CA2286735A1 - Spinning apparatus, method of producing yarns, and resulting yarns - Google Patents
Spinning apparatus, method of producing yarns, and resulting yarns Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2286735A1 CA2286735A1 CA002286735A CA2286735A CA2286735A1 CA 2286735 A1 CA2286735 A1 CA 2286735A1 CA 002286735 A CA002286735 A CA 002286735A CA 2286735 A CA2286735 A CA 2286735A CA 2286735 A1 CA2286735 A1 CA 2286735A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- sliver
- rolls
- pair
- spinning
- drafting
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Classifications
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D02—YARNS; MECHANICAL FINISHING OF YARNS OR ROPES; WARPING OR BEAMING
- D02G—CRIMPING OR CURLING FIBRES, FILAMENTS, THREADS, OR YARNS; YARNS OR THREADS
- D02G3/00—Yarns or threads, e.g. fancy yarns; Processes or apparatus for the production thereof, not otherwise provided for
- D02G3/22—Yarns or threads characterised by constructional features, e.g. blending, filament/fibre
- D02G3/38—Threads in which fibres, filaments, or yarns are wound with other yarns or filaments, e.g. wrap yarns, i.e. strands of filaments or staple fibres are wrapped by a helically wound binder yarn
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D01—NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
- D01H—SPINNING OR TWISTING
- D01H1/00—Spinning or twisting machines in which the product is wound-up continuously
- D01H1/11—Spinning by false-twisting
- D01H1/115—Spinning by false-twisting using pneumatic means
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D01—NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
- D01H—SPINNING OR TWISTING
- D01H5/00—Drafting machines or arrangements ; Threading of roving into drafting machine
- D01H5/18—Drafting machines or arrangements without fallers or like pinned bars
- D01H5/22—Drafting machines or arrangements without fallers or like pinned bars in which fibres are controlled by rollers only
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D10—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBLASSES OF SECTION D, RELATING TO TEXTILES
- D10B—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBLASSES OF SECTION D, RELATING TO TEXTILES
- D10B2201/00—Cellulose-based fibres, e.g. vegetable fibres
- D10B2201/01—Natural vegetable fibres
- D10B2201/02—Cotton
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D10—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBLASSES OF SECTION D, RELATING TO TEXTILES
- D10B—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBLASSES OF SECTION D, RELATING TO TEXTILES
- D10B2331/00—Fibres made from polymers obtained otherwise than by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds, e.g. polycondensation products
- D10B2331/04—Fibres made from polymers obtained otherwise than by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds, e.g. polycondensation products polyesters, e.g. polyethylene terephthalate [PET]
Abstract
A drafting and spinning apparatus is disclosed that produces highly uniform yarns with improved mechanical properties. The apparatus comprises a plurality of pairs of drafting rolls (26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40) for drawing a sliver (22) formed of one or more types of staple fibers, each fiber type having a predetermined effective fiber length. The plurality of pairs of drafting rolls comprises at least two pairs of intermediate rolls (30, 32, 34, 36), with the distances between the nips of adjacent intermediate roll pairs being no more than the effective fiber length of the longest fiber type in the sliver. The apparatus further includes means (15) for spinning the sliver into yarn at a take-up speed of greater than 150 meters/minute.
Description
SPINNING APPARATUS, METHOD OF PRODUCING
YARNS, AND RESULTING YARNS
Field of the Inv nt;~
The present invention relates to yarn spinning and . more particularly, relates to a novel method of drafting sliver in a spinning apparatus to form highly uniform yarns having good mechanical properties.
~a~karound of the Invent; nn One common method of forming single yarns has been the use of a spinning apparatus which drafts and twists prepared strands of fibers to form the desired yarn.
One of the first yarn spinning apparatus was the mule spinning frame which was developed in 1782 and used for wool and cotton fibers. Many decades later, the ring spinning apparatus was developed to increase the spinning speed and quality of the spun yarn. Although good quality natural yarns may be produced by ring spinning, the rate of ring spinning remains relatively slow, e.g., less than about 15 meters/minute. In the las~ few decades, other various types of spinning apparatus which operate at higher speeds than ring spinning apparatus have been introduced. For example, rotor spinning, friction spinning and air-jet spinning methods are capable of spinning sliver into yarn at speeds greatly exceeding ring spinning speeds.
Prior to spinning sliver into yarn, the fibers are . typically processed by carding and other various methods and then drawn to attenuate or increase the - 30 length per unit weight of the sliver. The sliver is generally drawn in a drafting zone comprising a series of drafting roll pairs with the speed of successive -t-roll pairs increasing in the direction of sliver movement to draw the sliver down to the point where it approaches yarn width. Numerous parameters have traditionally been adjusted in the drafting zone to attempt to maximize the drafting and quality of the sliver including draft roll spacings, draft roll diameters, draft roll speeds (ratios), draft distribution, and fiber blending (e.g., ~drawframe and/or intimate blending).
One particular parameter, the draft roll spacing between adjacent roll pairs, is normally defined by the distance between the nip, i.e., the line or area of contact, between one pair of rolls and the nip of an adjacent pair of rolls.
The conventional wisdom for draft roll spacings, especially for higher speed spinning processes such as air jet spinning, has been to set the distance between adjacent nips at greater than the fiber length of the staple fibers in the sliver. See, e.g., U.S. Patent No. 4,088,016 to Watson et al. and U.S. 25 Patent No.
5,400,476 to White. This particular roll spacing has been widely accepted as the industry standard based on the rationale that smaller roll spacing results in increased breakage of fibers. Specifically, when the roll spacing is less than the fiber length, individual fibers rnay extend from one nip to an adjacent nip or bridge adjacent nips. Because adjacent pairs of rollers operate at different speeds, the bridged fibers may become pulled apart thus resulting in breakage of the fibers. This fiber breakage can result in low yarn quality and even yarn breakage in subsequent processing ~. ~A~~ . . . , , .
equipment such as spinning apparatus which may require the processing equipment to be shut down. Thus, draft roll spacings of greater than the fiber length have been the standard in the textile industry. The standard draft roll spacings produce yarns having good uniformity and mechanical properties. Nevertheless, there is always a need in the art to improve the uniformity and the mechanical properties of the yarn.
Several attempts have been made to the drafting and IO spinning process to improve certain aspects of the spun yarn. For example, U.S. Patent No. 5,481,863 to Ota describes decreasing the distance between the nip of the front roll pair of drafting rolls and the nip of the delivery rolls (located after spinning) to less I5 than the longest fiber length to reduce ballooning in the air nozzles of the spinning apparatus.
Additionally, U.S. Patent No. 3,646,745 to Baldwin describes decreasing the distances between the nips of the front pair and the adjacent intermediate pair of 20 drafting rolls to less than the effective staple length of the fibers in ring spinning processes to reduce the formation of "crackers" caused by overlength staple fibers. Nevertheless, no drafting takes place between the narrowly spaced rolls described in these patents 25 and thus the problem of fiber breakage is not a danger in decreasing the roll spacings in these patents.
It has now been discovered that the uniformity and mechanical properties of spun yarn, particularly air-jet spun yarn, can be greatly enhanced by drafting 30 sliver through a four-roll drafting zone in which the distance between the back roll pair and the adjacent intermediate roll pair, are both no more than the effective fiber length of the longest fiber type in the sliver.
It has also been discovered that yarn uniformity and mechanical properties can be similarly enhanced by maintaining the distance between the nip of intermediate roll pairs at no more than the effective fiber length of the longest fiber type in the sliver while maintaining a distance at the effective fiber l0 length between the nip of the back roll pair and the nip of the adjacent intermediate roll pair.
Object and SLmmary of the Tnvenfi~~n The present invention thus provides a drafting and spinning apparatus that produces highly uniform yarns with improved mechanical properties. The spinning and drafting apparatus of the invention preferably comprises at least four pairs of drafting rolls for drawing a sliver formed of one or more types of staple fibers, each fiber type having a predetermined effective fiber length. The pairs of drafting rolls include a pair of back rolls, at least two pairs of intermediate rolls, and a pair of front rolls. The drafting roll pairs are spaced such that the nip of each of the drafting roll pairs is separated from the nip of the adjacent roll pairs by a predetermined distance such that the distances between the nips of adjacent intermediate rolls is no more than the effective fiber length of the longest fiber type in the sliver. The drafted sliver is thereafter spun into yarn by spinning means, preferably at a take-up speed of greater than 150 meters/minute. For identification purposes, this will be referred to herein as " the intermediate-pair technique."
In an alternative embodiment, the present invention provides a method of producing highly uniform yarns with improved mechanical properties comprising advancing a sliver formed of one or more types of staple fibers, each staple fiber type having a predetermined effective fiber length, through at least four pairs of drafting rolls by maintaining the nip l0 distance between adjacent pairs of intermediate rolls at no more than the effective fiber length of the longest fiber type in the sliver and thereafter spinning the sliver into yarn, preferably at a take-up speed of greater than 150 meters/minute. For identification purposes, this embodiment will be referred to herein as " the four-pair technique."
Preferably, the sliver comprises staple polyester fibers having a predetermined mean decrimped fiber length and typically will consist of blends of between about 20% and 100% polyester fibers and between about 80% and 0% cotton fibers. The polyester fibers used in the invention preferably are high cohesion fibers having a denier per filament of between about 0.5 and about 2.5 and a mean decrimped fiber length of less than about 2.00 inches.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, the present invention includes a spun yarn consisting of a blend of polyester and cotton fibers forming a parallel fiber core held together by wrapping fibers and having a mean tenacity of at least about 1.91 gf/den, a mean single-end strength of greater than about 275 gf, a maximum strength of greater than about 376 gf, and less than 1947 total defects (thin, thick, and nep) per 1000 yards. The present invention provides a drafting and spinning apparatus which produces highly uniform yarns having improved mechanical properties. Specifically, the yarns produced according to the invention have increased strength and fewer defects than similar yarns produced according to conventional processes.
These and other advantages of the present invention will become more readily apparent upon consideration of the following detailed description and accompanying drawings which describe both the preferred and alternative embodiments of the invention.
Brief Descri~ti~n of the Draws ~g,~
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a drafting and spinning zone according to the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a side plan view of a drafting zone according to the invention;
FIG. 3 is a microscopy photograph of an air-jet spun yarn produced according to the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a microscopy photograph of an air-jet spun yarn produced according to the conventional method of drawing sliver to form yarn; and FIGS 5, 6 and 7 are charts respectively comparing minimum strength, mean strength and certain types of defects among yarns formed conventionally, those formed according to the four-pair technique, and those formed according to the intermediate-pair technique.
Detailed Description of the Invention FIG. 1 illustrates a drafting and spinning apparatus according to the invention. As shown in FIG.
1, the drafting and spinning apparatus may be divided into a drafting zone 10, a spinning zone 15, and a take-up zone 20.
In the operation of the drafting and spinning apparatus of the invention, a sliver 22 of staple fibers is advanced to the drafting zone 10. The sliver 22 may be processed prior to entering the drafting zone using otherwise conventional steps such as opening, blending, cleaning, carding and combing to provide the 10 desired characteristics in the sliver for drafting and spinning. The sliver 22 used in the invention comprises one or more types of staple fibers, each staple fiber type having a predetermined effective fiber length.
The present invention is based on increased knowledge of the relationship of the effective fiber length to draft roll spacings. The " effective" fiber length can be defined as the mean decrimped fiber length of the fiber component prior to use in the sliver 22. The mean decrimped fiber length can be determined by fiber array testing of the fibers as described in ASTM method D-5103. However, staple fiber is very difficult to decrimp manually for ASTM D-5103.
To ensure a more accurate determination of the effective fiber length, measurement of three-process drawn sliver containing 100 of the fiber to be studied is recommended.
For sliver blended with two fiber types with different length distributions, one should examine the appropriate portion of the third pass sliver length distribution which represents the longest fiber type _g_ present. For example, a blend of 50% nominal 1.5 inch Fortrel~ polyester and 50% cotton three-process drawn sliver was examined. As known to those in this art, the actual length of any given fiber can differ slightly from its nominal length based on a number of factors.
To determine the effective fiber length in the sliver, the upper quartile length (i.e., the length for which 75% of the fibers are shorter and 25% are longer) l0 was chosen. This length was selected because the cotton length distribution differs enough from the polyester length distribution to make a " mean" fiber length of the blend somewhat meaningless. Thus determining the mean length of the polyester portion of the sliver requires measuring the upper quartile length of the blend.
It will also be understood that blends that are the same composition by weight can, of course, differ in effective fiber length in one or more of the components of the blend. Nevertheless, those skilled in the art will be able to make similar selections for length measurement and without undue experimentation based on the nominal length of polyester or the type of cotton present in any particular blend, both which are generally known or indeed selected for such blends. it will be further understood that the goal is the measurement of the longest fibers in any blend and that in certain cases the cotton (or other) fibers will be longer than the polyester fibers.
Once the effective fiber length of the sliver is determined, a superior yarn is produced through the WO 98148088 PCTlUS98107854 _9_ present invention of adjusting roll spacings to less than the effective fiber length between the two pairs of intermediate rolls and to the effective fiber length between the pair of back rolls and the adjacent pair of intermediate rolls.
The sliver 22 used in the invention includes one or more types of staple fibers including cut synthetic fibers, natural fibers, and blends thereof. Exemplary types of synthetic fibers include polyesters (e. g., polyethylene terephthalate, polytrimethylene terephthalate), rayon, nylon, acrylic, acetate, polyethylene, polyurethane and polyvinyl fibers.
Exemplary types of natural fibers include cotton, linen, flax, rayon, lyocell, viscose rayon, cellulose acetate, wool, ramie, alpaca, vicuna, mohair, cashmere, guanaco, camel, llama, fur and silk fibers.
Preferably, the staple fibers used in the invention are polyester (polyethylene terephthalate) fibers, either alone, or blended with cotton fibers. For example, the sliver may consist of between about 20o and 100 polyester fibers and between about 80o and 0% cotton fibers. Typically, the polyester fibers have a cut length of between about 1.25 inches and 2.0o inches, preferably between 1.25 inches and 1.60 inches and a denier per filament of between about 0.5 and 2.5, preferably, between 0.7 and 1.5. The polyester fibers used in the sliver 22 preferably have high cohesion for use in the drawing and spinning apparatus of the invention. The high cohesion of the polyester fibers may be achieved by any suitable means known in the art such as the application of liquid finishes to the polyester fibers.
As shown in FIG. 1, the sliver 22 is advanced through a trumpet guide 24 which gathers the staple fibers together and then to a series of drafting roll pairs. The series of drafting roll pairs includes a pair of back rolls 26 and 28; at least one pair of intermediate rolls (FIG 1 illustrates two pairs at 30 and 32, and 34 and 36); and a pair of front rolls 38 and 40. Preferably, as shown 15 in FIG. 1, the pair of intermediate rolls 34 and 36 adjacent the pair of front rolls 38 and 40 is a pair of apron rolls. For use in the invention, the series of drafting rolls preferably consists of at least four pairs or drafting rolls as, for example, the four roll pair arrangement illustrated in 20 FIG. 1. Nevertheless, the invention may also be applied to three roll pair arrangements having only one intermediate pair of drafting rolls.
The pairs of drafting rolls in the drafting zone 10 operate such that the speeds of the roll pairs increase in the direction of sliver movement as indicated, e.g., by directional arrow A, thereby drafting the sliver 22 down to yarn size. As illustrated in FIG. 1, typically the top roll 26, 30, 34 and 38 in the roll pair, rotates in a direction opposite that of the bottom roll 28, 32, 36 30 and 40 in the roll pair. As is well known to those skilled in the art, the ratio between the weight or length of the sliver 22 fed into the drafting zone IO and the weight or length of the sliver exiting the drafting zone is known as the draft ratio. The draft ratio may also be measured across individual roll pairs such as the back draft (between the back rolls and the intermediate rolls), the intermediate draft (between the intermediate rolls and the apron rolls), and the main draft (between the apron rolls and the front rolls).
Preferably, in the present invention, the overall draft ratio is between about 50 and about 220, and more preferably between about 130 and about 200. Typically, the majority of drafting occurs in the main draft. The width of the sliver 22 and thus the draft ratio may be affected by the speeds selected for the drafting rolls or a sliver guide (not shown) located between adjacent rolls pairs such as intermediate roll pairs 30 and 32, and 34 and 36. In the drafting zone 10, the distances between adjacent roll pairs or nips are typically IS preset depending on numerous factors including the staple fiber length, break draft and fiber cohesive forces. As illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2, the distances between adjacent nips 42 (for the front roll pair), 44 (for the apron roll pair}, 46 (for the intermediate roll pair) and 48 (for the back roll pair) are a, b and c, respectively. The distance between nips may be fairly approximated by averaging the distance between adjacent top rolls and the distance between corresponding adjacent bottom rolls. For example, if the spacings (FIG. 2) between adjacent top rolls are d=48 mm, e=37 mm, and f=35 mm, respectively, and 25 the spacings between bottom rolls are g=44 mm, h=35 mm and i=35 mm, respectively, than the distances a, b and c, between adjacent nips would be a=46 mm, b=36 mm and c=35 mm. respectively. In addition to the roll spacings, various diameters for the drafting rolls may be selected for use in 30 the invention and larger diameter rolls may be selected to further increase contact with the sliver 22 and thus increase the quality of the resulting spun yarn.
The conventional wisdom regarding roll spacing for a drafting zone 10 has been to set the distance between nips in adjacent drafting roll pairs to a distance greater than the staple fiber length to prevent individual fibers from bridging adjacent pairs of drafting rolls and breaking. It has now been discovered, however, that narrowing the distance between the nip 48 of the back rolls and the nip 46 of the adjacent intermediate rolls and the distances between the nips of adjacent intermediate rolls (e. g., 46 and 44) to no more than~the effective fiber length of the longest fiber type in the sliver 22 results in spun yarns having greater uniformity and mechanical properties, particularly for high-speed spinning processes (i.e., 150 meters/minute?. For example, if the sliver 22 consists of 80% cotton fibers having an effective fiber length of 1.0 inch and 20% polyester fibers having an effective fiber length of 1.5 inches, then the distances b and c would be no more than 1.50 inches (38 mm?, and may be 36 mm and 37 mm, respectively. The longest fiber type in the sliver 22 refers to the fiber type having the longest effective fiber length and forming a substantial portion of the sliver 22. Stated differently, fiber types which do not constitute a significant portion of the sliver are not used to determine the longest fiber type in the sliver and thus the roll spacing in the drafting zone r ~.
10.
.Although not wishing to be bound by a particular theory, it is believed that roll spacings tighter than the effective fiber length of the longest fiber type in the sliver 22 in the break and intermediate draft zones reduce fiber slippage at each nip point and thereby increase drafting control on the sliver. This greater control increases fiber alignment and uniformity in the drafted sliver 22 as it is introduced to the front drafting zone. A high cohesion sliver is preferred because it is believed to prevent fibers from slipping under the higher drafting force generated by the tighter roll spacings. Because the sliver 22 entering the front drafting zone is highly uniform and aligned because of the tighter roll spacings, the sliver 22 exits the front roll nip even more uniform and aligned.
Accordingly, the more uniform and aligned sliver entering the spinning zone 15 creates a unique spun yarn. Upon examination of the spun yarns through microscopy, more wrapper fibers appear to be generated in this yarn (FIG. 3) at the same spinning conditions than with yarn produced from sliver drafted with the conventional wider roll spacings in the back and intermediate drafting zones (FIG. 4). It is believed that the number and frequency of the wrapper fibers increase because of the greater fiber alignment in the sliver 22. The greater number of wrapper fibers combined with the more uniform and aligned sliver going into the spinning zor_e is believed to create a spun yarn with increased strength and reduced quality defects. Furthermore, the improvements in the yarn may result in improvements in the weaving performance of the yarn and the potential use of yarns, specifically air-jet yarns, in some knit applications. In addition to the above, it is believed that the speed and the mass of the sliver 22 used in the drafting zone 10 may contribute to the benefits of the invention. By way of example, in four-roll systems used according to the invention, the speed in the break and intermediate draft zones is about 3 times faster at the second nip roll than in ring spinning draft systems. The mass of the sliver 22 entering the drafting zone 10 is also typically 2 times greater than the roving entering a typical ring spinning draft system. The combination of greater speed and fiber mass is believed to make fiber slippage at the nip points more likely in the higher speed four-roll drafting system (e. g., MJS drafting system) thus providing the benefits of the invention in the higher speed four-roll system and not in ring spinning systems.
Once the sliver 22 exits the drafting zone 10, it is advanced to the spinning zone 15. The spinning apparatus in the spinning zone 15 selected for use in the present invention operates at higher speeds than associated with ring spinning. Exemplary spinning means which operates at these speeds and which use roller drafting systems include air-jet spinning means and roller jet spinning means. Generally, the spinning means operates at a take-up speed cf greater than about 150 meters/minute, preferably, of greater than about 190 meters/minute and more preferably, of greater than about 220 meters/minute. The spinning apparatus is ~ ~
typically capable of producing yarns having counts between 9 and 50, preferably 26 and 42. An exemplary spinning apparatus is an air-jet spinning apparatus such as the MJS 802H spinning apparatus is from Murata Machinery Limited.
FIG. 1 illustrates an air-jet spinning apparatus for use in the invention. In the spinning zone 15, the sliver 22 enters a jet spinner 50 and air nozzle 52 wherein the drafted sliver is twisted by opposing air vortices to form a yarn 54.
The spun yarn 54 is then advanced to the take-up zone and specifically, to a pair of delivery rolls 56 and 58. The spinning zone 15 also includes a slack tube 60 to hold any accumulated fiber during the start-up of 15 the drafting and spinning apparatus. The yarn 54 is then cleared by a yarn clearer 62 and collected on a take-up roll 64.
As described above, the spun yarn produced according to the invention has high uniformity and 20 improved mechanical properties over conventional yarns produced according to conventional constructions having broader roll spacing.
Specifically, the spun yarn produced according to the invention has increased strength and reduced defects over conventional yarns formed using broad roll spacing. The benefits of the present invention will now be further illustrated by the following non-limiting example.
EXAMPLE lA AND COMPA_RATTVF E~pLES 1B and 1C
Two slivers consisting of two cut length variations of intimately blended 50°s 0.9 denier per filament FORTREL~ Type 510 polyester (available from Wellman, Inc.) and 50~ cotton stable fibers were advanced through a four roll drafting zone and spun using an MJS 802H air-jet spinner from Murata Machinery Limited with an H3 air nozzle at a speed of 273 meters/minute. The air-jet spinning apparatus was preset at a feed ratio of 0.98, a condenser setting of 3 mm, an apron spring tension of 3 kg, a Nozzle 1 (N1) to front roll distance 10 of 39.0 mm, a N1 pressure of 2.5 kgf /CM2 and a Nozzle 2 (N2) pressure of 5 kgf /CM2. The effective fiber length of the 35 gr/yd three-process drawn slivers were measured using ASTM D-5103.
The upper quartile length of the slivers, representing the mean decrimped length of the polyester fiber in each sliver, was 38 and 39 mm respectively. The polyester fibers had high cohesion through the use of liquid finishes and for these particular samples the Rothschild cohesion of the sliver was 182 cN for both variants. The yarn count of the spun yarn was measured at 37 Ne. In Example lA, a narrow roll spacing was selected according to the invention wherein the top roll spacings were preset at 48 mm, 37.5 mm, and 39 mm (d, a and f, respectively, in FIG. 2) and the bottom roll spacings were preset at 44 mm, 39 mm and 38 mm (g, h and i, respectively, in FIG. 2). The distances between the nips were 46 mm, 38.25 mm and 38.5 mm (a, b and c, respectively in FIG. 2). The draft ratio across the drafting zone was 155 consisting of a break draft of 2.0, an intermediate draft of 2.17 and a main draft of 36. The sliver used for example lA had a 39 mm effective fiber length in order to be slightly longer than the 38.25 mm intermediate drafting zone. In Comparative Examples 1B and 1C, sliver exhibited an effective fiber length of 38 mm. In Comparative Example 1B, narrow roll spacings such as those presented in parent application 08/844,463 were utilized. The top roll spacings were preset at 48 mm, 36 mm, and 36 mm (d, a and f, respectively, in FIG. 2) and the bottom roll spacings were preset at 44 mm, 37 mm and 36 mm (g, h and i, respectively, in FIG. 2).
The distances between the nips were 46 mm, 36.5 mm and 36 mm (a, b and c, respectively in FIG. 2). In Comparative Example 1C, a broad roll spacing such as those conventionally used in the art was selected wherein the top roll spacings were preset at 48 mm, 39 mm, and 42 mm (d, a and f, respectively, in FIG. 2) and the bottom roll spacings were preset at 44 mm, 41.5 mm and 42 mm (g, h and i, respectively, in FIG. 2). The distances between the nips were 46 mm, 40.25 mm and 42 mm (a, b and c, respectively in FIG. 2). The draft ratio used was the same for Examples lA, 1B, and 1C.
The yarns produced in Example lA and Comparative Examples 1B and 1C were tested for mechanical properties and uniformity. The mechanical properties of the yarns were tested using both a Statimat testing apparatus at 100 breaks and a Tensojet testing apparatus at 6000 breaks and the yarn quality was determined using a Uster 3 Evenness Tester for ,000 yards and a Classimat II device for 100,000 me~ers.
The results are provided in TABLE l, and the Statimat Minimum Strength, Statimat Mean Strength, and Classimat H-1 Defects are also plotted in Figures 5, 6 and 7 WO 98!48088 PCT/US98/07854 respectively.
Sample Number lA 1B 1C
Effective fiber length (mm) 39 38 38 MJS Top Roll Spacings (mm) 48-37.5-39 48-39-42 48-36-36 MJ5 Bottom Roll Spacings (mm) 44-39-38 44-41.5-42 44-37-36 Statimat Data (100 breaks) Yarn Count (Ne) 37.07 37.76 36.89 Mean Tenacity (gf/den) 1.83 1.72 1.81 Second Lowest Tenacity (gf/den) 1.45 1.3 1.36 Minimum Tenacity (gf/den) 1.33 1.06 1.24 Mean Single-End Strength (gf) 262 242 261 Single-End Strength CV (%) 10.6 11.0 12.2 Maximum Strength (gf) 320 294 346 Minimum Strength (gf) 192 149 179 Mean Single-End Elongation (%) 8.3 7,9 7.8 Elongation CV% 8.1 10.1 8.0 Maximum Elongation (%) 9.8 9,9 9,1 Minimum Elongation (%) 6.7 6.1 6.0 Tensojet Data (6000 breaks) Mean Tenacity (gf/den) 1.91 1.78 1.90 Lowest l% Tenacity (gf%den) 1.40 1.28 1.25 Lowest 0.1% Tenacity (gf/den) 1.20 1.10 0.98 Mean Single-End Strength (gf) 275 251 273 Single-End Strength CV (%) 10.8 10.9 13.8 Maximum Strength (gf) 376 351 430 Lowest 1.0% Strength (gf) 200 180 180 Lowest 0.1% Strength (gf) 172 155 142 Minimum Strength (gf) 148 141 136 Mean Single-End Elongation (%) 8.1 7.5 7.5 Maximum Elongation (%) 10.7 10.0 9.9 Lowest 0.1% Elongation (%) 5.6 4.6 4.8 Minimum Elongation (%) 5.2 3.9 4.2 tester 3 Yarn Evenness Data Uster Evenness (CV%) 18.1 18.6 18.6 Uster 1 yd Evenness (CV%) 6.3 6.1 7.3 Uster 3 yd Evenness (CV%) 3.8 3.7 4.5 Uster 10 yd Evenness (CV%) 2.2 2.2 2.3 IPI Thin Places (-50%) 95 134 134 IPI Thick Places (+50%) 517 615 483 IPI Neps (+200%) 1335 1269 1520 Total IPI's 1947 2018 2137 Classimat Data A-1 Defects (A1-A2-A3-A4) 1396 1567 1344 Major Defects (A4+B4+C3+C4+D3+D4)B 1 C
H-1 Defects 823 527 1918 H-2 Defects ~ 4 ~ 0 15 i.
I-1 Defects 8 3 43 I-2 Defects 0 0 3 Long Thicks (E+F+G) 3 1 9 Total Defects 2242 2099 3332 Card Sliver Rothschild Cohesion 664 651 651 (cN) 182 182 182 Third Pass Rothschild Cohesion (cN) As shown in TABLE 1, the 50/50 polyester and cotton blends of the invention Example lA have a 10~
average increase in mean Tensojet single-end strength, a 11% average increase in lowest O.lo Tensojet strength, and a 4~ average reduction in the number of total defects, compared to the 50/50 blends prepared by conventional methods in Example 1B. The 50/50 spun yarn has a mean Tensojet single-end strength of greater than 275 gf and less than 2000 total defects per 1000 yards. The total Uster defects per 1000 yards include the number of peps and the number of thick and thin defects in the yarn per 1000 yards. As noted in TABLE
1, a " nep" defect refers to a yarn portion at least 200% thicker than average, a "thick" defect refers to a yarn portion at least 50% thicker than average, and a "thin" defect refers to a yarn portion 50~ thinner than average. In addition to these properties, the yarn has a mean Tensojet tenacity of more than 1.91 gf/den, a maximum strength of greater than about 376 gf, and a minimum strength of greater than about 148 gf, each of which are improvements over conventionally produced 50/50 yarn.
Furthermore, a comparison of Examples lA and 1C
show the improvements of the intermediate-pair technique even above those of the four-pair technique.
The 50/50 polyester and cotton blends of the invention Example 1A have a comparable mean Tensojet single-end strength to Example 1C. However, the current invention exhibits an 21°s average increase in lowest 0.1~
Tensojet strength, a 9o average reduction in the number of total Uster defects, and a 33~ average reduction in the number of total Classimat defects. The total Classimat defects per 100,000 meters includes several classifications of thin and thick places.
The less favorable results for Lowest 0.1~
l0 Strenght for Example 1C (Tensojet Data) are somewhat unexpected, but may result from the individual characteristics of the particular spinning machinery used.
As illustrated by the Classimat Data (Table 1;
FIG. 7) yarns produced according to the invention tend to have slightly higher total Classimat defects than do the control yarns. Nevertheless, the difference tends to be minimal, especially when considered in light of the advantages of the novel yarns.
The visible quality of the yarns of the intermediate roll technique is comparable to that of the four-pair technique. As illustrated in FIG. 3 (a microscopy photograph of the conventional yarn of Comparative Example 6) and FIG. 4 (a microscopy photograph of the yarn of Example 6 according to the present invention), the yarns of the invention have a visibly superior quality over the conventionally produced yarns. Although not wishing to be bound by a particular theory, it is believed that because of the increased control in the drafting zone of the invention, the wrapper fibers are twisted more WO 98!48088 PCTIUS98/07854 frequently around the core fibers; i.e., have a sharper wrapping angle and more wraps per unit length. The resulting improvement in visible quality may be responsible for the decreased defects in the yarn and may also be responsible for the increased mechanical properties of the yarns of the invention.
Although the four-pair technique offers these advantages, significantly more machine modification is required which adds a presently significant cost factor to the machinery. In particular, moving the drafting rolls to match the relationships in the four-pair teachnique tends to require a large number of adjustments to make things fit. Spring housings must be modified and a different condenser and condenser bracket must be utilized.
Accordingly, in the intermediate-pair technique the distance between the bottom intermediate roll pairs is set to 39 mm so that the aforementioned machine modifications are not required. Thus, in this embodiment of the invention a sliver with fibers of a longest effective length of 39 millimeters was used in a four roll system in which the distance between nips was set at 38.5 millimeters between the back rolls and the first set of intermediate rolls, at 38.25 millimeters between the nips of the intermediate rolls and at 46 millimeters between second intermediate roll pair and the front roll pair.
Stated differently, in the intermediate-pair technique only the intermediate drafting zone has a nip to nip distance that is longer than the effective fiber length. Preferably, the back zone is also maintained WO 98!48088 PCTIUS98/07854 near, but slightly less than, the effective fiber length.
It has been further discovered that the strength and quality of yarns produced in the intermediate-pair technique is greater than those produced in the four-pair technique.
In the intermediate-pair technique, the back zone is now comparable to the effective fiber length, the intermediate zone is still shorter than the effective to fiber length, and a slightly longer stable fiber is preferably used in the process.
With respect to the difference in side plate spacing from conventional spacing, a comparative side plate on the four mentioned MJS spinning machines would include nip spacing of 42 millimeters in the back zone, 40.25 millimeter in the intermediate zone, and 46 millimeters in the front drafting zone. Thus, as Table 2 illustrates, it tends to be mechanically easier to adjust the side plates to take advantage of the intermediate-pair technique as opposed to adjusting the side plates to take advantage of the four-pair technique.
Drafting process Front Intermediate Hack versus Nip Spacing Conventional 46 40.25 42 '463 Application 1 46 36.5 36 Invention 48 38.25 38.5 At present cost structures, applicants estimate that modifying a typical side plate in an air jet spinning ~ ~ .
machine in the manner disclosed in the intermediate-pair technique is approximately 1/6'h the cost of the modifications required for the four-pair technique.
It thus appears that in the back drafting zone the most favorable results are obtained when the nip distance is approximately equal to the fiber length while in the intermediate zone the most favorable results are obtained when the nip is shorter than the fiber length.
Although not yet formally demonstrated, it appears that the advantages will likewise extend to other high speed spinning machines such as Vortex type machines that create true twists in an entire yarn.
Again, although applicants do not wish to be bound by any particular theory, it thus appears that the intermediate drafting zone is the most important in terms of yarn strength in these high speed spinning systems. Apparently, the closer the fiber length approaches the nip spacing in the intermediate zone, the higher the drafting force will be on the sliver.
Additionally, the intermediate zone is the lowest drafting ratio zone of the entire system. Thus, it appears that the high drafting force in the intermediate zone results in very good alignment.
Set forth in progressive fashion, the nip spacing of the present invention produces a high drafting force in the intermediate zone which in turn produces a better alignment among the staple fibers in the yarn.
In turn, the enhanced alignment results in fewer thin places in the yarn and thus a more uniform bundle. In turn, the more uniform bundle produces a tighter wrap WO 98/48088 PCTlUS98/07854 during air jet spinning which results in the stronger yarn observed.
Although the above description generally applies to high speed spinning processes, particularly air-jet spinning processes, it will be understood that the invention is not limited thereto since modifications may be made by those skilled in the art, particularly in light of the foregoing description. Therefore, said modifications and embodiments are intended to be included within the spirit and scope of the following appended claims.
YARNS, AND RESULTING YARNS
Field of the Inv nt;~
The present invention relates to yarn spinning and . more particularly, relates to a novel method of drafting sliver in a spinning apparatus to form highly uniform yarns having good mechanical properties.
~a~karound of the Invent; nn One common method of forming single yarns has been the use of a spinning apparatus which drafts and twists prepared strands of fibers to form the desired yarn.
One of the first yarn spinning apparatus was the mule spinning frame which was developed in 1782 and used for wool and cotton fibers. Many decades later, the ring spinning apparatus was developed to increase the spinning speed and quality of the spun yarn. Although good quality natural yarns may be produced by ring spinning, the rate of ring spinning remains relatively slow, e.g., less than about 15 meters/minute. In the las~ few decades, other various types of spinning apparatus which operate at higher speeds than ring spinning apparatus have been introduced. For example, rotor spinning, friction spinning and air-jet spinning methods are capable of spinning sliver into yarn at speeds greatly exceeding ring spinning speeds.
Prior to spinning sliver into yarn, the fibers are . typically processed by carding and other various methods and then drawn to attenuate or increase the - 30 length per unit weight of the sliver. The sliver is generally drawn in a drafting zone comprising a series of drafting roll pairs with the speed of successive -t-roll pairs increasing in the direction of sliver movement to draw the sliver down to the point where it approaches yarn width. Numerous parameters have traditionally been adjusted in the drafting zone to attempt to maximize the drafting and quality of the sliver including draft roll spacings, draft roll diameters, draft roll speeds (ratios), draft distribution, and fiber blending (e.g., ~drawframe and/or intimate blending).
One particular parameter, the draft roll spacing between adjacent roll pairs, is normally defined by the distance between the nip, i.e., the line or area of contact, between one pair of rolls and the nip of an adjacent pair of rolls.
The conventional wisdom for draft roll spacings, especially for higher speed spinning processes such as air jet spinning, has been to set the distance between adjacent nips at greater than the fiber length of the staple fibers in the sliver. See, e.g., U.S. Patent No. 4,088,016 to Watson et al. and U.S. 25 Patent No.
5,400,476 to White. This particular roll spacing has been widely accepted as the industry standard based on the rationale that smaller roll spacing results in increased breakage of fibers. Specifically, when the roll spacing is less than the fiber length, individual fibers rnay extend from one nip to an adjacent nip or bridge adjacent nips. Because adjacent pairs of rollers operate at different speeds, the bridged fibers may become pulled apart thus resulting in breakage of the fibers. This fiber breakage can result in low yarn quality and even yarn breakage in subsequent processing ~. ~A~~ . . . , , .
equipment such as spinning apparatus which may require the processing equipment to be shut down. Thus, draft roll spacings of greater than the fiber length have been the standard in the textile industry. The standard draft roll spacings produce yarns having good uniformity and mechanical properties. Nevertheless, there is always a need in the art to improve the uniformity and the mechanical properties of the yarn.
Several attempts have been made to the drafting and IO spinning process to improve certain aspects of the spun yarn. For example, U.S. Patent No. 5,481,863 to Ota describes decreasing the distance between the nip of the front roll pair of drafting rolls and the nip of the delivery rolls (located after spinning) to less I5 than the longest fiber length to reduce ballooning in the air nozzles of the spinning apparatus.
Additionally, U.S. Patent No. 3,646,745 to Baldwin describes decreasing the distances between the nips of the front pair and the adjacent intermediate pair of 20 drafting rolls to less than the effective staple length of the fibers in ring spinning processes to reduce the formation of "crackers" caused by overlength staple fibers. Nevertheless, no drafting takes place between the narrowly spaced rolls described in these patents 25 and thus the problem of fiber breakage is not a danger in decreasing the roll spacings in these patents.
It has now been discovered that the uniformity and mechanical properties of spun yarn, particularly air-jet spun yarn, can be greatly enhanced by drafting 30 sliver through a four-roll drafting zone in which the distance between the back roll pair and the adjacent intermediate roll pair, are both no more than the effective fiber length of the longest fiber type in the sliver.
It has also been discovered that yarn uniformity and mechanical properties can be similarly enhanced by maintaining the distance between the nip of intermediate roll pairs at no more than the effective fiber length of the longest fiber type in the sliver while maintaining a distance at the effective fiber l0 length between the nip of the back roll pair and the nip of the adjacent intermediate roll pair.
Object and SLmmary of the Tnvenfi~~n The present invention thus provides a drafting and spinning apparatus that produces highly uniform yarns with improved mechanical properties. The spinning and drafting apparatus of the invention preferably comprises at least four pairs of drafting rolls for drawing a sliver formed of one or more types of staple fibers, each fiber type having a predetermined effective fiber length. The pairs of drafting rolls include a pair of back rolls, at least two pairs of intermediate rolls, and a pair of front rolls. The drafting roll pairs are spaced such that the nip of each of the drafting roll pairs is separated from the nip of the adjacent roll pairs by a predetermined distance such that the distances between the nips of adjacent intermediate rolls is no more than the effective fiber length of the longest fiber type in the sliver. The drafted sliver is thereafter spun into yarn by spinning means, preferably at a take-up speed of greater than 150 meters/minute. For identification purposes, this will be referred to herein as " the intermediate-pair technique."
In an alternative embodiment, the present invention provides a method of producing highly uniform yarns with improved mechanical properties comprising advancing a sliver formed of one or more types of staple fibers, each staple fiber type having a predetermined effective fiber length, through at least four pairs of drafting rolls by maintaining the nip l0 distance between adjacent pairs of intermediate rolls at no more than the effective fiber length of the longest fiber type in the sliver and thereafter spinning the sliver into yarn, preferably at a take-up speed of greater than 150 meters/minute. For identification purposes, this embodiment will be referred to herein as " the four-pair technique."
Preferably, the sliver comprises staple polyester fibers having a predetermined mean decrimped fiber length and typically will consist of blends of between about 20% and 100% polyester fibers and between about 80% and 0% cotton fibers. The polyester fibers used in the invention preferably are high cohesion fibers having a denier per filament of between about 0.5 and about 2.5 and a mean decrimped fiber length of less than about 2.00 inches.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, the present invention includes a spun yarn consisting of a blend of polyester and cotton fibers forming a parallel fiber core held together by wrapping fibers and having a mean tenacity of at least about 1.91 gf/den, a mean single-end strength of greater than about 275 gf, a maximum strength of greater than about 376 gf, and less than 1947 total defects (thin, thick, and nep) per 1000 yards. The present invention provides a drafting and spinning apparatus which produces highly uniform yarns having improved mechanical properties. Specifically, the yarns produced according to the invention have increased strength and fewer defects than similar yarns produced according to conventional processes.
These and other advantages of the present invention will become more readily apparent upon consideration of the following detailed description and accompanying drawings which describe both the preferred and alternative embodiments of the invention.
Brief Descri~ti~n of the Draws ~g,~
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a drafting and spinning zone according to the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a side plan view of a drafting zone according to the invention;
FIG. 3 is a microscopy photograph of an air-jet spun yarn produced according to the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a microscopy photograph of an air-jet spun yarn produced according to the conventional method of drawing sliver to form yarn; and FIGS 5, 6 and 7 are charts respectively comparing minimum strength, mean strength and certain types of defects among yarns formed conventionally, those formed according to the four-pair technique, and those formed according to the intermediate-pair technique.
Detailed Description of the Invention FIG. 1 illustrates a drafting and spinning apparatus according to the invention. As shown in FIG.
1, the drafting and spinning apparatus may be divided into a drafting zone 10, a spinning zone 15, and a take-up zone 20.
In the operation of the drafting and spinning apparatus of the invention, a sliver 22 of staple fibers is advanced to the drafting zone 10. The sliver 22 may be processed prior to entering the drafting zone using otherwise conventional steps such as opening, blending, cleaning, carding and combing to provide the 10 desired characteristics in the sliver for drafting and spinning. The sliver 22 used in the invention comprises one or more types of staple fibers, each staple fiber type having a predetermined effective fiber length.
The present invention is based on increased knowledge of the relationship of the effective fiber length to draft roll spacings. The " effective" fiber length can be defined as the mean decrimped fiber length of the fiber component prior to use in the sliver 22. The mean decrimped fiber length can be determined by fiber array testing of the fibers as described in ASTM method D-5103. However, staple fiber is very difficult to decrimp manually for ASTM D-5103.
To ensure a more accurate determination of the effective fiber length, measurement of three-process drawn sliver containing 100 of the fiber to be studied is recommended.
For sliver blended with two fiber types with different length distributions, one should examine the appropriate portion of the third pass sliver length distribution which represents the longest fiber type _g_ present. For example, a blend of 50% nominal 1.5 inch Fortrel~ polyester and 50% cotton three-process drawn sliver was examined. As known to those in this art, the actual length of any given fiber can differ slightly from its nominal length based on a number of factors.
To determine the effective fiber length in the sliver, the upper quartile length (i.e., the length for which 75% of the fibers are shorter and 25% are longer) l0 was chosen. This length was selected because the cotton length distribution differs enough from the polyester length distribution to make a " mean" fiber length of the blend somewhat meaningless. Thus determining the mean length of the polyester portion of the sliver requires measuring the upper quartile length of the blend.
It will also be understood that blends that are the same composition by weight can, of course, differ in effective fiber length in one or more of the components of the blend. Nevertheless, those skilled in the art will be able to make similar selections for length measurement and without undue experimentation based on the nominal length of polyester or the type of cotton present in any particular blend, both which are generally known or indeed selected for such blends. it will be further understood that the goal is the measurement of the longest fibers in any blend and that in certain cases the cotton (or other) fibers will be longer than the polyester fibers.
Once the effective fiber length of the sliver is determined, a superior yarn is produced through the WO 98148088 PCTlUS98107854 _9_ present invention of adjusting roll spacings to less than the effective fiber length between the two pairs of intermediate rolls and to the effective fiber length between the pair of back rolls and the adjacent pair of intermediate rolls.
The sliver 22 used in the invention includes one or more types of staple fibers including cut synthetic fibers, natural fibers, and blends thereof. Exemplary types of synthetic fibers include polyesters (e. g., polyethylene terephthalate, polytrimethylene terephthalate), rayon, nylon, acrylic, acetate, polyethylene, polyurethane and polyvinyl fibers.
Exemplary types of natural fibers include cotton, linen, flax, rayon, lyocell, viscose rayon, cellulose acetate, wool, ramie, alpaca, vicuna, mohair, cashmere, guanaco, camel, llama, fur and silk fibers.
Preferably, the staple fibers used in the invention are polyester (polyethylene terephthalate) fibers, either alone, or blended with cotton fibers. For example, the sliver may consist of between about 20o and 100 polyester fibers and between about 80o and 0% cotton fibers. Typically, the polyester fibers have a cut length of between about 1.25 inches and 2.0o inches, preferably between 1.25 inches and 1.60 inches and a denier per filament of between about 0.5 and 2.5, preferably, between 0.7 and 1.5. The polyester fibers used in the sliver 22 preferably have high cohesion for use in the drawing and spinning apparatus of the invention. The high cohesion of the polyester fibers may be achieved by any suitable means known in the art such as the application of liquid finishes to the polyester fibers.
As shown in FIG. 1, the sliver 22 is advanced through a trumpet guide 24 which gathers the staple fibers together and then to a series of drafting roll pairs. The series of drafting roll pairs includes a pair of back rolls 26 and 28; at least one pair of intermediate rolls (FIG 1 illustrates two pairs at 30 and 32, and 34 and 36); and a pair of front rolls 38 and 40. Preferably, as shown 15 in FIG. 1, the pair of intermediate rolls 34 and 36 adjacent the pair of front rolls 38 and 40 is a pair of apron rolls. For use in the invention, the series of drafting rolls preferably consists of at least four pairs or drafting rolls as, for example, the four roll pair arrangement illustrated in 20 FIG. 1. Nevertheless, the invention may also be applied to three roll pair arrangements having only one intermediate pair of drafting rolls.
The pairs of drafting rolls in the drafting zone 10 operate such that the speeds of the roll pairs increase in the direction of sliver movement as indicated, e.g., by directional arrow A, thereby drafting the sliver 22 down to yarn size. As illustrated in FIG. 1, typically the top roll 26, 30, 34 and 38 in the roll pair, rotates in a direction opposite that of the bottom roll 28, 32, 36 30 and 40 in the roll pair. As is well known to those skilled in the art, the ratio between the weight or length of the sliver 22 fed into the drafting zone IO and the weight or length of the sliver exiting the drafting zone is known as the draft ratio. The draft ratio may also be measured across individual roll pairs such as the back draft (between the back rolls and the intermediate rolls), the intermediate draft (between the intermediate rolls and the apron rolls), and the main draft (between the apron rolls and the front rolls).
Preferably, in the present invention, the overall draft ratio is between about 50 and about 220, and more preferably between about 130 and about 200. Typically, the majority of drafting occurs in the main draft. The width of the sliver 22 and thus the draft ratio may be affected by the speeds selected for the drafting rolls or a sliver guide (not shown) located between adjacent rolls pairs such as intermediate roll pairs 30 and 32, and 34 and 36. In the drafting zone 10, the distances between adjacent roll pairs or nips are typically IS preset depending on numerous factors including the staple fiber length, break draft and fiber cohesive forces. As illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2, the distances between adjacent nips 42 (for the front roll pair), 44 (for the apron roll pair}, 46 (for the intermediate roll pair) and 48 (for the back roll pair) are a, b and c, respectively. The distance between nips may be fairly approximated by averaging the distance between adjacent top rolls and the distance between corresponding adjacent bottom rolls. For example, if the spacings (FIG. 2) between adjacent top rolls are d=48 mm, e=37 mm, and f=35 mm, respectively, and 25 the spacings between bottom rolls are g=44 mm, h=35 mm and i=35 mm, respectively, than the distances a, b and c, between adjacent nips would be a=46 mm, b=36 mm and c=35 mm. respectively. In addition to the roll spacings, various diameters for the drafting rolls may be selected for use in 30 the invention and larger diameter rolls may be selected to further increase contact with the sliver 22 and thus increase the quality of the resulting spun yarn.
The conventional wisdom regarding roll spacing for a drafting zone 10 has been to set the distance between nips in adjacent drafting roll pairs to a distance greater than the staple fiber length to prevent individual fibers from bridging adjacent pairs of drafting rolls and breaking. It has now been discovered, however, that narrowing the distance between the nip 48 of the back rolls and the nip 46 of the adjacent intermediate rolls and the distances between the nips of adjacent intermediate rolls (e. g., 46 and 44) to no more than~the effective fiber length of the longest fiber type in the sliver 22 results in spun yarns having greater uniformity and mechanical properties, particularly for high-speed spinning processes (i.e., 150 meters/minute?. For example, if the sliver 22 consists of 80% cotton fibers having an effective fiber length of 1.0 inch and 20% polyester fibers having an effective fiber length of 1.5 inches, then the distances b and c would be no more than 1.50 inches (38 mm?, and may be 36 mm and 37 mm, respectively. The longest fiber type in the sliver 22 refers to the fiber type having the longest effective fiber length and forming a substantial portion of the sliver 22. Stated differently, fiber types which do not constitute a significant portion of the sliver are not used to determine the longest fiber type in the sliver and thus the roll spacing in the drafting zone r ~.
10.
.Although not wishing to be bound by a particular theory, it is believed that roll spacings tighter than the effective fiber length of the longest fiber type in the sliver 22 in the break and intermediate draft zones reduce fiber slippage at each nip point and thereby increase drafting control on the sliver. This greater control increases fiber alignment and uniformity in the drafted sliver 22 as it is introduced to the front drafting zone. A high cohesion sliver is preferred because it is believed to prevent fibers from slipping under the higher drafting force generated by the tighter roll spacings. Because the sliver 22 entering the front drafting zone is highly uniform and aligned because of the tighter roll spacings, the sliver 22 exits the front roll nip even more uniform and aligned.
Accordingly, the more uniform and aligned sliver entering the spinning zone 15 creates a unique spun yarn. Upon examination of the spun yarns through microscopy, more wrapper fibers appear to be generated in this yarn (FIG. 3) at the same spinning conditions than with yarn produced from sliver drafted with the conventional wider roll spacings in the back and intermediate drafting zones (FIG. 4). It is believed that the number and frequency of the wrapper fibers increase because of the greater fiber alignment in the sliver 22. The greater number of wrapper fibers combined with the more uniform and aligned sliver going into the spinning zor_e is believed to create a spun yarn with increased strength and reduced quality defects. Furthermore, the improvements in the yarn may result in improvements in the weaving performance of the yarn and the potential use of yarns, specifically air-jet yarns, in some knit applications. In addition to the above, it is believed that the speed and the mass of the sliver 22 used in the drafting zone 10 may contribute to the benefits of the invention. By way of example, in four-roll systems used according to the invention, the speed in the break and intermediate draft zones is about 3 times faster at the second nip roll than in ring spinning draft systems. The mass of the sliver 22 entering the drafting zone 10 is also typically 2 times greater than the roving entering a typical ring spinning draft system. The combination of greater speed and fiber mass is believed to make fiber slippage at the nip points more likely in the higher speed four-roll drafting system (e. g., MJS drafting system) thus providing the benefits of the invention in the higher speed four-roll system and not in ring spinning systems.
Once the sliver 22 exits the drafting zone 10, it is advanced to the spinning zone 15. The spinning apparatus in the spinning zone 15 selected for use in the present invention operates at higher speeds than associated with ring spinning. Exemplary spinning means which operates at these speeds and which use roller drafting systems include air-jet spinning means and roller jet spinning means. Generally, the spinning means operates at a take-up speed cf greater than about 150 meters/minute, preferably, of greater than about 190 meters/minute and more preferably, of greater than about 220 meters/minute. The spinning apparatus is ~ ~
typically capable of producing yarns having counts between 9 and 50, preferably 26 and 42. An exemplary spinning apparatus is an air-jet spinning apparatus such as the MJS 802H spinning apparatus is from Murata Machinery Limited.
FIG. 1 illustrates an air-jet spinning apparatus for use in the invention. In the spinning zone 15, the sliver 22 enters a jet spinner 50 and air nozzle 52 wherein the drafted sliver is twisted by opposing air vortices to form a yarn 54.
The spun yarn 54 is then advanced to the take-up zone and specifically, to a pair of delivery rolls 56 and 58. The spinning zone 15 also includes a slack tube 60 to hold any accumulated fiber during the start-up of 15 the drafting and spinning apparatus. The yarn 54 is then cleared by a yarn clearer 62 and collected on a take-up roll 64.
As described above, the spun yarn produced according to the invention has high uniformity and 20 improved mechanical properties over conventional yarns produced according to conventional constructions having broader roll spacing.
Specifically, the spun yarn produced according to the invention has increased strength and reduced defects over conventional yarns formed using broad roll spacing. The benefits of the present invention will now be further illustrated by the following non-limiting example.
EXAMPLE lA AND COMPA_RATTVF E~pLES 1B and 1C
Two slivers consisting of two cut length variations of intimately blended 50°s 0.9 denier per filament FORTREL~ Type 510 polyester (available from Wellman, Inc.) and 50~ cotton stable fibers were advanced through a four roll drafting zone and spun using an MJS 802H air-jet spinner from Murata Machinery Limited with an H3 air nozzle at a speed of 273 meters/minute. The air-jet spinning apparatus was preset at a feed ratio of 0.98, a condenser setting of 3 mm, an apron spring tension of 3 kg, a Nozzle 1 (N1) to front roll distance 10 of 39.0 mm, a N1 pressure of 2.5 kgf /CM2 and a Nozzle 2 (N2) pressure of 5 kgf /CM2. The effective fiber length of the 35 gr/yd three-process drawn slivers were measured using ASTM D-5103.
The upper quartile length of the slivers, representing the mean decrimped length of the polyester fiber in each sliver, was 38 and 39 mm respectively. The polyester fibers had high cohesion through the use of liquid finishes and for these particular samples the Rothschild cohesion of the sliver was 182 cN for both variants. The yarn count of the spun yarn was measured at 37 Ne. In Example lA, a narrow roll spacing was selected according to the invention wherein the top roll spacings were preset at 48 mm, 37.5 mm, and 39 mm (d, a and f, respectively, in FIG. 2) and the bottom roll spacings were preset at 44 mm, 39 mm and 38 mm (g, h and i, respectively, in FIG. 2). The distances between the nips were 46 mm, 38.25 mm and 38.5 mm (a, b and c, respectively in FIG. 2). The draft ratio across the drafting zone was 155 consisting of a break draft of 2.0, an intermediate draft of 2.17 and a main draft of 36. The sliver used for example lA had a 39 mm effective fiber length in order to be slightly longer than the 38.25 mm intermediate drafting zone. In Comparative Examples 1B and 1C, sliver exhibited an effective fiber length of 38 mm. In Comparative Example 1B, narrow roll spacings such as those presented in parent application 08/844,463 were utilized. The top roll spacings were preset at 48 mm, 36 mm, and 36 mm (d, a and f, respectively, in FIG. 2) and the bottom roll spacings were preset at 44 mm, 37 mm and 36 mm (g, h and i, respectively, in FIG. 2).
The distances between the nips were 46 mm, 36.5 mm and 36 mm (a, b and c, respectively in FIG. 2). In Comparative Example 1C, a broad roll spacing such as those conventionally used in the art was selected wherein the top roll spacings were preset at 48 mm, 39 mm, and 42 mm (d, a and f, respectively, in FIG. 2) and the bottom roll spacings were preset at 44 mm, 41.5 mm and 42 mm (g, h and i, respectively, in FIG. 2). The distances between the nips were 46 mm, 40.25 mm and 42 mm (a, b and c, respectively in FIG. 2). The draft ratio used was the same for Examples lA, 1B, and 1C.
The yarns produced in Example lA and Comparative Examples 1B and 1C were tested for mechanical properties and uniformity. The mechanical properties of the yarns were tested using both a Statimat testing apparatus at 100 breaks and a Tensojet testing apparatus at 6000 breaks and the yarn quality was determined using a Uster 3 Evenness Tester for ,000 yards and a Classimat II device for 100,000 me~ers.
The results are provided in TABLE l, and the Statimat Minimum Strength, Statimat Mean Strength, and Classimat H-1 Defects are also plotted in Figures 5, 6 and 7 WO 98!48088 PCT/US98/07854 respectively.
Sample Number lA 1B 1C
Effective fiber length (mm) 39 38 38 MJS Top Roll Spacings (mm) 48-37.5-39 48-39-42 48-36-36 MJ5 Bottom Roll Spacings (mm) 44-39-38 44-41.5-42 44-37-36 Statimat Data (100 breaks) Yarn Count (Ne) 37.07 37.76 36.89 Mean Tenacity (gf/den) 1.83 1.72 1.81 Second Lowest Tenacity (gf/den) 1.45 1.3 1.36 Minimum Tenacity (gf/den) 1.33 1.06 1.24 Mean Single-End Strength (gf) 262 242 261 Single-End Strength CV (%) 10.6 11.0 12.2 Maximum Strength (gf) 320 294 346 Minimum Strength (gf) 192 149 179 Mean Single-End Elongation (%) 8.3 7,9 7.8 Elongation CV% 8.1 10.1 8.0 Maximum Elongation (%) 9.8 9,9 9,1 Minimum Elongation (%) 6.7 6.1 6.0 Tensojet Data (6000 breaks) Mean Tenacity (gf/den) 1.91 1.78 1.90 Lowest l% Tenacity (gf%den) 1.40 1.28 1.25 Lowest 0.1% Tenacity (gf/den) 1.20 1.10 0.98 Mean Single-End Strength (gf) 275 251 273 Single-End Strength CV (%) 10.8 10.9 13.8 Maximum Strength (gf) 376 351 430 Lowest 1.0% Strength (gf) 200 180 180 Lowest 0.1% Strength (gf) 172 155 142 Minimum Strength (gf) 148 141 136 Mean Single-End Elongation (%) 8.1 7.5 7.5 Maximum Elongation (%) 10.7 10.0 9.9 Lowest 0.1% Elongation (%) 5.6 4.6 4.8 Minimum Elongation (%) 5.2 3.9 4.2 tester 3 Yarn Evenness Data Uster Evenness (CV%) 18.1 18.6 18.6 Uster 1 yd Evenness (CV%) 6.3 6.1 7.3 Uster 3 yd Evenness (CV%) 3.8 3.7 4.5 Uster 10 yd Evenness (CV%) 2.2 2.2 2.3 IPI Thin Places (-50%) 95 134 134 IPI Thick Places (+50%) 517 615 483 IPI Neps (+200%) 1335 1269 1520 Total IPI's 1947 2018 2137 Classimat Data A-1 Defects (A1-A2-A3-A4) 1396 1567 1344 Major Defects (A4+B4+C3+C4+D3+D4)B 1 C
H-1 Defects 823 527 1918 H-2 Defects ~ 4 ~ 0 15 i.
I-1 Defects 8 3 43 I-2 Defects 0 0 3 Long Thicks (E+F+G) 3 1 9 Total Defects 2242 2099 3332 Card Sliver Rothschild Cohesion 664 651 651 (cN) 182 182 182 Third Pass Rothschild Cohesion (cN) As shown in TABLE 1, the 50/50 polyester and cotton blends of the invention Example lA have a 10~
average increase in mean Tensojet single-end strength, a 11% average increase in lowest O.lo Tensojet strength, and a 4~ average reduction in the number of total defects, compared to the 50/50 blends prepared by conventional methods in Example 1B. The 50/50 spun yarn has a mean Tensojet single-end strength of greater than 275 gf and less than 2000 total defects per 1000 yards. The total Uster defects per 1000 yards include the number of peps and the number of thick and thin defects in the yarn per 1000 yards. As noted in TABLE
1, a " nep" defect refers to a yarn portion at least 200% thicker than average, a "thick" defect refers to a yarn portion at least 50% thicker than average, and a "thin" defect refers to a yarn portion 50~ thinner than average. In addition to these properties, the yarn has a mean Tensojet tenacity of more than 1.91 gf/den, a maximum strength of greater than about 376 gf, and a minimum strength of greater than about 148 gf, each of which are improvements over conventionally produced 50/50 yarn.
Furthermore, a comparison of Examples lA and 1C
show the improvements of the intermediate-pair technique even above those of the four-pair technique.
The 50/50 polyester and cotton blends of the invention Example 1A have a comparable mean Tensojet single-end strength to Example 1C. However, the current invention exhibits an 21°s average increase in lowest 0.1~
Tensojet strength, a 9o average reduction in the number of total Uster defects, and a 33~ average reduction in the number of total Classimat defects. The total Classimat defects per 100,000 meters includes several classifications of thin and thick places.
The less favorable results for Lowest 0.1~
l0 Strenght for Example 1C (Tensojet Data) are somewhat unexpected, but may result from the individual characteristics of the particular spinning machinery used.
As illustrated by the Classimat Data (Table 1;
FIG. 7) yarns produced according to the invention tend to have slightly higher total Classimat defects than do the control yarns. Nevertheless, the difference tends to be minimal, especially when considered in light of the advantages of the novel yarns.
The visible quality of the yarns of the intermediate roll technique is comparable to that of the four-pair technique. As illustrated in FIG. 3 (a microscopy photograph of the conventional yarn of Comparative Example 6) and FIG. 4 (a microscopy photograph of the yarn of Example 6 according to the present invention), the yarns of the invention have a visibly superior quality over the conventionally produced yarns. Although not wishing to be bound by a particular theory, it is believed that because of the increased control in the drafting zone of the invention, the wrapper fibers are twisted more WO 98!48088 PCTIUS98/07854 frequently around the core fibers; i.e., have a sharper wrapping angle and more wraps per unit length. The resulting improvement in visible quality may be responsible for the decreased defects in the yarn and may also be responsible for the increased mechanical properties of the yarns of the invention.
Although the four-pair technique offers these advantages, significantly more machine modification is required which adds a presently significant cost factor to the machinery. In particular, moving the drafting rolls to match the relationships in the four-pair teachnique tends to require a large number of adjustments to make things fit. Spring housings must be modified and a different condenser and condenser bracket must be utilized.
Accordingly, in the intermediate-pair technique the distance between the bottom intermediate roll pairs is set to 39 mm so that the aforementioned machine modifications are not required. Thus, in this embodiment of the invention a sliver with fibers of a longest effective length of 39 millimeters was used in a four roll system in which the distance between nips was set at 38.5 millimeters between the back rolls and the first set of intermediate rolls, at 38.25 millimeters between the nips of the intermediate rolls and at 46 millimeters between second intermediate roll pair and the front roll pair.
Stated differently, in the intermediate-pair technique only the intermediate drafting zone has a nip to nip distance that is longer than the effective fiber length. Preferably, the back zone is also maintained WO 98!48088 PCTIUS98/07854 near, but slightly less than, the effective fiber length.
It has been further discovered that the strength and quality of yarns produced in the intermediate-pair technique is greater than those produced in the four-pair technique.
In the intermediate-pair technique, the back zone is now comparable to the effective fiber length, the intermediate zone is still shorter than the effective to fiber length, and a slightly longer stable fiber is preferably used in the process.
With respect to the difference in side plate spacing from conventional spacing, a comparative side plate on the four mentioned MJS spinning machines would include nip spacing of 42 millimeters in the back zone, 40.25 millimeter in the intermediate zone, and 46 millimeters in the front drafting zone. Thus, as Table 2 illustrates, it tends to be mechanically easier to adjust the side plates to take advantage of the intermediate-pair technique as opposed to adjusting the side plates to take advantage of the four-pair technique.
Drafting process Front Intermediate Hack versus Nip Spacing Conventional 46 40.25 42 '463 Application 1 46 36.5 36 Invention 48 38.25 38.5 At present cost structures, applicants estimate that modifying a typical side plate in an air jet spinning ~ ~ .
machine in the manner disclosed in the intermediate-pair technique is approximately 1/6'h the cost of the modifications required for the four-pair technique.
It thus appears that in the back drafting zone the most favorable results are obtained when the nip distance is approximately equal to the fiber length while in the intermediate zone the most favorable results are obtained when the nip is shorter than the fiber length.
Although not yet formally demonstrated, it appears that the advantages will likewise extend to other high speed spinning machines such as Vortex type machines that create true twists in an entire yarn.
Again, although applicants do not wish to be bound by any particular theory, it thus appears that the intermediate drafting zone is the most important in terms of yarn strength in these high speed spinning systems. Apparently, the closer the fiber length approaches the nip spacing in the intermediate zone, the higher the drafting force will be on the sliver.
Additionally, the intermediate zone is the lowest drafting ratio zone of the entire system. Thus, it appears that the high drafting force in the intermediate zone results in very good alignment.
Set forth in progressive fashion, the nip spacing of the present invention produces a high drafting force in the intermediate zone which in turn produces a better alignment among the staple fibers in the yarn.
In turn, the enhanced alignment results in fewer thin places in the yarn and thus a more uniform bundle. In turn, the more uniform bundle produces a tighter wrap WO 98/48088 PCTlUS98/07854 during air jet spinning which results in the stronger yarn observed.
Although the above description generally applies to high speed spinning processes, particularly air-jet spinning processes, it will be understood that the invention is not limited thereto since modifications may be made by those skilled in the art, particularly in light of the foregoing description. Therefore, said modifications and embodiments are intended to be included within the spirit and scope of the following appended claims.
Claims (24)
1. A drafting and spinning apparatus that produces highly uniform yarns with improved mechanical properties, said apparatus comprising:
a plurality of pairs of drafting rolls for drawing a sliver formed of one or more types of staple fibers, each fiber type having a predetermined effective fiber length, characterized in that:
said plurality of pairs of drafting rolls comprising, at least two pairs of intermediate rolls, with the distances between the nips of adjacent intermediate roll pairs being no more than the effective fiber length of the longest fiber type in the sliver; and means for spinning the sliver into yarn at a take-up speed of greater than 150 meters/minute.
a plurality of pairs of drafting rolls for drawing a sliver formed of one or more types of staple fibers, each fiber type having a predetermined effective fiber length, characterized in that:
said plurality of pairs of drafting rolls comprising, at least two pairs of intermediate rolls, with the distances between the nips of adjacent intermediate roll pairs being no more than the effective fiber length of the longest fiber type in the sliver; and means for spinning the sliver into yarn at a take-up speed of greater than 150 meters/minute.
2. A drafting and spinning apparatus according to Claim 1 wherein said plurality of drafting rolls comprises at least four pairs of drafting rolls, including at least a pair of back rolls and a pair of front rolls,
3. The apparatus according to Claim 2 wherein the pair of intermediate rolls adjacent said front roll pair is a pair of apron rolls.
4. The apparatus according to Claim 1 wherein said spinning means is selected from the group consisting of air jet spinning means and roller jet spinning means.
5. The apparatus according to Claim 1 wherein the spinning means spins the sliver into yarn at a take-up speed of at least about 190 m/min.
6. The apparatus according to Claim 1 wherein the spinning means spins the sliver into yarn at a take-up speed of at least about 220 m/min.
7. The apparatus according to Claim 2 wherein the overall draft ratio over said at least four pairs of rolls is between about 50 and 220.
8. An apparatus according to Claim 1 comprising:
an air jet spinning apparatus a drafting zone of four pairs of drafting rolls for drawing a sliver formed of one or more types of staple fibers, each fiber type having a predetermined effective fiber length, the sliver comprising polyester staple fibers having a denier per filament of between about 0.5 and about 2.5;
said four pairs of drafting rolls consisting of a pair of back rolls, a pair of intermediate rolls adjacent the pair of back rolls, a pair of apron rolls adjacent the pair of intermediate rolls, and a pair of front rolls adjacent the pair of apron rolls; and wherein the distance between the nip of the intermediate roll pair and the nip of the apron roll pair is no more than the effective fiber length of the longest staple fiber type in the sliver.
an air jet spinning apparatus a drafting zone of four pairs of drafting rolls for drawing a sliver formed of one or more types of staple fibers, each fiber type having a predetermined effective fiber length, the sliver comprising polyester staple fibers having a denier per filament of between about 0.5 and about 2.5;
said four pairs of drafting rolls consisting of a pair of back rolls, a pair of intermediate rolls adjacent the pair of back rolls, a pair of apron rolls adjacent the pair of intermediate rolls, and a pair of front rolls adjacent the pair of apron rolls; and wherein the distance between the nip of the intermediate roll pair and the nip of the apron roll pair is no more than the effective fiber length of the longest staple fiber type in the sliver.
9. An air jet spinning apparatus according to Claim 1 or Claim 8 wherein the distance between the nip of the back roll pair and the nip of the adjacent intermediate roll pair is no more than the effective fiber length of the longest fiber type in the sliver.
10. A method of producing highly uniform yarns with improved mechanical properties comprising:
advancing a sliver comprising one or more types of staple fibers, each staple fiber type having a predetermined effective fiber length, through a plurality of pairs of drafting rolls comprising, at least two pairs of intermediate rolls, by maintaining the distance between the nips of adjacent pairs of intermediate rolls at no more than the effective fiber length of the longest staple fiber type in the sliver;
and thereafter spinning the sliver into yarn at a take-up speed of about 150 meters/minute.
advancing a sliver comprising one or more types of staple fibers, each staple fiber type having a predetermined effective fiber length, through a plurality of pairs of drafting rolls comprising, at least two pairs of intermediate rolls, by maintaining the distance between the nips of adjacent pairs of intermediate rolls at no more than the effective fiber length of the longest staple fiber type in the sliver;
and thereafter spinning the sliver into yarn at a take-up speed of about 150 meters/minute.
11. The method according to Claim 10 said spinning step comprises spinning the yarn at a take-up speed of about 190 meters per minute.
12. The method according to Claim 10 said spinning step comprises spinning the yarn at a take-up speed of about 220 meters per minute.
13. The method according to Claim to wherein the advancing step comprises advancing a sliver that includes staple synthetic fibers.
14. The method according to Claim 13 wherein the staple synthetic fibers are selected from the group consisting of polyester, polytrimethylene terephthalate, rayon, nylon, acrylic, acetate, polyethylene, polyurethane and polyvinyl fibers.
15. The method according to Claim 13 wherein the advancing step comprises advancing a sliver further that includes natural fibers.
16. The method according to Claim 15 wherein the natural fibers are selected from the group consisting of cotton, linen, flax, rayon, lyocell, viscose rayon, cellulose acetate, wool, ramie, alpaca, vicuna, mohair, cashmere, guanaco, camel, llama, fur and silk fibers.
17. The method according to Claim 10 wherein the advancing step comprises advancing a sliver that includes staple polyester fibers having a predetermined effective fiber length.
18. The method according to Claim 17 wherein the advancing step comprises advancing a sliver that includes high cohesion staple polyester fibers.
19. The method according to Claim 17 wherein said advancing step comprises advancing a sliver that includes polyester fibers having a denier per filament of between about 0.5 and about 2.5.
20. The method according to Claim 17 wherein the advancing step comprises advancing a sliver consisting of between about 20 and 100 percent polyester fibers with the remainder cotton fibers.
21. The method according to Claim 17 wherein the advancing step comprises advancing a sliver consisting of 100 percent polyester fibers.
22. The method according to Claim 10 wherein the spinning step is selected from the group consisting of air jet spinning and roller jet spinning.
23. A method according to Claim 10 comprising:
advancing a sliver formed of one or more types of staple fibers, each staple fiber type having a predetermined effective fiber length and one staple fiber type comprising high cohesion staple polyester fibers having a denier per filament of between about 0.5 and about 2.5, through a plurality of drafting rolls comprising, a pair of intermediate rolls and a pair of apron rolls, by maintaining the distance the nip of the pair of intermediate rolls and the nip of the pair of apron rolls at no more than the effective fiber length of the longest staple fiber type in the sliver.
advancing a sliver formed of one or more types of staple fibers, each staple fiber type having a predetermined effective fiber length and one staple fiber type comprising high cohesion staple polyester fibers having a denier per filament of between about 0.5 and about 2.5, through a plurality of drafting rolls comprising, a pair of intermediate rolls and a pair of apron rolls, by maintaining the distance the nip of the pair of intermediate rolls and the nip of the pair of apron rolls at no more than the effective fiber length of the longest staple fiber type in the sliver.
24. A method of producing yarns according to Claim 10 or Claim 23 and further comprising advancing the sliver between the nip of a back roll pair and an adjacent intermediate roll pair in which the distance between the nips of the back roll pair and the intermediate roll pair is no more than the effective fiber length of the longest fiber in the sliver.
Applications Claiming Priority (5)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US08/844,363 | 1997-04-18 | ||
| US08/844,463 US5950413A (en) | 1997-04-18 | 1997-04-18 | Spinning apparatus, method of producing yarns, and resulting yarns |
| US08/997,147 | 1997-12-23 | ||
| US08/997,147 US5970700A (en) | 1997-04-18 | 1997-12-23 | Drafting apparatus and method for producing yarns |
| PCT/US1998/007854 WO1998048088A1 (en) | 1997-04-18 | 1998-04-17 | Spinning apparatus, method of producing yarns, and resulting yarns |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2286735A1 true CA2286735A1 (en) | 1998-10-29 |
Family
ID=25292786
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002286735A Abandoned CA2286735A1 (en) | 1997-04-18 | 1998-04-17 | Spinning apparatus, method of producing yarns, and resulting yarns |
Country Status (3)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (3) | US5950413A (en) |
| JP (1) | JP2002514275A (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2286735A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (16)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2001038612A2 (en) * | 1999-11-21 | 2001-05-31 | Silktech Ltd. | A device and method for producing a silk yarns from cocoon threads |
| KR100367790B1 (en) * | 2000-11-23 | 2003-01-10 | 김기환 | Carded Woolen Yarn |
| GB0101360D0 (en) * | 2001-01-19 | 2001-03-07 | Bae Systems Plc | Composites |
| US6412261B1 (en) | 2001-03-21 | 2002-07-02 | The Forman School | Method of reinforcing a fiber with spider silk |
| EP1651804B8 (en) * | 2003-07-10 | 2013-04-17 | Return Textiles, LLC | Yarn incorporating recycled plastic material and method of making |
| EP1602755B1 (en) * | 2004-05-31 | 2007-07-25 | MARZOLI S.p.A. | Drawing device for spinning machine |
| WO2006078974A1 (en) * | 2005-01-21 | 2006-07-27 | E.I. Dupont De Nemours And Company | Staple yarn manufacturing process |
| US20080057813A1 (en) * | 2005-07-13 | 2008-03-06 | 1888 Mills | Polyester woven fabric |
| US7749600B1 (en) * | 2005-10-13 | 2010-07-06 | Patrick Yarn Mills | Microfiber core mop yarn and method for producing same |
| JP4842173B2 (en) * | 2007-02-28 | 2011-12-21 | 東海ゴム工業株式会社 | Fiber reinforced hose |
| AT506268B1 (en) * | 2008-01-11 | 2014-08-15 | Chemiefaser Lenzing Ag | MICROFIBRE |
| KR101432928B1 (en) | 2013-03-11 | 2014-08-21 | 삼일방 (주) | Process of producing polyester/lyocell air-jet belnded spun yarn having exellent sweat-absorbing and rapid-drying and antibacterial property |
| CH709694A1 (en) * | 2014-05-26 | 2015-11-30 | Rieter Ag Maschf | Spinning preparation machine for preparing a roving. |
| JP2017071870A (en) * | 2015-10-06 | 2017-04-13 | 村田機械株式会社 | Draft device, spinning machine, and spinning method |
| CN109468720A (en) * | 2018-12-13 | 2019-03-15 | 桐乡宝鼎纺织有限公司 | Blow spinning method used in Vinyon N and glass fiber package heart yarn |
| CN111910313A (en) * | 2020-08-12 | 2020-11-10 | 南通双弘纺织有限公司 | Production method of single-dyed polyester-cotton blended yarn |
Family Cites Families (30)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US1696553A (en) * | 1926-11-26 | 1928-12-25 | Whiting Machine Works | Drafting system |
| GB920427A (en) * | 1959-04-10 | 1900-01-01 | ||
| US3079746A (en) * | 1961-10-23 | 1963-03-05 | Du Pont | Fasciated yarn, process and apparatus for producing the same |
| US3487619A (en) * | 1966-09-02 | 1970-01-06 | Du Pont | Apparatus for high speed drafting |
| GB1200669A (en) * | 1966-12-29 | 1970-07-29 | Mitsubishi Rayon Co | High speed spinning method and apparatus for manufacturing jet bundle yarn |
| US3596456A (en) * | 1968-08-19 | 1971-08-03 | Graeme R Quick | Strawberry-harvesting device |
| GB1289683A (en) * | 1968-11-08 | 1972-09-20 | ||
| DE2149426C3 (en) * | 1971-10-04 | 1979-11-29 | Olbo Textilwerke Gmbh, 5650 Solingen | Core-sheath yarn for use as a weft thread for tire cord fabric |
| JPS5243256B2 (en) * | 1973-04-10 | 1977-10-29 | ||
| GB1504597A (en) * | 1974-04-22 | 1978-03-22 | Toray Industries | Yarn and a process for its manufacture |
| US4088016A (en) * | 1977-07-11 | 1978-05-09 | Eastman Kodak Company | Method and apparatus for determining parameters of a staple length distribution of fibers in yarn slivers |
| AU529092B2 (en) * | 1978-03-24 | 1983-05-26 | Toray Industries, Inc. | Fasciated yarn |
| DE2941612A1 (en) * | 1979-10-13 | 1981-04-23 | Zinser Textilmaschinen Gmbh, 7333 Ebersbach | ROUTE |
| US4387487A (en) * | 1979-10-16 | 1983-06-14 | Murata Kikai Kabushiki Kaisha | High draft apparatus in spinning machine |
| US4369622A (en) * | 1980-03-24 | 1983-01-25 | Riegel Textile Corporation | Method and apparatus for drawing and blending textile materials |
| IT1144368B (en) * | 1981-05-20 | 1986-10-29 | Gaudino Di P Gaudino & C Sas O | IMPROVEMENTS IN THE LAMINATORS WITH AT LEAST ONE IRON FIELD FOR THE DIRECT SPINNING OF COMBED AND SEMI-COMBED |
| US4428752A (en) * | 1982-07-22 | 1984-01-31 | Bertrand Goldenstein | High bulk olefin blended yarn |
| DE3404291A1 (en) * | 1984-02-08 | 1985-08-08 | Zinser Textilmaschinen Gmbh, 7333 Ebersbach | SPINNING MACHINE STRETCHER |
| DE3541219A1 (en) * | 1985-11-21 | 1987-05-27 | Schubert & Salzer Maschinen | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR SPINNING FIBERS |
| US4845813A (en) * | 1987-12-15 | 1989-07-11 | United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture | Roller drafter, process of use, and products produced thereby |
| EP0361257A1 (en) * | 1988-09-29 | 1990-04-04 | Maschinenfabrik Rieter Ag | Delivery rollers for a drawing frame |
| CH676860A5 (en) * | 1988-11-23 | 1991-03-15 | Rieter Ag Maschf | |
| US5497608A (en) * | 1991-02-22 | 1996-03-12 | Teijin Limited | Short fiber and continuous filament containing spun yarn-like composite yarn |
| JPH0674530B2 (en) * | 1991-07-30 | 1994-09-21 | 村田機械株式会社 | Spinning equipment |
| JPH05106121A (en) * | 1991-10-16 | 1993-04-27 | Murata Mach Ltd | Method for setting spinning condition of spinning frame and its apparatus |
| JPH07122167B2 (en) * | 1992-03-16 | 1995-12-25 | 村田機械株式会社 | Yarn splicing method for spinning device |
| US5568719A (en) * | 1992-06-11 | 1996-10-29 | Prospin Industries, Inc. | Composite yarn including a staple fiber covering a filament yarn component and confining the filament yarn component to a second thickness that is less than a first thickness of the filament in a relaxed state and a process for producing the same |
| JP3185393B2 (en) * | 1992-08-28 | 2001-07-09 | 村田機械株式会社 | Spinning method |
| US5400476A (en) * | 1994-07-12 | 1995-03-28 | Myrick-White, Inc. | Apparatus and method for controlling draft uniformity in textile sliver |
| US5749212A (en) * | 1995-06-06 | 1998-05-12 | Dixy Yarns, Inc. | Elastomeric core/staple fiber wrap yarn |
-
1997
- 1997-04-18 US US08/844,463 patent/US5950413A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
1998
- 1998-04-17 CA CA002286735A patent/CA2286735A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1998-04-17 JP JP54620698A patent/JP2002514275A/en active Pending
- 1998-05-22 US US09/084,363 patent/US5960621A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
1999
- 1999-03-03 US US09/261,513 patent/US6035621A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2002514275A (en) | 2002-05-14 |
| US6035621A (en) | 2000-03-14 |
| US5960621A (en) | 1999-10-05 |
| US5950413A (en) | 1999-09-14 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Basal et al. | Vortex spun yarn vs. air-jet spun yarn | |
| US6250060B1 (en) | Method of producing improved knit fabrics from blended fibers | |
| US5743077A (en) | Method for forming core/wrap yarn | |
| US5970700A (en) | Drafting apparatus and method for producing yarns | |
| US20220195639A1 (en) | Composite yarn, fabric comprising the composite yarn, method for producing a composite yarn and arrangement for producing a composite yarn | |
| US5950413A (en) | Spinning apparatus, method of producing yarns, and resulting yarns | |
| Ortlek et al. | Effect of some variables on properties of 100% cotton vortex spun yarn | |
| CN101654832A (en) | Spinning method of terylene-viscose blended yarn | |
| US20090183487A1 (en) | Staple yarn manufacturing process | |
| Basu | Progress in air-jet spinning | |
| Pouresfandiari et al. | Spinning conditions and characteristics of open-end rotor spun hybrid yarns | |
| Gharahaghaji et al. | Cluster-spun yarn—a new concept in composite yarn spinning | |
| JPH06257027A (en) | Compound yarn and its production | |
| JP4594715B2 (en) | Manufacturing method of long and short composite spun yarn | |
| JP3967622B2 (en) | Spinning method, twisted yarn, woven fabric and knitted fabric | |
| CN112877881B (en) | Moisture-absorbing and sweat-releasing knitted fabric and preparation method thereof | |
| Ul-Hasan et al. | Comparative study of mechanical properties, TPI, hairiness and evenness of conventional ring and modern rotor spun yarn | |
| Iqbal et al. | Comparative study on viscose yarn and knitted fabric made from open end and rieter airjet spinning system | |
| US4121412A (en) | Spun yarn and process for manufacturing the same | |
| JP3028600B2 (en) | Mercerized yarn | |
| Chollakup et al. | Silk waste/cotton blended yarns in cotton microspinning: Physical properties and fibre arrangement of blended yarn | |
| Song | Comparison between Conventional Ring Spinning and Compact Spinning. | |
| Punj et al. | Influence of spinning conditions on structure and properties of polyester-viscose blended MJS yarns | |
| ÜZÜMCÜ et al. | The Effects of Spinning System and Blending Ratio on Quality of Silk/Cotton Blended Yarns | |
| Maruf | Comparative study of conventional carded and compact ring Spun Yarn |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| FZDE | Discontinued |