CA2348663A1 - Self-tuning sufficient signal strength threshold - Google Patents
Self-tuning sufficient signal strength threshold Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2348663A1 CA2348663A1 CA002348663A CA2348663A CA2348663A1 CA 2348663 A1 CA2348663 A1 CA 2348663A1 CA 002348663 A CA002348663 A CA 002348663A CA 2348663 A CA2348663 A CA 2348663A CA 2348663 A1 CA2348663 A1 CA 2348663A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- signal strength
- cell
- strength threshold
- quality
- determining
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 28
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 35
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims description 17
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 claims description 13
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 description 140
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 10
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000003850 cellular structure Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 239000010410 layer Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000002356 single layer Substances 0.000 description 2
- 208000031481 Pathologic Constriction Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 101150112492 SUM-1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101150096255 SUMO1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 210000004271 bone marrow stromal cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000023402 cell communication Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005562 fading Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000002500 ions Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W36/00—Hand-off or reselection arrangements
- H04W36/04—Reselecting a cell layer in multi-layered cells
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W36/00—Hand-off or reselection arrangements
- H04W36/24—Reselection being triggered by specific parameters
- H04W36/30—Reselection being triggered by specific parameters by measured or perceived connection quality data
- H04W36/304—Reselection being triggered by specific parameters by measured or perceived connection quality data due to measured or perceived resources with higher communication quality
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W16/00—Network planning, e.g. coverage or traffic planning tools; Network deployment, e.g. resource partitioning or cells structures
- H04W16/24—Cell structures
- H04W16/32—Hierarchical cell structures
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W36/00—Hand-off or reselection arrangements
- H04W36/24—Reselection being triggered by specific parameters
- H04W36/30—Reselection being triggered by specific parameters by measured or perceived connection quality data
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
Abstract
In a hierarchical cell structure, the parameter for setting a signal strength threshold which determines the selection of serving cell, along with the preference rating of umbrella macrocells, microcells and picocells in a cellular telephone system, is related to a quality criteria, such as speech quality. The "sufficient signal strength" threshold is automatically tuned according to the quality criteria thereby avoiding the need for expensive, time consuming manual adjustment of this parameter.
Description
SELF-TUNING SUFFICIENT SIGNAL STRENGTH THRESHOLD
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Meld of the Inven ion The irmention relates to the setting of thresholds for handoff of mobile stations within a cellular radio system and, mare particularly, to a method and apparatus for self tuning a parameter indicating the minimum, sufficient signal strength threshold used in deterrnining whether ~or not a preferred cell is suitable for communication in a hierarchical cell structure of, e.g., rnacrocells, microcells and picocells.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Meld of the Inven ion The irmention relates to the setting of thresholds for handoff of mobile stations within a cellular radio system and, mare particularly, to a method and apparatus for self tuning a parameter indicating the minimum, sufficient signal strength threshold used in deterrnining whether ~or not a preferred cell is suitable for communication in a hierarchical cell structure of, e.g., rnacrocells, microcells and picocells.
2. Related Art In cellular radio communication systems a geographic area is divided into a plurality of individual region:. referred to as cells, each of which is provided with radio service on a plurality of separate RF channels the frequencies of which are reused among different cells sufficiently separated from one another that there is a sufficiently low Ievel of interi:erence between them. When a mobile station receiving radio service from a particular base station serving a particular cell moves from that cell into another adjacent cell communication with the mobile station is "handed off"
from the first base station to the second base station serving the adjacent cell. Such handoff is typically accomplished by a mobile switching center (MSC) to which all of the base stations are connected and which controls the allocation of communication channels to the individual mobiles moving throughout the region served by the cells.
As the demand for cellular radio service increases over time, the capacity of existing systems has been severely stressed to serve all the subscribers who would like to have access to the system, particularly in major metropolitan areas.
To address this demand, cellular radio technology is moving to digital based systems such as time division multiple access (TDMA) in which a plurality of subscriber WO 00/25547 . PCT/SE99/01934 channels can be assigned to each radio channel. In a TDMA system, each channel is divided by time slots, such that information is transmitted in the same frequency but at different times as other radio signals. The received signals are separated or demodulated according to appropriate decoding.
However, even with such improvements in channel capacity, there exist certain areas within major metropolitan areas in which the demands on the system are so great that it cannot be successfully satisfied by existing cellular radio architectures.
For example, in the area in and around a convention center located in a major metropolitan area, the channel usage by portable cellular radio transceivers may be so :l0 great that the demands for service cannot be satisfied by the entire channel capacity of the base station serving the cell within which the convention center is located. In such situations., it has been proposed to provide additional "layers" of cellular radio coverage provided by additional lower powered base stations located within an existing, so-called "umbrella" cell and referred to as "microcells". Such microcells L5 may have a coverage ar service area on the order of a few hundred meters in contrast to a few kilometers of coverage: by the base station of the overlying umbrella cell. A
plurality of such microceIls may be located adjacent to one another and form a contiguous coverage area of substantial width all of which is within the overall coverage area of the umbrella cell.
2.0 When a layered cell stricture, as described above in conjunction with umbrella cells and microceIls, i.s used there is provided an enhanced level of radio capacity which can be configured for individual circumstances and which provides an assurance that users can receive: service despite an extremely high demand within a small geographic area. Moreover, additional layers of radio coverage may be added, 25 for example, by a plurality of either contiguous or separated picocells positioned within the coverage or service ~~rea of the individual microcells, each of which are in turn within the overall umbrella cell. The base stations providing the radio coverage within the picocells would be o:f even still lower power than the base stations serving
from the first base station to the second base station serving the adjacent cell. Such handoff is typically accomplished by a mobile switching center (MSC) to which all of the base stations are connected and which controls the allocation of communication channels to the individual mobiles moving throughout the region served by the cells.
As the demand for cellular radio service increases over time, the capacity of existing systems has been severely stressed to serve all the subscribers who would like to have access to the system, particularly in major metropolitan areas.
To address this demand, cellular radio technology is moving to digital based systems such as time division multiple access (TDMA) in which a plurality of subscriber WO 00/25547 . PCT/SE99/01934 channels can be assigned to each radio channel. In a TDMA system, each channel is divided by time slots, such that information is transmitted in the same frequency but at different times as other radio signals. The received signals are separated or demodulated according to appropriate decoding.
However, even with such improvements in channel capacity, there exist certain areas within major metropolitan areas in which the demands on the system are so great that it cannot be successfully satisfied by existing cellular radio architectures.
For example, in the area in and around a convention center located in a major metropolitan area, the channel usage by portable cellular radio transceivers may be so :l0 great that the demands for service cannot be satisfied by the entire channel capacity of the base station serving the cell within which the convention center is located. In such situations., it has been proposed to provide additional "layers" of cellular radio coverage provided by additional lower powered base stations located within an existing, so-called "umbrella" cell and referred to as "microcells". Such microcells L5 may have a coverage ar service area on the order of a few hundred meters in contrast to a few kilometers of coverage: by the base station of the overlying umbrella cell. A
plurality of such microceIls may be located adjacent to one another and form a contiguous coverage area of substantial width all of which is within the overall coverage area of the umbrella cell.
2.0 When a layered cell stricture, as described above in conjunction with umbrella cells and microceIls, i.s used there is provided an enhanced level of radio capacity which can be configured for individual circumstances and which provides an assurance that users can receive: service despite an extremely high demand within a small geographic area. Moreover, additional layers of radio coverage may be added, 25 for example, by a plurality of either contiguous or separated picocells positioned within the coverage or service ~~rea of the individual microcells, each of which are in turn within the overall umbrella cell. The base stations providing the radio coverage within the picocells would be o:f even still lower power than the base stations serving
-3-the microcells and have a coverage or service area of, for example, a hundred meters to provide coverage within a single building or a single floor within a large convention center.
Thus, in layered cell architectures, the issue of base station server selection and handoff of each mobile radio transceiver moving within a geographic area involves many more options. That is, it is possible for the mobile station to receive radio service at any given moment from either a picocell base station, a microcell base station, or an umbrella cell base station. When conventional handoff criteria designed for u.se in single layered cellular architectures are applied to this situation, problems arise; and the solution is less than ideal. The ability to configure the handoff mechanism for maximum efficiency with respect to the utilization of channel availability and consistent witlh high quality radio service to each mobile subscriber is highly desirable.
When handoff is effected between adjacent cells in a single layer cellular radio architecture, the principle criterion used is the comparison of the quality of the signal received from the mobile station by the respective base stations capable of providing radio service. Alternatively, the mobile station may perform measurements on signals received from the base station of the serving cell and from base stations of adjacent cells and report the results to the serving base station. That is, the signal quality of the serving cell is compared with the signal quality of an adjacent cell and when the quality of signal in the latter exceeds the former, the mobile station is handed off to the base station ;serving the adjacent cell. In addition, a signal quality increment, known as an offset or hysteresis, is also applied to the signal quality difference value so that unless the signal quality in the adjacent base station is at least :Z5 "x" amount greater than the presently serving base station, handoff does not occur.
This prevents oscillating handoffs due to signal quality perturbations in which the mobile is repeatedly handed back and forth between two adjacent base stations.
Thus, in layered cell architectures, the issue of base station server selection and handoff of each mobile radio transceiver moving within a geographic area involves many more options. That is, it is possible for the mobile station to receive radio service at any given moment from either a picocell base station, a microcell base station, or an umbrella cell base station. When conventional handoff criteria designed for u.se in single layered cellular architectures are applied to this situation, problems arise; and the solution is less than ideal. The ability to configure the handoff mechanism for maximum efficiency with respect to the utilization of channel availability and consistent witlh high quality radio service to each mobile subscriber is highly desirable.
When handoff is effected between adjacent cells in a single layer cellular radio architecture, the principle criterion used is the comparison of the quality of the signal received from the mobile station by the respective base stations capable of providing radio service. Alternatively, the mobile station may perform measurements on signals received from the base station of the serving cell and from base stations of adjacent cells and report the results to the serving base station. That is, the signal quality of the serving cell is compared with the signal quality of an adjacent cell and when the quality of signal in the latter exceeds the former, the mobile station is handed off to the base station ;serving the adjacent cell. In addition, a signal quality increment, known as an offset or hysteresis, is also applied to the signal quality difference value so that unless the signal quality in the adjacent base station is at least :Z5 "x" amount greater than the presently serving base station, handoff does not occur.
This prevents oscillating handoffs due to signal quality perturbations in which the mobile is repeatedly handed back and forth between two adjacent base stations.
-4-As disclosed in U.S. Patent 5,499,386 issued to Bror Karisson, (herein incorporated by reference) to optimize service quality and capacity, it is preferable to serve mobile stations with the lowest possible level of base station transmission power while assuring that suf~Ficient signal quality exists. Hence, there is generally a preference to serve mobile stations in pico or microcells, rather than umbrella cells which has fewer total channels available for service than the plurality of adjacent microcells would have. Pico ;and microcells are thus defined as 'preferred' cells and umbrella cells as 'non-preferred' cells. The Karlsson patent introduces a system of handoff algorithms which may;imize the efficient utilization of channel availability :l0 within a mufti-:level or hierarchical cellular radio architecture. In Ericsson's CMS8800 system, a mobile station is served by the base station of a cell belonging to the preferred level as long as the measured signal strength, which is closely related to the signal quality of that particular cell, is above a selected minimum value, i.e. the "sufficient signal strength" parameter SSSUF. The sufficient signal strength 1.5 parameter is used to define the lowest signal strength level at which the preferred cell will be prioritized over a non-preferred cell.
Within a certain range of interference and noise in a cell, the setting of the sufficient signal strength parameter will determine the call quality in the cell.
However, the setting of these parameters is done manually in conventional 20 systems such as Ericsson's CMS8800 system which utilizes the concept of hierarchical cell structure to force tragic from non-preferred cells into preferred cells even though the non-preferred cell may provide a higher signal strength.
The tuning of this and other parameters for microcells and picocells is time consuming and often inaccurate. In a congested network, there may be thousands of 25 micro and picocells each servizig a fairly small amount of traffic.
Considering the relatively small returns in subscriber fees for each of these cells, it is often not cost effective to spend too much time in fine tuning the parameters of every single cell.
To minimize this work, a common parameter setting is often used for all microcells -S-or picocells. The selection of such parameters is often a trade-off between quality and capacity. Since the parameters are not tuned individually in each cell, the handoff mechanism may be satisfactory in some cells and not so good in others.
There may thus be call quality problems in some cells, e.g., if the level of co-channel interference on the frequencies used in the microcelI is high due to short re-use distances. In that case, a relatively high value of SSSUF is needed. On the other hand, if a high value of SSSUF' is used in general to safeguard quality, the usage of the micro and picocells, i.e. preferred cells, will decrease, thus limiting the overall system capacity. In the best case, system measurements are conducted to set such 1~0 parameters as the sufficient signal strength parameter.
SUM1~ZARY OF THE INVENTION
In one aspect of the invention, the parameters used to define the lowest signal strength level a1: which a preferred cell will be prioritized over a non-preferred cell is automatically tuned based on a signal quality criteria. For instance, the signal quality 1:5 criteria can be speech quality.
Specifically, the presenl: invention includes a method of determining a minimum acceptable, i.e., sufficient, signal strength in a cell of a hierarchical cell structure comprised of multiple: levels of cells having different service areas and including base stations and mobile stations. The method comprising the steps of: 1) 21) assigning to each cell according; to a cell level a category of preference for selection with respect to each other associated cell within the system having either a coextensive, adjacent, contiguous, or overlapping service area; 2) assigning to each associated cell a preselected sufficient signal strength threshold; and 3) at Ieast initially adjusting said threshold in accordance with a measured quality criteria.
2:i In the exemplary embodfiment the method measures the speech quality by a bit error rate (BER;). In accordance with this method the adjusting of the preselected sufficient signal strength threshold includes the following algorithm:
If BER > 1 % for more than 2 % of the call time in a cell, the preselected sufficient signal strength threshold is increased by 1 dB; and if BER > 1 % for less than 0.5 % of the call time in this cell, the preselected sufficient signal strength threshold is decreased by 1 dB.
Alternatively, the method can adjust the preselected sufficient signal strength threshold witlx a non-recursive, statistical relationship estirriate of how much the signal strength threshold should be increased or decreased, such as by determining the probability of a bit error rate being greater than 1 % for a given threshold level and determining a threshold level to be increased or decreased to assure that that probability is 'within a given range.
The preserit invention can be embodied as a method of handoff of a mobile station operating within a cellular radio system in a hierarchical cell structure comprised of multiple levels of cells having different service areas and including base stations and mobile stations, the method comprising the steps of: 1) assigning to each cell according to a cell level a~ category of preference for selection with respect to each other associated cell within the system having either a coextensive, adjacent, contiguous, or overlapping service area; 2) assigning to each associated cell a :~0 preselected sufficient signal strength threshold; 3) at least initially adjusting the preselected sufficient signal strength threshold in accordance with a measured quality criteria; 4) measuring the signal strength of communications between the mobile station and each base station serving the associated cells; 5) comparing the measured signal strength to the preselected thresholds for each of the measured cells;
6) and
Within a certain range of interference and noise in a cell, the setting of the sufficient signal strength parameter will determine the call quality in the cell.
However, the setting of these parameters is done manually in conventional 20 systems such as Ericsson's CMS8800 system which utilizes the concept of hierarchical cell structure to force tragic from non-preferred cells into preferred cells even though the non-preferred cell may provide a higher signal strength.
The tuning of this and other parameters for microcells and picocells is time consuming and often inaccurate. In a congested network, there may be thousands of 25 micro and picocells each servizig a fairly small amount of traffic.
Considering the relatively small returns in subscriber fees for each of these cells, it is often not cost effective to spend too much time in fine tuning the parameters of every single cell.
To minimize this work, a common parameter setting is often used for all microcells -S-or picocells. The selection of such parameters is often a trade-off between quality and capacity. Since the parameters are not tuned individually in each cell, the handoff mechanism may be satisfactory in some cells and not so good in others.
There may thus be call quality problems in some cells, e.g., if the level of co-channel interference on the frequencies used in the microcelI is high due to short re-use distances. In that case, a relatively high value of SSSUF is needed. On the other hand, if a high value of SSSUF' is used in general to safeguard quality, the usage of the micro and picocells, i.e. preferred cells, will decrease, thus limiting the overall system capacity. In the best case, system measurements are conducted to set such 1~0 parameters as the sufficient signal strength parameter.
SUM1~ZARY OF THE INVENTION
In one aspect of the invention, the parameters used to define the lowest signal strength level a1: which a preferred cell will be prioritized over a non-preferred cell is automatically tuned based on a signal quality criteria. For instance, the signal quality 1:5 criteria can be speech quality.
Specifically, the presenl: invention includes a method of determining a minimum acceptable, i.e., sufficient, signal strength in a cell of a hierarchical cell structure comprised of multiple: levels of cells having different service areas and including base stations and mobile stations. The method comprising the steps of: 1) 21) assigning to each cell according; to a cell level a category of preference for selection with respect to each other associated cell within the system having either a coextensive, adjacent, contiguous, or overlapping service area; 2) assigning to each associated cell a preselected sufficient signal strength threshold; and 3) at Ieast initially adjusting said threshold in accordance with a measured quality criteria.
2:i In the exemplary embodfiment the method measures the speech quality by a bit error rate (BER;). In accordance with this method the adjusting of the preselected sufficient signal strength threshold includes the following algorithm:
If BER > 1 % for more than 2 % of the call time in a cell, the preselected sufficient signal strength threshold is increased by 1 dB; and if BER > 1 % for less than 0.5 % of the call time in this cell, the preselected sufficient signal strength threshold is decreased by 1 dB.
Alternatively, the method can adjust the preselected sufficient signal strength threshold witlx a non-recursive, statistical relationship estirriate of how much the signal strength threshold should be increased or decreased, such as by determining the probability of a bit error rate being greater than 1 % for a given threshold level and determining a threshold level to be increased or decreased to assure that that probability is 'within a given range.
The preserit invention can be embodied as a method of handoff of a mobile station operating within a cellular radio system in a hierarchical cell structure comprised of multiple levels of cells having different service areas and including base stations and mobile stations, the method comprising the steps of: 1) assigning to each cell according to a cell level a~ category of preference for selection with respect to each other associated cell within the system having either a coextensive, adjacent, contiguous, or overlapping service area; 2) assigning to each associated cell a :~0 preselected sufficient signal strength threshold; 3) at least initially adjusting the preselected sufficient signal strength threshold in accordance with a measured quality criteria; 4) measuring the signal strength of communications between the mobile station and each base station serving the associated cells; 5) comparing the measured signal strength to the preselected thresholds for each of the measured cells;
6) and
5 selecting for the mobile station a base station for a communication based upon whether the measured signal strength of the base station is greater than the preselected sufficient signal strength threshold assigned to the cell and whether the base station ha.s a higher category of preference than the currently serving cell.
Further, the present invention can be embodied in an apparatus for determining a minimum acceptable signal strength in a cell of a hierarchical cell structure comprised of multiple levels of cells having different service areas and including base stations and mobile stations, the apparatus comprising: 1) means for assigning to each cell according to a cell level a category of preference for selection with respect to each other associated cell within the system having either-a coextensive, adjacent, contiguous, or overlapping service area; 2) means for assigning to each associated cell a preselected sufficient signal strength threshold; 3) means for at least initially adjusting the preselected sufficient signal strength a0 threshold in accordance with a measured quality criteria.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
For a more complete understanding of the present invention and for further objects and advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
a5 Figure 1 is a represent<~tion of a single level cellular radio communication system including a mobile switching center, a plurality of base stations and a plurality of mobile stations;
Figure 2 illustrates an exemplary mufti-layered cellular system employing umbrella macrocells, microcells, and picocells;
:~0 Figure 3 illustrates an exemplary implementation of an apparatus of a radio telephone system including a vase station and a mobile station.
Figure 4 is a graph showing the relationship between received signal strength and hand-off decisions;
Figure 5 is a graph mapping C/(I+N) to the probability of BER < 1 % ;
?5 Figure 6 is a flow chart illustrating an aspect of the present invention;
and Figure 7 is a flow chart illustrating the process of selecting a base station.
_g_ DETAILED DESCRIPTION
In the following description, for purposes of explanation and not limitation, specific details such as particular components, techniques, etc., are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced in other embodiments that depart from the specific details. In other instances, detailed descriptions of well known methods, devices and circuits are omitted so as to not obscure the description of the present invention.
Referring first to FIG. 1, there is illustrated a conventional single layer cellular radio communication system of the type to which the present invention has a relationship. In FIG. 1, an arbitrary geographic area may be divided into a plurality of contiguous radio coverage areas, or cells Cl-C10. While the system of FIG.
1 is illustratively shown to include only 10 cells, it should be clearly understood that in practice, the number of cells will be much larger.
Associated with and located within each of the cells CI-CIO is a base station . designated as a corresponding one of a plurality of base stations B1-B10.
Each of the base stations Bl.-B10 includes ~~ transmitter, receiver, and base station controller as is well known in the art. In FIG. l, the base stations B1-B10 are illustratively located at the center of each of the cells C 1-C 10, respectively, and are equipped with omn.i-directional antennas. However, in other configurations of a cellular radio system, the base stations B1-B10 may be located near the periphery, or otherwise away from the centers of the ce:Ils C 1-C 10 and may illuminate the cells C 1-C 10 with radio signals either omni-directionally or directionally. Therefore, the representation of the cellular radio system of FIG. 1 is for purposes of illustration of a single level cellular 2:i radio system only and is not intended as a limitation on the possible implementations of the cellular radio system within which the system of the present invention may hnd utility .
With continuing reference to FIG. l, a plurality of mobile stations M1-M10 may be found within the cells C 1-C 10. Again, only 10 mobile stations are shown in FIG. 1 but it should be understood that the actual number of mobile stations will be much larger in practice and will invariably greatly exceed the number of base S stations. Moreover, while none of the mobile stations M 1-M 10 will be found in some the cells C1-C10, the presence or absence of the mobile stations M1-M10 in any particular one of the cells C 1-C IO should be understood to depend, in practice on the individual desires of the mobile stations M1-M10 who may move from one location in the cell to another or from one cell to an adjacent cell or neighboring cell, il0 and even roam from one cellular radio system served by a Mobile Switching Center (MSC) to another system.
Each of the mobile stations M1-M10 is capable of initiating or receiving a telephone call via one or more of the base stations B I-B 10 and a mobile switching center (MSC). A MSC is connected by communication links, e.g. cables, to each of '.l5 the illustrative base stations Bl'.-B10 and to the fixed public switch telephone network (PSTN), not shown, or a similar fixed network which may include an integrated system digital network (ISDN) facility. The relevant connections between the MSC
and the base stiitions B1-BIO, or between the MSC and the PSTN or ISDN, are not completely shown in FIG. 1 but are well known to those of ordinary skill in the art.
~!0 Similarly, it is also known to include more than one MSC in the cellular radio system and to connect each additional MSC to a different group of base stations and to other MSCs via cable or radio links.
Each of the cells CI-CIO is allocated a plurality of voice or speech channels and at least one access or conb-ol channel. The control channel is used to control or :!5 supervise the operation of mobile stations by means of information transmitted to and received from those units. Such information may include incoming call signals, outgoing call signals, page signals, page response signals, location registration signals, voice channel assignments, and maintenance instructions as the mobile -IO-station travels out of the radio coverage of one cell and into the radio coverage of another cell. The control or voice channels may operate either in an analog or digital mode or a combination thereof.
FIG. 1 illustrates a relatively conventional single level cellular structure in which mobile stations are handed off from one cell to another by it being served with radio channels in communication with first one base station and then an adjacent base station based upon the signal levels as received either by the mobile station or by each of the respective base stations. Handoff decisions may be based on downlink measurements (MAHO) or uplink measurements or a combination of both.
:10 FIG. 2 is an exemplary multi-layered cellular system. An umbrella macrocell represented by a hexagonal shape makes up an overlying cellular structure.
Each umbrella cell may contain an underlying microcell structure. The umbrella cell includes micracell 20 represented by the area enclosed within the dotted line and microcell 30 represented by the area enclosed within the dashed line corresponding to l.5 areas along city streets, and picocells 40, S0, and 60, which cover individual floors of a building. The intersection of the two city streets covered by the microcells 20 and 30 may be an area of dense traffic concentration, and thus might represent a hot spot. Further details of this system are disclosed in U.S. Patent 5,353,332 issued to Alex Raith, herein incorporated by reference.
2:0 A mobile station periodically scans during idle mode the control channels in the coverage area that the mobile is located in to determine which cell it should be locked to. Thus, a mobile station may continuously select cells to be locked to based on the existing location of the mobile station and quality criteria (e.g., received signal strength) associated with the cells. The cell to which the mobile station may be 2.5 locked is the cell in which the mobile satisfies the quality criteria associated with the cell. For example, the most underlying cell based on capacity considerations may be designated by the system operator as a 'preferred' cell.
The above cell selection and reselection criteria involves measurement of received signal strengths on respective control channels. By comparing the set of measurements and parameters of different control channels, the mobile can select the most appropriate cell. Further, the service profile of a candidate cell may also determine the selection of control channels (cells). Service profile information might include information such as whether a half rate or full rate speech coder is being used; the data bit transmission rate; and the type of data the cell can handle, i.e., data, voice, and data and voice.
FIG. 3 represents a block diagram of an exemplary cellular mobile radiotelephone system. The system shows an exemplary base station 110 and a mobile station 120. The base station includes a control and processing unit which is connected to the MSn 140 which in turn is connected to the public switched telephone network (not shown.). General aspects of such cellular radiotelephone systems are known in the art. An exemplary system can be found in the earlier ' 15 mentioned U.S. Patent No. 5,353,332.
The base station l I0 for a cell includes a plurality of voice channels handled by voice channel transceiver 150 which is controlled by the control and processing unit 130. Also, each base station includes a control channel transceiver 160 which may be capable of handling more than one control channel. The control channel :?0 transceiver 160 is controlled by the control and processing unit 130. The control channel transceiver 160 broadcasts control information over the control channel of the base station or cell to mobiles locked to that control channel.
When the mobile 120 i;s in idle mode, it periodically scans the control channels of base stations like base station 110 to determine which cell to lock to or ~!5 camp on. The mobile station :120 receives information broadcasted on a control channel at its voice and control channel transceiver 170. Then, the processing unit 180 evaluates the received control channel information which includes the characteristics of the candidate cells and determines to which cell the mobile station should be locked.
Figure 4 shows that, in a hierarchical cell structure, handoff in and out of a microcell is done when the receive signal strength (RSSI) received from the microcell is above or below the sufficient signal strength level plus or minus a hysteresis value.
Cells in a lower level, e.g. mi.crocells, are classified as 'preferred cells' compared with the 'non-preferred' overlying cells, e.g. macrocells. If the RSSI in a preferred cell is above the minimum acceptable signal strength, e.g. SSSUF plus hysteresis, this cell is selected even if the RSSI is higher in the non-preferred cell.
The hysteresis value is used together with the sufficient signal strength parameter when handoff decisions are made, as explained above. This means that the handoff to the cell is actually done when the received signal strength indicator (RSSI) is greater than this sufficient signal strength parameter (SSSUF) plus the hysteresis value (HYSUF) and out of the cell when the RSSI is less than SSSUF minus HYSUF.
IS In accordance with the present invention, the sufficient signal strength parameter SSSUF is automatically tuned to overcome the problems associated with the time consuming and inaccurate previous methods of tuning of this and other parameters for microcells and picocells without resort to a common parameter setting for all microcells or picocells. The automatic tuning is based on signal quality :20 criteria. Specifically, the signal quality criteria can be speech quality which is determined, e. g. by measuring; bit error rate (BER) on the traffic present in the cell over a period of time (5-30 minutes for example), .preferably when the traffic load is high. One of the more critical factors for setting the sufficient signal strength parameter is the carrier to interference ratio (C/I) which relates closely to the BER.
a5 To get a good speech quality vi the cell, the BER should not be above a certain threshold for more than a certain percentage of time.
The sufficient signal strength parameter SSSUF is adjusted according to the measured quality. After such an adjustment, the quality must be measured again and the sufficient signal strength parameter SSSUF may be adjusted again.
With these factors in mind, one embodiment of the present invention relates the setting of the sufficient signal strength parameter to the bit error rate according to the following recursive algorithm:
I:f BER > 1 % for more than 2 % of the call time in a cell, the sufficient signal strength parameter SSSUF is increased by I dB; and if BER > 1 % for less than 0.5 % of the call time in this cell, the sufficient signal strength parameter SSSUF is decreased by i dB.
Naturally, other specific values can be adopted to optimize a given system.
In another embodiment of the present invention, a non-recursive, direct estimate of how much of an increase or decrease should be imposed on the sufficient signal strength :parameter using; a statistical relationship between the BER
and the ratio of the carrier signal to the sum of the interference and noise (C/(I+N)). A
certain probability for, e.g., BER greater than 1 % will be related to a certain threshold increase or decrease, e.g., a certain number of dBs to be added to or subtracted from the sufficient signal strength parameter if the target is, for example, f.0 90%.
An exemplary implementation is as follows: to determine the current call quality in a cell, the probabilit~r of BER < 1 % during a high traffic period is measured. From measurements in the D-AMPS system, for example, the relationship between the probability of BEF; < I % and Cl(I+N) has been established. See Fig.
2:5 5. The measured probability can then be translated to a Cl(I+N) estimate Qm.
Similarly, the required quality level in the cell (probability of BER < 1 % ) is translated to a (:/(I+N) value Qt. The proper value to add to the sufficient signal strength parameter SSSUF will then be equal to (Qt-Qm)dB.
From Figure 5 it can be seen that if the probability of the BER being less than 1 % is 80%, the carrier to interference ratio (C/I) should be increased by about 3 dBs to reach 90% . Similarly, by adding 3 dBs to the sufficient signal strength parameter value will achieve the same result because the carrier is increased while the interference and noise will remain the same. The adjustment given by the algorithm can either be used in a "closed loop", i.e. the system adjusts itself without interaction with the operator, or in an "open loop" where the operator is presented with a calculated value which he can chose to use or not to use.
Figure 6 illustrates an exemplary flow of the inventive method of determining a minimum acceptable (i.e. su:fficient) signal strength in a preferred cell of a hierarchical cell structure of rrmltiple levels of cells having different service areas and including base stations and mobile stations. At step 61, each cell according to a cell level is assigned a category of preference for selection with respect to each other associated cell within the system having either a coextensive, adjacent, contiguous, or 1.5 overlapping service area. At step 62, each associated cell is assigned a preselected signal strength threshold SSSU'F. At step 63, the call quality in the cell is determined. At step 64, it is determined whether the call quality is within a selected range. If it is not, at step 65, the current sufficient signal strength threshold SSSUF
is adjusted in accordance with a measured quality criteria such that SSSUF is 21) increased if the quality is too low and decreased if the quality is too high. If the call quality is within the selected range, then at optional step 66, a delay or waiting period is timed out, and the method returns to a call quality determining step 64.
Naturally, the sufficient signal strength threshold can be adjusted at various times as dictated by circumstances, such as the introduction of a new picocell, microcell, or macrocell.
2:i As shown in Figure 7, t:he present invention can also be embodied in a method of handoff or a mobile station operating within a cellular radio system in a hierarchical cell structure comprised of multiple levels of cells having different service areas anal including base stations and mobile stations. In this case, the method further includes step ',~1 of measuring the signal strength of communications between the mobile station and each base station serving the associated cells;
step 72 of comparing the measured si;;nal strength to the thzesholds set for each of the measured cells respectively; and step 73 of selecting for the mobile station a base station for communication based upon whether the measured signal strength of the base station is greater than the: current signal strength threshold assigned to the cell and whether the base station h.as a higher category of preference than the currently serving cell. 'This last step can be implemented in the mobile station or in the network.
:LO As mentioned before, the quality criteria is speech quality and the setting of the preselected signal strength threshold is related to a carrier to interference ratio.
In one embodiment the speech. quality is measured by a bit error rate. It should be noted that the quality measurements should ideally be made for a cell as appropriate for the conditions. For instance, measurements should be done during busy hours in :~5 the system since interference tends to be highest then and the largest percentage of the total number of calls are W king place. Quality for a digital channel is for example measured by BER on the up or down link. However, other known parameters such as Frame Erasure Rate and Fading Frequency measures can be used in a known fashion. For an analog channel, other known parameters such as C/I
and ~!0 C/N measurements can be used.
Step 65 may include adjusting the preselected sufficient signal strength threshold using the following algorithm:
If BER > I % for more than 2 % of the call time in a cell, the preselected sufficient signal strength threshold 25 is increased by 1 dB; and :if BER > 1 % for less than 0.5 % of the call time in this cell, the preselected sufficient signal strength threshold :is decreased by 1 dB.
Alternatively, in step 65 the adjusting of the preselected sufficient signal strength threshold includes a non-recursive estimate by a statistical relationship of how much the signal strength. threshold should be increased or decreased as earlier described. For instance, step 65 can use a statistical relationship such as determining the probability of a bit error hate being greater than 1 % for a given threshold level and determining a threshold level to be increased or subtracted to assure that the probability is within a given range.
It is believed that the operation and construction of the present invention will be apparent from the foregoing description and, while the method and apparatus shown and described has been characterized as being preferred, obvious changes and modifications may be made t~uerein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the following claims.
Further, the present invention can be embodied in an apparatus for determining a minimum acceptable signal strength in a cell of a hierarchical cell structure comprised of multiple levels of cells having different service areas and including base stations and mobile stations, the apparatus comprising: 1) means for assigning to each cell according to a cell level a category of preference for selection with respect to each other associated cell within the system having either-a coextensive, adjacent, contiguous, or overlapping service area; 2) means for assigning to each associated cell a preselected sufficient signal strength threshold; 3) means for at least initially adjusting the preselected sufficient signal strength a0 threshold in accordance with a measured quality criteria.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
For a more complete understanding of the present invention and for further objects and advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
a5 Figure 1 is a represent<~tion of a single level cellular radio communication system including a mobile switching center, a plurality of base stations and a plurality of mobile stations;
Figure 2 illustrates an exemplary mufti-layered cellular system employing umbrella macrocells, microcells, and picocells;
:~0 Figure 3 illustrates an exemplary implementation of an apparatus of a radio telephone system including a vase station and a mobile station.
Figure 4 is a graph showing the relationship between received signal strength and hand-off decisions;
Figure 5 is a graph mapping C/(I+N) to the probability of BER < 1 % ;
?5 Figure 6 is a flow chart illustrating an aspect of the present invention;
and Figure 7 is a flow chart illustrating the process of selecting a base station.
_g_ DETAILED DESCRIPTION
In the following description, for purposes of explanation and not limitation, specific details such as particular components, techniques, etc., are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced in other embodiments that depart from the specific details. In other instances, detailed descriptions of well known methods, devices and circuits are omitted so as to not obscure the description of the present invention.
Referring first to FIG. 1, there is illustrated a conventional single layer cellular radio communication system of the type to which the present invention has a relationship. In FIG. 1, an arbitrary geographic area may be divided into a plurality of contiguous radio coverage areas, or cells Cl-C10. While the system of FIG.
1 is illustratively shown to include only 10 cells, it should be clearly understood that in practice, the number of cells will be much larger.
Associated with and located within each of the cells CI-CIO is a base station . designated as a corresponding one of a plurality of base stations B1-B10.
Each of the base stations Bl.-B10 includes ~~ transmitter, receiver, and base station controller as is well known in the art. In FIG. l, the base stations B1-B10 are illustratively located at the center of each of the cells C 1-C 10, respectively, and are equipped with omn.i-directional antennas. However, in other configurations of a cellular radio system, the base stations B1-B10 may be located near the periphery, or otherwise away from the centers of the ce:Ils C 1-C 10 and may illuminate the cells C 1-C 10 with radio signals either omni-directionally or directionally. Therefore, the representation of the cellular radio system of FIG. 1 is for purposes of illustration of a single level cellular 2:i radio system only and is not intended as a limitation on the possible implementations of the cellular radio system within which the system of the present invention may hnd utility .
With continuing reference to FIG. l, a plurality of mobile stations M1-M10 may be found within the cells C 1-C 10. Again, only 10 mobile stations are shown in FIG. 1 but it should be understood that the actual number of mobile stations will be much larger in practice and will invariably greatly exceed the number of base S stations. Moreover, while none of the mobile stations M 1-M 10 will be found in some the cells C1-C10, the presence or absence of the mobile stations M1-M10 in any particular one of the cells C 1-C IO should be understood to depend, in practice on the individual desires of the mobile stations M1-M10 who may move from one location in the cell to another or from one cell to an adjacent cell or neighboring cell, il0 and even roam from one cellular radio system served by a Mobile Switching Center (MSC) to another system.
Each of the mobile stations M1-M10 is capable of initiating or receiving a telephone call via one or more of the base stations B I-B 10 and a mobile switching center (MSC). A MSC is connected by communication links, e.g. cables, to each of '.l5 the illustrative base stations Bl'.-B10 and to the fixed public switch telephone network (PSTN), not shown, or a similar fixed network which may include an integrated system digital network (ISDN) facility. The relevant connections between the MSC
and the base stiitions B1-BIO, or between the MSC and the PSTN or ISDN, are not completely shown in FIG. 1 but are well known to those of ordinary skill in the art.
~!0 Similarly, it is also known to include more than one MSC in the cellular radio system and to connect each additional MSC to a different group of base stations and to other MSCs via cable or radio links.
Each of the cells CI-CIO is allocated a plurality of voice or speech channels and at least one access or conb-ol channel. The control channel is used to control or :!5 supervise the operation of mobile stations by means of information transmitted to and received from those units. Such information may include incoming call signals, outgoing call signals, page signals, page response signals, location registration signals, voice channel assignments, and maintenance instructions as the mobile -IO-station travels out of the radio coverage of one cell and into the radio coverage of another cell. The control or voice channels may operate either in an analog or digital mode or a combination thereof.
FIG. 1 illustrates a relatively conventional single level cellular structure in which mobile stations are handed off from one cell to another by it being served with radio channels in communication with first one base station and then an adjacent base station based upon the signal levels as received either by the mobile station or by each of the respective base stations. Handoff decisions may be based on downlink measurements (MAHO) or uplink measurements or a combination of both.
:10 FIG. 2 is an exemplary multi-layered cellular system. An umbrella macrocell represented by a hexagonal shape makes up an overlying cellular structure.
Each umbrella cell may contain an underlying microcell structure. The umbrella cell includes micracell 20 represented by the area enclosed within the dotted line and microcell 30 represented by the area enclosed within the dashed line corresponding to l.5 areas along city streets, and picocells 40, S0, and 60, which cover individual floors of a building. The intersection of the two city streets covered by the microcells 20 and 30 may be an area of dense traffic concentration, and thus might represent a hot spot. Further details of this system are disclosed in U.S. Patent 5,353,332 issued to Alex Raith, herein incorporated by reference.
2:0 A mobile station periodically scans during idle mode the control channels in the coverage area that the mobile is located in to determine which cell it should be locked to. Thus, a mobile station may continuously select cells to be locked to based on the existing location of the mobile station and quality criteria (e.g., received signal strength) associated with the cells. The cell to which the mobile station may be 2.5 locked is the cell in which the mobile satisfies the quality criteria associated with the cell. For example, the most underlying cell based on capacity considerations may be designated by the system operator as a 'preferred' cell.
The above cell selection and reselection criteria involves measurement of received signal strengths on respective control channels. By comparing the set of measurements and parameters of different control channels, the mobile can select the most appropriate cell. Further, the service profile of a candidate cell may also determine the selection of control channels (cells). Service profile information might include information such as whether a half rate or full rate speech coder is being used; the data bit transmission rate; and the type of data the cell can handle, i.e., data, voice, and data and voice.
FIG. 3 represents a block diagram of an exemplary cellular mobile radiotelephone system. The system shows an exemplary base station 110 and a mobile station 120. The base station includes a control and processing unit which is connected to the MSn 140 which in turn is connected to the public switched telephone network (not shown.). General aspects of such cellular radiotelephone systems are known in the art. An exemplary system can be found in the earlier ' 15 mentioned U.S. Patent No. 5,353,332.
The base station l I0 for a cell includes a plurality of voice channels handled by voice channel transceiver 150 which is controlled by the control and processing unit 130. Also, each base station includes a control channel transceiver 160 which may be capable of handling more than one control channel. The control channel :?0 transceiver 160 is controlled by the control and processing unit 130. The control channel transceiver 160 broadcasts control information over the control channel of the base station or cell to mobiles locked to that control channel.
When the mobile 120 i;s in idle mode, it periodically scans the control channels of base stations like base station 110 to determine which cell to lock to or ~!5 camp on. The mobile station :120 receives information broadcasted on a control channel at its voice and control channel transceiver 170. Then, the processing unit 180 evaluates the received control channel information which includes the characteristics of the candidate cells and determines to which cell the mobile station should be locked.
Figure 4 shows that, in a hierarchical cell structure, handoff in and out of a microcell is done when the receive signal strength (RSSI) received from the microcell is above or below the sufficient signal strength level plus or minus a hysteresis value.
Cells in a lower level, e.g. mi.crocells, are classified as 'preferred cells' compared with the 'non-preferred' overlying cells, e.g. macrocells. If the RSSI in a preferred cell is above the minimum acceptable signal strength, e.g. SSSUF plus hysteresis, this cell is selected even if the RSSI is higher in the non-preferred cell.
The hysteresis value is used together with the sufficient signal strength parameter when handoff decisions are made, as explained above. This means that the handoff to the cell is actually done when the received signal strength indicator (RSSI) is greater than this sufficient signal strength parameter (SSSUF) plus the hysteresis value (HYSUF) and out of the cell when the RSSI is less than SSSUF minus HYSUF.
IS In accordance with the present invention, the sufficient signal strength parameter SSSUF is automatically tuned to overcome the problems associated with the time consuming and inaccurate previous methods of tuning of this and other parameters for microcells and picocells without resort to a common parameter setting for all microcells or picocells. The automatic tuning is based on signal quality :20 criteria. Specifically, the signal quality criteria can be speech quality which is determined, e. g. by measuring; bit error rate (BER) on the traffic present in the cell over a period of time (5-30 minutes for example), .preferably when the traffic load is high. One of the more critical factors for setting the sufficient signal strength parameter is the carrier to interference ratio (C/I) which relates closely to the BER.
a5 To get a good speech quality vi the cell, the BER should not be above a certain threshold for more than a certain percentage of time.
The sufficient signal strength parameter SSSUF is adjusted according to the measured quality. After such an adjustment, the quality must be measured again and the sufficient signal strength parameter SSSUF may be adjusted again.
With these factors in mind, one embodiment of the present invention relates the setting of the sufficient signal strength parameter to the bit error rate according to the following recursive algorithm:
I:f BER > 1 % for more than 2 % of the call time in a cell, the sufficient signal strength parameter SSSUF is increased by I dB; and if BER > 1 % for less than 0.5 % of the call time in this cell, the sufficient signal strength parameter SSSUF is decreased by i dB.
Naturally, other specific values can be adopted to optimize a given system.
In another embodiment of the present invention, a non-recursive, direct estimate of how much of an increase or decrease should be imposed on the sufficient signal strength :parameter using; a statistical relationship between the BER
and the ratio of the carrier signal to the sum of the interference and noise (C/(I+N)). A
certain probability for, e.g., BER greater than 1 % will be related to a certain threshold increase or decrease, e.g., a certain number of dBs to be added to or subtracted from the sufficient signal strength parameter if the target is, for example, f.0 90%.
An exemplary implementation is as follows: to determine the current call quality in a cell, the probabilit~r of BER < 1 % during a high traffic period is measured. From measurements in the D-AMPS system, for example, the relationship between the probability of BEF; < I % and Cl(I+N) has been established. See Fig.
2:5 5. The measured probability can then be translated to a Cl(I+N) estimate Qm.
Similarly, the required quality level in the cell (probability of BER < 1 % ) is translated to a (:/(I+N) value Qt. The proper value to add to the sufficient signal strength parameter SSSUF will then be equal to (Qt-Qm)dB.
From Figure 5 it can be seen that if the probability of the BER being less than 1 % is 80%, the carrier to interference ratio (C/I) should be increased by about 3 dBs to reach 90% . Similarly, by adding 3 dBs to the sufficient signal strength parameter value will achieve the same result because the carrier is increased while the interference and noise will remain the same. The adjustment given by the algorithm can either be used in a "closed loop", i.e. the system adjusts itself without interaction with the operator, or in an "open loop" where the operator is presented with a calculated value which he can chose to use or not to use.
Figure 6 illustrates an exemplary flow of the inventive method of determining a minimum acceptable (i.e. su:fficient) signal strength in a preferred cell of a hierarchical cell structure of rrmltiple levels of cells having different service areas and including base stations and mobile stations. At step 61, each cell according to a cell level is assigned a category of preference for selection with respect to each other associated cell within the system having either a coextensive, adjacent, contiguous, or 1.5 overlapping service area. At step 62, each associated cell is assigned a preselected signal strength threshold SSSU'F. At step 63, the call quality in the cell is determined. At step 64, it is determined whether the call quality is within a selected range. If it is not, at step 65, the current sufficient signal strength threshold SSSUF
is adjusted in accordance with a measured quality criteria such that SSSUF is 21) increased if the quality is too low and decreased if the quality is too high. If the call quality is within the selected range, then at optional step 66, a delay or waiting period is timed out, and the method returns to a call quality determining step 64.
Naturally, the sufficient signal strength threshold can be adjusted at various times as dictated by circumstances, such as the introduction of a new picocell, microcell, or macrocell.
2:i As shown in Figure 7, t:he present invention can also be embodied in a method of handoff or a mobile station operating within a cellular radio system in a hierarchical cell structure comprised of multiple levels of cells having different service areas anal including base stations and mobile stations. In this case, the method further includes step ',~1 of measuring the signal strength of communications between the mobile station and each base station serving the associated cells;
step 72 of comparing the measured si;;nal strength to the thzesholds set for each of the measured cells respectively; and step 73 of selecting for the mobile station a base station for communication based upon whether the measured signal strength of the base station is greater than the: current signal strength threshold assigned to the cell and whether the base station h.as a higher category of preference than the currently serving cell. 'This last step can be implemented in the mobile station or in the network.
:LO As mentioned before, the quality criteria is speech quality and the setting of the preselected signal strength threshold is related to a carrier to interference ratio.
In one embodiment the speech. quality is measured by a bit error rate. It should be noted that the quality measurements should ideally be made for a cell as appropriate for the conditions. For instance, measurements should be done during busy hours in :~5 the system since interference tends to be highest then and the largest percentage of the total number of calls are W king place. Quality for a digital channel is for example measured by BER on the up or down link. However, other known parameters such as Frame Erasure Rate and Fading Frequency measures can be used in a known fashion. For an analog channel, other known parameters such as C/I
and ~!0 C/N measurements can be used.
Step 65 may include adjusting the preselected sufficient signal strength threshold using the following algorithm:
If BER > I % for more than 2 % of the call time in a cell, the preselected sufficient signal strength threshold 25 is increased by 1 dB; and :if BER > 1 % for less than 0.5 % of the call time in this cell, the preselected sufficient signal strength threshold :is decreased by 1 dB.
Alternatively, in step 65 the adjusting of the preselected sufficient signal strength threshold includes a non-recursive estimate by a statistical relationship of how much the signal strength. threshold should be increased or decreased as earlier described. For instance, step 65 can use a statistical relationship such as determining the probability of a bit error hate being greater than 1 % for a given threshold level and determining a threshold level to be increased or subtracted to assure that the probability is within a given range.
It is believed that the operation and construction of the present invention will be apparent from the foregoing description and, while the method and apparatus shown and described has been characterized as being preferred, obvious changes and modifications may be made t~uerein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the following claims.
Claims (21)
1. A method of determining a minimum acceptable signal strength in a cell of a cellular radio system with a hierarchical cell structure comprised of multiple levels of cells having different service areas and including base stations and mobile stations, said method comprising:
assigning to each cell according to a cell level a category of preference for selection with respect to each other associated cell within the system having either a coextensive, adjacent, contiguous, or overlapping service area;
assigning to each associated cell a preselected signal strength threshold as a minimum requirement for radio communication with a mobile station;
determining the communication quality in the cell; and adjusting said signal strength threshold in accordance with a criteria for said determined quality.
assigning to each cell according to a cell level a category of preference for selection with respect to each other associated cell within the system having either a coextensive, adjacent, contiguous, or overlapping service area;
assigning to each associated cell a preselected signal strength threshold as a minimum requirement for radio communication with a mobile station;
determining the communication quality in the cell; and adjusting said signal strength threshold in accordance with a criteria for said determined quality.
2. The method according to claim 1, further comprising repeating said determining and adjusting steps if said quality criteria is not satisfied.
3. The method according to claim 1 wherein the quality criteria is a measure of speech quality.
4. The method according to claim 3 where the measure of speech quality is related to a carrier to interference ratio.
5. The method according to claim 3 wherein the speech quality is measured by a bit error rate (BER).
6. A method according to claim 5 wherein the adjusting of the preselected signal strength threshold includes the following algorithm:
If BER > 1 % for more than 2 % of the call time in a cell, the preselected signal strength threshold is increased by 1 dB; and if BER > 1 % for less than 0.5 % of the call tame in this cell, the preselected signal strength threshold is decreased by 1 dB.
If BER > 1 % for more than 2 % of the call time in a cell, the preselected signal strength threshold is increased by 1 dB; and if BER > 1 % for less than 0.5 % of the call tame in this cell, the preselected signal strength threshold is decreased by 1 dB.
7. The method according to claim 1 wherein the adjusting of the signal strength threshold includes a non-recursive estimate by a statistical relationship of how much the signal strength threshold should be increased or decreased.
8. A method according to claim 7 wherein the non-recursive estimating step includes determining the probability of a bit error rate being greater than 1 % for a given threshold level and determining a threshold level to be increased or subtracted to assure that the probability its within a given range.
9. A method of handoff of a mobile station operating within a cellular radio system in a hierarchical cell structure comprised of multiple levels of cells having different service areas and including base stations and mobile stations, said method comprising the steps of:
assigning to each cell according to a cell level a category of preference for selection with respect to each other associated cell within the system having either a coextensive, adjacent, contiguous, or overlapping service area;
assigning to each associated cell a preselected signal strength threshold;
adjusting said signal strength threshold in accordance with a measured quality criteria;
measuring the signal strength of communications between the mobile station and each base station serving the associated cells;
comparing the measured signal strength to the current thresholds for each of the measured cells respectively; and selecting for the mobile station a base station for a communication based upon whether the measured signal strength of said base station is greater than the current signal strength threshold assigned to the cell and whether the base station has a higher category of preference than the currently serving cell.
assigning to each cell according to a cell level a category of preference for selection with respect to each other associated cell within the system having either a coextensive, adjacent, contiguous, or overlapping service area;
assigning to each associated cell a preselected signal strength threshold;
adjusting said signal strength threshold in accordance with a measured quality criteria;
measuring the signal strength of communications between the mobile station and each base station serving the associated cells;
comparing the measured signal strength to the current thresholds for each of the measured cells respectively; and selecting for the mobile station a base station for a communication based upon whether the measured signal strength of said base station is greater than the current signal strength threshold assigned to the cell and whether the base station has a higher category of preference than the currently serving cell.
10. The method according to claim 9, further comprising repeating said determining and adjusting steps if said quality criteria is not satisfied.
11. The method according to claim 9 wherein the quality criteria is a measure of speech quality.
12. The method according to claim 11 wherein the measure of speech quality is related to a carrier to interference ratio.
13. The method according to claim 11 wherein the speech quality is measured by a bit error rate (BER).
14. The method according to claim 13 wherein adjusting of the signal strength threshold includes the following algorithm:
If BER > 1 % for more than 2 % of the call time in a cell, the preselected signal strength threshold is increased by 1 dB; and if BER > 1 % for less than 0.5 % of the call time in this cell, the preselected signal strength threshold is decreased by 1 dB.
If BER > 1 % for more than 2 % of the call time in a cell, the preselected signal strength threshold is increased by 1 dB; and if BER > 1 % for less than 0.5 % of the call time in this cell, the preselected signal strength threshold is decreased by 1 dB.
15. The method according to claim 9 wherein the adjusting of the current signal strength threshold includes a non-recursive estimate by a statistical relationship of how much the signal strength threshold should be increased or decreased.
16. The method according to claim 15 wherein the non-recursive estimating step includes determining the probability of a bit error rate being greater than 1 % for a given threshold level and determining a threshold level to be increased or subtracted to assure that the probability is within a given range.
17. An apparatus of determining a minimum acceptable signal strength in a cell of cellular radio system with a hierarchical cell structure comprised of multiple levels of cells having different service areas and including base stations and mobile stations, said apparatus comprising the steps of:
means for assigning to each cell according to a cell level a category of preference for selection with respect to each other associated cell within the system having either a coextensive, adjacent, contiguous, or overlapping service area;
means for assigning to each associated cell a preselected signal strength threshold as a minimum requirement for radio communication with a mobile station;
means for determining the communication quality in the cell; and means for adjusting spud signal strength threshold in accordance with a criteria for said determined quality.
means for assigning to each cell according to a cell level a category of preference for selection with respect to each other associated cell within the system having either a coextensive, adjacent, contiguous, or overlapping service area;
means for assigning to each associated cell a preselected signal strength threshold as a minimum requirement for radio communication with a mobile station;
means for determining the communication quality in the cell; and means for adjusting spud signal strength threshold in accordance with a criteria for said determined quality.
18. The apparatus according to claim 17, further comprising means for repeating said determining and adjusting steps if said quality criteria is not satisfied.
19. An apparatus according to claim 17 wherein the means for adjusting the signal strength threshold includes means for recursive estimating according to the following algorithm:
If BER > 1 % for more than 2 % of the call time in a cell, the preselected signal strength threshold is increased by 1 dB; and if BER > 1 % for less than 0.5 % of the call time in this cell, the preselected signal strength threshold is decreased by 1 dB.
If BER > 1 % for more than 2 % of the call time in a cell, the preselected signal strength threshold is increased by 1 dB; and if BER > 1 % for less than 0.5 % of the call time in this cell, the preselected signal strength threshold is decreased by 1 dB.
20. The apparatus according to claim 17 wherein the means for adjusting the current signal strength threshold includes means for non-recursive estimating by a statistical relationship of how much the signal strength threshold should be increased or decreased.
21. An apparatus according to claim 20 wherein the means for non-recursive estimating includes means for determining the probability of a bit error rate being greater than 1 % for a given threshold level and determining a threshold level to be increased or subtracted to assure that the probability is within a given range.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US09/179,958 US6782262B1 (en) | 1998-10-28 | 1998-10-28 | Self-tuning sufficient signal strength threshold |
| US09/179,958 | 1998-10-28 | ||
| PCT/SE1999/001934 WO2000025547A1 (en) | 1998-10-28 | 1999-10-26 | Self-tuning sufficient signal strength threshold |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2348663A1 true CA2348663A1 (en) | 2000-05-04 |
Family
ID=22658691
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002348663A Abandoned CA2348663A1 (en) | 1998-10-28 | 1999-10-26 | Self-tuning sufficient signal strength threshold |
Country Status (7)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US6782262B1 (en) |
| EP (1) | EP1125465A1 (en) |
| AR (1) | AR021017A1 (en) |
| AU (1) | AU1430900A (en) |
| BR (1) | BR9914832A (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2348663A1 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2000025547A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (42)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US7734298B2 (en) * | 1998-09-22 | 2010-06-08 | Polaris Wireless, Inc. | Estimating the location of a wireless terminal based on signal path impairment |
| US7899467B2 (en) * | 1998-09-22 | 2011-03-01 | Polaris Wireless, Inc. | Estimating the location of a wireless terminal based on the traits of the multipath components of a signal |
| US6393294B1 (en) * | 1998-09-22 | 2002-05-21 | Polaris Wireless, Inc. | Location determination using RF fingerprinting |
| US7257414B2 (en) * | 1998-09-22 | 2007-08-14 | Polaris Wireless, Inc. | Estimating the Location of a Wireless Terminal Based on Non-Uniform Probabilities of Movement |
| GB9923069D0 (en) * | 1999-09-29 | 1999-12-01 | Nokia Telecommunications Oy | Estimating an indicator for a communication path |
| GB0000528D0 (en) * | 2000-01-11 | 2000-03-01 | Nokia Networks Oy | Location of a station in a telecommunications system |
| US7272395B2 (en) * | 2001-10-18 | 2007-09-18 | Nokia Corporation | Method for setting parameters of a cellular radio network, in particular for access and handover |
| US7433695B2 (en) * | 2002-11-18 | 2008-10-07 | Polaris Wireless, Inc. | Computationally-efficient estimation of the location of a wireless terminal based on pattern matching |
| US7460505B2 (en) * | 2003-02-04 | 2008-12-02 | Polaris Wireless, Inc. | Location estimation of wireless terminals through pattern matching of signal-strength differentials |
| US7236789B2 (en) * | 2003-02-27 | 2007-06-26 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Channel rate and physical channel selection in wireless communications networks |
| US7551920B1 (en) * | 2003-09-18 | 2009-06-23 | Sprint Spectrum L.P. | Signal strength-based call forwarding for wireless phones |
| JP4318520B2 (en) * | 2003-09-26 | 2009-08-26 | 富士通株式会社 | Terminal status control system |
| CN1747588A (en) * | 2004-09-08 | 2006-03-15 | 展讯通信（上海）有限公司 | Village locking method of mobile communication terminal |
| US7929444B2 (en) * | 2005-03-25 | 2011-04-19 | Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc. | Communication nodes and methods using small routers to communicate over a backhaul facility |
| US20070135122A1 (en) * | 2005-12-12 | 2007-06-14 | Dillon Matt J | System and method for providing coverage to mobile stations in a network |
| US8965393B2 (en) * | 2006-05-22 | 2015-02-24 | Polaris Wireless, Inc. | Estimating the location of a wireless terminal based on assisted GPS and pattern matching |
| JP2007316068A (en) * | 2006-05-22 | 2007-12-06 | Polaris Wireless Inc | Method of estimating location of wireless terminal |
| US7753278B2 (en) * | 2006-05-22 | 2010-07-13 | Polaris Wireless, Inc. | Estimating the location of a wireless terminal based on non-uniform locations |
| JP2007316070A (en) * | 2006-05-22 | 2007-12-06 | Polaris Wireless Inc | Method for predicting position of wireless terminal |
| US7689325B2 (en) * | 2006-07-26 | 2010-03-30 | Delphi Technologies, Inc. | Communication control method for a vehicle |
| US8781391B2 (en) * | 2006-07-27 | 2014-07-15 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson | Hierarchical broadcast transmission via multiple transmitters |
| US8077676B2 (en) * | 2007-01-07 | 2011-12-13 | Futurewei Technologies, Inc. | System and method for wireless channel sensing |
| GB2460819A (en) * | 2008-05-28 | 2009-12-16 | Vodafone Plc | Controlling reselection from access points in a telecommunications network |
| CN102111718B (en) * | 2009-12-28 | 2014-12-17 | 深圳市齐创美科技有限公司 | System and method for electronic information distribution |
| US9625573B2 (en) * | 2010-04-08 | 2017-04-18 | The Boeing Company | Geolocation leveraging spot beam overlap |
| JP5348072B2 (en) * | 2010-05-31 | 2013-11-20 | 富士通株式会社 | Wireless communication apparatus and computer program |
| EP2533431B1 (en) * | 2011-06-10 | 2014-10-29 | Alcatel Lucent | Method for receiving uplink radio frequency signals in a radio communication system, master unit and slave unit thereof |
| US9838948B2 (en) * | 2014-07-29 | 2017-12-05 | Aruba Networks, Inc. | Deep packet inspection (DPI) aware client steering and load balancing in wireless local area network (WLAN) infrastructure |
| US10536859B2 (en) | 2017-08-15 | 2020-01-14 | Charter Communications Operating, Llc | Methods and apparatus for dynamic control and utilization of quasi-licensed wireless spectrum |
| US10340976B2 (en) | 2017-10-16 | 2019-07-02 | Charter Communications Operating, Llc | Methods and apparatus for coordinated utilization of quasi-licensed wireless spectrum |
| US11432284B2 (en) | 2018-05-22 | 2022-08-30 | Charter Communications Operating, Llc | Methods and apparatus for intra-cell and inter-frequency mobility optimization and mitigation of session disruption in a quasi-licensed wireless system |
| US11129171B2 (en) | 2019-02-27 | 2021-09-21 | Charter Communications Operating, Llc | Methods and apparatus for wireless signal maximization and management in a quasi-licensed wireless system |
| US11438771B2 (en) | 2019-07-11 | 2022-09-06 | Charter Communications Operating, Llc | Apparatus and methods for heterogeneous coverage and use cases in a quasi-licensed wireless system |
| US11528748B2 (en) | 2019-09-11 | 2022-12-13 | Charter Communications Operating, Llc | Apparatus and methods for multicarrier unlicensed heterogeneous channel access |
| US11317296B2 (en) | 2019-10-02 | 2022-04-26 | Charter Communications Operating, Llc | Apparatus and methods for interference handling and switching operating frequencies for devices being supported by a wireless access node |
| US11026205B2 (en) | 2019-10-23 | 2021-06-01 | Charter Communications Operating, Llc | Methods and apparatus for device registration in a quasi-licensed wireless system |
| US11581911B2 (en) | 2019-10-28 | 2023-02-14 | Charter Communications Operating, Llc | Apparatus and methods for phase noise mitigation in wireless systems |
| US11457485B2 (en) | 2019-11-06 | 2022-09-27 | Charter Communications Operating, Llc | Methods and apparatus for enhancing coverage in quasi-licensed wireless systems |
| US11363466B2 (en) | 2020-01-22 | 2022-06-14 | Charter Communications Operating, Llc | Methods and apparatus for antenna optimization in a quasi-licensed wireless system |
| US11483715B2 (en) | 2020-07-06 | 2022-10-25 | Charter Communications Operating, Llc | Apparatus and methods for interference management in a quasi-licensed wireless system |
| US11564104B2 (en) | 2020-11-25 | 2023-01-24 | Charter Communications Operating, Llc | Apparatus and methods for spectrum scheduling in heterogeneous wireless networks |
| US11877344B2 (en) | 2020-12-14 | 2024-01-16 | Charter Communications Operating, Llc | Apparatus and methods for wireless coverage enhancement using technology detection |
Family Cites Families (14)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4435840A (en) * | 1981-06-22 | 1984-03-06 | Nippon Electric Co., Ltd. | Radio mobile communication system wherein probability of loss of calls is reduced without a surplus of base station equipment |
| US4670899A (en) * | 1985-05-31 | 1987-06-02 | Northern Telecom Limited | Load balancing for cellular radiotelephone system |
| US5175867A (en) * | 1991-03-15 | 1992-12-29 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson | Neighbor-assisted handoff in a cellular communications system |
| US5241685A (en) * | 1991-03-15 | 1993-08-31 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson | Load sharing control for a mobile cellular radio system |
| US5257402A (en) * | 1991-03-28 | 1993-10-26 | Motorola, Inc. | Method for effecting handoff in a multi-site communication system |
| US5353332A (en) | 1992-09-16 | 1994-10-04 | Ericsson Ge Mobile Communications Inc. | Method and apparatus for communication control in a radiotelephone system |
| US5499386A (en) | 1993-07-09 | 1996-03-12 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson | Best server selection in layered cellular radio system |
| US5557657A (en) | 1993-09-09 | 1996-09-17 | Hughes Aircraft Company | Handoff between overlay and underlay cells |
| US5504938A (en) * | 1994-05-02 | 1996-04-02 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and apparatus for varying apparent cell size in a cellular communication system |
| GB2323740B (en) * | 1994-07-26 | 1998-12-09 | Maxpro Systems Pty Ltd | Video camera substitution system |
| US5572221A (en) | 1994-10-26 | 1996-11-05 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson | Method and apparatus for detecting and predicting motion of mobile terminals |
| US5701585A (en) | 1994-12-12 | 1997-12-23 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson | Mobile assisted handoff |
| GB2313740B (en) | 1996-05-30 | 2000-08-02 | Motorola Ltd | Handover management system for cellular network |
| US5765103A (en) * | 1996-08-16 | 1998-06-09 | Northern Telecom Limited | Spatially-oriented subscriber configuration in a fixed wireless system |
-
1998
- 1998-10-28 US US09/179,958 patent/US6782262B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1999
- 1999-10-26 BR BR9914832-3A patent/BR9914832A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1999-10-26 EP EP99971201A patent/EP1125465A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 1999-10-26 AU AU14309/00A patent/AU1430900A/en not_active Abandoned
- 1999-10-26 CA CA002348663A patent/CA2348663A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1999-10-26 WO PCT/SE1999/001934 patent/WO2000025547A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1999-10-28 AR ARP990105462A patent/AR021017A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| EP1125465A1 (en) | 2001-08-22 |
| AU1430900A (en) | 2000-05-15 |
| US6782262B1 (en) | 2004-08-24 |
| AR021017A1 (en) | 2002-06-12 |
| WO2000025547A1 (en) | 2000-05-04 |
| BR9914832A (en) | 2001-07-10 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US6782262B1 (en) | Self-tuning sufficient signal strength threshold | |
| US8005482B2 (en) | Measurements in communications systems | |
| KR100352040B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for selecting an optimal server in a layer cellular wireless communication system | |
| US5722072A (en) | Handover based on measured time of signals received from neighboring cells | |
| US7054635B1 (en) | Cellular communications network and method for dynamically changing the size of a cell due to speech quality | |
| JP3859714B2 (en) | Handover decision method in multi-cellular communication system | |
| EP0755613B1 (en) | Inter-cell and intra-cell handover | |
| US6434389B1 (en) | Method for selecting cell in cellular network | |
| US9161277B2 (en) | Mobility control method mitigating inter cell interference and base stations which adopt the method | |
| US8611938B2 (en) | Cellular basestation | |
| JPH11331929A (en) | Flexible channel allocation for cellular system based on hybrid of dynamic channel allocation algorithm based on measurement and reuse distance reference algorithm | |
| JPH08505028A (en) | Low-capacity mobility-assisted handoff in cellular networks | |
| KR100711531B1 (en) | An apparatus and method for resource allocation in a communication system | |
| GB2287858A (en) | Method for determining handover in a multicellular environment | |
| AU4967800A (en) | A method for cell load sharing in a cellular mobile radio communications system | |
| US6510321B2 (en) | Cellular communications network and method for maintaining speech quality by controlling the admission of a new call | |
| JP2002500847A (en) | Method for handing over a call between two cells of a digital cellular mobile radio network | |
| EP0967819B1 (en) | Method for handover in a cellular system | |
| Brouet et al. | Deployment of multi-layer TDMA cellular network with distributed coverage for traffic capacity enhancement | |
| NZ268683A (en) | Selecting base station as server according to signal strength and preference category in cellular telephony system |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| FZDE | Discontinued |