CA2292278C - A method of achieving a preferential flow distribution in a horizontal well bore - Google Patents
A method of achieving a preferential flow distribution in a horizontal well bore Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2292278C CA2292278C CA002292278A CA2292278A CA2292278C CA 2292278 C CA2292278 C CA 2292278C CA 002292278 A CA002292278 A CA 002292278A CA 2292278 A CA2292278 A CA 2292278A CA 2292278 C CA2292278 C CA 2292278C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- wellbore
- slot
- flow area
- open flow
- slot open
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/32—Preventing gas- or water-coning phenomena, i.e. the formation of a conical column of gas or water around wells
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/12—Methods or apparatus for controlling the flow of the obtained fluid to or in wells
Abstract
A method of achieving a preferential flow distribution in a horizontal well bore. This method consists of the step of positioning in a horizontal wellbore a slotted liner having a plurality of slots which provide a flow area. The slot open flow area of the slotted liner varying along its length in accordance with a selected strategy of flow distribution. The preferred strategy being to create an overbalanced condition in the wellbore which promotes promote a higher flow at the toe portion than at the heel portion.
Description
TITLE OF THE INVENTION:
A Method of Achieving A Preferential I~luw I)istributican In A Horizontal Well Bore The present invention relates to a method of achieving a preferential flaw distribution in a horizontal well bore.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The pressure drop along a producing se4ticrn c>f wellbc°ar~. has become the subject of study as the technology has been develcaped tc> drill hoa~izc»xtal tvellbores several kilometres Long. In an article published in 1')90 through the Society of Petroleum Engineers Ben :f.
lDikken presented an analytic model to predict the fi~ictiorxal pressure drop in a horizontal well due to turbulent wellbore flow, in an article published in I 994 in the Petroleum Science & Engineering Journal, Michael .!. l,andman discussed l~c~w productivity of a well can be optimized by varying the perfirratian distribution along the well. An optimization strategy was proposed in which the perforations were arranged tr:~ provide for a uniform specific inflow along the horizontal wellbore. Althcaugh it was acknowledged that the strategy would result in a slight loss in total well rate, this was,justified on ~:he basis that an advantage would be gained in delaying local cresting ofwater or- gas into the wellbore from a nearby aquifer or
A Method of Achieving A Preferential I~luw I)istributican In A Horizontal Well Bore The present invention relates to a method of achieving a preferential flaw distribution in a horizontal well bore.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The pressure drop along a producing se4ticrn c>f wellbc°ar~. has become the subject of study as the technology has been develcaped tc> drill hoa~izc»xtal tvellbores several kilometres Long. In an article published in 1')90 through the Society of Petroleum Engineers Ben :f.
lDikken presented an analytic model to predict the fi~ictiorxal pressure drop in a horizontal well due to turbulent wellbore flow, in an article published in I 994 in the Petroleum Science & Engineering Journal, Michael .!. l,andman discussed l~c~w productivity of a well can be optimized by varying the perfirratian distribution along the well. An optimization strategy was proposed in which the perforations were arranged tr:~ provide for a uniform specific inflow along the horizontal wellbore. Althcaugh it was acknowledged that the strategy would result in a slight loss in total well rate, this was,justified on ~:he basis that an advantage would be gained in delaying local cresting ofwater or- gas into the wellbore from a nearby aquifer or
2 0 ~;as cap. T'he Landman article predicted that as a greater uvc:lers~arxding was. gained that other selective perforation strategies would be develapeci.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates tca a nxethod of aclrievirxg ~r preferential flow distribution 2 5 in a horizontal well bore.
According to the present invention there is provided a method of achieving a preferential flaw distribution in a horizontal well bare. 'This nxethad consists of the step of positioning in a horizontal wellbore a slotted Liner having a plurality of slots which provide a 30 flow area. The slot open flow area of tl~e slotted liner van~ing ~rlong its length in accordance with a selected strategy of flow distribution.
The teachings of Landman related specifically to perforations. In contrast, the present invention relates to slotted liners used to reduce the inflow of sand into the wellbore.
This method of flow control has an advantage over the teacvhings of Landnaan.
Using the slotted liner for flow distribution is closer tc~ thr~ point of prryduction and has fewer '"dead"
zones.
Although beneficial results may~ be obtained through the application of the method, as described above, even more bernelicial results may 17e obtained when the slot open flow area of the slotted liner increases ft~om the heel portion to tyre toe portion to create an overbalanced condition designed to promote higher flow at the toe than at the heel. This is in accordance with a flow distribution strategy intr:rrded tr> rtstric~t water coning and gas break through tendencies to the toe portion of the wellbore a~rher~e they can be more readily mitigated. For injection wells, the strategy ol' creating an overbalanced condition is intended to reduce the tendency for short circuiting.
Landman described an unequal flow distribution that occurs in a horizontal well due to such factors as frictional pressure dmp and turbulent llr>w described by l~ikk:en. Landman :;ought to optimize the flow rlistribution. by snaking tyre flow distribution equal along the horizontal wellbore. Unlike the strategy advocated l~y l,andnran, the strategy described 2 0 above does not seek a uniform inflow or outflow pattern. Instead, an unequal flow distribution is deliberately created. This method has an inherent disadvantage in that higher pressure draw down is required to promote the desired inflow distribution.
rfhis means the method is best suited to lighter oil reservoirs with good pressure drive. It is believed that this disadvantage is more than offset by the advantages. Firstly, there is a reduced volume of 2 5 Irroduced water, with the associated treatment and disprisal ciasts.
Secondly, increased reserves are realized from increased cumulative production. ~I'llis combination of increased recovery and decreased costs will increase the economic: life of the well.
Water coning or gas break through inevitably occurs. lIowever, in accordance with
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates tca a nxethod of aclrievirxg ~r preferential flow distribution 2 5 in a horizontal well bore.
According to the present invention there is provided a method of achieving a preferential flaw distribution in a horizontal well bare. 'This nxethad consists of the step of positioning in a horizontal wellbore a slotted Liner having a plurality of slots which provide a 30 flow area. The slot open flow area of tl~e slotted liner van~ing ~rlong its length in accordance with a selected strategy of flow distribution.
The teachings of Landman related specifically to perforations. In contrast, the present invention relates to slotted liners used to reduce the inflow of sand into the wellbore.
This method of flow control has an advantage over the teacvhings of Landnaan.
Using the slotted liner for flow distribution is closer tc~ thr~ point of prryduction and has fewer '"dead"
zones.
Although beneficial results may~ be obtained through the application of the method, as described above, even more bernelicial results may 17e obtained when the slot open flow area of the slotted liner increases ft~om the heel portion to tyre toe portion to create an overbalanced condition designed to promote higher flow at the toe than at the heel. This is in accordance with a flow distribution strategy intr:rrded tr> rtstric~t water coning and gas break through tendencies to the toe portion of the wellbore a~rher~e they can be more readily mitigated. For injection wells, the strategy ol' creating an overbalanced condition is intended to reduce the tendency for short circuiting.
Landman described an unequal flow distribution that occurs in a horizontal well due to such factors as frictional pressure dmp and turbulent llr>w described by l~ikk:en. Landman :;ought to optimize the flow rlistribution. by snaking tyre flow distribution equal along the horizontal wellbore. Unlike the strategy advocated l~y l,andnran, the strategy described 2 0 above does not seek a uniform inflow or outflow pattern. Instead, an unequal flow distribution is deliberately created. This method has an inherent disadvantage in that higher pressure draw down is required to promote the desired inflow distribution.
rfhis means the method is best suited to lighter oil reservoirs with good pressure drive. It is believed that this disadvantage is more than offset by the advantages. Firstly, there is a reduced volume of 2 5 Irroduced water, with the associated treatment and disprisal ciasts.
Secondly, increased reserves are realized from increased cumulative production. ~I'llis combination of increased recovery and decreased costs will increase the economic: life of the well.
Water coning or gas break through inevitably occurs. lIowever, in accordance with
3 0 the teachings of the present method water coning or ga;~ break through problems can be dealt with. Following the teachings of the method ensures that water coning or gas break through occurs at the toe portion of the wellbore. When such water caning occurs a further step is taken of positioning a plug in the true portion of the w~llbc~r~ in order' to isolate the toe portion and permits oil to co~rtinue to be produced from that. portion of the well bore not experiencing such water coning or gas break through.
Eventually water coning or gas brook through will reoccur. Following the teachings of the method ensures that the reoccurrence of water coning car gas break through will be at the remote en.d of the wellbore just ahead of the plug. T"his can be dealt with by repositioning the plug in the wellbore in order to isolate floe water producing zone and permit oil to continue to be produced from that portion ol' the wellboro not experiencing water coning ar gas break through. In this mmner the shut dov;~n oi" the wel l duo to water coning or gas break through can be delayed for years, by merely plugging oft' the remote end of the wellbore.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
These and other features of tl~e i~avontion will koecome more apparent from the following description in which reference is mach to the. appended drawings, wherein:
FIGURE 1 is a side elevation view of a wellbore having a slotted liner in accordance with the teachings of this present method.
FIGURE 2 is Graph 1 showing the infloev performance ofd' a slotted liner;
FIGURE 3 is Graph 2 showing press~ire and slot ink; di~aribution for uniform inflow;
2 0 FIGURE 4 is Graph 3 showing overbalance well dE;sign and production profile;
FIGURE 5 is Graph ~ showing hack-c.alculaticat~ oi" inform: optimized vs. non-optimized;
FIGURE 6 is Graph 5 showing a slot densihr distribution for three design options;
and 2 5 F1GURE 7 is a table showing pressure draw-dcnvns required fen the same production rate from the three designs.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF'CHE PRE ERRED MBODIMENT
30 The preferred method of achieving a lareferential flow distribution in a horizontal well bore will now be described with reference to ~'I(ilaI~~: 1.
Referring to FIGURE: l, there is illustrated a horizorttal wellbore 12 having a heel portion 14 and a toe portion 16. 'The preferred method includes a first step of positioning in horizontal wellbore 12 a slotted liner 18 having a pluxalit~~ ~:~f slots 20 which provide a flow area. As will hereinafter be further descr°ibed, the slcat open flow area of slotted liner 18 varies along its length. 'l'he slot open flow area of slotted liner 18 increases from heel portion 14 to toe portion 16. This is done tc~ create axr cp~rrll~il~tnced condition designed to promote higher inflow at toe portion 16 than at heel portion 14. 'fhe slot open flow area of slotted liner 18 in heel portion 14 of wellbore 12 is less than 0.4~'io of the area of slotted liner 20 as compared to a slot open flow area that is maa~y tunes that amount at the toe. This creates a slot induced radial flow loss at the heel. Tllis i.5 in accordance with a flow distribution strategy intended fio resrrict water coning and gas break through tendencies to toe portion 16 of wellbore 12 where water caning can be n~or~ readily mitigated.
The slot open flow area at toe portion 16 will vac} with the lengtln irt the wellbore and the reservoir characteristics. As a general rule the slot open flow area at tore portion 1(~
will be a multiple of the slot open flow area at heel portion 14. This rntrltiple. corn be as little as twice the slot open flow area or can be mare than one hundred tunes the slat open flow area.
In the f;xamples That are hereinafter given and graphically supported, the multiple is close to one hundred times the slot open flaw area, 2 0 The preferred method involves a second step which is taken when water coning or gas break through occurs. Referring to FI(~(IR.E 1, tlmre is slnrwr~ a water come 22 that is resulting in an inflow of an unacceptable amount of' produced water into wellbore 12. The second step is to position a plug 24 in toe portion 16 ot~ wellbore 12 when water coning or g;as break through occurs. This isolates tc>e portion 1~> arod l~ec~n~its oil to continue to be 2 5 produced from the remainder of the well bor°e that Js not yct experiencing water coning or gas break through. If water coning or gas break through subsequently occurs ahead of plug 24, plug 24 is mowed along wellbore 1~: to maintain isolation caf the water producing portion of wellbore 12. Of course, unsloited pipe is used along portions of wellbore 12 passing through v~aater zones.
It will be appreciated that the advanta~;~s gained fr~orn an overbalanced condition are equally applicable to injection wells. 1~or example, where stearxr is inaected to stimulate an oil reservior; a portion of the steam often short circuits from the heel portion ofthe well. The above described overbalanced condition reduces the extent of such short circuiting.
Following is a sample programmed w-ellbore design along with a comparison with conventional well performance.
1 Wellbore Design for Ltniform Draw Iaor.~,~n An assumption of uniform inflow over the well kength is made, which therefore defines the flow velocity profile for the w°ell. 'hhe pressure distribution can therefore be calculated using pipe flow loss correlations. Such ooiwrek;~tioc~s are available for any flow regime of interest, including laminar/turbulc;rat flaw, and sin~;l~-/multi~phas~ flow. Single phase flow is assumed in t:kiis example, anti tl~o c.xarnple p~rar~~e~ters produce turbulent flow throughout most of the well. 'rhe parameters assumed ar~.~:
Producing interval: 1000m Fluid viscosity: 1 centipoise Formation permeability: 1 Darcy (isotropic conditions) Liner size: 114. ~mm Ul) (~.S inch) Total Production: 100 m~/dav A slot geometry is selected to provide the sand control required for the reservoir.
For this example the geometry chosen is 0. k ~mm w ~ide by ~4rnm long. (0.006"
by 2.1 LS").
Inflow performance for slots has been determined u:5ir~g finite element models of formation flow into slots, assuming a sand pack around the liner with the same permeability as the liner. While conventional designs assume open area controls inflow performance of liners, analysis demonstrates that slot spacing is the strongest controlling factor. FIGURE 2 (Graph 1) aomonstrates this relation,slaip by showing the inflow performance for the chosen slot geometry along :with eup°ves for wider slots. T'he performance is given by a slot skzn factor, which is the c:.ontribution to the overall skin factor associated with flow convergence 1~:~ the slot. Tl~e results demonstrate that the closer slot spacing required for more, thinner slots reduces the flow ions for a given open area.
Matching the flow lass associated with the slot f-actor to the pressure draw down inside the liner yields the slat distribution reduired for the specified production distribution. In this example, uniform pr°oduction is ~pecif'ied.
FIGURE 3 (Graph 2) shows the pressure and slotted area distributions that are calculated by this method to produce uniform inflow.
FIGURE 3 (Graph 2) shows the inflow pressure loss varying from 0.02kPa at the i:oe to about lkPa at the heel. The change in laressure (?.?kI'a) is duo to frictional losses from pipe flow. The slot density distributiian is used to balance the slot-induced radial flow loss to match the pipe flow loss over the entire producing interval. Note, however, that the slot-induced flow loss develops in the aaear-well-born region ~.~f~ the reservoir. Beyond that 2 0 interval, the reservoir is subjected to a nearly uniform draw down over its length An overbalanced condition can be designed to l~~°omot~: higher inflow at the toe than at the heel. 'rhe pressure and s1~>ttie~g distribtrtionsy calculated far an inflow distribution giving approximately twice as much inflow at the toe than at the heel is given in FIGURE ~ (Graph 3). Boundary conditions are applied to give the same slot density at 2 5 t:he toe and a new slot distribution is c.alca.tlatoc-1 over tlm ~°est oi' the well. Note the higher pressure draw down near the heel required to prc>rnote the. flow at the heel.
While laminar flow regimes give scolutions ~:.cm~;r°ii°ag tl-~e entire laminar flow range, nonlinear pipe-flow regimes make the optimised design configuration sensitive to production rates. A back-calculation mod~..~le can be used to determine the sensitivity. It 30 also gives an demonstration of the effectiveness of the design rnothod,.
FIGURE 5 (Graph
Eventually water coning or gas brook through will reoccur. Following the teachings of the method ensures that the reoccurrence of water coning car gas break through will be at the remote en.d of the wellbore just ahead of the plug. T"his can be dealt with by repositioning the plug in the wellbore in order to isolate floe water producing zone and permit oil to continue to be produced from that portion ol' the wellboro not experiencing water coning ar gas break through. In this mmner the shut dov;~n oi" the wel l duo to water coning or gas break through can be delayed for years, by merely plugging oft' the remote end of the wellbore.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
These and other features of tl~e i~avontion will koecome more apparent from the following description in which reference is mach to the. appended drawings, wherein:
FIGURE 1 is a side elevation view of a wellbore having a slotted liner in accordance with the teachings of this present method.
FIGURE 2 is Graph 1 showing the infloev performance ofd' a slotted liner;
FIGURE 3 is Graph 2 showing press~ire and slot ink; di~aribution for uniform inflow;
2 0 FIGURE 4 is Graph 3 showing overbalance well dE;sign and production profile;
FIGURE 5 is Graph ~ showing hack-c.alculaticat~ oi" inform: optimized vs. non-optimized;
FIGURE 6 is Graph 5 showing a slot densihr distribution for three design options;
and 2 5 F1GURE 7 is a table showing pressure draw-dcnvns required fen the same production rate from the three designs.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF'CHE PRE ERRED MBODIMENT
30 The preferred method of achieving a lareferential flow distribution in a horizontal well bore will now be described with reference to ~'I(ilaI~~: 1.
Referring to FIGURE: l, there is illustrated a horizorttal wellbore 12 having a heel portion 14 and a toe portion 16. 'The preferred method includes a first step of positioning in horizontal wellbore 12 a slotted liner 18 having a pluxalit~~ ~:~f slots 20 which provide a flow area. As will hereinafter be further descr°ibed, the slcat open flow area of slotted liner 18 varies along its length. 'l'he slot open flow area of slotted liner 18 increases from heel portion 14 to toe portion 16. This is done tc~ create axr cp~rrll~il~tnced condition designed to promote higher inflow at toe portion 16 than at heel portion 14. 'fhe slot open flow area of slotted liner 18 in heel portion 14 of wellbore 12 is less than 0.4~'io of the area of slotted liner 20 as compared to a slot open flow area that is maa~y tunes that amount at the toe. This creates a slot induced radial flow loss at the heel. Tllis i.5 in accordance with a flow distribution strategy intended fio resrrict water coning and gas break through tendencies to toe portion 16 of wellbore 12 where water caning can be n~or~ readily mitigated.
The slot open flow area at toe portion 16 will vac} with the lengtln irt the wellbore and the reservoir characteristics. As a general rule the slot open flow area at tore portion 1(~
will be a multiple of the slot open flow area at heel portion 14. This rntrltiple. corn be as little as twice the slot open flow area or can be mare than one hundred tunes the slat open flow area.
In the f;xamples That are hereinafter given and graphically supported, the multiple is close to one hundred times the slot open flaw area, 2 0 The preferred method involves a second step which is taken when water coning or gas break through occurs. Referring to FI(~(IR.E 1, tlmre is slnrwr~ a water come 22 that is resulting in an inflow of an unacceptable amount of' produced water into wellbore 12. The second step is to position a plug 24 in toe portion 16 ot~ wellbore 12 when water coning or g;as break through occurs. This isolates tc>e portion 1~> arod l~ec~n~its oil to continue to be 2 5 produced from the remainder of the well bor°e that Js not yct experiencing water coning or gas break through. If water coning or gas break through subsequently occurs ahead of plug 24, plug 24 is mowed along wellbore 1~: to maintain isolation caf the water producing portion of wellbore 12. Of course, unsloited pipe is used along portions of wellbore 12 passing through v~aater zones.
It will be appreciated that the advanta~;~s gained fr~orn an overbalanced condition are equally applicable to injection wells. 1~or example, where stearxr is inaected to stimulate an oil reservior; a portion of the steam often short circuits from the heel portion ofthe well. The above described overbalanced condition reduces the extent of such short circuiting.
Following is a sample programmed w-ellbore design along with a comparison with conventional well performance.
1 Wellbore Design for Ltniform Draw Iaor.~,~n An assumption of uniform inflow over the well kength is made, which therefore defines the flow velocity profile for the w°ell. 'hhe pressure distribution can therefore be calculated using pipe flow loss correlations. Such ooiwrek;~tioc~s are available for any flow regime of interest, including laminar/turbulc;rat flaw, and sin~;l~-/multi~phas~ flow. Single phase flow is assumed in t:kiis example, anti tl~o c.xarnple p~rar~~e~ters produce turbulent flow throughout most of the well. 'rhe parameters assumed ar~.~:
Producing interval: 1000m Fluid viscosity: 1 centipoise Formation permeability: 1 Darcy (isotropic conditions) Liner size: 114. ~mm Ul) (~.S inch) Total Production: 100 m~/dav A slot geometry is selected to provide the sand control required for the reservoir.
For this example the geometry chosen is 0. k ~mm w ~ide by ~4rnm long. (0.006"
by 2.1 LS").
Inflow performance for slots has been determined u:5ir~g finite element models of formation flow into slots, assuming a sand pack around the liner with the same permeability as the liner. While conventional designs assume open area controls inflow performance of liners, analysis demonstrates that slot spacing is the strongest controlling factor. FIGURE 2 (Graph 1) aomonstrates this relation,slaip by showing the inflow performance for the chosen slot geometry along :with eup°ves for wider slots. T'he performance is given by a slot skzn factor, which is the c:.ontribution to the overall skin factor associated with flow convergence 1~:~ the slot. Tl~e results demonstrate that the closer slot spacing required for more, thinner slots reduces the flow ions for a given open area.
Matching the flow lass associated with the slot f-actor to the pressure draw down inside the liner yields the slat distribution reduired for the specified production distribution. In this example, uniform pr°oduction is ~pecif'ied.
FIGURE 3 (Graph 2) shows the pressure and slotted area distributions that are calculated by this method to produce uniform inflow.
FIGURE 3 (Graph 2) shows the inflow pressure loss varying from 0.02kPa at the i:oe to about lkPa at the heel. The change in laressure (?.?kI'a) is duo to frictional losses from pipe flow. The slot density distributiian is used to balance the slot-induced radial flow loss to match the pipe flow loss over the entire producing interval. Note, however, that the slot-induced flow loss develops in the aaear-well-born region ~.~f~ the reservoir. Beyond that 2 0 interval, the reservoir is subjected to a nearly uniform draw down over its length An overbalanced condition can be designed to l~~°omot~: higher inflow at the toe than at the heel. 'rhe pressure and s1~>ttie~g distribtrtionsy calculated far an inflow distribution giving approximately twice as much inflow at the toe than at the heel is given in FIGURE ~ (Graph 3). Boundary conditions are applied to give the same slot density at 2 5 t:he toe and a new slot distribution is c.alca.tlatoc-1 over tlm ~°est oi' the well. Note the higher pressure draw down near the heel required to prc>rnote the. flow at the heel.
While laminar flow regimes give scolutions ~:.cm~;r°ii°ag tl-~e entire laminar flow range, nonlinear pipe-flow regimes make the optimised design configuration sensitive to production rates. A back-calculation mod~..~le can be used to determine the sensitivity. It 30 also gives an demonstration of the effectiveness of the design rnothod,.
FIGURE 5 (Graph
4) shows inflow distributions f'or the same v,~oll_ comparing optimised, non-optimised and over-balanced designs fox the same production rate of I t)Orn~/day. The non-optimised design uses the same slot density over the entire well, usin g the slot density calculated at the toe of the optimised design. 'fhe programmed wellbore produces uniform production over the entire well, whereas the conventiorwl design pr~oduc:ves 2.25 times as much at the heel as at the tae. This would clearly generate higher far-Geld pressure gradients that aggravate water coning tendencies at the heel. '-T"he cov~r~balan ced design generates about twice as much specific intluw at the toe as at the heel. generating higher water-coning tendency at the toe, which is much easier to mitigate.
A comparison of slot density distribution for the throe design options is given in FIGURE 6 (Graph _5). FIGURE; 7 is a table of pressure draw-downs rewired fear the name production rate from the three designs.
'2 Summary 'the programmed well bore uses slot density t~~ c:ontrol the inflow resistance to balance the pipe flow resistance and promote uniform hallow distributions.
'This provides a more cost-effective option f'or unifor~rn flow distribution than drilling larger wells installing larger liners because of the savings in drilling. steel and slcatting costs.
It also offers the option of over-balancing the flow distribution to promote greater inflow or outflow toward the toe.
It will be apparent to c ne skilled ir~r the art that n~rc>dilae~ations may be made to the illustrated embodiment without departing fiom t:he spirit and scope of the invention as hereinafter defined in the C~lainrs.
A comparison of slot density distribution for the throe design options is given in FIGURE 6 (Graph _5). FIGURE; 7 is a table of pressure draw-downs rewired fear the name production rate from the three designs.
'2 Summary 'the programmed well bore uses slot density t~~ c:ontrol the inflow resistance to balance the pipe flow resistance and promote uniform hallow distributions.
'This provides a more cost-effective option f'or unifor~rn flow distribution than drilling larger wells installing larger liners because of the savings in drilling. steel and slcatting costs.
It also offers the option of over-balancing the flow distribution to promote greater inflow or outflow toward the toe.
It will be apparent to c ne skilled ir~r the art that n~rc>dilae~ations may be made to the illustrated embodiment without departing fiom t:he spirit and scope of the invention as hereinafter defined in the C~lainrs.
Claims (7)
OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A method of achieving a preferential flow distribution in a horizontal wellbore, said horizontal wellbore extending from a heel portion to a remote toe portion, said method comprising the step of:
positioning in the horizontal wellbore, a slotted liner having a plurality of slots which provide a slot open flow area, the slot open flow area being the product of slot geometry selected to provide sand control and slot density, the slot open flow area of the slotted liner varying along its length in accordance with a selected strategy of flow distribution, the slot open flow area of the slotted liner in the heel portion of the wellbore being less than 0.4% of the area of the slotted liner in order to create a slot induced radial flow loss.
positioning in the horizontal wellbore, a slotted liner having a plurality of slots which provide a slot open flow area, the slot open flow area being the product of slot geometry selected to provide sand control and slot density, the slot open flow area of the slotted liner varying along its length in accordance with a selected strategy of flow distribution, the slot open flow area of the slotted liner in the heel portion of the wellbore being less than 0.4% of the area of the slotted liner in order to create a slot induced radial flow loss.
2. The method as defined in Claim 1, the slot open flow area of the slotted liner increasing from the heel portion to the toe portion to create an overbalanced condition designed to promote higher flow at the toe portion than at the heel portion.
3. The method as defined in Claim 2, the slot open flow area at the toe portion being at least twice the slot open flow area at the heel portion.
4. The method as defined in Claim 2, a plug being set in the toe portion of the wellbore when one of water coning or gas break-through occurs in order that oil may continue to be produced by that portion of the wellbore not experiencing such water coning or gas break-through.
5. The method as defined in Claim 1 or Claim 2, the slot open flow area being reduced along portions of the wellbore passing through water zones.
6. The method as defined in Claim 3 wherein:
(a) the selected strategy of flow distribution is intended to restrict water coning or gas break-through tendencies to the toe portion of the wellbore where water coning can be more readily mitigated; and (b) a plug is set in the toe portion of the wellbore when one of water coning or gas break-through occurs in order to isolate the toe portion and permit oil to continue to be produced by that portion of the wellbore not experiencing such water coning or gas break-through.
(a) the selected strategy of flow distribution is intended to restrict water coning or gas break-through tendencies to the toe portion of the wellbore where water coning can be more readily mitigated; and (b) a plug is set in the toe portion of the wellbore when one of water coning or gas break-through occurs in order to isolate the toe portion and permit oil to continue to be produced by that portion of the wellbore not experiencing such water coning or gas break-through.
7. The method as defined in Claim 6, the slot open flow area being reduced along portions of the wellbore passing through water zones.
Priority Applications (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002292278A CA2292278C (en) | 1999-12-10 | 1999-12-10 | A method of achieving a preferential flow distribution in a horizontal well bore |
| US09/732,851 US6533038B2 (en) | 1999-12-10 | 2000-12-08 | Method of achieving a preferential flow distribution in a horizontal well bore |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002292278A CA2292278C (en) | 1999-12-10 | 1999-12-10 | A method of achieving a preferential flow distribution in a horizontal well bore |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2292278A1 CA2292278A1 (en) | 2001-06-10 |
| CA2292278C true CA2292278C (en) | 2005-06-21 |
Family
ID=4164872
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002292278A Expired - Lifetime CA2292278C (en) | 1999-12-10 | 1999-12-10 | A method of achieving a preferential flow distribution in a horizontal well bore |
Country Status (2)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US6533038B2 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2292278C (en) |
Families Citing this family (35)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NO314701B3 (en) * | 2001-03-20 | 2007-10-08 | Reslink As | Flow control device for throttling flowing fluids in a well |
| US7866394B2 (en) | 2003-02-27 | 2011-01-11 | Halliburton Energy Services Inc. | Compositions and methods of cementing in subterranean formations using a swelling agent to inhibit the influx of water into a cement slurry |
| US20040211559A1 (en) * | 2003-04-25 | 2004-10-28 | Nguyen Philip D. | Methods and apparatus for completing unconsolidated lateral well bores |
| US7306056B2 (en) * | 2003-11-05 | 2007-12-11 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Directional cased hole side track method applying rotary closed loop system and casing mill |
| US7690429B2 (en) | 2004-10-21 | 2010-04-06 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Methods of using a swelling agent in a wellbore |
| US7673678B2 (en) * | 2004-12-21 | 2010-03-09 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Flow control device with a permeable membrane |
| WO2006101618A2 (en) | 2005-03-18 | 2006-09-28 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Hydraulically controlled burst disk subs (hcbs) |
| US7891424B2 (en) | 2005-03-25 | 2011-02-22 | Halliburton Energy Services Inc. | Methods of delivering material downhole |
| US7870903B2 (en) | 2005-07-13 | 2011-01-18 | Halliburton Energy Services Inc. | Inverse emulsion polymers as lost circulation material |
| CA2620344C (en) * | 2005-09-23 | 2011-07-12 | Alex Turta | Toe-to-heel waterflooding with progressive blockage of the toe region |
| BRPI0707496A2 (en) * | 2006-02-10 | 2011-05-03 | Exxonmobil Upstream Res Co | methods of completing a well, and producing hydrocarbons |
| US7543641B2 (en) * | 2006-03-29 | 2009-06-09 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | System and method for controlling wellbore pressure during gravel packing operations |
| AU2007243920B2 (en) * | 2006-04-03 | 2012-06-14 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Wellbore method and apparatus for sand and inflow control during well operations |
| US7857050B2 (en) * | 2006-05-26 | 2010-12-28 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Flow control using a tortuous path |
| US8025072B2 (en) * | 2006-12-21 | 2011-09-27 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Developing a flow control system for a well |
| WO2008092241A1 (en) | 2007-01-29 | 2008-08-07 | Noetic Engineering Inc. | A method for providing a preferential specific injection distribution from a horizontal injection well |
| US7789145B2 (en) * | 2007-06-20 | 2010-09-07 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Inflow control device |
| US20090000787A1 (en) * | 2007-06-27 | 2009-01-01 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Inflow control device |
| DK200701385A (en) * | 2007-09-26 | 2009-03-27 | Maersk Olie & Gas | Method of Stimulating a Fire |
| US7913755B2 (en) | 2007-10-19 | 2011-03-29 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Device and system for well completion and control and method for completing and controlling a well |
| US7740062B2 (en) * | 2008-01-30 | 2010-06-22 | Alberta Research Council Inc. | System and method for the recovery of hydrocarbons by in-situ combustion |
| US8555958B2 (en) | 2008-05-13 | 2013-10-15 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Pipeless steam assisted gravity drainage system and method |
| US8171999B2 (en) | 2008-05-13 | 2012-05-08 | Baker Huges Incorporated | Downhole flow control device and method |
| US8113292B2 (en) | 2008-05-13 | 2012-02-14 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Strokable liner hanger and method |
| US20090283256A1 (en) * | 2008-05-13 | 2009-11-19 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Downhole tubular length compensating system and method |
| US8261761B2 (en) | 2009-05-07 | 2012-09-11 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Selectively movable seat arrangement and method |
| US8151881B2 (en) * | 2009-06-02 | 2012-04-10 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Permeability flow balancing within integral screen joints |
| US8056627B2 (en) * | 2009-06-02 | 2011-11-15 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Permeability flow balancing within integral screen joints and method |
| US8132624B2 (en) * | 2009-06-02 | 2012-03-13 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Permeability flow balancing within integral screen joints and method |
| US8479823B2 (en) | 2009-09-22 | 2013-07-09 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Plug counter and method |
| US9279311B2 (en) | 2010-03-23 | 2016-03-08 | Baker Hughes Incorporation | System, assembly and method for port control |
| US8789600B2 (en) | 2010-08-24 | 2014-07-29 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Fracing system and method |
| US9896905B2 (en) | 2014-10-10 | 2018-02-20 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Inflow control system for use in a wellbore |
| NO342376B1 (en) | 2015-06-09 | 2018-05-14 | Wellguard As | Apparatus for detecting fluid leakage, and related methods |
| CN110231339A (en) * | 2019-07-10 | 2019-09-13 | 济南大学 | A kind of method and system hindering control and the evaluation preferential process degree of soil |
Family Cites Families (10)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5297627A (en) * | 1989-10-11 | 1994-03-29 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Method for reduced water coning in a horizontal well during heavy oil production |
| US5197543A (en) * | 1992-03-16 | 1993-03-30 | Oryx Energy Company | Horizontal well treatment method |
| US5415227A (en) * | 1993-11-15 | 1995-05-16 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Method for well completions in horizontal wellbores in loosely consolidated formations |
| US5421410A (en) * | 1994-07-08 | 1995-06-06 | Irani; Cyrus A. | Plugging of underground strata to eliminate gas and water coning during oil production |
| US5529124A (en) * | 1994-12-19 | 1996-06-25 | Texaco Inc. | Method for retarding water coning |
| US5626193A (en) * | 1995-04-11 | 1997-05-06 | Elan Energy Inc. | Single horizontal wellbore gravity drainage assisted steam flooding process |
| US5931230A (en) * | 1996-02-20 | 1999-08-03 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Visicous oil recovery using steam in horizontal well |
| CA2236944C (en) * | 1997-05-06 | 2005-12-13 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Flow control apparatus and methods |
| US6167966B1 (en) * | 1998-09-04 | 2001-01-02 | Alberta Research Council, Inc. | Toe-to-heel oil recovery process |
| US6279660B1 (en) * | 1999-08-05 | 2001-08-28 | Cidra Corporation | Apparatus for optimizing production of multi-phase fluid |
-
1999
- 1999-12-10 CA CA002292278A patent/CA2292278C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2000
- 2000-12-08 US US09/732,851 patent/US6533038B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| US20020170717A1 (en) | 2002-11-21 |
| CA2292278A1 (en) | 2001-06-10 |
| US6533038B2 (en) | 2003-03-18 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA2292278C (en) | A method of achieving a preferential flow distribution in a horizontal well bore | |
| CN107787391B (en) | System and method for removing condensate blockage using ceramic materials and microwaves | |
| US9399905B2 (en) | Leak detection in circulated fluid systems for heating subsurface formations | |
| EP1738054B1 (en) | Reducing viscosity of oil for production from a hydrocarbon containing formation | |
| CA2626969C (en) | Temperature limited heater with a conduit substantially electrically isolated from the formation | |
| WO2008048451A3 (en) | Improved method of developing subsurface freeze zone | |
| AU2014353213B2 (en) | Steam-injecting mineral insulated heater design | |
| IL152455A0 (en) | In situ recovery of hydrocarbons from a kerogen-containing formation | |
| US3272261A (en) | Process for recovery of oil | |
| WO2010021668A1 (en) | Apparatus for treating fluid streams | |
| US10400563B2 (en) | Pyrolysis to pressurise oil formations | |
| Elverhøy et al. | Autonomous inflow control for reduced water cut and/or gas oil ratio | |
| Greene | Analyzing the performance of gas wells | |
| US9702236B2 (en) | Heat-assisted steam-based hydrocarbon recovery method | |
| Lauritzen et al. | Selection methodology for passive, active, and hybrid inflow control completions | |
| US20050211438A1 (en) | Methods of stimulating water sensitive coal bed methane seams | |
| Roberts et al. | Recovery of Bitumen From a Carbonate Reservoir by Thermal-Assisted Gravity Drainage (TAGD) | |
| CA2898897A1 (en) | Partial height steam chamber sagd | |
| Razaq et al. | Using Smart Completion Technology to Control Water Coning Problems and Increase Oil Recovery in a Southern Iraqi Oilfield | |
| CA2848277C (en) | Heat-assisted steam-based hydrocarbon recovery method | |
| Almutairi et al. | Enhancing Production from Thin Oil Column Reservoirs Using Intelligent Completions | |
| US4819725A (en) | Recovering oil bypassed by a steam override zone | |
| Sipeki et al. | Impact of Operator's Best Practices, Completion Design and Well Density on Projected Ultimate Recoveries of Horizontal Bakken Wells in Williams County, North Dakota | |
| Mohammed et al. | Production well performance optimization in heavy crude oil carbonate reservoir Rx-Northern Iraqi oil field | |
| Rafferty | Design Issues in Commercial Open-Loop Heat Pump Systems. |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| MKEX | Expiry |
Effective date: 20191210 |