CA2285056C - Method for introducing pharmaceutical drugs and nucleic acids into skeletal muscle - Google Patents
Method for introducing pharmaceutical drugs and nucleic acids into skeletal muscle Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2285056C CA2285056C CA002285056A CA2285056A CA2285056C CA 2285056 C CA2285056 C CA 2285056C CA 002285056 A CA002285056 A CA 002285056A CA 2285056 A CA2285056 A CA 2285056A CA 2285056 C CA2285056 C CA 2285056C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- muscle
- muscles
- dna
- transfected
- stimulated
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N5/00—Radiation therapy
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K41/00—Medicinal preparations obtained by treating materials with wave energy or particle radiation ; Therapies using these preparations
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K39/00—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
- A61K39/02—Bacterial antigens
- A61K39/04—Mycobacterium, e.g. Mycobacterium tuberculosis
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
- A61N1/18—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
- A61N1/20—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes continuous direct currents
- A61N1/205—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes continuous direct currents for promoting a biological process
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
- A61N1/18—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
- A61N1/32—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
- A61N1/325—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for iontophoresis, i.e. transfer of media in ionic state by an electromotoric force into the body
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K39/00—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
- A61K2039/54—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies characterised by the route of administration
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K39/00—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
- A61K2039/545—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies characterised by the dose, timing or administration schedule
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
- A61N1/18—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
- A61N1/32—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
- A61N1/36—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation
- A61N1/36014—External stimulators, e.g. with patch electrodes
- A61N1/36017—External stimulators, e.g. with patch electrodes with leads or electrodes penetrating the skin
Abstract
A method is disclosed for delivering molecules such as pharmaceutical drugs and nucleic acids into skeletal muscle in vivo. The pharmaceutical drug or nucleic acid is first injected into the muscle at one or multiple sites. Immediately, or shortly after injection, electrodes are placed flanking the injection site and a specific amount of electrical current is passed through the muscle. The electrical current makes the muscle permeable, thus allowing the pharmaceutical drug or nucleic acid to enter the cell. The efficiency of transfer permits robust immune responses using DNA vaccines and produces sufficient secreted proteins for systemic biological activity to be observed.
The use of a drug for manufacturing a medicament to be used in the delivery method as well as a device for performing the method and the use of such a device is also disclosed.
The use of a drug for manufacturing a medicament to be used in the delivery method as well as a device for performing the method and the use of such a device is also disclosed.
Description
METHOD FOR INTRODUCING PHARMACEUTICAL DRUGS AND
NUCLEIC ACIDS INTO SKELETAL MUSCLE
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is related to a method for making skeletal muscle semipermeable to pharmaceutical dings and nucleic acids. More specifically, skeletal muscle is made semipermeable by electrically stimulating the muscle at low field strengths following pharmaceutical drugs and nucleic acids injection.
2. TECHNICAL BACK RO
Scientists are continually discovering genes which are responsible for many human diseases, such as genes responsible for some forms of breast cancer, colon cancer, muscular dystrophy and cystic f brosis. In addition, scientists are continually discovering genes that code for bacterial and viral antigens (e.g., viral capsid proteins). Despite these new discoveries, a 1 S major obstacle facing the medical profession is how to safely deliver effective quantities of these agents to patients to treat disease or for genetic immunization.
Currently, most pharmaceutical agents are taken orally or intravenously. Oral and intravenous drug and gene delivery methods, however, have several shortcomings. First, a large percent of orally or intravenously delivered drugs are degraded by the body before arnving at the target organ or cells. Acids and enzymes in the stomach and intestine, for example, can break down many pharmaceutical drugs. Similarly, genes would be rapidly destroyed by proteins found in the blood and liver which break down DNA.
Additionally, intravenously delivered drugs and genes are often sequestered by the liver or immune system before arriving at the diseased organ or cells. Second, oral and intravenous drug and gene delivery is non-specific. That is, the drug or gene is delivered to both target and non-target cells.
Skeletal muscle is a promising candidate for drug delivery, gene therapy and genetic immunization. First, skeletal muscle constitutes over 50% of a human's body mass, most of which is easily accessible compared to other tissues and organs of the body.
Second, there are numerous inherited and acquired disorders, such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD}, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidaemia and cardiovascular disease which are good candidate disorders for drug and gene delivery into the muscle. Third, muscle is an ideal site for genetic immunization because it is easily accessible and proteins made in the muscle are secreted, thus eliciting an immune response. Finally, skeletal muscle cells are non-dividing.
Therefore, CONFIRMATION COPY
skeletal muscle cells are capable of expressing a protein coded by a gene for a longer time period than would be expected of other cell types that are continually dividing. Because the protein is expressed for a longer time, fewer treatments would be necessary.
Currently, however, there is no non-viral method for effectively delivering S pharmaceutical drugs and DNA into skeletal muscle in vivo. There are several methods known in the art for transferring pharmaceutical drugs and DNA into skeletal muscle, such as intramuscular injection of DNA. The clinical applicability of direct muscle injection, however, is limited mainly because of low transfection efficiency, typically less than 1 % transfection efficiency. It has been demonstrated that the efficacy of transfection can be improved if DNA
injections are done in regenerating muscle. Injection is induced three days before DNA
injection with the drug Bivucain. While injection in regenerating muscles induced by Bivucain show higher efficiency, the method has limited applicability in humans because of the severe damage caused to the muscle.
From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that it would be an advancement in the art to provide a non-viral method of delivering pharmaceutical drugs and DNA only to diseased organs and cells. It would also be an advancement in the art to provide an electroporation method of delivering pharmaceutical drugs and DNA directly into skeletal muscle. It would be yet another advancement in the art if the electroporation method could deliver therapeutically effective quantities of pharmaceutical drugs and DNA into the skeletal muscle at multiple sites simultaneously. It would be a further advancement if the method permitted the delivery efficiencies to be regulated.
Such a method is disclosed herein.
NUCLEIC ACIDS INTO SKELETAL MUSCLE
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is related to a method for making skeletal muscle semipermeable to pharmaceutical dings and nucleic acids. More specifically, skeletal muscle is made semipermeable by electrically stimulating the muscle at low field strengths following pharmaceutical drugs and nucleic acids injection.
2. TECHNICAL BACK RO
Scientists are continually discovering genes which are responsible for many human diseases, such as genes responsible for some forms of breast cancer, colon cancer, muscular dystrophy and cystic f brosis. In addition, scientists are continually discovering genes that code for bacterial and viral antigens (e.g., viral capsid proteins). Despite these new discoveries, a 1 S major obstacle facing the medical profession is how to safely deliver effective quantities of these agents to patients to treat disease or for genetic immunization.
Currently, most pharmaceutical agents are taken orally or intravenously. Oral and intravenous drug and gene delivery methods, however, have several shortcomings. First, a large percent of orally or intravenously delivered drugs are degraded by the body before arnving at the target organ or cells. Acids and enzymes in the stomach and intestine, for example, can break down many pharmaceutical drugs. Similarly, genes would be rapidly destroyed by proteins found in the blood and liver which break down DNA.
Additionally, intravenously delivered drugs and genes are often sequestered by the liver or immune system before arriving at the diseased organ or cells. Second, oral and intravenous drug and gene delivery is non-specific. That is, the drug or gene is delivered to both target and non-target cells.
Skeletal muscle is a promising candidate for drug delivery, gene therapy and genetic immunization. First, skeletal muscle constitutes over 50% of a human's body mass, most of which is easily accessible compared to other tissues and organs of the body.
Second, there are numerous inherited and acquired disorders, such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD}, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidaemia and cardiovascular disease which are good candidate disorders for drug and gene delivery into the muscle. Third, muscle is an ideal site for genetic immunization because it is easily accessible and proteins made in the muscle are secreted, thus eliciting an immune response. Finally, skeletal muscle cells are non-dividing.
Therefore, CONFIRMATION COPY
skeletal muscle cells are capable of expressing a protein coded by a gene for a longer time period than would be expected of other cell types that are continually dividing. Because the protein is expressed for a longer time, fewer treatments would be necessary.
Currently, however, there is no non-viral method for effectively delivering S pharmaceutical drugs and DNA into skeletal muscle in vivo. There are several methods known in the art for transferring pharmaceutical drugs and DNA into skeletal muscle, such as intramuscular injection of DNA. The clinical applicability of direct muscle injection, however, is limited mainly because of low transfection efficiency, typically less than 1 % transfection efficiency. It has been demonstrated that the efficacy of transfection can be improved if DNA
injections are done in regenerating muscle. Injection is induced three days before DNA
injection with the drug Bivucain. While injection in regenerating muscles induced by Bivucain show higher efficiency, the method has limited applicability in humans because of the severe damage caused to the muscle.
From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that it would be an advancement in the art to provide a non-viral method of delivering pharmaceutical drugs and DNA only to diseased organs and cells. It would also be an advancement in the art to provide an electroporation method of delivering pharmaceutical drugs and DNA directly into skeletal muscle. It would be yet another advancement in the art if the electroporation method could deliver therapeutically effective quantities of pharmaceutical drugs and DNA into the skeletal muscle at multiple sites simultaneously. It would be a further advancement if the method permitted the delivery efficiencies to be regulated.
Such a method is disclosed herein.
3. BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides a method for delivering or transfecting pharmaceutical drugs and DNA into skeletal muscle. Without being bound by theory, the method is thought to be similar to electroporation. Electroporation works on the principle that cells act as an electrical capacitor generally unable to pass current. Subjecting cells to a high-voltage electric field, therefore, creates transient permeable structures or micropores in the cell membrane.
These pores are large enough to allow pharmaceutical drugs, DNA and other polar compounds to gain access to the interior of the cell. With time, the pores in the cell membrane close and the cell once again becomes impermeable.
Conventional eiectroporation, however, employs high field strengths from 0.4 to several kV/cm. In contrast to conventional electroporation, the field strength used in the present invention ranges from about 25 V/cm to 250 V/cm. These lower field strengths are thought to cause less muscle damage without sacrificing, and indeed increasing, transfection efFciencies.
Furthermore, using the method of the present invention, transfection efficiencies can be tightly regulated by altering such parameters as frequency, pulse duration and pulse number.
The increase in DNA transfection efficiency is observed only if the muscle is electrically stimulated immediately, or shortly aRer the DNA injection. Thus, the semipermeable quality of the tissue induced by the stimulation is reversible. Moreover, it is dependent on current through the muscle; activity induced through the nerve does not affect transfection effciency.
Once transfected, the muscle cells are able to express the proteins coded by the nucleic acid. Therefore, the transfection method of the present invention can be used, for example, to transfect expression vectors for genetic immunization (i.e., DNA vaccines). In one embodiment, rabbits were transfected with a plasmid containing the cDNA for rat agrin. The transfected muscles produced and secreted agrin protein. Nineteen days post-transfection, rabbit serum contained significant antibodies against rat agrin.
In a second embodiment, mice and rats were transfected using the method of the present invention with one or more of three different eukaryotic expression vectors containing the coding sequences for DH-CNTF, an agonistic variant of human ciliary neurotrophic factor, AADH-CNTF, an antagonistic variant of human ciliary neurotrophic factor and sec-DHCNTF, a secreted form of DH-CNTF. The muscles were either not electrically stimulated or stimulated immediately after DNA injection. Blood was collected at various time points and the antibody titers determined. In both rats and mice, electrical stimulation immediately after DNA injection led to approximately 5 to IO-fold higher antibody titers than simple DNA
injection.
The transfection method ofthe present invention can also be used to systemically deliver proteins to treat diseases. In one preferred embodiment, a DNA plasmid harboring the erythropoietin (EPO) gene was injected into skeletal muscle and stimulated according to the method of the present invention. Controls were either not stimulated or transfected with a control vector not harboring the EPO gene. After 14 days, only the mice transfected with EPO
according to the method of the present invention displayed an increased hematocrit indicating the transfected muscles were able to produce and secrete into the blood stream substantial amounts of EPO.
Non-nucleic acids may also be transfected by the method of the present invention. In one embodiment, r~odamin conjugated dextran was injected into the muscle followed by electrical stimulation. Three to five days later the muscles were frozen in liquid nitrogen and sectioned on a cryostat. Fluorescence was observed in cells injected and stimulated, indicating the rhodamin conjugated dextran was able to enter and remain in the muscle cells.
The invention provides an apparatus suitable for delivering a molecule to a skeletal muscle of a mammal in vivo, said apparatus comprising: a means suitable for injecting a molecule into an injection site in the skeletal muscle of a mammal; electrodes suitable for positioning near the injection site such that current travelling through the electrodes passes through the injection site; and a means for electrically stimulating the muscle with an electrical current: wherein, in use an electrical current having a field strength between 25 V/cm and 200 V/cm is provided.
These and other objects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent upon reference to the accompanying drawings and graphs and upon reading the following I S detailed description and appended claims.
The present invention provides a method for delivering or transfecting pharmaceutical drugs and DNA into skeletal muscle. Without being bound by theory, the method is thought to be similar to electroporation. Electroporation works on the principle that cells act as an electrical capacitor generally unable to pass current. Subjecting cells to a high-voltage electric field, therefore, creates transient permeable structures or micropores in the cell membrane.
These pores are large enough to allow pharmaceutical drugs, DNA and other polar compounds to gain access to the interior of the cell. With time, the pores in the cell membrane close and the cell once again becomes impermeable.
Conventional eiectroporation, however, employs high field strengths from 0.4 to several kV/cm. In contrast to conventional electroporation, the field strength used in the present invention ranges from about 25 V/cm to 250 V/cm. These lower field strengths are thought to cause less muscle damage without sacrificing, and indeed increasing, transfection efFciencies.
Furthermore, using the method of the present invention, transfection efficiencies can be tightly regulated by altering such parameters as frequency, pulse duration and pulse number.
The increase in DNA transfection efficiency is observed only if the muscle is electrically stimulated immediately, or shortly aRer the DNA injection. Thus, the semipermeable quality of the tissue induced by the stimulation is reversible. Moreover, it is dependent on current through the muscle; activity induced through the nerve does not affect transfection effciency.
Once transfected, the muscle cells are able to express the proteins coded by the nucleic acid. Therefore, the transfection method of the present invention can be used, for example, to transfect expression vectors for genetic immunization (i.e., DNA vaccines). In one embodiment, rabbits were transfected with a plasmid containing the cDNA for rat agrin. The transfected muscles produced and secreted agrin protein. Nineteen days post-transfection, rabbit serum contained significant antibodies against rat agrin.
In a second embodiment, mice and rats were transfected using the method of the present invention with one or more of three different eukaryotic expression vectors containing the coding sequences for DH-CNTF, an agonistic variant of human ciliary neurotrophic factor, AADH-CNTF, an antagonistic variant of human ciliary neurotrophic factor and sec-DHCNTF, a secreted form of DH-CNTF. The muscles were either not electrically stimulated or stimulated immediately after DNA injection. Blood was collected at various time points and the antibody titers determined. In both rats and mice, electrical stimulation immediately after DNA injection led to approximately 5 to IO-fold higher antibody titers than simple DNA
injection.
The transfection method ofthe present invention can also be used to systemically deliver proteins to treat diseases. In one preferred embodiment, a DNA plasmid harboring the erythropoietin (EPO) gene was injected into skeletal muscle and stimulated according to the method of the present invention. Controls were either not stimulated or transfected with a control vector not harboring the EPO gene. After 14 days, only the mice transfected with EPO
according to the method of the present invention displayed an increased hematocrit indicating the transfected muscles were able to produce and secrete into the blood stream substantial amounts of EPO.
Non-nucleic acids may also be transfected by the method of the present invention. In one embodiment, r~odamin conjugated dextran was injected into the muscle followed by electrical stimulation. Three to five days later the muscles were frozen in liquid nitrogen and sectioned on a cryostat. Fluorescence was observed in cells injected and stimulated, indicating the rhodamin conjugated dextran was able to enter and remain in the muscle cells.
The invention provides an apparatus suitable for delivering a molecule to a skeletal muscle of a mammal in vivo, said apparatus comprising: a means suitable for injecting a molecule into an injection site in the skeletal muscle of a mammal; electrodes suitable for positioning near the injection site such that current travelling through the electrodes passes through the injection site; and a means for electrically stimulating the muscle with an electrical current: wherein, in use an electrical current having a field strength between 25 V/cm and 200 V/cm is provided.
These and other objects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent upon reference to the accompanying drawings and graphs and upon reading the following I S detailed description and appended claims.
4. SUMMARY OF THE DRAWINGS
A more particular description of the invention briefly described above will be rendered by reference to the appended drawings and graphs. These drawings and graphs only provide information concerning typical embodiments of the invention and are not therefore to be considered limiting of its scope.
Figure 1 - graphically illustrates the method of delivering pharmaceutical drugs and DNA into skeletal muscle of the present invention.
Figure 2 - is a graphical illustration of an electrical stimulation delivered according to 2~ the method of the present invention.
Figure 3 - illustrates whole amounts of muscles which have been injected with 50 ~1 of RSV-Lac Z Plasmid DNA solution at a concentration of 1 ,uglul. Muscles in 3a and 3b were taken out 15 days after DNA injection. Muscles in 3c and 3d were taken out 7 days after DNA injection. All muscles are pairs from the same rat.
Figure 4 - pictures a whole muscle and a 1 mm slice of a transfected muscle.
Dark stain indicates o-nitrophenyl-b-D-galactopyranoside (ONPG) that has been catalyzed by (3-galactosidase in the muscle to yield a dark precipitate. Arrows illustrate muscle fibers that were successfully transfected using the method of the present invention.
Figure 5 - includes mean number of transfected fibers from each group of skeletal muscles shown in Figure 3.
Figure 6 - is a bar graph illustrating mean transfected fibers of muscles from several different experiments and several different batches of DNA grouped together.
In columns marked SOL S and EDL S the muscles (16 in each group) have been stimulated directly after the injection of DNA. In columns marked SOL NS and EDL NS the muscles (10 in each -4a-group) have been stimulated by the nerve, not stimulated at all or stimulated directly 10 minutes before the DNA injection.
Figure 7 - is a graph illustrating the number of skeletal muscle fibers transfected versus - the log of the stimulation frequency. The duration of the stimulation train was kept constant at 1 second.
Figure 8 - is a photograph of transfected muscles from which data in Figure 7 were generated.
Figure 9 - illustrates the results achieved when whole mounts of muscles were transfected according to the method of the present invention using two different electrodes.
Figure 10 - is a graph illustrating the number of skeletal muscle fibers transfected with increasing frequency compared to increasing pulse number.
Figure 11 - is a graph illustration of the number of skeletal muscle fibers transfected versus the number of pulses at constant frequency.
Figure 12 - is a graph illustrating mean luciferace activity versus the number of pulses.
Figure 13 - is a graph illustrating the voltage dependency of the stimulation method of the present invention. Figure 13a illustrates the luciferase activity of muscle stimulated with varying volts. Figure 13b illustrates the mean luciferace activity of muscles stimulated with an amplitude above 13 volts and below 5 volts.
Figure 14 - is a graph illustrating the effect of pulse duration on the transfection efficiency.
Figure 15 - is a bar graph illustrating a comparison of transfection efl<iciencies for varying pulse durations and pulse numbers.
Figure 16 - is a bar graph illustrating the effect of DNA concentration on transfection efficiency.
Figure 17 - is a photograph of transfected muscles illustrating damage caused by stimulation and regeneration of the muscle after a short period of time.
Figure 17a illustrates an injected muscle that was not stimulated. Figure 17b illustrates muscle damage following muscle stimulation. Figure 17c illustrates muscle stimulated under harsher stimulation conditions.
Figure 17d illustrates that muscles stimulated under the conditions of muscles in 17c are completely regenerated and repaired after 14 days. Figure 17e illustrates muscles transfected with green fluorescent protein (GFP). Figure 17f illustrates that transfected fibers can bee seen in the vicinity of the damaged area.
A more particular description of the invention briefly described above will be rendered by reference to the appended drawings and graphs. These drawings and graphs only provide information concerning typical embodiments of the invention and are not therefore to be considered limiting of its scope.
Figure 1 - graphically illustrates the method of delivering pharmaceutical drugs and DNA into skeletal muscle of the present invention.
Figure 2 - is a graphical illustration of an electrical stimulation delivered according to 2~ the method of the present invention.
Figure 3 - illustrates whole amounts of muscles which have been injected with 50 ~1 of RSV-Lac Z Plasmid DNA solution at a concentration of 1 ,uglul. Muscles in 3a and 3b were taken out 15 days after DNA injection. Muscles in 3c and 3d were taken out 7 days after DNA injection. All muscles are pairs from the same rat.
Figure 4 - pictures a whole muscle and a 1 mm slice of a transfected muscle.
Dark stain indicates o-nitrophenyl-b-D-galactopyranoside (ONPG) that has been catalyzed by (3-galactosidase in the muscle to yield a dark precipitate. Arrows illustrate muscle fibers that were successfully transfected using the method of the present invention.
Figure 5 - includes mean number of transfected fibers from each group of skeletal muscles shown in Figure 3.
Figure 6 - is a bar graph illustrating mean transfected fibers of muscles from several different experiments and several different batches of DNA grouped together.
In columns marked SOL S and EDL S the muscles (16 in each group) have been stimulated directly after the injection of DNA. In columns marked SOL NS and EDL NS the muscles (10 in each -4a-group) have been stimulated by the nerve, not stimulated at all or stimulated directly 10 minutes before the DNA injection.
Figure 7 - is a graph illustrating the number of skeletal muscle fibers transfected versus - the log of the stimulation frequency. The duration of the stimulation train was kept constant at 1 second.
Figure 8 - is a photograph of transfected muscles from which data in Figure 7 were generated.
Figure 9 - illustrates the results achieved when whole mounts of muscles were transfected according to the method of the present invention using two different electrodes.
Figure 10 - is a graph illustrating the number of skeletal muscle fibers transfected with increasing frequency compared to increasing pulse number.
Figure 11 - is a graph illustration of the number of skeletal muscle fibers transfected versus the number of pulses at constant frequency.
Figure 12 - is a graph illustrating mean luciferace activity versus the number of pulses.
Figure 13 - is a graph illustrating the voltage dependency of the stimulation method of the present invention. Figure 13a illustrates the luciferase activity of muscle stimulated with varying volts. Figure 13b illustrates the mean luciferace activity of muscles stimulated with an amplitude above 13 volts and below 5 volts.
Figure 14 - is a graph illustrating the effect of pulse duration on the transfection efficiency.
Figure 15 - is a bar graph illustrating a comparison of transfection efl<iciencies for varying pulse durations and pulse numbers.
Figure 16 - is a bar graph illustrating the effect of DNA concentration on transfection efficiency.
Figure 17 - is a photograph of transfected muscles illustrating damage caused by stimulation and regeneration of the muscle after a short period of time.
Figure 17a illustrates an injected muscle that was not stimulated. Figure 17b illustrates muscle damage following muscle stimulation. Figure 17c illustrates muscle stimulated under harsher stimulation conditions.
Figure 17d illustrates that muscles stimulated under the conditions of muscles in 17c are completely regenerated and repaired after 14 days. Figure 17e illustrates muscles transfected with green fluorescent protein (GFP). Figure 17f illustrates that transfected fibers can bee seen in the vicinity of the damaged area.
Figure I 8 - is a photograph of cells stained with anti-agrin polyclonal antibodies derived from a rabbit genetically immunized with an expression vector coding for rat agrin using the stimulation technique of the present invention.
Figure 19 - are graphs illustrating improved genetic immunization of mice and rats using the stimulation technique of the present invention versus naked DNA injection.
Figure 20 - is a photograph of muscles transfected with rhodamine-conjugated dextran and green fluorescent protein. Top: rhodamin fluorescence from rhodamine conjugated dextran. Middle: The same section as above but with filters revealing GFP
fluorescence.
Bottom: hematoxilin and eosin staining of a neighboring section.
5. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to a novel method for increasing the permeability of skeletal muscle tissue, thus allowing pharmaceutical drugs and nucleic acids to enter or transfect the cells. The method of the present invention passes a predetermined amount of I S electrical current through the skeletal muscle tissue. Unlike previously described electroporation methods, however, the parameters of the method of the present invention are unique, particularly with respect to the low field strength used and the amount of damage that occurs. Other parameters such as the number of trains, frequency, pulse number and pulse duration can be varied in order to regulate the amount of pharmaceutical drug or nucleic acid delivered.
As illustrated in Figure 1, generally, skeletal muscle is exposed and a predetermined amount of a molecule is injected into the muscle. In one embodiment the DNA is dissolved in 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCI). The exact solvent, however, is not critical to the invention. For example, it is well known in the art that other solvents such as sucrose are capable of increasing DNA uptake in skeletal muscle. Other substances may also be co-transfected with the molecule of interest for a variety of beneficial reasons. For example, P 188 {Lee, et al. PNAS., 4524-8, 10, 89 (1992)), which is known to seal electropermeabilized membranes, may beneficially affect transfection efficiencies by increasing the survival rate of transfected fibers.
With continued reference to Figure 1, electrodes are placed on the muscle, about I-4 mm apart, near the area where the molecule was injected. The exact position or design of the electrodes is not critical so long as current is permitted to pass through the muscle fibers perpendicular to their direction in the area of the injected molecule.
Figure 19 - are graphs illustrating improved genetic immunization of mice and rats using the stimulation technique of the present invention versus naked DNA injection.
Figure 20 - is a photograph of muscles transfected with rhodamine-conjugated dextran and green fluorescent protein. Top: rhodamin fluorescence from rhodamine conjugated dextran. Middle: The same section as above but with filters revealing GFP
fluorescence.
Bottom: hematoxilin and eosin staining of a neighboring section.
5. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to a novel method for increasing the permeability of skeletal muscle tissue, thus allowing pharmaceutical drugs and nucleic acids to enter or transfect the cells. The method of the present invention passes a predetermined amount of I S electrical current through the skeletal muscle tissue. Unlike previously described electroporation methods, however, the parameters of the method of the present invention are unique, particularly with respect to the low field strength used and the amount of damage that occurs. Other parameters such as the number of trains, frequency, pulse number and pulse duration can be varied in order to regulate the amount of pharmaceutical drug or nucleic acid delivered.
As illustrated in Figure 1, generally, skeletal muscle is exposed and a predetermined amount of a molecule is injected into the muscle. In one embodiment the DNA is dissolved in 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCI). The exact solvent, however, is not critical to the invention. For example, it is well known in the art that other solvents such as sucrose are capable of increasing DNA uptake in skeletal muscle. Other substances may also be co-transfected with the molecule of interest for a variety of beneficial reasons. For example, P 188 {Lee, et al. PNAS., 4524-8, 10, 89 (1992)), which is known to seal electropermeabilized membranes, may beneficially affect transfection efficiencies by increasing the survival rate of transfected fibers.
With continued reference to Figure 1, electrodes are placed on the muscle, about I-4 mm apart, near the area where the molecule was injected. The exact position or design of the electrodes is not critical so long as current is permitted to pass through the muscle fibers perpendicular to their direction in the area of the injected molecule.
Once the electrodes are in position, the muscle is electroporated or stimulated. As illustrated in Figure 2, the stimulation is delivered as a square bipolar pulse having a predetermined amplitude and duration. In order to optimize the transfection efficiencies, these parameters have been widely varied and transfection efficiencies compared. For example, the voltages have ranged from approximately 0 to 50 volts; the pulse durations have ranged from 5 ps to 5 ms; the number of pulses have ranged from a single pulse to 30,000 pulses; and the pulse frequency within trains have ranged from 0.5 Hz to 1000 Hz.
The conclusion from these results is that so long as the field strength is above about 50 V/cm, the other parameters may be varied depending on the experimental conditions desired.
While no upper limit was detected, effective transfection effciencies were observed with much higher field strengths. The field strength of the stimulation can be calculated using the formula:
E=V/(2r In(D/r)), which gives the electric field between wires if D »r. In the formula, V=
voltage = 10 V, D =
distance between wire centers = 0.1-0.4 cm, r = diameter of electrode = 0.06 cm. See Hofmann, G. A. Cells in electric fields. In E. Neumann, A. E. Sowers, & C. A.
Jordan (Eds.), Electroporation and electrofusion in cell biology (pp. 389-407). Plenum Publishing Corporation (1989). At 10 volts, the field strength is between 163 V/cm - 43 V/cm (from 0.1 to 0.4 cm between electrodes, respectively). Because D is not much greater than r, it may be more appropriate to use the formula for electric fields between large parallel plates:
E=VID
This gives a similar field strength of between 100 V/cm - 25 V/cm (from 0.1-0.4 cm between electrodes, respectively). It will be appreciated that the field strength, as well as other parameters, are affected by the tissue being transfected, and thus optimal conditions may vary.
Using the parameters given in the present invention, however, optimal parameters can be easily obtained by one skilled in the art.
As illustrated in Figures 3 and 5-8, the method of the present invention dramatically increases the e~ciency of drug and DNA delivery into skeletal muscle. In one embodiment, rat soleus or EDL muscles were injected with DNA plasmid containing the (3-galactosidase gene (lac Z). The (3-galactosidase gene yields a protein capable of converting a colorless substrate into a blue substrate that can be visually analyzed or measured spectrophotometrically. Figure 3 depicts representative soleus and EDL muscles that have been transfected with ~3-galactosidase gene using various stimulation parameters.
The conclusion from these results is that so long as the field strength is above about 50 V/cm, the other parameters may be varied depending on the experimental conditions desired.
While no upper limit was detected, effective transfection effciencies were observed with much higher field strengths. The field strength of the stimulation can be calculated using the formula:
E=V/(2r In(D/r)), which gives the electric field between wires if D »r. In the formula, V=
voltage = 10 V, D =
distance between wire centers = 0.1-0.4 cm, r = diameter of electrode = 0.06 cm. See Hofmann, G. A. Cells in electric fields. In E. Neumann, A. E. Sowers, & C. A.
Jordan (Eds.), Electroporation and electrofusion in cell biology (pp. 389-407). Plenum Publishing Corporation (1989). At 10 volts, the field strength is between 163 V/cm - 43 V/cm (from 0.1 to 0.4 cm between electrodes, respectively). Because D is not much greater than r, it may be more appropriate to use the formula for electric fields between large parallel plates:
E=VID
This gives a similar field strength of between 100 V/cm - 25 V/cm (from 0.1-0.4 cm between electrodes, respectively). It will be appreciated that the field strength, as well as other parameters, are affected by the tissue being transfected, and thus optimal conditions may vary.
Using the parameters given in the present invention, however, optimal parameters can be easily obtained by one skilled in the art.
As illustrated in Figures 3 and 5-8, the method of the present invention dramatically increases the e~ciency of drug and DNA delivery into skeletal muscle. In one embodiment, rat soleus or EDL muscles were injected with DNA plasmid containing the (3-galactosidase gene (lac Z). The (3-galactosidase gene yields a protein capable of converting a colorless substrate into a blue substrate that can be visually analyzed or measured spectrophotometrically. Figure 3 depicts representative soleus and EDL muscles that have been transfected with ~3-galactosidase gene using various stimulation parameters.
Figure 3a illustrates the improved DNA delivery efficiency of soleus and EDL
muscles that have been transfected according to the method of the present invention. Soleus and EDL
muscles {n=3) were first denervated by transecting the sciatic nerve. This was done to eliminate any influence of nerve-induced activity that arguably could contribute to the increased S transfection efficiency observed. Three days post-denervation, the muscles were injected with the Vii- galactosidase gene as described above. After the DNA injection, the muscles were either untreated or, immediately after the DNA injection, the muscles were stimulated according to the method of the present invention.
Fifteen days after DNA injection the soieus and EDL muscles were analyzed. As illustrated in Figure 3a, muscle cells that were stimulated immediately after DNA
injection {bottom panels) contain more blue product indicating that more ~i-galactosidase gene was introduced into the muscle cells. The transfection efficiency was quantitated by counting the muscle fibers in a I
mm cross section of the muscle that contained blue product as illustrated in Figure 4. As illustrated by the bar graph in Figure Sa, soleus muscle transfected using the method of the present invention showed a 47-fold increase over muscles that were not stimulated. Similarly, EDL muscle transfected using the method of the present invention showed a 12-fold increase over muscles that were not stimulated.
To determine whether nerve activity affected the transfection efficiency, the method of the present invention was performed on innervated (sciatic nerve not transected) and denervated (sciatic nerve transected) soleus and EDL muscles as described above. As illustrated in Figure 3b, fifteen days after DNA injection both innervated and denervated muscles produced a generous quantity of blue product indicating high efficiency transfer of the (3-galactosidase gene. As illustrated in Figure Sb, quantitation of transfected muscle fibers confirms high efficiency transfection of both innervated and denervated muscles.
To rule out the possibility that the increased transfection efficiency observed was due to muscle activity, direct stimulation of the sciatic nerve was compared to stimulation of the muscle (n=5). If the increased transfection effciency was due to muscle activity, the transfection e~ciency in muscles stimulated via the nerve should yield similar efficiencies as direct muscle stimulation. As illustrated in Figure 3c, direct nerve stimulation did not significantly increase transfection efficiencies compared to direct muscle stimulation. As illustrated in Figure Sc, in both soleus and EDL muscles a 10-fold increase in transfection e~ciency was observed with direct muscle stimulation.
_g_ As illustrated in Figure 3d, the increased efficiency is transient, consistent with electroporation. Muscles stimulated directly after DNA injection display significantly more blue dye than muscles that were stimulated prior to DNA injection. In fact, muscles that were stimulated directly after DNA injection displayed transfection efficiencies between 10- and 25-fold greater than muscles that were stimulated 10 minutes prior to DNA
injection (Figure Sd).
Figure 6 summarizes the results of the present invention. Muscles from several different experiments and several different batches of DNA are grouped together. In columns marked SOL S and EDL S the muscles ( 16 in each group) have been stimulated directly after the injection of DNA. In columns marked SOL NS and EDL NS the muscles { 10 in each group) have been stimulated by the nerve, not stimulated at all, or stimulated directly 10 minutes before the DNA injection.
The electrical stimulator used for the experiments was manufactured by FHC
(Brunswick, ME 04011 ). Both Pulsar 6bp and the Pulsar 6bp-a/s stimulators have been used.
The Pulsar 6bp-a/s delivers a maximal voltage is 150 V and a maximal current of 50 mA.
The maximal voltage that can be delivered requires a resistance between the electrodes of greater than 3000 ohms. The stimulators have been operated at constant voltage mode. Because of the low resistance in the muscle, the voltages have been lower as discussed in the Examples below. In all experiments the current has been maintained at SOmA.
It will be appreciated by one skilled in the art that numerous other electrode configurations can be employed. For example, Figure 9 illustrates the results obtained using two different electrodes configuration. The electrode shown in (A) was placed perpendicular to the muscle fibers. It consisted of a silver wire with diameter (d) of 0.6 mm, (C) (this is the electrode which was used in all experiments except in (B)). One electrode was placed on each side of the muscle. A short segment in the middle third of the muscle is positive for the Lac Z staining {A), indicating localized expression. In (B) a I .5 cm electrode made from an insulated silver wire was used (d=0.3 mm). Insulation was removed from short segments (0.5 - 1.0 mm) along the wire at 2 mm intervals (D). The electrode was penetrated into the muscle in parallel with the muscle fibers. One of the two wires of the electrode was penetrated into the muscle parallel with the muscle fibers. The second wire was placed on the muscle surface, also parallel with the fibers. Both types of electrodes (Figures 9c and 9d) gave a similar number of transfected fibers (approximately 250). Using the longer electrode in parallel with the muscle fibers, however, gave a more wide spread staining, indicating a transfection along a longer segment of the fibers and/or increased transfection.
Muscles were stained for Lac Z in whole mounts by methods well known in the art. After staining, the pictures were taken with the bluest side of the muscle up.
Thereafter the muscle was cut in three pieces as seen in Figure 2. The number of blue fibers in about I mm thick slice from the middle of the muscle were counted (fibers transfected distally or proximally from the S slice are therefore not counted). In order to count the transfected fibers, the slices were dissected into smaller bundles so single fibers could be distinguished under a dissection microscope.
In four (4) muscles the pSV40-luc construct was used. It was injected into the soleus muscle, 3 days after the muscles were removed and luciferase activity was measured using the Promega Luciferase Assay System (Daviset et al., 1993). Uninfected EDL from the same rats were used as control.
It will be appreciated that any nucleic acid can be used with the method of the present invention, for example, plasmid DNA, linear DNA, antisense DNA and RNA. In one preferred embodiment, the nucleic acid is a DNA expression vector of the type well known in the art.
Generally, an expression vector contains a promoter operably linked to a DNA
molecule that codes for the protein of interest followed by a termination signal such as a poiyadenylation signal. Other elements required for bacterial growth and proper mammalian processing may be included, such as the (3-lactamase coding region, an fl origin and ColEl-derived plasmid replication origin. Similar constructs containing a DNA coding region of interest can be constructed by one skilled in the art.
As illustrated in the examples below, molecules other than nucleic acids can be delivered to the muscle using the technique of the present invention. In one embodiment, rhodamin conjugated dextran injected into the muscles and stimulated according to the method of the present invention was able to enter muscle cells. In addition, nucleic acid and proteins can be simultaneously introduced into an electroporated muscle. In one embodiment, the large T-antigen nuclear localization signal was mixed with a plasmid containing the DNA coding region for Lac Z. The large T-antigen nuclear localization signal is a protein that binds DNA
and facilitates its transport into the nucleus of a cell. In other systems, large T-antigen nuclear localization signal has been shown to increase transfection efficiency. Using the method of the present invention, large T-antigen nuclear localization signal also increased the transfection efficiency of Lac Z indicating that the protein was able to bind the DNA arid enter the muscle cell.
6. EXAMPLE
The following examples are given to illustrate various embodiments which have been made of the present invention. It is to be understood that the following examples are not comprehensive or exhaustive of the many types of embodiments which can be prepared in S accordance with the present invention.
Example 1 - Stimulated Versus Unsimulated Muscles:
Transfection efficiencies were determined by injecting skeletal muscles with the pSV40-luc reporter construct into the soleus muscle. Three days after injection, the muscles were removed and luciferase activity was measured using the Promega Luciferase Assay System (Madison, WI) according to manufacturer's protocols. Unstimulated EDL muscles from the same rats were used as control. The data are shown below in Table 1.
STIMULATED VERSUS UNSTIMUALTED MUSCLES
Stimulated Unstimulated Muscle (Relative luciferase-(Relative luciferase-Percent activity) activity) Increase Soleus animal I 34.40 1.950 1664%
Soleus animal II 21.50 0.250 8500%
EDL animal I 0.045 ~~ EDL animal II 0 046 Example 2 - Transfection Efficiency Versus Frequency:
Rats were injected with 50 pl of 1 mg/pl of a plasmid carrying lac Z gene.
Immediately following injection, electrodes were placed between 2-3 mm apart and the muscle was stimulated with the following stimulation parameters: voltage = 30 volts;
pulse duration = 0.2 ms (total 0.4 ms, bipolar); trains = 30, 1 second on t second offfor 1 minute.
Transfected fibers were counted from a 1 mm slice from middle of muscle. The number of transfected fibers is shown below in Table 2 and illustrated in Figure 7. These data also illustrate that the method of the present invention transfects more than just surface muscle f bers;
muscle fibers several cell layers deep are also transfected.
____ TABLE
2 ~L'C'~' 3 ..~-.j.~,~
~
TRANSFECTION
EFFICIENCY
VERSUS
FREQUENCY
~~a ~
,"_.~
_ -Mean Frequency Percent ' ( Transfected Increase with Stimulation Fibers) p 22 _ 1 83 277%
10 I53 595%
100 2'15 877%
1000 315 1332%
Example 3 - Transfection Efficiency Versus Pulses:
Soleus muscles of Wistar rats (200-270 grams) were injected with 50 pg of RSV
luciferase DNA plasmid in 501r1 0.9% NaCI. Shortly after injection, the n'uscles were electrically stimulated using the following parameters: 1000 Hz, between 0 - I 000 bipolar pulses of 200ps duration in each train were applied to the muscle 30 times over a period of 1 minute. Muscles were removed 3 days after transfection and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Cryostat sections were TM TM TM
taken from the of the muscles and stained with I-iematoxolin, Eosin and Safran (see Example 9).
The remaining pieces were homogenized as described in Example 4 below. As illustrated in Figure 10-12, transfection efficiency increased with the number of pulses delivered to the muscle.
Example 4 - Determining the Effect of Voltage on Transfection Efficiency:
EDL and soleus muscles of Wistar rats (245-263 grams) were injected with 251tg of RSV
driven luciferace plasmid DNA in 501r1 0.9% NaCI. Shortly after injection, the injected muscles were electrically stimulated using the following parameters: 100 Hz, 100 bipolar pulses in each train of 200 ps duration, voltage varied from between 0 to 47.5. Muscles were removed 4 days post injection and stimulation, homogenized in Promega (Madison, Wl) iuciferace assay buffer and luminescence was measured according to manufacturer's protocols. Macintosh computer and a LabWiev acquisition program were used to capture the first voltage pulses. Recordings were done in parallel with the stimulation electrodes. The voltage measurements were done manually on prints as the average of the maximal voltage of 10 pulses approximately 100 ms after onset of stimulation.
As illustrated in Figure 13a, there was a pronounced increase in transfection efficiency with increased voltage. As illustrated in Figure 13b, under the conditions of this experiment, muscles stimulated with 13 volts or higher showed 40-fold greater luciferace activity compared to muscles stimulated with S volts or less.
Example 5 - Determining Optimal Pulse Duration:
Soieus muscles of Wistar rats (200-270 grams) were injected with 50 ~tg of DNA
plasmid containing the p-galactosidase gene in SOpI 0.9% NaCI. Shortly after injection, the muscles _were electrically stimulated using the following parameters: 100 Hz, 25 volts, 100 bipolar pulses in each train having pulse durations ranging from S-200 ps. The number of transfected fibers were counted in a 1 mm thick section from the middle of the muscle under a dissection microscope. A second set of rats were injected with 2Sltg of RSV-driven luciferace plasmid DNA in SO~tI 0.9% NaCI and electrically stimulated with the same parameters as above except that the pulse durations were varied from SO-2000 lls. As illustrated in Table 3 below and Figure 14, under these stimulation parameters, the optimal pulse duration ranged from about 50 ps to about 200 ps. This method can be used to optimize the pulse duration of other stimulation parameters.
TABLE
TRANSFECTION EFFICIE NCY ERSUS PULSE
V DURATION
Pulse Transfected Pulse Luciferase-Duration Fibers Duration activity (ps) (Mean ) (us) (Mean) 0 ' 0 52.7 Example 6 - Current versus number of pulses:
Soleus muscles of six Wistar rats (178-193 grams) were injected with 50 ug of DNA
plasmid containing the [3-galactosidase gene in SOpI 0.9% NaCI. Shortly after injection, the muscles were electrically stimulated as described above except that the pulse duration was varied. The following electroporation parameters were compared: ( 1 ) I 00 pulses of 50 ps duration versus 1 pulse of 5000 ps; and (2) 10 trains of 100 pulses of 50 ps versus 10 pulses of 5000 ps. Muscles were removed 14 days later and sectioned on a cryostat. Cross sections were stained as previously described. The number of transfected fibers were counted. As 3S illustrated in Figure 15, longer pulse durations result in higher transfection efficiency.
Example 7 - DNA Concentration:
EDL muscles of six Wistar rats (178-193 grams) were injected with either 1 ug/pl or Spglpl of DNA plasmid containing the (3-galactosidase gene in 501 0.9% NaCI. Shortly after injection, the muscles were electrically stimulated with 30 trains of 100 pulses of 200 ps duration or not stimulated at all. Muscles were removed 14 days later and sectioned on a cryostat. Cross sections were stained as previously described and transfected fibers were counted. As illustrated in Figure 16, greater transfection efficiencies were obtained with higher DNA concentrates.
I O Example 8 - Large T Antigen Nuclear Localization Signal:
Wistar rat muscles were injected with DNA plasmid containing the ~3-galactosidase gene containing a 100:1 molar excess of large T-antigen nuclear localization signal. This has been shown in other transfection studies to improve the transfection. (See, P.
Collas et al. Trans~enic Res., 6: 451-8 (1996)). The muscle were stimulated with 10 trains of 100 pulses of 50 ps duration. The muscles containing the large T-antigen nuclear localization signal had the highest number of transfected fibers. Specifically, the muscle co-transfected with large T-antigen nuclear localization signal had 100 and 38 transfected fibers versus 7.3 and 4.7 for the muscles transfected only with DNA, respectively. These data illustrate that transfection efficiencies can be aided by mixing the DNA with non-nucleic acid molecules. In addition, this data illustrates that non-nucleic acid molecules can also be delivered to the muscle using the electroporation techniques of the present invention. No improvement was seen in cells that were not stimulated following injection.
Example 9 - Muscle Damage Resulting from Stimulation:
Muscles from Example 3 that were sectioned and stained to assess the muscle damage from electroporation. As illustrated in Figure 17a, some damage can occur with injection alone, although the majority of unstimulated muscles were undamaged. In muscles stimulated with 300 pulses, more damage was observed (Figure 17b). As illustrated in Figure 17c, muscle stimulated with 30 trains of 1000 pulses displayed greater damage, indicating that damage is proportional to the extent of stimulation. Figure 17d illustrates that muscles stimulated under the conditions of muscles in 17c are completely regenerated and repaired after 14 days.
In another muscle which got the highest amount of stimulation (30 trains of 1000 pulses), plasmid DNA encoding green fluorescent protein (GFP), was also included.
Figure 17e ,.
WO 98/43702 PCTlIB98/00487 illustrates muscles transfected with GFP. Transfected fibers can bee seen in the vicinity of the damaged area (Figure l7fJ. Transfected regenerating fibers were never observed in cross sections 3 days after electroporation.
Exampie 10 - Genetic Immunization of Rabbits:
A female rabbit (4.5 kg) was injected into the right femuraiis rectus with 2 milliliters of 1 ~tg /pl of DNA plasimd containing the rat neural agrin cDNA driven by the CMV
promotor (Cohen et al. MCN, 9, 237-53 (1997)). The first milliliter was injected equally in ten places superficial in the muscle followed by 10 trains of 1000 pulses delivered at a frequency of 1000 Hz. The second milliliter was placed further down in the muscle. To test the rabbit serum, rat muscles and COS cells were transfected with the same construct. Muscles were taken out 5 days after transfection and the COS cells were stained 4 days after transfection.
Bleeds were collected at days 0, 19, 50, 81 and 106 and diluted 1:100 and 1:1000. After 19 days the bleed contained enough antibody in the serum to give a weak staining of transfected I 5 fibers when diluted 1:10. As a positive control the monoclonal antibody (mAb) AG-86 was used. See Hoch et al. EMBOJ, 12 (13): 2814-21(1994). Preimmune serum did not show any staining of transfected fibers. Later bleeds all had agrin antibodies in the serum. Bleed collected at day 50 or later contained sufficient antibodies to stained sections at a dilution of 1:1000.
Figure 18a illustrates the agrin transfected COS cells stained with antiserum from immunized rabbit (diluted 1:100) and fluorescein conjugated secondary antibody. COS cells were stained first fixing the cells in I.5% paraformaldehyde for 10 minutes, followed by a 30 minute wash with phosphate buffered saline (PBS). The cells were then blocked with 0.2%
bovine serum albumin, triton X-100, 0.1% in PBS O.1M, for 4 minutes. Serum diluted in same solution was added to the cells and allowed to incubate for 20 minutes. Cells were wash for 4 minutes in PBS and incubated with the secondary antibody (Cappel, 55646) for 10 minutes followed by a PBS wash. Mouse primary mAb Agr-86 was included in the same antibody mixture and rhodamin conjugated secondary antibody (Sigma T-5393, St. Louis.
MO) was used at a dilution of 1:100. Figure 18b illustrates the same cells stained with mAb Ag-86/rhodamin conjugate. These data illustrate the potential of the technique of the present invention for genetic immunization or DNA vaccine technology.
Example 11 - Genetic Immunization of Mice:
WO 98/43702 PCTIIB98/0048?
Groups of two-month old male Sprague Dawley rats were inoculated bilaterally in the EDL
and soleus muscles with a total of 200 micrograms (4 x 50 microliters of a 1 mg/ml solution of DNA in saline) of three different eukaryotic expression vectors containing the cytomegalovirus immediate early promoter (CMV} and the coding sequences for the following proteins:
DH-CNTF, an agonistic variant of human ciliary neurotrophic factor (Saggio et al. EMBO J.
14, 3045-3054, 1995); AADH-CNTF, an antagonistic variant of human ciliary neurotrophic factor (Di Marco et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 9247-9252, 1996); sec-DHCNTF, a secreted form of DH-CNTF. The muscles were either not electrically stimulated or stimulated immediately after DNA injection using 30 trains of 100 or 1000 square bipolar pulses (duration 200 microseconds; amplitude setting 150 V, effective voltage --25 V) each, delivered at a frequency of 1000 Hz with a two second interval between successive trains.
Groups of two-month old male CD 1 mice were inoculated bilaterally in the quadriceps muscles with 100 micrograms (2 x 50 microliters of a 1 mg/ml solution of DNA
in saline) of sec-DHCNTF plasmid, with or without electrical stimulation of the muscle immediately after DNA injection. Stimulation conditions were 10 trains of 1000 square bipolar pulses (amplitude setting 150 V) delivered at a frequency of 1000 Hz with a two second interval between successive trains.
Blood was collected from the retroorbital sinus at selected time points and serum was prepared and stored at -20° C. The presence of anti-CNTF antibodies in rat and mouse sera was determined by ELISA. Microtiter plates coated with recombinant human CNTF were incubated with serial dilutions of sera, followed by alkaline phosphatase-conjugated antibody against rat or mouse IgG (Pierce). The plates were then incubated in the presence of p-nitrophenyl-phosphate and the absorbance at 405 nm was determined using a microplate reader. Antibody titers were defined as the dilution of serum producing an absorbance reading equal to 50% of that obtained with a saturating concentration of anti-CNTF
antiserum.
The results are shown in Figure 19. Titers could not be averaged with precision, due to the fact that some animals did not develop detectable amounts of antibody. Data are therefore presented for individual animals, with a value of 1:100 representing a low or undetectable antibody titer (reciprocal titer 3/4 100). The results were similar for all plasmids used, as well as for rats and mice, as depicted in Figure 19. Similar results were also obtained in both rats and mice with another plasmid encoding an unrelated viral protein (data not shown). In both rats and mice, electrical stimulation immediately after DNA injection led to approximately 5 to 10-fold higher antibody titers than simple DNA injection. This was true for stimulation with _ 16_ both high and low numbers of pulses. These results demonstrate that the electroporation method increases the effciency of DNA-mediated immunization.
Example 12 - Secreted Proteins with Systemic Biological Activity:
Fifty micrograms (50 microliter of a 1 mg/ml solution in 0.9% NaCI) of a eukaryotic expression plasmid (CMV-EPO) containing the cDNA of mouse erythropoietin under the _ control of the cytomegalovirus immediate early promoter was injected in the left quadriceps muscle of three-month old 129xBa1b/C female mice. In five mice (group 1 ), the muscles were electrically stimulated immediately after DNA injection using 10 trains of 1000 square bipolar I O pulses of 200 microseconds duration, with an interval of 2 seconds between successive trains.
The frequency of the trains was 1000 Hz and the amplitude set at 150 V
(effective voltage ~25 V}. In another group of 5 mice (group 2) the muscles were not stimulated after DNA injection.
As a control, a group of 4 mice (group 3) was injected with a plasmid (CMV-GFP) containing the coding sequence for green fluorescence protein under the control of the CMV promoter, I S followed by electrical stimulation at the same conditions as group 1.
Group 4 consisted of 5 mice injected only with saline solution without electrical stimulation.
Blood was collected from the retroorbital sinus at selected time points and hematocrit was measured by centrifugation in capillary tubes. Serum samples were analyzed for the presence of EPO using a commercial ELISA kit (R&D Systems). The results are shown in Table 4. In all 20 groups of mice, except those that were injected with the EPO construct and electrically stimulated immediately thereafter, circulating EPO levels were below the limit of detection of the ELISA kit (<I S mU/ml). In contrast, mice injected with the EPO construct and electrically stimulated had significantly elevated serum EPO levels 5 days after injection (average of approximately 50 mU/mi). The serum concentration of EPO remained elevated for up to 28 25 days following DNA injection (latest time point examined; data not shown).
These levels of EPO produced an increase in hematocrits, which rose from 46.2% prior to injection to 70.0%
and 76.7% at 14 and 28 days after DNA injection, respectively. These values were significantly different from those obtained with both control groups (groups 3 and 4) and from those of mice injected with the EPO expression vector without electrical stimulation of the muscle (group 2).
30 Indeed, the latter had hematocrit levels not significantly different from those of the control groups (see Table 4}. These results demonstrate that the electroporation method is superior to simple DNA injection both in terms of the expression levels of a secreted protein and in producing a biological effect mediated by the secreted protein.
EPO Serum Concentrations and Activity Day Day Day 2 ~ 14 Mouse mEPO mEPO mEPO
No.
HCT HCT% HCT%
/
(mUlml) (mU/ml) (mU/ml) 7 45 ND ND 55.7 71 72.4 8 48 ND ND 54.6 68 5.3 9 47 ND ND 59 75.5 48.7 Group 1 CMV-EPO 10 44 ND ND 62.2 69.5 62.9 Stimulated 11 47 ND ND 7.9 66 22.4 Avg. 46.2 ND ND 47.9 70.Oa'"48.3 Stand . 1 3.6 Dev. .
12 45 ND ND ND 50 <15 13 45 ND ND ND 50 < 15 14 ND ND ND ND 48 <15 Group 2 CMV-EPO 15 46 ND ND ND 49.5 <15 No stimulation 16 44 ND ND ND 52 <15 Avg. 45 ND ND ND 49.9 <15 Stand.
Dev. .
2 ND ND ND <15 43.5 <15 3 ND ND ND <15 48 <15 5 ND ND ND < l5 46 < I S
Group 3 CMV-GFP
Stimulated 6 ND ND ND < 15 46 < 15 Avg. ND ND ND < 15 45.9 < 15 Stand.
1.8 Dev.
17 45 ND ND < 15 45.5 ND
18 45 ND ND < I 49 ND
~
19 43 ND ND < 1 48 ND
~
20 45 ND ND < 15 51.5 ND
Group 4 CMV-EPO 21 50 ND ND < 15 47 ND
Avg. 45.6 ND ND < 15 48.2 ND
Stand.
2.6 2.3 Dev.
ND= not determined. a p < 0.0001 vs. group 2; ° p < 0.0001 vs. group 3;
' p < 0.0001 vs.
group 4 (Fisher's protected least significant difference).
Example 13 - Delivery on Non-nucleic Acid Molecules:
Muscles were injected with 50 ~tl of a mixture of GPF plasmid DNA 1 ~g/pl and 2 ~g/pl rhodamin-conjugated dextran (10 kD from Molecular Probes). Three to S days later the muscles (n=b) were frozen in liquid nitrogen and sectioned on a cryostat. As illustrated in Figure 20, stimulated muscles (bottom) were transfected with rhodamin-conjugated dextran (top) and GFP (middle). As further illustrated, the same muscle fibers were transfected with both GFP and rhodamin-conjugated dextran. These data indicate that non-nucleic acid molecules can be delivered to muscle cells using the technique of the present invention.
Figure 2 Whole muscle and a 1 mm thick slice cut out from the middel of it.
Number of transfected fibers were counted after it was split into smaller bundels and single fibers could be seen through a direction microscop. In some areas of the muscle rmst fibers were transfected (black arrows). These areas were close to were the electrodes were situated during stimulation.
Figure 9 'Itao different electrodes have been used in order to improve transfection efficiency. The injection pirocedure and stinnilation pattern (100 Hz) was the same as previously described. The electrode sYwwn in (A) was placed perpendicular to the muscle fibers. It consisted of a silver wire with diameter (d) of 0.6 mm, (C) (This is the electrode which was used in all experiments except in (B)). One electirode was placed on each side of the muscle. A short segment in the m-fiddle third of the muscle is positive for LacZ staining (A), irx3i.cating localised expression. In (B) a 1.5 cm electrode made from an insulated silver wire was used (d=0.3 mm). Insulation was removed from short segments (0.5-1.0 mm) along the wire at 2 mm intervals (D). The electrode was penetrated into the muscle in parallell with the muscle fibers. A
second electrode was placed on the surface of the muscle. Positive blue staining was observed in approximately 250 fibers which were localised to the middle third of the muscle. In (B) the fibers shc7wed widepread staining. indicating transfection along a longer segment og the fiber and/or increased transgene expression.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
muscles that have been transfected according to the method of the present invention. Soleus and EDL
muscles {n=3) were first denervated by transecting the sciatic nerve. This was done to eliminate any influence of nerve-induced activity that arguably could contribute to the increased S transfection efficiency observed. Three days post-denervation, the muscles were injected with the Vii- galactosidase gene as described above. After the DNA injection, the muscles were either untreated or, immediately after the DNA injection, the muscles were stimulated according to the method of the present invention.
Fifteen days after DNA injection the soieus and EDL muscles were analyzed. As illustrated in Figure 3a, muscle cells that were stimulated immediately after DNA
injection {bottom panels) contain more blue product indicating that more ~i-galactosidase gene was introduced into the muscle cells. The transfection efficiency was quantitated by counting the muscle fibers in a I
mm cross section of the muscle that contained blue product as illustrated in Figure 4. As illustrated by the bar graph in Figure Sa, soleus muscle transfected using the method of the present invention showed a 47-fold increase over muscles that were not stimulated. Similarly, EDL muscle transfected using the method of the present invention showed a 12-fold increase over muscles that were not stimulated.
To determine whether nerve activity affected the transfection efficiency, the method of the present invention was performed on innervated (sciatic nerve not transected) and denervated (sciatic nerve transected) soleus and EDL muscles as described above. As illustrated in Figure 3b, fifteen days after DNA injection both innervated and denervated muscles produced a generous quantity of blue product indicating high efficiency transfer of the (3-galactosidase gene. As illustrated in Figure Sb, quantitation of transfected muscle fibers confirms high efficiency transfection of both innervated and denervated muscles.
To rule out the possibility that the increased transfection efficiency observed was due to muscle activity, direct stimulation of the sciatic nerve was compared to stimulation of the muscle (n=5). If the increased transfection effciency was due to muscle activity, the transfection e~ciency in muscles stimulated via the nerve should yield similar efficiencies as direct muscle stimulation. As illustrated in Figure 3c, direct nerve stimulation did not significantly increase transfection efficiencies compared to direct muscle stimulation. As illustrated in Figure Sc, in both soleus and EDL muscles a 10-fold increase in transfection e~ciency was observed with direct muscle stimulation.
_g_ As illustrated in Figure 3d, the increased efficiency is transient, consistent with electroporation. Muscles stimulated directly after DNA injection display significantly more blue dye than muscles that were stimulated prior to DNA injection. In fact, muscles that were stimulated directly after DNA injection displayed transfection efficiencies between 10- and 25-fold greater than muscles that were stimulated 10 minutes prior to DNA
injection (Figure Sd).
Figure 6 summarizes the results of the present invention. Muscles from several different experiments and several different batches of DNA are grouped together. In columns marked SOL S and EDL S the muscles ( 16 in each group) have been stimulated directly after the injection of DNA. In columns marked SOL NS and EDL NS the muscles { 10 in each group) have been stimulated by the nerve, not stimulated at all, or stimulated directly 10 minutes before the DNA injection.
The electrical stimulator used for the experiments was manufactured by FHC
(Brunswick, ME 04011 ). Both Pulsar 6bp and the Pulsar 6bp-a/s stimulators have been used.
The Pulsar 6bp-a/s delivers a maximal voltage is 150 V and a maximal current of 50 mA.
The maximal voltage that can be delivered requires a resistance between the electrodes of greater than 3000 ohms. The stimulators have been operated at constant voltage mode. Because of the low resistance in the muscle, the voltages have been lower as discussed in the Examples below. In all experiments the current has been maintained at SOmA.
It will be appreciated by one skilled in the art that numerous other electrode configurations can be employed. For example, Figure 9 illustrates the results obtained using two different electrodes configuration. The electrode shown in (A) was placed perpendicular to the muscle fibers. It consisted of a silver wire with diameter (d) of 0.6 mm, (C) (this is the electrode which was used in all experiments except in (B)). One electrode was placed on each side of the muscle. A short segment in the middle third of the muscle is positive for the Lac Z staining {A), indicating localized expression. In (B) a I .5 cm electrode made from an insulated silver wire was used (d=0.3 mm). Insulation was removed from short segments (0.5 - 1.0 mm) along the wire at 2 mm intervals (D). The electrode was penetrated into the muscle in parallel with the muscle fibers. One of the two wires of the electrode was penetrated into the muscle parallel with the muscle fibers. The second wire was placed on the muscle surface, also parallel with the fibers. Both types of electrodes (Figures 9c and 9d) gave a similar number of transfected fibers (approximately 250). Using the longer electrode in parallel with the muscle fibers, however, gave a more wide spread staining, indicating a transfection along a longer segment of the fibers and/or increased transfection.
Muscles were stained for Lac Z in whole mounts by methods well known in the art. After staining, the pictures were taken with the bluest side of the muscle up.
Thereafter the muscle was cut in three pieces as seen in Figure 2. The number of blue fibers in about I mm thick slice from the middle of the muscle were counted (fibers transfected distally or proximally from the S slice are therefore not counted). In order to count the transfected fibers, the slices were dissected into smaller bundles so single fibers could be distinguished under a dissection microscope.
In four (4) muscles the pSV40-luc construct was used. It was injected into the soleus muscle, 3 days after the muscles were removed and luciferase activity was measured using the Promega Luciferase Assay System (Daviset et al., 1993). Uninfected EDL from the same rats were used as control.
It will be appreciated that any nucleic acid can be used with the method of the present invention, for example, plasmid DNA, linear DNA, antisense DNA and RNA. In one preferred embodiment, the nucleic acid is a DNA expression vector of the type well known in the art.
Generally, an expression vector contains a promoter operably linked to a DNA
molecule that codes for the protein of interest followed by a termination signal such as a poiyadenylation signal. Other elements required for bacterial growth and proper mammalian processing may be included, such as the (3-lactamase coding region, an fl origin and ColEl-derived plasmid replication origin. Similar constructs containing a DNA coding region of interest can be constructed by one skilled in the art.
As illustrated in the examples below, molecules other than nucleic acids can be delivered to the muscle using the technique of the present invention. In one embodiment, rhodamin conjugated dextran injected into the muscles and stimulated according to the method of the present invention was able to enter muscle cells. In addition, nucleic acid and proteins can be simultaneously introduced into an electroporated muscle. In one embodiment, the large T-antigen nuclear localization signal was mixed with a plasmid containing the DNA coding region for Lac Z. The large T-antigen nuclear localization signal is a protein that binds DNA
and facilitates its transport into the nucleus of a cell. In other systems, large T-antigen nuclear localization signal has been shown to increase transfection efficiency. Using the method of the present invention, large T-antigen nuclear localization signal also increased the transfection efficiency of Lac Z indicating that the protein was able to bind the DNA arid enter the muscle cell.
6. EXAMPLE
The following examples are given to illustrate various embodiments which have been made of the present invention. It is to be understood that the following examples are not comprehensive or exhaustive of the many types of embodiments which can be prepared in S accordance with the present invention.
Example 1 - Stimulated Versus Unsimulated Muscles:
Transfection efficiencies were determined by injecting skeletal muscles with the pSV40-luc reporter construct into the soleus muscle. Three days after injection, the muscles were removed and luciferase activity was measured using the Promega Luciferase Assay System (Madison, WI) according to manufacturer's protocols. Unstimulated EDL muscles from the same rats were used as control. The data are shown below in Table 1.
STIMULATED VERSUS UNSTIMUALTED MUSCLES
Stimulated Unstimulated Muscle (Relative luciferase-(Relative luciferase-Percent activity) activity) Increase Soleus animal I 34.40 1.950 1664%
Soleus animal II 21.50 0.250 8500%
EDL animal I 0.045 ~~ EDL animal II 0 046 Example 2 - Transfection Efficiency Versus Frequency:
Rats were injected with 50 pl of 1 mg/pl of a plasmid carrying lac Z gene.
Immediately following injection, electrodes were placed between 2-3 mm apart and the muscle was stimulated with the following stimulation parameters: voltage = 30 volts;
pulse duration = 0.2 ms (total 0.4 ms, bipolar); trains = 30, 1 second on t second offfor 1 minute.
Transfected fibers were counted from a 1 mm slice from middle of muscle. The number of transfected fibers is shown below in Table 2 and illustrated in Figure 7. These data also illustrate that the method of the present invention transfects more than just surface muscle f bers;
muscle fibers several cell layers deep are also transfected.
____ TABLE
2 ~L'C'~' 3 ..~-.j.~,~
~
TRANSFECTION
EFFICIENCY
VERSUS
FREQUENCY
~~a ~
,"_.~
_ -Mean Frequency Percent ' ( Transfected Increase with Stimulation Fibers) p 22 _ 1 83 277%
10 I53 595%
100 2'15 877%
1000 315 1332%
Example 3 - Transfection Efficiency Versus Pulses:
Soleus muscles of Wistar rats (200-270 grams) were injected with 50 pg of RSV
luciferase DNA plasmid in 501r1 0.9% NaCI. Shortly after injection, the n'uscles were electrically stimulated using the following parameters: 1000 Hz, between 0 - I 000 bipolar pulses of 200ps duration in each train were applied to the muscle 30 times over a period of 1 minute. Muscles were removed 3 days after transfection and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Cryostat sections were TM TM TM
taken from the of the muscles and stained with I-iematoxolin, Eosin and Safran (see Example 9).
The remaining pieces were homogenized as described in Example 4 below. As illustrated in Figure 10-12, transfection efficiency increased with the number of pulses delivered to the muscle.
Example 4 - Determining the Effect of Voltage on Transfection Efficiency:
EDL and soleus muscles of Wistar rats (245-263 grams) were injected with 251tg of RSV
driven luciferace plasmid DNA in 501r1 0.9% NaCI. Shortly after injection, the injected muscles were electrically stimulated using the following parameters: 100 Hz, 100 bipolar pulses in each train of 200 ps duration, voltage varied from between 0 to 47.5. Muscles were removed 4 days post injection and stimulation, homogenized in Promega (Madison, Wl) iuciferace assay buffer and luminescence was measured according to manufacturer's protocols. Macintosh computer and a LabWiev acquisition program were used to capture the first voltage pulses. Recordings were done in parallel with the stimulation electrodes. The voltage measurements were done manually on prints as the average of the maximal voltage of 10 pulses approximately 100 ms after onset of stimulation.
As illustrated in Figure 13a, there was a pronounced increase in transfection efficiency with increased voltage. As illustrated in Figure 13b, under the conditions of this experiment, muscles stimulated with 13 volts or higher showed 40-fold greater luciferace activity compared to muscles stimulated with S volts or less.
Example 5 - Determining Optimal Pulse Duration:
Soieus muscles of Wistar rats (200-270 grams) were injected with 50 ~tg of DNA
plasmid containing the p-galactosidase gene in SOpI 0.9% NaCI. Shortly after injection, the muscles _were electrically stimulated using the following parameters: 100 Hz, 25 volts, 100 bipolar pulses in each train having pulse durations ranging from S-200 ps. The number of transfected fibers were counted in a 1 mm thick section from the middle of the muscle under a dissection microscope. A second set of rats were injected with 2Sltg of RSV-driven luciferace plasmid DNA in SO~tI 0.9% NaCI and electrically stimulated with the same parameters as above except that the pulse durations were varied from SO-2000 lls. As illustrated in Table 3 below and Figure 14, under these stimulation parameters, the optimal pulse duration ranged from about 50 ps to about 200 ps. This method can be used to optimize the pulse duration of other stimulation parameters.
TABLE
TRANSFECTION EFFICIE NCY ERSUS PULSE
V DURATION
Pulse Transfected Pulse Luciferase-Duration Fibers Duration activity (ps) (Mean ) (us) (Mean) 0 ' 0 52.7 Example 6 - Current versus number of pulses:
Soleus muscles of six Wistar rats (178-193 grams) were injected with 50 ug of DNA
plasmid containing the [3-galactosidase gene in SOpI 0.9% NaCI. Shortly after injection, the muscles were electrically stimulated as described above except that the pulse duration was varied. The following electroporation parameters were compared: ( 1 ) I 00 pulses of 50 ps duration versus 1 pulse of 5000 ps; and (2) 10 trains of 100 pulses of 50 ps versus 10 pulses of 5000 ps. Muscles were removed 14 days later and sectioned on a cryostat. Cross sections were stained as previously described. The number of transfected fibers were counted. As 3S illustrated in Figure 15, longer pulse durations result in higher transfection efficiency.
Example 7 - DNA Concentration:
EDL muscles of six Wistar rats (178-193 grams) were injected with either 1 ug/pl or Spglpl of DNA plasmid containing the (3-galactosidase gene in 501 0.9% NaCI. Shortly after injection, the muscles were electrically stimulated with 30 trains of 100 pulses of 200 ps duration or not stimulated at all. Muscles were removed 14 days later and sectioned on a cryostat. Cross sections were stained as previously described and transfected fibers were counted. As illustrated in Figure 16, greater transfection efficiencies were obtained with higher DNA concentrates.
I O Example 8 - Large T Antigen Nuclear Localization Signal:
Wistar rat muscles were injected with DNA plasmid containing the ~3-galactosidase gene containing a 100:1 molar excess of large T-antigen nuclear localization signal. This has been shown in other transfection studies to improve the transfection. (See, P.
Collas et al. Trans~enic Res., 6: 451-8 (1996)). The muscle were stimulated with 10 trains of 100 pulses of 50 ps duration. The muscles containing the large T-antigen nuclear localization signal had the highest number of transfected fibers. Specifically, the muscle co-transfected with large T-antigen nuclear localization signal had 100 and 38 transfected fibers versus 7.3 and 4.7 for the muscles transfected only with DNA, respectively. These data illustrate that transfection efficiencies can be aided by mixing the DNA with non-nucleic acid molecules. In addition, this data illustrates that non-nucleic acid molecules can also be delivered to the muscle using the electroporation techniques of the present invention. No improvement was seen in cells that were not stimulated following injection.
Example 9 - Muscle Damage Resulting from Stimulation:
Muscles from Example 3 that were sectioned and stained to assess the muscle damage from electroporation. As illustrated in Figure 17a, some damage can occur with injection alone, although the majority of unstimulated muscles were undamaged. In muscles stimulated with 300 pulses, more damage was observed (Figure 17b). As illustrated in Figure 17c, muscle stimulated with 30 trains of 1000 pulses displayed greater damage, indicating that damage is proportional to the extent of stimulation. Figure 17d illustrates that muscles stimulated under the conditions of muscles in 17c are completely regenerated and repaired after 14 days.
In another muscle which got the highest amount of stimulation (30 trains of 1000 pulses), plasmid DNA encoding green fluorescent protein (GFP), was also included.
Figure 17e ,.
WO 98/43702 PCTlIB98/00487 illustrates muscles transfected with GFP. Transfected fibers can bee seen in the vicinity of the damaged area (Figure l7fJ. Transfected regenerating fibers were never observed in cross sections 3 days after electroporation.
Exampie 10 - Genetic Immunization of Rabbits:
A female rabbit (4.5 kg) was injected into the right femuraiis rectus with 2 milliliters of 1 ~tg /pl of DNA plasimd containing the rat neural agrin cDNA driven by the CMV
promotor (Cohen et al. MCN, 9, 237-53 (1997)). The first milliliter was injected equally in ten places superficial in the muscle followed by 10 trains of 1000 pulses delivered at a frequency of 1000 Hz. The second milliliter was placed further down in the muscle. To test the rabbit serum, rat muscles and COS cells were transfected with the same construct. Muscles were taken out 5 days after transfection and the COS cells were stained 4 days after transfection.
Bleeds were collected at days 0, 19, 50, 81 and 106 and diluted 1:100 and 1:1000. After 19 days the bleed contained enough antibody in the serum to give a weak staining of transfected I 5 fibers when diluted 1:10. As a positive control the monoclonal antibody (mAb) AG-86 was used. See Hoch et al. EMBOJ, 12 (13): 2814-21(1994). Preimmune serum did not show any staining of transfected fibers. Later bleeds all had agrin antibodies in the serum. Bleed collected at day 50 or later contained sufficient antibodies to stained sections at a dilution of 1:1000.
Figure 18a illustrates the agrin transfected COS cells stained with antiserum from immunized rabbit (diluted 1:100) and fluorescein conjugated secondary antibody. COS cells were stained first fixing the cells in I.5% paraformaldehyde for 10 minutes, followed by a 30 minute wash with phosphate buffered saline (PBS). The cells were then blocked with 0.2%
bovine serum albumin, triton X-100, 0.1% in PBS O.1M, for 4 minutes. Serum diluted in same solution was added to the cells and allowed to incubate for 20 minutes. Cells were wash for 4 minutes in PBS and incubated with the secondary antibody (Cappel, 55646) for 10 minutes followed by a PBS wash. Mouse primary mAb Agr-86 was included in the same antibody mixture and rhodamin conjugated secondary antibody (Sigma T-5393, St. Louis.
MO) was used at a dilution of 1:100. Figure 18b illustrates the same cells stained with mAb Ag-86/rhodamin conjugate. These data illustrate the potential of the technique of the present invention for genetic immunization or DNA vaccine technology.
Example 11 - Genetic Immunization of Mice:
WO 98/43702 PCTIIB98/0048?
Groups of two-month old male Sprague Dawley rats were inoculated bilaterally in the EDL
and soleus muscles with a total of 200 micrograms (4 x 50 microliters of a 1 mg/ml solution of DNA in saline) of three different eukaryotic expression vectors containing the cytomegalovirus immediate early promoter (CMV} and the coding sequences for the following proteins:
DH-CNTF, an agonistic variant of human ciliary neurotrophic factor (Saggio et al. EMBO J.
14, 3045-3054, 1995); AADH-CNTF, an antagonistic variant of human ciliary neurotrophic factor (Di Marco et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 9247-9252, 1996); sec-DHCNTF, a secreted form of DH-CNTF. The muscles were either not electrically stimulated or stimulated immediately after DNA injection using 30 trains of 100 or 1000 square bipolar pulses (duration 200 microseconds; amplitude setting 150 V, effective voltage --25 V) each, delivered at a frequency of 1000 Hz with a two second interval between successive trains.
Groups of two-month old male CD 1 mice were inoculated bilaterally in the quadriceps muscles with 100 micrograms (2 x 50 microliters of a 1 mg/ml solution of DNA
in saline) of sec-DHCNTF plasmid, with or without electrical stimulation of the muscle immediately after DNA injection. Stimulation conditions were 10 trains of 1000 square bipolar pulses (amplitude setting 150 V) delivered at a frequency of 1000 Hz with a two second interval between successive trains.
Blood was collected from the retroorbital sinus at selected time points and serum was prepared and stored at -20° C. The presence of anti-CNTF antibodies in rat and mouse sera was determined by ELISA. Microtiter plates coated with recombinant human CNTF were incubated with serial dilutions of sera, followed by alkaline phosphatase-conjugated antibody against rat or mouse IgG (Pierce). The plates were then incubated in the presence of p-nitrophenyl-phosphate and the absorbance at 405 nm was determined using a microplate reader. Antibody titers were defined as the dilution of serum producing an absorbance reading equal to 50% of that obtained with a saturating concentration of anti-CNTF
antiserum.
The results are shown in Figure 19. Titers could not be averaged with precision, due to the fact that some animals did not develop detectable amounts of antibody. Data are therefore presented for individual animals, with a value of 1:100 representing a low or undetectable antibody titer (reciprocal titer 3/4 100). The results were similar for all plasmids used, as well as for rats and mice, as depicted in Figure 19. Similar results were also obtained in both rats and mice with another plasmid encoding an unrelated viral protein (data not shown). In both rats and mice, electrical stimulation immediately after DNA injection led to approximately 5 to 10-fold higher antibody titers than simple DNA injection. This was true for stimulation with _ 16_ both high and low numbers of pulses. These results demonstrate that the electroporation method increases the effciency of DNA-mediated immunization.
Example 12 - Secreted Proteins with Systemic Biological Activity:
Fifty micrograms (50 microliter of a 1 mg/ml solution in 0.9% NaCI) of a eukaryotic expression plasmid (CMV-EPO) containing the cDNA of mouse erythropoietin under the _ control of the cytomegalovirus immediate early promoter was injected in the left quadriceps muscle of three-month old 129xBa1b/C female mice. In five mice (group 1 ), the muscles were electrically stimulated immediately after DNA injection using 10 trains of 1000 square bipolar I O pulses of 200 microseconds duration, with an interval of 2 seconds between successive trains.
The frequency of the trains was 1000 Hz and the amplitude set at 150 V
(effective voltage ~25 V}. In another group of 5 mice (group 2) the muscles were not stimulated after DNA injection.
As a control, a group of 4 mice (group 3) was injected with a plasmid (CMV-GFP) containing the coding sequence for green fluorescence protein under the control of the CMV promoter, I S followed by electrical stimulation at the same conditions as group 1.
Group 4 consisted of 5 mice injected only with saline solution without electrical stimulation.
Blood was collected from the retroorbital sinus at selected time points and hematocrit was measured by centrifugation in capillary tubes. Serum samples were analyzed for the presence of EPO using a commercial ELISA kit (R&D Systems). The results are shown in Table 4. In all 20 groups of mice, except those that were injected with the EPO construct and electrically stimulated immediately thereafter, circulating EPO levels were below the limit of detection of the ELISA kit (<I S mU/ml). In contrast, mice injected with the EPO construct and electrically stimulated had significantly elevated serum EPO levels 5 days after injection (average of approximately 50 mU/mi). The serum concentration of EPO remained elevated for up to 28 25 days following DNA injection (latest time point examined; data not shown).
These levels of EPO produced an increase in hematocrits, which rose from 46.2% prior to injection to 70.0%
and 76.7% at 14 and 28 days after DNA injection, respectively. These values were significantly different from those obtained with both control groups (groups 3 and 4) and from those of mice injected with the EPO expression vector without electrical stimulation of the muscle (group 2).
30 Indeed, the latter had hematocrit levels not significantly different from those of the control groups (see Table 4}. These results demonstrate that the electroporation method is superior to simple DNA injection both in terms of the expression levels of a secreted protein and in producing a biological effect mediated by the secreted protein.
EPO Serum Concentrations and Activity Day Day Day 2 ~ 14 Mouse mEPO mEPO mEPO
No.
HCT HCT% HCT%
/
(mUlml) (mU/ml) (mU/ml) 7 45 ND ND 55.7 71 72.4 8 48 ND ND 54.6 68 5.3 9 47 ND ND 59 75.5 48.7 Group 1 CMV-EPO 10 44 ND ND 62.2 69.5 62.9 Stimulated 11 47 ND ND 7.9 66 22.4 Avg. 46.2 ND ND 47.9 70.Oa'"48.3 Stand . 1 3.6 Dev. .
12 45 ND ND ND 50 <15 13 45 ND ND ND 50 < 15 14 ND ND ND ND 48 <15 Group 2 CMV-EPO 15 46 ND ND ND 49.5 <15 No stimulation 16 44 ND ND ND 52 <15 Avg. 45 ND ND ND 49.9 <15 Stand.
Dev. .
2 ND ND ND <15 43.5 <15 3 ND ND ND <15 48 <15 5 ND ND ND < l5 46 < I S
Group 3 CMV-GFP
Stimulated 6 ND ND ND < 15 46 < 15 Avg. ND ND ND < 15 45.9 < 15 Stand.
1.8 Dev.
17 45 ND ND < 15 45.5 ND
18 45 ND ND < I 49 ND
~
19 43 ND ND < 1 48 ND
~
20 45 ND ND < 15 51.5 ND
Group 4 CMV-EPO 21 50 ND ND < 15 47 ND
Avg. 45.6 ND ND < 15 48.2 ND
Stand.
2.6 2.3 Dev.
ND= not determined. a p < 0.0001 vs. group 2; ° p < 0.0001 vs. group 3;
' p < 0.0001 vs.
group 4 (Fisher's protected least significant difference).
Example 13 - Delivery on Non-nucleic Acid Molecules:
Muscles were injected with 50 ~tl of a mixture of GPF plasmid DNA 1 ~g/pl and 2 ~g/pl rhodamin-conjugated dextran (10 kD from Molecular Probes). Three to S days later the muscles (n=b) were frozen in liquid nitrogen and sectioned on a cryostat. As illustrated in Figure 20, stimulated muscles (bottom) were transfected with rhodamin-conjugated dextran (top) and GFP (middle). As further illustrated, the same muscle fibers were transfected with both GFP and rhodamin-conjugated dextran. These data indicate that non-nucleic acid molecules can be delivered to muscle cells using the technique of the present invention.
Figure 2 Whole muscle and a 1 mm thick slice cut out from the middel of it.
Number of transfected fibers were counted after it was split into smaller bundels and single fibers could be seen through a direction microscop. In some areas of the muscle rmst fibers were transfected (black arrows). These areas were close to were the electrodes were situated during stimulation.
Figure 9 'Itao different electrodes have been used in order to improve transfection efficiency. The injection pirocedure and stinnilation pattern (100 Hz) was the same as previously described. The electrode sYwwn in (A) was placed perpendicular to the muscle fibers. It consisted of a silver wire with diameter (d) of 0.6 mm, (C) (This is the electrode which was used in all experiments except in (B)). One electirode was placed on each side of the muscle. A short segment in the m-fiddle third of the muscle is positive for LacZ staining (A), irx3i.cating localised expression. In (B) a 1.5 cm electrode made from an insulated silver wire was used (d=0.3 mm). Insulation was removed from short segments (0.5-1.0 mm) along the wire at 2 mm intervals (D). The electrode was penetrated into the muscle in parallell with the muscle fibers. A
second electrode was placed on the surface of the muscle. Positive blue staining was observed in approximately 250 fibers which were localised to the middle third of the muscle. In (B) the fibers shc7wed widepread staining. indicating transfection along a longer segment og the fiber and/or increased transgene expression.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
Claims (12)
1. An apparatus suitable for delivering a molecule to a skeletal muscle of a mammal in vivo, said apparatus comprising:
a means suitable for injecting a molecule into an injection site in the skeletal muscle of a mammal;
electrodes suitable for positioning near the injection site such that current travelling through the electrodes passes through the injection site; and a means for electrically stimulating the muscle with an electrical current;
wherein, in use an electrical current having a field strength between 25 V/cm and 200 V/cm is provided.
a means suitable for injecting a molecule into an injection site in the skeletal muscle of a mammal;
electrodes suitable for positioning near the injection site such that current travelling through the electrodes passes through the injection site; and a means for electrically stimulating the muscle with an electrical current;
wherein, in use an electrical current having a field strength between 25 V/cm and 200 V/cm is provided.
2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said means for electrically stimulating the muscle provides a single square bipolar pulse.
3. The apparatus of claim 2 wherein said bipolar pulse has a duration of between about 50 µs and 5000 µs.
4. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said means for electrically stimulating the muscle provides between about 2 and 30000 square biopolar pulses.
5. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein said bipolar pulses have a total duration of between about 10 ms to 12.000 ms.
6. The apparatus of claim 5 wherein said bipolar pulses are in the form of at least two trains.
7. The apparatus of claim 6 wherein the frequency of said pulses is between about 0.5 Hz and 1000 Hz.
8. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein in use said molecule is a nucleic acid, said nucleic acid being operably linked to a promoter which is capable of directing expression in said muscle cells of a protein coded by said nucleic acid.
9. The use of an apparatus as defined in any one of the claims 1 to 8 for delivering a pharmaceutical or therapeutical substance to cell tissue.
10. The use according to claim 9 wherein the cell tissue is skeletal muscle tissue.
11. The use according to claim 9 or 10 wherein the cell tissue is mammalian skeletal muscle cell tissue.
12. The use according to any one of the claims 9 to 11 wherein the pharmaceutical or therapeutical substance is a nucleic acid molecule.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US4259497P | 1997-04-03 | 1997-04-03 | |
US60/042,594 | 1997-04-03 | ||
PCT/IB1998/000487 WO1998043702A2 (en) | 1997-04-03 | 1998-04-03 | Method for introducing pharmaceutical drugs and nucleic acids into skeletal muscle |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2285056A1 CA2285056A1 (en) | 1998-10-08 |
CA2285056C true CA2285056C (en) | 2004-12-14 |
Family
ID=21922760
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA002285056A Expired - Lifetime CA2285056C (en) | 1997-04-03 | 1998-04-03 | Method for introducing pharmaceutical drugs and nucleic acids into skeletal muscle |
Country Status (16)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6110161A (en) |
EP (1) | EP1023107B1 (en) |
JP (2) | JP2001520537A (en) |
KR (1) | KR100427786B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN1198665C (en) |
AT (1) | ATE337794T1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU733628B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2285056C (en) |
DE (1) | DE69835761T2 (en) |
DK (1) | DK1023107T3 (en) |
EA (1) | EA002087B1 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2273408T3 (en) |
IL (1) | IL132103A0 (en) |
NO (1) | NO327806B1 (en) |
NZ (1) | NZ337853A (en) |
WO (1) | WO1998043702A2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (125)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5993434A (en) * | 1993-04-01 | 1999-11-30 | Genetronics, Inc. | Method of treatment using electroporation mediated delivery of drugs and genes |
US5702359A (en) * | 1995-06-06 | 1997-12-30 | Genetronics, Inc. | Needle electrodes for mediated delivery of drugs and genes |
US6261281B1 (en) | 1997-04-03 | 2001-07-17 | Electrofect As | Method for genetic immunization and introduction of molecules into skeletal muscle and immune cells |
PL337583A1 (en) | 1997-06-30 | 2000-08-28 | Rhone Poulenc Rorer Sa | Improved method of transferring nucleic acid to a striated muscle and connection enabling accomplishment of this method |
PL337584A1 (en) | 1997-06-30 | 2000-08-28 | Rhone Poulenc Rorer Sa | Improved method of transferring nucleic acid to eucariotic cells of multiple-cell organisms and connection enabling accomplishment of this method |
US6241701B1 (en) | 1997-08-01 | 2001-06-05 | Genetronics, Inc. | Apparatus for electroporation mediated delivery of drugs and genes |
US6055453A (en) | 1997-08-01 | 2000-04-25 | Genetronics, Inc. | Apparatus for addressing needle array electrodes for electroporation therapy |
US20040229363A1 (en) * | 1998-06-24 | 2004-11-18 | Ed Nolan | High efficiency transfection based on low electric field strength, long pulse length |
EP1100579B1 (en) | 1998-07-13 | 2015-09-02 | Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Skin and muscle-targeted gene therapy by pulsed electrical field |
US7922709B2 (en) | 1998-07-13 | 2011-04-12 | Genetronics, Inc. | Enhanced delivery of naked DNA to skin by non-invasive in vivo electroporation |
US6678556B1 (en) * | 1998-07-13 | 2004-01-13 | Genetronics, Inc. | Electrical field therapy with reduced histopathological change in muscle |
AU2868200A (en) * | 1999-02-08 | 2000-08-25 | Chiron Corporation | Electrically-mediated enhancement of dna vaccine immunity and efficacy in vivo |
US6593130B1 (en) | 1999-04-16 | 2003-07-15 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Method and apparatus for ex vivo and in vivo cellular electroporation of gene protein or drug therapy |
AU2001241958A1 (en) * | 2000-03-03 | 2001-09-17 | Valentis, Inc. | Improved poloxamer and poloxamine compositions for nucleic acid delivery |
CA2409603A1 (en) | 2000-05-22 | 2001-11-29 | Merck & Company, Inc. | System and method for assessing the performance of a pharmaceutical agent delivery system |
US6733485B1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2004-05-11 | Advanced Bionics Corporation | Microstimulator-based electrochemotherapy methods and systems |
US20040204669A1 (en) * | 2001-07-05 | 2004-10-14 | Hofmann Gunter A. | Apparatus for electroporation mediated delivery for drugs and genes |
US7713740B2 (en) * | 2001-08-24 | 2010-05-11 | University Of South Florida | Method of using electric fields to facilitate the entry of molecules into cells in vivo |
AU2002337840B2 (en) | 2001-10-11 | 2007-08-09 | Msd Italia S.R.L. | Hepatitis C virus vaccine |
DE60236364D1 (en) | 2001-10-11 | 2010-06-24 | Angeletti P Ist Richerche Bio | Hepatitis-c-virus-impfstoff |
CA2465476A1 (en) * | 2001-11-08 | 2003-05-15 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Methods and compositions for correction of cardiac conduction disturbances |
KR20040075003A (en) * | 2001-12-14 | 2004-08-26 | 제네트로닉스, 인코포레이티드 | Methods For Particle-Assisted Polynucleotide Immunization Using A Pulsed Electric field |
EP1470161A1 (en) * | 2002-01-18 | 2004-10-27 | Inovio AS | Bispecific antibody dna constructs for intramuscular administration |
US8209006B2 (en) | 2002-03-07 | 2012-06-26 | Vgx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Constant current electroporation device and methods of use |
US7245963B2 (en) * | 2002-03-07 | 2007-07-17 | Advisys, Inc. | Electrode assembly for constant-current electroporation and use |
JP2005518904A (en) | 2002-03-07 | 2005-06-30 | マーク アンド カンパニー インコーポレイテッド | Clinical syringe with electrical stimulation aspect |
US6912417B1 (en) * | 2002-04-05 | 2005-06-28 | Ichor Medical Systmes, Inc. | Method and apparatus for delivery of therapeutic agents |
CN100455328C (en) | 2002-04-16 | 2009-01-28 | 塞托·帕尔斯科技公司 | Method of treating biological materials with translating electrical fields and electrode polarity reversal |
US20040106896A1 (en) * | 2002-11-29 | 2004-06-03 | The Regents Of The University Of California | System and method for forming a non-ablative cardiac conduction block |
US7328064B2 (en) | 2002-07-04 | 2008-02-05 | Inovio As | Electroporation device and injection apparatus |
EP1729848B1 (en) | 2004-03-08 | 2015-04-29 | Ichor Medical Systems Inc. | Improved apparatus for electrically mediated delivery of therapeutic agents |
TW200613554A (en) | 2004-06-17 | 2006-05-01 | Wyeth Corp | Plasmid having three complete transcriptional units and immunogenic compositions for inducing an immune response to HIV |
CN101119735A (en) * | 2005-03-19 | 2008-02-06 | 加利福尼亚大学董事会 | Ultra low strength electric field network-mediated ex vivo gene, protein and drug delivery in cells |
EP1893636A2 (en) | 2005-06-17 | 2008-03-05 | Istituto Di Ricerche Di Biologia Molecolare P. Angeletti S.P.A. | Hepatitis c virus nucleic acid vaccine |
DK1984007T3 (en) * | 2006-02-13 | 2015-12-07 | Oncolytics Biotech Inc | Application of Low-dose local immunosuppression for amplification of viral oncolytic therapy |
US20100285040A1 (en) | 2006-11-17 | 2010-11-11 | Iacob Mathiesen | Methods of enhancing immune response using electroporation-assisted vaccination and boosting |
WO2009058564A2 (en) | 2007-11-01 | 2009-05-07 | Maxygen, Inc. | Immunosuppressive polypeptides and nucleic acids |
CA2720168A1 (en) | 2008-04-04 | 2009-10-08 | David B. Weiner | A composition, system and method for removal of detergents from aqueous solutions |
AU2009231559B2 (en) * | 2008-04-04 | 2015-10-22 | The Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania | Consensus sequences of Chikungunya viral proteins, nucleic acid molecules encoding the same, and compositions and methods for using the same |
EP2147697A1 (en) | 2008-07-21 | 2010-01-27 | Centre National De La Recherche Scientifique-CNRS | Process and device for applying electric fields into conductive material |
EP2156860A1 (en) | 2008-08-20 | 2010-02-24 | Centre National De La Recherche Scientifique-CNRS | Method for producing insulated electrodes for applying electric fields into conductive material |
US20100298697A1 (en) * | 2009-05-19 | 2010-11-25 | Medtronic, Inc. | Method and devices for improved efficiency of rna delivery to cells |
US8207138B2 (en) | 2009-05-19 | 2012-06-26 | Medtronic, Inc. | Methods and devices for improved efficiency of RNA delivery to cells |
EP2477659A4 (en) | 2009-09-14 | 2014-01-15 | Univ Pennsylvania | Vaccines and immunotherapeutics comprising il-15 receptor alpha and/or nucleic acid molecules encoding the same, and methods for using the same |
KR20210149203A (en) | 2009-11-02 | 2021-12-08 | 더 트러스티스 오브 더 유니버시티 오브 펜실바니아 | Foot and mouth disease virus (fmdv) consensus proteins, coding sequences therefor and vaccines made therefrom |
US8298820B2 (en) | 2010-01-26 | 2012-10-30 | The Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania | Influenza nucleic acid molecules and vaccines made therefrom |
AU2011213559B2 (en) | 2010-02-08 | 2015-05-07 | The Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania | Nucleic acid molecules encoding RANTES, and compositions comprising and methods of using the same |
KR20180096814A (en) | 2010-09-27 | 2018-08-29 | 더 트러스티스 오브 더 유니버시티 오브 펜실바니아 | Consensus antigen constructs and vaccines made there from, and methods of using same to treat malaria |
BR112013011705B1 (en) | 2010-11-12 | 2022-04-05 | The Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania | Consensus prostate antigens, nucleic acid molecule encoding the same, and vaccine and uses comprising the same |
CA2826199A1 (en) | 2011-01-31 | 2012-08-09 | The Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania | Nucleic acid molecules encoding novel herpes antigens, vaccine comprising the same, and methods of use thereof |
EA037377B1 (en) | 2011-02-11 | 2021-03-22 | Дзе Трастиз Оф Дзе Юниверсити Оф Пенсильвания | Vaccine for inducing an immune response against hbv |
US9238679B2 (en) | 2011-02-11 | 2016-01-19 | The Trustees Of The University Of Pennslyvania | Nucleic acid molecule encoding hepatitis B virus core protein and surface antigen protein and vaccine comprising the same |
WO2012172424A1 (en) | 2011-06-15 | 2012-12-20 | Crontech Pharma Ab | Injection needle and device |
ES2758713T3 (en) | 2011-07-11 | 2020-05-06 | Inovio Pharmaceuticals Inc | Lassa virus DNA vaccine |
CA2858884A1 (en) | 2011-12-12 | 2013-06-20 | The Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania | Proteins comprising mrsa pbp2a and fragments thereof, nucleic acids encoding the same, and compositions and their use to prevent and treat mrsa infections |
BR112014014078A8 (en) | 2011-12-12 | 2021-09-28 | The Trustees Of The Univ Of Pennsylvania | Compositions comprising improved IL-12 genetic constructs and vaccines, immunotherapeutics and methods of using the same |
KR20140146651A (en) | 2012-04-10 | 2014-12-26 | 더 트러스티스 오브 더 유니버시티 오브 펜실바니아 | Human respiratory syncytial virus consensus antigens, nucleic acid constructs and vaccines made therefrom, and methods of using same |
EP4190350A1 (en) | 2012-04-12 | 2023-06-07 | The Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania | Filovirus consensus antigens, nucleic acid constructs and vaccines made therefrom, and methods of using same |
DE102012013534B3 (en) | 2012-07-05 | 2013-09-19 | Tobias Sokolowski | Apparatus for repetitive nerve stimulation for the degradation of adipose tissue by means of inductive magnetic fields |
WO2014064534A2 (en) | 2012-10-05 | 2014-05-01 | Chrontech Pharma Ab | Injection needle, device, immunogenic compositions and method of use |
JP6523174B2 (en) | 2012-12-13 | 2019-05-29 | ザ トラスティーズ オブ ザ ユニバーシティ オブ ペンシルバニア | WT1 vaccine |
MX2015011487A (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2016-02-03 | Univ Pennsylvania | Foot and mouth disease virus (fmdv) consensus proteins, coding sequences therefor and vaccines made therefrom. |
CA2898126A1 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-18 | The Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania | Cancer vaccines and methods of treatment using the same |
DK3028048T3 (en) | 2013-07-31 | 2019-01-21 | Bioventures Llc | COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATMENT AND PREVENTION OF CANCER TARGETING AGAINST TUMOR-ASSOCIATED CARBOHYDRATE ANTIGEN |
SG11201604719WA (en) | 2013-12-13 | 2016-07-28 | Univ Pennsylvania | Dna antibody constructs and method of using same |
JP7268958B2 (en) | 2014-12-01 | 2023-05-08 | ザ トラスティーズ オブ ザ ユニバーシティ オブ ペンシルバニア | DNA antibody constructs and methods of use thereof |
US11491342B2 (en) | 2015-07-01 | 2022-11-08 | Btl Medical Solutions A.S. | Magnetic stimulation methods and devices for therapeutic treatments |
US20180001107A1 (en) | 2016-07-01 | 2018-01-04 | Btl Holdings Limited | Aesthetic method of biological structure treatment by magnetic field |
US10695575B1 (en) | 2016-05-10 | 2020-06-30 | Btl Medical Technologies S.R.O. | Aesthetic method of biological structure treatment by magnetic field |
US11266850B2 (en) | 2015-07-01 | 2022-03-08 | Btl Healthcare Technologies A.S. | High power time varying magnetic field therapy |
WO2017055522A1 (en) | 2015-09-29 | 2017-04-06 | Academisch Medisch Centrum | Stabilized env proteins of hiv |
US11253717B2 (en) | 2015-10-29 | 2022-02-22 | Btl Healthcare Technologies A.S. | Aesthetic method of biological structure treatment by magnetic field |
JP7123800B2 (en) | 2016-02-05 | 2022-08-23 | イノビオ ファーマシューティカルズ,インコーポレイティド | Cancer vaccine and method of treatment therewith |
JP6910075B2 (en) | 2016-03-28 | 2021-07-28 | イコル メディカル システムズ,インク. | Methods and devices for delivery of therapeutic agents |
WO2017180770A1 (en) | 2016-04-13 | 2017-10-19 | Synthetic Genomics, Inc. | Recombinant arterivirus replicon systems and uses thereof |
US11247039B2 (en) | 2016-05-03 | 2022-02-15 | Btl Healthcare Technologies A.S. | Device including RF source of energy and vacuum system |
US11464993B2 (en) | 2016-05-03 | 2022-10-11 | Btl Healthcare Technologies A.S. | Device including RF source of energy and vacuum system |
US11534619B2 (en) | 2016-05-10 | 2022-12-27 | Btl Medical Solutions A.S. | Aesthetic method of biological structure treatment by magnetic field |
US10583287B2 (en) | 2016-05-23 | 2020-03-10 | Btl Medical Technologies S.R.O. | Systems and methods for tissue treatment |
US10556122B1 (en) | 2016-07-01 | 2020-02-11 | Btl Medical Technologies S.R.O. | Aesthetic method of biological structure treatment by magnetic field |
MX2019004499A (en) | 2016-10-17 | 2019-11-18 | Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc Star | Recombinant virus replicon systems and uses thereof. |
US11845939B2 (en) | 2016-12-05 | 2023-12-19 | Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Compositions and methods for enhancing gene expression |
US11344618B2 (en) | 2017-08-26 | 2022-05-31 | Academisch Medisch Centrum | HIV envelope glycoprotein immunogens |
CA3083532C (en) | 2017-12-13 | 2023-09-05 | Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Cancer vaccines targeting prame and uses thereof |
US11235044B2 (en) | 2017-12-13 | 2022-02-01 | Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Cancer vaccines targeting MUC16 and uses thereof |
KR102637862B1 (en) | 2017-12-13 | 2024-02-19 | 이노비오 파마수티컬즈, 인크. | Cancer vaccines targeting mesothelin and uses thereof |
WO2019123250A1 (en) | 2017-12-19 | 2019-06-27 | Janssen Sciences Ireland Unlimited Company | Methods and compositions for inducing an immune response against hepatitis b virus (hbv) |
EA202091516A1 (en) | 2017-12-19 | 2020-11-03 | Янссен Сайенсиз Айрлэнд Анлимитед Компани | METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR INDUCING IMMUNE RESPONSE AGAINST HEPATITIS B VIRUS (HBV) |
EA202091517A1 (en) | 2017-12-19 | 2020-11-03 | Янссен Сайенсиз Айрлэнд Анлимитед Компани | METHODS AND DEVICE FOR DELIVERY OF VACCINES AGAINST HEPATITIS B VIRUS (HBV) |
MA51311A (en) | 2017-12-19 | 2020-10-28 | Janssen Sciences Ireland Unlimited Co | HEPATITIS B VIRUS (HBV) VACCINES AND RELATED USES |
EA202091513A1 (en) | 2017-12-19 | 2020-09-09 | Янссен Сайенсиз Айрлэнд Анлимитед Компани | VACCINES AGAINST HEPATITIS B VIRUS (HBV) AND THEIR APPLICATION |
JP2021511318A (en) | 2018-01-19 | 2021-05-06 | ヤンセン ファーマシューティカルズ,インコーポレーテッド | Induction and enhancement of immune response using recombinant replicon system |
EP3721939B1 (en) | 2019-04-11 | 2022-07-06 | BTL Healthcare Technologies a.s. | Device for aesthetic treatment of biological structures by radiofrequency and magnetic energy |
CA3140708A1 (en) | 2019-06-18 | 2020-12-24 | Helen Horton | Combination of hepatitis b virus (hbv) vaccines and pyridopyrimidine derivatives |
EP3986562A1 (en) | 2019-06-18 | 2022-04-27 | Janssen Sciences Ireland Unlimited Company | Combination of hepatitis b virus (hbv) vaccines and hbv-targeting rnai |
WO2020255014A1 (en) | 2019-06-18 | 2020-12-24 | Janssen Sciences Ireland Unlimited Company | Recombinant interleukin 12 construct and uses thereof |
US20220233685A1 (en) | 2019-06-18 | 2022-07-28 | Janssen Sciences Ireland Unlimited Company | Combination of hepatitis b virus (hbv) vaccines and anti-pd-1 antibody |
US20220249647A1 (en) | 2019-06-18 | 2022-08-11 | Janssen Sciences Ireland Unlimited Company | Combination of hepatitis b virus (hbv) vaccines and dihydropyrimidine derivatives as capsid assembly modulators |
WO2020254876A1 (en) | 2019-06-18 | 2020-12-24 | Janssen Sciences Ireland Unlimited Company | Virus-like particle delivery of hepatitis b virus (hbv) vaccines |
US20220233526A1 (en) | 2019-06-18 | 2022-07-28 | Janssen Sciences Ireland Unlimited Company | Combination of hepatitis b virus (hbv) vaccines and dihydropyrimidine derivatives as capsid assembly modulators |
WO2020255012A1 (en) | 2019-06-18 | 2020-12-24 | Janssen Sciences Ireland Unlimited Company | Combination of hepatitis b virus (hbv) vaccines and capsid assembly modulators being sulfonamide derivatives |
US20220241402A1 (en) | 2019-06-18 | 2022-08-04 | Janssen Sciences Ireland Unlimited Company | Combination of hepatitis b virus (hbv) vaccines and quinazoline derivatives |
US20220305107A1 (en) | 2019-06-18 | 2022-09-29 | Janssen Sciences Ireland Unlimited Company | COMBINATION OF HEPATITIS B VIRUS (HBV) VACCINES AND HBV-TARGETING RNAi |
WO2020255035A1 (en) | 2019-06-18 | 2020-12-24 | Janssen Sciences Ireland Unlimited Company | Combination of hepatitis b virus (hbv) vaccines and pyrimidine derivatives |
US20220305114A1 (en) | 2019-06-18 | 2022-09-29 | Janssen Sciences Ireland Unlimited Company | Combination of hepatitis b virus (hbv) vaccines and small molecule pdl1 or pd1 inhibitor |
WO2020255042A1 (en) | 2019-06-18 | 2020-12-24 | Janssen Sciences Ireland Unlimited Company | Combination of hepatitis b virus (hbv) vaccines and a pyrimidine derivative |
WO2020255019A1 (en) | 2019-06-18 | 2020-12-24 | Janssen Sciences Ireland Unlimited Company | Combination of hepatitis b virus (hbv) vaccines and a quinazoline derivative |
WO2020255016A1 (en) | 2019-06-18 | 2020-12-24 | Janssen Sciences Ireland Unlimited Company | Combination of hepatitis b virus (hbv) vaccines and dihydropyrimidine derivatives as capsid assembly modulators |
CA3141003A1 (en) | 2019-06-18 | 2020-12-24 | Helen Horton | Combination of hepatitis b virus (hbv) vaccines and pd-l1 inhibitors |
WO2020255018A1 (en) | 2019-06-18 | 2020-12-24 | Janssen Sciences Ireland Unlimited Company | Hepatitis b virus (hbv) vaccines and uses thereof |
WO2020255013A1 (en) | 2019-06-18 | 2020-12-24 | Janssen Sciences Ireland Unlimited Company | Combination of hepatitis b virus (hbv) vaccines and capsid assembly modulators being amide derivatives |
AU2020295012A1 (en) | 2019-06-18 | 2022-02-17 | Janssen Sciences Ireland Unlimited Company | Combination of hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccines and anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 antibody |
WO2020255022A1 (en) | 2019-06-18 | 2020-12-24 | Janssen Sciences Ireland Unlimited Company | Combination of hepatitis b virus (hbv) vaccines and aminopyridine derivatives as hpk1 inhibitors |
WO2020255010A1 (en) | 2019-06-18 | 2020-12-24 | Janssen Sciences Ireland Unlimited Company | Combination of recombinant interleukin 12 construct and hepatitis b virus (hbv) vaccines |
TW202114732A (en) | 2019-06-20 | 2021-04-16 | 愛爾蘭商健生科學愛爾蘭無限公司 | Lipid nanoparticle or liposome delivery of hepatitis b virus (hbv) vaccines |
EP3986457A1 (en) | 2019-06-20 | 2022-04-27 | Janssen Sciences Ireland Unlimited Company | Carbohydrate nanocarrier delivery of hepatitis b virus (hbv) vaccines |
US11878167B2 (en) | 2020-05-04 | 2024-01-23 | Btl Healthcare Technologies A.S. | Device and method for unattended treatment of a patient |
EP4146335A1 (en) | 2020-05-04 | 2023-03-15 | BTL Healthcare Technologies a.s. | Device and method for unattended treatment of a patient |
IL298874A (en) | 2020-06-12 | 2023-02-01 | Univ Rochester | ENCODING AND EXPRESSION OF ACE-tRNAs |
TW202216190A (en) | 2020-07-08 | 2022-05-01 | 愛爾蘭商健生科學愛爾蘭無限公司 | Rna replicon vaccines against hbv |
TW202245809A (en) | 2020-12-18 | 2022-12-01 | 美商詹森藥物公司 | Combination therapy for treating hepatitis b virus infection |
AU2021412833A1 (en) | 2020-12-28 | 2023-07-06 | Arcturus Therapeutics, Inc. | Transcription activator-like effector nucleases (talens) targeting hbv |
US11896816B2 (en) | 2021-11-03 | 2024-02-13 | Btl Healthcare Technologies A.S. | Device and method for unattended treatment of a patient |
WO2023150753A1 (en) | 2022-02-07 | 2023-08-10 | University Of Rochester | Optimized sequences for enhanced trna expression or/and nonsense mutation suppression |
WO2023233290A1 (en) | 2022-05-31 | 2023-12-07 | Janssen Sciences Ireland Unlimited Company | Rnai agents targeting pd-l1 |
Family Cites Families (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5389069A (en) * | 1988-01-21 | 1995-02-14 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Method and apparatus for in vivo electroporation of remote cells and tissue |
US5501662A (en) * | 1992-05-22 | 1996-03-26 | Genetronics, Inc. | Implantable electroporation method and apparatus for drug and gene delivery |
US5304120A (en) * | 1992-07-01 | 1994-04-19 | Btx Inc. | Electroporation method and apparatus for insertion of drugs and genes into endothelial cells |
US5273525A (en) * | 1992-08-13 | 1993-12-28 | Btx Inc. | Injection and electroporation apparatus for drug and gene delivery |
US5318514A (en) * | 1992-08-17 | 1994-06-07 | Btx, Inc. | Applicator for the electroporation of drugs and genes into surface cells |
US5468223A (en) * | 1992-11-30 | 1995-11-21 | C.N.R.S. Paris | Electrochemotherapy |
FR2703253B1 (en) * | 1993-03-30 | 1995-06-23 | Centre Nat Rech Scient | APPLICATOR OF ELECTRIC PULSES FOR TREATING BIOLOGICAL TISSUES. |
US5702359A (en) * | 1995-06-06 | 1997-12-30 | Genetronics, Inc. | Needle electrodes for mediated delivery of drugs and genes |
US5993434A (en) * | 1993-04-01 | 1999-11-30 | Genetronics, Inc. | Method of treatment using electroporation mediated delivery of drugs and genes |
IL108775A (en) * | 1994-02-25 | 2003-09-17 | Univ Ramot | Method for efficient incorporation of molecules into cells |
EP0769151A1 (en) * | 1995-05-02 | 1997-04-23 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method of and device for magnetic resonance imaging of objects |
US5944710A (en) * | 1996-06-24 | 1999-08-31 | Genetronics, Inc. | Electroporation-mediated intravascular delivery |
PL337584A1 (en) * | 1997-06-30 | 2000-08-28 | Rhone Poulenc Rorer Sa | Improved method of transferring nucleic acid to eucariotic cells of multiple-cell organisms and connection enabling accomplishment of this method |
-
1998
- 1998-04-03 DK DK98909691T patent/DK1023107T3/en active
- 1998-04-03 CN CNB98803980XA patent/CN1198665C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-04-03 KR KR10-1999-7009009A patent/KR100427786B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1998-04-03 NZ NZ337853A patent/NZ337853A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1998-04-03 ES ES98909691T patent/ES2273408T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-04-03 US US09/055,084 patent/US6110161A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-04-03 EA EA199900882A patent/EA002087B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1998-04-03 AT AT98909691T patent/ATE337794T1/en active
- 1998-04-03 JP JP54134898A patent/JP2001520537A/en active Pending
- 1998-04-03 CA CA002285056A patent/CA2285056C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-04-03 IL IL13210398A patent/IL132103A0/en unknown
- 1998-04-03 EP EP98909691A patent/EP1023107B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-04-03 WO PCT/IB1998/000487 patent/WO1998043702A2/en active IP Right Grant
- 1998-04-03 DE DE69835761T patent/DE69835761T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-04-03 AU AU69906/98A patent/AU733628B2/en not_active Expired
-
1999
- 1999-10-04 NO NO19994820A patent/NO327806B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
2005
- 2005-09-01 JP JP2005253462A patent/JP2006061701A/en active Pending
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
NO994820L (en) | 1999-12-03 |
US6110161A (en) | 2000-08-29 |
ES2273408T3 (en) | 2007-05-01 |
DK1023107T3 (en) | 2006-12-27 |
NO994820D0 (en) | 1999-10-04 |
EA002087B1 (en) | 2001-12-24 |
AU733628B2 (en) | 2001-05-17 |
EP1023107B1 (en) | 2006-08-30 |
EP1023107A1 (en) | 2000-08-02 |
JP2001520537A (en) | 2001-10-30 |
DE69835761T2 (en) | 2007-09-13 |
KR20010005932A (en) | 2001-01-15 |
WO1998043702A2 (en) | 1998-10-08 |
CN1276740A (en) | 2000-12-13 |
ATE337794T1 (en) | 2006-09-15 |
AU6990698A (en) | 1998-10-22 |
CA2285056A1 (en) | 1998-10-08 |
NO327806B1 (en) | 2009-09-28 |
JP2006061701A (en) | 2006-03-09 |
DE69835761D1 (en) | 2006-10-12 |
EA199900882A1 (en) | 2001-02-26 |
NZ337853A (en) | 2002-03-28 |
IL132103A0 (en) | 2001-03-19 |
CN1198665C (en) | 2005-04-27 |
KR100427786B1 (en) | 2004-04-30 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2285056C (en) | Method for introducing pharmaceutical drugs and nucleic acids into skeletal muscle | |
US6261281B1 (en) | Method for genetic immunization and introduction of molecules into skeletal muscle and immune cells | |
US7171264B1 (en) | Intradermal delivery of active agents by needle-free injection and electroporation | |
McMahon et al. | Electroporation for gene transfer to skeletal muscles: current status | |
EP1648555B1 (en) | Method for introducing an Agent into a Cell | |
Jaroszeski et al. | In vivo gene delivery by electroporation | |
DE69826124T3 (en) | ADMINISTRATION OF NUCLEIC ACID IN CROSS-LINKED MUSCLES | |
Rabussay et al. | Enhancement of therapeutic drug and DNA delivery into cells by electroporation | |
Zampaglione et al. | In vivo DNA gene electro‐transfer: a systematic analysis of different electrical parameters | |
MXPA99009026A (en) | Method for introducing pharmaceutical drugs and nucleic acids into skeletal muscle | |
Bui | Biphasic Gene Electrotransfer Enhances Gene Delivery in Vitro | |
JP2005524389A (en) | Enhanced electrical gene transfer of nucleic acid molecules into host tissues |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request | ||
MKEX | Expiry |
Effective date: 20180403 |