter (No. 17). A stainless steel sheet was subjected to a treatment with a solution mixture of the first and second treatment solutions (No. 18). These stainless steel sheets were subjected to the corrosion resistance test and were evaluated for gloss and discoloration. The results are shown in Table 6.
  • In the case of sample No. 18, the composition of the solution mixture was 9.37% by weight of phosphoric acid, 1.68% by weight of chromic acid, 0.78% by weight of magnesium oxide, and 1.34% by weight of a molybdate. The treatment conditions were 1 Aldm2 current density, 60 second treatment time, and 50°C solution temperature.
  • For the purpose of comparison, stainless steel sheets were subjected to dipping (without conduction of current) instead of cathodic treatment in the first and second treatment solutions (Nos. 19 to 21). These stainless steel sheets were subjected to the corrosion resistance test and were evaluated for gloss and discoloration. The results are shown in Table 6.
    Figure imgb0007
    Figure imgb0008
    Figure imgb0009
  • Example 6
  • Stainless steel sheets were obtained by bright annealing the sheets according to JIS SUS 430 to form BA films thereon. A treatment was carried out using these sheets as cathodes and metal molybdenum plates of 99.0% by weight purity as anodes in a treatment solution containing 10% by weight of phosphoric acid.
  • Some of these stainless steel sheet were subjected to a treatment under the conditions of 2 A/dm2 current density, 25°C solution temperature, and 3 minutes treatment time (treatment 1), and the rest to another treatment under the conditions of 1 A/dm2 current density, 60°C solution temperature and 1 minute treatment time (treatment 2).
  • The stainless steel sheets surface-treated in this manner were subjected to the corrosion resistance test by the method shown in Table 1, and the obtained results are shown in Table 7.
  • For the purpose of comparison, 0.5% by weight of sodium molybdate was added to the treatment solution of the example, and a stainless steel sheet was surface-treated in this treatment solution. The obtained sheet was subjected to the corrosion-resistance test, and the obtained results are shown in Table 7.
  • The stainless steel sheet having a BA film was also subjected to the corrosion resistance test and the obtained results are shown in Table 7.
  • The stainless steel sheet having neither the BA film nor the passive film was subjected to cathodic treatment under the same conditions as in the example. The results of the corrosion resistance test of this sheet are also shown in Table 7.
  • In the above example, a similar sheet was subjected to cathodic treatment using lead instead of metal molybdenum as the anode. The results of the corrosion resistance test of this sheet are also shown in Table 7.
    Figure imgb0010
  • It is seen from the above table that corrosion resistance is significantly improved according to the present invention.
  • A treatment solution containing sodium molybdenum also results in good corrosion resistance of the resultant sheet. However, as will be made clear in Example 8, degradation in quality of the treatment solution is significant with this composition.
  • Example 7
  • The surface gloss of the stainless steel sheet (JIS SUS 430) obtained in Example 6 was compared with that of the stainless steel sheet having a BA film formed thereon. Evaluations were made as to the presence or absence of gloss. The obtained results are shown in Table 8.
  • For the purpose of comparison, similar evaluations were made on a stainless steel sheet subjected to cathodic treatment using lead instead of metal molybdenum as the anode, on a stainless steel sheet subjected to cathodic treatment after being dipped in a treatment solution wherein the amount of phosphoric acid deviated from the range according to the present invention, and a stainless steel sheet subjected to cathodic treatment wherein the current density deviated from the range according to the present invention. The obtained results are shown in Table 8.
    Figure imgb0011
  • It is seen from the above table that excellent gloss may be obtained according to the process of the present invention.
  • Example 8
  • After the treatment (treatment 1) of Example 6, degradation in quality of the treatment solution was evaluated. Degradation in quality was not observed after 75 hours.
  • To the treatment solution used in Example 6 was added 0.5% by weight of sodium molybdate. Cathodic treatment was carried out using a ferrite anode. Degradation in quality of the treatment solution was evaluated. Degradation in quality of the treatment solution was first observed after 25 hours.
  • For judging the degradation, a belt-shaped plate of a sample 100 mm in width was continuously treated in 1 liter of the electrolytic solution. The solution was judged to have degraded when the rusting rate according to the sulfurous acid resistance test exceeded 10%.
  • In summary, according to the process of the present invention, corrosion resistance, particularly resistance to sulfurous acid, is excellent and excellent gloss may be maintained, providing an excellent process for surface treatment of stainless steel sheets for automobiles. With the process of the present invention, preparation for the treatment is easy and degradation in the treatment solution may be prevented for a long period of time.

Claims (13)

1. A process for surface treatment of a stainless steel sheet characterized by dipping a stainless steel sheet having a BA film or a passive film in a treatment solution and carrying out cathodic treatment under conditions of 1 to 600 A.sec/dm2 integrated current density and 0 to 90°C solution temperature, said treatment solution containing 0.1 to 70.0% by weight of phosphoric acid, 0.1 to 10.0% by weight of a molybdate and/or 0.1 to 10.0% by weight of chromic acid, and 0.1 to 2% by weight of a member selected from the group consisting of magnesium oxide, sodium silicate, and mixtures thereof.
2. A process according to claim 1, wherein the treatment solution contains 0.1 to 50.0% by weight of phosphoric acid, 0.1 to 10.0% by weight of chromic acid, and 0.1 to 2.0% by weight of a member selected from the group consisting of magnesium oxide, sodium silicate, and mixtures thereof.
3. A process according to claim 2, wherein the treatment solution contains 5 to 20% by weight of phosphoric acid, 0.5 to 1.8% by weight of chromic acid, and 0.5 to 1.5% by weight of a member selected from the group consisting of magnesium oxide, sodium silicate, and mixtures thereof.
4. A process according to claim 1, wherein the treatment solution contains 0.1 to 50.0% by weight of phosphoric acid and 0.1 to 10.0% by weight of the molybdate.
5. A process according to claim 4, wherein the treatment solution contains 5 to 50% by weight of phosphoric acid and 1 to 3% by weight of the molybdate.
6. A process according to claim 1, characterized by performing said cathodic treatment in two steps, a first step comprising dipping a stainless steel sheet having a BA film or a passive film in a treatment solution containing 0.1 to 50.0% by weight of phosphoric acid, 0.1 to 10.0% by weight of chromic acid, and 0.1 to 2.0% by weight of a member selected from the group consisting of magnesium oxide, sodium silicate and mixtures thereof and carrying out cathodic treatment under the conditions of 1 to 600 A.sec/dm2 integrated current density and 0 to 90°C solution temperature, and a second step comprising dipping the stainless steel sheet treated in the first step in a treatment solution containing 0.1 to 70% by weight of phosphoric acid and 0.1 to 10.0% by weight of the molybdate and carrying out cathodic treatment under the conditions of 1 to 600 Asec/dm2 integrated current density and 10 to 90°C solution temperature.
7. A process according to claim 6, wherein the treatment solution in the first step contains 5 to 20% by weight of phosphoric acid, 0.5 to 1.8% by weight of chromic acid, and 0.5 to 1.5% by weight of a member selected from the group consisting of magnesium oxide, sodium silicate and mixtures thereof, and the treatment solution in the second step contains 5 to 50% by weight of phosphoric acid and 1 to 3% of the molybdate.
8. A process according to claim 1, characterized by performing said cathodic treatment in two steps, a first step comprising dipping a stainless steel sheet having a BA film or a passive film in a treatment solution containing 0.1 to 70% by weight of phosphoric acid and 0.1 to 10.0% by weight of the molybdate and carrying out cathodic treatment under the conditions of 1 to 600 A-sec/dm2 integrated current density and 10 to 90°C solution temperature, and a second step comprising dipping the stainless steel sheet treated in the first step in a treatment solution containing 0.1 to 50.0% by weight of phosphoric acid, 0.1 to 10.0% by weight of chromic acid, and 0.1 to 2.0% by weight of a member selected from the group consisting of magnesium oxide, sodium silicate and mixtures thereof and carrying out cathodic treatment under the conditions of 1 to 600 A.sec/dm2 integrated current density and 0 to 90°C solution temperature.
9. A process according to claim 8, wherein the treatment solution in the first step contains 5 to 50% by weight of phosphoric acid and 1 to 3% by weight of the molybdate, and the treatment solution in the second step contains 5 to 20% by weight of phosphoric acid, 0.5 to 1.8% by weight of chromic acid, and 0.5 to 1.5% by weight of a member selected from the group consisting of magnesium oxide, sodium silicate and mixtures thereof.
10. A process according to claim 1, wherein the molybdate is supplied by using metal molybdenum as an anode.
11. A process according to claim 4, wherein the molybdate is supplied by using mainly metal molybdenum as an anode.
12. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the integrated current density is 60 to 360 A.sec/dm2 and the solution temperature is 40--70°C.
13. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the stainless steel sheet conforms to JIS SUS 430, JIS SUS 420 or JIS SUS 434.
EP81105614A 1980-07-24 1981-07-17 Process for surface treatment of stainless steel sheet Expired EP0045017B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (8)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP101556/80 1980-07-24
JP101555/80 1980-07-24
JP10155580A JPS5847477B2 (en) 1980-07-24 1980-07-24 Stainless steel surface treatment method
JP10155680A JPS5847478B2 (en) 1980-07-24 1980-07-24 Stainless steel surface treatment method
JP115865/80 1980-08-25
JP11586580A JPS5847479B2 (en) 1980-08-25 1980-08-25 Stainless steel surface treatment method
JP56085952A JPS5912755B2 (en) 1981-06-04 1981-06-04 Stainless steel surface treatment method
JP85952/81 1981-06-04

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0045017A1 EP0045017A1 (en) 1982-02-03
EP0045017B1 true EP0045017B1 (en) 1985-10-16

Family

ID=27467188

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP81105614A Expired EP0045017B1 (en) 1980-07-24 1981-07-17 Process for surface treatment of stainless steel sheet

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0045017B1 (en)
DE (1) DE3172671D1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6572756B2 (en) 1997-01-31 2003-06-03 Elisha Holding Llc Aqueous electrolytic medium
US6592738B2 (en) 1997-01-31 2003-07-15 Elisha Holding Llc Electrolytic process for treating a conductive surface and products formed thereby
US6599643B2 (en) 1997-01-31 2003-07-29 Elisha Holding Llc Energy enhanced process for treating a conductive surface and products formed thereby

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DK187391D0 (en) * 1991-11-15 1991-11-15 Inst Produktudvikling PROCEDURE FOR THE TREATMENT OF ZINC COATED MATERIALS AND TREATMENT SOLUTION FOR USE BY THE PROCEDURE
TWI427159B (en) * 2007-04-27 2014-02-21 Conductive member made of stainless steel and manufacturing method thereof
CN110904489A (en) * 2019-12-03 2020-03-24 天津理工大学 Micro-arc oxidation electrolyte for preparing high-corrosion-resistance coating on surface of low-carbon steel and preparation method and application thereof

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5330434A (en) * 1976-09-01 1978-03-22 Toyohito Tomonaga Surface treatment of stainless steel by chromic acids

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1356111A (en) * 1970-03-23 1974-06-12 South London Elect Equip Vacuum ovens comprising shelves or trays
FR2228863B1 (en) * 1973-05-07 1978-06-02 Alloy Surfaces Co Inc
JPS5652117B2 (en) * 1973-11-17 1981-12-10
IT1115840B (en) * 1977-03-09 1986-02-10 Centro Speriment Metallurg SOLUTION OF COATINGS FOR STEELS FOR MAGNETIC USE
DE2711431C2 (en) * 1977-03-16 1986-12-11 Metallgesellschaft Ag, 6000 Frankfurt Process for the surface treatment of metals

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5330434A (en) * 1976-09-01 1978-03-22 Toyohito Tomonaga Surface treatment of stainless steel by chromic acids

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6572756B2 (en) 1997-01-31 2003-06-03 Elisha Holding Llc Aqueous electrolytic medium
US6592738B2 (en) 1997-01-31 2003-07-15 Elisha Holding Llc Electrolytic process for treating a conductive surface and products formed thereby
US6599643B2 (en) 1997-01-31 2003-07-29 Elisha Holding Llc Energy enhanced process for treating a conductive surface and products formed thereby

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0045017A1 (en) 1982-02-03
DE3172671D1 (en) 1985-11-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3620934A (en) Method of electrolytic tinning sheet steel
US2913377A (en) Aqueous electrolytic process
EP0045017B1 (en) Process for surface treatment of stainless steel sheet
US3295936A (en) Thinly nickel-plated steel plate
US4427499A (en) Process for surface treatment of stainless steel sheet
US2453757A (en) Process for producing modified electronickel
US3912601A (en) Surface treatment of tin-plated steel sheets
EP0088192B1 (en) Control of anode gas evolution in trivalent chromium plating bath
US2436244A (en) Metalworking and strippingplating process
US4617095A (en) Electrolytic post treatment of chromium substrates
US3265597A (en) Anodizing process and electrolyte
US4466865A (en) Trivalent chromium electroplating process
KR101971811B1 (en) Tin-plated steel sheet, chemical conversion treated steel sheet and manufacturing method therefor
US4615773A (en) Chromium-iron alloy plating from a solution containing both hexavalent and trivalent chromium
US4806226A (en) Process for electrolytically coloring aluminum material
US5246563A (en) Process for the electrolytic zinc coating of stainless steel
US3898139A (en) Process for surface treatment of zinc-plated steel plates
JP3405669B2 (en) Nickel-plated steel sheet excellent in corrosion resistance and surface appearance and method for producing the same
Spooner et al. Phosphoric acid anodizing of aluminium and its application to electroplating
US2847373A (en) Electroplating zinc on basis metal
JPS5847478B2 (en) Stainless steel surface treatment method
Abd El Rehim et al. Role of halides in the electroplating of tin from the alkaline-stannate bath
JPS5837192A (en) Post-treatment for non-plated surface of steel plate electroplated with zinc on one side
US4085013A (en) Chromium plating process employing manganese dioxide coated anodes
JPH07145495A (en) Electrolytic refining method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19820305

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: JACOBACCI & PERANI S.P.A.

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT SE

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3172671

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19851121

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19920623

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 19920706

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 19920720

Year of fee payment: 12

ITTA It: last paid annual fee
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19920925

Year of fee payment: 12

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Effective date: 19930717

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Effective date: 19930718

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 19930717

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Effective date: 19940331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Effective date: 19940401

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed

Ref document number: 81105614.2

Effective date: 19940210