CA2732977A1 - Method of modifying the frequency response of a wooden article - Google Patents
Method of modifying the frequency response of a wooden article Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2732977A1 CA2732977A1 CA2732977A CA2732977A CA2732977A1 CA 2732977 A1 CA2732977 A1 CA 2732977A1 CA 2732977 A CA2732977 A CA 2732977A CA 2732977 A CA2732977 A CA 2732977A CA 2732977 A1 CA2732977 A1 CA 2732977A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- frequency
- article
- wooden
- acoustic
- response
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10D—STRINGED MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; WIND MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACCORDIONS OR CONCERTINAS; PERCUSSION MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; AEOLIAN HARPS; SINGING-FLAME MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G10D3/00—Details of, or accessories for, stringed musical instruments, e.g. slide-bars
- G10D3/22—Material for manufacturing stringed musical instruments; Treatment of the material
Abstract
A method for modifying the frequency response of a wooden article by exciting the article with acoustic energy. Frequency response is the measure of a system's spectrum response at the output to a signal of varying frequency but constant amplitude at its input. The acoustic energy includes at least one excitation frequency which is preferably in the audible spectrum (20 to 20,000Hz). The use of acoustic energy from the remote source provides non-contact excitation of the wooden article.
In one embodiment, the acoustic energy is at least one sound wave that includes at least one resonant frequency of the wooden article, at least one acoustic mode of the wooden article, at least one discrete broadband frequency, and a composite frequency including any combination of multiple broadband frequencies, white noise and pink noise.
In one embodiment, the acoustic energy is at least one sound wave that includes at least one resonant frequency of the wooden article, at least one acoustic mode of the wooden article, at least one discrete broadband frequency, and a composite frequency including any combination of multiple broadband frequencies, white noise and pink noise.
Description
METHOD OF MODIFYING THE FREQUENCY
RESPONSE
OF A WOODEN ARTICLE
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application is a continuation of copending U.S. Patent Application 12/185,906, filed August 5, 2008, which claims priority to copending U.S. Patent Application 11/668,031, filed January 29, 2007, which application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application 60/763,021 filed on January 27, 2006, which is incorporated herein by reference.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The acoustic properties of wood are well documented. The selection of wood as a construction material, particularly for acoustic applications such as instruments and concert halls, is important because the sound is produced by the vibrations of the material itself. The characteristics which determine the acoustic performance of a material are density, Young's modulus and loss coefficient (see Wegst, U. 2006. Wood for sound. American Journal of Botany 93: 1439-1448). Wegst has shown that Young's modulus (measurement of a material's stiffness) for a given species of wood is almost linearly correlated to density.
Pitch, loudness and timbre represent the three auditory attributes of sound.
The term pitch represents the perceived fundamental frequency of a sound, which can be precisely determined through physical measurement. The intensity of a sound is a function (the square of the amplitude) of the vibration of the originating source. In addition to a pitch associated with a sound, an acoustic body also has a pitch which is expressed by the spectrum of frequencies it creates when vibrated. The acoustics of a given body depend on shape as well as the material from which the body is made (Wegst).
It is known that stringed instruments are enhanced with age, specifically from actual playing-time (or use). The wood used to construct the instruments provides a more pleasing result as the instrument is played. It is for this reason that such a high value is placed on vintage instruments.
The vibration associated with use of the instrument causes subtle changes in the pliability of the wood. Vibration has equal effects on the natural resins within the wood.
Moreover, finishes such as lacquer, commonly applied to wooden stringed instruments, are effect by vibration resulting in the loss of plasticizers. These changes usually take many years.
Others have sought to shorten the time needed to gain the desired effects of aging. For example, U.S. Patent No. 2,911,872 describes a motor powered apparatus which mechanically bows the strings of a violin. The system can be set up such that the strings can be played at any selected position and bowed in succession. U.S. Patent No.
5,031,501 describes a device comprising a small shaker board which is attached to thee sound board of a stringed instrument. The shaker is then driven by a musical signal to simulate what the sound board experiences as it is being played. These approaches both provide automatic means to simulate playing the instrument, thus allowing the instrument to be aged without the expenditure of time or effort by a real musician. However, both approaches take a prolonged period of time to age a new instrument because they basically simulate playing the instrument; aging occurs in real time.
U.S. Patent No. 5,537,908 developed a process for wooden stringed instruments that utilizes broadband vibration from a large electromagnetic shaker and controller. The instrument is attached to a specially designed shaker fixture and then subjected to broadband vibration excitation. The broadband input provides excitation over the frequency range of 20 to
RESPONSE
OF A WOODEN ARTICLE
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application is a continuation of copending U.S. Patent Application 12/185,906, filed August 5, 2008, which claims priority to copending U.S. Patent Application 11/668,031, filed January 29, 2007, which application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application 60/763,021 filed on January 27, 2006, which is incorporated herein by reference.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The acoustic properties of wood are well documented. The selection of wood as a construction material, particularly for acoustic applications such as instruments and concert halls, is important because the sound is produced by the vibrations of the material itself. The characteristics which determine the acoustic performance of a material are density, Young's modulus and loss coefficient (see Wegst, U. 2006. Wood for sound. American Journal of Botany 93: 1439-1448). Wegst has shown that Young's modulus (measurement of a material's stiffness) for a given species of wood is almost linearly correlated to density.
Pitch, loudness and timbre represent the three auditory attributes of sound.
The term pitch represents the perceived fundamental frequency of a sound, which can be precisely determined through physical measurement. The intensity of a sound is a function (the square of the amplitude) of the vibration of the originating source. In addition to a pitch associated with a sound, an acoustic body also has a pitch which is expressed by the spectrum of frequencies it creates when vibrated. The acoustics of a given body depend on shape as well as the material from which the body is made (Wegst).
It is known that stringed instruments are enhanced with age, specifically from actual playing-time (or use). The wood used to construct the instruments provides a more pleasing result as the instrument is played. It is for this reason that such a high value is placed on vintage instruments.
The vibration associated with use of the instrument causes subtle changes in the pliability of the wood. Vibration has equal effects on the natural resins within the wood.
Moreover, finishes such as lacquer, commonly applied to wooden stringed instruments, are effect by vibration resulting in the loss of plasticizers. These changes usually take many years.
Others have sought to shorten the time needed to gain the desired effects of aging. For example, U.S. Patent No. 2,911,872 describes a motor powered apparatus which mechanically bows the strings of a violin. The system can be set up such that the strings can be played at any selected position and bowed in succession. U.S. Patent No.
5,031,501 describes a device comprising a small shaker board which is attached to thee sound board of a stringed instrument. The shaker is then driven by a musical signal to simulate what the sound board experiences as it is being played. These approaches both provide automatic means to simulate playing the instrument, thus allowing the instrument to be aged without the expenditure of time or effort by a real musician. However, both approaches take a prolonged period of time to age a new instrument because they basically simulate playing the instrument; aging occurs in real time.
U.S. Patent No. 5,537,908 developed a process for wooden stringed instruments that utilizes broadband vibration from a large electromagnetic shaker and controller. The instrument is attached to a specially designed shaker fixture and then subjected to broadband vibration excitation. The broadband input provides excitation over the frequency range of 20 to
2,000Hz, providing accelerated aging compared to single tone inputs from earlier methods.
Experienced musicians attested to hearing improvement in sound producing ability after application of this method. In addition, simple vibration measurements showed an increase in instrument response. The process, however, requires direct contact or coupling with a large electromagnetic shaker which can and result in damage to the instruments processed. In addition, the upper frequency limit of such shakers is about 2,000Hz.
In addition to its use in the construction of instrument, wood is an important component in the acoustic makeup of structures. Concert halls, in particular, are meticulously constructed to maximize acoustic effect. To this end, great care goes into the selection and placement of construction materials. Two important factors, with regard to room acoustics, are reverberation time as well as the level of reverberant sound. Wood is often used to maximize acoustic effect through the placement of wooden panels which act as reflectors and resonators, and the use of wood flooring and stage construction are necessary for the optimization of the sound field and reverberation time (Wegst. 2006).
An acoustic system, such as a musical instrument or concert hall, possesses an acoustic resonance. Resonance refers to the tendency of a system to oscillate at maximum amplitude at certain frequencies, known as the system's resonance frequencies (or resonant frequencies). At these frequencies, even small periodic driving forces produce large amplitude vibrations, because the system stores vibrational energy.
Acoustic resonance is the tendency of the acoustic system to absorb more energy when the frequency of its oscillations matches the system's natural frequency of vibration (its resonance or resonant frequency) than it does at other frequencies. Most objects have more than one resonance frequency, especially at harmonics of the strongest resonance. An acoustic system will easily vibrate at the strongest frequencies, and vibrate to a lesser degree at other frequencies. Materials, such as wood, posses the ability to react to its particular resonance frequency even when it is part of a complex excitation, such as an impulse or a wideband noise excitation. The net effect is a filtering-out of all frequencies other than its resonance.
SUMMARY OF INVENTION
In one embodiment, the invention includes a method of modifying the frequency response of a wooden article by applying acoustical energy from the acoustical energy source to the wooden article. The article can be any wooden article for use in an acoustical system such as musical instruments, unfinished wood, finished wood, wood panels and flooring.
In one embodiment, the article is suspended in an enclosure which allows free vibration and prevents dampening from contact with a support surface.
The acoustical energy has a predetermined frequency selected from the group consisting of at least one resonant frequency of the wooden article, at least one discrete broadband frequency, a composite broadband frequency and a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the excitation frequency is substantially maintained for a predetermined time (i.e. one week or 168 hours). Results of the treatment can be modified by altering the treatment time and/or intensity. In an illustrative embodiment, the article is treated between about 90 and 134 dB.
The acoustic energy can be applied perpendicularly to the longitudinal axis of the article or in parallel.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
For a fuller understanding of the nature and objects of the invention, reference should be made to the following detailed description, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an illustrative device for implementing the inventive method.
FIG. 2 is a side view of the illustrative device of FIG. 1.
FIG. 3A is the formula for calculating the average power and cross spectra.
FIG. 3B is the formula for computing frequency response.
FIG. 3C is the formula for calculating coherence y2(f) as a function of frequency.
Experienced musicians attested to hearing improvement in sound producing ability after application of this method. In addition, simple vibration measurements showed an increase in instrument response. The process, however, requires direct contact or coupling with a large electromagnetic shaker which can and result in damage to the instruments processed. In addition, the upper frequency limit of such shakers is about 2,000Hz.
In addition to its use in the construction of instrument, wood is an important component in the acoustic makeup of structures. Concert halls, in particular, are meticulously constructed to maximize acoustic effect. To this end, great care goes into the selection and placement of construction materials. Two important factors, with regard to room acoustics, are reverberation time as well as the level of reverberant sound. Wood is often used to maximize acoustic effect through the placement of wooden panels which act as reflectors and resonators, and the use of wood flooring and stage construction are necessary for the optimization of the sound field and reverberation time (Wegst. 2006).
An acoustic system, such as a musical instrument or concert hall, possesses an acoustic resonance. Resonance refers to the tendency of a system to oscillate at maximum amplitude at certain frequencies, known as the system's resonance frequencies (or resonant frequencies). At these frequencies, even small periodic driving forces produce large amplitude vibrations, because the system stores vibrational energy.
Acoustic resonance is the tendency of the acoustic system to absorb more energy when the frequency of its oscillations matches the system's natural frequency of vibration (its resonance or resonant frequency) than it does at other frequencies. Most objects have more than one resonance frequency, especially at harmonics of the strongest resonance. An acoustic system will easily vibrate at the strongest frequencies, and vibrate to a lesser degree at other frequencies. Materials, such as wood, posses the ability to react to its particular resonance frequency even when it is part of a complex excitation, such as an impulse or a wideband noise excitation. The net effect is a filtering-out of all frequencies other than its resonance.
SUMMARY OF INVENTION
In one embodiment, the invention includes a method of modifying the frequency response of a wooden article by applying acoustical energy from the acoustical energy source to the wooden article. The article can be any wooden article for use in an acoustical system such as musical instruments, unfinished wood, finished wood, wood panels and flooring.
In one embodiment, the article is suspended in an enclosure which allows free vibration and prevents dampening from contact with a support surface.
The acoustical energy has a predetermined frequency selected from the group consisting of at least one resonant frequency of the wooden article, at least one discrete broadband frequency, a composite broadband frequency and a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the excitation frequency is substantially maintained for a predetermined time (i.e. one week or 168 hours). Results of the treatment can be modified by altering the treatment time and/or intensity. In an illustrative embodiment, the article is treated between about 90 and 134 dB.
The acoustic energy can be applied perpendicularly to the longitudinal axis of the article or in parallel.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
For a fuller understanding of the nature and objects of the invention, reference should be made to the following detailed description, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an illustrative device for implementing the inventive method.
FIG. 2 is a side view of the illustrative device of FIG. 1.
FIG. 3A is the formula for calculating the average power and cross spectra.
FIG. 3B is the formula for computing frequency response.
FIG. 3C is the formula for calculating coherence y2(f) as a function of frequency.
3
4 PCT/US2009/038558 FIG. 4A is a graph showing representative initial and final (i.e., before and after) frequency response data (Example I).
FIG. 4B is a graph showing the difference in magnitude after the aging treatment (Example I).
FIG. 5 shows graphs of the initial frequency response measured versus the final response for test violins (Example I).
FIG. 6 shows graphs of the initial frequency response measured versus the final response for guitars (Example II).
FIG. 7 shows graphs of the initial frequency response measured versus the final response for the first guitar, left position, before and after treatment for one week (Example III).
FIG. 8 shows graphs of the initial frequency response measured versus the final response for the first guitar, center position, before and after treatment for one week (Example III).
FIG. 9 shows graphs of the initial frequency response measured versus the final response for the second guitar, left position, before and after treatment for one week (Example III).
FIG. 10 shows graphs of the initial frequency response measured versus the final response for the second guitar, center position, before and after treatment for one week (Example III).
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
In the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof, and within which are shown by way of illustration specific embodiments by which the invention may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the invention.
The invention includes a method for modifying the frequency response of a wooden article by exciting the article with acoustic energy. Frequency response is the measure of a system's spectrum response at the output to a signal of varying frequency (but constant amplitude) at its input. In the audible range it is usually referred to in connection with acoustic systems.
The acoustic energy comprises at least one excitation frequency, which is preferably in the audible spectrum (20 to 20,000Hz). The use of acoustic energy from a remote source provides non-contact excitation of the wooden article. In one embodiment, the acoustic energy is at least one sound wave which comprises at least one resonant frequency of the wooden article, at least one acoustic mode of the wooden article, at least one discrete broadband frequency, a composite frequency (including multiple broadband frequencies, white noise and pink noise) or any combination thereof.
The acoustic energy source of one embodiment is an electromechanical transducer, or any device that converts one type of energy to another (such as converting electricity into sound waves). In an illustrative embodiment, the acoustic energy source is a three-way speaker comprising three drivers: large for the bass, midsize for the midrange frequencies, and small for the high frequencies.
An illustrative device for employing the inventive method is shown in FIGS. 1 and 2. Wooden article A, here a guitar, is suspended in enclosure 20. Suspension of the article prevents dampening due to the articles contact with a solid surface. The enclosure can be mobile, resembling a box or case, or can be room specifically adapted for the accelerated aging of multiple instruments or large instruments such as a piano. In Fig. 1, the enclosure (20) is a box (with most of sides omitted for ease of viewing). Wooden article A is suspended in enclosure 20 at the neck by support 22. Padding can be used to isolate instrument A from support 22 and to protect its surface. Enclosure 20 can be constructed from any suitable material, including inexpensive materials such as medium density fiberboard.
Acoustic energy source, here speakers 30a and 30b, are positioned to apply acoustic energy to the surface of article A. In one embodiment, a pair of speakers is utilized with one speaker 30a facing the front body of instrument A and the second speaker 30b facing the instrument's neck. In an alternate embodiment, speaker 30a faces the front body of instrument A and the second speaker 30b faces the back or side of the article. The acoustic energy emanating from the acoustic energy source can be amplified through a power amplifier (not shown). In one embodiment, the acoustic energy is applied between about 100 and 140dB.
The acoustic energy source is adapted to run continuously for days or weeks at a time.
Test instruments were assessed before and after receiving an acoustic treatment as described above. Experienced musicians provided subjective input on test instruments and found significant improvement with respect to response, playability, and ease of tuning. In addition, frequency response data computed from impact testing using a miniature soft tipped impact hammer and a miniature accelerometer revealed significant improvements in measured response.
Frequency response, FR(f), was determined with the impact force F (in units of Newtons, N) to the article as the input and the resulting vibratory acceleration A (in units of g) of the article sound board as the output. It was calculated using a two-channel dynamic signal analyzer.
Time trace measurements of the dynamic input and output were obtained, these measurements were windowed, and the fast Fourier transforms of these windowed time traces computed. This was repeated at least 8 times, and the average power and cross spectra are computed as using equation (1) in FIG. 3A. The frequency response was then computed using equation (2) in FIG. 3B.
FIG. 4B is a graph showing the difference in magnitude after the aging treatment (Example I).
FIG. 5 shows graphs of the initial frequency response measured versus the final response for test violins (Example I).
FIG. 6 shows graphs of the initial frequency response measured versus the final response for guitars (Example II).
FIG. 7 shows graphs of the initial frequency response measured versus the final response for the first guitar, left position, before and after treatment for one week (Example III).
FIG. 8 shows graphs of the initial frequency response measured versus the final response for the first guitar, center position, before and after treatment for one week (Example III).
FIG. 9 shows graphs of the initial frequency response measured versus the final response for the second guitar, left position, before and after treatment for one week (Example III).
FIG. 10 shows graphs of the initial frequency response measured versus the final response for the second guitar, center position, before and after treatment for one week (Example III).
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
In the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof, and within which are shown by way of illustration specific embodiments by which the invention may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the invention.
The invention includes a method for modifying the frequency response of a wooden article by exciting the article with acoustic energy. Frequency response is the measure of a system's spectrum response at the output to a signal of varying frequency (but constant amplitude) at its input. In the audible range it is usually referred to in connection with acoustic systems.
The acoustic energy comprises at least one excitation frequency, which is preferably in the audible spectrum (20 to 20,000Hz). The use of acoustic energy from a remote source provides non-contact excitation of the wooden article. In one embodiment, the acoustic energy is at least one sound wave which comprises at least one resonant frequency of the wooden article, at least one acoustic mode of the wooden article, at least one discrete broadband frequency, a composite frequency (including multiple broadband frequencies, white noise and pink noise) or any combination thereof.
The acoustic energy source of one embodiment is an electromechanical transducer, or any device that converts one type of energy to another (such as converting electricity into sound waves). In an illustrative embodiment, the acoustic energy source is a three-way speaker comprising three drivers: large for the bass, midsize for the midrange frequencies, and small for the high frequencies.
An illustrative device for employing the inventive method is shown in FIGS. 1 and 2. Wooden article A, here a guitar, is suspended in enclosure 20. Suspension of the article prevents dampening due to the articles contact with a solid surface. The enclosure can be mobile, resembling a box or case, or can be room specifically adapted for the accelerated aging of multiple instruments or large instruments such as a piano. In Fig. 1, the enclosure (20) is a box (with most of sides omitted for ease of viewing). Wooden article A is suspended in enclosure 20 at the neck by support 22. Padding can be used to isolate instrument A from support 22 and to protect its surface. Enclosure 20 can be constructed from any suitable material, including inexpensive materials such as medium density fiberboard.
Acoustic energy source, here speakers 30a and 30b, are positioned to apply acoustic energy to the surface of article A. In one embodiment, a pair of speakers is utilized with one speaker 30a facing the front body of instrument A and the second speaker 30b facing the instrument's neck. In an alternate embodiment, speaker 30a faces the front body of instrument A and the second speaker 30b faces the back or side of the article. The acoustic energy emanating from the acoustic energy source can be amplified through a power amplifier (not shown). In one embodiment, the acoustic energy is applied between about 100 and 140dB.
The acoustic energy source is adapted to run continuously for days or weeks at a time.
Test instruments were assessed before and after receiving an acoustic treatment as described above. Experienced musicians provided subjective input on test instruments and found significant improvement with respect to response, playability, and ease of tuning. In addition, frequency response data computed from impact testing using a miniature soft tipped impact hammer and a miniature accelerometer revealed significant improvements in measured response.
Frequency response, FR(f), was determined with the impact force F (in units of Newtons, N) to the article as the input and the resulting vibratory acceleration A (in units of g) of the article sound board as the output. It was calculated using a two-channel dynamic signal analyzer.
Time trace measurements of the dynamic input and output were obtained, these measurements were windowed, and the fast Fourier transforms of these windowed time traces computed. This was repeated at least 8 times, and the average power and cross spectra are computed as using equation (1) in FIG. 3A. The frequency response was then computed using equation (2) in FIG. 3B.
5 The magnitude of the response function is presented graphically in FIGS. 4A
through 6 as g/N
versus frequency. Coherence was also computed to assess the validity of the measurement.
Coherence provides a measure of the power in the test instrument vibration that is caused by the power in the impact force. A coherence of 1 indicates that all of the vibratory acceleration is caused by the impact force, whereas a coherence of 0 indicates that none of the vibration is caused by the force. The coherence y2(f) is a function of frequency and is computed equation (3) (FIG. 3C).
Example I
Tests with several violins and guitars were performed. The instruments were subjected to the acoustic treatment, as describe above, continuously for several weeks using pink noise (1/f) broadband input. The instruments were assessed both before and after the treatment by experienced musicians and through frequency response measurements.
The musicians noticed a vast improvement in the tonal quality (warmer), responsiveness (increased response), and ease of tuning. The improved ease in tuning is of special interest because new instruments (especially lower end string instruments) are very difficult to get and keep in tune.
FIG. 4A shows representative initial and final (i.e., before and after) frequency response data.
The coherence shows that most of the response is due to the input over most of the frequency range assessed. The magnitude is notably higher following the aging treatment.
This is highlighted in FIG. 4B which shows the difference in magnitude. This data clearly shows that the instrument yields more vibratory response (g) per unit input (N) over most of the frequency range. This is consistent with one of the findings observed independently from experienced musicians.
Example II
Additional tests were performed on four violins and three guitars. The repeatability of the process is shown consistently between the ranges of 500 - 600 Hz and 800 -900 Hz for the violins. The magnitude of change ranged from 5 to 20. A positive magnitude change means that the instruments produce more sound, or responds more for the same energy input; a significant aspect of this process. The violins used for testing ranged in quality from very cheap ($150.00) to moderately priced ($1200.00) with the building quality commensurate with the price paid. FIG. 5 shows the initial frequency response measured versus the final response for the violins.
The repeatability of the process is consistent between the ranges of 700 - 900 Hz for the guitars (FIG. 6). The magnitude of change ranged from 0 to 1. Even though the magnitude change is significantly less than the results found for the violin, this is still significant.
through 6 as g/N
versus frequency. Coherence was also computed to assess the validity of the measurement.
Coherence provides a measure of the power in the test instrument vibration that is caused by the power in the impact force. A coherence of 1 indicates that all of the vibratory acceleration is caused by the impact force, whereas a coherence of 0 indicates that none of the vibration is caused by the force. The coherence y2(f) is a function of frequency and is computed equation (3) (FIG. 3C).
Example I
Tests with several violins and guitars were performed. The instruments were subjected to the acoustic treatment, as describe above, continuously for several weeks using pink noise (1/f) broadband input. The instruments were assessed both before and after the treatment by experienced musicians and through frequency response measurements.
The musicians noticed a vast improvement in the tonal quality (warmer), responsiveness (increased response), and ease of tuning. The improved ease in tuning is of special interest because new instruments (especially lower end string instruments) are very difficult to get and keep in tune.
FIG. 4A shows representative initial and final (i.e., before and after) frequency response data.
The coherence shows that most of the response is due to the input over most of the frequency range assessed. The magnitude is notably higher following the aging treatment.
This is highlighted in FIG. 4B which shows the difference in magnitude. This data clearly shows that the instrument yields more vibratory response (g) per unit input (N) over most of the frequency range. This is consistent with one of the findings observed independently from experienced musicians.
Example II
Additional tests were performed on four violins and three guitars. The repeatability of the process is shown consistently between the ranges of 500 - 600 Hz and 800 -900 Hz for the violins. The magnitude of change ranged from 5 to 20. A positive magnitude change means that the instruments produce more sound, or responds more for the same energy input; a significant aspect of this process. The violins used for testing ranged in quality from very cheap ($150.00) to moderately priced ($1200.00) with the building quality commensurate with the price paid. FIG. 5 shows the initial frequency response measured versus the final response for the violins.
The repeatability of the process is consistent between the ranges of 700 - 900 Hz for the guitars (FIG. 6). The magnitude of change ranged from 0 to 1. Even though the magnitude change is significantly less than the results found for the violin, this is still significant.
6 Example III
Two guitars were treated for a period of one week (168 hours) with the method as described above. The guitars were suspended at the neck as shown in FIG. 1. Padding was used to protect their surfaces. The acoustic energy was non-contact, broadband audio at a sound level of 110dB.
The vibratory response of the guitars was assessed before and after the treatment using impact testing. For this test, the guitars were suspended on elastic bands under the nut and at the end pin. The impact was applied on the bass side of the bridge with a PCB model 086D80 hammer with a vinyl tip and a sensitivity of 59.5 N/V, which provides fairly uniform excitation up to 1,000 Hz. A spring and a positioning guide were used to provide repeatable hammer hits.
The vibration of the guitars was measured with a PCB model 309A accelerometer placed at two different positions: (a) on the bass or left side of the bridge (one inch from the bridge), and (b) at the center (one inch from the bridge). The sensitivity of the accelerometer was 200 g/V. It was attached with bees wax, which is easily removed and does not damage the guitar finish.
The vibratory response, shown in FIGS. 7 through 10, is presented as the magnitude of the frequency response with units of acceleration output per unit force input, i.e., g/N. This is computed from an average of four impact force and accelerometer measurements using a spectrum analyzer. Measurements were taken every 24 hours to monitor change and each test was done twice to check repeatability.
The data shows that one week of treatment causes an increase in amplitude in several of the vibratory modes. Physically, this means more response (measured acceleration) for the same input (measured impact force). In addition, the treatment causes a decrease in frequency of several of the resonant frequencies. This indicates increased flexibility (or decreased stiffness). Treatment at higher sound levels will potentially induce larger changes and/or reduce treatment time.
It will be seen that the advantages set forth above, and those made apparent from the foregoing description, are efficiently attained and since certain changes may be made in the above construction without departing from the scope of the invention, it is intended that all matters contained in the foregoing description or shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
It is also to be understood that the following claims are intended to cover all of the generic and specific features of the invention herein described, and all statements of the scope of the invention which, as a matter of language, might be said to fall there between.
Now that the invention has been described,
Two guitars were treated for a period of one week (168 hours) with the method as described above. The guitars were suspended at the neck as shown in FIG. 1. Padding was used to protect their surfaces. The acoustic energy was non-contact, broadband audio at a sound level of 110dB.
The vibratory response of the guitars was assessed before and after the treatment using impact testing. For this test, the guitars were suspended on elastic bands under the nut and at the end pin. The impact was applied on the bass side of the bridge with a PCB model 086D80 hammer with a vinyl tip and a sensitivity of 59.5 N/V, which provides fairly uniform excitation up to 1,000 Hz. A spring and a positioning guide were used to provide repeatable hammer hits.
The vibration of the guitars was measured with a PCB model 309A accelerometer placed at two different positions: (a) on the bass or left side of the bridge (one inch from the bridge), and (b) at the center (one inch from the bridge). The sensitivity of the accelerometer was 200 g/V. It was attached with bees wax, which is easily removed and does not damage the guitar finish.
The vibratory response, shown in FIGS. 7 through 10, is presented as the magnitude of the frequency response with units of acceleration output per unit force input, i.e., g/N. This is computed from an average of four impact force and accelerometer measurements using a spectrum analyzer. Measurements were taken every 24 hours to monitor change and each test was done twice to check repeatability.
The data shows that one week of treatment causes an increase in amplitude in several of the vibratory modes. Physically, this means more response (measured acceleration) for the same input (measured impact force). In addition, the treatment causes a decrease in frequency of several of the resonant frequencies. This indicates increased flexibility (or decreased stiffness). Treatment at higher sound levels will potentially induce larger changes and/or reduce treatment time.
It will be seen that the advantages set forth above, and those made apparent from the foregoing description, are efficiently attained and since certain changes may be made in the above construction without departing from the scope of the invention, it is intended that all matters contained in the foregoing description or shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
It is also to be understood that the following claims are intended to cover all of the generic and specific features of the invention herein described, and all statements of the scope of the invention which, as a matter of language, might be said to fall there between.
Now that the invention has been described,
7
Claims (11)
1. A method of modifying the frequency response of a wooden article, comprising the steps of:
placing the article in an enclosure having at least one acoustical energy source;
applying acoustical energy from the acoustical energy source to the wooden article.
placing the article in an enclosure having at least one acoustical energy source;
applying acoustical energy from the acoustical energy source to the wooden article.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the acoustical energy has a predetermined frequency selected from the group consisting of at least one resonant frequency of the wooden article, at least one discrete broadband frequency, a composite broadband frequency and a combination thereof.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein at least one predetermined frequency is substantially maintained.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the acoustical energy is applied to the wooden for a predetermined time.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the acoustical energy has a sound pressure level greater than about 100dB.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the acoustical energy has a sound pressure less than about 140dB.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the acoustical energy is applied to the article for about 168 hours.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the article is selected from the group consisting of musical instruments, unfinished wood, finished wood, wood panels and flooring.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein at least on portion of the article is suspended in the enclosure.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the acoustic energy source is substantially perpendicular to the surface of the article.
11. The method of claim 1, wherein the acoustic energy source is substantially parallel to the surface of the article.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US12/185,906 | 2008-08-05 | ||
| US12/185,906 US7977555B2 (en) | 2006-01-27 | 2008-08-05 | Method of modifying the frequency response of a wooden article |
| PCT/US2009/038558 WO2010016954A1 (en) | 2008-08-05 | 2009-04-27 | Method of modifying the frequency response of a wooden article |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2732977A1 true CA2732977A1 (en) | 2010-02-11 |
Family
ID=41663923
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA2732977A Abandoned CA2732977A1 (en) | 2008-08-05 | 2009-04-27 | Method of modifying the frequency response of a wooden article |
Country Status (4)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US7977555B2 (en) |
| EP (1) | EP2316116A4 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2732977A1 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2010016954A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (11)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US7977555B2 (en) * | 2006-01-27 | 2011-07-12 | University Of South Florida | Method of modifying the frequency response of a wooden article |
| US8662245B1 (en) | 2006-01-27 | 2014-03-04 | University Of South Florida | Frequency response treatment of wood paneling |
| EP1977416B1 (en) * | 2006-01-27 | 2010-03-31 | University of South Florida | Accelerated aging process for acoustic instruments |
| US8134064B2 (en) * | 2010-01-13 | 2012-03-13 | Sanns Jr Frank | Method of improving sound quality of a musical instrument |
| US8642877B1 (en) * | 2012-06-24 | 2014-02-04 | Jeffrey A. Blish | Vibration applying assembly |
| US9583076B2 (en) * | 2015-05-21 | 2017-02-28 | Luciano Nigro | Device and method for improving the sound of musical instruments |
| US10121457B2 (en) * | 2017-02-02 | 2018-11-06 | John Gilbert | Method and apparatus for waking-up violin and other string instruments |
| US10762886B2 (en) * | 2018-06-26 | 2020-09-01 | Synca-Outfit NQ co., Ltd. | Vibration applying apparatus |
| JP6500264B1 (en) * | 2018-06-26 | 2019-04-17 | 株式会社シンカ・アウトフィットＮｑ | Vibration application device |
| TWM586795U (en) * | 2019-07-17 | 2019-11-21 | 楊岱宜 | Stringed instrument resonance analyzer |
| US11670268B2 (en) * | 2021-06-24 | 2023-06-06 | Gerald Francis Brown | Broad spectrum audio device designed to accelerate the maturation of stringed instruments |
Family Cites Families (80)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US1197116A (en) | 1915-06-08 | 1916-09-05 | Boston Conservatory Of Music And College Of Oratory | Method of and means for increasing the resonance of sound-modifying wooden bodies. |
| US1467576A (en) * | 1920-08-09 | 1923-09-11 | Martinus H Flydal | Machine for the purpose of breaking in or seasoning violins |
| US1836089A (en) * | 1928-09-04 | 1931-12-15 | Edmund O Schweitzer | Method of treating acoustical members and the article produced thereby |
| US2911872A (en) * | 1957-09-17 | 1959-11-10 | Carl Wendel | Violin breaking-in apparatus |
| US3194870A (en) | 1962-01-15 | 1965-07-13 | Albert W Tondreau | Self-contained electrical musical instrument |
| US3656395A (en) * | 1970-06-08 | 1972-04-18 | Kaman Corp | Guitar construction |
| US3774009A (en) | 1970-07-06 | 1973-11-20 | Empire Stove Co | Fastener for securing sheet material |
| US3824343A (en) | 1972-11-29 | 1974-07-16 | J Dahlquist | Multiple driver dynamic loud speaker |
| US3825666A (en) | 1973-07-30 | 1974-07-23 | Lectrasearch Corp | Apparatus for transmitting the output of a musical instrument for amplification |
| US3860086A (en) * | 1974-03-20 | 1975-01-14 | Continental Can Co | Noise reduction housing for a can bodymaker |
| US4245540A (en) | 1976-04-12 | 1981-01-20 | Groupp Barry A | Sound sustaining device for musical instruments |
| US4496831A (en) | 1980-02-29 | 1985-01-29 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | Portable laser scanning system and scanning methods |
| US4593186A (en) | 1980-02-29 | 1986-06-03 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | Portable laser scanning system and scanning methods |
| US4387297B1 (en) | 1980-02-29 | 1995-09-12 | Symbol Technologies Inc | Portable laser scanning system and scanning methods |
| US4450929A (en) * | 1980-05-09 | 1984-05-29 | Marrs Ralph E | Acoustic energy systems |
| US4348552A (en) | 1980-06-09 | 1982-09-07 | Siccone Ralph R | Direct/reflecting speaker system and triangular shaped enclosure |
| DE3214621A1 (en) | 1982-04-20 | 1983-10-20 | Siemens AG, 1000 Berlin und 8000 München | COMBINED OPTICAL HAND READER FOR MECHANICAL CHARACTER RECOGNITION WITH INTEGRATED OPTICAL SYSTEM |
| DE3504898A1 (en) * | 1985-02-13 | 1986-08-14 | Rütgerswerke AG, 6000 Frankfurt | METHOD FOR RETURNING WOOD AND USE OF THE RETURNED WOOD |
| US5023824A (en) | 1987-10-02 | 1991-06-11 | Norand Corporation | Hand-held computerized data collection terminal with indented hand grip and conforming battery drawer |
| US5488575A (en) | 1989-05-02 | 1996-01-30 | Norand Corporation | Portable work station and data collection terminal including switchable multi purpose touch screen display |
| EP0667019B1 (en) | 1989-06-07 | 2003-09-17 | Intermec IP Corp. | Hand-held data capture system with interchangeable modules |
| JPH03201016A (en) | 1989-12-27 | 1991-09-02 | Sony Corp | Handwriting input device |
| US5031501A (en) | 1990-03-19 | 1991-07-16 | Ashworth William J | Method for attaching an audio transducer to a string musical instrument |
| US5198651A (en) | 1991-05-03 | 1993-03-30 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | Laser diode device incorporating structure with integral scanning motor |
| US5168145A (en) | 1991-08-30 | 1992-12-01 | General Motors Corporation | Plastic fiber optic terminator |
| US5475214A (en) | 1991-10-15 | 1995-12-12 | Interactive Light, Inc. | Musical sound effects controller having a radiated emission space |
| US6036098A (en) | 1992-05-15 | 2000-03-14 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | Miniature scan element operably connected to a personal computer interface card |
| US5468952A (en) | 1992-05-15 | 1995-11-21 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | Miniature high speed scan element mounted on a personal computer interface card |
| JP2978655B2 (en) | 1992-10-30 | 1999-11-15 | シャープ株式会社 | Input pen storage mechanism |
| US5453762A (en) | 1993-01-20 | 1995-09-26 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Systems for processing information and identifying individual |
| US5537908A (en) * | 1994-02-08 | 1996-07-23 | Rabe; Steven W. | Acoustic response of components of musical instruments |
| US5416283A (en) | 1994-02-17 | 1995-05-16 | Adac Plastics, Inc. | Drop-in speaker mount |
| US6708883B2 (en) | 1994-06-30 | 2004-03-23 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus and method for reading indicia using charge coupled device and scanning laser beam technology |
| US5763864A (en) | 1994-07-26 | 1998-06-09 | Meta Holding Corporation | Dataform reader including dual laser and imaging reading assemblies |
| US5552569A (en) * | 1995-03-08 | 1996-09-03 | Sapkowski; Mechislao | Exponential multi-ported acoustic enclosure |
| US5600121A (en) | 1995-03-20 | 1997-02-04 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | Optical reader with independent triggering and graphical user interface |
| US6415982B2 (en) | 1995-03-20 | 2002-07-09 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | Triggered data collector and data transmitter |
| US5744791A (en) | 1996-07-24 | 1998-04-28 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | Solar energy-powered optical reader |
| JP3323693B2 (en) | 1995-05-15 | 2002-09-09 | 株式会社リコー | Pen input information device |
| US5600081A (en) * | 1995-10-04 | 1997-02-04 | Simjian; Luther G. | Method of improving the sonority of a musical instrument |
| US5657201A (en) | 1995-11-06 | 1997-08-12 | Teletransactions, Inc. | Portable data collection terminal including arm mounting assembly |
| US5969328A (en) | 1995-11-17 | 1999-10-19 | Intermec Ip Corp | Portable hand-held data terminal having curvilinear housing and keypad |
| US6109528A (en) | 1995-12-22 | 2000-08-29 | Intermec Ip Corp. | Ergonomic hand-held data terminal and data collection system |
| US5736726A (en) | 1996-03-29 | 1998-04-07 | Telxon Corporation | Portable data collection device having removable handle and battery |
| US6262354B1 (en) | 1996-07-17 | 2001-07-17 | Collins Solomon, Jr. | Protective guard and pick holder for musical instruments |
| US6065679A (en) | 1996-09-06 | 2000-05-23 | Ivi Checkmate Inc. | Modular transaction terminal |
| US6170748B1 (en) | 1997-01-06 | 2001-01-09 | Widata Corporation | Object identification system employing pulsed magnetic field-stimulated, tag-embedded transponder |
| US6040510A (en) | 1997-05-13 | 2000-03-21 | Yaun; James S. | Acoustic stringed instrument enhancement device |
| US6497368B1 (en) | 1998-01-22 | 2002-12-24 | Intermec Ip Corp. | Portable data collection |
| US5911396A (en) * | 1998-01-23 | 1999-06-15 | Bireley; David R. | Closet guitar hanger |
| US6068307A (en) | 1998-06-16 | 2000-05-30 | Micron Electronics, Inc. | Closure system for devices having a stylus |
| US6112993A (en) | 1998-09-03 | 2000-09-05 | Psc Scanning, Inc. | Flexible dither mount with rotation |
| US6394355B1 (en) | 1999-02-22 | 2002-05-28 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | Hand-held acquistion device |
| US20060072768A1 (en) | 1999-06-24 | 2006-04-06 | Schwartz Stephen R | Complementary-pair equalizer |
| US6179135B1 (en) * | 1999-10-22 | 2001-01-30 | Anthony A. Casillas | Support assembly for a stringed musical instrument |
| US6495784B2 (en) | 2000-05-16 | 2002-12-17 | Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd. | Step keys, step key assembly, and terminal having the step key assembly |
| TW471670U (en) | 2000-07-20 | 2002-01-01 | High Tech Comp Corp | Ejection mechanism of touch pen |
| US6605765B1 (en) | 2001-01-19 | 2003-08-12 | William A. Johnson | Acoustic guitar with internally located cassette tape player |
| USD473658S1 (en) * | 2001-07-05 | 2003-04-22 | Albert George Adams | Sound proof chamber |
| US6722569B2 (en) | 2001-07-13 | 2004-04-20 | Welch Allyn Data Collection, Inc. | Optical reader having a color imager |
| AUPR893501A0 (en) | 2001-11-15 | 2001-12-13 | Workman, Dean Ronald | Musical instrument support and stabiliser apparatus |
| JP4086622B2 (en) | 2002-03-11 | 2008-05-14 | ローランド株式会社 | Speaker device |
| US6822853B2 (en) | 2002-04-18 | 2004-11-23 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | Method and system for assembling keypad |
| KR100446747B1 (en) | 2002-05-29 | 2004-09-01 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Rotary-Keypad Mobile Terminal |
| TW571564B (en) | 2002-07-22 | 2004-01-11 | Veutron Corp | Scanner |
| US7151210B2 (en) | 2002-09-26 | 2006-12-19 | Fender Musical Instruments Corporation | Solid body acoustic guitar |
| US8027482B2 (en) | 2003-02-13 | 2011-09-27 | Hollinbeck Mgmt. Gmbh, Llc | DVD audio encoding using environmental audio tracks |
| US7463746B2 (en) * | 2003-03-31 | 2008-12-09 | Bose Corporation | Narrow opening electroacoustical transducing |
| DE50301431D1 (en) * | 2003-06-17 | 2005-11-24 | Hans-Peter Wilfer | Wall holder for at least one neck or a similar rejuvenation musical instrument, in particular a guitar or bass guitar |
| US7069061B2 (en) | 2003-07-18 | 2006-06-27 | Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications Ab | Speaker assemblies and mobile terminals including the same |
| US7195169B2 (en) | 2003-07-23 | 2007-03-27 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | Mobile terminal with ergonomic housing |
| US7002066B2 (en) | 2004-01-20 | 2006-02-21 | Ming-Ti Yu | Musical instrument stand |
| US20050252363A1 (en) | 2004-05-11 | 2005-11-17 | Rockett Daniel P | Electric/acoustic guitar |
| US7227068B1 (en) * | 2004-05-17 | 2007-06-05 | Clayton Lee Van Doren | String-mounted conditioner for stringed musical instruments |
| US7453040B2 (en) | 2004-12-03 | 2008-11-18 | Stephen Gillette | Active bridge for stringed musical instruments |
| US7678987B2 (en) * | 2005-08-11 | 2010-03-16 | ToneRite, Inc. | Apparatus and method for vibrating stringed musical instruments |
| US7977555B2 (en) * | 2006-01-27 | 2011-07-12 | University Of South Florida | Method of modifying the frequency response of a wooden article |
| EP1977416B1 (en) * | 2006-01-27 | 2010-03-31 | University of South Florida | Accelerated aging process for acoustic instruments |
| US7968779B2 (en) * | 2008-03-11 | 2011-06-28 | Aaron Courtright | Stringed instrument conditioning device |
| US20090293707A1 (en) * | 2008-06-02 | 2009-12-03 | John Martin Suhr | Wood aging method for musical instruments |
-
2008
- 2008-08-05 US US12/185,906 patent/US7977555B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2009
- 2009-04-27 WO PCT/US2009/038558 patent/WO2010016954A1/en active Application Filing
- 2009-04-27 EP EP09805303.6A patent/EP2316116A4/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2009-04-27 CA CA2732977A patent/CA2732977A1/en not_active Abandoned
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| EP2316116A1 (en) | 2011-05-04 |
| US20080289483A1 (en) | 2008-11-27 |
| EP2316116A4 (en) | 2013-08-14 |
| WO2010016954A1 (en) | 2010-02-11 |
| US7977555B2 (en) | 2011-07-12 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US7977555B2 (en) | Method of modifying the frequency response of a wooden article | |
| US7932457B2 (en) | Accelerated aging process for acoustic stringed instruments | |
| US5537908A (en) | Acoustic response of components of musical instruments | |
| US8134064B2 (en) | Method of improving sound quality of a musical instrument | |
| Wright | The acoustics and psychoacoustics of the guitar | |
| Gough | Acoustic characterisation of string instruments by internal cavity measurements | |
| US8662245B1 (en) | Frequency response treatment of wood paneling | |
| US20130047825A1 (en) | Method of Improving the Acoustic Response of Musical Instruments | |
| US6787688B2 (en) | Musical instrument | |
| Hanagud et al. | Active structural control for a smart guitar | |
| Tolonen et al. | Simulation of plucked strings exhibiting tension modulation driving force | |
| Hacklinger | Violin timbre and bridge frequency response | |
| Rokni et al. | The production of phantom partials due to nonlinearities in the structural components of the piano | |
| Borland | The effect of humidity and moisture content on the tone of musical instruments | |
| Hamdan et al. | Marimba Instrument construction from kayu malam wood (Diospyros maingayi) | |
| Hall | Frequency response treatment ofwood paneling | |
| Oliveira | Evolution of the vibrational behaviour of a guitar subjected to localized vibratory excitation | |
| Šali | Frequency response function of a guitar-a significant peak | |
| Pölkki et al. | New designs for the kantele with improved sound radiation | |
| Sratong-on et al. | An Analysis of Vibration Characteristic of Thai Traditional Xylophone (Ranad-Ek) | |
| Fouilhé et al. | String “After-Length” and the Cello Tailpiece: Acoustics and Perception | |
| Šali et al. | Measuring a frequency response of a guitar | |
| Pham | Structural Properties and Perceived Acoustic Quality of Modern Violins | |
| Keane | Understanding the complex nature of piano tones | |
| Moore et al. | The production of phantom partials due to nonlinearities in the structural components of the piano |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request |
Effective date: 20140425 |
|
| FZDE | Discontinued |
Effective date: 20180427 |